The American Journal: SDNY Press Release on Epstein “Suicide” DAY BEFORE DEATH, FBI Caught Redacting Elite in Epstein Files on “Clear and Specific Guidance” under Trump Admin, & Thomas Massie calls on Howard Lutnick to Resign over Epstein Files
Ghislaine Maxwell’s upcoming deposition—where she’ll likely plead the fifth for a Trump pardon—exposes gaps in the Epstein investigation, including ignored Saudi ties, WTC 7’s suspicious collapse, and $6B in unprosecuted frauds like BCCI. Meanwhile, calls for Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s resignation over Epstein links clash with federal redactions shielding figures like Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg, despite a 2015 DOJ photo placing them at his table. Florida’s unsealed grand jury transcripts reveal alleged rape by a 17-year-old victim, yet federal inaction persists. The episode ties Epstein’s crimes to broader fears: Canada’s MAID expansion (100,000+ deaths since 2016) risks U.S. "eugenics," while immigration policies allegedly enable predators targeting children. Conservatives push cultural alternatives like Kid Rock’s Super Bowl performance as resistance against perceived systemic decay. [Automatically generated summary]
A single email unearthed from the sprawling Jeffrey Epstein document dumps has sent shockwaves through anyone paying attention.
In 2003, investigative journalist Edward J. Epstein, no relation to Jeffrey, but a longtime chronicler of espionage, cover-ups, and institutional deceit, Edward Epstein reached out directly to Gheline Maxwell with the casual yet loaded invitation, any interest in joining a proposed shadow commission on 9-11?
This wasn't some random outreach.
The former Harvard professor was floating the idea of an alternative inquiry into the attacks, one presumably free from the constraints and compromises that plagued the official 9-11 Commission.
What diminishes the idea of a conspiracy in my mind is not that one can't think of a good reason why one couldn't put a conspiracy together, but it's the passage of time.
One has to take that into their reckoning as we covered, you know, decade after decade.
Maxwell's inclusion on the invite list speaks volumes about the overlapping circles of power, influence, and potential blackmail that Epstein's operation allegedly cultivated.
Why would a man known for dissecting government whitewashes think the partner of Jeffrey Epstein belonged on such a panel?
The official 9-11 Commission report released in 2004 has long been accused of being a carefully curated exercise in selective truth rather than unvarnished accountability.
Glaring omissions like the collapse of the World Trade Center Building 7, ignored Saudi connections to the hijackers, eyewitness accounts of bombs by Barry Jennings in World Trade Center 7.
unidentified
Now, Barry Jennings, you're on the eighth floor.
You work for the city housing department.
Explain to me the moment of impact.
Well, me and Mr. Hess, the corporation council, were on the 23rd floor.
Entering Building 7 together before the strike on the South Tower at 9.03 a.m., Jennings and Hess were surprised to discover that the office had been abandoned.
Receiving a phone call from his superior, Jennings was warned to leave the building immediately.
Descending via the stairwell, Jennings and Hess reached the sixth floor before an explosion blew them back up to the eighth floor, trapping them inside the building.
After seven years of investigation, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST, determined that the building had not come down due to explosives or controlled demolition, as many alleged, or due to structural damage from the collapse of the Twin Towers, an explosion in the building's fuel oil systems, or any of the other suggestions that had been put forward and retracted by NIST over the course of its investigation.
Instead, NIST spokesman Cheyenne Sunder insisted that the building had collapsed due to ordinary office fires.
unidentified
For the first time, we have shown that fire can induce a progressive collapse.
The commission's own co-chairman, Lee H. Hamilton, later admitted significant limitations, including restricted access to classified materials and pressure to produce a unified narrative that avoided rocking too many boats in Washington, D.C. If it's an act of war and it's hiding things, which everyone on your commission knew that the Pentagon was changing their stories, lying to you, and it's a cover-up of an act of war and under Article 3, Section 3 of the Constitution, it's treason.
unidentified
So unless we get to the very bottom of it, then we're still talking treasonous exposition.
It's a longer conversation.
I'm not sure NIST would ever get to the bottom of it.
I don't think, well, that's the if that's the condition upon which we're going to be saving our country because the problem is it's a 30-year-old conspiracy.
And the rapid removal of debris before thorough forensic analysis could take place.
unidentified
I'm also told that military heavy equipment will be brought in, bulldozers, cranes, things of that nature, to go in there as soon as they possibly can.
We're excited you're all jumping on with us today.
A lot happening over here, and we are happy that you're here with us.
A lot happening over the weekend.
A lot happening the weekend.
We're going to be diving into on today's show.
So buckle up for that one.
It's going to be a good one.
As many of you guys know, there were more documents unearthed in that Epstein file dump.
A lot going on there.
Also, a lot of big things happening today in regards to Epstein.
As many of you guys know, today Ghelene Maxwell is going to be testifying.
It's front of a, well, actually, it's a closed door deposition, and it's virtual.
She's in prison.
She will be doing a virtual deposition today with members of Congress.
She'll be meeting amongst those will be obviously the chairman, James Comer and others.
Now, interesting enough, we'll dive into the details in a bit.
She's expected to complete the fifth, and I'll get into that in just a few moments.
Before we do, I also want to tell you all what we got coming up ahead of the show.
First, let's look at the president's agenda, for example.
That's probably the best place to start.
The president is, he's got a light morning today.
Nothing on the agenda for this morning, but in the afternoon, he's expected to have an interview, a TV interview at 3 p.m. Eastern Time.
Then later at 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time, there will be a policy meeting that he will be participating with in.
We got our eyes on a couple of really important topics, and we'll get to that in a little bit.
But specifically, the UK right now, obviously, the Epstein files have imploded for many, specifically those who try to lie and hide their ties to Epstein.
Matthew Marzen will be joining us later in the show today in the second hour of the program.
Matthew is going to be detailing specifically for us what I think is actually really, really important here, and that's the ramifications for the latest dump, what it means to those in the UK right now, because a lot of people are calling for the prime minister in the UK to resign.
But the next runner-up for that position, not someone you want, not someone you want.
Matthew Mars will be joining us in a little bit to discuss just that.
We'll also be discussing the latest, obviously, document dumps, but it's not going to end there.
We also have more coming about.
Oh, Mike Benz actually did a really good interview with Joe Rogan last week.
And something very important that I'm going to point out to you as well in that Mike Benz interview, plus Tulsi Gabbard under attack.
As many of you guys know, the deep state operatives do not like Tulsi Gabbard.
They don't like the fact that she's digging in for the truth.
They don't like the fact that she's going to uncover the election fraud that we all knew was taking place in the very beginning.
And they're going after her.
That's a lot of fake news reports that are being posted online, a lot of unverified sources, and they're trying to uppercut everything that she's doing over at National Intelligence.
I'll bring you the latest on that fight right there because that's a big one.
That's a big one.
Also, I mean, you guys all know it, but Democrats are still trying to push back against voter ID, even though the vast majority of Americans, even Democrats do support voter ID.
The interesting part here is it's so bad that even Democrats have to say that, yeah, we actually don't support, don't support the lefties, the far lefties agenda that not have voter ID.
There's also a new group of left-wing racists that need to be on your radar because these are just evil human beings, both talking about, you know, how the United States has imported the third world brown people who have specifically Indians and Middle Eastern is what they're alluding to in this soundbite, are going to outbreed us.
And most importantly, marry Western women.
Plus is another Democrat in, I wouldn't even call him a Democrat, call him just a straight up communist in Texas who obviously caught a lot of people's attention over the weekend because he too is another racist.
But there's a lot there about this individual I don't think most people even know, especially because he is one of those many CCP.
I mean, you could just say he's probably a CCP operative at this point because he's not from this country.
He is from China.
He was born in China, but we've allowed him to run for office here in the United States.
I don't know why we keep doing this to ourselves and then wondering why we have the same results of hateful people in our political sphere.
People that hate this country are running for office.
We've done it to ourselves.
We could get rid of these people pretty quickly, given the fact that they are in line with the communist movement.
RFK Jr. just recently is discussing how food is literally killing us.
And he's detailing specifically how our enemies are looking to do just that.
Our adversaries are looking to do just that.
Plus, also, Democrats are really worried right now that we're going to become a surveillance state.
No, seriously, it's happening.
It's happening.
They've gone fringe.
They're just jumping off the cliff these days.
They're worried that ICE is going to be using their photo images, running their biometrics, and they're worried that we are going to become a massive surveillance state.
We've been talking about this for years now.
They didn't care because it worked towards their advantage, but now they care because it's really going to infect their ICE, their anti-ICE terrorists.
And that's the reason why they're pushing back on that front.
We'll also be talking about some crazy, crazy stories in regards to Virginia.
Virginia is just going downhill rapidly.
This is why elections have consequences.
Virginia, it's running for the lead blue state right now.
I mean, it's pretty, pretty bad in Virginia.
We'll tell you about the new push to go after those who dare spew hate speech because freedom of speech is a threat to them.
And we'll discuss just that.
Also, President Trump, there's this fake hoax that's going out there again.
In the shadowy underbelly of elite power plays, the abduction of Nancy Guthrie, mother of NBC's Today Show darling, Savannah Guthrie, screams of something far more sinister than a random crime.
Snatched from her Tucson home in the dead of night, with blood splatters at the scene and her essentials left behind.
The 84-year-old widow's disappearance has law enforcement scrambling.
What follows is not an attack on the Guthrie family.
They are merely questions regarding overlooked possible connections to the Guthrie family and the rumblings of panic behind the scenes of an elite reeling with the damage compounding due to the recently released Epstein files.
unidentified
When a group of people who've experienced trauma of this kind come together united against a common enemy, there's a very special bond between us all.
Behind the scenes, Savannah's husband, Michael Feldman, isn't just some PR suit.
He's a deep state operator with eight years in the Clinton Gore White House, serving as Al Gore's traveling chief of staff and a key congressional liaison for Bill Clinton himself.
Begging the question, is this payback from the Clinton machine's endless web of scandals?
Feldman's tentacles run deep into the globalist swamp, co-founding the Glover Park Group, a D.C. political consulting powerhouse.
This firm pops up in the Epstein files, linking straight to Epstein's network of influence peddlers.
The timing is impeccable.
Just as the Clintons are hauled before Congress on February 26th and 27th to spill their Epstein ties, this kidnapping erupts.
Coincidence or a desperate warning shot from the shadows to keep mouths shut.
According to internal State Department memos, the agency might have called up or intervened in investigation into possibly illegal and inappropriate behavior within its ranks, allegedly to protect jobs and avoid scandals.
This concerns the time that Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.
You know, there's an old saying in Washington that the cover-up is worse than the crime.
But in this case, both parts of it are disturbing allegations of prostitution and pedophilia and allegations that those crimes were somehow covered up or not looked into.
So the State Department this morning is having to respond to those claims and those investigations of misconduct by State Department officials, including by an ambassador and security agents attached to then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
The response we received was not cooperation, but defiance, repeated delays, excuses, and obstruction.
The Clintons had documented relationships with Epstein and Maxwell, including President Clinton's trips with Epstein and Maxwell, evidenced by numerous photographs, flatlog records, wedding invitations, and other materials.
We repeatedly informed the Clintons attorneys that a written statement would not be sufficient.
With Feldman's Glover Park Clinton cleanup crew entangled in this mess and Nancy Guthrie's fate hanging in the balance, America awakens to the real threat, a cabal where kidnappings, cover-ups, and child exploitation are just business as usual.
Now, as many of you guys know, her mother is still missing.
FBI is on board trying to help find her.
But again, we don't have any updates into all of that.
The case is quite strange.
But I thought that was a really great report that we have up right now on Bandai Video.
Definitely check that out too, because we've done a bunch of incredible reporting on Infowars.com as well.
But let's get into some of the latest in regards to what's happening today.
Like I told you, obviously, Glene Maxwell will be giving her deposition.
It's a virtual deposition that she's going to be providing the Judiciary Committee with.
Now, expect there to be some information uncovered here, but probably not much.
And that's because while many are expecting Ghelene Maxwell not to speak, they actually expect her to plead the fifth.
That's according to Congressman Ro Kahn.
As many of you guys know, that's the Democrat in California who's been leading the way in making sure that these Epstein files are made public.
Well, he sent over this letter yesterday or over the weekend, I should say, to James Comer, who is the chairman of that committee.
Now, he's outlining the fact that he knows that she's going to invoke her fifth and that she's not going to want to talk about, according to him, of course, not going to want to talk about anything related to Epstein or President Donald Trump.
Now, obviously, we've talked about it.
We've reported on this show.
Ghelene Maxwell is trying to angle herself for a pardon.
And that's probably why, if this is true, she would do that.
Why would you want to give all this information?
And if you're someone in her situation, obviously she is a human trafficker.
She is a, well, human trafficker, allegedly, we should say, because nobody's been arrested.
I mean, she's apparently trafficking children, but we don't know to who.
Isn't that strange?
But here's the problem here.
She obviously wants to be freed from prison.
And so now she's trying her very best to play her hand in all of this.
You could expect that she's not going to be speaking.
Why would you speak when the price that you expect the government to pay is your freedom?
And we know that's what she's angling for, according to those who have spoken to her attorneys.
Now, when it comes to all of this, obviously we'll keep our eye and see when those deposition recordings do drop, because that will be quite the fascinating new document or audio version for me to dive into.
But the reality of it is we don't expect much.
We heard her interviews with Todd Blanche and there really wasn't much there.
There really wasn't much there.
But we are learning more and more from the documents that have been released thus far.
And it's really hard to figure out what's real, what's fake, because after a document gets posted online, I've got a search and it takes hours, takes days.
Oh, we're digging.
We're digging.
There's a lot there right now.
I want to get into the first document so far.
This one dropped yesterday.
I think it's insane.
This document comes from the Southern District of New York.
And the reason why this is so important is because you have to check out the date on this document.
Now, what do I mean by that?
This is what I mean by that.
This, what appears to be a press release drafted up by the Southern District of New York, could be a clerical mistake.
But it says for the immediate release on Friday, August 9th, 2019.
Now, Jeffrey Epstein, according to the records, didn't actually kill himself until the 10th of August.
So keep that in mind.
This one, specifically outlining how they found Jeffrey Epstein dead, saying that he was pronounced dead after he was discovered in his cell.
Unresponsive.
Today's events are disturbing, and we were deeply aware of the potential.
And interesting enough, too, this is the email that's getting a lot of people fired up right now.
There was an email that was made public, and specifically this email.
Well, it's interesting because it was sent in 2025, March 17th, 2025.
It looks like somebody over at the FBI field office in New York sent out an email in regards to the Epstein files being released.
Now, the concerning part in all of this is they're hashing out what should be redacted and what shouldn't be redacted.
And specifically, in this email, it looks to say that obviously, and we all strongly back this, that redaction should include obviously the victims and photos, unknown or unidentified with females and males, which is strange, and former U.S. president, secretary of state, and other celebrities.
Ain't that something?
Now, we did see that one image, and they didn't cover up Bill Clinton's face in that jacuzzi pool photograph.
But we keep hearing that they are trying to block pieces of information, that a lot of the redacted information isn't of victims.
It's actually of high-up officials.
Whether or not that's true, well, we'll find out soon.
We're going to find out soon because members of Congress are now going to be given the opportunity to go and look at the Epstein files unredacted themselves.
So, people like Congressman Thomas Massey, who obviously has been advocating for a lot of this.
I know a lot of people believe that it's politically motivated on Massey's part, but according to his own tweets, he's actually going to be making his way today to look at those unredacted Epstein files.
And technically, I mean, if Thomas Massey didn't want to be sued, but wanted to out what he found, he could definitely go to the congressional floor, the House floor, and outline those accusations.
I'm pretty sure now, I'm not an attorney, but I'm pretty sure if he makes those claims on the House floor, that he has immunity from defamation claims.
But he's claiming he's going there.
Now, he's also asking the public to let him know what you want to know about specifically and to send in what files you want to make sure he looks over.
Now, obviously, he knows what he's doing.
I don't doubt whether or not he knows what documents he's specifically searching for.
But there's been so much put out there that we need to know about.
There was even that email that just said 10 years old.
Now, obviously, we know that Jeffrey Epstein's a pedophile.
So when you see that, your heart sinks immediately.
But what is that in reference to?
Who is that 10-year-old?
And they've redacted the email address too.
That was a part of that conversation.
Again, why?
Well, the DOJ is claiming that this is a victim.
Well, members of Congress should shuffle on over there to see if it's actually a victim.
Now, again, I don't really trust politicians, but I also don't trust the DOJ.
I also don't trust the DOJ.
And there's so much we're going to be diving into regarding Epstein over the next hour.
But man, oh man, there was also this report that's that's really crazy.
Apparently, he purchased 330 gallons of sulfuric acid.
He purchased it back in 2018, it looks like, according to this document.
Now, as many of you guys know, that's something that could actually be used to dispose of bodies.
That's deeply concerning.
You know, when we had on my show, when we had human trafficking experts, they were talking about the organ angle to all of this, the organ harvesting angle to all of this.
One of them outlined that that's how they were disposing the bodies of children after they harvested their organs.
Now, when you look at that, when you look at that piece of document that was posted online, it also has, according to another document, it was the same day another investigation was opened into Epstein.
So obviously this could all be coincidental.
But I don't believe it's coincidences.
I believe that this is an evil man who's doing evil things.
We'll get into the other reports, which just are absolutely disgusting.
Absolutely disgusting.
Including allegations that there was a human incubator.
And ultimately, folks, those allegations are really, I mean, this is probably one of the worst ones I've seen thus far, where young girls were getting pregnant and they were taking their children.
I'll give you the details on that too.
We're talking about a bunch of sick, sick human beings, sick human beings.
You can't tell me over these 3 million documents you've just put out there that there's nothing that could be criminally charged.
Folks, the DOJ, FBI, right now, you can't sit there and continue to do this to us.
We're not stupid.
We know that there's more there.
We know that there's more there.
I'm going to dive into all of the details though, because it's more, especially with Howard Lutnick.
As many of you guys know, he is the commerce secretary right now.
But it looks like Howard was not very honest with the American people.
And we're going to dive into those details in just a little bit.
This is the problem with everyone who's associated with Jeffrey Epstein.
They'd sit there and tell you, oh, no, no, no, no, we were doing business prior to me even knowing any of this.
But when you look at the dates, shortly after Epstein was a known pedophile because he was convicted, they all still were trying to do business deals with him.
Folks, before we get into those details, I want to remind you all to head on over to the alexjonestore.com because last week we did something very, very exciting over at the alexjonstore.com.
We launched our very brand new electro-like drink mix.
Now, as many of you guys know, optimal human hydration is our new one that we just launched.
It's the Electrolight drink mix, which includes French sea salt.
It's 20 stick packs.
These are incredible because there's zero sugar in any of this.
And it's going to help increase your energy.
It's also going to reduce brain fog.
This is something that I tell everyone, you need to start your day off with every single day.
Your electrolytes is something that you definitely need.
And it's a reasonable price.
When you subscribe, it's about $1.25 a serving.
So head on over right now to the alexjonesstore.com and make sure you snag this.
Again, that's the alexjonesstore.com.
unidentified
We'll be back with more.
Tuned in to the American Journal with your host, Breanna Morello.
I had a little bit of a crazy weekend, a lot to uncover in regards to Epstein.
So we're going to be dedicating the first hour to going through all of the information that's come out in regards to just that.
So buckle up more to discuss.
As many of you guys know, we're keeping our eye out to see if anything happens in regards to Galene Maxwell, who's expected to give her deposition today to the Judiciary Committee.
It's going to be the specifically the Epstein file one, I believe.
So that is the one that we're going to keep our eye on.
Again, it's virtual, so we won't get anything from that until probably a couple of weeks after the fact.
I believe the last one we got back, it took them at least two weeks before they put it out publicly.
So you could expect there to be a bit of a delay.
But again, as I outlined in the beginning of the show, we think that she's going to plead the fifth in a lot of this because she doesn't want to give up too much information without getting an agreement because she is fishing for a pardon for President Donald Trump.
So we'll keep our eye on all things related to that.
But there's a lot of really, really key information that's making its way to the surface that I expect everyone to want to buckle down and make sure that they know about.
Specifically, we're hearing these allegations about Howard Luttnick.
Now, as many of you guys know, he is the commerce secretary right now for President Trump.
He's an individual who has denied a lot of the accusations that have floated around about him in the past.
Now, here's the thing, right?
There hasn't been much in the way of hard concrete evidence to link him up to Epstein post, the fact when he was convicted pedophile.
So a lot of people have been able to get away with, well, I didn't know who Epstein was when taking certain meetings.
But the reason why there are calls for Luttnick to resign today is because there's now emails that are being released.
And it's quite the interesting set of emails.
Now, Jeffrey Epstein Center, obviously the newly released documents, reveal that Luttnick maintained far more of an extensive and prolonged contact with Epstein than he previously claimed.
This is according to one report.
Lutnick, at one point, was apparently neighbors with Epstein in New York City and publicly stated that in the 2025 interview, saying that Epstein was disgusting during a home visit, vowing to never be in the same room again with this individual.
Now, however, according to reports, the files show an ongoing communication between the businessman and Epstein.
Now, there were emails going back and forth at timed down about 2012.
Now, again, it doesn't make sense because based on Luttnick's previous comments, he no longer wanted to even deal with Epstein after seeing how disgusting the man was.
So this is conflating, right?
This is, you got two people out here right now.
Actually, you only have one.
You have Jeffrey Epstein's emails that continue to speak for him.
And you have all of these top people saying, no, no, no, I had no relations with him.
Once I found out what an evil, disgusting man Jeffrey Epstein was.
Now, obviously, we could all agree that Jeffrey Epstein was an evil man.
I don't see really anyone disputing that.
But the simple fact that a lot of these individuals knew that Epstein was a pedophile, right?
Yeah, we'll be diving into what's happening in the UK in a little bit too with my good friend Matthew Marsden, who will be jumping on to discuss that.
But Thomas Massey's right, he should resign.
He should resign because can the American people trust him?
Well, the answer is obviously no.
These emails are legitimate, which they seem to be.
You owe us an explanation.
I'm so fed up with these people going out there and lying to the American people, thinking that we weren't going to find out.
You sent emails, sir.
How did you not think that the American people weren't going to see this?
Yeah, you could give him some leaning and say there are some slip-ups, but the reality of it is the American people see through this.
And there's also another report.
And again, Elon Musk has been very outspoken.
In fact, screaming that he wants the Epstein files released.
And so this one is a head scratcher for me.
This is the New York Post also outlining this.
A newly released photo from the DOJ's Epstein files show Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg seated at a dinner table in 2015 in California with Epstein.
The dinner was hosted by none other than LinkedIn co-founder, Reed Hoffman.
Reed Hoffman's a BFF over there.
So again, just more people being dumped into all of this.
Now, obviously, this doesn't mean that Elon Musk or even Zuckerberg are pedophiles, but it's disturbing given the fact that his conviction, again, was in 2008.
This photo allegedly comes from 2015.
Meta has stated that Zuckerberg met Epstein only in passing, by the way.
They said it happened at a scientist-focused dinner, not organized by him, and never communicating with them afterwards.
Elon Musk, just to be fair and balanced here, Elon Musk has also denied any close ties or being introduced or introducing anyone to Epstein.
And he's denied any type of visits to Epstein Island.
And I played that clip for you guys months ago of the victims coming out and saying, you know what, the DOJ is not going to put out a list.
We're going to put out our own list.
We're going to put out our own list.
I would love to see that list.
I would love to see that list.
We have surviving Epstein victims.
Let's hear the names of the individuals you're going to accuse of sexual assault.
Folks, I'm just so tired of us playing this tug of war game.
Like, maybe they might give us some names, maybe they won't.
We have a list.
We don't have a list.
There's over 3.2 million pages, 2 million documents that are being dumped on all of us.
You could create a list from that.
There's no way you're telling me that there's no, there's no, given the digital footprint that this man left behind, you can't find out at least three or four people who were out there reaping children with him.
You can't tell us who those people are.
See, this is why the American people still do not trust the DOJ, the FBI, none of these agencies, because, well, they're playing along.
And when you think about it, it's actually pretty genius, right?
The deep state used some of the most trustworthy conservative voices, pulled them in through the FBI, DOJ, and other entities, and have now had them out there saying everything about the Epstein stuff that you're hearing is true.
But those are the people that were the biggest doubters before they were sworn into their positions.
When you think about it, it's actually quite genius.
It's actually quite genius.
Because a lot of these key individuals didn't receive much in the way of pushback.
So, whether that's me just downplaying their involvement in all of this and trying to pretend, I mean, I'm not trying to pretend anything, but it might sound like I'm trying to downplay their involvement in all of this.
I mean, some of the top people who you and I have listened to over the years are now going along with the Epstein narrative.
Now, does this mean that it's very deep, it's very dark, and anyone who gets close to the truth will be suicided, will have their lives ruined, their families' lives ruined.
Maybe that's why everyone gets in line.
Maybe they're giving us the truth, but gut tells me no.
So, it's truth, truly just infuriating, but I think it highlights the bigger issue here.
And the bigger issue here is they're not telling us the truth because there's a reason for that.
There's a reason for that.
This one tore at my heart.
I've heard the accusations of these young underage girls giving birth and their babies being pulled from their arms shortly after giving birth.
But according to the latest documents, a teenager who's accusing obviously Jeffrey Epstein of sexual assault alleged in a diary entry around 2002 that while she was 16 or 17 years old, she was used as a human incubator to carry and give birth to a secret baby girl with Glenn Maxwell present.
Now, this was all part of their plans to create this type of superior gene pool, which obviously nobody wants any part in.
Now, again, this breaks my heart because you don't know what happened to that little girl.
The newborn was apparently snatched from her minutes after giving birth.
Her pleas to keep and feed the child remain unverified with no confirmed evidence that Epstein ever fathered a child with this victim.
Folks, we have a massive issue here.
You can't sit here and tell me that there's no who sat there and helped her give a birth.
Wouldn't really trust her, probably trying to save faith on that one.
But there's got to be doctors in that room.
Who are those doctors?
We've even seen the code words that his own doctors were using.
There's a disgusting email of one of his doctors talking about giving him ED medication.
And then again, alluding to catching up to get leave has an email with pizza and grape soda, if I'm not mistaken.
So obviously, folks, this is all really just infuriating.
This evil, this evil must be significantly worse than what we already know.
You know, Mike Benz, good friend of mine, good friend of folks here at Aval Wars 2, we truly do love and appreciate what Mike Benz does, but he does an incredible job at taking you into the truth on all of these issues.
And he has been pretty accurate on a lot, on a lot.
And he sat down last week with Joe Rogan.
I've been trying to sift through a lot of it.
It's hard for me to buckle down and listen to hours and hours of content.
But when it's Mike Benz speaking, I could listen to him for hours.
He does an incredible job.
But he recently did a really good piece and he's floating a lot of important ideas in regards to the latest document dump that has just been made.
Take a listen to clip two and his discussion with Joe Rogan.
The point I'm getting to here is, given Jeffrey Epstein's involvement in the BCCI network, given Jeffrey's involvement in the 1990s with all the foreign policy activities happening in the Middle East at that time, given Jeffrey Epstein's involvement through the early 2000s, Clinton era and everything, given his involvement in everything from Israeli to Saudi to British to French high-level government officials, can you Jeffrey Epstein was investigated by the SEC in the 1980s.
He was one of the two people who ran the biggest Ponzi scheme in history at the time in the United States, the Tower's financial collapse.
Epstein's business partner goes to jail for like 30 years or 20 years or whatever.
But Epstein skates completely free.
Epstein gets involved in this huge fraud in the U.S. Virgin Islands with this billion-dollar fraud case in the U.S. Virgin Islands, never prosecuted for any of it.
Why is that?
Well, one is, you know, he may have, we know in the U.S. Virgin Islands case, he was sponsoring the campaigns basically of the politicians there.
The prosecutors answered to the politicians.
Could be that.
But I would be shocked if they're in 40 years of this where's Waldo Forrest Gump.
He's always in the room in 40 years of American foreign policy and intelligence activity, you know, money sourcing for that for all the crimes that Epstein committed, the concern was the same one they had with Rolando Masfer.
Don't bring the case, and if you do, bring it in a highly limited way.
And that's exactly what happened in 2006, the first time he was indicted.
I think it was three hours, maybe two and a half hours interview that Mike Benz did with Joe Rogan.
You got to check it out later in the day when you're just sitting around your house.
Definitely listening on that because Mike Benz does an incredible job at breaking down the latest in regards to the Epstein file dump.
And so we look forward to playing more of his content, of course.
All right, folks, Democrats, Democrats, Democrats, Democrats, they're all fraudsters.
But again, it's, and I just don't want to like put all the attention on them, but the reality of it is, is I'm going to focus on them for a second because, you know, their own voters understand that voter ID is an important issue, except those who are being elected.
Now, those politicians don't like voter ID.
Well, because we could just assume at this point that they're stealing their elections, that they're stealing their local elections.
And so the reality of it is people are like, I can't say, I get so angry.
The New Yorker and me.
Hakeem Jeffries.
Hakeem Jeffries is a scumbag.
And Hakeem Jeffries loves to sit out there and pretend like voter ID is somehow discrimination.
That's the reason why they did their very best to infiltrate millions of illegal aliens into our country and to put them strategically in red districts.
If you're wondering why you're in the Midwest and all of a sudden there's Muhammad Muhammad everywhere when you're trying to pick an Uber ride, the reason why they've done all this is because these are the future voters for Democrats.
They are trying to flip red districts.
And they did that successfully, honestly, because there was very little pushback.
Too many Republicans are too afraid of being called racist by calling out the nonsense that was happening in this country.
They wanted to drown out your vote.
And they did just that by bringing the invaders straight into your communities.
As a Democrat, I do not believe that it's unreasonable to show ID just to vote.
And I remind everybody that less than a year ago in Wisconsin, you know, they added that to the Constitution by a 63% passing to put that in the Constitution that you have to show ID to vote.
And they also elected a very, very liberal justice into their Supreme Court.
So it's not a radical idea for regular Americans to show your ID to vote.
And it's absolutely, those things are not Jim Crow or anything.
Of course, that's part of an awful, awful legacy of our nation for so, so long ago.
But where we are now, trying to find a way forward, just trying to call balls and strikes, seeing what's unreasonable.
Hopefully we don't have to do and pay the TSA people and everyone, secure our border and focus, focus on deporting all of those kinds of criminals, wherever they are.
That's the guy that votes for that and supports that as a Democrat.
And I don't ever want to vote to shut our government down again.
Well, I mean, for me, the SAVE Act is not going to pass because of the filibuster, because they would need at least seven or eight Democratic votes to pass that.
And now remember also, all the Democrats, all we wanted to eliminate the filibuster, except for it was Manchin and Cinnamon.
They wanted to eliminate the filibuster, and now our party loves the filibuster.
And then I do think we, you know, I think the filibuster is a good thing, and it does force us to work together overall.
It also tells me that I know for a fact what's happening behind the scenes.
I mean, I know it for a fact.
I know that for a fact that there are people on Todd Blanche's team trying to plant bad information over at CNN because CNN got that exclusive that they broke saying that Ed Martin was on the way out.
So while we talk about the details, I mean, he's obviously trying to highlight and try to bring back the attention, Ed Martin.
Blanche even met with Caitlin Collins prior to taking on this position.
So he's very, very cozy with those over at CNN.
So although Ed Martin's telling you, we're good, are you really?
Are they really?
It's more like the question.
Folks, head on over right now to the AlexJonesStore.com.
Last week, we launched these new Electrolytes drink mixes.
You got to try them out for yourself.
They are these hydration packets.
They are an incredible way to start your day every day over at the AlexJonesStore.com.
It's about $1.25 a serving when he subscribes to do just that.
Welcome back to the American Journal.
We're working aggressively hard.
We might have some breaking news coming your way exclusively on this show.
So make sure you're with us.
Don't go anywhere.
We are working our way and trying to nail an exclusive down.
We'll bring it to you once we finalize just that.
It will likely happen on this show.
But in the meantime, though, we're going to be diving into a couple of really important interviews during the show in the first second hour, I should say.
Matthew Marsden will be joining us.
He's a Blaze contributor, but most importantly, he's British.
The latest scandal that's going on right now in the UK, as many of you guys know, the Epstein files have kind of had this, they've had like this echoing effect now over in the UK right now.
There's a lot of shake-ups happening politically, politically.
So Marson's going to join us to break down the very latest that's going on over there.
So the American people understand what's really happening here.
We're also talking about briefly, because I think it's all just a distraction, but I think there's a massive, massive victory for conservatives.
And that victory has to do with the fact that yesterday there was like this foreign slash like cross-dresser who was performing at the Super Bowl.
Wasn't worth your time watching, but what was really impressive is Turning Point actually did an event to counter that performance.
And it had everything to do with Christianity being the front and center of it.
And something that the families could watch, something that families could watch.
It was quite the impressive performance by both Kid Rock and others.
So we're going to be talking about that because it actually, I think, had a very impactful, impactful effect on the Super Bowl yesterday.
Millions of Americans turned off the Super Bowl to watch Kid Rock.
And I am actually very, very excited about that.
This is how we win the war, folks.
This is how we win the war.
When they know that we're no longer watching because we've done, we're done with their propaganda.
This is how we defeat them.
We'll also be talking about how in New York right now, they have officially legalized, and I know my guest is going to have a problem with me saying it like this, but they've officially legalized euthanizing those who are terminally ill.
It's obviously, it's a sick, sick thing to do, but there's been this big issue here.
It's been going on across the world right now.
And I spoke with her.
This was probably close to two years ago.
Kelsey Sheeran is going to be joining us.
The reason why this is so interesting to me is, you know, she's done an incredible job at digging into all this, depending on my radar.
And she flagged this for me years ago and was like, Brianna, just so you know, this is not going to stop in just Canada.
It's going to trickle down to the United States too.
And it has happened.
I mean, right now they're doing it.
I believe they've gotten a bunch of states right now on board with all of this.
New York is now the 13th state to now allow this.
So she'll be joining me to discuss.
There's a lot in it too that you need to know about because this is going to be something that's going to be the big push, especially given the fact that they want to push us all in the same healthcare system.
I mean, this is what they're going to start doing.
There was all, and I would laugh just because of how absurd it was, but it's actually just so evil.
Also, I've got this crazy story that I want to break down because as we talk about the economy improving, there's more glimpses that it's actually not improving.
And it's actually really depressing news as Americans are turning to rent now, pay later programs.
But most importantly, there was just a recent drop that I want to make sure all of our audience is aware about, is aware about.
I don't even know if that makes any sense, but we're going to run with it.
The J6 sub-select committee just dropped a new document.
This one's interesting, mainly because of the fact that it comes from Christopher Wray.
Trying to pull this up for us now.
According to the J6 subcommittee, these new documents prove that Christopher Wray, the former FBI director, actually predicted a January 6th-like event.
Now, he predicted this back in September of 2020.
Keep in mind.
So they just dropped this.
And yeah, I mean, it looks like Christopher Wright did predict it.
Now, again, these documents were just recently unclassified.
And he outlines the escalation from threats to increased violent attacks on individuals.
And it goes on to going and detailing the harder targets.
Now, again, there could be something here.
I'd like to see the full document, of course, but unfortunately, they didn't give us that.
They gave us that little snippet.
But that was just recently released, just a couple of moments ago, from the subcommittee on January 6th.
All right, folks, let's shift gears a little bit because I want to talk about what's going on in the UK right now.
Now, as many of you guys know, there's a scandal in the UK because of an individual who was recently forced to resign from his position.
Now, as many of you guys know, the latest document dump that's coming out has been quite the enlightening experience.
Many people have denied in the past their ties to Jeffrey Epstein, but now there's no denying it for a lot of the individuals who are officially being named in it.
Now, a lot of them always dismiss themselves like, oh, I wasn't with Epstein, or I knew him prior to him being convicted pedophile and I didn't know any better.
But over in the UK, they're also getting wrapped up into all of this.
Peter Mandelson is an individual who obviously was affiliated with the Labour Party.
He recently just resigned.
He stepped down, but it's caused quite the stir in the UK.
In fact, given the fact that Peter was named in all of these document dumps that recently came about, and it looks like what he's told us in the past isn't exactly true.
Well, now the Prime Minister of the UK is getting wrapped up into all of this.
Keir Starmer, as many of you guys know, he is the, can we say cuck?
We're just going to run with it.
He is the cuck prime minister of the UK.
And he sat back and he's watched, he's encouraged the invasion of foreigners into his country, which are sexually assaulting young girls and women in his country.
And because of all of that, it makes sense as to why he's being wrapped up into the Epstein scandal.
Well, now there's new calls for his resignation.
Joining me to discuss is the well-respected Matthew Morrison.
He is an actor, most importantly, a dad.
And he's also a contributor to The Blaze.
And he's with us now.
Matthew, and thank you for jumping on with us.
Okay.
So I'm trying to sift through everything that's going on right now across the pond.
And I think it's quite fascinating that we're hearing a lot about now these calls to ask the prime minister Kier Starmer to step down in all of this.
Now, obviously, a lot of people were trying to distance themselves from the Epstein scandal, but it looks like we're finally figuring out that they're lying to us.
So break down exactly what the latest scandal is over in the UK right now.
I find it amusing, actually, that this is the straw that broke the camel's back because you've had multiple, as you mentioned, instances of actual predators coming into the United Kingdom, like thousands and thousands of them.
There was a case recently in my hometown, the town where I grew up in, a lady by the name of Rhiannon Sky White, who was stabbed to death on the steps of a train station, which you would think that that would be enough to kind of start calling for Kier Starmer's resignation.
But, you know, this, this kind of, it's almost like an adjacent thing, right?
Like he's appointed Peter Mandelson as the ambassador to the United States of America.
It's come out that he has been involved in some way, shape, or form with Epstein.
And all of a sudden, Keir Starmer has to go.
So I think it's to me, it's a little bit mind-boggling that you can have multiple instances of Brits being murdered in the streets by illegal aliens or as they call them, asylum seekers coming into the country.
And this is the thing that is, as I said, the straw that broke the camel's back that will probably result in him resigning.
He has been an overwhelming failure.
I thought he was going to go within the first two weeks of him taking the office.
He's been dreadful.
He's a horrible leader.
It is shocking to think that the country that produced Winston Churchill has such, as you said, such a cuck as Keir Starmer as the prime minister.
It's staggering to me.
And I think that what he did was he for those of you that don't know he hired a guy called David Lammy, as his always say vice president, but it's the deputy prime minister, and that is kind of like trying to um protect your job, because nobody in the Uk wants David Lamy becoming the prime minister, because he's even a bigger moron than Kiir Starmer is.
So it's it's very, very interesting what is going on over there.
I think that they should call a general election.
The king can push to call a general election.
They won't because they absolutely know that Nigel Farage would be elected in the landslide.
Make no mistake, Brianna, all of this isn't about immigration.
It's the number one topic.
The country is a shadow of what it was when I left about 20, 23 years ago.
And when I went about a year and a half ago or two years ago back there, it was unrecognizable to me.
I mean, just in so many different ways.
There are elements of it that are still amazing.
I still love the country that I was born in, but it has fallen so far now that the only way to go is to have mass deportation, same as in the USA.
You need mass deportations and a real kind of top to bottom change in politics over there.
Well, I mean, that's what most, I think, people are wanting.
And I think, you know, Marsden, I think the real key issue here too is it's the reason why they've suppressed so much in regards to free speech.
It's the reason why they've tried controlling the narrative in regards to immigration.
I mean, under Keir Starmer, they've locked up thousands of Brits for speaking openly online about how they're not happy with the invasion that's happened in their country.
And because of that, a lot of people have been sentenced to one, two, or three years in prison or even more.
And so, you know, this has been building up in your country for a while now.
And I know you're American now, obviously.
You live here.
But I mean, it's been really upsetting to sit back and watch.
I've been covering it for years and I haven't really seen this big push as of yet.
But now it's starting to happen.
We're thankful that it's happening.
You know, there are reports going around online too.
I know a lot of people are concerned that if Keir Starmer does step down, you just listen to the deputy who would probably take over for him, but there's also fears that there might be a Muslim female who might also take over for him potentially as well.
You might have to correct me on this, but the pronunciation, I believe, is Shabana Mahamud.
They do have that attitude of keep calm and carry on.
They're not as kind of reactionary as Americans are.
Americans are much more involved in their politics, obviously, because, you know, the whole country was formed upon rights being infringed and Americans rising up against tyranny.
So, and that's an amazing thing.
I can tell you that, because obviously I've got way more involved in politics since I've become an American than since I came here.
But the Brits are kind of like a little bit slower to kind of react.
And they tend to be kind of center, right, center left.
And what has happened now is that there's been so many people coming into the country.
And those, you know, the left will cite statistics like, oh, it's only X amount percentage.
But the problem is, like in the United States of America, those more violent areas are concentrated in the cities.
So the people that are coming in are pretty much being concentrated in one area and they're really causing no-go areas.
And in a country that is so small, I think you can fit the United Kingdom into the state of Texas like three times.
So a country that is so small, it just cannot take that amount of people coming in in such a short period of time.
And couple that with a feckless prime minister who keeps saying these aren't the droids you're looking for when Brits are going, hang on a second.
I have a problem with a man being stabbed in the street when he's walking his dog by an Afghan.
I have an issue with that.
And they're like, well, actually, we might arrest those people.
But really what we're doing is we're going after you for hurty words on social media.
It is insane.
And again, I mean, I talk to people every day.
My family's still over there.
I talk to people in the UK.
And do you know who it affects the most?
It affects the working class, right?
The people that have government housing.
I grew up in government housing.
So I know these people.
These are my people.
And they're saying we can't go out anymore.
We feel like foreigners in our own land.
And yet the elites, the same as over here, right, Brianna, the elites kind of lecture down to the working man and tell them that, you know, what they're experiencing isn't really real, even though it's their daily experience.
They can't go out.
They don't feel safe.
Their kids can't walk the streets like we did when we were younger.
And now it's getting to a point where you can't escape it.
You can't go anywhere without seeing this.
And I went when I went back to the UK, I went to Birmingham, which is the biggest city near to where I grew up.
And it was like visiting a foreign country.
I mean, the change was so rapid from in the 25 years since I left there.
It was market.
It was very, very worrying to me because look, you can turn around and say, I don't have a problem with a multi-ethnic society, but a multicultural society is not good.
You have to come into the into the country and adopt the culture of that country.
Otherwise, you have all these factions splitting up.
And this is what we've seen in the United States, by the way.
The difference is, is America's so big, it's so massive.
And it's very difficult for people in Europe to understand how big America is that you're not really seeing it until people go into places like Minnesota and they're like, what is going on here?
You've literally got a demographic change that we've never seen in 200 years.
In the UK, the demographic change hasn't been seen.
They've imported more people over the past 20 odd years than they did since 1066, right?
Since, you know, back, back, back hundreds and hundreds of years.
Well, a millennia ago.
This is a massive problem, Brianna.
And it's not going anywhere.
And I don't know how they're going to rectify it because what are they going to say?
They're going to get rid of people that are allowing people to become citizens after being there for five years.
I mean, this is a massive problem.
So there's no way out of it.
In my opinion, there's no way out of it without seeing massive civil unrest.
So what you do is you end up in this government housing.
Where are they going to go?
They're going to put them in government housing, which means once again, the British people lose out and you get these enclaves of people coming in.
It's like these little ghettos, which we know because we've seen what Barack Obama did in, you know, back in the day, we went from what I consider, you know, you go through the 90s and into the early 2000s.
I don't remember anyone talking about race.
I don't think anyone really cared about the color of anyone's skin.
We kind of got past that.
I mean, look, shocker, there's always going to be racism because of the human condition, because the way that human beings are, we're always going to have something like that in our system.
You can't legislate that out of the human heart, right?
But what Obama did was he really did start separating people off into different groups, which, to your point earlier on about the Super Bowl, you shouldn't have a Super Bowl where people are, Super Bowl halftime show where people are speaking Spanish.
You shouldn't do that.
And this is what happened in the UK.
And I noted it ages and ages ago.
That in the UK, what they started doing, Brianna, was they started saying, oh, let's put a sign up here in Urdu.
Let's put a sign up here in a different language.
Instead of saying to people, you come to this country, you have to learn the language.
You come to this country, you have to abide by our laws because not all cultures are equal.
And I'm fed up of saying this.
I'm fed up of us that the greatest nation, the United States, and shortly behind the UK, being the greatest nations the world has ever seen, just saying, no, no, this country over here, where they, by the way, in place like India and Pakistan, they have a caste system, right?
They're even more that they want to separate people even more than they do in Western society.
So they're coming over here and they're saying, no, our culture is equal.
It's an incremental push towards separating people.
Why should the thing that I used to when I was growing up in the UK?
Everyone used to watch the Super Bowl halftime show, didn't care about the Super Bowl, but everyone watched to watch the greatest artist on the planet.
It was the premier platform.
If you got to do the Super Bowl halftime show, you were elite.
Think about the Prince performance.
Think about Paul McCartney.
You can list all these great performances and you would watch it.
Now, I think that the biggest market outside of the USA for American football, you say American football, for the Brits, is the United Kingdom.
So why would you do it in Spanish?
It makes no sense.
It's all about division.
It's all about putting people in different pockets so they can point them at each other to fight.
And that's the reason why when you watched, I mean, I didn't watch, but I was told when you watched, you saw two different national anthems.
I mean, this is the goal here is to be as divisive as possible, even though we're all from the same country.
We have one national anthem.
I don't respect the other one that they've made up.
We have one national anthem in this country.
But I also want to get to something that's kind of on the good side of things.
You know, you and I, Mars, and we talk about it in private quite often about how we need to create an alternative, a conservative alternative, instead of having to just deal with like these woke dantes that we're fed all the time.
In clip 12, Kid Rock yesterday was performing during the Turning Point halftime performance, and he had a very interesting moment on stage yesterday.
Take a listen to Clip 12.
unidentified
There's a book that's sitting in your house somewhere that could use some dusting off.
There's a man who died for all our sins to hang it from the cross.
You can give your life to Jesus and he'll give you a second chance till you can.
I actually floated this idea about 15 years ago to do an alternative to the Super Bowl halftime show.
And by the way, and TPU is saying, I'll give you this one and to do an alternative to the Oscars.
This is the only way that we can change the culture.
And that is to invest in it and give an alternative because people are desperate for it.
You saw it yesterday with the sheer amount of numbers that watched that show.
I mean, I got with a bunch of my friends yesterday and I didn't really watch the game because, you know, for the longest time, I'm sick to death.
I was sick of the kneeling.
I was sick of the degradation of the flag.
I'm sick of the wokeness in it and the way that we should only have, as you said, we should only have one national anthem.
But we all watched, we turned it over and we watched the turning point halftime show.
And it was great.
I mean, it's what it should be.
It should be about great talent talking about how great this country is.
We really should be having that.
Because let me tell you this, Brianna, and a lot of Americans don't really understand this or realize this because you kind of think, well, you know, everyone else is kind of like us, but that would never happen in Europe.
What Kid Rock said yesterday would never happen in Europe.
And this is part of the problem with the UK, with France, with Italy, with Germany, is they've lost their faith.
They've lost their Christian faith.
So when you are unmoored from an objective good, how can you say something is evil or something is good?
Also, by the way, outside of the stadium, there was also a billboard, a massive billboard, a very pro-ICE billboard that was placed.
And it had a lot of people fired up.
Local news was covering it extensively because they were so upset that there would be pro-ICE rhetoric being spewed in their city.
It's a great group of folks who are putting together all of their resources to make sure that we don't forget about the brave men and women who do serve.
And we should all be very proud.
Yeah, that's the one.
Defensive player of the year, ICE.
Got him.
That's how you trigger those on the left.
So we love to see it.
We hope that there's more of this, of course.
But when it comes to the immigration issue, again, folks, they're lying to you about a lot.
In fact, I just actually saw this when I was scrolling through Twitter just a moment ago, but Bill Mnusian is actually fact-checking CBS News, who put out a recent report saying less than 14% of nearly 400,000 immigrants arrested by ICE in President Trump's first year had charges or convictions of violent crimes.
That's what they're claiming.
But Bill Minusian points out that if you just scroll a little bit further, there's actually facts past the headline.
Now, most of course, mostly their audience isn't going to be scrolling in for details.
They just want the quick spew of information and that's what they're going to run with.
But Bill Minusian also pushing back a little bit and saying nearly 60% of ICE arrestees over the past year had criminal charges or convictions, the document indicates.
Ah, so they left that part out of the headline, nearly 60%, which would mean the majority of illegal aliens who they are capturing do in fact have prior criminal charges.
Now, what does CBS include in the whole, these are violent crimes?
Well, keep in mind, folks, the left doesn't think pedophilia is violent.
In fact, in New York, they thought that possession of child pornography was a nonviolent offense, even manslaughter.
So keep that in mind.
Some of the most heinous crimes that you and I would say are the worst of the worst, well, they deem as nonviolent.
So if you want to call the show, 877-789-2539, that is the number you're going to want to call.
But most importantly, I'm working on a couple of other things that I wanted to dive into.
There's a group of racist, nasty trolls, and they're all on the left.
And here's the thing, right?
Because they expect white people just to tolerate their nasty racism.
And I constantly hear, oh, black people can't be racist.
Minorities can't be racist.
Well, if you ever buckled down with a couple of got a lot of Hispanic friends that say things that I've never, I would never say in a million years.
Asians who say things.
White people aren't, aren't racist, I have to say, because even in private, I don't hear them say racist things.
But I will tell you this, black people have no problem going out there and Muslims and Indians as well.
And they have like this new renewal, especially on the left.
This is maybe exclusively to those on the left, form of racism where they could sit there and just put things out there and say things that they probably shouldn't say out loud.
They say them because they don't care.
Gene Yu, Wu, I guess you could say, he's a Chinese national.
He's also a Texas House Representative.
Now he's just throwing his mask off these days, doesn't even care in clip seven.
He is a racist, nasty troll.
And because, again, we brought him into this country, I don't know why we keep doing this to ourselves.
He thinks he'll come out here and openly talk about the takeover.
Remember when they told you that theory, that race theory, that they were just trying to replace us?
Replacement theory, I believe, was what they called a conspiracy.
Remember when they told you that was a conspiracy?
Well, the left always knew it was a conspiracy.
And now they're actually celebrating the fact that they have now made white people the minority in their own country.
I always tell people the day the Latino, African-American, Asian, and other communities realize that they are, that they share the same oppressor is the day we start winning because we are the majority in this country now.
We are, we have the ability to take over this country and to do what is needed for everyone and to make things fair.
Some white women, you know, the Western civilization women, the pure women, the American women, quote unquote, the Rustbut women, the real women, they like some of us brown folks.
When you're getting hit on cat calls, who are those folks who are doing so?
You'll probably hear a very common theme racially as a demographic that's doing that.
Those that creep them out.
And I could promise you, I mean, how many times do you need to see those videos?
There was one recently too.
I believe it's Australia where there's a woman who's just laying out on the beach by herself.
I guess she just finished surfing.
She got a surfboard there, but she's just laying out, trying to enjoy her peace.
And there's this guy who obviously is a native to Australia hovering over her and harassing her to the point where people who were nearby her felt very uncomfortable and started filming it just to make sure that she was okay and she had any evidence in case he crossed the line.
I mean, this is the type of stuff that happens.
No, they're not coming to you.
It also just happens to be the Indian accent.
It just happens to be the probably one of the worst accents when it comes to an accent to be attracted to that mostly every woman would probably agree on is the least sexiest.
But I could get into that wormhole and it would be successful.
I guess that guy that was just talking about Don Lemon forgot about Sleepy Uncle Joe eating ice cream, talking about we don't need any more N-word mares and, you know, sitting in Congress.
I guess they forgot all about that.
First thing I want to talk about, I asked Matt if he knew about this.
And then also when you look at the videos too, and you see the expressions of her children, I mean, one of the daughters, not Savannah, but the other one.
Yeah, the FBI is now with gloves digging in the daughter's backyard.
So, you know, we'll see.
But the thing I would talk about is the Epstein stuff.
One of my favorite channels on YouTube, End Times Productions, they do really good deep dives on a lot of spiritual Bible, like deep dives and stuff.
But he was talking about how it doesn't matter how much they release because everything they release is like Gmail stuff.
They're not going to talk about overtly doing things on Gmail.
It's all going to be on signal, which is going to be completely white forever.
So it doesn't matter how much they release.
You know, it's not, I don't remember what movie it was where, you know, a courtroom drama or something.
It's like, it's not what you know, it's what you could prove.
And everything we've seen so far, yeah, put it all together, it all stinks, but there's nothing to prove.
It's like anyone could go out and buy a 55-gallon drum of sulfuric acid, I think.
I've never tried, but, you know, it doesn't mean, you know, and that's all the lawyers got to say is it doesn't necessarily mean we're melting kids in them.
You know, we're doing it for a derpy derp or whatever.
I mean, as I reported extensively too, and that was claims from a girl who was 17 the day before her 18th birthday, Jeffrey Epstein actually raped her.
And he did so when he found out that it was about to be her 18th birthday.
So we're talking about one of the worst pedophiles that this country has ever seen, but nothing being done at our federal level.
And, you know, it just, it's so infuriating continuing to talk about all this to see it all unraveled, all the evidence and rabble.
And they continue to tell us there's nothing more that can be done.
We're looking into it.
Don't worry about it.
We'll get to the bottom of that.
They never do.
And we all know that.
Savage Dog, thank you for calling in.
I wanted to get to this.
James Comer actually just spoke moments ago, and I want to play that for you because it's about Ghillene Maxwell deciding to plead the fifth in her deposition that just happened moments ago.
I'll just add one thing that the attorney for Ms. Maxwell said that she has no indication and would say that neither Presidents Trump or Clinton are culpable for any wrongdoing.
And that's one thing they said in his opening statement to us today.
unidentified
Gheline Maxwell put under pressure to stay silent.
Was Ghillaine Maxwell put under pressure to stay silent today?
We would have brought her in a month ago, but she's indicated she was going to plead the fifth.
And unfortunately, she had an opportunity today to answer questions that every American has, questions that would be very important in this investigation.
And she chose to invoke her Fifth Amendment right.
unidentified
Mr. Chairman.
I'm going to clarify what her lawyer said about President Trump and Clinton.
Just to be clear, what her attorney said, Maxwell didn't say her attorney said that she would answer questions if she were granted clemency by the President Trump.
That she went on to say about Clinton and the other thing is he pointed out a number of times that she has a habeas corpus petition pending for a new trial and release, and that's why she is not going to answer questions.
Are you interested in talking to anyone that might have any information that would help us get justice for the survivors?
unidentified
Mr. Chairman, thank you.
On your disagreement with the Clintons about closed-door videotape testimony versus public hearing, are you concerned that this will be enough to restart contempt proceedings or do you think you'll come to a resolution?
Your investigation about Ilon Omar, why are you targeting her when there is a process?
Ilon Omar, your committee investigation with Ilon Omar, when there is a process in the House and people have questions about their conduct, this would go through the ethics committee.
But a few seconds later, I mean, I think the Clintons are trying to muddy the waters and create a false narrative like depositions behind closed doors.
That deposition was behind closed doors, but you had at least 10 members of Congress in there, and you'll have the video, I hope, very soon.
unidentified
Gayle Maxwell, we know from the Epstein files, didn't tell the truth.
I don't know The rationale for moving her from one prison to the other.
But look, initially she had asked that the oversight committee grant immunity.
And when we met with the survivors of Epstein, it was pretty clear, according to the survivors, and we had 20-some members in that meeting, that Maxwell was a very bad person, and she committed a lot of crimes.
And it was the intent, in my opinion, when we left that meeting in a bipartisan manner that we would not grant immunity.
Now, what she said today, she's asked for clemency from the president.
So I personally, for the reasons you just stated, don't think she should be granted any type of immunity or clemencies.
But we'll obviously, you know, as more documents are read and understood, then we'll go from there.
But I'll close with this.
I think it's great that the Department of Justice is letting members of Congress come in and look at all the unredacted versions of the documents.
I'm going to step in on this because obviously we're learning a little bit more.
Obviously, we know that she's not trying to speak.
She's pushing to be freed, and that makes sense.
There's not going to give Congress a bunch of evidence and tell them what actually happened behind the closed doors.
She knows what she has, and she's looking for freedom.
And that's the price.
If the FBI, DOJ, and the White House truly wants her to come forward and speak to them, I don't think that's a top priority for this administration right now.
I think the president's made it very clear that he's over the Epstein files and ready to move on.
Get ready to kick off the third hour of the show by taking your calls.
877-789-2539 is the number you're going to want to call if you want to join the program.
Again, folks, that's 877-789-2539.
That is the number to call.
We'll also be joined in this hour by Kelsey Sheeran.
Now, as many of you guys know, she is an advocate.
She's an independent journalist, most importantly, best-selling author, but she's also an advocate for life, but specifically for those who are trying to push the government that's trying to push euthanizing those who are diagnosed with terminal illnesses.
She's obviously been someone exposing all of this and will be joining us to discuss the latest because New York has just become one of the many states now offering these services.
And obviously, this is inhumane.
Of course, we shouldn't be pushing this, but she's got the very latest on that.
And it's been a fight and she's been pushing for this all across Canada and now here in America as well.
So we look forward to that discussion as well.
We'll also be giving you an update regarding that Scottish girl at the Axe.
Now there's been an arrest in that case.
It's what we were telling you about.
Remember this girl, this brave, brave girl, tired of being a victim, was tired of being attacked, was tired of watching her sisters or her sister, I should say, get attacked by predators.
We always knew there was more to the story, and now we're learning more because there's just an arrest.
Finally, there was just an arrest.
I'll bring you those details in a bit as well.
Plus, there's a good situation going on right now.
We can actually break this down for you right now.
Let's talk about Second Amendment for a moment.
Yesterday, Ed Martin, the pardon attorney for President Trump, put out a tweet.
It was in response to a Todd Blanche tweet saying that at President Trump's direction, Americans will get back their Second Amendment rights from pardon office.
Stay tuned.
Now, I had the feeling that this had it to do, and I verified it with those non-violent, non-violent felons, ex-felons, those who have served their time.
They want access to getting their firearms back, which I don't really object to.
I honestly, I've become an absolutist at this point when it comes to the Second Amendment.
And so, if you're a nonviolent offender, then why not?
Now, it depends, of course, what they consider to be non-violent.
But I guess given this administration, given Ed Martin too being in this, I have a good feeling that it's not going to be the Democrats' version of nonviolence.
But they are looking to give them back their Second Amendment rights.
And for someone who's like charged with a finance crime, I don't have an issue with that.
I don't.
If you paid your dues, there should be a level of redemption.
And I don't think it infringes when you pull these Second Amendment rights from these individuals.
Now, again, I'm not talking about murderers.
I'm not, I don't even think they should ever be let out of prison.
Rapists, no, those are the people you want to keep firearms away from, of course.
And again, this has a lot to do with the executive order that was actually signed one year ago from yesterday, or I guess you should say Saturday.
As many of you guys know, President Trump did sign an executive order on February 7th, 2025, titled Protecting Second Amendment Rights.
Now, he wanted to make sure that there were safeguards put into place if there was ever an infringement.
Now, keep in mind, Pam Bonnie's the one who's going to be heading all of this, and she was a big fan of red flat laws when she was Florida AG.
But this executive order allowed that any potential infringements on the Second Amendment to be submitted to the DOJ within 30 days to eliminate or come up with a plan on how they were going to eliminate those infringements and protect the rights of law-abiding citizens.
Now, again, keep in mind, that's also the setup that the DOJ now has over in Harmonylon's team, that little division that they have inside of the civil rights division.
Well, that's what they're doing there too.
So, a bit of good news.
We could always use good news.
We got more good news though, heading your way.
I'll talk about Maha and the latest there.
Folks, in the meantime, though, if you haven't done so already, head on over right now to the AlexJonesStore.com.
You guys know I'm like the queen of biometrics because whenever I see a biometric grab, I'm on it.
I just got a report in from The Verge, and this they just dropped a second ago.
Ultimately, though, they're saying that this court will soon be requiring users to scan their faces so that they could verify whether or not you are of age.
It's beginning apparently in March.
All accounts will have a teen appropriate experience by default if they're underage.
And so it's their way of verifying whether or not you are who you say you are.
Again, I mean, Discord just seems to be like the big, I mean, it just seems to be just like a big pedo ring.
And again, the company itself, it's massive.
So I understand that it's really, it's a tough situation when it comes to patrolling what's being said on their platforms, what's being done and carried out in their platforms.
It's a massive operation.
And of course, you can't sit there and hold every single thing to their, I mean, you can't say it's their fault sometimes.
But what I will say here is that anytime they're asking for your biometrics, I always think the worst of the worst.
And obviously, this is a privacy violation.
And it's a private company.
So you never know what they're going to do with your biometrics once they get that.
They could sell it.
I mean, again, this court has not yet put out a statement regarding this.
It's just a report coming out.
I will reach out for comment, but I've reached out to them before.
They don't respond.
There's probably a lot here.
I'd have to see the terms and conditions to see what's actually going on and if they're actually selling your biometrics after you confirm that information.
Remember when Twitter was doing their biometric grab for those who are paid content contributors, that information was being shared with a company in Israel.
Obviously, that's concerning.
And so again, the biometrics grab is never ending.
And that is a new report dropping now.
But folks, I want to get some callers because we do have some, we have a long list of people who are calling into the show.
If you want to join 877-789-2539 is the number to call.
I didn't know if you had any questions for me, but I kind of wanted to wonder why Trump just doesn't, you know, come clean and either start arresting people or just start releasing this stuff.
But I think he's afraid it'll cause too much havoc, you know, financially and stuff, or he's, he's covering for, you know, they don't want the havoc.
But like, like I was telling your guy on the phone, I'm almost sure Jeffrey Epstein was backstage during Miss America, but we were more like a rehearsal hall because that was happening down the street at the convention center.
And I do remember him giving one of the girls the creeps.
That would be Epstein.
And the only other thing I remember about it is I asked one of the other stage hands and they told me he was a financier.
And again, this is Reuters fact-checking this allegation.
Reuters coming out saying this is fake news.
Now, I'm not an ally of Reuters, but I'll tell you that if Reuters has the opportunity to go after Trump and destroy him, they would utilize something like that.
So, Charlie, I'm going to hold off on all of this until I see some physical evidence.
And you're welcome to send it in if there's an actual piece of evidence, a photo of some sort.
We welcome that.
But again, a lot of this information is being circulated and trying to associate Trump with Epstein.
And I have not yet seen any evidence of that.
So I'm going to hold before I make any accusations that have not yet been proven.
Well, in terms of the replacement immigration, there's a lot of talk about the illegal invaders, but there's not much talk about the fact that there's a war on Americans with traditional values.
Now, to do that, they basically make it very hard to afford for families, American families to have kids.
There's a low birth rate because it's so unaffordable for many people.
And also the indoctrination of the children of next generation.
Now, in terms of the indoctrination of the children, Republicans, they claim that they're in favor of school choice, school vouchers.
I mean, if you're spending in New York City for a public school $30,000 for each student, well, parents should have the right to go to private school, religious or otherwise, and get $30,000 for alternative means to educate their children, not to be indoctrinated and go off with them mutilated in the school system.
And also, it has to be affordable.
So there's all this talk about, you know, give credit to Trump, but at least he closed the border down.
And now he has to try to get rid of 20 million invaders that just came in under Biden, never mind all the people who came before.
But what about encouraging American people who are here, making it affordable and reasonable so that people get married and have kids and doing something about the indoctrination, meaning you have to break out of the mold of the school system.
And the other thing is, in general, the Republicans, they campaign as MAGR.
And when they get in there, they don't govern as MAGA.
For example, Trump, they don't appoint any of his people.
He wants to appoint people in blue states, like in Virginia, he wanted to have the U.S. attorney.
The Republicans wouldn't even give him a confirmation vote because, oh, it's a blue state.
What do you mean by blue state?
President Trump is the president of all 50 states and they're not willing.
And they don't give him recess appointments.
His executive orders, many of them are very good, and they don't want to codify it.
And even with the Save Act or Better Yet the Save America Act, which requires proof of citizenship and ID, they're going to, oh, everyone's in favor of it, but that it's not going to get through because of the filibuster.
Now, I'm against doing away with the filibuster, but at least they should make a standing filibuster and try to get this thing through.
No, I mean, Robert, you're not going to get any pushback from me on that.
I think it's really important and should be a top priority.
And it's a great alternative because the public school system is an absolute cesspool.
So I'm 100% on board with you, Robert.
And we appreciate you calling in, of course.
So thank you for that.
No, he's right.
He's right when it comes to that.
Folks, I want to just give you like a little bit of an update.
Remember when I broke that CBS news report to you where they are claiming that less than 14% of those who've been arrested by ICE in President Trump's first year in office had a violent record, a violent criminal record?
Well, DHS actually just detailed for you what CBS is leaving out.
And they have deemed when it comes to violence, they deem these as actually nonviolent offenses.
Maybe you at home disagree with this, but according to the staff that they don't want to loop into this because they think this is non-violent, that would be drug trafficking, the distribution of child pornography, burglary, fraud, DUI, embezzlement, soliciting a minor, human smuggling.
Those are all nonviolent offenses.
So isn't it convenient, right?
They want to sit there and say, how is human smuggling not a violent offense?
Most of them aren't willing participants.
Distribution of child pornography.
I told you the left does this.
They don't deem child pornography as a violent offense.
In New York, they literally eliminated cash bail for those caught with child pornography.
In fact, if you were caught in New York State when they first launched that criminal justice reform nonsense, they would actually give you a bench ticket, an appearance ticket to come back to court later, if you feel like it.
You weren't even allowed to be brought in front of a judge.
It doesn't matter how many files you had.
They didn't want you arrested.
So no surprise here that even the mainstream media is trying to particularly nitpick what stats, what crimes they deem as nonviolence.
These people are sick.
It actually enrages me because I don't want to share a country with these people.
If you don't think that child pornography is a violent crime, we can't agree on anything at that point.
So I'm really upset that we have all of these people at the top that have clearly been linked to Epstein.
You can look at the emails and read the emails for yourself.
And even though there's a lot of things that are blacked out, you can tell that something clearly happened.
And when you start looking at, you know, you start looking at people like Bill Gates and people at the top, I understand that we have a lot of these people and we have their money tied up in tech.
But we also have to understand that we were involved in government contracts with these people when they decided to act poorly and behave badly, representing as being somebody that's in business with us that they should not have been acting in that manner.
So we still have a certain amount of rights over things.
And I think it's kind of interesting that BlackRock is in on everything, literally from every angle.
So I think they would probably want to protect their self in the best way possible.
So I don't know why we just don't reclaim the copyright on everything that we've done as far as tech goes, continue to run the companies, put these idiots in jail for what they've done, take them out of these positions and not reward them with these great government contracts, but they'll be able to go on and thrive forever and ever, you know, and always be able to afford to hire just the right people to never have to face any kind of heat for anything they ever do.
I just look at this stuff all the time and I think to myself, like, how are we allowing this to happen?
How are not how are we not like creating a petition or something else?
Kindly please get these people out of here.
Okay, when you see something that has substance and FBI says there's no substance, but then I've sat and I've read a lot of these emails.
Well, it doesn't seem to be that way to me.
I see a lot of substance in there, you know, and sure, some of it might just be like, you know, due to it might be just a term or whatever, but Pizzagate was real.
You know, and now they're trying to brush everything under the carpet like, oh, no, it wasn't.
By the way, Gillian Maxwell was her last thing as far as withholding all of her information and trying to blackmail the court system with it because that's let's call it what it is.
Well, I mean, listen, you're like the millions of other Americans who are pissed off, tired of all of this, try to be tired of being gaslit.
I mean, the reality of it is we've been lied to for many, many years.
And like you said, we're never really going to find out the truth.
I know for a fact that when there was the shift, when Kash Patel and Dan Bongino took over the FBI, I know that they deleted things.
And so I think the worst of the worst, you're not going to find any of these Epstein files.
You know, when we go through all the information, if they're, this was a black, this was a blackmail ring.
And so they're not going to have the evidence that shows people's deepest, darkest secrets make its way to the surface through all of this.
It's just not the case.
It's just not the case.
So I think a lot of it, and Barbara, thank you for calling into the program.
We appreciate it.
But I think a lot of it has been mass deleted and that's the purpose in all of this.
You know, early in the show, I told you guys I wanted to bring you an update and reference that Scottish girl.
As many of you guys remember, this was the young woman who last year was seen carrying an axe and a knife.
Now, we all knew what this meant, but it was whether or not the government was actually going to get in line and actually look to protect these girls.
But she was very, very upset.
And there's only one reason why a girl her age would feel the need to carry these types of weapons because predators, invaders have targeted them.
And as a young girl, you're tired of being the victim.
So you're going to save your family or to save your sisters.
And it looks to be the case.
According to several reports, there's been two individuals who have been arrested who apparently are, or I've seen reports that they're gypsies, but these people are the ones who are on the receiving end, the ones who are filming this.
According to the reports, that these individuals approached and followed four girls who were ages between 12 and 14.
They apparently made sexual remarks towards these girls, seizing one of the girls and pushing her to the ground.
That's what currently they're being accused of.
I don't know what country these people come from.
They're accused of trying to seize and pulling another girl's hair, dragging her to the ground and punching her on the head.
Of course, their cameras didn't catch that, though, right?
This is why I always tell people when you see footage, hold off for a second because there's a reason why they're not putting it out there.
This is another lie.
This is another push.
These girls were rounded up and targeted by the police.
They were the victims.
They were the victims, it sounds like.
If these accusations are true, and of course, those cameras only roll when the girls are forced to defend themselves.
Children, children.
What would drive a young girl to carry an axe and to carry a knife with her?
I'll tell you, predators, predators.
What have you done to your countries when you sit there and you look and you see all of these young, beautiful girls who have such a bright future ahead of them?
Now they're at the point where they're carrying around butcher knives and they're carrying around axes.
And what the government did, they hired, I forgot, I think last time I checked, it was like 30,000 employees with the government that are SES employees.
I think it was, I think it was a signal to all those deep states.
And I think they're a version of the deep state that hasn't been addressed yet.
SES, look it up.
And also, I believe that the reason I held off on this Epstein stuff for so long is because they had to let AI catch up because they can always take it to court and say, you know, well, this is a fake video and it's plausible deniability and case dismissed.
A lot going on over here that we've been diving in and out of, but there's something that I want to make sure is on your radar.
It's in regards to what the left likes to call, that they like to make it sound nice and fluffy.
Like they're just helping those who are diagnosed with terminal illness.
They make it sound like it's a great thing and they do their very best to not make it sound like what it really is.
So when I break this latest story down for you guys all at home right now, I want to just do it from the angle of the latest individual jump on board with this.
This is the New York governor, Kathy Hochul.
She just recently signed a Medical Aid and Dying Act.
Now, they like to say that they're trying to help those with terminal illness to end their own lives peacefully.
They always make it sound like it's this humane thing that they're doing.
Now, they say that they're only going to allow those who are mentally competent to make that decision for themselves to be euthanized.
And they always make it sound extremely fluffy.
Just from the press release alone, this is what they're detailing to you guys.
They're saying that it's a mandatory five-day waiting period after between writing and filling the prescription.
They also require there to be a mental health evaluation by a psychiatrist as well.
They also require an in-person physician to evaluate the patient as well.
So they're claiming that this is all going to be done in a humane way.
That's what the governor wants you to think.
Now, obviously, this is something that's been going on for quite some time now.
And I remember the last time I spoke to our next guest, we were talking about it in Canada.
And she did warn me and she did tell me that, you know, it's not just going to happen in just Canada.
This is going to trickle down to the United States.
And so far, so far, 13 states have jumped on board with this.
The 14th, it's not a state, but DC is also looking to legalize this.
And it's very, very concerning.
Joining me to discuss is Kelsey Sheeran.
As many of you guys know, she is the best-selling author, also an independent journalist who does an incredible job on Substack breaking this all down.
You can follow her on X. Kelsey Burns is where you could find her as well.
I want to welcome you to the show.
You know, the last time you and I spoke, I think it might have actually been like maybe two years ago, as crazy as that is, you were predicting that this was going to be a massive issue in the United States as we were covering it in Canada.
And lo and behold, I mean, we're talking 13 states that have now jumped on board with all of this.
And when the left tells us about this program that they're always launching or how they're passing these pieces of legislation, they always make it sound like it's humane.
But I know that's not the argument that you ever make.
And you want to highlight the fact that this is the complete opposite of what they're trying to sell us.
Oh man, did we warn you years and years and years ago?
You know, normally what we see in Canada is if we start to put in some draconian healthcare issues or laws, it trickles down to you in about 18 to 24 months.
I spoke about this before because at the time, veterans in Canada were being illegally offered this as a treatment solution to post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury.
And I am a veteran who suffers from both of those.
So when that happened, we started speaking about this because a friend of mine was offered and we started breaking the stories on these things.
Now, the United States is important to pay attention to.
So one slight correction.
There is already Washington, D.C. is already legal.
So there is 13 states and one jurisdiction that are currently allowing the MAID program in the United States.
And they're doing it incredibly quietly, the same way that Canada rolled the program out with the death cult lobby Dying with Dignity, who was lobbying the government to the tune of over $9 million.
We just got their financials and it is nasty.
You guys have another organization called Compassion and Choices, as well as a Dying with Dignity.
And there are a ton of nonprofits in America that lobby your government to bring this into place.
Now, New York, we knew was on its way.
Kathy had brought this up several times now.
We knew it was going to happen.
It was the same sort of conversation around Delaware right after I did Jordan Peterson.
They debated it on the floor saying, well, what about the drugs?
How does the system actually work?
And the thing we want to understand is these drugs are non-FDA approved for killing.
And the United States government is allowing them to be utilized by your medical staff to provide death.
Now, that's important to note because for several reasons, you guys really love the FDA down there.
And normally, if it's not FDA approved, it cannot be utilized.
But all of these drugs are being utilized for killing when not a single one of them has been tested for killing.
Now, there are other states that are important to note.
And most people will say this, these are all liberal issues.
I caution you with that narrative because Montana Republicans voted for this as well.
And now it is also legalized in Montana.
I would also take a look at the way the United States is working around what's called track one.
This narrative is incredibly important because you guys have the chance to hit the brakes, whereas we do not, as we are legalizing into the mentally ill starting in March of 2027.
And right after that is already started the conversation around mature minors, which are children.
We've heard that narrative with the LGBT community and the trans community.
And that's how they got children able to get their breasts cut off.
And we're now seeing that going down the same path with MAID.
So the United States right now is track one only.
That's important for several reasons.
It is terminally ill only.
Now, let me show you how they legalized in Canada and how they're about to do it with you and how they're going to make sure it keeps going.
You need two assessors that say to you that they believe you qualify to die.
That's important because we're not looking at the biases of these doctors who are under CANMAP.
CANMAP is the Canadian made assessors of practitioners.
There are our lovely band of killers up here with over 1800 practitioners in the country and roughly 300 of them doing the majority of the deaths.
The reason we are the cautionary tale, and I'm so glad that you brought this up, is because we now are going into the spring of 2026 and we will have killed over 100,000 Canadians with this protocol since 2016 alone.
I mean, this is all like, I didn't even know about Montana and I was quickly doing research on Montana and I found that this has been going on actually for quite some time now.
Didn't even know this.
And it was based on a Supreme Court ruling back in 2009 in Montana, which is mind blowing to me.
So you just woke me up to that as well.
And then obviously over 100,000 Canadians being killed this way is absolutely devastating.
That number is just horrifying because again, here in the United States, they make it seem like it's just people who are terminally ill.
And I remember, I believe it was the last time we spoke too, there was that Canadian, I think she was a veteran, but she had requested some type of device so that she could be helped up her steps because she was losing her movement and needed some assistance.
And instead, they responded by offering her the services of euthanizing her as if as if there was type of a benefit from that.
So that was devastating in itself.
So like you're highlighting in all of this, I mean, this expands and my jaw hit the ground at the 100,000.
That's why I'm trying to catch up with you now.
But the fact that the FDA hasn't proved these drugs also has me angry right now because I can't even get ivermectin over the counter, even though here locally in Texas, we've approved it.
They won't let me get ivermectin without a script from a doctor.
And even with that, there are pharmacies that will hold you up from getting that, which is insane.
And then you hit the lobby groups, the lobbyists.
Okay, explain this to me.
Why the heck are there lobbyists out there lobbying for people to be able to kill themselves?
I mean, it's just a big pharmaceutical thing that they're kind of advocating for, or is there something deeper here?
And so just to highlight, that was Christine Gauthier.
She's a friend of mine.
She was an artillery gunner.
She was injured in service.
She was a Paralympian in the Invictus Games as well as the Paralympics.
Incredible human.
Her and I just testified recently in the new suicide study.
She still, by the way, is fighting to get a wheelchair and is suffering.
It's insane.
So when we're looking at the motive behind these things, we have to always, always go back to money.
Everything always goes to money.
So, but this isn't just a pharmaceutical play.
This is so much deeper than that.
You know, this is where the conspiratorial put my tinfoil hat on moment comes in, where I've said, you know, Bill Gates has had this conversation publicly now for multiple years saying that every hospital should have a death commission.
Well, what do you think made assessors are?
They are a death commission.
They decide whether you live or you die.
And if you have a doctor or a nurse practitioner who basically believes that this is the only solution to your suffering, this is all you're going to be offered.
We know this because we had a case recently.
I just spoke when I hosted Alex's show about Mrs. B. Mrs. B didn't want to die.
Yes, there's sedation involved, but there is care and compassion and family and empathy when they walk you through the next ending of your life.
Where MAID is a drug in America, they do it a little different than Canada.
In America, they give you a cup and they fill it with poison.
The poison that I just told you were non-FDA proof for killing, which, by the way, for those that love to squawk at me, are all available on PubMed under the medications and dosages of the MAID program.
And just to let you know how sinister we are up here, the MAID practitioners are the ones who actually advised America on how to kill.
They state it very clearly.
The difference between you is we give you a cup filled with poison.
We set it in front of you.
And then your doctor says, okay, I need you to drink it.
The longest death we have on record right now is 137 hours in America.
And the term terminally ill can be manipulated.
And we know this because of a case out of Colorado.
A young girl in her 20s, going into her 30s, battled anorexia her whole life.
Now, anorexia is a mental health disorder.
It affects the mind and the ability to ingest food and the control techniques that kind of go with that mental illness.
It is not terminal.
Let me make that abundantly clear.
It is a non-terminal illness.
There was a doctor in Colorado.
I have such a hard time calling these people doctors.
There was a doctor in Colorado who made up a new term, which is not in the DSM-5, which is not a qualifying term, terminal anorexia.
And she was then killed.
So for us to say that this isn't going to change and verbiage won't change is a very, it's just, it's a false lie.
We're narrative we're telling ourselves.
And then we have things like savings on healthcare.
Now, I know America doesn't have socialized healthcare and people say, you know, we wish we did.
You would die in a waiting list like 20,000 Canadians do a year.
But you do have different options.
Now, a lot of these states, like I said, here's the kicker.
You don't have a residency requirement, which means people can come from, say, more red states if they are more empathetic towards this ideology and they can go be killed in, say, Oregon or New Mexico or New Jersey.
And that's important to note because people will find access wherever access is.
The other thing that's important is these drugs are public.
You can find out what the kits look like.
We had a gentleman, gentleman, we had a murderer up here named Kenneth Law who got a hold of these drugs and were selling them online on Amazon.
And it looks like he might get off on a technicality and a bunch of people were killed across the globe.
So America is down the slippery slope now with track one, saying it will only stay at terminally ill.
And I am incredibly intentional when I say it doesn't stop there.
You will move to track two, which is non-foreseeable death, which is people like myself with a physical ailment that is not basically, you're not going to die.
It's irremediable or grievous, but you're not going to die from it.
And then your secondary can be mental health.
And then you will move into what we are moving into March, which is for mental illness only.
So depressed people, people who have PTSD, people who have gone through loss in their life, they're going to be euthanized.
Canada puts IVs in you and the drug, the doctors push the drug and kill you.
Like the most prolific killer we have, Ellen Weeb, Stephanie Green.
I have a list I'm compiling of all these doctors because they all need their names said very publicly.
But these people kill, you know, Stephanie Green's over 300.
That doctor you're putting up right there, Ellen Weeb, she says 400.
Fun fact for you.
I was in a room in Salt Spring Island off of Vancouver when she admitted to a group of over 100 people that she's killed over a thousand people alone.
So to think about that, you know, in 2024, we had 16,499 deaths.
And now we have the Ontario coroner report that's come out that you've seen recently circulating with Dr. Ramona Coelho, who we just had on the Kelsey Sharing Perspective, breaking down the non-compliant deaths.
We killed somebody for chemical sensitivity.
Basically, she was allergic to her house.
We couldn't get her better housing.
We have a friend of ours, Roger Foley, in a London, Ontario hospital, who's offered maid almost every day of his life just because he has a degenerative disorder because he can't get help.
We have Kayla Pollock, who's, she was a lovely individual.
She's still alive, but she's a quadriplegic now due to the vaccine and she's currently going through that.
She's offered maid all the time.
And then we have the most recent case, which is Keanu.
And Keanu was 26 years old with depression and he had diabetes.
And Ellen Web, that killer you just saw there, she mated him on December 30th after he was qualified in 2022 by Dr. Tepper and Maidhouse.
We have two facilities that only do killing, by the way.
They're called Maidhouse, one in Victoria and one in Toronto.
You have to laugh because this is so sick.
And the mother made so much noise that the doctor said, fine, I won't kill him.
And then Ellen Web got his hooks in him and killed him last year in December.
So to say that this is going to stay as track one, Kathy knows this is a lie.
That's Keanu right there.
Everybody understands this is a lie.
This is a bold face, lie right to your face.
Once we get something legalized, we can amend.
And that is what the lobby groups do.
And this is why I have been trying to encourage the United States government and state to take a look at these lobby groups.
They are fundraising to kill your citizens and they're using non-FDA approved drugs through your medical system to euthanize and take off the face of the earth, God-fearing Americans and convince them that death is the only solution instead of healthcare.
Well, you know, we have, we have like eight minutes.
I definitely want to get to the organ part with you too.
But I also want to say something that's crazy too.
Like the FDA stuff is just so mind-blowing to me because when we have people here in this country who want to do their, they're diagnosed with terminal illness here in the United States.
We just had someone on last week to detail just that.
He was actually diagnosed with terminal brain cancer.
And the access to get his hands on experimental treatment so that he could just try and fight for his life anyway possible was so hard.
Only because he had a, he had a medical background was he able to get these group of doctors to let him partake in experiment in an experiment, which has expanded the lifespan of his life.
We can't even get people to allow these people into these programs.
So it's really a cute thing here in all of this.
This is Michael, Mike Hughes, who we're working with to help him out, but Hugo, sorry.
We'll be working with him to try to help him out.
I'm trying to get the FDA on board with this, but he's someone who's trying to help others who are struggling as well.
But Kelsey, I'll let you take it away from the organ part here because we've covered the organ harvesting issues that we have here in the United States, but I know you have something else that you want to talk about on that angle as well.
And people can say, well, Kelsey, that's not true because the MAID drugs will actually break the organs down.
Well, that's actually not factual at all because what we do know about the MAID drugs is you can have your organs taken, even if you are killed at home.
They just transport you very quickly.
Now, certain organs are not on the table once these drugs are pushed.
These aren't, these aren't like just for fun drugs.
These aren't funsies.
These are going to poison you to death and they're going to eradicate your entire system.
So you can't use the heart and the lungs, but you can use the liver, the kidneys, the eyes, the skin, and every body is worth a lot of money.
Now, what's crazy is people say in Canada that's not required to have made.
Well, I'm holding up a lovely little sheet here in front of me that actually shows how a patient is coerced through the end of life.
And it gets all the way down to the bottom where it talks about the retrieval, surgical retrieval of organs.
Now, the reason I bring it up is because they have two pipelines, and both pipelines all lead to organs.
So thank you.
That's it right there.
If you look at step number six at the very bottom, they all lead to organs.
Now, that's important because I don't know if you saw recently in the past couple of months, a Canadian heart made its way down to America.
I've never seen that before publicly.
And we are seeing that organs are worth a lot of money and there's corruption, massive amounts of corruption in this.
Dying with Dignity is one of the largest, most corrupt organizations we've seen.
And they post their donors on their website because they're smart.
And what I'll tell you about them is they work alongside Health Canada, CanMap, and the Canadian Blood Service.
Now, the Canadian Blood Service holds shares in Dying with Dignity.
That's terrifying because they are responsible for our plasma, our blood, and our organs.
And now you used to only be able to bring up organ donation after somebody was approved for MAID.
Now it's at the very forefront of the conversation.
And this is why there's a new bill being brought forward by one of the MPs in Saskatchewan that's called Bill C260, and it talks about MAID and coercion.
Now, that was just tabled.
It was a private member's bill this week.
And it is talking about what's happening and how patients are being coerced into death and donating their organs.
Now, in Canada, you are not a presumed organ donor unless you are in Nova Scotia.
Then they make you a presumed organ donor unless you request otherwise.
Now, I would encourage people to take a look at this because what we do know right now is that if you are a presumed, they're going to take your organs.
That's just the end of the conversation.
But I have always been a fan of organ donation.
I am not anymore because I do not know where they're going and I do not know what they are selling them for.
And we have to be honest about this.
It sounds disgusting and it sounds like a horror movie, but they are taking your organs and doing something with them.
And those are worth a lot of money.
And when you have Health Canada funding and sponsoring the CanMap Journal, and you have them then teaching all of the doctors the new protocols to kill people, and then the people sponsoring their events are the Canadian blood services.
There is a massive conflict of interest going on in here because it saves the healthcare system billions of dollars if we kill you instead of heal you.
And that's what's going to be happening with America.
So we have to be like with an abundance of caution here.
I've asked the legislators in Canada: is there an appetite to roll back MAID completely?
And they have said to me that everyone they've polled says no.
That's even more terrifying because our people are so drunk on the Kool-Aid and thinking that killing their grandmothers and their loved ones and now mature minors, which is not legal yet.
Notice I said yet, but you have the College of Physicians suggesting we should be able to kill children zero to one with malformation when they are born with, say, spinal bifida or they're born with Down syndrome.
You have them suggesting we murder children already.
So we have gone so far off the slope.
America can stop this right now.
You guys have the right to stop this right now.
But if you expand to the rest of your states, I promise you, you're going to be in the same path in the next few years.
And when we look at 100,000 in Canada, it's going to make the American population look like pittins because you guys are so much larger than us.
And I'm hopeful that at some point, somebody from the United States State Department, even the ones I've spoken with, others will reach out and say, how do we stop this?
Because right now, if America doesn't stop this, 100,000 is nothing.
You guys are looking at a mass, mass genocide.
I call this eugenics.
So most people don't love that term, but it is the truth.
Yeah, well, that's what everyone's really afraid of, Kelsey.
And you've called it before and you were accurate when you told me that the last time we spoke.
So I'm 100% on board with this is going to be a massive, massive issue.
And the organ part in all of this is just so infuriating.
It's so infuriating.
You know, we keep talking about it.
I've had many guests on that I've spoken to in the past about the organ harvesting problem we have in this country.
And sadly, I don't think our government's really interested in even entertaining the discussion.
Human trafficking experts telling me that for so long, children were being kidnapped throughout the South American region, brought to Mexico where their organs were harvested at veterinarian clinics in the middle of the night.
And for some reason, our government just doesn't get on board.
And if you're someone who maybe has access to the dark web, I don't recommend you do this.
But if you really want to verify, which sadly I've done previously, they are selling these organs on the dark web and it's absolutely gut-wrenching because, you know, we all know what this is.
These are innocent victims who are losing their organs, losing their lives, and they're now being sold online.
So it's a massive, massive issue.
Kelsey, I look forward to having you back on the program to detail all of this again for us because there's just so many layers to all of this.
And I've learned so much from you.
So I appreciate it.
And I want to point our audience over to your Substack page as well.
Let me spell it for you all at home in case you're audio only right now.
Give it a look.
It's K-E-L-S-I-S-H-E-R-E-N is where you could find her right now on Substack.
You also do a great job over on X as well.
And I give everyone, I tell everyone to give you a follow there, Kelsey Burns, where you can find her on X as well.
Thank you for joining me.
It's always a pleasure to catch up with you.
And you're right.
So a little, it's not a victory lap, but you know, it gives you more credibility on this issue.
And that's why it's an honor to have you on to detail just that.
It's about time we wake up the rest of the world to what we're doing when our doctors are deciding instead of helping in healing and taking the oath, they will murder them.