Watch the UNCENSORED second hour live on RVM Rumble www.rvmrumble.com or Rokfin FREEShow more Not RVM Premium yet? Try it for $1 and get 2 EXCLUSIVE Interviews A Week!!!
https://redvoicemedia.com/Uncensored
Listen Live and Call In at:
https://theinfowarrior.podbean.com/
Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermas
Watch My Documentaries:
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/category/bermas-docs
Subscribe on Rokfin
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
Subscribe on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/TheInfoWarrior
RVM Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/RedVoiceMedia
Subscribe on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
Follow me on Twitter
https://twitter.com/JasonBermas
PayPal: [email protected]
#BermasBrigade #TruthOverTreason #BreakingNews #InfoWarrior #BreakingNews Show less
We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
We think too much and feel too little.
More than machinery.
We need humanity.
We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat.
As if that's the way it's supposed to be.
We know things are bad, worse than bad.
They're crazy.
I am a great and powerful island.
You've got to say, I'm a human being.
God damn it.
My life has been.
You have met all the primal forces of nature.
Don't give yourselves to brutes.
Men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder.
Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men!
Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts!
You're beautiful.
I love you.
Yes.
You're beautiful.
Good morning, good morning, good morning.
It is Reality Rance.
I am Jason Burmes and in the ever-long quest to try to get things right, folks.
I gotta tell you, still huge issues.
I went and bought me a little stream deck.
Didn't want to do it.
Didn't really feel like it was necessary.
I've talked up this software forever.
First world problems, I know.
Even right now, I feel like I look a little dark.
I'm going to try to fix it.
But in reality, what I could do is just crash the whole thing.
Defining Womanhood00:12:42
But why not?
Why not go for broke?
Why not go to crashy McCrasherton?
There we go.
We'll brighten it up just a little bit.
There we go.
I don't want to blow myself out too much.
Maybe that's a little too much.
First world problems here on the show.
And we got plenty of first world problems in this country.
One of those first world problems, in my opinion, is that no one can seem to define a woman.
Okay, see, here's the issue.
The cloudiness here, guys.
Can't have that.
Gonna have to blow it up a little bit more.
Can't have the cloudiness.
Won't do it.
Won't do it.
So let's just do some of this.
Let's check some of that up.
It's not seeming to help.
Great.
It's probably because I chose the wrong thing.
Actually, no, I didn't.
Oh, yeah, no, I did.
Okay.
Sorry, guys.
We're doing it on the fly.
We're doing it live.
But Wyoming, of all places, can't seem to figure out what a woman is.
I think that's pretty insane.
Am I, am I kooky?
To think that in 2023, we can't figure out what a woman is.
Bueller?
Bueller?
Anybody?
Anybody?
And this is especially egregious.
Like, you know, you live in a dark cartoon, okay?
When this person, this person, just gets to join a sorority.
And all the girls can be horrified.
I mean, take a look.
Everybody here could be horrified.
They can sue.
And a judge just says, don't know.
Can't tell you.
A judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by University of Wyoming sorority sisters contesting the admission of a transgender woman whom they accused of being a sexual predator.
Six members of the Kappa, Kappa, Gamma Sorority Chapter had challenged Artemis Langford's admission by casting doubt on whether sorority rules allowed a transgender woman.
The district court judge found in if in favor of the sorority, if favor of the sorority in Langford, ruling the sorority's bylaws as a private voluntary organization, don't define who's a woman.
The very essence of being a sorority defines what a woman is.
Because fraternities have men and sororities have women.
That's it.
That's as deep as it needs to go.
I mean, what in the world are we thinking right now?
The six members had raised safety concerns, you think, and detailed allegations against Langford, but said they were told to change our definition of a woman in the September 22 lawsuit.
This needs to go to the Supreme Court.
And by the way, the Supreme Court needs to rule correctly.
Several members of the sorority also claim Langford's presence in their home left them feeling vulnerable and uncomfortable.
You think?
Would you?
I mean, I don't know this person, but here's the thing: take a look.
I know one thing.
I don't really like to go where I'm not wanted.
Period.
Let's start there.
Like, if you've got a choice of bars, which I did in Oneana, if I felt that I was unwanted in a bar, the service wasn't there, the atmosphere wasn't mine, I didn't go there.
I went somewhere else.
Now, if you want to be the ultimate outsider like this, I'm not quite sure where you fit in.
And by the way, let's go to a place called reality now.
When you're having an identity crisis, okay, because you are not accepted in traditional circles or otherwise, and then you get heavily medicated and you are influential, you might think this is a good idea.
And hey, maybe the court system does too.
They alleged that she would stare at the other girls for hours without saying anything while sitting with a pillow in, I'm not even going to say the H-word lap.
So now you got this person with a dead stare and a pillow over the pantaloons.
No, Biggie, it's America.
It's not just America.
It's Wyoming.
Now, a lot of people out there would have said, well, if this was California, maybe I could have seen it if this was New York.
Maybe I could, et cetera.
It's coming everywhere.
And it's not going anywhere.
Because these people are really pushing a transhumanist agenda.
And they are pushing mental illness on folks.
They want it.
They want you.
I know that's hard to believe.
I know that sucks to talk about.
But the more dependent you are, the more mentally ill the populace is, okay?
The greater the strength over everybody else in this great narrative is for the predator class, period.
And that's why you're going dark cartoon style.
How can you not define?
You don't need to define a woman.
It's a sorority.
That's the definition.
It's for young women.
Period.
The Girl Scouts are for girls.
It's in the title.
The Boy Scouts are for boys.
Oh, man.
They also accused Langford of taking photos of the girls at a slumber party and making inappropriate comments to them, including about what vaginas look like, breast cup size, whether women were considering breast reductions, and birth control.
Yeah, nothing creepy about any of this.
There's not anything weird about any of this.
Like, you couldn't have made a horror movie up of a futuristic scenario where it goes all the way to the court system.
And they're like, you got to roll with it.
Sorry.
On one occasion, one of the women claimed she was engaging, she was changing clothes inside the house without a brawn, but turned around to find Langford staring at her, the complaint alleged.
And by the way, I don't know that Langford is on any medication or Langford is gotten any kind of surgery or anything.
And I don't know that matters at all.
Fellow sisters reportedly later said that Langford had his hands over his genitals and appeared sexually aroused.
At the heart of the lawsuit was the issue of defining a woman, with the sorority sisters arguing that because KKG's governing documents define it as a space exclusively for females, it's a sorority.
The organization broke its own rules by admitting a biological male.
The sisters claim that the sorority changed its criteria to allow Lankford to apply, while KKG's lawyers said the definition of a woman has evolved since the sorority's founding 150 years ago.
The term woman is unquestionably open to many interpretations the sorority's filing claim.
So are they fighting their own sorority on a national level to do this?
They're coming for us all.
That's insane.
That's insane.
Thumbs it up, subscribe, and share, everybody.
Although the plaintiffs offered a definition in their lawsuit as an adult human female, KKG said that this was restrictive.
Oh, it's restrictive.
I mean, I just, I can't do it.
Like, look at this.
Yeah, like, wow.
Wow.
It's restrictive.
The sisters claim that sorority changes criteria.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Has evolved after the founding of 150 years ago.
Let's see.
I just.
It's cut and dry.
It's cut and dry.
The case at Wyoming's only four-year public university drew widespread attention as transgender people fight for more acceptance in schools, athletics.
I'm so done with the athletics thing, too.
Stop.
Stop.
This is hurting people.
It's all hurting people.
But they don't care because this is what directed evolution means.
You understand?
This is the essence of what directed evolution is.
This is getting you as human beings to reject your very biology in search for something else as they just toy with you and just decide what something else means.
You get it?
And it means a lot.
It's just unreal.
They describe the sorority as a safe space to grow together and build genuine, long-lasting relationships, as well as a refuge for us biological women to relax and release from the pressures and stress that come with college and life.
It's a lifelong friendship thing.
It's a networking thing.
You want to feel comfortable around these people.
It's really like a second family.
Has been for me.
Has been for me.
Again, I just talked about my Vegas trip.
The one person I went and visited was a fraternity brother.
You know, I know I've talked about it before, probably not with this audience, but when I first got my first desk job at 24, and that's big for me.
Like, wow, I'm not just flipping pieces.
I got a desk.
I had a secretary.
I mean, it wasn't paying, you know, big bucks, but I was doing computer work, paying little 24-year-old Jason.
It was a big move.
And I had to sleep in my fraternity brother's closet for like a semester because I couldn't get an apartment out there where the job was.
And there was three of them, and they were good enough to let me do that.
One of them really never got along with, still really don't get along with much to this day.
But because we were brothers, it happened.
And, you know, I do a lot for him too, even though we don't get along.
I remember those kind of things.
It's a brotherhood.
It's a sisterhood.
Computer Work Chronicles00:12:22
It's in the definition.
But nope.
Nope.
Wyoming U.S. District Court Judge Alan Johnson in his ruling found that the sorority bylaws as a private voluntary organization don't define who's a woman.
So the nationals come in.
They say, you're going to do this, girls.
We don't care.
They say, no, we're not.
We're going to sue you.
And the judge sides with insanity.
The judge sides with insanity.
We got to go to a commercial break.
We're going to come back after this.
We're going to hit some more stories.
It is Reality Rance.
Thumbs it up, subscribe, share.
And folks, remember, these things are going to continue on.
We have to fight them back at every single level.
How in the world could such a small group of people with limited resources change world history?
But in fact, that's happening.
And it's the power of the truth.
The truth is like kryptonite.
Healthcare isn't in some sense working very well.
Foster Coulson is thinking about this.
He's got a new company, an online healthcare platform called the Wellness Company.
Telehealth company called The Wellness Company.
The wellness company.
TWC.Health is the wellness company.
The most popular product is the detoxification supplement that features natokinase.
Natokinase is the only enzyme that we're aware of right now that dissolves the spike protein.
Spike protein is loaded in the body with a COVID-19 infection, and definitely with the vaccines, we've been completely accurate on the spread of the virus, early treatment on the deficiencies in hospital care, and now the deaths that are occurring after vaccination.
This is a human outrage and is occurring at the end of a hypodermic needle.
Isn't it interesting?
Natural substances combating this man-made disaster.
I'm just going to say this.
Let's just hope that doesn't get me banned from YouTube.
I didn't even look at it.
It was an ad I'm supposed to run.
Guys, can I even play that?
Let's hope I don't get a strike on that one.
I'm not a doctor.
And yeah, I just want to say that right now.
Just want to say that right now.
Yikes.
I mean, I don't even know if the other shows, do the other shows run on YouTube?
Am I the only one on there on YouTube?
All right, that threw me off a little bit.
Sorry, guys, I got a new commercial.
We got rid of the VPN ad.
I hadn't watched it before.
I just threw it in the mix.
I do love McCullough, obviously.
I guess we'll see where it goes, but I would suggest we get another one just in case.
And maybe I'm trimming that out after the show.
Anyway, side issue.
Side issue.
This one is a big story for me.
And by the way, Ray McGovern, I'm going to mention this now because we're about to talk about 9-11.
And I've got this huge clip that we're going to get to, which will be kind of like a watch-along with McGovern because McGovern's the man.
Ray McGovern is a CIA analyst.
He worked really heavily under the first Bush administration.
He was in the Reagan administration around for a very, very long time.
And he was one of the few guys that spoke out about 9-11.
And he's featured in both Lose Change Final Cut and Fable Enemies.
Okay.
So, number one, really important because Ray's also a fighter.
I remember when I was interviewing Ray probably back in 2007.
2000s, that's a long time ago.
And I believe Ray was diagnosed with cancer right around that time when I was interviewing him.
Very gracious, very well spoken.
I always loved the shot I got for those films with him.
And 9-11 anniversary is coming up around.
Okay?
About to be the 22nd anniversary.
And the thing is, they can't have Zombie J there.
They can't do it.
So for the first time, first time ever since the event, there's not even going to be a president down at any of the attack sites.
And honestly, you know, I'm kind of torn here.
Number one, I don't love the grandstanding.
I never have.
I don't believe that there's a president that has properly dealt with this issue since then.
I know that Trump has toyed with talking about it.
That's not dealing with the issue.
In fact, it's going to be one of my, I would say, Man, big-time criticisms of a clip I'm going to play of Bannon and Giuliani talking about how the deep state is taking down anybody that's challenged them.
Well, Giuliani, where are you?
Now's the time, bro.
They're going for your throat.
You want to actually tell the people the truth about 9-11?
You want to tell me why you wouldn't talk about the explosives?
You want to have Michael Hess go on the record?
I mean, that's the real deal.
But this just shows you how bad it is with Biden.
When he they don't even want, can you imagine?
I mean, right now, he's pretty far gone.
Everything we've seen, it's over the top.
He's pretty done, is all I'm going to say.
Not doing well.
Okay?
Not doing well.
And on a 9-11 moment, where I mean, not that the media hypes it up as much anymore.
Now you're the domestic terrorist.
Things are much more about the climate crisis, right?
That's the new boogeyman.
Yeah, you're not hearing about ISIS and Al-Qaeda and Islamic terror anymore.
No, it's domestic terror.
It's your neighbor.
They morphed it pretty quick.
So, you know, they might not want Biden down there talking about white supremacy to, you know, a bunch of family members that are still mourning their loved ones' loss.
And I'm still mourning the loss of what was left of our Constitution and Bill of Rights prior to this event.
But they're not even going to roll him out.
You know, and by the way, they shouldn't.
They shouldn't roll him out.
It's over.
But he shouldn't even be the puppet face of the administration right now, either.
He should be gone.
It's embarrassing that that's even the dude they put forward.
In fact, you know, he's got all of all these charges against him, more and more coming out.
And the thing is, this guy's not going to prison.
He's going to be protected.
And they're going after the other guy.
Whether you love Trump or hate Trump, it is pretty apparent.
They're going after the other guy, who I'll say it again, usually is protected.
And I know a lot of people go, it's all fake.
It's not real.
Nothing's real.
That's not real either.
Sorry, guys.
Hate to tell you, these are real people with real lives.
They're really trying to put Trump in real prison.
Like, Biden was really a bagman and a gangster for years.
And then Biden Jr. here, little hunt hunt.
He was absolutely a protege of his father and the criminal activity.
He ended up like the Krakens and it's out of control.
That's all real.
The Ukraine stuff, all real.
The China stuff, real.
It's an international cartel.
How do you think it works?
Right?
So, I mean, you look at this.
National Archives reveals it as 5,400 Biden emails in which the president potentially used fake names to forward government information and discuss business with his son Hunter.
I've never discussed business with my son Hunter.
Come on.
Give me a break.
President Joe Biden may have used pseudonyms in nearly 5,400 emails, electronic records, and documents.
When he was vice president, a bombshell letter from the National Archives and Records Administration reveals.
And again, that's only an eight-year period.
You don't think he was doing this while he was a senator in Delaware?
Give me a break.
A trove of communications was confirmed after the Southeastern Legal Foundation filed a Freedom of Information Act for emails connected to aliases allegedly used by Biden, including Robert Ware, or I'm sorry, Robin Ware, Robert L. Peters, and J.R.B. Ware.
Get that one?
He thinks he's funny.
See?
J.R.B. Ware Jr.
Beware.
I was a big wrestling fan as a kid.
I remember Coco Beware.
And, you know, Robert L. Peters, that may have something to do with Hunter having his dad in his contacts as Pedo Peter.
I don't know.
Again, highly underreported.
Republicans have been demanding the release of the emails they say could show, could show.
Come on, Biden used the names to discuss foreign businesses with his son and share information on countries where he was doing deals.
The White House has insisted Biden was never in business with his son.
And vice presidents and high-level government officials often use pseudonyms to prevent being inundated with spam and emails from the public.
At the time, the Obama administration dismissed criticism.
The communications were secret because they were all archived.
But the sheer volume of emails raises questions over whether then VP Biden broke the absolute wall he said he maintained between the personal and private and the government.
He's like, look, Jack.
The Russians, Jack.
Can't even do that anymore.
But when he does get angry, he gets crotchety.
He gets pointy.
He gets screamy.
He gets angry.
Emails from Hunter's laptop also reveal business partners referred to Biden as the big guy.
The big guy.
So there's a Robert L. Peters, and he's talking about a phone call with Poroshenko.
Okay?
Yeah, that's, I mean, obviously, that is to avoid spam.
And here he is as Robin Ware, 456.
Call me right away, Dad.
Yep.
There's a little response right here.
Excuse me.
Before you fill the position, please talk to me.
Again, Hunter Biden, of course, was discussing this with his father.
The SLF submitted FOIA request in June 2022, and the results appear to confirm that Biden was using the emails connected to the aliases.
Biden used various private email addresses from which he sometimes sent, received, and forwarded government correspondence.
The names are all pseudonyms that Biden was known to use while he served as vice president under the Barackstar, 2009, 2017, and were used on emails that were about both official and family business.
The Southeastern Legal Foundation took legal action against NARA on Monday to secure the records release.
New Batch Revealed00:02:44
Now, the question is: all right, we've got these out there.
How many more are there?
Are we going to see censored batches of them?
I mean, right now, the Daily Mail cover this because it's the right-wing outlet.
And then the other side just gets to say it's all fake news.
It's all fake news.
And they play this game constantly with whoever's in power.
It's all fake.
Not all of it's fake news.
I'm always about getting the documents.
When you have the documents yourself, when you have the emails yourself, you can have discernment.
And that's certainly important.
Okay?
But the question is, we already know the Department of Injustice has had all the emails for how long?
Why is it that we're filing FOIA requests to get them?
They have all the evidence in the world.
You know, this is another point.
You know, I bring it up on the show all the time, but I brought it up with Hoft.
And by the way, the second premium should be up today.
I put it in the drop box last night, so I'm sure they're going to be cutting that up.
But that one has Chris Skye.
That has a gentleman from the Gerald from the Sons of Liberty and a great conversation with Richard Bartlett.
So if you're a premium member and you watch the other interviews with Joe Hoft, Mindy Robinson, and Paul Davis yesterday, I got a whole new batch for you.
Whole new batch tacular.
We're doing it big.
And they were great conversations, by the way.
But talking to Hoft the second day, I think it was, or it was later the first day, hard to remember.
I was busy on the grind.
You know, come to think of it, I did end up getting like nine interviews.
It's pretty good for as busy as I was running around.
It's not easy in there.
It's hot, blah, blah, blah, blah.
But I brought up Wiener's laptop to him because Hoft was Joe was one of the first people that actually had access to the Hunter laptop in the media after Giuliani got it.
Okay.
And they published some stuff, really nasty stuff on there.
But I said to him, Joe, you know, the Trump administration, when they got in, they had the Wiener laptop.
And I go, that whole thing with the 15-year-old girl and the Skype and all that stuff, I go, that wasn't even from his laptop.
He's like, what?
I'm like, yeah, man.
I go, think about it.
Because at first, he goes, a lot of people are saying she wasn't even 15.
Access to Hunter Laptop00:02:10
I go, let's just stop.
I go, that girl is just one girl, and it didn't come from the laptop.
She blew the whistle.
She had the screenshots and she had the information on her Skype and it came from her.
They didn't even double down on the forensics of what you know the Justice Department had.
And he goes, wow, I didn't realize that.
And I go, yeah, that's how corrupt it is.
And now Anthony Wiener gets to go on radio shows like Valutainment.
We got to take a break, thumbs it up, subscribe, share.
Remember, the second hour is over on RVMrumble.com, RVMRumble.com.
You can go check out my entire presentation at the Clay Clark Vegas event pinned to my Twitter at Jason Burmes.
We'll be back after this word from our sponsor.
We interrupt today's programming to bring unfortunate news.
Biden's dangerous plan for a digital dollar is underway.
Don't be fooled.
It won't benefit you.
So take action now.
The Federal Reserve Space Deployment of FedNow began on July 1st, 2023.
Be prepared.
This may catch many off guard and put your hard-earned assets in jeopardy.
But here's the good news: there's a simple legal tax loophole to opt out of the digital dollar.
Speak to someone at American Alternative Assets for a free wealth protection guide and discover how to safeguard your wealth with gold and silver IRAs against a failing dollar and volatile markets.
Call 833, the number two USA gold.
Yes, call now.
833-287-2465.
This invaluable guide provides precise steps to transfer your IRA or 401k into precious metals without any tax consequences.
Don't let right force you into using the government's new digital dollar.
Call 833, the number two USA gold.
Yes, call now.
833-287-2465.
Swiftly, 833-287-2465.
We are back.
It is Reality Rance.
Ramaswamy's Cringeworthy Expo Experience00:11:53
I am Jason Burmes.
Thumbs up, subscribe, share.
Remember, the second hour is over at RVMrumble.com.
You want to support the broadcast?
Redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
And it is a $1 for the first week, $10 a month, or lock it in, really support the broadcast and support trips like the one I just took.
It's funny because I was watching Jones yesterday late when I was finishing up the edit.
Because by the way, I don't just pin one camera over.
I mean, it's not great.
I'm doing the best I can with what I got, especially in a tight space.
I got these webcams and I got three cuts on each.
That's a side note.
But I heard Jones basically complaining because I think he's lost some control of InfoWars with this whole having to declare bankruptcy and hire somebody to oversee everything.
And he was saying that they just didn't have the budget for him to go into Hawaii and do the on-ground investigation.
And he was kind of alluding to the award show stuff.
And by the way, I'm not Mr. I don't need any awards, man.
In fact, you know, I talk about this kind of thing.
I know I talk about it with you, but behind the scenes when I talk to people, I was lucky enough to really get to talk to Gene Ho.
He's on the other network that I do a show on.
And, you know, he just said, yo, man, I'm really impressed with you.
This and that.
I like a level of anonymity.
The last thing I want to do is be completely bombarded.
Like, I would never want to be Alex Jones.
It sounds awful.
It kind of would turn my stomach, to be real.
To be really honest.
That's why if you go look at my social media, the vast majority of it, I mean, overwhelmingly has nothing to do with my personal life.
You've got five personal life posts a year.
It's a lot.
It's a lot.
That's for me.
That's for me and my friends and my family and things like that.
And basically, he was bitching because they don't have money for him to go to Hawaii.
But, you know, people, I guess there was some Barton Springs event.
He was alluding to the American Liberty Awards, which I was nominated for that were like two and a half weeks ago.
Again, I opted to go to the Red Pill Expo for a number of reasons.
I mean, the Red Pill Expo was basically a drive and a night in a hotel, right?
And again, maybe the last chance I'll have to shake G. Edward Griffin's hand in the future and, you know, has nothing to ever do with giving a rally cry.
So in other words, you know, when I go speak at these things, I'm not up there to like brag or to be like, thank you, everybody, for being my audience.
The vast majority of those people have no idea who I am.
And I like that.
I like it.
You know, we played it yesterday, but I'm there to hammer home information I think these people need thousands of people that would never listen to me otherwise, hammer home that information and then make direct contact with other people that are fighting the fight.
Like Paul Davis, who I interview and is in, I believe it's yesterday's video.
But Paul Davis is this lawyer who gets fired for being at the Capitol, doing nothing, just being there, and a Twitter mob goes after him.
I mean, is he a conservative?
Yes.
Is he religious?
Yes.
Did he lose his job at his law for law firm because the mob said so?
Yes.
Yes.
And by the way, he sued.
We talk about it a little bit.
But at the same time, that guy is representing a bunch of people going against the authoritarian mandates.
That's a big deal.
That matters.
Okay.
Period.
It matters.
Okay.
So I want to not only interview that person.
By the way, I intend having him on the show for a much longer interview.
A lot of those people.
So you make those kind of connections and hopefully you get people hip to new information.
And I really hope that a lot of people in the audience that did raise their hand and did learn something during my speech go check out my films so they can learn more.
Because these issues overlap, right?
They overlap.
And a lot of these people are mainline conservatives and just Trump supporters on the peripheral.
For instance, in today's premium video, when I talked to Gerald from, and I believe he might have been from Wyoming, Sons of Liberty.
In fact, that might really be the case.
I totally didn't make that connection, but I'm pretty sure he was from Wyoming.
This guy, he's a conservative again.
He's a Republican again.
But he says, you know, a lot of these people that just kind of vote that way and kind of think that they're being represented don't even know what a quote-unquote rhino is.
And of course, that's a Republican in name only.
And duh.
It's like a uniparty most of the way.
But that guy's really trying to take hold of his local government.
That guy doesn't want the insanity of a judge ruling that a biological man can be part of a sorority and stare at them like some kind of a freak show that we have to celebrate.
Oh, I like that he's staring at me like that.
Doesn't make me feel uncomfortable at all.
Just crazy.
Crazy.
So, you know, I go to these things once again to try to wake people up beyond where they're at to make them realize this isn't just like a Republican or Democrat thing, and these people are pushing forward.
The transhumanist thing is huge.
And, you know, that's why I do it.
On the flip of that, you know, I took all sorts of heat for the Ramaswamy show yesterday.
But I gave everybody a challenge to send me the stuff that you didn't like about the guy.
Okay.
And we were going to do that video, but nobody sent me anything but other people's videos.
Like everybody sent me like an hour-long video from somebody else that wasn't them.
Like if a content creator who did a full video on them sent me something, that's one thing.
Because hopefully they're actually sourcing everything.
I'm not going to watch videos from a bunch of other people except around my own time on that.
You got documentation on the guy.
You got short videos of Ramaswamy and quotes, which are out there, by the way.
That's what I was looking for, guys.
Show me why you don't like the guy.
I mean, I'll show you a little reason.
I might not like the guy.
Ramaswamy gets the cease and desist letter.
What was he thinking?
You know, and hey, you know, get up there and do your thing.
But this is just cringy.
He's so mad, but he won't give up that easy.
He's so sad that he knows when he goes back to this mobile home That's when it's back to the lab and it goes to this old rap Better go catch this moment and hope it don't catch Lose yourself in the music And that is in Iowa.
That's in my little.
That's Kim Reynolds, the governor, right there.
And that's the Rama Swam.
Like, that's cringy.
That's kind of funny.
I mean, I wouldn't do it.
You know what I'm saying?
But I'm still waiting.
Believe me, I believe people when they tell me that Big Pharma, Soros, the whole nine, send me the stuff so I can do the real deep dive video that everybody wants.
I'll do it.
Like, for instance, somebody either tagged me in or sent me a video of Clay Clark breaking it down.
I'm the one who told Clay what to look into.
Literally on Saturday morning.
Me.
And you know who posted it?
General Michael Flynn posted it on Twitter.
Guess who told Flynn about it?
Me.
It was literally the 90 seconds, maybe three to five minutes I had with both those guys behind the scenes.
And they asked me about Ramaswamy.
And I gave them the information my audience gave to me.
And then somebody sends me the video of Clay talking about the exact same information that I gave to him.
Guys, I want documents.
I want short quotes.
I want original content.
Send it to me.
I'm not riding some Ramaswamy train.
But again, the guy's telling more truth than anybody else up there, especially on the quote-unquote right-wing or conservative side.
And you can say what you want about all of politics as a show.
I live in Iowa.
I live in Cornwrap Central, there, where the Ramaswam is doing his thing.
And I'm telling you, living here and the policies here are very different.
Very different from New York.
They do matter.
I'm not sitting up here and bullshitting you when I tell you that you have to look in the mirror, make decisions.
Okay, and a lot of this is up to you.
You have to be your own hero.
You have to get involved.
You have to go to the city council meetings.
You might have to run for office.
Or get on a team with others behind somebody who is willing to run for office and try to take our country back.
Because otherwise it ends horribly.
It ends horribly.
You know, Chris Sky, one of the very few Canadians up there.
In fact, again, I talked about Nathaniel Pavlovsky, and that young man just totally and completely impresses me.
Chris, I'm not sure how old he is.
He's got to be younger than me because I'm an old man.
But Chris Sky's another one out in Canada that early on recognized what was happening, stood up against it, and continues to stand up.
And Skye 100% doesn't believe that Tromsky and Hutch goes to prison.
It's never even crossed his mind, by the way, until we talked.
Like he was just so dead, dead on that that was not going to happen.
And I said to him, like, that was close to the wrap-up, guys.
And it's a short, it's like a 10 or 12-minute interview.
That's why I've been integrating three interviews together.
So you get, you got, instead of two interviews, guys, you got six for the premium.
Humor Me, Chris00:02:26
You got six.
I'm just saying.
Sick.
Commercial free, six.
We did it live.
I edited it later.
But I said, humor me, Chris, because he just, he's like, nah, like a lot of people feel that way.
And I think they're really naive.
Okay.
Same thing because Joe Hoff didn't quite feel like exactly like Chris Skye did, but I feel like a lot of naivety there.
And I just said, just humor me.
And let's say they put the guy in prison.
I can't reiterate enough.
I don't feel like he's done anything to warrant that, but they do it.
And Chris just kind of takes a step back.
He goes, you know, I hadn't considered that at all up until this moment.
But considering it, he's like, I think that there actually might be a civil war in this country.
And I don't want that.
And he said he doesn't want that.
And I'm not sure that's exactly what happens.
But I can tell you this: good things don't happen.
Good things don't happen.
So we're going to go to break.
We got one more segment in the first hour.
That's just one more segment.
Then you got to go to RVMrumble.com for that second hour.
And we will be back after this word from our sponsor.
When I invented My Pillow, my passion was to help each and every one of you.
And 20 years later, all of your support is what keeps us going.
Because of you, we've been able to create thousands of USA jobs and help millions get the best sleep ever.
To thank you, my employees and I are bringing you a limited edition My Pillow.
The Giza Elegance My Pillow is made with my patented adjustable film, the most amazing cotton and a two-inch pipe cusset.
It has four custom moth levels, machine-washable and dryable.
And you get my 60-day money-back guarantee and 10-year warranty.
Go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code to get your limited edition 20th anniversary My Pillow Queen Size.
Retails for $69.98, now only $19.98.
That's right.
Get a queen size My Pillow for only $19.98.
From all of us here at My Pillow, well, thank you, Mike.
Yeah, I didn't see Lindell this time around.
I'm sure he was there.
I didn't see a lot of people.
Manchurian Candidate Concerns00:15:23
I wanted to run into Alex Stein, and I must have just missed him.
We were in cross tents.
I would have really liked to see him.
You know, there were quite a few people I did get to quickly shake a hand with.
But again, I'm there to work.
I'm there to talk to people.
I'm there to open minds.
I'm there to make connections.
It's not, you know, I could care less about some kind of like acknowledgement or whatever.
And I understand Jones' frustration.
You know what?
I think he would understand that I understand that frustration because that's never what I've been into.
I'm pissed, man.
I'm pissed.
The 9-11 thing, forget about it.
That did it.
That was enough.
And we should still do that, you know, that's why I should probably play this clip of Bannon and Giuliani talking now in the first hour.
Because to me, Giuliani is as much to blame as anybody.
Period.
Period.
Like, he's obviously a compromised guy and has been strong-armed in many respects.
But 9-11 is inexcusable.
That's where you really had to put the chips down and put it on the line.
And a lot of people failed.
And Giuliani not only failed on that, but then grandstanded after the fact, right?
No bueno.
No bueno.
I think you're the only guy that sat down with him personally.
I think that's one of the reasons you went to Ukraine, was actually meet this guy and make sure he was still breathing.
Rudy Tywa.
I first revealed everything he said last night in February of 2019 on Hannity's show.
So he's talking about Biden, Ukraine, Hunter, the whole nine.
And then with John Solomon.
And that was an audio recording that was done from U.S. to Ukraine.
And then in December of 2019 with Chanel Rion, I went to Ukraine and spent a couple of days with him and did a video recording.
That's my number three podcast.
And at that time, he had already been, they had attempted to kill him once.
Myself and several people working with me got him to the same doctor that we could trust that had dealt with the former president of the Ukraine who had been poisoned by probably by Putin.
And we helped to save his life.
He's since been poisoned another time after that.
And what he's saying is very simple.
I mean, he was right there at the times that Biden would call Poroshenko, the president of Ukraine, and pressure him to fire Shokin.
And this idea that Shokin was corrupt and not going after Burisma is just proven by the public record.
In February of 2016, Shokin raided Burisma, closed him down, and put him out of business.
And look, again, this doesn't mean I love Giuliani, but he's telling the truth here.
You know, known liars and grifters also tell the truth.
This is real.
Zelshevsky, the president of Burisma, went crazy.
There are four recorded or there are four conversations that the White House will not release between the president of Ukraine and the vice president in that two-week period following the shutdown.
And at the end of that two-week period, Shokin is fired.
And Shokin will tell you the whole story.
I mean, he was fired because he wouldn't back off Burisma.
He offered to resign.
He would have kept his mouth shut until Biden started accusing him of corruption, which wasn't true.
There's no evidence anywhere in Ukrainian files of corruption.
That rumor was spread mostly, believe it or not, by Soros' NGOs in Europe.
They're just lying.
And the State Department had actually has all kinds of reports about what a good job Shokin was doing, which then changed to he was corrupt after he was fired.
So this is, I mean, this has been available for four years now.
And what he revealed the other day to Brian is just a repeat of what he revealed to Hannity four years ago.
There you go.
And that's the thing.
How long is this stuff in the public arena?
It's just like the Wiener laptop I was talking about earlier.
The wheels of injustice move ultra slow, but yet they're going to fast track the Donnie T trials.
We got to fast track the Donnie T trials, put Donnie T in prison before he can run for president so we can try to take him off the ballot.
You know, it's funny.
Trump, in a lot of ways, like at least in my world, because I'm not a Trump guy, his voice has been vastly marginalized to where it's, I would say, super amplified with those that follow him.
What do I mean?
So freedom of speech, not freedom of reach on Twitter is obvious to me.
Before I came on the show, what I was looking for were clips of the Donnie T. Tucker interview.
I would have thought that there would have been clips everywhere.
It's almost an hour-long interview.
There were a ton of clips, obviously, of the debate that were out there.
Although, again, not as many as I would have thought.
It was hard for me to find the extended clips that I would have liked to see.
It feels like some of that's being curated.
But I couldn't find, I found one.
I found one clip.
And, you know, talking about Biden being a Manchurian candidate.
I would have thought I would have found more.
Now, Trump needs to get back on Twitter, but even then, I assume they will just algorithmically decimate his reach.
Again, you got to Elon Musk ain't your friend.
Make no mistake about that.
So you have that aspect of it.
And then he tries to amplify himself on Truth Social.
I'm not on Truth Social.
I have no idea what that guy's talking about most of the time at all.
Like he has to do a full sit-down with the Tuckins, and I have to watch that sit-down for me to get a beat on it.
Whereas it used to be, you know, four, five, six posts a day on Twitter, videos, people amplifying it all over the place.
Not anymore.
Those days are done.
So I want to play this clip of Trump.
Where are you?
Do I have it?
There it is.
Talking about Biden being a Manchurian candidate.
I agree with everything the guy says right here.
By the way, at Penny gets millions of dollars.
China pays this guy millions of dollars.
See, I think he's the most corrupt president we've ever had.
And he also has the distinction of being the most incompetent.
And I believe both.
I mean, he's both incompetent and corrupt.
So let me say this.
As a president, he's not running anything.
As far as corruption goes, yes, heavily corrupt, a big-time social club climber, the most corrupt in history.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I think that that might be a reach because there's been some really bad corruption in the past.
I would point to people such as George H.W. Bush and then really the George W. Bush administration, extremely corrupt.
But yes, no, certainly, I mean, this guy was a wheeler dealer gangster as a senator in Delaware.
I actually believe he's compromised because China knows so much about him.
They know where the money comes from.
They know where it is, who paid it.
And they probably paid it.
Well, they do pay Penn, and he gets a million dollars.
I think he takes $999,000 because it keeps it a little bit under a million, like by a dollar.
But he, in many ways, is a Manchurian candidate.
We have a Manchurian candidate.
By the way, in the office.
I agree.
Like, you got a total and complete zombified puppet.
That's it.
Wanted to play this one before he went to the second hour because this is just quality.
Max Blumenthal, you're the man.
We need to get him on.
This is the gray zone.
But here, he exposes the ridiculousness of equity and diversity at Lockheed Martin.
Hello, Max Blumenthal, the gray zone.
My pronouns are Trump Russia.
Lockheed Martin has been identified as one of the most diverse employers in the country.
And I was wondering if you knew by any chance how many products or weapons produced by Lockheed Martin diversity and equity and inclusion bombs have been dropped on the children of Palestine, Yemen, or Syria.
And also, do you happen to know off the top if any non-binary U.S. Navy divers were used in blowing up the Nord Stream pipelines?
Boom!
Come on.
That's gold wrapped in diamonds right there.
That's platinum-studded, awesome.
Good job, man.
And that's what we need to be doing more of, by the way.
You don't think that makes a difference, but to me, something like that, even though it's not going to go hyper-super mega viral, like triggering somebody with a weird hat or a nose ring or that identifies as a giraffe, right?
That's really important, putting these people on the spot and letting them know that, no, you're not safe at your little true con.
People are hip to the fact that, you know, you dress this up any way you like it.
You're involved in death.
You're involved in control.
You're involved in oppression.
That's the reality.
Okay.
That's what matters.
So, bravo to Max Blumenthal.
Really love what he's doing for sure.
Killing it, really.
Absolutely killing it.
So I have this video that we're going to do in the second hour.
I couldn't rip it, of course.
Why would I be able to rip it?
Why would things work?
Why would things work?
This is Ray McGovern.
And I want to encourage people to please, go check out Loose Change Final Cut and Fabled Enemies, especially on the run-up to the anniversary of 9-11.
We're less than two weeks away now.
Believe it's going to be on Monday.
Yeah, so now we're like, I believe 13 days out.
And it is that catalyzing and catastrophic event like a new Pearl Harbor that the Neocons somehow identified in their project for a new American Century document.
And McGovern has been at the forefront of exposing corruption on all sides and really coming in as an analyst insider from the agency.
From the agency.
You want to talk about white hats?
You know, did you watch my interview with Drew Berquist, folks?
Who Berquested with me?
That's an example of a white hat.
Ray McGovern is an example of a white hat, somebody who's fed up.
And I want to say it was at a Rumsfeld event many, many years ago that they drug him right out of there.
Manhandled him for asking a real question.
A guy who was on the inside asking a real question.
The manhandled him.
Get out of here, Ray.
We don't like you.
So we're going to come back on the other side of this commercial really quick.
Tell you where to check out the secondhourrvmrumble.com, rvmrumble.com.
And we'll do it after a word from our sponsor.
Attention, Americans, breaking news.
Biden's dangerous plan for a digital dollar is underway.
Don't be fooled.
It won't benefit you.
Take action now.
The Federal Reserve phase deployment of FedNow began on July 1st, 2023.
Be prepared.
This may catch many off guard.
Your hard-earned assets are in jeopardy.
But there's a simple legal tax loophole to opt out of the digital dollar.
Reach out to American Alternative Assets for a free wealth protection guide and discover how to safeguard your wealth with gold and silver IRAs against a failing dollar in volatile markets.
Visit protectfrombiden.com.
This invaluable guide provides precise steps to transfer your IRA or 401k into precious metals without any tax consequences.
Be smart.
Don't let Biden force you into using the government's new digital dollar.
Visit protectfrombiden.com to get your free guide and get started.
Again, that's protectfrombiden.com.
All right, we are back.
Folks, the first hour is over.
You're going to want to go over to redvoicemedia.com, RVMrumble.com, rumble.com, and Red Voice Media's channel, where they run it on an almost 12-hour loop twice.
It's a real network.
We got other great people like Chad Caton, Wayne Dupree.
We got Ray Dietrich, Drew Berquist, and beyond.
And also, they're tightening up the weekend lineup.
I'm very proud to be on this network.
I'm very proud that nobody censors anything that I say, that nobody gives me a list of what I should and shouldn't say.
Nobody suggests, hey, you know, maybe I took it a little too hard the other day.
And look, I respect my audience too.
I respect you guys out there for being critical of the things that I say.
I just want some evidence provided.
Imagine that.
So I'm hoping that people didn't hit the DMs, but my DMs are open.
Hit the DMs with the small quotes, the news articles, the reason you don't like the Rama Swamp.
Okay?
That being said, YouTube, we're going to take it uncensored style over to the second hour over at RVMrumble.com.
Remember, support the broadcast at redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
All right, we're off the tubins, and that means it's Ray Day time.
Let's do it.
Let's get some McGovern up in this mother trucker.
Gussifer 2.0 Announces Emails00:05:59
I said she was a shoe-in, and everyone was operating in that environment, including James Comey, John Brennan of the CIA, the NSA, and the Department of Justice, Liberal Editor Lynch, and all those folks.
Very high-level people, okay?
So, again, you know, you don't have to love Trump to understand how the selection process usually works and how they tried to destroy Trump because he was actually able to not only challenge that system, but defeat it.
Now, how do I know that?
Well, you can reason to that by being an analyst, okay?
But now I have documentary evidence in the form of James Comey saying we were operating in an environment where we expected Hillary to win.
Now, if you don't understand that, it's really hard for you to believe that our very top law enforcement officials and the Department of Justice as well as the FBI played fast and loose with the law to make sure Hillary would win and that Trump would lose.
And the documentation is out there.
You don't see it in the New York Times, but I'll expose you to some of it, okay?
So if you don't realize that these people fully expected to keep their jobs, no small thing, fully exercised, be rewarded rather than indicted by playing fast and loose with the law, then you don't understand how this kind of thing could happen.
And I've not seen the like of it since Watergate and I was around for Watergate as well.
So that by way of preference or preface to what we're going to say here.
So June 12th, Alkanji announces that he has emails related to Hillary Clinton, was his words, and he said that he's going to publish them soon.
Two days later, CrowdStrike, the computer entity hired by the Clinton campaign, announces we have seen an intrusion into the Democratic National Committee, and there are telltale signs in Cyrillic.
Cyrillic, as most of you know, is Russian, right?
As a matter of fact, we have the name of the first head of the Soviet secret police, his name and patronymic, Felix Ermundovich, which is for Jashinsky the first thing.
So whoever intruded into the DNC was either incredibly sloppy, and no one has accused the GRU, the Russian intelligence, military intelligence service, of being sloppy, or they were overly clever in leaving more than just telltale signs in Cyrillic, not leaving just a tablet or a Microsoft-type format, but leaving, so we wouldn't notice, I mean so we wouldn't miss it,
the name and patronymic Felix Imundovich.
So that's January, that's June 14th, two days after Julius Sanj announces he's got these emails.
So again, he's also an expert on WikiLeaks, and I believe it's 28-year CIA veteran.
RaymacGovern.com is where you can find out more about him.
But we're going to continue with this.
Again, this is spa on.
He's telling you.
He's telling you they did not expect to lose their jobs.
Think they were a little bittersweet about it after the fact.
January 15th, out of the ashes arises an entity, a persona, named Gucifer 2.0.
Who is Gucifer 2.0?
We don't know.
A year and one month ago, we asked the president to find out.
Maybe he should ask the FBI, who is this Gusifer 2.0 persona.
We don't know if it's an entity or a man.
We use non-sexist language pertaining to personas, so we don't say Guccipher he, Guccifer.
We don't know.
We still don't know who Gussifer is, but we do know that he's a fraud.
He's an out-and-out fraud.
Now, how do we know that?
Our Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity group is blessed with all kinds of expertise, including two former directors, two former technical directors of the National Security Agency, Bill Binney and Ed Loomis.
Bill Binney has been around.
You've seen some of the things that he said.
And they know, they know that Gussifer is an entity that is fabricated.
They know because they have some forensics that come.
So for those that don't know, Gussifer 1.0 is a hacker that was quote-unquote extremely notorious.
And Gussifer 2.0 was this connection to their Russian narrative that was a complete farce.
I'm at a metadata, metadata associated with these intrusions, and they've been manipulated.
And so Gussifer 2.0, we still don't know who he, she, or it is, but we know Gusford 2.0 is a fraud.
And we can prove it.
We have hard copy of the intrusions.
And Bill Benny has taken me through.
So even a liberal arts guy like me can understand you can't have an accurate thing when you have interspersed intermingling of various periods.
Special Authorities Revealed00:15:37
So what does that mean?
Well, that means that these indictments of the 12 apostles, then the 12 apostles, the 12, 12 GRU people, GRU, the military intelligence arm of the Russian, well, they're all based on Gussifer 2.0.
They sure are.
And I called them a farce from the beginning.
I read that indictment.
It was ridiculous.
Well, hello?
What does that mean?
It means that, as my Russian teacher would say, it means that you cannot be sure of these conclusions.
It means that Bob Mueller, well, Bob Mueller enjoys a reputation of being universally respected.
That is, if you read the New York Times or the Washington Post.
Colleen Rowley, who worked in the FBI during his tenure and worked when James Comey was in the Department of Justice, tells us all that, you know, James Comey, I mean, Bob Mueller, falsified the intelligence before Iraq, didn't say no to the torture, approved the wiretapping, you know, that famous scene in the hospital.
Well, the next day they approved the program.
They just changed the name.
Okay?
And Bob Mueller has been, you know, I had a personal encounter with Bob Mueller.
I was at Georgetown University with 300 other people.
And John Brennan introduced his old friend Bob Mueller, who had just retired from the FBI.
And Mueller made some comments.
Any questions?
So I raised my hand.
And by the way, McGovern's actually being generous here because Mueller absolutely 100% helped cover up what?
9-11 as well.
Brought us into the war of terror.
I do that, you know.
So I said, now, Mr. Mueller, as a lawyer, do you have any legal qualms with the process called the process whereby you take sensitive information?
It's called parallel construction.
And for the benefit of the people that I said, that means that you take illegally acquired information from NSA, you give it to the cops, and you say, look, go to this corner, next Saturday night, this time.
And you get these guys, you prosecute them, and you put them in jail.
You don't tell the judge.
You don't tell the defense attorney where you got the information originally.
And so you're perjuring, perjury is involved at every stage of this.
And I was just wondering, Mr. Mueller, do you have any legal qualms about that?
There's a lot of murmuring my all-intelligence friends.
So Mueller looks at me.
He's a big guy.
He looks at Mr. McGovern.
He said, after 9-11, we were given special authorities.
Next question.
Yeah.
After 9-11, they sure were.
And that guy was one of the main players that they brought in as the cover-up crew, right?
I mean, he comes in right before as the head honcho.
But don't worry, he'd been doing dirty business way before with buddies of his like Bill Barr.
Buddies of his like Bill Barr.
Buddies of his like Bill Barr.
There you go, folks.
After 9-11, we were given special authorities.
You've heard endless times, you know, after 9-11, maybe you could complete the sentence.
After 9-11, everything changed, right?
And so this Constitution, you know, this thing that I swore to support and defend, and I usually have in my back pocket there, it was sort of overtaken by 9-11.
My God.
And he was the head of the FBI at the time.
Okay?
So he was given special authorities.
Now, I said to Colleen Rowley, you're a lawyer, I'm not a lawyer.
How do you figure this?
I mean, how can you do illegal things just because you were given special authorities?
And she says, well, Ray, it's sort of complicated.
But basically, it takes about a decade for the judges, the courts to catch up.
And then they say, oh, no, this is illegal.
But meanwhile, you do illegal things and you say you had been given special authorities.
Wow.
So that's Mueller.
Now, how did he get appointed?
Well, you probably remember that when James Comey decided he would leak a personal conversation with the president.
Now, in my day, a personal conversation with the president was ipso facto classified.
I mean, hello.
That's a no-brainer.
But he thought, well, he could make it unclassified.
He gave it to a lawyer friend.
They leaked it to the New York Times.
And the story was that President Trump tried to get Comey to go easy on General Flynn.
What he said was, I hope you can, you know, go easy on him.
Words to that effect.
So New York Times publishes that.
Now, they asked James Comey, you know, it's a little irregular for FBI heads, president or former, to leak information.
Why did you do that?
And he said, oh, I wanted a special prosecutor named.
And sure enough, the next day, a special prosecutor was named.
His name was Bob Mueller.
And James Comey said, thank you, Jesus, my best friend forever, Bob Mueller.
Oh, man, this is going to be great.
Hello?
You see the setup?
I mean, McGovern's breaking it down probably better than most.
I've always liked Ray.
Like, you know, they talk about Joe Biden's America's grandpa or America's uncle.
No, this should be America's grandpa or America's uncle.
I mean, obviously, I'm gray.
I'm a little long in the tooth these days.
But Ray is really aged gracefully.
He's a real fighter.
He brings humor to some of the darkest subject matter as he lays it out surgically.
That's how it happened, folks.
Don't believe me.
Believe what James Comey said.
Now, with respect to Comey, while we're on the subject, when it was revealed that, or when it was claimed that the Russians hacked into the DNC, into the Democratic National Committee, do you remember what John McCain said?
Act of war.
It's an act of war.
The Russians have done an act of war.
Lots of people are saying this is an act of war, right?
What did James Comey do, the head of the FBI?
Anybody know?
I was like the tar baby in Uncle Remus.
You didn't say nothing.
Didn't do nothing.
Now, if you were the head of the FBI and you heard that the Russians had hacked into the DNC computers, what was the first thing you would do?
Yeah, right.
Seize the computers.
Take a look at them.
Send your forensic experts in there to seize the computers and find out what, you know, how did this all happen.
But for some reason or other, Comey didn't do that.
And when he was asked softball questions by the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, which is a softball, the archetype of a softball outfit, now, Mr. Comey, tell me, you didn't have access to the computers of the DNC.
Why was that?
Oh, we were never given access.
We were never given.
Well, hello?
What do you need?
All you need is a little warrant or a little letter.
They were never given.
I mean, just again, cartoon world.
The dark cartoons have been around a long, long time.
Of course they had access.
Of course they know what's on there.
It's just real misinformation, real disinformation.
The Injustice Department at work with the phoniest and most ridiculous excuses you could ever imagine.
The FBI doesn't hesitate from invading the homes of some of my NSA friends or anything.
So, he said, we weren't given access.
Next question.
Now, Mr. Comey, is it general practice not to seize the computers in such a case?
Like when people are saying there's a war?
Well, no.
I have to admit that best practices would mean that we had physical access to the computers.
But we decided to rely on CrowdStrike, which was a super top-rate cyber organization.
And they did forensics, and we borrowed their forensics.
Anybody know about CrowdStrike?
Run by a bunch of Russian-hating groups hired by Hillary Clinton with a very spotty record, actually a disastrous record of veracity in their conclusions in the past.
So for some reason or other, James Comey didn't do that.
Well, I'm getting a little ahead of myself.
Let me be a little bit more orderly here.
So we have June 12th.
Assange says he's got the emails.
Now, that gave, well, June 12th and July 25th, when the DNC convention was, I've done the subtraction, I think it's about three weeks, okay?
Now, Just imagine the situation at the DNC.
Hillary's sitting there with a bunch of her advisors, and they're saying, oh my God, Assange just got DNC emails or my emails.
And we haven't even had our convention yet.
What is Bernie going to say?
What is Bernie going to say when he finds out what we did?
My God, what are we going to do?
And somebody says, I know what we'll do.
We'll blame the Russians.
Everybody's like, come on, it was the Russians.
It was WikiLeaks.
That's okay.
We'll get a twofer here.
We hate Wikileaks as much as the Russians.
We'll say that the Russians hacked, and they gave the information to WikiLeaks.
Spot on.
So, Hillary, anybody got any better ideas?
Okay, we'll go with it.
And that was it, folks.
That's what they did starting after June 15th, all the way up to when, on June 22nd, three days before the convention, Julian Assange released the emails.
Now, what happened?
What was the headline of the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, when it became clear that these hacked emails had been published by WikiLeaks?
Headlines were, why did Russia do this?
Why did Russia, why are the Russians doing this?
Why are the, nobody looked at the content of the emails.
It was amazing.
It was a magnificent diversion of attention.
You look at the record.
Nobody looked at what the emails said.
It was all about, why did the Russians do this?
So it worked like a charm.
It worked like a charm.
And I had a chance to talk, well, to hear Jennifer Palmieri, who was Hillary Clinton's PR person, and she was bragging about going to the convention and shopping, going around in a golf cart to the various cable and other news outlets and pushing this line under instruction that the Russians hacked.
She said, and I have it there, it's on tape.
C-SPAN has it.
She said, you know, it was hard for me to believe that the Russians would hack to help defeat Hillary Clinton, help Trump win, but we try to sell it.
And it was hard for anyone to believe.
But when we got back to Brooklyn, Brooklyn was Clinton headquarters, right?
Then intelligence people started coming to us and filling in the blanks.
Oh.
Oh, the intelligence folks.
Like the Hunter Biden laptop intelligence folks?
Kimmy, these were a direct download.
And yes, Wikileaks and Assange thought Hillary Clinton would be worse.
They weren't Russians.
As to how the Russians hacked.
And then we had journalists who had been briefed by intelligence people, and they told us more.
And then, best of all, the Obama administration would start to confirm these stories.
So then we were off and running with this story.
Now, it was so bad.
John Brennan, the head of the CIA, was leaking like a sieve to the New York Times and elsewhere.
It was so bad that the Wall Street Journal complained, they're not talking to us.
They only talk to the Washington Post.
They only talk to the New York Times.
They're neglecting us.
That's the Wall Street Journal saying.
So that's what was going on then, okay?
So the story was out and it was clear in everybody's mind.
Okay.
Then there's the election.
What was that, the 8th of or 7th, 7th?
Yeah, okay, of November.
And then a curious thing happened.
Now, we all watch Rachel Maddow, of course, right?
No, okay.
Well, she had...
I see somebody.
I see somebody like this.
I share that sentiment.
He's got jokes.
So she had Chuck Schumer as a special guest on the 3rd of January.
And they were talking about Trump and how he was bad-mouthing the intelligence community.
Can you imagine bad-mouthing his own intelligence community?
And so Chuck Schumer said, you know, I thought that Trump was a pretty smart businessman.
Bad-Mouthing The Intelligence Community00:15:09
He knew, you know, what fights to pick, but he's done something very, very stupid.
And Rachel says, oh, what would that be, Chuck?
And he says, well, he says, he's taken on the intelligence community.
And they have six ways to Sunday to get back at you.
Very foolish thing to do.
Now, Rachel, if she was a real interviewer, she would have said, Senator, are you saying that the President of the United States or the President-elect should be afraid of the intelligence community?
And that's, of course, exactly what he was saying.
And I'm sorry to tell you that's true, because that is the reality.
Trump's own freedom of flexibility, his freedom to do things he wants, is tightly circumscribed by the intelligence community.
And that is the Donnie Brook that's in process right now.
I'll talk a little bit more about that in just a few minutes.
Anyhow, that was Chuck Schumer on the 3rd of January.
And by the way, obviously, this is some years back.
But again, McGovern, being on the inside, being somebody I highly respect, somebody I used in my films, breaking down the initial sins of Donnie T and really how they were going after him even prior to the election.
It's so important.
I mean, this is never ending.
But now he doesn't have the office of the presidency to protect him, and I truly believe that they will put him in prison.
And unfortunately, this has been a military-industrial complex move from the beginning.
They managed him during his years in the presidency.
Now, on the 5th of January, President Obama, in his last few weeks in office, this is 17 now, 2017, he was briefed by NSA, CIA,
and the FBI that had done this very poor excuse for an intelligence assessment, adducing no real evidence but saying that Poochin himself had hacked, had ordered the hacking of the DNC.
The poop-poot!
The pootster!
He was briefed on that.
That's important to realize on the 5th.
On the 6th, the president-elect entertained James Comey, FBI, John Brennan, CIA, Admiral Rogers, head of NSA at the time, and James Clapper.
James Clapper is a Russian expert.
Studied the hands of Air Force generals down the line, okay?
And he knows, and he said, quote, you know, Russian history shows that the Russians are almost genetically driven to be deceitful, to cheat.
I say that, that's a direct quote, almost genetically driven to be deceitful and to fool and blah, So.
I mean, can you imagine, you don't have to imagine, genetically driven.
No, that's not a bigoted statement.
That's not beyond ridiculous.
That's not inherently.
The Russians are almost genetically driven.
Clapper's one of the worst ghouls out there.
And then, again, Clapper has been completely unaccountable for the fact that he lied and said that they weren't spying on the American people when they were clearly spying on the American people and up statute of limitations.
See, there's a person that should really be in prison, James Clapper.
So this Jane Comey and his three members of the Magi there going in to see President-elect Trump.
Now, by prearrangement, by prearrangement, James Comey lingered behind as the head of the FBI.
And he said, now, Mr. President, this is embarrassing to tell you, but you should know that we have this dossier, which really shows some scurrilous things about your visit to Moscow a couple years ago and how prostitutes were involved and peeing on your bed.
That's not confirmed, not confirmed.
But some of the press has it.
And we just, just so you know, just so you know, that it's available.
Now, that's an old trick, folks.
That's an old trick.
A president-elect is always subjected to this kind of, we have this stuff on you, and we don't want it to get out, but just so you know, just so you know.
And if I were Trump, I would have fired Comey right then.
I would have said, Comey, go back, empty your desk, and don't show your face in the FBI again, okay?
Now, he would have had a couple weeks to do that.
That's okay, because Trump wasn't president yet.
So this was the celebrated steel dossier paid for by whom?
Hilldog.
Yeah.
Now, who else paid for the dossier?
Who read the news today?
It was confirmed that the FBI paid for the dossier.
Paid this guy steel.
So, are you getting the picture here a little bit?
Okay.
So that's what we have on the 6th of January.
Now, what's really interesting is that this document that everybody crows about, this intelligence community assessment, the only accurate word in those three words is assessment.
Was it the intelligence community?
No.
Was it just three agencies of the intelligence community?
No.
What was it?
It was hand-picked analysts from these three agencies, not the agencies themselves, hand-picked analysts.
Who picked them?
Who picked them?
James Comey, for God's sake.
Now, everyone knows in Washington that if you hand-pick the analysts, you hand-pick the conclusions, right?
Okay?
So there you had this document out that everyone is still crowing about how can Putin, how can Trump stand next to Putin and not believe U.S. intelligence, you know?
And again, look at where we were historically.
Trump and Putin were meeting.
The idea that we were going to be involved in a global conflict, that nuclear war would be on the table and threatened on a semi-regular basis, that wasn't real.
That's not something I was worried about.
That's not something the vast majority of people were worried about.
For good reason, because there was nothing to worry about.
And now we got dementia-ridden puppet Biden in there, and that's a very real possibility.
But it's PP time, and it's FBI time, and it's steel time.
It's the whole shebango.
And boy, at the end of the story, they want so badly to put this guy in prison.
I'm just telling you.
Oh, this is terrible.
Oh, U.S. intelligence is always correct.
Except for before Iraq, and except for a couple other things, all right?
So this is necessary because on the 18th, so we're talking about the 5th of January 2017, Obama's briefed on all this, okay?
Now, on the 18th, Obama gets up for his last press conference.
And having read this and been briefed on this assessment that Putin himself directed that the DNC be hacked and the results be given to WikiLeaks, what does Obama say?
He says, and I quote, the conclusions of the intelligence community with respect to how Russian hacking got to Wikileaks are inconclusive, period, end quote.
Inconclusive conclusions?
Wow.
So why does Obama say that two days before he's going out of office?
Because he's a lawyer.
He wants to protect his derier, you know?
The Russian hacking was bad enough because he probably knew what the evidence was, like, not much.
I would assume that anybody with a brain in the upper echelons obviously knew it was a bunch of Johnny nonsense.
And McGovern correctly identifies lawyer speak, liar speak, covering your own Arnis.
It's saying that it was given by the Russians to WikiLeaks.
You know, we know, and I refer to my NSA colleagues, former NSA, I probably already mentioned two of them were technical directors at NSA.
They know that it wasn't a hack because of the fact, number one, NSA collects everything.
Now, you know, when Bill Binney first, Bill Binney, one of these former technical directors, when he told me that, I said, right, right, Bill, come on now.
All emails, all talking, come on, everything.
He says, Ray, trust me.
I couldn't say this before, but once Ed Snowden brought those slides out into Hong Kong, not only could I say it, but I could show exactly how it's done.
I could show the trace routes that are implanted in the network where they trace every single email.
100%.
And we covered it even before Snowden.
Norris Insight Systems, Hepting versus ATT, they've been doing it since the 90s.
100%.
Broken down into packets.
The packets are reassembled.
Those of you technical people realize what that means.
We can trace exactly where it originated or where it ended up.
And there ain't nothing.
There ain't nothing on Russian hacking.
So that's negative evidence, right?
In other words, the argument would be if NSA had that, certainly they would reveal that given all the controversy.
But you know, Donald Rumsfeld, not my favorite philosopher, but he did go to Princeton and he learned the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
That's pretty profound.
Think about that.
The absence of evidence that there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq doesn't mean they're not there.
And so even though NSA collects it all, even though NSA has the Ecuadorian embassy in London surrounded what they call ironclad coverage, which means no signal gets in there, gets out of here with NSA getting it, right?
Again, this is before they tore Assange out of the Ecuadorian embassy to put him in Belmarsh, a big mistake of the Trump administration, by the way.
A big mistake.
But the Central Intelligence Agencies, along with a bunch of other agencies, had plans to kill and kidnap Assange.
100%.
100%.
Also, connected to Israeli privatized agencies.
Even though that was the case, we're not supposed to believe that the absence of evidence here means anything.
So that was kind of hard.
Now, Bill Benny and I did get into the Baltimore Sun, almost sort of a mainstream, a couple of op-eds there.
But we couldn't get any other exposure for these views.
But now we have forensics evidence.
Now we have some forensic investigators, private ones, who were really interested in working with the metadata that surrounded one of the hacks.
And we found out, as I said before, Gucifer 2.0 is a fraud.
And we found out that this one celebrated event, which we have the transfer rate for.
In other words, let me explain.
It's sort of like, it's not hard to understand.
Even a liberal arts guy like me can understand it after Bill Benny briefs me five times on it.
Okay?
Now.
Before he even says anything, transfer rates, okay?
If they're at a crazy speed, especially at the time, it would have to be a direct download.
Okay, that's one of the things.
You're going to be limited by your bandwidth, the transfer rate, just like when you look on your phone and you see something downloading or you do a speed test or whatever when it's slower, et cetera, et cetera.
That's your transfer rate.
And there's a max and there's a minimum.
Okay?
But when you have a direct transfer rate from a hard drive or a thumb drive, et cetera, et cetera, it's usually a lot quicker.
Liquid dynamics.
You have a pipe.
It has a capacity.
You can't get stuff through that pipe that exceeds its capacity, right?
So think of the network.
Think of the network, the internet, that way.
We know exactly what the capacity of the internet was on the 5th of July 2016.
What was taken out of the DNC computers was taken out at three times the capacity, the rate, so fast, bits, bites, whatever you want to call them, that it could not have been a hack.
had to be a copy from the computer system onto one of those little thumb drives.
And coincidentally, the rate was exactly the same as what a thumb drive can accommodate.
False Flag Suspicions00:12:44
Okay?
So this is physics.
This is liquid dynamics.
And we were able to prove that a year, well, on the 24th of July was his main, our main effort on that.
And that was what got Bill Binney an interview with the head of the CIA at the time, Pompeo.
Bill's friend that, Bill is a very straight guy, right?
So I said, how'd it go, Bill?
He said, well, you know, he asked me what's going on.
I said, well, your people are lying to you.
Seriously, think about that.
Again, another terrible move via the Trump administration behind the scenes.
All the stuff involving Assange and WikiLeaks were terrible moves because you had guys like Pompeo inside.
You had Mattis, you had Bolton, McMaster, all those guys, horrific.
Yeah, they're lying to you, Pompeo.
Come on.
Is Mike Pompeo really that empty, that vapid, that naive?
Oh, he doesn't know?
He says, well, what do you mean?
He says, well, you know, he explained the situation, and there were only two aides there, and I'm not sure how technically adept they were.
But then Pompeo says to him, do you have a relationship with the FBI?
And Bill says, well, sort of.
Eight years ago, they appeared at my house at 6 o'clock in the morning, guns drawn, shoved them in the face of my wife and my child, and got me in the shower.
Shower curtain opened.
There's a gun look pointing at me.
So, yeah, that's the last time I had any dealings with the FBI.
They knew that Bill Binney was not the source of a leak that they were investigating.
They already knew who did it.
They just wanted to make sure that nobody would, you know, people know what happens to people who could be the source.
And three of Bill's colleagues were invaded the same morning at the same time.
Two from NSA and one from the House Intelligence Committee who is a straight person.
Her name is Diane Roark, and she was distraught at what was going on at NSA, namely the collecting of information on all of us.
Now, let me just, people always say, well, I don't, you know.
You see how they strong-arm those that would dare think to question, and not just those that would think to question, but those in a position to question later on?
Point that out.
Needs to be talked about.
nothing to hide.
I mean, if you catch a terrorist, I don't care.
Well, that was prevalent when Ed Snowden came out and told us all what was going on.
So we approached an old friend named Wolfgang Schmidt, who used to work for the Stasi, which is the East German intelligence service.
Did any of you see Das Leiben der Ando, The Lives of Others?
It was a wonderful film.
It was Academy Award winner, wasn't it?
See if you could fish it out, because it shows what the Stasi did, the incredible intrusiveness of their monitoring.
So Wolfgang Schmidt is consulted by a couple of my friends, and they say, now Wolfgang, what do you say to people who say, we have nothing to hide?
It doesn't matter to us.
He says, this is incredibly naive.
You don't get to decide what the government uses against you.
The reason they collect this information is to use it against you in case they want to.
The only reason, the only way to prevent it from being used against you is to prevent it from being collected in the first place.
Love, right?
Correct.
All of it's collected.
We all have a little file in some of those, you know, those big, big stories.
You know how much stuff you can fit on a little thumb drive.
So the only way to prevent it from being used against you is to prevent it from being collected in the first place, and we have a Fourth Amendment that is supposed to prevent that from happening.
People like James Comey, people like Bob Mueller, people like General Hayden, people like John Brennan said, we don't care about the Fourth Amendment.
Hayden.
Just monitor everyone.
Now that was sort of an aside here.
But I want to tell you that there are great advantages to live near Washington.
And we've been there 55 years now.
We've been in our same house for 51 years.
We couldn't possibly buy it now.
You know how that goes, right?
Yeah.
But one advantage is that you get to go to meetings.
You can even go to Hillary's and Podesta's old think tank.
The, what, Center for American Progress or something like that.
Okay, so that's what I do.
I always go to those things.
And if I can, if they'll recognize me, I raise my hand and ask a question.
Well, we have queued up here a two-minute thing where I had already worn out my welcome the previous week and so they wouldn't recognize me when I raised my hand.
So I went up after Schiff, Adam Schiff, representative from California, who's the lead on all this Russia gate.
And I didn't know the camera was on.
And I just sort of asked him a question.
And you'll see it, I hope, if this thing works.
And the whole deal was that he told me, well, he couldn't tell me the answer because he just couldn't share it with me because it was classified.
And it's pretty telling.
I was delighted to learn later that day that C-SPAN cameras were still on, and they even got the voice to it.
So let's see if it works.
My name is Ray McGovern.
I served in CIA under seven presidents and nine directors.
Thank you very much.
We have a little alumni group called Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity.
And we've been following this issue very closely.
One of our members is the former technical director of NSA.
I'm interested in one week ago when the president said this, I don't want to misquote him, the conclusions of the intelligence community with respect to Russian hacking were not conclusive regarding WikiLeaks.
In other words, there's a big gap between alleged Russian hacking and WikiLeaks.
The intelligence community does not know how or if that information, to the degree it exists, got to Wikileaks.
Now, you assert as flat fact that Russia did this.
Do you know more than Obama?
Well, I would never claim to know more.
I mean, my man, Ray McGovern is the, this is the deal.
This is the kind of activism you need.
And think about that.
This is a guy who was on the inside for many years challenging the system.
That might be the best way to ask the question of shift there ever was.
It's a very serious question.
No, it's a serious question.
I have every confidence in the intelligence of the Russian hacking of both the DNC as well as John Podesta.
James Clapper is a convicted.
You asked me.
Do you want to hear the answer?
I will.
And while I can't go into the classified information, I have every confidence that the Russians use WikiLeaks, whether Julian Assange was a known participant or, as the Russians would describe, a useful idiot.
That we will hopefully find out.
But I don't have any question in the conclusions of the intelligence.
You have every confidence, but no evidence.
Is that right?
No, I can't share the evidence with you.
Congressman?
That's bogus.
We always refer to it as the SSCI, the intelligence.
Totally bogus.
So he has every confidence, but no evidence.
It's so nice to know that these politicians have 100% confidence in the intelligence community.
I mean, I feel so safe.
Now, I think while this is still working, I'm going to show you one other short clip.
Just to introduce it, there's one congressman, his name is Devin Nunes.
He comes from the Central Valley of California.
Now, I have to tell you that I know something about him because I met him about nine or ten years ago.
He was the only congressperson, the only U.S. official that had the guts to give an award to one of the survivors of the USS Liberty.
One of the people working for him, Terry Harbarjier, was the sailor when the Israelis were attacking the U.S. Liberty, poured napalm all over the deck, shot out all the active radars that were working.
He went up to Captain McGonagall and he said, Captain, he was from Texas, I think I can make that, you know, that antenna we couldn't get to work before, but the Israelis haven't knocked that out, so I think I can connect that.
And McGonagall said, right.
What are you going to swim across that napalm?
What are you going to do?
No, I don't.
He said, sir, I'd like to try.
I request permission.
Permission granted.
He went out with some bailing wire.
You know how to do those things.
In infantry, we call that a field expedient, right?
Well, Terry Holbert did, he knew how to do this.
He connected the wire, they got an SOS out, and that's the only reason that only 34 people were killed by the Israelis that day, not the whole shipload of almost 300.
They broke off the attack because they intercepted the SOS.
Now, Devin Nunes had Terry Harbor Jer working for him.
And he heard about all this, and so he petitioned the Navy to give Terry the Silver Cross, which I'm told is the second highest, right underneath the Medal of Honor.
And by the way, most politicians and people in the know stay away from the USS Liberty incident, like the plague, because they don't want to admit that this was another instance where the Israelis were involved in what could have been a deadly debt.
I mean, it was deadly, but I mean devastating.
Could have sparked so much via these type of false flag events.
I'm just saying.
And when I heard that, I'm very friendly with a lot of the Liberty survivors.
You want to see what PTSD looks like, folks?
Talk to the Liberty survivors for lots of reasons.
Anyhow, I went out there in the next plane and I got there just for the ceremony, modest ceremony, right in Nunes' office there in Vesalia, the Central Valley.
And there were a couple press around, no big deal.
And Terry was awarded.
They pressed using, can you show us your award?
He pulls up his shirt, the shrapnel thing, you wouldn't believe.
Anyhow, he got that award.
I thought that was courageous.
You know, you can be cynical and say, well, there aren't too many Israelis living in the Central Valley of California.
But still, you know, he's a congressman and he faced into that.
Now, I never thought that he'd reappear in this incarnation, but he's now head of the intelligence committee in the House.
Nunes Holds Feet to the Fire00:02:54
And together with two other committee chairs, he seems to be doing a job that is quite uncommon in Washington.
See, the oversight committees have the idea that oversight is oversight, not oversight.
So what Nunes is doing is holding people's feet to the fire.
Now, he had a, he, I think he arranges these interviews.
He had one interview with Cheryl Atkinson.
Here's the problem.
No one ends up being accountable.
Obviously, time has been told.
You know, as well-meaning as Nunes might have been, what did it turn into?
Bar, Durham, nothing.
We only got a few more minutes in the broadcast.
We're going to cut it there.
It goes on for another 16 minutes.
He's the man.
Ray McGovern is the dude.
He's the guy.
He's the man.
And he is in, let's see, my films, Fabled Enemies and Loose Change, Final Cut.
He's some of the glue that holds Fabled Enemies together.
So if you haven't seen those films, they are free of charge.
I want you to check them out.
I want you to share them with others.
In fact, you know, again, when I'm at these events, I'm not selling anything.
People tell me I should get cards.
I probably should get a card.
I only have a cart.
I'm there to work.
I'm there to talk.
I'm there to share information.
I only wish that, for instance, I'll tell you what, somebody wants to fund, and who knows if I'll get invited, but I know that they're having one in December.
So if I get invited to the one in December, if somebody wants to, and it's not a big fund, if they want to burn or print up a bunch of my DVDs of films, I would gladly just hand them out for free at these events.
In fact, that would be a great move.
I might do that on my own.
It takes a lot of time to burn.
If you've got Mass Burner or Printer or you're in the business and you want to do that, let's make that happen, Captain.
Because again, it's about sharing this information with others.
And Ray just did a really great breakdown of them going after Trump from the beginning, the Russia hoax from the beginning, and important information that still is not discussed within the mainstream media.
So guys, once again, thumbs up, subscribe, share.
Remember, Red Voice Media does it throughout the day, and then they run it again.
And, you know, it's so impressive to have an almost 12-hour a day network.
Six Interviews Packed00:00:41
We run it Monday through Thursday, 9 to 11 a.m. Eastern.
And remember, you can support us at redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
Six different interviews packed into two different videos.
That's the premium this week from Chris Skye to Richard Bartlett to Joe Hoft and beyond.
You can't miss it.
Really great conversations.
And I think Wednesday. when we have the canned hour, which is tomorrow, we'll probably have a compilation of some more of those interviews that still haven't made the cut.