Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermasShow more ETH - 0x90b9288AF0E40F8C90604460973743dBC91dA680
Watch My Documentaries:
https://rokfin.com/stack/1339/Documentaries--Jason-Bermas
Subscribe on Rokfin
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
Subscribe on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/TheInfoWarrior
Subscribe on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
Follow me on X
https://x.com/JasonBermas
PayPal: [email protected]
Patriot TV - https://patriot.tv/bermas/
#BermasBrigade #TruthOverTreason #BreakingNews #InfoWarrior Show less
Hey, everybody, Jason Burmes here, and I'm so happy to share with you the very first segment called Deep in the Weeds.
Now, every Friday, I'm going to be going on WQUD 107.7 FM in Illinois and doing this segment.
And obviously, I want to make the show just like this one.
And now that I know how to connect, I think we're going to do it way better the next time.
But I do have to say this: I need your support now more than ever.
There are no paychecks, $5, $10, $15.
It does mean the world to me.
Big donors.
Thank you so much.
And if you don't like the buy me a coffee, there are other links down below.
Again, this is a deep, rough cut, but now that I know how to connect, I think, I think that next week is going to be so much better.
So buckle up, check it out.
So what's going on, man?
How you doing, friends?
I am.
I'm doing pretty good.
I've been excited about talking to you all week just because, well, you're kind of a fascinating guy to talk to.
I mean, what, we had lunch a few weeks ago.
How much of that lunch did you eat?
I did not eat a lot of that lunch.
You ordered a lunch, but you did not eat the lunch because we got talking, and then that's just kind of how things go.
And I guess right out of the gate here, I want to know, or I'd like to talk a little bit about all this Trump Epstein stuff.
And now I'm seeing a lot of Bill Clinton Epstein stuff is starting to creep into the news.
Of course, both of them were friends of his.
Is anything going to come of this?
What are you seeing here?
I don't think anything is going to come of this.
I don't think that Barack Obama is going to jail for Russia Gate.
Unfortunately, I think that we have a system where we haven't had any kind of real criminal accountability really since the Iran-Contra fair on an executive level.
And even that was much of a whitewash.
I think what's happening right now is the fact that, you know, the administration overpromised and we're getting kind of into the twilight of the Trump MAGAverse, right?
He can't run again, even if they're talking about a third term.
I think that's imagination land.
And look, he's brought this up since 2015, the relationship with Clinton and Epstein in particular.
And you can't have somebody like Dan Bongino or Kash Patel in your administration, especially in your Department of Justice, and just ignore Epstein when they literally went on hundreds of podcasts and talked about it thousands of times.
You know, I would say that Trump himself thought he could kind of get away with skirting the issue.
If you go back to that Fox News interview prior to the election, when they asked him about JFK, RFK, MLK, he was like, yes, we're going to release that.
They talked about 9-11.
He immediately said yes.
Of course, we're still waiting on that.
Total crickets.
But then when he was asked about Epstein, he was extremely hesitant.
He goes, well, I guess, but I think the other two are more important.
And, you know, yet, again, 9-11 has not been discussed.
I think that he'd gotten away with so many of these things.
And what do I mean by that?
Well, when he ran the first time, he loved the WikiLeaks, couldn't get enough of the WikiLeaks, leaned into those WikiLeaks.
And then when he got in and he was asked about WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, he said, I don't know much about that.
And it was his Department of Justice that really litigated heavily against Assange, and it continued into the Biden administration.
Also, notice when Assange was released under the Biden administration, not only did Biden not talk about it, there wasn't a Democrat out there that talked about it.
The Republicans didn't talk about it.
It.
It happened before the debate.
Nobody in the debate talked about it.
Trump hasn't talked about it.
There are these third rail issues.
Another one, you know, that Trump was out there talking about no tax on tips.
That's basically disappeared.
He was able to outlast the falling out with Elon Musk, and that didn't seem to affect him.
We're still in wars in both the Middle East and Ukraine, although people are upset about that.
It has just not had the impact of Epstein.
Epstein is that ultimate issue that I think crosses party lines and gets into the salacious, disturbing, and disgusting.
And because of that, the issue is not going to go away.
I think that right now we're in the works of a limited hangout solution.
Like you said, a lot of the stuff about Clinton is being recycled, but that's because a lot of the stuff about Trump is literally being recycled.
Yes, we're getting some quote-unquote new stuff, but how new is it that Epstein and Trump had a relationship for decades?
We've already known that.
A lot of people like to downplay that.
But, you know, I wasn't dismissive of this Trump letterhead with the doodle and the drawing like so many others were right out of the gates.
Now that I've seen that, it looks to me that it's more than likely real.
CNN publishes photographs of Epstein at Trump's Marla Maples wedding.
Again, not shocking as both Ghelane Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein were at many of these events.
And not just the wedding, they also published pictures.
I believe it was an after-party at a Victoria's secret modeling event.
And that's another thing Epstein and Trump had in common.
A lot of people don't know this, but Epstein originally, when he was going to be arrested in Miami in that first case, 2007, 2008, they had considered arresting him at a beauty pageant, he was judging.
But they didn't want to make a big scene, so they decided to wait on that.
Trump himself ran Miss Teen USA.
So I think, again, Aaron, what you're going to see coming up is a ton of different social relationships with Epstein.
And to combat that, I think that the Trump administration, those behind the scenes, are going to be emphasizing the political arrangements made between Epstein and Clinton.
Yeah.
Well, and now there's chatter that there's a Clinton letter in that book, too.
Clinton sent him a letter that was in with the Trump letter.
Yeah, which would not shock me at all.
And when you look at the timing of all this, again, you know, there's a lot of people out there because there is reporting that want to say out of the gates that Trump and Epstein's falling out came from Epstein going to Mar-a-Lago and essentially trying to pimp out one of the girls that worked there.
Or it was either she was working there, but her father had worked there for a long time.
Allegedly, that was the Virginia Guffray Roberts case.
Of course, Roberts committed suicide a couple months ago.
And by the way, I do actually think that she committed suicide.
However, well, I think obviously with Epstein, when you look at that case, you know, I guess let's delve into both of them really quick.
For those that don't know who Virginia Guffray Roberts is, I mean, she was one of the main victims, but that is because she got into the inner circle of, you know, some of the other girls that became women and were part of that quote-unquote harem and recruiting other girls.
She Really, you know, she was a diamond in the rough.
Not only did she escape, but she won in court and she won against Prince Andrew, and she won millions and millions of dollars.
However, when you're in that type of a situation where you've literally been abused your entire life, you know, I talked to Nick Bryant, who knew her personally and is the gentleman that got the black book and the flight logs published all the way back in 2015.
And he said, you know, she had been abused since she was seven years old.
Now, yeah, now she had also, when she broke away, gotten to a relationship with a man that, you know, was abusive.
And she had three kids with this guy.
At the time, he had filed a restraining order against her.
She was unable to see her children.
And then you had this mysterious bus crash that happened just before the suicide.
When I looked into that bus crash, it was very apparent to me that there was no way that Virginia Guffray Roberts got injured in the manner that she posted online.
She was beaten and bruised in that posting.
Nick Bryant seems to think that it was her ex-husband that beat her, and that's why she was in that shape.
But at the end of the day, even before that suicide, she had flown out, I believe, family members, I think her brothers were out there.
And I think the fact that she was no longer able to see her children really just put her over the edge.
Now, with Epstein, you have a completely different case, right?
You have somebody that's been doing the abuse, somebody that really thought he was going to get out.
Somebody that was in a facility where they had not had a suicide in almost 14 years.
And by the way, have not had a suicide in that facility since Aaron.
So what does that mean?
That means Epstein is the only person to successfully kill themselves at MCC in New York in almost the past 20 years.
Now, I got a quick question for you about this.
Didn't you, were we talking about this and you told me he was just leaving every day?
Well, in the first arrest, for those that don't know, not the MCU arrest in New York, but that sweetheart deal, yes, he was leaving every single day and going to a private, a private residence where he was supposedly conducting business.
A private investigator tailed him.
And yes, you had women or girls, you know, there was no way to ID these people going into that facility every single day.
So those people that think he even served, you know, that year or whatever via Miami, that didn't happen.
In fact, when you watch that infamous Alex Acosta interview where he's asked if Epstein is intelligence, he also gets asked about that on whether Epstein was actually leaving every day as it was being reported.
And he said, well, he was leaving in accordance with the sentencing that he got and none of that was unusual, et cetera, et cetera.
So it's been totally and completely admitted.
Now, when you get to the New York facility, remember, there was supposedly a suicide attempt before this.
So now you got to believe the only guy to successfully kill himself in that prison in the past 20 years had given all the warning signs, was on suicide watch, and he also happened to be the most high-profile, I would say, American citizen to be held there because they were so sure of that facility and its safety that they held El Chapo there.
I mean, that's the kind of jail he was in.
That's easy.
So basically, on the first go-round, he was basically on like work release.
He was still doing all the stuff he'd always been doing.
He was just leaving during the day and then coming back at night.
Absolutely.
And, you know, there's even questions if he would come back every single night.
You know, there's a lot of questionability of how much he was actually punished in that first case.
And of course, we don't have the details of what that deal actually was.
And that was a big part of the appeal with Ghelane Maxwell.
You know, Ghelane Maxwell really thought and still thinks that she can get out on appeal.
That's what we saw in the news with the Supreme Court.
And the Department of Justice doesn't even want them to hear the case.
Because unfortunately, if they open that case up and look at that deal, they're either going to have to say this whole thing was unconstitutional.
And then you can have criminal charges not only against Ghelane Maxwell, further criminal charges, but the other unindicted co-conspirators, of which there seem to be at least three or four more.
You don't even know the number of unindicted co-conspirators.
But others that have been sued that were part of that network of Epstein and Ghelane Maxwell include Adriana Ross, Leslie Groff, Sarah Kalin, Nadia Marcinkova.
So when we sit here and we talk about this network and the idea that we don't have other names, we have plenty of other names.
I saw Maxwell was speaking in front of the DOJ or got questioned by him yesterday, and she didn't take the fifth at all.
She answered all the questions according to the initial report.
Well, I think that she's looking for a way out of jail, right?
And she's kept her mouth shut enough.
During that trial, not all the documents were able to be used.
Now you have to ask yourself what documents were not able to be presented and why.
And, you know, we have to understand she comes from an extremely powerful family.
We often talk about her father, Robert Maxwell, the media mogul and quote-unquote super spy.
People will talk about his work with the Mossad, MI6.
There was a recent documentary out there that alleged that he was also involved with Russian intelligence, all very, very possible.
But then you look at Maxwell's brother, sister, very involved in modern-day globalism, the World Economic Forum, and even Maxwell herself, Ghelane, was very much a part of that world prior to her arrest.
So these people have never given up on the idea that they were getting their sister out.
And right now, I really do believe that they're looking at the limited hangout burn because nobody can go to jail for this, right?
It's not like they can put Bill Clinton in jail.
They can continually point out that Epstein was at the White House at least 17 times between 93 and 95.
They can continually point out that Epstein had a large role in the Clinton initiative and the Clinton Foundation.
No One Goes to Jail00:02:37
But there's not necessarily going to be anything criminal there.
If you move into the area of criminality, then you have to start getting into arms dealing over literal decades with different individuals, Adnan Khashoggi, the Israeli military-industrial complex, people like Prince Andrew.
And quite frankly, I hate to say that there's a separate set of rules and laws for ourselves and others, but there clearly are.
Prince Andrew's not going to jail.
I don't think Bill Clinton's going to jail.
Even, like I said, Barack with this Russia Gate thing, not going to jail.
And I think there's plenty of meat on that bone on RussiaGate, on the previous administration and intelligence spying on the Trump campaign, et cetera, et cetera.
I just don't know if there's an actual modus operandi for them to be not only criminally charged, but then successfully prosecuted and punished.
Would Obama, wouldn't he get presidential immunity, though?
Or how does that work?
I mean.
You would think that with the Supreme Court ruling, because you would have to get to the level of treason.
And it is going to be extremely difficult to prove that a sitting president committed treason against his own country.
I don't see it.
You know, I think that this is a listen, I think it's good to get it out into the public arena for transparency.
But as far as the actionability of it, it's just not there.
And then you're going to have all the talking heads saying, of course, nothing was going to happen.
There was no crime that was committed.
This is another witch hunt.
Everybody seems to get their narrative, right?
Trump will get his narrative of they spied on his campaign and they committed treason, which I actually agree with.
But then Obama will get his narrative that they thought there was Russian collusion and they had to take the proper steps.
And if he wanted to do this, why didn't he do it in his first administration?
Why wasn't the Robert Mueller report more telling?
Why did John Ratcliffe and Marco Rubio sign off on that?
Now, Rubio and Ratcliffe are part of this administration.
Ratcliffe, of course, held Tulsi Gabbard's position the first time around and didn't do anything.
And now he's the head of the CIA.
So what does that tell you?
FEMA's Muddy Waters00:06:32
Plenty.
I tell you what, one thing about Obama, it seemed like for being in there eight years, it was kind of a quiet, you know what I mean?
Well, and maybe that's just because we've had so many fireworks since, you know, with Trump, then Biden, now Trump again.
But, you know, Obama, I think the best thing he did was he privatized space, you know, I mean, or opened it up so rich guys could pay for it, even though we're the ones paying them to pay for it, if that makes sense.
I mean, basically, right, with contracts and stuff.
I mean, that's just a rebranding.
We're paying for all that.
There is no privatization of space.
Anybody who believes that, it's just like Trump anointing a part of the Air Force that was already working in space as Space Force.
Though that's all smoke and mirrors, you know, NASA behind the scenes is actually one of the more powerful agencies and works hand in hand with DARPA.
SpaceX is nothing more than an extension of that.
Even Bezos is Blue Origin.
You can't do these things without the blessing of the federal government and quite frankly, the Defense Department.
You're not launching things into the sky.
Right.
Things that look like very phallic.
And you put, I mean, you call it B.O. and then you make your rockets all look like dongs.
I mean, come on, man.
What are you doing?
The other thing I was going to say to Obama, of course, the modernization of the Smith Mun Act, which I've talked with, of course, Tom McGreevy from River City's Reader in Depth about on a number of occasions.
And in my opinion, that was sort of just like knocked the bottom bricks out of the wall of society.
Because now, you know, our media is so partial now.
Everything is so polarized.
And people don't know what's real or true or, you know, lies or truth.
It's like 1984.
You know, I often call it the post-truth world.
And it was actually the Bilderberg group that coined that.
Was either in 2017 or 18.
And it's funny.
I hear that more and more and more in the podcasting world.
For instance, I just did a broadcast on the Nelk Boys and their interview with Netanyahu.
And to their credit, you know, the Nelk Boys in the very beginning talked about how out of depth they were and how they were the last people that should be conducting this interview, which they were like the last people you'd want conducting this interview.
But they also acknowledged, you know, they just don't know what's true anymore online.
You know, they just don't know what to believe from television.
And that sentiment is across the board.
And I think that a lot of that is done on purpose because if you truly do live in a world where out of the gates, you can't believe your eyes, you can't believe your ears, you can't believe the narratives that are being presented by the authoritative sources, by the alternative sources, you're going to create a chaotic environment where you may or may not have the kind of discernment you normally would.
In order to really have discernment on the big issues, Aaron, you do kind of have to get deep in the weeds, right?
You have to read more than one article.
You have to listen to more than one pundit.
You might have to go to more than one document.
You might have to cross-reference it with a historical situation, et cetera, et cetera.
And then even then, you may not have the best view.
There are so many things that go on behind closed doors that we're simply not privy to that you also kind of have to claim ignorance at a certain point.
But that's not what you really have in the media sphere.
You have these people that have this kind of cockshore attitude where what I say is the ultimate truth and this side is lying or that entity is lying and that person is lying.
Rather than saying, hey, here's the source material.
This is what you should be looking at.
And then you should make your own decision based on critical thinking.
Yeah, throw all the sides into a bowl, mix it around, read between the lines and kind of figure out what might be true, you know, or what that looks like, what the partial truth is.
There's something that's been really bothering me for quite a while, and that's North Carolina.
And I saw that they're talking about cutting a billion in funding for FEMA, which is kind of the idea of that is a little scary.
You think, oh, they're not going to have any money, which I know they get a lot more than a billion dollars, but to not have someone show up when you need them in the case of a natural disaster or something like that, it's kind of a scary thought to think about.
But that's exactly what we did to the people in North Carolina.
And I know you went there not long after the hurricane happened, what, within like a week or something.
And I just, I'm trying to, I'm still trying to wrap my mind around this thing.
Now, Uncle Tim here, Uncle Tim show 6 to 10 every night.
He went there.
I mean, he took generators and cash.
We had boots on the ground.
And he said, you know, it was devastating.
And it was so disappointing to see the lack of, because he said, all the people helping people were all like the local, it was churches, it was local organizations down there.
It was people coming from all over the country like him, driving all the way down there with a trailer full of generators and stuff.
Those were the people who, you know, we, the people, help the people.
The government did not.
Like, what did that look like when you went down there?
And what do you know about this?
If we can get deep in the weeds on that one a little bit.
Yeah, I mean, honestly, it's the same kind of sentiment.
Everybody that I was talking to was saying that essentially it was the locals that were helping.
It was individuals that were filling up their trucks with water and food.
And really, FEMA and the federal government not only weren't doing anything, they were stiphoning a lot of the things, like saying you can't go down here.
You can't rebuild here.
You can't dig out there.
This place is warded off.
I mean, just look at the wildfires in California.
Here we are six months later from those wildfires, and there's still no construction.
FEMA's still not clearing it out.
To the president's credit, I think he got that one right when he was sitting next to the mayor of LA and she just keeps promising, well, next week we're going to do something.
And this is what we're going to do.
He's like, why are people even waiting a week?
Elon Musk's Disturbing Vision00:13:25
Why can't they go on their own property?
Hawaii, another great example.
You know, those people, it's well over a year, probably closer to a year and a half, maybe two.
And they're still not allowed to rebuild on their own property.
Think about that.
That's not allowed.
I mean, it's insane that, you know, you can buy a home, a disaster can happen.
You can continue to pay taxes on that home that you never really own in the first place because if you go defunct on those taxes, they'll take it from you.
And you're not allowed to clear it out.
You're not allowed to rebuild until the government says it's okay.
You know, that's where I'm so with the libertarians, but that's because it's not really a libertarian position.
It's a constitutional one where you have to understand if you are going to be a free person, that means in your persons and property that you're actually allowed to take ownership of something.
And if you can't own your own home, if you can't clear out your own property to rebuild, what do you own?
And are you a free human being?
I would argue you're probably not.
And the system's completely and totally broken.
That's hard to argue.
I mean, that's what I worry about our country.
And I feel like the partisanship of media is feeding into all of that.
And obviously social media feeds into our head.
Everybody's got their face in their phone all the time.
And you have this algorithm is like a tail of anything that you've ever looked at.
It knows.
And it's going to keep feeding you things to try and keep you to keep clicking.
And so they can sell advertising and all this other stuff.
But in the meantime, I feel like, you know, the society is kind of ripping apart a little bit.
And the way our government deals with some of these things is just making it worse.
You know, it's boring salt on the wound.
And it's super easy and convenient to just sort of stick your head in the sand and not worry about any of this stuff and just go micro, you know, be happy, drink some beer, whatever it is.
But man, it's hard for me to not.
I look at my kids and I worry about what they're going to be looking at when they're 45.
Yeah, that's a hard one because, you know, me and my brother talk about this a lot.
You know, he's got an older daughter.
She's, I think, 19, 20 right now.
And then he's got two smaller kids, one, six, one, four.
I've got two teenage nieces, you know, that I take care of.
And you do wonder, you know, outside of the artificial intelligence revolution, outside of automation, just, you know, what and where they're going to be able to thrive and not just survive.
Like, are is this the last generation that's going to own their home unless there's some type of nepotism where it's passed down?
So many people, including myself, you know, I'm not a homeowner.
I'm a bit of a gypsy and move around quite a bit.
But, you know, that's not everybody, you know.
And then if you do, quote unquote, own your home, what, you're on a 30-plus year mortgage.
A lot of people don't even make it that far, right?
And then, if they do, like I said, God forbid, there's some kind of disaster, and all of a sudden they don't have their homes.
You know, I don't know if it's just this country, if it's the world, but I always tell people that you're going to have to navigate things that you could not even imagine five or 10 years ago.
You know, automation is a real thing.
The humanoid robots are starting to pop up all over China.
The plan is to have them not only in the United States, but globally.
And, you know, I often talk about the reason that they're building these things to look like humans isn't because the human being is the apex of the worker bee.
We're not.
We could easily build machines that don't look like us and could probably do more things.
They want us to be acclimated to be amongst these things, unfortunately, to ultimately replace us in a lot of aspects.
And if you think about that, that's the big, scary thing to me, because right now the real AI data centers are being built.
And think of the mantra of the last several decades, Aaron, of our carbon footprint and how bad human beings are and how we pollute the planet and we use too much energy.
And yet these AI data centers, they're going to use way more power than human beings could ever fathom.
And that power isn't going to be to produce cheap energy for you and I.
It's not going to be to empower humanity.
It's going to run data centers for Meta, Google, Amazon, essentially with technology that we haven't been allowed to use.
They're going to allow on-site mini-nuclear reactors.
Now, I want people to think about that for a minute.
We've had nuclear power demonized on another level, again, through our generation.
And now you're telling us, oh, no, no, it's totally safe as long as the machines want to use it.
I mean, these AI models are already scary in the sense that if I want to access those AI models, it's a pay-to-play basis and not like I bought a program and I can use it forever.
It's not even like I pay for a monthly subscription.
Adobe, for instance, just up their creative suite from $60 to $70 for the first time, I think, in over a decade.
Now, I don't own the software.
I've got to pay it every month just to be able to use Photoshop, editing tools like Premiere, et cetera.
But now they have the AI component, right?
So I'll get a certain amount of credits for AI prompts for video creation, right?
But as soon as that goes out, I've got to pay more money.
And we're talking about five-second clips that are like five, they're not even true HD.
They're like the original iPhone, their retina scan or whatever.
If you want to compete with the big boys that are going to have this, you're not going to be able to.
You would go groke.
So we're creating a class system based on AI.
And those are the small types of tools.
It's only going to get worse when we get into resource distribution, when we get into media usage, et cetera.
And they're going full force.
This one center alone by Meta in Kentucky is physically the size of two-thirds of lower Manhattan.
That's massive.
That's insane.
And I mean, he's, well, and then he's out buying all the top AI people.
You know, here's $100 million.
Come work for me.
See you tomorrow.
I mean, he's poaching everybody from all the different companies and stuff and doing this.
But that's, yeah, that's a lot of energy usage.
So, these things that are supposed to help us out are actually going to use more of energy and push our grid even more because that's already questionable, isn't it?
It's not even going to be on our grid.
These people are going to have private grids.
Because of the nuclear reactor.
So, they basically have their own little power plant.
Yeah, no, it's not just one power plant.
I mean, when we're like I said, these aren't buildings, folks.
When I say that, go down, visit New York City, look at the layover.
These are these data centers are literally going to be the size of cities.
So, you're going to have these mini nuclear reactors in the four corners, somewhere towards the center, et cetera.
And they're going to be all on site.
And again, I don't necessarily, I wouldn't be against these mini nuclear reactors if the people were getting that power, if it was going into cities or rural areas or lowering your electric bill.
That's not what this is.
This is to ensure that these data centers can run 24-7, 365, not only suck in as much of data as possible, but then redistribute it at a price for those willing to pay.
And back to the humanoid robots for a second.
I mean, I see that as just creepy as all get out, but how long before they're all that's who we have for soldiers?
Man, that's a great question.
I don't know necessarily when they're going to strap up the humanoids as soldiers.
For a long time now, we've had the big dogs.
Of course, the little dogs have kind of made their way again into that commercial arena.
And we've seen them in commercials now the last almost decade.
And those are the little yellow dogs.
We saw them rolled out in certain places during COVID.
But those started as a DARPA military program for the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, carrying equipment, very, very hard to push over, et cetera, et cetera.
Now, on top of those, we have smaller, even like tank-like drones that are used to distribute explosives or go in surveill areas.
We have a multitude of different types of drones in the sky.
I think as far as the humanoid robot goes on the battlefield, a la clone wars and Star Wars, we're probably quite a ways away from that.
I don't think that they necessarily are going to make really, really good soldiers.
And that's kind of the other hint, right?
That we're not built the best and these things shouldn't be being built to look like human beings in the first place.
But you are seeing them.
For instance, Adam Sandler just got asked about the Adam Sandler robot in China.
Now, it doesn't, you know, physically, facially look like Adam Sandler, but you have this robot that's white and black and looks like something out of West World running around in like cargo shorts and a Hawaiian t-shirt like Sandler.
So it's a big joke and it's ha ha, funny, funny.
And, you know, you're seeing those humanoid robots at kiosks, making your burgers, making pizzas, I mean, other robotic components, but serving them to you as like that humanoid robot.
So right now, I think it's really about acclimation.
I don't think, again, I don't think they're going to make that great of a soldier, right?
Because they're going to have some weak points at this point.
Like if you had a humanoid robot, basically, you know, you'd have to take out the ankle of that robot and it's, you know, frawling.
It can't do anything.
Whereas a lot of these other ones that are on wheels or roll around or are on propellers, you know, you've got to take out certain, you know, points and there's a multitude of them and they're made much, much cheaper.
And the programming on them is much, much cheaper.
Well, I got 20 bucks as China's already working on it, especially designed robots just to be soldiers, or maybe we are too, or who knows.
But I don't see how this doesn't go that direction.
You know what I mean?
You specifically does it, yeah.
We got this humanoid robot that's your butler, and this one over here is Rambo.
Why wouldn't they?
You know what I mean?
If you're already doing this, you're already dumping all this money, you're already getting into this technology.
I mean, yeah, do I think it's wrong, weird, and creepy?
Yeah, but that doesn't mean somebody's not going to do it.
I mean, when you say somebody's not going to do it, Elon Musk has already talked about a disturbing near future where humanoid robots outnumber human beings anywhere from two to one to ten to one by 2050, you know, in less than 25 years.
And he's even made the statement, I think by 2035, in a decade, there will be more humanoid robots on the planet than people.
I don't know if that's necessarily logistically possible.
I think if it is, it's nightmarish.
And the other thing that you'd have to ask yourself is if that's the case in 10 years in 2035, you know, we're around 9 billion people right now, maybe just under that.
Will we be at 10 billion people and 11 billion robots?
Or are we going to be at a much lower human populace for some unknown reason and just hit that marker by robots?
I certainly hope that humanity continues to expand, but there is definitely a class of people out there.
I refer to them as the predator class that would like to see our population decline, that are very, very big on the depopulation agenda.
Predator class.
Wow, that's a new one on me.
I haven't thought about that, but you're pretty much hitting the nail on the head there.
And that's the concern, I guess.
But at the same time, I would love to see our global population kind of stabilize because I feel like, and I'm not a scientist, but I know this.
Predator Class Concerns00:05:54
When I walk into a room and I'm by myself, it's fine.
If 30 other people come into that room, it gets hotter.
And the more people we have in this room we call Earth, I feel like it's feeding into that.
And obviously, all of our resources, what we use, our carbon footprint, I believe is what you said earlier.
All that stuff is just adding into making it hotter.
And now we got crazy weather all the time and stuff like that.
And I'm still not 100% sure if that, you know, like the thing that just happened in Texas, they cloud seeded in San Antonio two days before that.
Two days, 150 miles away.
And I would love to know more about this weather manipulation that some of these countries and companies are doing because it's, and of course, nobody's going to admit anything, but it's just like we had a derecho, which I'd never even heard of before.
We had, you know, periodic thunderstorms was the forecast.
A land hurricane is what we got.
And then to the day, one year later, we had another one.
Not as bad, but we had another one on the exact same day.
That's weird, Jason Burmes.
We are, by the way, everybody, deep in the weeds with Jason Burmes here finishing off our week.
This is our new standard on Fridays.
But what do you know anything about the weather stuff?
About the weather stuff.
No, go fix it.
I have a film out there.
Anybody can watch it for free.
It is called Shade the Motion Picture, and it gets into geoengineering.
It gets into bioengineering.
I don't love using the term quote-unquote chemtrail.
We use the term prolonged jet contrail.
We also talk about solar radiation management and many of these programs.
And that film is 15 years old.
I think it holds up extremely well today.
You know, I want to address the idea that we are, as human beings, warming the planet.
I am way more concerned, not just because we're doing more stuff and making it warmer.
I think a lot of that is conjecture.
I'm way more concerned about what we're doing to the planet in the sense of what is now in our water.
You know, you take a sample of just the quad cities.
We have some of the worst water here via PFAs and chemicals in the country.
No one talks about that.
Our air quality, you know, again, that movie talks a lot about the geoengineering.
You talked about just kind of regular cloud seeding that we're not that privy to.
Well, let's go beyond regular cloud seeding and look at some of the other ingredients in some of this stuff from barium, aluminum, strontium, silver oxide, and a multitude of other things that are extremely hard to confirm as many of these programs are just simply outright denied.
You're supposed to not believe your own lying eyes.
And then the other big thing that we've done to our environment that is extremely scary, and I mean, it just supersedes this idea that we're quote unquote warming the planet with CO2 is we're literally genetically changing the biosphere with our GMOs.
And it's not just the tomatoes and the watermelons and the corn.
We're now genetically modifying organisms such as mosquitoes and letting them into the wild, into the biosphere.
You know, even with the new type of injections that we're giving livestock and not just livestock, but produce is mRNA based.
I think that's extremely, yeah, extremely alarming.
And as far as the actual number of people on the planet, I think that we could probably have 10 times the number of people on the planet.
When you look at how unpopulated, not just the United States, I mean, there's huge swaths in areas.
And I tell people to drive across the country sometime, not just on the highway, but take the rural roads.
And you'll find out soon there's plenty of land here.
And we're one of the more densely populated areas in the world.
You think about what South America looks like.
You think about what parts of Asia looks like.
Because even in China, Africa, even in China, yeah, you have these super mega cities and you have these densely populated areas.
There are about 1.4 billion people, but then you literally have super rural areas.
And a lot of people don't know, but India has now surpassed China as the most populous nation.
They're at like 1.46 billion.
And yes, the slum dog millionaire and these concentrated cities are a real thing, but you also have massive, massive rural areas.
And then just kind of speak to the idea of resources.
I think there's a case to be made that oil itself is not a quote unquote fossil fuel and is actually a renewable resource created by the planet, one of the life forces here.
Of course, you never want to hear that because if that's the case and it's basically constantly renewable, well, that means that you would have an abundance of it.
You would stabilize the price of it.
And if you weren't constantly demonizing it, well, then you wouldn't be able to tax it either.
And taxes and then the limitations of the general populace to be able to heat and power their homes is part of that resource control that goes into population control, in my opinion.
Sure.
Oh, yeah.
And that makes sense.
I mean, have you read The Prince by Machiavelli?
Yes.
Yeah.
I mean, and that was what he wrote that in 1300 to 1400.
Oswald's Intelligence Connections00:07:48
And so much of that is still so true today.
Well, I would say this, too.
You know, you mentioned that predator class moniker.
And when you look at what that class of people is trying to do is they are trying to create a new system of neo-feudalism.
And of course, Machiavelli, the only real systems of control at the time, were authoritarian and feudalistic.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, that's what they knew.
So, well, we're deep in the weeds here with Jason Burmese, everybody.
Brand new segment on the show.
We're going to be doing this every Friday from 9 to 10 because Jason is a wicked smart documentary filmmaker.
Of course, has his own YouTube channel, Making Sense of the Madness.
You got to check this show out.
And to finish off today, I want to talk about probably one of the most famous days and the most famous situations in American history, that being the assassination of President Kennedy.
And here lately, some files, more chatter, more things coming out about Lee Harvey Oswald's connections to the CIA.
And you told me about something that I'd never noticed before, and I think most people don't.
And that is just as the car is coming around the corner in the film footage, you see a Secret Service guy get called off.
You know, the guy that should have been standing in front of Kennedy from right where he got shot, you know, it was like, hey, get out of the way.
Like, what?
Because he's going crazy.
Anybody watch this, watch that clip.
I'm sure you could Google it and check it out.
But you know a lot about this.
Please share because we've talked about some of this off air and it is insane.
Yeah, for those that don't know about what you're talking about, there was a documentary now, man, probably close to 20 years ago.
It's called JFK2, The Bush Connection.
And it actually makes a really compelling case for George Bush Sr., HW, being involved in that assassination of Kennedy.
For those that don't know, Prescott Bush, who was George's father, George W's grandfather, he was very, very heavily involved in the OSS, the precursor to the Central Intelligence Agency.
He would become the governor of New York, but he was also involved in Brown Brothers Harriman banking.
And essentially, you know, his family was good enough that he was able to get into Yale and he was able to get into Skull and Bones, which is a very difficult task, even there.
Aside from Skull and Bones, you know, there are a few other secret societies, very blue blood, very nepotistic.
And Prescott gets in there while his family basically are selling tires.
So they're lower rung.
But he's a smart guy.
He ends up marrying one of the other Skull and Bonesman's sisters, you know, that's of a higher prominence.
And so these are social climbers, right?
And he brings his son into intelligence.
I think it's absolutely ludicrous to believe that George H.W. Bush just became the head of the Central Intelligence Agency out of nowhere.
And really, while he was covertly in the CIA, they were constantly trying to get him into elected positions, usually in the Senate and failing.
So he actually became a UN diplomat to China under the Nixon administration.
Now, I bring that up because when you get into Spook Central and you get into these families and you get into the intelligence circles, you often get into names that you hear about that supposedly have great power, but then you don't hear about those aspects of it.
And so people can go check that not only the video you're talking about where it's clear that this Secret Service agent is called off just before and you wonder where that order came from, but you also get more insight into Bush.
For instance, the documentation that Bush was one of the CIA officers that had briefed Jay Edgar Hoover, the head of the FBI at the time, the day of the assassinations.
So when I look at that case, obviously there's a multitude of things to look at, but Oswald in particular absolutely has intelligence connections, not just the Central Intelligence Agency, but it seems to be the FBI as well.
There's a 19, I think it's 76 CBS documentary.
I'm pretty sure Dan Rather is the main guy hosting it, but it's a two-parter.
And not only do you have an individual from the Central Intelligence Agency saying he saw the documents on Lee Harvey Oswald at the CIA, I believe it's his mother in the documentary also making those claims.
And then you get to the FBI connection.
And I encourage people to check out a gentleman named Warren C. DeBru.
Warren C. DeBrux was a section chief for the FBI in New Orleans.
He was supposedly, according to another informant of Debru's, the handler for Oswald.
And this individual that said that he was a he was a Latin American bar owner.
And basically, Debru would come there and meet with other agents, other assets, and Lee Harvey Oswald was amongst them.
Now, Debru's on camera being asked about this, smirking his face off, saying, oh, no, no, none of that's real.
But he knows the gentleman who's making the claim and it's just false, et cetera, et cetera.
Well, it turns out, when we got that first document dump release by Trump all the way back in 2017, it turned out that Warren C. DeBrux was in those documents in a way that he had never been before.
And that not only was he in New Orleans while the Fair Play for Cuba committee and Oswald were associated there, but he leaves to follow Oswald all the way to Dallas, which he does.
And then DeBru is commissioned to do the initial investigation, overnight investigation that ends up being an 800-page document into the assassination.
Now, we supposedly, Aaron, have all the documents now, right?
Supposedly all the JFK documents.
You know what I haven't seen?
That 800-page report that I absolutely know exists by Warren C. DeBrux.
So I'm waiting on that.
There have been some other documents that have named Debru that have been called into question on their authenticity.
They allege that Oswald essentially was trained by the Office of Naval Intelligence for the Central Intelligence Agency.
That would not be far off.
A lot of people are not familiar with ONI.
When you look at that time period, especially, it would not be odd for you to try to take a job somewhere or think you're taking a job somewhere, not just the Office of Naval Intelligence.
But for instance, we talked about NASA.
There were many people that applied to NASA and got into other black projects around the country, some of which who even ended up working in Area 51.
That is documented in Andy Jacobson's book, Area 51.
Man, my brain is swirling right now.
And just the connection with H.W. Bush or J.W. Bush with the whole thing is kind of wild.
Deep Dives Ahead00:04:07
I mean, if you want to really get deep into the weeds on George H.W. Bush, we talked about my film Shade the Motion Picture, but I've got another movie out there called Invisible Empire, A New World Order Defined.
And recently, I reposted just the arms dealing segment because I've been doing a lot of panels where I tried to explain the international arms trade and how the United States and Israel use each other for plausible deniability.
Well, that section of the film ends with George H.W. Bush and asking the question, who the hell is this guy?
And then I gave you about a 15, 20 minute section on George H.W. Bush and some of the things that we discussed here.
And I think even that clip of the Secret Service is in there, but a lot more as well.
You know what?
I got some homework for next Friday before we go back deep in the weeds with Jason Burmes.
I'm going to watch your movies because I'm fascinated by both.
The shade with the weather stuff is fascinating to me.
And anything with all of what we've just been talking about basically is really grabs my interest.
So I'm going to watch some movies this week, Jason Burmes.
And I know this is our first shot at this, but man, you knocked it out of the park.
This was awesome.
I hope everybody is enjoying this as much as I am.
And just the, I don't know, to be able to conversate with you, with the information that you have and the background that you have is pretty wild.
And I really appreciate it.
We are, we're going to have this will be available.
Now, you have all kinds of social networks and stuff going on.
We'll have this available up on our website if anybody wants to listen on demand and we can call it a podcast if we want.
You probably also have it available.
Yeah, you know, again, we had some hiccups.
I've got a ton of equipment and gear in front of me and I could get none of it to work the way that I wanted to.
However, no, I am actually filming this as well.
We're going to see how the audio came with the mic over the phone and this and that.
But more than likely, I'm going to be posting this later this afternoon.
And we're going to be posting it every week.
Hopefully, we're going to get it even more where when I talk about an article, yeah, and people can see it and that type of thing.
And by the way, folks, if you want to see me in person, meet me in person, I'm also going to be doing this gala with Jens Pulver, UFC Hall of Famer.
I know that's out of left field on August 14th.
EvolutionFightClub.com is where you can find out more about that.
But that's kind of my side gig.
As you know, Aaron, I'm a big fight fan and I call fights for caged aggression here in the quad cities.
It can't all be deep in the weeds.
You got to get out in the sunshine sometimes.
That's right.
You got to have some fun, man.
So, well, again, it's fun for me talking to you.
And so I'm very much looking forward to next Friday.
Get to talk to you again.
We'll go back deep in the weeds with Jason Burst from 9 to 10.
And yeah, this is only going to get better.
You know, this first week, that's how it always goes.
You work out some bugs and this will only get better and better.
But as long as we got you involved, we're going to be just fine.
Thanks again, man, so much.
I appreciate all your time.
I know you're a busy guy.
You're always on shows.
And I mean, we didn't even talk about the fact that like the Hunter Biden thing that he just did with Andrew Calligan is the guy that you know and talk to all the time.
We'll save that.
Let's save it for next week.
I mean, there's just, you know, there's a million different topics we could go into.
So anyway, Jason Burmes, you guys check this guy out.
Again, YouTube channel, Making Sense of the Madness is the show there.
Jason, have a great one, man.
I'm sure I'll be talking to you here in a little bit and we can get some plans going for next week.
Thanks, Aaron.
And there it was, our maiden voyage on WQUD.
Now, again, we're going to try to make it so when I'm talking about these things, you can see it.
That I can play clips that go out over the radio as well.
If you like this and you want to sponsor something even bigger, you want to get me on FM, AM, you know the drill, please.
You know, we're looking to reach as many people as possible.
And again, consider supporting the broadcast.
The links are down below.
The buy me a coffee and otherwise.
And as always, it is not about left or right, it is always about right and wrong.