A Powerful Musk Of Transhumanism And Authoritarianism Is In The Air
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermasShow more https://rumble.com/c/c-1647952
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
https://theinfowarrior.podbean.com/
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
https://twitter.com/JasonBermas
PayPal [email protected]
#BermasBrigade Show less
Hey everybody, Jason Burmes here, and earlier in the week we did end up doing a mixed martial mindset, but John Fitch was not here.
He looks confused right now with the lighting.
Trying to get my lights just right.
And my good friend here has joined us later in the week to do a broadcast.
I got plenty to say.
I'm sure we got plenty to watch.
Yeah, there was a lot of great fights on the fight night also.
You know what?
Another awesome car.
We might as well get a little MMA out of the way before we talk about Elon Musk, his AI robot, what that's going to mean for humanity.
The Tuckster tonight is going to be doing a special segment on AI and Google, what John and I actually discussed last week.
But yeah, you know, one of the highlights behind the scenes, and you don't really get to see it in the ESPN feeds because they're just chock full of commercials.
But if you have, if you can still get like a fight pass feed, right?
Those are banned in the United States as well because of the deal with ESPN Plus, even for fight nights.
You know what I mean?
They used to be included.
But if you get that feed, and a lot of internationally do, did you see Philip Hawes and Daniel Cormier gumming at each other after the fight?
You picked the wrong pony.
You didn't see that?
No, I didn't.
I didn't know.
He was man.
DC was very pro-Hawes throughout the fight.
And I don't listen to the commentation.
That's like the commentators and the previews and all that stuff.
Twitter's Transparency Push00:09:52
It's like the worst part of it for me.
I think it was.
It's circus pro wrestling stuff.
I'm not a fan of it.
They say a lot of the same stuff.
It could be like interchangeable.
You could interchange the fighter's name and it's like the same canned responses.
I just mute it.
I don't want to listen to it.
I just watch the fights.
Well, he ended up apologizing afterwards, but it's actually worth watching for anybody that missed that.
The whole card was really worth watching.
I believe Bellator returns this weekend.
I'm not sure if there was a KSW also this last weekend in the PFO.
So there's a lot of action.
Listen, KSW is hot.
I'll watch some of that, but that thing is they're all juiced out of their minds.
Oh, man.
Yeah.
They are.
I mean, I hate to say it, guys, but there's you forget about it.
They're on everything over there.
And if you look at Jan, who came up.
Oh, yeah.
Nobody, nobody getting tired.
Everybody's just jacked in the gills.
Just huge.
Super strong.
But I mean, it makes for some really great fights.
Yeah, it does.
So I want to talk Musker Dew, okay?
Because there's a lot of hype all around all this stuff, guys.
And there's a good article in Mint Press right now that's talking about how Twitter is hiring a ton of ex-FBI agents.
Okay, so that's happening.
They just signed, what, $100 million to the FBI in that bill they just passed?
Look, man, here's the deal.
How bad has the FBI's track record been in the last four or five years?
And they're going to give them how much money?
They need to be cutting funding.
They need to be like rounding those guys up and then making sure they're on the program.
They're not looking out for American citizens.
I mean, look at what just happened.
Again, we discussed it last week, but with Project Veritas and the Jill Biden diary, you know, and the fact that now they are trying to press charges against the woman who sold the diary to National File.
And I'm going to say this again: I don't like, okay, I don't like that the media is not saying National File's name in this.
In fact, you know, they're making it all about Veritas.
That worries me because look, National File is not perfect.
I don't know a lot about Papert.
I've interviewed Patrick Howley before.
I think Patrick Howley's got a lot of things wrong.
They all still deserve to exist.
Okay.
And you give credit where credit is due.
And those guys, whether you like them or not, put their balls on the table, paid for the fucking diary, put their goddamn watermark on it, and put it out to the public.
And it was out before the elections.
I want to repeat that.
It was out before the elections.
Guys like me, because of the track record of some of those people, stayed away from it, knew it was out there, waited until the FBI moved on Veritas seven months ago, I think it was, John, to report on it and finally say, look, inappropriate showers with his daughter, highly sexualized, thinks that she was molested as a child with her cousin.
Come on.
Come on.
So at the end of the day, you have to give credit where credit's due.
That's it.
You know, think about this.
It was the National Inquirer that back in the day broke the John Edwards story.
It was the National Inquirer that was doing work on Bin Laden pre-9/11 and magically had anthrax sent to them.
One guy actually died over in the Inquirer from that.
They never talk about that.
So you give credit where credit's due.
I want to thank Van Gil Frog.
And it says, hello, Burmese and Fitch with that.
So Musker do, okay, the Muskernuts.
Veritas has this.
I might do a watch along with the whole thing.
Okay, but they've got this whole video with everybody.
And that's the first thing I think we're going to break down.
We're also going to show his presentation of the new Tesla bot and why that's important from last summer out in August.
And I'm going to show you Sarcos Robotics.
We've got a lot to discuss.
But Bloomberg did a 20-minute interview with him where they're kind of still trying to level him out and portray him as a hero, John.
Let's kind of analyze this right here.
Here is the Muskernuts.
I think it's essential to have free speech and to be able to communicate.
Yeah, just communicate freely if there are multiple opinions, and just make sure that we're not sort of driving a narrative.
In order for people to have trust in Twitter, I think it's extremely important that there be transparency.
I think Twitter, in terms of like serious issues, can be a lot better informing informing people about serious issues.
How many times have the media gotten it right?
I would say almost never.
Not never, but almost never.
Can we talk briefly about your political views?
So let me just stop it right there before we even get into his political views.
I want to make sure that we go over what he just said.
Okay.
He already starts talking about how they don't have to be quote-unquote pushing one narrative.
And I think that that's important.
Obviously, it says the right thing about the media getting everything wrong.
But again, you'd have to be totally gone.
Totally gone.
I mean, all even the hardest of right-wingers are admitting by now, Fitch, weapons of mass destruction didn't exist.
And Iraq was a mistake.
Even those people, the most hardliners of hardliners that flipped the script.
Dude, you know what's crazy?
Let's hear it.
I've gotten an argument with leftists saying that, oh, it was a mistake.
Like they just made a mistake about the weapons of mass destruction.
Now covering, like now, yeah, like they're covering for it.
I'm like, bro, like, if we would have talked about this 20 years ago, you'd have gone crazy about how much of a piece of shit Bush was.
And rightfully so.
And now your position's changed.
Like, oh, yeah, well, you know, we kind of needed to do that.
And it's such a bizarre thing to me.
So here's where he reveals to me, because he also talked about transparency, John, right?
So what does that mean?
That means that it is going to be more difficult to make anonymous SOC accounts or bot accounts.
So there will be some type of verification of who your true identity is.
Now, I don't know if that's going to be biometric information, like a thumb scan.
I don't know if it's going to be now you're going to have to put your license and you're going to have to give a real-time face ID of yourself.
That's very possible with the technology.
Not just a photo, but you know, this is who I am.
You link to a certain account.
I want people to keep that in mind because if there's full transparency, then there shouldn't be AI, multiple accounts, bot accounts that are on Twitter eventually.
Okay.
But listen to what he has to say.
Well, my political views, I think, are moderate.
I'm in favor of moderate politics.
But, you know, allowing people who have relatively extreme views to express those views within the bounds of the law.
You know, it's free speech within the context of the law.
So I'm not definitely not suggesting that we just flout the law because we'll get shut down in that case.
And I think there's also freedom of speech and freedom of reach.
So I think people should be allowed to say pretty outrageous things that are within the bounds of the law, but then they don't, you know, it doesn't get amplified and doesn't get a ton of reach.
So let's just stop it right there.
Think about what he's saying right there.
If you have full transparency, right, and there's some kind of extreme content, and he talks about, I'm not sure if they're going to show it next, but he talks about how you can go in the middle of Times Square and you can deny the Holocaust, right?
So immediately, he's putting extreme views with Nazis and Holocaust denial and white supremacy, okay?
But if there's true transparency, guess what?
Those views don't get fucking amplified anyway because nobody thinks like that.
Okay.
And if there's true transparency, those that actually amplify those views are seen by the public.
You actually see who they are.
So I'm unsure what the problem would be, right?
But again, this isn't about Nazis or Holocaust denial.
This is about creating a narrative that you're still not allowed to go against.
And if you say certain things, the algorithm will still work against you.
And I think an important goal for Twitter would be to try to include as much of the country, as much of the world as possible.
So the things that I've said about Twitter, I think, are going to need to happen in order for it to be, you know, to really go to the next level.
I mean, I think the potential is there for Twitter to have and be accessible to an order of bang two more people.
But say the far left 10% and far right 10% were equally upset on Twitter, then that would probably be a good outcome.
The standard is much more than not offending people.
The standard should be that they're very entertained and informed.
So again, he said a lot of real things there, right?
Obviously, but he also says we're still going to run our algorithms.
There's going to be more transparency, which I'm kind of for.
Space Travel Challenges00:13:34
Like, you know what?
The anonymous bots on Twitter and the anonymous try just blocked another anonymous loser today.
Yeah, I started.
I started.
I never used to do it before.
Now I start checking.
I start checking who those things are and like one follower, no followers, or a 10-year-old account.
Like block every time.
Yeah, I block a lot now.
I don't even care.
So, and by, and by the way, blocking, we talked about this.
You know, Ukrainian state bank personnel seize journalist equipment, delete footage.
This was just before the Ukrainian war.
Just outlaw the opposition party, too.
Yes.
Yes.
But they also.
In the name of democracy.
They also are restricting Russian books and music now.
That's the next thing.
Ben Stiller came in.
And Ukraine says Elon Musk Starlink has been very effective in countering Russia.
China paying close attention.
Well, we're going to get into it because, look, where is it?
Right here?
No, that's not it right there.
Pentagon studies use of SpaceX for rocket deployment quick reaction force.
Okay, and here's the document.
Let's see.
Don't tell me.
Man, we'll bring the document up in a moment.
So anyway, this thing is from Mint Press, and it's talking about the deployment of individuals.
Like they talk about it as a strike team.
And by the way, a lot of it's redacted, guys.
Gee, I wonder why.
I can't believe a lot of it's redacted, Fitch.
How could it be redacted?
But they're making, look, they already admit, like, you go through this article, and they're already talking about how they're using this stuff, SpaceX, as a military contractor in the Ukraine.
This is U.S. Strandcom, okay?
And they're basically saying that here's the Ukrainian commission links.
Okay.
They don't mention the blackjack system, but they start hinting towards the deployment of strike forces.
And basically, when they get down to the people inside the military, they have a very canned response, but say it could happen in the next five to ten years.
Well, yeah, if it's not a human being.
So here are the options.
Basically, you look at this, and they talk about Project Ithaca, which was an old school program with Werner von Braun right here, where way back in the 60s, they wanted a spacecraft to deploy 1,200 soldiers to their destination in an hour.
Now, remember, we're openly moving cargo in an hour.
Okay?
We're openly moving cargo in an hour.
So let's just say that the Muskernuts is here.
And I think that since we're not on YouTube, I'm actually going to play the audio and dance to the absurdity because every time they get ready to let you know that you're going to be automated out of society, there's like a hot techno-disco.
They got a hot techno-disco beat.
Let's dance our way into extinction.
So this is, think about it this way.
I'm not saying that they wouldn't be able to send some kind of an altered human being, but still space travel is very hard on the human body.
A lot of people don't understand that.
The G's, if you saw Maverick, again, they allude to that in the very beginning with Skunk Works and the Lockheed Martin plane he's in and how he had to get in the astronaut suit and he had to get in the seat and he had to run and have to think, all those things.
So it's tough to space harden humans.
If we genetically modify them, like they talk about in the NASA documents and Bushnell talks about maybe not.
And then you further that with some type of brain chip technology or nanotechnology that controls endorphin systems, nervous systems, you know, sensory systems within the body.
Maybe that's possible.
Nanotech?
Maybe.
But I'll tell you what is possible.
Sending fucking badass DARPA dogs with goddamn fucking cannons on them.
Yeah.
Yeah.
You send those things, right?
And they're just remote controlled by somebody with an Xbox controller.
Just 100,000 little mini drones with C4 strapped to them.
Let's not forget the air drones.
Exactly.
But let's just say those aren't the things they want to do.
Let's say they actually want to go, you know what?
Those DARPA ones are terrifying, but let's make it look more humanoid.
And here we go with that hot disco techno Elon Musk beat.
Get ready, everybody.
Fun stuff.
Thumbs up, subscribe, and share.
Boom!
Yeah!
Yeah!
Looks like something out of a PlayStation fucking three game.
And they're not done rubbing it in.
Let's keep going let's bring out the asshole Here he comes.
He's doing the robot.
It's all cute.
It's funny.
Oh.
This is how they treat you.
They treat you like children.
And Musk is the front man for this.
The muster nut.
The Tesla bomb.
The humanoid robot that's going to openly replace you.
All right.
Thank you.
So here comes Elon.
I'm sorry, I had to put everybody through it all.
Unlike Dojo, obviously that was not real.
So Dojo is real.
The Tesla bot will be real.
But basically, if you think about what we're doing right now with cars, Tesla is arguably the world's biggest robotics company because our cars are like semi-sentient robots on wheels.
And with the full-scale driving computer, essentially the inference engine on the car, which we'll keep evolving, obviously, and Dojo and all of the neural nets recognizing the world, understanding how to navigate through the world.
It kind of makes sense to put that onto a humanoid phone.
And we're also quite good at sensors and batteries and actuators.
So we think we'll probably have a prototype sometime next year that basically looks like this.
And it's intended to be friendly, of course.
It's going to be friendly.
Sure.
It's going to be friendly.
Totally.
And navigate through a world for humans.
Yeah.
Well, don't worry.
Injects you with stuff.
Well, it's going to be friendly, especially when it's designed to be friendly.
You know, these are the help bots that ease you out of the working situation.
You know, the jobs that you don't want.
Remember those jobs?
Remember when they told us when there was an influx of migration?
And listen, I'm not against immigrants coming in.
But they said, you know what?
They're taking the jobs that nobody wanted.
Let me just talk about that for a second.
The jobs nobody wanted back in the day were done by kids, like mowing lawns, and they learned respect and the value of money.
And they learned discipline got you money, okay, and entrepreneurship.
And that made people who wanted to work.
That was wiped out a generation ago.
Huh?
How many millennials, you know, really want to work?
Not everybody.
But it's a lot less.
It's really weird, isn't it, how that works?
Huh.
Yeah, exactly.
So let's look at this bad boy.
Okay, it's a world built by humans.
He's going to be friendly and it's going to be eliminating dangerous and repetitive, boring tasks.
And eliminate dangerous, repetitive, and boring tasks.
We're setting it such that it is at a mechanical level, at a physical level, you can run away from it and most likely overpower it.
It's hilarious for now.
We'll get you used to the pussy robot.
You remember that one we were showing last week that was curling the weight?
Don't worry, this one's not that one yet.
So hopefully that doesn't ever happen, but you never know.
So it'll be a, you know, a light, a light, yeah, anyway.
Five miles an hour.
You can get run past on that.
It'd be fine.
So, yeah, it's around 5'8.
Has sort of a screen where the head is for useful information.
But it's otherwise basically got the autopilot system in it.
So it's got cameras, got eight cameras.
Where's it sending those videos?
Wherever it wants, probably up to the Starlink metaverse, John.
Again, this guy is a Defense Department contractor.
For instance, they pointed out, and I always say this about rocket technology.
That's why the whole front that he's taking us to fucking the moon and we're going to Mars and Project Artemis.
No.
Let me say it again.
No.
They admit in those documents, John, okay, that the four rockets that they tried to deploy in the test for this strike action team all exploded.
You know why?
Because rockets explode.
It's what they do.
I just don't understand how people don't get that.
They explode.
It's in here.
This is U.S. Transcom.
The technologies that are truly revolutionizing space travel and weaponry systems, right?
One of the things I forgot to grab today, and I really wanted to grab, was this video where they show like a UFO thing on the history channel.
And they say, well, is the video a hoax?
The video is not a hoax, but it's probably not a UFO.
It looks a lot like a mini sat or a derivation from.
You know what I mean?
It looks like our technology floating through the sky in a place where it's not supposed to be.
And, you know, we can't come to that.
So let me just bring this up now that I actually do have it finally.
Of course, wanted to do it that way, but whatever.
So this is that report, okay?
With SpaceX, I want people to understand, again, that they're a military contractor.
That's what this is, okay?
You see?
They're highly classified.
They black a ton of stuff out.
It's, I mean, come on.
Very, it's, it's very redacted, what's actually going on.
Do we understand that?
Can we, can we agree on that, guys?
There's a lot of things going on in space warfare that you and I don't know about.
But the fact that nobody seems to understand that, you know, this is a real issue.
You know, this is what's going on.
U.S. Congress.
Oh, look at that.
And NASA is running warfare.
That's what this is.
This is warfare, man.
Sounding rocket program, small rocket program, orbital, orbital service program, national security space launch.
It's all these aren't my documents.
You think they let you in on the national security space launches, everybody?
Like, what planet are we on?
Seriously, what planet are we on, John?
It's incredible to me.
So let's continue here with, and that's the thing.
The robots are what's going to be manning most of this stuff, and they're going to be the military.
Like I'm saying, and now they're getting you ready for humanoid robots that you're also going to work with that are going to police force, everything, everything.
And they're going to get rid of us as humans.
Could be your chefs in the kitchen, but you know what?
When the alert goes off and the single scent, they all become police officers.
They all could become anything.
Like, maybe you're lucky if they're police officers.
Maybe they get turned on to total and completely psychopaths.
You know, forget about it.
This is insane.
Can you get hacked?
Yes.
They just, all of them are running around trying to hump people and teabag them.
Some teenagers will have a hoot out of it.
Yeah.
Grandma's going to get hurt.
She'll break a hip because she got teabagged by a robot.
Opportunity or Oppression?00:04:18
I was having a similar thought, and it's nightmarish.
Let's continue on.
Full self-driving computer and making use of all of the same tools that we use in the car.
So, I mean, things that I think that are really hard about having a useful human right robot is you cannot navigate through the world without being explicitly trained.
I mean, without explicit, like line-by-line instructions.
Can you talk to it and say, you know, please pick up that bolt and attach it to the car with that wrench?
And it should be able to do that.
It should be able to, you know, please go to the store and get me the following groceries.
That kind of thing.
So, yeah, I think we can do that.
In other words, you're not allowed to have human interaction.
All right.
And I have another video we're going to be playing to Klaus Schwab talking about Davos this year.
And actually, I'll give the journalist credit, man.
He actually does call him a failure many times over.
Kind of calls him out on his bullshit a little.
It's a little bit contrived.
But at the same time, they can fail again and again and again.
They're bringing in stakeholder capitalism.
They're always offering these solutions.
And now they're offering the solution from this guy who's like on a tour.
He's like, think about it.
Does he look like a guy that's running multiple companies?
Or he's on a press tour all the time.
Is he a celebrity?
Is he a spokesperson?
Right?
Is he a front man, right?
He's like a vaudevillian fucking circus act, in my opinion.
So you look at this, and now he's telling you, here they come.
And then he's going to tell you the UBI is coming too.
Okay.
He's like, this is why we're eventually going to need to use Universal Basic Income because you're useless.
And yeah.
This, I think, will be quite a bit of a question.
It's like guys like him pushing UBI.
Yeah.
So you push in the UBI.
They're okay with giving up all of their wealth.
None of them are going to give up any wealth because it's going to be.
No, no, no, that's what I'm saying.
That's what I'm saying, though.
But that's what they're doing is if they issue a UBI, what they're basically saying is we're freezing the money on the table.
We're freezing the game.
No one will ever raise up.
No one will ever drop off.
We'll all stay exactly where we're at.
So all the rich, powerful people will never risk somebody else becoming rich and powerful and threatening their power.
They're going to lock everybody into place.
This is feudalism.
Yes.
They're going to lock you in to your level.
You'll never have the opportunity.
Your children will never have the opportunity to raise yourself above your current position.
Yes.
You'll just always be a grain eater.
You'll always be a bottom dweller.
You'll be one of the poorers.
Yes.
And that's why in the future strategic warfare document by NASA, I continually talk about this document because we're going to go to haves and haves nots.
Haves.
Look at this.
Exactly what you just said.
The equalization of the haves and have-nots.
So basically, right now, we live in a system, John, where a lot of us can't imagine when you get up to that predator class level.
But when we interact in society, we often say, well, the head of this Hollywood studio or the guy who owns the car lot or, you know, has the franchises, he's the rich guy, right?
They're millionaires.
They're multi-millionaires.
They're superstars.
That's nothing.
Those people they intend to even out, right, to the very poor, right?
The very, very poor will probably have their lives come up a little bit, right?
They'll get a pod that'll be taken care of.
I don't even think so.
You don't get shoved into some kind of whatever, housing situation, some kind of tent situation, something that's not going to be good because you're going to have forced people and forced living situations and you're going to have just monsters, animals, and psychos who make it a living hell and you're not going to be able to do anything about it.
The Feminization Of Wealth00:03:38
Well, you're not wrong.
You're not going to be able to move out of that area and move away from bad people.
You're just stuck.
you're just stuck there well i think where are you going to go Oh, it's universal basic income.
You can't work hard and level yourself up to move away from crime and degeneracy.
You can't do that.
Well, no, I think, look, I think on one end, we've got population control, or what they say right there in the same exact page right there, right?
Stabilization of the world population going on right now.
It's happening.
In fact, you know what?
I might as well bring it up.
We'll come back to Tesla in a moment and his UBI, but we need to show this one.
You could say what you want, but we already know that the musker nuts here or these things are hating lies, okay?
And you'll never see these headlines in the United States.
But this is a headline from the Daily Mail today.
Tears and squirms as America's children start to receive, you know what?
And Biden brags that the nation is the only country in the world doing this right now.
Idiots.
Absolute idiots.
So, I mean, I told you they were coming for your kids.
They have now come for your kids.
And let me say this in the most serious way possible.
May God have mercy on you and your family, for real.
I don't want anything bad to happen to you if you're watching this or anybody you love, especially your children.
But this is insanity.
And if you don't think that these people, when we now know, it's messing with fertility in a lot of different places.
Did you see the UK headline of let's see if I can find it first chance on Google?
UK stress causing women's periods.
Let's see.
Another made-up explanation to brand new health issues popping up.
So this is things that didn't exist two years ago.
Also, again, just going on with, I mean, you look at this.
Two-thirds of UK women are missing periods because of stress or poor diet.
Okay?
Like, in fact, new research, let's bring it up so everybody can read it here.
Okay.
Oh, they're just fading how unhealthy they are over there.
In fact, new research suggests the striking majority of UK women are missing periods because of lifestyle factors.
And there's a worrying lack of awareness about the implications of this.
Okay.
So now they're selling you on the idea that if you had a normal mental cycle your whole life, now your diet is coming home to roost or just the stress of everything.
Maybe you should get on some SSRIs, John.
Now, it could be the, yeah, it's a mixture of psychiatric drugs, the jabs, and poor diets.
Because there are, it's, man, most people are obese in the U.S. and England.
So I could see how diet could be very well be affecting people's, it's, you know, it's affecting males' testosterone levels.
You're not right.
Listen, again, I couldn't believe how low my testosterone level was when I fucking got a check, John.
It was shameful.
Shameful, Fitch.
It's unbelievably shameful.
And I'm a pretty high-energy guy, I thought, at least.
I guess not.
Dystopian Labor Trap00:05:55
And that's the thing.
Think about this.
They have ultimately, at least in this country, feminized the male population, whether you like it or not.
They have made us extremely soft, even physically.
Chemicals in the water, plastics, all kinds of things bombarding our system and attacking testosterone.
So let's play it.
Okay.
Here it is.
Here's Musk talking about that UBI.
Because if you say, like, what is the economy?
It is at the foundation of it is labor.
So what happens when there is, you know, no shortage of labor?
This is why I think long-term there will need to be universal basic income.
Yeah.
I mean, the fact that that gets applause should send chills down your spine.
That just shows you.
And again, this is a bunch, this is in front of a bunch of young people, okay, that are musketeers to the end, that love the musquerade, that can't wait for robots.
Remember, Davos had their little when, you know what?
Let's just play this really quick too, John.
Why not?
Why not?
Let's cut it in because people are cheering here.
Let's bring it back.
We'll do it live.
I believe this right here sums it up.
We're going to start the When Humans Become Cyborg session.
You know, I always wanted to be a cyborg.
I'm waiting for the day to become one, but let's see.
Like, today we like to really talk about the recent developments of brain computer interface.
So, can't wait to become a cyborg.
Fitch, did I lose you?
It looks like I just lost John Fitch.
There he is.
He's coming on back.
Good thing.
No.
Did you hear it?
Or did you miss it?
Let's do it again.
It's only 20 seconds.
Again, this is what's happening at the World Economic Forum.
If you don't think that you're getting automated out of society and they're pushing you into transhumanism, look how happy this woman who's leading this forum is.
We're going to start the when humans become cyborg.
Not if.
When?
When humans become cyborgs.
Not if.
You know, I always wanted to be a cyborg.
I'm waiting for the day to become one.
Let's see.
I think this is a dystopian trap.
They're going to get a bunch of midwits and dummies and poor people to think I'm going to be able to upload my consciousness to this robot and live forever.
And the AI is just going to mimic that person.
So like friends and family will think that the conscious was uploaded, but really they're just trying to get people to kill themselves.
Thank you.
I totally agree with you.
I think that's totally.
We'll get rid of your worthless body.
We'll upload the consciousness.
You'll totally be a robot forever.
It'll be great.
Oh, really?
I know you love me because you got money and you work for the government.
Let's do it.
Oh, my God.
You're not wrong.
It ends with that.
It does.
So let's let, you know what?
Let's let Musk finish up here.
And then I'm going to show you just some of the stuff, robotics tools that are going to get rid of a ton of jobs by people getting into these exosuits.
Okay.
The stuff that you and I played with via G.I. Joe's and all these other things is now a reality, John.
We're going to show you the Sarcos robots in a moment.
But not right now, because this robot doesn't work.
So we just need a minute.
So, yeah, but I think essentially in the future, physical work will be a choice.
If you want to do it, you can, but you won't need to do it.
That's not true either.
Because let me tell you something.
Again, if you it won't be a choice, because if you are in one of these societies where John's talking about and he's right, where you're in one of these techno ghettos and you can't get up in the class system, then no, you won't have to do physical labor at all.
But if you decide, oh, again, man, the computer, the thing is going down today.
If you decide to live in a different type of society, a secondary society, well, then it's going to be an issue.
It's going to be a problem.
If you try to be too independent, then you're really not going to have a choice of physical labor.
You're going to have to do the physical labor, period.
Okay.
But the rich, I mean, they're going to be able to do whatever they want because they're going to be at the helm of these robotics, the super rich, the predator class.
And, yeah, I think it obviously has profound implications for the economy because given that the economy at its foundational level is labor, I mean, capital is, capital equipment is just distilled labor, then is there any actual limit to the economy?
Maybe not.
So, yeah.
I'm going to let it stop right there.
Once again, he's talking about the Tesla bot.
He's talking about the future of economics.
He's talking about AUBI, and he's basically, listen, whenever they tell you it's going to be a choice and things like that, they sold all these people back in like the 50s that all this techno revolution was going to bring in an age where they weren't going to have to do anything, right?
Like, oh, we're going to have all this stuff and life's going to get easier.
No, instead, instead of being able to own a home and not have debt and have several cars, okay, and have one person in the house working, everybody works.
Future Of Economics Pushed?00:06:08
Some of them work multiple jobs.
You're all in debt.
Multiple jobs.
They still don't have money to pay for things.
They have to pay crazy amounts of money for rent.
They can't afford homes.
They can't afford health care.
They can't.
Nothing's gotten easier.
But cheap, worthless trinkets, food, like some things.
What they call food, John, not real food.
Yeah, yeah, junk food.
Garbage food is more readily available.
So none of the things you need to survive got cheaper or easier to attain.
They got more scarce.
In fact, real food has gotten exactly way more scarce.
And it's a false scarcity.
Okay.
It's a mandatory thing.
Well, it's gotten distracted.
It's a distraction, you know?
Like, yeah, they distract you with the cheap thrills, and you don't realize that you're not getting any of the stuff you really need.
So, John, I know that you love the last heavy disco beat, you know, crazy beats.
We've got some more crazy beats for you.
These are the Sarcos robots, everybody.
And again, it comes to like a nice, hot, techno, beaded track.
Got a nice little guitar riff in there, yeah.
You're getting replaced!
They're coming in to take the job.
Yeah.
I like the movie Avatar 2.
That's an alien.
You're right.
It is Aliens.
The second one, right?
Aliens, yeah.
Wait, did she use it?
So no, it was the first one.
Very first one, wasn't it?
She uses at the end, right?
Isn't that the deal she gets in at the end?
Exactly.
Yeah, you're right.
right looks kind of like a human Isn't that cute?
So here we go, the hook man.
Oh boy.
Oh, there's the military using it.
That's lovely.
Of course, they are.
But no, they're getting totally going to use it for moving boxes.
They're totally going to move in boxes of food, eight.
Yep.
make sure they don't throw their backs out so basically they're like you know you don't have to do physical labor anymore We're just going to make you super weak, too.
Nobody's going to be a big, like, fat pig.
You know, that's exactly right.
You know, like, their bones are going to break trying to lift the arms.
Don't worry.
They'll be genetically modified with the latest mRNA shots to make sure that their stringy little muscles survive, John, because they're working just long enough to do their service for the military and getting the exosuits.
You know, they'll probably be sterile by then, and they'll be identifying as gender X12.
I'm sure you saw that terrible military video that went viral yesterday about the pronouns, right?
Yeah, I saw.
I didn't even want to listen to it.
It's hard.
It's like you're doing a blues clues thing for soldiers about not hurting people's feelings by calling them the wrong pronoun.
Like you're training these people to kill people.
And not only that, but oh, what's your pronoun?
Oh, she like they didn't even put any money into it.
It was bad green screen.
It looked like something out of like that you would watch in like the early 90s.
It was bizarre and terrible.
But hey, that's fine.
I believe that this is a woman in there, right?
I'm pretty sure this isn't a man.
You know what I mean?
That's what they're trying to say.
Look at this.
We got like a skinny middle-aged woman in there.
She's killing it.
Sarcos Robotics, helping people navigate difficult environments.
Little mini drones.
That's nice.
Whatever that thing is.
That looks dangerous.
Huh?
Little ground terrain drones.
Nice.
Yep.
Yeah, right in there.
Come right up through exactly.
Come right up through your toilet while you're taking a shit and explode.
We got him.
Hey, boss.
A little nuclear Poseidon's kiss.
Navigate stairs pretty well right there, Sarkos.
And then let's see.
What do we got?
Oh, we got the robots in the trees.
Listen, I'm all for things like these.
You know what I mean?
If they're in the right hands.
But at the same time, you see how they're making it humanoid.
You see how they're pushing you into transhumanism.
John told you, listen, we're not joking when we say they're going into a virtual age.
When I say this, they're in the stage right now of stabilizing the world population.
Okay, rapid technology diffusion, equalizing the quote-unquote haves and have-nots.
All right.
Demise of underclasses and altered political military outlooks worldwide that changes everything.
What do you think the Greek reset is?
What do you think the new world order was?
And it's on the road because once they get that firmly into place, they want their virtual world.
Powering the Future00:06:12
You know, I wish that they didn't, but that's the era that they want to bring in.
And we've played the clips here again on the show.
We're not going to do it now.
They openly state it's uploading your consciousness.
Or what was it?
Human-contaminated machines, John?
At the end of the day?
Human-contaminated machines.
So let's see if I can find the Klaus House video where he's basically being called out on failing on everything.
So why should we give you more power?
We do it live.
Thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
By the way, Fitch, tell people where they can find your stuff.
Go to johnfitch.net.
I have a brand new Fitch Smash Strength program I just made live this week.
That's available.
It's the lifting system that I created so that I could stay strong and lift while I was fighting.
And then now that I'm retired, I still use it.
Stay strong, stay lean, stay jacked.
And sharing that with everybody now.
Excellent.
Founder and executive chairman of WEF.
Dr. Schwab, Professor Schwab, says this year's event is more important than ever.
Called it WEF, by the way.
And this guy's a seasoned journalist.
He's been around for a while.
I actually don't hate this guy as much as I do other guys, but let's just continue.
Given the challenges that the work is facing, the world is facing.
Klaus Schwab says it's crucial that leaders meet in person as it helps create trust between them.
Exactly.
And they want to take.
And who made these people leaders?
Well, let's just say this.
He's not wrong that people need to meet in person so they can build trust in human relationships.
Notice they get to do that as the minions of the predator class, and we don't.
It's fuck you time.
It's virtual world.
It's pod world.
It's fucking.
Who the fuck?
Elected this Schwab character, this Nazi child.
Child of a Nazi.
Where was that vote?
When did I sleep in?
You got to read the Johnny Vedmore piece.
It tells you the deification and the rise of Klaus Schwab through people like Galbraith and Kahn and, of course, Kissinger.
But you can check that actually out on Rockfin.
I might actually post that one on Rumble because that's a damn good one.
You see every day how the world is falling apart.
No, I don't.
I see the world being torn apart.
Yeah, I see these jerk off screwing everything up.
Leave us alone.
Yeah.
Exactly.
I see you guys literally tearing us apart, not solving any of the world's issues.
In fact, making all of them worse.
And saying you are fixing them.
Oh, the worst.
It's a different crisis which we have to manage.
And you can exchange in small circles ideas.
You can take certain decisions.
But it was so important to bring the global community, the global stakeholder community.
And notice he's saying stakeholder because he wants to talk about stakeholder capitalism and sell you on that bullshit.
But basically, he's really telling you the reason we need to meet in person is because there's a bunch of backdoor deals we also do, okay, that are totally illegal.
And by the way, we can never have them go public.
And then we have to build trust and say we have this on.
We're rigging the system and we got to trust each other.
We can rig the system together to screw over everybody else.
Correct.
Together in person again, because it's only the personal interaction which creates trust or which recreates trust.
Isn't the reality, though, that everything that Davos stands for is on the verge of failure?
I mean, the only thing that I'm going to say about this is he spins it into the climate change stuff.
But the thing is that net zero is fictional.
You could never have zero carbon emissions unless you have no life on the planet.
So that's the big scam.
That's always going to be a failure, no matter what solution they give you.
The technology, I've said this to people, like the battery technology, the technology for harvesting solar or wind energy is not that effective.
It's not really a doable thing right now.
Technology is not there.
The amount of carbon you have to burn through, the amount of fuel you have to burn through to make those batteries, to make the windmills, like it ends up eating up anything that was saved.
Like you end up using more petrol and more gas making this stuff than you save by using it.
And then you have pieces like China that have no standards.
Their solar panels are made with all kinds of toxic chemicals that bleed out and then they don't last very long.
So they got to keep remaking them.
And then the toxins seep into the ground.
And now you've got some pollution to deal with, too.
It's just, it's not there.
It's a big lie.
My favorite little clip of recently was somebody asking about to some politician, like, you know, like, where does the power come from to charge the battery?
Yeah, we played that on the show.
Exactly.
Yeah, and they said 95% coal.
The roof of the T-roof.
And like, oh, the energy comes from the battery.
But no, how do you charge the battery?
And then he asked some other people.
I was like, oh, yeah, well, the electricity comes from the coal plant, the coal power plant.
Yeah, exactly.
You're not saving anything.
No.
No, you're just switching from one dirty fuel to another dirty fuel.
Like the energy, the electric and the batteries, it's just a store of energy.
Like you're not, like, you're still burning up the same amount of fuel drink.
Correct.
So let's continue here because he's telling them, hey, everything you've done has failed.
Give you an example.
Number one, the war in Ukraine.
All the idea of some sort of common views on a European way forward.
Number two, China.
Unilaterally, shut down.
Why We're Not Saving Anything00:02:29
Everybody else is open.
Number three, we're failing on our climate targets.
So what's the purpose?
First, Damos never has been as important as it is now, particularly for the reasons you mentioned.
Because we are such losers.
It's never been more important now.
We need to devastate the economies.
We cannot prevent the war in Ukraine.
Bullshit.
You guys literally, through the World Health Organization, WF, had like Zoom calls with Zelensky.
You saw that Stiller went out there and met with him.
Come on.
Give me a break.
We cannot take away COVID and so on.
No, you can just force the world through pseudo-bureaucracies to bend your authoritarian wills.
But we can create coordinated responses to those challenges.
And that's what we are doing.
And those challenges need the cooperation of business, civil society, and, of course, mainly politics.
Right.
So right there is total fascism.
And he's saying we can suggest things and make things move, which they did, which was a total failure.
The Hayden Live shots are a total failure.
All right.
America's giving them to people under five.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Way to go, Joe Biden.
Whatever.
Like, did you know why he crashed that bike, by the way?
Yeah, he was stopping to talk to a little girl.
That's right.
So a little girl in the crowd.
He got all excited.
Couldn't wait to jump off his bite and smell her bike and smell her hair.
Oh, and there goes Fitch's.
I think it's getting hot here in San Jose.
Gotcha.
I'm not sure what's happening is my camera's over.
Well, you know what?
It's okay because we're on the last five minutes anyway.
And we'll do something else on the Schwab.
We can wrap it up here.
Fitch, you gave out the website.
What do we got for the UFC card this weekend?
It's not a very good card.
It's the ESPN Plus card, and it's very bleh.
It's very bleh.
I had some other stories, but you know what?
We're going to do some other stuff.
Not to disrespect any of the fighters on the card, but they didn't put a lot of name power on it.
Gotcha.
All right, folks, you know how to do it here.
You thumbs it up, you subscribe, you share.
If you're on Rockvin, go check out on Rumble.
If you're on Rumble, we got the Pod Bean.
We got the audio.
I don't know.
Did anybody try to call in on Pod Bean?
No, but we were live.
We did it live on Podbean as well.
So you can probably get the video cast after that.