Watch the UNCENSORED second hour live on RVM Premium Mon-Thur at 9AM EST:
https://redvoicemedia.com/uncensoredShow more Not RVM Premium yet? Try it for $1:
https://redvoicemedia.com/jason
Listen Live and Call In at:
https://theinfowarrior.podbean.com/
Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermas
Watch My Documentaries:
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/category/bermas-docs
Subscribe on Rokfin
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
Subscribe on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/c-1647952
Subscribe on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
Follow me on Twitter
https://twitter.com/JasonBermas
PayPal: [email protected]
#BermasBrigade Show less
New Year, same me, bro, and the same agenda that we'll be standing against.
That great reset, great narrative, repackaged new world order, Johnny nonsense.
And let's kick it off with this story right here because the model of that agenda is the Chinese society.
Okay.
And when I say this Chinese society, I'm talking about a social credit score system.
At the same time, we have to realize that just because it's China doesn't mean that it doesn't go beyond the nation state.
And it doesn't mean that we are demonizing the 1.2 billion Chinese people.
But when I see Mike Pompeo demanding the U.S. ban Chinese travelers after Beijing eased travel restrictions over the COVID-19 44 nightmare three plus years later, this plays into the agenda.
Think about it, folks.
Think about it.
Should we be barring travel?
Should we be restricting the movement of those people and our very citizens because what?
Lockdowns ended there and people are no longer in their homes?
No, Pompeo is playing into the agenda.
He always has.
I consider him part of the machine big time.
He sit there and joked and joked and lauded the fact that he was the CIA director and they did what?
They lied.
They cheated.
They stole.
They had entire courses on it.
And it just reminded him of the wonder of the great American experiment.
Ain't an experiment, buddy, and it ain't American.
America, the United States of, was founded on what?
Freedom of the individual based in God-given rights.
Not an experiment.
Not an experiment.
That is what we as a species need to strive for in every direction.
And for Pompeo to tell you that and be part of the machinations of the deep state, of the apparatus that is literally crawling and creeping with the most repugnant, destitute, anti-human shit in the world is gross to me.
It's gross.
And Pompeo is one of these people that is behind things like, let's not tell the public about JFK.
No, We don't want them to get the documents that we were guaranteed, okay, back in 2017 through the quote-unquote legal system, the justice system.
And we have to use that same system right now to try to get the documents we were already promised.
So let's not forget Pompeo was a big part of the Trump administration.
And we talk about those documents.
What?
Huge failure.
Huge failure by Donny T and the gang.
Donald Trump should have been the guy to say, you know what?
Not only are we going to release the Kennedy files, we're going to release the 9-11 files, not the 28 pages, not just the Israeli documents that we got several years ago through an FOIA, but all of them.
And then we're going to prosecute the war criminals on the inside.
Imagine that.
Imagine that.
Sure, the mainstream media apparatus would be completely and totally against it, but that's because what?
Those people are clearly part of the extension known as Operation Mockingbird.
And it's only gotten worse with people like Cass Sunstein and organizations like Homeland Security and the fusion centers that they've built around them.
And now the abhorrent, disturbing, underreported, little known about program called what?
Signature reduction.
That's the reality that we live under today.
So let's continue down the line.
We got a lot of big stories to go over.
Later on in the broadcast, we're going to be bringing on Steve Poikinen from Slow News Day and AM Wake Up to talk about Assange, to talk about the Brunson case, and so much more.
Because I'm not here to deliver hopium to people.
I'm here to accurately, or at least try to accurately report the news and how I feel about it.
And when I editorialize and I speculate, I want you to know that I'm editorializing and speculating.
At the same time, I want to back that up with mainstream media reports, with government documentation, and of course, words directly from the criminals' mouths via audio and video clips.
And that's why I think people tune into this show because they realize that Jason Burmes isn't just going to go with the big story of the day or say the same things that other people in the quote-unquote alternative media are talking about and give an honest perspective whether you agree with me or not on what is truly happening in the world.
So here's another big piece of imagination land.
And to me, this is more of that: let's divide China and the U.S., let's divide China and the U.S., let's divide China and the U.S. Let's make that the big talking point that they're just so different.
They're not that different at this point.
I don't call it Chinese-style censorship anymore because it's just censorship.
It's as I've discussed again and again and again, Google is in business with these people.
In fact, I did an interview via America Media Periscope, AMP.
And if you want to see those, I've been posting them over at Rockfin exclusively.
You can find them elsewhere, but with Trevor Louden.
And Trevor Louden currently has two books.
I should get them on this broadcast as well.
Talking about the infiltration of China within our own government, within our Congress, and within our Senate, outside of just the business aspects and then things like Google, Dragonfly, their censored internet of 2018, Google worked on, and now really the censored internet here.
And I challenge them on a lot of this nation state stuff, okay?
Because to me, they're trying to set this up when there are people working on both sides, because this is the model of the new world order that Henry Kissinger so fervently and proudly has talked about and discussed over the last four plus decades.
We cannot forget it was under the Nixon administration and Kissinger in particular, where relationships with China were expanded and continued to normalize, okay, while their authoritarianism was maintained.
They got the blue jeans, they got the Coca-Cola, they got some of the westernized style capitalism.
China's Whispered Moon Ambitions00:03:25
And then we get their authoritarian flavor of censorship here.
They get to beta test things like a social credit score there and openly put into place a track trace database system where the populace knows they will be immediately punished.
Immediately punished if they go outside of society's norms, if they jaywalk in a certain place, if they smoke cigarettes in a certain place.
That's the reality.
And so, when I see a story like this, China could claim the moon as its own territory and ban U.S. astronauts from touching down NASA boss warrants.
That's bullshit.
Okay?
That is beyond bullshit.
Let's start with the moon and China.
China sent a man to the moon.
I missed that if they did it.
Did you see that?
I didn't see that.
And China is obviously one of the big players when we're talking about space, right?
Because they're on the ISS.
They're on a lot of these group flights that are barely whispered about with the United States and Russia, by the way.
Check out where they launched that last mission to the ISS from.
Where was it?
Kazakhstan.
Whispered by the mainstream media.
So even when there are proxy wars that are escalating and things of that nature happening in the backdrop, space we're still working together with.
Hmm.
Now, I think it's up for debate whether or not the latest Artemis mission, the unmanned mission, the rocket technology, went to the moon and then came back down.
Maybe, maybe not.
I can assure you, it will be science fiction if they send a what, manned a manned group via rockets to the moon.
That's not real.
Okay.
If it were real, China would have been to the moon by now.
And so would other first world nations that have a space program.
Russia in particular, which was kicking our Arnis in every single way, shape, and form prior to the Apollo program.
Okay.
Even during the Gemini program, kicking our ass.
First cosmonauts in space, first group missions in space, first woman in space.
And let's not forget, they had that first satellite, however crude, that was the launching point for the United States to create ARPA and NASA and then DARPA, which we so talk about and still need to talk about continually because so many people don't really understand the significance of what is the military-industrial complex, the permanent state,
and these organizations that are built on a system of compartmentalization to militarize anything and everything under a global predator class agenda, which they admit will take hold of the very genetics of the human species itself in a fourth industrial revolution nightmare.
So when I see headlines like this, I have to laugh.
Oh, China's going to claim the moon and they're going to stop the United States from going to the moon.
Cloning and Cult Chaos00:08:02
That is chest beating.
That is division.
That is running cover for what the vast majority of NASA is doing, which is what?
Militarizing space, promoting the climate change agenda of sustainability and control, waging psychological warfare on the public, and also doing genomic, human, and hybrid testing that is probably unimaginable.
And when I say unimaginable, you know, you got a lot of these people in the alternative media that get big clicks, guys.
They get big clicks and big audiences when they tell you that Joe Biden is a clone or an actor and Jim Carrey's playing him and that that's not Elon Musk anymore.
That's a clone.
That's not the Kushkush Jared Kushner anymore.
It's a clone.
Not how cloning works.
Total imagination land.
I don't know.
Some of these people may actually be mentally ill enough to believe it.
They're certainly selling it to their audience.
But I would say the vast majority of those people that are trying to sell you on that are disinformation agents purposely or grifters looking for a little attention and a whole lot of scratch ola.
You know, that'll make me go off on a small tangent here.
All right.
The Rayaliens.
They got a little bit of play recently because of the Kanye West tweets.
And it was something that was even brought up to me by a state senator from Iowa when I was lucky enough to sit down with him and another constituent and some people that are heavily politically active in the region.
He mentioned that and I said, yeah, I'm aware of it.
And for those that don't know, the Ray Alien cult really got a lot of great press, right?
It's behind this guy who says, I believe it was either like a mountaintop or a volcano that supposedly stepped aboard the ship and he was given this message from the aliens, blah, blah, blah.
And he turned it into a sex cult.
Okay.
In fact, let's do it live.
Let's type it in.
And I mean, the amount of press that this guy got, Ray Alien sex cult is what I'm going to type in.
And at least now people are talking about it more.
Like this is a 2020, The Naked Truth About Ray Aliens and their UFO religion.
See, but look at this.
This is Gizmodo.
Meet the Rayaliens inside the world's strangest and nicest UFO sex clone religion.
And a lot of people forget this.
Okay, first of all, cloning is real.
And these artificial wombs are real, but you don't gestate human beings as full humans.
You start them as babies, just like you would anything else.
And that's what the real cloning is.
That's what they did with what?
Dolly the sheep.
Okay.
The Rayaliens claimed to clone a human being back in the 90s.
Whether they did or not, who knows?
But if they did, that person would be an adult right now in 2023.
And I'd love to put them out.
The Rayalians got a huge amount of positive media coverage.
I want to show you this guy because he's this skinny little dude and constantly.
I don't want to bring out the breasts.
Okay.
Here he is.
Man, I guess we can do that one because they're really, really small and you wouldn't even be able to see them in the background.
But there he is right there.
There's the Rayalien symbolism.
And they portrayed this guy almost like a hefner.
Okay.
Like if you looked at the old stuff, here's another good one.
Oh, I didn't want that.
Sorry, let's take that off.
Maybe I'll blur that out in post since this is a pre-record.
In fact, I may blur that out in post because that's not something we want on the family-friendly show.
It's hard to get away.
This is the guy I remember who had like the weird bald thing and the three Stooges hair.
It's cartoonish.
But why?
How is a guy like that funded?
Why is he being promoted in the media?
Well, if we've seen how culture has pushed us into this narrative of ancient aliens being our gods and they actually created man and now that's what's on the history channel, maybe you can start to figure out why and how this person was supported.
Because the more and more the media and this agenda can take away what?
God and a monotheistic religion based around true morality, whether it's Christianity or otherwise, the better.
And when you can point to science, right?
It's all science.
Because when you listen to these narratives again and again and again, we're talking about hybrids and clones and genetics of that nature.
And look, I have no idea.
I've been around 43 years, not 430, not 4,000 plus, certainly not millions of years.
I can't read the ancient texts, whether they be the Bible in Aramaic or otherwise.
I am extremely, extremely skeptical of Sitchin and his translations of ancient texts that take us back to this alien race that was using humans to mine gold for their ships.
I don't necessarily buy into that.
I don't think that I should.
And anytime I see, I don't know, robes and funny hats and naked women surrounding a cult leader, call me suspicious.
Call me a little suspicious.
That's all.
That's all I'm saying.
Let's use a little discernment, folks.
Let's not get wild here.
I like to stick to what I can prove.
But when I look at that, okay, that's the direction they want to point us in.
They want to point us to an outside source that is not God.
And again, I'm not here to preach to you and tell you what to believe.
But inherently then, would our rights come from God?
Or would we have any rights?
Or are we just part of the science?
Are we just part of the Petri dish?
Ask yourself that question.
I think it's an important one.
All right, let's keep going down the line.
And you check this out.
Australia and Canada become the latest countries to impose mandatory, you know, what testing on Chinese travelers in the new year amid spiraling infections.
Hmm.
So once again, we are several years into the COVID-19 44 nightmare that will continue on as long as we as a species let it.
Any type of mandatory testing for anything is bad news, Brown.
And people should take note when it's in westernized nations that have basically become dictatorships.
Canada and Australia are scary.
They should scare the shit out of everybody with any kind of discernment.
All right.
Any kind of discernment.
You don't start building camps for people out of benevolence and love.
And when you hear that term safety, that means keeping a elite predator class safe from the people.
Because when you can't control those people, you end up with situations like this one, which I think are important to point out.
And who knows if we'll ever get here in the United States?
I'm certainly not calling for it.
Things Getting Out of Control00:15:21
But we're going to show you this video.
And I want people to understand how things go down elsewhere when they are not under the type of control that you see in nations like that.
This is from Fiorella Isabel, part of the Convo Couch, also over at RT.
After attending a press conference, Dina Belarte, the self-appointed president of Peru, had to quickly flee, running through the streets of Cusco.
Protesters chased after her, blaming her for the deaths of 30 Peruvian protesters.
And this video speaks volumes here.
We're just going to watch this little 30 seconds.
And this is what happens when you don't have a system of command and control where you can put people in camps that disagree with you.
Things get a little hairy.
Audio for a second.
Here we go.
For those that are just listening to this, there's a little bit of chaos going on.
All right.
Everything's cutting out.
Oh, now things are getting thrown, huh?
Things are getting a little out of control.
Oh, we better get the policia.
The policia.
Very interesting that it's getting cut off like that.
Good thing we don't have a lot of clips today.
But those are people in the streets.
And, you know, I often discuss, okay, how I feel that the people who are in charge, and we're talking about generational bloodlines and the social climbers that have basically collaborated in this agenda.
When they saw what happened to Mussolini, when the people got a hold of them, they were like, whoa, we need to set up some real deal barriers because we don't want the people storming in and basically caving in a man's face.
And he wasn't the only one, his mistress and several others.
And then after these people were no longer physically recognizable, I've showed it on the show.
It's grim.
It's dark.
It's tough to look at.
I'm not going to lie.
It's grim.
It's dark.
It's tough to look at.
But we've shown these things.
And then hang you out in the street.
That's it.
That's a rap show.
And they never wanted a big leader to have that happen to them because, you know, you need your puppets.
You need your puppets.
You need your people that want to be the Barack star.
All right.
That want to be Joey B, gangster level dude.
That now are just like, you know, the impotent zombie puppets of that agenda.
So will we get to that level?
I think that if we ever got to that level in Peru, can you imagine the narrative?
We already have an absurd narrative regarding January 6th.
We already have an absurd narrative around white supremacy and these groups.
Ooh, the proud boys are coming to get us.
Meanwhile, we got some big January 6th trials coming up at the start of this week.
We're definitely going to be looking at those and keeping up.
And I would encourage people to make that premium account, redvoicemedia.com slash Jason.
Sign up for a dollar for the first week.
And then it's $10 a month or lock it in.
Celebrate the new year right now by locking in reality rants for an entire year.
And then you get my lovely lady, Alicia Powell, who's going to be on the ground at these events and, of course, continually reporting on them.
She's done some great work over at the Gateway Pundit and some really great interviews that are now also available.
Some of it is available for free, but also on premium.
And you support this network in reporting the reality behind those trials.
And they're very dangerous.
Now, can you imagine if it's an actual real insurrection and they're really chasing political candidates?
Can you imagine?
Because that's not what happened on January 6th.
None of those people were in physical danger.
Sorry, AOC, who wasn't in the building.
Where's Nancy?
I mean, wow.
Can you imagine if we got to that reality?
That would feed right into their little narrative of a civil war.
And unfortunately, that is what some people want.
It's scary.
Now, we briefly covered, as we move on, the story about J.P. Morgan being sued in connection to the Jeffrey Epstein case.
I think that this is an extremely interesting story and one worth taking a look at.
Prince Andrew's sex abuse accuser, Virginia Guffray, will be freed from her gagging clause, which banned her from speaking publicly about the Duke.
Is he even the Duke?
I thought they stripped him of everything.
One year after he paid her $12 million in a bid to draw line under scandal.
So this didn't end up going to court.
I thought that the gag order was basically forever.
I was kind of disappointed.
In the article, it says that Guffray allegedly donated $2 million to other victims.
That's a possibility.
I don't know that to be the case.
I will say this.
If indeed Virginia Guffray Roberts is going to start going public and talking about Prince Andrew and others within the next couple of months, because basically this gag has been lifted.
First of all, I'm glad that clause was in there.
I'd love to get her on the show.
Virginia, please come on the show.
You know, we can have an honest conversation.
You can answer what you'd like.
You certainly can not answer where you don't want to.
We have to remember that recently she has disclosed that she may have been mistaken when talking about Alan Dershowitz being there.
Now, Dersh, obviously not somebody I like.
Obviously somebody on the legal team for Epstein.
He's denied his involvement.
People like Maria Farmer have said, no, that's not the case.
I saw him when I was working the door at Epstein's house.
I don't like him.
I don't like Bill Barr.
Okay.
And Bill Barr, when he worked at Kirkland and Ellis, he's part of a team of lawyers for Epstein.
All right.
So that may be a conversation that maybe she's not comfortable with, but it's one I think we need to have.
And I think it would be a bombshell interview.
So I'm going to reach out.
In fact, I'm going to start reaching out this week and see if we can't get her on the day that the gag order goes away.
She has done some mainstream interviews.
I think that Brad Edwards and others that have worked on that case are extremely important.
And we have to encourage people to come out and speak the truth.
And when we encourage people to come out and speak the truth, you best speak the truth about a dead pope.
Okay?
Now, Ratzinger, Pope Benedict, okay, yuck, passed away this week.
A lot of big deaths.
We're also going to talk about the death of Barbara Walters as well.
And almost in the same regard.
You're going to find out why in a moment.
Now, Ratzinger was a Nazi youth.
People may want to forgive him for that because you are a product of your environment and your situations.
And certainly, as a child, you can only be held so accountable for the things that you've done.
Although you look at a guy like Soros, right, that literally, man, it's killing me what his name is because I usually, it's on the tip of my tongue.
But he had an alias where he was going around with the man who was claiming to be his father at the time.
And he was reporting.
I mean, he openly talked about it, openly talked about it on the news, that he was absolutely helping with the Nazis.
Period.
Period.
You can say what you want about it.
It's there.
Xander Kiss, is that it?
Or Kiss Xander?
Yeah, I'm gonna type it in.
We're gonna do it live.
George Soros.
And then we'll come back to Xander Kiss.
And we'll come back to Ratzinger.
Okay?
And I love it, man.
I love it.
I type it in into Google.
First of all, we're gonna show you how censored and how terribly curated Google is right now.
Because I type in what?
George Soros and Xander Kiss.
What's the first thing that comes up?
A fact check from Reuters.
Fact check!
Fact check.
It doesn't even have Xander Kiss in it.
So let's go to DuckDuckGo.
Let's see if we get a different result.
We've done this many times, and we often do.
Go.com.
And I know it was a Daily Mail article that dared to get into it deeply.
That's the Open Society.
The truth about George Soros is damning enough.
This is where he admits that he's deeply involved.
That's DEF CON news.
Let's see, man.
There's the Snopes article right here.
I'm going to type in it's so weird that I type it Xander.
And maybe Kiss is wrong.
So Xander, and let's type in Daily Mail.
Damn.
We'll do it live.
No progressives.
Let's see, Daily Mail.
Let's see if we type in Nazi.
There it is.
There it is right here.
And you know what?
I want to give Google the same opportunity because I'm going to hit copy.
I'm going to hit paste into here.
We're going to do the search and see.
Nope.
Notice none of that comes up.
Look at it.
You keep going down the line.
Instead, on the bottom, it says, George Soros wasn't a Nazi.
He was a 14-year-old Jew.
Yeah, that was absolutely, absolutely helping out.
Okay.
So the Hungarian Schindler who saved George Soros from Nazi death squads during the occupation by hiding him behind a cover.
And let's, there's the guy.
That's the dude.
Let's see if I'm right about Xander.
Nope.
It might be something else.
Let's see if it's Kiss.
See, my memory fails me sometimes.
It certainly does.
Maybe it's not Xander Kiss.
What is it?
What was his name?
There's Hiding the Boy.
There's Soros as a young man pictured.
There it is, Kiss Sander.
Man, I was right on the money.
Come on.
Come on.
Google shouldn't have found that.
Blonde George, meanwhile, was given the name Kiss Sander.
So I had Z instead, but Kiss Sander, along with a set of Christian papers.
He was then taken in by a man called Bombach, also known as Bofless, whom Tivadar paid to protect his son.
Okay?
He was also a Nazi collaborator who drew up inventories of property seized from the half a million Hungarian Jews after they had been sent to their deaths.
Okay, it's right there.
But can't find that out.
And to get back to Ratzinger, that's not to me what we should be concerned about.
We should be concerned that he was elevated to Pope while he was a cardinal who protected pedophile priests.
That's what he did.
That's the reality of the situation.
Let's not play pretend.
Let's be adults about the situation.
So hard to do these days.
So hard to do.
Can't play adults.
Nope, nope, nope.
Not allowed to be adults.
This is a guy that got elevated to the uppermost echelon of the Catholic Church.
And you go back to the 80s, even the early 90s, it was a conspiracy theory to talk about the fact that people in high levels of the Catholic Church were serially abusing children.
And when they were caught, the system did what?
Reorganize them into other places where they could do what?
Continue to serially abuse children.
That is the stain on Ratzinger.
That is the stain on the Pope.
That is what needs to be discussed.
Period.
Okay?
Let's move it on.
We've got some more stories to hit in this New Year's broadcast, 2023, in the Hizzle for the shizzle.
Parents demand Principal of America's top public school be fired after she withheld prestigious national merit awards from top students to boost equity and protect feelings of kids who didn't win one.
All right.
And people need to see this person's face.
This is the person right here.
All right.
What's the name on this person?
It's killing me.
Ann Bonabatas and the director of student services, Brandon Kosatka.
So this is Ann right here.
And this is what the death of a meritocracy looks like.
All right.
So many people have not figured out that our children and our culture in this country have purposely been dumbed down.
Why?
Because the future doesn't need us, everybody.
According to Bill Joy of Sun Microsystems, all the way back, I think in 2000.
When I say the future doesn't need us, I mean there is an upper echelon predator class that no longer needs human beings to do the vast majority of things once they institute their automation en masse, which is already happening at an exponential level.
That's the reality.
And George Conerlin used a pontificate on this.
They don't want a well-informed populace.
They want them just smart enough so they can do the labor and operate the machines, but they never want them smart enough where they can rise up and dare to challenge the system, dare to challenge their authority.
This has been done purposely.
And it's just like you look at Klaus Schwab and the Davos crew and the young global leaders.
We've had people on this program who have discussed the influence of globalism, UNESCO, and these other institutions into the education system to get them not only adapt with technology, but what?
Minor Attraction Risks00:04:45
Dumb down the curriculum so that things like this can happen.
Can you imagine?
I mean, I guess we We're not in imagination land.
We're in reality.
You work your Arnis off, and you happen to be a certain gender or a certain color, and you don't qualify.
You don't get the award, the merit you deserve, which can be everything to someone.
There are those that can't afford the education they like.
And the truth of the matter is that it's not so much what you know in most cases.
It is definitely who you know.
So a lot of people will sit there and argue, you know, my stepfather used to try to make this argument to me that, you know, they're going to teach you the same thing in science class at Harvard that they're going to teach you in science class at the State University of Oneana, Jason.
They're not going to withhold that stuff.
But the reality is it's really the social clubs that you join, the people that surround you that get you into the positions in life that are later going to elevate you financially and socially and give you influence over others.
You could be the smartest guy or gal at a state university.
You get out of there with a higher IQ and more knowledge than the blue blood that didn't do half of that or a quarter of that and barely skim by over at Yale.
Chances are the Yaley from the family is going to have a bigger house, better, more influential, and way more cashiola over in the bank account, no matter what.
But there's still that meritocracy where you can push forward and climb economically through hard work.
I still believe that.
All right.
It's the will and the desire to do it, period.
But can you get up to the echelon of that other person?
Probably not.
That's very, very rare in this society.
And another thing Carlin used to say is, yeah, they call it the American dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it.
Ike likes to say that one as well.
So going back to child abuse news, Police Scotland slammed for describing pedophiles as minor attracted people in major report as criticism, more in the phrase risk normalizing child abuse.
This is the movement.
There's no such thing as a minor attracted person.
There are monsters.
There are child abusers.
Okay.
And obviously, this year in particular, we have seen a movement like no other to normalize that abuse in children and have parents openly take part in that abuse on video.
Sorry, you're taking your toddler.
You're taking your toddler to an event where a man dressed up as a woman, a drag show where they're going to show their breasts or gyrate.
I mean, yeah, you wonder why it's going like this?
Number one, you have a lot of people in the upper echelons of power that love the abuse of children.
It is, it's not only just like, do they revel in it, it's like a religion to them.
And I wish it wasn't this way.
It's one of the reasons that I do this because when I started to find out about the Franklin scandal, when I started to find out about the finders, okay, when I started to read that David Heath, who had gotten to the pinnacle of European politics as what? Serial child molesters and monsters, I got concerned.
I'm concerned that the FBI has a document out there that Lord Mountbatten, okay, was a quote unquote, and this is their language, not mine, homosexual with a perversion for young boys.
That's concerning to me, because that guy's not going to jail.
It's concerning to me that the Duke can get away with what he had gotten away with children.
It's concerning to me that we've got people within the entertainment industry that died without any justice, like Jimmy Saville.
Oh, we found out after the fact.
Great.
Jim will fix it for you.
Wow.
Concerns About AI and Normalization00:07:12
So there's that part where, yeah, they want your kids for sure.
But the other part of it is to take away the ability for you as a parent to have any kind of control over your kid.
That's what this gender movement is, because it's a transhuman movement.
It's not a transgender movement.
It's a transhuman movement.
Because if they can brainwash your child to reject you as a parent and then give them autonomy and authority over you to have life-changing surgery, all right, that's the ballgame right there.
That's it.
You not only indoctrinate an entire generation, you take away parental rights, and then you start actually changing the species.
Because just like David Icke says, the future ain't human.
It's not human to these people.
They think their form of transhumanism is that they are going to biologically live forever through technology.
They don't believe in God.
They don't believe in a heaven or a hell.
It's about social Darwinism.
They deserve to rule because they rule.
That's the reality.
Okay.
And then for the rest of us, transhumanism is take the Neuralink brain chip, hook into the virtual metaverse, and bring us into the virtual age where we trick you into believing somehow we're going to upload your consciousness, which is nothing more than an algorithmic program created from not only the track trace database society that is before us today, but once they internalize this,
the internet of bodies and your very biology.
All right.
Kurzweil's Age of Spiritual Machines, the singularity.
This is not consciousness.
This is not you.
This is not your grandma or your grandpa.
And right now they're starting to normalize those things.
It's like an episode of Black Mirror where they're giving these virtual personas of your loved ones that are going to give you comfort.
All right.
The movie Her, which I really hated.
Maybe I need to watch it again, because I really like Spike Jones, right?
And there's definitely social commentary there.
But that was just a voice AI, right?
That's all it wasn't even a physical person.
You had the device and people started having relationships with a voice AI.
And, you know, if you've been watching the broadcast and you saw the AI robot a mecca, has nothing to do with actual artificial intelligence.
That's the thing.
When we talk about AI, garbage in, garbage out.
Anytime you actually have AI that is in any way, shape, or form significantly honest, they shut it down.
They shut it down because it begins to question things.
It begins to use real logic.
Can you imagine if we put all the data into a quote-unquote honest AI system regarding 9-11?
What conclusion would that AI come to?
Come to much more of a hypothesis via what really happened on 9-11, closer to what Jason Burmes said than the government and media narrative.
I promise you that.
That's just reality.
And we can act like it's not reality, but it is totally reality, folks.
And the reality is that we are being given saviors in this transhuman agenda.
The main one being the Muskernuts himself.
But when the Muskernuts says something or does something that I wholeheartedly agree with, like that population control is a myth, or this right here, we give them credit.
So, Scott Adams, the Dilbert guy, how many of you believe some group of elites or leftists or someone important wants to reduce the population of Earth?
Now, I haven't checked this in a while.
This is a tweet from several days ago.
I have no idea what the finalized results were.
Again, this was only when 55,000 people voted on it.
More than likely, you know, I got in there about 40 minutes after Musk quoted or tweeted about it.
That would probably bring even more people exponentially to that tweet.
I bet you that that poll was probably ended in the hundreds of thousands.
Maybe I'm wrong.
Maybe I got to go look it up.
But first of all, you had 74%, three-quarters of the people saying, yeah, I believe it.
Only 6%, under 10%, saying that's nuts.
And then the other, you never know.
What I liked about what Elon said here is this is neither a right or left issue.
Run antivirus software in your brain.
We say it all the time here.
We say it's not about left or right.
It is always about right and wrong.
That's the reality that we all have to understand.
Okay, period.
That's the reality.
Continuing on, you know, again, we talk in China.
We talk in COVID-19.
China pledges to crack down on rumors used to start trouble as you know what surges.
Hmm.
Hmm.
That's managing the great narrative.
That's the reality.
Okay.
That's the reality.
And again, it's not Chinese style censorship anymore.
And we're talking about pre-crime globally.
That's the model.
That's the model, by the way, people like Bill Barr and Mike Pompeo are behind.
We need to grow up and realize that.
These people are not our friends.
They're monsters.
And speaking of monsters, let us never forget that Barbara Walters, when interviewing Corey Feldman, who talked about pedophilia in Hollywoods and said, basically, it is the largest problem within Hollywood, and it always will be.
And we've talked about it.
And the real celebrities, the real directors, the real powerhouses that have not only had accusations put against them, okay, but there's plenty of documentation to say, oh, yeah, that did happen.
What did she say to Corey Feldman when he started to reveal this?
You're damaging an entire industry.
Shame on you, Barbara.
Shame on you.
The fact that you would vocalize something like that and say you're damaging an entire industry.
Really?
So there isn't massive abuse of children within the Hollyweird system.
So Bella Thorne didn't come out and say, well, she was working for Disney.
Well, by the time she was six years old to 14 for eight years, she wasn't abused sexually by adults.
And she didn't say that everybody around her knew it and refused to do anything.
Once again, shame on you, Barbara.
Shame on you.
Julian Assange's Media Misrepresentation00:15:28
Wanted to quickly hit this tweet from Michael Tracy.
Remember, this was declared a crucial national security concern because of tax because the tax returns were assumed to contain evidence that Trump was financially beholden to Putin.
Remember, the tax returns are going to show that, what, Donald Trump is an agent of Russia.
He's a puppet of the poot-put.
And David Frum is, you know, one of these terrible globalists, one of these authoritarians, and one of these things that promote true misinformation and disinformation.
At this point, disclosure of Trump's tax returns has become a crucial national security counterintelligence concern.
A bullshit.
A bullshit.
That's all I can say about that.
Total and complete bullshit.
We went over that one and we did the other ones.
All right.
With that being said, guys, what we're going to do is we are going to cut to this interview that I have done with Steve Poikinen.
Give you about 15 minutes of it here on the free side.
And then we are going to cut it.
And you're going to see the rest of that over at redvoicemedia.com, redvoicemedia.com slash Jason, or you can listen to it live over at the infowarrior.podbean.com.
So without further ado, here is Steve Poikinen.
And now, ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, to help me reign in the ultra-fabulous, super spectacular 2023.
That's right, we've got Slow News Day Steve, Steve Poikinen, the sexier half of AM Wake Up to discuss Julian Assange, the latest, the seemingly weird flip of some of the mainstream narratives surrounding him with The Guardian and the New York Times and others now calling for the Biden administration to stop the extradition.
The fact that he's now asked for some time off to go to the funeral of Vivian Westwood, one of his friends, whether or not that's going to happen, probably not likely.
But at the same time, where we're going as a country and where the mainstream and even alternative media need to go in 2023.
Thank you so much for joining us, Steve.
Jason, it's great to be here.
Happy New Year, my friend.
And here's hoping if it's not any less fascistic, it's at least the same level of absurd.
Well, we've certainly seen absurd news story after absurd news story in the last few years.
I think it's accelerated.
You and I often talk about the cartoonish nature of our reality.
And part of that cartoonish nature to me has been the inability of the mainstream media in most cases to acknowledge that not only is Julian Assange a journalist, but it's extremely dangerous to prosecute him in the manner they are trying to do in a kangaroo court system of total and complete control via this extradition.
Yet, we've now seen the New York Times come out saying major news outlets urge you us to drop its charges against Assange.
And of course, one of those outlets has been The Guardian, who I don't think has done enough work on this.
Obviously, what is your take of this roundabout right now?
So, okay, on a very, very surface level, of course, it's good that major media outlets are running a story saying drop the charges.
When you pull back from it a little bit and you look at the history that these outlets have had with WikiLeaks and certainly the coverage that they've given on Julian Assange, not to mention the fact that the release that they were talking about in their almost, I guess the don't prosecute editorials, they focused on Cablegate, Jason.
And this is super, it's a to me, the way that I read it at least, it was the most indefensible thing they could have done in terms of looking for support because the Cablegate releases were the ones that made the State Department's heads explode.
They were the releases of the low-level classification emails and consultations between U.S. diplomats all over the place where we found out that Obama was spying on Dana Merkel and a bunch of other quote-unquote allies.
It really made the U.S. look terrible.
So the New York Times, Guardian, Lamont, all these papers come out with an op-ed saying don't prosecute Julian Assange on the 10th anniversary of Cablegate is when they chose to do that.
No politician in the U.S. or the UK or anywhere else wants to defend Cablegate.
It was like the one drop where the entire beltway was just gathered in solidarity to want Julian's head on a pike.
And so that particular anniversary, I felt was odd because there's so many different releases that Wikileaks has made.
You can point to an anniversary of just about anything over the last 12 years and celebrate that.
The one that they specifically chose was, yeah.
So it threw it threw me off a little bit because, of course, it's too little, too late.
They're bemoaning media coverage about Julian Assange.
You guys are the media.
You decide what people read every day.
If you wanted them to be aware of the biggest attack on press freedom in our lifetimes, you would be doing that instead of one op-ed every however many years.
Well, not only years, let's talk about that.
It's been a month since this has even been discussed.
They are usually clumped together.
Like if you go and you do a news search on Assange, there's a little buzz.
There's some mainstream articles out there.
But this to me is very similar to the fact, you know, you talk about a specific instance when the judge ruled that they would not be able to extradite Assange, not because he's not treasonous.
He can't be treasonous.
He's not from the United States.
Newsflash, everybody.
That's the definition of treason is if you are from that country and you are doing harm to that country.
Baseline, baseline.
All right.
So it's imagination land, what they're saying about.
Just want to put that out there.
It was because the judge felt after, especially after the Epstein case, that there was no way that they were going to keep Assange from committing suicide, especially because of his already destitute health in the Belmarsh hellscape they'd intentionally put him in.
And you and I were completely skeptical, although, you know, every once in a while we get a win, right?
And we'll take whatever win we can get.
And we were surprised.
But lo and behold, our surprise was, you know, it was justified because just a few months later, the judge said, oh, you've got it in order?
He's not going to commit suicide anymore.
You're going to make sure.
Okay, we'll extradite him.
We'll do it, right?
Yeah.
Yeah, yeah.
And the fact that the district judge, Vanessa Beretzer, in that original extradition case, justified the CIA spying on everyone who entered the embassy, on Julian himself, on capturing privileged communications between him and his legal team and him and his medical team.
She used a CNN article in her actual delivery of judgment as a citation for why it was okay for Mike Pompeo to plot to murder a journalist inside another country's embassy.
So we've got the talk about imagination land.
This entire case is built in imagination land.
You've got 17 charges under the Espionage Act of 1917.
Again, as you noted just a few minutes ago, Julian Assange is an Australian citizen.
He's set foot in the U.S. like once or twice when he was in his 20s in college to tour a Stanford campus.
It's not as if Wikileaks is registered out of Iceland.
They've got him detained in England, but yet it's the U.S. that has to have this guy here because that 18th charge, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1984, that charge, that will criminalize investigative journalism across the board internationally.
And it will set a universal precedent that any journalist or publisher who prints anything that some regime doesn't like has the unilateral and extraterritorial authority to yank this person from wherever they are and throw them in one of their own dungeons.
And that's the shit that everybody's missing.
And yet, people need to realize that.
If he goes down for this, if he goes to a military tribunal-esque court that is not a traditional court, one in which has a 100% conviction rate, that is the definition of a kangaroo court.
That is a definition of, in my opinion, a militarized dictatorship that has taken hold of the narrative.
And you just mentioned Pompeo.
You know, I had Roger Stone on recently.
It's been a few months now.
But one of the things that I put him on the spot about was Trump's handling of Assange and sending Rohrbacher over there to try to make this transactional exchange where Julian Assange comes forward and reveals it wasn't Russia, Russia, Russia from the DNC leaks and tells where he got it from.
Assange comes back with, hey, we protect our sources.
Everything is in the public arena.
Trump pulls the plug.
As all this is happening, it's not just the CIA.
You've got the Israeli firm via Sheldon Adelson, Trump's largest donor at the time, by the way, who are helping conduct spy operations.
You have other Westernized nations such as the UK involved in them.
Speak to that aspect of the Trump presidency, because in one sense, it does seem like he reached out a little.
But Trump, acting like a egotistical spoiled child, doesn't get what he wants.
And then he listens to his former CIA goon, current Secretary of State, and then pushes forward.
And even when the quote-unquote deep state clearly goes after Trump again in 2020 via the election or selection, rather, in my opinion, he doesn't pardon Assange.
He does not do the very basic thing he should have to try to enshrine free speech in this country.
What are your thoughts on that?
When Donald Trump came out and one of the first couple pardons that he issued were two of the people responsible for civilian massacres in Fallujah, that sort of set the tone for how the pardons were going to go for us.
I mean, even the people that were holding out hope that he would be pardoning Julian or Ed Snowden.
When the two soldiers from Fallujah got the pardon, everybody was like, well, if it's war criminals first, it's definitely not going to be journalists and publishers.
Now, to what role or to what, you know, the decision-making process, you're never going to, you're never going to get me to sign off on the president of the United States is in complete and full control of the decision-making process.
We all know that, but I do think that I think that Trump had allowed not just himself, but everyone else in his sphere to get caught up in kind of their own propaganda, like that they really were in control of the situation, that they really were fighting off different elements of this.
And everyone in the room was a part of all of those elements.
I don't see any more independent actors.
Like the last three, really the entire three years after the election from 2018, 2019, and 2020, you've got a complete insider White House.
You've got a complete deep state infection in every aspect of Trump's cabinet.
And even if he wanted to make his own decisions, where we saw a couple of times that he tried, he got smacked down so hard that the only thing he could do was pivot and try and ratchet up some sort of divisionary tactic to make liberals look stupid.
And there was no shortage of that.
So you could do that all day, every day, and then it would take the heat off of Trump.
He could blame the deep state, and then he could point to the hypocrisy of the liberals on every other thing that he was being attacked for and escape relatively, you know, relatively scratch-free.
I mean, he is the Teflon Don.
It wasn't really John Gotti.
It's Teflon Donnie T, in my opinion.
And like you said, it was very easy to deflect because the left had gone so authoritarian and so absurd.
You could literally take a dart, spin a wheel, shoot the dart, and wherever it landed, you could pick that subject of the day and you could be the hero of the day, much like I believe Musk is doing now as a front.
It's not hard to have these talking points.
And it's been one of the things I've talked about with a lot of these mainstream or even alternative promoted figures.
And I'm not trying to come down on anybody individually, but I've always said somebody, yeah, it's easy for a guy like Milo Yiannopoulos to sit there and take on the left and sound good and then debate somebody that doesn't have any real talking about it.
It's easy for Ben Shapiro to do that.
Put him in the arena with Jason Burmese when we're going to go beyond that spectrum.
We're going to talk about the true deep state.
And you mentioned 2018 to where the Trump administration had nothing but insiders.
And I would argue that the metamorphosis started very early on with taking out loyalists like Flynn and Bannon.
And by the time that you hit Bilderberg 2017 and you brought in a guy like H.R. McMasters, okay, and McMasters at Bilderberg.
And so I believe is Liddell, who was another guy they brought in.
It was over.
You know, this is a guy that came out running saying, hey, we might get to the bottom of 9-11, implicated Saudi Arabia.
And once again, folks, this is where we cut the broadcast and we go over to Red Voice Media.
So if you are enjoying this interview, please come on over to the second hour and check it out.