All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Oct. 7, 2016 - Jim Bakker Show
27:55
Michael Snyder Warns of MAJOR Voter Fraud
|

Time Text
Voting Frauds and Romney's Votes 00:10:22
We need to deal with the root of this evil rather than the fruit of this evil.
And we need to ask ourselves some tough questions.
Your vote isn't just affecting you.
Your kids, your kids' kids are coming.
They are going to have to deal with what we choose today.
Start praying to God for wisdom.
Praying to God for ways that people can start to open their eyes to really the truth that's taking place around them because this is such a critical moment in history.
Hello, everybody, and welcome to today's special episode of Revelation in the News.
I'm your host, Zach Drew.
And I'm your host, Sasha Vols.
Today we have a very special guest with us.
It's Michael Snyder, who's best known for his work on the famous The Economic Collapse blog.
He also recently wrote a book that I really highly recommend.
It changed my life with what I actually previously thought for a number of years about the rapture.
Check it out.
It's called The Rapture Verdict.
He's a graduate of the University of Florida Law School, and he even worked as an attorney in the heart of Washington, D.C. for a number of years.
And now he actually hosts a brand new show called The Watch on the PTL television network.
Michael, it's so great to have you with us here today.
Thank you.
And we're going to go right for it.
You're really concerned.
You've been writing recently about the elections.
And you're really, really concerned because we're even talking about it seems like such important news of things that have taken place in America and the world.
If it happened over six months ago, it's like so many of the American population forgets about it.
Well, we have forgotten about something that took place a few years ago around last election time that has you very concerned.
Can you talk about that?
Absolutely, Zach.
I'm very concerned about this election coming up.
And we've forgotten what happened last time around, where we had a close election between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney.
And, you know, when the election was approaching, the polls were very close.
As they are, they've tightened up between Trump and Clinton now.
And at the time, everyone was pointing to Ohio.
In fact, if you remember election night, you know, the analysts were circling Ohio on the television screen saying it's all going to come down to Ohio.
That's the key state.
If Romney wants to win, he's got to take Ohio.
And so, and it turned out that Barack Obama barely squeaked by in Ohio and then went on to win the election.
Well, you know, the funny thing was there were some highly irregular things that happened with the vote in Ohio at the time.
For example, if you look at the vote in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, key county in Ohio at the time, well, overall in the county, Mitt Romney got about 30% of the vote.
Many precincts he actually won.
But there were a lot of precincts where the vote totals were extremely strange.
And I actually went to the Cuyahoga County website.
You can go there today because the vote totals are still up.
Four years later, the vote totals are still up.
But it turns out, and you can look and you can verify this for yourself, but in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, key to the election, there were 16 precincts where Mitt Romney did not receive a single vote.
The vote totals were like 597 for Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, zero.
But that's not all.
There were more than a hundred precincts where Barack Obama got more than 99% of the vote.
Now, statistically, this is virtually impossible.
You know, if you just took random chance, you flipped a coin and you try to get this kind of result.
I mean, mathematically, I mean, the odds are so low, they're not even worth mentioning.
But in more than 100 precincts in just that one county, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, Barack Obama got more than 99% of the vote.
And now at the same time on Election Day last time around, just regular voters were reporting that they were having a real time having their votes for Mitt Romney recorded.
For example, I want to read part of this quote from Fox News where this voter named Joan Stevens, this is what she told Fox News, quote, I went to vote and I got right in the middle of Romney's name, Stevens told Fox News, saying that she was certain to put her finger directly on her choice for the White House.
She said that the first time she pushed Romney, the machine marked Obama.
So she pushed Romney again.
Obama came up again.
Then it happened a third time.
And she said, maybe you make a mistake once, but not three times.
And so she reported this.
And overall, there were 70,000 reports that were reported in of voting problems, voting irregularities, particularly in these swing states, Zach.
And so there was, you know, so there was all these problems in Ohio, and yet they barely made a blip in the mainstream news, and we all forgot about it.
And we went on and we said, oh, Obama won the election, but it just wasn't in Ohio.
In Pennsylvania, another swing state, Pennsylvania.
In Philadelphia, there were 59 voting divisions, 59 voting divisions just in the city of Philadelphia where Mitt Romney did not receive a single vote.
Not one vote in 59 different voting divisions.
And I have the total here.
When you total up those 59 voting divisions, the grand total was Barack Obama, 19,605 votes, Mitt Romney, zero votes in those voting divisions in Philadelphia.
Wow.
So you don't believe that this whole being able to jack into or hijack the election process really is that much of a conspiracy.
You believe it as a fact.
Yeah, I believe that voting fraud was rampant in the last election.
For example, you just take a look at what was being reported.
Did you know that in the last election, Barack Obama did not win a single state where a photo ID was required to vote?
In the states where a photo ID was required to vote, Barack Obama did not win a single state.
But of course, Democrats have been fighting against those kind of laws.
And you had problems in another swing state in Virginia.
This is what a poll watcher, someone who was there all day watching what was happening, observing, reporting what was happening.
This is what the kinds of things she told WMAL, big news station in the Washington, D.C. area, this is what she reported that she witnessed.
She saw that voters for Obama were being bussed into polling locations.
She said that many of them could not speak English at all, couldn't even speak English.
She said that, you know, when they came in, they couldn't even identify the correct address on their identification card.
So it's like they didn't even know their address.
And then, you know, but the most alarming of all, she said that she watched as many people were coming in to the same polling station voting several times throughout the day, of course, for Obama.
But this is the kind of thing that she observed and she reported to WMAL, but was conveniently kind of forgotten afterwards.
So basically the very things that the Republicans are fearful for, the vote, you know, fraudulent voting with, you know, even voter ID situation and, you know, just this type of things, it's true.
Yeah.
They actually have reason to believe it.
But yet the left, they make it sound like, well, they're not issues to really be concerned about.
Yeah.
Another big thing to be concerned about along these lines is the voting machines.
I just watched a video on Facebook, and it's been viewed about 2 million times.
But some election workers, they said, okay, we want to test this thing.
Can our voting machines be hacked?
And so they brought in a computer expert, and the only thing he had access to was a memory card.
And so they went to their wall of voting machines, took one completely at random, and they pulled it out, and then the voting card was brought in.
And so they inserted the voting card, I'm sorry, the memory card into the machine.
And when that happens, and they turn it on, it boots up and it prints out a report.
Are there any votes in the machine already?
And so they started it up, and the memory card did its thing, and it said, no votes in the machine, no votes.
And so they asked one question: Do you think that this voting machine can be hacked?
And two of them said yes.
Six of them said no.
The votes were fed into the machine.
You watched on the video.
And then, and so it was two versus six.
Two, yes, six, no.
And so then they went to get the results, and the results came back: seven yes, one no.
And so, but the only thing that had been touched was the memory card.
But it just showed, and afterwards, they were all upset because these were, and the guy in charge said, I would have certified this election as being true, you know, because he wouldn't have known any better.
But, you know, our machines, our elections, they can be hacked.
And it's been documented many times.
So, yeah, I'm very concerned about the integrity of our elections, Zach.
You know, it kind of reminds me of the story of Elijah and the prophets of Baal.
There's over 400 of them.
And basically, Elijah, he made it more and more and more difficult to let God work, if you will.
You know, he put more water on the altar and more water and just gallons and gallons and gallons of water.
And then said, you know, God, I'm expecting you to, you know, burn this thing up with fire.
He made it nearly impossible, right?
In our natural thinking, he made it nearly impossible to show that God was in it.
You know, he made it extremely difficult.
And it's kind of like that with Donald Trump.
You know, all the odds are against him.
And there's just more and more and more water on this altar.
This, you know, being able to hijack the system.
United Nations Resolution? 00:15:29
It's another gallon of water.
If he gets elected as president, there is absolutely no other way at describing it other than a divine appointment, a divine happening.
There's no way that he could become present with all this against him.
Yeah, I would consider it to be a miracle with everything, the mainstream media against them, all the big money pouring in against them, and the integrity of our elections where they could be swayed to Clinton very, very easily.
Yeah, I'm very concerned.
And if Donald Trump won, I would be amazed.
I would consider it a miracle.
Now, you brought up the priest of Baal, which is very interesting because this kind of brings in something else that we wanted to talk about, Zach, where, you know, if you remember that confrontation, Elijah versus the priest of Baal, well, what did the priest of Baal do?
They cut themselves.
You know, Baal is associated with violence, with bloodshed.
Well, it's very interesting because on September 19th.
This is huge.
Yeah, we saw that in New York City, right there in a park near City Hall, what Rabbi Jonathan Kahn is calling the harbinger of Baal went up.
This arch, which stood in Palmyra, Syria, which if you wanted to go to the Temple of Baal, you had to go through this arch.
If you wanted to leave the temple, everyone going and coming went through this arch.
It was kind of a gateway to the Temple of Baal there in Palmyra, Syria.
And this Temple of Baal, this archway, is now in New York City.
Well, it was put up in September 19th.
Now, it was going to be displayed for approximately one week.
Now, during that week, it was on display in New York, and Rabbi Jonathan Kahn actually filmed the unveiling.
But in the seven days following, what did we see in America?
In just those seven days, we saw the terror attacks in New York, New Jersey, Minnesota.
All those happened within a 24-hour period.
We saw the unprecedented riots in Charlotte, which went on for a couple of days, horrible rioting, violence, 16 police officers were injured.
We saw the attack outside of Seattle where someone went into a Macy's and the violence there.
So we saw all this violence, this outbreak of violence within seven days of this unveiling of the Harbinger of Baal in New York City.
Now, is there some type of connection?
We don't know.
We can only speculate.
Only God knows, and he hasn't told me.
I don't know that he's told anyone else, but it just seems very odd that this goes up, and then there's this crazy outbreak of terrorism, of rioting, of violence all over the country.
Is there some kind of connection?
I don't know, but it's kind of alarming.
Yeah, and of all the places, to put it in New York City, I mean, there has to be spiritual significance to that.
I mean, out of the thousands of cities, it's only in New York City.
And it's just very interesting to see.
Even after people have fought it, Christians have stood up.
News outlets have stood up to say, please do not put this here.
We don't want this in our nation.
Why?
Why is it so important that we had to place this here?
And really, even right after the anniversary of September 11th, just to see this whole thing rise up, and then we see all of these attacks right afterwards.
It's just very interesting to watch all these events play out.
Yeah, and if you remember, you know, in the Harbinger, you know, one of the things about it was, you know, we said, hey, we're going to rebuild.
You know, that was one of the big things.
Well, one of the reasons New York City was chosen for this arch was because the organizers said, hey, New York City knows what it's like to lose something on 9-11 and then to rebuild.
And so we're going to put this arch there as a symbol that, hey, we're going to rebuild these monuments, these ancient monuments.
And it was actually in one newspaper described as a symbol of defiance, where, you know, you remember the Harbinger in Isaiah, where, you know, it was kind of the people of Israel being defiant saying, hey, we will rebuild.
You know, even though God had brought judgment, we're going to rebuild, not relying on God, but saying, we're going to do it.
Well, this arch is being used and it's being described as a symbol of defiance, saying, we will rebuild, even though, you know, these arches, it was destroyed by ISIS and so forth.
So there's a connection there to the Harbinger.
And it's one of the reasons why Jonathan Kahn is calling it the Harbinger of Baal.
And, you know, we can study it just from reading Isaiah, that at that particular moment, the Jewish people, they did not repent.
And judgment came upon their entire nation.
And that's kind of where we're at right now.
You know, we're kind of anticipating, well, listen, either an incredible revival is going to take place, and it's going to change the hearts of Americans, and we're going to repent and turn from our wicked ways, or judgment is going to come.
And one of the ways that judgment always comes, as we've studied, is whenever we do something to pressure Israel to divide its lamb.
You know, you recently wrote an article about how Obama used his final UN address to promote a liberal worldview and a Palestinian state.
And you also said that you really believe that it was in this address that Obama showed his true colors.
Can you explain what happened and what you mean by that statement?
Yeah, every year during his presidency, Barack Obama has addressed the United Nations coast of the beginning when they begin a new session for the year, which just began in September.
So this was Barack Obama's eighth and final address to the United Nations.
And the Washington Post reported, hey, Obama defends a liberal world order.
You know, you've heard of the New World Order.
Well, the Washington Post, their headline said, Obama defends a liberal world order.
And Obama defended globalization, all these free trade agreements, which are leading us into a one-world economic system.
He defended, you know, hey, we need international cooperation.
We need to expand kind of global governance, all these things, which is what's on Obama's heart.
He is a globalist.
He believes in internationalization, all of these things.
He believes in the move toward a one-world economic system, even one world politically, because that's kind of his background and what his philosophy is.
But to me, the most alarming thing that came out of all this was when he talked about Israel.
And there was one quote from his address, which was extremely alarming to me.
And let me read this quote from you from Barack Obama at the United Nations: quote, surely Israelis and Palestinians will be better off if Palestinians reject incitement and recognize the legitimacy of Israel.
But here's the key part.
But Israel must recognize that it cannot permanently occupy and settle Palestinian land.
Now, I might be wrong about this, but I don't recall any president ever referring to the West Bank as Palestinian land, basically saying, this doesn't belong to Israel.
This belongs, this land belongs to the Palestinians.
In his mind, already thinking basically that a two-state solution is a foregone conclusion.
That whatever land that, you know, whether it's East Jerusalem, elsewhere in the West Bank, where Jewish settlers are living right now, well, that land is going to be taken away from them and given to the Palestinians for a Palestinian state.
So showing what's in his heart regarding Israel.
Now, this is extremely alarming because, as I've talked about extensively previously, there's a tremendous amount of concern that before Barack Obama leaves office on January 20th, 2017, that he might decide to throw his support to a UN Security Council resolution.
They're calling it a parameters resolution, which would officially recognize a Palestinian state for the first time ever at the UN Security Council, basically legitimizing them as a state, officially recognizing them as a state, setting the parameters for the Palestinian state, and granting them East Jerusalem as their capital.
Now, of course, the Netanyahu government has said Jerusalem's never going to be divided.
We're never going to give up East Jerusalem.
But a UN Security Council resolution would be considered to be internationally, legally binding on both Israel and the Palestinians.
But Barack Obama basically only has until January 20th, 2017, to support such a resolution and to get this through the United Nations because Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton have both said that they're not going to support such a resolution once they become president.
So there's this kind of major push to get this through the United Nations while Barack Obama is still in office.
So we're kind of in the danger zone for this right now.
If it's going to happen, it's going to happen within these next few months.
And if it happens, Zach, as I've described previously on the Jim Baker show, this is one of the most critical and important prophetic markers that we're watching for.
You know, William Koenig's book, he outlines basically every major disaster and the most costliest natural disasters that we've ever experienced in America.
It all came within 24 hours of doing something negative to Israel.
And to do this, I mean, this is huge.
And President Barack Obama, he wants to do this before January 20th.
And if that happens, shouldn't we be able to look at the template, look at how it's happened before, and expect an incredible event to take place if this would go through?
Yeah, of all the steps we've ever taken to divide the land of Israel, this would be the biggest, by far, the biggest betrayal of Israel.
Now, we don't know if it's going to happen before January 20th.
And if we get to January 20th, we can probably breathe easier because probably Clinton and Trump, neither one of them is going to move forward on this.
So we've got these few months we're watching.
Now, earlier this year in the Los Angeles Times, Barack Obama said, I don't know what we're going to do, but for the first time, we're saying it's on the table.
So the Obama administration said that it's on the table.
We don't know if we're going to do it, but it's on the table.
And why so much power is in Barack Obama's hand is because last year, about this time, last September, France had this resolution all ready to go.
And the rest of the UN Security Council was ready to support it, which would have divided the land of Israel, established the parameters for a Palestinian state.
And it was, and the only thing standing in the way was the U.S. veto power, because the United States government has veto power on the U.N. Security Council.
And so Barack Obama, if he would have supported it, it would have gone through.
It would have been done last year.
But Barack Obama said, hey, we're not going to do it, not yet anyway.
He was hoping maybe some negotiations could take place.
He wanted to say, maybe we can get the Israelis and Palestinians together.
Let's try to do it that way.
So at that time, and I've talked about how it was kind of like a pause button was pressed.
But now this year, he's saying, okay, it's on the table.
We don't know what we're going to do.
Now, Barack Obama's got a decision to make because there's a tremendous amount of international pressure on him right now because the rest of the UN Security Council resolution, once again, is ready to move forward.
136 nations have already recognized a Palestinian state.
And so, and the rest of the world knows: hey, if Clinton or Trump gets in, this is probably not going to happen for a while.
So we've got to get it right now.
So ultimately, the decision is in the hands of Barack Obama whether this is going to happen or not by January 20th, 2017, his last day in office.
Wow.
Now, as you're saying his last day in office, do you think this is the last we are going to hear of President Barack Obama?
Or do you think that, especially with his ties to the United Nations, what do you see his next plan or his next step in the plan is?
Well, I tend to agree with Zach and others that have said, hey, I don't think we've heard the last of Barack Obama.
I think he wants to squeeze as much as he can out of the remaining part of his presidency, as he said.
But even beyond that, I think he has more plans.
I think he wants to continue to work for change, as he refers to it.
And, you know, I think he wants to continue to be involved in world affairs, whether that's at the United Nations or elsewhere.
You know, we'll see how that plays out.
But I don't think we've heard the last of Barack Obama.
That's for sure, Sasha.
Yeah.
You know, I've given the analogy before that, you know, I like movies, I like Marvel movies.
And, you know, you're so excited once the villain is defeated.
And it's always in those last moments, usually after the credits roll, that you see the villain, what you thought he was done.
You know, you see his chest start to move again, or you think he's gone, and his eyes, you know, wake up.
And all of a sudden, you know that there's going to be a sequel.
There's going to be a part two to that movie.
And a lot of people think that, well, once Obama's out of the White House, the villain is gone.
He's done.
We don't have to worry about him again.
But once the credits are done rolling, like I said, I think that he's coming back and we have not heard the last from President Barack Obama.
You mentioned France.
I don't get it.
I don't understand why it, what's the, what is why are they so against Israel and so pro Palestine?
I mean, we think that our current administration is pro-Palestine.
I mean, the French, they put us to shame with this.
What is their dog in this fight?
Yeah, well, the French, you know, anti-Semitism is sweeping the world, the kind of anti-Jewish sentiment.
And over in Europe, the French in particular, they've got this obsession with peace in the Middle East.
And all along, for decades, there's been this idea, well, if we can just get Israel to give up land, maybe go back to the 1967 borders, well, the Palestinians, the surrounding Arab nations, they'll be satisfied.
We'll have peace in the Middle East.
Of course, that's not true at all, but the French have been, for whatever reason, have been really pushing.
They're the ones that were pushing the UN Security Council resolution last year.
And once again, they're pushing it this year.
Now, we've seen so many things happen to France.
We've seen the terror, the horrible terror attack in Nice.
We saw the attack in the church.
We've seen riots in Paris.
But what was interesting, not too many months ago, they actually had a big conference on the Israeli-Palestinian thing, and France had organized it, and it was a push toward this resolution and so forth.
But when they held that conference, they basically had some of the worst flooding at that time in French history.
In fact, they had to pull artwork out of the Louvre at the time.
I don't know if you remember that, but it was just horrible.
At the time of this conference, which was the whole goal was, we're moving toward the division of Israel, they were hit with historic flooding, unlike really anything that France had been seen in decades and decades and decades.
It's just another example of how when people try to divide the land of Israel, disaster strikes.
And someday when the U.S. government has a hand in dividing the land of Israel, disaster is going to hit this nation on a scale like we've never seen before.
Yeah.
And they have been, they've been pressuring our administration to put this back on the table.
And, you know, whenever God deals with Israel, he really does seem to still deal with it, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.
Whatever you do to Israel, I'm going to do that exact same thing to you.
And we talk about the judgment that will take place to America if this happens.
And I believe that something incredibly catastrophic, because like you said, we've never done, if this goes through, we've never done quite that amount of damage to Israel.
Seeding Our Katrinas 00:02:32
And we think Katrina was bad.
You know, I can't even imagine what's going to take place to America if this goes through.
But I also can't imagine what's going to take place to France.
And like I said, they're the ones that have been pushing America.
I mean, they've already, you know, just in France alone, since 2015, in the last year, they've experienced more Islamic terror attacks in the last year than they have experienced in the last 100 years.
So I think that they're kind of, they're seeding their Katrinas right now, if you will.
But I also don't think that I don't think it's looking good for France's future either.
No, and as we're ending the show right now, I really just want to encourage everybody, especially as we're hearing 136 nations have already recognized this land as a Palestinian state.
This isn't just, we're not in this decision to figure it out where, oh, this may or may not happen.
This is a very big tipping point.
And right now, we have to pray for our current administration.
We have to pray that the president makes a correct decision in this because we're not just dealing with a piece of land.
We're dealing with God's apple of his eye.
We're dealing with God's people.
And we've seen the repercussions of whenever we've tried to divide the land before.
So I just ask you to start praying for our administration, praying for wisdom in this decision, because this is a very pivotal moment in history.
Amen.
Thank you, Sasha.
Well, this has been a great show.
Michael, is there any final thoughts, any final words that you just want to share with the people right now?
Yeah, the phrase that I would use for the time we're moving into right now is the danger zone in terms of the election.
We need to be in prayer for Donald Trump and his family for their safety.
Because with the polls tightening up, you know, and the elite so desperate to keep him out of the White House, we could see some type of October surprise.
We could see some type of where they just try to smear his character even more than they have so far.
But potentially even we could see in their desperation the elite, who knows what kind of action they could take against Donald Trump and his family.
And if something happens, usually throughout U.S. history, it's always blamed on a lone wolf.
But if something happens and they say, oh, lone wolf, don't believe them.
But also with this UN resolution, we've got till January 20th, 2017.
This is a key moment.
So right these next few months, we're in the danger zone.
So we'll see what happens, Zach.
Wow.
Wow.
Thank you, Michael, for coming on the show today.
It's always an honor having you here on Revelation in the News.
Export Selection