Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 3, 2023 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas

01:55:06

Deep State Scumbaggery On Display | Reality Rants with Jason Bermas

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
	Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
	We think too much and feel too little.
	More than machinery, we need humanity.
	We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat, as if that's the way it's supposed to be.
	We know things are bad, worse than bad.
	They're crazy. Silence!
	The Great and Powerful Dammit!
	My life has value!
	You have meddled with the primal forces of nature!
	Don't give yourselves to brutes, men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder!
	Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men!
	Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts!
	Yeah! Thank you! You're beautiful!
	I love you! Yes!
	You're beautiful!
	Thank you!
	Ha ha!
	Shh!
	It's...
	Showtime!
	And now, reality hit with Jason Vermis!
	And who loves you?
	And who do you love?
	Good morning, everybody.
	It is Reality Rants. I am Jason Hermes.
	Hey, everybody. Here I am in Sherwood, Connecticut.
	And, of course...
	I screw it up again.
	I can't help myself.
	Should have had a very smooth intro there.
	Instead, nope. Forgot to take the shuffle off of when I have a little playlist going on.
	Just amateur hour over here.
	Man, the bags are hardcore.
	I got like five, six hours.
	Wasn't great sleep last night.
	The grays are popping.
	We're old. But we're genuine.
	We're real. We're not Billy Barr.
	We're not the fixer.
	And that's a good thing because Bill Barr is somebody I've been warning people about for a very, very, very long time.
	And you know what? The more I think about the Bannon tirade, about how they're going to declassify all these assassinations, yada, yada, yada.
	First of all, I'm not buying into that.
	But when I really step back, And I think to myself, wait a minute.
	Why not do 9-11?
	I mean, 9-11 is the baseline.
	And obviously, I think back to a young Jason Burmus.
	A Jason Burmus who's just not only discovering this stuff, but discovering that no matter how much you point out, no matter how much evidence you have that you've been lied to, About what was then the largest global event of change in my lifetime easily.
	And it ranks on the scale, seriously, for human history big time because it's not just another war.
	It's a never-ending war.
	It's also a war that sets up a Stasi-like infrastructure within our constitutional republic run on democratic values.
	And the big thing for me is that you'd have actual, real prosecutions of real people that are still alive.
	And it would upend what's really going on with our quote-unquote alliances with nation states such as Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Pakistan in particular.
	It would show this network of disruption.
	And it would, in my opinion...
	Allow more people to understand why the entire infrastructure of our intelligence has to be restructured and restructured in much more of a transparent manner.
	I mean, what we have is a bad joke and that puts people like Billy Barr in charge.
	In fact, If Trump...
	And I'm not saying he's going to do it.
	Again, I don't even think that he could...
	I don't know how he's getting in.
	I mean, that's basically this first hour.
	How the hell is he going to get in?
	They're trying to put him in jail.
	Every talking point from here on in is he's a criminal.
	I mean, CNN ran a piece.
	Now, I'm going to play the Newsmax piece with Gates and...
	I don't know who the other guy is, but you got this individual on CNN comparing Don E.T. to Osama Bin Laden.
	Now, that's what really triggered this 9-11 discussion.
	Because look, it is.
	It is the baseline for our entire foreign and domestic policy over the last 20 plus years.
	And it was hammered.
	Hammered. Like, right now, they're really trying to get you to forget about a lot of the things that went down during the COVID-1984 nightmare.
	Not the case with 9-11.
	They just kept upping the game.
	From a color-coded terror list.
	You know, where we were at.
	Color codes. We're in orange!
	Watch out! Constant, constant pushing of Islamic terrorism, Al-Qaeda in particular.
	It took a good almost decade for them to have to transition from Al-Qaeda into the idea of ISIS. But again, that was part of the never-ending war and them getting into Syria via Operation Timber Sycamore.
	So I'll say it again. You could get in there I mean, Bannon also talked about Epstein under Bill Barr's watch.
	Donnie T put him in.
	You know, this guy was a deep state puddin' pop.
	From the get-go, Iran-Contra fixer.
	You know, Mueller-Buddy.
	Like the apprentice of George H.W. Bush.
	One of the true, I would say...
	Outward, just, priests of the New World Order.
	I mean, he got up there and he gave it to you.
	It's not just that one speech.
	The dude went on tour.
	He went on a New World Order tour.
	Then, after the first Gulf War, which was like, I'll say this, you know, when I talk about a beta test of the biometrics and the drones in the War of Terror, they got to just kind of unveil some of the toys.
	Obviously the drone stuff, you know, wasn't put out there, but the stealth bomber was like, alright, you know, we're going to show people the blackbirds.
	You know, they probably had them for 20, 30 years operational before that.
	And then they get to start mass producing them as well.
	But after that, he literally gave his boys, including Dick Cheney and Colin Powell and Donnie Rumsfeld, the Donnie of his day, New World Order commemorative handguns.
	Had New World Order engraved on it.
	That's how dead serious George H.W. Bush was about globalism.
	Just a little snippet, a little nugget for you.
	And Bill Barr is his dude?
	And I was, again, you know, I'm not an I told you so guy, but this guy's still out there.
	And he's going to be rolled out everywhere.
	Everywhere. Everywhere.
	Robert Johnson, I mean Bill Barr, says the First Amendment will not protect Donald Trump from the charges of trying to overturn the election.
	Free speech does not entitle you to engage in a fraudulent conspiracy.
	So he's on with Little Leslie.
	I forget her name.
	I probably don't want to know it.
	Let's see if they show Little Leslie.
	I mean, come on. Both of those guys.
	You know what Trump needs to do, first thing, if he actually could get in?
	This one's a little Leslie.
	We're going to play the whole thing. We're going to break it down.
	Don't worry. In order to do a lot of what he's going to need to, he needs a really strong attorney general.
	And it's not an easy job.
	I would be remiss.
	And I'm not even sure if this is possible.
	Because I'm not sure if you have to be a lawyer to be the Attorney General.
	I have no idea.
	Ignorance on my part.
	But I'd put a Rand Paul in there.
	Rand Paul really seems to want to prosecute people.
	I'd put the doc in there.
	That's the pediatrician.
	Just me. I put someone in there that's actually going to use the law to go after criminals.
	Because Bill Barr ain't doing it.
	Bill Barr is now making the case.
	First of all, he's lying. And saying that Trump didn't really believe he won.
	Now, on any level, does anybody actually believe that?
	That Don doesn't think he won.
	Of course he does. Even in an ultraverse where I believed in imagination land and pony triplets pooping out rainbows into a sky of diamonds with leprechauns and unicorns colliding into a big bang of a new galaxy.
	A whole lot of giant nonsense there, right?
	That Biden got 81 million votes.
	Even in that world, Where I legitimately thought that Biden beat Trump, I don't think Trump's ego would allow him to think that Biden beat him.
	Period. So at no moment, at no moment do I believe that Trump thought he actually lost the election.
	That's what Bill Barr is trying to sell you on.
	And that's what will prove the conspiracy.
	In a DC jury, they might be able to convict you of nothing now.
	You've got to understand, when the Department of Justice...
	Was under Bill Barr.
	And not only did they have the Hunter laptop.
	I mean, he's the cover-up crew for all this stuff.
	Epstein, Hunter laptop.
	You know, he smiles behind the scenes with Trump.
	I mean, he's the disinformation guy.
	But while that's happening, he's setting up an infrastructure for pre-crime.
	Forget about thought crime.
	Forget about censorship on the internet, which is still there.
	And you know what? Before we end up going to that big video, which we'll do in the second segment, I want to share this with everybody.
	This should let you know, again, the muskernuts ain't your friend.
	Last American Vagabond, a.k.a.
	Ryan Christian, who I have nothing but respect for.
	And Ryan, we've got to now do a broadcast.
	I'm going to reach out to him today.
	He's not allowed...
	To be in communities. He's not allowed to monetize his blue checkmark page that he paid for.
	And I'm going to say it again.
	If you don't think shadow banning is still going on, if you don't think that signature reduction is part of being inside these tech companies that censor these Trojan horse civilian systems, you need just look at this.
	So I was just shown in addition to TLAP being artificially withheld from setting up subscriptions and ad revenue, okay?
	Despite meeting all the requirements, we're also being blocked by Twitter from being added to any communities.
	What was this again about not shadow banning?
	They do it more and more in the open.
	Look, Twitter right now, I have again lost followers.
	I've lost about, I don't know, probably like 50 to 100 over the last week or so.
	So not only can I not gain any traction, because my tweets are so awful and off-putting.
	They're never informational.
	By producing more content, you usually lose people.
	That's how it usually works.
	And in YouTube, again, we're about to go under the 600 mark.
	Just keep losing subscribers.
	Now, I'm maintaining...
	A 15-20 minute watch time on my hour-long videos.
	Huge for YouTube. They get you to watch 5 minutes out of an hour.
	They love you. Alright?
	98-99% plus on approvals.
	And just for some reason, for some reason, I keep losing followers.
	And if you don't think that this is big tech collusion...
	Same thing with Facebook, by the way.
	Now, I realize that Facebook also wants you to pay money.
	And I have a separate page that I don't really post to that's not my normal page.
	But my normal page has 4,500.
	They cap you at 5,000.
	4,500 followers.
	I post a full video of one of my shows there.
	I get 10 people engaged in it out of 4,500.
	10 people engaged in it.
	But it's okay.
	Bill Barr says there's clearly a fraudulent conspiracy afoot and Trump is clearly going to be going to jail.
	We're going to get to that after this.
	We interrupt today's programming to bring unfortunate news.
	Biden's dangerous plan for a digital dollar is underway.
	Don't be fooled.
	It won't benefit you.
	So take action now.
	The Federal Reserve's phased deployment of FedNow began on July 1st, 2023.
	Be prepared. This may catch many off guard and put your hard-earned assets in jeopardy.
	But here's the good news.
	There's a simple legal tax loophole to opt out of the digital dollar.
	Speak to someone at American Alternative Assets for a free wealth protection guide and discover how to safeguard your wealth with gold and silver IRAs against a failing dollar in volatile markets.
	Dial 833-287-2465.
	This invaluable guide provides precise steps to transfer your IRA or 401k into precious metals without any tax consequences.
	Don't let Biden force you into using the government's new digital dollar.
	Call 833-287-2465.
	USA Gold.
	Yes, call now.
	833-287-2465.
	Act swiftly. 833-287-2465.
	I can't really emphasize enough.
	That's why it's like the hardcore support out there.
	You guys that are watching every single morning, every single day, sharing the links, sharing the small stuff, sharing the stories.
	That's what's important.
	That's how we reach people. We need that infrastructure.
	All this alternative stuff.
	Even at Rumble, we're doing okay, but there's not a huge amount of growth.
	They still have, I think, a real problem with the fact that Their mobile search engine and their app just isn't up to snuff yet.
	Right? And then it's not like I believe that Peter Thiel, who's highly invested, is a great guy and won't engage in the same types of censorship.
	And that's the whole thing, right? Power is a vacuum.
	We have these things in place so they can't be imbused not only by the people in charge at the time, but the people in charge later.
	And that's why, like...
	The idea that Biden prosecuting Trump is a good thing from some of these people in fantasy land because it's going to set up the infrastructure for Trump to do the same thing when he gets in.
	It's ridiculous. It's not how it works.
	None of this is good.
	It's like, no.
	It's the same thing when people were in fantasy land believing that Guantanamo Bay was a good thing and that White Hats had gotten people into Guantanamo Bay.
	They'd cut deals with Assange.
	They tried John McCain in a secret hearing.
	It's like, what are you talking about?
	It's Looney Tunes land.
	Like, you literally just set up a totally and completely ridiculous argument so that you could prop up the idea of black sites and torture, dummy.
	We don't want Abu Ghraibs.
	We don't want Guantanamo Bays.
	Because at the end of the day, they're for you.
	They're for your kids.
	They're for your brothers and sisters, your neighbors.
	If we don't protect innocent people everywhere, you don't protect yourself.
	It's also in your self-interest not to go along with such garbage.
	Just want to put that out there. Alright. I've ranted here on Reality Rants, redvoicemedia.com, for a little bit.
	Second Hour, rvmrumble.com.
	Second Hour was fun yesterday.
	I hope people enjoyed it.
	More disc info, disinfo out there.
	We've got to make that into a hot new single.
	Disc info, disinfo.
	With a nice disco backbeat.
	We can throw in maybe some Nine Inch Nails synth there too, but...
	Hear me out. Someone create that AI for me.
	Let's do that. Okay. Bill Barr with little Leslie.
	These are the talking points you're going to continuously hear.
	Period. All right?
	Here we go. And I'm joined now by the former Trump Attorney General, Bill Barr.
	His first reaction since we have seen these new charges.
	And thank you so much for being here, Mr.
	Attorney General. I mean, you've now read through this indictment.
	Do you think it's a strong case?
	He's looking really pale. I mean, just like on that screenshot.
	He looks like a cross right here.
	Between, like, you know, one of the withered old lizard folks of lore and maybe some kind of like a tarantula creature.
	There's a lot of, there's a lot of lip nose leeway there.
	He's gotten a little long, long in the face, Bill Barr.
	Seems to be enamored with Caitlyn, aka little Leslie over here.
	Just, you know, I can already tell.
	Yeah, I think it's a legitimate case.
	I think, unlike the document case, it's going to have issues of proof.
	It's a more complicated case.
	And I think There are some downsides to it.
	I think there were reasons not to bring it.
	I've said before I'm a little concerned about the slippery slope of criminalizing legitimate political activity.
	I'm worried about moving in that direction.
	They've done it.
	What do you mean moving in that direction?
	This is it. It happened.
	No, he thinks it's a legitimate case.
	And notice... He's also promoting the idea of the document case basically being a slam dunk.
	But it's a Trump-appointed judge!
	Dude! Guys!
	Wake up!
	I mean, none of these people are your friends.
	And people are people.
	People like a little cheese.
	They like a little comfort.
	They sell out easy.
	Even if they pretended to have scruples and morals and be a good person.
	Humans are humans.
	But Bill Barr has been a professional fixer his entire adult life, literally in the Central
	Intelligence Agency before he became a lawyer,
	before he was working at firms like Kirkland and Ellis that were Epstein lawyers, for instance.
	I'm also worried about bringing this case and the divisiveness that it will bring by highlighting
	double standard.
	Because at the same time this case is being brought, you know, the department appears to have dropped the ball on the Hunter Biden investigation.
	It's going to be very hard to...
	So again, Bill Barr, I mean, he's crafty.
	He's crafty. He brings up the Biden case.
	Bill Barr knew all about the Biden case prior.
	He has claimed ignorance.
	He's claimed elements of the Justice Department hid things from him.
	Do you believe that?
	A guy like Bill Barr, who was running the fixing show, whose career in television, he didn't know they had the laptop and it was real?
	Like, what planet are we on?
	And he thought that Epstein death was pretty suspicious too, but then he went in there and he figured it out.
	And boy, oh boy, he got real concerned.
	He got real concerned about all this Russia talk with the FBI and this witch hunt with Trump.
	But don't worry.
	He told you on Fox News that him and Chris Wray fixed it up because he's the fixing kind of guy.
	He's fixing things.
	Mr. Fixer. Persuade many Republicans that this isn't political.
	Well, talk about the Hunter Biden investigation.
	But, I mean, when you do look at the indictment, do you think it's something you would have brought?
	I think...
	I don't know if I would have approved the indictment, but in the sense, I may have exercised this question and not gone forward with the case.
	I'm also concerned about having this case going on during the election and diverting people's attention from the issues in the election.
	I'm also worried about, you know, what the impact is if there are acquittals during the campaign.
	Why would you be concerned about acquittals?
	Remember, this is an administration he supposedly worked in.
	So, if Trump's found innocent because he actually did believe that, you know, he won the election and he looked at his legal means to challenge a fraudulent outcome, why would that be bad?
	Why would you be worried about people being acquitted?
	But as a legal matter, I don't see a problem with the indictment.
	I think that it's not an abuse.
	The Department of Justice is not acting to weaponize the department by proceeding against the president for a conspiracy to subvert the electoral process.
	Which is what Trump's attorneys are saying.
	I mean, Bill Barr may be the worst.
	She's terrible, too. Let's get a good look at her.
	How much makeup do you need?
	She's younger, right?
	I mean, there's a lot of makeup there.
	There's, I mean, a lot, a lot of makeup right there.
	But again, I'm not trying to get, I'm trying to get into the content of somebody's character, but sometimes the content of somebody's character, it just pushes through in their appearance.
	Just, you know, putting that out there.
	Saying that he was just exercising his First Amendment right here.
	Do you think that's a valid argument in your view?
	No, I really don't think that's a valid argument.
	You know, as the indictment says, you know, they're not attacking his First Amendment right.
	He can say whatever he wants.
	He can even lie.
	He can even tell people that the election was stolen when he knew better.
	When he knew better.
	Now, some people, and myself included, says, you know, he's trying to say that he knew he lost.
	But there's kind of like a double enchantment to that.
	He knew better than to challenge the election.
	We all told him. It's not going to turn out how you think, Donnie T. Just back it up.
	The fixer's in. Billy Barr said back it up.
	Back it, back it, back it on up.
	But that does not protect you from entering into a conspiracy.
	All conspiracies involve speech, and all fraud involves speech.
	So now, again, Bill Barr is equating free speech and questioning things with fraud and conspiracy.
	And again, you're a conspiracy theorist if you talk about things like, I don't know, human sex trafficking when it just so happens to be in the news yesterday that the FBI finds 200 sex trafficking victims, 59 missing children in two weeks sweep.
	Nationwide operation also identified and arrested 126 suspects of child sexual exploitation and human trafficking and 68 suspected traffickers.
	You know, a conspiracy!
	Yeah, it's so weird.
	I mean, the media attacks Sound of Freedom.
	We're like, this is nuts!
	And then, boom.
	And this is just a minor thing.
	When you look at what's happening in county after county, when police actually do do these type of sweeps, if you will, Florida in particular, California in particular, New York, come on. I mean, this is the real deal.
	But no, Bill Barr.
	Bill Barr, he's the man.
	Let's continue with Billy Barr and little Leslie.
	Free speech doesn't give you the right to engage in a fraudulent conspiracy.
	The other thing that they're arguing, including John Laro, Trump's new attorney to me last night, was that they were simply asking the former Vice President Mike Pence to pause on the counting of votes.
	Mike Pence pushed back on that today, said that's not what they were asking him to do.
	Let's be clear on this point.
	It wasn't just that they asked for a pause.
	The president specifically asked me and his gaggle of crackpot lawyers asked me to literally reject votes, which would have resulted in the issue being turned over to the House of Representatives and literally chaos would have ensued.
	Chaos would have ensued. We would have had an audit.
	We would have had a type of checks and balances.
	What? What he wanted him to do was not certify the votes in clearly fraudulent states so you could do an audit.
	I am pro-audit.
	We put the system on quote-unquote pause back in the Bush Gore days with the hanging chads in Florida.
	I just want to point that out.
	That actually happened.
	For quite some time. And then the challenges to the 2016 election were over the top.
	And then you had literally John Podesta and company wargaming what would happen if Trump came out on top and how they could stop his presidency by going to the Electoral College.
	Can't make it up. Can't make it up.
	We're about to go to break.
	I want to remind people, the second hour is over at rvmrumble.com.
	Give us a follow. On a multitude of social media.
	On top of that, what I need you to do is consider redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
	That's redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
	That's how you support us.
	That's where you get the exclusive interviews, at least for the first couple weeks.
	And then we put them out for free anyway, because it's really about getting this information out.
	We're gonna come back to Pence and Barr in a moment, but first a word from our sponsor
	When I invented my pillow my passion was to help each and every one of you and
	And 20 years later, all of your support is what keeps us going.
	Because of you, we've been able to create thousands of USA jobs and help millions get the best sleep ever.
	To thank you, my employees and I are bringing you a limited edition MyPillow.
	The Giza Elegance MyPillow is made with my patented adjustable fill, the most amazing cotton, and a two-inch pipe cusset.
	It has four custom loft levels, machine washable and drivable, and you get my 60-day money-back guarantee and 10-year warranty.
	Go to MyPillow.com or call the number on your screen.
	Use your promo code to get your limited edition, 20th anniversary MyPillow queen size.
	Retails for $69.98, now only $19.98.
	That's right, get a queen size MyPillow for only $19.98.
	From all of us here at MyPillow, face America!
	How strong of a witness do you think he'll be against Trump if he's called?
	Vice President? I think he'll be a very strong witness.
	He has the highest integrity.
	Mike Pence, the highest integrity, man.
	Pence for President 2024.
	He's got Bill Barr's endorsement.
	That's a good thing, huh? Pence, Pence, Pence.
	Behave with dignity and propriety all the way through this.
	Do you agree that they weren't just asking him to pause the counting on the votes?
	They were asking him to overturn the election?
	Do you agree? I mean, God, every time I hear her tone, her candor, the speed at which she speaks, the speed at which she speaks, I want to vomit.
	I mean, she really, that's...
	That's someone that you can tell feels like they know everything.
	And that's a little authoritarian.
	That's a little Leslie. He wasn't around, but from what I read in the indictment, there was a discussion, and the president himself stressed that he would prefer him just to accept the votes.
	Oh, he would prefer him.
	Well, he would prefer him to do that.
	Wasn't that nice of him? And that, I mean, Donny T, they fortified the election.
	I'd prefer it if you just let it go.
	Hmm, weird. He knew better, right, Bill?
	He knew better. The panels that were pro-Trump, that it wasn't a question of just buying time.
	Yeah. The other argument that we're hearing is about who Trump was listening to at this time.
	Trump's attorney, John Loro, said this of John Eastman.
	Mr. Trump had the advice of counsel, Mr.
	Eastman, who was one of the most respected constitutional scholars in the United States, giving him advice and guidance.
	I mean, Waters, again to his credit, read part of the indictment and they said the lawyers only said he had like a five to ten percent chance of succeeding.
	That's, first of all, that's not zero.
	And second of all, that's their advice.
	Their, I mean, it's utterly ridiculous.
	I mean, but again, we're here.
	We're in the dark cartoon.
	We're in the upside down.
	He's citing John Eastman as this constitutional scholar, but we know in the indictment, I mean, it says Trump is ignoring your advice, that of other senior Justice Department officials, Pat Cipollone.
	I mean, he ignored the intelligence community when everybody said the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation.
	How dare he?
	Like, the fact that these people act like these are authoritative sources and beyond question when they are proven liars again and again and again and again and again.
	Proven liars again and again and again and again.
	It's cartoon level.
	And you know what? Little Leslie here fits in because you got like the little Joker dimples when she smiles.
	When will he get a load of me?
	White House counsel, the director of national intelligence.
	I mean, is it a credible defense to say he was just listening to John Eastman?
	You know, I don't think that that dog is going to hunt, as you say.
	First, as to people who had some knowledge of whether or not there was fraud, everyone was telling him that the election was not stolen by fraud.
	And then as to the- And remember, When they did find anomalous behavior or any types of quote-unquote fraud, it became the talking point.
	There was no evidence of widespread voter fraud.
	Widespread voter fraud.
	So that basically let them just deny, because again, it's all about Bernaysian language, and they're protecting themselves by saying there's never zero anyway.
	Right? So now there is no definition for widespread.
	And all the experts are telling you that Joe Biden got 81 million votes.
	I mean, the makeup on Bill Barr, also not the best.
	A little bit ghoulish.
	I mean, he's definitely got that starring as like the guest uncle in a Munsters episode vibe in this.
	The issue of what he could do legally at that point, he went through all the lawyers, you know, he wouldn't listen to all the lawyers in the department who, in various departments or the White House that had those responsibilities, or his campaign.
	He would search for a lawyer who would give him the advice he wanted.
	But I'm not even sure you would characterize what Eastman said as advice.
	I mean, It'd be interesting to see, but I interpret what he was saying essentially was, well, you know, it's unclear here and you can make this argument.
	I'm not saying the courts would accept it and so forth.
	And you act on that at your own hazard.
	You act on that at your own hazard.
	Again, what actions were taken?
	That's what I continuously ask.
	The guy couldn't have been in a better position to fight this, but because Trump made bad decisions with people like Bill Barr, with people like John Bolton, with people like James Mattis, with people like Jeff Sessions, with people like Mike Pence, this is where it got him.
	When he made bad decisions against his instincts on Julian Assange, on not getting us out of Syria, Okay?
	Not following through on the questions that he was asking about 9-11.
	You're going to find out who did it.
	We're going to find out. Really?
	So again, I'm going to bring it back to the beginning of the show.
	That's what... You know what?
	He needs to start talking about that on the campaign.
	If they're going to compare him to Osama bin Laden...
	He needs to go, well, wait a minute.
	First of all, you don't compare me, you know, to a terrorist that you've accused of doing all these things, especially since he used to be your Central Intelligence Agency buddy.
	And they found him in Pakistani intelligence when Pakistan intelligence was there on the morning of 9-11.
	When I say there, in D.C., in the week of, meeting with all sorts of goodies.
	Isn't that right? After wiring out a hundred grand through another asset that's just the shadiest dude ever and currently in a safe house in the UK. Yeah.
	Yeah. That's how it really works.
	And if a dumb guy like me can point that out, Donnie T needs to start pointing it out, man.
	Say, we got criminals running the show.
	And boy, you think the knives have come out on him now?
	He's got nothing to lose.
	They're trying to put him in prison for the rest of his life.
	And people are like, it doesn't matter.
	He's going to get the nomination and win.
	Like, whoa. Guys.
	Whoa. I mean, the propaganda campaign is in full effect, but like...
	Let's pull it back and get back to reality for a minute.
	I don't think this defensive advice of counsel is going to go forward because I think the president would have to get on the stand and subject himself to cross-examination in order to raise that.
	And he'd also have to waive attorney-client privilege.
	Wait a minute. He'd have to waive attorney-client privilege?
	Since when? Since when does that happen?
	I mean, first of all, they have these new subsection laws where attorney-client privilege isn't even really there anymore and it can act as criminal behavior, which it never has been.
	That's how a guy like Roy Cohn exists, by the way.
	Because everything that they say in that room is between them and it doesn't matter.
	Period. That's how gangster lawyers like Roy Cohn You wonder how Trump went up the ladder?
	Come on. You don't think Roy Cohn had a huge thing to do with that?
	Of course he did. Of course he did.
	And what would happen if he got on the stand?
	I think it would not come out very well for him.
	I mean, look at the little smircles.
	I haven't seen him look so happy since he laughed hysterically with the CBS News guy about the death of Jeffrey Epstein and making sure that Ghislaine Maxwell didn't commit suicide.
	Remember that? Cackle fest?
	Look at the little smircle on him.
	There he is. He's got a nice one. A little smircle.
	Would it hurt him? Oh, yes.
	Yes. Why do you think that?
	Look at the smirkle on her too, man.
	She loves what he just said.
	Ooh yeah, look at that smirkle!
	I think he'd be subject to very skilled cross-examination and I doubt he remembers all the different versions of events he's given over the last few years.
	Do you think he knew that he lost the election?
	Do I personally believe that?
	At first I wasn't sure, but I have come to believe that he knew well that he had lost the election.
	Oh! You know, at first I just wasn't sure.
	First of all, let me go back to my original point.
	There is not a moment, not a split second, that Donald Trump thought he lost to Joe Biden.
	That's just not real.
	Okay? Even if he had lost to him, that wouldn't be real.
	But... Here's a guy who literally has hangers of people coming to see him at military bases during COVID because they made him go outdoors.
	Was basically running for a second term from the moment he got in.
	I believe gave the press more access than any other president.
	And they demonized a large portion of America.
	They told you the guy with dementia was the dude.
	And now Bill Barr has come to believe that Trump knew that he had lost the election.
	And that also is criminal.
	They were trying to overturn the election.
	Election denier. Let's get some thumbs up.
	Can we get a hundred thumbs up over on YouTube?
	I'd appreciate it, guys.
	Again, social media is tough out there.
	That's why we need redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
	And your support, $10 a month, try it for a week for a buck, or lock it, lock it, lock it in for a year.
	It really helps me out.
	If you lock it in for a year for $100, save yourself $20.
	And that's where you see, really, me interact with people more.
	It's not just a reality rant and me talking about somebody looking as makeuped and ghoulish as Bill Barr.
	Now, what I think is important is the government has assumed the burden of proving that.
	The government, in their indictment, takes the position that he had actual knowledge that he had lost the election and the election wasn't stolen through fraud.
	And they're going to have to prove that beyond a reasonable doubt.
	Which is a high bar, of course.
	It's a high bar. Now, that leads me to believe that we're only seeing a tip of the iceberg on this.
	You think Jack Smith has more?
	Oh yes, I would believe...
	Oh! No, no, no.
	He knows Jack Smith has more.
	This guy's the fixer.
	You don't think that behind the scenes, like, Bill Barr is working with this system that is criminally charging Trump?
	Come on now.
	Come on. Again, are we allowed to be adults?
	Is that okay?
	TV has a lot more.
	And that's one of the things that impressed me about the indictment.
	It was very spare. Look at him smile.
	It was very spare.
	It was a joke.
	Because it is a bad joke.
	Because you're trying to criminalize speech.
	You've changed the definition of what disenfranchise means.
	And somehow now it's a criminal activity to deny someone the right to vote.
	I thought we had free will in this country.
	I thought in this world, especially in our democracy, it's a republic if you can keep it.
	Boy, we haven't. We got guys like Bill Barr up here, like lecturing us, lecturing us about really being the problem because we question this thing.
	The old, you know, the, I mean, the old insurrection line, all of it, that's all Billy Barr.
	So, we're about to go to break.
	Thumbs it up, subscribe, share.
	We're going to do one more segment in the first hour, and then we're going to go over to rvmrumble.com for that second hour, that sweet, sweet second hour.
	We'll be back with little Leslie Stahl, Bill Barr, and more after this word from our sponsor.
	Attention Americans.
	Breaking news. Biden's dangerous plan for a digital dollar is underway.
	Don't be fooled.
	It won't benefit you.
	Take action now.
	The Federal Reserve phase deployment of FedNow began on July 1, 2023.
	Be prepared. This may catch many off guard.
	Your hard-earned assets are in jeopardy.
	But there's a simple legal tax loophole to opt out of the digital dollar.
	Reach out to American Alternative Assets for a free wealth protection guide and discover how to safeguard your wealth with gold and silver IRAs against a failing dollar in volatile markets.
	Visit ProtectFromBiden.com.
	This invaluable guide provides precise steps to transfer your IRA or 401 Again, that's ProtectFromBiden.com.
	Alright, we are back.
	We're going to continue on with this.
	And I'm reading the comments section sometimes in the thing.
	And I'm hearing Trump fanboying.
	I'm not fanboying for the guy.
	I just don't think that the guy...
	First of all, this is what I believe about it.
	Because I've been challenged by other people.
	It's like the same thing with Rudy Giuliani.
	What do you think? Rudy Giuliani is a hero?
	Hell no! I think Rudy Giuliani is one of the worst.
	I talk about that on the show constantly.
	Again, Trump fanboy, I sat here just in the last segment and talked about how he was able to come up because he had Roy Cohn as a lawyer.
	I'm certainly not shilling for Roy Cohn.
	I'm pointing out that Roy Cohn not only had some pretty heavy-hitting political players, but then what?
	He was a mob lawyer in New York City for so long.
	My point is that they did steal the election.
	I think that's 100% real.
	That's not fake. That's not phony.
	And then what do you do?
	He's not supposed to challenge it?
	To criminalize the President of the United States who's been duly elected for challenging a stolen election to me is insane.
	But again, I pointed out how can I be fanboying for the guy when I pointed out the fact that look at all these people and decisions that he made that brought him to this point.
	And again, I'm pushing for right now that he does what?
	He starts coming hard via what?
	9-11. I mean hard.
	I mean as hard as you can.
	Which is going to be a problem for him.
	And probably an impossibility.
	Because I sat here and I talked about the Pakistani role in particular.
	And I alluded to the Saudi Arabian role that people are obviously aware of.
	But then the Israeli role.
	And you know this guy is as tight with a Netanyahu as you can get.
	That's a big problem.
	I didn't like what he did with making Jerusalem the capital and continuing to stoke the fires there.
	While he didn't get us into any new wars, he certainly didn't do anything for a real resolution via the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
	Right? That's a big problem with RFK Jr.
	too. Especially the way that he's discussed it.
	And, you know, you shouldn't be worried about being attacked to say that.
	That's another thing.
	I want a resolution.
	I don't like the fact that Gaza, in so many respects, resembles an open-air prison.
	I don't like the fact that they have checkpoints now with sharpshooter AI killer bots.
	That's bad news brown, man.
	That is not good.
	I don't like the pot shots that get taken at journalists that sometimes take their lives.
	That's a lot of issues.
	So, no, I am certainly not fanboying for Trump, but I think that people...
	I work in a sphere where there are a lot of people that have a lot of hopium out there.
	And I find myself to be maybe sometimes too cynical.
	A lot of people would argue, I'm not cynical enough.
	But, as I meet these people behind the scenes, and I get a read on them, yes, you've got the grifters, you've got the social media wannabes, you've got the people in the religious sect, but there are some genuine people.
	And it's like, For instance, I interview a guy named Zach Payne.
	I think he's over at Badlands Media about once a week.
	And we talk. And he's a smart guy.
	And we actually talked before the show the other day.
	And we were kind of talking about the old pirate days.
	And, you know, sharing information and how corrupt the government is.
	And especially, you know, these coming cases with the documents and now the indictment via January 6th.
	And look, he loves Trump.
	He loves him just for the fact that he was such a disruptor that people did start disbelieving the government.
	You know, Tucker Carlson... Continually makes the same point.
	Like, people stop believing the media.
	You know, politicians, that's another thing.
	But the media, that's a big deal.
	All right. I digress.
	We've only got about 10 minutes in this first hour.
	Let's get through more of this Barr interview.
	And there are a lot of things he could have said in there.
	And I think there's a lot more to come.
	And I think they have a lot more evidence as to President Trump's state of mind.
	You said you've come around to the idea that you do think he knew that he lost.
	Why have you come around to that?
	Number one, comments from people like Bannon and Stone.
	Boy, oh boy.
	People like Bannon and Stone.
	And again, you could say what you want about those guys, but I mean, they did throw Roger in jail.
	Like... What they did to Roger, and I've interviewed Roger for RVM. You can find that in the free section now.
	It was a premium. I encourage you to go watch that interview.
	I should get Roger on the show again.
	We actually talked a lot about these upcoming indictments and whether he was in jail or arrested.
	He said he could still run from jail.
	Stone, first of all, didn't do anything criminal.
	They tried to paint him as some kind of conduit through WikiLeaks and Russian operatives.
	That was extremely dishonest.
	But Stone tries to distance himself as much as he can from WikiLeaks, but at the same time talks about how Assange is a journalist and being wrongfully prosecuted.
	Bannon, we've discussed at length on this show, the ups and downs, the good things about him talking about transhumanism and having a large audience, the Epstein tapes and meetings that haven't been released.
	A lot of things there. A lot of things there.
	But it looks like they want to, you know, I think Bannon's already looking at a prison sentence.
	And he's going to have to go away to jail for some time.
	And then you have Stone, you know, without the pardon, would be in jail.
	Before the election, saying that he was going to claim it was stolen if he was falling behind on election night, and that that was the plan of action.
	I find those statements very troubling.
	And then you see that he does that on election night.
	And then the evidence that has come out since that, you know, the press reports and the indictment and his lack of curiosity as to what the actual facts were.
	That's my personal opinion.
	That's my personal opinion.
	We'll see if the government can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
	You spoke to the January 6th Congressional Committee.
	Have you talked to Jack Smith's investigators?
	I'm not going to get into that.
	Oh! Oh!
	Oh! Whoa!
	I'm not going to get into that.
	Of course he has! Of course he has!
	Like I said before, if you don't think Bill Barr is working with these people and has been working with these people for some time, give me a break.
	Of course he has.
	And of course he is.
	Look at that. I mean, look at it.
	Oh! Oh, Bill.
	Perhaps we will have dinner later this evening.
	You came out on December 1st.
	You were there on election night.
	And you said that the Justice Department had uncovered no voting fraud on a scale of what would have changed the outcome.
	Right. So there we go.
	There it is again. The widespread on a scale of.
	Meanwhile, there's no audits.
	We've uncovered nothing that could overturn the results.
	I was there on election night.
	Right. Look how serious his face is.
	...of the election. When you look back on that time period from the election to December 1st, do you ever wish that you had come out sooner and spoken up sooner?
	Not at all. Because if I had come out and shot from the hip without doing some due diligence...
	And making sure I understood what the claims were and that I knew the facts.
	And if I turned out to be wrong without doing due diligence, I think that would have been a disaster for the country.
	But did you get that long to do due diligence?
	Well, the allegations kept on changing from day to day and were very frequently specific.
	You know, a truck driver took so many ballots from here to there.
	And you interviewed that truck driver even.
	Well, I didn't, but the department didn't.
	The department didn't. Yeah, so we were chasing down all these things and I wanted to make sure.
	Just like they were chasing down the Hunter Biden laptop.
	Just like they were chasing down all that information on the Anthony Weiner laptop that they had.
	I mean, come on!
	I'm not going to get into my relationship with Jack Smith and whether I've talked to that.
	Give me a break. I mean, these people use language and Bernaysian talking points.
	I'm going to say it again. Widespread voter fraud.
	Nothing that could have changed the outcome.
	All right? Safest election in history.
	It's the safest. It's the most secure election in history.
	And then they admit they did no audits internally.
	No, we're talking about from the Russians.
	The Russians didn't get this one.
	The Russians hate Joe Biden.
	And it's like, oh, by the way, we're going to try to start World War III once we put the zombie puppet in.
	That the major allegations were looked at and that I had a good sense of what happened.
	I also wanted to analyze the votes themselves and see how the voting patterns were in those states.
	Not only did we not find any fraud of that magnitude, but in the states, and when you actually looked at the votes, they were very clear to me why he lost.
	He ran as the weakest person on the Republican ticket.
	Pennsylvania, he came in 60,000 votes below the Republican ticket.
	So he's losing Republican votes.
	He lost at least 75,000 Republican votes in Arizona.
	I mean, does anybody believe that?
	He got more votes, even what they tell you, than he did the time before.
	And they're telling you he's losing Republican votes.
	I don't know of any Republicans That weren't cheering the guy on.
	And I was seeing people starting to register to vote.
	Not because they had severe TDS or they couldn't wait for a zombie to be put to office.
	But because they were worried about the zombie and wanted to vote for the orange man.
	That's just what I saw.
	But Bill Barr, I mean...
	You know, he's not like a born and bred intelligence guy.
	He's not like an asset.
	He's not like a protege of George H.W. Bush.
	He's none of those things. He's shooting from the hip.
	If I'd shot from the hip. And so, you know, to me there was no...
	And these were the female voters in the suburbs that were Republicans.
	These were the independents in the suburbs that ordinarily would vote Republican.
	So I didn't think there was a mystery as to why he lost.
	Because it was in areas that he was underperforming with.
	His attorney predicts it would take nine months to a year to try this case.
	Do you think a good, solid defense team could get it done before the 2024 election?
	I think it all depends on the judge, and I think my impression is this judge may want to move it along, and so they'll have to be ready to try the case.
	I kept warning people.
	Everybody thought that in Florida they were going to move the case.
	No, they're going to bring the thunder down right around that time and try to convict him and throw him in prison before the election.
	Maybe even before the primaries are over.
	I mean, because it's just going to be over and over again asking the other people running whether or not the Republican Party should give the nomination to a convicted felon.
	That's going to be the talking point.
	100%. Okay?
	Okay. We're going to go to break.
	We're going to come back for a moment.
	You're going to be able to watch the rest of this over at rvmrumble.com in that second hour.
	I use this VPN. You should consider it.
	I'm a big fan of IPVanish.
	We love the internet, but the internet is tracking everything you do.
	Take control of your online privacy with IP vanish people with malicious intent are everywhere
	Watching you criminals can hack your Wi-Fi while broadband providers and advertisers
	Monitor your data with IP vanish on your device your internet activity is encrypted
	No one can see what you're doing your location your connection completely hidden protect your internet privacy
	today with IP vanish and
	Come on over to the second hour via rvmrumble.com YouTube
	I hate to say it, but we've got to leave you, and we will see you on the flip side.
	Boom. All right.
	We're all for the Tubins, and we're rolling here on alternative platforms such as Rumble.
	We're rumbling. We're going to let Barr finish up his treasonous talk.
	I mean, this is real treason, right?
	Like... Oh, I warn people.
	He wasn't coming to save you.
	He's coming with knives out.
	Case, when she's ready to try the case.
	But do you think the American people, was it in the American people's best interest to have this adjudicated before the 2024 election happens, before they cast their ballots?
	Well, the paramount question has to be fairness to the defendants, the fairness of the process.
	And I think there are arguments to be made both ways as to whether it should be first or whether it should come afterwards.
	Of course, if he's elected president, then coming afterwards would be meaningless.
	Because you believe he tried to essentially either get rid of it or pardon himself.
	Do you think this entire indictment for January 6th could have been avoided?
	Is this something of his own making?
	Yeah, I don't think that this is an issue of his victimization.
	I think he brought this on himself.
	This is one of the reasons I oppose him for the Republican nomination, because he has this penchant for engaging in these reckless acts that create these calamitous situations, and then undercut the cause he is supposed to be leading.
	And this is a perfect example of it.
	Again, do not question authoritative sources.
	Bend the knee when you have been wronged.
	Listen to the intelligence community that has clearly lied about you and its activity that it's done to you.
	That's what you're supposed to do.
	That's what you're supposed to do.
	You're just supposed to take it.
	Just supposed to take it.
	Alright. I've got...
	More Trump-Biden stuff.
	I've also got a bunch of news articles that I do want to hit.
	I absolutely want to hit.
	But before that, I want to play this clip of Kevin O'Leary.
	I think he's on Fox News.
	Now, I'm not a big fan of Kevin O'Leary.
	Every once in a while, I'll be flipping through a news channel.
	It's been a while since I watched it, but CNBC loves to play Shark Tank.
	O'Leary's a smart guy.
	That's what I'll say. He was a big pusher of the boopity-boopity-bopity-boo and that kind of sickness.
	So maybe not the smartest guy.
	But it's the first time that I heard that the United States credit rating has now been demoted from AAA to AA. So the slow implosion of the economy continues.
	And you know, I talked about the shadow banning stuff, right?
	Let's go to that.
	Now, first of all, I don't like the fact that I can't make a thumbnail or pick a scene from my tweets.
	And maybe that has a minimal piece to do with this, right?
	But like, you know, I'm able to get, wow, a whole 1600 on that show.
	Here's a... Here's a news clip.
	Just a regular Fox News clip.
	Look at the engagement here. Less than $600.
	And it's such an important news clip because what does it mean for you?
	It means that your car payments, interest, your mortgage payments are going to go up like 9-10% maybe.
	That's a real thing.
	They're going to start passing the buck.
	And this is Bidenomics in action.
	Bidenomics! Yeah, pay attention.
	So here's Kevin O'Leary breaking it down.
	So now for the second time in our nation's history, the country's credit rating has been downgraded and that is no good.
	Fitch ratings point to rising debt and a quote deterioration in standards of governance.
	Treasury now calling the cut arbitrary, but it could actually cost taxpayers.
	Mr. Wonderful is Kevin O'Leary.
	He's got a tick on this now.
	Nice to see you, sir. Good morning to you.
	We were in the same spot 12 years ago.
	2011 was the only other time.
	What do you make of it as the Biden administration pins a little bit of this blame, not a little bit, maybe a lot, on Donald Trump?
	Go figure. Go figure.
	Well, it's really about government and policy.
	There's no way to sugarcoat this at all.
	It's bad. And I'll tell you how you measure it's bad.
	Basically, when you downgrade the U.S. economy, which is what this downgrading is, you are losing a little faith in the U.S. dollar and the U.S. Treasury bill because the default currency of the world, defined by every commodity priced by U.S. dollars, is the good faith of the U.S. government.
	And we don't have a lot of good faith.
	And they're looking at digital currencies.
	And at the same time, they're offering you privatized currencies that could later possibly be adopted, like WorldCoin, Involving biometrics and the orb.
	The whole world trusts it.
	Most sovereign funds keep the majority of their liquidity in U.S. dollars.
	That got hurt 24 hours ago because now you start to ask yourself, well, where is this going?
	A downgrade from AAA to AA, does it go to AA? Now, if you're a sovereign wealth fund, you start to put that in your mind, and the bottom line for you and me is the cost of capital goes up.
	In other words, what it costs for us to borrow money to fund the government in deficit goes up.
	No sugarcoating that.
	Now, how does this actually affect the next 24 months?
	Well, let me explain. Think about the CHIPS Act and the Inflation Reduction Act.
	We're printing billions of dollars.
	Government claims it has merit.
	It's important to do this. But at the same time, that's just a lot of spending.
	And they've already printed up so much, and that's why we've seen inflation.
	The COVID-1984 nightmare had an influx of dollary-do's like you cannot imagine.
	And it's marginalized, if it's discussed at all, across the board.
	It increases the deficit, and that's why Finch did this.
	They downgraded it. And I wouldn't say it was the two bills that caused the camel's back to be broken, but it was enough for them to say, okay, I've seen enough.
	Now, for me and you, or anybody at a kitchen table in America, your car loan just went up from 5% to somewhere between 7% and 9%.
	Really? That's not going to help.
	So the cost of your loan and your borrowing and your mortgage going up, period.
	Okay, so that's on the economic side of it.
	But on the political aspect, if the Biden administration was defending itself, they pointed repeatedly to January 6th from a political standpoint that leads to a lack of trust on behalf of those who...
	January 6th.
	I mean, Joe Rogan caused January 6th now.
	That's in the Daily Beast.
	I mean, he's the guy. Ray Epps had nothing to do with it.
	Epps' lawyers are like, look in the mirror.
	The narrative is Joe Rogan and podcasters caused January 6th.
	And January 6th is the reason that we had inflation.
	And January 6th is the reason that we've been downgraded to AA. Because people just don't trust the government anymore.
	Investing in the United States of America.
	Now, do you think that to be true?
	I think that's a political statement, Shirley.
	I mean, really, this downgrade is about debt and the ability to pay it back.
	It looks beyond any one event.
	It doesn't matter. The more the government goes into deficit spending, the more rating agencies scrutinize the quality of that debt.
	And if you thought we got to the point of no return where it was impossible I don't know if we're nowhere near that.
	And what do I mean by that? Well, we got a taste.
	Just a small sampling of what it's like when restrictions on food happen over the COVID-1984 nightmare.
	Meat shelves in a lot of areas, especially my area, they were done-zo.
	Or when it had it, it was limited to rationing.
	Right? Now, again, this happens in 2011 when hope and change is going on.
	And what did you have?
	You had the big fix there with the banks.
	To the tune of probably $27 trillion.
	We don't know all the backdoor dealings of the bailouts that were occurring in that time period under the Barack star.
	But really it was Trump being a disruptor That brought our economy back somewhat because what?
	We're producing our own energy.
	Energy independence is a huge thing.
	We're threatening tariffs on other nations which was unprecedented because why don't other leaders do that?
	Because they're all about globalization.
	They're all about what?
	This new world order that Bush Sr.
	champions so much. So I think that these guys get their way And they get any of their little popitos in there.
	And by the way, I want to say this.
	Take a look. Ron DeSantis accepts Gavin Newsom's challenge to live TV debate after he claims Florida's already won as everyone is ditching California for it.
	So, first of all, can't stand Sean Hannity.
	But why would you have a debate between these two guys?
	That are on the opposite ends of the political spectrum.
	And somebody I've been mentioning that could upend Joe Biden and the preferred establishment candidate for the Republicans, clearly.
	Let's just play this quick. We'll go back to Kevin O'Leary in a second.
	You heard Kevin make the offer.
	Your answer is...
	Absolutely. I'm game.
	Let's get it done. Just tell me when and where.
	We'll do it. And here's the thing, Sean.
	I mean, in one respect, the debate between California and Florida has already been had, as you suggest.
	People have been voting on that.
	They've been voting on it with their feet.
	They have fled California in record numbers.
	Florida has been the number one state for net in-migration.
	We have the number one ranked economy, number one now in education, crime rate at a 50-year low.
	But in another sense, this is the debate for the future of our country.
	Because you have people like Joe Biden, they would love to see the Californication of the United States.
	Biden may not even be the nominee.
	You could have Gavin Newsom.
	You could have Kamala Harris.
	And I think if we go down that direction, that's going to accelerate American decline.
	We can't see America decline anymore.
	Again, even Ron DeSantis is framing the narrative that I'm discussing.
	And now, again, you have what seems to be a slow implosion of our economic system.
	And this AA thing is a bad, bad thing.
	Let's go back to O'Leary.
	What happened there? What happened in the last 24 hours?
	And how does that change my propensity to bet on the United States of America as a long-term good gamble where I put capital to work?
	And that lost a little bit last night on the downgrade.
	I keep pointing this out to people.
	How can you possibly spin this in a good light?
	There isn't one. There's no good news.
	Okay, so we got 2023, we got 2011, 12 years apart.
	Next topic, quickly now, on BlackRock and investments in China.
	This got our attention.
	We don't know what it means, but this is...
	What do you mean you don't know what it means?
	You know, BlackRock is part of the privatized takeover of you will own nothing and you will be happy.
	You will be a renter. And you'll be renting via our biometric tokenized slave grid.
	We can't wait.
	Larry Fink's defense. It is unconscionable for any U.S. company to profit...
	Sorry, excuse me. This is the House Select Committee's letter to Larry Fink.
	Yeah. It is unconscionable for any U.S. company to profit from investments that fuel the military advancement of America's foremost foreign adversary and facilitate human rights abuses.
	They allege that their investments in Chinese companies are helping these aspects of Chinese society to do bad things essentially.
	Do you see a case here or not Kevin?
	Well, I see a case for Larry Fink being fried under a microscope.
	You know, it's just like burning an ant with a magnifying glass.
	That's what's happening to him right now on the Hill.
	And the reason that's happening, maybe they could make an argument about funding the Chinese army and espionage and all the rest of that, but that's not his problem.
	His problem is lack of transparency.
	When I invest in the world's largest money manager in an index fund that's global, a portion of that is based On the larger economies.
	It's prorated by the size of an economy.
	China gets a big chunk.
	What I don't get, and there's no information for me to get, is the transparency specifically of what those investments are.
	So the only defense Larry Fink has and BlackRock has is to shine the light of transparency on every single investment so that you can see whether or not these allegations are true.
	And you don't get to do that in an index fund.
	It's very hard to.
	So that's his only way to do it.
	And he won't be doing it.
	I think through PR campaigns and lies, he'll do just fine.
	Alright, I want to hit some of these stories because...
	Honestly, the time just flies by.
	And I've got several other videos that I do want to play, including Devin Archer talking to Tucker Carlson.
	We're not going to play the whole thing.
	But there's a three-minute clip in particular about it.
	We've got the Gates Newsmax piece where CNN has somebody talking about Donald Trump essentially being Osama Bin Laden.
	The one that really triggered me to think about 9-11 and how...
	That should be at the forefront of this Donald Trump campaign.
	Of, you know, now moving past, you know, not just, you know, the deep state, but what they've really been doing globally.
	You know, period.
	And 9-11 is at the crux of that issue.
	Let's hit this, and we're going to hit a bunch of other stories, hopefully pretty quick.
	FBI finds...
	Oh, no. So we're now stuck with this.
	That's fine. I hate it when this happens.
	So now I've lost the ability to change scenes.
	So now it's just the little Burmess for the rest of the hour just like this.
	That's fine, we'll do it.
	Let's see, the FBI found 200 sex trafficking victims and more than 125 suspects
	during a two-week child exploitation operation in July, federal officials said Tuesday.
	During the operation cross-country, the FBI located 59 victims of child sex trafficking
	and child sexual exploitation and 59 missing children.
	The FBI teamed up with state and local officials to identify and arrest 126 suspects
	of child sexual exploitation and human trafficking and 68 suspected traffickers.
	Sex traffickers exploit and endanger some of the most vulnerable members of our society
	and cause the victims unimaginable harm, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland said in a statement.
	This operation, which located 59 actively missing children, builds on the tremendous work the FBI undertaken
	over many years to rescue minor victims and arrest those responsible for these unspeakable crimes.
	The FBI-led initiative in partnership with the National Care Center
	for Missing Exploited Children.
	Focused on identifying and locating victims of sex trafficking and investigating and arresting individuals and criminal expert enterprises involved in both child sex and human trafficking, federal officials said.
	Behind every statistic, there is a person with dreams, aspirations, and the right to live a life free from child sex trafficking and exploitation, the president said, and CEO Michelle Delaunay.
	As a society, we must work together to ensure the protection, support, and empowerment of those impacted by this heinous crime.
	And I'll say it again. There are some really great people in the baseline of our intelligence networks, for sure.
	But in the upper echelons, no bueno.
	And the thing is, if this had happened under the Trump administration, it would have been another one of those, It's happening!
	See, he's tough on sex.
	Listen, this happens all the time.
	Because the crime is that heinous.
	And you have to do something about it.
	The problem is, when it reaches up into a high level, what happens?
	A lot of times it's obfuscated.
	A lot of times those people are protected.
	A lot of times those people are blackmailed via some type of Epstein network.
	Just pointing that out, okay?
	Alright, let's keep moving down the line here.
	Oh yeah, I gotta get that one.
	Mark Zuckerberg leaves his wife fuming after building an octagon in the backyard to prepare for a potential billionaire bout with Elon Musk.
	Hey man, I don't think it's going to happen.
	Did you see the octagon I put in the backyard?
	Yes, I saw it.
	It looks awesome. Mark, we have plenty of yard space.
	I've been working on that grass for two years.
	It's nice to know that, you know, billionaires at least have the same wifey problems that the rest of the populace have.
	Huh? He's just building octagons.
	Here's a story I don't think that's been discussed enough and hasn't got a lot of traction.
	Kevin Spacey plots his big theater comeback.
	Oscar-winning actor toasted his court win and discussed redemption over dinner with director Trevor Nunn in Mayfair Restaurant.
	Okay, so...
	Spacey was cleared of all charges in his last high-profile sex assault case.
	Right there. You talk about the Teflon Don, Kevin Spacey is just, he's been the luckiest guy ever, accused multiple times of this type of behavior, and even accused of trying to ply a young teenage boy who would later become an actor with alcohol and, you know, sexual aggression.
	No big deal. Spacey's comeback?
	And now they're saying that he can actually sue House of Cards for letting him go amidst all the scandals because, you know, he's won his court cases.
	Other court cases have never been brought because people died.
	Just, how about that?
	Kidnapper. Now, there's a lot here.
	First thing, crazy exists.
	Crazy exists.
	And people are dark.
	And this guy is, you know, one sick puppy.
	And now they are looking to see if he had done this to other victims.
	They're linking him to at least four other states.
	Just want to point that out.
	A woman, there are monsters among us.
	There's a reason that you want a Second Amendment outside of a tyrannical government or outside of hunting.
	It's because people like this exist.
	A woman has escaped from a cinder block cell hidden inside the rental home of an Oregon town mayor where
	she'd been held captive by a fake undercover cop.
	The man was kidnapped, the woman was kidnapped on July 5th, 15th, just after midnight, sexually assaulted, kidnapped,
	and driven more than seven hours away according to a criminal complaint.
	Just wild.
	Hidden in a makeshift cell, the woman slept and awoke with the realization she would likely die if she didn't attempt to escape.
	She broke down the door, leaving her hands bloody.
	Thank God! Her alleged captor, Negasi Zaburi, 29, who also goes by several other names including Justin Joshua Haishi Sakima Zubari, And Justin Kasai fled the rental home in Klamath Falls to Reno, Nevada, where he was arrested by state police a day later.
	So, scary that he would choose Reno.
	I mean, take a look at this.
	Pretty sick puppy.
	Goes out and gets a bunch of cinder blocks.
	Puts them together, puts a door on there for a victim in a neighborhood like this.
	It's not the first time that sex dungeons of kidnapped people have been revealed, by the way.
	FBI released eerie photos of the tiny quarters in which he'd held her captive.
	She beat the door with her hands until they were bloody in order to break free, claimeth police captain Rob Reynolds said at a press conference Wednesday.
	Her quick thinking and will to survive may have saved other women from a similar nightmare.
	On July 15th, Zuberi allegedly traveled from his Claymouth Falls Rentals to Seattle, where he solicited the woman for prostitution along Aurora Avenue, a known area for prostitution, according to court documents.
	The woman told cops that Zuberi told her he was an undercover cop before he showed her a badge.
	He pointed to a stun gun at her, placed her in the back seat of his car after he'd handcuffed and put leg irons on her.
	Boy, once they get the cuffs on you, man...
	That was a big John Wayne Gacy.
	He liked to use the cuffs.
	That's a rat. Zuberi drove more than seven hours to his home in Klamath Falls, only to stop when he pulled his vehicle over and forced the victim to perform both oral and vaginal sex.
	The affidavit said that Zuberi attempted to, ugh, but stopped after the victim pleaded for him not to do it.
	When they arrived, Zveri put his captor into the cell.
	He said he was leaving to do paperwork.
	The woman briefly slept and awoke to realization that she would likely die if she did not attempt to escape.
	She started punching the metal door and broke some of the welding joints, creating a small opening in which she climbed through.
	The victim saw Zabari's vehicle, parked in the garage, opened it, grabbed his gun, and then took off.
	She left behind a blood on a wooden fence that she'd climbed over to escape before flagging down a passing driver who called 911.
	Man, just...
	Again, monsters live amongst us.
	Washington State, right up...
	I mean, seven hour drive.
	They would not say there was any indication that any of them had been aware of the Seattle woman's abduction.
	Okay? I guess they interviewed Zabari's wife and neighbors.
	Yikes. So this guy has a wife?
	When Zabari was arrested by Nevada State Patrol officers in a Walmart parking lot the day after he fled, he was with his wife and at least one of his children.
	How many children does this guy have?
	It remains unclear how many children he has.
	Jesus. Boy, this thing just keeps getting more and more nightmarish.
	When he was approached by the officers, he refused to exit his car, started cutting himself with a sharp object, and tried to destroy his phone.
	Investigators said they searched Zabari's home and garage.
	They found the makeshift cell, the woman's purse, and handwritten notes.
	One of the notes was titled, Operation Takeover, and included a bullet point list with entries that read, Leave phone at home and make sure they don't have a bunch of people in their life.
	you don't want any type of investigation.
	Another handwritten document appeared to include a rough sketch of an underground structure
	using concrete blocks, foam insulation, and waterproof concrete.
	The FBI is now probing whether Zuberi may have had other victims.
	They are also investigating whether he may have used other methods of gaining control of women,
	including drugging their drinks.
	The agency said it was setting up a website asking anyone who believes they may have
	They may have been a victim to come forward.
	According to the FBI, Zubairi has lived in multiple states since 2016, possibly
	including California, Washington, Oregon, Colorado, Utah, Florida, New York, New Jersey, Alabama, and Nevada.
	Damn.
	Wow.
	Again, monsters.
	This guy right here.
	The Klamath Falls rental home where Zabari allegedly took the woman is owned by the city's mayor, Carol Westfall, and her husband, Kevin, according to property records.
	The house backs onto a park and is a residential street less than a quarter mile from a highway.
	The court records show that after Zabari's arrest, the couple had him evicted.
	I would hope so. We are shocked and dismayed by what has occurred.
	Yeah. We applaud the actions of the woman who helped capture the person and prevent him from committing further atrocities.
	Man. So they've contacted the wife for comment.
	Just wild story.
	Something I felt like we had to highlight here today.
	Okay. Let's continue on.
	Will Justin Trudeau's separation from his wife, Sofia, affect his election odds?
	I mean, I know the jokes are, please, please, divorce us.
	Trudeau's a puppet. Most people don't want him in power.
	So, you know, that's the reality.
	I don't think they'd give a rat's ass whether he's still with his wife or not.
	They hated him before when he was with his wife.
	So Trudeau's little breakup, fun boy, dress-up boy, he can't wait.
	Yeah, let's do this one before we do the really, what I think is a good story that people can actually still defend themselves.
	Anheuser-Busch lost a staggering $390 million in second quarter after Bud Light sales to retailers plunged 14% after brands' partnership with Mulvaney.
	14% is pretty high.
	And, I mean... I just saw a terrible deep fake where they put the Barack star on Mulvaney's face.
	Ugh. And had the whole Bud Light thing go on.
	First of all, Bud Light's awful beer.
	It's just terrible.
	Now, Anheuser-Busch...
	You know what?
	Let's just look it up right now.
	Anheuser-Busch line of beers...
	I mean, we're talking about a ton of beer.
	Just Budweiser.
	You stop drinking Budweiser, just Bud Light.
	Rolling Rock. Natural Light.
	Stella. I like a Stella.
	I mean, all the Buds.
	We can forget about them. Goose Island, they own.
	Goose Island makes them select stuff.
	Did you stop drinking that, everybody?
	Huh? Did you?
	I mean, they're showing a Michelob.
	Also them. You stop drinking Mick.
	Shock Top. That's another big one.
	Let's see. Let's go to the actual brands.
	We just saw a bunch. That's nothing.
	Kona Big Wave?
	Delicious. Kona Big Wave is delicious, everybody.
	Hogarden. I just had a Hogarden this last week.
	It's also delicious.
	So look, Anheuser-Busch, Blue Point, has a lot of good ones.
	They own a ton of stuff.
	Your favorite cider, right?
	Like, that's there.
	They own a ton of beers.
	We're not even done. And then, of course, the seltzer lines.
	So, look, Elysian, they do some good beers, too.
	They really, really do.
	Lots of good stuff there.
	They're still making money.
	You're hurting them a little bit.
	But have you stopped drinking all these, too?
	Most people that are outraged about it in the first place don't really know that these things exist.
	Okay. In the We Fought Back story of the day, California 7-Eleven worker takes matters into their own hands, two of them, as they stop brazen thief filling trash can with tobacco.
	So this dude just walks in here.
	Goddamn. Ain't nothing you can do, though.
	Ain't nothing you can do, man. Tell your top police.
	Ain't nothin' you can do, man, till the police come in.
	Ain't nothin' you can do, man.
	Ain't nothin' you can do, man. Don't do that.
	Don't do that man. Don't do that And honestly
	That's light for what that guy just tried to steal hundreds of dollars worth of their product
	Was told he can't do nothing by someone else and I know we're not gonna play that game
	And he just gets beat with like a stick or a cane?
	I mean, oh, come on.
	Come on, we didn't just lose all internet, did we?
	That's a weird thing to crash.
	Let's watch it again. Hey, it's not like I'm the violence guy, but come on.
	Show me what these guys did was wrong.
	Absolutely not, dude. Goddamn.
	Watch this guy. Ain't nothing you can do, though.
	Ruining the racks on top of it.
	Just taking whatever he wants.
	Ain't nothing you can do, man, until the police come in.
	Ain't nothing you can do, man.
	Don't do that. Don't do that, man.
	Don't do that. Now, it used to be, of course...
	Like, this guy could have had a legit baseball bat.
	What he's hitting with is pretty good.
	But it ain't like what he could have got.
	This guy could have got really...
	First of all, these guys could have shot him.
	Like... I think they're showing restraint.
	And, you know, that's bare minimum what that guy should have got.
	And hopefully they prosecute that guy and they put him in jail.
	Look, he just filled up a trash can that he probably stole from them with a bunch of cigarettes and messed their place up.
	Kind of got what he deserved. Alright.
	I've got to do this.
	I've got to bring this behind me now because I can't move the show.
	I should have restarted my computer in the morning.
	I've been having issues with XSplit, which I should never have issues with, but we do.
	Maybe I should get like a 4TB hard drive on top of it and just stick that in here too.
	And that way, I'm never going to run out of hard drive space.
	But then I've got to do a whole reformat and yada, yada, yada, yada.
	I don't want to bore you with it.
	All right. Let's go to MacGates watching this clip on Newsmax where they compare Donny T to Osama Bin Laden.
	There was recently some commentary on CNN of all places, which is just the absolute worst.
	Check out what this one person said comparing the indictment of President Trump to this.
	Take a look. I told him how proud I felt To be an American at that moment.
	Much in the way that I did when I learned that our military had killed Osama bin Laden.
	Osama bin Laden was a terrorist who committed a horrific act against American people and against our republic.
	And I believe that Donald Trump is a terrorist who committed horrific acts against the American people.
	I mean, everything about this is just over the top.
	But hey, we're in the dark cartoon.
	We've had a lot of over the top stuff before.
	And this is another reason.
	And again, Gates' response is somewhat correct.
	But at the same time, we still haven't been told the truth about 9-11.
	And that's why Trump needs to come out guns a blazing with that information.
	I wonder what he liked or hated the most about Trump.
	Was it the no wars, low gas prices, lower taxes?
	What was it? Yeah, I mean, it's a sick comparison to suggest that sending planes through buildings to kill thousands of our fellow Americans, destroy our economy, and send our military into great consternation over the attack on the Pentagon, that that is somehow analogous to saying that we ought to have an objection and have people peacefully and patriotically protesting.
	I mean, there were people who had permits outside the Capitol for a peaceful demonstration, like we see, frankly, many days at the Capitol.
	And the fact that The barriers were taken down and it was a confusing, riot-like situation is obviously not something to celebrate, but it's also not something that puts any criminal culpability on President Trump.
	We don't need Jack Smith to tell us what happened on January 6th.
	We watch President Trump say that people should be peaceful and patriotic and have their voices heard.
	And by the way, not for nothing, Carl, but no Republican has been sworn in President of the United States, absent some Democrat objection to the electors, since George Herbert Walker Bush These people were objecting to George W's elections.
	Where was the criminal indictment for Jim McGovern when he objected?
	Or Sheila Jackson Lee or Jamie Raskin?
	Of course, we would never do that to them because the Constitution contemplates a process by which we can have this debate.
	No less than Mike Pence, who, by the way, today appears to be quite interested in the subject, even said that we need to have the debate.
	And that's what we were preparing for.
	Yeah. Marjorie Taylor Greene and myself, my colleagues, we were not there to try to foment some riot.
	We were there to put on evidence, have a debate, have a discussion, have a vote, and then very likely we knew Joe Biden was going to be the President of the United States.
	So they are taking First Amendment activity, and they're trying to make it criminal, and that should frighten every American.
	Spot on. I agree with Gates there.
	So... I've also got this little lovely clip of Devin Archer talking to Tucker Carlson about Biden and his relationship with the Bidens and this business partnership that probably should not have existed while Biden was the Vice President of the United States.
	Strategic advisory and then kind of a, you know, some type of coalescence around having a private equity fund that would have this unique access and understanding of a regulatory environment in DC. Again, to be clear.
	How many times do you think you met Joe Biden during the course of your relationship with Hunter?
	How many times? I should have this off the top of my head since I've been asked so many times.
	Probably... Same thing, 20?
	So I got one last question for you, and we'll do a much longer interview and get the entire story.
	But we found this letter kind of amazing.
	It's from January 20th, 2011, which I think puts you in your late 30s, mid to late 30s, okay?
	So you're a younger man.
	This is from the Vice President of the United States, Joe Biden, to you personally, and it's personalized here at the bottom.
	Devin Archer, Rosemont Seneca Partners, that was your partnership.
	With Hunter Biden in Georgetown.
	Yes. I hope you enjoyed lunch.
	Thanks for coming. Sincerely, Joseph R. Biden Jr.
	P.S. Handwritten, happy you guys are together.
	So there are many levels here.
	But here's the Vice President of the United States saying to you, a man in his mid-30s, who's not a government official, I'm sorry I was occupied with the guy who runs the world's largest country.
	I would much rather talk to you and thank you.
	What was he thanking you for?
	Well, first of all, it's a lovely letter, and it was...
	It's quite enthusiastic.
	It's a little weird, though, right?
	Yeah, well, listen, it was kind of the beginning of our partnership, and he was thanking me and thanking Hunter, I think, at the end of the day for bringing this idea of this government regulatory strategic advisory business into the private equity world.
	And I think he was excited about the prospects for Hunter, and, you know, he was just thanking me.
	I think it was a nice gesture. It was a nice show.
	For sure. For sure.
	Very polite. It gets a 10 on the etiquette scale.
	But he's a vice president of the United States, and he's talking about foreign business deals with you and thanking you for that.
	Right. I think, again, it goes back to my earlier point in, yeah, I think I hit, at the time, I think I hit the jackpot in finding the regulatory environment or company that can navigate right to the top.
	But, you know, obviously, as time was told, you know, being a little bit too close to the sun ends up burning you.
	For sure. And it did you.
	Absolutely. And you suffered greatly for it.
	And this is not a criticism of you.
	I would think as a business guy, you use every advantage.
	These are not business guys. This is the vice president of the United States.
	He's not allowed to be working on businesses with foreign governments while he's vice president.
	I don't think. Not that I know of.
	Not that I know of.
	But he is! But here he is!
	Right. Amazing.
	Right. Yeah. Amazing. Alright.
	One more clip for the day.
	This is one of the reasons I really do enjoy Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
	I think that again, he may have his faults, but he's somebody that I would vote for over Trump, by the way, if he was able to get the nomination.
	I would probably even vote for him as a Independent candidate, which is going to be difficult.
	I don't think he wants to do that.
	He wants the Democratic nomination, obviously, but that would be a protest vote for me.
	Honestly, the Green Party should be the ones to give him the nomination because, you know, if he can't get the Democratic nod, the Green Party giving him the nomination at least gives him the ability to be on the ballot in all 50 states.
	And that would be huge.
	Do I think he could win that way?
	I don't know, but at the same time...
	It sets up so many weird scenarios because with such a corrupt system, you can't believe the results of anything.
	And they can always use that as a dark horse excuse that it's split the Republican vote.
	And that's why, you know, Joe Biden's in again or whatever other puppet they want to place there, etc.
	But here's RFK Jr.
	talking about the current farming system and responding to a question about why we're allowing Bill Gates and China to own our farms.
	Hey everybody, here I am in Sherwood, Connecticut on Sherwood Island.
	There's a little woodchuck hall.
	Shirley Troubadour asked a question about why Gates and China are being allowed to buy up all the farmland in our country.
	And I'm going to tell you something that I had an experience with.
	I spent many years, about 20 years, suing the factory farms, the big hog farms, and The big chicken producers like Tyson and Bo Pilgrim and Frank Perdue.
	But Smithfield Foods was the biggest pork producer.
	And Smithfield came into the state of North Carolina.
	They built a slaughterhouse that could process 30,000 pigs a day.
	And then they had a partner named Wendell Murphy, who was in the state senate.
	And he passed 28 laws in the North Carolina state senate.
	Making it illegal to sue a factory farm.
	He left and went into partnership with Smithfield, created a way to raise pigs, instead of raising them on farms, to raise them in warehouses called Murphy 1100s.
	And they dropped the price of pork from 60 cents a pound to 2 cents a pound.
	It put out of business all 28,000 independent hog farmers in the state of North Carolina.
	And it replaced them with 2,200 factories, all of them either owned by Smithfield or contracted to Smithfield, the only farmers who could stay in business.
	We're farmers who signed that contract with Smithfield to mortgage their homes, to put those big hog sheds, the Murphy 1100s, on their property, and then they lose all control.
	They become serfs on their own land.
	Smithfield dictates all their farming practices.
	It gives them the food.
	It delivers the The piglets picks up the grown animals and brings them to slaughter.
	They put out of business 28,000 farmers and they control now 80% of the hog production in North Carolina.
	Because they dropped the price in North Carolina, Iowa had to adopt the same system, had to cave in to Smithfield.
	They ended up taking control of 80% of the hog production in our country.
	Then they sold themselves to China.
	So now China owns all that hog production in America and it controls our landscapes.
	And that's the end of Thomas Jefferson's vision of an American democracy rooted in tens of thousands of independent freeholds, each one owned by family farmers, each with a stake in our system of government.
	And that's why all of this industrial agriculture not only gives us substandard food, but they're also taking control of our landscapes, and that is a huge threat to American democracy.
	I hope you guys have a good day.
	I think you laid it out pretty perfectly, right?
	I think that that is...
	Certainly something that we have to be aware of, especially in a post-truth world, especially with people like Gates that have all these public-private partnerships.
	You think about what's really going on, and more and more of it is outward fascism.
	I mean, period. Maybe it's the RAM. I had all these things fail, too.
	Maybe that's what's happened with the Xplit, but I have 64 gigabytes of RAM on this bad boy.
	64 gigabytes of RAM and I'm using it says 27%.
	14% of my CPU. I don't even think I've got my GPU processes up there, but the GPU process, I mean, we got the banger of a card here.
	I do not like that.
	I do not like that. But the bottom line is, when you have all these public-private partnerships, you have all these circles of deniability, as we saw with the COVID-1984 nightmare, and then we have all these avenues...
	Of indemnifying them from breaking the law.
	Allowing them to break the law.
	And then if they do get caught being too damn egregious.
	Just too awful.
	What happens?
	Nothing. Absolutely trucking nothing.
	Some financials?
	Like that's what happened to Monsatan.
	Even with the Roundup Monsanto scandal.
	That's going on right now.
	And has been for years, by the way.
	That's monetary compensation for giving people cancer and killing them.
	Knowingly. Okay?
	No one's going to prison.
	I was talking about the vaccine issue yesterday with a woman who's been on the front line since the early 80s, literally for more than four decades.
	And she explained to me, NVIC.org, the National Vaccine Information Center, that in 86, when her and others worked with the government To go against these big pharmaceutical companies when they indeed actually injured people with their shots, their goal was to not only make the shots safe, but have a compensation program for when they clearly were not.
	And instead, after passing that, It gets gutted over the next year plus and then continually gutted over the next few years.
	And then by 2011, the final nail in the coffin inverts the entire thing and makes it impossible To, you know, sue these people.
	When, you know, they had created a system that was like literally a checkmark system of going down the line very easy and you got your help.
	Now, the way it works is you have to have tremendous resources to take on these large pharmaceutical companies in the smallest of cases.
	And that's what they were trying to fight against.
	I just want to point that out.
	And that's... What's really going down.
	But no, it's just like, you know, yesterday we focused on Bidenomics.
	Bidenomics. And then all of a sudden we have a double A downgrade.
	Bidenomics is awesome.
	The shots are safe and effective.
	Anheuser-Busch loves you.
	Child sex traffic doesn't exist until we tell you it exists.
	Shouldn't go see Sound of Freedom.
	And, you know, you look at something like this.
	That's in our country.
	It's in our country.
	It's happening now. We should all be concerned about this.
	Not a right or left issue.
	These are kids.
	These are kids. And you know...
	That's why I continually say that you need to be your own hero.
	You have to make the decision on which one of the topics that we cover today that you want to be most involved in.
	I still think that 9-11 is the daddy pants.
	I get it. COVID woke a lot of people up.
	It woke a lot of people up.
	It did. But the crux of the 9-11 lie...
	Allows criminals to operate within our intelligence community today that damn well helped that happen.
	That damn well carried out psychological operations after the fact when they knew better.
	That's 100%.
	And you've got people on a larger level...
	Because I think that George H.W. Bush was a puppet as well.
	It's hard to believe that you can look back at that puppetry of 2000 to 2008 and, you know, think that the guy, I mean, he was not a great speaker.
	He never came off as super intelligent.
	But compared to what they put in there with Biden, it's like, whoa, guy might as well be friggin' Hamlet.
	I guess I should say Shakespeare.
	But you get it. You get the gist.
	He's like a great orator.
	And then they put in a puppet that can speak, Barack Obama.
	That's a lawyer that's been groomed for this position, etc.
	And he brings you hope and change.
	But the only change is that he's doing everything Bush did and more.
	So yeah, we need to clean up the real swamp.
	We need to clean up the Cheneys and the Podestas of the world.
	The Rahm Emanuel's of the world.
	Like, that's real.
	I don't know that even Bush Jr.
	would have any real culpability with 9-11.
	I mean, he might actually believe it was Osama bin Laden.
	Daddy told me.
	My pappy told me.
	But if you think that a guy like Cheney believes that, come on.
	I mean, he's smarter than that.
	I mean, Cheney's a guy, again, old school, just like Rummy was, old school.
	Condoleezza Rice is another one.
	Now, there's somebody kind of just like in the backdrop.
	Philip Zelikow and his new COVID report when he was the oversight of the 9-11 commission report.
	Those are bad guys.
	Those are bad guys.
	And we should go after those guys in the internal infrastructure.
	I will give Bannon credit where he says that if you've been a part of the corruption, now's the time to have your come-to-God moment, basically, and blow the whistle and talk of these corrupt operations.
	One, I don't imagine that that will happen, as a lot of these people are just too deep, dark, and down the rabbit hole of deception, where they think the ends justify the means, and they're doing the right thing no matter what.
	A lot of these people obviously display sociopathic tendencies anyway, but let's say that did happen.
	Some people just started to have a soul, wanted to come forward, right?
	You would have others come forward that at first seemed legitimate and you would want to believe.
	And then they would come up with some Johnny nonsense so it could be discredited.
	And I'm not saying that it would be, you know, you shouldn't try.
	And I don't want whistleblowers to come forward.
	But I've seen their game plays before.
	That's how it works.
	And they'll focus on that person.
	To discredit the others.
	If the others gain any sorts of traction.
	Or they'll largely ignore the others and they'll make that the focal point.
	You know, they'll manage it somehow.
	I know a lot of people don't want to believe that or don't want to hear that, but that's how the cookie crumbles.
	That's how the game is played.
	With that being said, I do want to remind everybody I am a documentary filmmaker.
	Loose Change, Final Cut, and Fabled Enemies will lay out 9-11 for you in a way that the mainstream media did not, that the mainstream politicians still have not, And Invisible Empire, A New World Order Defined, and Shade the Motion Picture are my large-scale films that go above and beyond 9-11, which is really just a modus operandi for this quest for a quote-unquote New World Order that we discussed today.
	We also run here on the RVM network until I believe it's about 8.30 p.m., maybe 9.30 p.m., Eastern Time.
	It's almost a 12-hour block.
	I'm 9 to 11. I think it's 8.30 p.m.
	I'm 9 to 11 here, Monday through Thursday.
	Hard to believe another week has just flown by.
	Flown by. And if you want to support the broadcast, redvoicemedia.com, redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
	Try it for a buck today, 10 bucks a month, or $100.
	Lock it in. It helps the broadcast.
	Know what else helps the broadcast?
	Let people know about the Rumble.
	Let people know about the Twitter.
	Subscribe, follow, notifications, all that good stuff.
	Share, share, share.
	But also remember to check out all the other programs here on Red Voice Media.
	Krista, I can't fade away.
	So that's going to do it for me, guys.

▲