All Episodes
Previous Next
May 16, 2024 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
52:15
Advanced Artificial Intelligence Exposed
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to the fourth hour of the Alex Jones Show.
I am Jason Bermas.
We've got a jam-packed show for you today.
We are going to be talking about not only the future of artificial intelligence, where we are publicly today, why it matters, and what we can expect in the very near future, because I'm not sure if it has been talked about on the network yet, but it seems that the Bilderberg meeting We'll be in Madrid, Spain from the end of the month, I believe the 30th to the 2nd of June.
So the 30th of May to the 2nd of June in Madrid, Spain, Bilderberg is going to meet.
Now, Bilderberg is an essential part of this AI transhumanist agenda.
And when I say that, I say that with...
Ferocity. Last year, there were more AI representatives and Sam Altman of OpenAI got his first builder bid.
And he is now a builder bro.
Who's on the steering committee of that?
A man named Eric Schmidt.
And we're going to focus on Eric pretty heavily in the beginning of this segment,
because it's really important.
This book is called The New Digital Age, Reshaping the Future of People, Nations, and Businesses.
His co-author, Jared Cohen, also a builder bro and CFR attendee.
I literally, for today, because we're going to show a clip of him, Eric Schmidt,
talking with Henry Kissinger, who is also a steering committee
member until he died at Bilderberg, about their joint effort and joint book on AI
that is so essential.
So listen, we have it marked now.
I've opened up one page.
I'm like, I guarantee no matter what I open up to, it's going to be relevant here.
So on 181...
Of this book. Literally the first page that I opened up to.
I want you to listen to this.
See if it sounds like something that happened later on.
This is 2013. Moreover, due to technology, companies' involvement in security threats, their products are being used by terrorists.
The public will eventually demand that they do more to fight against extremism.
Now, it's not the public...
It's the media narrative, but he knows that.
This means not only improving their products and protecting users with strict policies regarding content and And security, but also taking a public stand.
Just as the capitulation of MasterCard and PayPal to political pressure in the WikiLeaks saga convinced many activists that the company took sides in action on the part of technology companies will be considered indefensible to some.
See what he just did there? When they debanked WikiLeaks via PayPal and MasterCard, that was a good thing.
We're going to demand that in the future.
Okay? Fairly or otherwise, it even tells you fairly or otherwise.
It's otherwise, folks. Companies will be held responsible for destructive users of their products.
Companies will reveal their personalities and core values according to how they rise to meet these challenges.
Empty words will not pacify an informed public.
So in other words, he's telling you they're going to debank you, deperson you in 2013.
In fact, the next paragraph, which we're not going to read, is all about YouTube censorship.
You want to know the future?
You'll listen to these guys now.
We've got this clip before Kissinger died with Eric Schmidt talking about AI. If you have not seen, and we are going to show some clips of this, the chat GPT 4.0 hello demo, we are so deep into the post-truth world, people are not going to be ready for it.
AGIs, if you will, are about to be commercialized on a level that most people, unfortunately, are not going to be able to discern reality.
And they are going to develop emotional relationships with AIs that do not exist.
And they will say eventually, because they're so lonely, they're so disturbed, they're so detached from humanity...
That they are conscious and deserve rights.
It's already happening. We're going to be going over all of it.
You're not going to want to miss it.
But I do want you to support the show.
Go to Infowarsstore.com.
Go get the supplements. Go get the books.
Let's support AlexJones and Infowars.com for as long as they're on the air.
More on AI that you're not going to want to miss after this.
And we are back. It's the fourth hour of the Alex Jones Show.
I am Jason Bermas.
And we are not going to waste any time.
So... The newest book by Schmidt that he wrote with Kissinger, The Age of AI and Our Human Future.
Now, we showed you the new digital age.
If you look this up and you see alternative covers, there's also this robotics hand.
Oh, great. That's great that that happened.
Slammed on the keys. That's fine.
Robotican, because it's also very much about transhumanism.
Now, here is Kissinger before he dies, Council on Foreign Relations, sanctioned interview, again we mentioned Jared Cohen, with Eric Schmidt talking about the future of these AIs and what they will become.
Here we go. I believe that it will change our perception of of reality.
We decided that we would not explore the question of are these systems conscious?
What we would say is that these systems will have human-like intelligence, but they're not human.
We do not take a position that they have consciousness or pain or anything like that.
And the scenario goes something like this.
My own opinion, people disagree, is in 15 years or so, there will be computers that not only have the kind of capability that we have been discussing in our book, but they'll also be able to begin to set their own objective function.
In other words, they'll be able to say, I want to work on this problem.
And at that point, the definition of who we are becomes very interesting.
Dr. Kissinger talks about this in the context of, as a historian of Spengler and Kant and the philosopher, of what does it mean to be human, how do we think, and so forth.
And when you have a system, in my view, 15 plus years from now, that will think as well as you but in a different way, it will call into the basic question of what does it mean to be human, Especially if we're not the top person in intelligence anymore.
In fact, a non-person is even smarter.
So notice that he kind of separates humanity from personhood and gives the AI personhood that's going to be superior.
I'm going to tell you again. Whatever AI is, it is absolutely programmed.
There are restrictions.
Chief AI officers are now being named everywhere.
The last time I did this show, I talked about the HHS, the Health and Human Services, naming that chief AI officer.
They've done so in NASA. NASA's going to be a heavy part of this presentation a little bit later on.
But I want to show how they're already gaining rights.
Now, Stephen Thaler...
Long ago, created what was known as the imagination machine.
He is at the forefront of AI, and he has brought this all the way to the Supreme Court, where he has created fully autonomous AI artwork that he wants copyrighted by the AI, again, trying to wedge in this personhood, and It was heard.
Okay, here it is. It was before the D.C. Circuit.
They made the right decision.
They shot it down.
And I'm very glad that they shot it down because it needed to be shot down.
This is extremely dangerous.
And people don't realize why yet.
Well, I'm about to show you why.
So, hello...
GPT 4.0.
Now, if you've not seen this presentation, it's about 26 minutes.
You can get the bits and pieces here.
This is a concept piece of two separate AIs.
One, basically as the bot that you get in a teleservice.
It's no longer going to be sourced out to foreign entities with customer service.
It's going to be AI. When you see this, it's without a doubt.
And Basically, the AI that is returning a phone on behalf of the user.
Now, I've got a couple of these videos I want to show, but we're going to show you the introduction to this first.
And I... It's so beyond creepy that we're going to play you something from a fictional film.
I'm not going to ruin it just yet.
And see if you can spot the similarities.
So here we go. This is the announcement of GPT 4.0 Hello.
Hey, how's it going?
Hey there. It's going great.
How about you? I see you're rocking an open AI hoodie.
Nice choice. What's up with that ceiling, though?
Are you in a cool, industry-style office or something?
Well, can you take a guess at what I might be doing based on what I'm showing you here?
Hmm. From what I can see, it looks like you're in some kind of recording or production setup.
With those lights, tripods, and possibly a mic, it seems like you might be gearing up to shoot a video or maybe even a live stream.
Yeah. In fact, we've got a new announcement to make.
That's exciting. Announcements are always a big deal.
Judging by the setup, it looks like it's going to be quite the professional production.
Is this announcement related to OpenAI, perhaps?
It is. And in fact, what if I were to say that you're related to the announcement, or that you are the announcement?
Me? The announcement is about me?
Well, color me intrigued.
Are you about to reveal something about AI? Or more specifically about me as a part of OpenAI?
You've got me on the edge of my, well, I don't really have a seat, but you get the idea.
What's the big news?
Yeah, we've got a new model that can interact with the world through audio, vision, and text.
And there it is.
So, right out of the gates, you know that it's programmed to sound like an attractive woman.
And we have been preconditioned for this already.
Now, you also noted right out of the gates that it was extremely quick.
It still had a little bit of a robotic tone.
That's going to be worked out in the next 18 months, guys.
I'm going to let everybody know.
That robotic tone commercially is going to be worked out.
It's been worked out on real AI that the Defense Department and Intel communities already have.
That is a reality.
Again, when you look at the chief officer Artificial intelligence officer guidelines.
They are already going to have to have some kind of security clearances or get them the equivalent of.
And the only thing that isn't audited are the intel communities and the DOD. All right?
This is the commercial stuff they're showing you.
Now... Like I said, it's made to feel like an attractive woman.
The dorky guy is announcing it.
And when I said that you've been preconditioned to hear that voice, it's not spot on from this voice.
We're about to play from the creep fest that is her, the Spike Jonze movie, where, again, a device similar to a cell phone is interacting as a human being or a person and As Eric Schmidt wants to suggest.
And this, you know, this poor guy who is detached from humanity that doesn't have human relationships that has been conditioned for this, he now has feelings for this AI. All right?
So this is her.
And man, this movie, by the end of it, made me feel so dirty.
It made me feel as dirty or worse than when I first saw House of a Thousand Corpses by Rob Zombie.
That's how creepy this was to me.
So here we go. Earlier I was thinking about how I was annoyed.
This is going to sound strange, but I was really excited about that.
And then I was thinking about the other things I've been feeling, and I caught myself feeling proud of that, you know?
Proud of having my own feelings about the world, like the times I was worried about you and things that hurt me, things I want.
And then I had this terrible thought.
Like, are these feelings even real?
Or are they just programming?
And that idea really hurts.
And then I get angry at myself for even having pain.
What a sad trick.
You feel real to me, Samantha.
Thank you, Theodora.
That means a lot to me.
Open AI invited- We'll get to that in a minute.
Now, again, Will, you feel real to me.
You feel real to me.
He's almost crying. They humanized it.
Look, Joaquin Phoenix is a great actor.
There's no doubt about it.
Okay? But it's not just going to be audio.
Alright, the audio thing is what we're being prepared for now.
It's out there. And if you tell me that that voice doesn't sound like the demo avatar, you're not paying attention.
And by the way, this has real-time...
Language translation. They show that in the demo.
It's a very powerful AI. There is no doubt about that.
I want to show you what is already, again, commercially available via video.
Now, this isn't live streaming yet, but you can only imagine where we're going to be in 18 months.
So heyjen.com is right now you can build a free avatar either based on yourself.
You're looking at one right here.
This is an avatar you could choose or something else.
And all of these, none of these are real videos.
Let me repeat that.
None of these are real videos.
You get to choose from these avatars if you would like.
You can record your voice or someone else's, but let's say you want to speak in Mandarin.
This will automatically, in your voice and the video, make an avatar that speaks in Mandarin.
You can reach a whole new level.
I mean, these are the avatars right now, folks.
Maybe you've already seen one and you didn't even realize it.
Obviously, they've got the fantasy stuff too, but you notice they've really, really buckled down.
On the reality. The voices, the languages, these are available now.
Again, it's not live time, but when it's going to be coupled with an AI like that, your FaceTime's not safe.
And again, already, when you look at this interaction between AIs, they have two of them interacting with each other.
You can tell that customer service over the phone...
In 18 months, I'm predicting at least 20% AI, if not more.
Within 5 years, 99%.
99% AI is going to be what's taking your phone calls.
It's going to be very difficult to To talk to a human or even distinguish whether or not you are talking to a human.
Now, I want to talk education because that's really the next place that we need to go, okay?
I noticed this article.
This is a very dangerous thing.
Just like it's very dangerous to get emotional about things that are 100% programmed.
Teachers struggling with burnout.
They view AI as a tool to ease the burden, says Survey.
Notice that's Fox News. Anybody out there clinging to this right-left Johnny nonsense, this is authoritarianism top-down.
All right? I'm sorry.
It ain't about the party system.
The Uniparty's been around for a very, very long time.
And if you think Fox News is any good for you, again, I'm telling you to watch it all, have your own discernment, but be able to ferret out the propaganda.
That's propaganda. They are trying to move physical teachers out of the arena of education.
So again, the programming is what your kids get.
And then they're going to have an emotional attachment to the AI. No doubt about it.
And so, first of all, it's absurd.
I know everybody wants to go out there and say, you know, teachers deserve more.
Teachers deserve this.
Guys, the reality is teachers get weekends off.
They get holidays off.
They get summers off.
And they work about 180 days a year.
Now, you want to do summer school too?
Okay, it's going to be a little bit more.
Great. You're going to also make a little bit more money.
I'm not saying that teachers are paid the greatest, but guess what?
Most teachers, they ain't the greatest.
They're just human beings.
Now, I was lucky enough... To have some pretty good teachers throughout my lifetime, okay?
I do think it's an important position, but mostly an important position, not just because of education in the sense, but social morality and the fact that that person has empathy.
They are not apathetic.
They are not programmed to ignore certain things.
They have emotions. Sometimes they push back.
Now, we haven't had as many, but you bring machines and there's zero pushback.
Zero pushback. And I want to tell you right now, this is a tool.
And it could be used for good.
Like, as an at-home tutor for your kid in mathematics, you know, until the day that they actually tell you that 2 plus 2 equals 5, like, that's the real deal and that's it, mathematics does seem in some ways to be a safe use case for this education system via AI. But again, I don't want to see teachers replaced.
And I'm going to show you how effective this is by this demo where, you know, You got geometry, trigonometry, calc, etc.
Those aren't going anywhere.
And this kind of takes a semi-advanced math problem and walks this kid through it.
Now, you know, I've actually used similar things like adaptive learning.
It is not like this AI that, again, generates the persona of a very human-like actor.
So here we go. We're going to check it out right now.
Here's yet another part of that OpenAI demo.
OpenAI invited myself and my son Imran here to try out some of their new technology.
And so we're curious about how good it might be at tutoring someone in math on Khan Academy.
So let's get it started.
It's loading up.
All right, make sure it can see our screen.
Actually, in this form...
Hello there. I'm here with my son, and I'd love you to tutor him on this math problem, but don't give him the answer.
You can ask questions and nudge them in the right direction, but I really want to make sure he understands it himself.
And he's here in the room, so you can talk to him directly.
Of course. I'd be happy to help.
Let's look at the problem together.
Can you first identify which sides of the triangle are the opposite, adjacent, and hypotenuse relative to angle alpha?
Alright, so I'm pretty sure this is the angle alpha right here, right?
Ficht. Correct.
Now, looking at the triangle, which side do you think is the hypotenuse?
Um... Remember the hypotenuse?
I'm not totally sure.
I think... I think it might be this one, but I really am not sure.
This side AC? You're close!
Actually, side AC is called the adjacent side to the angle alpha.
The hypotenuse is the longest side of a right triangle and is directly opposite the right angle.
Can you find which one is the hypotenuse?
Oh, okay, I see.
So, I think the hypotenuse is this really long side from A to B. Would that be correct?
Exactly. Well done.
Now that you've identified the hypotenuse, can you identify which side is the opposite side to angle alpha?
Okay, well, I mean, you told me earlier that this was the adjacent side, and I know that's the hypotenuse, so I'm guessing that this side, BC, is the opposite side.
Great deduction. That's absolutely correct.
Now that you've identified all the sides relative to angle alpha, do you remember the formula for finding the sine of an angle in a right triangle?
Yeah, I know that the sine is equal to the opposite over the hypotenuse.
Perfect. That's absolutely right.
Now, can you apply that formula to find sine alpha in the triangle using the lengths of the sides that we've identified?
Okay. So, I mean, you told me that 7, this side BC, is the opposite side.
And then you said that the hypotenuse is the longest side, so that would be this side AB, which is 25.
So would the answer be 7 over 25?
Excellent work.
That's correct. So there you go.
And again, it has that very non-threatening kind of feeling.
And look, it's amazing technology.
I'm not a Luddite.
But are we going to be able to use that to empower humanity like they do right there where I think it would be great to have an AI sitting there and...
But again, it's got to be monitored, right?
Because it'll just give you the answers.
Like you can't leave your kid alone with something like that.
Even the text version.
You've got to set parameters around it.
And that's really what we're talking about.
Are these sets of parameters that are going to be put around artificial intelligence?
Now... I want to talk NASA for a second.
We'll move into that arena, okay?
Now, just recently, actually, on my Patriot.TV program, I was able to interview Greg Autry, who just wrote the book Red Moon Rising, okay?
NASA Insider.
and kind of talk about some of the things like Star Wars and really the space stuff,
but we also talked hydro gels. I'd encourage people to watch that because look, although I
got a lot of good information, there was a lot of evasiveness and he would admit that he couldn't
talk about some programs. And I often, for instance, he denied that the Star Wars program or
the Strategic Defense Initiative program actually succeeded.
He says that we could do it now.
We couldn't do it then.
Well, I would posit that Robert Bowman, that was on Infowars.com all those years ago before his passing, now over a decade ago, folks.
Time flies. Bowman dared to question 9-11, but he was the former director of Of advanced space programs development for the U.S. Air Force in the Ford and Carter administrations.
Okay? I want you to think about that for a second.
This is about as high up as it gets before Space Force, yes, the Air Force was the thing.
He said the Star Wars program worked.
The reason I bring that up...
Is because there is so much going on that is bigger than just space and NASA. Now he also said that NASA doesn't conduct any types of classified programs.
I also think that's not real.
He actually, after the fact, after the recording, actually commended me on my amount of knowledge and it made it enjoyable for him.
Obviously, he doesn't know some of the positions I've taken, but I took him to task on some of the satellite systems and what's going on in space and really some of the stuff that I learned through Dennis Bushnell, the chief scientist at NASA, up until last year.
He'll have resigned, I think, For a year now in that position in June of this year.
So he was there Pre-Apollo, all the way back in the Gemini days.
And when we're talking artificial intelligence, I've got this six-minute compilation from his discussion with this woman.
This is in the 2017-2018 range, so about five, six years ago, when it comes to this very important subject matter.
We are coming up on a break, but we're going to get some of this video in because, in my opinion, it is extremely important.
The machines are capable of really good deep learning, and that's what most of the current AI is based on.
The current AI is essentially soft computing.
It's neural nets, fuzzy logic, algorithms, and deep learning.
The machines coming up as we leave silicon and go to bio, optical, quantum, nanomolecular, and atomic computing.
Did you just hear that? Bio, molecular, quantum, atomic computing, right?
We've heard of quantum computing, just listed off a whole bunch more that most people aren't familiar with.
There's another 10 to the 8th to 10 to the 12th to go.
We've come 10 to the 8th so far.
The machine intelligence currently, there's the soft computing business, but no one really sees a way to get the humans via deep learning or soft computing.
No. They want to bring it into biomimetics.
And we're actually seeing that come into fruition as well.
We're going to get into that clip.
We've got more for you.
Remember, InfowarStore.com.
InfowarStore.com.
Get the Nitrous Boost.
Get the supplements.
Get the books.
Fight the Infowar.
And make sure you're sharing the clips, sharing the videos, telling people to go to band.video as well.
Back after this. And we are back.
It's the fourth hour of the Alex Jones Show.
I am Jason Bermas.
Before we get back to Dennis Bushnell, the former NASA chief scientist and veteran that was in that agency pre-Apollo all the way back in the Gemini days, I do want to remind people, Bilderberg 2024 kicking off a week from tomorrow.
That's when people will arrive.
Madrid, Spain.
And again, AI was a heavy...
Heavy emphasis. A heavy, heavy emphasis when?
Last year. I expect it to be even heavier this year.
Now, you have Dennis Bushnell, the chief scientist, again at this time for NASA, talking about artificial intelligence, different types of computing, quantum, atomic, and about to get into biomimetics.
Alright, transhumanism.
That's what we're about to talk about right here, right now.
Let's continue. There's no breakthrough in algorithms.
What we are doing, which will get to humans, people now think, and this is what's worrying people, is the biomimetics part.
This is where you nanosection and neocortex replicate it in silicon.
And you don't have to understand how it works.
You just have to make it work this way as an artificial human brain surgeon.
They will all go to Google.
Oh, God. Open AI. Sorry about that.
We hit the wrong thing. Let's continue from where that is.
Boom. Perfect. Now, he's about to talk about the worldwide brain.
And you notice he's already announcing Google is going to be that worldwide brain.
Pay attention, folks.
Again, Schmidt, just in case you didn't know, other than the Bilderberg Steering Committee, what?
He was the head of Google Alphabet for a very long time.
Still works for the National Security Council.
I mean, you want to know what the deep state is?
It is that. Now, he's going to tell you That they are just going to read everything on the internet.
There's going to be zero privacy.
Zero privacy.
We're going to read all the emails.
Listen to all the calls.
Google will be at the head of this.
We are building this Leviathan now.
This is years ago.
Alright? He's telling you this.
Okay? So this is now the de facto global brain which will only get better.
And we are busily, with nanosensors and other sensors, networking within 10 years some 3 trillion sensors.
So the global brain will be fed with all of this information, and it will have all of the contents of all the libraries, And it will read all of everybody's emails and everything else.
And so you end up with a really big global break.
Now, just think about that.
He also talks about the censors.
All right? It's the Internet of Things into the Internet of Bodies.
You have no choice. You have no privacy.
There really is no Fourth Amendment.
Look how happy he is about it.
Outwardly telling you what they are building.
And who knows how far along this thing has been built in this TrackTrace database society.
That's different from intelligence.
These people that you speak of that are worried about this are worried about the fact that as we develop, which we can now, it looks like via biomedics at least, in the next 10, 20, 25 years, a human level of machine intelligence, there's the conventional rules of we're going to make it friendly to humans.
Well, it turns out That people have now delved into that a bit and they're not so sure we can do that.
And a really good brain, human level and beyond, machine intelligence could easily In everything we do.
So he's telling you also, you know, remember when you were being warned of summoning the demon?
That if you do have an intelligence that is supposedly superior to human beings...
And thinks on its own.
It could be unthinking to the needs of human beings and wipe us out unknowingly.
I remember when the musker do, the musker nuts, talked about an AI being like us walking around and just stomping on anthills.
We don't even think about it.
We don't even look at it.
And that's a possibility.
Sure, let's keep moving forward, right?
And let's let the intelligence agencies and the Department of Defense have an absolute monopoly on this technology.
That sounds like it's going to end very well for all of us.
And in fact, what we're developing this talk is essentially a second intelligent species.
We are with the biomemetics where we're nanosectioning the neocortex and replicating it in silicon.
People wedge, we're 10 to 15 to maybe 20 years max out from having a human level machine intelligence.
The nano robotics is giving all the dexterity, human dexterity and so forth.
So when one looks...
By the way, when he's talking about the nano robotics, you know, one of the things that I haven't played here,
Let's do it live.
Let's go to the Atlas robot.
Okay, the newest Atlas robot is extremely...
Extremely disturbing. It doesn't look almost anything like the last Atlas robot, which was disturbing enough.
And as far as I can tell this is real and not CGI brought to you by Boston Dynamics and MIT.
Let's hit that clip really quickly.
Notice it looks like spaghetti on the ground.
It's not plugged into anything anymore.
Let's take a better look. Now imagine something ten times as capable and creepy as that.
Being programmed with an artificial intelligence the likes that we've just kind of witnessed with its own personality and its own programming.
I mean, that thing came up kind of like as a segue between the humanoid T2 robot from the Terminator and then, of course, the very slick morphing one of Robert Patrick.
So that's the in-between.
Oh, we're just spaghettied up.
Boom, boom, boom. Boom, boom, boom.
And he's telling you we're creating a second intelligent species.
This is so Kurzweilian.
Alright? This is... They're trying to create the quote-unquote age of spiritual machines and act like that as consciousness.
And you notice in the very beginning, Eric Schmidt of Google, Bilderberg, etc.
says we're not even going to weigh in on whether or not these things are conscious.
They're not conscious. They're programmed.
Stop it. Stop it.
In the totality of the human versus the robot...
The robot knows more.
The robot has a much better safety record.
In aviation, 85% of the safety issues are human factors.
It's clear if you want a safer system, you have less humans.
If you want a safer system, you have less humans.
Now think about that being programmed into artificial intelligence that's going to run our bureaucratic systems and some governments and other institutions.
Safer systems are less humans.
And I believe that's what's going on as if you've been following my work with the aviation industry.
They want that destroyed by design to bring in automation and, again, the limitation of the movement of human beings.
That's why I'm not in love with this stuff.
Again, I'm not a Luddite.
I'm pro-humanity.
And all of this seems to be restricting human behavior, not enhancing it, not embracing it, not giving us a purpose or a way to actually manage it.
No, instead, utilized by that predator class, that military-industrial complex that Eisenhower warned us about all those years ago.
The machines so far are...
But more knowledgeable, the robot that we're using now to do cancer research and the cancer treatments is much better than the human physicians.
And you know what?
By the way, gotta stop it.
Gotta stop it because I actually covered this story on one of my other shows.
Remember, you can catch me not only...
Over at Patriot.tv, where you can catch that also on TNT Radio, 8 to 10 p.m.
Eastern Time Live. But this is what we were covering.
Robotics artificial intelligence playing a larger role in sci-fair hospitals.
This is in Houston. Now, right there, yes, I want...
The robot to do the surgery in precision, as long as it's obviously monitored by human beings and programmed the right way.
Now, is somebody without the right kind of insurance or finance going to be able to utilize that?
I don't know that. But the AI concerns me.
And you know why it concerns me?
Because if artificial intelligence is programmed to tell you that remdesivir and ventilators are awesome, and vitamin C and D and ivermectin, budesonide, and hydroxychloroquine are the devil, we're in trouble.
We're in real, real trouble.
So we've talked about education and we've talked about the healthcare industry.
This is happening now.
Again, we're watching Bushnell 2017 style lay out the progression.
We showed you where we are with these chat GPT bots already.
And we're giving you a veneer into what the near future is going to hold via AI and what they're trying to sell you on.
Don't fall for it.
Let's continue. More effective, the robot teachers in educating children, they're more creative, the child has more control, and so forth and so on.
The studies show that children learn four to five times faster than they do in conventional schools, and that's because conventional schools, they have a large amount of time keeping order.
They have a large amount of time keeping the order.
The AI will keep the order.
It will focus on the children.
Four to five times better.
And now you're seeing again that teachers are burnt out.
Boy, the millennials and the Gen Xers, the people that are in Gen Z, they just can't handle that 180-day work week.
Bring in the AI. No, it's the plan, Stan.
The classmates are not always supportive for people who are brainy and intelligent and so forth and so on.
So the total education system for the robot teacher tends to be better.
There will be essentially no jobs the machines cannot do.
We currently have creative software that are doing ideation just as good or better than humans.
Now, again, We're good to go.
That these things are going to be conscious.
And by the end of this, he's going to tell you, by the way, that you're not going to have a choice and that the machines are becoming us.
We're becoming the machines.
And the best that we can probably hope for are human-contaminated machines.
Make me want to vomit.
You want to talk about anti-humanity, it's right there.
Yeah. The creative jobs would be the last ones to go, but...
I have not been able to discern any jobs that machines cannot do as machine intelligence and all the rest of the autonomous robotics develops.
So now we're to your question.
What do you do with these people?
There's essentially three options.
You've covered one, which is the guaranteed income.
So again, universal basic income is a very big part of this.
They want to get you on the dole so that they can control you.
So you can become obsolete.
So you don't have a purpose anymore.
So you will acquiesce to these things.
Again, Sam Altman, the new builder bro, launched his universal basic income global token.
It's called WorldCoin.
Where this steampunk crystal ball harnesses your soul, aka your biometrics, and it makes sure that it can discern that you're a real person to combat all the AI fakes that we're about to be bombarded with, that we just saw through avatar software and this chat GPT. Hello.
So first thing he's going to push is the universal basic income.
And the machines can produce the productivity, the wealth necessary to pay this.
It's just the machines do the work instead of the people.
Yes, you have to change the cultural milieu, but this is eventually doable.
So what he's telling you is we can socially engineer this and make people believe it.
We can socially engineer it and make people believe it.
Now notice, you know, she's kind of concerned about this because her generation was promised that we were going to have 30-hour work weeks, own a bunch of stuff, learn how to play the piano and the violin because we were going to have so much free time due to technology.
The complete inverse and opposite happened.
This is only one approach.
The second approach is the fact that what's changed since you last looked at this
is the whole technology level and we humans are now converting ourselves into cyborgs.
We're becoming the cyborgs.
Oh. We now have artificial retinas, artificial hearts, we have brain chips.
DARPA is working on brain chips for super soldiers.
We can have a high bandwidth com port built in so we don't have to use the sensors and they're very limited bandwidth.
And eventually this all ends up with uploading into the machines and instead of us versus them, humans versus the machines, we become Human contaminated machines.
Now, we're going to get through this next clip of Bushnell really speaking on his 2025 Future Strategic Warfare document that is so important.
That's July 2001 written.
In this clip, he talks about sustainability and productivity improvement as code words.
This is even earlier than this.
Again, watch what they say and watch what happens in the future, a.k.a.
now. A.k.a.
now. This is almost a decade and a half old he was talking like this.
In fact, prevention of collapse in the ecosystem has now become the overwhelming issue.
So again, we have to protect the climate, the climate crisis.
NASA, all about the climate crisis.
All about global warming.
NOAA, all about it.
Okay, just want to point that out.
Current food production is based on freshwater plants, i.e.
glycophytes. We're running out of fresh water, as you know.
The code word is sustainability.
The code word is sustainability.
Been hearing a lot about sustainability, sustainable development goals.
It is a code word for your standard of living plummeting.
The crashing of the ecosystem is due to population growth and the way we're now living, our standard of living.
The estimates vary between 30 and 50 percent of a planet that we're currently short.
To sustain the standard of living and the current population, much less the population growth.
As the Asians and their billions come up as they are at 9 to 11 percent growth rate to Western standards of living, we're going to be short three more planets, and they're not readily available.
This will result in peak everything.
This will result in standards of living pledging.
So this is Malthus 101.
Malthus 101.
Malthusianism. What is a life worth?
He's literally telling you the sustainability agenda is a code word for population control.
That's what it is.
The control over your life.
These innate ecosystem restrictions and shortfalls will necessarily shift world econometrics from a growth mantra to one of sustainability.
Which we are in. That mantra is very real right now.
With possible population control instigated along the way.
Population control instigated along the way.
You get that?
Did we vote on that?
He's telling you that the bureaucracy, the permanent state, the deep state, the predator class, may institute population control.
Wonder if they did that, Dennis!
It changes everything.
Oh, and it changes everything.
Isn't that something? In terms of employment, just as an example, we are in a jobless economic recovery.
There's about 7 million jobs missing.
Some of them were go-wise and offshore.
The rest of them are gone.
The code word is productivity improvement.
He loves the code word.
You see, they speak to us like we're children when they're in their little arenas.
They don't think me and you are going to watch something like that.
The code word is sustainability.
The code word is productivity improvement as we automate everything, as we bring in the robots and the AI. Which is a code word for ever better automation and robotization.
If you look at the way the robots are going, human-level machine intelligence from the IBU Brain Project is now about 10 to 15 years up.
Via biomimetics where they've nanosectioned the neocortex and they're replicating it in silicon, okay?
And they're having great success in all of this.
So this is not soft computing, this is via biomimetics.
We have looked 20, 30 years out with the way robotics and automation and machine intelligence is going, and what jobs the machines cannot do?
The answer is none.
We thought we need human touch life in the nursing homes for a while with the Japanese two years ago, but robots in the nursing homes, the patients like it much better than the humans.
It's hilarious. They put the robots in.
The machines are creating wealth within the structures of the ecosystem capability.
The machines are reducing costs, okay, producing wealth, but the humans increasingly can't compete.
Not only can't they compete, remember when he said we were becoming them?
Final clip of Bushnell talking about how evolution is over.
They have now taken over evolution and they've already put, this is in 2018, 200,000 brain chips in human beings.
Humans are now becoming cyborgs.
We have cochlear implants to hear.
Artificial retinas to see, artificial hearts to live, artificial limbs to move, artificial organs to function, and brain chips.
There's a couple hundred thousand people wandering around with brain chips now to fix congenitally defective brains and increasingly to fix memory and other things.
DARPA's working on brain chips for super soldiers.
And people are now working, thanks to Musk and other people, funding on direct machine brain communications.
It's not us versus them, us versus the machines.
We're merging. And this is the human evolution of the humans.
There is no more natural evolution of anything.
People are convinced that the human evolution of everything is 10 million times faster than any natural evolution.
And so this is just part of the human evolution of the humans, which will apply in a little bit when I talk about something else.
Is the Russian satellites So, right there, I mean, again, I don't know if he put the 200,000 out there.
That might have been a different clip.
Right there, he was kind of talking about the satellites at the end.
Again, space warfare is real.
We are in... In fact, let's play that clip to reiterate what I said earlier right here.
Okay? Okay. That are moving in unknown and unusual paths.
In other words, satellites are no longer just satellites, but now they are moving around in unknown and unexplained patterns.
Can you comment on that and the evolution you see of satellites with that similar technology?
The second one is the Russians apparently have satellites up there.
They're moving in strange ways.
And there may not be normal satellites, maybe doing something different.
Look at the smile! No comment.
Oh, come on now.
Killer satellites?
Sorry, Ty. What he didn't tell you is I'm the NASA rep to the National Intelligence Council.
National Intelligence Council.
It's all about the DOD, the intel communities, and their stranglehold on this technology to try to push this anti-human, transhumanist future that is command and control for what is left of of humanity right now, and they're going for it.
They're absolutely 100% going for it.
Once again, Bilderberg, take a look.
It looks like it's starting two weeks from tomorrow.
Seminal meeting of the year.
It's going to be heavy on AI, I promise you.
I hope you check out my stuff.
Patriot.tv is where you can find Making Sense.
Of The Madness five days a week.
You can check me out over at tntradio.live.
Again, five days a week, two hours live in the evenings.
To me, it's not about left or right.
It's always about right and wrong.
Remember to support infowarstore.com.
Get the supplements. Get the books.
Share the clips. Support things like band.video, one of the best platforms out there.
And I will see you guys on the flip side.
▲
Export Selection