All Episodes
Previous Next
April 18, 2023 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
01:03:03
BOMBSHELL! The 9/11 Hijackers Were CIA? | Reality Rants With Jason Bermas
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
We think too much and feel too little.
More than machinery, we need humanity.
We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat, as if that's the way it's supposed to be.
We know things are bad, worse than bad.
They're crazy. Silence!
The great and powerful Oz knows why you have come.
You've got to say, I'm a human being!
God damn it! My life has value!
You haven't met all the primal forces of nature!
Don't give yourselves to brutes, men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder!
Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men!
Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts!
Ah!
Thank you!
You're beautiful!
I love you!
Yes!
You're beautiful!
Thank you!
Ha ha!
It's...
Showtime!
And now, reality with Jason Vermis.
Out!
you Good morning, good morning, good morning.
It is Reality Rants. I am Jason Bermas.
This is brought to you by RedVoiceMedia.com.
Remember, the second hour of the broadcast starts at the top of the next hour.
RedVoiceMedia.com slash Jason or slash Uncensored will get you there.
Please consider supporting the broadcast and And joining us in that portion, if you can't pay, I understand we still give everything away for free.
You can listen over on Podbean or every two weeks you get the second hour anyway.
And by the way, the second hour, in my opinion, is extremely powerful most of the time because in a lot of cases I shut my mouth more.
It's reality rants.
You're going to have to deal with me talking.
It's kind of the deal.
I mean, I see some complaints.
You talk too much. It's a two-hour talk show.
But in the second hour, there's a little bit more leeway.
And we've done not only watch-alongs with Peter Thiel that are extensive or Joe Biden that are extensive, but on the UN Global Davos, really predator-class sustainability agenda.
Sustainability agenda. Is and has been for a long time now a code word, what, for your standard of living as a human being on the planet, doesn't matter what color you are, what ethnicity you are, what gender you are, okay, is going to plummet, plummet, plummet.
Again, let me say it.
Doesn't matter how you vote, left or right, if you're a conservative or a Democrat.
They're coming for everybody.
And they have for a very, very long time with numerous, large-scale, what some people would call deep state operations.
And really, at the crux of that in modern day is...
Still, and has been, 9-11.
And that's really one of the main reasons that I've really dedicated my life, in particular, after that event, to not only exposing the truth behind that event, but the underlying reasons it happened and the overarching agenda that of the event, okay, in this country and beyond.
And whether You want to admit it to yourself yet or not?
Because I know we've brought so many people in.
I get the vast majority of my audience gets this.
But those that are new and somehow think that, you know, George Bush was a good guy or his pappy was a good guy or Mike Pompeo's okay.
Bill Barr did the best he could.
I understand if you came here from a Trump perspective, you may have gotten over those things.
But I hear about...
Reagan's presidency, for instance.
Here's another guy that may have had decent intentions in the beginning, but was brought up through the system.
Hollyweird in particular.
Which is a whole other can of worms.
And as soon as he got slightly out of line, in the very beginning, after winning...
And taking the fork-tongued, snake-like being that was George Herbert Walker Bush as his vice president, he gets shot.
And there's connections to that fork-tongued-like being, as in, the guy that shot Reagan, his brother, because their families were so close, was supposed to have dinner and With George Bush's son, Neil, the following evening.
So the brother of John Hinckley Jr., or John Hinckley Jr., there's always like a three, right?
They didn't put the middle name on Hinckley because, hey, they were going to let him out later on, which they did.
And now he tours the country with an acoustic guitar, talks about peace and love.
And hey, there's gotta be redemption arcs out there.
But talk about cartoon level.
And you know, there was a reason that I included that in my film, Invisible Empire, A New World Order Defined, which at the time really was my opus, my swan song, about these kind of events and really where they belong in this global coup d'etat.
Of an unelectable class of people.
And they know they're unelectable.
They don't want to be elected.
They want to be the people that influence and select the minions they put out in the front.
And how they do that.
That's the reality.
So when I saw this story...
And I think I started to post it.
It might have even been Thursday afternoon.
I think it might, like someone sent it to me Thursday afternoon.
The first thing that hysterical, low IQ morons on social media would try to say to me and laugh at me is this is Russian state media.
It's Russian disinformation.
It's Russian misinformation.
Russia, Russia, Russia.
Hysterical. Like, they don't even understand how ridiculous they sound.
They didn't click the article.
They certainly didn't read it.
They don't understand that the Russia Today article by a guy named Felix Lipschitz, you can't make that up.
Very Russian-sounding name.
Felix Lipschitz.
Okay? So, you read this article, and it links to a document we're going to show you right here, which is the declaration of Donald C. Canestro, who is an investigator assigned to the Office of Military Commissions for a Guantanamo Bay defense agent.
Now, we're going to read this, but we really got...
A lot to play for you today.
I'm assuming this is going to take the vast majority of the first hour, if not all of it.
What I need people to understand about 9-11 is that we have an international intelligence operation.
I can't tell you how many people, after they watched Fabled Enemies, would come up to me and say, But in Loose Change, you said this about the hijackers, or you said that about the hijackers.
Loose Change Final Cut, Loose Change Second Edition is the one that exploded.
And in that film, the original one, not the recut...
It may have even been in the recap, but the media was saying like 9 to 11 of the hijackers were actually reported as alive.
Now, a lot of that got cleared up in similar names.
However, Ada's father came out and said that he had just talked to his son.
The propaganda machine was in the works.
You really didn't know what exactly was to believe with those guys.
But as things got deeper and darker into my research, you realize that the vast majority of these guys had connections Two military bases were trained on them.
Some had been living with, Khalid Al-Madar included, an FBI informant and asset, wasn't the only one.
And the CIA was absolutely warned about the hijackers.
On top of that, there was another shadow network that...
Seem to be following and monitoring some of these people that was outside of the U.S. military industrial complex, okay?
And in the Israeli Mossad and IDF and basically their network through not only the art students you hear about, but also mall kiosks across the country.
Now, when I tell you that the CIA Seem to have protected these guys.
It's in my film, Invisible Empire.
Or not, I'm sorry. It's in my film, Fabled Enemies.
And it's a big deal.
It's a big deal that Diane Albright, and we're going to show this clip, we're even going to show you how Operation Vulgar Betrayal under the FBI knew how the money moved and knew how it worked and couldn't do anything about it.
Okay? It's a big deal.
Because these guys were running live stakings of planes before the hijackings, the actual ones.
And that is evidence via the James Woods event on Flight 11.
And in a video I'm going to play from four years ago, it's about 16 minutes long.
I'm going to show you that Khalid Al-Madar was allegedly on a plane in August prior to 9-11...
With three other guys, casing the plane, and he should have never been on that plane.
He's supposedly the lead hijacker on 77.
Now, my critics on every side of the fence, right, when I debunk, for instance, the no plane theory, because it's absurd, it was there to really obfuscate Issues like the one we're talking about, and then legitimate physical things you could prove, like the controlled demolition of seven and others.
That's why a lot of that stuff, the fantastical stuff, came out.
It wasn't because it was a real theory.
I mean, number one, there are crazy people.
We have to understand that. But number two, you put in purposeful disinformation that you hope will then be parroted or mockingbird traveling.
You'll get that.
No planes.
Ridiculous. And then other people will come and attack me.
And then say, I'm a no-planer because of my position on Shanksville.
Or what we had in the second edition on the Pentagon.
When if you watch the final cut when we were able to do our own investigation and a ton of interviews, there's a much more nuanced perspective.
Which is a good thing. Right?
None of us are perfect.
You know, more legitimate criticism and evidence is a better thing.
Now, This document you're going to see is just one small part in this whole case.
And RT seems to have picked up this story from a place called Florida Bulldog.
And I don't know their background at all, but this is extremely detailed as well.
And it also involves a guy named Richard Clark.
Now, Clark was also involved in a film prior to the 9-11 commission and testimony called Press for Truth.
It was about the Jersey Girls.
And mainly with the cover-up that they were alluding to in that.
Because Richard Clark's the guy, if you remember, I failed you and your government failed you.
Or vice versa.
And I always thought he was a very limited hangout.
I still think he is. He knows damn well he could have said more.
And he probably did behind closed doors.
But he may have been very compromised.
Now, when I put something that's speculation out there, I'm going to say it's speculation.
But from my inside sources, and I never pull out the inside sources, Very early on, when we were considering trying to get a hold of Clark and have him in one of our films, etc.
Because, again, if you watch Fabled Enemies, we've got clips of Bob Graham, Bo Deedle, right?
Obviously interviewed Cynthia McKinney, McGovern, Springman.
If you haven't seen Fabled Enemies, it's a must-watch.
We're going to watch a piece of it, okay?
But what I was told about Clark...
Was that he was a closeted homosexual.
And obviously they had that on him.
And I believe he was married with a family.
And he didn't want it to come out.
Period. And I don't know whether that's true or not.
I'm not trying to get sued.
Just telling you what I heard.
On the inside. What I was unaware of.
And this was post me putting out...
Loose Change Final Cut and Fabled Enemies that he does a 12 or so minute interview which we're also going to play where he alludes to the fact that the CIA essentially created the hijackers and was running the hijackers he said he couldn't prove it but it's the only thing that he could think of all right that that They wanted to turn these guys through Alex Station, the Bin Laden unit. And if you remember, Michael Springman said the same thing about that Saudi Arabian embassy where 17 of the 19 guys came out of.
Said it was essentially a central intelligence agency front for the Bin Laden network that they were controlling.
And I know that's a gut punch for some people, and they don't want to believe that, but there are so many layers to this, right?
The layer that it's now come out, at least in the public now, even though it's in, again, in my film, Fabled Enemies, that you had United 23, one of the other possible hijacks, okay?
And you have to understand that they also found weapons on other planes.
They were inside jobs to the fullest, right?
To the fullest. However, only some of the game plan worked that day.
And we may never know why or who, but my money's on Cheyenne Mountain, the E4Bs, and a network on the ground.
What we're talking about now is the network of the hijackers.
And setting them up and running drills with them.
And I would say this.
They're patsies in the regard that they were doing these things, but the endgame, what they thought they were doing and who they were doing it for is certainly in question.
And whether they're the ones that actually pulled it off at the end.
Obviously, there are some aspects where the planes were in the air.
And we tell you, we've shown you here how empty they were.
How empty those planes were.
So bizarre. So bizarre.
So boy, we've gone 17 minutes.
I've played no clips yet.
And in order to hammer this home, that these guys were CIA, I don't normally do it from a web browser, guys, but I wanted to show people this.
So I type in Fabled Enemies.
Now, to YouTube's credit, probably because I'm signed in as me, it comes up on my channel.
But then, this is the stuff that comes up, Despised Icon, all this.
I have to scroll down how long?
I mean, none of these even in the title.
This thing has more views than any of them, most of them.
Well, I guess not that one.
But at the same time, they're not even in the title.
I have to scroll all the way down there.
So, this is literally right, directly after the introduction that I put out there in Fabled Enemies.
The role credits, the event that day, how they had named Bin Laden, right out of the gates, okay?
But, in short order, I think we'll probably just play...
The first five or six minutes after, you're going to see that the CIA was called on these guys, that they had connections to military bases, and none of this, none of this was explored in any kind of public forum or any kind of mainstream media in a serious manner.
They always want to go to no planes.
Let's begin with the hijackers.
Many of them were actually trained within U.S. military bases.
On September 15, 2001, Newsweek reported that U.S. military sources have given information that suggests five of the alleged hijackers received training at secure U.S. military installations in the 90s.
Zaid Al-Ghamdi, Ahmed Al-Nami, and Ahmed Al-Ghamdi listed their address on driver's licenses and car registrations as the Naval Air Station in Pensacola, Florida.
Another indication of how the hijackers were tied to U.S. bases was reported on September 12th by Fox in D.C. They stated congratulatory phone calls were made from a separate aeronautical school in Florida, which suggests inside help for the hijackers.
Now here at Emory Riddle School in Daytona Beach, investigators say that they did indeed intercept cell phone calls that originated out of here.
Calls that were congratulatory after yesterday's attacks.
Calls the feds say were made by terrorist sympathizers here in Daytona as well as in Broward County.
The New York Times would report that the Defense Department said that Ada had gone to the International Officer School at Maxwell Air Force Base in Alabama, Abdul Aziz Alamari to the Aerospace Medical School at Brooks Air Force Base in Texas, and Saeed Al-Ghamdi to the Defense Language Institute at the Presidio in Monterey, California. The Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs at the Defense Language Institute, where Al-Ghamdi trained, went public and said, Bush knew of the impending attacks on America.
He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism.
He was quickly disciplined and threatened with court-martial.
Even when neighbors called the CIA on hijacker Walid Alshieri, nothing was done.
Now, you might think that some of the neighbors would be shocked to find out that a suspected terrorist lived right down the street from them, but at least one woman we spoke with was not surprised at all.
Diane Albritton was so concerned about what was happening inside the home at 502 Orange Street, she called the CIA. Why was she suspicious?
The odd coming and going, the different rental cars, the odd-looking people that came and went.
At that time, she says, the agency was not interested.
How could it be that the CIA wasn't interested in this woman's story?
Other government officials would go public as well.
J. Michael Springman, a former head of the Visa Department in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, would blow the whistle that the United States was taking part in covert programs as far back as 1987 to funnel in and protect Islamic terrorists.
Well, it began in Jeddah when I was repeatedly told to issue visas to unqualified applicants.
This went on for quite some time during most of my tour there.
Under the American immigration laws, you need to demonstrate that you're going to the United States for a specific purpose, and typically, in such a situation, you're going to sign a business deal, or you're going to go as a tourist to see the Grand Canyon, or you're going to the United States as a student to study a particular course of study.
And these were people that had no job in one instance.
He was a Sudanese who was unemployed in Saudi Arabia and a refugee from the Sudan.
But he got a visa for national security purposes after it was taken out of my hands by the chief of the consular section.
At basis, though, I really think that these were more CIA assets, people that were recruited like all of the folks I had been issuing visas to a couple of years previously.
And these people were tools to be done for a job.
Well, the visas issued to the hijackers in Jeddah It came about as a result of it being a CIA consul.
It was the fifth largest visa issue imposed in the Middle East.
It was pretty much a closed system, and they simply brought them through there, knowing that they would be protected by the agency, that people would get their visas, or if they didn't get the visas, they could be made to be given visas.
Once I got back to the United States and was out of the Foreign Service, I ran across a couple of people with ties to the American government that told me another story, that the CIA was recruiting fighters for the Afghan war against the then Soviets and that their asset, Osama bin Laden was working with them.
In the early 1980s, bin Laden worked with operatives from U.S.
intelligence, the Pakistani military, and Arab states.
They ran a wide-ranging covert network that recruited and financed Muslim fighters to battle the Soviet army.
Now...
Obviously...
When you look at that, that's one of the reasons that I also focus on Pakistani intelligence funding some of these hijackers.
It shows you that in some of these cases, in this one in particular, it seems like they're working in unison to supply this current network.
It is now known that Osama bin Laden was a CIA asset under the codename Tim Osman.
Bin Laden would use this handle when he would visit the states.
The relationship between bin Laden and the CIA was essentially, he was one of the assets, one of the people they could turn to for help if they had questions.
If they wanted somebody recruited, if they wanted somebody sent somewhere, if they wanted information, if they wanted something done, they went to bin Laden.
Bin Laden isn't wanted by the FBI, and he was on a CIA payroll?
Is he the brutal Islamic terrorist we have been led to believe?
Or a mere front man?
My question was, is it not true that the United States government paid $300 million to the bin Laden family for the construction of the military camps?
At that point, then, the person who was testifying had no choice but to admit, yes, that the money had gone to the bin Laden family for the construction of those military training facilities in Afghanistan.
However, he added that None of that money went to Bin Laden himself.
Of course it was a joke.
Alright, so the next part gets into more of the FBI aspect, but I want to read some of this right here.
The defense organization and have been working in the capacity since April of 2016.
Prior to my assignment to the Military Commission's defense organization, I was a special agent for the Drug Enforcement Agency for more than 21 years while serving as a DEA special agent.
I interviewed numerous suspects and witnesses.
Information developed during these interviews furthered investigations under my purview.
These investigations led to seizures and arrests.
Testimony I have provided has been accepted by both federal and state courts as accurate and trustworthy and has contributed to numerous convictions.
I have not included each and every fact known to me in this declaration.
So right out of the gates, right out of the gates, what's he saying?
He's literally saying, hey, I can't tell you everything I know about the case.
Okay? I can't tell you everything I know about the case.
During July of 2016, I began an investigation into the possible involvement of the Saudi Arabian government and the Central Intelligence Agency in the events leading up to the 9-11 attacks.
In support of this inquiry, I began a review of discovery provided by the government to the defense in open-source materials Available on Omar al-Bayami, a suspected Saudi intelligence officer who had contact with 9-11 hijacker Nawaf al-Hamzi and Khalid al-Madar.
During the review I conducted, I noted that the FBI file on Al Biami released to Judicial Watch by the FBI pursuant to an FOA request, a 199 numerical designator followed by the letters SD. Based on prior training experience, I noted that the FBI file designer is a part of a numerical code that tells the reader what type of violation the FBI is investigating in the case.
I observed that the 199 numerical designator most likely indicates a counterintelligence file.
And that the letters SD indicates that the investigation was conducted by the San Diego field office.
And remember, a bunch of these people are over in California.
And they talk about what?
The hijackers and their apartment.
Stuff we've been talking about for years.
Now... What do we got?
We only got about half an hour left.
So, do I play Richard Clark first, or do I play the Dark Overlord?
We'll probably do the Dark Overlord, James Woods...
Al-Madar and all that stuff on the premium side of the broadcast, but maybe we'll get a little piece on this side.
Because there's a whole bunch of other stuff I want to talk about too, guys, that's important.
For instance, you know, SNL went on this very weird political diatribe to basically...
I don't even want to get into it because it's just going to make me upset and go off on a rant.
I keep seeing these HIV drugs everywhere.
Like, I'm watching The Food That Built America, folks.
That's my weekend after fights.
I find that kind of documentary stuff fascinating.
And I gotta watch HIV prep commercial after HIV prep commercial.
Is there going to be an explosion in this?
So a lot of other stories as well.
Hopefully we're going to cover the vast majority of those on the other side.
But this is just too important.
So I guess we're going to go to this clip of Richard Clark being interviewed by these two guys.
I had no idea this video existed.
It was after I posted the original RT article on the matter.
Okay? That somebody else put that out there.
And that's how I found really the...
Florida Bulldog story that started it all by Dan Christensen.
And it's a must-read, even if you're familiar.
It's a must-read to understand how the CIA and the FBI, yeah, there are certain parts of it that are going to work together.
And you may even have...
I would say the FBI infiltrated by actual CIA officers, whether they're assets or on the books or not, in a lot of places.
But at the end of the day, there is this network that's really protected by the other intelligence agents, whether they understand it or not.
That is what most people would refer to as rogue.
They're rogue.
But it's not really a rogue operation.
So, Richard Clark, again, he's one of those interesting characters.
A decade ago, when Michael Hastings' car blew up, you guys remember that one?
I remember. I remember.
I remember. So, Michael Hastings...
Was doing a story on national security.
And in particular, I believe at the NSA head at the time, who for some reason I remember was also from Syracuse, New York.
And all of a sudden, it was...
He just said he got in this weird car accident where his car blew up.
Very bizarre. Didn't involve another car.
Like, the engine was...
Just kind of took off like Superman.
Okay? Okay. So, Richard Clark said, hey, yeah, we do have the technology, and we do utilize that technology, where we can hack vehicles.
Oh. So, in other words, they could have remotely crashed the car, and if they had a bomb or something, or explosive device there, they could have also detonated that remotely after the car was virtually jacked.
So, look, in a lot of cases, I feel like Richard Clark wanted to say more back in the day, but he didn't want to jeopardize what he had going.
The jeopardized part is his mode of speculation.
But in this, he essentially, again, says that the Central Intelligence Agency seemed to be running the hijackers.
Okay.
This is a very, very intense, intense hearing.
And, as you're all very curious about, this travel is the summit of the belief.
When the cable came in, one of the people there, a suspected terrorist, had intentions to travel to the U.S.
I can't explain why, you know, it was the middle of the November, um, what happened.
In particular, it was determined that they did go over to the U.S. and they did travel to America.
I think they had some sort of operational plan going on, on the Bureau to, uh, to know about.
What we did after the embassy bombings was we came up with an interagency approved strategy.
Some of that involved CIA, some involved the State Department, some involved the Defense Department, some involved the FBI. What I was told by CIA at the time was that they were now going to try for the first time to get sources on the inside.
So let me just stop right there.
For the first time to get sources.
They have sources on the inside from the very outset.
So even in this, I'm going to be slightly critical of Richard Clarke.
And why shouldn't I be? Because there was so much open source available information That proved that the narrative they were telling us about 9-11 was a lie.
And he gets, I failed you, and your government failed you.
A lot deeper than that, Richard.
And again, this network spans back.
And if you look at the 93 bombing, who was it that actually built the bomb under the direction of John Antisev and his partner?
Well, it was their own asset, their own informant, Ahmed Salam, their own private Egyptian army officer that had come over to the United States and was working at a hotel.
So this idea of sources on the inside, especially Central Intelligence Agency sources and the Bin Laden network, I'm skeptical.
I'm very skeptical because it seems like that network was around for some time.
Followed all of the information about Al-Qaeda in microscopic detail.
He read raw intelligence reports before analysts in the counterterrorism center did.
And he would pick up the phone and call me at 7.30 in the morning to talk about them.
Kofor Black had a reputation for being hard-charging.
Now, most CIA agents in those days didn't like to get their fingers dirty.
They liked to work under diplomatic cover in embassies and go to cocktail parties.
Kofor Black had been in the back alleys of Khartoum.
And Rich Blee understood how CIA worked because he'd been sitting right next to George Tenet as his aide.
They understood al-Qaeda was a big threat.
They were motivated.
And they were really trying hard.
They only follow Al-Mudar, Al-Hazmi and Bin-Attash out of the meeting.
Thanks.
And again, they call them the lead hijackers.
They're always the lead.
And these are the ones that especially look like they're part of intelligence or protected by intelligence.
By the way, almost 500 people watching, which isn't bad in the morning, guys.
Can we get 200 thumbs up?
Can we get this one out there?
Can we get maybe the Tuckins to cover this one?
Hey, Tuckins, you think you might be able to do a special on this?
You're getting better, bro. In fact, that's another video I should have played.
Maybe I'll play it tomorrow if we have time.
You had Bryce Mitchell on there from the UFC talking about one world government and the new world order, baby.
Thank you, Bryce. We appreciate that.
I appreciate that.
But let's continue, because this is important.
Because on record, Clark states not only the CIA involvement, but he believes the CIA was running it.
And then they lose them in Bangkok.
you you
And it's not as I originally thought, which was that one lowly CIA analyst got this information and didn't somehow recognize the significance of it.
No. 50, 5-0 CIA personnel knew about this.
Hear that? You hear that?
55, not one analyst, not, oh, we missed it.
Within the agency, that many, all right, there are going to be people...
Within the network, okay, that not only are knowledgeable about it, but at the upper echelons, they're running it.
That's why, when this information is out there, all of a sudden it's being suppressed.
You understand the way they update us at the White House is every morning I come in, I turn on my computer, and I get 100, 150 CIA reports.
I'm not relying on somebody calling me See that?
So in other words, it's directed that we have to shield this from anybody that might make a decision we don't like.
If there was a decision made to stop normal distribution with regard to this case, then people like Tom Wilshire would have known that.
Tom Wilshire, as well as Desk Officer Michelle, accessed the cable mentioning the UBL Associates coming to the United States, the March cable, and they also accessed the original Malaysian cable about the visa multiple times.
On these subsequent times, if he shook something loose, he had full range of opportunity to alert you.
He did, but he wouldn't have to.
Because unless somebody intervened to stop the normal automatic distribution, I would automatically get it.
For me, to this day, it is inexplicable why, when I had every other detail about everything related to terrorism, that the director didn't tell me, That the director of the Counter-Terrorism Center didn't tell me?
So Tenet didn't tell him?
George Tenet is kind of, where's George Tenet?
You never hear about most of the boogeymen in the Bush administration.
A lot of them kept a low profile after the fact, didn't they?
Don't hear a lot of Condoleezza.
Condoleezza with the cheese-a.
You don't hear about Rice. You don't hear about Tenet.
You don't know what Cheney's up to, except for his daughter.
But the other 48 people in CIA who knew about it never mentioned it to me or anyone in my staff in a period of over 12 months.
They were stopped from getting to you and stopped from getting to the White House then.
And at the same time, again, the CIA is being called by Deborah Albritton.
Hmm? They're at U.S. military bases.
James Woods is filing reports.
And we're going to show you that.
And we're going to show you names.
And we're going to show you that the FBI was confirming it.
That a dry run hijacking involving Al-Madar, I believe, of Flight 11 took place in August prior to the attacks.
So they're dry running.
They're getting the CIA called on them.
They're coming from basically CIA consulates.
They're being funded that we know about, not only through the Saudis, but Pakistani intelligence, and they're being shadowed by a network of Israelis.
All enfabled enemies, all without a doubt, all provable.
And stop from getting to the FBI and the Defense Department.
We therefore conclude that there was a high-level decision in the CIA... Ordering people not to share that information.
How high level? I think it would have to be made by the director.
Right there, he accuses Tenet of prior knowledge.
I mean, that he would have to be aware.
And look, to the extent Tenet knew anything, it's tough, man, because I feel like they put yes-men in these director's positions.
Some of them are very cunning.
Alright? Very cunning.
Like a James Woolsey and a Brennan and a Pompeo, they're very cunning.
Make no mistake about it.
But especially with Tenet, maybe it was just because he was silent, but I never was really impressed by Tenet.
They never put him out in the public arena that much.
So in some cases, maybe Tenet was guarded by some of it, but he knew these networks existed and that they were being run by, Alex Station in particular...
People within the Central Intelligence Agency.
You've got to understand my relationship with him.
We were close friends.
He called me several times a day.
We shared the most trivial of information with each other.
There was not a lack of information sharing.
They told us everything except this.
So, everybody also at the end of the day wants to cover their own harness.
But there's a multitude of things happening here.
Because you also have the war games that help facilitate the attacks.
And you also have the Able Danger Network that has identified several of the quote-unquote terrorist cells and is tracking Ada and others.
Okay? Okay. And even that information ends up being on a limited scale.
Here they are in the NSC advisor's office, trying to make their best case possible for action.
But, in trying to make this persuasive case, they never once mentioned That already two Al-Qaeda terrorists, known to be involved in the Kuala Lumpur planning center, had entered the United States.
Why don't you trot out what is the most persuasive piece of evidence you've got?
These guys are already in the country.
They're not here to go look at the Grand Canyon.
The people who were doing that briefing knew that fact and didn't trot it out.
So, you ask yourself, why not?
I have thought about this a lot, and there's only one conceivable reason that I've been able to come up with.
Now, there may be other reasons, but I've only been able to come up with one.
When Kofra Black became the head of the Counterterrorism Center at CIA, he was aghast that they had no sources in Al-Qaeda.
So he told me, I'm going to try to get sources in Al-Qaeda.
I can understand them possibly saying, we need to develop sources inside Al-Qaeda.
When we do that, we can't tell anybody about it.
And I can understand them perhaps seeing these two guys show up in the United States.
I'm thinking, aha, this is our chance to flip them.
This is our chance to get guys inside al-Qaeda.
So again, this is where we would part ways in agreement.
You notice how careful he is.
He's going to say they were running him.
But at the same time, I believe that they were sent here to this network.
Now, whether they knew that or not, You know, you look at guys like Atta and perhaps Al Madar.
Atta in particular screams, screams of having knowledge on the inside.
And especially when you look into Rudy Deckers and Florida and the Venice Flight School there.
And the fact that most people thought Ada and his crew were some kind of mafioso or gangsters and they were talking about the family and involved in drug dealing.
Okay? All that stuff.
Again, Central Intelligence Agency doesn't have its hands clean on the drug dealing, right?
Go back to that Reagan presidency.
Iran-Contra blows up.
So here he's being really careful, and again, I would disagree that they weren't brought here in particular to be part of that network.
And to do that, we can't tell anybody outside CIA until we got them, until they're really giving us information.
If they tell the FBI, the FBI can say, no, this is in the United States, we want him He's going to become an FBI source.
And they'll botch it.
Let's instead, we'll flip them.
Then we'll get them to leave the United States and go back home.
And they'll be our source.
And we'll never have to tell the FBI that we got them here.
So we do know that these two guys show up in Southern California.
And pretty soon thereafter, they're approached by A Saudi.
We know the Saudi reaches out, meets them in a restaurant, arranges housing for them, arranges payment to them, arranges to move them to San Diego.
And that Saudi has connections to the Saudi government, and some people believe that guy was a Saudi intelligence officer.
And that's the one that's being referenced right now in this new documentation, by the way.
If we assume, for the sake of argument, that the Saudi intelligence guy in Southern California was the handler for these two, then presumably he would have been reporting to the CIA Los Angeles station.
There was a strong relationship between the CIA director and the Minister of Intelligence in Saudi Arabia.
After that the trailer was cold about what conceivable Saudi intelligence or CIA contact with them.
I would disagree.
Again. And how much of this does he actually not know?
Maybe on the inside with the briefings, but...
Obviously, the open source intelligence that's come out says it hasn't gone cold.
And that's going to be illustrated when we go to the other side and I play the Dark Overlords files, the secret testimony of James Woods.
And so many people are still unaware of the Dark Overlords files that we only got three or five layers of.
And there was some juicy, juicy stuff.
Lots of repeat stuff.
I mean, that deserved more of my attention.
That deserved deeper dives into the actual documentation, which was vast.
Which was vast.
So let's continue on.
There's about three more minutes in this.
Thumbs it up. Subscribe and share, everybody.
You know, one thing that happens in agent recruitment is we think we've recruited the agent.
But then later we discover that they're playing us.
Here's a double agent.
And at some point, CIA realizes that.
That's possible. How long do you think it would take them to decide this isn't working?
I don't know. I do know in August of 2001 they decide they're going to tell the FBI. In August of 2001, they're going to tell the FBI, but before that, again, there's FBI connections to Al-Madar and others.
And in August, not sure where this would relate, because he doesn't give us a certain date, old Richard Clark.
But in August, you have the faux hijacking, the casing of Flight 11 in particular, according to James Woods, before the attacks.
This should raise huge alarm bells on foreknowledge, pre-knowledge, planning.
And there's no obvious reason in the record why for 15, 16 months they decide not to tell the FBI and then one day they wake up and say they're going to tell the FBI. Ask yourself why, on September 4th, after they've told the FBI, but not told senior levels of the FBI, why not raise it in the September 4th principles meeting?
I mean, if I ask myself that, I don't...
It's a very obvious answer. What am I going to say I know how all this stuff works.
I've been working it for 30 years.
You can't snowball me on this stuff.
If they announce on September 4th in the principal's meeting that these guys are in the United States and they told the FBI a few weeks ago, I'm going to say, wait, time up.
How long have you known this?
Why haven't you reported it at the daily threat meetings?
Why isn't it in the daily threat matrix?
We would have begun an investigation that day into CIA malfeasance and misfeasance.
That's why we're not informed.
So, whether or not that would have happened or not, you gotta understand.
Old Pappy Bush is still around and kicking.
In fact, Old Pappy Bush and his network were part of what?
His son's administration.
And Old Pappy B! He just happened to be in the White House on 9-11.
Also in my film, Fabled Enemies.
Just pointing that out.
Think it's important. So, you know, Richard Clarke...
I take a lot with a grain of salt, but this absolutely 100% interconnects with these new revelations of a military commissions investigator that is finding the same thing with these Central Intelligence Agency connections.
So they put their own asses above national security.
If you believe all of this, I can't prove this.
I have a set of facts.
I'm trying to make sense of those facts.
And I'm trying to come up with an explanation as to why those facts that we know are true occurred.
So there it is, man.
Central Intelligence Agency assets.
They're running. I had no idea that this existed.
This 2009, again, that is after Fabled Enemies.
That is after Loose Change Final Cut.
These articles are extremely, okay, extremely important to read.
Ex-FBI agents accused top CIA FBI officials of 9-11 cover-up.
CIA said to use Saudis' others for illegal domestic spy operations.
So let me expand upon that by talking about Robert Mueller.
And how Robert Mueller stopped the FBI within the agency who was following the money and knew something was wrong from actually blowing the whistle after the fact.
You know who else helped with that? The deputy director of the FBI at the time, Michael Shertoff, who they would put in charge of the initial homeland security that should have never existed in the first place.
A Deutschland! A Deutschland security.
No thank you. You know, because of that, we've got a few more minutes before we go over to redvoicemedia.com slash Jason, redvoicemedia.com slash Uncensored, where we're going to talk a slew of other issues other than 9-11, but this, again, this is an important one.
It always is. We're going to play...
The Dark Overlord James Woods video.
So you can again understand it wasn't just the CIA being called on Al Shieri.
It just wasn't the military bases and the whistleblowers within there.
It wasn't just the congratulatory phone calls.
This whole network.
...the only one working with U.S. intelligence.
Hijackers also had ties to federal agencies.
Alleged terrorists Khalid Al-Madar and Nawaf al-Zahami lived with and rented from an FBI informant.
The New York Times stated on October 6, 2002, the Federal Bureau of Investigation had a confidential informer who rented rooms in California to two of the September 11th hijackers.
But the bureau is resisting a request from the Congressional Committee investigating the attacks to interview the informer and his FBI handler.
Several members of the FBI had their investigations into terrorism impeded and shut down, especially when they got close to Bin Laden.
John O'Neill was the FBI counter-terror chief responsible for the investigation into Osama bin Laden.
On August 22, 2001, after claims of a repeated obstruction of his investigations into Saudi funding, O'Neill left the FBI. This document is marked secret and WF, which means it walked its way out of the Washington Bureau of the FBI. It indicates that before the attack of September 11th, agents had wanted to question two members of a very powerful family for their connections to a suspected terrorist organization, Omar and Abdullah bin Laden.
But the agents weren't allowed to.
O'Neill went on to take a new post as head of World Trade Center Security.
He would move into his office days before 9-11 and be killed during the attacks.
I have four children.
I've lost friends.
John, my friend from the FBI, was killed after...
We lost a lot of family members.
What did John O'Neill do before we worked in the World Trade Center?
John was in the FBI. He was tracking down...
Osama. He was tracking down Osama.
Because the government didn't listen to him.
The government didn't listen to him.
The FBI... Hold on.
We want to call a car to car?
The FBI fucked up.
They know about the flight training.
That was a fuck-up for having these people in our country.
We all agree on something.
And the important thing is you have to understand.
I feel what you feel.
I have your friends there. I feel what you feel.
That was our world training.
That was our people that fucking died that day.
At a time when Bin Laden was the most wanted man in the world, why would intelligence agencies stop their own investigations, especially as they were closing in on him?
Robert Wright and others within the FBI also had their investigations into terrorism stopped prior to 9-11.
Since August of 1999, I've been working to legally expose the very real and foreseeable Middle Eastern terrorist threats to American citizens at home and abroad.
From 1993 to 1999, I was assigned to the Chicago Division's Counterterrorism Task Force.
The successful investigation, which was codenamed Vulgar Betrayal, V-U-L-G-A-R, Betrayal, led to the June 1998 seizure of $1.4 million of Middle Eastern terrorist funding.
These funds were linked directly to Saudi businessman Yasin Khadi.
On October 12, 2001, Yassin Khadi was designated by the United States government as a financial supporter of Osama Bin Laden.
Larry Klayman of Judicial Watch initially tried to help get Wright's story to the proper authorities.
He wanted to come forward long before 9-11.
We were taking those steps beginning last summer to do that.
The FBI had 30 days to allow that to occur.
They violated their own regulations.
They covered it up. If you didn't hear me, I went specifically.
I called the Attorney General's office just days after 9-11.
I said, Dave Shippers and I represent a special agent of the FBI Chicago field office who has years of information about how the FBI did not do its job, did not in any way investigate a meaningful way money laundering in the United States.
You're now claiming you want to do this.
I'd like to make them available to you, Attorney General Ashcroft.
And I was met with a response by Michael Chertoff, head of the criminal division.
We're tired of conspiracy theories.
So there you go. Criminal Division, Attorney General's office, this guy.
Michael Shertoff will later become the head of Homeland Security, the department set up to fight the war on terror after 9-11.
Wright was also restricted from telling any specifics about their investigation.
Robert Wright was then prevented from working on terror investigations.
So what happened to Wright?
He was demoted in and around the time period.
Leading up to 9-11, he's working on innocuous, meaningless things.
That's what he's doing. Yes.
He's a paper pusher.
It's because these monies were going through some very powerful US banks with some very powerful interests in the United States.
These banks knew or had reason to know that these monies were laundered by terrorists.
And there are very significant potential conflicts of interest in both the Clinton and Bush administration, and in particular, the Bush administration, who is as tight with Saudi Arabia as you can get.
The president's father used to stay with the bin Laden family when he would go to Saudi Arabia.
We'll end it there on this part of the broadcast, everybody.
Can we get 300 thumbs up?
Can we get that before we go?
So that'll be a cue to my producer to move it on over.
Redvoicemedia.com slash Jason.
Redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
We're going to keep going on this 9-11 issue.
We're going to show you how they were protected and identified yet again from a blast from the past from four plus years ago.
Really, probably closer to five.
You know, probably right on the brink of five years ago.
Man, time flies. Time be flying.
So thumbs it up. Subscribe, share.
You want to listen for free?
Theinfowarrior.podbean.com Every day we do this, we get another premium free unlocked for those that aren't part of that.
But remember, you can try it for a buck for the first week.
One dollar. Numero uno.
Myself and many others on the network.
Full lineup coming.
12 hour lineup.
That's what they're working on right now.
I mean, badingo badongo.
Yeah, that's big time.
So consider coming on over.
Lock it in for a year.
Those that do that, thank you so much.
$100, it'll save you $20.
We're going nowhere fast here.
In other words, we're sticking around.
Still haven't gotten my text yet, so I'm not sure we're there.
But let's start leaving each broadcast.
Goodbye, Rockfin. I love you.
We'll see you later, Rumble.
Let's Rumble on. We all know about you, YouTube.
And let's never forget the Twitter that we can't stream to anymore for some reason and still don't have our blue checkmark.
▲
Export Selection