Alex Jones and Jason Bermas dissect an accelerated global shift toward transhumanism, focusing on a newly formed 13-person presidential AI advisory group featuring Mark Andreessen and Jensen Huang. They allege this consortium seeks total state control via un-auditable Chief AI Officer programs while exploiting freshwater scarcity to displace farmers. The discussion connects Epstein documents to AGI mind control, claims bio-nano tech deployment since 2013, and cites a 40% cognitive drop in Gen Z due to screens. Ultimately, they argue NASA's "Mad Scientist" program and brain chip implants are paving the way for a virtual era where humanity is replaced by uploaded digital systems. [Automatically generated summary]
I've known Jason Burmess for 21 years, one of the co producers and directors of Loose Change 1, 2, and 3.
He is one of the most informed people out there.
So I wanted to get his take today, and I appreciate him joining us.
I'm going to do about 30 minutes with him, and he's going to take over.
So he has the floor here.
He'll be putting a lot of stuff up from his end to talk about all the huge movements.
And again, I've held back on Trump because overall he was good compared to the Democrats.
But now his change of course is so quick.
To the globalist.
At first, it was great.
He had good advisors.
Great things were happening.
But Elon Musk and others are out of the new AI commission.
And Trump signed executive orders, trying to pass laws that AI, no one can sue it.
It's above the law.
Zuckerberg runs it, the guy that spent 400 plus million to steal 2020.
Elon Musk is out.
Remember, Trump was warning Zuckerberg a year and a half ago he'd spend his life in prison.
Well, now he's put him in charge of everything.
Am I supposed to just endorse that or I'm what a neo Nazi leader like the ADL says?
What the hell is this?
And then you've got this liability protection takeover AI situation, trying to pass a bill to dovetail.
You have internet ID coming in all the world.
So there's a lot to cover with Jason Burmess today with these developments.
And then you've got all the rest of the craziness that all ties in together.
Jason Burmess is a filmmaker, investigative journalist, talk show host at Jason Burmess on X, rumble.com, the info warrior, and so much more.
So, Jason, I interrupted you a lot when you were on yesterday or Thursday.
So I want to have you back on so you can kind of go with this.
But big change is ever.
Zuckerberg Runs Everything Now00:15:35
This is a time of great change.
Regardless, people think about left and right, and that kind of dumbs it down.
It's a lot bigger than that.
How would you quantify the moment in history we're in right now?
And then let's ferret into all of this.
Well, I'd say we're at a very accelerated moment for technology and humanity without humanity really having a grasp on what that technology is going to be utilized for and how it is literally.
going to deprive us of the type of resources that we've had since our inception.
This has been a long incremental march, as you know, Alex.
And I would say the aspect of artificial intelligence, its regulation and the movement towards transhumanism has had that march really start that acceleration in the late nineties.
But right now, where we are with this new, uh, 13, Person advisory group that we're going to get into in a moment.
We've actually had a lot of movement in the last several years in regards to artificial intelligence, starting with this, which is the CAIO program.
Okay.
And that is the Chief Artificial Intelligence Officer Program.
So just under two years ago, we had this executive order that essentially outlined what you just said.
State control over all artificial intelligence and all aspects of it on some level.
So Alex, how do you- Total immunity against state government and individuals.
That's tyranny.
Well, what they've done is they've set up a system where in order to have this technology, you have to have this officer who in turn has to have at least a top secret security clearance.
Now, depending on what large language models you're using or what hardware you're using, that person may even have to have a higher clearance.
And then you look at the auditing of this stuff.
Of course, the government is the only one that is beyond that audit.
So it's complete and total control.
Now, getting into who was just chosen, because I think that this is really important as well.
First and foremost, anybody can go and check out ai.mil.
And they can check out the chief digital and artificial intelligence office.
So, in large part, again, that acceleration to have government oversight over every aspect is clearly in our face.
Now, let's go down through the list here because what you have is you have a consortium of people in the tech industry, but also in the world of, of course, law, lawyers, and then nuclear fission, genetics, and science, because all of those arenas are playing into.
This new era of AI.
Now, let's talk about the top guy just for a moment, because a lot of people may be familiar with Mark Andreessen, who, you know, he's invested in everything from Stripe to Instagram, uh, to Facebook in its inception, Twitter, you name it.
Now, Andreessen's an interesting character, Alex, because he's the guy.
Well, he was exposing Biden and then running it, trying to create an AI monopoly.
He was against it.
So that's one of the few good signs I see.
Well, that, well, that, that's where I wanted to go with this.
I would say this.
Andreessen is the guy that told everybody that he was on a call.
Where the government said, Hey, don't invest in any of these companies because we're not going to allow them to basically compete in this arena.
And he said, Well, how are you going to do that?
This is open source math.
I don't understand.
He goes, Oh, well, we did it during the cold war with large areas of physics.
So that shows the management.
And I think that shows that Andreessen is somewhat accepting as long as he is on the inside.
However, if you just saw who the second person in this is, uh, sorry about that.
It is Sergey Brin.
Who is the co founder of Google?
And, you know, I mean, if we're talking just Trump, just about as anti Trump as you could possibly get.
Then you have Safra Katz, who's the CEO of Oracle.
Of course, you also have Larry Ellison of Oracle on here.
You've got Michael Dell, and basically, Michael Dell and Dell Technologies.
What do they do?
They put out a lot of this technology in all forms to the public.
Then you've got Jacob DeWitt, only person that doesn't really have a picture out there.
His company specializes in advanced nuclear fission and micro reactors.
Why is that important?
Let's talk about that aspect, Alex.
The plans for power for data centers.
Absolutely.
So, so right now, as these data centers are being put into place, they have large problems.
Number one, they're over promising on what they're going to deliver for the public in the arena of jobs.
And then they're also making contracts.
They're only going to use so much energy and then exceeding those contracts.
Even Elon Musk here.
His data center in Memphis, they were not getting enough power.
So they tried to use a loophole, brought generators onto the scene, and it has caused chaos.
By the way, every single place that these things go up into, guess what?
Your power bill goes up.
And then your fresh water supply starts to go down.
So we literally have robots taking over human resources.
And for what?
Not even for us to have.
Access and ownership.
This is.
No, it's all for an AI race to replace us.
Well, that's definitely the end game, Alex.
But right now, what are they selling it to the public as?
Intelligence that you can buy metered through the cloud.
So, the first time in history, we don't get to own the hardware.
We don't get to have the software and do what we want with it.
This is the ultimate track trace database technology, by the way.
I mean, you cannot use these things without.
Totally being spied on on every aspect and every prompt that you put in.
And you can never.
And it decides what you can do while it surveils it all.
Well, I'll give you a great example.
You know, I'm working on this Epstein docuseries right now.
And for the last, geez, man, decade and a half almost, ever since 2013, I've not been able to own the Adobe suite of products.
Okay.
Now they've upped my bill this past year because now they've integrated AI.
Even if I don't want it, I've got to still pay for it and Firefly.
And say I take a picture, a historical picture, something with, say, Jeffrey Epstein in it.
I can't edit it.
It won't do anything with it.
It tells me it's against the terms of service to even utilize that picture.
So, you have these inbuilt guardrails across these platforms that we've already seen that is anything but intelligent.
No, it is programmed narrative management.
And even where they can't bring in this nuclear technology, guess what?
The water is still being used in mass.
And the irony is, Alex, that look, during our generation, nuclear power.
I'm not telling panhandle Texas cotton farmers, you don't get to cotton farm anymore.
All the water goes to AI.
Well, they even scam the farmers.
Like a lot of people are talking about this woman who said, look, you're not taking 600 of my 1200 acre farm for 26 million.
We don't want that AI data center.
She's really smart actually because she probably wouldn't have gotten that 26 million.
What a lot of these companies will do with either data centers or say solar farms, wind farms is they'll cut a contract with these people where they're going to pay a certain amount upfront.
Right.
So they're going to pay them 10 or 15 million of the 25 million upfront.
And then every year, They're going to pay a certain amount out after they make money.
Well, a lot of them will just go bankrupt.
They don't pay out the rest.
These people don't get paid out.
And then another company comes in and buys it for pennies on the dollar.
You can't trust these people at any level.
And that's just a small microcosm of what this is.
But let's keep going down the line, okay?
Because again, there's only 13 of these people.
And Zuckerberg, of course, is a concern.
But you also have Fred Eshram, who is the co founder of Paradigm, but the co founder of Coinbase as well.
Crypto.
Big in the future, I promise you.
Larry Ellison, as we talked about, David Friedberg, Ohalo Genetics, and again, part of that podcasting arena.
So some of these people aren't just on the podcast circuit like Andreessen, but they actually have their own shows.
Jensen Wong, he is the founder and CEO of NVIDIA currently, and he's been making waves there.
He's the new cool hip tech guy in the leather jacket, Alex.
And for those that don't know what NVIDIA technology essentially is, it's Graphics cards that are now being made on an industrial level.
Many people were already priced out of these on the consumer level during COVID 1984.
There was this small window where you could get them for MSRP.
And then all of a sudden, these AI data centers, Alex, they started to explode.
And the three companies that were left that were making RAM decided one of them, Micron, to just stop making it.
Samsung's the other one, they're proprietary.
And then the third one, Is still doing like half of their production for this stuff.
For the first time in history, Alex, for the first time in history, a computer I built in 2022, normally it would be half or a third of the price by now in 2026.
It's tripled in value.
That's not normal.
Okay.
That shows you that they are taking technology away from people.
It's the ultimate.
Again, you will own nothing and be happy and be forced to rent with us.
And Jensen.
The whole economy is falsely made.
We have to give up the water, the energy, everything.
And we're told it replaces us.
This is literally a weapon system to take everything away from us.
It's exactly what it is.
As it tries to mimic us, by the way, and.
Acclimated.
So let's just see what it is.
This is an alien takeover.
I mean, certainly an alien technology takeover.
They're building an alien private corporate intelligence that steals our identity and then replaces us.
I mean, at the end of the day, that is what they're looking for.
They are looking not only for a transhuman future, but in large part a post human future because the ones that want to stick around, Alex, if they do it, they're going to be anything but human.
I got news for everybody.
Part of our very humanity.
Is mortality, is the idea that we have a lifespan and during all lifespans.
And so this is about escaping death and saying humans are failed.
And so that's it.
And so Elon says it looks like humans are a booting up service for this.
No, we control our environment.
We can decide not to do this.
We're being told upfront, though, give everything to this.
So we're all fighting black versus white over resources.
How about we fight human versus robot?
I couldn't agree more.
And again, I'm not some kind of a Luddite.
Where I'm against the technology itself.
Now, you've always been a big tech guy.
It's you understand it's being deployed to get rid of us.
Yes.
And so, why do you think Elon was kept out of it?
Because out of all these guys, he's doing a lot of good things.
Have kids, pro humanism, empower us.
Why do you think Elon was kept out of this?
You know, for me, I am probably much more of a critic of Elon Musk than you are.
I would say, well, I mean, I look, I just look at his defense contracting.
I look at Starlink right now, again, being utilized during this new war in the Middle East, but was the big starter.
When we're talking about warfare, Ukraine, Russia, when you look at Tesla, for instance, and the fact that you not only have the Optimus robot there, but he partnered with CureVac and they built the micro nano factories that printed up the hate and lie shots.
You know, Elon has a lot of great rhetoric, right?
And ultimately, if you're listening to that pro human message, he'll come out, he'll tell you that there is no population issue when that's been hammered down our throats again our entire lifetimes.
I don't know.
Whether or not his inclusion would make much of a difference.
I think that, you know, people like him, people like Lucky Palmer, I don't know if you're aware of Lucky yet, but, you know, this is a new, younger guy.
He's not in the leather jacket like Huang, but he's got a Hawaiian shirt.
Palmer Lucky.
Yeah, yes.
Palmer Lucky, yes.
He is essentially this guy that came out of Meta and he created the Oculus virtual reality goggles.
And now he's one of the top defense contractors that wants to be the world's gun store.
And he is very in line with the Alex Karps of the world, the Peter Thiels of the world.
And that's where Andreessen, for me, is a little bit of a worry.
He has a company called OpenGov that was created with the co founder of Palantir.
And look, Andreessen's also talked about the Palantirification of everything.
We're beyond track trace database, Alex.
When you look at the dark journalism.
No, the real future is predicting the future.
So.
Bottom line, we're in the middle of a giant revolution and the public doesn't even understand it.
Yes.
I mean, the vast majority of the public does not understand that we are now in what they call the bio nano quantum revolution.
And by they, I would say whether you call it the military industrial complex, the deep state, this was all laid out in a document that's actually getting a little bit more traction online these days called Future Strategic Issues and Warfare from 2001.
And it lays out, uh, all of these things.
And it says in 2020, actually, uh, right here is when that bio-nano era began.
They're not sure how long it's going to take to get to the virtual era.
Uh, but once you hit that quote unquote virtual era, again, humans, Are really put by the wayside.
Now, I have a ton of clips.
You go to the Neutron movie, but also the announcement of the White House with Melania with a robot.
This is the invasion of AI and cyberspace into our dimension.
This is where they are literally talking about the creation of biomolecular life forms of intelligence that integrate into the AI.
So beyond just genetic manipulation, chimeras.
Okay, this new technology, and NASA is a huge part of this.
You know, they're doing this on places like the ISS out in low Earth orbit, as well as in black sites.
And most people, again, they're captivated by this idea oh, we're going to the moon.
They're telling us we're going to build bases.
You know, the new head of NASA, Jarek Isaacman, another, again, rich, good looking guy, a billionaire, good face for the whole thing.
He recently went further than any other human beings outside of the Apollo missions, uh, last year in Polaris Dawn, and it was only 870 miles.
Brains Not Designed for Screens00:04:12
Most people don't even know that, Alex.
You know, they don't have a real grasp of what technologies are actually doing and where they're going.
For instance, you mentioned Musk.
You know, I'm highly skeptical of the Mars stuff, but what I do know is that on the Starlink missions, which is really the commercialized, uh, version of their Black programs.
It used to be called Blackjack was the DARPA satellite, uh, program.
There's a new name for it.
You're going to love it.
I know that you're a big Cobra Commander fan.
Uh, the new classified version is Starshield.
So it's Starshield, Alex.
Yes, Starshield.
So Starshield is this artificial skin that NASA was talking about in 2016.
I might play that clip a little later.
Uh, that basically is this information skin that controls everything.
It's beyond track, trace, database.
They do want to integrate it with these new 5G and beyond technologies.
They do want to integrate it into this automated world.
And the more automation that comes in, Alex, what the less autonomy, unfortunately, the human beings have.
And I just want to hit this because we hit it very briefly.
Uh, that study quickly, uh, of how the kids these days literally have that much less.
40%.
Yes, 40%.
So the funny thing is, so I went and I tried to find that number afterwards.
And it was obfuscated from me.
But when I went to the AI and I said, okay, so I typed in kids 40% reduction in cognition.
And they try to skirt around and I go, well, what measure would you give it?
40%.
I mean, 40% written cognition.
I got a clip here.
If we can bear through the three minutes, this is the individual that conducted that study telling people exactly what's happening.
A Senate committee is raising alarms over how screen time may be changing kids' brains.
making Gen Z the first generation to cognitively underperform the one before it.
Gen Z includes those born between 1997 and 2012.
Fox 13's Genevieve Curtis spoke to a neurologist and neuroscientist about what's changed and what parents can do about it.
Genevieve.
Yeah, Haley, for the first time in modern history, experts told a Senate committee that kids may not be getting smarter than the generation before them.
And it has to do with how they're learning.
Our kids are less cognitively capable than we were at their age.
Neurologist Dr. Jared Coney Horvath says since the late 1800s, when cognitive function was measured in a standard way, every generation has been smarter.
Outperformed the one before until now.
Gen Z is the first generation in modern history to underperform us on basically every cognitive measure we have.
That includes areas like memory, attention, executive function, and even overall IQ.
Experts told senators the shift started around 2010 when digital technology exploded into classrooms and daily life.
They say the replacement of screen time in the classroom, even educational tools, has worse outcomes for learning.
Our brains are not designed for this day and age.
We need to train differently to get the brain to work with all the technology that we have today.
Neuroscientist Dr. Patrick Porter tells me the problem isn't that kids today aren't smart.
It's how their brains are being trained.
He says screens encourage quick recall, not deep understanding.
And the environment the brain needs to learn isn't being fostered.
Whether it's a computer screen or your phone screen, your brain is trying to predict every one of those pixels.
It's actually stressing out.
When we show kids playing even fun games, their brain gets Disoriented, they need to take some recovery time away from that technology and learn in rhythms and learn with actual conversation and creativity.
Clearwater based neurologist Dr. Dinesh Sivan Kolindu agrees, saying heavy screen use can disrupt attention and working memory while kids' brains are still developing.
There are other things that get affected because attention is altered.
Quantum Computing and AGI Goals00:09:32
Both doctors stress technology isn't the end.
Now, look, Alex, I want to talk about this just for a second because, again, I'm not against the technologies, but On that commercial.
The way it's been deployed is to destroy people.
I mean, think about it.
On that commercial where you're actually signing your name, right?
There's a generation that the vast majority of the kids can't even do that.
And you can say what you want, whether or not cursive, for instance, is.
It was all deployed to do this.
It's a depopulate us, steal our identity, and get rid of us.
It is literally part of the human identity and experience to put things to paper.
Your signature.
Well, it's in major studies that when you write something, it activates part of your brain.
Not only activates part of your brain, your signature is unique, Alex.
You know, it's something that we can share as a collective.
In other words, we can understand, but you can actually identify a person by not only the style that they write in, but the visual presentation.
It becomes.
And you know, somebody was illiterate if they just signed an X. Exactly.
And they're robbing us of that type of important communication that I think.
And what type of elite tries to dumb people down?
It's so evil.
I mean, again,.
It's the type of quote unquote elite that wants to dominate and change society.
And, you know, again, that Jensen fellow that I was just talking about, that is also on this board, they've just announced artificial general intelligence.
Okay.
And AGIs essentially are the next step in AIs.
And there are these quote unquote agents that are going to be acting for you.
Now, I mentioned to you during our last broadcast, That AGIs and Jeffrey Epstein were going together like peanut butter and jelly.
In these documents, Epstein is interested in things like mind control, has a big, big document on that, directed energy weapons, but in particular, transhumanism and artificial general intelligence.
Here are just three documents that are in the Epstein files.
Okay.
So you have this article from Ben Gortzel, who he's in constant contact with.
The article itself, I believe, Is from before 2011, but this is from a 2011 email.
And it's, it's, anyway, just in closing, because I'm going to give you the floor, go 30 minutes an hour, whatever you want.
The crew's good for it.
Everybody's watching, so I don't want to interrupt you.
He's in there about transhumanism to get his transgender to get his transhumanism.
He was this high level Rockefeller, Toronto Commission member up there, and he's a mad scientist.
We're up against a mad scientist cult that just sees us as guinea pigs to test to create the Uber Mention or the new life form.
And we're all to be tested on to then do this.
It's a total power trip.
It's totally satanic.
Jason Berman's continued to expose this.
When you're done in 30 minutes, an hour, whenever it is, we'll re loop with, and before you end, I want to get your take on this.
Total trap, BlackRock crashed the economy.
Trump looped into it, not until they closed the trade of Hormuz.
Total disaster.
How the Iran war fits into this.
Jason Burmans take over.
You got it.
You know, Alex just mentioned the mad scientist.
Okay.
And the guy that actually put together that document that we just showed you, that future strategic warfare, we're going to show you clips from, he created the mad scientist program in 1998.
It's a real thing.
The Pentagon had a mad scientist program, still have it today.
And they call it.
From 1998 to 2012, he was in charge of it.
And he was still the chief scientist.
Up at Langley Research Center up until a few years ago, uh, just passed away at 84 this, uh, past October.
So you, you think that Alex is joking about mad scientists.
No, they literally call themselves that.
Okay.
Um, just to quickly get back to EFSI and then we're going to hit a bunch of this other stuff.
We're going to go down the line of why NASA and Google are important in this AI arena.
Uh, you have yet another, uh, document right here and engineering general intelligence part one, 2013, ahead of the game.
Epstein was.
You can say what you want.
Project Prime AGI.
These are literally just three of the hundreds of documents that we know about.
And if you just see in this, you notice what their goal is of AGI 2025 to 2026.
And the guy they just put on the tech advisory board for the president announced it from his company, NVIDIA, that I'm not sure if it's the most valued company in the world right this minute, but it has been recently.
Okay.
But Let's bring it back a little bit.
Okay.
Let's bring it all back.
And then we're going to get into Dennis Bushnell of NASA, Mad Science, and more.
Let's get into Google and their role with NASA because I think that's really, really important.
Google, which is a shell company of Alphabet, okay, they have all these other companies.
Alphabet is at the head.
Most of us are familiar with Google.
But remember, you've got things even like Calico, which is their immortality division.
See how all these things play in together?
Yes.
They have a division in which they not only want to live forever, they want to DH as well.
That's part of Google.
Now, Google and NASA are basically one in the same when it comes to technology, artificial intelligence, and quantum computing.
Now, you've heard less and less about quantum computing, but the truth is that it is completely and totally integral into the type of advanced AI that we're moving in towards.
Because of its ability to problem solve and look at things in a non binary fashion or a fashion that is beyond zeros and ones.
Okay.
You know, I'm sorry, I just got a Sam Tripoli text.
I'll probably have to text him in a moment.
Anyway, so Google and NASA, they achieved quantum supremacy back in 2019 together.
Now, since then, you've heard almost nothing about this partnership.
Try to type it in.
Try to type in what Google is doing with NASA.
On quantum computing and artificial intelligence.
There's almost nothing there.
But they share the quantum artificial intelligence laboratory at the Ames Research Center.
I mean, it's as high level as it gets.
And every once in a while, this is the stuff they'll put out, right?
Because again, they've got to integrate it into the.
We're going to the moon.
NASA and Google test AI medical assistance for astronaut missions to the moon and Mars.
Folks.
We're not going to Mars.
I mean, that's a whole nother issue.
But are they trying to put AI doctors and AI teachers into the mix?
Yeah, that's exactly what they're doing right now.
And when we talk about quantum computing right now, again, this is what's in the arena of the news on quantum.
Google's issuing a warning essentially that all of our encryption, and it's Q Day.
Oh, I bet you some of you love that.
It's Q Day where All encryption is going to be broken.
All traditional encryption.
Now, what does that exactly mean?
It's hard to tell, but it could be the type of catastrophic and catalyzing event that pushes us into something that is not necessarily beneficial to the vast majority of us and that actually offers more modes of control.
Okay.
And, you know, isn't there a website neat?
QuantumAI.google.com.
If you doubt that quantum computing and artificial intelligence are essentially one in the same, when you get down to the nuts and bolts, that's exactly what they are.
It's exactly what they are.
And these things, forget about it.
I mean, in order to take a quantum chip and keep it cool, at least on the large scale levels, I mean, they have to build these enclosures.
That are literally, you know, they talk about the vacuum of space like that cold just for these things to operate.
Okay.
So I was bringing up earlier not only the fact that you have the nuclear fission founders on this council, but that even without the nuclear power they'd like to put on these AI data centers, the fresh water is a big issue.
And That's where we're going to start these videos.
Dennis Bushnell, the same guy that, and that's Ray Kurzweil, not Dennis Bushnell, the same guy that gave us this documentation right here that in 2001, prior to 9 11, this is from July, that we were going to hit the bio nano era in 2020.
And I'll just say this in 2020, yeah, did we have bio nanotechnology before that?
Humans Becoming Cyborgs Today00:12:30
They hadn't injected billions of people with it.
Literally billions of people.
Like, can't even imagine, man.
You know, just billions of people with bio nanotech.
And then that's, again, a big problem I have with Musk, you know, those CureVac centers that printed these things up.
So somehow they predicted that era starts in 2020 when they did that to human beings.
All right.
The same guy that puts this document down, and I mean, this document, Has everything from CNN syndrome in it to the genomic manipulation of the population.
This document was a blueprint for the last 25 years.
There's almost nothing in this document I can think of that didn't come to fruition in some way, shape, or form.
So we would constantly travel around and tell people that our fresh water was running out.
Now, it never seemed to be a concern in my mind, a real one, until now when the AI data centers are coming here and we're feeding the machine this life force of the planet that we all need.
Now, this is a clip of him, of Dennis Bushnell, I think from 2011, talking about code words such as sustainability and productivity improvement.
Okay.
And how essentially it is about population control.
And the genetic manipulation of the public.
Just, again, mad scientist stuff.
In fact, prevention of collapse of the ecosystem has now become the overwhelming issue.
Current food production is based on freshwater plants, i.e., glycophytes.
We're running out of freshwater, as you know.
The code word is sustainability.
The crashing of the ecosystem is due to population growth and the way we're now living, our standard of living.
The estimates vary between 30 and 50% of a planet that we're currently short to sustain the standard of living and the current population, much less the population growth.
As the Asians and their billions come up, as they are at 9 to 11% growth rate to Western standards of living, we're going to be short three more planets, and they're not readily available.
This will result in peak everything.
This will result in standards of living plunging.
So, this is Malthus 101.
These innate ecosystem restrictions and shortfalls will necessarily shift world econometrics from a growth mantra to one of sustainability, with possible population control instigated along the way that changes everything.
So, let's just pause it right there.
I mean, he tells you this is a code word, everybody's laughing around.
Ha Tells you it's Malthus 101.
What is a life worth?
Malthusianism, not good for individual humanity, folks.
Talk about pretty scary and just no problem.
No, I mean, just, and by the way, we might just instantly, who's we to instigate population control along the way?
This is a mad scientist program guy right here.
In terms of employment, just as an example, we are in a jobless economic recovery.
There's about 7 million jobs.
Some of them were globalized and offshore, about a third.
The rest of them are gone.
The code word is productivity improvement, which is a code word for ever better automation and robotization.
If you look at the way the robots are going, human level machine intelligence from the IBM Brain Project is now about 10 to 15 years out via biomimetics, where they've nanosectioned the neocortex and they're replicating it in silicon.
Okay, and they're having great success at all of this.
So, this is not soft computing.
This is by a lot of things.
We have looked 20, 30 years out with the way robotics and automation and machine intelligence is going at what jobs the machines cannot do.
The answer is not.
We thought we need human touch and light in nursing homes for a while, but the Japanese took years ago, but robots in nursing homes and patients like them much better than the humans.
The machines are creating wealth within the strictures of the ecosystem.
Capability.
The machines are reducing costs, okay, producing wealth, but the humans increasingly can't.
So, humans can't compete.
Productivity improvement is a code word for more automation, more robotics to replace you.
How much clearer does it need to be?
I don't know that it needs to be a whole lot clearer, everybody.
I mean, that's pretty damn clear.
Now, in that same speech, he said that they had already put brain chips.
In 10,000 human beings.
So forget about Neuralink, et cetera.
BlackRock also has BlackRock Neurotech.
They're putting brain chips in people.
Our government in black programs with contractors have been utilizing this technology for an extremely long time.
An extremely long time.
Okay.
And here is Bushnell.
Let's lower this one.
I believe seven years later in 2018, Talking about the fact that they've already put brain chips in a couple hundred thousand people.
This is almost a decade ago.
Humans are now becoming cyborgs.
We have cochlear implants to hear, artificial retinas to see, artificial hearts to live, artificial limbs to move, artificial organs to function, and brain chips.
There's a couple hundred thousand people wandering around with brain chips now, it affects congenitally defective brains, and increasingly it affects memory.
And other things.
DARPA is working on brain shifts for super soldiers.
And people are now working thanks to Musk and other people funding direct machine brain communications.
It's not us versus them, us versus the machines.
We're merging.
And this is the human evolution of the humans.
There is no more natural evolution of anything.
Let me just stop it right there.
You understand the arrogance of a statement like that?
There is no more natural evolution of anything.
This mad scientific class, the scientific elites, if you will, that were discussed by Eisenhower in that military industrial complex speech, are just going to do whatever they and their masters want.
It's over, babe.
Natural evolution is over.
It's a pretty bold statement.
And this small group of people is taking over not only the evolution of human biology, but apparently of every biological entity and beyond on the planet.
People are convinced that the human evolution of everything is 10 million times faster than any natural evolution.
And so this is just part of the human evolution of the humans, which will apply in a little bit when I talk about something else.
Is the Russian satellites.
So, right here, he gets asked about these satellite systems.
Now, I've talked about this a bunch.
You have the classified stuff, right?
The Blackjack, the Starshield stuff I was talking about.
You have Starlink, which is a commercialized version.
But then you have other technologies outside of this, right?
CubeSats are something they've let you know about.
But a lot of this stuff, Is moving in a manner, as this guy's going to say, that's not traditional.
Okay.
And I think there's all sorts of things going on up there between us, other large nation state entities like the Russians, like the Chinese.
And here he gets asked about that.
And I would assume it's going to be a part of the weapon systems and networks that come in the video after this that NASA talks about.
But first, well, let's hear what Bushnell gets asked and what he has to say.
That are moving in unknown and unusual paths.
In other words, satellites are no longer just satellites, but now they are moving around in unknown and unexplained patterns.
Can you comment on that and the evolution you see of satellites with that similar technology?
And the second one is the Russians apparently have satellites up there that are not described.
They're moving in strange ways, and there may not be normal satellites, maybe doing something different.
So, what's that all about?
No comment.
Oh, come on now.
Killer satellites?
Are they?
No.
Okay.
All right.
Sorry, Ty.
What he didn't tell you is I'm the NASA rep to the National Intelligence Council.
So again, it's an intel, a defense operation.
And you notice time and time again when an uncomfortable truth gets brought up, everybody laughs.
You've been trained to laugh about it.
Hey, Oh, it's funny.
They're putting robots in the nursing home so you die cold and alone.
I mean, seriously, you've been trained when you're talking about technologies that literally not only have the ability to surveil you.
But perhaps hurt you or beyond.
It's funny.
So here's a clip coming up of a NASA rep talking about this artificial information skin.
And another part, again, of this artificial information skin is to interact with the robotics and the automation on the ground, whether that be the self driving cars or 101 other.
Technologies they intend to utilize this for?
Through ISS, has been sort of seeding the small sat market.
But you can't launch into all the different orbits from ISS.
And so, what we'll be able to do with our Vehicle Launcher One is to put these satellites into other orbits.
But I think what's interesting is that the U.S. is now leading a new area, which is the small satellite sector.
We're going to see tremendous growth.
The number of geostationary satellites getting launched into orbit isn't really growing right now.
But you're going to see this huge growth in small satellite constellations over the coming years that will establish essentially a new information skin for planet Earth that helps us with navigation and communication and weather and remote sensing.
And I think it'll be eventually sort of a permanent new skin around the planet.
And a lot of that is being catalyzed.
By the work that was done inside NASA Labs and now inside the National Lab at ISS.
So there you go.
This global permanent information skin.
Global Brain and Permanent Skin00:13:33
Now, I've got this compilation of Bushnell.
It's about a six minute compilation that I'm going to have to constantly break each part down.
But the second part in particular, He talks about Google being the global brain a decade ago and nonchalantly talks about, again, this society where everything, everything is drawn.
Into some type of model that is building information databases and beyond on.
And he's like, yeah, just reads everybody's emails, takes everybody's books, everybody's information, just dick and dick and do magic.
Well, that sounds like the end of human privacy on a massive level.
But let's kick it to Bush.
No, this takes place about 2016, this interview.
The machines are capable of really good deep learning.
And that's what most of the current AI is based on.
The current AI is essentially soft computing it's neural nets, fuzzy logic, network algorithms, and deep learning.
The machines coming up as we leave silicon and go to bio, optical, quantum, nano, molecular, and atomic computing, there's another 10 to the 8th to 10 to the 12th to go.
We've come 10 to the 8th so far.
The machine intelligence currently, there's the soft computing business.
But no one really sees a way to get to humans via deep learning or soft computing.
They just don't, not yet.
There's no breakthrough in algorithms.
What we are doing, which will get to humans, people now think, and this is what's worrying people, is the biomimetics part.
This is where you nano section the neocortex, replicate it in silicon, and you don't have to understand how it works.
You just have to make it work this way as an artificial human brain surrogate.
They will all go to Google.
Oh, God.
Okay.
So, so this is.
See, it's big funny that, that, you know, that Google's the brain, but let's just go back to what he was just talking about for a minute.
You know, there is a difference between actual intelligence or actual consciousness, which they're trying to sell you on, and what these models are doing.
Period.
Now, he talked about the biomimetic aspect.
And I think that a lot of this is to blur the line between.
Human and machine.
And for instance, right now, one of the projects on the ISS at NASA is one called Organoids.
And Organoids are taking traditional human genetic material, stem cell and otherwise, and incorporating that into traditional electronics and microchips, right?
He talks about how, you know, we're wet computing.
Well, they're combining the two on every single level.
And even when you look at something like mRNA technology that is printed by bio nanotechnology and then put into humans, that's it on the other side.
See how it keeps, they keep trying to come together?
Get you to accept things that are less and less about humanity.
The de facto global brain, which will only get better.
And we are busily With nanosensors and other sensors networking within 10 years, some 3 trillion sensors.
So the global brain will be fed with all of this information, okay, and it will have all of the contents of all the libraries, and it will read all of everybody's emails and everything else.
And so you end up with a really big global brain.
That's different from intelligence.
So the global brain, you see how he smiled when he said it's going to read everybody's emails?
See what he just said about the sensors?
That's another thing that people don't understand with these things.
You're giving up your geolocation everywhere you go.
People are giving up their heart rates everywhere they go.
Forget about your biometric information.
You know, I remember watching Alex Jones' 9 11, The Road to Tyranny.
And he was talking about the acclimation of the public through popular culture to the idea of giving up your biometrics.
And he used a Buzz Lightyear cartoon as an example where, you know, they scan your eye and your face and your palm and all those other things.
How many, first of all, just to let everybody know, no, nothing, no unlocky, just really boom up.
No, no, I don't scan my face.
Now, I'm not dumb.
I realize I put myself out there and that obviously the biometrics on my face are out there, but I'm not volunteering it.
I don't use my thumb.
I didn't put my thumbprint up on here, you know, so it could take it down.
Again, obviously, I'm not naive and I understand that there's a good possibility they could just take it or have it if they want it.
I'm not going to volunteer it.
How about that?
Let's get back to Bushnell.
These people that you speak of that are worried about this are worried about the fact that as we develop, which we can now, it looks like via biomedics at least in the next 10, 20, 25 years, a human level machine intelligence, there's the conventional rules of we're going to make it friendly to humans.
Well, it turns out that people have now.
Delved into that a bit and they're not so sure we can do that.
Well, you know, kids and a really good brain, uh, human level and beyond machine intelligence could easily, uh, produce untoward effects on humans.
It wouldn't have to be malicious, it would just have to be unthinking and wipe us all up given our huge reliance upon electrons in everything we do.
So In that instance, right there, he's kind of being really honest that you could just build an AI that's not necessarily malevolent and does something so catastrophic it takes out humanity.
I mean, again, just really lovely stuff.
In fact, what we're developing this time is essentially a second intelligent species.
With the biomimetics, where we're nano sectioning the neocortex and replicating it in silicon, people wedge we're 10 to 15 to maybe 20 years max out from having a human level machine intelligence.
The nanorobotics is giving all the dexterity, human dexterity, and so forth.
So when one looks in the totality of the human versus the robot, the robot knows more, the robot has a much better safety record.
In aviation, 85% of the safety issues are human factors.
It's clear if you want a safer system, you have less humans.
The machines so far are more knowledgeable.
The robot that we're using now to do cancer research and the cancer treatments is much better than the human physicians.
The teachers, Are in fact more effective, the robot teachers in educating children.
They're more creative, the child has more control, and so forth and so on.
The studies show that children learn four to five times faster than they do in conventional schools, and that's because conventional schools.
They have a large amount of time keeping order.
The classmates are not always supportive for people who are brainy and intelligent, so forth and so on.
So, the total education system for the robot teacher tends to be better.
Now, first of all, he started that basically telling you what Alex Jones said that they're creating a new life form.
Okay.
And then.
They're selling you on the idea that that life form is going to be better at teaching your children, despite the fact we just showed you what happens when you integrate technology too fiercely into the education system.
You're actually dumbing them down.
Okay.
And it's always wrapped up in this benevolent ideal set that they're helping.
I'm sorry.
Again, I don't want a robot teacher, I don't want a robot doctor.
Ever at all.
And you know, they also talk about the safety of these systems.
And the less humans, the more safe things are.
Geez, I wonder what that could mean for human beings.
There will be essentially no jobs the machines cannot do.
We currently have creative software that are doing ideation just as good or better than humans now.
The creative jobs will be the last ones to go, but.
I have not been able to discern any jobs that machines cannot do as machine intelligence and all the rest of the autonomous robotics develops.
So now we're to your question.
Okay, what do you do with these people?
What do you do with these people?
And by these people, it's everybody.
Because the robots can do everything.
What do you do with these people, Dennis?
There's essentially three options.
You've covered one, which is the guaranteed income.
And the machines can produce the productivity, the wealth necessary to pay this.
It's just the machines do the work instead of the people.
Yes, you have to change the cultural milieu, but this is eventually doable.
This is only one approach.
The second approach is the fact that what's changed since you last looked at this is the whole technology level.
And we humans are now converting ourselves into cyborgs.
So, before we get into the cyborgs, let's go to his other one, the UBI.
They've been trying to sell you on the UBI.
So, in other words, your only choice, other than the one he's going to tell you, which is totally and completely nightmarish, is to get hooked into an income system that is controlled by the state, an authoritarian entity, is going to be digitized.
Tokenized and they essentially incorporated into a social credit score.
That's your choice.
That's it.
No thank you.
How about a big no thank you on that one?
How about an even bigger no thank you on his suggestion here?
We now have artificial retinas, artificial hearts.
We have brain chips.
DARPA is working on brain chips for super soldiers.
We can have a high bandwidth COM port built in so we don't have to use the sensors and their very limited bandwidth.
And eventually, this all ends up with uploading into the machines, instead of us versus them.
Humans versus the machines, we become them, or they become us, or you end up with human contaminated machines.
Human contaminated machines.
I think I'm going to be fighting that.
I think I'm going to be fighting the virtual era.
I think I'm going to be trying to stay human, everybody.
I think that's the big necessity.
I'm going to wrap this one up.
I want to thank Alex Jones and the crew for allowing me.
Uh, to have this audience, if you want to check out all my documentary films, which I encourage you to do, check out Loose Change Final Cut, Fabled Enemies, Shade the Motion Picture, and Invisible Empire, a new world order to find, all free on my YouTube channel, The Info Warrior.
Go give a subscribe over there, ring that bell.
We're also on Rumble.
It's at Jason Burmess on X. Go check out the Alex Jones Store dot com and support the broadcast.
InfoWars Becomes a Thing of the Past00:00:23
Again, it's hard for me to believe.
That after all these years, that InfoWars is going to become a thing of the past.
But I'll tell you right now, the InfoWarriors and the InfoWar itself isn't going anywhere.
As always, it is not about left or right, it is about right and wrong.
I absolutely love you guys, and I will see you all on the flip side.