All Episodes
Previous Next
July 31, 2022 - InfoWars Films
01:47:26
Endgame 1.5 (2007)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
*sad music* *sad music* One, two, two,
one. one.
One, two, one.
One of the things that we're getting from this morning, this afternoon conference, this morning conference was about the energy crisis, the press of the afternoon conference, which started at 4:00, the press of the afternoon conference, which started at 4:00, 4:30.
They were talking about, one of the American delegates, I wasn't told who exactly it was, was talking about the concern that the American citizens have had with the housing crisis going down, so they're not investing that money.
So what they needed to do is they needed to create the illusion that everything is going well.
So what they're going to do over the next year, year and a half...
It's to bring the market back up to 1998, 1999 levels.
They're going to get all the suckers to invest whatever little money they have left over.
And that's when they're going to make the economy bottom drop out.
They need to destroy the economy because as we're running out of oil, when people don't travel, at least that's what they're saying, when people don't travel, when people don't have money, they don't travel, they don't spend any money, which means you don't waste all that of oil and natural gas.
Actually, there are two people who are members of the Billaber Club.
It's actual members that are...
They're members of the Builder Club who, for years and years and years, have been going and participating in all the conversations.
They've always been dead on, always.
And last year, they said the oil prices are going to go up to 150. At the time, it was 39, went up to 76, basically doubled.
If it doubles again, it's going to be back to where these people said it was.
If they attack Iran, it will hit 150. Well, the Iran thing is on the back burner.
It was very much on the agenda last year, but from what I'm getting at this year's lunch, today's lunch, today's lunch...
And a few people playing golf.
Iran is definitely sour, and they're not exactly sure how to do this thing.
There's just too many consequences, too many repercussions.
They told them no.
I mean, they said, don't attack Iraq, half of them back in...
Well, I think it's different.
I think the new cons, I think the Bush administration is not in the same position as they were two, three, four years ago, as they are now.
So the whole point is that...
28% of real writing, huh?
We still have two days of bill of reconference because it started late, a day late.
It's going to go on until Sunday afternoon.
I think it's going to go Sunday morning.
Still going to have discussing something.
Anyway, it's on all day tomorrow.
So we'll find out a lot more about what they're going to be talking about.
Tomorrow, the first item on the agenda is Eurasia.
Russia, China, and the relation that the Russians and the Chinese have with the Americans.
That's the first item on the agenda, first in the morning.
And that discussion forum will be led by Richard Cornell.
The New World Order, as we're seeing it evolve, is exactly the opposite of what our Founding Fathers intended by developing the Constitution, the tripart form of government where you have division of powers between the legislative, judicial, and executive branches.
When our Founding Fathers established the Constitution in the United States, they intended to have the local government as being the superior government over the state government and the federal government.
Unfortunately, over the last 50 years, The reverse has occurred.
Now we have an all-powerful federal government.
Jefferson said when that happens, we will have a tyranny that is far worse than the one that they had just separated, which was, of course, England.
We now have a government, basically, that is a tyrannical form of government in the federal government.
It will become more so in the future because they have no accountability to the actual local person.
The reason why we had...
Local government as being the most powerful government in our Constitution was the fact that these were people that were being elected by the people over which they had jurisdiction.
Now we have jurisdiction by bureaucracy at the federal level that has no accountability whatsoever to the local person.
And that will always result in tyranny eventually.
Littleberg's ultimate goal is a world government for the United Nations to evolve into a world government, and they're making progress, and we must stop that progress.
The fact that the UN is now the standing army of, I mean, NATO is now the standing army of the United Nations that was established at the 50th anniversary celebration of NATO,
pending before the UN for at least three years now, is legislation to oppose a direct tax on all The people on Earth, their favorite being a 10-cent tax on barrel oil head, but it was established the president of the UN directly taxing individuals throughout the world.
And, of course, the American Union.
NATO is to expand throughout the Western Hemisphere, evolve into the American Union.
The dollar will be the euro.
And already the groundwork is being laid for the Asian Pacific Union.
The goal is to divide the world into three great regions for the administrative convenience of a world government which the UN will become in our lifetime unless we win this fight.
I think that their plans are not coming together as quickly as they would have liked and would have hoped.
For example, their idea for breakup of Canada, you know, the initial plan was for 1996. We stopped them because we found out what their plan was.
That was in King City and Toronto.
Hundreds of thousands of people came out onto the street protesting the possible breakup.
So these people postponed their plans to the year 2000. Now they have postponed them to the year 2007. The United States and Canada more or less are one nation now because...
You know, you have the military co-sharing, so the United States and Canadian military basically are working on the same wavelength.
Congress has already been signing its authority over to international bodies and...
The World Trade Organization already has more authority over our trade disputes than our own Congress.
Can you speak to that?
It's already happening.
Well, yes, the WTO has ordered Congress to change some of the trade laws.
And Congress comes running back like a political child and follows orders.
And I forgot exactly what the deal was.
Something to do with tariffs or something.
But because we're part of the World Trade Organization, they, in effect, nullified laws of Congress.
They say, you've got to change that law.
We are adapting our Supreme Court, our Constitution, to fit within this legal model of the world.
We are being homogenized into the world.
Our military is being homogenized and standardized into the world format.
Everything that's happening through NATO and all the rest.
NATO is the military branch of the European Union.
We're going to have one here for the North American Union to enforce our borders, supposedly.
The ASEAN or the new Asian Union will have another and so forth.
This is going to be, within a couple of years it looks like, standardized all around the world.
If you really look at the world, up until the Renaissance, what you had basically had the feudal society with the slaves and the slave owners.
Then suddenly with the Renaissance, the ideals of Socrates, the ideals of Solon took forth.
If we kind of jump forward to the reign of Louis XI and Henry VII in England, these people, for the first time in the history of mankind, the ideals of nation-state, which defines the United States, the ideal of the government working for the people, not people working for the government, the idea of the social good, of greater good for humanity, came about.
And if we jump to the 1760s, In Europe, the European intelligentsia, the people like Bailly and Lafayette, they realized that to destroy the old world order, to destroy the European monarchy, what they needed to do, they needed to create a state.
And that's what the idea of the United States came from, this Eden on Earth of a nation where every man and woman were created equally, had the freedom of speech, where he had for the first time in the history of mankind the ideal of nation-state, of people, of governments working for the people and not people working for the governments.
And so these people like Lafayette and Baili and other European...
Intellectuals and thinkers, they build themselves around the figure of Benjamin Franklin in the United States.
And through this man, the idea was to create the Constitution of the United States and then import that Constitution back into Europe and use that Constitution to destroy the World War Order, which was basically the order led by the royalty of European nations.
Now, the British East Indian Company, led at the time by Lord Sherylburn, was basically the...
The treasurer of the royal family and the man who ran.
The Committee of 300, the Council of 300 was called at the time, realized that they were looking at a very, very grave crisis.
So what they wanted to do, what they needed to do, they needed to destroy the idea of the United States as a nation.
That's where the idea of the American Revolution came about.
Now, thankfully, the Committee of the Council of 300, they lost that revolution.
But what they tried to do, and they were able to succeed, is they, by forcing the French Revolution, they destroyed the...
We had to wait until after Napoleon III, and then we had to jump to the age of the Fifth Republic of de Gaulle until we finally saw that nation-state building that the United States was built on.
Now what they've done, the Jacobian terror in 1789, 1794, the French Revolution, that was the concept of terror created by the Council of 300, the same Council of 300 which today lives on in the body of the Bilderbergs.
Now the ideal hasn't changed.
They're still pursuing this.
The same goal, the goal to destroy humanity, to create the Nietzschean man-beast.
And again, the Jacobian terror, the siege of Bastille, which basically a terrorist act, that's what it was.
There was very little difference.
You know, in my conferences, I always talk about, you know, if you want to understand the 11th of September, you need to understand the French Revolution.
What happened in Bastille is the same thing that happened on the 11th of September.
The concept of man-beast, the concept of terror, for terror's sake, The idea of Napoleon, which is one of the things that people do not understand.
Napoleon worked, basically, for the British government.
He was the agent, not literally an agent, but because of Napoleon's terror, destruction for destruction's sake, the men destroyed all of Europe and debilitated the Europe.
And in result, the only superpower left standing was Great Britain, controlled by Council of 300, which were the forerunners to today's Bilderbergers.
Well, the idea of world government, again, in the future world order, when you have...
Slaves and slave owners, you don't need a population base of 6 billion people because these people need to eat, otherwise they die.
So you might as well just get rid of half of the population base.
And again, we saw that in 1974, a report which was leaked years ago, the 9th of April, 1974, a report signed by Henry Kissinger in the last...
Dying months of Nixon's administration.
When they were talking about reducing the population base by 3 billion people, it's on page 9 of that report.
I think it's.29C. They're looking at ways, again, they're looking at ways scientifically how to reduce the population base.
And what is so terrifying about that document is they're using graphs, line charts, pie charts to talk about killing three...
I mean, it's genocide.
That's what it is.
Killing 3 billion people using graphs and pie charts.
And if you jump to today and you see what is going on...
It's very easy to understand that what they were talking about in 74 is coming around today.
In the very near future, if we're paying right now $75, $76 a barrel, and in the near future we're paying $150, $200 a barrel, what's going to happen is to transport apples from point A to point B is going to cost an exorbitant amount of money, which means that poor people will not be able to pay $50 per apple, and they will die.
And the same will happen with people who live in Canada, who live in...
In Scandinavian nations, anywhere there is, you know, you have this terror, you have to overcome these 40, 50 degree below zero winters.
They'll just die because they will not have heat to heat their homes.
So the Bilderbergers don't physically need to eliminate 3 billion people by putting a gun to their head.
They can do it...
In a very, very subtle way, again, using the control, the population control, and we're seeing it right now as oil goes up, as the food quality goes down.
The age of the $10,000 Caesar salads, or $10,000 Kiwis, or 10,000 kilometers, sorry, Kiwis that travel from New Zealand, then they get packaged in Norway, then they're sent to Spain, and then finally get to the United States, where it's sold, you know, in Loblaws, are over.
If you want to eat Kiwis, you better grow themselves.
If you want to eat bananas, you better grow themselves.
I think the future of humanity is based, the survival of humanity is going to be based on our ability to live in much smaller community.
If not...
Unfortunately, we're playing into the hands of the Bilderbergers and the world elite.
One of the things that we need to recognize in infrastructure is what causes the economy to grow.
Yes, we need private property rights.
Yes, we need a good economy.
But the economy is also dependent upon our transportation system of being able to get products from one area to another.
The whole Agenda 21 concept compartmentalizes that economy.
In other words, the environmentalists want us to be able to grow and produce everything that the local region They do not want us to have this transportation.
They do not want us to have the ability to draw tomatoes from South America into the United States.
If we cannot produce it in the United States during the middle of winter, then we shouldn't have it.
If we cannot produce it in your local community, then we shouldn't have it.
This is all part of their vision, their view of sustainable development.
It doesn't have to be that way, but that's the way they elected to do it.
Why?
Because they believe, one, that nature is God, and that, two, they want to have control.
The more they can control, the better they can be able to accomplish what they want in our lives.
One of the things that most people do not understand is most of the environmental laws that we have created over the last 40 years have come from a very small group of people through what is known as the IUCN, the International Union for the Conservation of Nature.
This itself has been created and sponsored by principals like Prince Philip or Prince Charles, as well as the Rockefeller Foundation.
If you think back, not very many years ago, if you talked about the Bilderbergers, if you try to talk about the Trilateral Commission or the Club of Rome, you would be called some sort of conspiracist nut.
Those organizations, we were told, did not exist.
It certainly did not have an agenda that we claimed that they had.
Now it's all out in the open.
They will lie and they will conspire to keep the truth from the people until they no longer can, and then they'll paint it as just something that's normal.
But think about it.
Think just a moment about it.
You have 135 people roughly in the Bilderbergers.
You have about 175 in the Trilateral Commission.
These people are making policy decisions for every single human being on planet Earth.
Somewhere less than 500 people if you look at it in total.
Maybe a thousand.
It doesn't matter.
These people are making decisions for the entire world.
Do you really want that?
One of the things that a lot of people don't realize is that this concept of regionalization has been around for a long time.
In 1973, the Club of Rome actually published a diagram showing that they wanted to divide the world up into ten different...
They call them actually financial kingdoms in which each kingdom would have its own separate economic integrity so that they would be able to carry forth the types of supervision, the types of economic flow and so forth that is necessary to stabilize what is going on in the world and provide the mechanism, the structure, architectural structure to begin the population reduction that they've always been wanting to promote.
In order to achieve their idea of world government, or global governance as they now call it, they wanted to actually divide the world up into ten economic regions.
They called them ten kingdoms, but that was kind of a language that just...
Didn't fit very well within the psyche of the American people and Europeans at the time, so they changed it to financial regions, and that's what it's been called ever since.
It's one of the issues in which all of the member organizations of this effort, of the Anglo-American faction, have been working on.
The Trilateral Commission, the Club of Rome, the Bilderbergers, the...
CFR and so forth have all been working on this.
And here you can see the diagram of how they envisioned it back in 1973. When it came out in 1995, our global neighborhood was the United Nations Commission on Global Governance.
This is where they begin to finally put it together in the form of a document.
This document has been the actual template that we've been using ever since 1995. If you look at what's actually going on, what they called regional groups, not only are there 500 or 1,000 people actually developing the policy for the world, they're developing a policy that benefits them, not us.
I work closely with the EPA and the U.S. Forest Service and many environmental organizations.
And it became very obvious to me that they really weren't interested in protecting the environment.
They were interested in advancing an agenda.
And so I began to do research as to what it is that was motivating them and where they were going.
And I was shocked to realize that at least in the leadership, both of our government and the non-governmental organizations that were involved in this...
We're what's called pantheists, the belief that nature is God, and therefore their role was not in serving the American people, but in protecting nature from the American people.
It was actually 100 years ago with Muir.
In starting the Sierra Club and so forth.
And he, again, was a pantheist to believe that nature is God.
I won't go into that particular aspect of it, but he truly believed that we need to set vast acreages of land aside for the principal purpose of allowing nature to go her own way because, in essence, nature is the foundation of all life and therefore we must protect it at all costs.
It actually languished for about 60 or 70 years until the 1960s with the advent of the New Age movement and the counterculture movement.
And then it began to take on some real power.
Which thought it was counterculture but really foundation funded the whole time.
That's right.
The whole counterculture movement was orchestrated and funded not only by the...
The foundations, but was inspired by a pantheistic belief system, an occult religious belief system, whose origins are found in theosophy, or the belief that nature is God, and taken through what is now known as Lucifer Trust, which is the organization for the elite to implement their ideas, headed by Alice Bailey in the first half of the 20th century.
The whole global warming issue is a farce.
It's a sham, basically, to advance this agenda and create a condition in which the United States, the citizenry of the United States, is going to be willing to give up our sovereignty in order to control what they perceive as a doomsday.
Scenario that if they don't get a handle on it within the next 10 years, that's what we've been hearing now.
Actually, if you remember back in the early 1990s, they said we had 10 years to do it or we're doomed.
Well, now it's been 15 years ago now and, of course, nothing's changed.
Well, the same thing is going on right now.
Global warming is occurring, don't get me wrong, but it's not caused by man.
We had what was called the Little Ice Age back in the 1700s and 1800s.
And during that period of time, there's a high correlation between sunspot activity and the energy output of the sun.
There were almost no solar flares, no sunspots during the early 1800s.
And it got about a degree, degree and a half colder than it is right now.
It is very interesting that the solar radiation and the Earth's temperature are highly correlated.
In fact, they can actually be almost on a daily coordination.
We had a major solar eruption back in 1998 at the same time as we had El Nino.
And we had a solar spike within a week, a temperature increase within a week of that event.
That peaked out within a few days, about a week or so.
And this is global.
This isn't just the United States or a local regional area.
This was global.
And the two in combination, the El Nino and a solar spike, in which we had a major solar eruption that was pointed right at Earth, actually changed the Earth's temperature right away.
And if you go back into the 1700s, you can actually see the correlation between the Earth's temperature and the emissions of radiant energy by the sun.
One of the ironies, I think, of our times is the fact that during the 1960s and so forth, they begin to have a dogma that the environment is being destroyed by human beings.
And this was perpetrated or spread out through the media.
You can't watch any nature program on chimpanzees, whales, it doesn't really matter, without coming away from the fact that human beings are a virus.
We're killing planet Earth.
According to this media hype that we've had ever since the 1960s.
Now it's global warming.
You can't hardly go through a week without hearing some scare story about global warming that if we don't stop it in the next few years, the earth is going to boil up and blow away, even though that there's been times in history where it's been much warmer than it is today, and of course obviously times in history where it's been much colder.
None of these things really by themselves really are caused necessarily by human activity.
It's a natural cycle.
We can destroy the environment.
We can destroy ecosystems.
But now we have the incentive to maintain ecosystems, to manage ecosystems, but that's not good enough.
We can actually manage ecosystems better than nature can herself.
We can make ecosystems healthier, but that's not an alternative.
Their alternative is that you have no use.
That's the only solution that they have for protecting the environment is you cannot use it.
You cannot use it.
You must protect it.
You must put it in the form of wilderness, whatever the case might be.
Nonetheless, we cannot use it.
Humans are the cause of the problem.
We have many people in our university systems right now, PhDs and so forth, that really believe that we must reduce our human population by 70, 80, even 90% in order to protect Mother Earth.
Many of these people actually believe that There should be wholesale slaughter of human beings in one form or another, either through disease or actual government programs of some sort or another.
The actual Wildlands Project itself that I fought back in the 1990s calls for a reduction in human population of 80% in the next 50 years.
They don't say how to get there, although they do make it very clear that they would probably do it through agricultural means.
They really truly believe that if Fertilizers and so forth cause ecological destruction because they believe that.
Then we must reduce the use of fertilizers and it's fertilizers and genetic improvement and so forth that have caused the Green Revolution that fed the world from the 1960s on.
If we eliminate that, we'll only have food production enough for about a third of the global population that we have today.
That would eliminate the population within one generation.
One of the things that Carol Quigley, one of the foremost historians of the 20th century, said after going through all the documentations of the global elite for at least two years, said in his book, Tragedy and Hope, towards the end of the 20th century, the expert will replace the democratic voter in control of the political system.
This is because planning will inevitably replace laissez-faire and the relationship between government and business.
This planning may not be single or unified, but it will be planning in which the mainframe work...
And operational forces of the economic system will be established and limited by the experts on the governmental side, and then the experts on the economic side will do their planning within these established limits.
And so what Carol Quigley is saying is that by the 21st century, we are going to be living in a planned society controlled by the experts.
Now, look back.
Now that we're in the 21st century, has not that occurred?
It has, just as he said was going to happen.
But of course, he had access to the records of what they were intending to do.
But it actually gets worse.
Back in 1965, the Department of Health and Education and Welfare, HEW, sponsored a study to define how they're going to get from where they were then in 1965 to where we are now in the 21st century.
They came out with a report in 1969 called the Behavioral Science Teacher Education Program that's now fully integrated within our educational program.
And this is what they said, and I want to have you hang on to your hats because you will not believe what they planned to do back in 1965-69 and what is happening actually today.
He said, calculations of the future and how to modify it are no longer considered to be an obscure academic pursuit.
Long-range planning and implementation of plans will be made by a technological scientific elite.
This will strain the democratic fabric to the ripping point.
The Protestant ethic will atrophy as more and more enjoyed a varied, lasered, and guaranteed sustenance.
Work as a means and an end of living will diminish.
Most people will tend to be hedonistic, and a dominant elite will provide the bread and circuses to keep social dissension and disruption to at a minimum.
A small elite will carry society's burdens.
The resulting impersonal manipulation of most people's lifestyles will be softened by provision for pleasure seeking and guaranteed physical necessities.
The controlling elite will engage in power plays largely without the involvement of most of the people.
And that is so true today.
Most people have no idea what's going on in the international arena.
Have none.
Almost all of this is being done in secrecy.
Going on with this report.
The society will be a leisurely one.
People will study, play and travel.
Some will be in various stages of the drug-induced experiences.
Each individual will receive at birth a multipurpose identification which will have, amongst other things, extensive communications and control uses.
Each individual will be saturated with ideas of information.
Each will be self-selected.
Other kinds will be imposed overtly by those who assume the responsibility for the other's actions.
Relatively few individuals will be able to maintain control over their opinions.
Most will be pawns of competing opinion molders.
It's amazing how back in the 1960s they began the process of getting us to where we are right now.
If you look at society today, almost every one of the characteristics that I read have come true.
We are living in a planned society.
We are living focused on leisure and recreation.
We live in a drug-induced society.
All of the things that they talked about in the 1960s have become a reality by the 21st century.
This is the level of extent of control that they have.
Most people's opinions are not done through education and through knowledge.
They're done by molding your ideas.
And that's why it's very hard for the average person to understand the fact that we're moving into a global society that is totally controlled by puppeteers, the global elite, and moving towards their ultimate objective of having world government.
They have created various crises along the way over the last 100 years.
World War I, as we've talked about, was contrived.
World War II was contrived.
We got the United Nations as a result of World War II, which was one of their big goals.
Even though they denied the fact that they ever intended to have the United Nations as a world government, some of their more esoteric documents show very clearly that that's what they intended right from the start.
And we're starting to see that now with the Commission on Global Governance.
All the international treaties that we're looking at, especially the environmental treaties, basically are like these strands over Gulliver and Gulliver's travels.
One strand does not necessarily trap us, but when you have hundreds of these international treaties and all of these regulations, when you have the North American Union where you give up your basic sovereignty to a group of international bureaucrats, all of these things are strands that literally tie us down to the point that we no longer have freedom to cause development, we no longer have economic freedom, we no longer have a free market enterprise, we no longer have the ability to profit from innovation.
And that will ultimately destroy us.
Now that we no longer have war to maintain stability within the population and maintain control, which the kings and queens and bureaucrats and tyrants and so forth through history have used war, we have to have an alternative form of terror in order to maintain the stability of people and the allegiance of people behind their government.
That is now taking the form of terrorism.
It's a perfect recipe.
Back in 1967, there was a report called the Iron Martin Report that was released.
Calling for environmental holocaust and so forth to accomplish the same thing.
That worked to a point, but did not take them where they fully wanted to go.
And they now have this mechanism of always the constant fear of terrorist attack to keep us off our feet, to keep us willing to give up our freedoms in order to gain peace and security.
Carol Quigley in his book, Tragedy and Hope, basically said they were willing to work with communists, they're willing to work with fascists, they're willing to work with any of these Isms or whatever, because those groups control their population and they want to control the population.
So they're more than willing to work with those groups.
They say they're capitalists, but understand their form of capitalism is nothing more than controlled economies.
It's not true free markets.
It's not even true capitalism.
It's capitalism only to a certain percentage of the population that are part of the global elite or part of the upper crust.
In many ways, it's either crony capitalism or a monopoly, because those are the people, those people that rise to the top, and there are not going to be very many of them.
that benefit from this fascist form of government.
The End
In that building is congregating 100 of the most elite people on the planet, a bunch of scum.
And they're so intimidated by accredited journalists just trying to cover what they're doing that they pull stunts in every country, getting people detained, arrested, or deported.
This time it backfired on them because the press learned of it.
Think about it.
Five, six years ago, the national press said the Bilderberg Group did not exist.
Of course, it was founded by a top Dutch Nazi, the Crown Prince, in the early 1950s after World War II. And this is nothing more than the...
We've gotten their minutes.
We've gotten their documents.
These people.
For 27 years, Jim Tucker's been covering this.
Jim, every year, gets documents, minutes of their meetings from employees inside these facilities that find out how evil they are.
And what's in there?
Discussions of world domination, world tax, getting rid of Canada and the U.S. and Mexico's sovereignty, the American Union.
And now, because of brave people like you see here, it's now mainstream news in Canada, it's even on CNN, that they're setting up world government.
They're not going to get rid of Canada, the U.S., or Mexico.
They're not going to merge us.
We're going to stop it.
Those men, right there, those men are destroying your children's future.
Those men are absolute criminals and will be exposed.
They talk about the founder being an SS guy.
The co-founder's name is Redinger, the Zionist.
Of course, the Zionists and the Nazis had a lot in common.
They actually worked together.
They actually worked together, yep.
Very evil.
They're still working together.
So what do you think these guys are up to in here?
Well, we know what they're up to.
We've gotten their documents repeatedly.
We have moles inside.
And they're setting up world government, world taxation.
They openly call us slaves, and they have other poor slaves guarding them.
And what are they afraid of?
They're afraid of the truth, because criminals, organized crime, meet in secret with our leaders trying to take our freedoms.
That simple.
I mean, look, there's lots of planets.
You've got to understand there's billions upon billions of planets in the universe.
And, you know, we can afford to blow up a planet here and there.
We've got antimatter bombs in the works, and when that gets ready, we're going to blow up the whole solar system.
We're not going to stop at just one planet.
We're going to blow up the solar system because, you know, there's lots of solar systems in the universe.
There's billions upon billions of them.
You blow up one here and there, who's going to notice?
Exactly.
So I say we've been stockpiling these bombs for 50, 60 years.
Wondering what to do about it, listening to those protesters, terrorists in the streets telling us we shouldn't do things like that.
Well, it's about time we put our foot down and put these bombs to good use and teach these people a lesson about democracy and freedom.
Well, George Bush has been saying he wants to use the nukes.
Well, he's been saying it for a long time, and I knew he wanted to use the nukes even before September 11, 2001. I was trying to tell everybody, but they would look at me kind of strange, you know, and they wouldn't answer my emails and stuff like that, but I kept at it.
After September 11, I said, well, this time everybody's going to notice.
I mean, it's so blatantly obvious they're not going to get the wool pulled over their eyes this time around.
Was 9-11 an inside job?
Well, I think this answers your question.
If 9-11 is an inside job, what was surprising is the number of people on the inside.
It's just amazing the quantity of people on the inside willing to stand up for this and use it as a pretext to go and bomb countries halfway across the world.
It just blew me away.
I've been traumatized by September 11th.
I didn't think the people were that gullible, ignorant, and willingly stupid.
All right.
Thanks for talking to us.
Can you talk about how these guys connect with the Illuminati?
Well, they don't connect with the Illuminati.
They are the Illuminati.
There's no doubt that many of the people in there are Satanists.
And again, I'm just a reporter.
Ten years ago, I laughed at this.
And there were some Channel 4 reporters, TV crew.
In Texas, and they were saying, you know, do you know about this, Skull and Bones, Bohemian Grove, and I went and started investigating it.
Of course, in 2000, I infiltrated into the Bohemian Grove, where Bush and all the rest of them go, and it's been on national U.S. television.
The Grove admits I snuck in and got their ritual on tape.
They say it's no big deal.
As old men, we get in red and black robes and run around naked and worship 45-foot stone owls.
I mean, hell, when you've got trillions of dollars, that's what you do.
You run around the woods naked and worship big owls.
I mean, you know.
And what about the primates?
It's like Peter Jennings said.
He played a clip of it and played a clip of Skull and Bones.
He said they're just having fun.
You know, no big deal.
Stealing, robbing skulls from grace.
I mean, it's like Eyes Wide Shut.
You know, that's based on what really goes on.
Big deal.
This is what people do, you know.
It's Christian.
They're probably having some Eyes Wide Shut action in there right now.
Everyone in here is, like, wanted for something.
God almighty.
He says he's good, though.
He doesn't need to do it.
I said, Google in Bilderberg.
He said, no, I'm good.
No, no, no, no, no.
They're good.
We don't want to know we work for criminals.
Actually, I think he was flipping off the guard.
As a Canadian taxpaying citizen, I cannot believe in a country that has a democracy like ours, we are being put through this lies of the secret agenda of the Bilderberg Group, which have only their interests in mind.
And when oil's $150 a barrel next year and everybody starts to go down and the middle class is eroded, there'll be them on top and all of us at the bottom.
Are we going to try to go inside?
No.
Hell no.
Because I'm not going to give them what they want, man.
We know who they are.
We're trying to just show the fact that they're in there nesting right now, conspiring.
My name is Jeff Matthews.
I'm a Canadian, and I extend my apologies to the way you were treated, which was disgraceful, sir.
I run an independent newspaper.
It's called the Kingston Eye Opener.
And from a historical standpoint, if anybody's interested, in the 1920s, there was a legendary editor of a free press in Canada called the Calgary Eye Opener.
Bob Edwards was the editor of the Calgary Eye Opener.
If you're a Canadian or an American, look up the history of that.
It's a beautiful history.
We've taken his name out of respect for the great achievements of Bob Edwards in the 1920s.
This is the third year we're covering Bilderberg.
Last year and the year before, we were the only Canadian press I'm aware of that even mentioned Bilderberg.
We were able to cover it thanks to Daniel Estelin.
And what I believed, when I was...
I'm 50-something now.
When I was a kid, I was brought up that a free press was an essential part of a free country.
That without a free press, without an independent press, everything was going to go to pieces.
And I'm not too sharp, but I've seen the quality of reporting and radio and television and the newspapers go steadily downhill.
Just a few days ago, it was Sunday morning in the 7.30 CBC Radio News.
That's the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, our national news.
We were told...
Unconfirmed reports suggest that there may have been a possible target somewhere.
But what kind of reporting is this?
Unconfirmed reports suggest that possible targets may have been.
And we're supposed to get scared.
But that's the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
That's basically the Canadian government, our national radio, giving us that quality reporting.
What do you think of the...
I mean, not just talking about myself, but since you brought it up.
It's scary when they had been told, they admitted Bilderberg had a contact, and they called it the conference that was worried about me, that Bilderberg would be trying to keep me from getting in, and they almost did it if press wouldn't have heard and shown up.
I mean, they're to the point of trying to suppress in North America, folks, supposed to bash into freedom, Canada and the U.S., the press.
I know.
I know what happened to you.
It was a disgrace.
It's a national disgrace, incidentally.
But what you have is bullies.
And have you ever seen a smart bully?
I never have seen a smart bully.
I've seen guys that throw their weight around.
And these guys are used to throwing their weight around.
They say, keep this guy out.
We don't want to be bothered.
They're not smart because it backfired.
It's like egg all over their face.
You had a rough 14 hours, and I personally apologize as a Canadian.
No, no, it's not your fault.
But, no, as a Canadian, I apologize.
It wasn't me, but as a Canadian member of this country, I apologize.
But, and I think every Canadian will apologize, but...
It was the stupidest dumb stunt they've pulled in a long time and a long list of stupid stunts because that got national news, got the more attention than they ever had before, and the whole country of Canada is embarrassed about what happened to you.
I wonder if they're going to let me get out of here.
Stick around.
It just gets better.
I know.
Hey, I love Canada.
Everybody from Canada is really smart, really nice.
I mean, you think Canadians aren't informed of what's going on.
It's really bad in the U.S. Yes, I've heard.
I've heard it's...
We've both seen more than enough.
At any rate, we'll be covering this Bilderberg conference again this year in our little newspaper, our little independent newspaper, and it's been a pleasure to meet you, sir.
Do you think it makes them angry?
Well, a pleasure meeting you.
Do you think it's made them angry that they woke up that morning on the National Post?
It was the front page, the Ottawa Citizen, all these papers.
Myself on the front page of the National Post coming out of customs.
I'm sure it upset them.
I'm sure it upset them.
And they'll find the most junior guy in customs Canada and they'll fry him.
But those are the guys that were responsible for it.
Yeah, which is why they're under arrest here.
So anyway, of course it upsets them, but bullies are stupid.
You're dealing with bullies.
They've never had to be accountable.
They've always used their power to shut people up.
And it's not working.
I think that's what they don't understand.
It's not working.
You're right.
Up until about six years ago, we never saw in major U.S. papers or Canadian papers, never a mention of Bilderberg.
Now it's finally all over the place.
Europe is all over the place.
What is that a sign of that this is happening?
It's a sign that an independent press is growing.
What I don't know are enough of the public listening.
That's my great prayer, is that enough of the public are listening.
Because you can keep telling them, I can keep telling them, but is there enough of the public going to listen?
Against the tidal wave of trash media, you know, all the cheap thrill stuff, all the commercial stuff, are people really going to learn what's going on?
Because what is happening to the United States, to Canada, to Mexico is terrible, terrible, terrible stuff.
Can you talk about the American Union?
I mean, the CFR writes the white papers for their agenda.
They carry out Bilderberg's orders.
That's on record.
And even Lou Dobbs on CNN said, American Union, end of Canada, end of U.S., they are actually, through the trade deals, already starting to bleed us.
Well, I breezed through what in Canada we've referred to as the Manly Report.
John Manly was a previous Deputy Prime Minister, and he sat on a...
Council of Foreign Relations Committee with Mexicans and Americans.
The two were John Manley and Thomas Aquino, who's president of the Council of Chief Executives, a bunch of very big business guys.
And they put this report together.
And it started off by saying, does it not make sense that Canada and the U.S. should be one, that we should have a common currency?
Does it not just make enormous sense that we should have a common border?
To ask the question is to answer it.
Now, that was right in the report.
You know, these guys are trying to sell us this bill of goods.
Now, fortunately, when it got to the House of Commons, it didn't do very well.
So they've just put it under the table for a while until people are looking the other way.
Maybe Christmas morning when everybody else is out of the house, they'll pass it.
I don't know what'll happen.
But that's what I'm sure.
Then there were Americans on that thing pushing the same agenda, and they're just waiting until nobody's watching.
They've had joint congresses with your parliament, the U.S. Congress, the Mexican Congress in Mexico.
Yeah.
Can you speak to that?
Well, I don't know all the details and I have to learn more, but I know they're just waiting for us to look the other way so they can whisk it through.
And as I just drove, I was away for about...
24 hours because I had to leave yesterday, went all the way to Toronto, drove back.
And I'm listening to some radio station.
I can't tell you which one it was.
And there was a story about a minor riot, I believe it was in Halifax, one of the maritime capital cities, the maritime province of Canada, because the people were upset that a transnational commercial area was being declared called Atlantica, which is what this agenda is about, and that they were going to lose jobs.
And I didn't catch the details.
Maybe some of you other fellows in the...
St. Louis is being given to Mexico.
The huge rail yards, these huge highways, and a stretch of highway from St. Louis, the biggest rail yard in the U.S., all the way down to Mexico.
They're giving them our country right now.
I'm sure you've heard about foreign countries buying our ports, all this.
Yeah, I heard about that, and I heard about the uproar, too.
Congratulations.
But this is what, and either Canadians and United States citizens are going to rise up against this and stop it, or else you can say goodbye to your country.
It's really that simple.
Thanks for talking to us.
Anything else you want to add?
No, that's it.
Thank you very much.
Tell us about your website.
I don't have a website.
I have a little paper.
You're kicking butt.
Hey, stop and let me in front of you.
Let me in front of you.
Okay.
Let me in front of you.
Let me in front of you.
Let's just take the freeway.
Which way is that?
I'm in March right now.
Just keep going straight to you.
Then take a right north.
417, yeah, like we did before.
You're going to go east.
No, those aren't cuffs.
They're hot though.
Alright.
It's 417 east.
Yeah.
Yeah, we should have pulled up a sentiment at the stoplight like this.
Is there anyone in that car?
I can't tell.
I can't tell if he's seen.
Yes, there's an old man right there.
He's in the passenger bag.
He's in the right-hand corner.
Won't be able to identify him, but...
I can see him to the glass.
He's a distinguished, like, seven-year-old man.
Yeah, I could see his glasses, but...
Let's see.
East?
Yeah.
East?
Thank you.
Thank you.
So what do you think about this whole thing, man?
Tell us about you.
Oh jeez, put me on the spot.
Well, pretty much everything I know I got from you.
That's my inspiration.
Really?
Looking into this stuff, yeah.
You live around here?
Yeah, I live about 30 seconds that way.
Wow.
Yeah, when I found out they were coming to the Brook Street, I was like, I gotta go and see.
I knew that Alex would be here for sure.
Here we are.
Yeah.
In none of the glory.
Sir, why are you here?
Just to get a first sight glimpse of the most evil people in the world, pretty much.
You know, the mediocre.
It comes out in droves.
If you had 120 top Hollywood stars meeting in secret on top of it, people would be wondering, what's going on?
What's happening?
But for many years, we couldn't get the press to ever report on this.
In fact, they'd say it didn't exist.
Yeah, it's pretty amazing how they could, not that many people are aware of it, and the press won't report it.
They refuse to report it.
It shows how horrible these people are and their influence.
Well, I appreciate you coming out.
I wonder how many of these guys are going to be at the Grove next month, meeting at, seeing Mr. Moloch there.
A lot of them.
Yeah, I think so.
In their robes and everything.
It's pretty crazy.
Think of anything more horrifying.
Hey, Daniel, where are you?
We have got them now.
We are exposing them more and more and more.
Have you heard of the American Union?
Yeah.
You'll be part of it.
Yeah.
It's been in your papers.
That's what they call it, Build-a-Bird.
Build-a-Bird.
Info-mores.com Info-mores.com What'd you do?
A man with a camera at the front.
Hello.
Hi there.
Well, you can't park there, right?
We've been parking there all the whole time.
20 cars there.
Sir?
You can't park there.
Really?
Well, where can we park?
Well, I guess we can park there.
Everybody's been parking there with a police herald.
I'm on a picture of you, sir.
And I'm here now.
You're parked on a roadway.
You can't park there.
Alright?
Sure.
You can park there.
I'm in the middle of the roadway.
Oh, the light's back.
Uh, ma'am?
Ma'am?
It says no parking from that sign back.
But I'm from the U.S. I may have trouble understanding signs.
Can you explain the municipal law to me?
Can you see?
Will you come?
The sign says from here back.
The sign says from the sign back you can't park.
The sign, we have the same signs.
But will you explain to me?
So you're saying that sign has arrows pointing more ways?
It says an arrow pointing this way.
I can't see that.
Yes, ma'am, it does.
We were here with officers for three days.
We're allowed to park there unless the signs changed.
I wonder what it is.
I wonder what it is.
I wonder what it is.
*cough* Yes, sir.
Sir, sir, can you say that again?
I'm hard of hearing.
If you can just stay off the road away, we don't want anybody hitting you guys on the door.
Okay, when the cars come through, we're trying to get pictures of them as journals.
They've been trying to cover their paces up.
I mean, we did it yesterday in front of the police.
I'm not on an interview, sir.
Stick that out of me.
It's just if you can just so windy we can't hear you Officers Blacked out windows, lots of black sedans, old men hiding their faces.
You gonna go investigate Bilderberg Group, sir?
Can't do that.
Can't do it, huh?
No.
We've got a task here, my friend.
I hear you.
And that's to sit here and keep peace.
Yes.
I'm very friendly.
We're talking to Canadians about what you think about the move by your government and the U.S. government to merge Canada, Mexico, and the U.S.
together as an American Union.
Did you hear about the Bilderberg Group that was meeting here in town?
We're all paged at the House of Commons and can't comment on political issues.
Jeff can!
Well, I mean, do you want to give up Canadian sovereignty?
No.
What do you think of what the Bilderberg Group's doing?
I don't even know who they are.
Well, they're meeting here in town.
They're the folks that founded the European Union, and they're openly pushing for an American Union through so-called trade deals, but the agreements are really to create a supranational state.
Is this a deal like free trade?
That's how they sell it, but the agreements are public.
It is really getting rid of Canada's sovereignty as well as the U.S. So then we wouldn't have to sell you all our wood anymore?
Exactly.
Oh.
No, I don't think that's a good idea.
I don't think it's a good idea either.
Sweet.
But the U.S. is going to lose its sovereignty, too.
It's like Germany and France going to the euro, they start losing their sovereignty.
And that's how the euro started, was the euro started as an economic community.
And that's what the Bilderberg Group is meaning to do right now.
You guys didn't hear about this?
It's been all over radio and TV. Wait, wait, you did hear about it?
Sorry.
We're not allowed to talk.
Really?
So you...
You're not allowed to comment on activities going on in here.
You're allowed to comment as...
Nothing of a political nature.
Really?
Well, that doesn't sound like a free country to me.
We signed a contract.
It's a contract.
You signed a contract, not to talk to anybody.
We're pages at the House of Commons.
We have to maintain our impartiality for this year.
Yeah, so you can't even discuss the end of your country's sovereignty?
Not even if I wanted to.
All right.
Well, we're friendly.
We're just trying.
I mean, seriously, folks, this is really happening.
The European Union started as an economic community.
They signed the agreements.
It's even been on CNN. They're getting rid of our countries right now.
And the average Canadian we've talked to doesn't know.
Even less Americans know.
I mean, I'm not putting Canadians down.
You guys are more informed than Americans.
It's dangerous.
You guys are politically informed.
That's why a few of you even knew about this.
This is serious.
American Union, check it out.
Thanks for talking to us.
I'm sorry for interrupting.
How's your croquet game going?
We're winning.
You're winning?
Yeah.
I like your outfits.
There's not any programming going on from Virgin.
We've got the Parliament right over here.
By the way, they admit that the Parliament, they have top professors in this country and other historians, that a group of Masons paid for the design of the Parliament and that the whole thing is built according to occultic specifications.
And we have this little calling card, 666, right here.
Well, I mean, sir, did you hear about Bilderberg?
Yeah.
What did you hear about it?
I just saw a little bit about it on the Internet.
From what you saw on the net, what do you think it is?
I don't know, kind of an organization or something to, you know, maybe talk about world events or something.
When they were set up in 1954 by Prince Bernhard, who was an SS officer, their main function was to create a European Union.
And their own documents have now been released where they said we have to call it a trade deal to fool the people.
The same thing is now happening.
The American Union is already in the middle steps, very close to being complete.
The average American or Canadian isn't even aware.
Though I have seen it in some Canadian papers that Canadians are aware that you're losing your sovereignty.
Are you guys concerned about Canada losing its sovereignty?
I guess so.
I mean, I don't know too much about it.
I think it's the media's job, that's what we're trying to do, to start having a debate about this.
I personally am against it.
I don't want you to lose your sovereignty.
I don't want the U.S. to lose its sovereignty.
Do you have any comments, sir?
None at all.
All right.
Thanks for talking to us.
Ma'am, have you heard of the Bilderberg Group?
Well, I know that they're in town.
Yes, they're meeting in Canada at the Brook Street restaurant.
Hotel, sorry.
Yeah, that's about it.
I mean, what else is there to know?
There are 120 of the most powerful people in the world, Queen Beatrix, David Rockefeller, and they set up the European Union back in 1954. They're setting up the American Union right now.
It's even been on CNN. They're getting rid of the sovereignty of Canada, Mexico, and the U.S. merging us, and the average American or Canadian or Mexican is totally unaware.
Have you heard any rumblings of the merger?
No.
My understanding is that they're just talking strictly business.
That's what their agenda is.
I don't know that they have any political agenda.
Oh, yeah, their stated agenda is world government.
Well, I'm not aware of it, if that's the case, but I found it difficult to believe.
Sure.
Would you be for getting rid of national sovereignty?
National sovereignty.
What do you mean by that?
Would you be for Canada relinquishing power over itself?
Of course I'd be against it.
Fantastic.
Sir, do you have any comments about that?
No, I have no comments at this point.
I don't know enough about it yet.
See, that's the thing, is that this is really happening.
Only Lou Dobbs on CNN has talked about it.
He got the documents.
And our presidents, your prime minister, Vicente Fox, George Bush, and your last prime minister all met last year, and they're signing the agreements.
And we talk to people, and they just don't know about it.
I mean, you guys are more informed than most.
You even know the meeting was happening.
Well, yes, it's been in the newspapers and news.
Like I said, I don't know that there's a political agenda.
In fact, my understanding is that it's not a political agenda, but it's strictly business.
Oh, yeah, there's a whole bunch of government leaders and ambassadors and people that attend.
Right, right.
Anyway, well...
Well, thank you for talking to us.
You're very welcome.
It's a lovely day, isn't it?
Beautiful.
It's really a Masonic temple.
A what?
No, that was in about three of your newspapers.
The design of it is laid out as a temple.
It's beautiful.
Neo-Gothic.
Yeah, Neo-Gothic.
But the circumference, all the rooms, just type in Canadian Parliament building temple design and you'll get it.
That was like 1840-something, whenever they had the contest to build it and wrote it all up.
It's just a side issue.
I also have a syndicate radio show, so I heard all these people.
It was in the Canadian papers about a year ago when I had the guy on.
That's pretty wild.
171 years ago, Texas declared independence from the tyranny of Mexico, Texas declared independence
and we redeclare that independence from the globalists and the foreign corporations and Spain that thought that they could come into Texas and to many other states and pay off our politicians to hand the infrastructure over to them to rape the American people and the people of Texas.
They have consistently lied about the trans-Texas Corridor.
They have consistently claimed it wouldn't be on existing roads.
Their own documents have been made public.
It's a scam.
All over the planet, in third world nations, the big central banks go in, buy off the politicians, and then seize the water, the roads, the power plants, the infrastructures.
And that is exactly what's happening here in the United States, and Texas is the front line.
Our entire infrastructure is being seized by criminals, but the people of Texas and the United States are rising to resist it.
No one knew the Bilderberg Group even existed.
Now it's in the Dallas Morning News.
And now your treason is public, Perry.
Perry!
Perry is guilty of prison!
Perry is guilty of treason.
He is publicly bought and paid for by foreign central banks!
He is publicly bought and paid for by foreign central banks.
We know that Texas is the front line of the fight against the New World Order.
We know that Texas is the front line of the fight against the New World Order!
Texas is the keystone, the let's pin.
Texas is the keystone, the let's pin!
You and your criminal cohorts are failing when it comes to your North American Union and you're failing when it comes to the hijacking and seizure of our infrastructure!
You and your criminal cohorts are failing when it comes to your North American Union.
And you're failing when it comes to the hijacking and seizure of our infrastructure.
Over.
Rick Perry made secret agreements with the foreign Spanish company, Citra.
Rick Perry made secret agreements with the foreign status company Citra!
Rick Perry made secret agreements to sell out 8,000 miles of Texas roads and infrastructure.
Rick Perry made secret agreements to sell out 8,000 miles of Texas roads and infrastructure!
We've now bullhorned your little facade!
We've now bullhorned your little facade.
Now we're going to confront your body, which is as hollow as you are!
We followed him as he attended a formal dinner.
Governor Rick Perry is a traitor!
He publicly is bought and paid for by an international crime syndicate known as the Bilderberg Group!
on the Bilderberg group.
Freeze up!
Freeze up!
Freeze up! Freeze up! Freeze up! Freeze up! Freeze up! Freeze up! Freeze up! Freeze up!
Freeze up!
Prison!
Just as the new world order has done all over the planet!
They have seized the infrastructure of nations whose governments they have bought off, whose presidents and prime ministers and governors they have bought.
Rick Perry is publicly bought and paid for by the new world order.
He is a traitor!
So we're asking nice people.
We're asking you right now just so we don't have to make any arrests.
We don't want to.
We got to stay if you're saying there's going to be arrests.
No, that's just crazy.
No, man.
It's the first amendment.
It's really important.
A lot of people died for it.
This is their property.
No, no.
We're not on their property.
Sidewalks right here.
We're working from there.
No, no.
We're working from there.
No one's going to leave.
We're working from there.
Yeah, call more guys in.
Go ahead.
Even if we're on city property, they're going to call in a false arrest.
We need everybody to videotape it so we get official oppression charges on all of them and end up getting them all indicted.
Okay?
So let's be seriously careful.
We're going to get the police officers out there.
They now want to attack the First Amendment head on because we're all here on city sidewalks.
We paid for it.
So don't step on their royal area here unless you're walking back and forth.
We were about to go, then they said we'll have to arrest you.
We're staying?
We're going to go.
Five, three, two, one.
How are you the flight, Jim?
Lousy.
That was an overnight flight.
Ever good.
You can't sleep on an airplane.
Did you fly from New York or Chicago?
Washington, Dallas to Munich, to here.
Oh, it's a long way.
I used to fly to a Chicago dragnets.
There's a dragnet flight of Turkish Airlines.
They don't have one from Washington.
As you know, for a Chinese smoker, smoking an airplane is difficult now.
The way you have to do it...
Always take an aisle seat so that one leg can stretch.
Then, you do not fasten your seat at all, so the stewardess has to come and give you some personal attention.
You just clutch the half apart and say, take me home, Jesus.
Take me home, Jesus.
This is your first fight.
Take me home, Jesus.
Can I help you, sir?
I'm going to need some cigarettes on this flight, so I need to go in the cockpit and help us.
The pilots smoke.
The pilots can smoke under the police under U.S. federal law in the cockpit.
I followed that debate with some amusement because this house never put a stupid-ass bill about no smoking any girl on an airplane.
But this one congressman said, I'm not a smoker myself, but I don't want to be killed and have 100 other people killed on an airplane because the pilot says, I'm going to get a damn bad in this fog.
I'm going to get this goddamn plane down so I can have a cigarette.
So I want the pilot to smoke your boss to survive the flight.
They passed that exception.
So you smoke in the cockpit?
Yeah.
Veteran newspaper reporter Jim Tucker has been covering the Bilderberg meetings for over 30 years and has physically attended more than 20.
There are some Turkish important guys who just sneak in and just like Hillary Clinton did last year.
Well, she was invited.
She's not on the list.
She's not invited.
No, but I mean, nobody except Miss Nixon.
You have to be invited.
Well, she's invited, of course, but secretly.
She was not in the inviting list.
So there will be some more than these guys.
There will be the Prime Minister problem.
There will be the Minister of Foreign Affairs.
I gave a list in the internet which was possible Turkish list.
So probably that's not the exact Turkish list.
The ones I gave in the internet probably exactly fit those names.
Ali Babacan, Kemal Derrish, Mustafa Koç and others, the Turkish list.
Bilderberg toptantılarının 55.si bu yıl İstanbul'da yapılıyor.
Üç gün sürecek toplantıya çeşitli ülkelerden hükümet, finans, eğitim ve iletişim alanında üst düzey 135 kişi katılıyor.
Iran, Afghanistan and the region of the country.
President Legio Serumanoi, President Sikho MК.
President Gennonis, President Gennonis, President Sikho M. President F venJustian NIRP devant Scheinbrin's Lamb to that person in Twitter and that person in Kepai Na..
President Gennonis Baker, President Gennonis, coverage CEO Pursuit A.P Garden U.S. President Gennonis, President R.C. President Mussolini, President Y.R.C., President Gennonis, fondöёлrops and unit discoveries in Kepavi Mele...
...Ritz Carlton Oteli ve çevresinde geniş güvenlik önlemleri alındı.
There's a phone for you James.
James?
The check is in the mail.
Hello?
Yes, Yes, traditionally all the guys chasing the builder will be meeting here at this bar in the evenings about 4 or 5 o'clock preparing notes.
Just join us and we can do it then.
Let's say 4 p.m.
right here at this hotel, in this hotel's bar on the street level bar.
Who do you think it will be a big surprise appearance this year?
I never know.
In fact, a lot of the three or four newcomers are actually obscure at the time.
They're newcomers like Bill Clinton in 1991. He's the governor of Arkansas.
He made an ass of himself at the 88 convention that nominated Dukakis.
His windbaggy speech.
And it ran over about 45 minutes when he was supposed to speak for 10 minutes, among the seconding nominations of all that jazz.
And when he finally said, add in conclusion, he got a standing ovation for saying, in conclusion, a sneering standing ovation.
But then in 1991, he's brought the bill for the first time.
In 1992, he's elected president.
Governor Rick Perry is visiting Istanbul, Turkey this weekend, but some critics are questioning the company he's keeping.
Perry has been invited to attend the Bilderberg Conference.
He'll speak to the conference on state-federal relations.
The Bilderberg Conference is an unofficial, invitation-only conference of about 100 guests, and those guests include some of the most powerful people from the worlds of business, media, and politics.
Critics say Bilderberg only invites people from North America and Western Europe and the conferences are closed to the public.
Bilderberg's defenders say the summits need to be closed so that people of influence can openly share ideas.
The critics answer back that the conference's secrecy defeats the purpose of open democracy.
The guy I was doing the radio interviews with yesterday, you guys jumping on, the volunteer of the governor of Texas, was attending.
It was reported in the Dallas Morning News.
I think that he's probably being chewed out by Bilderberg for being so proud of it that he would call the press conference to announce, or had his staff call the press conference to announce he would be attending Bilderberg.
He's not supposed to be there.
He's supposed to quietly go and quietly come back.
Were there any use of any European royals?
Green Matrix is there.
The Conference of Spain is there.
The Bilderberg group consists of the heads of all of the managing roundtable groups that steer individual countries.
Picture the elite power structure of the world as a giant pyramid, with only the elite of the elite at the tip top of the capstone.
Because tomorrow is Friday.
And those kids do work hard.
They typically will have a breakfast at 7. Their first meetings at 8. They don't sleep late even though.
In fact, I guess a lot of millionaires got up early.
I remember one time calling up David Rockford at his hotel when I was able to filter.
This included what rooms they were staying in.
So if I didn't ask for whom such and such, I'd get through.
I thought I was probably talking to his valet and asked if I could speak to Mr. Rockefeller.
For just a moment, I recognized he's a very busy man.
He said a very sweet voice.
This is he speaking.
And I explained that I was working for him.
He's going to be a high official of the Defense Department and is unable.
To hear everything that Cheney, who was then Secretary of Defense, said about maintaining troops in Europe at the end of the Cold War.
The Cold War was over.
He didn't stress that the Americans, troops, would stay with NATO. Typically, on the first day, there'll be a lot of armed uniformed guards, setting up their sawhorses, then a lot more armed guards later.
In Germany, they deployed the army.
Now, in fairness to Bilderberg, since a million dollars is pocket change, they do reimburse local governments, in the case of Germany, the military, for the cost of the local police to back up the armed guards.
You have the CIA men in plate and close detail behind them when they're in full swing, in full operation.
So it becomes quite conspicuous.
They will seal off the resort.
No people who are not Bilderberg can come in.
They'll be stopped by armed guards.
How close do you think we can get to the site?
A lot of it is luck and happens, hence.
I've been inside a few Bilderberg meetings.
That was about 40 pounds.
20 years ago.
They don't like me very much, so they'd get me out of there pretty quickly.
They know you like me.
They seem to have noticed me.
In fact, we were meeting at that place near Atlanta some years ago.
This guy, you know, told me, Bill and Barry people are very unhappy that you're here.
I said, well, they've never been very cordial.
Oh, I should have mentioned a couple of old spooks.
They volunteered to meet the plane.
Their names could not be used.
They met my plane.
They drove me.
They knew all about the planet.
They drove me to the site of the crime.
And when I got in, I was going to stay at the Bilderberg Hotel until everybody has cash to check out by noon Wednesday.
All guests know that.
I got a call.
A moment after walking into the room, these two old spooks said, oh, you want me to stay another day?
If you just move down to 1.20 instead of 1.16, you can say, that sounded like fun.
I hadn't even opened my suitcase yet and unpacked my other pair of socks.
So down to 1.20 or something like that we go.
Then the old spoke said, one moment, turned over the couch, cuddles with it and handed me a bug.
The little hotel where we were staying at Jim and I. Out of the 20 rooms, six were occupied, three by the CIA and three by the German Secret Service.
That's how serious these people are, and that's how afraid they are of actually what we may be able to reveal, and what we actually do reveal publicly about the Bilderberger.
This is the global government.
They are setting the world agenda.
Inside right now, they're deciding whether or not there will be a war with Iran.
They're deciding whether or not taxes will increase, whether oil prices will be suppressed or increased.
There's much more on the agenda that we'll be finding out in the fullness of time, but those are three items that are heavy on their list this year.
The decisions that these people take, again, they're not only decisions that affect the business community, they affect...
Politics, business, environment across the entire spectrum.
And these decisions are made and taken by a very elite group of people behind closed doors this year at the Brook Street Hotel.
We are not private to these decisions.
We're not allowed to know what they're talking about.
But we'll definitely feel the consequences of these decisions over the next 12 months when events which apparently by accident seem to happen, in fact, have been planned right here this year at Brook Street Hotel.
Bilderberg is making great progress toward a world government.
They have created a super state in Europe called the European Union.
They are intent on creating a Western Hemisphere Union called the American Union.
NAFTA is to be expanded into every country in this hemisphere.
As NAFTA expands, it will take on the role of the American Union.
Is there any mention about Iran?
Iran was discussed and concerned.
is not just nuclear weapons but controlling Iranian oil and Kissinger and others arguing that all the Middle Eastern states have to get together to help control Iran, keeping from developing nuclear weapons underlying all of this is Iran's rich supply of oil which you cannot replicate on because
of its archaic system keeping from developing nuclear weapons underlying all of this is Iran's rich supply But oil is there as a space asset.
They're suggesting that if it's necessary to make a military strike against Iran, it would only be airstrikes and it would only be a little bit more than a single one.
But I think it's a very important thing.
I think the President is saying that the United States has a very important role in the United States.
Working toward nuclear weapons.
No on the ground attack.
No boots on the ground.
All I thought was that tomorrow morning, quite often in the Wednesday afternoon, we saw horses go up and a few guards at the expense to tell people, "No hotels before you can't come in.
Stop you at the gate." Then it gets much friskier on a Friday than the security gets real deep with the plain-posed security, behind-the-arms security.
In Germany, they used the military along with the local cops.
The lady said that there would be a talk for Henrikissinger tomorrow at 2 p.m.
Where was that?
There would be a talk for Henrikissinger tomorrow at 2 p.m.
Really?
Yeah.
So you should shoot that too.
- And for three days and-- - Where kids because actors' speech might be fun to follow.
But the Thursday is not really a big, busy day for a building, Friday is. - In the Middle East, we live in a different world.
The nations do not represent historic entities in the same sense the European nations did.
Turkey, of course, does.
And Iran, in a considerable extent, does.
But in the region in between, the borders were drawn by the victors of World War I on the basis, largely, of what would facilitate their influence.
So, therefore, the identities of these And of their borders can be challenged more easily.
What we in America call terrorists are really groups of people that reject the international system and they are trying to regroup it, very radical Islamic fundamentalist kind.
Interviews you saw with Henry Kissinger, the speech he made the day that Bilderberg was getting together, directions, is exactly what he said at Bilderberg.
Although, of course, in delivering speech he may have buried something, he may have interjected with a joke or whatever, but if you don't...
If you paraphrase and not quote directly, you're safe in reporting.
That was what Kissinger said to Bilderberg.
One cannot say one should end the war in Iraq as if it were a national problem.
What is the war in Iraq affects?
All surrounding countries.
I have disagreed with those who urge immediate withdrawal from Iraq, because I believe that that would move the crisis into the neighboring countries.
The discussion is, as I pointed out before.
Largely on the issue, how do we end our commitment in Vietnam, in Iraq?
But Vietnam was a different kind of issue.
Vietnam was an episode in the Cold War.
The problem in Iraq is that there is no government that controls its entire territory.
So, at the end of the day, the outcome in Iraq...
will depend on something that a German philosopher Immanuel Kant wrote at the end of the 18th century.
He said, someday there will be universal peace.
The only question is whether it comes about through human insight.
Or whether it comes about because through a series of catastrophes of such a magnitude that people are so exhausted that they have no other choice.
Through a series of catastrophes of such a magnitude that people are so exhausted that they have no other choice.
Today, America would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order, referring to the 1991 LA riot.
Tomorrow they will be grateful.
This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence.
It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil.
The one thing every man fears is the unknown.
When presented with this scenario...
Individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the world government.
Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bildenberg Conference, Avion France, 1991. Because Turkey as a state is still in some respects a more national unit so that the change Turkey has to make in entering Europe is bigger.
than the European states have had.
But it does not change the importance because all the countries are in the process of going from where they were to where they had never been.
Well, the Turk Bill of America said he dislikes me for this country to be portrayed as, quote, begging, quote, for EU membership.
And he pointed out that many of Turks oppose the only sovereignty of the United Nations, the European Union.
Henry Kissinger made a strong plea for Turkey's admission to the European Union and, of course, Germany and France's school of Czech.
There is a new element in international relations that a number of issues have come up.
That no state, no matter how large and powerful, even including the United States, can possibly deal with by itself.
Like environment, global warming, energy, and above all proliferation, must be dealt with on a global basis.
The controllers also talked about exploiting the public's fears of climate change to push a continent-wide tax to fund the new government.
As Bilderberg is gathering here in Istanbul, Bush softened his position on global warming.
As you know, the Bilderberg boys years and years ago were among the first to become environmental tree hunters.
Not because they're worried about dirty water or clean air, but because of the potential for immense profits.
We've all seen them unfold in recent years with heavy costs imposed on industry and taxpayers to keep the water clean and keep the air clean.
So they noted as purely profits.
So their term was, or at least one of the terms used by one of the bill of bird, was "surrender," quote, "surrender," quote, "surrender" on the climate "surrender" on the climate issue.
We recognize that we have a problem with greenhouse gases.
We agree there is a global threat.
It's a serious threat.
We agree there is...
We need to establish a limit to greenhouse gases.
We need to discuss the possible pricing of CO2. A global solution to a global problem.
If Bilderberg succeeds, America falls.
All the victimized countries lose their sovereignty.
But by calling for goals, which he did, even as Bilderberg was meeting, I think, about May 31st in Washington.
announced that we should have 15 major nations, including India, in his words, to set goals for admission limits by the end of the year 2008, which is, of course, just over a year.
The next big surprise is not...
It emerged yet in the mainstream media that's going to have to.
Bush is going to push the Law of the Sea Treaty, Lof-S-T, Lof-S-T. Now, this strange sovereignty surrendering treaty.
It would, of course, give the UN and the tribunals and bureaucracies, it would set up total control of all their seaways, 77% of the earth.
It has everything in it.
It has money, it has power, it has socialism, it has national security, world government, oil.
It even has global warming.
And yet, no one in the media is talking about it.
It all revolves around an international agreement called the Law of the Sea, or the Lost Treaty.
And even though we've been fighting it off since the days of Ronald Reagan, we are now closer to it than ever before, and the Senate is about to ratify it.
The real story is that the only thing that will be lost if this treaty is ratified will be more of our sovereignty.
It will kill you.
But you never see it coming.
They can actually have more power than our own Constitution.
In the next couple of days, President Bush is scheduled to resurrect the old law of the Sea Treaty and ask the Senate to ratify it.
He's already written to Senator Biden and asked him to hurry up and pass it.
Now, this is the same treaty that Ronald Reagan rejected 25 years ago.
He was so angry about this attack on our sovereignty that he fired the State Department personnel who had negotiated the treaty under the Carter administration.
One of the original creators of this treaty was a public supporter of one world government.
She was a woman who saw lost as a trial balloon for developing a, quote, common global constitution.
We must wake up the...
The killers are inside the house.
Our country and our sovereignty is being lost to socialists, globalists, elitists, and corporations.
And it's happening right in front of our eyes.
I know the United States wants to be a constructive part of the international community, and I know that's a lot of the motivation to work with other countries, and our role and responsibility in this world is very different than any other country, and the expectations of us are very different, and the need to act independently, as we have seen many times in the last decade, is very important, not only to us, but the world itself.
I believe that was Reagan's philosophy.
I've heard him quoted today.
It's interesting.
His diaries have come out.
And he said, on Tuesday, June 29th of 1982, decided in the National Security Council meeting, will not sign the Law of Sea Treaty even without seabed mining provisions.
He wanted us to go along with the treaty, obviously, and work with the international community, but recognize the dangers of signing up to this.
I think the question before us is, do we want to submit the United States to another international body?
But I think it is unreasonable for us, as we look at the other bodies that we're a party of, to submit ourselves again to an international group.
I think America and our fellow countrymen are deeply sensitive about it now.
We saw that during the immigration debate.
The emails and phone calls we got, a lot of them had nothing to do with immigration.
They were concerned about our sovereignty, our borders.
They were concerned about Congress not acting in their best interest and not really trusting us to act in the best interest.
All of us get emails and phone calls about the North American Union that people are concerned about, or the NAFTA Highway.
And I would just contend to all of you, as we move forward with debating this, this is not a good time to bring something like this back up in front of the American people.
If the Senate ratifies this treaty, it will in effect constitute a financial bailout of a failing and dysfunctional UN bureaucracy.
It would be a gross dereliction of duty for the United States Senate to vote on this treaty without getting to the bottom of the allegations of corruption and mismanagement in the ISA. The history of the treaty goes back quite some years.
Enough nations ratified to make it a treaty.
It was very easy for a lot of countries.
Reagan in 1982, President Ronald Reagan, Rejected it with contempt.
President Bush, the elder, Bush 41, the life fallow.
Then President Bill Clinton, himself as a Bilderberg, to the 1991 meeting in Baden-Baden, Germany.
He signed the treaty and was ready to send it to the Senate for ratification until a test that the Senate gave out 95 to nothing.
In opposition to the Law of the Sea Treaty.
So he pulled it back, knowing that obviously it would be defeated if he submitted for ratification.
Now, Bush is going to submit the treaty to ratification.
Some of his aides are saying, well, he's already asked the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee, his post-advisors, officials, probably asked the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee to ratify the treaty. probably asked the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee to ratify the Bush will have to come forward at some point and publicly urge the Senate ratification.
How close do you believe we are, Senator, to losing America as we know it?
We stopped it in 04 only because no one knew what it was.
It passed the Senate Foreign Relations Committee 16 to nothing.
So it would have been ratified, but we stopped it by having hearings.
Recently, some senators thought they could reform immigration when the American people weren't looking.
Fortunately, we found out in time how bad such reforms would be for us and for our country.
Now, some senators think they can sneak a treaty past the American people that will have even more serious costs for our country.
Ronald Reagan understood these dangers and rejected the Law of the Sea Treaty 25 years ago.
Now, it's time to tell your senators to reject it, too.
I have some real concerns about the treaty, and almost all of them revolve around the fact that it does have a binding or has several binding dispute resolution mechanisms.
As I read it, they try to choose the arbitrators, and if they can't, somebody else, the king of the law of the sea land, chooses three of the five arbitrators.
Isn't that the case?
The glass in the Law of the Sea Convention is neither half.
It's not all full and it's not all empty.
We would try to be very careful on that.
As to the arbitration, what you describe is correct.
And there, the appointing authority, if agreement couldn't be reached, would be the Secretary General of the United Nations.
I think that is a recipe for disaster for us.
This treaty would set up an international tribunal, headquartered in Hamburg, which would resolve disputes and be superior to our own Supreme Court.
It would be anti-American, like these other tribunals, such as the World Trade Organization.
Unfortunately, the Bush administration is using the United States Navy to lobby for this treaty.
Now, don't pay attention to what they say.
You know we have civilian control of the military.
There's no way the Navy can oppose a Bush policy.
They're trying to tell us that they need this treaty to do what the Navy has to do.
This is an insult.
Our American Navy can go anywhere we want on the high seas, and we don't need to ask some international authority.
There is a separate Article 213, which is entitled Enforcement.
With respect to pollution from land-based sources, if everything about land-based pollution is purely feel-good hortatory, why would there be an article entitled Enforcement?
Many of the pollution provisions of the treaty are what we call framework provisions.
It's what I mean when I call the convention a constitution for the oceans.
But again, it seems odd to put a feel-good provision like that with the title enforcement with respect to pollution from land-based sources because this treaty does have enforcement mechanisms.
I just have one article here.
It's titled Potential causes of action for climate change damages in international fora, colon, the Law of the Sea Convention.
And he says, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea is a promising instrument through which such action might be taken, given its broad definition of pollution to the marine environment and the dispute resolution mechanisms contained within its provisions.
I'm just...
Confused.
We know there's already creeping jurisdiction within the authority of this treaty.
We've seen that they claim jurisdiction on land pollution in Great Britain.
And we know what happens when we turn authority over to a third party, that what we think is their mission will soon be greatly expanded all over the world to the disadvantage of the United States.
These proliferating bureaus with their thousands of regulations have cost us many of our constitutional safeguards.
Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American Revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves.
And regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would trade our freedom for security have embarked on this downward course.
Obviously you're straining a great deal of sovereignty, and Bilderberg is gloating over that.
What tremendous pressure must be involved to make a man alienate his own party more than he already has.
The Republican base is already angry about high deficits, stupid spending.
Many are opposed to the invasion of Iraq.
That's not 100% on the so-called conservative base of the Republican Party.
It will really outrage the Republican base when it is forced into the mainstream media as it will have to be if he succeeds.
So obviously Bilderberg considers this a great trial.
And ask the president not to submit the Law of the Sea Treaty.
And if he does, it will diminish whatever he has left of conservative support in this country.
This is the first time now the UN will be able to actually levy a tax.
Is that true?
Yeah.
What it is, is the Law of the Sea Treaty, I think, is the greatest single...
Great on our sovereignty, in my lifetime anyway.
It is global socialism.
It is world government.
It is worse than the United Nations.
This international seabed authority would have the power over nine-tenths of the world's surface.
It would have sovereign control over all the riches at the bottom of the oceans.
It would have the power to impose an international tax disguised under the words assessments, fees, and permits.
A little bit of history.
It was about 1982 or 1983 when Bilderberg's junior varsity.
As you know as well as I do, the Trilateral Commission is a junior varsity.
There's interlocking leadership.
Peter Sutherland and Hendrick Kissinger are on the governing boards of both groups.
It was created by Rockefeller to include the...
Japanese and other Asian and Oriental countries.
They're being involved slightly more than 300 people a year.
Triple that of Bilderberg.
But they have the common agenda.
The Tribunal Commission met in San Diego about 1982 or some century.
Long time ago.
Gasoline prices have always been the all-time high.
The Europeans demanded the United States to increase gasoline taxes by 10 cents a gallon.
The meeting ended on Monday morning with farewells.
On Tuesday morning, the Washington Post had an editorial calling for the tax on gasoline to be raised by 10 cents.
It passed America's plate.
As you know, Washington Post is a stepchild of Bilderberg.
▲
Export Selection