Watch the UNCENSORED second hour live on RVM Rumble www.rvmrumble.com or Rokfin FREEShow more Not RVM Premium yet? Try it for $1 and get 2 EXCLUSIVE Interviews A Week!!!
https://redvoicemedia.com/Uncensored
Listen Live and Call In at:
https://theinfowarrior.podbean.com/
Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermas
Watch My Documentaries:
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/category/bermas-docs
Subscribe on Rokfin
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
Subscribe on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/TheInfoWarrior
RVM Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/RedVoiceMedia
Subscribe on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
Follow me on Twitter
https://twitter.com/JasonBermas
PayPal: [email protected]
#BermasBrigade #TruthOverTreason #BreakingNews #InfoWarrior #BreakingNews Show less
Machinery That Gives Abundance Has Left Us Blunt00:07:03
We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
Machinery that gives abundance has left us in blunt.
We think too much and feel too little.
More than machinery.
We need humanity.
We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat.
As if that's the way it's supposed to be.
We know things are bad, worse than bad.
They're crazy.
I am the great and powerful knows why you have come.
You've got to say, I'm a human being.
God damn it.
My life is safe.
You have met all the primal forces of nature.
Don't give yourselves to brutes.
Men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder.
Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men!
Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts.
You're beautiful.
I love you.
Yes.
You're beautiful.
With Jason Girmas.
And who are you?
Good morning.
Good morning.
Good morning, everybody.
I am Jason Burmes.
This is Reality Rants over at RedVoicemedia.com.
Right out of the gates, I want to thank all those that have supported me here at the broadcast, have gone the extra mile and gotten the premium this weekend.
We had two great interviews up there.
One with the financial prepper and another with a young individual that really impressed another really impressive young individual from the Reawaken America tour.
Straight up.
Just the young guys were the ones that truly did impress me.
Obviously, Nathaniel Poplowski from last week was probably, I mean, out of the six people in that one, he just blew me away.
But John Fleetwood, talking about BlackRock eloquently and how much they actually own and what a danger they actually are, a lot of that was definitely news to me.
However, what I do want to discuss right now a little bit is this quote-unquote article, Nuclear War is inevitable.
I certainly hope not.
It's not what I'd like.
Doesn't make me feel warm and fuzzy on the inside if that's the case.
And I'm not trying to fear-monger.
I realize that the predator class always wants a way out.
They don't want to ever put themselves at risk.
They're willing to sacrifice assets and people because they treat people like assets, etc.
But they don't want to sacrifice themselves.
So to me, despite the fact that I am heeding this warning, we're going to go over it.
And I got to get Stuart J. Hooper back on the program.
In fact, I'm going to contact him today and we'll talk about it.
Because this guy wrote like a three-volume book on what?
On warfare.
Okay?
On the art of war.
Yes, the quote-unquote war Bible.
It is Alexander Vladimirov.
And what a last name, huh?
And look, the fact of the matter is, you can only deplete their military so much.
They're only going to allow the West and Ukraine to have limited victories.
And if their back is indeed against the wall, this is certainly something that could actually happen geopolitically.
And it is frightening because to me, once again, no matter who sets one off or where it occurs, life changes for human beings forever.
Forever.
This is the forever one.
I want to make that extremely clear.
And you can argue with me all you want, but I truly believe it would be hard, other than if you're like totally off-the-grid, Aborigine style.
It's going to touch every single person on the planet somehow, some way.
My opinion.
My opinion.
I'm going to read some of this.
Nuclear war is an inevitable conclusion of Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
A Russian general who wrote the nation's war Bible was warned, or has warned.
I'm sorry.
The chilling forecast came from retired Major General Alexander Vladimirov, who penned Russia's three-volume book called The General Theory of War.
For the transition to the use of weapons of mass destruction, only one thing is needed: a political decision by the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, the poop-poot.
The veteran commander warned in an interview with journalist Vladislav Shurigan: the goals of Russia and the goals of the West are their survival and historical eternity.
And this means that in the name of this, all means of armed struggle available to them will be used, including such a tool as their nuclear weapons.
He warned, I am sure that nuclear weapons will be used in this war, inevitably.
And from this, neither we nor the enemy have anywhere to go.
And this is the general that does it.
When I read stuff like that, I get a little sick.
I think that's a normal reaction.
I think that's a normal reaction from anybody that truly understands the quote-unquote gravitas of such a statement.
Because it's a pretty gravity-driven statement.
Let's be honest.
It's not like I don't know what to say other than they're not playing around.
That's not a playing around, huh?
Hmm.
What if?
No.
They've made these weapons for years and years and years.
And there is such a thing as quote-unquote blowback.
And in this case, do you really even consider it blowback?
Because this has really been the eternal post-World War II struggle that we've all talked about.
Now, meanwhile, while this is happening, although it's not getting a ton of press, and it should, first of all, I want to say this.
I don't believe this headline.
I think this headline is kind of Johnny nonsense.
Bloomberg's Naive Headline00:02:50
Let's see, where is it?
Right here.
I think the headline from Bloomberg is extremely naive.
China slowdown means it may never overtake U.S. economy forecast shows.
I doubt that.
Like, I think that's a little, that's a little much.
Okay.
So, for those that don't know, there's a real economic downturn.
There's some real busts over in China right now.
They've overextended a bit.
And the idea for them to quote unquote overtake our economy is really to globalize and harmonize the economy so that there is no more middle to upper middle class.
There are two clear caste systems out there, two clear ones, but there's really a third.
And the third are the ones in control of the pyramid, right?
But I would even call it, even though these guys that think they're going to be on top and have the best lives in the world and all the access, that's the minion class.
All right, that's it.
The equalization of the haves and have-nots mean to put the vast majority of the population into third-world standard of living.
That's it.
Okay?
So China has been the model not because of the outright obedience and authoritarianism.
That's a big, big part of it.
But because of that, they were able to institute a track, trace, database, internet of things into bodies.
I mean, they're very much internet of bodies social credit score first.
And they knew they could do that with the authoritarianism in China and with really the Asian culture.
And the Asian culture, I'm not saying it's eternally subservient, but it's one of silence, it's one of respect, it's one of obedience in many cases.
I'll never forget watching James Corbett somewhere, I don't know, mid-COVID 1984.
And for those that don't know, he's in Japan where they really didn't have to mandate much because people just did it.
They told them to do it and they did it.
And he's like, Yeah, you know, I never wore a mask for the whole thing, and no one said anything to me.
And he's like, Even if they were upset, it's not in their nature, their culture.
They wouldn't come up to you anyway and say it.
Large Part Left Unseen00:11:37
Huh.
It's an interesting take.
But at the same time, you know, we often, my generation at least, is very much more familiar with quote-unquote suicide bombers in the Islamic jihadi sense, right?
That Middle Eastern terrorism sense, maybe the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
But if you just go back and you took history, the original quote-unquote kamikaze pilots were Japanese in warfare.
And they slam a plane right into a boat, and the next guy would come in and slam a plane right into a boat.
Now, you know, oftentimes it was kind of sold to these people: if you were going down, do everything you could to stare it in.
But there are some right in there, right in there.
And I guess thinking about that now, you know, obviously the same idea comes in where they superimpose the Islamic terrorist threat over planes and civilians on 9-11.
But then also a military target with the Pentagon.
And I assume that the Shanksville, Pennsylvania plane attack, whatever you want to call it, if that's the only other one that was thwarted, because there could have been more folks, believe it or not.
That could just be the one that you heard about.
There's a lot going on that day.
A lot.
Probably White House or Capitol building.
Both on an extensive list.
Some people have speculated New York again, maybe Building 7 was the target.
That's why it was rigged up to go.
I don't know.
That's all speculation, by the way.
The idea there were more attacks going on.
That's not speculation.
The idea that you had planes on the scene that were mobile command centers and doomsday planes, mobile command centers for the continuity of government program that was immediately put into place.
Just on standby for a drill at the attack sites.
No big deal.
The E-4Bs.
That's something that's still classified to this day and is still not being talked about.
That's a simple declassify that, right?
Because we can sit here and we can jibber jabber and yabber-dabber all day about Saudis coming in from a CIA consulate and being picked up by a Saudi intelligence asset and the FBI connections and the CIA connection.
All day.
All day.
They're still not admitting to the fact the shadow government, in conjunction with the military-industrial complex, okay, is running these drills where all of a sudden they're on the scene of the attacks.
And the drills, in large part, are running out of Cheyenne Mountain and do so throughout the day.
I think about 20 minutes past the Shanksville incident.
That's real.
I mean, that deserves to be declassified 100%.
We're on the run-up now, by the way.
We're less than a week away.
Next Monday, you know, I'm not exactly sure what I'm going to be doing because a lot of people are already asking me for interviews and panels and this and that.
And I'm sure I'm going to be quite the busybody on that day.
You know, not only this show, my other show, and those shows.
But we're going to be talking about because it is still the issue.
I don't want to drop that issue.
We're talking about possible nuclear war.
And like I said, Stuart J. Hooper, we're going to go over that.
But that guy can say that it's the inevitable conclusions.
We still don't know who pops it off.
I mean, that's something that all show should be looked at.
We talk about false flags.
We don't know.
And we don't know the proxy networks.
And we don't know the level of the devastation.
But what I do know, in large part, is they target civilians.
They target civilians.
And we should all be aware of that.
So we're about to go to break.
I want you to thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
Got a bunch of stuff that I want to go over here.
Got this Shapiro clip where he's bitching about being YouTube demonetized for talking about the NWO.
Oh, the new world.
Is this new to Shapiro?
We know I'm not a fan of Ben, but we're going to go over this video, break it down, and we'll be back after this.
It is redvoicemedia.com.
Consider supporting us at redvoicemedia.com/slash uncensored for only $10 a month.
Here we go.
Attention, Americans.
Breaking news.
Biden's dangerous plan for a digital dollar is underway.
Don't be fooled.
It won't benefit you.
Take action now.
The Federal Reserve phase deployment of FedNow began on July 1st, 2023.
Be prepared.
This may catch many off guard.
Your hard-earned assets are in jeopardy.
But there's a simple legal tax loophole to opt out of the digital dollar.
Reach out to American Alternative Assets for a free wealth protection guide and discover how to safeguard your wealth with gold and silver IRAs against a failing dollar in volatile markets.
Visit protectfrombiden.com.
This invaluable guide provides precise steps to transfer your IRA or 401k into precious metals without any tax consequences.
Be smart.
Don't let Biden force you into using the government's new digital dollar.
Visit protectfrombiden.com to get your free guide and get started.
Again, that's protect frombiden.com.
We are back.
It is reality, Rance.
And before I go to this Shapiro clip breakdown, that's probably going to be extensive and long and the whole shebango.
I want to talk a little bit about kind of the hopium that's out there, guys, because there seems to be a lot of it.
Just want to point that out.
A lot of hopium lately.
Oh, man.
My programs just don't want to work, guys, but we're going to just power through it.
There's this new woman out there, Jan Halper, who I think worked for the Defense Department, got on some kind of British TV show and spouted a bunch of Johnny nonsense.
Just not totally made up.
Totally made up.
Okay?
The only thing that woman said that was correct, in my opinion, Halper, was that she identified that the court cases were thrown out in large part via this idea that we no longer have standing to audit anything.
That's it.
Everything else talking about U.S. corporation, Trump in control, signed this into that.
No, they're going to put him in prison.
I just, I'm very unhappy about all this.
Okay?
Now, there's this new thing where this person's putting out this nonsense, this 6,000-person underground plan.
There is no plan.
There is no underground.
I've went over this ad nauseum.
Ad nauseaum.
Okay.
They haven't changed the infrastructure of the voting.
This is a big problem.
They didn't prosecute people they actually caught cheating in 2020.
You know, I had Christina Bob on my other show.
And, you know, point blank, I'm asking her if anything has changed.
And there was like a couple little things, but the vast majority of it hasn't.
They haven't prosecuted anybody.
When I brought up the trials and whether or not they find Trump guilty and put him in prison, she acted like there was a possibility that some of these won't even go to court.
They're all going to court.
Like, what planet are you living on?
We're in a very bad spot.
Okay?
Way worse, at least for what was left of this constitutional republic than any time in history.
And they've built off of 9-11 to do that.
That's the model, man, is enemy fear control.
Enemy fear control.
Enemy fear control.
And they're up in the level.
And right now, the enemy they're putting out there, by the way, is you and me.
You and me.
Anybody that questions the system, white, black, Asian, they don't give a shit.
Man, woman, giraffe, pansexual deer creature, I got news for you.
They don't care about you either.
You're in their scope.
As soon as you challenge whatever narrative they put out, you're in their scope.
Look at these sentences for these January 6thers.
Now, I constantly go over absolutely horrific crimes against children by a range of individuals.
And I often talk about the fact, for instance, you know, we just went over this woman who is having, allegedly having sex with two teenage boys that we know about that are twins.
She is not in jail.
She's on house arrest.
What?
What?
No.
You're effing around with kids.
You should be waiting in jail for a trial that if you did that, and it seems like there's plenty of evidence that they did, as when they went in to go find the guy, she's topless, the guy, the kid.
She's topless.
Just, you can't make this stuff up, guys.
She's topless.
And they find him and his boxers.
So why is this woman not in prison?
She should be doing a long prison sentence.
17 years for Joe Biggs?
What?
You know, interviewed Owen Schroer on the other show.
Saw him at Vegas while I was there briefly.
Didn't want to talk about January 6th because he's going to be sentenced.
Found him guilty.
So, you know, that's the other thing I want to throw out of the window.
I hear again the retort, like from maybe the less hopium people out there.
And I think they're dead wrong on this.
Audit Election TDS Concerns00:15:30
All right, they go, he's beaten every case.
He's going to beat this one.
He hasn't beaten every case.
They've ramped him up.
Okay.
He was protected while he was in the presidency because it was beyond the absurd.
And the base of Republican politics would not allow their representatives to totally and completely betray him in the impeachment hearings.
Right?
This is not that.
And I can give example after example after example now of where they're jailing political prisoners for nothing.
Look, I'm not a LARPer.
By the way, there is no way to like overtake the government or stop the elections or have a real insurrection.
That's over.
That's over.
There's so many layers to this.
Right?
For instance, another one of these Hopium people, and he's an activist.
He's totally someone I respect.
If you watch the premium interview I did with him, Chris Sky, or even the piece that I put out, it never even occurred to him that Trump goes to jail.
And then they say civil war.
There's no chance of a civil war, guys.
And we wouldn't want one if there was.
Let me explain why there's no chance of the civil war.
We now live in a country of probably 400 million plus people.
Do you know how many more people that is, period, than our Civil War in the 1800s, mid-1800s?
It's a lot.
In fact, let's do it live.
You know, we'll do it live.
We'll do it live.
Okay.
We'll do it live.
Fuck it.
Do it live.
I can all write it and we'll do it live.
Population of United States.
Let's go.
1860.
Let's do it.
Okay.
Okay.
Are you ready for this?
Want people to understand 31 million people.
We have 10 plus times that.
Okay, that's one reason there is no civil war.
Not possible.
There's no target or enemy.
Okay?
Just want to point that out, except for each other.
Like pockets of decimating each other.
So there is no civil war.
Also, when they had 31 million people, think about the transportation differences.
Think about the military capabilities compared to what the civilian capabilities.
They're on par.
They're even.
They're not even, they got space weapons, folks.
Let me explain to you what would happen if the media portrayed that a civil war would break out after they put Trump in prison, which they're going to do.
I'd love to be wrong about that too.
But boy, are they going to, I'll cheer if they don't put him in prison because it'll be such a bad, bad thing.
So they portray that a civil war is kicking off, and that's what they'd have to do.
Okay?
Systematically, even those that were completely and totally peaceful and wanted nothing to do with either side.
And I would probably be one of those people.
If anything like that broke out, I'd be worried about my family.
I'd be worried about protecting them and make sure that they could survive the mess.
Okay, period.
But in actuality, there will always be somebody in control of the actual military through that continuity of government program.
No matter what happens to the senators and congressmen and representatives and city councils, no matter what happens in some kind of wackiness that's not going to happen.
But let's say, again, pockets.
They will eliminate every damn dissident out there, one at a time, and probably frame them up as part of this civil war on whatever side they're not taking.
Like the insurrection, they'll just, even if you're not that person, the deep fake technology is here, man.
You know, we're in running, man, at this point.
And if you don't think they would deploy that, you bet, and that's even if they've got to argue about it in the court of public opinion.
They may not even have to.
I mean, that's the reality.
Okay?
So again, a lot of people don't want to hear that, but they want to listen to hopiates that are putting out Johnny nonsense that somehow Trump's got a plan.
Trump's plan is to try to win the election and stay out of prison.
And if they throw him in prison, win the election and pardon himself.
I know that sounds like the craziest thing in the world, and it kind of is, but that's where we're at.
That's the reality.
I wish it weren't.
And people just can't deal with that.
I mean, to go back to examples, you know, I mentioned Schroyer, who didn't do anything.
I mentioned Biggs.
Like Tario, they've moved his sentencing a couple weeks.
What's he looking at?
He's looking at like 33 years, something like that.
I mean, he wasn't even there.
Let me repeat that.
He wasn't even there.
They found him guilty.
And we'll do it live again.
Let's do it live.
Okay.
And Tario, Max Sentence.
Yes.
My memory has served me well.
The guy's looking at 33 years.
They've already found him guilty.
They put Roger Stone in jail for nothing.
Like, again, no plan.
No white hats.
No civil war, no revolution, no restitution.
Right now, we should be concerned about changing the system as peacefully and quickly as possible.
Okay, so there's some accountability.
Just any accountability.
Right now, there's literally zero.
Zero.
And, you know, I got to watch Bill Maher on Joe Rogan go on a tirade about all this nonsense.
He can't even name the crimes.
He's trying to name the crimes, saying falsifying documents.
What?
Trump never ordered anybody to falsify any documents.
I've seen no evidence of that.
They're talking about email exchanges between lawyers and people on his team to try to send what?
The votes back to the electorate and audit the election, not overturn anything.
This idea of what Trump said, you only have to find me so many votes.
That means let's audit the election.
And if those votes are there, let's show people.
It didn't mean count the ballots that you want or make up, you know, 15,000 or 150,000 extra people.
No.
Meant none of that.
And every single person has it twisted in the media that he wanted something done other than an audit of the election.
We should be auditing these things anyway.
They should be paper ballots and voter ID, right?
And chain of custody on ballots.
Duh.
The idea there's no chain of custody is insane.
All right, we're going to go to break.
Let's thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
Second hour is on RVMrumble.com.
I hope this is going to work because it appeared that VLC was not going to be my friend, but we're going to find out right now.
When I invented My Pillow, my passion was to help each and every one of you.
And 20 years later, all of your support is what keeps us going.
Because of you, we've been able to create thousands of USA jobs and help millions get the best sleep ever.
To thank you, my employees and I are bringing you a limited edition My Pillow.
The Giza Elegance My Pillow is made with my patented adjustable film, the most amazing cotton and a two-inch pipe cusset.
It has four custom moth levels, machine washable and dryable.
And you get my 60-day money-back guarantee and 10-year warranty.
Go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code to get your limited edition 20th anniversary MyPillow queen size.
Retails for $69.98, now only $19.98.
That's right, get a queen size My Pillow for only $19.98.
From all of us here at MyPillow, it's a data!
So we got somebody with extreme TDS in the comment section.
All right, and this is with his fake slate of electors after they told him no way on martial law.
Is your memory that tiny?
Or do you just want to remember?
No.
And see, none of that happened.
Let me explain what did happen.
They sat there and went through the scenarios.
And yeah, one of them was martial law.
Now, what would martial law actually entail?
All right, let me ask you that.
And by the way, they suggested this.
Never went forward with it.
They went through the constitutional things they could do that were set up for the executive administration scout master, okay?
Robert Cummins.
Doubt that's your name, but Kayla, Scooby-Doo.
Now, they said they wanted to seize the machines with the military and then audit them.
What didn't you understand about what I just said?
There was never a plan, okay, to just find votes.
It was to audit the election.
We saw literal suitcases of ballots come from under tables after pipes burst that didn't burst.
You know, you talked to Christina Bob, and she says there were 7,18,000 to, I forget the specifics, on the voter rolls when there's only 3.5 million total of those people in Wisconsin.
That's why when Trump sits up there and he talks about they've pretty much just admitted it in Wisconsin with what's left of that audit, that's a small part of it, Cubby Spanklerman.
Like, what are you talking about?
And again, all of this was lawyer speak in meetings to see what they could do.
I've tried to remind people that Trump was in the greatest position of power to actually audit the election and could not do so.
It's just like they had to pass a law after the fact to act like Pence didn't have the constitutional obligation to send the electors back and do what?
Audit the election.
I mean, wow.
Can't believe it.
We definitely shouldn't count the votes.
There's never been voter fraud in history.
We should totally trust machines with proprietary software.
Like, what planet do these people live on?
I've been in this fight against the stupid machines for 20-plus years.
No real exit polls, ballot harvesting.
What are we talking about here?
Mailing ballots?
Like.
Again, you're always going to have trolls or people with severe TDS.
I mean, again, Marr has severe TDS.
He made that very clear.
I think he truly believes that Joe Biden got 81 million legitimate votes.
That's not real.
No matter how many people out there had the TDS, you know, this is a supposed news story, but the truth of the matter is, we all knew he had dementia.
There was nobody that could look me dead in the eye when I asked the question: do you believe that Joe Biden runs the country?
That they didn't try to talk around it, didn't want to answer the question, try to make it about some weird conspiracy where I still think Trump's in control.
No, let me make it clear for you.
We've had puppets in office before, and the president has only been able to do so much against the administrative state and those in true power, okay?
But we've never had more of a dementia-ridden outward poopy pants puppet ever.
Ever.
Just you know.
You know, they used to make fun of Gerald Ford for falling down on SNL.
Ford was mentally pretty damn sharp well after he was in the office.
Just want to point that out.
Joe Biden, when they put him in there, was pretty far gone.
And now he's totally gone.
We're there.
We're there, man.
I don't know what else to say.
Okay?
So I want to play this Shapiro clip.
At least get it going.
Because I don't like Ben Shapiro.
I think he's a hack.
The Daily Wire does some good stuff.
You know, I'm not trying to pick a fight, but they're a pretty lowest common denominator, lukewarm.
I get, ooh, they brought Jordan Peterson on and they've done this.
And look, Peterson says some nice things, and then he goes and speaks to the Trilateral Commission.
Okay?
And Peter says some good things now about the biggity bobbity boobity boop.
Totally promoted them and acted like they were the best thing since breakfast.
Go watch his interview with Tim Dylan.
Okay?
So the Daily Wire is kind of a hack job.
We want people to come around.
We want more and more people to understand what's going on.
So if Shapiro wants to talk about the quote-unquote New World Order, that's great.
I want that.
Okay?
By the way, let's thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
Blackrock's Dominance In Media00:10:48
Remember, the second hour is going to be at rvmrumble.com.
That's rvmrumble.com.
I'm probably going to play, well, we'll see how long this takes to get through because I also want to play one of my primo clips on BlackRock.
Maybe we'll do that before Shapiro because it kind of all integrates.
The New World Order really is kind of like this globalized, techno, fascistic, authoritarian dystopia anyway, right?
And part of that will be these BlackRock type scenarios.
So yeah, why don't we do that?
We'll get into this because YouTube has suppressed monetization, ironically, he says, for episode one of my new YouTube series, Facts, because it discusses New World Order, which is a non-monetizable conspiracy theory under YouTube's dangerous acts in ad-friendly guidelines.
Except nothing in the video is a conspiracy theory at all.
Welcome to the party.
Welcome to the party, pal.
No kid.
Welcome to the party.
Okay?
Watch for yourself, and we will watch.
We'll watch it, Ben.
Okay?
But come on.
Give me a break.
Before we watch that, here is a primo cut, let's make sure, on BlackRock and, you know, what exactly is going on there.
A lot of people will talk about the World Economic Forum.
They'll talk about Klaus Schwab.
They'll talk about ESG.
And they kind of talk about these things like they're disconnected, but they're all kind of going toward the same end goal, this kind of dystopian goal.
But the key is to put both the World Economic Forum and BlackRock together.
A lot of people don't know what BlackRock is.
They'll call it Blackstone, which is another company that very faint came from, though.
So there is a connection there.
But BlackRock's the main one, BlackRock.
It's a capital B, and I mean, it's a capital B and a capital R.
I mean, name the bank, they own it.
Name the credit card, they own it.
They also own all the big tech companies.
They own Apple.
They own Microsoft.
They also own all the food companies.
They own Starbucks.
They own all the shopping companies.
They own Walmart.
They own Target.
Now, what do we mean when we say that?
They have controlling shares in a company, BlackRock's job.
A lot of people don't know this because BlackRock's really only been around for a few decades.
Yeah.
Since like the 70s when like the S ⁇ P 500 started.
That started at a company called Vanguard, who's another financial asset manager like BlackRock.
John Vogel, the very head who started Vanguard, the original, kind of like the original big asset manager, he did an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal.
I think it was 2018, 2019, just before he died.
It reads like a confession.
Because he said that asset managers, because of how much control they have over everything, not just one industry, every industry, his words were, it's not in America's best interest.
They're not going to be working for Americanizations.
So Larry Fink's the CEO at BlackRock.
He says that we force behavior.
It's a direct quote.
I think he was at, I can't remember if it was Harvard, Yale, maybe it was Stanford.
One of the big schools, he's sitting there.
They've got like, you know, got these like backdrops there.
The backdrop says Harvard, Stanford.
Of course.
So he's there and he says we force behavior at BlackRock.
What does that mean?
It means that all of the companies that they have controlling shares of, they force the ESG, they force the climate change narrative, they force the pro-China narrative.
That's also being forced through BlackRock.
Where do they get that from?
They get it from the World Economic Forum.
How do you know that?
Because BlackRock is an official partner of the World Economic Forum.
If you type weforum.org/slash partners, go down to B and you'll find BlackRock.
BlackRock's an official part of the World Economic Forum.
Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, is also an official, is a board member at the World Economic Forum.
When Larry Fink puts out his annual letters to shareholders, he says all the same buzzwords, ESG, diversity, equity, inclusion, climate change, COVID-19 is an opportunity for us to do something.
That all comes from the World Economic Forum.
Why is that a problem?
Who cares?
It's a problem because BlackRock owns, like I say, Apple, Microsoft.
They own all the pharmaceutical companies.
They own every side to every coin.
You can't name a big company and just type in Google Nike shareholders.
Go to CNN.
This is a liberal source, CNN, and they'll show you all the shareholders, BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street.
They'll all be the top ones, and they all own each other.
And it's a problem because they're pushing the World Economic Forum Great Reset through BlackRock.
Who cares?
It's just one company.
No.
BlackRock's job, one of the things they do is not to make a widget.
You know, you make a phone and then you sell your phone and then you make money.
That's not what they do.
Their job, part of it, is to own other companies, so much so that they have controlling shares of it, and it's a problem.
And you say, well, it's not enough.
John Vogle says it's a problem.
He was the founder of the original asset manager.
So here's how it works out in real life.
Here's like a practical example of how this lives out.
You had all the media.
You probably, I think you showed some of this stuff on your shows, maybe.
Who were saying, you know, brought to you by Pfizer.
Oh, yeah.
Fox News, brought to you by Pfizer.
CNN brought to you by Pfizer.
So you got all these news companies pushing, pushing.
Well, why is Fox News doing that?
Why does Fox News seem to be kind of doing all these liberal things?
Well, incidentally, Fox News is owned by News Corp, is owned by BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street.
So Fox News, oh, I thought they were conservative.
I'm sorry, they're owned by BlackRock, who's pushing the Great Reset.
But then NBC, I think is owned by Comcast.
Comcast is owned by BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street.
You got CNN, I think Time Warner, Time Warner is owned by BlackRock.
You go ABC, CBS, they're all owned and controlled by BlackRock.
So they have all of the media.
So, they can say whatever they want in the media.
Well, guess what?
BlackRock also owns all of the pharmaceutical companies.
Guess who owns Pfizer?
BlackRock.
Guess who owns controlling shares in Moderna?
BlackRock.
Guess who owns controlling shares in Johnson Johnson?
BlackRock.
Guess who owns controlling shares in AstraZeneca?
BlackRock.
Merck.
You go down the list of all the big mayor.
All the big pharmaceutical companies who do all the shady stuff that you know about incidentally are all owned by the same financial asset manager who also own all of the media companies from Fox News to CNN.
So it's a complete conflict of interest.
Get the whole story on Red Voice Media using the link below, completely uncensored and free.
Redvoicemedia.com/slash uncensored.
Again, I can't do it without you guys.
You get that whole interview very, very sharp.
John Fleetwood.
Again, that's why I go to these things.
I'm not going there to cheerlead and grandstand, right?
Go watch my presentation.
I jam-pack everything I possibly can into around 15 minutes.
I'm not there to get an award.
I'm not there to shake hands and kiss babies.
Not running for anything.
I'm not selling anything.
Again, couldn't do it without you.
I know a lot of you guys plunked down on several different accounts for me to support the broadcast.
And I really do appreciate that because I'm trying to do my best.
I'm trying to get the coolest interviews, the most insight.
This isn't a right or left channel.
It's always about right and wrong.
You know, we're about human freedom here.
Imagine that.
Imagine that.
We do got to pay the bills.
So we are going to go to yet another word from our sponsor.
Again, thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
And we're going to start that Shapiro clip when we get back.
Attention, Americans.
Breaking news.
Biden's dangerous plan for a digital dollar is underway.
Don't be fooled.
It won't benefit you.
Take action now.
The Federal Reserve phase deployment of FedNow began on July 1st, 2023.
Be prepared.
This may catch many off guard.
Your hard-earned assets are in jeopardy.
But there's a simple legal tax loophole to opt out of the digital dollar.
Reach out to American Alternative Assets for a free wealth protection guide and discover how to safeguard your wealth with gold and silver IRAs against a failing dollar in volatile markets.
Visit protectfrombiden.com.
This invaluable guide provides precise steps to transfer your IRA or 401k into precious metals without any tax consequences.
Be smart.
Don't let Biden force you into using the government's new digital dollar.
Visit protectfrombiden.com to get your free guide and get started.
Again, that's protect from biden.com.
You know, I was talking, you know, just because we're bringing up Bidenomics and all that other Johnny nonsense.
It is Johnny Nonsense, Bidenomics.
What a sick joke.
Again, Biden doesn't run anything.
This isn't his economy.
It's not his administration.
But I want real-world inflation.
Okay.
Now, one of the things that was kind of barely touched during all this, at least for me, was big gallons of bottled water.
So usually what I get, I've talked about it before.
Back in the day when I could get it, I would get the Gerber water because I had no fluoride added.
I was like, yes, good luck finding the Gerber water these days.
Can't find it anywhere.
That's all right.
Okay.
I'm going to go with whatever.
And I usually go with like the distilled, right?
Less than a year ago, maybe a year tops 89, 94 cents, tops, 89, 94 cents, $1.34 water.
$1.34.
It's not 3% inflation.
That's not 9% inflation.
It's just like the dollar store goes to a buck 25 and then everything shrinks.
It's not 25% inflation.
Everything shrank.
It's more like 30, 40.
This economy is in shambles, man.
I mean, absolute shambles.
It's incredible.
Enforced Narratives?00:10:24
Anybody could argue anything else.
You know, you know, again, you look at, I saw this, again, you got the puppet talk, the parrot talk, thinks this is a mainstream channel talking about Biden and Medicare negotiating for drug prices.
If you don't remember it, right before Trump left, he made insulin and EpiPens way more affordable for everybody, and Biden revoked it immediately.
First of all, the whole pharmaceutical, medical, industrial complex is out of control.
They literally have a sliding scale pay scale for everything.
Shapiro, again, starts talking about the quote-unquote New World Order, which in my film, Invisible Empire, a New World Order Defined, I do my best to define it through the people that used it through their own words and actions and their own quotes for over 100 years.
For over 100 years.
We go all the way back to Samuel Zane's Batten's book, New World Order, which is all about collectivism and a one-world society.
Say it.
It's the basis of the book.
It's under a Christian cloak.
It's nothing else.
Not a conspiracy theory.
So let's do a little Shapiro ring.
Let's do some Shapiro.
There's a group of people who control what you are allowed to see.
The news you read, the videos you watch, the posts you engage with.
You haven't heard of them.
You don't know their names, but they determine through methods both direct and indirect whether you are allowed to be exposed to particular messages.
Their decisions can bankrupt.
You see that right there?
I feel like someone's been watching Truthstream Media over there because Aaron Dykes, one of the best researchers out there, really helped pioneer, in my opinion, utilizing stock government footage.
Like a lot of it's like government propaganda films, old school in documentary films.
And boy, you know, he helped edit a section on the European Union in my film, Invisible Empire.
And it utilizes this type of archive footage very well.
Companies silence voices and fundamentally shift cultural norms.
Who are these people and how do they do this?
Well, at the top level, you have a network of global elites that has created a universal framework full of guidelines and ratings designed to enforce approved narratives and punish disapproved ones.
It sounds like a conspiracy theory, except it isn't a secret, and we're not guessing.
First, we have the World Economic Forum, WEF, and their platform for shaping the future of media, entertainment, and culture.
See, I'm going to be quite frank about this.
You're starting with the World Economic Forum.
Okay, I hope that you're going to be working your way backwards.
Because if you're just, if this is going to be base level, World Economic Forum, United Nations, yeah.
I mean, Davos, kind of a public face of it.
United Nations certainly has a place in it.
You know, World Economic Forum, less, but the United Nations gets a decent chunk in my film, Invisible Empire, a New World Order, defined for good reason, right?
However, are we going to hear about the Council on Foreign Relations?
Are we going to hear about Bilderberg?
He's got eight and a half minutes here to go.
Maybe, maybe he will.
Maybe he'll go there.
I don't know.
I guess we're going to find out.
Second, you have the World Federation of Advertisers, WFA, who represent mega corporations that control 90% of global advertising dollars.
WFA members are a who's who of global business and include some of our recent locified favorites, like Bud Light's parent company, AB Inbeth, Hershey, Rocker and Gamble, Lego, and Disney.
There is barely a billionaire Fortune 500 CEO, heavyweight philanthropist, government, or woke nonprofit that isn't associated with the WEF or the WFA.
In 2019, the WFA established the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, or GARM.
Within months, the WEF adopted GARM as part of its platform for shaping the future of media, entertainment, and culture.
GARM is a cross-industry alliance that brings these mega corporations, the advertisers, together with big tech companies like Meta, who owns Facebook and Instagram, Google-owned YouTube, the CCP's TikTok, and even Snapchat and Pinterest.
This unholy alliance created something they call the brand safety floor and suitability framework.
Think of brand safety as a dog whistle for censorship.
They say it themselves: the brand safety floor means, quote, content not appropriate for any advertising support.
In other words, if you publish.
So, I mean, again, this is really also kind of, and they'll probably bring it up along the lines of sustainability development goals, SDGs, and the ESGs, the economic, societal, and yeah, I think it's the economic and societal goals.
You know what?
I want to get it right.
What does ESG stand for?
A little groggy today.
Environmental, social, and governance.
That's what it is.
Environmental, social, and governance.
The social is big because they've got to lie to you about what?
The government and the environment.
They got to tell you the government is benevolent and the environment's falling apart because of you.
Publish content that violates these guidelines, you will be blacklisted from 90% of the advertising revenue in the marketplace.
So, what have these global elites decided to put in their censorship framework?
It started with things we can almost universally agree on, like preventing the distribution of child pornography or the advocacy of graphic terrorist activity.
But they don't draw the line at what is objectively criminal, abusive, or dangerous.
They continue expanding the guidelines to include far more subjective parameters.
For example, the framework lists subjective terms like hate speech as a problem.
It says that anything surrounding transgenderism that they decide is dehumanizing or discussing what they deem to be a debated social issue in an insensitive way is off limits.
The framework is deliberately vague, allowing those in control to pick and choose how they enforce it and against whom.
Again, I mean, another system and mode of control.
It's just like the injustice system that we have today, by the way.
Like, again, with these judges that are now just saying, hey, not only do you not have standing, but you're not allowed to present evidence anymore.
And if you do try to present evidence or challenge us in any way, we're going to just default you and find you guilty.
So, how exactly do the approved narratives set by these global entities get enforced all the way down to the daily content you consume, including maybe this video?
Well, here's how.
We'll start with NewsGuard.
NewsGuard is an organization that formulates ratings for American media.
They rank news sites on a 0 to 100 scale based on nine supposedly apolitical criteria.
These criteria are anything but apolitical.
They often align with left-wing positions.
During the height of COVID, NewsGuard falsely labeled and downgraded.
Whoop!
Whoa.
See?
Can't.
Whoa.
Whoa, we don't even want to talk about it here.
That's where we got to stop it, Ben.
We'll come back to it on the other side.
That I promise you guys.
That I absolutely promise you.
Let's hit some of these other stories up really quickly.
Okay?
Here's the Muskernuts.
Since we're in this issue, the Facebook caved to far-left pressure groups and are not allowed them to silently dictate policy in exchange for admin.
You're doing the same thing, bro, inside the ad boycott that Facebook on the defensive.
None of them are on the defensive.
Look, it's been rigged.
They should be able to be sued.
You get it?
Like, it's not an even playing field.
It hasn't been for a long time.
Twitter is not an even playing field.
Okay?
It's not.
Ooh, I did want to go into that too.
We should definitely go into this before we go into the second hour and back to Shapiro.
Bill Richardson is dead.
Bill Richardson is the former New Mexico government.
He tried to run for president in 2008.
He was a big Clinton initiative minion, huge globalist.
He was accused of horrific things via the Epstein case.
One of the names that was named again and again and again in the documentation: Bill Richardson.
Putting that out there.
It's another loose end that has now been tied up in the Epstein saga.
I do not believe there's another great example.
Tario is facing 33 years, and I saw some people talking about how he worked with feds in the past.
Yep, they'll burn your ass.
It's not like they're putting him in a good place.
Okay?
And that's why you never work with the feds.
Period.
At all.
No matter what.
Like, if they come at you, like, you better get ready to take your sentence because they're going to try.
I mean, you could try to defend yourself, and you should.
You should fight, fight, fight all the way.
You don't work with the scumbags.
Just saying.
And that's not to say that the guy deserves anywhere.
Again, they found him guilty of nothing.
He wasn't even there.
There's no direction.
Nobody was going to insurrect the government.
Nobody was going to stop the certification of votes.
Nobody was going to hurt anybody.
It's ridiculous.
So, I mean, Ghelain Maxwell gets 20-something years.
His appealing is probably going to get that sentence reduced.
Think about that in comparison to somebody like Tario and what we know about Maxwell.
Epstein Client List Revelations00:02:58
And, you know, I saw another viral Vivek clip.
And Vivek's talking about the Epstein client list.
And he's going to release it.
There is no Epstein client list.
Keep trying to explain that to people.
That's not real.
There are people that are blackmailed.
Okay.
There are people that Epstein did favors for.
There's a lot of pictures and video of that stuff.
There's no client list.
There's lists of associates and names.
But I would doubt that there's even just like a down-the-line list of everybody that's compromised.
Just want to point that out.
All right, we're going to come back on the flip side of this over at YouTube.
Let you know where you can watch the second hour.
Hint, hint, hint.
Guess what?
Guess what?
It's over at RVMrumble.com.
But one final word from our sponsor, and we'll briefly come back and tell you where you can watch the second hour for free.
When I invented my pillow, my passion was to help each and every one of you.
And 20 years later, all of your support is what keeps us going.
Because of you, we've been able to create thousands of USA jobs and help millions get the best sleep ever.
To thank you, my employees and I are bringing you a limited edition My Pillow.
The Giza Elegance My Pillow is made with my patented adjustable film, the most amazing cotton and a two-inch pipe gusset.
It has four custom mop levels, machine-washable and dryable, and you get my 60-day money-back guarantee and 10-year warranty.
Go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code to get your limited edition 20th anniversary My Pillow Queen Size.
Retails for $69.98, now only $19.98.
That's right, get a queen size MyPillow for only $19.98.
From all of us here at MyPillow, it's a game!
All right, guys.
You know what the drill is.
We are going to RVMrumble.com, RVMRumble.com for that second hour.
I want to remind people redvoicemedia.com/slash uncensored to help support the broadcast.
I got another couple clips that I do want to play from the premium, especially one on 9-11, Building 6, quote-unquote, the controlled demolitions, etc.
Guys, YouTube, sorry, but we'll see you on the flip side.
Okay, we are free to go.
So let's get back to the Shapiro and NewsGuard talking about COVID-19.
Rated 21 news sites, only well after the fact admitting that they either mischaracterized the site's claims about the lab leak theory, referring to the lab leak theory as a conspiracy theory, or wrongly grouped together unproven claims about the lab leak with the separate false claim that the COVID-19 virus was man-made, without explaining that one claim was unsubstantiated and the other was false.
Genucell Lab Leak Controversy00:14:44
NewsGuard apologizes for these errors, they said.
We have made the appropriate correction on each of the 21 labels.
And when you compare their ratings of left-leaning news organizations to right-leaning news organizations, you see the same bias appear.
The Media Research Center, a free speech nonprofit, studied NewsGuard's ratings.
Here are the average ratings afforded to left and left-leaning outlets versus those on the right.
The study found glaring examples of bias by NewsGuard.
The left's BuzzFeed managed a 100 out of 100 perfect score despite its reporting on the Steele dossier and alleging collusion between Trump and Russia.
The study found that the Global Times, a Chinese propaganda government outlet, scored a 39.5.
That is 27 points higher than the U.S.-based conservative outlet, the Federalist.
I mean, it's absurd.
BuzzFeed come BuzzFeed.
Despite a scandal at USA Today, revealing the publication of multiple fabricated sources in their stories and their own fact-checking operation misleading readers on the history of the Democratic Party and the KKK, USA Today maintained the 100 out of 100 rating by NewsGuard.
NewsGuard is a trusted partner to GARM.
They help ensure that ad buyers and users looking for news can be in safe and suitable places.
Now I'm going to give you a practical example of what this means for this show.
For example, if I didn't add on this show, I'd have to do it with a company that doesn't make ad buying decisions according to GARM standards.
A company not associated with GARM or NewsGuard that we love doing business with is a company called Genucell.
You've heard about Genucell on my daily show.
Genucell has great products like their Dark Spot Director.
See, we sell our ad space based on a certain number of projected views.
But unfortunately, due to GARM and NewsGuard, we now sell them at a reduced rate.
As this is the very first episode of Fact, we're betting we've got our projected view count right for the sake of deals with future advertisers.
But either way, we're thankful to be working with Genucell, a company using cutting-edge ingredients and products like and again, like none of this is new and none of it's changed on Twitter.
In fact, you know what?
Let's go to my Twitter feed really quick.
We'll do it live.
We'll do it live.
Oh, went to Twitter Downloader because I use that a bunch, but we'll go to twitter.com, which is X.
It's X.
Okay?
And Rob Bammas, he's here on the network.
Okay.
90,000 followers.
Take a look.
Take a look.
Down 37%.
Down 40%.
Down 76%.
I mean, it's ridiculous analytics.
I wonder if I can do my social blade.
We're going to do it.
Socialblade.com.
I mean, and it's in unison.
Let's enter my name, Jason Burmes.
Boom.
And there I am.
Hey, look at that.
Caged aggression comes up.
By the way, I'm going to be having a link for the pay-per-view coming up in about a month or so.
So take a look, okay?
Notice, what, we had one spike in views, probably the Obama episode, okay?
Like, you look at my subscribers down the line, down the line, no real improvements, nothing, nothing.
There's no movement whatsoever.
Let's see if we can bring up my Twitter on here.
I think we can, right?
I'm pretty sure.
Twitter's also on here.
Okay, so let's see about my Twitter.
This is a good thing for anybody if they wants to check out where they're at.
Okay.
Total grade B minus.
So like again, you know, there's no real growth here at all.
Wow, last 35 days, I've gotten maybe 100 extra people.
And my real followings plus 15 somehow.
Right?
With 220 tweets for the month.
That's it.
And those are my impressions.
They're nothing.
Nothing, nothing, nothing.
Take a look.
Just boom.
Followings gained weekly.
Again, there's just nothing here.
It's trash.
Let's see.
Monthly gain tweets.
I mean, take a look at it, guys.
Nothing happened.
Nothing.
They're all colluding with one another.
I just want to point that out.
It's not changing.
Let's go back to Shapiro.
Their ultra-retinal moisturizer with retinal alternative for safe use in the sun.
If you go to genucell.com slash ben right now, you can get your dark spot corrector and ultra-retinal moisturizer in the genucelle most popular package.
NewsGuard is also working with others to use AI technology to enforce brand safety standards at scale by identifying scalable hoaxes and misinformation in order to streamline blanket removal.
This means that the news that you read, news that is supposed to be fair and objective or at least diverse, must adhere to GARM, the WEF, WFA, and their subjective and biased standards in order to be deemed monetizable.
If you think this is only something big news corporations have to contend with, think again.
Even the content you consume from independent content creators on social media platforms, like the one on which you're watching this video, is subject to these globalist powers that be.
So for example, my friend Matt Walsh, he was demonetized on YouTube.
Why?
Well, because he says that men are not women.
The same was true on TikTok, another GARM member, where Daily Wire hosts are keenly set with content strikes and various bans for saying things like men are not women.
Meanwhile, Dylan Mulvaney shoots up the TikTok algorithms by insulting women, saying day one of being a girl.
Now, I've already cried three times already.
Or for example, if you question the accepted wisdom on COVID.
So for example, let's say you say that vaccines not great for kids.
No evidence kids need them.
Kids aren't dying from COVID.
If you say any of those things, GARM, WEF, WFA, they will crack down on you with alacrity.
In addition to looking at how companies and creators are punished for violating these standards, it's also important to look at what is considered brand safe.
In other words, what narratives are 90% of advertising revenue dollars working to advance?
So, for example, advertisers like Procter ⁇ Gamble, who advertise with Mulvaney, consider Mulvaney safe, as opposed to the Daily Wire, which is not considered brand safe and thus would never be supported by the same advertisement.
Brand safety regulations inform culture.
In some ways, they actually fund culture.
So, you know, I got to say, we've only got two minutes left in the video.
I haven't heard anything about global governance or the new world order yet.
So, you know, if that tag's on there, that is a little bit frightening.
Well, like, obviously, for me, none of this is news.
You know, the collusion against narratives and narrative control is just completely over the top at this point.
So this is kind of like a milquetoast report.
And of course, this is going to get demonetized.
I mean, I actually, I'm kind of surprised that it did get demonetized by YouTube.
But then again, with the New World Order tag, you know, up in the air.
Like Garm member Bud Light sending a personalized girlhood beer can to Dylan Mulvaney.
Or Garm member Lego declaring gender is non-binary and making trans-themed Lego designs.
Or Garm member Hershey's using a male in a women's chocolate ad.
Or Garm member PNG's Razor Brand Gillette, which pushed toxic masculinity narratives and taught dads how to shave their daughter's beard.
These are all endeavors deemed to be brand safe for companies to engage in and not risk being either deprived of others' advertising dollars or having their advertising dollars turned away.
By contrast, Jeremy's Razors, not a brand safe partner.
Bud Light isn't going to be sending a flannel shirt to Matt Walsh.
Matt is not brand safe.
Abigail Schreier can't advertise her book on Amazon.
It contains objectionable content about sexual orientation.
But Amazon will allow paid ads for things like chest binders and pro-trans books.
So what does all this mean?
Why should you care?
Well, like any other business, the news media, we have to be able to make money by producing the news.
Fact checkers are now incentivizing media outlets to comply with the WEF GARM narratives by determining what is and what is not monetizable.
The WF, GARM, WFA, they're all actively working with social media companies to censor what they consider to be misinformation, which very often is just good information with which they disagree.
Finally, the WEF, WFA, GARM, they're all aggressively pouring billions of dollars a year into news and content that drives their preferred narrative.
Narratives that are often counterfactual at best and harmful at worst.
When you look at the news, you need to feel as though you're getting all the information.
And even if one source isn't giving you all the information, you can check another source.
And all of those sources together will give you a broad view of the world.
But the World Economic Forum, the World Federation of Advertisers, and the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, they don't want you to have a full view of the news.
They want you to see what they want you to see.
And they will work to prevent anyone from disseminating information they don't pre-approve.
They are determining what you see, what you hear, what you watch.
And that's dangerous.
So I guess now just criticizing the media and the government and these NGOs is New World Order.
Like talking about the World Economic Forum is New World Order?
I mean, that is a little nuts.
But again, that's why we need lawsuits.
And look, that's a good piece to show people.
I guess I don't think it's going to change anybody on the quote-unquote left's mind.
I guess it's a good piece for not the no conservatives or maybe people that don't understand the mechanisms of how these things work, but still kind of super milquetoast stuff from the Daily Wire.
Just want to point that out.
Like Daily Wire, you're going to talk about 9-11?
Because I think that this other video I did with, well, it's another section of the premium with John Fleet, what is more important.
But at the same time, you know what?
Let's talk about the UN more.
Let's have my man from the financial prepper break it down.
And this is one of the premiums that you can get if you sign up today at redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
The war that we're coming up on, we've never been so close to war in my life.
World War III, I'm talking.
We're getting really close.
And it seems to be it's NATO against bricks.
That's pretty much what it is.
They're starting their own currency.
And the UN, I think their goal is to own it all.
I think their goal is to, you know, literally own all the world.
And, you know, we can go down that rabbit hole.
Well, you know, let's talk about the UN for a second because that's another great thing that G. Edward Griffin, who is the founder of the Red Pill Expo, obviously the main driving force here, he wrote The Fearful Master on the United Nations way back in the day, and that's why he's a big part of my film, Invisible Empire, A New World Order to Find.
And in that, you know, we kind of go through the process of a failed League of Nations, the first attempt at global governance, something that was going to stop all these wars after World War I.
A lot of nations didn't sign on to it.
There wasn't really a lot of power put behind it, and it failed.
Second attempt, the United Nations, however, has really just grown and grown and grown and has its home base here in the United States in New York City.
And I have been a huge advocate for decades now of the Ron Paul stance of we want the UN out of the U.S. and the U.S. out of the UN.
That is something that needs to be done.
We should no longer not only adhere and kowtow to them, we should eliminate them and let them go to Europe or South America or wherever else, maybe China, where they want their building.
I want them out of here.
I do too.
Yeah, it's this one world order.
It's awful.
The WHO, the UN, all these things.
You know, it's 1984.
It's the thought police.
And you're not allowed, like you said, misinformation, disinformation.
They treat you like you're so stupid.
You're not capable of discerning the truth.
You know, it's just, that's why I come here.
That's why we come here and we meet.
And as soon as I met you, we resignated and he's out to do the right thing.
He's been very helpful showing me some of his stuff.
The tech stuff, the tech stuff.
His platform, you guys know, you watch his stuff.
It's really, really nice.
Well, it's another tool, right?
Like, one tool is the face-to-face, which I think we need more of, by the way, right?
Especially with the younger generations and social media and even our generation on Facebook Messenger or group chats.
We don't get together enough.
That's one tool.
But how do you get people to get together?
You got to use media, right?
You got to use the tools out there.
And whether that be documentary films, talk radio, podcast, shows.
I think the better, and you know this, the better you can present your material, the more people will not only gravitate towards it, but when they actually see it, they can share it with others, right?
Sure.
Yeah, and that's the main thing.
Sharing information.
Share these videos.
Grab more people and show them the truth.
And they'll take the red pill.
We're at the red pill, right?
And then you've got somebody else that could possibly start a channel and do their part to grab their people because you're going to resonate with somebody else.
And to be honest with you, I've never been on, I've never been a Facebook person, never really wanted to have a platform like that.
You just about have to.
You've got to create your digital footprint.
You've got to get your social footprint out there, and you can reach so many more people if you do.
So if you guys are interested in anybody spreading the truth, this is probably the best way.
Get the whole story on Red Voice Media using the link below.
Completely uncensored and that's great.
Redvoicemedia.com/slash uncensored.
So I got a little Faucians for you because we live in the post-truth world.
I'm going to play that clip with me in Fleetwood talking about 9-11 and Building 6 and Molten Metal, etc.
We're definitely going to get there.
But I want to play this.
This is with a guy that I was on his show, God, 15 plus years ago, something like that.
And, you know, Smirkomish is okay.
Fauci Under Fire00:06:40
He's still pretty much an establishment tool.
But he puts Fauci a little bit on the spot here.
A little Fauci and sauce doesn't have the super comfortable interview that he often does.
So it might get a little testy right here.
A little Fauci.
Fauci roasted as fraud and liar after being confronted with damaging study on masks.
Well, let's watch the clip.
Let's get to it.
2023, Fauci, masks.
Ridiculous.
I would hope that if in fact we get to the point where the volume of cases is such and organizations like the CDC recommend, CDC doesn't mandate anything.
I mean, recommends that people wear masks.
I would hope that they abide by the recommendation and take into account the risk to themselves and to their families.
And again, we're not talking about forcing anybody to do anything.
Totally understood.
There is a perception out there by many, how many I don't know, that they don't work and that the data concludes that they didn't work in the first go-round.
Respond to that on masks.
Yeah, well, that's not so.
I mean, when you're talking about at the population level, that the data are less strong than knowing that if you look on a situation as an individual protecting themselves or protecting them from spreading it, there's no doubt that masks work.
Different studies give different percentages of advantage of wearing it, but there's no doubt that the weight of the studies, and there have been many studies, indicate the benefit of wearing masks.
What?
Where are these studies?
The weight.
What is he talking about?
I'm going to refer to one of them.
You've heard about it before.
I heard about it from a number of radio callers.
Brett Stevens in The Times talked about Cochrane.
Put that on the screen.
The most rigorous and comprehensive analysis of scientific studies conducted on the efficacy of masks for reducing the spread of respiratory illness, including COVID-19, was published last month.
Its conclusions said Tom Jefferson, the Oxford epidemiologist who is the lead author, were unambiguous.
There is just no evidence that they, masks, make any difference.
He told the journalist Mayan DeMasi, full stop.
But wait, hold on.
What about the N95 masks as opposed to the lower quality surgical or cloth masks?
Makes no difference.
None of it.
Observational studies.
How do we get beyond that finding of that particular review?
Yeah, but there are other studies, Michael, that show at an individual level for individual.
Individual level for individuals.
Individual, like nothing, that makes no sense.
That's complete and utter hokeum.
That's Johnny nonsense at its what?
Highest levels.
Make no mistake about it.
It is 110% Johnny nonsense on an individual level, all the studies, individually, on an individual level.
What you just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard.
At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought.
Everyone in this room. is now dumber for having listened to it.
But let's continue.
Talking about the effect on the epidemic or the pandemic as a whole, the data are less strong.
But when you talk about as an individual basis of someone protecting themselves or protecting themselves from spreading it to others, there's no doubt that there are many studies that show that there is an advantage.
When you took at the broad population level, like the Cochrane study, the data are less firm with regard to the effect on the overall pandemic.
But we're not talking about that.
We're talking about an individual's effect on their own safety.
That's a bit different than the broad population level.
Man, you are one pathetic loser.
Yeah, that's not, yeah.
I mean, that's it, right?
They treat you like children.
They lie to your face.
They act like you have no discernment.
And, you know, kudos again to Smirkhomish for putting that on the screen, the full stop.
There's no evidence.
This is the most comprehensive study.
It's out there.
But Fauci just spits hate and lies because that's what Fauci does.
Because he's a minion.
He's at that minion level.
He's a minion for the Predator class.
Okay?
So let's do it.
Let's go to the Building 6 FEMA Dripping Molten Metal Clip.
I want your expertise on how to put together the right kind of documentary.
This hasn't been said yet, and it has to be said in the right way.
And I know you've done stuff on 9-11, opening up a lot of minds, doing great things.
I'll tell you how to do it, man.
Well, first of all, who knows if I'm ever going to make a documentary film again?
It's been 10 years.
But I would say watch my final documentary, Shaded Motion Picture, because for me, that's the most effective one, at least production value-wise, because it's shorter than all the other ones.
It's got kind of concise messages, and there's no narrator.
Now, a narrator can be great, but what I find is a great way to do these things is it is interviews with people that are obviously in the know about your perspective and can prove what they're saying and then intertwine with clips, documents, and graphics.
And so there is no general narrator.
Even in the film Shade, you'll hear and see me, but that's because we interview myself and where it needs that.
That way you can also bridge that gap to where maybe the interviewees that you have aren't saying your specific message.
I'm saying they are not necessarily articulating what you'd like to.
So you can bridge the gap that way.
Low volume.
We'll speak over it.
I'm just saying, well, no, instantly, I mean, you're just sitting there.
So you're already, they've got the nice shot on you.
You're not the narrator, but you're part of the picture, obviously.
I thought that was a very effective style.
And the other thing is, you know, I've never done it like Michael Moore style where I'm part of the picture, really.
Right.
Scientific Examples of Extreme Temperatures00:03:49
This has a very tiny bit of that in the very beginning.
But for the most part, man, I want people to focus on the information.
It's not about me.
You put the truth front and center.
I mean, look, the documents are there.
We have the documents.
They can look at them.
I'm the original do-your-own research guy.
When we put out 9-11, the tagline, or loose change, about 9-11, the tagline was ask questions, demand answers.
It's not about left or right.
It's about right and wrong.
And that's it.
When people talk about 9-11, and I actually get those conversations with people, I usually go for the footprint thing, it collapsing on its footprint, or thermite or the steel beams, and how hot they can melt.
What's like the number one thing?
If you had to just give somebody one piece of information, what would it be if you had to change somebody's mind about it and say, yeah, this kind of does look like it was an inside job?
Well, I mean, building seven is it, right?
Like, you talk about the one and two.
I mean, if you're, because just because you focused on the demolition and you asked about thermite and all those other things, you know, let me just give you a factoid of the temperatures, right?
Because the meme is, jet fuel can't melt steel beams.
I hate that.
Yes.
So the denial is that there's any type of molten metal that is hotter than the jet fuel, right?
They say that basically the collapse came from, I believe it was thermal expansion.
And once collapse initiated, global collapse occurs.
That's the official position in a nutshell of NIST.
So they say basically it never got that hot.
It's a verifiable lie on most levels.
So from the NASA imagery alone.
It's a lie that it didn't get that hot?
Yes, exactly.
So I'm going to give you several scientific examples anybody can look up of how hot it actually was.
So they say it only had to be about 1,500 degrees because they can't have temperatures hotter than the plane fuel in it.
In fact, you had temperatures of up to 2,700 degrees, which is completely impossible without some kind of secondary incinerator.
So where do I get that number from?
On September 16th, the head of FEMA in New York, James Bukarski, gave out the quote that when you're talking about temperatures of 2,700 degrees, you're talking about a cremation effect.
Okay?
Exactly.
Because they weren't finding bodies.
They're finding pieces and parts, and many people never got identified.
So bone fragments, very minimal stuff.
Now, on top of that, as I was saying, the NASA imagery clearly shows 2,000 plus degree temperatures.
I have Giuliani and Pataki on record on the site because it burned for months.
A lot of people forget that too.
That the temperatures were indeed above 2,000 degrees.
Absurd.
Okay?
And really, when you look at all of that, you had Ken Holden and FEMA in the official government investigations come out and say on record, it's in my film, I believe it's in Loose Change Final Cut, that they had molten metal dripping down in building six.
Now, this isn't just the firefighters and the ones talking about like lava and running through channels.
This is the FEMA representative.
And notice I said building six.
Forget about one and two and seven.
If you look at building six, it looks like it scooped out from the top.
What could have happened in that building that Ken Holden found molten metal there?
Get the whole story on Red Voice Media from using the link below.
Completely uncensored and free.
Redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
Consider supporting the broadcast.
Rights Under Siege00:07:56
I want to thank everybody who has.
You know, I do have a couple Tipskis and Hutch from over the weekend over on my other, my individual channels.
There's a ton of other stuff up there.
Put out a ton of videos over the weekend I hadn't posted yet.
Let's see if we can find it.
Here we go.
Scott Free, he had listened to me ask one of his questions before.
I've never been certain if my comments are even read.
And I just heard it live.
It struck me later that Thompson, he's talking about Hunter Thompson, was also mayor of Aspen.
I didn't know that.
Another loved counterculture, Maverick, bites the dust.
No one, not going to comment on your appearance, but let me just say some of the other folks are being very generous.
Yeah, some people were telling me how great I looked.
Look, yeah, of course they're being generous.
I'm getting old.
I'm getting old.
Got the eyeballs of tired.
You know, I just, time marches on, man.
It always moves forward.
So I got a couple more clips that I do want to play and go over.
One of them is Reagan in the 60s, and I believe this is during his run for the governor of California.
And, you know, he's talking about politics, being beholden to a political elite class.
Gets a lot of the rhetoric correct some almost 60 years ago.
So without further ado, let's do a little Reagan old school.
This is the issue of this election.
Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American Revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves.
Now, it doesn't require expropriation or confiscation of private property or business to impose socialism on a people.
What does it mean whether you hold the deed or the title to your business or property?
If the government holds the power of life and death over that business or property and such machinery already exists, the government can find some charge to bring against any concern it chooses to prosecute.
Every businessman has his own tale of harassment.
Somewhere a perversion has taken place.
Our natural, unalienable rights are now considered to be a dispensation of government.
And freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp as it is at this moment.
Well, I think it's time we ask ourselves if we still know the freedoms that were intended for us by the founding fathers.
Not too long ago, two friends of mine were talking to a Cuban refugee, a businessman who had escaped from Castro.
And in the midst of his story, one of my friends turned to the other and said, We don't know how lucky we are.
And the Cuban stopped and said, How lucky you are.
I had some place to escape to.
And in that sentence, he told us the entire story.
If we lose freedom here, there's no place to escape to.
This is the last stand on earth.
And this idea that government is beholden to the people, that it has no other source of power except the sovereign people, is still the newest and the most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man.
And we need to keep it that way because they certainly don't act like it, especially now.
This is the issue of this election.
Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American Revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves.
You and I are told increasingly we have to choose between a left or right.
Well, I'd like to suggest there is no such thing as a left or right.
There's only an up or down.
Man's own old age dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order, or down to the ant heap of totalitarianism.
And regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would trade our freedom for security have embarked on this downward course.
And boy, have we traded our freedom for security in ways that most people can't even imagine.
Post-9-11, the amount that we have acquiesced is overwhelming.
It's over the top.
It's almost indescribable.
It's totally anti-constitutional.
It's totally anti-Bill of Rights.
It's totally anti-human rights.
I mean, it is the beginnings of the regimentation of all human beings.
It is a track-trace database society with impunity and no accountability and no audits through the Patriot Act, through the National Defense Authorization Act, through Homeland Security,
through fusion centers, through privatized intelligence companies, through black programs, through the military-industrial complex, through the media-industrial complex that promotes these as the authoritative ideas and facts.
Just saying.
In this vote harvesting time, they use terms like the great society, or as we were told a few days ago by the president, we must accept a greater government activity in the affairs of the people.
But they've been a little more explicit in the past and among themselves.
And all of the things I now will quote have appeared in print.
These are not Republican accusations.
For example, they have voices that say the Cold War will end through our acceptance of a not undemocratic socialism.
Another voice says the profit motive has become outmoded.
It must be replaced by the incentives of the welfare state.
Or our traditional system of individual freedom is incapable of solving the complex problems of the 20th century.
Senator Fulbright has said at Stanford University that the Constitution is outmoded.
He referred to the president as our moral teacher and our leader.
And he says he is hobbled in his task by the restrictions of power imposed on him by this antiquated document.
He must be antiquated document.
We've heard that before, too, about the Constitution, about the Bill of Rights.
Antiquated.
Be freed so that he can do for us what he knows is best.
And Senator Clark of Pennsylvania, another articulate spokesman, defines liberalism as meeting the material needs of the masses through the full power of centralized government.
Well, I, for one, resent it when a representative of the people refers to you and me, the free men and women of this country, as the masses.
This is a term we haven't applied to ourselves in America.
But beyond that, the full power of centralized government, this was the very thing the founding fathers sought to minimize.
They knew that governments don't control things.
A government can't control the economy without controlling people.
And they know when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose.
They also knew those founding fathers that outside of its legitimate functions, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector of the economy.
You know, when we talk about the private sector, yeah, the vast majority of the good stuff is from the private sector, and we need more and more of the private sector.
But to act like even then that the government wasn't capable of doing things that the private sector was, you know, again, when we talk about weapons, yeah, they bring the private sector in, but without the government and compartmentalization, can they really create those weapons?
Operation Paperclip Revealed00:10:17
Can they really have the military-industrial complex that has grown out of World War II?
Can they really have Nazi scientists come in and dictate a lot of their belief systems and policies through technology?
That's what really happened.
In fact, that's the other clip that we have.
We have Annie Jacobson talking about Operation Paperclip, which is her second book.
So let's play some Annie.
How's the sound?
Good.
Thank you so much, Politics and Pros, for having me.
And welcome, everyone.
I'm Annie Jacobson.
I'm going to talk to you tonight about Operation Paperclip.
And I really want to thank everyone for coming.
It's really my favorite part of the book tour.
And really writing the book is just being able to look people in the eye that read my book and speak with them about it.
So, again, this is her second book.
This is part of about an hour-long Politics and Pros.
I'm pretty sure you can find the full thing on C-SPAN.
I think I've watched it.
It might even be available on YouTube in full, maybe even Twitter at this point in full.
But I've watched the whole thing.
And the funny thing is, and you're not going to see it here, but she takes questions and does answers at the end.
You know, she just talked about it.
And you had these World War II vets that are just still like, I just can't believe we did this.
You know, the only good German back then was a dead German.
How could this have happened?
I mean, is this real?
Oh, it's real.
So I'm going to take you through about 60 slides and tell you a little bit about Operation Paperclip, and then I welcome your questions.
One of the things that people often ask me is, why would I write about such a subject?
Operation Paperclip was a classified military program.
It had a public face.
So the idea was that you couldn't very well have 1,600 Germans running around the United States in various military facilities or ultimately in academic institutions and not have an explanation why.
And so.
And so we're going to do it live here.
How many, again, she said 1,600.
How many were prosecuted via Nuremberg?
Prosecuted Nuremberg.
This is going to be a tough one for some people.
Okay?
Yeah.
Yeah.
See, like not many.
Okay?
161 were convicted.
Think about what she just said.
16,000 came in, and we'll do it again right here.
161 were convicted.
161 were convicted.
There were 199 defendants, so less than 200 people.
All right, and that seemed like a lot of people until you realize that both the United States and Russia took in a lot of their top people and their top programs.
Period.
That's the reality.
Let's get back to Annie Jacobson and politics and prose.
With the German scientists came a propaganda campaign to call them good scientists.
That may be the case.
There were 1,600 of them.
That may certainly be the case with some of them.
And I've actually had people at every one of my book readings so far who had a father or an uncle that was part of Paperclip.
But what I will tell you is the men that I focused on had very dark pasts.
And I'm going to tell you a little bit about that.
So how did I report the story?
I was originally working on this book, my first book, Area 51, when I came across these two aircraft designers.
And they were the Horton brothers.
They designed this aircraft, the Horton All-Wing 5.
And you can see it looks remarkably like the B-2 stealth bomber.
And when I first.
Of course it does.
Because that technology had been around for a very long time, just like we have different vehicle technology and different propulsion technology right now.
Much different.
So yeah, the Horton brothers are a big deal.
And they're barely mentioned at all in history.
Saw those two images next to one another.
I suddenly realized without very much more explanation how much technology we in fact got from the Reich.
And I wanted to know more.
What I learned was that while the Horton brothers were overlooked for paperclip, their boss was not.
This is their boss.
This is Colonel Siegfried Kneemeyer.
He was one of the Reich's top 10 pilots, and he flew on spy missions.
This photograph here is Kneemeyer about to fly over Norway to choose bombing targets.
And Kneemeyer, you see, that's his paperclip photo there.
And when I learned Kneemeyer came to the United States, I wondered how you could go from having Hermann Göring as your boss, as he was.
Now, keep in mind, Göring was in charge of the German Air Force, the Luftwaffe.
Kneemeyer was so important to Goring that in documents he refers to him as my boy.
My boy!
He's my boy, Blue.
I mean, look, the bottom line is we're talking warfare.
We're talking military.
We're talking taking orders.
I mean, again and again and again, when people were confronted with the horrors of their war crimes, okay, taking orders, they say take, I was taking orders.
We were taking orders.
So the question for me in my mind was: how do you have this as your boss and then suddenly have the Pentagon as your boss?
I learned that when Kneemeyer retired from the U.S. Air Force in the mid-70s, he was given the Department of Defense Distinguished Civilian Service Award.
And that is the highest award that a scientist can get from the Defense Department.
And I wanted to know how this could be.
I tracked down one of Kneemeyer's grandchildren who courageously agreed to share the story of his grandfather with me, including a box of papers that he had in the attic.
And one of the most interesting things that Dirk Kneemeyer said to me and made me know that I wanted to write this story to research and report it was he said, Annie, many of my family members say, do not speak about Siegfried's past.
But he, being my age, said, you know, a Google search very quickly reveals that Kneemeyer was Goring's right-hand man.
And he said he would rather know the truth about his grandfather than not know it.
And so that was one example of a seed planted that I knew there is more to be learned about Operation Paperclip.
I mean, obviously more.
I think in the book in 2013, which is 10 years ago, time flies when you're delving into forgotten history or unlearned history, et cetera, classified history, whispered history, whatever you want to call it.
But think about it, he left with accolades from the Defense Department.
He left with the accolades.
I'm going to take you back briefly to the fall of 1944.
This is Germany there in dark blue, and of course the Allies have landed at Normandy.
They're going at Germany this way.
The Soviets are coming this way.
And immersed inside the Army soldiers are a group of scientists led by a particle physicist named Samuel Gudsmith.
And that operation was sort of the precursor to paperclip.
It was called Operation Al Sauce.
Samuel Gudsmith and his team have one mission.
That is to find out about what was known as ABC weapons, atomic, biological, and chemical.
They find out very quickly that Hitler's atomic program is not what we had feared.
That was lucky for us, but as Hitler told his war and weapons minister Albert Speer, nuclear science is Jewish science.
This is what Hitler said.
And therefore, that atomic program had not progressed the same way that the biological and chemical weapons had.
Very quickly, Samuel Gutzmidt in a small apartment in Strasbourg, France, learns about this man, Dr. Kurt Blum, the deputy surgeon general of the Reich.
And he also learns about this man, Dr. Walter Schreiber, the surgeon general of the Third Reich.
What Gutsmid's finds and these papers that I looked at were remarkable because they're just a sort of seemingly benign correspondence between scientists.
The apartment belonged to a doctor named Dr. Eugen Hagen, once a temperate man, worked in the United States on a Rockefeller Foundation scholarship.
And Hagen was writing to Himmler and saying, Oh, the old Rockefeller Foundation, just so weird.
They always work themselves in.
Of the hundred prisoners you sent me, a group of them died in transport.
Please send more.
And this is a terrifying moment for Operation Al Sauce because they realize that the Reich is experimenting on humans from the concentration camps to push medical science in a manner that cannot be pushed if you're experimenting on rabbits and guinea pigs.
So Dr. Blum and Dr. Schreiber are now on the top of the target list for Operation Al Sauce.
So again, you know, this is what eventually becomes what I call directed evolution.
Directed Evolution Risks00:04:49
I only call it directed evolution because that's what you see in their white papers.
And you're now hearing about it from pharmaceutical companies.
Pharmaceutical companies, especially in their modern format, definitely come out of World War II.
Okay?
IG Farben, like big pharma, so much comes out of post-World War II.
Okay, and if you don't think that MKUltro, which was artichoke and then Bluebird, I believe it was Artichoke and then Bluebird, had to deal with Nazi scientists.
Well, again, you're not paying attention.
You're not paying attention.
That's exactly where it comes out of.
All right, we got about 10 minutes left in the broadcast.
I think I have like one more story that we didn't hit that just, again, shows you the degradation of society, shows you how bad it really is in New York City.
Terrifying moment, Brute hits woman 60 50 times with her own cane at 3 a.m. on New York City subway in the latest attack on crime-ridden network.
I mean, I don't even want to play like the whole thing 50 times.
This crazy person takes this woman's cane and just starts bashing her at 3 in the morning.
And, you know, you take a look.
You know, this poor lady might be homeless.
I mean, I don't even want to play it because it's going to make me sick.
And look, I get it.
Crime happens all the time.
I try not to focus on especially like individual violence, but this is all real and this is all by design.
We're in a place where they want people to be scared to go outside.
They want criminal elements to rise up.
Want to destabilize everything about this country, everything for you to destabilize the economy.
This Bidenomics garbage is just the craziest thing ever.
Anybody that can defend the economy right now is they're just a bald-faced liar, a total and complete liar.
I mean, how many people are telling you they're doing better now than they were three, four years ago?
You know, you can go through the COVID-19 episode nightmare where they really pumped up the amount of currency, especially dollars in the world, and they just it was a free-for-all.
And now they're admitting to massive fraud.
The true criminals, you know, they are not the little guy.
Believe me, the little guy stole plenty.
It's the big guys, it's the big guys that got the big checks that were probably still allowed to stay open that went through the protocols that really, if you think about it, are an extension of what Shapiro was talking about in his video right there.
It's real.
Let's point that out.
Got to acknowledge that.
And it, you know, it's so let's do that live.
Let's go to YouTube and Daily Wire because I want to see exactly what it says.
Daily, the Daily Wire and how many views it has.
Facts.
Okay.
So Daily Wire Plus.
Let's go to videos.
Okay.
Do we have it all?
It's probably not on a full one.
10 days ago, four days ago.
Convincing, convicting of murder.
One is it on a different channel?
Deep fake official trailer facts.
Does it have its own channel?
It can't be on live, right?
No.
Nope.
Daily Wire, facts.
Ben Shapiro, facts.
So maybe it's on the Ben Shapiro.
Fascists who want.
Oh boy.
So let's see.
That's one day ago.
Ben Shapiro views the Simpsons predictions.
Ooh, exciting, Ben.
Not seeing it here either.
Seeing latest videos.
Three days ago, four days ago.
The deep state targets must come on.
Crisis response plan five days ago, seven days ago, blah, blah, blah.
Jimmy Dore's Rise00:04:56
Days ago.
All these are getting like, well, it's only got 55,000.
Yeah, I mean, someone like Jimmy Dore is now getting more views than him, which is great.
I love Jimmy Dore.
I think Jimmy Dore is much, much better.
Okay?
But yeah, I don't see it.
I don't see the video that he's referring to.
Maybe I was just way off on the date on that.
I didn't think I was.
Oh, that's the Richardson thing.
Okay, I already exited out.
This one.
My man Jamie Deluxe posted this UNESCO courier interview with Jacques Cousteau.
Now, growing up, I knew that Jacques Cousteau is this famous man who is in the oceans.
He was teaching us about wildlife.
It is very important.
And I would watch documentary films in schools in Reels.
And they would come.
Jacques Cousteau, everybody knew who Cousteau was.
And in this, this is what I'm talking about.
This is my man.
And deluxe actually posts a link.
I retweeted it so you can get it to this article.
Okay, so here it is: A Global Commitment, Environment and Development.
November 91, November 91, November 91.
Okay, 30 plus years ago, insane people like Castow were saying this.
It's terrible to have to say this.
World population must be stabilized.
And to do that, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day.
This is so horrible to contemplate that we shouldn't even say it.
But the general situation in which we are involved in is lamentable.
350,000 a day.
That means in a week and a half, 10 days, what?
That's 3.5 million people.
3.5 million people in 10 days.
35 million people, what, in 100.
35 million people in 100.
Still not enough.
Just death, Oh, it's so horrible to say.
I mean, they tell you.
They tell you.
And again, he's got it right here in Dropbox for you.
If you want the whole shebango.
And notice it's the stabilization of the planet.
Let's, let's again, we'll do it live.
Let's see if we can bring this up.
See if I can get my Adobe up.
Let's bring up my Adobe Acrobat.
Okay, great.
And there's my future strategic warfare.
Okay, it's not where it should be.
Why would it be?
We're still, we're going to find it because we do it live here.
That's what would do.
And you thumbs it up, subscribe, and share, even with a few minutes left.
The reason we're bringing this up is because what?
This shows you world population stabilization 100%.
And here it is.
This is it.
Can we get it open?
Can we do it?
There it is.
We did it.
And we did it live.
So let's just X that out.
And now, stabilization.
Why?
Dude.
Oh, it really upsets me.
So there it is.
Stabilization of the world population.
This is what we've been talking about.
Equalization of the haves and have-nots, what we're talking about.
Okay?
Altered political military outlooks worldwide, i.e., that changes everything.
This is globalism.
This is why demise of the U.S. underclasses.
Wealth creation from enabled invention.
That's the plan, Stan.
It's right there.
All right, folks.
We're here.
We're at the end of the program.
I want to remind everybody that I am indeed a documentary filmmaker.
Less than a week to go from the 9-11 anniversary.
Share Loose Change Final Cut and Fable Enemies with Others.
Share the fact that Biden met with one of the money men behind 9-11, got confronted on it, admitted it, got confronted again on it, said it was classified.
This is before he's the vice president of the United States, folks.
Come on.
We talked about FEMA and building six.
Loose Change Final Cut goes over the controlled demolition and explosive evidence.
Please watch it.
You know, we started today talking a lot about globalism and global conflicts.
Invisible Empire, a new world order to find and shade the motion picture are free right here, right now.
Remember Folks00:00:20
Multiple playlist sections, also at redvoicemedia.com.
Remember, folks, that over at redvoicemedia.com, we run it for almost a 12-hour block.
Chad Caton, Wayne Dupree, Ray Dietrich, Drew Berquist amongst them.
And if you are watching on that stream, you get another hour of Burmese.