https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermasShow more https://rumble.com/c/c-1647952
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
https://theinfowarrior.podbean.com/
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
https://twitter.com/JasonBermas
PayPal [email protected]
#BermasBrigade Show less
Hey everybody, Jason Burmes here, and as always, I am joined by John Fitch for some mixed martial mindset.
And John, today, other than fights, we're going to be talking a little bit about how they just redefine terms.
Now, did it just make up new things and then redefine turns?
And yeah, it's making me think about some stuff with how there are certain words that have different meanings today, but you're not allowed to redefine them.
There's an F-A-G word that I remember using as a kid that had nothing to do with sexuality when we used it.
Not at all.
In fact, you know what?
You cannot say it today.
Well, you're not allowed to read it.
We're not allowed to redefine words.
Hold on.
Let me just say this.
You can if you are a multinational corporation like Viacom.
And let me explain how.
And I'm not promoting censorship, but I do want to show the double standard here.
They constantly, and Comedy Central, you run this on Wednesdays all day, all night long.
It is literally your block other than the daily show from when the daily show ends till about four in the morning, South Park.
South Park used that term mercilessly, mercilessly.
In fact, I watch a lot of these from 15, 10, 20 years ago now.
And that term is constantly.
There's actually an episode where they tell everybody they don't want them to take that away from them.
Right?
And in that, they parody people using that term not as a derogatory term towards homosexuals, but by other people basically saying you're squirrely or you're just being a punk.
You know, I don't want that.
You're weak.
You're weak.
Exactly.
All these things.
Untrustworthy, just by having them used by Big Gay Al and Mr. Garrison's boyfriend, Mr. Slave.
Okay.
So like the most grotesque, in his own opinion, like depraved sexual character in all of it.
This is the character, again, that's putting live animals up his butt, the tale of Lemmywinks and beyond.
Oh, man.
And again, they're making that point.
But again, you can play those.
You don't get canceled if you make billions of dollars.
You understand?
We can't say that.
We're bigots.
And I just like pointing out that double standard.
The definition we're going to talk about today is recession.
Now, before we even get to recession.
The most recent, the other most recent thing they've changed the definition to was the boop terminology.
Yeah, exactly.
At least on a mass scale, right?
Yes.
But we can't even talk about that.
In fact, I can't show you the actual tweet.
This is like the original tweet it came from, the screen grab from Thomas Massey, because a representative we've been covering a lot here because his Twitter feed is fire.
And John, in that tweet, he said the very same thing that first they redefined the V-word, which we can't even say on YouTube or on this channel anyway, we'll get banned.
So they redefined that.
And not only did they redefine this, everybody, but the White House press secretary was actually asked about it.
And wait, do you see her response?
Okay.
It's a Freudian sentence.
I'm sure it was very honest.
Bro, it's the craziest thing.
Again, it's like we live in a cartoon, John.
Before we read it.
We live in communist Russia.
This is North Korea.
We live in North Korea.
King Jung, whatever, freaking hit a hole in one in all 18 holes.
Kim Jong-K.
Joe Biden now.
Get out of here.
But he doesn't say that.
I'm surprised they didn't tell us that when he fell off the bike.
Oh, he was really doing a wheelie and did a stunt roll.
He was filming something for the new jackass film.
He's going to be in jackass forever, five.
Forever, forever, the real forever.
Again, let's read this, and then we're going to go to the press secretary who admits it's exactly what it is in a Freudian slip, then corrects herself in a word salad moment where they just make stuff up and she doesn't have to answer the question, and then on the follow-up, just complete and total denial.
So this is on the White House website today, and this is why she got asked it.
What is a recession?
While some maintain, some, you know, the new experts are rolling out.
This is going to get fact-checked.
Don't worry.
While some maintain that two consecutive quarters of a falling real GDP constitute a recession, that is neither the official definition nor the way economists evaluate the state of the business cycle.
Okay, based on this data, it is unlikely the decline in GDP in the first quarter of this year, even if followed by another GDP decline in the second, indicates a recession.
Now, let me say this.
In many ways, they're right.
Because whether you realize it or not, over the past two decades, they redefined what depression meant as recession.
And a lot of it was just masked by the fact that we didn't see bread lines anywhere and that more people just had EBT cards.
Do you see how that works?
So in a sense, yeah, it's not a recession.
And by the way, it's not a recession in the sense that we're coming back.
They want to fucking devastate us.
All right?
So let's do it live, John.
Let's play this, you know, stunning, beautiful, intelligent woman of color as she is asked why they just changed the definition of recession on the White House website.
Next week's a very big week for the economy.
So I read the CEBA blog.
Is the White House trying to change the common definition of a recession?
Because next Thursday, the GDP numbers coming out are going to show that we've been in a recession.
So let me say this.
You know, the strength of our labor market, along with the other economic factors, is what we generally see in a recession.
You hear what she just said there?
What you're saying is what we generally see in a recession.
So she's got her talking point.
Normally, this is totally a recession, but because we don't want to look bad.
Again, it's the Freudian slip.
She can't even read the fucking talking point right.
She knows where we're beyond recession.
And now watch her correct herself.
And here comes the spewed bullshit of we're not answering the question.
Or even a pre-what is not what we generally see in a recession.
Listen, guys, take a look at this woman.
She's not impressive at all.
There is no reason she should be the press secretary.
She's not intelligent.
She's not well-spoken.
She's not good off the cuff.
She can't keep eye contact.
She just made a Freudian slip where she admitted, of course it's a recession.
And now she can barely read the talking point.
Look, she has to look down.
Say what you want about Jen Psychosaki.
She knew very poignantly how to speak and just lie.
This woman can't.
Oh, she's a psychopath.
100% psychopath.
100%.
She had those damn.
Like, you have to, people need to learn and study body language.
And like body language is very telling because it's a lizard brain thing.
It's not something you consciously think about.
Your body reacts because things that make you uncomfortable, questions that make you uncomfortable, like you cannot turn it off unless you are a psychopath and you can train yourself to avoid that stuff.
There's like that's that's just it's scary.
It is.
So let's let her finish.
Let's now let her tell that's Ted Bundy.
That's Ted Bundy.
When Ted Bundy would talk and say stuff, like he looked like he was telling the truth because he was a crazy person.
He was a psychopath and he didn't have those bad feelings about those things.
Exactly.
Neither did that Jen Psaki.
Nope.
Not even a little bit.
Psychopath.
Absolute psychopath.
And again, that woman was a, I'm not saying she was an intelligent woman.
She knew she was lying all the time.
You know, a lot of psychopaths are higher intelligence.
Yeah, that's very, very true.
This woman.
Kaczynski.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, you know, again, Kaczynski, man, I don't know.
I don't know.
As every day goes by, he might have been right.
You know, you read his manifesto, and I certainly don't.
Modernity is evil.
But like his own expert, man.
Well, I want to talk about those movies you were discussing in the beginning.
But every time I think of Kaczynski and the timeline, I always think about Terminator 2, right?
And in Terminator 2, they're trying to stop the cybernetics and trying to stop all of this evolution of Skynet.
And it was because of Terminator 1 that the guy who supposedly invented this stuff now had the cybernetic hand, right?
Whether that was a paradoxical loop or whatever, I think that with Bundy, or I'm sorry, Kaczynski, you kind of have this paradigm where even if what he was doing at the time is righteous, technology waits for no man.
You know what I'm saying?
And you can't end technology and where it's headed by taking the lives of those that may develop it, right?
You really have to change the cultural milieu and those in charge.
Tom Cruise's Cybernetic Hand00:14:52
And I'm not referring to his actions as being right.
I was talking about his like manifesto.
Yeah, his manifestos, again, everybody should read Bill Joy, Why the Future Doesn't Need Us, because in that, in the introduction to that, he cites a long section from Ted Kaczynski's manifesto and asks that same question.
Let's get back to Little Miss Liar Pants.
Or even a pre-recession because we're seeing the strength of the economy and the labor market.
So that's really important to note there because those are key elements as we talk about that, as folks keep asking us about that.
So Americans across the country are back to work at a historic level.
21 states, the most in history, have unemployed rates, unemployment rates at or below 3%.
That is an important number to note.
14 states are now at their lowest unemployment rates since the series began in 1976.
And last month, the unemployment rate was a new low in eighth states.
So again, the strength of our labor market, along with the economic indicators, is not what we generally see as we talk about recession or even pre-recession.
So again, she just, it's generally not what we see.
She never says yes or no.
They redefine the term.
She literally gives the Freudian slip.
Now, here comes the follow-up.
For people watching, this is a great cue for when somebody's lying to you, when they're directly lying to your face.
And if you ask them a yes or no question, and that's all they need to say is yes or no, and they give you this big, long-winded answer, they're lying.
They're 100% lying and manipulating you.
Listen.
Just go just go back to that.
It's like, no, no, it's just yes or no.
It's just yes or no.
Just tell me yes or no.
If they refuse to do that, they're a liar.
They're not going to tell you the truth.
So it's funny.
And children do that, by the way, as a huge tell.
Like, I'll give an example.
And we're going to get to the follow-up question.
But basically, you know, my girlfriend's been up here with her daughter for almost a month.
I'm having a blast.
We just celebrated my birthday, all that good stuff.
But my girlfriend's on the road a lot.
You know, the kid has fallen behind in math.
So what we did was we got her on an online program.
And some of these online programs have the little bells and whistles kids want to see, colored elephants and animals and all that stuff.
And what's great about it is when you get one wrong, you can hit play and the teacher goes over and writes it out, right?
So I have a rule.
If you get it wrong, you don't skip the lesson.
You make sure to go through it and you go through, right?
So, you know, I work.
So I went downstairs after I saw her trying to skip a question.
I said, hey, we're not going to skip any more questions.
It's okay to get them wrong, but we're going to do this, right?
So I go downstairs, and by the time I come back up, she's done.
And she hadn't written out any work.
You know what I mean?
And that's another big thing.
I said, hey, I want you to write out the work.
So I looked at her.
I go, how many of those questions did you skip?
Oh, I didn't skip any.
I go, because we were on the train.
I go, well, I'm going to check on my phone right now because they give me an email and they tell me how many questions you got wrong.
And you were supposed to write out all the ones you got wrong.
And I only see the one that I asked you to write out on the thing.
So I'm going to give you another chance.
Did you skip any questions?
Yes or no?
And now the sentences start coming out, right?
Well, I don't think that I skipped any.
I think.
Well, you see, the teacher said that we did this thing and then the thing with the there.
And then actually, you know, so yeah, that's why.
And yeah, my oldest, yeah, he gets through that a lot.
You know, you know the deal.
And, you know, I break it down.
I go, listen, I'm going to ask you again.
I asked you to do something.
It's a yes or no question.
I don't want to hear no.
I want to hear yes or no.
And I want you to be honest.
I want you to look me in the eye, too, because you notice this woman's not making a lot of eye contact until after she can memorize her talking point and push it through.
That's another tell, just like Don was said.
And it goes on and on and on.
So here's the follow-up question.
And here's her talking point bullshit back.
The job for the three-month trend, the growth of job growth in the U.S. is shrinking, is decreasing.
And 7.5 million people, a growing number, are multi-jobs, meaning they have to work more than one job to afford a living.
That's way low.
7.5 million?
Come on.
Times 10.
Give me a break.
Is jobs really a good indicator?
Look, here's what I would say.
We've always talked about the strength of our economy.
We've always talked about how historic it's been.
And we've always talked about the transitioning, right?
The transitioning to more stable and steady growth.
And so to your point about the job growth there, this is what we have been kind of stating for the past several months.
Look, you know, the economy created 1.1 million jobs in the second quarter.
And so, and around 375 jobs per month.
Those are historic numbers.
Those are, if you think about the 1.1 million jobs, we are back to where we were at pre-pandemic level.
So that is what we see as strength of the economy.
Again, we're going to transition into a more stable and steady growth.
And so we're going to continue the work that the president has set out to do.
He doesn't do any work.
He can barely speak.
He's barely conscious.
He's a puppet.
I mean, if anybody thinks him or Kamala is running anything, you're not a smart person.
Do you really believe that?
And they make zero decisions about anything.
I don't think Joe Biden dresses himself.
He doesn't get to choose what clothes he wears.
No, 100% not.
I watched that climate emergency speech, and now they're going for it.
I don't know if you've seen this now.
They're going to try to push through anything they can via executive order for your carbon credit system.
And when they talk about a transition of the economy, they talk about gutting you.
This is not a recession, folks.
I'm going to say it again.
They don't plan on a comeback.
This is the transition via the fourth industrial revolution of your slavery, and they're doing it right in front of your face.
They have an unintelligent, not well-spoken woman here projecting an agenda for a poopy pants puppet and his whoremongering, cackling sidekick.
And they have nothing, like John said, they have nothing to do, zero to do with what is actually going on in this country.
John wanted to make this point, and then we'll maybe get into these movies you were talking about.
We talked on this program about the studies that are now out there.
And again, no mainstream coverage in the United States whatsoever.
None whatsoever.
None whatsoever.
I talked about this too last night on my show.
After I talked about the fights, I talked about a couple of these scientific discoveries.
Not sure 100% which ones you're talking about, but the serotonin discovery, and there was another one that showed that exercise was as effective as the medicine.
It was the placebo and exercise.
Yes.
And this is what was really shocking was the placebo was 31% effective.
The exercise was like 41% to 43%, and the pills were 47%.
Exactly.
So why is anybody taking pills?
if a placebo can solve the problem 31% of the time, shouldn't we be treating majority of these things with placebo and exercise?
Also, because there's no, there's no negative side effects.
Why?
Why?
Oh, you know, Is the side effects really worth that extra 7% bump?
I don't think so.
Well, let's also point out that some of these studies, not just putting in a placebo, would actually take people who are not suffering from depression and they would artificially lower their serotonin levels.
And lo and behold, those people did not start suffering from depression.
They also had massive examples of people that already had low serotonin levels that were not suffering depression whatsoever.
But this is a pill factory.
And I talked about it more extensively in the broadcast.
The funniest thing, when I was reading through this stuff, it was talking about how, maybe I should just hit it.
But it's talking about how the chemical imbalance theory wasn't even heavily supported.
It came out in 1965, right?
Psychology today, almost as soon as it was floated, 1965 by Harvard psychiatrist Joseph Schildkraut, the serotonin hypothesis of depression reduced and simplified by pharma marketing to the chemical imbalance theory of depression and anxiety has been subject to critical research and found wanting.
That was 1965.
1965, they found that theory wanting.
It was not solid enough.
But 85, it says also 85 to 90% of people believe it.
Oh, yeah.
85 to 90% of people believe it.
And it was very weak evidence to start with.
Well, the other thing is getting off them is crippling.
And they talk about this long-term side effect.
And what it's doing to our water supply.
One of the guys watching my show last night said that there are measurable levels of antidepressants, SSRIs, in the lakes in Minnesota.
And it's been discussed, by the way, for statins to be put in the water by government officials.
These things are reality.
I would encourage everybody to read this one up and down, and it also links to the studies.
Depression is not caused by low serotonin levels.
Study casts doubt over widespread use of potent drugs designed to treat chemical imbalance in the brain.
Experts reviewed 17 analysis of serotonin in its relationship to depression with no evidence of a link casting doubt on their use.
Now, here's the deal.
I'll tell you where they were used.
MK Ultra.
They were used in Jonestown.
They were used in universities.
And guess what?
Big pharma companies during the MK Ultra.
They always want to tell you about LSD, everybody.
Let me tell you right now, the SSRIs were a huge, huge part of it.
And, you know, love them or hate them.
We're going to give Tom Cruise his due for this famous interview that he did back in the day with Matt Lauer, where he absolutely schooled Lauer.
You know, say what you want.
And we cannot forget who Matt Lauer is, too.
Absolutely.
Absolute cretin of a human being.
Horrific human being.
Here we are today where I talk out against drugs and psychiatric abuses of electric shocking people against their will of drugging children with them not knowing the effects of these drugs.
Do you know what Adderall is?
Do you know Ridland?
Do you know now that Ridland is a street drug?
Do you understand that?
The difference is Matt and Will though.
This wasn't again asking you a question.
Matt, I'm asking you a question.
I understand there's abuse of all of these things.
No, you see, here's the problem.
You don't know the history of psychiatry.
I do.
All it does is mask the problem, Matt.
And if you understand the history of it, it masks the problem.
And look, again, say what you want about Tom Cruise.
He's a fucking alpha.
That's an alpha dog.
He might be five foot nothing, a hundred and nothing.
He is a force to be reckoned with, not only in Hollywood, but in media in general.
And you notice they don't bring this up a lot because he really owns him here.
He looks him dead in the eye.
He's read these things.
And look, I get it.
He's a Scientology guy.
He exploits that.
That's a whole nother system of control and a cult.
But he knows a cult when he sees one.
And he also understands why.
I have a feeling that that's just a financial loophole.
I think it's a part of it.
Actors and actresses.
I had heard a story about him.
He had a huge hangar and airplane and whatever shit built for millions and millions of dollars, but it was paid for through the church.
So he didn't have to pay for it.
He didn't have to get taxed on it.
I was like, well, that just seems like a big tax grift.
That's all it is.
It's definitely part of it.
I would absolutely agree with you there.
And the other thing is.
But I mean, do you blame him?
Do you blame him for playing the game?
Right?
He figured it out.
He knows that the government's stealing from you.
He knows that the government's not going to take care of them.
He knows that they're terrible people.
So why not create your own institution to back and support yourself?
Well, think of it this way.
All right.
L. Ron Hubbard, say what you want about him.
He wasn't an idiot.
And the reason that most people get involved in, say, Scientology is because they are looking for self-help, self-improvement.
They do use NLP techniques, neuro-linguistic programming.
And very much, you know, in the very beginning of it, it's not based on a higher being.
So it's those who feel dejected by traditional religions.
You know, it's not till later on.
I mean, you got to get to the highest levels that we're talking about aliens and thetans and spirituality.
Most of this stuff is the same kind of stuff that you're going to see promoted by a Tony Robbins or someone of that ilk, right?
And Tom Cruise has done that.
There is a power to looking yourself in the face in the mirror and talking to yourself and holding yourself accountable for that verbalization of what is in your head, right?
There's visualization, there's verbalization, and then there's realization after work.
And this guy's an expert on that.
So let's watch him continue to school Lauer.
That's what it does.
That's all it does.
You're not getting to the reason why.
There is no such thing as a chemical imbalance.
I'm saying that drugs aren't the answer.
That these drugs are very dangerous.
They're mind-altering, antipsychotic drugs.
And there are ways of doing it without that so that we don't end up in a brave new world.
Yes, there are abuses.
And yes, maybe they've gone too far in certain areas.
Maybe there are too many kids on Riddling.
Maybe electric shock is.
Kids on Riddland.
I'm just saying, but aren't there.
Exactly.
Yeah, you're goddamn life.
He's just chilling.
He's just chilling.
And like, you see the disgust in Tom Cruise's face because he knows he's chilling.
Dude, this is where it went all wrong.
All right?
We made it socially acceptable 25 years ago to drug your fucking kids.
All right.
And now, what are we talking about?
We're talking about whether or not your eight-year-old has the right to decide if they want to chemically castrate themselves.
All right.
So you reap what you say.
Surgically remove body parts.
Dude, did you see that story about the guy who wants to be an alien?
Wants the body modification?
Riddlin, Glib, and Responsible Communication00:02:14
We'll get to that in a minute.
All right.
But you talk about mental illness.
Hey, I'm a libertarian.
You're not hurting anybody kind of guy.
You do your own thing.
But a lot of these people are totally and completely warped.
Crazy is real.
And they're taking it on to another level where they want to embrace the crazy so they can convince that you that you can be anything you want.
And you could, all these drugs are another venue for that.
Okay?
Believe it.
Fairy tale land.
Examples where it works.
Matt, Matt.
You don't even, you're glib.
You don't even know what Ridlin is.
You're glib.
You don't even know what Riddlin is.
I love this.
He's the dude.
This is like the best Tom Cruise has ever been.
I'm going to go back 10 seconds.
Listen to it again.
He goes, you're glib.
Meaning, you're just saying this.
You're totally uneducated.
You're just endorsing a position.
You have no fucking clue what you're talking about.
Perfect.
Riddlin.
Maybe electric shock is.
I'm just saying, but aren't there examples where it works?
Matt, Matt.
You don't even, you're glib.
You don't even know what Riddlin is.
If you start talking about chemical imbalance, you have to evaluate and read the research papers on how they came up with these theories, Matt.
Okay?
That's what I've done.
And you go and you say, where's the medical test?
Where's the blood test that says how much Ridlin you're supposed to get?
It's very impressive to listen to you because clearly you've done the homework and you know the subject.
And you should.
And you should do that also because just knowing people who are on Ridland isn't enough.
You should be a little bit more responsible in knowing what you're prescribing Riddlin, Tom.
And I'm not asking anyone else to do it.
Well, you are, you're saying no.
I know some people who seem to have been helpless.
But you're saying, but this is a very important issue.
This is a very important.
You know what?
And you're here on the Today Show.
Right.
And to talk about it in a way of saying, well, isn't it okay and being reasonable about it when you don't know?
And I do.
I think that you should be a little bit more responsible in knowing what it is.
Because you communicate to people.
Yeah, but that's not what we do in the media.
You know, they do communicate.
They communicate a narrative.
They communicate.
They tell you what you're supposed to believe.
That's our job to tell you how to think about things.
That's me capricious.
Gattaca's Digital Screens00:02:05
Yeah, I sent you that little, I sent you an article about the exercise being comparable.
Here, let's bring that up.
And then, Fitch, I want you to talk about these movies as well.
Well, the movies, these are movies that I knew about, but I never watched.
One is, I'm almost, I'm about halfway through it right now.
One is the sixth day with Arnold Warschnager.
It's about, this is 2000, it came out.
And they're talking about the future, near future, probably right about now, where they're cloning people and cloning animals and all this stuff.
And It's wild, man, because some of the stuff that they got, right, because we didn't have cell phones at the time, but you know, they got the communication watches, all the mirrors and screens and refrigerators have like glass, whatever, and they have screens.
They have, you know, your digital screens to read stuff or whatever.
There's the virtual girlfriend that the guy has.
He sits down and puts a thing on his head.
And now, you know, it's got the simp guy with the virtual girlfriend.
It's disturbing, some of the things you see in that.
And in the beginning of that film.
The other movie was Gattaca.
Oh, yeah.
Gattaca's even more because it's based on your genetics.
And, you know, both of them are pretty tough because, you know, Gattaca, I remember less, but I remember being more impactful because, you know, the other one still had that Scharzeneger action.
It made you, Gattaca made you angry because it reminded me of all the uppity college-educated people who know everything.
Well, actually, actually, because they had superior genes or their parents made them better because they had the right high color, the right hair color.
They didn't have heart problems or they could predict what kind of medical issues you're going to have in the future.
So if you were natural born, you were the invalid.
That's what they called you.
You're invalid.
So you had to be genetically modified to be considered worthy to take part in society.
Yeah, it's eugenics 101.
Genetically Modified Worthy00:03:30
Right.
And with the other one, it starts off, I believe, in a football game, right?
And they had the, yeah, and they've got the star quarterback who gets basically a broken neck and dies right there, but they don't let you know that.
They act like, oh, you know, the announcers are giving you that narrative.
Oh, he's going to be back on the field.
And all of a sudden, he's out doing commercials and you're like, what happened?
Well, they had him on Clone Tap, you know, and it's this idea that you're going to be able to actually upload your consciousness and gestate a full clone of yourself as well.
The sixth day is a really interesting one that has flown under the radar for sure.
That's a little pre-programming that you can upload your consciousness to something else and continue to live.
Absolutely.
Let's talk about this article.
So this is not, this is at HHS Public Access.
You can get it on the NCBI site.
And this is exercise and pharmacotherapy in the treatment of major depressive disorder.
Tell us about it, John.
Basically, it just points out that the exercising was as effective as the drug.
I'm trying to see where the drug is here.
Well, let's read it for people because it says it right here in the summary and the conclusion.
The efficacy of exercise in patients seems generally comparable with patients receiving antidepressant medication, and both tend to be better than the placebo in patients with MDD.
So what are they looking at here?
What is MDD?
So they had MDB as the major depressive disorder.
Okay.
But they had four different groups.
Supervised exercise was at 45%.
Home-based exercise was 40%.
And the medication was 47%.
But I'm blown away by the placebo number.
31%.
31%.
Like, you're only 16% better taking the actual hardcore drugs than you are taking a sugar pill.
Not to mention, they admit in all of it, over half of the time, it doesn't work.
Forget it.
You know what I mean?
Like, none of them even hit 50%, right?
None of them even hit 50%.
Listen, and here's the thing.
That's why when I did this, it speaks to the fact that all of us go through struggles in life.
None of us feel great 100% of the time.
However, I feel like when you have a goal-based lifestyle where you're driven by things that you're generally interested in or that matter or have a purpose, your mental health is usually better on top of exercise.
I don't think people really understand how hard life was for most of history.
The physical demands that it took just to survive 30 or 40 years.
Unbelievable.
The internal rewards probably that you get because, oh, I found water.
Oh, I found a potato.
Oh, I found something else to eat.
It was so important to save you from dying that it probably lifted you up.
I'm sure of it.
Like, survival was a huge purpose.
Can you imagine an apple tree, right?
Like, you're on a journey and you find an apple.
An apple tree.
Vaccines and Viruses00:10:17
Wow.
We got food for a day.
And it's sweet and delicious.
Like, we're raging.
But now it's just, you just sit around and scroll and sit around and scroll and you have like empty dopamine and serotonin releases for nonsense video games.
You're not actually ever building anything real or tangible.
Like building a huge game or thing and Roblox or the Minecraft, it's not the same as building like Legos with your hands even.
I would say that you're going to get more, you know, if you're talking about my kids, my kids do those things, but like they're going to get more internal like pride from building something real, tangible.
And I see the reality.
It's not being done today.
You know, like yours, you know, the little girl upstairs, she's eight years old and she's got Minecraft on her little switch light and she loves it.
But now twice since she's been here, we got her two different Lego sets.
She's much more happy with the physical Lego sets.
She likes to take them apart and put them back together.
She likes to show me the different arrangements.
And it's less so with that because it's physical.
It's tangible.
It's in your hands.
But they want to push you into a metaverse, into a virtual reality, and into an almost hypnotic state of sleep while you are awake.
And these drugs are a big part of that.
So now I want to talk about what they intend to replace us with.
Because guess what?
DARPA just did.
Oh, baby.
I saw this.
Yes.
We were talking about this not long ago.
Yeah, yeah.
So we got black helicopters that can be retrofitted now with the type of Global Hawk technology where, guess what?
We don't need a human to pilot them anymore at all.
So they just did that publicly.
They'll be able to do that with other types of aircraft.
This wasn't a drone.
This was an actual self-piloted machine.
Yeah.
This is a no human messing with the steering or anything.
Nothing.
And it's an old school Blackhawk.
They didn't have to.
So again, they didn't have to redesign it.
Did you see the thing for today?
In Russia, the robot, the chess robot?
No.
Should I type that in?
The little kid was playing chess with a robot, and it put the piece down on his finger and crushed his finger.
Oh, no.
Let's find it.
Excellent.
That's going to be great.
Let's see.
Chess playing robot breaking away.
It's going to be a chess robot not to kill people.
So let's play it.
Yeah.
If we can get it.
So a chess playing robot breaking a boy's finger during a game.
This happened at the Moscow Chess Open.
And officials say the boy made a move during the robot's turn, and that caused the robot to grab his index finger and squeeze it.
Several bystanders helped free the boy and take him away from the table.
You can imagine how scary this, though.
It's almost like the plot of Elysium.
I mean, I don't know.
It's like the robot's like, no, it's not your turn.
Crush your finger.
Jesus.
Yeah, let's do that.
Let's put that CPU unit in the helicopter.
Let's let that happen.
Well, once again, totally safe.
Safe and effective robot Apaches.
Safe and effective.
They're going to retrofit everybody.
They're going to write that on the bullets.
Well, you know, that'll just bring us into this now, I guess.
They're going to write safe and effective on rainbow bullets.
I'm going to turn the music all the way down, the sound down on this, and we can just watch it.
Because what you're watching is, yep, one of the DARPA robot dogs with a rifle.
Now, we've seen the guns, but you actually get to see it fire in this one.
You might want to have this sound a little bit, because I feel like the gunshot is kind of a part of the terror.
That's terrifying.
That's coming down the hall.
Yeah, you can.
Please show me your papers.
Please show me your papers.
Jesus Christ.
Who has ever read a history book?
Who's ever read a history book?
He's like, Yeah, I can't wait for governments to have that.
I can't wait for the ruling class to have that.
Oh, man, it's going to be so awesome.
I can't wait to get nuzzle bumped by a robot dog telling me to pick up my drool and clean shit.
Unbelievable.
It is.
And again, this technology is moving forward.
Whether you like it or not, what they're showing us in public and what they're manufacturing now is nowhere near as far as they actually are.
And they plan on automating the vast majority of us out of work and into a UBI slave type system.
So I got a few more ones I want to go over.
Ghelain Maxwell.
I want to talk about the Franklin scandal a little bit because it was in the Daily Mail this weekend for some reason.
And then I don't even want to say this word, even though it has to do with polio.
And I know a lot of people think that we eradicated polio way back in the day, but we're going to save it.
So if you want to see the rest of this broadcast, which we still got about 20 minutes or so, guys, you need to leave YouTube.
You need to come over to either The Rockfin or Rumble, where we're doing it live.
And we're going to say the V-word on the flip side.
Fitch, before we go, tell people where they can find your stuff and what you're up to.
Go to johnfish.net, sign up for the newsletter.
I have Fitch Smash Strength up and available right now.
It's a system built for martial artists to stay strong and healthy through training, but it works for regular people too.
I take that concept of strength training and turn it into hygiene.
Do a little bit almost every day.
It goes a lot faster.
It keeps you a lot healthier.
We're not trying to, you know, bulk and be huge and be bodybuilders.
We just want to be strong and healthy.
Guys, buy me a coffee.
Links down below.
The other links to where this broadcast continues right now are also down below.
So, YouTube, Arriva Dirchie.
Okay, I can now say the word vaccine.
Couldn't say it before.
And I just want to show everybody this story because people need to understand how far this has gone.
Unvaxed person from upstate New York is diagnosed with the first case of polio in the U.S. in nearly a decade.
So that tells you that there's been polio not only around the world because it's never been eradicated, but in this country just a decade ago.
And number two, which is really interesting about this, is that they admit later on in the article that it seems to come from a vaccinated strain of polio.
So even though this person is vaccinated, it seems that the strain itself is from a vaccinated person, and that's how it was created.
Remember, we had that story from the Sudan where you had the polio outbreak.
They did it on purpose, man.
They gave those people polio to put it back out in the populations.
You can't tell me that was an accident.
I don't think it was an accident at all.
You know, they took a sample group, said nobody's going to care about this.
Nobody's going to investigate this.
Let's give them polio so we have a new problem, new epidemic.
It's just, again, you know, you look at that Sudan story, you know, Afghanistan, Pakistan, the Congo.
They never eradicated polio, folks.
It was one of the bullshit talking points that you've been taught your entire life.
That never happened.
In fact, they used SV40, Simian virus 40, in the polio vaccines, and they lost a lot of lawsuits because they gave people fucking cancer.
And not only did they give people cancer, but they gave babies cancer that then were so infected that the parents that were cleaning their diapers who were not vaccinated got cancer and won lawsuits.
All right, this is before they set up the vaccine courts.
You can't make this up.
You know what?
Let's type it in.
Let's do it live.
Probably couldn't get away with this on YouTube anymore.
It's probably not World Health Organization approved, but let's type in SV40 cancer polio vaccine.
Let's see what we get with the Google results.
Okay.
And you do get something right out of the gates.
SV40, contamination of polio vaccine and cancer.
PubMed.
Cancer risk associated with simian virus 40.
This is from 1999.
That's from 2002 when you could actually break this stuff.
The SV40 virus has tainted polio vaccine.
I'm sure it was tainted, folks.
All right.
Do you get where this is going?
So they never eradicated polio.
They gave cancer to people with the vaccine.
And really, you can, I'm not saying that there was nothing to some of these, you know, the technology of vaccination.
I don't trust Jonas Salk and the Salk Institute and his son.
They're big eugenicists.
They talk about population control.
It's open.
All right.
We've played the videos.
But I will say this.
All right.
At the same time, polio was going down in this country.
What did we have?
We had a merging sewage system.
We had clean water all of the sudden.
And it was becoming more and more common for people to have access to medical care and treatment and a good diet.
And only in the countries that didn't seem to have that infrastructure did we continue to see polio in those countries.
Fight Structures Debate00:14:21
So ask yourself.
Is it a quinky dink?
I don't know.
I don't know.
Something to think about.
John, is Ghelane Maxwell long for this world?
I don't know if you've seen it.
Daily Mail exclusive.
She's now been moved to a low-security federal prison in Florida.
She can now teach yoga again.
She can learn plumbing or cosmetology.
Most importantly, you know, other inmates will obviously have access to her.
Have access to her.
I'm sure that won't go bad at all.
What's the over-under that she lasts six months?
Man, I don't know.
It's a tough one, right?
I got $100 says she's gone by Christmas.
I mean, that's even money right now.
I'd love to disagree, but that sounds about even money, you know.
Especially with this, you know what?
This caught me by surprise.
On the 22nd, so three days ago, out of nowhere, John.
We've talked about this before.
I would encourage people to go watch my recent interviews with Nick Bryant on both the Franklin scandal and the Epstein scandal.
Nick Bryant, the author of this book, is the guy that published with Gawker the Epstein black book, the only one that we found.
I mean, this guy is the legit guy.
Look how thick this is.
And the Franklin scandal back in 1988 was this prostitution ring that had started to make its way into the mainstream media, including the Washington Times, that did a lot of really good work on it.
And this was the callboy ring that reached into the White House, extended into Barney Frank's bedroom that we've covered.
And for some reason, out of nowhere, Evil in the Heart of America, shocking documentary exposes mystery surrounding alleged 1988 prostitution ring, detailing child victims' horrific claims of being flown across U.S. and abused by high-powered officials and their accusations of cover-up by the FBI.
This article is extensive.
It goes through almost the entire documentary.
It shows Lawrence King, who we have talked about many times as one of the serial pedophiles that was generally running this ring from Nebraska and also this credit union.
It shows you Peter Citroen, media personality.
It shows you Gary Caradori, Alan Baer.
I mean, this thing is extremely well written.
In fact, right here, victim Paul Bonacci, he gives a very disturbing and harrowing account of SRA, occultic ritualistic child abuse that also involves snuff porn.
Okay.
Hardest thing I've ever had to read.
I read it twice because it was in the original book that this guy was trying to debunk it all.
All right.
Go watch my interview with him.
He didn't think he was writing this book.
And I mean, I'm just going to say, it's just the most disturbing, disgusting thing that you could ever imagine happening.
And it almost made me puke.
I almost cried when I read it.
And the Bohemian Grove is going down right now.
Here's some of their annals here.
And then their boy Bromley's book.
Here's the owl god that they love.
That's, you know, just some of the stuff.
And he also, we played this interview.
Bonacci was there when Nambla was formed, John, the North American Man-Boy Love Association.
And he names in a video who started it and where they started it in a Boston church.
So, guys, I'm going to actually put the link to this in the Rockfin.
If you're watching on Rockfin now, I'm going to give you the link to this article because Conspiracy of Silence was supposed to air on, I believe it was the Discovery Channel at the time.
Had a pretty big budget.
There's Paul Bonacci now.
He's one of the only survivors.
Troy Bonner, no longer with us.
There's Troy Bonner.
And it never aired.
This documentary was leaked to John DeCamp, who was representing Bonacci.
That's John DeCamp right there.
He played it in court.
It actually has scenes missing from it because back in the day, in order to get one of these copies, you couldn't digitally give it to anybody.
There were no digital copies.
So someone had to actually dub a tape that had worked on the documentary that wasn't the main producer or the writer or the director or part of the team, mail it to DeCamp, and you can watch Conspiracy of Silence.
I'm going to tell you, it's a tough watch.
It's a tough watch.
It's available now, so people can't watch the documentary.
I've watched it, dude.
John, if you haven't seen it, I'll send you the link, man.
It is about as wild as it gets.
It's what led me to read these books.
It's what also led me down the path that a lot of these, you know, high-level people were indeed pedophiles.
And now we live in a fucking world, John, where the poopy pants puppet has a daughter whose diary leaks that says he's having inappropriate fucking showers with her.
His son calls him Pete O. Pete.
And he's got pictures of him with underage girls.
There's videos of him committing horrific acts to children.
Dude, it's unreal.
So, you know, Conspiracy of Silence, if you haven't seen it, I would encourage people to check it out.
I didn't want to get kicked off of YouTube today.
That's why we did this.
That's why we came over here because you can't talk about this stuff.
You cannot talk about this stuff at all.
It's over.
They've redefined words, guys.
They've redefined recession.
They've redefined what, you know, they're ready for the economic collapse.
One of the things I didn't bring up was that the Builder.
We're in North Korea territory, guys.
We're here.
He's going to declare a climate emergency.
They've already talked about how the economics is over at Bilderberg.
You can't talk on actual science and actual things on YouTube.
It's on.
We got a tip, and we got somebody that says attorney David Evan Shore was recently elected the president of the New York chapter of Nambla.
He is attempting to represent Chris Cuomo.
Are you kidding me?
Send me the information.
Listen, you need to send me that information where I can verify it on my Twitter.
Robert Wallach has monkeypox.
I don't know who Robert Wallach is, but and I'm not sure what that person said.
Listen, I'm just reading stuff, guys, on that one.
I'm reading stuff.
That's a wild thing to me.
Oh, the monkeypox?
Yeah, steps you can take to not catch monkeypox.
Yeah, don't have gay sex.
Not even gay sex.
You want to have gay sex with your longtime boyfriend?
Great.
You're not going to get monkeypox.
Don't have orgy gay sex.
And be a man.
Because if you're a woman and you're having gay sex, you're probably going to be okay.
Even orgy gay sex.
You really got to specify it.
Because, again, it doesn't stop the World Health Organization from declaring one of these imaginary emergencies.
So, folks, I think we are going to wrap it up.
Remember, we are still on YouTube by the skin of our nuts.
You can support me there, but I'd much rather you hit $9.99 a month.
We got to do the quick breakdown of the fights.
Oh, you're right.
Okay.
Let's talk.
What did you think of the?
Well, I think Patty's impressive, although Jordan Levitt doesn't have big stand-up, right?
I was disappointed, obviously, that Aspinall looks like he blew out his knee in the very, very beginning against Blades.
And this is another case.
All right.
Guys, the situation with the structure of MMA is causing this.
Okay.
You're not able to turn down fights because you're seriously injured.
You're not allowed to take breaks.
You're not allowed to choose your career path.
That puts you in a very vulnerable position.
And these guys are getting hurt in the middle of their fights in their main events, and you're not getting to watch it because they're unhealthy.
They're underpaid, and they're not allowed to take breaks when they need it, right?
This is like slave work, and these guys are, their careers are being shortened.
Their bodies are breaking down.
This is what, like the third, fourth event in like really recent history where guys are getting injured off of nothing.
I guarantee you that those weren't just freak injuries that happened right there.
These guys went into the fights hurt.
Well, on the flip of that, I don't know if you saw Bellator, but, you know, Patriki Pitbull, he was supposed to fight Sydney Outlaw, I believe, for the title.
Sydney Outlaw decides to take another fight, which was extremely dangerous, fighting a former one champion.
And he's only a former one champion because he left one.
He's a bad tofiq.
He's a bad dude, right?
Didn't he recently beat Pitbull?
Who just beat up Pitbull over in Risen?
It might have been him.
I think it was him.
I think he was the champion over there and beat Pitbull, and then he came over here.
Yeah, and I mean, he's a destroyed monster.
He's a monster.
He is.
He's the real deal.
So is that Cuban kid who beat Masasi a few weeks ago?
The Bellators definitely got some blue chip players over there.
But as long as promoters control the title, those blue chip guys are going to jump ship because Bellator will never, ever, ever be able to pay them as much as they would make if they had the UFC title.
Independent titles, guys.
We have to have independent titles or it's not a sport.
It's a production.
It's just glorified pro wrestling.
And quite honestly, with the commentating that I heard this last weekend from UFC and Bellator, like it's gross.
It's gross how much they hype the guy that they want to win.
They're pushing.
They will say there was one fight in the UFC where it didn't matter what the guy who was winning was doing.
The guy they wanted to win, everything that happened in that fight, they said that guy's name and the fight perspective from that guy.
Like the other guy didn't even exist.
You know, the fight with Lima and Jackson.
The whole fight, they're just talking about Lima.
And Jackson dominated that fight.
Yeah, Lima didn't do anything, though.
Like he's to blame.
Lima's to blame for that fight.
He had about five to six seconds of action.
And that's all they talked about.
Oh, my God, Lima.
Oh, my God.
Wow.
Look, he's fighting and throwing punches from his back.
It was like six seconds of action.
He didn't create space.
He didn't try to get up.
That's stalling.
We need to reintroduce the yellow card.
Pride used to have a yellow card.
It either needs to be a purse deduction or you take points away.
You want to get stood up.
You want to stop the action from your back by holding and hugging and stalling.
Okay.
But you get a yellow card and you lose a point.
John Fitch.
No free rides.
Why do you get a bonus?
Why do you get pushed ahead?
Why do you get put in a better position?
Because you stopped the progress of the fight because you stalled.
It's infuriating to me.
And there was like five fights.
If you guys go watch my podcast from last night, John Fish Knows Nothing, 173.
I went crazy on this on a few fights because there was a number of fights that were like this.
It's all the same bullcrap.
The guy on bottom does nothing.
He's not trying to fight.
He's not trying to get up.
Your responsibility from bottom is sweep, submit, or escape.
If you're not doing any of those things, you're stalling.
Watch how Tony Ferguson fights from his back.
Watch the key fight that I like to give people an example of what you're supposed to look like from your back.
Frank Shamrock and Tito Ortiz, when they fought 22 years ago, right?
Frank was giving up 15 pounds to Tito.
Frank never stopped moving from bottom.
Tito had to chase him, chase him, chase him on top.
He had to work hard to stay on top.
And eventually, Frank created space, got up.
Tito was too tired to do shit.
And Frank finished him.
That's how you fight.
That's how you fight from your back.
I'm so sick of these excuses coming from the commentators trying to shame the guy from top because the bottom guy is stalling.
It's pathetic.
I'm tired of it.
You heard it from Mr. Smash himself, John Fitch, MMA legend, right here.
We got one more tip.
This is from my man, Anthony Zappin.
He's big on the quantum computing and, of course, AI.
IBM just reached quantum supremacy through hybrid classical quantum machine learning.
We are on the verge of the AI quantum computing takeover by the Predator class.
So I'm going to have to look into that story.
Maybe that's something we cover this week, but we'll probably cover it by next week.
I would love for all you folks out there to check out my films.
They're free.
Loose Change, Final Cut, Fabled Enemies, Invisible Empire, a new world order to find.
And of course, Shade the Motion Picture.
If you want to support me, you can buy me a coffee.
All the links are down below.
I've been slacking on the pod bean, but this evening or sooner rather than later, I'm going to start uploading to there.
So you're going to, if you're just a pod bean guy, you're going to get a ton of content over the next 48 hours.
Fitch, what you got going on?
Obviously, John Fitch knows nothing.
Anything else coming up this week?
I'm working on a package program with all my fitness stuff, and that's what I'm trying to get put together right now.
So stay tuned.
I got the lifting stuff done, and I've got cardio and some other stuff.
I'm going to put it all together with a consultation and an accountability chat on Telegram.
So it should be good.
It should be motivational and get some people in there and get jacked.