All Episodes
March 29, 2023 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
01:00:49
BREAKING!!! Epstein Secrets To Be Revealed? | Reality Rants With Jason Bermas
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
We think too much and feel too little.
More than machinery, we need humanity.
We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat, as if that's the way it's supposed to be.
We know things are bad, worse than bad.
They're crazy. Silence!
The great and powerful Oz knows why you have come.
You've got to say, I'm a human being!
Goddammit! My life has value!
You have meddled all the primal forces of nature!
Don't give yourselves to brutes, men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder!
Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men!
Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts!
Yeah! Thank you! You're beautiful!
I love you! Yes!
You're beautiful!
Thank you!
Ha ha!
Shhh!
It's...
Showtime!
And now...
Reality Hits with Jason Vermis!
with Jason Hermes.
And who loves you?
And who do you love?
Good morning, good morning, good morning.
It is Reality Rants.
I am Jason Bermas.
Brought to you by redvoicemedia.com.
Remember, the premium portion of the broadcast starts at the top of the next hour.
I do want to let everybody know that across platforms...
I have recently released the premium portion of the Peter Thiel Watch Along that I think is extremely relevant.
Maybe like 10 or 15 minutes of that.
It was on the regular portion of the broadcast.
Now several weeks old, still relevant.
Because although we tackle a lot of breaking news, and by the way, we're going to...
Revisit the shooting over at the Christian school that really a lot of information was released within the first 24 hours.
Maybe more than I had ever seen before.
In any type of event like this, there's some, I think, misguided conspiracy theories out there going around about some shoes.
I saw those posts everywhere.
I'm going to attempt to explain what I think is going on with the shoe controversy, and I know a lot of people aren't going to like to hear it.
Because it has nothing to do with a false flag and has everything to do with angles and video compression.
Okay? And I know there's still a lot of people over there.
You know, I had somebody in my feed talking about the Fetterman post I did and saying, oh, if you're such an expert in Photoshop, show us how it's Photoshopped.
Show us how it's...
And I did it on air.
Okay? I already did it on air.
So the people that love to throw mud and love to throw dirt, they're in imagination land.
They act like I didn't do that or they didn't watch the video far enough to see me in real time debunk the Fetterman nonsense.
The video was Fetterman.
The photograph is Fetterman.
It's from a different type of lens, possibly distorted in Photoshop from a lower angle.
And that's why it looks somewhat distorted.
Those pictures are Fetterman.
And I believe, by the way, that the video we're looking at is not doctored, is 100% real.
I've seen some other kooky stuff out there.
The no blood thing always kills me.
When you get shot immediately, depending on where it happens, there can be a large pool of blood, a small pool of blood, you can cover up the blood, etc.
It's certainly not something that's easily focused upon.
But what I can tell you from the body cam footage that I've seen with those police officers is that it appears that somebody does get shot And that somebody gets killed.
And what do you mean, Jason?
How would you know? They're in a death position.
What do I mean by they're in a death position?
Their leg is bent in such a manner that it would not be bent that way if the person was alive or conscious.
The only time you see positions of human beings like that is when they are completely and totally knocked out from a physical altercation or they're killed.
And let me say this.
All the reports I'm seeing are that the police were there and took out the suspect within 15 minutes.
Good. Still not enough.
You've still got three dead kids and three dead administrators.
Still a huge issue.
But the larger issue to me is this person was clearly not mentally well.
Although we have reports stating that there was no history of mental illness, the person identified as a he-him while being a biological female, to me that screams of mental illness.
We don't know about hormones.
We don't know about SSRIs or psychotropics.
But I will say this.
At least Tucker Carlson talked about them yesterday on his program.
Led with it, really. Sounded a lot like Jason Bermas yesterday.
And then, out of nowhere, and you know I forgot to go get this clip because I'd have to go download the entire show.
Once again, question 9-11 on the air.
Kind of out of nowhere, by the way.
He said, I still don't know why 9-11 happened.
And I'm being serious. They hate us for our freedoms?
Wasn't it a little bit more than that?
Yeah, Al-Qaeda's bad.
They hate us for our freedoms?
So, Tucker, keep dipping that toe in 9-11 truth, brother.
And I really hope to hear from you soon.
I really hope that you swallow your pride.
You do a full episode on some of the real remaining questions on 9-11.
Maybe you start with United 23 like we reported on last week and flesh it out from there because that's now in the news again.
But let's do it, Tuck.
Let's have the real conversation for an hour on the biggest news show out there because it's important.
Just like the Epstein case is still important.
9-11 is super important.
So, I'm going to start by reading this new article on Jamie Dimon.
In May, he's going to be testifying in this lawsuit via the Virgin Islands and Epstein.
Where finally the Virgin Islands are suing these banks that continue to do business with Epstein even after his last arrest.
Okay, so long after the Palm Beach incident in which he signs a deal with Mueller and the FBI to become an informant.
Where he doesn't really do any jail time.
Where he's allowed to leave the jail almost on a daily basis.
Barely a tap on the wrist.
And by the way, to throw a little shade Tucker's way that he deserves, he brought Dershowitz on again.
He continues to bring Dershowitz on.
I even heard Jonesy say this, that Dershowitz had been totally exonerated in the Epstein case.
I don't believe that. I don't think he's been totally exonerated at all.
I'm still listening to those that have accused him of abuse.
I'm still listening to those that aren't Dershowitz fans to the fact that Dershowitz has his hands in getting the Israelis that were detained before, on, and after 9-11 out of the country.
Dershowitz has talked about the Rothschilds.
Being part of his introduction, Evelyn to Rothschild, to Epstein.
Dershowitz has admitted that he'd been to the island once and received a massage from an old lady.
As far as I know, as far as I've seen, there were no old ladies on Epstein Island.
And that's not to say that everybody was underage, but certainly...
I don't know that there were any 30-year-olds, other than maybe Ghislaine Maxwell, that were around Epstein.
You're talking about women in their 20s, max, and that had been around for some time.
Some of which, including, I believe it's Nadia Marcinkova, have been alleged to be purchased as teenagers, according to documentation.
So this is a big deal.
This is a big story.
The Jess Staley Barclays story should have been a much bigger story.
Instead, you got people memeing.
Ultra memeing with the list.
It's the Epstein list.
We've got the client list.
There's no client list.
It doesn't exist. It's total and completely fabricated.
There are videos incriminating people.
Okay. Okay.
That's 100%. There are pictures incriminating people.
Not a list, but people.
And then there are a ton of associates that worked with Epstein financially on things that appear to be transhumanist in nature.
And I'm waiting, Bannon.
Old Stevie B. I'm waiting.
I'm waiting for those Epstein videos, those 16 hours of tapes.
And there was another one.
You know, weeks ago, when I talked about Epstein and Bannon and their meeting before his final arrest, prior to the midterms, and then I show the trailer that Bannon made that I didn't even know he made, I think entitled The Monsters, Where Epstein appears to agree with Steve Bannon that his two islands are Islands of Dr.
Moreau. Whoa! That's a pretty big admission.
Islands of Dr. Moreau.
This isn't a bad sci-fi adaptation with Marlon Brando.
By the way, Marlon Brando is not really in the film that much.
They got a body double in makeup for most of that film.
By the way, can we get 100 thumbs up, everybody?
And can we get a comment in the comment section?
Can we get a like? Can we get a share on Rumble?
Can we get it all? Can we continue to grow the broadcast?
Because we're trying to cover stuff that you're not seeing anywhere else or you're seeing days, weeks, and months away.
So let's read this piece because this is an important development in an important case.
Remember, Jess Staley has private conversations and emails with Epstein talking about women, possibly girls, dressed up like Snow White.
And then Epstein asking if there's another request and the guy says Beauty and the Beast.
Epstein jokes that he can get half of that done for him.
Beauty and the Beast.
Makes almost no headlines.
I read about it in the Daily Mail.
Didn't hear much about it in the United States.
Still not hearing about this case with Jamie Dimon and J.P. Morgan.
Same case. But again, under oath interview to be conducted in May.
Let's read it!
JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon will face federal prosecutors under oath about his bank's decision to retain pedophile Jeffrey Epstein as a client despite his sex trafficking.
Dimon is set to give a sworn deposition behind closed doors in May, the Financial Times reported, as part of two suits brought against the largest U.S. bank by an alleged Epstein victim and the U.S. Virgin Islands, where the disgraced financier had a home.
The lawsuits claim that J.P. Morgan, where Epstein banked from 1998 to 2013, so apparently stopped banking with them in 2013.
I wouldn't be surprised if there were some shell companies and still some other things going on.
This guy had mucho dinero and mucho resources.
And remember, 2013 is far after the 2007-2008 Palm Beach case.
Just want to put that out there.
They claim J.P. Morgan benefited from human trafficking and ignored internal warnings about their clients' illegal activities.
Well, again, big banks love to do businesses with criminals, and cartels in particular.
They just do.
Go watch the Cocaine Cowboys series.
The idea that banks don't know that they're trafficking in criminal cash is absurd.
Of course they know.
Hey, the money's green.
It spends, doesn't it, Mr.
Diamond? A pretrial investigation later found that Diamond conducted some sort of review about the bank's relationship with Epstein in the years before he was arrested.
But the bank has repeatedly denied that Diamond conducted any such review and has described the lawsuits against it as meritless.
Instead... Mm-hmm.
Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.
Let's see. JP Morgan Chase lawyers have repeatedly denied that Diamond was involved in Epstein's sex trafficking scheme with one person familiar with an internal investigation telling the Financial Times that there is no record of Diamond being in direct communication with Epstein or being included in any discussions about retaining him as a client.
That's interesting. I guess we'll find out.
But the attorneys have previously resisted attempts to depose Diamond and had tried to limit the range of documents handed over during the pretrial process.
Ding ding ding. We need discovery.
We need discovery.
We need the emails and the text messages.
Instead, the bank has countersued Staley, arguing that he should be held responsible for JP Morgan's financial damages if a federal judge finds that the bank did benefit from its relationship with Epstein, which they may actually do.
The lawsuit also demands Staley pay back the wages he was paid from 2006 to 2012, Which could amount to tens of millions of dollars, according to Reuters.
You bet it amounts to tens of millions of dollars when you're in that position.
A six-year stint as the head of J.P. Morgan?
That's some cheese, everybody.
That's some cheese.
Lawyers claim Staley witnessed and participated in sex crimes at Epstein's residences and alleges he did not disclose this despite having a fiduciary duty to do so.
Staley was known to have shared a close relationship with Epstein over the years with the pair sometimes taking trips together.
Isn't that lovely? I believe that's Staley right there.
And Epstein on the other side.
There's Staley. They love each other.
Isn't that great? Yay.
In total, he is said to have exchanged roughly 1,200 emails with Epstein from his JPMorgan Chase account from 2008 through 2012 when Epstein had over $120 million in assets at the bank.
And while he was high-ranking J.P. Morgan executive, Staley is said to have visited Epstein in prison after his conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor in 2008.
And I wonder if it is even at the prison if those records exist or it was while Epstein was supposed to be in prison and instead just traveling around.
Just checking in and checking out.
Checking in and checking out.
Barely sleeping there.
Because That's what happens when you're part of the power structure.
But then again, it gets too far along.
They'll burn your ass like they burned his ass.
The twice committing suicide deal.
Staley has not been convicted of any crimes in relation to Epstein.
He left JPMorgan in 2013 and became CEO of Barclays in 2015.
He then resigned in 2021 to contest findings by regulators on his connection to Epstein.
The UK-based bank has now admitted that the recent allegations against the former CEO were serious.
Oh! Serious like his relationship to Les Wexner that apparently has been completely investigated and completely exonerated.
And guess who represented Les Wexner?
Alan Dirty Dershowitz.
The Dersh. And by the way, get your questions and comments in.
We may get some questions and comments in the first hour before we go to the premium portion of the broadcast.
I want to thank everybody who is coming over to the premium portion of the broadcast.
If you did so yesterday, you got to get a look at my mini documentary, Code Red, from several years ago that I really felt, first of all, was timely to play as of yesterday, but also asked some of the big questions that still have not been answered to this day, five years after making that film.
I just want to point that out.
Epstein, um, let's see.
Sorry, um, let's see.
In its lawsuit against J.P. Morgan filed in December, the U.S. Virgin Islands alleged the bank had a more than close-up view of Epstein's sex trafficking.
Yeah, don't say.
It also said the bank ignored obvious red flags relating to Epstein's accounts.
You don't say.
Epstein ran much of his criminal activities out of Little St.
James Island, a private island he owned off the coast of the St.
James Islands. The government further claimed that JP Morgan had more than enough exposure to Epstein's accounts to determine he was conducting criminal behavior in In their territory last week, Federal Judge Jed Rakoff allowed the lawsuit to proceed along with one brought by an alleged Epstein victim and another against Deutsche Bank for similar charges.
You gotta love that they're going after the banks.
It's the way to go. It's the way to go.
He also ordered JP Morgan to hand over documents containing communications involving Diamond and former General Counsel Steve Cutler from before 2006 when Epstein was first arrested.
Along with Diamond, other senior officials at the bank like Mary Erdos, the head of the bank's $4 trillion asset and wealth management business, are also expected to be deposed before the bank faces trial in both cases in October.
JP Morgan has been contacted for comment.
So this is something we are going to focus on.
We're going to continue to talk about because it is extremely important.
And remember, this is completely separate from From the Ghislaine Maxwell case, in which we're supposed to see a huge document dump of unsealed documents coming since February.
You know, when the...
We've got the list!
The documents are unlocked!
When all that bullshit has happened, okay?
So again, we focus on things that are a reality here.
Instead of things that are Johnny Nonsense.
And in that light, I want to play this election integrity piece.
Basically exposing...
How much of a fraud it would be to go fully on...
We already had our problems with mail-in ballots and ballot harvesting and the COVID-1984 nightmare.
Okay? And the idea that you can't say that there was any kind of election fraud if it was quote-unquote widespread election fraud.
There's no evidence of widespread election fraud.
So again, it's all semantics and bullshit.
In other words, we can have any level of corruption that we want.
We'll just say it's not widespread and we'll change the definition of that.
And then if you... We'll censor you because that's what we do because we set up a censorship program via all of social media over the years and really amplified that and took it to the next level pre-COVID 1984 nightmare in which we have a clip of the Atlantic Council.
Teaming up with Facebook on some of these issues.
But first, let's start with this piece exposing online election fraud and why we should never go to a system of email ballots.
Ever. Ever, ever, ever.
I'm going to simulate being a voter who's voting by email.
So the first thing that I have to do is I've filled out my ballot.
Now I'm going to write a message to the county clerk.
So this handy email alias that I also own is countyelectionclerk at gmail.com.
That's just who we're sending it to.
We're going to put a subject line, my ballot, and This is my ballot.
That's our text. Now what we're going to have to do is attach our ballot, and we're going to attach these three files.
The first page, a second page, and a signature page, which I'll show in just a sec.
So let's open those up.
Those are now attached, so that's good.
Now let's go check out what each of those pages has in turn.
So these are the three exact files that I just uploaded to the email.
The first page has instructions and a vote for Joe Smith and Bill Johnson.
Okay, so we're voting for Joe Smith and Billy Johnson.
The second page is reasonably inconsequential, but it just has another page to simulate a real ballot going over email.
That vote, we're voting for Bobby Lewis.
Bobby Lewis, yes.
And this third page is a signature affirmation page, basically.
So that's our page.
Now, all three of those same exact files are uploaded here to the email.
Okay, this is all normal so far.
This is all normal. They're in Boston.
Let's send it off. It's sent off to our county election clerk, whose email happens to be open here in Gmail on Firefox.
So at this point, we're simulating sending this to the election clerk.
Exactly. So the election clerk has just received an email here from our alias that we sent it from, and with subject line, my ballot, text body, this is my ballot, and it includes three images.
And the first page...
It shows that indeed our vote has been changed from Joe Smith and Bill Johnson to Mary Kane and Elizabeth Mark.
And that's where the money is.
The rest of the pages haven't changed.
They've just been attached to make it look like it was an email.
It's just exactly as it was sent, except for that one change here on the first page.
So you intercepted this email on this computer and then sent it on its way?
Yes, we intercepted this email on a mail server that we're running on this computer, though it doesn't have to be running on this computer.
And would you be able to do this remotely?
Yep. If you were to set up a mail server and spoof any computer to think that that's a valid mail server while in fact it's a malicious mail server, you could definitely get away with the same exact result.
So you have confidence that you could do this with almost any ballot being mailed by email?
Yes. You might have to edit the way you do this.
So some email connections are secured with TLS encryption and other forms of encryption.
Those would require different handling, but it's definitely not out of...
It's definitely the same level of ease to get those ballots hacked as well.
And are you going to show me a little bit how you did it?
How you intercepted the ballot?
If you want me to, it's very simple to show.
It's text, but basically we edit a configuration file.
This is one of the ways to see it.
What we did is we sent it from our email alias on this machine, and somewhere in here it'll show that it was filtered out.
Tell me what that is.
So that's just basically showing that we sent it to this email address here via the filtering mechanism.
And what does that filter do?
It runs a bash script on the email that switches out the vote placement, the placement of the check.
So that filter is a program that changes the dot from one...
The filter doesn't. The filter just enables us to run a bash script every time it catches an email that we want to edit.
So that filter is what grabs the email for you.
Okay, so once you grab the email, how do you change the dot?
So there are many ways to do that.
In this particular one, given the time constraint, all we did is we pre-knew the location of both dots, so we just swapped them around.
But in a real attack, you could use An image working toolset and an OCR toolset that are all free and open source to find maybe the political affiliation of a candidate or the candidate's name itself and swap a filled-in mark, which you can determine, into an empty blank and vice versa.
Did you do it in Photoshop? Like how did you do it?
We did it with a program called ImageMagick.
It's an open source Linux program.
So you did it manually?
The script did it automatically.
So we had to program, we had to give a set of commands that told ImageMagick exactly what to do, but ImageMagick took care of that.
Did you do it in bulk? Yes.
This is done in bulk.
I didn't touch anything as the email went through.
Did you do thousands? Yes.
We could send emails through this all day and they did the same exact thing to them.
It's right there. It's right in front of your face.
This isn't new, okay?
And it just...
First of all, I'm not saying that I could do these things, nor would I ever want to do these things.
I'm not a coder.
I'm not a hacker. But just the way the woman sits there and kind of tries to understand it and pick it apart with not much knowledge about the subject, right?
Like, she's like, wait a minute, so the filter did it?
No, no, no, no, no. I know the filter's grabbing everything.
Okay, so what, like Photoshop?
No, no, no, no, no. We have an automated program, image magic, that's doing it.
So one at a time, no, no, no, no.
All day, every day, thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, really millions if they wanted to.
That seems safe.
So with that, I wanted to play this clip of voter fraud being exposed.
Okay? And somebody who was supposed to have come in third in, I believe, a New Hampshire race won the race.
Oh, wow, that could never...
It happened. That could never happen.
That's conspiracy theory.
This is Michelle Long Spears' race.
She was initially declared third place, but she actually won, and she...
She figured out something was wrong.
There were precincts where there were actually zero votes recorded for her, and she found it very suspect, and she demanded that they recount the ballots, and it turned out that she had won the election.
These are just a few.
I don't even have time to go into all of the races that there are There's good data for where the machines counted incorrectly.
Antrim County, Michigan is a prime example.
There were 6,000 votes for Trump that were accidentally counted by the machine for Biden.
New Hampshire, there was a race where the machines actually counted incorrectly because there was a fold in the ballot.
So once again, not widespread voter fraud.
6,000 votes, that's not widespread.
You get it? No, they're accidents.
They're not features built in.
They're accidents.
Oh, everything's an accident.
Everything's incompetence.
Nothing's widespread.
Nothing's malicious.
We fortify elections.
We don't fix them.
The shadow of the fold made the machine think that the bubble was filled in when it wasn't, and the machines counted incorrectly.
So these are the types of things that just having these digital ballot images on hand can actually help us identify, I worry, I worry, How many of these races are we not knowing or do we not know about where the machines are counting incorrectly?
The ones that we've caught are usually where it's really obvious if there's tens of thousands of votes missing, but maybe it's a close race and we may not be catching it.
So that's one of the main reasons I'm advocating for the digital ballot images to be I think that it is going to increase confidence and accuracy.
And I think that we do not have nearly enough checks on the actual machines.
There are very few states, almost no states, that are actually auditing 100% of the ballots of 100% of the races.
I think Maryland is actually the only one right now.
And again, Jimmy Carter and the James Baker wanted like a 3% random audit of the machines.
We don't even have that.
We don't even have that.
And kudos to this person for stepping up to the plate and saying, hey, maybe we catch some of the more obvious ones, but we're not going to catch all of them.
Really? No kidding you're not going to catch all of them.
How about that?
Weird. Okay.
I'm going to shift gears, although I do have some Atlantic Council disinformation clips.
I've got Fauci talking about disinformation.
And I think in the premium portion of the broadcast, we're going to play the second half of that Alex Karp interview that we only got through the first 15 or 16 minutes of.
In light of the fact that Palantir is always going to be relevant.
Peter Thiel is continuing to be relevant.
Alex Karp, Bilderberg.
These are things, the security state, that constantly integrate to all these other topics.
But first, what I want to do is I want to address this really quickly because I think it needs to be addressed.
Now, first of all, Right away, what you do is you get the image that this is the shoe in the left.
Puma suede.
I've got a pair downstairs.
They're not black. They are maroon.
They are the exact shoe that you're seeing behind my head.
Now, the first thing I am going to say about this is...
One, this is 360p video.
360p video.
Okay, let's start there. Two, the flame end, and I'm not sure whether or not right here is plastic or reflective.
It almost doesn't even matter.
But you're looking at an above shot, okay?
And now we don't know whether or not a...
A shoelace might be hanging over.
We don't know whether or not there's a glare there.
And although it looks darkened, again, the shadow of the pants that are cuffed could also be causing that.
So when I see the videos, and they're so, so far away, and every other part of the shoe matches up with the shoe of the dead victim, Really, not a victim. They went in and killed kids.
But the people that the police shot, the soles are the same, the front ends are the same, and really the sides are more than likely the same.
That's just so far out and so compressed that you can't see it.
Now, I won't be surprised when more video comes out Perhaps you can see the flames.
But so many people I see posting this and just immediately it rang alarm bells in my head.
And by the way, I looked at it and I'm like, well that is odd.
And then I thought about it for a second and I looked at the angles and I went and I downloaded the videos.
And one of the things that I noticed when I downloaded them is again...
There was no real 720p version.
It was all 360p.
So you're talking about not even standard definition, which is 480p.
And I really think that's what we're seeing in that anomaly.
We're simply not seeing the details underneath the white stripe.
And as far as the white stripe not fitting the exact way that you would expect it, again, I think it's an angle...
And a compression thing, H.264 compression and illusion.
Everything points to this person being the person who did this from the manifesto to the fact they wanted to shoot kids in another school to the fact that they wanted to harm family members, etc.
And the fact that the person was clearly...
Mentally ill. Clearly mentally ill.
But again, you can't talk about that.
Oh, no, no, no, no.
In fact, just quickly, I want to go over this.
And then we're going to hit some of your questions and comments, by the way.
That's the next thing we're going to do. We're going to go down the line and do that.
No laughing matter. Biden is slammed for cracking a joke when asked his views on transgender school students' motive.
So, pretty repulsive, but here you go.
Do you believe that Christians were targeted at a Christian school?
I have no idea.
Okay, so do you believe that Christians were targeted at a Christian school where a former
student who renounced Christianity and put it as part of their motivation targeted Christians?
of course. Now, love or hate Josh Hawley, he said that that was the case.
And then the immediate knee-jerk Biden reaction of joking around because no one's ever going to hold his feet to the fire because he doesn't run anything because he's a zombie puppet.
He can barely stay awake during the day.
He has to stop himself from shitting himself in public.
Alright, but this is classic Joey B. This is I'm a partisan hack.
It's funny. Dead kids are funny.
I have no idea.
He said it's a hate crime.
I'm joking. I have no idea.
I mean pretty basic.
Pretty basic. And you don't have to be a Christian conservative to point that out at all.
Alright. Let's get to your questions and comments for the next 15 or 20 minutes or so.
Get them in. We'll see if we're able to scroll all the way down.
More than likely not. But then again, they jump big time.
I want to remind everybody to come on over to redvoicemedia.com slash Jason or redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
Sign up for the first week for only a dollar.
And it's 10 bucks a month.
Or lock it in for the year.
Lock it, lock it, lock it in for that year.
And what? It's $100.
You save $20. It's not just Jason Bermas.
It's not just Matt Couch.
It's not just Chad Canton.
It's Alicia Powell.
It's the Juice Bros. It's Ray Dietrich.
It's Drew Berquist.
And sooner rather than later, we're going to have an actual 12-hour lineup most of the day.
How many networks are kicking that jam out?
Not many, if any.
Props to them. Thumbs them up.
Subscribe, share. Hit that like button.
Tell people about the program.
Check out the alternatives.
Rockfin, Rumble, Band.Video.
We're on Bitchute. You name it.
We want more free speech, not less.
With that being said, let's do this.
You should go on ROTC Revenge of the Sis with Mersh and Royce.
Best show on YouTube and Rumble besides yours, of course.
Well, thank you. I've heard of Revenge of the Sis.
I don't know that I've ever been approached by those guys.
I've got a ton of requests right now to go on shows.
And they get just jumbled up in my...
You know, overly spammed email.
And then I don't catch up with a lot of people or I do them quickly and I forget them.
I just did a really good one with an individual overseas that I should...
Actually, a couple good ones with individuals overseas that I should post because they're not going to get the viewership.
In fact, maybe tomorrow in the second half of the program we'll post...
One of those videos. Remember we do it Monday through Thursday at 8 a.m.
That's 8 a.m. Eastern and we do that second hour starting at the next top of the hour.
Time for some Johnny Nonsense, you bet.
Notify me, notify you.
Good morning, Jason. There, you've been notified.
And by the way, if I've had people tell me they've been unsubscribed several times, they never get a notification, you've got to go over to the Rumble.
You know, 17,000 plus strong over at Rumble, and our videos are getting three times, three to four times, the number of views over at Rumble than they are on YouTube.
Period. They just are.
That's the way it is. Howdy friends.
Check, check. I'm about to eat my last mushrooms.
I was about to watch America's Untold Stories Operation Paperclip Part 2.
This better be good, Jason.
Well, I hope I didn't disappoint.
Because for me...
Watching documentaries on Operation Paperclip are extremely interesting.
I continue to do so.
Lots of World War II in color, Apocalypse Stalin, Apocalypse Hitler, Nazi blueprints.
A lot of American Heroes channel lately for this guy.
From the photo of Diamond, you can't help but notice his believe me eyes.
Oh, Jamie Diamond. My goodness.
It's a fascinating...
Contrarian Barbarian on AOC. It's a fascinating episode.
Good morning, folks, from FEMA Region 4, Old Hickory, Tennessee.
How we doing, Scott?
How we doing, Karen? There's more Epstein didn't kill himself.
Yes, there's plenty of evidence that Epstein did not kill himself.
Not another pumped-up kicks.
Nope. Best intro on YouTube.
Glad you like the intro.
Love the intro. Let's see...
Lots of good mornings.
Yes, we are in a distorted reality.
Hey, hey, I just happen to be awake at 5 a.m., so not an early riser usually, but I went to sleep super early.
We've been going to sleep super early over here.
Super early over here.
Yes, the leg is bent in the video backwards as somebody who got shot.
That is correct.
That is what we saw.
Period. That is exactly correct, Omundo.
I don't think anything was a deep fake.
Just pointing that out.
I agree with that.
They were dead. Yep.
Yes. Got lit up immediately.
Women are super flexible.
You should see how I can bend my legs.
Oh, Jenny Simone.
Ha ha ha. Yes.
Legs. But this is half of the leg at the knee part bent backwards.
I haven't seen the video, but I know there are positions people go in when their brain goes out.
Yes. I mean, again, you watch that.
It's a death position.
It's an oversauce.
Morning to the moderators.
Love them all. I love them too.
Getting in a flexible position and staying that way are different.
And again, it's not the leg at the hips.
It's the leg at the knee.
Tucker is absolute controlled opposition.
You know, that may be the case, and I don't love the China fear-mongering over there.
And look, this is a guy that has the most popular show on television, who's a multi-millionaire, who comes, you know, from a rich family, is a trust fund kid.
I'm not putting all my hopes and dreams in the tuck.
But... When the Tuckins continues to question 9-11, I have to give him props.
Period. When the Tuckins says, why did 9-11 happen?
Why can't we ask about Building 7?
I was wrong about the Iraq War.
Who else do we have that's even remotely close to that in the mainstream media?
And who else do we have in the mainstream media that's even close to that with an audience like Tucker?
We don't. We don't.
Period. Just saying.
It's not a real thing.
Killed by pronouns in school.
How ironic.
Good morning, contrarian, barbarian.
Okay. Yes, you can buy me coffees down below.
All the links to support the program are down below.
Controlled opposition is still useful 80-plus percent of the time.
Interesting. Staged event, as all of them are, Burmas.
No. No.
Sorry. See, the mindset that you have to think that every event is a false flag, or we're being lied to completely about it, or that people on psychotropic medications don't snap and kill other people, that's just not real. They're not all staged.
Okay? And I've said it from the beginning.
And I'll say it today, over a decade later, they killed kids at Sandy Hook.
They murdered them.
Kids died at Sandy Hook.
Okay? I've looked at it and done deep research on it.
Probably more than 99.99% of the population.
Maybe 99.99% of the population.
And look, people are entitled to believe whatever they want.
That doesn't mean that you're correct.
That doesn't mean that you're right.
And quite frankly, you kind of show your ignorance and bask in it by saying things like that.
But then again, the vast majority of those people that say those things are anonymous social media users.
They don't put their real name and their real face out there.
When you make a blanket statement about all events being staged events, that's a ridiculous statement.
Period. Period.
You've got to have discernment.
You've got to look at each event individually.
You have to look at the available evidence.
And then you have to look at the evidence that may be being suppressed.
Imagine that. Imagine that.
Time to go back and perform autopsies on all mass shooters.
We're going to find many sexual deviants.
Well, I think, once again, there was a time and a place in this country where that was obvious.
Where it was even in our mainstream entertainment.
You look at the Silence of the Lambs.
And I go back to the Silence of the Lambs many times.
Why? Because in that, you had the major killer being somebody that suffered from gender dysmorphia.
Or dysphoria.
Or whatever you want to call it.
I mean, that's where the tuck it in...
I'd F me. Would you F me?
I'd F me. Buffalo Bill.
And we forget about that.
Boy, that movie now. You like Silence of the Lambs and Anthony Hopkins and Jodie Foster?
You're a bigot. You're a bigot.
You hate trans people.
What? I don't know that there's any video of someone predicting Babbitt being shot on January 6th at all.
Building 7, a totally different story.
That is something, obviously, that there were...
Premeditated narratives that were set to go out via 9-11.
And yes, it's extremely egregious that the BBC on that day had said that the Solomon Brothers building, aka Building 7, had collapsed and it still took another 20 minutes.
And it's in the video behind the person.
So what that tells me is that, yes, someone got the memo, someone got the newswire, someone reported it too quick.
As far as CNN's super detailed article, I'd have to see the timestamp on it.
If you get an article up within the first hour of an event like that, that just means you have a quick writer.
Just saying. And then, as far as January 6th goes...
You can watch me interviewing Whitney Webb prior to January 6th and talking about what may or may not happen there.
And Webb did a great job of talking about how it was more than likely going to be a trap, which it was, and that they wanted a type of protest and resistance that they could exploit, which they did.
Whitney Webb didn't have any insider information on that either.
She was just looking at the scenarios that were all around us.
Let's see. Five o'clock shadow ban says he should have Jason on his show.
You should go on. Okay, you've already said that.
They reported that the shooter had emotional issues and was being treated by a doctor.
I would consider that mental health problems.
Once again, if you look at the New York Post article, they were trying to say there was no history of mental illness.
It doesn't make a lot of sense, does it?
Again, I think you look at this, you're going to find out this person was on hormones and SSRIs.
And that's why Tucker had the most important segment on it yesterday of all.
And look, to Tucker's credit, the week before, he was talking about, or just days before, it wasn't even the week before, it was like Monday, he was talking about transgender ideology pushing guns and violence.
And then this happens.
I mean, that one podcast that was put out by NPR talking about this, just like really bizarre.
Really, really bizarre.
I like Paul Joseph Watson's breakdown on the she wanna have a he dangler murderer.
Don't know. Didn't see it.
Nah, there are actually some bad players with mental issues that do bad things.
Correct. Thank you.
Thank you for that, Scott. We appreciate it.
NDA are, as far as I'm concerned, admissions of a cover-up.
Dirty derch. Go back and watch the senator's speeches on January 6th, or the 6th of January.
I watched it live on my TV while PC screen had smoke and scan with split screens and a police camera.
There's no way they rewrote the speech's setup.
I mean, the setup's a definite possibility.
We're less than 10 minutes away from premium.
Remember, you can listen to the whole thing for free live over at Podbean, the Info Warrior channel.
That's made available every single day.
Look, the premium's out there if you don't want to pay for it, if you just want to listen to it.
Really? I like Kim Iverson.
She was with The Hill for a while.
I'm not sure if she went back there.
Doing a lot more independent things.
Blew up pretty quickly. Let's just be honest.
It's a lot easier for an attractive female to blow up in this space than it is for the average Joe.
Looks matter. I'm rough.
I mean, look at me. I mean, I don't look as terrible today.
At least we put a little gel in my hair.
But the grays are popping. You know, there's no makeup on the face.
The imperfections are showing.
And Iverson in particular has gone farther than many.
But not far enough on some.
And I do appreciate the position on Fauci.
For those that don't know... Fauci was set to appear on the hill and they essentially told her not to show up that day because they feared that she would ask some real questions of Anthony Fauci.
And that kind of brought an end to that relationship.
Good. Stand up for your principles.
We need more people to do that.
Let's see. Nobody under 30 for a thousand miles.
I regret having had dinner with him.
That is Bill Gates' quote.
Old lady is code for 13-year-old.
That's the Dershowitz talk.
Apparently, I was the only one watching and listening to the Senator's speeches on the 6th of January.
Even Rand Paul was in on it.
They all were, describing the events of that day in detail.
How did they know?
Well, you've got to send me some links.
My DMs are open.
I remember, Jenny...
It was a membership 800 number.
Not sure what we're talking about there.
I know that AOS Jackson has apparently retracted a bunch of his statements.
Okay, someone noticed.
YouTube channel is dark journalist about Steve Bannon and mystery schools.
Don't know what that means.
Have some context, Lena Edwards.
Did you know Marlon Brando was Superman's dad?
Big fan of the Superman series, Richard Donner films.
Yes, I did. Yes, let's get those thumbs up.
Five minutes away from the premium portion of the broadcast where we're going to play a little...
Disinfo Fauci.
Some Atlantic Council disinfo and the rest of the carp.
Got my thumb, Jason.
Sorry for my Etch-A-Sketch memory.
That's alright. Derpity derp derp derp.
Love those derps. Jamie Dimon, friend of Epstein.
Weird. He has been so good for everyone.
Let's see.
What do we got? See, Jenny, this shows that you need to get a grip on reality.
I'm sorry, and I'm not trying to be mean to you, but Epstein is dead, and yes, Ghislaine Maxwell is in prison.
So let me repeat that for you.
Epstein is a dead man, okay?
His face was blue and purple.
The photographs are real.
People were at the autopsy that then questioned the actual autopsy and blew the whistle on the fact that it appeared that he was strangled and murdered and did not kill himself after an incident where they said he tried to commit suicide but then he told his lawyer that Nicholas Tartiglione an accused quadruple murderer and ex-cop had attacked him.
Now you can ignore those things But that's reality.
And you can ignore the pictures of Ghislaine Maxwell in prison.
But that's reality. You can ignore the video conferences she's now done with 60 Minutes in the prison while 60 Minutes is sitting there with her brother.
But that's reality.
Reality happens.
You can't dismiss it.
It's not malleable.
Now on the other end, you're allowed to believe whatever fantasy you want.
But I'll say it again. Epstein is dead.
There is no list.
And Ghislaine Maxwell is in prison.
Okay? Ghislaine Maxwell does not have a body double either.
There's no evidence of that at all.
Now, was there some chicanery when she was on the run with the pictures and things like that?
Sure. But what you're saying isn't real.
Okay? Okay?
It's not real. You need to take a step back, look at the real evidence, and have some discernment.
Can we get 200 thumbs up, by the way?
Can we get this one out there?
This isn't over until Les Wexner, at least.
We just have to pray they go there.
They're not going to Les Wexner.
Wexner's been pretty exonerated, and Wexner is not a bank.
As far as I know, the Virgin Islands isn't going after Wexner.
They should be. My sister was a high-level PA at a big law firm in WPB. She won't talk.
He didn't have much De Niro as much as he had muchos resources.
It's like Fed evidence they have at their disposal.
Money means nothing to the Satanists.
Well, it's controlling the resources that actually matter.
Let's see. They found a woman serving life in prison, probably for murder, and offered her a deal...
Again, what you're saying here is totally made up.
It has no basis in reality, Jenny.
You're just posting that.
There is no woman that they found to be a body double of Ghislaine Maxwell.
That's not real.
That's not real.
And if you think that is real, you probably need to take a step back.
You need to go outside, get some fresh air, some sunlight, go over some thoughts in your head, and try to work out why you believe that.
Don't get me wrong, we've been lied to about a lot of things.
And a lot of things are part of a facade.
But I assure you, Ghislaine Maxwell was in court in New York, was in jail there, lost the case, And is currently in prison.
That's all real.
Okay? That's all reality.
And that's why this is Reality Rants.
So folks, on your way out, I'm going to give the cue to the producer as we are getting ready to go over to the other side.
I want to thank Fadista for the $5 tip over on the Rockfin.
But we're going to start leaving these and we're going to start with...
YouTube, YouTube, I love you.
You know, I take the questions and comments over there.
I hope you appreciate it.
And I hope you appreciate that we try to stay on course and in the realm of truth.
Not Johnny Nonsense.
Not made up.
Just total disinfo.
Not heroes on message boards.
Not Q and Nonsense.
Not body doubles and false flags and deep fakes all the time.
No, we're in a place called reality.
So YouTube, we'll see you later.
Goodbye, Rockfin.
Export Selection