Feb. 27, 2026 - American Journal - Breanna Morello
02:36:02
Watch Live: Bill Clinton Testifies In House Epstein Probe After Hillary’s Interview Halted, DHS Secretary Noem Exposes Deep State Spying On Trump Officials & Globalists Set Stage For New Pearl Harbor Dragging US Into WWIII - FULL SHOW - 02.27.2026
Alex Jones and Mel Kay dissect Bill Clinton’s closed-door Epstein testimony amid claims of deep-state obstruction, including erased evidence like surveillance footage and 17 White House visits. Kay ties Epstein to CIA’s Project Artichoke, alleging Dulles Brothers’ Nazi-linked origins and a globalist infrastructure—BIS, World Bank, UN—shielded by the 1945 Immunity Act. Meanwhile, tensions rise with U.S. evacuations from Israel, laser strikes near El Paso, and Iran’s defiance of NPT demands, framing a potential WWIII as part of elite-driven "one-world government" plans. Epstein’s case exposes systemic corruption, while border security failures highlight alleged infiltration by cartels, terrorists, and foreign spies under Biden’s DOJ. [Automatically generated summary]
We'll go over what happened yesterday, obviously, because that was an absolute train wreck.
No surprise there, of course.
House Republicans really to blame on all of this.
Even Hillary Clinton saying, you know, you guys didn't really ask me any good questions.
They fought hard for this, apparently.
And also, why are we traveling to New York?
Why aren't the Clintons being forced to come down to DC?
Strange, right?
We'll talk about that in a little bit.
When I look over at President Trump's agenda for today, it looks like he's actually heading to Texas.
He's going to be in Corpus Christi right now, it looks like.
He's going to be heading there in a couple of hours, actually.
The president is expected to be receiving an energy briefing when he makes his way to Texas.
He's going to be also delivering some remarks around 3.35 p.m. Eastern time today.
And also, the president, while he's out in Texas, is expected to meet with the member of the media and do a sit-down interview as well.
So that is on his calendar.
Then after Texas, he heads on over back to Palm Beach, Florida, where he's expected to spend the weekend, it looks like.
Must be nice.
I heard it's great weather this time of the year.
Case you haven't seen, there's a lot going on right now in the Middle East.
It looks like maybe, possibly they're going to get their way and start this war with Iran.
The State Department has ordered and authorized the departure of non-essential U.S. government personnel and eligible family members from Israel right now.
Now, that went out, of course, just a couple of hours ago.
I put it up on X for you as well.
That message coming from the embassy in Israel.
So again, this is just one of the many layers to all of it.
Yeah, that's what dropped earlier this morning.
Obviously, as many of you guys know, they've been nudging this war.
They've been hoping for something to happen.
I don't understand how we've gotten to this point where we can't just simply have a discussion, but here we are.
Here we are.
You can't miss out on a good opportunity to start another war.
You can't.
You can't.
So we got that going on for us too.
We'll be speaking with Matt Tardio about just that today.
We'll also be speaking with my girl, Mel Kay, because there's again more CIA documents being dumped down to the web.
And these documents are quite revealing.
What are we seeing here?
Well, we're seeing that the CIA decided to do an operation to get this, go assassinate an individual overseas.
Now, the name of that individual is rejected.
I don't know why.
Obviously, everyone's dead involved in that because it took place back in 1951.
But again, it goes to highlight the fact that our CIA has been rogue for quite some time now and actually goes around killing people.
So Mel Kay will be joining us because, you know, she's working on a whole book that's going to be released soon.
And that is, of course, her main point in all of that.
Also, we'll be talking a little bit about ICE because, you know, Politico is really upset right now.
They're actually pushing, of course, more false nonsense.
But most importantly, they're trying to lie to the American people.
We're going to debunk that.
And we're even debunking with their own reporting.
That's how bad things are getting for those on the left.
They're lying and they don't realize that they're exposing themselves at the same time.
And it's the latest information that we're finding over at Politico.
We're excited that you're jumping on board with us today.
A lot happening yesterday in regards to Hillary Clinton giving her testimony yesterday in New York.
We're going to go over all of this because it actually has me quite infuriated right now that the fact that our lawmakers actually decided to make their way from DC to New York to give them some type of, I guess, luxury of appearing there.
I mean, listen, when you're called to testify, there's no reason why these lawmakers should be the ones going and bowing down to the Clintons.
The Clintons should make their way to DC.
That's how normally this would work out.
But of course, folks, we have to sit here and coddle these people.
It's quite infuriating, especially because how are we paying for this, right?
How are they paying for their transportation?
How are they paying for their hotel stay?
I'm sure they brought security with them.
You and I are paying for that.
You and I are paying for that.
Hillary Clinton yesterday gave her remarks in regards to what actually happened behind those closed door meetings.
And of course, they were closed door, but not at the request of the Clintons.
The Clintons actually said they wanted to publicly testify, which actually tells me that House Republicans are a bunch of cowards.
Because why else would you do this?
I know James Comer is going to tell you something fluffy because he's the chairman of the committee, like, oh, we don't know if there's any criminal charges going to stem from any of this.
There's never going to be any criminal charges, James Comer.
Stop with the nonsense, bring them in front of the American people and let's put their feet to the fire.
But no, of course, now we have to wait for those depots to drop, which actually could be redacted as well.
So Hillary Clinton yesterday, when she shuffled on out of her own hearing yesterday, decided to speak to the media.
And this is just some of the clips.
Take a listen.
unidentified
You've spoken your opening remarks about how heartbroken you have been for the Epstein survivals as these files have come out.
Can you talk to us a little bit about how you have processed and reacted to the fact that president, your husband, Bill Clinton, is referenced in the Epstein files numerous times, including in some photos featuring women.
And how have you been personally preparing for the deposition that is coming tomorrow?
Are you 100% confident that there isn't anything that the former president knows about Epstein's crimes?
And I think the chronology of the connection that he had with Epstein ended, several years before anything about Epstein's criminal activities came to light and that he was charged and sadly given a sweetheart deal, which as I said in my statement, had that not happened, perhaps his predatory behavior could have been stopped earlier.
But I think it is fair to say that the vast majority of people who had contact with him before his criminal pleas in 08 were like most people.
They did not know what he was doing.
And I think that that is exactly what my husband will testify to tomorrow.
And why did it take so long for her to comment on this?
By the way, folks, you could actually reject someone if you know that they are, well, hanging out with pedos.
She was popping her head out of the aisle, folks.
She was front and center at the wedding.
I get it.
They're trying to distance themselves from Golleen Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.
But there's a lot there.
I mean, we even have emails.
There are so many emails.
Hillary Clinton claiming that she doesn't recall ever meeting Epstein.
That's apparently one of the liners she used while testifying.
It was in her opening statement.
But if you look at this email here, it comes from Jeffrey Epstein directly.
Hillary Clinton is much prettier in person.
Well, obviously, we know that's a lie.
But again, that means he probably saw you in person, Hillary.
I mean, there's not many people who are going to lie for you for that one, especially that kind of lie.
And when it comes to Bill Clinton, he's going to have a rough road today.
He's testifying, obviously.
It's probably not going to go too well for him.
Because when you look at the relationship that he had with Epstein, well, it's quite the head scratcher because he knew exactly what was going on.
There's no way he can continue to play dumb.
How many more photos do we need to see with redacted faces, which allegedly are supposed to be victims?
You see, there's evidence that Jeffrey Epstein brought about like eight young women with him on trips to see Bill Clinton at the White House.
There's photos of him posing at the briefing room podium as well at his Palm Beach mansion.
So there's evidence that these two were buds.
Good luck getting around that one.
Now, when it comes to all of this, Congresswoman Lauren Bobart says that she actually showed Hillary the photos of her husband and asked if she knew anything about it.
So the secretary was shown photos of former president Bill Clinton with photos that were released in the Epstein files.
And she did admit that it was her husband, but she could not admit where they were, when they were taken, who they were taken with, and why they were taken, and what he was doing with those women.
So it was very difficult to actually get any truth from her.
But we did hear from Mrs. Clinton regularly that the committee should ask her husband these questions if we want answers.
And so we are going to be asking Bill Clinton questions tomorrow and see if he can recall why he was in hot tubs with these young girls and receiving massages from women and what exactly he was doing all those times on the Lolita Express and on Jeffrey Epstein's island.
Since Hillary Clinton could not recall the conversations that she personally had with her husband once she learned about these images, we are going to take it directly to Bill Clinton himself tomorrow.
You can see her name card is clearly displayed there.
She's not hiding the angle either.
Hillary Clinton's a mess.
She's an absolute mess.
You see, this woman kept her husband around because she thought one day she would be president of the United States and she's been unhinged since, since, because her plan didn't work out.
She's led a very miserable life with a very creepy husband and now she's upset.
She's angry.
She's not happy.
And you would be too.
The man that you were forced to pretend to be married to was a cheater.
Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna has actually been doing a great job on all of this.
And she says that it's hard to believe that Hillary Clinton did not know of Bill Clinton's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein because that's what you're going to want to do.
You're going to downplay everything.
Ignorance is their strategy politically and obviously PR-wise as well.
And when you have top-tier donors, of which the Epstein-Maxwell entire apparatus was, you know the names of your donors and individuals.
And I do find it hard to believe that she didn't know of the relationship between the two.
Obviously, you had said that, and there is White House logs that Epstein attended the White House many times.
There's also two reports of Galene Maxwell kind of in and out of the same circles.
And so, you know, I think the question is, is whether or not they were being targeted.
But also too, remember, you know, when you hear the Clinton specifically say, oh, well, Bill Clinton cut all ties with Jeffrey Epstein before the actual charges were brought forward.
Well, remember, President Trump has said the same thing.
And yet the way that the DNC, the way that the Democrats are trying to use this is to smear the president.
And I actually brought this up in the press scaggle today in that we've asked the victims specifically on whether or not President Trump had hurt them.
He released the files and they don't want to report that.
What they want to try to do is take this and have us say on record whether or not we will subpoena the president to come testify, in which I respond, the president is not considered a person of interest in this investigation.
He's been nothing but cooperative, at least with us and members of the task force.
And I think that his record will reflect that he has released all files.
It was also interesting to note that we inquired on how many files did President Biden release.
His own daughter saying that he took inappropriate showers with her.
Nobody ever asked about that, though.
Look the other way.
Don't talk about that.
Don't talk about that.
If you do, they might actually raid your home.
Folks, what's going on right now is deflection, obviously, of attention.
The Epstein files are heavily involved with Democrats, and they don't want you to talk about that.
They don't want you to see that.
Point back to the White House.
The guy who was the one who authorized the release of the Epstein files is obviously heavily involved in all of this.
He's not.
He's been vindicated.
We see the police documents saying that he was the one who was initially coming forward and trying his very best to end what Epstein was doing because he knew he was a creep.
We know they kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago as well.
Now, there was obviously the false reports that were being made, and that's obviously politically motivated given the timeframe of when they were taking place.
But this is what Democrats do.
And I told you, I told you all, evidence has been erased.
Now, whether it's permanently erased or it was taken out of the files and it was shifted over to a deep state operative, we don't know.
But I've been telling you for months now.
I know based on my sources that evidence has been erased.
And Anna Paulina Luna, the great congresswoman from Florida, also yesterday exposing just that as well.
That is a big, big issue.
Now, again, nothing's being done by the DOJ or the FBI about it, it seems like, because we haven't heard them even say it.
But they know that when they took on these positions, there was a lot of key elements gone, missing.
MIA, and they knew this.
And they've done nothing to fix any of this.
Time and time again, it's like rage bait at this point.
They tell you and they point, say, do you see this?
I still have hope in Kash Patel that maybe he'll wake up and start doing something.
He's doing great work on the pedophilia side of everything, going after a lot of these pedo gangs on the dark web, the internet.
He's doing a great job at that.
When it comes to the core at all of this, we're not really seeing much in the way of movement of arrests coming anytime soon.
Again, that really falls, though, on the it's not shifting blame.
It really falls on the DOJ.
The DOJ is the one that's supposed to ignite the charges, file those charges.
They have chosen not to do anything of significance.
Oh, this grand jury is popping up everywhere.
Great.
Let's see something.
Let's see some results.
We haven't seen anything.
Everyone that I know over the DOJ is a credible person who was actually there to help end these deep state operatives to put their careers on the line.
Well, they're all fleeing.
Or they're being forced out, pushed out.
We don't have many options currently right now in our federal government.
And it's because the swampiest of swamp creatures have penetrated their way to the top of all of these agencies and they are continuously pushing people out.
Speaking of that, it's an interesting report that came out yesterday.
Howard Luttnick, again, another individual who should be brought before the committee.
I know James Combery played that live press conference that he held yesterday, says that, all right, maybe we'll bring forward Lutnick.
Because Howard Luttnick has a lot of very strange, strange activities with Epstein.
Remember when we played, we also played it here live when it was going on.
He was giving congressional testimony where he claimed that, oh, no, he went to Epc9 with his family.
Well, that might actually be Howard Luttnick.
Again, the angle is quite strange, but it looks like the younger version of Howard Luttnick.
I don't see family.
I don't see kids.
Thankfully, we don't see kids.
His kids, by the way, that's what he was saying.
So it might be best just to prioritize getting Howard Luttnick in front of the committee and having him address these issues.
Again, that photo, apparently, according to reports, was put up by the DOJ and then quickly taken down.
But there's a great, great X account that's gone up, J Mail Archive.
And they're posting a lot of this.
They've saved it quickly and are archiving it themselves.
And that's the type of thing we need.
Because DOJ claims, oh no, we've put up everything.
We've showed you everything we've got.
Well, it doesn't appear to be that way.
And asking simple questions is completely acceptable.
You're allowed to do just that.
And I highly recommend you do it.
But in regards to the documentum, again, this is going to take a very long time for everyone to sift through all of this.
And every single day I'm going through it and I'm like, there's just a whole nother side of all of this.
A whole nother story.
Well, our good friends over at Zero Hedge are doing an incredible job too at diving into all the docs.
And they're trying their very best to sift through the information.
In fact, they've put out a lot of key pieces of information in regards to possible surveillance footage that the American people could rely on that might actually still exist.
There are several accounts that Epstein had that are still currently active.
And so while they'll claim that there's no actual Epstein tape, there's no tapes of these children being raped, it's quite strange given the fact that his island and his properties were heavily surveilled.
Jeffrey Epstein hired, this is according to report, private detectives to remove a large amount of potential incriminating items from his Palm Beach property and transfer it over to a secret storage locker shortly after the police raid back in 2005.
Now, the storage unit contained three computers, 29 address books, and three-page lists of Florida masuses.
Ooh, can't lose those.
It also included nude photos believed to be of Epstein's victims.
But again, they have photos, but they don't have, and they also have, by the way, DVDs.
But they don't, for some reason, have any suspects on those photos.
In those photos, in those videos, weird.
Very weird.
It also included pornographic magazines, sex leave training manuals, more videotapes, some showers of women, lingerie, sex toys, lingerie, cash, and other personal items, greeting cards, even.
Well, that's nice of him.
There's no way that he had a PI take all of that into a storage unit to avoid the federal government from getting it.
And you haven't obtained it, FBI.
You don't have any footage, any evidence of these men raping children.
Hard to believe.
Very hard to believe.
The inventory of the locker was emailed to Epstein and his lawyers back in August of 2009 following the release of him from prison.
Some of the materials included surveillance-linked computer equipment.
Again, this is the latest report right now over at Zero Hedge.
No surprise there, folks.
No surprise there.
They hope that you're just not paying attention, I guess.
Oh, by the way, even Zero Hedge is pointing out there was an individual, an IT manager, who was helping Epstein install his Peto Island recording devices allegedly.
And instead of pulling over, once they saw cars flying right at them, the witness says the semi sped up and was hitting 50 miles per hour, going the wrong way for nearly three miles.
Miraculously, they didn't hit anyone in Missouri.
Highway Patrol eventually pulled over that driver who had a legal commercial driver's license, commercial driver's license from Minnesota.
But Highway Patrol says during that stop, our commercial vehicle enforcement troopers conducted a driver inspection and determined the driver could not properly identify road signs as mandated by federal motor carrier regulations.
Per federal motor carrier guidelines, he was placed out of service and not allowed to continue driving.
Here's what we know about this particular trucking business.
Cargo Transportation LLC is run out of an apartment in Hopkins, Minnesota, just outside Minneapolis.
It was registered in 2023 to an Abdulwali Ahmed and only has two drivers, one of whom presumably can't read road signs.
But still, last year, the company drove more than 81,000 miles.
We've reached out to both Cargo Transportation and Minnesota's Commercial Driver's License Division for comment.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy says the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration is now investigating this particular company as the administration continues its push to crack down on foreign nationals driving commercial semi-trucks on our roads after a number of high-profile fatalities involving drivers, several of whom have been in the country illegally.
All right, although our government will tell you that they're trying to crack down on the illegal aliens that are driving semis, I can tell you with confidence that they're still allowing those companies to obtain H-1B visas.
A lot of trucking companies are able to obtain H-1Bs and they're not stopping anytime soon.
This administration is more concerned about the economy rather than public safety and they wouldn't want the economy, the trucking industry to do an ultimate collapse because these illegal invaders have, well, they've penetrated the trucking industry.
And because sadly, we've now given them cheaper labor.
They are cheaper labor, I should just rephrase that.
They have just completely destroyed the trucking industry.
And so the administration tells you that they are trying their best to get rid of the illegals, but they are also allowing H-1B visas.
When you go and do a deep dive in the political article, they do cite, yes, okay, Chrissy Noam's saying that they are criminals.
But she didn't tell us what kind of criminals they are because this is the problem with those on the left.
They actually think that some crimes are acceptable and some aren't.
And so when you look at all of it, they say, yeah, all right, they got criminal history, but Christine Adam won't tell us what that means.
That could be a traffic, a traffic violation, or nonviolent misdemeanor offense.
I would say a crime's a crime and get them the hell out of here.
They don't belong here in the first place.
We were being nice.
I wasn't being nice.
I didn't want them here, but some other people were being nice and allowed them to stay here.
So that's the kind of nonsense that's being pushed right now by Politico: they want to create rage bait.
And that's what they're doing.
They know that the left-wing terrorists or all the domestic terrorists pretty much are on their side at this point.
Yeah, of course, there's a couple of nuts, nuts-oh, people on the right, but the main ones, the violent ones, the ones that are carrying out these mass shootings, the ones that are going to go out there and actually carry through with their assassination attempts are those on the left.
You see time and time again.
And so what they keep doing is they keep pushing things like this to make it seem like these IC agents are going out there and just ripping away DACA recipients and dragging them back to their home countries.
Why not include the criminal history line to the headline?
It's a very short headline.
I'm sure you didn't hit your character limit.
When you look at Politico, they've had much longer headlines.
It's strategic.
It's rage bait.
They want you to get angry.
But they're not supposed to be here in the first place.
Deport, deport, deport.
And they didn't care about these individuals prior to this administration, of course.
But now they do.
Now they do.
It's all about creating the illusion as if they truly care about them.
They don't.
They don't authentically care.
It's like how they use these Epstein victims.
They're using them for political gain.
I want to take a look at this article too.
This one is quite interesting.
There is a, what shouldn't be allowed, an Islamic judge who's now facing calls for impeachment.
Why?
Well, because apparently he's threatening to drag in Trump officials if DHS keeps preventing illegal alien criminals from being released into the community.
You see, this is what happens when you allow the third world into your country.
You get the garbage that comes with it, those garbage cans.
I would say are the judges holding on tight for all their trashy human beings to be allowed into this country, the third world garbage.
Now, of course, they're really upset about this.
They're like, oh, there's an illegal alien from El Salvador, a 29-year-old who they're fighting over.
They're saying, oh, he's got no criminal record.
If he's illegally living in the United States, he's got a criminal record.
He's got a criminal record.
See, this is the problem, right?
Because when Obama was doing all these deportations, even Hillary Clinton admitting, yeah, Bill Clinton and Obama, they deported way more than Donald Trump.
Well, even after admitting that, you'd think something would change.
Nothing's changed, though.
It's just so frustrating because those on the left continue to intentionally mislead the public as to who's being deported.
And when I'm telling you who's being deported, I'm telling you awful human beings who allowed into this country.
Again, I've showed you the evidence.
The Biden regime knew that these individuals that were being shuffled in were convicted rapists.
In fact, that was allowed to be used as their form of ID, allowed to shuffle them through the airports while you and I had to get a real ID and show our ID.
And then they tell you to scan your face.
I don't do it.
You shouldn't do it either.
But those illegal invaders, no, they didn't have to do that.
They instead, though, to get through TSA, just had to show their rape cards.
Oh, yeah, I'm a rapist.
But I promised to go to sexual deviance courses.
And I promise I won't do it again.
Well, that's not what's actually happening here.
These people are monsters, monsters.
And the real victims of all of these crimes are never, they never have their stories told.
I want to play clip six for you because it's just another, a recent, recent plea that took place.
A group of individuals, again, Trende Diagua, sex trafficking minors.
Well, because Maryland Democrats don't want them to get it.
We've got a massive issue in this country, specifically, of course, up in the north as well, where all these illegal invaders have been shuffled to areas like Maryland.
I mean, they've destroyed this beautiful country.
And it was all strategic.
It was all intentional, of course, shift the illegal invaders into places that normally they wouldn't land in.
And, well, what's going on right now?
What you see unraveling.
Great work that these sheriffs are gathering together to out all of this.
It is quite important to do just that.
I want to pivot a little bit, but keep it on the DHS topic.
This one involving Christy Noam, she actually dropped a bombshell yesterday, and it's something that's worth your attention.
She's actually saying, and I told everyone this.
I knew when people were getting involved into the administration, I warned them all: hey, listen, don't trust anyone.
Don't trust anyone.
Don't give them your devices.
I wouldn't even plug in.
I bring my own ports and charge with my own ports.
And it looks like, according to Christy Noam, that she actually uncovered spyware that was uploaded on her devices, specifically to her cell phone.
And that was something that if you didn't have those technology experts here in the department looking at all of our laptops and our phones and recognizing that kind of software, it would still be happening today.
We have to sweep my office on a regular basis to make sure that there's not listening devices in it.
It was very prevalent.
And I think that what happened at this department was individuals had gotten away with for years spying on people who were politically appointed and trying to stop an administration that was coming in and trying to fix this country and keep us safe.
Let's put their names out there so that everyone knows not to hire these people because they are treasonous pigs.
They should be charged.
They should be criminally charged.
You see, this is the problem.
This is the reason why Democrats do what they do.
They've carefully infiltrated every single federal agency with their own operatives, and they have no problem doing things like Christy Noam just detailed for you.
And it's not just her, it's happened literally at every level, at every level.
The FBI specifically, too, by the way, when Dan was still over at the agency at the initial time when he first jumped on board, I was getting reports from individuals over at the Texas field offices stating that there was efforts locally to try to block them from doing specific things.
I mean, imagine the Gojonas on a lower level official trying to block their supervisor just because they don't like their political stance on something.
Folks, this is how bad these institutions have been infiltrated.
And firing these people, when you ask these government officials, are you going to fire them?
They tell you it's so hard to fire these folks.
I mean, I just say just put them on unpaid suspension and leave them out to dry.
That's what they've done under previous administrations, the Biden administration specifically.
They had no problem doing just that.
They need to purge these individuals.
But again, it's very hard to spot them.
And that is the reason why Democrats have done what they've done.
They literally promoted individuals over at the FBI, I've told you extensively, who hated President Trump.
If they had some anti-Trump social media posts, guess what they did?
Promoted, promoted, promoted.
These people are still working within government.
And so it's important to know that, even at the DOJ.
And I want to be gracious, of course, but the reality of it is, is most of it falls on Pam Bonnie.
But when we're talking about documents not being released, it's not like Pam Bonnie is going to know what 3 million documents were actually put out, which ones weren't.
She wouldn't actually know that.
She had to trust people working underneath her to tell her what was going on.
But I lack empathy for her given the fact that she did that little photo op of the binders at the White House, which she obviously knew given the fact that she put a letter in there saying that we didn't get all the documents, but still use those people as political props.
Unwillingly, by the way.
Yeah, that was the moment.
A lot of people still having to deal with the harassment from all of this because they didn't know.
And then, of course, the DOJ, I also told him, I mean, you can't talk about this for like three more hours.
Let's pivot a little bit.
So talking about corrupt individuals, Tony Gonzalez, I'm still not letting up on this issue.
Several Republicans have come forward and called for his resignation, given the fact that he's allegedly a creep.
He's allegedly a creep.
There's text messages that have been brought to the light, and they show that Gonzalez, in fact, was sexting.
I mean, I don't even know if it was willingly because she twice tells him that he's going too far.
But he didn't stop.
The married father of six wouldn't stop.
And he went from initially denying everything to now he's no longer denying it.
Now he's just saying, the truth will come out soon.
Yeah, dude, the truth is coming out.
And you don't have a defense.
So you think by saying, oh, this is all political, they're trying to push me out.
Oh, as if you've been a real fighter.
You've been a real tough ass?
Come on.
Come on.
Well, Tim Burchett, who is a great, great congressman, I've got like those who are still in the office.
I've got like maybe, I've got like maybe like three that I authentically like or maybe five.
Yeah, I mean, given the fact that we've waited for him to tell his story, he's chosen not to.
He's trying to get away with this primary, so he's not going to say anything now.
That's the reason why when you're asking these questions, he's telling you, wait until the truth comes out.
No, now's actually your time to tell the truth.
No one's stopping you from telling the truth.
Texans want to know, were you sleeping with your staff or did you send questions to your staffer about what kind of sexual things she was into?
Again, we don't really care for your personal life.
And if you're cheating on your wife, then that's something for your wife to deal with, as well as God who's going to punish you later for this, of course, because that is a heinous, heinous thing to do.
But the reality of it is, and the man has six kids, by the way.
But the reality of it is, is he's not trying to take any responsibility for any of this.
He wants to look the other way on the issue.
That staffer later killed herself.
And again, initially, a lot of us thought it was due to the affair, but apparently there's allegations that his own, well, her own husband was having an affair as well with her best friend.
Disgusting human beings, if true.
But folks, that's what's going on right now in Texas.
And obviously it's primary season.
So Tony Gonzalez is trying to look the other way and hope that people will not ask these tough questions.
He needs to go.
He needs to go.
If he was a man with a little bit of class, he would have withdrew his name from re-election.
I would have said, hey, I'm going to hold on this seat for the time being, but I'm going to bow out because he's classless.
He's decided not to.
And again, normally I would say, ah, you're innocent until proven guilty.
But folks, these text messages, he can't even tell you if they're real or not.
He just tells you that the truth would come out soon.
Tony, are those text messages yours?
Yes or no?
It's a pretty simple question to be answered.
This isn't a hard question.
But again, if you're a man who's constantly cheating on your wife, you probably are just used to deflecting.
That's what's going on right now in Congress.
They can't, on both sides of the aisle, keep their junk in their pants.
All right, let's pivot a little bit.
Let's go to a lighter topic.
It's a little early and you're probably drinking your coffee and don't want to hear stuff like that.
Netflix has just changed its decision to purchase Warner Brothers.
Netflix has declined to raise its offer to purchase Warner Brothers.
So it looks like it's done deal.
According to their claim, they no longer find it financially attractive anymore, which is actually a massive, massive win for conservatives itself, because imagine if Netflix purchased Warner Brothers.
I mean, everything's going woke.
As conservatives, you can't really find content out there that your kids could watch that's not going to try to turn them into a tranny.
And we all know Netflix is out there pushing propaganda that men could have children or birth children, I should say.
Netflix is one of the many, many groups trying to erase the greatness that women do provide to this world, and that is life.
And it's been absolutely disgusting.
I've canceled my membership a long time ago.
I remember when there was that ad that they were running, it was obviously a biological woman pretending to be a man, and they were trying to push this as real propaganda: like men can have kids, they could birth children.
It's one of the great things that make men and women different, but it's a beautiful thing.
And they're trying to erase it.
They're trying to erase it.
So it's a good thing that Warner Brothers is no longer going to be purchased by Netflix.
It looks like so far.
We just need to downsize everyone.
Bankrupt Netflix.
Cancel your memberships.
Because this is my opinion here, folks.
I think that they've gone woke.
I think they've gone, they're just trying to destroy this country, would be the better way to phrase it.
And I think they're pure evil at this point.
I don't understand why people continue to pay for Netflix.
There's other alternatives.
Yeah, they're not all great.
Maybe you go on eBay and just buy a VCR and just play tapes for your kids.
My mom actually has stashed hers away, and I'm telling you, those are actually going to be worth a lot of money.
I'll probably go over there and grab them for my feature children as well because you don't want them reading this nonsense.
You don't want them watching this nonsense.
Everything is absolutely disgraceful over at Netflix these days.
Speaking of disgraceful, this is interesting.
America First Legal has actually filed a lawsuit against the city of Philadelphia.
They're now suing in regards to five police officers who say that they were refused promotion due to the fact that they're white.
It's so crazy that this is the world we live in, right?
Because discrimination is acceptable if it meets the correct standards.
AFL is now suing on behalf of these five individuals.
They filed a federal class action lawsuit representing the white male police officers who were denied promotions based on their race and sex under the city's DEI policies.
The suit targets Philadelphia Police Department and officials.
And they're doing their best to try to push back on this.
It's also worth noting that they adopted this DEI policy post-George Floyd, which prioritized both minorities and female candidates over higher-ranking white men.
How crazy is that?
I actually just, there's some, you know, positions that I think women can have in law enforcement, but those who have to do, you know, day by day interacting with the public, it's quite the challenging task, especially if you're interacting with a violent male for a female to take on.
And so wouldn't you want more men joining the force because of that?
The physical differences, which I guess we're not allowed to talk about.
The DEI-driven policy replaced their previous merit-based rule of two, which required sections from the top two candidates ranked by exam and seniority and education.
And of course, AFL has done an incredible job, by the way, of combating all of this and pushing back when it comes to discrimination.
They're one of the great law firms that does just that.
They've actually had massive victories and they were very busy under the Biden years because, folks, there was a lot of you-know-what going on during the Biden years.
Folks, I want to remind you over at the alexjonstore.com right now.
We have a BOGO sale going on for a limited time.
It's going to end on Monday.
When you buy Ultimate Creatine, you're going to get the CMOS gummies or the Sheila Jit gummies for free.
Again, that's going to end on Monday.
So, before you forget, you got to head on over right now, the AlexJonesStore.com and make sure you snag it before it is too late.
It's also 25% off all apparel right now over at the shop.
That includes t-shirts, hats, and hoodies.
Now, that is expected to end on Wednesday.
And just a little reminder, when you support the AlexJonesStore.com, you're supporting this broadcast and keeping us on air.
So we're very grateful for you doing just that.
Also, if you haven't done so already, I'll keep telling you.
You got to head on over and download the app, alexjonesapp.com right now.
We never know when that door is going to lock.
It could be any day now.
And the best way to stay in touch with us, of course, is to download the app.
Make sure you have it on all of your devices.
Because when we start off our next project, you're going to want to say in the know.
So head on over, alexjonesapp.com and make sure you download that now.
All right, folks are getting ready to kick off the second hour of the show.
Howard Lutnick, currently serving as the 41st United States Secretary of Commerce, joined Cantor Fitzgerald in 1983, rising rapidly to become its president and CEO at age 29.
establishing himself as a prominent Wall Street figure for over three decades, rebuilding Cantor Fitzgerald after the devastating loss of 658 employees, including his brother, in the September 11th, 2001 attacks, an event he somehow missed.
Recently, taking the economic wheel on the Trump administration's second term, Luttnick publicly championed and defended the tariffs as essential for national security and economic rebalancing, dismissing concerns about their legality or economic fallout, calling worries about Supreme Court invalidation silly.
The mechanism offered companies an upfront payment of 20 to 30 percent of the duties paid in exchange for assigning their legal claim to any refund, effectively a litigation finance bet that the tariffs would be ruled unlawful, triggering government repayments of potentially hundreds of billions in collected duties, 175 billion at last count.
Many have been quick to debunk the possibility of Luttnick scamming the United States.
It is all based on a 2025 Wired magazine article that claimed the firm had already completed a $10 million deal in refund rights, a claim that remains a he said, she said between media reports and company denials.
Regardless, Luttnick's myriad of Epstein connections is raining down like meteors from the sky.
Luttnick is referencing a supposed innocent trip to Epstein Island referenced in an Epstein email that reveals creepy details about the ages of the children.
A constant red flag in the Epstein emails.
This is followed up three years later with an invite to Jeffrey Epstein to an intimate event for Hillary Clinton at Cantor Fitzgerald from Luttnick, followed by another email two years later thanking Epstein for a donation in honor of Howard Luttnick.
You're all jumping home with us today on this beautiful Friday morning.
A lot happening here.
Maybe we're going to war.
I don't know.
A lot happening there.
We're going to dive into in just a second.
I want to remind you guys all at home right now that we'll be taking your calls later in the show.
So if you want to jump on the lines, 877-789-2539 is the number to call.
That is 877-789-2539 is the number to call.
We'll probably get to those calls in about, I'd say, 24 minutes, roughly.
So give us a call if you'd like to join the show and talk about stuff.
The stories we've talked about thus far.
I'm not really like a morning showgirl, I feel like.
It's the stumbles.
If you guys were to hear me in like four more hours, I work my way through it.
Work my way through it.
And I'm trying to weed myself off the caffeine these days.
So there you go.
I want to dive into what's been going on all across, obviously, the country, but most importantly, the world right now.
And we got the perfect guy on to do just that.
Let's dive into this story first.
The U.S. military apparently employed a laser today to take down these Border Patrol drones.
It's all quite strange.
We are learning about this because it took place near El Paso, Texas.
Again, that's setting off red flags for you.
That's because just a couple of days ago, we were told that our federal government had to shoot down, allegedly, had to take down several drones that they said were part of the cartel.
Cartel apparently sent them.
Again, that story was quite strange because if you remember, they shut down the airspace at first for 10 days and then they quickly stopped.
All right, we'll open back up.
It was all really, really strange.
But now apparently, they're also taking down Border Patrol drones by the El Paso area, which apparently, according to the FAA, is a restricted area.
It's all quite strange.
Joining me to discuss is Matt Tardio.
He's been doing a deep dive into all of this.
And I don't know what to think of this, Matt.
So we're going to bring you in to talk.
You obviously know this better than anyone else, the subject matter.
What do you make of the report that our U.S. military had to take down a Border Patrol drone?
Like when you first started reading on it, I started to laugh a little bit because I saw you smirk and it just made me lose control on the backside.
But yeah, U.S. military shooting down a Border Patrol drone.
That's very interesting that they're using the laser in order to do so.
But I mean, if we were to back it up two weeks ago, you know, you just said that the original reports that came out from the El Paso area prior to them shutting it down the airspace was that, you know, the White House officials were stating that it was cartel drone that ended up getting shot out.
By mid-afternoon that day, the reporting changed to a party balloon, a party balloon, which was really, really interesting to me because these lasers are extremely high tech.
Israel's been employing them for some time and we've actually got a little bit of an insight to what that looks like.
And I mean, you can see these things crystal clear.
I mean, these are very high energy lasers that if they want, they could, you know, poke it on the drone and they can cut the wing off the drone, right?
Like that's how high energy these lasers are from from a great distance away.
So I say that because it gives a very good picture of what exactly it is that they're shooting out of the sky.
If it had been a party balloon that they had, you know, put up two weeks ago, they would have seen the balloon very clear, put the laser on it and pulled the trigger and you would have watched that sucker pop and they would have known immediately it was a party balloon.
There would have been zero, you know, how do you want to say zero misinformation that ended up getting put out about it.
But one thing's for Dengster, you know, if the United States Army is now shooting down border patrol drones, it means they're scared and they're very, very worried and their fingers kind of on the trigger.
So why is it with all of the thousands of drones that are operating along the border all year long, and we have cartel drones going back and forth across the border, dropping off drugs and other things throughout the year, conducting reconnaissance on border patrol agents and such?
Why is it now that within this two-week time span, we now have people that are worried to the point where we're shooting our own stuff out of the sky?
And I think that's the very real question, very real question that we need to look at, particularly while we're on the verge of going to war with Iran and after El Mencho's death down inside of Mexico.
I think the United States is scared and was the initial reporting we probably heard out of two weeks ago was probably accurate and they just don't want to admit to it.
Yeah, that's what I was going to get to with this.
Do you actually believe the narrative still from, you know, we brought you in immediately and you reacted to the report that this was a drone that was a drone that was owned by the cartel was the initial report that came down from the Pentagon.
That's exactly what they told me.
We haven't received any updates on all of that.
Do you believe that report?
Do you believe this report too, that this was a border patrol drone?
I mean, it sounds like, I mean, it sounds like to me that maybe it was a mistake, or do you think that they were actually aiming to take down a border patrol drone?
I actually believe that the U.S. Army could shoot down a border patrol drone.
Yes, that is not beyond the realm of possibilities here.
That is way more believable than a party balloon because like I said, you know, these cameras are very high tech and they can they can look and see exactly what it is.
The deconfliction that should have taken place before that gets shot down is the real question, right?
Like, why didn't the United States military reach out to CBP and ask whether or DHS and ask whether or not they had drones operating in that area?
That should be one of the very first things that you do, right?
But aside from that, you know, do I believe the initial narrative about it being a party balloon?
No, I don't for that very reason, right?
Because these lasers are very high tech and the camera systems on them are very, very good because those lasers have to be very precise in order to take those shots.
So no, I don't believe that we shot down a party balloon initially or popped, excuse me, popped a party balloon two weeks ago over the border.
I'm getting so annoyed at this because I never know what to make of it.
I don't trust anyone.
I don't trust any of these folks.
But so we keep you around, Matt.
You're the one who's helping us sift through all of this.
I wanted to dive into another topic, too.
One was obviously the way we kicked off this morning when we learned that officials in Israel are being told if they are, if they're not emergency officials working for the U.S. government, that they want them out.
This is coming from the State Department right now.
The State Department has authorized the departure of non-emergency U.S. government personnel and family members as well.
Again, this is based in the, these came from the embassy in Israel.
What do you make of this one?
Because again, I mean, we keep getting told that we're getting closer and closer to possibly going to war with Iran.
Does it sound like they're going to strike sometime soon now?
It sounds like we're about to be striking sometime soon.
The evacuation of non-essential personnel is huge.
It's not just the United States that ended up doing that over inside of Israel.
We also saw the same thing, you know, with China putting out the same order to their people over inside of Iran.
You know, we've got the USS Ford that just arrived over inside of Israel outside of Port of Haifa earlier today, local time, all right, a little bit earlier today.
It was over inside Crete refitting for about three days, three to four days, excuse me, before it actually left and it headed over to Israel.
And so now we've got another aircraft carrier.
The interesting thing about this is we now have a bunch of F-22s that are staged over inside of Israel.
And I believe it was up to 14 refueling aircraft as well that are at the airport over there, the main international airport.
And so we've got a bunch of U.S. military aircraft that are on the ground over inside of Israel itself.
And of course, military aircraft are going to make it a pretty big target for Iran should they choose to strike first, particularly those refueling tankers.
The aircraft that are aboard the Ford that are parked over outside of Israel right now could theoretically be used in a strike against Iran.
They just have to refuel on the way over or back, right, in order to strike Iran, likely on the way over there.
And if that's the case, that's what all of those refueling tankers are for on the ground over inside of Israel.
At the same time, we have hundreds of aircraft stacked up over inside of the Middle East with a bunch of them stacked up over inside of Jordan.
And it's just kind of one of those things that's inevitable.
The Iranian foreign minister or the Iranian officials had came out yesterday following the meeting over inside of Geneva where they're trying to reach what is being called a peace deal between the United States and Iran.
And they had said that everything is moving in the right direction.
No deal has been reached yet, but it's moving in the right direction.
And I think that framing is completely and totally out of context by saying that we're having negotiations.
It's not a negotiation.
The U.S. has demands for Iran, zero uranium enrichment.
They're not allowed to enrich any uranium.
They have to stop funding foreign terror organizations around the Middle East, including Hezbollah, that was operating over inside of our hemisphere.
And on top of that, they have to limit their ballistic missile range to 300 kilometers.
Now, that's pretty scary when you start thinking about it, what our actual demands are, thinking that we're going to somehow come to some sort of an agreement on this, because those are the U.S.'s like red lines, you know?
So where do you negotiate from 0% enrichment?
Well, Iran's not going to negotiate on that.
Ayatollah already came out and said that that's not going to happen.
He actually threatened Trump in his Friday sermon that he was giving, talking about when he's screaming death to America, it doesn't mean death to America.
It means death to Donald Trump and basically all his cronies.
So that's, I mean, this is the rhetoric that the United States is dealing with.
They've been in violation of the NPT that they're signatories to, that they claim that they suspended their status.
They denied the IAEA, the Atomic Energy Agency, the International Atomic Energy Agency, to go and inspect any of the stockpiles post-strike.
So we don't know what the status is of their 450 kilograms of enriched uranium, whether or not it's blown up, whether or not it's leached out in the environment, killing people.
We got no freaking clue what's going on with it.
So, I mean, all in all, it's just a, it's just a huge problem.
We've got more than enough aircraft in the region to knock the hell out of them.
And I think it's going to happen in the very near future.
And I haven't heard any updates in regards to how many have been captured by DHS.
And again, I mean, that's the intentions.
I'm assuming that these people would probably be hiding in mosques and it would make it very difficult for our federal agencies to go out there and wrap them up because for some reason we view Islam as a religion rather than, well, that's a whole nother argument for another day, I guess I could say.
I want to say the number that was put out by Joe Kent was 18,000 known or suspected terrorists that ended up entering the country, Islamic terrorists that ended up entering the country underneath Joe Biden.
And I don't know if the American people know the vast majority of these illegal invaders who've come into our country, these terrorists, actually come from our northern border.
I don't know if you have any background on that, Matt, but I don't think the average American understands that the northern border is where they come in from.
I think a lot of the focus has always been on the southern border, but because they know that our northern border is significantly larger, obviously, but it's also easier to get in from Canada because Canada doesn't love their people.
So they allow anyone in.
And then they try to shuffle their way into the United States.
It's a mess right now.
And by the way, again, I'm just going to keep reminding people, DHS is not funded right now.
So a lot of employees who aren't receiving paychecks are going to take time off to pick up other gigs.
And so obviously that's a huge national security issue.
But are you familiar with the northern border angle to all of this?
I mean, the Canadians are pissed off about it, to be quite frank.
Like you look at what the Canadians are saying about the Islamic terrorists that have worked their way over into Canada and a lot of the different things, like the church burnings and things of that nature that have been happening over the last year and a half.
And then it's really no wonder that our northern border is the way that they end up coming in.
You look at the populations of the Midwest and one major municipality basically takes up like five major states over inside of the Midwest as far as population goes.
Like there's just nobody out there.
It's just scattered no man's land.
So yeah, I mean, that border is extremely insecure up there.
And it's very easy for them to make their way over into the United States of America.
And Canada provides a good, you know, access point for them in order to come in, regardless of where they're coming in from.
The same thing goes true for Russians.
We've got a lot of Russians that go up over into Canada.
You look over into Northwestern United States of America.
You've got a lot of like prior Russians that are actually up there over inside the Northwest.
So the entire thing is just a problem.
And it's not just the Islamic Jihadists either.
You know, we've got spies coming in from China and we've also got a bunch of cartel members.
You know, people are worried about sleeper cells as far as Islamic jihadists are concerned.
Look at what happened in Mexico after El Mento got killed, right?
And how quickly over 200 roadblocks got thrown up and tons of people ended up getting murdered in gunfights and everything just ended up taken out.
And that is just in the blink of an eye.
They didn't see that coming, but they were able to activate all of their little cartel network down there.
Well, in every major city, you've got a bunch of cartel terror organizations that are operating.
So if we go in and we start killing terrorists down inside of Mexico, guess what's going to happen here in the United States?
It's nothing for them to flip that switch.
So we've got lots of problems here in the United States.
It's not just the jihadists.
It's not just the cartels.
It's Chinese.
It's Russians.
It's all of them.
Our borders were just screwed for years and we've been ignoring it.
I don't even think, like I said this before, Donald Trump during his State of the Union address.
He said our borders are perfectly perfectly secure.
Zero illegal aliens ended up crossing over the last year.
That is just a flat out lie.
We had countless numbers of illegal aliens cross into the United States over the last year.
What he probably meant to say was that more have gone the other way than have came in for the first time.
We've had a net negative, but that doesn't mean they're not still getting into the United States.
Well, you can take, you can take, you know, CBP encounters for, you know, last year down on the border and, you know, CBP, depending on who you talk to, because they, they have different estimates for what they call gotaways.
And so you can go over to the CBP's website and you can look up, you know, the estimated amount or not estimated amount, they'd be on a CBP encounters for 2025.
And for every single encounter, there's always X amount of gotaways that end up coming through.
Now, the number has been drastically reduced over the last year, but it's not zero, right?
If we had zero people coming across the border illegally, there wouldn't be as many CBP encounters as there was.
Underneath the Biden admin, I want to say it maxed out at 2.8 mil as far as the high number goes for CBP encounters.
Underneath Trump, I think it dropped to under 500,000.
I'd have to go look at the direct number over the last year, but I mean, it's significantly declined.
And that is kind of like the average of where it kind of like sits at.
But either way, there's always those gotaways that get factored in.
And you could look up previous interviews with CBP chiefs that'll come out and they'll tell you the exact same thing.
And yeah, I mean, I remember I think it was yesterday, the day before that there were three unaccompanied miners who were also trying to make their way into the country as well from the southern border.
And it just seems strange.
But again, that probably is a deflection of resources trying to use it to pivot.
So we'll keep looking at that story.
But there's another story too that you just put on my radar as well.
Yeah, the Taliban picked a fight with Pakistan, made a very horrible mistake in doing so.
I mean, they've been having disputes along the border.
And you have a group that's called the TTP, which is identified as Taliban, but the Taliban, the official Taliban government, and I hate to call them that of Afghanistan doesn't necessarily recognize them.
But they've been attacking Pakistani military forces inside the Pakistani borders for quite some time.
Pakistan told them to get, you know, told the Taliban to get them under control.
Taliban said we're not affiliated with them.
So Pakistan, you know, started attacking.
As soon as they started attacking the TTP, then we saw the official Taliban rolling out and U.S. military vehicles heading over towards a border with Pakistan.
Overnight, I think it's estimated that Pakistan has killed over 400 Taliban members, destroyed over 50 border patrol checkpoints.
They currently own 20 of them that used to belong to the Taliban, different border outposts, because you have a very mountainous region spread across the border.
So they have different mountain outposts that are just kind of like set up there, picture small little military outposts that are set out there.
And they've taken out ginormous numbers of armored vehicles, tanks, APCs, Humvees, things of that nature.
They were bombing Kabul.
They have taken out numerous battalion headquarters elements of the Taliban in three different provinces across Afghanistan.
And it's still ongoing to this morning.
They're trading artillery fire across the border.
And it looks like, at least in this case, that the Taliban is getting their butt handed to them.
And it's going to continue on that way for quite some time until they learn to stay within their borders.
Let's be perfectly clear about what's going on right now.
It's Ramadan.
And they get extra concessions and their radical Islamic belief up in heaven if they end up dying as part of like a holy war and they die as martyrs for that holy war.
So that's exactly what's going on.
Like let's be perfectly clear about that, right?
You cannot, you cannot take out the Ayatollah and get rid of a radical religious ideology.
There is one way to get rid of a radical religious ideology and only one proven way to get rid of a radical religious ideology, but I don't think the world is ready for that.
And as the video I was just talking about, as he walks up to the police and then he blows himself up, four Pakistani police officers were killed in this explosive.
Who knows what he had on him?
But of course, this is one of the many, many issues that they have in the Middle East and that they're trying to bring here.
You know, Matt, when they sit here and make the argument that they want to bring Islam to the West and they want to conquer us, it wouldn't end their violence.
Who do you think are the people saying, let's bring Islam to the West, right?
Do you think it's the moderates that are happy, like where they're sitting at, that are just kind of hanging out over in their country or the ones that are going, we need to take Islam to the West, i.e., we need to go conquer the West.
Do you think that those are like nice, peaceful guys, or do you think those are the radical ones, right?
It's not like they're missionaries like flying over here and being like, have you guys heard of Allah?
Have you heard of the Prophet Muhammad?
You know, that's not what they're doing at all.
That is not the way they're going about life.
That's not what they're doing at all.
They're looking at taking things over.
And those suicide bombers, by the way, somebody had mentioned that Pakistan has nukes.
And then the leader of the Taliban, one of the ground force commanders of the Taliban, actually got word of, you know, Pakistan threatening nukes or hearing about their nukes.
And he put out yesterday, I don't give a damn if Pakistan has a bunch of nukes because we have suicide bombers.
And our suicide bombers are going to have greater effects than your nukes.
What are you going to do?
You know, we're all willing to die for the cause and we'll all just strap on a vest and go walk into Pakistan.
What are you going to do about it?
I mean, that is the ideology.
That is the ideology.
How do you stop someone that's sole goal is to kill you and they're willing to give their life in order to do it?
And the answer is you have to kill them.
So you can take that how you will.
People, people get upset with me when I talk about genocide when it goes down to radical Islam.
And sometimes genocide can actually be a good thing.
But the fact is that they're willing to genocide themselves.
So what do you do?
You canoe their foreheads.
There's not another answer that goes into stopping this madness, right?
It's not like we can put them on an isolated island and call today, right?
Israel tried that over inside of Gaza.
Look where Gaza's at today, right?
Didn't work out so good, right?
All they did was build a radical Islamic jihad base with hundreds of miles of tunnels underneath civilian infrastructure, still managed to get in RPGs, surface-to-air missiles, belt-fed weapons, explosives, right?
All of this crap with like one of the most like surveilled borders in the freaking world.
So yeah, there's one answer when it comes down to getting rid of radical Islam.
It's, it's not their job to stomach it, you know, and that's why, unfortunately, you know, when people are looking at the different things the United States military is doing, they go, well, well, we don't agree with this.
You can, you can take your pacifist ideology and you could push it up your own butt and go sit down and relax because my kids' safety, my family's safety, everybody else's safety depends on it.
I don't care about your pacifist ideology.
What I actually care about is the national security and the safety of the United States of America.
And just because you don't understand violence doesn't mean they don't.
So leave it up to the men that actually understand it and allow them to go take care of it and kill these bastards before they start killing us back here at home.
And the worst part is, I think even if 9-11 happened today here in the United States of America, that they would probably end up setting up a memorial for the freaking pilots.
All across America who have kept up with the whole Epstein investigation and are outraged by the obvious fact that men and women, for that matter, of great power and great wealth from all across the world have been able to get away with a lot of heinous crimes, and they haven't been held accountable and they haven't even had to answer questions about what they knew and when they knew it.
Today, we hope to be able to do as we did yesterday and continue to bring some of the most powerful people in the world in to answer questions.
Again, no one's accusing anyone of any wrongdoing, but I think the American people have a lot of questions.
And our House Oversight Committee is committed to getting answers.
We're committed to transparency.
We've already seen a lot of very powerful people who have been held accountable by having to resign in disgrace from various boards all over the world.
We're going to continue to seek the truth, try to figure out how the government failed the victims, and try to hopefully hold more people accountable.
That's what the purpose of this investigation is.
I will say this: it's very difficult to get people in for these depositions of great power and great wealth.
And I used yesterday and today as an example, it took seven months, seven months to get the Clintons in here.
But we've got them in here, and we look forward to answering, to asking lots of questions that I think any curious media outlet in America would have.
Yesterday, Ms. Clinton deferred a lot of questions to her husband today.
There were at least a dozen times when she said, you'll have to ask my husband that.
I can't answer that.
So we already had a big portfolio of questions for him.
Well, I think everyone's seen there are a lot of photos that have been released by the Department of Justice as well as the Epstein estate.
There are a lot of email correspondents that included President Clinton.
We know President Clinton had, and Secretary Clinton confirmed this yesterday.
Jeffrey Epstein was in the White House 17 times while Bill Clinton was president.
We know that Bill Clinton flew on Jeffrey Epstein's plane at least 27 times.
So those are questions that we're going to ask.
Everything that most media outlets have reported with respect to pictures and correspondence between Epstein, Maxwell, and Bill Clinton, these are all questions that we're going to ask today.
unidentified
Yesterday, you both told me that you were planning on asking about an email that Howard Luttnick sent to Jeffrey Epstein, I presume about our Hillary Clinton fundraiser in 2001.
If he's worth asking about, is he not worth asking in to talk about what he might know?
Yeah, and I think it'll be interesting when we hopefully get that video out later today or to Myers as quick as we can get it out.
I think it'll be interesting what Hillary Clinton said about Howard Luttnick and how she said it.
We looked, I think that was Ms. Mace with the line of questioning.
So there was a pretty thorough line of questioning yesterday between Ms. Mace and Ms. Clinton with respect to Luttnick.
Now, I think you all find it very interesting what she had to say, but we're going to continue to ask questions of everyone that shows up in photos on the island and things like that.
And she also said there were substantive questions yesterday, too.
But one reason there were repetitive questions about Epstein is because we went through every email and every correspondence that implied Hillary Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein communicated often.
You all have seen the email where he said that she looks better in person and all of that.
Those were questions we asked.
So every item of evidence that would suggest Hillary Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein had a close relationship, we went and asked about that.
So it may have seemed repetitive because there was a lot of documentation that would suggest that she had a relationship with Epstein.
To be clear, Secretary Clinton actually asked us about what happened with the disclosure language in the NDAA.
So, I mean, I know she's trying to pivot from the fact that she's here and she had a very close relationship regarding the Clinton Foundation and Epstein and Maxwell.
But the point is, and I think I'd like to hit on this with probably Miss Mace here, but I think we have a very important interest and curiosity about what specifically the co-conspirators had a role in all this, right?
We know for a fact that some of these were women.
And I think that today, at least with my line of questioning, I'm curious about that.
Why is it that these women were given plea deals as adults for trafficking minors?
How much of that did they witness, et cetera?
And so, you know, I don't know that Secretary Clinton was all that honest about the context of this investigation.
We asked extensively about intelligence ties, whether or not she felt that she was targeted as a result of possibly an intelligence gathering operation.
And she was very curiously interested in that.
And then also, you'll hear it in the response, but had told us to follow up with a few countries, one of which is our ally.
And I think Ms. Luna brought up a good point about the Clinton Foundation.
There's so many examples in the evidence the Department of Justice released in correspondence where Epstein bragged about how involved he was initially in setting up the Clinton Global Initiative and the Clinton Foundation.
We asked those questions to Secretary Clinton yesterday, and she kept saying, well, she was in the Senate at that time.
She wasn't focused on it.
You'll have to ask my husband.
So a lot of the Clinton Global Initiative questions yesterday went unanswered because Ms. Clinton deferred to her husband to ask.
No, she didn't want to answer any questions about any of that and deferred most of those, if not all of those questions to her husband.
And he will be thoroughly asked about that today.
You know, what did he know?
What did he know?
What did he see?
Because there are other people who've come forward publicly, like Kevin Spacey, who thought all of this was very strange and actually a very high risk for a president of the United States or former president.
It's all very bizarre, but I asked her very pointed questions, and you'll see that in the transcript in the video that comes out, and you'll see how she responded as well, screaming.
We're going to get the video out as quickly as we can get it uploaded in the sound and everything from yesterday.
So this is, for all practical purposes, a public deposition.
The American people are going to see it.
I heard C-SPAN's going to air it wire to wire.
So everyone's going to see what was asked yesterday.
And I think that'll answer a lot of questions, especially with Lutnick and other things like that.
Throughout the day, we'll try to send different members out to give you brief updates.
We don't want to disclose what's going on in the deposition specifically until after at the conclusion, but we'll keep you updated and we appreciate everyone being here and look forward to updating you throughout the day.
And I think you'll find out from Clinton probably today in sending up the Clinton Global Initiative.
unidentified
President Trump that he was authored by Willie coming in.
All right.
What we're going to say is we need transparency, accountability, and we need justice for the victims.
And we need to make sure we find out how can we write laws to prevent human trafficking and prevent people of that evil level infiltrating the highest levels of government.
As you just heard there, they're trying to figure out what kind of laws they could draft up to prevent human trafficking.
Well, we do have laws in the books, and the DOJ failed to do its job, but that was all intentional, not a mistake, of course.
So I think we need more laws.
I think we need people in power who will enforce those laws and aren't afraid of the deep seat operatives looking to target people for doing their damn jobs.
As you heard there, though, you heard James Comer, who's the chairman of this committee, go out and say that he could expect possibly the Hillary Clinton depot to be dropped either today or possibly tomorrow.
And then said it's pretty much like an open testimony.
I mean, why aren't we doing this in open congressional spaces?
Why are we doing this behind closed doors?
There's no reason for that.
And Clinton told you directly yesterday we heard Hillary say, I actually wanted it to be out there in public.
I wanted to do this openly.
Now, it looks like Democrats are now making way to the podium.
Oversight Committee for Democrats, and we're going to make some brief comments.
Everyone's got a few brief remarks, and then we're going to start the deposition.
I want to just begin by just saying that what we're interested in today is a serious deposition.
We have real questions that deserve serious answers from former President Clinton.
And we have said from day one that Democrats want to talk to anyone, whether they are a Republican or a Democrat, no matter how powerful they are, whatever position that they've been in, if anyone has information about Jeffrey Epstein and certainly the horror that he inflicted on so many women and children, we want to hear from them.
What we do not want today is a sideshow and questions about UFOs or about conspiracy theories from decades ago, which is what unfortunately happened yesterday when a series of bizarre questions were asked of Secretary Clinton.
And Secretary Clinton was clear.
She never met Jeffrey Epstein.
She never went on the island.
She's never on the plane.
And she had no knowledge, of course, of Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.
I want to also add that there are a lot of questions today, whether they're about Epstein's finances, about survivors, about foreign intelligence, that we look forward to asking in a way that's serious and dignified, and we hope Republicans do the same.
I also want to add one other thing, which I think is really important.
Republicans have now set a new precedent, which is to bring in presidents and former presidents to testify.
So we're once again going to make that call that we did yesterday.
We are now asking and demanding that President Trump officially come in and testify in front of the oversight committee.
He appears in the Epstein files next to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghelane Maxwell, almost more than anybody else.
So it's time for the president to answer questions about why files are missing from the DOJ, why there's been a White House cover-up, and why we continue in that administration to call this investigation a hoax.
And finally, I'll review the call that we made yesterday that we are demanding again that the press and the public be allowed inside the depositions so that you can hear the answers and the questions directly.
And if that's not going to happen, they need to release a full, unedited review of the questions and video within 24 hours of the end of these depositions.
That means the Secretary Clinton deposition needs to be released immediately today.
Today we're here to conduct a serious investigation.
And it is obvious that our Republican colleagues, at least yesterday, were not here to do the same thing.
We've said it many times and we'll continue to say it again.
We will hear from anyone.
We don't care who you are.
We just want the truth.
All of us have met with the survivors.
All of us looked them in the eyes and promised them that we would see this thing through the end and do it in a serious way.
Asking questions about UAPs, UFOs, as interested as I am in the subject too, it has nothing to do with this investigation.
Don't waste our time.
Don't waste the time of survivors who have been waiting and waiting for justice.
Now finally the government is paying attention.
Members of Congress are paying attention.
Stay focused on the matter at hand.
We're also calling out the hypocrisy of our Republican colleagues who, yes, we're here to talk with President Clinton today.
We'll talk with anyone.
But how come people like Howard Ludnick see it seems like they don't want to talk with him.
They don't want to talk with the president.
They don't want to call in Pam Bondi, who has done everything that she can do to cover up and to slow down our investigation.
A law passed by Congress damn near unanimously that she's done everything she can to slow down the release of the files.
And even when they're released, and they said members of Congress would be able to go to the Department of Justice to view them unredacted.
I know all of us, if not most of us, have gone in there and seen files that are still redacted and not given a proper explanation as to why we can't view them.
We know the Department of Justice has deleted things having to do with Donald Trump, has deleted things having to do with Howard Ludnick and people connected to the administration.
We know that Pam Bondi has been spying on members of Congress as we've been trying to conduct our legitimate oversight responsibilities.
I'm James Wachenshaw from Virginia's 11th District.
I am glad that President Clinton is going to sit down today with us and answer questions under oath.
Anybody who had a significant relationship with Jeffrey Epstein should explain what, if anything, and when they knew about the crimes that were being committed.
President Clinton's sworn statement said that he had no knowledge of the crimes that were committed.
And I know that we're committed to asking tough questions about that today.
But President Clinton's presence here today under oath highlights the Donald Trump-sized gaping hole in Chairman Comer's investigation.
President Trump is mentioned tens of thousands of times in the files.
We learned in recent days that files related to an accusation made against President Trump have been removed, not released to the public in the files.
And this investigation will not be complete until we bring President Trump in to answer questions under oath.
I'm hopeful that Chairman Comer will have the courage to move us in that direction.
You didn't act that aggressive when Joe was occupying the White House.
Of course, now you want to pretend like, oh, we got the wrong president here.
No, no, you got the right one, the one who was enjoying some nice flights on Epstein's private jets, enjoying some, you know, alleged hangout sessions with Epstein.
We're not going to run that propaganda, obviously.
There's a lot of questions that Bill's going to have to answer for today, hopefully.
Hopefully, Republicans ask the right questions.
But again, you saw House Republicans come out and say, oh, yeah, this is going to be pretty much like a public hearing because we'll release the recordings on a Friday and a Saturday.
In the news world, we call that burying the lead because, well, you're going to be paying attention to your weekend.
You're not going to want to watch a six-hour depot, of course.
He was recently having a podcast where he had Jim Brewer, the comedian on.
And they were talking about some emails I saw regarding Epstein.
And it was like a two-set where one was like an email where Epstein and a confidant were talking about how he doesn't have a prostate.
And Epstein says in the email, no, he doesn't.
And then there's another email, the coroner report, that says he does have a prostate, the body the coroner had.
So I was wondering, you know, did he grow one?
Did he harvest one?
Obviously, I'm being sarcastic.
You know, it's obviously not the same person, you know, a body double.
You can't have a prostate removed and then a prostate reinstalled and the coroner's not going to notice.
So I thought it was just another indicator that, you know, he's still on the loose.
And I think it would be great if they brought him in like Osama bin Laden style.
You know, don't throw him in the ocean.
You know, I want to, you got to bring the monster in front of people to reaffirm that America is still in power and not under threat of some foreign organization.
You know, it's become to the point where it's literally a threat to national security.
Other countries lobbying, other groups lobbying over America.
And you can see right now, today we have a former president, Bill Clinton, in the mix on this.
Everybody said it was a conspiracy theory and a rumor.
Obviously, he's part of the mix.
They grabbed him up because look, the first place he attacked, him and Hillary were Serbia.
And Serbia was a big hub of that.
He was probably taking some Serbian people, and there was organ harvesting there, and people missing women taken.
And it echoed in Stanley Kubrick's movie, where the person, the actor, who plays the person who's selling his kid is one of the only Serbian actors that Hollywood uses.
He has a kind of a Russian Soviet Count Chocolate accent, you know.
And it's just astounding to me that it's been confirmed in spades that, you know, these type of monsters are among us and running loose, running rampant.
And I'm excited to see Bill Clinton today on how he's going to answer these questions because he totally looks like a zombie.
He's walking around like Biden.
He was wearing some red tennis shoes, too, which I don't know if you know about the red shoe conspiracy theory.
Now, Governor Tim Wallace says the decision to withhold a quarter billion dollars in Medicaid money is an example of the Trump administration weaponizing the federal government and punishing the people in a blue state.
This is the problem when you have these massive programs like this.
Obviously, it is a suction when it comes to fraud.
People just kind of pour on in, and that's what's underway right now.
And it's going to take a lot of sifting through to get through.
By the way, remember on the DOJ just a couple of maybe, what was it, two months ago, when this all started first popping off and gaining popularity, they said, oh, we're going to have a separate division over the DOJ.
I still haven't heard of the U.S. attorney being designated with that task to investigate the fraud.
And it's been quite some time since they've made that announcement.
So we hope that very, very soon we'll be hearing about that.
Also, folks, if you live in Kansas, Kansas, I want to give you an update.
If you are a tranny living in Kansas, you better get your IDs changed because guess what?
It is now officially considered invalid if you don't have your actual real gender on those IDs.
Yeah, just so you know.
So let your tranny friends know that live in Kansas that they have to get their IDs changed.
Folks, we're taking your calls in the next segment.
877-789-2539 is the number to call.
That's 877-789-2539.
We're going to try our very best to work down the caller list.
So make sure you call in right this very second.
In the meantime, though, head on over to the alexjonesstore.com.
We have BOGO right now.
When you buy Ultimate Creatine Powder, you're going to get either the CMOS gummies or the Sheila Jit gummies for free.
Now, that sale is going to last until Monday.
So stop what you're doing right now.
Head on over before you forget the AlexJonesStore.com.
Again, it's also, by the way, 25% off apparel as well.
That includes t-shirts, hats, and hoodies.
And remember, when you support the alexjonesstore.com, you're supporting this broadcast and our efforts to continue on with whatever the future has on hold for us.
Those front doors locked to you.
Make sure you download the app, alexjonesapp.com as well.
That is alexjonesapp.com.
Do that as well.
All right, folks.
We're taking your calls in just a moment.
And then Mel K is joining the show.
And there's a lot to talk about with Mel Kay because there's new CIA documents that have been unearthed.
That even weren't unearthed.
Probably not.
Excuse me, I'm from New York.
We'll be right back.
Let's tell you all stopping on with us today.
Happy Friday, everyone.
All right, we're diving into some phone calls and trying to work our way down the list.
Let's get to my good old buddy, Mr. Savage Dog, first up from Georgia.
You know, it's one thing to just go, Trump sucks, Trump sucks, Trump sucks.
But if you're going to sit there and say two Purple Heart recipients, one Legion of Merit, and two Medal of Honor recipients are just winning prizes in a game show, even not just normies, but even people on the left with, you know, relatives that have served, they're going to look at that and go, what did she just say?
Last I looked, Fox actually has 35% more viewership than CNN does and the other outlets, the left-leaning outlets.
So no surprise there.
But these people, they just hate this country.
These people don't have anything really in common with us anymore.
And she's the same troll who continues to cut off Republicans when she has them on her show because she wants to look fair and balanced, but she cuts them off and then tries to fact check them, even though her facts are just lies or not actual facts.
And then she gets burned by it on Twitter, but on her show, she doesn't want them to give a rebuttal.
So that's the kind of nonsense that she does quite often.
So truly no surprise there, Savage Dog.
I want to thank you as always for calling into the show.
The reason why I wanted to drop this is because, you know, it's Friday and it'll disappear and more things will happen on the weekend and it'll get away.
So what I'm calling about is yesterday, what dropped is from the select committee on the CCP.
You can find this at ChinaSelect Committee.house.gov.
Okay, it's just a legitimate government thing.
And this is the investigation undercovering China's space operations in Latin America.
So apparently they're well established here in the Western Hemisphere.
And if you read the report, it says that this is the second of Two Port's reports.
The first one was about money laundering, but this one is pulling Latin America into China's orbit, how the PLA weaponizes the ground architecture of the space silk road in Venezuela, Brazil, Bolivia, Argentina, and Chile.
The committee, they're actually doing great work, but we're not getting much in the way of a response, though, from the reports they've released so far.
But yeah, just another thing to add to the long list, Tim, to the very, very long list.
Did you guys ever cover that runway incursion there at San Antonio on the 27th of January where Southwest Jet was going like more than 150 miles an hour and all of a sudden had to report because the jet ran right out in front of him?
Well, I mean, it's just, that was, as I said, January 27th.
I just thought since maybe you fly in and out of there, maybe I didn't know.
I didn't know.
I thought, well, for that matter, I'd asked Rob, did he see the robot cowboy that runs around on the streets of San Antonio with his cowboy hat on and he talks like John Wayne and he haggles with tourists and then he runs away and he's a robot.
Anyways, if you're a San Antonio person getting around in San Antonio, maybe you'll see that.
I'm so handsome that even Hillary Clinton had a crush on me.
But it's a true story.
It was a rally in New York, and I was set up with the camera, you know, close, maybe like 30 feet away from her.
And she was, you know, puppy dog guying me with other females, like there were two other females, and they were giggling like, you know, quick.
It was quick, but they, you know, like school girls, but she would have no chance, but you would have a chance, not only because physically beautiful, but ethically, like Hillary wouldn't have a chance.
That's plus the lack of character, you know, like that the Epsteins didn't have any dealings, you know, like he didn't fund her organization, which we know that he did.
And I want to say you're doing a great job just pointing out the hypocrisy of the Democrats that they keep saying, you know, how they care, but they didn't care when Biden was in or when Obama was in and the horrendous double standard that imagine if it was Trump in the photos with the underage girls at Epstein Island.
You know, he would be arrested as he should be.
But it's so hypocritical.
But lastly on that too, with the people that have issues psychologically and they're predators, and then you have the lawyers that are not, that lie.
It's just sickening seeing the Democrat politicians and lawyers who don't have to do that.
Like, I think every criminal deserves a defense.
And usually, the good thing with defense lawyers, they'll say, is that they see that the Constitution that the law is not being usurped, which I completely agree with.
But to absolutely lie about pedophilia and to lie to cover your client, like Hillary did, InfoWars points out how that's how she started her career covering for a pedophile, rapist.
And I had the term attempted murderer because the person that raped this 12-year-old girl and threw her in a ditch, the woman now grown, said that she thinks that they thought that they killed her, that they finished her off.
So it's actually a murderer.
But I don't want to rehash.
It's appalling.
But InfoWars always was on the cutting edge reporting that before any of the mainstream.
And I'll let you go, but keep up the report.
I can't wait till hear Clinton.
But I think he's going to play dumb, like that he's senile now, like Joe Biden.
He doesn't know anything.
But lastly, with the affairs, the reason why I didn't because I love the rock, not Wayne Johnson, who I like, but in Thai, rock means love.
I think that, and I'm not trying to be dirty or nasty or anything, but I think all the people on the files should have to give stool samples so we can see who's eating people.
And nothing's going to get solved until they start arresting people.
And we bring out the gallows and just start hanging because it's just time to stop with all the horseplay and the, you know, oh, I was there, but I didn't see anything.
And, you know, Hillary Clinton trying to lie and say that she didn't know or didn't have any direct contact with Epstein.
Everybody knows these are lies.
It's just time to just get real and just stop.
Just stop with the lies.
Stop accepting the lies.
And the minute that America stops accepting these lies and starts just, you know, like really taking to the streets, really stop paying their taxes, you know, really affecting some change, nothing's going to change.
We need to like get real, like really fast, because this is coming to a head.
I was awarded the state of California when I was a kid, so I have a little bit of inside baseball as a blue-eyed, blonde-haired kid that was turned over to the state.
So I know what they do.
This has been going on for generations.
And it just breaks my heart that it's coming out.
And we're still sitting here just spinning our wheels.
I always thought that once things came out that, you know, there would be people in the country that, you know, do have dignity and staying to them would do something about it.
I think the West needs to identify Islam as incompatible.
And it'd be nice if we could get a world trial and have scholars at theologians and do a broadcast live worldwide, once and for all, point out all the incompatibilities with the Quran, Sharia law, and deem it not compatible with the West and therefore not to be practiced or respected in the West.
The conquest is on and we're just falling into it again.
And these people are consistent in what they want to do, you know, take over the world.
And we've got to put an end to that.
Another problem I have is the Jewish percentage of representation population-wise versus the controls, the media, Hollywood, banking, all of the huge institutions, just it's so disproportionate.
So just want to point those things out using all of all the supplements and been listening since 2006.
You know, I really want to feel that the people of America have an option that is peaceful and bloodless to possibly regain our republic.
And I've been dwelling on this idea for a while, and it's so simple in concept, yet it's never been instituted.
Do you feel that we're under any sort of contract with those that we elect into any sort of office, whether it's a mayor, county commissioner, your congressman, your senators?
Do we have a contract with them that they have to uphold?
No, I'm very passionate about this because we need to have every vote equal a contract.
I've been discussing this with Tiffany Fiancé because she inspired me with the arbitration clauses that we find in all of our contract agreements.
And they have these courts that don't have to follow the law.
So why don't we use their tools and weapons formed against us and start every vote equaling a contract that we developed for every voter district for every voter.
If you could basically hold someone in office accountable for their actions, you know, we could set terms and standards.
Well, you can only serve this term if you uphold what you agree to do and keep it reasonable and a very simple and basic contract.
But if they're in violation of the contract, we hold them in arbitration court.
We take them to the cleaners.
We evaluate their net worth.
And at that point, we basically do forensic backgrounds to make sure we know where all of their money is.
So they're going to leverage their money for their word if they want to be elected.
When they're elected to that position, we then say, okay, you're doing what you say you're going to do.
Great job.
We're going to go ahead and vote you back in.
If anyone ran on that campaign with a promised contract obligation to the voters that were voting for them, they would win because they'd be like, this guy's going to do what I want him to do, or this woman's going to do what I want them to do.
If they're not leveraging their net worth, which most people are going to Washington these days or to any position of power in government, seem to want to go there to get authority and power and money.
Well, if we have access to their power and money because they violated a contract, we've actually got something over them.
We actually had, they actually have skin in the game.
Well, we're about to cut off because we have a hard commercial break here, but I want to thank you for jumping in and calling into the show and everyone else who's called in.
No, I agree with you.
That's the idea of primary.
This is what primary is supposed to do.
Unfortunately, though, the local GOPs really hang that up and they don't allow people to decide and they weigh in and so does President Trump as well.
So there's that.
Folks, thank you for calling in.
I'm sorry we didn't have enough time to get to everyone.
In the meantime, though, head on over to the alpha store.com.
It's BOGO.
Some of your favorite supplements right now that includes when you've purchased the ultimate creating get Seamos gummies or Shiloh J gummies as well for free.
Head on over at Alfdemstore.com.
Welcome back to the American Journal.
Happy Friday, everyone.
You know, I'm watching President Trump and he's dropping a bunch of endorsements right now on True Social.
But there's one that stands out.
And anytime I got to flex and do a little bit of baseball coverage, you know, I'm all in.
The president just endorsed Mark Teixeira, a former Yankee, Yankee great, by the way.
He just backed him for the congressional seat in Texas.
It's the 21st congressional seat in Texas.
And he calls to share a total winner.
I agree, but obviously I'm biased as a New Yorker and a Yankee fan.
I have to say that this is a great endorsement.
I'm very critical of his endorsements most of the time, though.
But this one, you got mine.
You got my endorsement for that endorsement.
So that's a good one that just dropped.
But yeah, there's a couple more that are on it.
That's what you'd all expect.
That's the only one that I think is worthy of your time.
All right, folks, I want to get to some CIA-related topics and make sure you saw this one.
There's a couple of documents that are coming back to the surface that were released.
And this one's actually a really important one.
Again, it has to do with Project Artichoke.
We talked about it earlier in the program.
I know, I think it was Wednesday.
I covered one of the pages.
But there's another page that shows how the CIA was preparing to potentially assassinate high-ranking politicians in foreign countries.
Now, wouldn't that be a shocker?
It looks like this was apparently going to happen in an unnamed country, of course, because they've redacted still all the information.
Even though this happened in 1954, you got to protect those institutions still.
The person who was directing this assassination is also heavily redacted.
And the alleged victim, we don't know who that is either.
It's also redacted.
Access to the person's information is obviously very limited, noting that the subject was a heavy drinker with potentially the possibility of secretly drugging them with a spiked alcoholic beverage, of course.
And so, yeah, it's not like our CIA goes around killing people unless you have a document that backs just that.
Joining me discuss the woman who's doing a deep dive for her latest book on the CIA and how corrupt they, of course, are.
Welcome back to the show.
My girl Mel Kay.
She's host of the Mel K show and author of the book, Americans Anonymous, which I highly recommend.
If you haven't grabbed yet, make sure you do just that and give her a follow on X as well.
That's Mel K Show.
All right, Mel.
No surprise here.
I actually forwarded this to you when it first started dropping all the information on Project Artichoke.
And, you know, we've speculated about this for years now, but again, this is just more of a backing of another document verifying that the CIA is, in fact, going around killing people.
Yeah, that's because we've been lied to from the very beginning about the CIA itself and the entire architecture that was created in the wake of World War II.
While the Allies were celebrating victory, the supranational infrastructure and architecture was being created by two Americans that we are familiar with, but I don't think that their history is actually what really they were involved in, which is, of course, the Dulles Brothers, John Foster Dulles and Alan Dulles.
Everyone knows John Foster Dulles went into the State Department after World War II as the Secretary of State, and his brother created and then ran the CIA.
What I've learned in research for my next book, Infiltration Instead of Invasion, America Betrayed 1944 to 1954, was that the Dulles brothers, along with the man, the American that was running the Bank of International Settlements during World War II, basically looting and transferring and transmitting all of the wealth that was stolen from 60 million people affected by World War II.
The three of them got together with the head of the Bank of the Reich, Schreff, and the head of the Bank of England and a whole bunch of people at the time that called themselves internationalists.
And they created the supranational infrastructure, the octopus of global control, as I like to call it, that has been capturing and has captured all nations, including our own.
I do believe that the CIA was created to protect that infrastructure, that architecture above nations.
And essentially, when George H.W. Bush and many people know his father was all mixed up with the Nazis as well, I firmly believe that the Dulles brothers worked actively with the Nazis.
And there was a lot more than Operation Paperclip that came out of it, including the origins of both NATO and West Germany being filled with Nazis picked by Dulles and another military man that's honored named McCloy.
And frankly, I think that they transferred a lot of that here.
I think the OSS essentially was working with the Nazi spies.
And many people know about Annie Jacobson's great book, Operation Paperclip, and really she digs in deep.
But there's a lot more to come.
Apparently, right now, Grassley and Malay are sponsoring a deep dive into the Swiss banks and the rat lines, as they're called, of all the billions and billions of dollars, probably trillions that came out of Nazi Germany and proliferated around the world.
A lot of it ending up here in the United States of America.
And what we need to understand is that the CIA has never been about protecting the United States of America.
It has been about protecting the international infrastructure from the people of the United States of America and many other countries from seeing it.
They have become, as you brought up, artichoke, but we also know about MKUltra.
We also know that Helms destroyed a lot of the MKUltra documents.
But as you know, and I know you guys have had on Kathy O'Brien, who's written multiple books about her experience being in the program for nearly 30 years, she was sold as a child into the CIA program.
A la stranger things, if you're familiar, that was very much how she was raised.
And there's other people like Dr. Juliet Engel, who's a survivor.
MKUltra victims were not supposed to live past a certain age, but they were in fact trained to become spies.
Kathy in her own book talks about being sent to Nicaragua and not remembering when she came back and all kinds of mind control that went on.
We know what happened in Canada as well.
There's also a Dr. Jolly from UCLA.
Many people also believe that Mengele himself did continue with the program and all of the experiments.
And now, as we read Jeffrey Epstein's emails, where one of the Rothschilds is saying we funded Hitler, and Epstein's kind of, you know, going back and forth with him, what you have to understand is everything we have been told since World War II about our history is essentially a lie.
And that is by design.
And the people that protect the lie, apparently, are the CIA.
And all of our embassies are essentially infested with CIA and operatives.
And at the end of the day, there's no accountability.
There's no oversight.
Their black budgets never get looked at.
And as you know, and I always talk about the International Organization Immunity Act of 1945, and then was doubled down on later, protected all of the banks from the BIS and World Bank and IMF and 63 other banks that are connected to that.
All of the infrastructure kind of put together in the end days of World War II.
And then also they went on to protect their international organizations that do similar things, which is the UN and all of the tentacles there.
So, I mean, essentially, the American people and frankly, free people worldwide have not been free, have not had a sovereign nation, have not had law and order.
We have had the illusion of such.
But JFK wanted to destroy the CIA for reasons.
And we were already told by the 80s by Yuri Bezamnov that we were fully infiltrated.
Don't forget about the Franklin School.
I mean, the Frankfurt School coming into Colombia, the bastion of, you know, Marxism in America, of course, critical legal theory, critical race theory.
All of this stuff is Marxism and communism.
And the American people have to decide: is this the direction we want to continue on?
Is being, you know, living in an illusion of freedom, an illusion of choice.
Because as you notice, no matter who we vote for, these deep state lawyers, many of them I believe to be CIA, many of the people in the media now, these mainstream media, CIA, and then you also look at things like the Dulles brothers went on, John Foster Dulles, to run the Council of Foreign Relations, which, of course, has been running our foreign policy above any president.
So when we talk about the deep state and we talk about all of this, this is the senior executive service.
These are people that never go away.
They call it continuity of government, meaning that no matter what president comes in, no matter what the people vote for, no matter what we want, they're going to come with all barrels blasting and make sure that the votes and the voice of the people are not heard, are not followed through, and they wait out presidents, the presidents that they don't murder.
But I think we have to go back and look at JFK's warning about the monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that seeks to entrap and basically imprison all men, women, and children worldwide because the panopticon of their technocracy and their eugenics and all of the things they've been planning, particularly the financial world order that is a fraud and has looted and lied to and manipulated our nation and the world into endless wars for profit, into justifying NATO's expansion, of course,
because the military-industrial complex feeds into the international banking cartel at the very top.
So, you know, what country do we want to be?
And that's where we have to go right now.
Let's learn the real history, which I dug into hard in my new book, and it's really going to be eye-opening.
I have all the real documents: infiltration instead of invasion, because between 1944 and 1954, a whole bunch of internationalists, bankers, billionaires, and frankly, the Dulles brothers sold our country out.
And I don't think since then the State Department, USAID, CIA, National Endowment for Democracy have worked at all for the American people.
I believe they have worked actually against the American people to protect the institutions they built above our country.
Yeah, but you've actually sent over a couple of these and it details specifically how the CIA was able to do the, or was trying to do the coup against President Trump back in 2015.
Well, we started in 2016, pretty much the day after the election of Donald Trump.
Myself, I'm former CIA.
I used to work also on Capitol Hill on the intelligence committees, as well as the Homeland Security Committee and the Judiciary Committees.
And many of us, we call ourselves formers sometimes, had kept in touch.
We're sort of on the older side.
So we had left government service.
Some of us had retired.
Some of us had gone into the private sector.
And we were a group that was mostly drawn from CIA and the Department of State.
Many of us had worked on issues in the Balkans at the end of the Clinton administration.
We liked each other.
We kept in touch.
We trusted each other.
We were very concerned that we had just elected somebody who seemed remarkably unprepared to be commander-in-chief.
And it really wasn't a political thing.
In fact, many of us, I later found out, and I'll explain what I mean by later found out and why had been Republicans.
So it wasn't a party thing.
It was a we were worried that we had a president who was inexperienced and unsuited to be commander-in-chief.
So what do we do?
What we first decided to do was, let's just tell.
Let's offer our experience and our professional expertise to the new administration in a nonpartisan way.
And we wrote to the National Security Advisor designate, that was General Flynn, basically said, We're a bunch of formers and we know what we're talking about.
We're all out of the government now.
You have a tough job.
We're here to help.
We didn't get a response.
He got fired a few weeks later and then indicted.
So we wrote the same letter to General McMaster and never got a response.
And we sort of floundered a little bit at that point.
And we started hearing even back then about retaliation and blacklists.
This was a president who had stepped outside the framework of how America does its national policy, national security policy, and how we make decisions in a democracy.
This was an existential threat.
And we sort of pulled up our pants and said, what do we do?
We don't want to get involved in domestic politics, but it's an existential threat.
So we had two competing issues here, and we decided to get involved.
Now, when I say get involved, I do not mean bring the skills of trained intelligence officers to bear domestically.
We didn't do anything spooky.
It was what lots of advocacy groups do.
We wrote, we spoke, we talked.
We eventually endorsed candidates.
It was really hard for us, particularly the CIA people.
It was like, oh, my goodness, we're talking to reporters and academics publicly?
That's crazy.
But we did it.
We managed to do it.
And then Joe Biden wins.
Existential threat gone.
And I got to say, one of the things I'm proudest of is we continued to adhere to our sort of professional ethics.
And what did we do after vanquishing the existential threat?
Mel, apparently, he thinks he knows better than the American people and that the CIA knows who should be elected in this country, not the will of the American people being carried through, though, fortunately.
And like he's talking about, it was the State Department and the CIA decided that Donald Trump was not going to be president and they were going to do everything they could and they did.
And the letter to Flynn and then what happened to Flynn, of course, was orchestrated with the help of John Brennan, who was running the CIA and Gina Haspel, who was running the CIA headquarters in London.
They orchestrated almost everything.
We also know that for whatever reason, Peter Strzzok had one foot in the CIA and one foot in the FBI.
Well, that shouldn't be happening.
And more than that, what's really sad is they have a whole website, Steady State.
And if you look through their website, it is unending ambassadors and CIA agents and military intelligence that all got together when Donald Trump won in 2016 to destroy him, to end the voice and the vote of the people.
We knew things weren't right since the murder of JFK.
No one being held accountable.
One crime after another, essentially by the intelligence community.
Regime change wars, responsibility to protect endless expansion of NATO.
This was not what was supposed to happen.
And you throw in the Project for a New American Century and the money-making scams of the war on terror, a war on a tactic that changed regularly, and you wonder about the $21 trillion missing from U.S. taxpayer money that has gone into black holes all over the world.
This is not what the United States of America was supposed to be.
In fact, everything he's saying is the opposite.
And then, of course, he's part of the group.
He spoke about the Balkans.
Well, who was in the Balkans when he was there?
That would be Norm Eisen, the leader of the lawfair that has been going on since 2016 in tandem as well.
So we have the whole Project for a New American Century, and that's Wolfowitz, Cheney, Rumsfeld, all the war for profiteers, the people that got us into Iraq based on lies and everything else.
And then, yeah, so this is the most important thing for people to know about Project for a New American Century.
When you look into it, you'll see there all of these people, that's Samantha Power, that's Rothschild, that's Soros, that's Cheney, Obama, all these people.
Well, what it says on the first page of this document that came out in 2000, it says the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor.
Well, wouldn't you know it?
Just a short time later, we had 9-11.
And as you're noticing in the Epstein files, the 9-11 years are basically still redacted from about a year before to about two years after.
There's some good reporting coming out about his participation, Jeffrey Epstein's, in the Iran-Contra scandal, in dealing with Khashoggi, in asking Elaine Maxwell if she'd like to be on the 9-11 Alternative Investigation Division.
I mean, it's just so many layers of corruption, but I will say that it all leads back to the Dulles brothers essentially selling out the United States of America and turning the State Department and their partners at CIA and USAID into a separate entity above our nation, above our president, above our voices and our vote, above our so-called democracy, which is really a constitutional republic.
And we have not been free since then.
And anyone that gets in the way of the international banking cartel or their money machine known as the military-industrial complex NATO expansion gets taken out one way or another.
And we can never forget what happened to Gaddafi and frankly, what even happened to Saddam Hussein, all based on lies.
So who are these people?
And where is all the money?
And America is $36 trillion in debt.
You're telling me right now, where is that money?
We got to end the International Organizations Immunity Act of 1945 and the following and look into the Bank of International Settlements, the IMF, the black hole that is the World Bank where a lot of our money goes, the UN.
I mean, all I am telling you is that everything that was created during those years, 44 to 54, was created to subvert the United States of America, to pump up civil society we now know as NGOs as global and to end the United States of America as a nation state and every other nation state for global governance by a technocratic totalitarian elite.
We have the documents from George Soros from 1993, the NATO world order, still on his website.
We have the Brzezinski document from the Council of Foreign Relations of 1995 laying it all out.
And here we are watching what I see as the fourth Reich in Europe marching us one more time to World War III on that continent that we actually fought a war not to be a part of.
And when people tell you the EU is our is our ally, no, it's not.
We paid for the EU through the fraudulent Marshall Plan.
That's a whole bunch of taxpayer money, trillions of dollars that went into building the EU.
Henry Kissinger recruited Klaus Schwab from Harvard with a CIA operation to start the World Economic Forum.
So all of this is a fraud again for the one world government and their end goal is World War III.
And then again, during the Reconstruction, like after World War I and World War II, they consolidate power and money.
And this time they have the technology to do it.
So we have to be very loud about all that's going on to connect us in cyberspace on a global public infrastructure and examine: is the EU our ally?
And I would say no.
They are a partner of the international banking cartel.
They've captured all of those countries.
They're taking away their sovereignty.
And we're next.
And this goes back to Kissinger, Brzezinski, Madeline Albright, all the people that Obama brought back in when he got back into office.
And then, of course, Joe Biden brought in a lot of the acolytes.
Well, Mel, too, before we go, I want to make sure we hit this too, because you also sent me this clip 13 as well, which tells us how CETI State Spook was focused on the domestic surveillance during the Biden years.
Just to kind of collect the history here, I mean, at this point, Trump had also revealed something quite significant, which is that he did try to steal the 2020 election and hold on to power despite losing.
And so, you know, in some sense, that was the greatest revelation, in my opinion, of like his authoritarian impulses.
And the fact that you all were able to see it early in 2016, 2017, 2018.
But I, first of all, it's surprising to me that after that moment, that was when he receded a little bit.
Trump would recede into, as someone once said, the dustbin of history, one of a number of failed dictators.
That's fine.
So we didn't think we were necessary.
Most of us returned to whatever we were doing in retirement.
I actually, being a glutton for punishment, decided eventually to go back into government.
I went to the Department of Homeland Security where I joined the Office of Intelligence and Analysis.
I became an intelligence officer again.
I was the senior advisor to the undersecretary.
I want to just a slight digression.
Why did I do that?
Well, because INA, that's what it was called, intelligence and analysis, is the only element of the intelligence community that doesn't have a law enforcement guided by courts and criminal justice mission, but it's focused domestically.
And in fact, that was sort of an experiment in the post-9/11 world when DHS was created against and in the face of fears that we could be creating a sort of ministry of interior, which is a terribly scary thing.
I thought it's one of the hardest problems in Intel.
I think we, I thought, and I still think we need some domestically focused intelligence organization.
But doing that without destroying democracy is a hard thing.
This guy, obviously, is saying that he got back into the intelligence agencies.
It's absolutely kind of horrifying.
You still have whistleblowers who still can't get back in after blowing the whistle on thousands of missing children that went missing under the Biden regime years.
Well, I just want to say that my reaction is I don't understand why these people believe that they are superior to anyone else.
These people, they do not believe that the American people should have a voice or a vote.
It goes back to Rockefeller believing that an intellectual elite and bankers are more suited at running this country.
Well, that is what he's a part of.
That is what he wants to keep in power.
And frankly, I don't know who this guy thinks he is, but if somebody does not look into steady state, then they are not serious about destroying the deep state or the sewer that runs our country.
That man is admitting right there with all kinds of arrogance that he, in fact, is above the president of the United States that we, the people, voted for.
And a lot of his friends are the same.
And I would say this, he is connected 100% to Norm Eisen and the lawfare crew that has gotten in the way and throwed sand in the gears of what the American people voted for and what the American people want.
And don't forget, he's admitting right there, not only that he was involved in writing the Patriot Act, which is the most unconstitutional thing, but then he went back in to work for Maorcas and open up that border and do all the trafficking through the border.
So, I mean, every single one of these CIA agents, they should shut down the CIA, out everyone.
We have Spamberger running Virginia.
She's a CIA agent.
We have Slotkin running in Michigan CIA agent.
These are people that are trained to lie, cheat, and steal and undermine the will of the people of this country.
They have nothing to do with democracy.
And it's time for us to be honest about it and hold these people accountable.