Hour 2 Of Reality RantsShow more Watch the UNCENSORED second hour live on RVM Rumble or Rokfin FREE
Not RVM Premium yet? Try it for $1 and get 2 EXCLUSIVE Interviews A Week!!!
https://redvoicemedia.com/jason
Listen Live and Call In at:
https://theinfowarrior.podbean.com/
Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermas
Watch My Documentaries:
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/category/bermas-docs
Subscribe on Rokfin
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
Subscribe on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/TheInfoWarrior
RVM Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/RedVoiceMedia
Subscribe on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
Follow me on Twitter
https://twitter.com/JasonBermas
PayPal: [email protected]
#BermasBrigade Show less
I'm about to take you from 8 billion people, which we currently have on the planet, to a little place called 3 billion.
Now, 3 billion, just for those that maybe don't have the basic math skills, is 5 billion less.
And it's still 1 billion more than what Ted Turner said he thought the global population should be on the record in my film, Shade the Motion Picture.
Go check it out for free.
Very, very important movie in my eyes.
And one that really stands the test of time now.
I can't believe it, but a decade later.
So when Ted Turner was confronted about overpopulation in a positive manner, he's not afraid to tell you, hey, hey, 2 billion, 2 billion.
I don't know where everybody else goes.
Where are they going?
What happens to those people?
It's just so insane to even suggest.
And in my opinion, it also shows a certain narcissism on those that would propagate this nonsense, not come to the realization that what they're doing is anti-human, has nothing to do with climate change.
Please Share the Threads!00:03:21
Although that's the facade, right?
That's the big excuse.
And what we're going to do and how we're going to get from eight to three billion is we're going to go to this planet critical, planet critical YouTube.
Okay, now we're not going to watch the full hour and 10-minute conversation between Rachel Donald and Phoebe Barnard, who is this climate specialist.
Ooh, gonna have to save us from the boogeyman of climate change.
Insanity.
But I will say this.
They're very, very honest about what?
The problem is that there are too many people.
Now, Ted Turner is very honest when he says that too.
He says, too many people doing too many things, doing too much stuff.
We got to get rid of all that stuff we're doing.
Old stuffings.
And when I see this, okay, and we've got, what do we got?
About 10 minutes worth of clips that were taken out by the researcher over at Twitter.
The researcher, a great resource.
I'm constantly trying to send people there.
If you're not following me on Twitter at Jason Burmes, it's where I'm personally most active with not only kind of posting the links to this show on a daily basis because I put a lot into this two-hour show every day, but also the stories I think are worthwhile and clips that I think are worthwhile.
Many make them here.
Many don't.
But at the same time, a lot of people are like, do you put links to the stories?
Guys, I know that people hate on me for that.
Burmes Brigade, if you're out there underneath, if you want to make threads of replies of all the articles we cover in an episode, when I post it on Twitter, please do that.
Please do that.
I see some people respond.
I mean, I put the headline up there.
The headline, I get it.
The hyperlink's very easy to click on.
You type the headline into any search engine.
It's going to come up.
You know what I'm saying?
That's all I'm saying.
When we show you the documents, I tell you what the document name is.
When I show you the bill, I give you the number.
When we're at courtlistener.com, we're there.
I will say this.
When you're on Twitter, you will get a lot of the legitimate links to source material, right?
And by the way, I want to give a shout out to Matt Couch for retweeting the show out today that was embedded in Twitter.
Supposedly, the algorithm is going to treat, obviously, videos embedded in Twitter as better.
And look, we're trying to reach people on every single level.
Like I said, I don't care.
I'll pay so I can stream on Rumble.
I don't care.
I'll pay so I can stream on Podbean.
I don't care.
I'll pay so I can post videos and hopefully eventually stream again.
Still can't for some reason on Twitter.
I want to reach as many people as possible.
So now if we can move Twitter into the sphere of not only, you know, one or two or 3,000 people watching the show, but like 5,000, 15,000 people watching the show on that venue, that's awesome.
That's awesome.
Matter of Color and Women00:09:26
There's a lot people don't know out there.
And I'm also not trying to be doom and gloom all the time.
Right?
Those that know me know I like to joke around, especially on the show, have a good time, smile, go out into the big, bad world and do stuff.
I enjoy a good concert.
Everybody knows that I'm a big MMA fan.
Weekends are for fights, right?
But with all that stuff and the fact that I tell people that they have to get involved and the best way you can do so is in your own life, in your own community, and work outwards, right?
Don't think you're going to solve the world's problems.
I don't think I'm going to solve the world's problems.
I don't have answers to all the world's problems.
I could point out a lot of the problems: say, hey, maybe we should do this.
This is maybe how we could have actual accountability.
A lot of those accountability issues, though, also have to do with who can be prosecuted.
Right?
And unfortunately, we have a military-industrial complex apparatus in this country that goes far beyond, really, in my opinion, the reaches of even a nation state, as you have huge collusion in a multitude of regions with big tech and these NGOs, right?
Again, this trans agenda, really about transhumanism in every respect, everybody, 100%, believe the hype, is now one in unison with big tech, okay, global governance organizations like the WHO and the UN and every other virtue signaling organizations.
This isn't a grassroots thing, right?
Yesterday, played a clip of this woman basically talking about how, you know, the grassroots and the top have to come together, but at the bottom, we're the ones paying for the vast majority of it under the guise of benevolence.
Like this is under the guise of benevolence.
But their end game, at least in this one, is very open.
Okay.
And I'll tell you what it is.
It's less people.
It's less people.
And I said narcissistic before, but it's really sociopathic and psychopathic to think that you're the one that gets to decide that.
We all must come together as one.
So again, you want groupthink.
You want collectivism.
And collectivism, in my opinion, is the complete and total antithesis of actual freedom.
Does that mean you can't come together and work with your fellow man?
We encourage that here.
We want open discussions.
We want dissent.
We want different opinions.
We want people to be able to work together.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
But not in lockstep with some authoritarian agenda that divvies up the system of one of immense inequality.
F their equity nonsense.
Equity means slavery for us all.
The end of the haves and the have-nots and the have-everythings are there.
This is it.
This is it.
And as they do that, believe it, they're talking about decimating the population.
So I'm going to let the clips roll.
Obviously, we're going to be talking it up as we go through that.
Here it is.
Planet Critical.
Now, thank God this thing has only, what is it, 3.14 or 3.41 subs, right?
3,100.
But you notice, you can't see it in here, but they have 2.2,000 views.
So, you know, I have literally 20 plus time thousands or 20 plus times the amount of subs just on YouTube alone.
And it doesn't have much less views than what we get here.
I wonder why this because they're authoritative sources and they're amplified.
They're planet critical.
Planet critical.
Okay.
All right.
Let's hear about planet critical, everybody.
Buckle up.
This week I spoke with Phoebe Bernard.
Phoebe is a climate scientist who has worked across very many sectors of the climate problem, from biology to women's leadership in the global south.
You know, because women's leadership is a real issue when it comes to climate science.
I mean, do these people hear themselves?
Would it matter if they did hear themselves?
That's one of the most ridiculous and ludicrous things you could absolutely say about science, you know, women's leadership roles.
Like, we've ever excluded exceptional women scientists on this show alone, all right, during the Transformers conference, you know, and I'm not going to be referring to Martine Rothblatt here.
I'm going to be referring to the head of Rocketdyne.
There's a woman.
She'd been there forever.
She talked about it being a boys' club, right?
But she rose to the top over there.
Why?
Because she was good at her job.
And that's something I don't think people understand.
The actual bureaucracies that have control and run things, they are being run by absolutely capable people.
And the buffoons they're now putting out in front are very much buffoons.
Very much yes men.
Social climbing chumps.
All right.
And I mean, at the apex of that, obviously, is the Biden administration and Joey B, aka Zombie J himself.
Let's get back to it.
From 8 billion to 3.
I mean, the gall of these people.
She's also the co-founder of the Stable Planet Alliance, a group that is investigating overpopulation and hyperconsumption.
They're currently working on a paper that will be submitted to the United Nations.
They're looking at developing top-down policy plans and also bottom-up grassroots organization.
Top-down policy plans.
This is exactly what we talked about yesterday.
Top-down policy plans.
We tell you what to do while we put in less resources and money.
Then you put in the actual money and the resources.
And we act like it's grassroots because we get a lot of you by plugging you into this.
It's insane.
It's insane.
I mean, how authoritarian did that sound to you?
It sounded plenty authoritarian to me.
I promise.
Now, it struck me just before jumping on the call with Phoebe that actually hadn't talked about population on the show yet.
And that seems unfathomable.
Planet Critical has been running in its current form for about nine months.
So, how is it that the population question has not yet come up?
Well, it's a very divisive question.
It's a very emotional question.
It's a very historical question with roots in eugenics and racism and these things that we absolutely cannot ignore.
And yet, Phoebe says we have to take those concerns very seriously, but we also have to take the problem of overpopulation very, very seriously.
Let's stop it there.
So, there's the acknowledgement, and I think it's important we talk about that.
Look, we get it.
We get it.
Why there's a lot of people that are maybe not so into this.
It is rooted in eugenics and racism.
Here's the thing: and one of the things that people don't get enough, especially now because they've been trained not to.
So many people have been now trained to see in color again and see in quote-unquote gender.
And they've taken what was a sexual preference between adults, all right, and now made it a spectrum of different things and made it into this situation where they're dividing everybody on every issue.
Boom, boom, boom, boom.
So that you fight amongst that Johnny nonsense, and it's everyone.
They don't really care about that.
It's going to be these people that are advocating for it.
It's everyone, everyone, everyone.
That's the new civil rights movement.
It doesn't matter the color of your skin, doesn't matter what language you speak.
And this is a global thing.
It's a global movement.
It's the fourth industrial revolution.
This is biomimetics.
All right.
This is what they're telling you: AI, but not really AI.
Artificial intelligence, in this respect, is really programmable, algorithmic software.
Okay?
So whoever's programming it can ensure that the outcome can exclude certain things and promote others.
It's at its very nature.
Family Planning's New Civil Rights Movement00:15:48
Okay.
This whole self-aware nonsense, again, that's stuff that, in my opinion, is being promoted propaganda style by people like Dennis Bushnell and NASA, right?
Oh, some people think the web might be waking up.
Bullshit.
It's nonsense.
That's nonsense.
They want you to equate that digital life, that metaverse they're pushing on you, that multiverse idea that there's infinite realities that we're all part of, that you could be in a simulation, and that consciousness can be not only replicated, but somehow digitally uploaded into this system.
And you'll just wake up in the wonderverse, a metaverse like you could never imagine.
Meanwhile, that's to euthanize your ass.
Yeah, and along the way of getting people to believe that, they want you to merge with machines, become more docile.
Well, they use technology to try to biologically live forever and become superior beings and have an endless surf class of whatever they allow in their allotment system of sustainability to command, control, and ultimately experiment on like guinea pigs.
Yeah, that's why you might want to take a step back and be like, yeah, maybe it is a little eugenics-y.
That is a tad eugenics-y, isn't it?
Hmm.
That's bad news, Brown.
Maybe something we don't want to be a part of.
Okay.
Next clip.
From 8 billion to 3 with Rachel Donald and Phoebe Barnard.
I'm still a negotiator at the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, and the global south and the global north would bicker about who is at fault with the state of the planet.
You know, it's the affluent North.
No, it's the overpopulating South.
It was never honestly that simple, but it's especially not that simple now.
Affluence becomes a poison wherever it is in the world.
And the USA and a few other countries, Kuwait, Luxembourg, Canada, Australia, are all in much the same camp.
Let me just say what she said in layman's terms.
If you're in a first world nation and you have comfortable accommodations, you're bad.
You're bad.
And working with the United Nations, the carbon system is a fraudulent system.
Again, one of the reasons I have respect for Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and I've talked about this before, even before relating it to RFK Jr., is one of the big problems with coal, and we should acknowledge this, is the mercury runoff and waste product that happens to the water waste.
But it can be cleaned up.
You can do it the right way.
All right.
And he sued them and did that.
And that's a good thing.
But we're not talking about heavy metals.
We're not talking about statins and antidepressants that have somehow gotten into our water supply.
We're not talking about GMO foods that have been manipulated.
You know, yesterday I briefly discussed the GMO mosquitoes and the good people at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, also big on the, well, we got way too many people.
But by vaccinating them, that wouldn't reduce the population.
Even though there's that, you know, famous clip of him talking about doing a real good job with reproductive health and vaccinations.
It's wild.
You know, and again, I constantly go to this book, Unzip Genes, taking charge of baby making in the new millennium, because, I mean, they're very open about it right in the very beginning that, hey, basically, they're talking about the population control.
This is taking control of the human species and what it means.
And they point out eugenics, but how it can be positive.
And guess what?
They term it as the new one.
Transgenics.
You can't make this shit up.
I guess that you're just connecting too many dots.
Just one author, Jason, most powerful transgender person on the planet.
On the planet.
My goodness.
But again, let's continue.
You're being told right here, first world countries, and this is exactly what Dennis Bushnell told you.
The mantra will go from one of growth to sustainability.
And that means your standard of living plummets as the Asians and their billions come up.
It's almost a direct quote.
Played it dozens of times here.
Okay?
So let's hear from this woman right now that's now crucified the Western world for daring to have a first world lifestyle.
It's insanity.
One in which she has enjoyed herself.
I'm sure she bears so much guilt, so much guilt for that.
But affluence has popped up, inequality, obscene inequality, has popped up everywhere in the world.
And people in Nigeria, for example, and Lagos are just as likely as affluent people anywhere to want to fly to London and do their shopping or have a weekend holiday in Budapest.
And it's gotten out of control.
So we have it's out of control that people want to travel and see the world and be on vacation.
It's out of control.
Ask yourself: does what she had to say really have anything to do with saving the planet in reality?
Or in reality, would that restrict your movement based on the class of person you are?
These people are openly advocating for a techno-fascist biomedical caste system.
The worst of the worst.
The worst of the worst.
Even if this woman is 100% based in what she thinks is benevolence and is ignorant, there's no excuse.
There's no excuse for the things she's saying.
It's out of control.
We've got to have this conversation.
Yeah, we have to have a conversation about why people like her, okay, shouldn't have power over our lives in any way.
And one of the solutions to that is to get the United Nations out of the United States and the U.S. out of the U.N. Let China have the United Nations.
I'm dead serious.
100%.
Listen, let Europe have it somewhere.
Let it be in France.
How about that?
Would you like it?
How about you, Sweden?
How about one of the NATO nations?
Listen, start building a new building because we're going to use the old one as a museum as to the failures of the United Nations and its policies.
There's a solution.
There's the real solution.
And that museum, as such, would be where we actually bring our youth to educate them.
You know, I went down to the New York Met as a kid.
One of the greatest museum experiences of my life.
I went down to the World Trade Center as a kid, back before it was, you know, not there in there.
That stuff is important, man.
I want to be able to travel.
I want other people to have that experience, Phoebe.
Okay?
Or the opportunity, but these people don't want that.
They want to tell you what to do, when to do it, how to do it.
No, you're not my daddy.
You're not my mammy.
These people are gross.
Let's continue.
We have to talk more in a nuanced way about where the problem is, what the problem is, and not just have knee-jerk finger-pointing insults about the other.
We've got to get around a table using the kind of civil discourse methods that we have in conflict resolution and figure out how to go forward because we all bear collective responsibility for the state of the planet, not necessarily individually, because big chunks of humanity cannot in any way be said to have personal responsibility for the planet.
Let's just stop there.
It's insane.
Again, collective is the key term.
You need this collectivism.
And if it wasn't about carbon and the system of command and control, we could have a discussion, an open discussion.
But I want to remind people that not only do we have a system where we're not really focusing on actual pollution and the dangers of GMO, of biomimetics, right?
Of these biological laboratories, those very real dangers of nuclear war at this point, because these people just can't stop conflict.
No, we're not worried about that.
We're worried about carbon.
Well, our military doesn't have to report any of the carbon emissions from any of its weapons testings that we have no idea about, of which much is done in the ocean.
Okay, can you imagine what the military's carbon footprint is?
If you had any idea, it would make our first world lifestyle carbon footprint look like a joke by even their metrics, and they know it.
And by the way, the United States isn't the only one that's guilty on that.
It's all these militaries.
So they're full of shit on their face.
I want to make that extremely clear.
But both systemic change and individual change need to, you know, really accelerate.
And we're not going to do that if we continue to sit and argue about what's the problem or who should be allowed to talk about it.
And I've gotten really impatient with people that should know better at this late 11th hour, almost 12th hour for humanity.
It's always at the end.
It's the 11th.
It's the 12th.
The 13th hour.
There's no 13th hour.
It's the 12th hour for humanity.
Fearmonger, fearmonger, fearmonger, a fear monger.
That's what that is.
Okay?
Let's see.
I think I might have skipped over one, so let's go to this one right here.
What sort of top-down policy changes are you guys advising on?
Well, we're putting together a white paper for the UN FPA, family planning.
Family planning, number one.
Number one, family planning.
We want you on birth control.
Oh, you got pregnant?
We'd love you to get rid of that baby.
Let's have an incentive for you to get rid of that baby.
Family planning, numero, uno, top-down policy.
Taking charge of baby making in the new millennium.
Martine Rothblatt.
I mean, again, why do we want to be involved with the United Nations?
Seriously at this point.
I mean, the UN is putting out papers like this.
United Nations free and equal.
And yes, this goes after your children.
They've come after your children.
Why are we in the UN?
Why is that even a thing?
It should not be.
All right?
Discrimination.
I mean, they're already telling you it's everybody's child.
There's new science.
There's no new science.
This is about transhumanism and control.
A non-binary person.
They're going for it.
A third gender, two-spirit, Travisti, Fafina, genderqueer, transpone, mukes, warrior, and meti.
You know, This is never going to end because they want you to disassociate from your biology.
Number one, family planning.
But there's no agenda for that.
I'm Kookie McGee for even suggesting it.
Number one, family planning.
Division, the population division of the UN, but also to all branches of the UN.
And therefore, through trickling down the member states of the UN.
On the SDGs, the sustainable development.
The sustainable development goals.
I want you to know what she just did there.
This is their religion.
All right.
That's why.
And she literally looked up and prayed as she started to talk about these things to trickle down before she got down to the sustainable development goals.
All right?
Let's bring it back.
Let's bring it back.
Watch her hands.
Okay.
I'm sorry, but when you see actions like that out in the open, you've got to call them out.
You must.
The UN.
And therefore, through trickling down the member states of the UN.
On the SDGs.
The Sustainable Development Goals do not pay nearly adequate attention to either of these issues, population or consumption.
They do talk about the economy and they do talk about consumption, but it's pretty much still in a growthist framework.
And population is virtually not mentioned.
And there are some reasons for that, but corrective action is needed because...
There are some reasons for that.
We don't want to scare the public too much that we want to cut it by more than half and have global inoculation.
I mean, sterilization, I mean, extermination programs.
No, Jason, no, no.
I'm sure Leslie from 60 Minutes would say, no, no, no.
I mean, an organization as great as the UN that gets wrapped up in child sex scandals, like during the Ebola breakout while COVID-1984 was going on.
Remember that?
Oh, no one talks about that.
And that not being the first.
I mean, we should totally trust those organizations and be a part of them and be in them.
It's a great idea.
Father Knows Best00:08:13
This is not 1950 anymore.
It's not the age of father knows best where everyone was in this delusion of growth.
Now we are, you know, right at the crossroads of civilization.
All lies.
All lies.
95% of the usable land out there, we don't populate.
We all populate.
You think that the powers that shouldn't be the predator class, and we've talked about this, wants cheap or virtually free energy for the masses?
It's a huge system of control.
They want to control how much energy you use, how much travel you have.
This is very apparent.
This whole fathers knows best.
Look, I'm so sick of men just being completely and totally attacked all the time.
First of all, to act like I'm going to speak for half of the human species on the planet.
I'm not.
Talk about, you want to talk about diversity.
Big spectrum of different men out there.
Huge.
Talking about in the billions.
I guess not if they have their way.
Huh?
They'll never be able to say, because if they have three, you know, guys are probably going to max out about 1.5 billion.
That's not multiple billions.
But right now, we're there.
Not going to speak for them.
But I'll say this.
I do believe not in macro evolution, species to species evolution, but microevolution for sure.
And species-wise, yeah, men did pretty well for themselves.
And I know there are still good fathers out there and good husbands out there and good brothers out there and good uncles out there and good cousins out there, good people out there, both sexes.
But the attack on men, it's such trash because historically they know that it's going to be strong men that come together against this collectivist nightmare that are going to put an end to it or resist it.
And they don't want resistance.
You know, 1950s.
Father knows best.
What is this?
Awful.
And so for the developing countries, which really do benefit most from the structure and the framework that sustainable development goals provide,
a reform of them in their 2030 iteration, because the goals are reformed every 10 years, is going to be really important to ground population and consumption right at the core of them so that future generations are adequately valued and catered for and their rights are protected.
They're going to be catered for.
I just.
What they're telling you is, we want to bring the third world up to the second world, stabilize the second world with more authoritarianism, command control, biometrics, basically the stuff we did during the war of terror, right?
Afghanistan, Iraq, biometrics movement, you know, put some flashy things on it so we can put a cap on growth and population, but you'll be catered to.
And then anyone that's in the first world, sorry, sorry, you're going to have to gradually become more sustainable and live like the second worlders.
Like the people that are literally in the third world in the worst conditions might see a gain if they get their command and control system.
But really, this is also setting up class warfare where people will point the finger at their neighbors instead of what's actually driving this.
This is a nightmare agenda.
Because at the moment they are not.
And the UN, my colleague Carter Dillard of the Fair Start Movement, a founding member of Stable Planet Alliance, argues, and he's quite right, that the UN is failing its own Convention on the Rights of the Child by failing to ground intergenerational rights.
It's all about protecting children.
These people care so much about children that they've got two dozen genders for them and protection.
Okay?
And it's intergenerational rights.
We have to protect the rights of those down the line.
When does a human being get to be a human being?
Right?
I'm not saying go out and poison the air or poison the water or poison the food.
But then again, I'm not the one with military programs of solar radiation management spraying things into the sky, am I?
Am I Phoebe, Miss Barnard?
Oh, but don't worry, it's planet critical.
I mean, again, solution, very simple.
The executive order is get the United States out of the UN and out of the WHO and get them the mother truck out of there immediately, immediately out by Sia, a Riva Dirci.
We don't want them, we don't need them.
And man, that's going to spark some problems.
Issues maybe I can't even imagine would arise.
But it needs to be done.
The UN is an acting vehicle of this cancer collectivist control society being pushed, of global governance, if you will, of their quote-unquote, time and again used, new world order.
In the charter.
Yeah, it's a really interesting angle.
It makes it a more tolerable point of discussion when you think about it in terms of intergenerational rights.
Yeah, it makes it more tolerable to think that you might want to cut the population by over half by referring to it in a Bernesian talking point of intergenerational rights.
For sure.
And I think that it's something Greta has done wonderfully throughout her years of campaigning.
Oh my God, they love Greta.
I mean, that's all you need to know.
They put out, and I and I don't like to pick on Greta Thunberg because she is put into the limelight as basically a child.
All right.
She's already been scared to death and told the world is going to end if she doesn't do these things and she needs to get her generation behind it.
Children are what I like to call impressionable.
You know, we, you know, again, impressionable, that we influence her for a reason.
Let's don't do the double think, right?
No.
No, no Orwellian thinking here.
And they pushed her out there and both of them, oh, Greta has done just a great job.
And Phoebe loves it, right?
Because all the press they've gotten and they're saving the children and it's intergenerational and it's how dare you like I'm not trying to hurt you kid trying to help you, trying to help you and others like you live a good life with real competition, with a high standard of living, with you making the choice about your diet and your vacation and your car and your home.
Ultimately, and by actually working hard in a meritocracy right, you can have those things and make those decisions.
Because I like life, it's a good time.
But ask yourself, are these people pro-life or are they pro-slavery?
The Heart of the Debate00:03:05
Is frame intergenerational rights?
That's sort of the heart of this debate.
Have you yet interviewed um Kate Raworth's partner, the Uk philosopher Roman Jernard?
I don't know how to pronounce his surname Jernard no, but I have Kate coming on the show in october.
Oh great, Great.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
He's an interesting person, too.
I would love to be, I shouldn't say this online, I'd love to be a fly in the wall in their marriage because they must have the most incredibly interesting and powerful discussions.
But she, as someone transforming the economy and reminding humanity of the things that should bound an economy, which currently aren't.
And he, as a philosopher looking at deep time rights and responsibilities, you know, he's written a very interesting book called The Good Ancestor, for example.
He's a really good person to talk about the rights of those who aren't in the room.
The irony of what she just said there is a little overwhelming.
Those who aren't in the room are this audience.
Our audience is kids, their parents, their brothers, their sisters, their neighbors, and their co-workers.
That's who's not in the room.
But they're going to make a reference for an imagination land future.
And who will be here when none of us are here?
All right.
So, in a place called reality, the people who aren't in the room aren't actually being represented.
And in the fantasy verse that they want to project as reality, their narcissism, their sociopathy, gets to decide for the imaginary people that they tell you they're acting for as some kind of virtue signal.
It's, I mean, it's over the top.
It's that pesci shot in JFK.
It's a riddle wrapped inside the Nigma man.
It's insane.
It's the dark cartoon.
And the corporations that are increasingly starting to leave a blank chair in the room to represent children, to remind people that they're not there and they need to be included.
He talks about Sophie Howe, the Welsh Commissioner for the Future, for example, and the Well-Being Economy Alliance and the Well-being Economy Governments, of which there are now six: Finland, Iceland, Scotland, New Zealand, Canada.
Coercive Policies Without Half Billion Survival00:10:58
Guys, again, the well-being economy.
Peace for health and health for peace and peace for health and health for peace.
Remember, that's the UN motto now.
And their little transgender ladyboy person with the sustainability goals and the climate now part of the health for peace and the peace for health.
And we have a wellness economy in westernized nations.
Wellness for whom?
Oh, this is for the children?
Yeah, I'm sure the children are going to want to struggle in their younger years and watch their parents' standard of living just plummet.
This is insanity.
Insanity.
And Wales.
How they are taking intergenerational rights very much more to the Center for Public Policy, Center of Public Policy.
So, you know, these are the kinds of top-down policies that I think we do need to engage in for the survival of humanity, for the survival of millions of other species on this planet, and for the thriving of humanity.
You know, if we are optimistic enough, and sometimes I still am, to feel that humanity can not only survive but will thrive and flourish in the future, then I think we have to understand the tension that is helpful between bottom-up grassroots action and top-down public policy reforms.
It's all about top-down to brainwash the bottom-up and really pay for a false grassroots movement.
There is no grassroots movement for this, and there would never be one for this, which is a decimation of society if humanity wants to thrive.
You want to know how humanity thrives?
We have 25 billion people on the planet in 100 years.
You heard me.
25 billion people, three times in 100 years.
That's how we thrive, not only survive, but thrive and do kick-ass shit.
What do you think about that, Phoebe?
I mean, that's real.
That's real.
Like, advancing to the point where we can take care of all of our problems.
But first, we got to stop this top-down control and these top-down policies by the predator class through vehicles and mechanisms like the United Nations, like the Davos crowd, like the World Health Organization, and a slew of these other things, like the Club of Rome, all of it.
All of it.
All right, we got one more clip before we wrap this up.
I do want to remind people: redvoicemedia.com/slash uncensored, redvoicemedia.com/slash Jason.
Two extra interviews.
That's two over the weekend that you won't get anywhere else.
Pretty awesome stuff.
I love that we're doing the second hour and ripping it hard here.
And remember, 12-hour stream over at Red Voice Media.
Make sure you go subscribe to them over at Rumble.
A lot of people are asking me, where's the second hour on Rumble?
First of all, they do post my video later, but if you go to the RVM total live stream, that's where you're going to find my morning show kicking it off.
Okay, and once that kicks off, both hours are there.
Remember to subscribe to them, subscribe to me, get it out.
All right, let's continue on with this final clip with these ladies.
Let's go through some of the data then on population.
How many people can the biosphere support?
I'm a person who's very particular about that issue.
I don't believe in giving a number.
It's probably between the ranges that are often talked about now.
Chris Tucker's planet of 3 billion on the high side.
On the high side.
3 billion.
I just told you.
25 billion, lady.
3 billion on the high side.
And perhaps the recent figure that was coming out from that Stonehenge type of structure that was vandalized in the U.S. state of Georgia recently, where someone had carved out an inscription about a population of half a billion.
Isn't that wild?
You know, I sit here and I talk about the religious aspect of this, and she brings up the Georgia Guidestones.
She's talking about half a billion.
Now, When Ted Turner is confronted in shade, there was this old quote that was out and about of Ted Turner saying about half a billion.
And he said, I think that's kind of low.
I think two billion is about right.
One child policy.
One and done.
This lady's telling you, hey, you know, maybe we have to get rid of seven and a half billion people.
No, biggie.
Oopsie on the earth.
Now it's going to take a long time to get back there.
And most people aren't even willing to talk about doing more than stabilizing the planet.
In fact, most people just accept almost exponential growth as a continuing reality and to talk about anything else is somehow rights insulting in a rights context.
But we're not thinking about intergenerational rights when we have these discussions.
And maybe I'll get on to that in a second.
But my personal view is that we've got to get people walking in the right direction.
Walking in the right direction.
Now, what does that mean?
Well, let's ease them on in.
Let's ease them on it step by step.
A little nudge here and a little nudge there.
Some propaganda here and some subliminals there.
Here's some sustainability.
There's some sustainability.
We've got sustainability everywhere.
We just got to nudge them in the right direction, just a little bit.
Without getting hung up on a numeric goal.
Because again, it's another thing for people to bicker about.
And yeah, it's another thing for people to bicker about.
Argue about how many people we eventually euthanize.
Or how we control who's allowed to have babies and why.
Just bicker about it.
A little bickering.
A little bicker schmicker.
Personally, with 8 billion people, we've got to start the momentum going much more.
I mean, so many countries with coercive pronatalist policies, like increasingly the U.S., China, Iran, Hungary, a lot of countries that the U.S. might think that it doesn't like to be associated with, Poland, increasing number of countries are moving in precisely the wrong direction.
But we need to get the mass of humanity accepting that planetary impact is likely to cause the collapse of civilization within the lifetimes of someone your age, possibly within my lifetime.
And that's fantasy.
We're in the 11th hour, the 12th hour, really.
Fantasy.
Fantasy, doom, and gloom.
Not true, not real.
And we need to figure that out and de-grow both our economy and our numbers as fast as humanly possible.
Some initial modeling.
As fast as humanly possible.
De-grow our economy and numbers.
Turn the economy off and cut down people.
This is a crazy person.
Okay?
And this is the official policy of these people.
And that's alarming.
Suggest that we might be able to get back to a population of 3 billion and a total fertility rate of 1.5 children per woman sometime in the 22nd century without coercive methods, without policy measures, without autocratic governments, just through the changes of approach and choice and increased access to birth control.
Love that birth control.
By the way, everything she said was a lie without autocratic governments.
Everything she mentioned would be a tool of instituting the madness she just discussed.
Okay.
Yeah, but I mean, that is a change in policy.
Increased access to birth control, also increased access to education.
The higher educated a woman is, typically the less children.
Not coercive policies, I suppose.
I mean, right.
Yeah.
Non-coercive.
Non-coercive.
Sure.
Folks, that's going to wrap this segment and wrap this show.
I actually, for those that don't know, I do the live show.
Okay.
We do it Monday through Thursday, 8 a.m. Central, 9 a.m. Eastern.
We do it for two hours.
We run commercials in the first hour.
It's on YouTube.
And then we go over to Rumble and Rockfin exclusively.
And we do the second hour there so we can talk a little bit more real with y'all.
I want to remind you: I am a documentary filmmaker.
All my movies are free.
Loose change final cut, fabled enemies, learning the truth about 9-11 today.
I think it's key in understanding where we are as a populace, not only here in this country, but around the world, as it has ramifications to this day globally in a number of geopolitical arenas.
Okay.
And then Invisible Empire in New World Order Defined and Shade the Motion Picture.
Consider supporting the broadcast.
All right.
10 bucks a month, $100 for the year.
Try it out for a buck.
Come on over to RVM Premium.
Again, 222 separate interviews that are exclusive over there.
Plus, you get all the other premium content of RVM.