AI OFFICERS AND THE FORCED DRUGGING OF OUR AIR AND WATER!!!
|
Time
Text
Thank you, Alex. I really do appreciate it.
We're going to be talking about the AI takeover and the infrastructure that is currently in place right now and being rolled out throughout all government agencies.
So, the Department of Health and Human Services recently got in line.
And folks, this is it.
This is chief AI officers across the board, across every government agency, and within any corporate structure.
And then they're going to be subject to audits of everything.
Again, there'll be no privacy except for special exceptions, which we're going to get into, for companies that are working with the big exemptions.
And what are those? Intel agencies and the Department of Defense.
When you read through what was a memorandum that came out last month, here it is right here, The Executive Office of the President and how this is in line with the AI Act of 2020 and the Advancing American AI Act as well, which I think is in 2023, maybe 2024.
This is building what we're going to get, the consumer level, the equity of outcome.
In fact, in the... Memorandum here from HHS, 13 times you see equity, okay?
All of this is about equitable outcomes and your safety, fairness, democracy, all the buzzwords they're giving you right now.
But at an intelligence level, they will maintain all of the technology and not be subject to any accountability or any audits.
This is the takeover of And they put it on paper and the infrastructures are being built as in new agencies, new bureaucracies outside the purview of any type of checks and balances which was originally intended in our constitutional system.
Republic. Now, before I dig deeper into this, also talk about Amazon Web Services, digital assistants that are now rolling out on the executive level, and then the consumer level, we're going to get our QApps.
I do want to emphasize that human beings aren't over, that we can have wins.
Now, this has been the feel-good story of the year for me.
I continually say this.
And I've got a video here where...
This is essentially the plan, or at least what they're trying to sell you on.
And again, they're going to sell you on the best thing since breakfast.
It's called Neom the Line.
This is the utopia that they're trying to promise everybody.
It failed miserably.
And I believe out of the hundred plus miles of this thing, of this imagination land plan that they tried to build, 1.65 of the miles were built and it had to be scrapped immediately.
So here's what they're trying to sell you as an AI-driven future.
A revolution in civilization is taking place.
Imagine a traditional city and consolidating its footprint, designing to protect and enhance nature.
The Lions communities are organized in three dimensions within five-minute walk neighborhoods.
Travel end-to-end in 20 minutes.
Designed by world-leading architects, the line is 500 meters tall, 200 meters wide, 170 kilometers long, and housed within an elegant mirror glass facade.
The line is designed as a series of unique communities, providing equitable views and immediate access to the surrounding nature.
At the heart of the globe's key trade routes, a place for commerce and communities to thrive.
The Line, the city that delivers new wonders for the world.
Now, again, you notice the five-minute walking distance cities?
You're basically encapsulated in a glass prison.
Alright, that's what they want.
But you notice it's nothing more than a computer simulation.
It's not reality.
And that'll really get us later into this virtual universe they want for us.
When we get into Amazon and AWS, I want people to check this out because I think it's pretty important.
They now have Gen AI powered assistance.
What does that mean? That means within the Amazon corporate structure, they are giving certain executives...
AI assistants that are going to weed out a lot of the fat within the corporate world.
So many people, again, thought this AI thing was going to be self-driving trucks, going to put truckers and blue-collar people out of business.
Oh, no. Oh, no.
A lot of you social climbing, corporate, political filth, you're going to get weeded out right now.
Now, when you scroll down, you also realize that there are going to be QApps.
Now, that's the consumer level for us.
That's what we're going to get.
Now, when you look at this documentation, and it's really important to understand, they're under a full audit.
So, let's put in the Department of Defense.
Let's find that right there.
No, we don't want that.
Let's go of. Right?
We got to be department of.
Exact matches. There we go.
The DOD. They are completely and totally exempt.
AI use case inventory.
So everybody else is going to be fully audited.
They're going to have to be in line with ESG, equitable, sustainable, and governance regulations.
So they're going to have the AI, the garbage in, garbage out AI, forcibly.
And then any innovations they have have to go to the Department of Defense and intelligence communities that are completely exempt.
100%. And we haven't been able to audit them on any real level in decades.
Decades. All right?
Notice it says, reporting on AI use cases, not subject to inventory.
Some AI use cases are not required to be individually inventoried, such as those in the Department of Defense or those sharing would be inconsistent with applicable law and government-wide policy.
So when you look at this again, in this techno-fascistic society we live in now, Google is not a company.
It is an arm of the defense and intelligence agencies.
It openly works with them on quantum computing and artificial intelligence.
They have been homogenized, right?
That's why, again, when you look at The health and human services document right here, which is a large rehash of this, right?
Actually, in this document, they also talk about human capital.
Let's type that in there.
Oh, I spelled capital as in the capital.
See, Jason? Human mistakes they want to take out with AI. There it is right there.
It's mentioned three different times in the document, apparently.
Advising the chief human capital officer.
They're actually... Again, they want chief artificial intelligence officers across the board for regulation within governments, within corporate structures, and also the human capital officer.
Isn't that nice? We're worried about human capital.
Here it is right here. Data governance.
in partnership with relevant agency officials, authorizing procurement, legal data governance,
human capital and oversight officials, establishing controls to ensure that their
agency does not use AI that is not compliant with this memorandum, including by assisting
the relevant agency officials in evaluating authorizations to operate based on risks from
the use of AI. All this is going to be government controlled.
You're going to have to have permission.
And again, we'll type it in.
Climate crisis. They're going to be using AI to address these issues.
Let's read this right here.
Let's see.
Where do I start?
I guess we'll just start at the top. If implemented responsibly, AI can improve operations and deliver efficiencies across the federal government.
Agencies must improve their ability to use AI in ways to benefit the public and increase mission effectiveness.
And it's so funny. When you see some of the World Economic Forum rollouts for automation and AI, it's cartoon level.
But it shows you that if one person, and we'll get to it later, says or shows technology, they're a conspiracy theorist, they're not.
If the World Economic Forum does it, well then, obviously, it's a good thing.
You see how that works?
All right? So, right here, such as using AI to improve the accessibility of government services, reduce food insecurity...
The government's worried about food insecurity.
Has anybody seen the prices at the grocery stores right now?
Address the climate crisis.
Oh, I want AI doing that.
Because when they talk about addressing the climate crisis, what does that mean?
The regulation of all human behavior.
Based in carbon, by the way.
Meanwhile, the U.S. military completely exempt from carbon emissions.
Improve public health, advance equitable outcomes.
There it is again. Equitable outcomes.
Not equality of opportunity.
Equitable outcomes.
Protect democracy and human rights and grow economic competitiveness in a way that benefits people across the United States.
Bull snap at the end.
Bull snap. Now, Right now, globally, we have repackaged New World Order garbage in this techno-fascistic world with the summit of the future.
And Derek Brose has done a great article over at the Conscious Resistance.
We have UN 2.0 where they're talking about all of this regulation.
And it's under the benevolence of the earth.
Yet again, the military-industrial complex, they don't care how much carbon...
Is emitted from drones, from bombs, from death from above, from constant surveillance.
That's not in the mix.
That doesn't count.
We don't talk about a pipeline that gets bombed and releases more carbon than natural events, right?
In history. But again, the bombs are much worse.
Just doesn't matter. With the bombs, it's kind of ironic that they're used to actually take out the carbon they don't want, aka human beings.
That's it. So, right now, at every single angle, last week when I was doing the show, what were we talking about?
Global health security.
It's all repackaged authoritarianism.
Now, we only got a couple minutes left in this segment.
When we come back, we're going to play Herman Kahn.
Now, Herman Kahn is an individual that really helped create the World Economic Forum, the current Davos mechanism of this globalism.
And he was one of several people that Stanley Kubrick knew and was basically the vision for Dr.
Strangelove. There were several characters.
Khan was one of them.
Khan's a really interesting character.
He's also the person that came up with the term mutually assured destruction.
Now the clip that we're going to play as soon as we come back from the break is at the Hudson Institute.
And we're talking about black and white.
We're decades old.
Three and a half minutes long.
I don't think that I'm even going to do the whole pause and talk thing because it is so spot on all the way through in a track trace database society that it actually takes it from not just the internet of things and that track trace, but the internet of bodies and the surveillance under the skin.
And the involuntary drugging of populaces via the water and air supply.
You're not going to want to miss it.
Before we go on that break, I do want to encourage everybody to go hit InfoWarsStore.com.
Get yourself a book.
Get yourself the supplements.
I still supplement every single day.
I'm not getting any younger folks.
And by the way, when I was younger, I was still taking things like nitrous oxide.
Things like turmeric acid.
In a concentrated form are very, very good for you.
So there's a ton of products out there.
Please support the InfoWAR.
It's the Alex Jones Show.
We'll be back with more after this.
And we are back. It's the fourth hour of the Alex Jones Show.
I am Jason Bermas.
You can check my stuff out over at Patriot.TV and TNTRadio.Live.
I got three hours a day of yapping it up.
Mostly interviews, but a lot of news as well.
And I promised you Herman Kahn...
And a prediction of the future many decades ago.
So let's hit the clip.
Think tanks. The Hudson Institute.
In this 19th century mansion, they are looking for alternative futures, both utopian and dystopian.
The end product of this think tank, scenarios.
Scripts for the 21st century.
Let's admit that the affluence, the skills, the technology...
We'll really make life better in all kinds of ways.
But, you know, we also know these things go badly.
Okay, everybody's worried about the possibilities of, you know, various kinds of social controls and so on.
What would the scenario be?
Herman Kahn is director of the Institute, Tony Weiner his assistant.
It has to involve the social controls coming into effect gradually and slowly and at each step as a result of some decision which seems to be very much in the general interest.
There is no imposition by an evilly intended big brother.
How are we going to achieve a utopian peace in our cities even without the bomb?
What is the scenario for a utopian peace?
Take a black power movement, and one which really is trying to cause problems, to put sand in the gears.
Right. And you've already set up a good deal of this social...
watching.
You know, you've got your TV cameras everywhere, you've got your data processing, everybody has his ID card, you've double-checked it, and now all of a sudden you've got these guys that are throwing sand in the gears, and you clamp down.
That is, you keep track of every car, you keep track of every...
This is easy to do. You keep track of...
10% or 100% of conversations occur on telephones.
One could, with a computer capacity that will be available in the next couple of decades, one could easily record every phone conversation made.
And then one could easily scan, mechanically, no human being could spend the centuries that would be required.
One could scan every conversation looking for keywords that would identify the conversation as worth looking into a little further.
So that, for example, one could begin with a naive set of words.
Kill, rob, murder, assassinate, plot, conspire.
You know, even more than that, you could imagine temporarily tranquilizing the whole city.
You know, there's been upset, there's been riots, you know, let's put transguarders either in the air or in the water.
You know, just get people settled down a bit.
I could imagine you could do preventive medicine going on in this kind of state, you know, where you really check up with everybody and you see that they keep their drug levels right.
Yes. In fact, the first thing you do when you go into work is they punch you and check your blood and see that the drug level is what it's supposed to be.
So you'll buy the safety of your city at the expense of the privacy of individuals.
And for most people, most of the time, the intrusion will not be the kind of thing they'll be conscious of.
The intrusion would not be the kind of thing they'd be conscious of.
That's a pretty powerful three-minute clip when you think about it.
Think about this. They talk about keywords, right?
That's something we saw come into fruition several decades ago.
Promise carnivore keyword software.
Herman Kahn talks about monitoring 10-100% of the conversations.
Hepting vs. AT&T showed that they were damn near monitoring 100% of the conversations.
And if you don't think that these things have gone beyond just phone calls with the microphones, I mean, come on.
Give me a break. And the keyword stuff is still there.
Then we have the audacity to say we need to calm the population down a little bit.
Now, last week when I did the show, I believe it was last week, I played Howard Scott.
And he is the founder of Technocracy.
And he also advocated not for a drug to...
Just calm it down!
You might have an angrier world.
Let's calm it down. No, no, no, no.
He advocated for a drug to sterilize all mammals in the water supply.
Now, Khan here even talks about what?
Preventative medicines and checking one's blood levels.
Punching them when they get to work.
Don't even need to do that anymore with the biosensors and the Bluetooth technology.
We've actually covered it here on this show.
For those that don't know, Abilify is now part of the MySight line, the MySight technology, M-Y-C-I-T-E. Is a technology in which they can check whether you took your medication.
And Abilify is, you know, that antidepressant for when your antidepressants aren't working.
You should take more of that.
That's today.
That's now. That's happening.
It's a reality. Now, when we talk about this sum of the future in UN 2.0, it is worth noting this is all So we're not going to play the whole video.
Not even close because it's 30 minutes long.
But this is the limits of...
And it starts with a big scare piece.
We're going to have fun with the scariness of it.
Because when you look at this summit of the future, this new treaty that they want to put out there, this new pact, it's just...
More Club of Rome.
Okay. Committee of 300 garbage.
Garbajo. Public libraries.
So it's going to have the book cover right here of The Limits of Growth.
This is the old school. This is how you got it when you were my age.
Come on, let's show the book cover.
There it is. The Limits of Growth.
And now, let's cue the scary music and a bunch of crazy things that have gone on in world society.
I think this is like 1973-ish?
Not sure. The limits to growth.
Here it is. Our riches and our numbers burden the world.
We're bad. Humans are bad.
People are bad. We're burdening the world.
Cars are bad.
You know how much carbon is emitted from rockets guys?
They always go to the space stuff.
Continuously. If you remember the dramatic pictures taken by the Apollo Flyers of the Earth, standing out in space all by itself, no one after seeing that could deny that the world is finite.
Then it's impossible for people to go on saying, we have an infinite supply of air, an infinite supply of water, an infinite supply of minerals.
Man must...
We actually do have that.
We live in a regenerative system.
Yes, no, that's real.
We are a minuscule part on that giant globe you're watching.
Learn to balance his activities in nature against the regenerative power of nature,
or he is inevitably going to join the Tyrannosaurus in extinction.
So again, industrialization bad, flying bad, people bad.
If you just saw that big blue marble, yeah, very minuscule human populations.
As we grow richer, there is rising concern about pollution, our ability to feed a growing population, and fears that we may run out of fuel and metals.
No, we're not running out of fuel and metals.
This is the original AI, by the way.
There it is. There's the machine that told us we were going to destroy ourselves.
We're going to play a little bit of that.
Then we're going to play some WEF propaganda.
Final segment of the Alex Jones Show.
Coming up, support InfoWars by going to InfoWarsStored.com right now and buying the products.
We'll be back after this.
I am Jason Bermas.
Final segment of the Alex Jones Show.
I am Jason Bermas. We're talking the limits to growth and the original AI god that demonized humanity.
So without further ado, let's get back into this clip from that 30 plus minute documentary where the switches and wires here determined human beings bad.
A computer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology has been used to look at these problems, to analyze in broad terms the direction in which our world is headed.
Sponsored by a group of businessmen and academics, the Club of Rome, its conclusions are revolutionary.
The most important lesson is that we're near the end of a development of society which we've been going on for about 2,000 years.
That we've reached levels of prosperity which carry the seeds of disruption.
And necessitate a complete re-look at the whole world, social, political and other situations.
It's telling us that the world is in a completely unstable situation and is likely to fall to pieces if it doesn't stop growing.
Let's put it bluntly.
Our option is not between this kind of society, present society, and a stable state society.
It is between a stable state society and chaos.
Our progress is our end.
Again, human beings bad.
They were telling you then we were at the peak of technology.
Now again, this is all about regulating us through the current technology and not empowering us with what they really have.
And the current technology that's out there for the public is not the technology that we just illustrated today.
The intelligence agencies and the Defense Department, the military-industrial complex that has helped to be run by these people, the academics, the billionaires, their mouthpieces, they will have access to it.
We will not. In our progress is our end.
I mean, they love the propaganda.
They love the space stuff.
That's a big theme of propaganda, by the way.
The world is six billion years old. All big bang garbage.
Late Monday night, a cell divides.
And that's the thing.
They always ultimately take God out of the equation.
And I'm not here to preach to you about what to believe, but our rights, they don't come from the state.
They don't come from some global governance body.
They don't come from the Club of Rome, from the World Health Organization,
from the World Economic Forum, from the United Nations. No, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no. They don't, they don't come from the White House.
Thank you.
Our rights are inherent as human beings.
Now again, they're trying to separate us from our humanity and push a lot of different types of automation.
I want to move on from this clip because I got a couple of Davos clips that I want to put out there.
I think it's really important.
This one right here is a clip of the robots that they want to infiltrate our education systems.
Let's make this a little smaller.
That way we can read the fun stuff that they have on here.
And here we go. Robots that could keep schools safe from COVID-19.
Obviously, this was put out during the COVID-19-84 nightmare, but has much broader implications.
And so much of this surrounds the idea that we need to be protected from invisible enemies, whether it's viruses or carbon dioxide, the climate crisis...
All things that we can't perceive with our senses.
We have to rely on that academic class 4.
Oh, they're disinfecting.
Notice that they have the light on them.
They have UV light on them.
Now, they say the UV light to scramble genetic material inside viruses.
Now, Trump talked about UV light, right?
And what did it turn into?
He said, let's drink bleach.
He's talking about this is a disinfectant.
Now, the World Economic Forum does it brilliant.
Let's have robots in the classroom.
Trump says, again, you've got to be sympathetic to the guy in those type of cases.
Oh, you want you to drink bleach!
So again, spooky robots, full, you know, surveillance, automated cars.
Now, they do want the automated vehicles, but they already have a lot of these robotics, by the way.
Here, right here. They've already put it in schools.
But they have these, for instance, robot nurses in other countries.
In fact, Dennis Bushnell of NASA was joking around that when they were using them in Japan 15 years ago, they liked them a lot better than the human nurses.
Yucca, yucca, yucca.
And Sophia, which is Grace's cousin, right?
I think actually Grace, which is Sophia's cousin, actually runs on the blockchain and is one of these AI robots.
And guys, AI, it's not walking.
It's not jogging anymore.
It's running full force forward.
It's moving into every arena.
So again, this is about command and control.
Scaring everybody.
Quarantining people.
Automating things.
Putting health and human services into the hands of AI programmed by a corrupt class of people.
That's what this is.
Okay? Inequalities.
I can't even believe they use the term inequality instead of equity.
Hey, remember that when they made a bunch of little kids wear masks and tortured them all the time?
Remember that? That wasn't so far, far long ago, was it?
No. No, it wasn't.
All right? Now look, a large part of this is also the central bank digital currency.
Why? Because it will be on the blockchain.
When they're talking about human capital, they're also talking about economies and innovation, right?
Right? They are trying to push a central bank digital currency.
You already have blockchain people through the World Economic Forum and IMF World Refugee Program.
And this final clip that we're going to play today is at a World Economic Forum.
I said forum twice.
Shouldn't have done that. Talking about the central bank digital currency.
And I think we didn't talk about yet.
There are two ways on central bank digital currencies.
One is the wholesale piece.
So basically, our interactions as a commercial bank with the central bank.
And here, I would say it makes a lot of sense.
This is new technology coming in.
We can talk about it, advantage, disadvantage.
But at the end, it's an efficiency game, and maybe it's a security game.
It makes a lot of sense. A completely different ballgame it is when you start to talk about the retail...
You know, central bank digital currency.
Not because it's digital.
I can pay this digital with my mobile.
It has nothing to do with central bank digital currency.
But I think the fundamental changes, the underlying business model is, as I, as a retail customer, as a citizen, will have an account with the central bank.
I don't have just an account with a commercial bank.
I have it with the central bank.
Which has a lot of advantages for me.
It's safe, it feels good.
But yeah, there are some challenges with this.
Because a central bank is ultimately, you know, it's a public office.
Commercial banks are under a commercial regime.
Central banks are not under a commercial regime.
What about interest rates on...
An account like that when things are going well, how does this look like?
Oh, on a bank run, how does this look like?
Is this accelerating the bank run because I have a safe account with somebody?
So these are then the fundamental questions.
That's why I think it's excellent to see that 90%, 87% I think central banks are looking into that and...
Number's higher. They're not just looking into it.
They want it for command and control purposes.
Again, no real backing.
You can talk about safety all day, but at a moment's notice, you're debanked.
All of a sudden, you don't have anything.
I know a lot of people want to believe cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, Ethereum.
They address this situation.
Look, There's a lot to navigate in the future, in the post-truth world that we live in today.
And those AI regulations and barriers are now being put into place.
I am Jason Bermas.
I hope you check out all my stuff, including my documentary films, which are free of charge.
Shade the Motion Pickership, Invisible Empire, A New World Order, Defined, Fabled Enemies, and Loose Change Final Cut.
Many of those produced right here at InfoWars.com.
I was listening to Alex earlier today.
A 50-50 shot.
This thing doesn't last 60 more days.
That's extremely upsetting.
So go to InfoWarsStore.com.
Get the products. And if you can, just make a straight donation because this is a revolutionary operation.
And really, in the times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.