The Epstein Files: Les Wexner And The Censor Machine AMA
Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermasShow more ETH - 0x90b9288AF0E40F8C90604460973743dBC91dA680
Watch My Documentaries:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4VFYRaltcc&list=PL5vtMLUWgYehCTEfSmgEzAEC9Dvt9FZmc
Subscribe on Rokfin
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
Subscribe on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/TheInfoWarrior
Subscribe on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
Follow me on X
https://x.com/JasonBermas
PayPal: [email protected]
Patriot TV - https://patriot.tv/bermas/
#BermasBrigade #TruthOverTreason #BreakingNews #InfoWarrior Show less
Hey everybody, Jason Burmes here, and we are going to continue on with the Epstein files dump.
Now, we're going to be focusing a bit on Les Wexner on this one.
Someone we don't mention in every video, but we can't mention everything in every video because Epstein's career within this quote-unquote deep state cabal spans my entire lifetime.
And props and kudos to Mike Benz for being really the only person of any kind of prominence with any kind of following that continues to hammer home Epstein the arms dealer involved with Iran-Contra.
Now, we showed you the New York Times piece that essentially reveals a relationship between Epstein and a man named Douglas Leese in the early 80s, in which he quote-unquote mentored Epstein.
This is in that Kashogi range, the beginnings of Iran-Contra.
And at the same time, also confirms that Epstein not only shared an office with Stanley Pottinger, Mr. Iran-Contra, okay, but he worked with him and ran a business with him.
Now, again, we're going to show you this, but Johnny Vedmore was reporting this years ago.
All right.
Huge, important, just by the wayside.
And Benz just did this like 30-minute piece talking about Ace Greenberg, who also brought Epstein into Bear Stearns.
And he mentioned BCCI Banking.
Now, the Bank of Criminals and Cartels International, as it was known tongue-in-cheek style, is something that I featured in my film, Invisible Empire, a New World Order to Find.
Now, I want to say this, especially to my new audience right now.
I get it.
I can be grading.
Some of these shows can be a bit slow.
It can be methodical.
Go watch my movies.
That's when I've really got the information at a boom, beat.
Because BCCI, even my knowledge of it then, was also this network that brought up Al Cieda, the Mujahideen, the Bin Laden Network.
And anybody who knows about my work knows that I got into this through questioning 9-11.
So props to Benz.
We're going to show you where you can find that.
And then both Roe Cana and Massey went on Face the Nation, and they pretty much talked about their disgust with this release.
Now, in past shows, I've gone through a thousand different photographs and I've picked out the key ones.
Here's the deal.
You notice I got confused on the last show.
Well, it turns out that now all of a sudden these are misnumbered.
I can't do what I'm doing, so we're going to do them fresh.
Plus, I got to a Les Wexner photo album point right after the Winnie the Pooh photo that I stopped on.
And there's just a ton blacked out there.
And a ton blacked out in particular where they show Wexner, but not other people.
And Les Wexner is not just this billionaire in the fashion industry, L-brands, Victoria's Secret, but he's also very heavy into the geopolitical arena, this black ops world, Israel in particular, the Wexner Foundation.
And we're going to show you that.
So we're going to have a Face the Nation clip.
We're going to do a bunch of these photographs live and for the first time.
I'm going to show you where you can find the Mike Benz, Iran-Contra, Jeffrey Epstein breakdown, and so much more.
And then we're going to go to your questions and comments.
That's right.
Get your questions and comments in.
Throughout the broadcast, I will jump over, take a look.
If there is a super chat, break in very quickly.
But we've got a lot to cover.
The Face the Nation piece is over 10 minutes.
So let's kick this up.
Get the thumbs up, subscribe, and share.
And folks, I can't reiterate it enough.
I need you now more than ever.
I want to keep this going.
I want real, independent media.
I want the raw files out there.
I want to start the conversation where nobody else seems to.
And that is with you being able to have discernment outside of a narrative that's shoved down your throat via the information that we have.
$5, $10, $15.
It means the world to me.
Big donors.
Thank you so much.
We got the Buy Me a Coffee Link, which is great.
We've also got PayPal.
Thank you, thank you, thank you to all that have supported me over the years.
I want to thank MarigoldResources.com.
They buy and sell businesses for supporting the broadcast.
And then, of course, River City Reader, RCReader.com, truly independent media outlet.
This is the video that we are going to go over and we're going to play in a moment.
It's right here.
But before we get there, this is the video you need to watch.
If you're not following Mike Benz, I don't know what you're doing.
But I'm so happy to see 2.3 million views now.
Look, the Twitter views are souped up.
I mean, I barely can get 400 or 1,000 views on mine.
Just want to point that out.
If I'm lucky, 400 or 1,000 views on anything.
But that's not even real.
That means like 40 people watched it.
So, hey, even a couple hundred thousand getting it, this is, you know, this is important to watch.
Good for Benz.
And look, I see Vedmore underneath.
And Vedmore's not wrong that, you know, One Nation under Blackmail covered so much of this.
But, you know, at least Benz has an audience and is showing people this stuff.
And this is the latest article that shows not only the Pottinger and the Douglas Lease connections, but also talks about direct connections to the Rockefellers.
Here is, I think, the second part of the Pottinger ultimatum.
You see Maria Farmer there.
Hey, in these documents, they have now confirmed.
And I interviewed Maria years and years ago that she indeed went to the FBI and the NYPD on Epstein in 1996 and nothing was done.
And she says that she was assaulted at Les Wexner's mansion.
And Les Wexner in this document, Israeli Communications Priorities 2003.
Again, this is an archive.
This whole analysis, look, it says right here, a vital new Israeli propaganda strategy document for the period following the war in Iraq.
That's exactly what this is.
That's how the ADC is describing it.
But this is it.
Wexner Analysis, Israeli Communications Priorities 2003, was prepared for the Wexner Foundation, which operates leadership training programs such as the Birthright Israel Project, which offers free trips for young Jewish Americans to Israel.
I mean, again, this is a document that is 20-plus years old that couldn't be more relevant than today.
All right?
So before we go back and we go through the new Epstein files, and we're going to do them one by one by one, and we'll get to the Wexner ones pretty quick because that's where I said, you know what, I better just stop right now because I'm getting confused on which ones I'm pulling in, and we might as well just do it live with everybody.
So we're going to do that live after you hear Thomas Massey and Ro Conna talking about the betrayal of the Attorney General's office and this administration via this Epstein file dump, which has so much redactions and is only a small portion.
I mean, look at the grand jury stuff right there, just all blacked out.
New York grand jury, all blacked out.
Bipartisan conversation with the two members of Congress who pushed to pass the law calling for the Epstein files to be made public.
Has the Trump administration obeyed that law?
We'll talk with Kentucky Republican Thomas Massey and California Democrat Roe Conna.
Good morning and welcome to Face the Nation.
So far, there have been few surprises in the tens of thousands of documents related to the case against convicted sex offender and accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and his partner, convicted child sex offender Gheelain Maxwell.
The Justice Department says that 1,200 names identified as victims or their relatives were redacted, along with materials that could result in their identification.
Will the release of the documents satisfy Congress and the political forces who lobbied for their disclosure?
And much more importantly, will it satisfy the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and their families?
The two House members who pushed their colleagues into passing the bill to release these documents, Republican Thomas Massey, who's in Garrison, Kentucky, and Democrat Ro Khanna, who joins us this morning from Palo Alto, California.
It's good to have both of you here.
I want to start with you, Congressman Massey, because in these past 48 hours, we have seen the Justice Department acknowledge it's an incomplete release, but they have put out more than 13,000 files.
They say more will come.
This isn't everything you asked for just yet, but would you acknowledge that they are complying with the spirit, if not the intent of your law?
No, they're flouting the spirit and the letter of the law.
It's very troubling, the posture that they've taken.
And I won't be satisfied until the survivors are satisfied.
You know, I said in the hours leading up to this release that we will know if they are complying, if they implicate any of the other criminals that are involved and the suspects that are involved, that the witnesses, the victims themselves have given to the FBI, and they've never been mentioned.
Well, there are some disclosures in here that seem new, Congressman Conna.
The documents confirm that the FBI received a complaint about Jeffrey Epstein back in 1996, but the woman whose name is Maria Farmer, who made that complaint, said federal officials failed to follow up.
She said the disclosure makes her feel redeemed and that this was one of the best days of her life to see these documents made public.
What action do you want taken around a case like this?
That was the single most important disclosure of what we got.
Know Maria's sister.
She sounded the alarm in 1996.
She complained to the FBI.
The problem is that Epstein was so connected with law enforcement and powerful politicians, the FBI did nothing for a decade.
Frankly, she deserves compensation.
She deserves an explanation.
But the broader point is: Blanche was on this morning saying that Mancy and I have a problem that it's taking too long.
That's not the problem.
The problem is this was a slap in the face of survivors.
What do they want?
They want to know who are the rich and powerful men who visited Epstein's rape island and covered up the abuse.
And the key documents that our law basically said needed to be released, the 60-count indictment that actually implicates a lot of these people and the prosecution memo were not released.
It's not about the timeline, it's about the selective concealment.
Well, yet, right?
The Deputy Attorney General said there are more disclosures that will be made.
You believe that they will not release that particular part.
I mean, you did give them some leeway for redactions.
Well, first of all, the redactions were excessive, and even Harvard law professors who have looked at that have said you can't redact internal communications, you can't redact workforce product, and the courts are going to find that these were excessive.
But my point, and I'm sure Congressman Massey can elaborate, is that we want the files out.
So if our sounding the alarm on what is missing is going to help them get those files out, fine.
But this shouldn't be a big document up.
There's a pretty simple point.
Who raped these young girls?
Who covered it up?
And why are they getting away with it?
So you are saying specific things regarding the indictment.
Congressman Massey, I saw in a video that you posted, you had a very specific benchmark of success here.
You said you know there are at least 20 men accused of sex crimes known to the FBI.
How do you know that number?
And do you know those names?
Yeah, the survivors' lawyers have told me those numbers and they've described their professions and in general, but they've only given me one of those names, and I mentioned that in a congressional hearing, Jess Staley.
So I searched these documents.
I didn't see Jess Staley's name, nor did I see 19 other names.
And here's why we shouldn't be optimistic that Blanche or Bondi are going to release these things.
They sent a six-page memo to Congress and said they cited pre-existing laws as reasons that they weren't going to follow our law.
For instance, our law requires them to release information regardless of embarrassment, but they are trying to say that a previous law prevails when it doesn't.
Common sense says it doesn't.
The Privacy Act doesn't protect them from that.
And then also, as Rose said, internal communications, they're using a FOIA standard that doesn't apply because our law already says they have to give us internal communications.
In terms of the gentleman there you referenced as accused, I mean, being in the document doesn't necessarily prove criminal behavior, right?
And in terms of the redactions, what the Deputy Attorney General said is that they were abiding by your law, and also a judge in New York had ordered them to listen to victims.
So they're claiming that information that they had initially even published Friday, they had to pull down because they were trying to protect victims.
You don't sound convinced that they are abiding by this intent.
No, they are not abiding.
And all three judges who released the grand jury material said that our law trumps the prior law.
That's just common sense, Law School 101.
Yet Todd Blanch is using a different theory that wouldn't survive first contact with any court, which is he's trying to say that prior laws override our law.
That's not the way this works.
Okay.
What are you going to do about it to force them to comply?
I mean, can you do anything?
Oh, absolutely.
Look, people have talked about, and by the way, Todd Blanche is the face of this, but it's really the Attorney General's office, Pam Bondi, who is responsible.
And there are several ways to get at this.
Some take longer, some are shorter.
The quickest way, and I think the most expeditious way to get justice for these victims is to bring inherent contempt against Pam Bondi.
And that doesn't require going through the courts and give her and basically Rokana and I are talking about and drafting that right now.
Okay, well, I mean, on another network this morning, Democratic Senator Tim Kaine said impeachment or contempt, it is premature, Congressman Khanna.
And the Deputy Attorney General said, bring it on.
They don't seem to be taking this very seriously.
And if you just don't have the math in the Senate, including, at least now, this Democratic Senator not being convinced, doesn't that sort of show that you're at the limit of pressure?
No, we only need the House for inherent contempt, and we're building a bipartisan coalition, and it would fine Pam Bondi for every day that she's not releasing these documents.
I'll tell you why I've talked to the survivors, why this is such a slap in the face.
One of the survivors said they released her name accidentally, but they still have not released the FBI file about the people who abused her at her request.
And the problem here is that there are rich and powerful people.
We all know this.
There are 1,200 victims.
They're rich and powerful people who either engaged in this abuse, covered it up, or were on this island.
And what the American people want to know is who are these people?
And instead of holding them accountable, Pam Bondi is breaking the law.
And this is the corrupt system, the Epstein class that people are sick of.
So I believe we're going to get bipartisan support in holding her accountable.
And a committee of Congress should determine whether these redactions are justified or not.
Sometime in January, when you all come back, I assume that that'll happen.
I want to ask you, though, Congressman Khanna, there have been images released in the past 48 hours.
Some of them include former President Bill Clinton.
There's at least one image of Donald Trump.
I should say neither man has been accused of any wrongdoing doing related to Epstein, though they clearly knew him.
But since Friday's publication, we're showing the image here now.
One of the pictures was pulled down.
There were 15 images total that were then redacted from the DOJ website.
And it's kind of hard to see, but it's an open drawer with a photo of President Trump.
Why do you think that was pulled down?
Because the Deputy Attorney General says this was victims saying that their privacy or somehow their integrity was being compromised by having that image published.
Well, I'm less concerned about that photo.
I don't know the facts.
My concern is the major documents that we know are out there that haven't been released.
The 60-count indoubtment that shows massive financial fraud and foreign interference, the prosecution memo.
And look, they put out these Bill Clinton pictures.
Well, they're allegations that they're foreign governments that potentially were involved.
And that all needs to come out.
And it needs to come out in the indictments.
It needs to come out in the prosecution memos.
But the reality is they put out these pictures for Bill Clinton.
Fine, put it all out, but don't distract from the fundamental issue, which is who are these powerful people who visited Rape Island?
I mean, there are 1,200 victims.
It defies common sense that it was just Epstein and Maxwell.
And they're hiding something.
And you know why the American people are so upset?
My ex-account had mega supporters supporting me for the first time saying, you know, Pam Bondi whiffed, according to Susan Waltz.
She is breaking the law.
She needs to be held accountable.
You're referring to the Vanity Fair quote that the chief of staff gave saying the whiffs, and she said that Pam Bondi gave them binders full of nothingness.
And then when it came to the client list, she said it was on her desk.
There is no client list quote, and it sure as hell wasn't on her desk.
Do you see that as an acknowledgement here, though, that the politics have overtaken the substance?
No, for us, it's about the survivors.
And if you look at Thomas Massey in my comments the morning of the release, we were giving Blanche the benefit of the doubt.
We said, if it's not all there, fine.
Just get the information out.
It's when the survivors said that this is an insult, this is a slap in their face, that we aren't getting the truth about who these men were on Rape Island that we started sounding the alarm.
And this is more documents of nothingness.
And I guess the question the American people have, even to me, is, is the system so corrupt?
Is the system so corrupt that Thomas Massey and you defy the odds, pass a bill through a discharge petition, get the Senate, get the president to sign it, and still these rich and powerful people are being protected.
Who has this kind of hold on our government?
What are they hiding?
Why are they not releasing this?
Well, you want, what, people involved in those initial investigations down in Florida re-examined and possibly prosecuted?
I want the information out, which was in that prosecution memo that Acosta disregarded, that were in those indictments, that there were 60 counts against Epstein.
Only two counts were prosecuted.
I want to know who were these other people who were on the Epstein's rape island?
Who were the people who saw young girls being paraded around at parties, 13, 14, 15-year-olds, and didn't say anything?
And why is this so hard when there's a law requiring these names to come out?
What we're seeing is survivors' names come out, but not the men who abused them.
And instead of holding elites accountable, Pam Bondi is breaking the law.
Well, we will see when you gentlemen come back to work.
So, I mean, from the fact that Thomas Massey names Jeff Staley, says, hey, I haven't seen Jeff Staley's name in the documents.
Big-time banker, J.P. Morgan, no big deal.
Post-Epstein conviction.
To the fact foreign governments were discussed.
How about that?
Then even this non-prosecution sweetheart deal and Acosta are mentioned.
So, again, these guys are trying.
And at the same time, there's a whole lot of redactions.
We're going to go over it right now.
Let's get into it.
Let's do it to it.
Right there, redaction.
Redaction.
Redaction.
Redacted?
Redicted.
A no, sir.
That's a big no, sir, right?
I mean, we see some trees in the background, but no, sir.
And there we are.
Now, how many of these prior photographs had Wexner in them?
But we got half a photograph of Wexner amongst a bunch of redactions.
Redaction.
Again, redactions.
I'm not sure who this gentleman, but it's amongst what I would assume.
I mean, this is an Epstein, an Epstein, Maxwell, Wexner trip.
But I don't know.
We've got a redaction on whoever's next to Wexner here.
And then you've got Epstein and Maxwell.
Now, again, I assume that's probably all the same ring.
And then we've got a horse of some sort, but a whole lot of redactions surrounding Wexner.
Here's Epstein doing his best Frodo, apparently.
But you also see Glaine Maxwell in a large-scale, kind of outdoorsy, riding the horses type getup.
And here they are actually riding horses together.
Ocean, some land in the back.
Epstein and Ghelane.
I'm not really sure what we're looking at here.
I mean, it looks like some of this could be like snow, but maybe the lighting, maybe it's just a beach.
Found this one kind of interesting, actually.
And then, like, underneath the stragations, and I don't know.
Weird picture.
Then we got some old school black and white pictures.
We got Epstein smiling it up there.
Some kind of a boat deal.
This one's got Epstein and Ghelain Maxwell, high society style.
And I assume, maybe I'm getting it wrong, but that could be Prince Andrew.
Higher res photo would let us know.
Epstein and the gang amongst the plebs.
Some topless dude in white jeans, wearing like the outfit from the jerk, seems like.
We got this Epstein with his grandma glasses on.
We've seen this one before.
Motorcycle Epstein.
Red carpet jet.
Smaller, a little privatized jet.
Large estate right here.
And, you know, I was looking at it, and I don't think that's Zorro Ranch, but maybe it's Zorro Ranch.
You know what?
Let's just look at the Zorro Ranch estate right now.
Let me get some fresh eyes on it.
Because that'll bother me.
Because remember, we're not going to get any of the big-time Zorro Ranch stuff.
Maybe that's Zorro Ranch?
I don't.
Yeah.
Yeah, that's probably Zorro Ranch.
Here's some shots of Zorro Ranch right here.
And here's a better shot of it.
Maybe there's been some renovations over the years.
I mean, the way it's done.
It's probably a pick of Zorro Ranch.
So you wonder if that string of pictures was Wexner taking them out to Zorro Ranch maybe for the first time.
I don't know.
I'm speculating here.
I'm speculating.
See, because that looks like third world country.
Then we got some blacked out.
No, sir.
Sorry, but not sorry.
Hey, hey, you wanted photographs?
No photographs for you.
Hey, we're censored, And then we get to this.
Couple of photographs of some kind of a trip.
And by the way, let's zoom in on this one right here with the background.
Because we did have that, you know, last time that odd, he was with that guy who was clearly excavating stuff with Epstein.
And then I'm not sure who this is.
Maybe someone's going to be able to tell me who this is.
I don't know.
I don't know.
Let's see.
Epstein amongst the pillars.
For some reason, some terrible follow-up to that.
That's all pixelated.
Same thing there.
Very bizarre.
Not sure what was going on there.
Epstein and Ghelane.
Epstein at dinner.
Somebody touching an asleep guy.
Someone touching an asleep guy again.
Don't know.
Now, this looks like that Africa trip.
We're about to get to the Africa trip with Ghelane Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Chris Tucker, and Kevin Spacey.
And I think Clinton was on this trip as well, but I'm not sure.
Because there's the Tucker, right?
There's Chris Tucker singing away.
Here's Bill Clinton in his Michael Jordan shirt.
And there is somebody behind Chris Tucker and Ghelain Maxwell.
Chris Tucker's kind of fall off the face of the earth.
I don't know that he's ever answered a question about the Epstein stuff.
There's Spacey.
There's Bill Clinton.
Ghelain, Spacey, Clinton.
And that guy over to the left of Spacey, I feel like he's somebody that's been working with Maxwell.
Maybe he takes trips with him or works with Clinton.
Because I think this is the second time that he was on that other trip, too.
Probably works for Clinton.
Probably a Clinton working guy.
And he's right behind Ghelain Maxwell right there.
Let's see.
Let's see what we got here.
Man, that guy looks like almost like not even human.
Look at this guy.
Is this some like wax?
This has got to be, right?
That can't be a real person.
It's got to be like a tourist attraction, right?
Yeah, like the guy behind some World War II recreation.
It's like, yeah, that's not a human being.
Nope, definitely not human beings.
Bill Clinton with somebody.
The same individual with Jeffrey Epstein right next to him.
Not sure who this person is.
See, there's some doubles in here.
I've noticed that too.
It seems like a bunch of photographs are missing, and then there's like doubles.
Okay, here's Clinton shaking hands.
And that's the other thing.
We know this is a trip, it seems, to Africa with Clinton.
And earlier I was looking it up, and people couldn't tell me.
The AI couldn't tell me where these pictures were taken.
Really?
Like, give me a break.
How hard would it be?
So, yeah, we're getting a lot of doubles here.
Lots and lots of doubles.
Clinton, and I assume Epstein's here too for a dinner, taking the pictures.
And yep, there's Chris Rock right next to old Billy Boy Clinton.
Like, hey, look at me.
And then there's Bill Clinton with the press.
Once again, there's no reason why we can't figure out what the dates are and where this is.
Ghelain Maxwell in her pilot attire.
Jeffrey Epstein ranching it up, it looks like, with some doggies.
Here's Epstein wearing loafers on a motorcycle.
And here's a guy who looks like he is in a Rico Suave video selling oranges on the side of the road.
Dare I say it?
Moore Epstein with dogs.
Younger Epstein.
Don't know who this guy is.
Actually, that is Sergei Bryn.
No.
Definitely not.
Sergey, you're not as dreamy.
This guy who I showed you earlier, who looks like a Secret Service agent, probably wasn't in love with his photograph being taken.
Here, Ghelain Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein are at this, it appears to be somewhere in the UK or Europe.
Same place where like the queen hangs out.
That's right here.
Younger Epstein in thought, Bill Clinton on what a piece this looks like a plane with a younger lady on top.
And here is Bill Clinton with the pilots, arm around a mustachioed man.
Guy asleep.
Here's the infamous photo we showed you where we already have a photo out there of, I guess that's Diana Ross's son, and then two of Michael Jackson's kids.
Boy, Michael Jackson just looking freaky in that.
Jesus.
What did that guy do?
Delaine with a dog.
Moscow Epstein.
Weird that you get that.
Fur on a plane, Epstein.
Tacky 60s Kubrick plane Epstein room.
And let's see.
Again, this looks like maybe the Philippines or Singapore or South Korea.
I don't know.
But here's tell you what, maybe it's the Philippines indeed because there's Mick Jagger.
And we had that Rolling Stones concert.
So Rolling Stones, Bill Clinton.
Remember, there was a lot censored around that Rolling Stones thing.
Okay, Bill Clinton right here eating.
Boy, Mick not looking the best then, but still out on stage.
Still out on stage.
Somebody in between Mick Jagger and Bill Clinton.
There's Epstein yoking it up with Bill.
I don't know who that is with Ghelan.
This looks like the same gentleman, however.
So a few pictures of this guy.
Chris Rock with somebody.
Okay, so maybe they're still in some part of Africa.
I'd have to look up where this trip went.
There's Epstein.
There's Epstein ducklipping.
Epstein smiling.
Epstein boating.
Grumpy Epstein.
Just up Epstein.
Smaller boat Epstein with a guy.
Somebody asleep on the boat.
And I don't know.
Is that Brunel?
I'm seeing him many times.
He's who I look.
It looks like Jean-Luc Brunel to me.
Yeah, that's Jean-Luke Brunel.
Oh.
Oh, that's Brett Ratner with him.
Isn't it?
Brett Ratner with.
And Brett Ratner had some allegations.
Let's see.
Brett Ratner.
I don't know if that one's been out there before.
So Brett Ratner, Hollywood, or Hollyweird.
Makes sense.
He did direct the Rush Hour movies.
So there's Brett Rattner hugging a topless Jean-Luc Brunel.
Hollywood and modeling together again for the very first time.
Somebody taking some measurements at Epstein's place.
Epstein with a possibly breast-shaped cake.
U.S. Army sweatpants.
Epstein with something on his chin.
I don't know who these guys are.
Maybe other people will know who these guys are.
Not 100%.
Let's see what we got right there.
Let's see.
Not sure who this is.
But it looks like an interesting dinner.
Perhaps the Burmese Brigade will be out there because there haven't been a lot of reports on who any of these guys are.
And they're older gentlemen meeting with Jeffrey Epstein.
There's a younger guy.
Dinners with Epstein.
You know what?
I think that's a good place to wrap this one up.
I want you to thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
I want to thank all the new folks out there.
Remember, I'm a documentary filmmaker, and if you find any of this riveting, my documentary films, Invisible Empire and New World Order Defined, you want the bigger picture stuff?
You want to know the networks that Epstein ran in?
Invisible Empire and New World Order Defined.
You want to watch a film that is just as relevant today that tried to warn you about Bill Gates before the COVID-19 44 nightmare?
Shade the motion picture.
You want to understand 9-11, Fabled Enemies, and Loose Change Final Cut.
And remember, I cannot do it without you guys.
$5, $10, $15, it means the world to me.
It keeps this operation afloat.
Big donors.
Thank you so much.
Again, big time car issues right now, all out of nowhere.
Just one after another after another in the shop.
Wouldn't be able to fix that without you guys.
So I do want to thank everybody that has donated, not only in the past, but will in the future.
As always, folks, this is not a partisan show.
We're not raging against the liberals or the conservatives or the Republicans or the Democrats.
No, no, no.
It is always, always, always, always about right and wrong.