All Episodes
Previous Next
July 28, 2025 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
28:49
Obama Clapper Comey Brennan Guilty? Yes! Going To Prison? NO!!!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
We think too much and feel too little.
More than machinery, we need humanity.
We know the air is unfit to breathe.
Our food is unfit to eat.
As if that's the way it's supposed to be.
We know things are bad, worse than bad.
They're crazy.
I play an owl.
knows why you have come You gotta say, I'm a human being.
God damn it.
My life is amazing.
Don't give yourselves to brutes.
Men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives.
Tell you what to do, what to think of what to do.
Who treat you?
You as a kid.
Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men, machine men with machine minds and machine hearts.
Yeah, thank you.
You're beautiful.
I love you.
Yes.
You're beautiful.
Thank you.
Ha-ha.
It's showtime.
It's time to buckle up for making sense of the madness.
And who loves you?
And who do you love?
Hey, everybody, Jason Burmes here, and it is time to talk RussiaGate, Tulsi Gabbard, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and the Barack Star.
So let me start here.
All right.
We actually read documentation on this show, and I have throughout my career.
Now, I want to point out really how rare that is.
Okay.
Think about it for a moment.
You have a certain class of people that think they are extremely informed that literally read almost nothing that isn't on the scroll box and in bite-sized bits, like headlines at most via social media, via memes.
All right?
That is now a large sector of the general populace.
Then you have, I would say, the tail end of the Gen X crowd and the boomer crowd that watches cable news, but then also still indulges in some print media, 99% mainstream because there's not a lot of alternative print media out there.
And they think they are extremely informed.
The people that actually pick up and feel that New York Times, that Wall Street Journal, they think they are the bees' knees.
How many of those people, okay, that are the so-called educated academic class in this country and in really global society, right?
You could put this anywhere, actually read the Mueller report, actually read the GRU reports, actually read the lawsuit via Seymour Hirsch and Ed Butowski.
And we're going to talk about why that's important in a moment.
I tell you what, if it's one out of 500 of those people that are, again, that are watching the news, and we're going to play a news clip here, okay?
That are watching the news and reading the paper, maybe one in 500, I would say, is reading that stuff.
And literally, the vast majority of those that report on it don't even read the report.
Now, if that's not concerning for folks, I don't know what it is, but it allows a pool of mass ignorance so that narratives can be set almost immediately with talking points that are regurgitated again and again and again from every side.
A great modern example of that is the Justin Mackey case where the mainstream alternative media made it all about a Hillary Clinton meme and a phone number.
It's not the case at all.
Like at all, not even a little bit.
Like that was one small aspect of the case.
And Tucker Carlson regurgitated that narrative.
He had Mackey on the broadcast and really didn't delve into why they really went after him.
They went after him because he was part of an effective group that was able to set political narratives and exploit social media.
And they had flipped the more aggressive member to testify against him.
And that member would be, quote-unquote, microchip, one of the people that claimed to put out the initial QAnon sense posts.
That's a real...
It's what happened in court.
So we're going to be talking a lot about what happened in court and what's in the documents.
And the truth of the matter is that from what I've seen and the evidence shows, Barack Obama, Clapper, Comey, okay, Brennan, all guilty of sin.
Are they going to jail?
Absolutely not.
I wish it were a different system.
But it's not a different system.
And we unfortunately have an executive within an executive that seems to do whatever they damn well please.
And this isn't me stumping for Trump, but the impeachments were nothing but Johnny nonsense.
They were totally fabricated by this same intel system that's completely out of control.
And in order to get to the level of to be able to do anything against the Barack star himself, I mean, you'd have to get to literal treason level and then have both sides of the aisle basically agree on that.
It's not going to happen.
Sorry.
That's not the world we live in.
In fact, the clip we play will be a reporter asking Trump about the Supreme Court ruling on his immunity and how that helps Barack Obama.
I mean, it's a slam dunk for him.
And then you have the statutory limitations on the other crimes committed against these other people in the executive.
It's by design.
All right?
John Ratcliffe had Tulsi Gabbard's job in the first administration.
Did nothing, not a zipper-de-doo-dot zilche.
What, if they didn't have access to the documents then?
And we're also going to talk about documentation because there's a lot of talk of fake documents or, you know, not writing things.
Listen, there's a whole bunch of that narrative management within the documents themselves.
George Carlin said it best when asked about 9-11.
He said, well, do I think there should be a new investigation?
He's like, no, not really.
He goes, these people don't investigate themselves.
It'll be the same thing as the Kennedy thing and every other thing.
Now, on one end, that's true.
And on the other end, we at least have the damn right to know.
We at least have the damn right to know.
So that I can point to something with evidence and make an educated based argument.
You don't get a lot of those.
But we're, again, going to show you a bunch of different documents today.
And we're going to start with Gabbard.
We're going to get to her video at the end, but we're also going to show you how Assange and Wikileaks is integral into all this.
And I've had like some hard thoughts lately about how much we miss Wikileaks as a society.
The last thing of substance that came out of WikiLeaks while Assange was in prison is like 2017.
It's been almost a decade.
That was the OPCW stuff that showed that we were lied to about that entire Duma attack and chemical weapons.
And Tulsi Gabbard, back then, was one of the few people within the government to even question that.
Happened under the first Trump administration.
They had a guy in there, looked a lot like Emperor freaking Palpatine.
And by the way, that same guy, when he met up with John Bolton, who came into the administration, Warhawk Walrus mustache, okay, commented about him being Satan.
You know, let's put, I didn't have that pulled up.
Comments on John Bolton being Satan when meeting him.
Let's see what we got here.
Yeah, Mattis, here it is.
It's a joke.
It's so funny.
Oh, ha ha ha ha ha.
He jokes that Bolton is devil.
Oh, I heard you were the devil incarnate.
It's all funny, funny, these people.
Yeah, it's not that funny, funny to me.
So this one's going to be a broad range episode.
I do want to remind everybody, I cannot do it without you.
$5, $10, $15.
It absolutely means the world to me.
I want to thank the new monthly supporter, those that have donated, big donations.
Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you.
Once again, there are no paychecks.
I hate to have to come to you guys, but we're fully demonetized on YouTube.
Can't make any money there.
We pay to be on Rumble, barely make our money back on there.
I've said it before, I think for the whole year, if we have like a net game of like $500, $600 on Rumble, that's big time.
Not monetized on X. I mean, kicking and screaming and clawing.
And, you know, although we've been growing on YouTube, there's no monetization in site.
And we actually lost subscribers today.
For the first time, we've been on a gravy train with Biscuit Wheels, getting about 8 to 10 subscribers a day.
For some reason, I must have said something that angered people.
Well, that's fine, because we're certainly not changing it up.
But let's get into it.
One of the reasons I started with Bolton and the mustache, John Bolton slams Tulsi Gavard over treasonous Obama report.
She's imagined evidence that doesn't exist.
Now, I want to point out that the mainstream media, this is the news, this is the Google AI.
This is your defense department.
You understand?
That's exactly what this is.
Gavin White House lying about Intel on Russian interference in 2016, ex-CIA official says.
Next one.
How Tulsa Gabbard is trying to rewrite the history of the 2016 election.
Gabbard attacks on Obama put the Attorney General in a tough spot.
Now, Ratcliffe says that they're about to release some of the classified stuff of the Durham report.
You know, we're going to play this Gabbard clip where she talks about weapons of mass destruction and lies from that administration.
No, it actually starts with 9-11.
We still aren't being grown-ups about That.
It's a big problem.
Okay.
And this idea that Russia hacked the election or hacked the Democratic Party, I've seen no evidence of it.
Okay.
Period.
Although it is stated as fact time and time and time and time again in the Mueller report.
So here is that Mueller report.
And when they talk about the GRU, they're talking about the Russians.
And they say that basically the GRU is Gussifer 2.0 and DC leaks, which was on the scene at this time period when there's all this stuff coming out, right?
And you notice in this report, there's still massive classification when they start talking about WikiLeaks and Julian Assange.
All right?
Now, this is really important because, again, this is something that happened during the Trump administration.
The Trump administration on the inside, whether they were telling the truth or not, which it doesn't look like they were, was painting this narrative.
It was the Russians that were in contact with Assange and they're the ones right here.
Shortly after the GRU first release of the stolen document, everything was about stolen documents.
You had people like Chris Cuomo telling you you couldn't read the WikiLeaks DNC emails and it was illegal.
You talk about collusion with the media and Tulsi rightfully points that out in this clip.
You know, look at all this investigative techniques.
And we're not going to play the Hirsch stuff that contradicts all of it, that says that, yes, Seth Rich was actually the person, but we're going to get into it.
Because Seth Rich ends up in this.
Okay?
Assange.
See, investigative technique.
Look how much of this is classified.
Still.
Still.
Now, they also lie to everybody.
All right?
And I mean, just again, so much of this.
And this is only the section on him.
Here it is right here.
Announce Wikileaks has decided to issue a 20K reward for information leading to the conviction of the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich.
So they put it out there.
And look, you can say what you want about Wikileaks, but they also alluded to the fact to look for human trafficking in those emails.
They put out that FBI document on purpose on their site for people to go down these rabbit holes.
And when they did, there was a ton of disinfo and misinfo that went around it.
But remember, the FBI denied they had anything on Seth Rich.
Oh, oh, really?
Huh.
Well, that changed in a hurry.
Seth Rich case exposes how FBI shields record from the public.
Yeah, it sure did.
Because then we found out during this whole Russiagate mess where Peter Strzok got to sit there and weasel fisted out.
Oh, he was on the Seth Rich case?
Huh.
Look at that.
So wait a minute.
There were FBI documents.
We still haven't seen a bunch of them.
The Russiagate report is still heavily classified.
And here's some more right here.
And, you know, the Seth Rich emails are directly related to the fraudulent Russian collusion investigation.
And Mrs. Strzok, Ms. Page, and the FBI itself have already shown great willingness to lie and cheat in order to conceal their misconduct during that investigation.
I mean, forget about this as headlines.
You don't hear any of it.
So that's going to bring us into the fact they still have massive redactions, 300 pages of redactions that shed no light on the alleged connection to WikiLeaks.
And these are the latest releases, I think, as of where, when was this?
This is in March.
They're supposed to get more.
They still are shielding these.
Now, Hirsch alleges in a taped phone call with Ed Butowski.
He taped a bunch of calls with Hirsch.
Butowski is the guy that hired Ed Wheeler and set the whole thing off.
And if you type in Seth Rich, it'll tell you how it's a big right-wing conspiracy.
Okay?
You know how right-wing I am.
You are massively right-wing, Jason.
So we've played those Hirsch tapes, and he talks about it being a Brennan operation, the whole nine.
And he says he's got a guy from the FBI that goes in and reads the documents.
And they said that basically the DCPD couldn't get into Seth Rich's computer, but the FBI could.
And that's where they found some transactions, apparently through eBay, I believe.
Hopefully I'm not getting that part wrong.
But again, it's all through that.
Butowski, in the lawsuit, it comes out.
And if you want to check out that audio, it's right there.
Audio, it was out there since 2017 now.
All right.
And this one actually is by Matt Couch.
I don't know if he still writes for the DC Patriot.
Here's a bunch of the audio.
It's out in full.
Someone's put a truncated version.
But he says that Andrew McCabe, Andrew McCabe is the one that leaked the Seth Rich information to Cy Hirsch.
So you take that as what you want.
Because McCabe is certainly no friend of the Trump administration.
Now, again, because we read the documents, here is Butowski and Hirsch in court, part of the Wheeler lawsuit.
All right.
Basically, saying that Hirsch told him who it was and he had his balls in a noose.
Now, I've had Brutowski on the program.
He can't talk about any of this stuff after all these lawsuits, obviously.
So with that said, let me reiterate it.
These people are guilty as sin.
Are they going to jail?
No.
Will there be indictments?
Maybe this time.
Maybe.
This isn't super secret squirrel stuff that was done.
We got a whole bunch of sealed indictments.
You told us.
The white hats are coming.
Where we go one, we go all.
I never understood.
I never understood why people would believe any of that stuff.
Now, you might see indictments, but the narratives have been set, and actual prosecutions are going to be extremely difficult.
Forget about prosecutions that lead to convictions and punishment.
I think it's almost an impossibility.
And, you know, Trump right here is kind of going to acknowledge that.
Let's get into it.
How do you think that the Supreme Court ruling that benefited you on presidential immunity would apply to former President Barack Obama and what you're accusing him of doing?
It probably helps him a lot.
He's done criminal acts.
There's no question about it.
But he has immunity, and it probably helped him a lot.
He hosted the big President Trump saying former President Obama could benefit from Trump's own fight for presidential immunity now that Obama is tied to that explosive DNI report that details his administration's involvement in the Russia election hoax.
Here now is the report's author, Director of National Security, Tulsi Gabbard.
I mean, unfortunately, Fox, and I guess now they've got Charlie Kirk in there, they're like robots, too.
It just, the state of the media is just so damn piss poor.
Welcome to the show, Director.
Good morning.
Good morning.
So let's talk about the reactions that you have had to this report coming out.
And also, you've mentioned obstacles that you've had in actually putting and compiling this report.
Yeah, thanks, Rachel.
Thanks for continuing to bring this story to the forefront because of the magnitude of the implications of it.
It's been interesting to see how the mainstream media has either refused to cover this story at all, the headlines or the lack thereof of newspapers, Washington Post, New York Times, and others in the days following this release have actually been quite deafening in their lack of coverage.
And it's interesting to see how when they do cover this, they don't actually cover the revelations that these intelligence reports and the evidence that we released actually conveys to the American people.
They simply talk about their criticisms of it or convey Democrat politicians' criticisms of it, but none of them actually dealing with the truth that has been revealed.
Shocking.
I mean, it's the playbook.
And to me, there's two reasons for that.
Number one is they don't want the American people to know the truth, but also they recognize the mainstream media's complicity in this, that they were fed early lines from this manufactured false intelligence assessment that President Obama ordered, that John Brennan and James Clapper created without any vetting, without any actual journalistic integrity of looking at what they were being fed.
They received it and they printed it almost immediately.
And then they went on to double down and triple down on this over the next several years.
I look back at, you know, the Iraq WMD manufactured false intelligence to support an action to go to war in another country.
Yeah, I mean, 9-11 is even worse.
And we're still not there 20 plus years later.
Still waiting on that one.
You know, and that's the problem.
The public is outraged and rightfully so about the Epstein stuff, right?
Trump actually said they'd release the 9-11 stuff.
And it's crickets on that.
And I went back and looked at the mainstream media's complicity in that and how many, did they ever admit that they were wrong, that they failed as journalists?
Really, they didn't.
They gave, a couple of them gave some lame excuses, but there's a lot of parallels here for us to take a step back and look at, again, the magnitude of what has been revealed and why it's important to every American, not just Democrats or Republicans, but it really has to do with the foundational principles of our Democratic Republic and the integrity of that.
That is the thing that I think a lot of the mainstream media folks, again, have refused to cover at all or are failing to focus on.
It's such an important point.
Also, former President Obama's office responded to the documents that you've released, calling them bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.
What is your response to the former president?
They're doing the exact same thing that people like Senator Warner are doing.
He was the head of the intelligence committee at the time.
They would have to admit and actually address the details of their complicity in this or their absolute failure in conducting the most basic responsibilities of, again, asking, where is this intelligence coming from?
What are the sources?
What proof do you have of this high confidence assessment?
Remember, John Brennan and James Clapper at the time assessed and James Comey with high confidence that Russia aspired to help Donald Trump win the election in 2016 when there was no credible intelligence that actually reported that.
So President Obama's very carefully worded response that came from his office, Again, deflects away from addressing any of the truth that was revealed.
Senator Warner refuses to speak the truth about how one of our whistleblowers came forward and approached his office numerous times about what had actually occurred, how he wouldn't go along with this fake intelligence manufactured report, was sidelined because of it.
And guess what?
Senator Warner's office wouldn't even give the whistleblower an email address to send his evidence of this, the treasonous conspiracy that we have now released to the American people.
So the complicity, the deflection, and the silence of politicians, of the mainstream media, and of those directly implicated into this speaks volumes.
Director Gabbard, thank you for your clarity, your moral clarity on this and for your courage to come out with this super quick.
Can you comment also on the other parts of the Intel networks that they might have been abusing against President Trump?
Because I believe this is just the start, not the end, of how they abused the Intel agencies against the American people.
Where else are you looking?
The start?
It's a clear continuation for decades, Kirk.
My God.
We're only six months into this term.
I can't imagine what else you might discover.
When you look, Charlie, at everything that happened in the months leading up to the November 2016 election, what occurred in the years after with multiple investigations from Mueller and others, there are a lot of questions that remain unanswered.
We are continuing in our core mission, our pursuit of the truth and bringing transparency and accountability.
Well, then let's start declassifying everything.
Let guys like me at least report on documents like we just showed you here today.
Especially with things like 9-11.
I'm sure there's some juicy stuff there in Iraq, too.
In fact, WikiLeaks published a bunch of juicy stuff that we never actually got a hold of.
You see how that works?
Folks, you know the drill.
I need you.
Please consider supporting the broadcast.
$5, $10, $15, big donations.
If you don't want to do the buy-me-a-coffee, there are other links down below.
I also want to remind everybody, I am a documentary filmmaker.
All of my movies are free and they hold up to this day.
And we talk about 9-11, fabled enemies, and loose change, final cut.
Watch them, share them, let everybody know.
Thumbs up on this broadcast.
Subscribe, share, ring that bell.
Ring a ding, ding.
Also comment down below, not just in the live stream if you're watching then.
And remember, it is not about left or right.
It is always about right and wrong.
▲
Export Selection