Watch the UNCENSORED second hour live on RVM Rumble or Rokfin FREEShow more Not RVM Premium yet? Try it for $1 and get 2 EXCLUSIVE Interviews A Week!!!
https://redvoicemedia.com/jason
Listen Live and Call In at:
https://theinfowarrior.podbean.com/
Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermas
Watch My Documentaries:
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/category/bermas-docs
Subscribe on Rokfin
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
Subscribe on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/TheInfoWarrior
RVM Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/RedVoiceMedia
Subscribe on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
Follow me on Twitter
https://twitter.com/JasonBermas
PayPal: [email protected]
#BermasBrigade Show less
We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
We think too much, we feel too little.
More than machinery.
We need humanity.
We know the air is unfit to breathe.
Our food is unfit to eat.
As if that's the way it's supposed to be.
We know things are bad, worse than bad.
They're crazy.
I am the great and powerful arm.
You've got to say, I'm a human being!
God damn it.
My life has been.
You have met all the primal forces of nature.
Don't give yourselves to brutes.
Men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, tired you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder.
Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men.
Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts.
Jason.
Good morning, everybody.
It is Reality Rance.
I am Jason Burmes.
WikiLeaks and Trump Meltdown00:15:26
And yesterday was World Free Press Day.
Okay.
And we had an individual from our government who, by the way, who I think is extremely capable.
One of the few people inside the Biden administration that I do believe is capable is Blinken.
Blinken and Garland, I would say, are capable and on the level of that Bush Jr. administration, like, you know, a Wolfowitz in the background, a Rumsfeld, very capable guys, right?
Some of the other people are clearly clowns, but these guys are well-versed in the talking points, pretty much stone-faced as they lie to the American public, as Garland lies in government hearings and then says to the press, I stand by my testimony.
They know what they're doing.
Okay, so it really warmed the cockles of my heart, okay?
For real.
When I saw Code Pink get up on stage after you were hearing this rhetoric of how we're, you know, we're the beacon of shining light for press freedom and journalism in this country.
Not one word about Assange.
You know why?
Because we're not.
We can't claim to have a free press in this country when we are currently illegally prosecuting a non-U.S. citizen under the Espionage Act after conducting a fifth-generation warfare program directly against WikiLeaks and a psychological operation on the American people and general public,
the general public of talking points, really, that somehow Wikileaks was a conduit for Russia and that really they're Russian assets or agents.
Total Johnny nonsense.
Clearly not true.
Not only never proven, but a load of hooey.
So when I see Code Pink get up there and say, what is this?
No one said anything about Assange, not one time.
We can't be talking about press freedom without talking about Assange, period.
And look, we know what Assange's greatest crimes were, and that was exposing actual war crimes.
And, you know, another reason to get behind RFK Jr. right here.
Another reason.
Look at that.
I didn't, sorry about that green screen.
Oh, do that.
Didn't see that before.
It was a little cut off.
Instead of championing free speech, the U.S. actively persecutes journalists and whistleblowers.
100%.
I'll pardon brave truth tellers like Julian Assange and investigate the corruption and crimes they expose.
This isn't the Soviet Union.
The America I Love doesn't imprison dissidents.
Hashtag free Assange, hashtag Kennedy24.
And again, I'm not trying to turn this into an RFK Jr. commercial, but where is everybody for Julian Assange?
Let's talk about Trump and Assange really quick.
That was one of the last straws on Julian, period.
That was really, okay, now we're going to drag him out of the embassy.
Because this spans administrations.
I'm not just going to blame it on Trump, but remember, when Trump was running that first time, you see the WikiLeaks can't get enough of the WikiLeaks.
How about the WikiLeaks?
They didn't like that Wikileaks did take a stand in the 2016 election, and they understood that Hillary Clinton would absolutely be the worst thing possible for not only this country in the world, and that's documented.
This is why they really didn't like him.
Let me show you this.
And by the way, it's tough to find these.
It used to be very easy to get what WikiLeaks was posting on Twitter.
And we're going to show you one of those documents and how they were actually saying to their audience, which was captive at the time because these DNC emails, they were raw and they were searchable.
They said, look for signs of human trafficking.
They don't like that either.
That last straw is here.
We got to drag him out.
Remember, Trump was loving this stuff on the way up to the election.
They said, we believe it would be much better for the GOP to win.
The Democrats, media, and liberals would then form a block to rein in the worst qualities.
With Hillary in charge, GOP will be pushing for her worst qualities.
Dems, neoliberals will be mute.
She's a bright, well-connected, sadistic sociopath.
Budingo, badongo.
You got it right, Wikileaks.
Okay?
And that's why for the first time in a long time, if not my entire life, there was a meaningful difference, in my opinion, in the candidates that were running for president.
But Trump failed on this.
We have to acknowledge that.
Trump failed on this.
First, we have the reporting from Cassandra Fairbanks, who was recording Rick Grenel's top assistant, had an in with the NSA and was basically told, not basically, I mean, you can listen to these recordings.
They're out there.
I don't think they've been, you know, I don't know if they've been scrubbed from the internet.
But in these conversations, he was upset because a lot of these things were getting him in trouble or maybe getting him fired.
You know, that's a big deal, all these Washington leakers.
They said, it was said that Donnie T and Donnie T. Jr. were shown evidence that women and children were killed because of WikiLeaks, including graphic pictures of the bodies.
Now, in court, in court, it has been proven none of that is real.
That's imagination land.
And that, in fact, mainstream media, mainstream media reporting on WikiLeaks, where WikiLeaks had purposely redacted names and informations as not to give up assets and put them in danger.
The media are the ones that put those two in danger by exposing who they were.
WikiLeaks never did.
And remember, in the beginning, with Julian Assange in particular, none of this had to do with whether or not things were redacted, espionage act.
No, no, no.
They tried to get him on a weird rape charge.
That to this day, if you have one of those really low intelligence, doesn't look anything up parrot people out there, other than the Russia smear, that one stuck also.
He's a rapist Russian.
He's a rapist Russian asset.
All made up.
All made up.
And Assange ain't perfect.
I've seen people in the comments before talking about his stance on 9-11, but later on, he simply said, look, that does need to be looked at.
But I don't think, like many others, that it's like the panacea.
In other words, look, there was a feeling, and I had this feeling, and that's what got me started.
I really believed in my heart of hearts, in my mind of minds, that we could reach a cultural zeitgeist in this country and take it back well before the Barack star came into being.
And I saw that window just before the fifth anniversary of 9-11, and then I saw it close.
And I saw so many people sucked in because they'd had eight years of the Republicans and war and Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld and the same old, same old Neo Khan was in the vernacular finally, right?
And this young stud, the Barack star, Barry Sotero, just promoted everywhere.
I can't tell you how many people came up.
What do you think about Barack?
I'm like, I don't think much of him.
I think he's an extension of the problem.
I think, you know, he's an articulate, well-spoken individual that's been groomed for this position.
Okay.
And we really got Bush 2.0 wrapped in different packaging.
That's it.
That's it.
It would be like going into Christmas.
Okay.
Seeing a box about this big in red dressing, right?
Like a nice little red bow, right?
It's got the candy cane wrapping on it.
And over on the other side, you got the blue and the blue bow.
And when you open them both up, it's a turd sandwich in each.
Same thing.
Same exact thing.
Maybe one was a little stinkier.
You could smell that one a little bit more as you were unwrapping it.
I hate to be vulgar.
But that's about it.
That's about it.
In 2016, there was a difference.
WikiLeaks did take a stand on that difference.
And, you know, I want to show people this.
Like, you type in Twitter, WikiLeaks, Clinton emails.
Believe me, I went to DuckDuckGo2.
This is the Google results, but they're here.
They got the Podesta emails, all those things.
They didn't like that the FBI had this Symbol here that to look for people who were doing bad things to kids.
And WikiLeaks highlighted this and then was also using Twitter as a tool before it was moderation central, before the algorithm stopped real information from being shared, right?
And they were saying, Hey, take a look at this and take a look at these emails and see what you find.
Hey, get out there.
So, what do they get for it?
Oh, you know what they got for it.
WikiLeaks, pretty sure Hillary Clinton is a child sex trafficker now.
It is just obvious.
This is Wantcat.
And, you know, again, WikiLeaks had linked to a supposedly pro-Trump Reddit.
And that's how they muddy the waters.
You show me where Wikileaks ever said Hillary Clinton is a sex trafficker.
But that's the meme.
It's the same thing with 9-11, which we'll get into a little later.
Glenn Beck finally does like a three-minute segment talking about the CIA 9-11 link that's brand new, that isn't really brand new.
There's just a multitude of qualified people now talking about it.
Whereas there was a minutiae of people who knew talking about it 20 plus years ago now.
20 plus years ago.
Literally 20 plus years ago.
Springman was out there immediately talking about the CIA, that Saudi consulate, and the hijackers.
Immediately, boom, Okay?
So what did they make that into?
Jet fuel can't melt steel beams.
So there's so many associations with that mentally.
Okay.
First of all, it gives them the straw man debunk that the steel memes didn't, steel beams didn't have to melt.
Now, initially, that's what media reports said: that, well, it got so hot and they melted, and then you had a pancake collapse.
It was a pancake, talking pancakes, no syrup.
That was the meaning thing.
Then later on, it was, oh, they sagged.
They didn't actually have to melt because they realized the temperatures couldn't have them melt.
Now, at the same time, molten metal is reported all over.
Molten metal is on film pouring out, pouring out of one of the parts of the impact zone before collapse, period, on tape, documented, documented in my film, Loose Change Final Cut.
See multiple angles.
It's not a debate.
Okay?
It shouldn't be a debate.
But they make the debate something else.
Look over here.
Okay?
So it's like, oh, Hillary Clinton was trafficking children from a pizza shop.
That's insane.
And meanwhile, that's not what anybody who was looking at it intelligently said.
That's what they made it popular meme style.
Okay?
So that in turn, all of it gets discredited.
And now a word from our sponsor.
Have you heard of Executive Order 14067?
This little-known order implemented the digital dollar, the most sinister plan to control your spending.
And it gets worse.
In November, the federal government and banks began a test program to roll out the digital dollar.
With this, privacy for all Americans will be lost forever.
Imagine the government can now track all of your spending.
The government can tell you what you can and can't buy.
The government could confiscate your cash.
When digital currency was rolled out in China, Bloomberg wrote, This will lead to control like no other, end quote.
The EU has announced that they are next, but it is already happening in America, which makes this wealth protection guide that American Alternative Assets just put out even more urgent.
Project Hamilton, as this secret order is being called, might be the scariest order to happen to privacy and freedom in America since its founding, which makes this wealth protection guide so incredibly valuable right now.
Move your money out of cash and into something that doesn't infringe on your privacy.
You see, there is one legal IRS-proof loophole that could protect your IRA, 401k, and pension savings with gold and silver.
And this free guide tells you exactly which steps you need to take right now to move part of your IRA or 401k into precious metals with no tax consequences.
As this program rolls out, the sky's the limit for the level of government control that could be enforced on your money.
Protect your savings and your privacy.
But in the devastation ahead, American Alternative Assets is offering you something rare, a chance to protect your wealth and possibly even grow it.
All right, everybody, we are back.
And I want to play the clip because this is how it's done.
This is how it's done, son.
The other way it's done is by using your little magic box or getting a camera and confronting these people.
Confronting The CIA Calmly00:11:14
Confront them.
Confront them calmly, okay, and with a pointed question.
Last year, I remember that Blinken, might even be less than a year ago, was confronted by Abby Martin, you know, one of my favorite independent journalists on the left, and confronted with the fact that you just had a journalist killed on camera by the IDF reporting on the Palestinian conflict.
Big deal.
American citizen, by the way.
Big deal.
Never really heard about it here in the press.
Blinken actually commented on that one.
You think they're going to make any comments about Julian Assange?
Let's find out.
In particular, I'm curious whether you've been able to talk.
Excuse us, we can't use this day without calling for the freedom of Julian Assange.
The Biden Gibner.
I mean, that's the deal.
Take it easy.
Take it easy.
Take it easy, guys.
Not one word about Journal Sharing Avoid.
So we're here to celebrate World Press Freedom Day.
We're not going to talk about Julian Assange.
And you notice he's talking about the IDF as well.
That's how it's done.
That's how it's done, everybody.
And look, not a left or right issue to me.
That Code Pink, they used to march with my ass for 9-11 truth.
Not many people on the right did.
If you align yourself blindly with one side of the political spectrum, I just truly believe you do yourself a disservice.
Now, that doesn't mean that I don't think that you should get involved politically.
That doesn't mean I don't understand why you wouldn't register for a party so you can be a part of that process, especially in the primaries, okay?
And delegation, all of it.
I understand that.
But on certain issues, you have to acknowledge we need organizations like Code Pink.
We need lefties like that who are for real and anti-war to do what they just did.
Let's play it again.
You notice how Blink, like, easily with the lady.
Let's take it easy.
Oh, thank you, Tony.
In particular, I'm curious whether you've been able to talk.
Excuse us, we can't use this day without calling for the freedom of Julian Assange.
Oh, let's mute him.
Let's mute him.
Easy.
Easy.
Take it easy.
Not one word about Journalists.
So we're here to celebrate freedom of expression and we just experienced it.
Livvy, let me continue, Mr. Secretary, to ask you about Evan Gershkovich and your efforts to get him free.
Yeah, let's talk about Russia and stuff.
You know, let's talk about Jamal Khashoggi and stuff.
Let's talk about the safe stuff, Mr. Blinken.
We just experienced this.
The Bezos press outlet, one of the worst out there, the Washington Post, up there with Tony Blinken, and they don't acknowledge a word those people said.
Two hours.
No talk about Assange.
And look again.
Big mistake, Donny T.
I know you sent Rohrbacher over there.
I know you wanted to cut deals with Assange and have him testify that it wasn't Russia who had given him the documents because it wasn't Russia and it wasn't a hack.
Okay?
It was a download.
There's a difference.
You take one of these little magic stickle noodles and you stick them in the computer and then you can take and download stuff and you got it on this hard thing.
You don't got to go dickadickadoo and be in a dark room with smoke and a hooded sweatshirt and hack in.
Oh, Russian style.
No.
No.
Clearly, someone who had had access to it, clearly the data was copied to one of these bad boys and that's how it was shared.
And again, Donnie T, he's very transactional, took it as kind of a slight that Julian didn't want to come out on his terms.
There should be no prosecution of the man, period.
Zero.
Zipples, Zilch, none.
Drives me wild.
Drives me wild, man.
And look, again, nobody's perfect.
He's an imper, all of us are human.
We're imperfect beings.
But you can't sit up there, World Press Freedom Day.
What a joke.
What a bad joke.
Brought to you by Tony Blinken.
All right, we're going to move on.
We're going to move on, but with a similar theme, because it's really the same thing over and over and over and over and over again with the Central Intelligence Agency.
Another reason that I like RFK Jr.
And I've got a clip of him talking about NATO and Russia, but we'll probably play that later.
Maybe we'll play that in the first hour, not sure.
But he's also talking about now breaking the CIA up where it is actually accountable.
I'm not sure how you do that, but I like that we're actually discussing it because the CIA and the mainstream media and probably a lot of the alternative media guys, I'm sorry.
They have penetrated, if not outright created, just like Klaus has penetrated the cabinets, which I have that clip for a little later.
We're going to be clipping it up today.
This is John Stockwell, one of the best, biggest, and brightest, probably one of the most forgotten CIA whistleblowers out there, telling you how it goes down.
This analysis that we made of the CIA's media operations disclosed, among other things, that they deliver through CIA couriers ready to print or ready to broadcast news.
And I put that in inverted commas, which is Used by the media.
And this is created by the CIA.
How often does the CIA manipulate the media in this way, plant stories, get their views in the media?
Is this fairly common as a modus operandi for the CIA?
It goes beyond your, in the course of the past 30 years, it goes beyond your wildest imagination.
The extent to which the CIA has gone to manipulate public opinion.
If you include the MH Chaos program, which was a billion-dollar program of setting up proprietary companies, setting up student organizations so they could draw radical students in and do every kind of duplicious manipulation of national student movements,
press, propaganda, labor, extensive formation of labor unions, funding of major labor unions with the objective essentially of manipulating the mind and attitudes of workers throughout the nation and the world.
A whole range of areas wherein the CIA provides briefings to selected journalists.
And there are numerous cases where the CIA has, for example, published books.
Several thousand books were published in English by the CIA, and this is documented in the Church Committee report.
They set up 250 news services and wire services, some of which, not all, but some of which are still in the pocket of the CIA.
And I think it's only fair to say that even some journalists who don't realize, there are some who are winning, but there are also some who do not realize that they're being targeted by the CIA when they come home from a trip overseas.
They might talk to somebody and they don't realize, at least right away, who they're talking to, and then it turns out that they've been the source of information which was used by the CIA.
Oh yeah, the CIA.
That really is the tip of the iceberg.
When you talk about your wildest dreams, you've got to think about the Central Intelligence Agency and the entire Disney apparatus, right?
In order to buy up all that land for Disney World, the CIA set up all these shell companies.
Can you imagine how many shell companies are out there right now that either were started or have massive intelligence connections, whether it's the Central Intelligence Agency or not?
So you set up these shell corporations back in the day for Disney, like the powerhouse in media, goes well beyond Mickey Mouse at this point, everybody.
Everybody has to bend a little bit of the knee to Disney somewhere, somehow, believe the hype.
They buy up all this land under these organizations because they wouldn't let Disney do it.
And I know people are like, DeSantis versus Disney.
And I don't hate what DeSantis is doing.
And I am, you know, Team DeSantis when it comes to Disney.
There's no reason that a private company should be able to self-regulate and have its own bylaws.
It's ridiculous.
Like, what is this?
That's not capitalism, everybody.
I can promise you that.
That's not, people can't call that capitalism because it isn't.
Period.
So, I mute.
That's, again, tip of the iceberg.
Bezos, Amazon.
Amazon is a company, everybody.
Think about this.
Is that real capitalism?
They were not profitable for how many years, serving people at a loss year after year after year after year, But being subsidized and promoted by the government intelligence agencies because they're a Trojan horse civilian system, period.
And now it's he's the private space guy.
He's he's in the backdrop.
I mean, he's only got dick rockets, right?
He's not as renowned.
He's like the anti-musker nuts, right?
You've got Elon being promoted in movies like Iron Man, Disney, Disney, Disney, Disney as the good billionaires, the Tony Stark guy.
And then you've got evil, you know, space guy, Lex Luther-esque Jeff Bezos buffing up.
Mypillow Ads Dominate00:02:46
And you got a whole media outlet where they get to sit there with Tony Blinken and talk about World Press Freedom Day and we love democracy.
It's a bad joke.
It's the dark cartoon.
And we're in it.
We get some thumbs up, by the way.
Low views today over on the YouTube.
But we get 100 thumbs up.
And barely anybody saw yesterday's show after the cluster knuck.
We did end up posting, I believe I posted the first hour to YouTube as I often do.
Let me go check that out right now.
Yeah, it's over on the YouTube.
But both hours are on My Rumble.
You can go to the streams over at Red Voice Media.
That's where the second hour is going to be as well for free.
We've got it everywhere.
If you're listening, you can listen on Podbean.
Okay, we stream it there just in audio format.
Share the RSS feed.
Second hour also at Rockfin and Rumble.
And this weekend, we're going to have Wayne Dupree and another special interview for you.
You get everything premium over at Red Voice Media.
There is now a 12-hour block four days a week.
They're letting me spout my mouth out, talk about Assange, show code pink.
You think you're going to hear that on any other alternative right program?
You know, there are alternative media programs that are going to talk about this.
Thank God.
But we really need to be hammering it home to free Julian Assange.
And now a word from our sponsor.
And he's interrupting this commercial.
You're still looking good.
I'm still feeling good.
You know, I've got all your MyPillow products: mattress, toppers, bed sheets, my pillows, towels, slippers, blankets, sleepwear, dogs.
Whoa, whoa, Charles.
Everyone now can get MyPillow products at huge discounts at mypillow.com.
That's right.
Now's the time to go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code to take advantage of our three-in-one sale.
We're bringing you exciting new products, overstock specials, and close-out deals you won't find anywhere else.
For example, when you buy one of our brand new MyPillow 2.0s, you get another one absolutely free.
And with our overstock sale, you see 50% on our luxurious Giza Dream bed sheets.
That's as low as $29.99 for the best sheets ever.
And with our biggest close-out special, you get our all-season slippers for only $35 or our sandals and slides for just $25.
Quantities are limited.
And once they're gone, they're gone.
Use that promo code RVM.
Okay, I'm going to shift gears a little bit.
Glenn Beck And The CIA Revelations00:13:19
I want to talk about Glenn Beck and 9-11.
Okay.
Beck did about a three-minute piece talking about the complete and total media blackout on the CIA revelations with the hijackers, Khalid Almadar in particular.
Now, where I believe Beck gets it wrong at the end of this is that somehow the FBI was shielded by the fact that Almadar and I think it's Al Nawafi were Central Intelligence Agency recruits or assets.
I find that extremely hard to believe that people within the FBI were unaware of this because what?
Almadar was living with and renting from an FBI asset and informant as well.
And as I've discussed many, times here, and we've shown you the video, the James Woods incident is another incident where clearly the hijackers were protected because you wouldn't have an incident where a pilot, a stewardess, and a Hollywood actor said, hey, these guys are going to hijack a plane, and you better look at them, that they wouldn't look at them.
Of course, immediately.
It's not like every day the Federal Bureau of Investigations, the DOJ, the DOD get a legitimate commercial airline hijacking threat.
That's not every day.
Sorry.
Especially when you're connected to foreigners that when you look at the money are connected to not only Saudi nationals, but the Pakistani ISI.
Of course you look at that.
And then you have Walid Al-Shari, again, having the CIA called on him individually.
No one seems to wrap that in.
Put that in with this story.
They need to.
Because when you're at the point where you're not calling local police and you're calling the Central Intelligence Agency about your neighbors, Shizzizzle must be a popping off all pre-9-11.
Then you look at a bunch of these guys.
For instance, this story takes place like in LA County.
I'm over on the left coast.
Look at the Florida flight schools.
Look at the military connections in this country, in Florida, in California, Monterey in particular, at Maxwell Air Force Base.
It's all there.
It's all there.
And yesterday, it's funny, I was watching H2, History 2.
H2 is usually better than the History Channel, which is, you know, just complete and total trash.
Not as good as AHC, which I like.
And everything has to be taken with a grain of salt and a lens, and especially this story will tell you that.
But first they had, I think it was America's Secret Book or Codes and Conspiracies.
And it's funny for me to watch martial law plans from the Obama era, so the pre-Trump era, all this stuff.
I think that show was shot in like 2012, 2013.
It's over a decade old.
But I'll see somebody like Bill Crystal, project for a new American century, total neocon, kind of a mentor to Tucker Carlson back in the day before the Tuck-ins figured it out and started calling out Crystal on his show as a warmonger, by the way.
It's incredible.
I see that person, okay, in the same episode with someone like Michael Rivero, who Rivero's in my film Fabled Enemies, which we'll talk about because Fabled Enemies has that CIA clip, takes you on the journey of these hijackers and the connections they had to intelligence, Abel Danger, all that stuff.
But Rivero in particular in that film comments on the Israeli connection.
Not only the dancing Israelis or the possible explosives and vans Israelis, not that, but also Amdocs and Converse telecommunication companies and this network that was being quietly rounded up pre-9-11 and that post-9-11, they arrested and detained a bunch of them as well.
Colin Powell acknowledged it.
It's all in the film.
Ari Fleischer acknowledged it.
I'd tell you to go talk to the Defense Department.
That's not, I can't really comment on that.
Hmm.
Interesting.
All these things have been around for a very, very long time.
Very long time.
And so finally, Glenn Beck is talking about it.
We're going to show that clip, but this is what I'd love the Burmese Brigade to do.
If you are on Twitter, okay, again, we're trying to use things as a tool here.
Everything's a tool.
I tagged Alex Stein because it was his retweet that got me this story that we're about to play.
Finally, Beck talks about 9-11 at Alex Stein.
Should have him give Fabled Enemies from 2008 a look.
If you guys could retweet the hell out of this, hard it, retweet it, okay?
Let people know that you want Glenn Beck to at least look at this film.
Look at this film, Glenn.
It's 15 years old now, Glenn.
And now we're going to play his clip now.
But now you're finally asking some real questions about 9-11 and the media, which is good.
It's long overdue.
But let's just go to the clip, everybody.
Let's hear what Glenn has to say.
Let me show you this.
This is a document from the sworn declaration of a 9-11 investigator with the Office of Military Commissions, part of the Department of Defense's Military Commissions Defense Organization.
This document is dated July 20th, 2021.
Now, it first appeared on a former Washington Post journalist substack, Jeff Stein's Spy Talk.
Now, before...
Isn't that funny?
Like, like, like...
We're just talking about the Washington Post.
They're sitting there on World Press Freedom Day, loving blinking, not talking to Sanj.
The legitimate journalists have to leave.
They're like, what happened?
And they go to Substack.
And look, I'm glad Substack exists.
Any outlet, remember when you used to be able to dig things?
Like, you'd actually be able to promote it.
The people could promote?
They've taken away every legitimate way for the people to do that by putting algorithmic boundaries on what's acceptable to talk about.
Before I go any further, have you heard anything new at all regarding the 9-11 investigation in the last 10 years?
Anything?
Have you heard anything about the newly discovered sworn declaration anywhere in the mainstream media?
I saw it once.
Maybe there's nothing to it.
Well, I mean, nothing is probably a little too harsh.
Just the allegation from multiple FBI agents that the CIA was running an illegal domestic spy agency inside the United States.
And that's the other thing.
We have to acknowledge that even with the Snowden documents, another person, I mean, again, you can't really pardon these people because Snowden in particular hasn't even been charged with a crime, let alone convicted.
And Assange certainly hasn't been convicted of anything in this country at all and should not be deported to this country.
But they're going to wait it out, man.
They'll just let him rot in Belmarsh.
Honestly, they're hoping that he ends up dying or taking his own life out of the madness that they've put him through.
The declaration says that the Saudis were being used as intermediaries to recruit al-Qaeda operatives for the CIA.
Quote: Al-Bawami was an intelligent, it could be Salami.
I don't know how to pronounce it.
Anyway, he was running, he was an intelligence officer in the employ of the Saudi government.
He was, quote, directed to attempt to recruit two of the 9-11 hijackers at the Saudi consulate in Los Angeles.
And remember, it's the consulate in Saudi Arabia that's giving these guys passports that's a front for the Central Intelligence Agency and absolutely working with Saudi Arabian intelligence.
See how that works?
See how that works?
This declaration alleges the CIA knew the hijackers were inside the United States.
And they wanted to work with them to recruit them through an illegal domestic espionage operation and hid everything from the FBI.
And look, I'm not saying that that's not true on the surface, but the idea that there weren't elements of the FBI that were well aware of this program, too, that's, I think that's Johnny nonsense with all the evidence given.
This information just came out.
Just came out.
Does anybody find that interesting?
Does anybody find it interesting that it's not everywhere in the mainstream media?
I mean, the CIA was running illegal operations that accidentally led to the worst tragedy on American soil.
I mean, that seems kind of newsworthy.
Where's the curiosity from the press?
Is it a problem of sourcing?
Well, let's see.
This account comes after the interviews of 11 ex-FBI agents, two ex-CIA agents, a CNN investigative journalist, former deputy of national security advisor Richard Clark, and former Senator Bob Graham from Florida, a Democrat.
So he's also going to talk about how he co-chaired the initial congressional investigation.
All this stuff is covered in more.
And Bob Graham, by the way, is in my film Fabled Enemies that we're going to try to get Glenn Beck to watch, admitting that he knew the Pakistani ISI chief was working with the Taliban.
That wasn't a secret.
Joe Biden admitting that he met with that guy, amongst many others like George Tennant, Condoleezza Rice, who would deny that, and then, of course, be proven a liar.
No one talks about that.
Meanwhile, you got Philip Zelikow, the main cover-up king with what is it, the Keene, man, the Keene Hamilton Commission, Lee Hamilton, you know, JFK guy.
Lee Hamilton, huh?
Little Warren report guy.
Yeah.
And Zelikow, after him and Condi, they wrote a book together.
He's the head of the 9-11 Commission, writing the book.
And guess what?
He's part of the new war on COVID report.
I mean, talk about obfuscation, limited hangout, whitewash garbage and trash, man.
And Richard Clark, as we've discussed here before, and we played the video a couple weeks back when we were talking about this story, Openly was talking about this CI connection all the way back in 2011.
All the way back in 2011.
It's not new, everybody.
He was the co-chair of Congress's joint inquiry into 9-11.
I don't know.
It's an amazing claim.
It seems to have a lot of sources, but the media doesn't care.
Nope, they sure don't, Glenn.
And it's not a shock.
And remember, you didn't help things.
You didn't help things when that first came out at all.
Not even a little bit.
Not even a little bit.
So we're coming up on another commercial break.
Before we get there, I want to talk about this story quick because it's something we highlighted before the mainstream media allowed it to be mentioned, perhaps because Jamie Foxx is said to have tweeted something out.
I'm not sure if it's in this story, but he's, you know, he's like, thanks for all.
Here it is right here.
From the Fox family, we want to share that.
My father, Jamie Foxx, experienced, oh, this is from the very beginning.
There also may be a picture of him in a hospital bed.
I'm not sure if that's legit.
But basically, they're still not saying what the medical emergency was.
But if you look it up, there's some people that are talking a brain aneurysm, but the popular one is he suffered a stroke on set and had to be revived.
I'm not saying that.
Jamie Foxx's Stroke00:02:54
I'm just going to type it in.
Let's just type it in.
Where are you, Jamie?
Let's see.
So, Jamie Foxx, stroke.
Okay.
They say Jamie suffers from high blood pressure, which doctors say can cause clots in the brain leading to stroke.
So that's probably midday.com and entertainment news right there.
I think they're easing you into it.
That's the first time I've seen that there at all.
And now, you know, you're seeing it with this.
This is a Nigerian site, but it was only the hip-hop community that was talking about that at all.
Maybe Ebony is now talking about it.
Let's see, revive.
Let's see if Ebony dare uses the term stroke a week ago.
I doubt it, but it may.
Maybe they did.
That'd be about as mainstream as it got for this.
Yep.
Yep, said the insider.
So there it is.
Ebony was probably the biggest one to actually say that a week ago.
Whereas it's not being discussed.
But what we're going to discuss here is a word from our sponsor.
Folks, we have a huge problem on our hands.
A banking crisis is spiraling, and it's all thanks to the current administration's reckless spending, sky-high inflation, and massive interest rate hikes.
Now, these banks are suffering.
And guess what?
They can legally seize your savings without notice to bail themselves out.
That's right.
Thanks to a sneaky law passed back in 2008, it's now legal for banks to take your hard-earned money, including your retirement savings, to save themselves.
Now, this could leave your retirement accounts decimated and you paying the price for their disastrous policies.
Take action now before it's too late.
Now, this guide will show you how to defend your money and keep your retirement savings safe from the banking crisis and the current administration's financial fiasco.
This simple and 100% legal strategy may help you protect your retirement against higher taxes, soaring inflation, and a volatile economy.
So don't let your golden years be ruined by someone else's mistakes to secure your free wealth protection guide and safeguard what's rightfully yours.
Don't wait.
The time to act is now.
RVM goldandsilver.com.
But what we want you to do is to sign up for RVM Premium, redvoicemedia.com/slash Jason, redvoicemedia.com/slash uncensored.
Please consider $10 a month.
It's only a buck to start.
Okay, you get the first week for the dollar.
That is $10 a month or $100 for the year.
Lock it in.
Politicians, Criminals, and Denial00:14:33
It supports the broadcast.
We're trying to bring as many people over as possible.
Again, two interviews coming up this week.
We're going to be leaving YouTube in just under 15 minutes, but the second hour live and free over at redvoicemedia.com or either of our rumbles.
Or if you're on Rockfin, you can also watch the second hour there.
We're going to be talking about the two Democratic social media young stars going on Tim Dillon.
And boy, Tim is just, I like Tim.
You know, I've been on one podcast with him.
I've talked to him a little bit behind the scenes.
I like comedy in general.
I think he's a funny guy.
But I like the fact that he got these kids on the show.
And they are.
I'm sorry.
They're kids.
When I say kid too, I'm not trying to be disrespectful to young people because I know I hated that.
But I'll sit there and I'll watch MMA or the UFC and I'll watch like somebody who's in their mid-20s.
And you go, oh, this kid is tough.
It's kind of what I mean by it.
It's kind of what I mean.
It's all.
That's all.
All right.
We got plenty of other clips other than that that I wanted to play.
In particular, this one, RFK breaking down NATO and Russia, especially after the media.
It's unbelievable.
Again, it's not something we focused on, but Russia, came back with more ludicrous Johnny nonsense yesterday, where there were these weird drone attacks of explosives over at the Kremlin.
Now, maybe we should do that live.
Let's see if we can bring this up.
Because when I watch it, I'm like, is this a real threat?
Where did this come from?
They're saying Russia may have done it to itself to false flag it.
Even some in the mainstream media seem to be reluctant to go with that.
So here it is here.
You know, you just type in Kremlin and you can find it.
Let's go with this one.
Like, what is that?
Don't get me wrong.
If, like, you see the size of that, like, let's take a look at it right there.
And yeah, about the size of a door or a window.
But if you're telling me that there couldn't be something of more sophistication and even the vulnerability, the whole thing is just highly suspect.
But Russia doing it to themselves, I don't know.
Actually, my boy Stuart J. Hooper, I didn't pull this clip, but I did retweet it, had a little something to say about it.
So let's hear it from him.
He's one of my favorite guests to have on the show.
It doesn't matter really where this came from.
It's an excuse for escalation on either side.
If it comes from the Ukrainians, well, that's an escalation in and of itself.
If it comes from the Russians attacking themselves, it's an excuse to escalate this conflict further.
This all comes back to the central point I have made again and again and again on this channel since again the start of this conflict.
This war needs to end.
This war is benefiting absolutely nobody except the military-industrial complex in the Western world and some key political elites amongst the nations that are involved in this conflict.
100%.
100%.
My boy lays it down very well.
And here is RFK talking about the NATO and Russia situation that everybody seems to forget.
We should have listened maybe to Putin over many years.
You know, we made a commitment to Russia, to Gorbachev, that we would not move NATO one inch to the east.
Oh, you know, why didn't we went in and we lied?
We went into 13 NATO countries.
We put missile systems in nuclear capacity.
We did joint exercises with the Ukraine and these others from NATO.
You know, what is the purpose of NATO other than to oppose Russia?
And if you're addressing Russia hostily from the beginning, of course, their reaction is going to be a hostile reaction back.
And if you're slowly moving in, all of these states who we said would never become part of NATO would suddenly become part of NATO, you know, and then, you know, and we know what happened to Ukraine.
The U.S. supported essentially a coup d'état in 2014 against the democratically elected government of Ukraine.
And we put in place, and we now have, you know, the telephone call transcripts.
Victoria Newland, one of the neocons in the White House, then handpicking the new cabinet that was hostile to the Soviet Union.
And so, you know, if you look at that and you put yourself in Russia's position and you say, okay, the United States, our biggest enemy that's treating us as an enemy, has now taken over the government of a nation and made them hostile to us and then start, you know, passing laws that are prejudicial to this giant Russian population.
If Mexico did that and then started killing, they killed 14,000 Russians and dumped us.
The Ukrainian government, if Mexico did that to expatriate Americans, we'd invade in a second.
So, you know, I think we have to put ourselves in the shoes of our opponents.
And it doesn't mean saying that Vladimir Putin is not a gangster.
He is.
That he's not a thug.
He is.
That he's not a bully.
He is.
But going to war is not in his interest either.
And he repeatedly told us, these are red lines you're crossing.
And they crossed them again and again, and it continued to cross them.
Continue.
Again, the idea that the United States is not running the operation on the ground, the idea that the Starlink slash blackjack system that is being utilized for modern warfare there isn't ours is it's ludicrous.
It's insane.
It's Johnny nonsense is what it is.
Okay?
Can we get 150 thumbs up in the shares and remember to rumble on over in about six minutes?
I want to play this clip to be fair.
I want to play this clip to be fair because look, if I'm going to be pro-RFK, so many people are saying, well, he wants climate change people to be arrested.
And I've discussed this before, saying, look, it was nine years ago.
The video is also taken out of context.
He doesn't say that.
We're going to play it so you can understand that.
He's talking about specifically the Koch brothers.
And you notice they don't even have the actual question they ask him.
All right.
He just starts talking about global warming and the science being undeniable.
And I hope that he's changed his mind on that.
I really do.
I really, really do.
He's also talking about laws against politicians that lie, but nowhere in this clip does he call for people who deny climate change to go to jail.
I want to make that clear too.
And plus, I really hope now that he's seen post-COVID-1984 nightmare, what the World Health Organization, the UN, the Davos crowd, the driving forces publicly of this agenda are capable of, that he's reconsidered.
He's a smart guy.
He's a smart guy.
So let's play the clip.
This is the clip everybody's telling me is why I shouldn't get behind RFK Jr.
I think they should be in jail.
I think they should be enjoying three hots and a cot at The Hague with all the other war criminals who are there.
What about politicians, people who deny?
So now let me stop you.
So I want to just tell you how this is framed.
In every post I've seen this on, they make it sound like he was asked the question, people that deny climate change.
That's not what he was asked at all.
He specifically asked about the Koch brothers.
So I'm going to bring it back and let him say this.
I think they should be in jail.
I think they should be enjoying three hots and a cot at The Hague with all the other war criminals who are there.
What about politicians, people who deny who dispress skepticism?
They're selling out the public trust.
And, you know, I think those guys who are doing the Koch brothers' bidding and who are against all the evidence of the rational mind are saying that global warming doesn't exist, that they are contemptible human beings, and that, you know, I wish that there were a law you could punish them under.
I don't think there's a law that you can punish those politicians under, but do I think the Koch brothers should be prosecuted for reckless and dangerous?
Absolutely.
That's a criminal offense, and they ought to be serving time for it.
So again, the way everybody framed it is he wants people that deny climate change or global warming to go to jail.
Think about what he just said.
He specifically talks about the Koch brothers being prosecuted not because they're denying climate change or global warming, but because they have to be accountable for what they've done to the environment.
Let's bring it back.
I'm going to say it again.
So look, are there parts of this I completely disagree with RFK?
You bet.
You better bet your butt.
But I'm not going to stump for the Koch brothers.
Punish them under.
I don't think there's a law that you can punish those politicians under, but do I think the Koch brothers should be prosecuted for reckless and dangerous?
Absolutely.
That's a criminal offense, and they ought to be serving time for it.
All right.
Well, thank you very much.
Appreciate it.
So there it is.
There's the big bad clip that makes me not be the guy for him.
They're telling me he's bad.
Meanwhile, he's putting stuff like this out.
Cryptocurrencies led by Bitcoin, along with other crypto technologies, are a major innovation engine.
It is a mistake for the U.S. government to hobble the industry and drive innovation elsewhere.
Biden's proposed 30% tax on cryptocurrency mining is a bad idea.
It's crazy, by the way.
It's totally insane.
A 30%, like, again, where is the baseline on capitalism?
And look, they're trying to use it.
They're trying to say this because of energy.
It's all, again, all bullshit.
This, you should use less.
Get out of here with that.
Yes, energy use is a concern, though somewhat overstated.
You bet it is.
But Bitcoin mining uses about the same as video games, and no one is calling for a ban on those.
The environmental argument is a selective pretext to suppress anything that threatens the elite power structures.
Bitcoin, for example.
Some advocates tight control of cryptocurrencies to prevent their use by criminals, but it isn't just criminals who want privacy.
So do dissidents and ordinary citizens.
We're going to read the rest of it in a second after we have a word from our sponsor.
We love the internet, but the internet is tracking everything you do.
Take control of your online privacy with IP Vanish.
People with malicious intent are everywhere watching you.
Criminals can hack your Wi-Fi while broadband providers and advertisers monitor your data.
With IP Vanish on your device, your internet activity is encrypted.
No one can see what you're doing.
Your location, your connection, completely hidden.
Protect your internet privacy today with IP Vanish.
RVMVPN.com.
I actually do use IP Vanish.
That's not a joke.
You know what?
I'll do it live.
It's actually even in my regular bar.
But here it is.
That's what it looks like when you actually use the IP Vanish.
And I'm a big fan of it.
Okay, YouTube, here's the deal.
We're leaving.
We're going.
Arriva Dirchi.
Sayonara.
See you later.
Thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
I love you.
But come on over to Rumble and Rockman for the uncensored, the uncensored second hour.
And remember, redvoicemedia.com slash Jason, redvoicemedia.com/slash uncensored.
That's going to get you two, two, two exclusive interviews this weekend only at redvoicemedia.com.
So YouTube, Arriva Dirchie.
Ah, yes.
The second uncensored hour of truth.
Glad to be here, everybody.
Glad you came over.
Glad you're listening and loving it.
I'm hoping you're sharing it.
I'm hoping that you're also, you know, now that you're over on that second hour, you're also going to get Glenn Beck to watch Fabled Enemies.
Enough of this accidentally let it occur.
And you can tag Alex Stein in that.
You know, he's the one that retweeted it.
He works over at the Blaze.
We've had Alex on the program.
We appreciate a lot of what he does.
Imperfect human being, but a very funny individual.
And it's different strokes for different folks.
That's how I look at it.
So let's continue with this statement from RFK Jr. about cryptocurrencies.
But it isn't just criminals who want privacy.
So do dissidents and ordinary citizens.
Governments harass their enemies and crush dissent by controlling bank accounts and payment platforms.
Until we restore trust in government, a distant prospect, we need cash and crypto to ensure freedom.
Just as a biodiverse ecosystem is a resilient ecosystem, so too will our economy more resilient if it has a diverse ecology of currencies, not just a single, centrally controlled one.
Benefits of Diverse Currencies00:03:26
We are seeing today how fragile our over-centralized system is.
Bank failures afoot.
Inflation everywhere.
Wasn't transitory.
No, no, no.
Payment platform penalties.
Say it with me now.
Payment platform penalties.
Don't have the wrong opinion.
And look, to be fair, because we were talking climate change, we gave RFK his word on it.
I want you to watch Ron Johnson break down how this green agenda is totally ludicrous, is set up really to not only economically devastate us, but it's based in imagination land.
In your testimony, you said that the subsidies in the U.S. for fossil fuels are about $12 billion over five years, correct?
The Inflation Reduction Act, I think it's over 10 years, about $400 billion, but a Goldman Sachs study said it'd be closer to $1.2 trillion.
So just comparing that, $12 billion versus $1,200 billion worth of costs, sure subsidizing a whole lot more green energy, correct?
According to those numbers, yes.
According to those numbers, yes.
Well, again, according to the real numbers, yes.
100 times higher costs.
And that's just one piece of legislation.
Let's talk about the benefits.
I think it's undeniable that fossil fuel is going to power 80% of our economies decades in the future, correct?
So when you're powering 80% of the economy, you're paying for air conditioning to allow people to escape the heat.
Certainly, China and India are going to use fossil fuels to lift their people out of poverty.
Ms. Guy, do you believe there's any chance whatsoever that India and China are going to stop using fossil fuels?
Nor do I think we will.
Right.
Zero chance of that, okay?
Are you aware of the climate alarmist studies?
Their own models show that even if we eliminated all CO2 emissions in the United States, it would have a negligible, less than a degree difference in terms of what their projections say in terms of climate change.
Among other things, again, when you look at this, they're telling you that 0.04% is about all we can handle.
We got to get it down to 0.02%.
Carbon is not the problem.
Sorry.
And maybe RFK thinks it is.
Hey, buddy, I know that you've looked at real pollutants, real issues, such as mercury, heavy metals, toxins.
I'm concerned about the air.
I'm concerned about the water.
I'm concerned about my food supply as well, especially because the air and the water affect the food supply no matter what.
But when the food supply continually becomes more and more GMO and more and more processed, no bueno.
No bueno.
Okay?
And you know, I'm glad I made that food supply analogy when we're talking about all of this because when we're talking about climate change and the actual agenda, it's about command and control.
Water Supply Concerns00:07:28
That's what it's about.
And it's really about population control.
And if you don't think that people behind the new world order or the great reset agenda or the technocracy, which is really a technopoly, don't have this social Darwinistic, sadistic,
sociopathic, psychopathic mindset, I need you to listen and listen good to Howard Scott, who was the founder of, I believe it's Technocracy Inc., talking about these things, pro-population control, talking about how he knew Margaret Sanger, little miseugenics, little miss, we've got to get rid of the black weeds population, all right?
And he's like, look, we need to put it in the food supply.
We put it into candy.
We don't need to let them know.
I mean, literally to sterilize people.
And if you don't think it goes from just disease and sterilization to euthanasia, again, you're not paying attention.
All of it is sadistic and wrong and evil and should be fought against.
So, Howard Scott, it's about a four-minute clip.
I'm going to try to play as much of it without me running my big mouth as possible.
Now, the birth Planned Parenthood, Birth Control League, and all that.
Well, I knew Margaret Sanger.
Did you?
Yeah, way back, oh, there was an old English tea room, 40th Street or someplace there.
And there was a gravestone company next to it then.
There weren't many buildings in there.
And you got crumpets and muffins and nice little things.
I remember Bill Williams and a whole bunch more and Margaret Sanger.
And I said, well, to you it's a car select.
But it isn't birth control that you're preaching.
It's voluntary parenthood.
Yeah.
Yeah.
There's a distinction there.
You're right.
Yeah.
And I said, you may have been driven into this because you had eight children.
I think it was eight, I've forgotten.
Some number of children she had.
But I said, as a collective measure, you have to have a collective means of doing it.
Well, of course, we have advocated to hell with all this voluntary parenthood.
That is not going to stop reproduction.
And we have stated this in the public platform time and time again, that the female of the human species has had the power and the facility to dissolve the fetus without any deleterious results to her reproductive or general metabolism.
That's been known for generations.
We didn't know what triggered it.
But several biochemists have found out.
They have found out.
Oh, yeah.
Tasteless, colorless, odorless.
It's cheap to manufacture.
And put in the drinking water of a metropolitan water system.
This warfarans rat poison.
Yes.
Well, it's about the same percentage of effective as the poison is in warfarans, which is around decimal 0.3041%.
I just have to stop it there, really quick.
Think about this.
This guy's got it down to the 0.341% of the poison you need to put into the water supply of a metropolitan system to collectively stop people from procreating.
Stop their biological choices.
He talks about Planned Parenthood, birth control, abortions as voluntary parenting.
But we need a collective, it's always about collectivism.
That's why I hammer that term instead of socialism or communism or Marxism or all these other things that you hear about that have varying aspects of it.
But at the end of the day, collective, collective collectivism.
And that means someone else is going to decide for you.
And listen to these people.
Seriously.
Take a good listen.
We'll poison the water supply.
And then they laugh about it.
That's the best part.
And no mammal will conceive.
Well, that percentage is in the water.
Is that so?
No.
Dogs, cats, cows, anything.
Human beings.
No deleterious results, whatever.
No.
And you stop it for six, seven weeks.
Bang.
Fertile again.
Now, if you haven't got a metropolitan water supply, you can put it in candy.
Or soft drinks.
Here's an eyedropper.
Well, yeah, but you couldn't.
But it's much simpler to put it in something like that.
Just the same as a Sabin-like live vaccine.
Just like the Sabin-like live vaccine.
So he even makes the association of population control and sterilization through poisoning the water supply, poisoning candy, which is usually marketed at children, and then soft drinks.
But then he says, you know what?
You do it live.
Just like that Sabin vaccine.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah.
Vaccine it up.
Yeah.
Here we wouldn't touch the Sabin vaccine.
We wouldn't even run tests on it.
Look at what the Russians did.
They proved up on one, two, and three Sabin vaccines.
And they ran 79 million one year.
They put it in candy.
They beat us on that, huh?
They were ahead of us on that?
Oh, yes, they did it by the million.
Oh, yes, they did it by the millions.
Fantastic.
Just lovely.
Alex Jones Controversy00:07:18
All right.
I'm torn between going to Klaus House next and the club of Rome.
That's probably what we need to do.
Klaus and the Club of Rome.
Now, I'm going to play the famous Penetrate the Cabinets clip.
And what a lot of people don't point out is that Klaus is sitting next to David Gergen.
And Gergen is a big political insider, part of past administrations, all over mainstream media the past couple decades.
Became kind of infamous.
In fact, we are past the YouTube.
So maybe I'll see if we can't find it on YouTube.
Alex Jones, David Gergen.
Gergen.
This is where Alex Jones.
Nope, of course.
No, I'll just mainstream bashing of Jones.
Let's see if I can find it via DuckDuckGo.
I bet you I can.
Duck DuckGo here.
Go.
So, yeah, of course.
First thing.
Man, the search results are just so different.
So let's do.
Let's go to the five-minute clip because maybe there's a breakdown of the Bohemian Grove.
And let me say this again.
You know, we've been showing you Bohemian Grove annals that I have and, you know, books.
And I want to reiterate again: I don't believe it to be Moloch.
They don't have it written down as Moloch.
They may do ball or Moloch type rituals via the cremation of care with the owl, but their deity is the owl based on its wisdom, its ability to see in the dark, and its predatory nature.
It also may represent Minerva, according to their writings.
Just want to put that out there.
So let's do it live and let's go to David Gergen and Alex Jones and we'll watch Gergen sitting there with Klaus House.
We're trying to introduce it.
He's this guy.
Is there like more extras?
Come on, just give me the jump.
David Gergen, top presidential advisor to Ford, Reagan, George Herbert Walker Bush, and Bill Clinton.
We couldn't believe our luck.
It just so happens that David Gergen is also a prominent member of the Bohemian Grove, the offshoot of Skull and Bones.
This insider of insiders, a staple of the White House for 22 years, got very upset when we brought up Bohemian Grove to him.
He didn't deny its existence.
He didn't deny that he was a member.
He didn't deny the rituals.
He just became angry and didn't act very gentlemanly.
Hey, Mr. Gergen, can we talk to you for a second?
Where are you from?
I'm Alex Jones.
I have a TV show in Austin.
I make documentaries.
Just a few questions about the convention.
Is there a camera?
Are you?
Yeah, right there.
I just want to get your permission first.
Here.
Okay, okay.
It's looking like I've got.
No, I understand.
Okay, great.
We're talking to David Gergen, and he, I mean, just told you, I bet you Gergen was so upset that he had a bad feeling about this one from the beginning.
Let's be honest.
Has advised several presidents and, of course, has written quite a few books and is a, I would call you a political pundit or researcher.
Commentariate over the hill, whatever.
One last question.
I read a Washington Times article many years ago where you had a comment about the organization, and then now it's been in the Wall Street Journal.
It's been in a lot of different newspapers, and that's the Bohemian Grove.
And back in, what was it, 1996, when you joined as a Clinton advisor, the Republicans were criticizing you.
Oh, what about Bohemian Grove?
And then you countered, and then you countered them by saying, hey, I don't run around in the woods naked.
What did that mean?
Here is the before-mentioned Washington Times article.
He said, I didn't run around naked like they do.
I don't know what quote you're referring to.
I'm not aware of any quote like that.
Listen, I am a happy member of the Bohemian Grove.
I like the folks who come there, and it's really inappropriate for me to talk about the group beyond that.
Thank you.
Have you been there for the ceremony with the cremation of care?
Frankly, I don't think that's something I need to talk to you about.
Frankly, I don't think that's something I need to talk to you about.
I mean, seriously, they did not like Alex Jones exposing this.
You know, I saw some people in the comments that, ooh, did he state?
He didn't state.
This isn't staged.
He really broke into the Bohemian Grove.
It wasn't staged.
I mean, the conspiracies within conspiracies, man, somebody on Twitter tagged me in this.
Alex Jones was right piano bit.
And like, it starts off with like Alex Jones's Bill Hicks and a whole bunch of other stuff in there that's just total Johnny nonsense.
And somehow it's become, you know, the edgy, fringy Alex Jones folklore.
It's weird.
Have you been there for the service?
Midsummer sets us free.
By the way, I have those recordings.
One of the annals that I have, I'm only missing two now, guys.
Man, I've got two through, I think two through 10.
I think I'm missing 11 and 1.
It's Walter Cronkite who's recorded on that.
He's a big Bohemian Grover.
The disc has a bunch of the show tune stuff too.
But you have to acknowledge that these guys like to dress up in cloaks and do weird stuff.
Ceremony with the cremation of care?
Frankly, I don't think that's something I need to talk to you about.
Really?
That's right.
Well, I'm Alex Jones, and I snuck in there in 2000.
I'm the guy that blew it wide open and got the video.
It's been on national TV.
Well, I disrespect you for that.
You do?
I do.
There's a lot of big public officials going in there.
You don't.
I think we deserve to know.
I don't know anything about you, and I don't know anything about your film.
But if you go in there with an understanding, you violated that understanding by releasing that film, and I don't respect you for that.
Really?
I'm sorry.
You took an understanding when you went in there that you would not do that film.
Did you have an understanding when you went in there?
No.
Did you crash it?
Yes.
Yeah, and it has no trespassing signs there too, doesn't it?
No, they put me up after.
Oh, I'm sorry.
I just walked in.
I'm sorry, sir.
I've been there before.
I know what the circumstances are, and I'm sorry you violated the understandings.
That was not a gentlemanly thing to do.
But what about the ritual?
the ritual gentlemanly sir everything you i i don't owe you this comment I know, I'm sorry.
This is what's called ambush journalism, and I disrespect you for that as well.
So thank you and goodbye.
That's none of your damn business.
That's none of your damn business.
Calling Out Disinformation00:13:13
Was that stage two?
Did Jones stage that?
Did Bill Hicks stage this one?
Here he goes.
He goes, that is a three-pointer?
Oh.
All right.
Listen.
Listen.
You go around and make understandings with people and violate them.
You ambush people on the streets, and that's an inappropriate form of journalism.
If you wish to practice that, that's fine.
But don't ask others to respect you for it.
You can do your free American, like anything you want.
If you want to be uncivil and rude and ungentlemanly, that's up to you.
But don't expect the rest of us.
I'm sorry.
Nobody says policy in there.
We try to be gentlemen, and obviously you don't belong there.
Weaving spiders come not here?
Yeah, that is a three-pointer.
I love it.
Weaving spiders come not here.
So from that to the Klaus House sitting with Gergen talking about penetrating the cabinets, talking about France in particular.
And then after the clip, you'll see, I believe it's the French prime minister being confronted about the relationship with Klaus House and the Davos crew.
Okay?
And now think about it.
The Davos crew, very much a part of the Bohemian Grove crew.
See how they intersect?
See how that works?
This notion to integrate young leaders is part of the World Economic Room since many years.
When I mention our names like this Merkel, even Vladimir Putin and so on, they all have been young global leaders of the World Economic Forum.
But what we are very proud of now is young generation like Prime Minister Trudeau, President of Argentina and so on, so that we penetrate the cabinets.
So yesterday was understood.
Look, we all know that Klaus speaks English well.
It's not his first language.
But when he says penetrate the cabinet, you notice he actually penetrates.
He's penetrating.
So, this idea that he doesn't know exactly what he's talking about and how he's talking about and how he feels about it, he very much means that he's penetrated, okay, the political and economic systems of nation states through their leaders.
President of Argentina and so on, said he penetrates the cabinets.
So, yesterday I was at a reception for Prime Minister Trudeau, and I would know that half of this cabinet, or even more, half of this cabinet, are for our actually young noble leaders of the World Economic Forum.
And that's true in Argentina, too.
Well, yeah, sorry.
That's true in Argentina as well.
It's true in Argentina, and it's so in France.
No, I mean, with the president, who is a young global leader, but questions and comments.
The Honorable Member for Oshawa.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
And I listened to my colleague's speech.
I had a constituent that wanted me to ask a question about outside interference to our democracy.
Klaus Schwab is the head of the World Economic Forum, and he bragged how his subversive WWEF, World Economic Forum, has quoted infiltrated governments around the world.
He said that his organization had penetrated more than half of Canada's cabinet.
I was wondering, in the interest of transparency, could the member please name which cabinet ministers are on board with the WEF's agenda?
My concern is the deputy.
Order, order, order.
I know that the member was in a really good question there, but the audio is really, really bad.
The audio is not bad.
The audio is not bad.
And by the way, I'm sorry, it's not France.
It was Canada.
But again, the audio is not bad.
And you can see, we'll go back to that in a second.
But you can see right here when he cuts it.
Watch the look at this face.
Klaus Schwab is the head of the World Economic Forum, and he bragged how his subversive WWE.
Oh, you see that?
Oh, that's a great question.
We're not going to answer it.
The audio is bad.
The audio is not bad.
They cut away right here.
He's like, what do we do with this guy?
WEF, World Economic Forum, has quoted infiltrated governments around the world.
He said that his organization had penetrated more than half of Canada's cabinet.
I was wondering, in the interest of transparency, could the member please name which cabinet ministers are on board with the WEF's agenda?
My concern is the deputy.
Order, order, order.
I know that the member was in a really good question there, but the audio is really, really bad, and the video is really, really bad as well.
and i apologize i don't know if if the member okay uh let's let's Let's try again.
The honorable member for Timothy James Bay.
Mr. Speaker, that member is promoting open disinformation.
That's not debate.
We have to call out disinformation.
We'll get into debate again.
The honorable member.
Questions and comments.
The honorable member for Lambton, Ken Middlesex.
There is no debate.
There is no debate.
We're not even going to acknowledge the question.
We're going to let somebody stump and just say it's debunked.
Debunked.
Open disinformation.
Okay.
All right.
Yeah, that's the way to have a civil discussion.
That's certainly the way to prove your point.
That makes sense.
Tim Dylan.
Tim Dylan, right here.
Killing it.
I'm sure the vast majority, especially if you watch this network, have seen the viral video of the two kids talking about how we don't like Republicans.
We don't like Republicans.
I could give a rat's ass.
Republicans, Democrats.
But these kids are just total talking points for the DNC.
I mean, detached completely from reality.
And they look like children.
They sound like children.
And these two clips in particular show how ridiculous they are.
And Tim Dylan doing a great job of showing how ridiculous they are.
It's actually really hard in this space, right?
Like we have like 45 seconds to record a video, keeping people's attention.
And a lot of the people on our side, like if they start hearing, like I've actually done it before, I've criticized like Democrats, like specifically Hakeem Jeffries, and it all just went south.
Like I started losing followers.
Oh my God, I said something I honestly felt about a Democrat and I started losing followers and that's no good.
I mean, I'm telling you right now on this program, I don't detract from what I say or not cover subjects because I think I'm going to lose followers.
Think about how disingenuous that is.
It's bad, right?
And I really want to be that person that like reaches the other side because Democrats, I mean, they're horrible at their jobs, right?
They do a lot of shitty things, although I'll vote for them all the time.
But it's also hard in the space to criticize.
I mean, it's so funny because I wish I had the longer clip because Tim Dallen goes, hey, clip that.
And he goes, oh, no, no, please don't clip that.
I mean, think about how ridiculous.
I mean, look at these guys.
If I told you they were sophomores in high school, would you not believe me?
And think about what this kid just said.
He admits he can't criticize the party legitimately because he'll lose followers.
And then he admits they do shitty things and they're horrible at their jobs.
I mean, you're doing well here, fella.
It's actually really hard in this space, right?
Like we have like 45 seconds to record a video, keep people's attention.
And a lot of the people on our side, like if they start hearing, like I've actually done it before, I've criticized like Democrats, like specifically Hakeem Jeffries, and it all just went south.
Like I started losing followers.
Like it's bad, right?
And I really want to be that person that like reaches the other side because Democrats, I mean, they're horrible at their jobs, right?
They do a lot of shitty things, although I'll vote for them all the time.
But it's also hard in the space to criticize.
On our side.
On our side, on our side.
Do shitty things.
Still vote for them.
Can't criticize them.
That's you being a part of a cult, period.
That's Coltown.
It's Colt Town USA, baby.
That's what that is.
This one is even more revealing because it's the other kid that starts talking.
And he basically goes down the line with Democratic talking points of fantasy land that Joe Biden is the best thing since breakfast and somehow running the country and an effective president.
All of which is nonsense.
Yeah, effective at what?
Destroying this country from within on behalf of a globalist predator class agenda.
Just signing off on it, making no decisions.
Like, hey, back in the day, Joey B was a little slick.
He's like, let's go after Michael Flynn for the Logan Act.
You know who had been talking about the Logan Act for many, many years?
This guy.
This guy.
Not to go after Michael Flynn with, but to go after people within our government that we're meeting at the Bilderberg group, setting policy at the Bilderberg group.
That's a violation of Logan Act about to happen in the next couple of weeks.
Supposedly in Lisbon, Portugal.
That's what we're hearing.
We'll see.
We'll see.
So let's play this second clip.
But, you know, what do you what?
Give me the what?
What's the pitch for Joe Biden?
Oh, man.
I mean, do you want me to go down the list?
Go down the list.
Oh, man.
What do you want me to go down the list?
Whoa, what's the pitch for Joe Biden?
All right.
I won't go into detail on each one, but I think generally his presidency has been incredibly successful in terms of like one of the most productive presidents in modern American history, undoubtedly.
The American Rescue Plan, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal, the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, the PACT Act, the CHIPS Act, the Inflation Reduction Act, rejoining the Paris Climate Accord, rejoining the WHO, historic judicial nominees.
First black woman on the Supreme Court.
The child tax credits.
Who cares?
Who cares?
First of all, being a part of the WHO, terrible.
One of the things that Trump did was to get us out.
So it's not like Joe Biden got us into the Paris Climate Accords or the WHO.
The truth is that Trump got us out of those bad things.
And Joe Biden just signed off on what was an already globalist agenda.
There is no inflation reduction from the Inflation Reduction Act.
It's the build-back better thing.
He's admitted it.
Admitted it.
So it's a program of slavery under the guise of sustainability.
Just played you the Ron Johnson clip of what they want to spend for the infrastructure bill.
And now Tim Dylan's going to eviscerate him on the identity politics stuff.
Happy Internet $35.
First black woman on the Supreme Court.
What?
Like, I mean, that's good.
I mean, but she's also like, aside from that, but just putting an extremely qualified nominee on the Supreme Court.
I mean, okay, but say that.
Say, I think it's a combination of things.
Say, like, a first black woman who's an amazingly qualified, you know?
And we've spoken to you.
And I just otherwise we're just checking boxes.
It doesn't seem to make sense.
Well, I've spoken to her qualifications, but what, like, the point is there is that she is obviously far more qualified than any of the nominees that Trump put on.
So it's like, do you want qualified people?
Like, political ideology aside, do you want qualified people or do you just want people who are going to rule in?
Fred Kavanaugh is qualified.
Amy Coney Barrett's qualified.
You may disagree with them.
Amy Coney Barrett is nowhere near as qualified as Katanji Brown Jackson.
Well, listen, well, define qualifications in that sense.
Just time served.
Like, Amy Coney Barrett only had a very short amount of time actually serving as a judge, whereas Katanji Brown Jackson had far more experience, you know, worked more in the field prior to being a judge, and her opinions were more consistent.
Like Amy Coney Barrett had a lot of inconsistencies.
Well, now we're politicizing it.
Well, we're just going to go with quality, but whatever.
Well, now we're politicizing it.
Listen, the kid on the left in the gray shirt, he's a little brighter than the other kid, you can tell.
And he seems to be the leader, but he's brighter in the sense that he's got muscle memory in his mind.
In other words, he can go to those Bernesian talking points, those check boxes.
Brett Kavanaugh's Mentor00:03:00
He knows exactly what to say.
He's actually pretty decent on the comeback, but it's ludicrous.
First of all, I don't know, Brett Kavanaugh came up in the Bush administration under the mentorship of Carl Turdblossom Rove.
Let me say it again: Carl Turdblossom Rove, who's all over Fox News as a contributor on every show, right?
And if you don't think that some of the people that may have stretched out to the tuck-ins length, like Laura Ingram, every once in a while, she wouldn't go as hard as Tucker, but she says reasonable things.
That's going to be peeled back.
Bring on the Rove.
We love Carl.
That's what's on the table.
And let me say this.
Let me give credit to Gutfeld because he's defended Tucker a couple times now.
All right, and Gutfeld has got the most popular show there now, in my opinion.
Uh, yeah, I mean, especially right now when he's got no late-night comedy competition.
And really, what is the Greg Guttfeld show?
It's very much like politically incorrect with Bill Maher before it was real time, right?
He's shortened the panels now and he has the front interview, but back in the day, politically incorrect was really just Bill Maher and four guests.
Let's see, I sent you the longer.
Oh, did you send me the longer version of which clip?
I'm not sure.
My producer just uh texted me.
Um, while that's going on, too, I want to thank uh, the tips over at Rockfin.
Thank you so much, uh, Scott, Steven, and Tara, as well as uh, TD last week.
I couldn't do it without you.
Everything is appreciated.
I think we're gonna be good on the longer, the longer clip.
You probably, it's the longer clip of Dylan, right?
Where he's like, hey, clip that.
Yeah, maybe we'll play that comedy style tomorrow.
Got about 20 minutes left in the broadcast, and I've got a bunch of other stories that I haven't even hit up, especially in the Epstein case.
So, you know, he went after Geraldo Rivera, who took a swing at Carlson after the fact.
We know there's a non-disparagement clause, so Tucker's not going to be able to come out and say what happened, obviously.
It'll be interesting if he gets to comment on the Media Matters leaks that have only made him look better.
But really, what I'm concerned about is: is he not going to be able to do anything prior to the election cycle?
Because I think that he is, even not on Fox News, extremely important in at least getting people out to vote and bringing up real issues.
And I don't think they like that RFK Jr. was featured recently there, among many other things.
Doomsday Climate Debates00:05:47
Apparently, everyone understands nonsense banter between segments, except for Hall Monitor failures bitterly chronicling the lives of the far more successful.
Like I said, those leaks only made him look better.
Only made him look better.
You know, I didn't play the two Klaus clips.
We'll do that and then we'll come back to a couple of these stories.
These are Klaus talking about his relationship to the Club of Rome.
Okay, there's a couple of them.
I have one clip of him talking about that relationship all the way back in 73, talking about climate change, which again is the guys for the command and control system that they want to put under.
Okay.
And then we've got a clip of the Club of Rome.
Now, we've played that one.
We did a watch-along with one of these old school 1970s Club of Rome documentaries essentially telling you doom and gloom from the supercomputer, right, that looked ridiculous at the time, and that we need to cut-cut the population.
Sustainability.
Okay, so here's Klaus talking about him loving the clubbing.
I've worked on climate change for 25 years.
I've worked on climate change since 73.
So you can see that.
Just to tell you, because I was the person who gave the club of Rome the first big platform.
I share with you the concern, and I think we can solve those issues only if we repair our global architecture and our global system.
A global architecture and system.
I give Club of Rome first launch platform.
Zigar!
The Club of Rome then held a press conference where they announced that the computer had predicted that the world was heading for a disaster From a very large number of computer runs, making various assumptions, adopting various maxima and minima, there is in fact a general forecast of a breakdown of world society in the first decades of the next century.
We regard the MIT report as an extraordinarily important initial pioneering effort.
And notice that never happened.
Past the first decade of the next century, well past it.
And it's still not going to happen.
But it's the sky is falling, doom and gloom.
We know better than you.
We're at the 11th hour.
We're at the 12th hour.
Right, we played that yesterday.
We're at the 12th hour.
Get out of here with that Johnny nonsense.
Opening up a great new field of research.
Research on the world as a system.
The Club of Rome published a book called The Limits to Growth, which laid out Forrester's world model and its frightening conclusions.
It was a bestseller, and it transformed the debate about the environment.
Because Forrester's model offered a way of conceptualizing the problem that seemed to be scientific and therefore neutral.
His vision of the world as one interconnected system seemed to transcend politics and the petty interests of nations.
No, it's the political interests of collectivism.
So this whole notion of the nation state, etc., that's eroded over time, infiltrated and penetrated over time through not only cabinet members and prime ministers, but treaties.
But treaties decoding the UN cybercrime treaty.
And remember, it's cyber terrorism.
Don't think that that's not integrated into misinformation, disinformation, malinformation, the whole spectra of big tech control and censorship.
And eventually the criminalization of thought crimes.
We already really have the criminalization in some Western nations now of thought crimes.
We saw that again and again and again during the COVID-19 44 nightmare.
They just show up for a social media post.
Believe me, it's going to get much, much worse.
Especially if they get their doom and gloom, we've got to manage the population.
And that we got to have climate lockdowns because we're destroying the earth.
I mean, talk about horrid, talk about nightmarish.
A lot of it stems here from this thing that was supposed to be apolitical but was anything but.
It's pro-new world order, pro-globalization.
Then, in Stockholm, in 1972, the United Nations held a conference for the first time ever on the world environmental crisis.
And the international bureaucrats who ran it turned to this idea of the world as a system to provide the conceptual framework.
The world needed to be managed in a new, non-political way to avoid the threat of global collapse.
Now, this is the beginning of a debate.
Nobody's decided precisely what the limits are.
One can question whether it's 2010 where we all collapse or 2050 when we all collapse.
But what is absolutely certain is you cannot run a planetary society on the total irresponsible sovereignty of 120 different governments.
It simply can't be done.
Unraveling the Epstein-Chomsky Relationship00:12:18
There it is.
It's about collectivism.
It's about globalization.
It's about Zenu Werld Oda.
That's what it's about.
Believe it.
All right, let's hit some of these other stories that I wanted to grab.
Let's see.
Is that where we're at?
This is where we're at right here.
LinkedIn's billionaire Reed Hoffman visited Jeffrey Epstein's private island, planned to visit New York City Mansion back in 2014.
As I stated yesterday from the Wall Street Journal article that got put out there, there's going to be a lot of other mainstream media that's going to be dissecting that article.
I'd love to see the documents.
Love, to see the documents.
That's just me.
Billionaire LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman visited Jeffrey Epstein's private island and had plans to stay at Epstein's notorious Manhattan townhouse back in 2014.
A new report revealed: Hoffman 55 paid a single visit to Epstein's Caribbean island, Little St. James, also known as Pedophile Island, where Epstein and Gal Ghelain Maxwell allegedly abused underage girls.
The Wall Street Journal has reported.
Joy Ito, the then MIT media lab director, was also in attendance and had asked Hoffman and Epstein to help him raise funds for MIT.
Isn't that lovely?
Wait a minute, didn't Club of Rome limits growth MIT?
Oh, it's almost like there's connections everywhere.
Connections everywhere.
Ito confirmed Hoffman's involvement in the MIT fundraising on Epstein's Island in an email to the journal.
Reid attended a few fundraising events at my request, including one trip to Little St. James, after I confirmed to Reed that Mr. Epstein had been an approved donor target for MIT in accordance with university rules and regulations.
Isn't that nice?
Hoffman also penned an email to the journal apologizing for ever meeting with the convicted sex offender.
While I relied on MIT's endorsement, ultimately, I made the mistake, and I am sorry for my personal misjudgment.
Now, there's a piece.
We're going to read as much of it as we possibly can in the next 10 minutes from Whitney Webb, who has done tremendous work on the Epstein case and currently has this article featured at Unlimited Hangout.
Really great.
Unraveling the Epstein-Chomsky relationship.
Okay?
Recent revelations that the renowned linguist and political activist met with Jeffrey Epstein several times have surprised and confused many.
Why was Epstein interested in meeting with Noam Chomsky?
And why did Chomsky agree to meet with him despite his past?
The answer may surprise you.
That's a belief a Twitter feed right there.
Let's see.
Oh, look at you.
Thank you, Patty.
Patty just bought me a coffee.
Let me know via Twitter.
That's another great way to support the broadcast.
The links are down below.
That's how you support me directly.
But really, redvoicemedia.com/slash Jason, redvoicemedia.com/slash uncensored to get those two extra interviews every single week.
I mean, we're doing it eight hours live and free, and then we're giving you two, two, two more.
So you get some new Burmese material over the weekend as well.
What more could you ask for?
On Sunday, the Wall Street Journal published a report detailing information contained within a trove of previously unreported documents and deceased sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.
Those documents, which have not been publicly released and appear to have been passed solely to the journal, included Epstein's private calendar and meeting schedule.
The documents per the journal contain thousands of pages of emails and schedules from 2013 to 2017.
As the report notes, detail Epstein's dealings with several prominent individuals whose names were not on the flight logs or his infamous little black book of contacts.
We've covered this.
One of these individuals is the renowned linguist, political commentator, and critic of capitalism and empire, Noam Chomsky.
Chomsky, who has previously discussed the Epstein case in interviews and who has maintained that Epstein's ties to intelligence agencies should be considered a conspiracy theory, had not previously disclosed these meetings.
Shocking.
Shocking.
Chomsky, when confronted by journal reporters, was evasive, but ultimately admitted to meeting and knowing Jeffrey Epstein.
Well, how about that?
Wang diggadado!
Many largely on the left have expressed dismay and confusion as to why someone with the political views of Chomsky would willingly meet, not once but several times with someone like Jeffrey Epstein, particularly well after Epstein's notoriety as a sex trafficker and a pedophile.
As this report will show, Epstein appeared to view Chomsky as another intellectual who could help guide his decisions when it came to his scientific obsessions, namely transhumanism and eugenics.
What Chomsky gained in return for meeting with Epstein isn't as clear.
Baby making farms, anybody?
Hmm?
Anybody?
Bueller?
Bueller?
According to the journal, Chomsky's meeting with Epstein took place during the years 2015 and 2016 while Chomsky taught at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or MIT.
Chomsky told the journal that he met with Epstein to discuss topics like neuroscience with other academics, like Harvard's Martin Nowak, who was heavily funded by Epstein.
On a separate occasion, Chomsky again met with Epstein alongside former Israeli prime minister Ahud Barak, allegedly, to discuss Israel's policy with regard to Palestinian issues and the international arena.
A separate date saw Chomsky and his wife invited by Epstein to have dinner with him.
Woody Allen and Allen's wife, Soon Yee, Pervin, so they were at that dinner with Chomsky.
Very interesting.
When asked about the dinner date with Woody Allen and Epstein, Chomsky referred to the occasion as an evening spent with a great artist.
I'll bet.
Never liked the Woody Allen films.
I gotta tell you, I mean, don't get me wrong, I was soured at a young age by the I Married My Daughter thing.
I was soured then and obviously thought, but I remember, you know, being told about, I think Annie Hall was the big one.
Even people tried to get me to watch it in college, and they all just, Woody Allen was never funny to me.
The movies were never funny.
They're never really that entertaining.
But whoa, he's a great artist.
Okay.
You know, I'm probably too much of a bro frat boy type to understand Woody Allen.
I don't get the nuance.
When confronted with this evidence, Chomsky initially told the journal that his meetings and relationship with Epstein were none of your business or anyone's.
He then added that I knew him, Epstein, and we met occasionally.
Before continuing further, it's important to note that aside from Epstein, both Ahud Barak and Woody Allen have been accused of having inappropriate sexual relationships with minors.
Excuse me.
Ooh.
Yikes.
For instance, Barack was a frequent visitor to Epstein's residences in New York so often that the Daily Beast reported that numerous residents of the apartment building linked to Epstein had seen Barack in the building multiple times over the last few years, and nearly half a dozen more described running into his security details, adding that the building is majority owned by Epstein's younger brother, Mark,
and has been tied to the financier's alleged New York trafficking ring.
Specifically, several apartments in the building were being used to house underage girls from South America, Europe, and the former Soviet Union, according to a former bookkeeper employed by one of Epstein's main procurers of underage girls, Jean-Luc Brunel.
Jean Luc is dead.
Jean Luc was in a prison in Spain and killed himself, apparently, allegedly.
Hmm.
Don't hear about that one as much, do we?
Sure don't.
You know, in pictures on planes with Epstein and Glenn Max.
Well, in pictures, in IDF gear.
No biggie.
No biggie.
Barack is also known to have spent the night at one of Epstein's residences at least once, was photographed leaving Epstein's residence as recently as 2016 and has admitted to visiting Epstein Island, which has sported nicknames including Peto Island, Lolita Island, and Orgy Island.
In 2004, Barack received $2.5 million from Leslie Wexner's Wexner Foundation, which we talk about often on this program, where Epstein was a trustee as well as one of the foundation's top donors several years later.
Barack put Harvey Weinstein in contact with the Israeli private intelligence outfit Black Cube, which employs former Mossad agents and Israeli military intelligence operatives as Weinstein sought to intimidate the women who had accused him of sexual assault and sexual harassment.
Got to love that involvement of Weinstein and Epstein and Barack and Black Cube and the Mossad.
Just checking boxes.
Checking those.
See, these boxes have nothing to do with identity politics or political parties and everything to do with a compromised system of command and control by sociopathic lunatics.
You know, and the people that they buy and the people that they compromise and the ways that they do so that involve underage girls.
In addition, Barack previously chaired and invested in Carbine 911, a controversial Israeli emergency service startup that has expanded around the world and has become particularly entrenched in the United States.
Barack has directed Epstein to invest $1 million into that company, which has been criticized as a political tool for warrantless mass surveillance.
Leslie Wexner has also invested millions in the company.
In Woody Allen's case, he has been accused of sexually assaulting his adopted daughter, Dylan Farrow, when she was seven years old.
The abuse claim has been corroborated by witnesses and other evidence.
Furthermore, Allen refused to take a polygraph administered by state police in connection with the investigation and lost four exhaustive court battles related to child custody and abuse of Dylan Farrow.
One of the judges, by the way, you know, it was Ronan Farrow that really blew the lid off the Black Cube connection.
One of the judges in the case described Alan's behavior towards Dylan as grossly inappropriate, that measures must be taken to protect her.
According, actress Mia Farrow Dylan's mother alleged in court that Alan took sexual interest in her adopted daughter when she was between the ages of two and three years old.
Two Interviews Released00:00:44
Yeah.
Here's the deal, guys.
It's the end of the week, but that doesn't mean you can't get more Jason Burmes.
Redvoicemedia.com/slash Jason.
Redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
Sign up for $10 today.
Actually, a buck today for the first week, $10 a month.
Lock it in.
Tell him Jason Burmese sent you for $100 for the year.
Two, two, two interviews going to be released over the weekend at RVM exclusively.
Thank you for joining me.
Stay tuned.
I'm fired up is next Matt Couch after that.
Great lineup, including Ray Dietrich, Drew Berquist, and Wayne Dupree.