Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermasShow more ETH - 0x90b9288AF0E40F8C90604460973743dBC91dA680
Watch My Documentaries:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4VFYRaltcc&list=PL5vtMLUWgYehCTEfSmgEzAEC9Dvt9FZmc
Subscribe on Rokfin
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
Subscribe on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/TheInfoWarrior
Subscribe on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
Follow me on X
https://x.com/JasonBermas
PayPal: [email protected]
Patriot TV - https://patriot.tv/bermas/
#BermasBrigade #TruthOverTreason #BreakingNews #InfoWarrior Show less
We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
We think too much, feel too little.
More than machinery, we need humanity.
We know the air is unfit to breathe, and our food is unfit to eat.
As if that's the way it's supposed to be.
We know things are bad, worse than bad.
They're crazy.
You've got to say, I'm a human being.
God damn it.
My life has value.
You have meddled with the tribal forces of nature.
Don't give yourselves to brutes.
Men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder.
Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men.
Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts.
You're beautiful.
I love you.
Yes.
You're beautiful.
Thank you.
Ha ha.
It's time to buckle up for making sense of the madness.
And who loves you and who do you love?
Hey, everybody, Jason Burmes here.
Let me tell you something.
Thomas Massey continues to kick Arnis all over the place, okay?
You want a true America first guy, a true constitutionalist.
There's one name out there right now that's head and shoulders above all the rest and continues to deliver the same message that he originally delivered when he first got into the halls of government.
That individual is Thomas Massey.
He has just introduced the NATO Act, which is actually not a trusted organization act.
Let me repeat that.
Not a trusted organization act.
Now, Donald Trump, to his credit during his first administration, really started talking about NATO, started talking tough, acted like maybe we were going to get out.
No, And I know there's a lot of people ride or dying on his commentary via Zelensky.
Hey, still not out of those wars.
We just pledged more money to Ukraine.
Oh, yes, we did.
We're not just America's gun store, which I don't like either.
Oh, well, if Europe wants to buy the weapons, I guess it's no, it is a big deal.
We are perpetuating a global proxy war, and that's what this is.
This is a global proxy war between the United States and Russia.
It makes me ill, where you even have 100,000 North Koreans on the ground.
Can you imagine how many teenagers, some under 18, that have been utterly slaughtered, utterly slaughtered on both sides, Ukraine and Russia?
And if that doesn't matter to you, I'm sorry.
You're just not pro-humanity.
Okay?
If you're going to remain consistent, if you want freedom, if you want a great life for you and yours, you have to acknowledge the fact that right now in 2025, we have a massive, massive military operation going on that is taking the lives of first world citizens.
Yes, Russia is the first world, everybody.
And that should make everybody disgusted and disturbed, especially because prior to the war on terror, so many of these academics and think tanks, right, they said that history was over.
They said there'd never be a major war again.
All Johnny nonsense.
I mean, we don't declare it war anymore, and we haven't for years and years and years, and that has been progressively more dangerous.
And that's why guys like Massey matter, because they're not just checkboxes for a president of the United States, whether it be Trump, Biden, Obama, doesn't matter.
Doesn't matter.
And that's the whole thing, right?
I'm not an occult.
I don't play team baseball.
I'm not a conservative.
I'm not a Republican.
I'm not a liberal.
I'm not a Democrat.
I am a constitutionalist at best.
And quite frankly, we have circumvented the Constitution.
When I say we, the United States, the military-industrial complex, globalist organizations like NATO, to continue massive warfare that is not benefiting you or I at all.
Not even a little bit.
Okay?
So we're actually going to read the entire bill here.
It's absolutely very readable.
Not that many people out there, in fact, we'll probably be the only show you watch that reads the entire bill.
In fact, we may be the only show that you watch that reads any of the bill.
Sure, it'll be thrown up on social media.
There'll be little portions taken out.
But we're going to go over the whole thing because I think it's like under four pages long and it's complete common sense.
We're also going to take a look at two other videos showing you how great Massey is.
One, via the Epstein case, just a 45-second clip of him talking about basically that bill that got through Congress and into the Senate before it went into the Senate telling them not, not to try to tamper with it or eviscerate it and create loopholes, if you will, for this.
Guys, we're less than two weeks out.
We're supposed to be getting those Epstein documents.
I mean, not that I'm holding my breath, but if it weren't for guys like Massey and Massey in particular, wouldn't be happening.
And then we're also going to go to a recent budget hearing where once again, Thomas Massey continues to make the most sense out of Congress.
So I need you to thumbs the video up, subscribe, share, ring that bell.
Check out all the documentary films for free.
If you're new to the channel and about half of my viewers are always new for whatever reason, and you don't want to subscribe, okay, you don't want to ring the bell, you think that I'm annoying.
I get it.
Watch the documentary films.
They're way more important than Jason Burmes could ever be.
And they are evergreen documentaries that are now, I mean, the newest one that I did was in 2013, well over a decade ago.
And all of them are still relevant today.
Loose change final cut, fabled enemies.
You want to learn 9-11?
It's right there.
Okay.
Invisible Empire, a new world order defined.
You want to understand that terminology?
You want to understand globalism?
Right there.
Shade the motion picture took on Billy Gates well before, well before the COVID-19 44 nightmare.
Warned a lot of people out there.
So, if you enjoy this work and you want to continue to support me, please consider a donation via the Buy Me a Coffee $5, $10, $15.
It truly means the world to me.
Remember, there are no paychecks right now.
You are the supporters of this totally and completely independent media operation.
I want to thank those that have contributed in the past and will contribute in the future.
We've also got the PayPal down below for big donors.
We want to give a big shout out to MarigoldResources.com.
They support the broadcast.
If you're buying or selling a business, go check them out.
MarigoldResources.com may be able to help you out.
And of course, River City Reader, RC Reader.com, a truly independent media operation.
Folks, we're going to be looking at the X.
I do want to mention that I've literally lost about 50 followers on X over the last month.
Not a free speech platform.
That's bull.
I have to pay to have the blue check mark.
I have to pay to be streaming live right now.
Okay.
And the algorithm is awful.
It absolutely suppresses people that dare to question the great narrative of the day and dare to go outside of this left-right paradigm that is constantly being pushed.
So a big thumbs down for X, but I still need your support.
And if you want to give me a follow over there, you get a lot of the raw material.
So here it is.
Representative Massey introduces a bill to remove the United States from NATO.
Awesome sauce.
We're just going to read this paragraph and then we're going to read the whole NATO Act in a moment.
Okay.
NATO is a Cold War relic.
We should withdraw from NATO and use that money to defend our own country, not socialist countries, said Representative Thomas Massey.
NATO was created to counter the Soviet Union, which collapsed over 30 years ago.
Since then, U.S. participation has cost taxpayers trillions of dollars.
Let me repeat that.
Trillions of dollars and continues to risk U.S. involvement in foreign wars.
Our Constitution did not authorize permanent foreign entanglements, something our founding fathers explicitly warned us against.
America should not be the world's security blanket, especially when wealthy countries refuse to pay for their own defense.
And that's the smallest part of it for me.
I know that that's a point that constantly gets brought up, but I don't want to be the world's gun store either.
I want to have the best weapons in the world here.
I want to be able to defend ourselves here.
I don't want to share those weapons with other nation states that are going to just kill people, okay?
And use it beyond a deterrent.
Just me.
So, Massey, I want to also point out, continues to remain.
You know, I just talked about how we're going to play the budget video.
We're going to play the Epstein video.
Shout out to Kara Castranova, who's featured in this Lindell TV clip.
We're not going to play it.
But he's still questioning the pipe bomber, as he should.
And remember, the guy they just picked up, Brian Cole, for the pipe bombing, five plus years, took five plus years.
Okay.
Then on top of that, or right around five years, I shouldn't say five plus, because it'll be five plus in about a month.
Okay, so I guess just under five years.
Got that wrong, pulling it back.
Human being, made a mistake.
Just under five years.
And the Blaze comes out with this piece where they feel like they've got a pretty good beat on what happened.
They even name a name as to this possibly being the pipe bomber.
And then all of a sudden they arrest somebody totally different.
Again, supposed to do a press conference about today, didn't do that.
But from what we do know about this guy, extremely suspicious that this would be the pipe bomber, a supposed brony that lives with his parents that looks highly autistic.
And from what I've seen, there's been nobody out there that's done an extensive deep dive on his social media presence at all.
Haven't seen it anywhere.
If someone else has seen it, please link me to it down below.
I'll be checking it out.
Rand Paul jumped in talking about this latest budget.
This is not America first.
U.S. Congress approves defense bill with $800 million in aid for Ukraine.
And then, of course, somebody below, no do Israel.
I don't like the military budget going to Israel either.
Okay?
So in other words, Israel seems to have a blank check in this defense bill.
And by the way, we're going to talk about the National Defense Authorization Act in Thomas Massey as well.
So in other words, if other nation states or entities don't want to do business with Israel because they don't like what's happening with them militarily, somehow we're going to fill the gaps in on that.
What?
How does that help us?
How does that balance our budget?
How does that make us safer?
It doesn't.
Okay.
So again, Rand Paul also remaining consistent.
Here is that U.S. Congress approves defense bill with $800 million in aid for Ukraine.
Four years has been going on, by the way.
Four years.
This war keeps going.
And before we read the entire bill, which we are going to read, I want to remind everybody right here, right now, I don't want any new wars.
U.S. deploys fighter jets in the Gulf of Venezuela yesterday, okay, for a 30-minute flight.
Then today, we had U.S. troops actively dropping in on an oil tanker.
Not a good sign, folks, taking that.
Don't want it to escalate.
Oh, I guess the NDAA thing.
Unfortunately, I don't have it right there, but maybe I should just type that in.
Massey, NDAA.
N-D-A-A.
See if it comes up.
We're doing it live.
Haven't hit this button in a while.
We'll do it live.
Okay.
We'll do it live.
Fuck it.
Do it live.
I'll write it and we'll do it live.
So, yeah, man.
Maybe we'll do a whole nother video on the NDAA and Massey because, you know, he's at least, first of all, we need to stop reauthorizing the National Defense Authorization Act, but at least he's trying.
He's trying to change that situation.
And he does stand alone, okay?
He wants everybody to understand this is bad news, Brown.
But let's do it.
Like I said, let's read the whole thing.
So this is it, to require the president to give notice of denunciation of the North Atlantic Treaty for purposes of withdrawing the United States from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and for other purposes.
Okay?
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives for the United States of America in Congress assembled.
The short title of this may be cited as the Not a Trusted Organization Act or the NATO Act.
Get us out.
Get us out.
Congress makes the following findings.
The North Atlantic Treaty, also known as the Washington Treaty, was signed on April 4th, 1949 in Washington, D.C. and created the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
NATO was intended to counterbalance the political and military power of the Soviet Union in Eastern Europe and was originally composed of 12 member states representing Western Europe and its transatlantic partners.
The preamble to the Washington Treaty affirms that the parties will unite their efforts for collective defense.
Similarly, Article III of the Washington Treaty provides that each party will maintain and develop their individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack.
The Warsaw Pact served as the collective defense block of the Soviet Union and collapsed in 1991.
I was 12 years old.
Followed by the collapse of the Soviet Union itself by the end of that year, shortly before the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States Secretary of State James Baker made assurances to Soviet Union leader Mikhail Gorbachev and NATO, or I'm sorry, that NATO would not expand eastward.
Not another inch.
Not another inch.
Sure didn't stand by that one, did we?
The dissolution of both the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union fundamentally altered the security environment in Europe and rendered NATO's founding collective defense mission irrelevant.
Despite its warning, or I'm sorry, despite its waning relevance and prior assurance to the contrary, NATO began a profound eastward expansion in 1999, which, as of 2025, culminated in the land border with the Russian Federation that exceeds 1,500 miles and circles the Baltic Sea.
Successive national military doctrines and national security strategies of the Russian Federation have framed the expansion of NATO as a pervasive threat to Russian security.
You bet you it is.
I mean, again, look what's happened the last four years because of it.
In a speech before the Munich Security Conference in 2007, President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin described NATO expansion as a serious provocation and referenced the assurances previously made by the United States.
Let me just stop it there.
And this is why so many pundits will go after Massey for this, because they want the Russian boogeyman.
They'll act like this is siding with Putin.
No, this is siding with common sense.
This is siding with the Constitution.
This is siding with America first for real.
This is siding with humanity.
Okay?
NATO members have refused to rule out further expansion.
Since the founding of NATO, the United States has shouldered the burden of what was categorized as a collaborative security alliance as the largest financial and hard power contributor.
At the Wales Summit in 2014, NATO members pledged to spend 2% of their gross domestic product on defense, known as the Wales Pledge.
More than a decade later, nearly one-third of NATO members fail to meet the Wales Pledge.
You don't say.
You don't say.
And again, this is a minor aspect, the financial aspect, but it's a real one.
Consistent with the United States' national security interests, Europe is not a priority theater for the United States engagement.
The principal interest of the United States in Europe is preventing the emergence of a regional hegemon.
And by the way, that regional hegemony is very much the EU, which we laud, which is a big, contributor to the NATO narrative.
The combined military and economic capacity of European NATO members exceeds that of the Russian Federation, serving as a sufficient counterweight to the prospective regional hegemon without United States engagement.
While the United States continues to subsidize Europe security, or I'm sorry, European security, European NATO members are disincentivized from forward movement on burden shifting in the European theater.
Membership of the United States in NATO is inconsistent with the national security interests of the United States.
That is correct.
Denunciation of the North Atlantic Treaty.
Consistent with Article 13 of the North Atlantic Treaty done at Washington April 4th, 1949, not later than 30 days, not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this act, the President shall give notice of denunciation of the North Atlantic Treaty for purposes of withdrawing the United States from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
Fulfillment of requirement of Section 1250A of the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2024.
And again, there were articles on the NDAA, et cetera.
I want it done.
Again, I want us off the Patriot Act, off the Military Commissions Act, off the National Defense Authorization Act.
I want Homeland Security done.
I want not only us out of NATO, I want the, if you watched the replay of me and Whitney Webb talking over five years ago, October 7th, 2020, I was talking about it then, that I wanted the United Nations out of the U.S. and the U.S. out of the U.N. Haven't changed my mind.
Okay.
This act satisfies the requirements of Section 1250A of the National Defense Authorization Act for the fiscal year of 2024 for congressional authorization of suspension, termination, denunciation, or withdrawal from the North Atlantic Treaty.
Please, no funds authorized to be appropriated, appropriated, or otherwise available by any act may be used to fund directly or indirectly United States contributions to the common funded budgets of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, including the civil budget, the military budget, or the security investment program.
If any provisions of this act or the application of such provisions to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this act and the application of the provision to any other person or circumstances shall not be affected.
That's it.
We did it.
We read it in under 10 minutes, folks.
Look how short that bill.
Short, sweet, and to the point.
I want out of NATO, and so should you.
Here's Massey nailing it when it comes to Epstein.
Cadence, that is wrong.
Do not let the Senate muck this bill up.
And if you are, if you're a party to that in the Senate, you are part of this cover-up that we are trying to expose.
I am sorry if one of your billionaire donors is going to get embarrassed because he went to Rape Island.
That is what they have coming.
In fact, they need to be on the other side of bars, a lot of them.
Some of them will be embarrassed, but some of them need to go to prison.
And the survivors know that.
So how will we know if this bill has been successful?
We will know when there are men, rich men, in handcuffs being perp walked to the jail.
And until then, this is still a cover-up.
And it's not just men, it's women.
And I'm not holding my breath.
I want to be wrong.
I want Massey to be successful.
I want people to go to jail.
But just like we talked about with this administration, just like we talked with Russian collusion, just like we talked with Brennan, Comey, Bolton, Clapper.
I don't see it happening.
I love the fact that Trump came in hot and he took away their security clearances.
I like the attempt at indictments.
But if we can't get real indictments that stick and real prosecutions that stick via an executive against an obviously, obviously corrupt military-industrial complex and intelligence apparatus, I don't know that we ever will.
And if we can't do that, do we really have a constitutional republic?
It's a great question.
Here comes Massey talking budget.
I'm all for balanced budgets.
I built this debt badge and I wear it to try and instill at least some sense of urgency among my colleagues.
I gave one to every freshman member of Congress, and the only member who wears one is a Democrat because he wants to show how much the debt's going up under the Republicans.
And he has a fair point.
You know, I think the balanced budget amendment is one of those things that sounds good on the surface, but it's the exceptions that are written into it that get you.
In fact, I voted against the balanced budget amendment when it came to the floor several years ago.
And I'll tell you why.
It said that if Congress, if both chambers of Congress vote with at least 60 percent of the members, they can undo the balanced budget amendment.
That was the exception.
Well, just a few legislative days prior to voting on the balanced budget amendment, we had just passed an omnibus with over 60 percent of the House voting for it and obviously over 60 percent of the voting, the senate voting for it.
So when Mr. Biggs, our colleague on the Judiciary Committee, offered a balanced budget amendment, he suggested the threshold should be two-thirds.
So I went back and looked from 2016 until 2026 at all the CRs that have passed the House and the Senate and all the omnibus bills that have passed the House and the Senate.
And it turns out that 11 of the 16 CRs passed with more than two-thirds vote in the House, and 14 of the 16 CRs passed with more than two-thirds vote in the Senate.
The results are similar for the omnibus bills, but I believe my colleague here, Mr. McClintock, has suggested a three-quarters threshold.
So what does a three-quarters threshold get you?
Well, in 2024, the CR passed with 77 percent of the House, 77 percent of the House in the next CR, 72 percent of the House, 74 percent of the House, 78 percent of the House.
And finally, in 2025, not too long ago here, the American Relief Act, the second CR of 2025, 84 percent of the House voted for that.
That sucker wasn't balanced.
What about in the Senate?
85 percent.
There's literally almost no threshold you could put in there that they couldn't override and haven't overridden already.
So, Mr. Walker, do you want to address that?
Yes, thank you, sir.
Number one, you have to define what type of unexpected events can cause there to be a potential exception to the rule, and then you have to have a high enough threshold combined with those unexpected events to be able to limit it.
And in addition to that, you have to say it's for year by year.
In other words, you don't just get a pass, it's a year by year.
With regard to the convention, this is not a constitutional convention.
The Federalist papers make it very clear that the founders intended there to be Article 5 limited conventions.
There are several safeguards to deal with your question, Mr. Raskin.
Number one, a majority of the applications back in 1979 and today are fiscal responsibility only.
There's state delegate legislation.
Let me follow up, Mr. Walker's sister.
Yes, sir.
Oh, on something you said.
You have to specify the exemptions.
And one of those is war.
I have, tongue-in-cheek, remarked that at least this would get Congress to declare wars again because there's an exception if you declare a war.
This gives me some concern because I've watched them play budget gimmicks here with something called OCO, Overseas Contingency Operation.
It's supposed to be for emergencies or for things that came up, contingencies, not expected, but they have used it to fund the basic defense of the United States to replenish stockpiles and whatnot.
And forgive me if I'm very suspicious of specific exemptions because I've seen those, you know, they were statutory, not constitutional, but I've seen them abused here in the House of Representatives.
I think the only thing that really works is you've got to elect people who are serious about balancing the budget.
The result of the big beautiful bill and the CR and everything that's passed since then is that this year we've increased spending $200 billion.
And next year we'll increase spending over more than $200 billion.
But I mean, my colleagues are, my Republican colleagues, and especially my Democrat colleagues, but this whole place is unserious about balancing the budget.
And if you give them any exemption, they'll use it.
And the reason, honestly, they're not that serious about it is because they can get re-elected every time by telling people they can cut their taxes and increase spending and things are going to turn out fine.
Well, that is not the case.
And with that, I see my time has expired.
It is certainly not the case.
And I really love the fact that he brought up the fact that, hey, at least we'd start declaring war again for those exemptions.
Massey's the real deal.
Always has been, continues to be.
We read the bill here.
I'm all for it because NATO is not a trusted organization.
Folks, thumbs it up, subscribe, share.
Remember, I can't do it without you.
I really, really do need your support.
If you're a new listener, you like what you see, please consider the buy me a coffee, $5, $10, $15.