| Time | Text |
|---|---|
|
Testing Claims: FGL Laboratory Reports
00:04:22
|
|
| But can you tell us about the testing and the proof that it really does take out radiation? | |
| You know, it it's very difficult. | |
| You see so many articles and products on the market everywhere, but it's rare that you get to that many of these people really test the things to its fullness. | |
| The minute this happened, in order to properly present it to people around this country, first of all, we went to FGL laboratories. | |
| Here's a picture of FGL laboratory report looks like, but basically what it is, it's the largest radiological laboratory in the United States. | |
| They have four different laboratories. | |
| Actually, they have different laboratories throughout the world, but this is that when most laboratories want anything tested that's radiological, they go to FGL laboratories. | |
| So in this particular test right here, we did two sets of tests, six tests in each product. | |
| We did the picture and we did the bottle. | |
| And in here it shows, unbelievably, that we removed radiation, both stromium-90, radon-222, all beta-carotene, all beta chemistries. | |
| And at the bottom of this, the serious contaminant that we get from radiation is cesium-137 and 134. | |
| The lab director says cesium-137, neuterized with gross beta radiological, removed removal tests. | |
| And each test, the cesium-137 removed that was added, removed 100% of all contaminants. | |
| Wow. | |
| Now, test number one. | |
| 100%. | |
| We did test number one. | |
| One test. | |
| Test number two. | |
| We did it again. | |
| Okay. | |
| And that's it. | |
| Same thing. | |
| 100% removal on radiation. | |
| Right. | |
| Picks. | |
| Right there. | |
| You see the ad? | |
| Yes. | |
| See the colonel? | |
| Yes, sir. | |
| 540 procureers went to the same laboratory. | |
| Okay. | |
| And they put 540 pecures, I think you're talking about, into the product. | |
| Zero came out after the test. | |
| That's right. | |
| I absolutely did. | |
| So I've known about this process for some time, but I never had the chance to do it. | |
| And the United Kingdom, the Yankee Environmental Laboratories, there's their tests. | |
| They did all the tests on what we call iodinated chemistry and iodine. | |
| And here's the test removal. | |
| Iodine, 91 greater than 91. | |
| That shows that's 100%. | |
| Then from that we go. | |
| At that point, we thought that the greatest market in the world would be, obviously, would be Japan, right? | |
| Yes. | |
| Sure makes sense. | |
| So here is the periodic table which certifies what all their testings were. | |
| We go to there. | |
| Here's the certification of the Japanese government. | |
| Oh, wow. | |
| So they don't fool around with you. | |
| So they didn't necessarily validate, but they also wanted their own testing. | |
| And their universities and colleges and I was there. | |
| They told me they don't accept any American testing. | |
| All right. | |
| Wow. | |
| That's the way you certainly retested it from the beginning. | |
| No, I said I got to pay to do it myself. | |
| But you did. | |
| Who would you have do that, Carl? | |
| This particular set of tests right here are the tests that were done by the Ministry of Health for the Japanese government. | |
| And after that, they recommended that we go to the University of Tokyo and the University of Tokyo. | |
| The results were 99.9996% removal on all contaminants. | |
| Same deal. | |
| Here's the third set of tests that we did, and that was done for Kyoto University of Kyoto. | |
| So we were pretty satisfied. | |
| They've been satisfied. | |
| Where we're going to go from here with them, I'm not too sure. | |
| But we're interested. | |
| We have another set of tests that was just done in Vietnam. | |
| Wow. | |
| That showed the exact similar results of reduction value, 100% removal. | |
| Now, I asked you the question in theory. | |
| And I'm not a meteorologist. | |
| I'm not a geology. | |
| You're a geology. | |
| I'm not an ocean person. | |
| But when you have the flow going this way to the west coast, and then now they're getting hammered with rain. | |
| Okay, is it possible, that's all I ask. | |
| Is it possible that there's evaporation into the clouds? | |
| Okay, and that that rain could be carrying radiation. | |
| California is not the only place that's getting radiation, right? | |
| Oh, no, there are 20 other major cities been hit with it already. | |
|
Cancer On The West Coast
00:00:47
|
|
| That news was just came out two weeks ago. | |
| That radiation now is all over the United States. | |
| They've even found it in France. | |
| So it picks up the clouds, pick it up and dump it wherever they want to dump it, wherever rain comes. | |
| But you know, there's a serious, serious problem when this thing continues to grow. | |
| It's all over everywhere now. | |
| Yeah. | |
| And what's going to happen? | |
| You imagine one-third of the children right now and on the west coast are being exposed to cancer, thyroid cancer. | |
| And I've talked to so many people right now in California that are already having the problems. | |
| So that's really, really serious, right? | |
| So there's a war on water, folks. | |
| There's no question about it. | |
| I brought this message to you one time before. | |
| At that particular time, we weren't moving into this concept at that point. | |
| Now we are. | |
| What's happening right now? | |
| What are you reading about Flint, Michigan? | |
| We all read what we've talked about tonight. | |