Jason Bermas challenges the Artemis mission's lack of independent verification and exposes alleged U.S. war crimes, including an Iranian bridge bombing, while linking Senator Babbitt and Rep. Matt Gaetz to a classified alien-human hybrid breeding program. He connects Epstein files to Rothschild family arrests, critiques the Trump AI council for enabling censorship, warns of 2030 encryption collapse via quantum computing, and suggests UFOs harvest tornado energy, ultimately arguing that media indoctrination suppresses critical thinking regarding these global threats. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Skepticism Meets Rocket Launches00:14:52
Right over there, Mike?
Good, I'm good.
All right.
All good.
Yeah, it's Friday.
It's 9 a.m.
And that means it's time to go deep in the weeds with Jason Burmis, brought to you by River City's Reader.
Very much love this segment every week, finishing the week off.
Some thought provoking things get thrown around here.
And if you are not familiar with Jason Burmis, you need to get there.
It's spelled B E R M A S. Check out his documentary films.
Shade the Motion Picture has been a big one chatter around my house here lately.
Of course, you know, loose changes.
Is opus as of now, but uh, check out the new trailer for his Epstein documentary that's going to be coming out.
It's about three minutes long, it's very good, uh, it sucks right in.
And uh, you know, make sure you check out the YouTube channel as well, making sense of the madness.
And here he is now, the man, the myth, the legend, Mr. Jason Burmess.
What's going on, buddy?
A lot going on.
Uh, apparently, we've got human beings, uh, a little over 70,000 miles from the earth right now.
Um, in rotation to try to slingshot, not to land on the moon, to but to circle the moon.
Uh, just so everybody understands, there is literally zero way to independently visually verify that.
Uh, and I got attacked for daring to ask that question.
I'll explain that.
I mean, it is insane to me.
Um, look, here's the deal, folks I am highly skeptical, not that we had a rocket launch, although you really need to appreciate my feed right now.
Like, I am being attacked.
On a multitude of levels.
Most people are anonymous losers hiding behind avatars that would never put their face to any of it.
Every time I ask just a valid question, I get a type of automated response that says that, you know, independent people are tracking it everywhere through ham radios.
They're tracking transponder communications.
And anybody out there, and I've actually had some honest people, which is, You know, very nice every once in a while in the literal hundreds of comments, dozens of which are just calling me a retard.
And worse, of course.
This guy at least admitted it.
He says, Look, I can follow the communications via my ham radio.
I have no way of independently verifying what those communications are.
Badingo.
Of course you don't.
All right.
I heard the same thing about the Apollo missions.
All right.
I had one person, and we'll put it up because I simply asked a very simple question.
Is there any group of private citizens?
There's a ton of observatories out there, right, Aaron?
There's a ton of high power telescopes.
I said, Is there any group of individuals that are visually tracking this thing, start to finish, to verify any of it?
And I mean, first I just get attacked.
Then, of course, there aren't.
Okay, there is zero.
Uh, there is one site up, uh, called Astronomy Live.
I'll put it up for those that will visually watch this, uh, later.
That when you look at what they put up, all right, um, there is, I mean, no actual way.
Yeah, don't get me wrong, you watch movement in stars, we're watching it here, but there's no way to verify what you're watching is Artemis, right, at all.
Zero, okay, like, like.
I'm not even saying there's not a rocket out there.
I absolutely believe there's a rocket out there.
I believe that there are people in space.
I believe space exists.
I know you know this, Aaron.
But boy, oh boy, those are the big attacks, right?
I've got people in there and like, like they're coming at me like I'm a flat earther and I'm not, okay?
I have never been, I've been in this game 20 plus years.
And then as soon as they realize that you're not a flat earther and you're asking common sense questions and they don't want to show their face, they don't want to debate, it's over.
They just stop, right?
Or they just continue.
Prove to me you're not a flat earther.
I had one guy go, prove to me you're not a flat earther after I just dismantled.
Every single, like the first comment I had was, Yeah, they're big rockets that took it there.
And then I pulled out the quote Wernher von Braun in 1953, I believe it was Conquest to the Moon.
And this is the guy that built the Saturn V, everybody, the largest rocket, the ones that were used in Apollo.
He stated to get to the moon, you would need rockets the size, two of them, of the Empire State Building.
Okay?
Now, look, those rockets were pretty big yesterday.
They were nowhere near the size of the Empire State Building.
We've come a little way on technology since the 50s, right?
Actually, when you look at rockets, no, we haven't.
If you look at what they showed you again during Apollo and what they're using now, there is not a significant difference whatsoever.
The only thing that is really advanced in this technology, at least in the public arena, is the ability to land some of them.
And they're not really, they have to be caught.
It's a very, very meticulous process.
They wave.
There is no huge leaps in technology on the size or the trajectory or power of rockets, full stop.
There's been no massive advance.
All right.
So I put that out there.
And then this, I would assume it's a woman.
You never know.
Again, these are anonymous people hiding behind avatars.
They don't ever put a picture of themselves up.
Everything is hyperbolic.
And she goes, He thinks it goes straight to the moon.
And I'm like, No, I actually understand that this circles the earth.
It could be two, three times, depending, because again, they have to have weather conditions.
The earth rotates.
Again, not a flat earther, guys.
And then it slingshots out.
Do you know what the round trip on, you know, you know, we've talked about half a million miles.
It ain't half a million.
Okay.
It's 650,000 plus because of the circling of the earth that this pod is traveling without those massive rockets used.
Those massive rockets are basically gone within the first few minutes of launch.
And then you have a pod that has these controlled bursts, supposedly that push them forward.
And they're just like, we'll let the vacuum do the rest.
Color me skeptical.
Okay.
Color me skepticism if you were going to put a shade to it.
I'd say it's bright red.
Okay.
All right.
I'd just say it's, listen, to me, this whole thing is part of basically what they're giving us with disclosure.
That's a whole other subject we've got to talk about today.
They're preparing us for one of the biggest Johnny nonsense narratives humanity has ever. Ever, ever been a part of.
And that has to do with space travel.
That has to do with quote unquote bases on the moon.
And that has to do with I don't know if you saw the headlines these past couple days, the idea that the United States government has a secret alien human hybrid breeding program.
Did you see this?
No, where is that at?
Oh, oh, again, not Jason Burmess.
Again, I'm not a flat Earth guy, I'm not an alien guy.
It was a Senate.
It was actually Matt Gaetz on top of a current senator.
Okay.
So Senator Babbitt came out.
I think it was, what was it?
The 31st.
So this wasn't an April Fool's joke.
Okay.
It's the day before April 1st, everybody.
And he came out, and I'll just read the quote You would be very surprised who is not entirely human, but says he can't disclose more because the alien hybrid program is classified.
Oh, is it?
This is the United States Senator.
Senator Babbitt, 100% United States Senator.
I believe he's actually in the disclosure documentary that I've mentioned before on this channel that I'm highly skeptical of.
Matt Gaetz went further than that.
Matt Gaetz claimed that he had an in uniform officer.
And by the way, I don't think Matt Gaetz is lying, I think this actually happened to him.
In uniform, officer who claimed that he was privy to the alien human breeding program, that many of the people that they were using were people that they would just like take from the theaters of war around the world that we're involved in.
So you'd have ultimate plausible deniability and never be able to find these people.
And that's a good way to make people disappear if you wanted to use them for something else, go snap them out of a war zone.
Sure.
Again, that was the claim.
Anyone can go watch this claim from Gates.
It's on the Benny Johnson program.
And he says that he named a multitude of locations where this breeding program is taking place, and that he was attempting to get members of Congress all at once to show up to each location and demand transparency.
Obviously, you know, that would be almost impossible.
We can't even get an audit of Fort Knox, Aaron, after we were promised one, by the way.
Well, a lot of broken promises in politics.
Oh, you think?
I was saying earlier, it feels so like it's all just so corrupt on both sides now.
I feel like, you know, it's so, they walk crooked.
It's so bad.
I mean, it's just, you know, why do you think Pam Bondi got fired by just out of curiosity?
I mean, Bondi was the ultimate brown noser.
She was the ultimate company man, if you will.
She didn't, she couldn't, she couldn't acknowledge a fault in Donald Trump.
He was the ultimate Jesus Christmas to her.
I mean, She's talking about the Dow when she's getting grilled about the Epstein files.
I think that, you know, you got Massey still doing his thing, threatening criminal prosecution of those that have not followed the law, the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
And remember, we talked about it last week.
They said they're done releasing files, they've got 3 million pages of files still that they admit they have.
Forget about the videos.
Forget about the storage lockers.
Forget about whatever's going on at Zorro Ranch.
This is just from what we already have, and they haven't released it.
Okay.
Who do you think is really in charge of the release, though?
You know what I mean?
Is that what this is about?
I mean, I've seen all kinds of crazy speculations and this, that, and the other about why we've gone into Iran, who controls the rest of the Epstein stuff, if some of the rest of the stuff has Trump in it, and that's why he's.
And like if Israel somehow controls that situation.
That's why he's just doing whatever they want.
But we've always done what Israel's, you know, that's always been the standard.
I mean, it is, right?
I mean, the way I look at it is this, Aaron.
You know, a lot of people want to put it down like it's all Israel control.
I don't believe that to be true.
I think that you absolutely have, first of all, the files don't make anybody look good.
I mean, look at what we've already gotten with the two and a half million pages.
There might not be any arrests or prosecutions here in the United States.
But we have had arrests internationally, even if they don't go anywhere.
Last week, we reported on a Rothschild bank being raided, a company being raided.
That's unheard of.
You had to dismantle part of the royal family, also unheard of.
The gentleman who was enjoying the torture videos with Epstein via email and can be seen cooking in his kitchen was a high level multi billionaire mover and shaker in the Arab world, especially when we're talking.
Talking about Dubai, when we're talking about Saudi Arabia, et cetera.
No small player.
All right.
And he was forced to resign from his position.
Jess Staley, I could keep going.
Larry Summers.
I mean, this has caused a huge amount of riffs.
Howard Lutnick, still under scrutiny, hasn't left, but people are now aware Lutnick was on the island, right?
So, just like I said in the very beginning, no one looks good.
As far as Trump, I think that the major stuff about Trump has already kind of been released in these files.
I've said it many, many times.
That if they had anything concrete in those files, they would have been leaked years ago and they would have used them, if not in the 2016 election cycle, certainly the 2020 or the 2024 election cycle.
So I don't think that's it at all.
I think that we're talking about a multitude of other interests that still have not been revealed.
Obviously, you have the intelligence aspects, both with Israel and the United States, probably the United Kingdom and parts of Europe as well.
He's clearly, I mean, again, this guy that was forced to resign, this high level Arabic man, is calling or emailing Epstein about a.
IDF massacre assassination of a high level figure overseas, and then telling him he needs to calm about it because this doesn't help anybody.
So, you don't want to expose the system.
I mean, so much has already been exposed about Epstein and crypto and the manipulation there, Epstein and microtransactions in video games, Epstein and transhumanism, AGIs.
You know, the one saving grace of Epstein is that he decided not to invest in the Hamilton musical.
Good choice.
War Crimes and Epstein Secrets00:08:01
Although it's still absolutely exploded.
I think, number one, that what's going on in the Middle East right now, does that have to do with Israel?
100%.
Did Israel push us into that?
100%.
Will Trump ever admit that?
No.
It just got announced that F 15 went down over Tehran, one of ours.
So there's rescue missions in route.
I think they ejected.
This just came out a few minutes ago.
Um, let me ask you something, Aaron.
You hear about the war crime we committed yesterday?
Which one?
I mean, the massive one that doesn't seem to be in any news feed or acknowledged anywhere in Iran.
You know what we did yesterday?
Blown up a power plant or something like that.
Oh, no.
Although we have said another war crime that we will blow up all of their power plants because that's fair.
You know, we'll just go in and take the power out of the entire country of 90 million people because they're all terrorists or they're all Hezbollah or they're all, you know, anti Semitic, whatever label you want to give them, right?
Well, it.
To justify, I had somebody in my feed today talking about Thomas Massey and how bad he was because he wants the Epstein files and he's okay with Muslims buying and basically sexually assaulting their victims, their nine year old children victims.
Now, look, am I for nine year old brides with Muslims?
Take a wild guess.
No, no, I'm not, Aaron.
However, let me ask you something did we stop that in Afghanistan over the last 20 plus years that we were there?
No.
No, we didn't, actually.
No.
I know some people who served in Afghanistan, and what was explained to me was a lot of the reason that people have PTSD from being over there wasn't necessarily the fighting.
It was the fact that when they went to sleep at night, they would have to listen to the people that they were working with that weren't American soldiers, but whoever on that side was over there would have boys chained up to their tent all day and then would do terrible things to them at night.
And they would hear that going on.
And that was the guy on.
Their side.
Yep.
And they were forced to defend and work with these people.
And that's kind of what, you know, and that was just explained to me from someone I know very well who was over there.
And he said that's what messed everybody up was like all of a sudden, okay, this guy's on my side.
Like this doesn't feel right.
Doesn't, you know, that's not right.
And so, but that's their culture.
And it's way out there, man.
I don't know.
No, it's horrific, Aaron.
But the bottom line is.
We're not going to change that culture by bombing certain parts of their countries into oblivion.
Okay.
That's not how you change that culture.
In fact, it's probably never going to change, unfortunately.
Um, you know, we just have to make sure that it does not come to the United States and we continue to successfully prosecute our child abusers here, uh, which unfortunately I don't think we do a great job of.
Um, that's a whole nother issue.
Getting to the actual war crime we committed yesterday.
All right.
We bombed the B 1 bridge in the middle with civilians on it.
It's in now again, you can go and watch this after the fact, or you could just type it in right now.
We bombed the middle of it, it's essentially the equivalent to something like the Golden Gate Bridge.
Can you?
I'm looking at a picture of it right now on the London Times website.
They had a story on it there.
Haven't seen much in our media, but also haven't seen much, you know, period on a lot of things.
I've really turned to more foreign media sources, even though I mean, I don't know that they're any more accurate than ours, but at least you're seeing some different.
Things and they do have videos they show of things going on that certainly our media won't touch.
That's exactly correct.
Now, I'm not telling people that they should believe everything out of foreign media.
I'm not saying things like Russia Today don't have pro Russia propaganda.
But the truth of the matter is that you are going to get a much wider spectrum of knowledge by going to foreign media to find out what we're doing.
With our foreign policy, full stop.
Just like here, you will see much more critique of what is going on in Europe, Russia, Africa, et cetera, right?
So I always tell people to go to as much source material as they can.
And, you know, the pictures, the video of this are the sources.
Obviously, the Iranians did not do this to themselves and, you know, have discernment.
Trump gave that speech yesterday.
Okay.
Or I'm sorry, I think it was on the first, on the evening of the Artemis launch.
And I don't know if you saw what he said before the speech, but he got, he literally said, I'm going to talk about how great I am and how great this administration is.
How great you are?
Dude, like you have gone off the rails with a vast majority of the base that got you elected.
The base that got you elected, man, they weren't the neocons.
They weren't Lady Lindsey Graham's cheerleading squad.
Okay.
They were people that genuinely thought that you would give the old college try to.
Ending the conflicts in Ukraine and Russia, ending the Palestinian Israel situation, not allowing a genocide and then allowing an escalation into a nation state that's going to give us problems.
Okay.
Iran is going to keep fighting.
This whole idea that we're going to be in and out, that this is going to be like four or five weeks, that he just spouted on, that's not real, everybody.
These people will fight to the bitter end.
They're not going to surrender, okay?
And this is not Afghanistan and it's not Iraq in 2004.
They're not even close to the same.
Even Eric Prince, who I have quite a bit of disdain for.
For those that don't know who Eric Prince is, Eric Prince is the guy that brought us Blackwater.
Which became a multitude of things and then turned back into Blackwater, right?
It was XC Services at one point, et cetera.
Had to change the branding.
And even he tells you that if you have troops on the ground, get ready because we're going to have mass casualties.
We're going to have casualties like we never saw over the last 20 years.
These guys have intercontinental ballistic missiles.
They may not have the same technologies that we have, but they also have an ally in Russia.
And the chances of the Chinese joining into this, probably pretty good at this point.
You want World War III, just keep moving in this direction.
And we call it World War IV because, in reality, what we did over the last 20 years in the Middle East, if you don't want to call that World War III, I mean, just because it was so dominant and war was never declared, you look at the casualty numbers, you look at the overall geopolitical movement, you could obviously make that case.
But if we're talking about Global warfare with first world nations.
I mean, we might get there a lot sooner than people think.
And we are just, we are on this complete direction of escalation.
You know, I kind of went off the rails a little bit on Bondi, but Bondi is gone now, essentially, so you can obfuscate what happened with the Epstein files.
You can try to play it off on her.
She can become a scapegoat.
Escalation in the Tech Realm00:07:52
They put Todd Blanch in there, who's already been a lapdog for the establishment.
He's the one that.
Basically, shut down the vast majority of the investigations that we wanted the DOJ to be involved in, whether that was the Russiagate hoax or whether that was election integrity, the machines, mail in ballots.
I got news for people.
There ain't going to be no trials.
That is over with.
Fauci ain't going to jail.
Just like this guy chanted, lock her up through the first term.
Of his 2016 run, and then gets in there and calls Hillary Clinton, says, You ran a good campaign, and let's stop with that.
I didn't even say that.
No one's going to jail.
No one's going to jail, man.
And now we've got what?
Probably another two years until we're in another election cycle.
And they're pushing people like Marco Rubio, Total Warhawk.
They're pushing people like JD Vance.
JD Vance is a Peter Thiel acolyte.
He fits right into the groove.
Of this automation nation robotics takeover.
I'm sure you saw this new special tech panel that Trump has put together as of last week, correct?
Yeah.
Take a look at who's on that.
I have not actually seen that.
So, who's on it?
Oh, some really great people, let me tell you.
I actually did a special broadcast over the past weekend, last Saturday, with Alex Jones about it.
I've been lucky enough to host the third hour of the Alex Jones show several times in the month of March.
And he ended up staying on with me on Thursday.
And we were going over some of the aspects of this new council and who's on it.
The Muskernuts not on it.
And that kind of rubbed Alex the wrong way.
However, I'm not a Muskernuts fan.
That's kind of where we part ways in the technology realm.
But some of the names on the list are that of Zuckerberg, that of Larry Ellison, of Oracle, that of Sergey Brin, of Google.
Essentially, they took these tech magnets.
Mark Andreessen is another interesting character that's now on there.
He's connected to Palantir.
He's actually gone out and said some pretty astounding things.
He's the guy in that clip from about a year and a half, two years ago with Barry Weiss, where he was talking to the Biden administration about investing in artificial intelligence.
And they told him not to because they were going to truncate it, which they have, because it's not about the Biden administration or the Trump administration.
It is literally about the executive and maintaining a technopoly on this stuff.
And they said, don't bother because we're going to allow a few companies to do this and they're going to be highly regulated.
And Andreessen said to him, How are you going to do that?
The math is already out.
Like, I don't understand what you mean.
And he goes, Well, we classified a ton of stuff via physics during the Cold War in the 50s, 60s, and 70s.
He's like, What?
And no one's followed up on that.
I mean, geez, man, at the end of that little Epstein interview in 2019 with Bannon, at least the two hours that we have, he starts talking about how basically our mathematics and our physics are outdated and they need to be re examined, et cetera, because they all know it.
That's not what they're actually using for the technology that's not being shared with the public.
So they've got this whole tech group, right?
Then they have a couple of.
Nuclear engineers in there as well, because we're talking about data centers.
And as I've stated again and again and again, the plan eventually is to build these small nuclear reactors on this center for power because these are power hungry monsters.
Posted this yesterday, and we're not going to play it here just because I don't have it hooked up that way.
People can go check it out over on my X at Jason Burmas, B E R M A S.
This is the noise coming from the hyperscale data center in Doigiac, Michigan.
All right.
And you click the video, and it's a horror show of buzzing, like, ah, like it's crazy what this data center is doing.
And this poor bastard who bought a home in 2009 to have, you know, country living.
On top of being in a suburban area where he can, you know, it's a lot like here where you are in Erie, right?
You can drive about 25 minutes and you can be into the metropolis that is Davenport, right?
That's right.
He loved it there.
He's like, My house is now worth nothing.
He's like, It's worth nothing.
He's like, No one's going to buy this house.
He goes, He's like, They've taken away all of my property value.
He's like, It actually, and the news person is there interviewing about his porch while this thing is just blaring, okay?
And he's like, well, are there any positives?
And he's like, I haven't seen any.
He's like, and help the economy at all.
And he's like, what are the positives here?
Who are we helping?
Well, we're certainly not helping the individual.
We're certainly not helping the human race.
And we are putting these tech magnates, I'm sorry, at the helm of this new technology on an unaccountable board.
And that is in conjunction with the CAIO program that I've discussed.
On this show, the Chief Artificial Intelligence Officer program that is very clear that the government gets to audit all of it and the government gets to put in their own people.
So, if you want to be a CAIO, you have to have a top secret clearance.
You have to essentially become part of the government.
All right.
That's where we are right now.
So, we are at an accelerated pace for these technologies, for these data centers, for artificial intelligence.
And automation.
We are at an accelerated pace for global warfare.
Okay.
And we are, quite frankly, at an accelerated pace in this country for massive propaganda regarding our space program and intelligent life outside of Earth.
We are deep in the weeds with Jason Bermas, brought to you by River City's Reader.
And man, I can't tell you.
So I look through all the state news every day, and the amount of what's really shocking is we know they're going to use water to cool.
And we've got like massive drought going on in the West.
And those are some of the states like Nevada's all in.
They're trying to build power plants to keep up, which I feel like if they would just build the AI data center with its own little power plant, it would be way better.
But that's not what they're supposed to do.
But in fact, they're just jumping on the grid, driving up demand and driving up prices for everybody so far.
That's what we're seeing.
But, you know, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, they're getting all in on this.
They don't even have any water anyway.
They're already imposing water restrictions on things.
AI Data Centers and Grid Strain00:05:24
What was it, Mike?
Can't water your lawn.
Oh, yeah.
They couldn't even serve water to patrons at restaurants in some places.
You always ask, yeah, you don't wash your car.
No.
You don't do anything like that.
None of that.
And yet, hey, let's.
Let's get the say I did it, sir.
Let's give them all the tax breaks so that the middle class can pay for that, too.
And away we go.
Lake Powell is like drying up.
This is one of the most insane moves in terms of what's good and bad for humanity that I can recall in history.
100%.
I mean, how is it benefiting any of us?
Now, look, I love the fact that I have a new way to tell my stories.
You know, you mentioned the Epstein docuseries that I'm putting together right now.
And anybody can go watch the trailer over at my YouTube.
I should actually feature it over at my YouTube and get rid of the James Woods video as my feature.
In fact, got to do that.
But if you look at that, you know, I got a couple of AI clips, right?
I've got this great picture.
Of Epstein.
It's the one of him and Ghislaine Maxwell, where he's in like the little tuxedo suit, looks very Bond esque.
And I was able to, you know, make an eight second video out of that where they're moving and she's laughing and it looks very hyper realistic.
Even that opening shot, Aaron, I was able to take a picture of Epstein's airplane and a picture of the island and create a pretty impressive graphic, right?
Of the plane flying over the island to kick off that trailer.
Yeah.
Well, thank you.
But like, had I done that traditionally, right?
The plane and the island, that could have taken me, you know, a couple days alone, you know, to find a plane model, then find the textures and map it out, then use a 3D program to move it and animate it and render it and make it look like.
You used AI and it made it easier.
I used AI and I cracked it out probably in about 30 minutes.
There were a couple of tweaks.
There was a couple of videos I made that I didn't like that, you know, the, The prompt was not good enough, et cetera.
But 30 minutes compared to one or two days' work.
Okay.
Yeah.
Great.
I'm very, very happy.
Larry Ellison of Oracle, they just announced that, well, they started sending out emails that said your position's been eliminated because of AI.
30,000 of their 162,000 employees are getting the axe right now.
More are expected in the future.
Oracle's been very front running about, obviously, since he's on the AI tech board or whatever the hell, they've been very forward about, yeah, we're going to invest heavy in AI and we're going to get rid of the people.
That's what we're doing.
And that's what they're doing.
Well, one of my frustrations, Aaron, in this whole thing, and just kind of going back to that graphic, right, is that I have the CPU and the GPU power to do that right here on my PC.
A thousand.
Now, would it take 30 minutes?
It might take a little longer, right?
Because it's going through a cloud.
Maybe it would double in time.
I don't think that it would triple.
I'm not allowed to have that.
I'm not allowed to have that.
You know, Sam Altman said it a couple weeks ago on a forum.
You know, we see this, we see AI, we see intelligence in general as a utility like water, like electricity.
So, in other words, it's nothing you will ever own.
They are never going to allow you to have the hardware or the software to do these things.
Even they're going to put it on a meter, right?
Is that what he said?
It's already metered.
So, let me give you an example of what I used to create that first plane graphic.
Now, I'm lucky enough to be working with the good people at Dauntless, formerly Dauntless Dialogue.
So, they've got a couple accounts outside of my Adobe account.
And that's how I created, say, the Epstein thing.
And that's much better than what Adobe gives me.
Adobe wouldn't even let me actually edit that picture of Epstein because any picture of Epstein is not allowed.
The guardrails on Adobe are crazy.
You can't, I mean, There are certain words it will not let you use.
There are certain individuals it will refuse to edit.
This is supposed to be something that I quote unquote own, but I don't really because I've been on a monthly fee since 2013.
So, along with that monthly fee, last I think about six months ago, they increased my price and they gave me access to Firefly.
Now, I used Firefly for this thing.
That's all it is, Aaron, is credits.
So, every time I fire up a prompt, my credits go down.
You know, talk about a social credit score type thing.
And for what?
Like, this is software I'm paying for.
And again, they could utilize my hardware instead of their cloud servers to create these graphics that are already highly censored.
Like, the really scary thing is that there's a good chance that they're going to impose a bunch of censorship on all of these other companies that are providing AI.
Fake Students and Quantum Computing00:07:57
That'll further consolidate power, that will further consolidate the narrative.
And just so everybody understands, AI is a filthy liar.
Okay.
It is.
Yeah.
It is.
Caught it.
So, my other project that I'm currently doing, okay, is I am working on a 9 11 white paper.
All right.
I've gone through, I've gotten a lot of the whistleblower information, I've done that.
And recently, I've been diving into urban moving systems and the Israeli involvement in 9 11.
Now, I have a chapter in Fabled Enemies called The Israeli Operatives that really lays a lot of this stuff out, okay?
A lot of the publicly known information.
However, when you want to get deep in the weeds as to what the names of each individual are, What passports or fake student identification, et cetera, is attributed to whom and where?
You not only have to go through the files, but you often do have to go through like artificial intelligence or other people's work to kind of piece it together, right?
So I went through the raw files, I had my notes, and I asked artificial intelligence about the fake student identifications that were found in the urban moving systems van.
For those that don't know, There were a group of Israelis that several, not one witness, several people witnessed both taking pictures and filming the attack on the World Trade Center before the second attack.
Okay.
So it seems like they were prepositioned.
Not only are they taking these pictures, they're celebrating while they do it.
They're smiling, they're laughing, they're hugging one another.
Okay.
They notice one of the women. who see, like, looking at them through binoculars and they leave.
So, so they're gone before the second plane hits.
Okay.
They end up getting picked up.
Now.
They didn't have one camera.
Three of them had cameras on them.
One of them had two cameras.
They never found the video camera, Aaron.
Um, but I had, I read the documents, right?
I knew they had fake student identifications on them.
Okay.
I knew this.
So I asked Google AI about it because I'm trying to figure out which ones had the, had the fake student IDs, right?
That's what I'm trying to piece together.
It straight up lies to me and it tells me there were no fake student identifications found and that this is part of The broader conspiracy of the individuals that were picked up before and after 9 11, part of the Israeli quote unquote art spy ring.
So, you know what I have to do?
I say, hey, why did you just lie to me?
And then I take a screenshot of the FBI document, I feed it in, and they go, oh, sorry for the error.
Sorry for the error.
We were talking in more general terms.
You are correct.
And then it lays down which one of the individuals.
Is attributed to that ID.
I caught it doing that to me three separate times.
If you don't know what you're searching for in artificial intelligence, you're going to be lied to.
If you don't do your due diligence after the fact, you're going to be lied to.
It's all about narrative management.
In fact, this event took place at a place called Doric Apartments.
Okay.
And so I simply asked the artificial intelligence, About Doric Apartments and their location.
And immediately it put the guardrails on it because of the Israeli angle and said, oh, well, that's really controversial.
And, you know, we can't really get into too much about that.
But here's what happened in the investigation.
I'm like, I didn't even really ask that.
And it's setting up these narrative boundaries around it.
It's going to tell people what they and whoever they are want them to know or want them to not know.
And it's going to dictate that.
I mean, it's kind of just a way to get the broader narrative that we see in the media into your phone and into your head.
Right?
I mean, it's like the Ministry of Truth in 1984.
You just keep changing history to fit the current narrative.
And I mean, that's what they're doing.
And again, Sergey Brin.
Who is the head of Google?
He's on this tech board.
He's actually also the founder.
You know, he's somebody that has been nurtured by the military media industrial complex since the 90s when they essentially chose Google as this new Leviathan.
You know, remember, it started not as a browser, but mainly a search engine, okay, before it was a Chrome.
And that search engine was actually given to them by the code by NASA and DARPA.
And Sergey Brin, his partner, I believe it was Larry Page, wrote a thank you letter to them for that.
And then they got seated with money from InQtel, the investment arm of the Central Intelligence Agency.
Then they declared quantum supremacy in 2019 with NASA, if you want to know what NASA's really doing.
And now at the NASA AIMS Center, they have a quantum artificial intelligence center.
You know, a lot of people.
Don't understand how quantum computing fits into all that, this, because it's kind of been put into the wayside.
But I got news.
They're going to pull the rug on people's encryption sooner rather than later.
We're in 2026.
And the predictions being put out by individuals at the top, and don't get me wrong, these guys constantly over promise and under deliver.
So you take everything with a grain of salt.
But they're discussing a thing called Q Day.
And they think that Q Day.
Is going to happen sometime before 2030.
And essentially, what Q Day is when quantum mechanics and quantum computing breaks all natural encryption.
So, all of your passwords are going to be totally and completely obsolete and compromised.
And all of a sudden, we're going to live in this world that if you don't have the power of quantum computing, well, you are going to be extremely vulnerable.
And who knows what could or could not happen to your assets in some type of transition where everything has to be quantumly encoded.
And, you know, I just need to emphasize this.
You read any of the white papers on modern day warfare going back to the late 80s, early 90s, into the 2000s, and they tell you the entities that control artificial intelligence will control the world.
Full stop.
Full stop.
So we see how much power consumption there is surrounding even commercial AI in this country.
If you look at what we're doing with Iran, because remember, first it was you can't have nuclear weapons.
Energy Weapons and UFO Theories00:10:23
Then they started talking about regime change, and then they started talking about uranium enrichment, right?
Right.
And now we're basically backing off a lot of that and just saying, hey, we're leaving in two weeks.
Yeah.
I'm not holding my breath that we're going to be celebrating in two weeks here on Deep in the Weeds, Aaron.
But my point being is we're not going to allow a country of 90 million, a first world country, To have that technology, like they don't get to be in the AI game, so essentially they're going to have to be repressed and just have to bend the knee on the global stage, right?
Um, that's extremely dangerous to them to not deal with AI.
Well, how are they going to deal with AI on the same level as a nation state that is allowed to pump as much energy and use?
You know, they just fired up an old school nuclear reactor, I forget what state it was, uh, but it had been dormant for years, but now they realize they're going to need that power.
For these data centers, okay?
Wyoming?
It might be Wyoming.
I saw that story and I can't really, I can't, I don't have the detail in my head.
I don't remember stuff like you do, but I, yeah, I saw something about that.
There's a lot of that kind of activity going on.
What's up, Mike?
Oh, hold on.
We'll get to that before we.
Mike's got a question about something completely different that we want to get to before the end of the show, but one thing I wanted to comment on earlier, you were talking about Russia possibly helping Iran, China possibly.
Dipping its toe in.
My thought there is I think if China were to get involved, it'll be behind the veil.
They're not going to come out and purposely do anything, but I do think they're going to make a move on Taiwan.
And I also still think the big three made a little bit of a deal somewhere along the line to, hey, you guys do this and this, and we're going to take this, and Russia, you get to keep Ukraine.
China, you take Taiwan because we can do our own ship production now.
We'll be fine.
But Russia's in trouble.
According to a lot of foreign media outlets, Russia's in trouble.
Since we gave Ukraine the good stuff, like a few months ago, they started to implement a lot of that, and they are pushing them back.
And again, no one talks about this in our media, and I still don't understand why.
They also don't talk about the fact that Russia's bringing in North Koreans, not just to fight, but to do jobs, because all the guys are gone.
They got North Koreans in there farming, doing stuff like this, basically slave labor.
It's what this one guy and two other guys claim to be that they were sent to Russia and they were found.
Somewhere like that, but they claim to have escaped because they were being forced to live in shipping containers and do all this work, work 16, 18 hour days, and then North Korea took all the money they got.
And that was like, you know, so that was this guy's story.
But Russia's having to bring in, and now they're bringing in some African folks as well to try to, you know, basically to catch bullets.
Yeah.
And a lot of their munitions plants have been taken out with these long range missiles.
A lot of their capability, basically, so they can't build any more weapons.
A lot of their oil stuff has been damaged.
That's how they make money.
Like, Russia's in trouble.
But nobody in this hemisphere wants to talk about it.
And I don't really understand that at all.
It's just, I don't know, man.
Like I said earlier, it's so corrupt now, they even walk crooked.
Like it's.
Well, look at what's happening with the Straighter Moose right now.
Like people do not understand the significant aspects of not only oil, but major trade in that region in general.
You know, I don't think Russia's going anywhere.
I think that the big danger, though, is this escalation.
Could cause them to use unconventional weapons, right?
If their back is completely against the wall.
Yeah, and it's not just pushing back on the front lines or these different lines that have been kind of blurred, if you will, between Ukraine and Russia since 2014.
And you start getting onto the Russian border, which we're not that close to, by the way.
Again, the pushback is from land that's been taken and then back.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Yes.
Yeah, occupied land.
But they are able to fire into Russia now with all these long range missiles.
And so they are knocking out things in Russia.
Yeah, absolutely.
But if you started getting ground troops and they were taking land there, I don't know that Russia has another choice, right?
That's where it gets severely dangerous.
And I've said this before.
I'll say it again.
I hope it never happens in my lifetime.
If a nuclear weapon is used anywhere in the world for any reason, Our entire life changes almost immediately.
Now, if it happens in a Western nation, if it happens in a European nation, Canada, the United States, I mean, I don't think it would be such a directional shift for the current quote-unquote world order and humanity in general that I don't think the vast majority of us can really even relate to what that
was.
look like.
It would look like the COVID-1984 nightmare times 100, which is extremely frightening.
We're talking about militarized checkpoints.
We're talking about drone surveillance that we can all see, drone enforcement, more than likely.
We could be talking about rations of Gas, we could be talking about rations of food, we could be talking about the reinvention of our economic system digitally.
All that could come in one fell swoop if, for any reason, this escalates into a nuclear nature.
Yeah, let's not do that.
We are Keep in the Weeds with Jason Burmess, Roger by River City's Reader.
As always, my head's always a little spinny about this time, this part of the segment where I'm still thinking about all this stuff.
We started talking about rockets, space, alien hybrids, UFOs, and Mike has something he saw on the Weather Channel.
This was on, so this piqued my interest.
Watching the Weather Channel the other day with all this bad weather coming and.
Tornado season, they had this like this half hour segment about UFOs being spotted around tornadoes.
And the one guy's theory was they're there to collect energy.
Have you heard anything about this?
I have not seen that.
But let me say this.
They're showing videos and stuff.
I don't know if it's AI or not, but they're like, there's the look at this.
And it's next to the tornado.
Then it leaves.
I mean, again, with the UFO stuff, I think the vast majority of what we are seeing is man made technology.
And current technology that is outside of the realm of traditional propulsion and weapon systems.
I mean, currently we've got some really weird things going around with disappearances of people that are extremely important.
Have you seen this?
No.
I mean, you got, I just listened to the 911 call of this military gentleman that seems to be heavily involved in, let's just say, untraditional types of propulsion and weapons systems where he just disappeared.
You know, his wife went to a doctor's appointment.
Oh, yeah, I know that story.
Yeah.
Yeah.
One of his assistants also came up dead within a week of that.
There does.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's not just him.
There are other people in that connection.
So, you know, whether that has to do with the escalation of warfare and the weapons that we're using overseas or this idea of disclosure, I'm not quite sure.
But when we're talking about these UFOs, I think they run a multitude of different purposes.
You know, we talked about hurricanes and the godfather of weather warfare, Ben Livingston.
A few weeks ago.
So, you know, is there the possibility that maybe they're harnessing some type of energy from them?
Maybe.
I don't know.
I don't know what kind of energy they run on, right?
Like a tornado, yeah.
I mean, I have no idea.
I'll say this, you know, way back in the day, before you and I were a twinkle in our grandparents' eyes, 100 plus years ago, there was a lot of talk, especially surrounding Tesla and his types of technology, of tapping into the quote unquote ether.
Of the planet to harness energy.
And we know that we are surrounded by a multitude of different types of electromagnetic fields on this planet, right?
That's a real thing.
So, you know, the harnessing and distribution of energy, I think a lot of it has been suppressed by the public.
You know, going back to that Andreessen comment, and again, Andreessen's on this board.
Anyone can go look up that comment about just type in.
Mark Andreessen, classifying physics, U.S. government.
You should find that clip, no problem.
So, you know, my biggest thing is that UFOs have been such a mainline topic now for the past 20 years that there's an entire generation that isn't blinking an eye and they're buying into the ancient aliens theory.
Gen Z Media Consumption00:02:53
You know, those kids have probably.
Been surrounded with that type of media more than they've gone to church, Aaron.
And I'm not here being a Bible thumper, but you think about it when you have a totally different indoctrination of a narrative surrounding humanity in general to a highly impressionable scroll, you know, doom scrolling generation.
You know, it's funny.
We brought up the study last, uh, last week, but literally 40% less cognizant than the generation, uh, before them.
And you know, it's funny.
The no agenda folks, Dvorak and Curry, who never get anything right.
And for some reason, Todd loves them.
Never heard a prediction.
They've gotten right.
Not one.
They love to make predictions.
Name me one in the last five years they've gotten right.
Dvorak played a clip of me on Jones, called me bashing, not Burmese.
Activism, I was some kid.
I'm five years younger than Jones and have known him for 21 years.
And then made it out like I was bashing Generation Z.
And I was literally just quoting from not only a study, but the guy behind the study testified before Congress.
I played some of the clip on Saturday.
And Adam Curry's response, he's laughing at it.
He says, I must hate Gen Z. I'm raising two kids in Gen Z, far from hate them.
And then he said something else that's just total jackassery.
He's like, This is the generation that's going back to church.
What does going back to church have to do with the ability to read and write?
And speak.
There's no correlation, Adam Curry.
So, you know, even people in the alt space get so much wrong, bro.
They get so much wrong.
And I'm not here to crap on anybody, but I'm also not here to play team baseball or to play into popular narratives because they're popular.
I'm here to give you the raw data and let you have your own discernment and make your own choices.
And if you like that sort of thing, Please go check me out at Jason Burmas, B E R M A S, on X, where you can see that.
I mean, my analytics show, it's not a free speech platform, far from it.
But you can also see a bunch of my broadcasts over on my YouTube, The Info Warrior, as well as my trailer for the upcoming Epstein Files docuseries.
Can't wait, man.
Thank you so much for your time, as always.
We sure appreciate it.
Always a thought provoking hour of the week.
And we'll look forward to next week when we go deep in the weeds with Jason Burmas, brought to you by River City's Reader.