Jan. 23, 2026 - American Journal - Breanna Morello
02:37:28
Full Show: Third Arrest Made in Minneapolis Over Church “Protests”, Democrats Caught In Major Lie Involving Abandoned Child & Trump Hits The Ground Running After Return From Davos
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and four allies face $250M fraud charges tied to pandemic relief, while media bias—like ABC’s "bait" narrative in an ICE case—ignites partisan clashes. Jack Smith’s $20K payments to confidential sources raise questions about Trump’s indictments, contrasting with bipartisan contempt votes against Bill Clinton for Epstein ties. Alex Rosen’s arrests of unrepentant child predators, including a New Jersey molester with thousands of images, expose liberal sympathy for offenders. Meanwhile, Mel Kay warns Davos’ WEF pushes Agenda 2030 surveillance tech, linking Gaza’s reconstruction to globalist control and NATO’s expansion under Clinton and Soros, urging state sovereignty over federal schemes. [Automatically generated summary]
How frustrated Minnesotans are right now with the level of fraud and the lack of accountability.
Assistant Commissioner Moore said that through the SWIFT system, through your accounting system, you know who you're paying.
You know the people who you are sending money to.
You know their name.
You know their business.
Frankly, you probably know who they're connected to.
And through the tools, across state agencies and across all of the executive branch, from business registrations to what they have to file with the Attorney General's office, all of those tools exist.
So why are payments continuing to people who have been convicted of fraud?
Former senior policy aide Abdi Nur Salah pleaded guilty to wire fraud.
Shamarke Issa, twice handpicked to chair the Minneapolis Public Housing Authority, copped to wire fraud and restitution in the millions.
Abdik Qadir Ainanche Mohammed Tap for Fry's Community Safety Work Group faced indictments in the same rotten scheme.
Add in campaign max donations from at least eight indicted players, plus Fry's own wife, Sarah Clark, lobbying at the firm that shielded Feeding Our Future itself.
And you've got a tangled web of proximity, appointments, and unanswered questions screaming conflict and cover.
We've all got to acknowledge that the fraud is very real.
And by the way, when somebody commits fraud, and there are many that have done that, you investigate it, you charge, you prosecute, and yeah, you put the person in jail as an individual.
You put the person in jail as an individual.
You do not hold an entire community, any community, accountable for the actions of individuals.
And I do want to correct something that was said in the beginning.
We did not rush into that church.
We actually went and sat down and participated in the service.
And after the pastor prayed, that is when I stood up and asked him a question in response to his prayer.
And then I, and he responded to me.
And then I proceeded to ask him about Pastor David Easterwood and how is it possible for him to serve as both the pastor and the director of ICE for Minnesota.
And instead of responding to me, as soon as I said the name David Easterwood, the pastor says, shame, shame.
And that is when I led us and chants justice for Renee Good and hands up, don't shoot.
So I want to clarify that.
We didn't rush in.
We didn't bust in.
We were a part of the service until I got up and posed that question to the pastor.
So good on the DOJ for finally getting involved in all of this.
Also, speaking of Don Lemon, it's worth noting that there was a federal magistrate judge who refused to sign off that arrest warrant for Don Lemon.
Douglas Mikko is his name.
Him and his wife, apparently, might have very close ties over to the AG's office.
This is according to Bill Minusian, who's out here reporting that his wife, that's the magistrate judge, works as an assistant attorney general in Minnesota's Attorney General's office, Keith Elson's office.
So that's where she's at.
Of course, guys, that's a conflict of interest.
Now, a normal judge would probably, just to be safe, would punt and say, all right, this is obviously a conflict of interest.
So we want no part in any of this.
That's what a normal judge would say, but no.
Now, I'm sure the DOJ, given the fact that this is obviously very high profile, and I did see a video of Don Lemon ranting saying, I'm going to keep doing journalism.
He had embedded himself in what he called an operation, not a protest, an operation.
Don Lemon needs to get rounded up too.
Don't care what liberal judge decides to say, nah, I'm not signing that.
Go to another one.
Democrats were the masters of this.
They knew exactly what judges to ask favors of.
Why is the current DOJ not playing by the old rules?
The old rules are: you didn't like what one DOJ or what one magistrate judge does, take it to another one.
Keep bouncing around until a judge will give you what you want because they comply with your abuse.
That was the old rule.
Now this isn't even abuse.
In fact, all of this is warranted given the fact that we watched the Biden regime round up peaceful protesters outside of abortion clinics for political gain because why they were upset that Roe versus Wade was overturned.
Apply the same set of rules.
These people are cons.
These people are cons.
We've also got a couple of mugshots.
And again, these people and these mugshots have been doing a bunch of unhinged interviews.
I'll play one later in the show for you, but not a good-looking crowd.
Not a crowd I'd ever find myself hanging out with on a Sunday.
But clearly, individuals suffering from leftist derangement system.
I mean, that is exactly what's going on here.
These people are out of their freaking mind.
So good on the DOJ.
There's, you know, claims that there's going to be more arrests.
Don Lemon needs to be one of them, swept up into all of this.
How quickly he bows out.
Oh, I wasn't a part of the protest.
Let's see those text messages, Don.
Were they orchestrating it?
Were you involved in that?
Were you told where to go?
You see, if we apply the same set of rules, you're going to have your home raided.
And then when they ask for an explanation as to why you even were able to secure those warrants, give them a heavily redacted document and tell them to have a good time at that.
And then if you really want to have a little bit of fun, give them the Steve Baker treatment, right?
Because Steve Baker was rounded up for his coverage of January 6th, going into the Capitol that day and filming.
So what'd they do?
Well, I was there for it.
Our federal government took Steve Baker, slap cuffs on him, put him in ankle bracelets, and dragged him off to court with a bunch of criminals.
Find a magistrate judge that will sign off on your warrant and send Don Lemon packing.
Why not?
Folks, later on in the show, too, we're going to talk more about this and the legal side of it with Robert Gouveia.
He'll be joining the program, as many of you know.
He's a criminal defense attorney.
He's also the host of the Spotlight of Justice.
And he'll be joining us to break down the legal side of all of this.
Also be joined by Alex Rosen as well in the next hour and Mel Kay in the third hour of the program.
So we've got a lot going on over here.
But I feel like we got to call out a lot of the fraud that's going on.
And when I'm talking about the fraud specifically, I'm not talking about the dollar amounts that have been stolen from the American people.
I'm talking about the fraud that's being printed and pushed out through the propagandist mainstream media.
Those who are sitting here don't ask the simple questions as to, well, how did we arrive at this one point?
There's a bunch of stories that they keep trying to push.
And I warned you guys, as soon as President Trump was elected, they were going to find any little story that might be able to pull out your heartstrings when it comes to immigration.
And they were going to put it on blast.
And they keep doing that.
They keep doing that.
In fact, there's a five-year-old who they're trying to cook up this fake narrative about how a five-year-old came home from school in Minnesota and he was quickly arrested by ICE with his father and dragged off into federal custody.
What they're also trying to say is that five-year-old boy was used as bait to get the father to come out so they could arrest the dad.
First off, father's a criminal legal alien.
Okay, just so you know that that's what we're hearing from DHS.
The second thing we're hearing from DHS is the mom is also an illegal alien.
Yesterday on X, DHS came out and said, oh no, the actual father abandoned the son at first.
And then when we were trying to get the mother and also said, hey, we're not going to arrest you, just take your son.
Tonight, the haunting images sparking a firestorm.
A preschool boy standing in the Minnesota cold swept up in the ICE crackdown.
School officials say five-year-old Liam wearing his blue hat and backpack and his father, Adrian Alexander Conejo Arias, had just pulled into their suburban Minneapolis driveway Tuesday when agents took that father into custody.
The school then saying an agent essentially used the five-year-old as bait, directing him to see if anyone else was home before taking the boy away.
The district saying Liam is among four students recently detained.
unidentified
The sense of safety in our community and around our schools is shaken and our hearts are shattered.
And honestly, at the end of the day, children should be in school with their classmates.
But DHS telling a different story, saying ICE did not target a child, claiming Liam's father is an undocumented immigrant and fled on foot, abandoning his son in the driveway.
Tonight, during a visit here in Minneapolis, Vice President JD Vance saying the agents were protecting the child.
The father abandoned the child to go run off to get away from ICE.
That's what they're alleging, right?
Then you hear the follow-up to which didn't come obviously from ABC News, but came from DHS, DHS coming out and saying that we actually tried to give the alleged mother custody of the child, of her own child, but she refused because she refused to come out of the home.
So they abandoned their child.
They are leaving that part completely out.
They don't want you to know that.
And then ABC News cuts this point in.
Multiple people on scene want to take custody of the kid.
You mean strangers?
Left-wing liberals wanted to snatch a child up and take him into their home.
Imagine if federal agents were just giving away children.
That is trying to very much so spin your own narrative.
They're all full of it.
They're all full of it.
And it's really frustrating to sit back and listen to because they just continue to go out there and spew lies.
They've got nothing but lies.
Even Kamala Harris jumping on board now and she's spewing lies, trying to again drum up the narrative that this Ramos five-year-old kid was somehow, some way used.
Thankfully, though, Trish McLaughlin, who is probably one of the best spokeswomen you're going to find in the communications world, I would say comms, but some of you probably don't know what that is, the communications department of these companies.
She's by far one of the best.
She's been going out there and fact-checking every single person's page because, again, why would ICE, knowing how controversial things are right now in Minnesota, why would they use a child as bait?
It doesn't make sense when they know that they're trying to win a PR war here.
But the mainstream media, the politicians, everyone's on their side.
So they're going to go spend these narratives how they want to.
By the way, also, this screenshot, I guess this would be a tweet.
Democrats, it's their official page keeps pushing that lie, that same exact lie.
A five-year-old coming home from preschool had been used as human bait.
His teachers describe him as a bright young student.
These monsters are sick.
They weren't sick, though, when Barack Obama was doing his mass deportations.
They weren't sick then, but now they're sick.
Now they're demonized by Democrats.
It's just, it's so insane that we've gotten to this point.
And it's getting even worse, right?
Because now we have these communist Democrats who are trying to convince the American people, of course, that non-U.S. citizens who are here illegally, that they're too, they too are Americans.
The reason I released a video yesterday last week informing my constituents about increased ICE presence in Orlando, where there's a huge Haitian diaspora, we're very worried about the targeting of our Haitian brothers, sisters, and siblings across the entire country.
And us as a community, we have to band together to protect Americans.
And you're an American regardless of what your legal status is.
You can't just come into our country, invade, and then think that we're going to allow you to stay here and then pretend like you're an American citizen.
What's Frost hoping here?
He's hoping you're just as stupid as he is.
He's a communist pushing his agenda.
And no, they are not our Haitian brothers and sisters.
They are people who were intentionally brought into this country, by the way, for the Haitian cause by the Biden regime, flown in actually, because they were trying to change communities demographically, of course.
And so they were strategically brought into this country and put in areas they don't belong in because they have no roots in these areas.
Because what are they trying to do?
Well, they're obviously trying to change the demographics of this country.
And that's exactly what they did.
So don't hit me with the, there are Haitian brothers and sisters.
No, they're actually foreigners who need to go back to their countries.
And it gets even worse.
There's this woman out there, Nasara Ahmed, a 23-year-old U.S. citizen, is what they're saying.
And I did ask the agents for comment.
It was kind of last minute.
So I'm still waiting to hear back from them on this front.
But apparently she was arrested and detained by ICE.
And you got to listen to her story because her story is quite laughable.
Well, law enforcement has just released the photo of the two federal agents that called her the N-word while beating her up.
And here they are on your screen, folks.
All right, that's a bad joke.
But the reality of it is, this is all fake.
This is all fake.
The theatrics is fake.
I did ask DHS specifically for her background.
Why was she apprehended?
I'll let you know when we find that out.
But folks, come on.
We've seen this time and time again.
We're done with these fake, epithetic stories.
Why did ICE have to detain you?
Why did the federal agents have to detain you?
There's probably a reason why.
You see, they keep saying, oh, Americans are being arrested.
Well, no, Americans.
And again, we don't know what her situation was.
We're still waiting for details.
But I could promise you this.
The Americans that are being arrested are being arrested because they're being jerks.
Because they're trying to inject, and jerks was the better choice of word.
What I was actually going to say.
They're being arrested because they are trying their very best to stop ICE from doing their jobs.
And it's all intentional.
This isn't an accident.
They are actually there for a reason.
They are there for a reason.
They are there to try to stop ICE from doing their jobs, to try to intimidate them.
But the American people voted for ICE to do their jobs.
We're not going to sit here and bow out like they did in the BLM riots.
We're not going to sit here and pretend like these people have a backbone to stand on, like these people are fighting for truth.
That's a load of garbage.
That's a load of garbage.
And the vilification of these ICE agents, which is so wild to me considering the fact that when they were doing their job just a few years ago, no one had a problem with them.
But now they're demons.
Now they're demons.
Now they're Nazis.
People like Eric Swalwell in Clip 7, they just love going out there and consistently spewing lies.
Eric Swawell never gets fact checked in live time.
And it's really frustrating because he's not very intelligent.
So if you wanted just a viral clip, all you had to do is ask him simple questions.
But that doesn't happen on CNN, on MSNBC.
So that's why he goes there because it's a safe place.
I think that if you continue to work for them now, seeing what they're doing, dragging women by their hair through the streets, deporting a four-year-old battling stage for cancer, shooting a mother in the face three times, if you still work for them, that's a choice.
All right, guys, we got more to discuss in just a bit.
Don't go anywhere.
In the meantime, though, head on over to the alexjon store.com because we have incredible deals, a very various amount of discounts heading over to the shop right now.
T-shirts, 25% off.
So are the hoodies.
Hats are 20% off.
And when it comes to your favorite vitamins, well, you could save up to 45% off on some of your favorites.
Other discounts do vary, though, as well.
So, head on over to the alexjonstore.com, check out the savings that are going on right now, and we'll be right back with more to discuss in a little bit.
unidentified
You're tuned in to the American Journal with your host, Breanna Morello.
We're excited you're all jumping on board with us today.
Just so you know, in the second hour of the show, we'll be taking your calls.
So, if you want to give us a call, talk about stories we've discussed thus far throughout this week, I guess I could say.
The number is 877-789-2539.
That's 877-789-2539 is the number you could call into to chat with me and our audience.
So, give us a call if you want to join the show.
All right, folks, I wanted to bring your attention back to a story that we discussed earlier this week.
It has to do with an individual who just happens to have the middle name Jihad.
He did a horrific, horrific, horrific attack, murdered three innocent men who were here as just Horace in Florida.
We're here in Orlando, I guess I should say.
So, not here technically, but I'll be in Florida in a little bit.
But the story itself is just an absolute tragedy.
This individual was acquitted prior because they didn't think he was mentally capable of being able to be held accountable for his own actions.
This is something, too, that has a lot of people very frustrated because this could have been preventable, right?
These three people would still be alive today if, you know, people did their jobs, if people stopped having empathy for individuals like that.
Keep in mind, originally he was charged with shooting at another person in a gas station.
So, he's got a record for this, okay?
Went out, murdered three people, stalked them prior, and it's an absolute horrible situation here.
Now, this happened in Orlando, and the state attorney over there, Monica Worrell, well, is an individual who is trying to, and I could be nice and say that she's not trying to directly do this, right?
She doesn't maybe have a conscious effort that she's putting into this, or I could be realistic with you and I could say, this is just another liberal who's trying to make excuses for a horrible human being who shouldn't even be in this place.
And by this place, I mean this country, this world.
When people do heinous crimes like this and we ignore the earlier signs of all of it, there's always signs.
There's always signs.
And he has a record.
He has a record.
Before I play the state attorney's comments, I want to remind our audience that he has a record.
According to the local sheriff over there, they've apparently received 41 calls to his home.
That's from 2006 to 2022.
16 of those calls were about aggressive behavior.
That's according to local reports.
So obviously, someone not mentally well, middle name Jihad, you probably didn't give him a good running start at life, mom.
But the attorney had this to say in regards to why he no longer was getting the mental help that he was supposed to be receiving.
Oh, now's not the time for political discussions, but you had no problem doing that in your lead in because obviously she's liberal.
I mean, it was very obvious, right?
She wants you to empathize for an individual who just killed and murdered, executed three innocent men.
So she wants you to feel bad because he couldn't afford the $7.
He couldn't afford the $150.
He couldn't, it got too expensive for him.
Cut the crap, lady.
Cut the crap.
My empathy is with the victims and not the suspect.
See, that's the difference between the rest of us and liberals.
Liberals always want you to be empathetic towards suspects.
Oh, he couldn't afford treatment anymore.
The three victims, they're just collateral damage.
And who even needs a criminal defense attorney when you have prosecutors like that?
Prosecutors that want you to be empathetic towards the suspects.
Three men just enjoying their vacation, brutally murdered by an individual whose middle name is Jihad.
By the way, we still don't have motive, in case you're wondering.
We still don't have motive.
But this is why it's just so painful, so painful to deal with these liberal prosecutors.
I hear story after story.
Everyone reaches out to me about what's going on here in Austin, that all the liberal, the liberal prosecutor here who's running the show, by far one of the worst in the country, probably, I'd say top, top.
They shouldn't have these positions because they don't want to actually equally apply the law.
They want to apply the law based on their own personal beliefs, which is liberalism, communism, Marxism, whichever angle these people are at, that's where they're spewing this from.
Empathetic.
You want me to feel bad for a guy who got off on shooting another person at another person in a gas station just a couple of years back?
You want me to feel bad for him because he couldn't afford the $150 a month for his mental health treatment?
I'm sure there's a service that would have helped him out.
But then again, why are they out in the streets?
Again, Jury was the one who did this, by the way.
People want you to be empathetic towards the suspects.
F the suspects.
People like that who commit heinous crimes, allegedly.
I'm just so done with it.
This case needs to be a death penalty case, but I know what they're going to do.
The defense attorneys, even if you do make it a death penalty case, they will say, oh, he's not mentally well.
You can't do that.
Because again, we, I'm emo, we as a country have more empathy for the suspects than the actual victims of crime.
And this is just more proof of just that.
Speaking of Texas, too.
Well, I'll get to this in a second, actually.
Let's go to this one first.
Clip nine, Jasmine Crockett.
As many of you guys know, she is a one of the lovely gifts of low voter turnout that Texas has given this country.
And she's in Congress, obviously.
But, you know, we tried fixing this issue by just nuking her seat.
That didn't really work because she's trying to run for Senate.
And I don't think she's going to win, but she's trying her best.
We'll talk about that in a little bit.
But Jasmine Crockett is doing her very best to call people criminals.
And she did this, or this is actually a slip of her tongue.
She tried referring to Jack Smith.
And she caught herself as a career criminal, but she was actually referring to something else and it slipped.
They didn't really want you out public because they were afraid of what you would say, which is that you could have proven your case because you are a career prosecutor who knows how to prosecute criminals.
He almost said the truth could have slipped through those lips.
Good thing she caught herself, though, because that would have been a bad clip for Jack Smith.
Jack Smith obviously didn't have a very good day yesterday, although it wasn't really a bombshell day.
I won't oversell you on it, but he did testify yesterday in front of the judiciary committee.
We're jumping in and out of it.
Nothing bombshell.
The deposition was more interesting than the actual testimony was.
But I guess you could say there was a little interesting moment that took place.
Congressman Troy Nels, who has obviously been a fighter for Jay Sixers in regards to the treatments in jails and trying to get to the truth.
And he really isn't even partisan on the issue.
He was strongly about prosecuting those that committed acts of violence against law enforcement that day, but he also wanted to make sure that people weren't being abused.
And that was obviously going on.
So Congressman Troy Nels has been, I would say, fair on the issue itself.
But in clip 10, while he's trying to explain the multiple failures that took place on January 6th, you'll notice that there is a troll that's sitting behind the witness, and that being Jack Smith, and he seems to be making some, you know, gestures.
And he also extremely, he has a cough that he can't seem to get rid of, where he just happens to drop a curse word.
We know the Capitol leadership team, specifically Yogananda Pittman, had the intelligence, and there was going to be a high propensity for violence that day.
And the Capitol itself was the target.
We knew the extremist groups are going to be there.
And why do I say that?
It was your own report from your intelligence section, the IICD, which was run by Pittman in the January 3rd special event section.
Well, they don't like you calling them out for their nonsense.
By the way, this is a fake tough guy, a very fake tough guy.
We're going to get you this clip of Kara Kashinova grilling him and it's quite the laughable moment.
But the two officers that were there at the hearing, let's just be very clear.
These two officers are accused of perjury.
These two officers, we could just focus on Harry Dunn for half a second here.
Harry Dunn, the guy who looks like Shrek, who's just moping around, that guy is a liar, liar, a liar.
It is in my personal belief that he sat there and he knowingly lied during the criminal trials of the Oath Keepers.
We know this because Steve Baker's uncovered the footage that shows that his testimony was completely false in regards to the fact that he said the oath keepers were also the agitators that day.
How do we know this?
Well, Harry Dunn did fill out a document.
That document was suppressed from ever getting into the courtroom.
That document actually said that the oath keepers were helpful to him that day.
Somebody likely got in his ear and told him, can't have that in here.
But Kara Kashinova, you can't land a punch on Karakashinova because that girl, not only is she a professional fighter, but she's also a fighter for real causes like Jay Sixers.
And she had quite the very laughable moment when she decided to confront this coward.
Jack Smith testified about how he had proof beyond reasonable doubt that Donald Trump incited, orchestrated, and funded the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6th, 2021.
Well, I think your question assumes something that's not necessarily an evidence, which is that when there are American citizens who have been caught up in some of these enforcement operations, very often it is people who have assaulted a law enforcement officer.
They're not being arrested because they violated the immigration laws.
They're being arrested because they punched a federal law enforcement officer.
So you're Dan and you're a media figure and you've got one of the biggest podcasts in the country and you're making tons of money and you're having a great time, which he was.
You just built this brand new studio in Florida.
You work with your wife who you really like, what she does.
And you get the call saying you'd be deputy FBI director and you're like, I love Donald Trump.
I love this country.
I will, you know, cut my pay by into a tenth of what it was.
And I will leave my house and move to DC, which is a kind of prison sentence itself.
And I will do this because I love the president.
I love the country.
And you're there a few months.
And all of a sudden, everybody thinks you're covering up Epstein's crimes.
And it kind of wrecks Dan's career.
Like he can't go back.
It's going to be very hard at this point.
I mean, things may change, but as of today, pretty hard for Dan to go back to his podcast audience and be like, I'm telling you the truth when they all think he's covering up for Epstein.
Who did that?
Pam Bondi did that.
And I don't know that she did it on purpose.
I'm assuming not.
I don't think she's a mean person.
I've never gotten that sense.
But for whatever reason, she went out there and said things that were not true that she could not back up.
And then they issued this memo thinking that it would clear everything up.
And I guess they're just so dumb, they didn't realize that if you tell everybody you have the tapes of these crimes and then you issue a memo saying you're not going to prosecute anybody for the crimes, what are you saying?
I'm covering up for the perpetrators of these crimes.
Duh?
They have no one with an IQ over 80 over there to read the memos?
Are you kidding?
You know, I'm not exactly sure how that happened, but I do know that it leaves a guy like Dan in a horrible position.
Yeah, I mean, folks, he obviously is going to have a rough road ahead.
His podcast is expected to begin next month.
And, you know, the best way to handle this, just from a PR perspective, because I've done crisis management in my lifetime, that's one of the many hats I wear, would be just to come forward and just speak the truth.
Now, obviously, can't tell you everything.
There's ongoing investigations and that I understand.
But the Epstein saga needs to be detailed.
You can't get past that.
You can't get past that.
Rather than going out there and attacking individuals, which I don't think is the right way to go about it.
If a journalist is actually throwing punches at you, then definitely fight back.
But just to sit here and say that if you disagree with the report, you're a black pillar.
Or if you disagree with criticism, you're a black pillar.
These labels don't work.
We've seen it during the pandemic when they tried labeling us as conspiracy theorists based on our own beliefs that the vaccines weren't actually vaccines.
They tried their very best to do that and it didn't work.
Trying to throw names on people doesn't work.
My advice for this entire situation for Dan Bongino would just be simply to come forward and tell the truth.
And I, again, I've said it before like a thousand times.
I don't think Dan Bongino is a bad person.
I knew him before he went in.
That's why I endorsed him.
I thought he was going to be great at this.
But the Epstein files clearly was a DOJ issue, not FBI-related.
I know this because I've been speaking to people across the agencies, and it's always been the focus that the FBI was trying to push this forward, but it all fell to the DOJ.
So keep that in the back of your minds.
All right, folks, buckle up.
We got more to discuss in just a bit.
We're going to be taking your calls in the next hour: 877-789-2539 is the number to call 877-789-2539.
And again, we got a great sale going on right now over at the AlexJonesStore.com.
25% off hats, sorry, hoodies, t-shirts, hats are 20% off.
There's also incredible discounts across the line when it comes to supplements.
So you've got to head on over to thealexjonesdoor.com right now.
First, we'll be welcoming an attorney in just a little bit.
And then after that, we'll take your calls.
But you know what?
I see that Jim in Montana wants to talk about an exclusive story broke to you guys here during the week in regards to a possible either theft of a bioagent or a leak of a bioagent that came from a Montana lab.
It's a Fauci bio lab.
So, Jim, I see that you're from Montana and you had something you wanted to talk about in regards to that story.
I've been trying for years to get FOIA requests from them, and I've received nothing.
But I was able to get some traction with that report to my state rep, and she was totally appalled that one, she wasn't notified, nobody was notified about that.
I can also tell you that if you think that it's just Americans working at this lab, I know for a fact that there's nations that of questionable whatever come here and do testing at that lab.
I can also tell you, I can also tell you that they did an upgrade, and I was talking with one of the contractors there, and he said they were installing cages with the labeling on them, human primate.
Haven't been able to get in touch with our local congressmen, but all I can say is if people of the United States don't understand how important InfoWars is, there are hundreds of bio-level three and four labs.
Well, there's 13 bio-level four labs across the nation: Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana.
Well, Jim, first off, I want you to email me so we could talk about this off cam because I want to figure out who that state, if you don't, or if you want to disclose the name of the state rep who's helping you, or you could just email it to me, whatever is your preference.
But, you know, I just texted Justin Goodman because he was the one who was able to obtain these records.
And so Goodman's all over this.
This story has blown up since we've covered it here on this show.
He's the one who runs the White Coat Waste Project.
This is on his radar.
So, Jim, I want you to actually email me.
And if you're comfortable giving us any information about the state rep and what she might be doing, we'd love to hear that as well.
She's going to, I talked to her yesterday and she's going to do everything in her power to try and get any other information.
But she's pretty sure that not only was she not contacted, our county seat wasn't contacted, our emergency services wasn't contacted, and our sheriff wasn't contacted.
Well, you know, Jim, we're going to be on this and I want you to email me.
We'll give you just BriannaMorella at protonmail.com.
That's where the tips come in from.
That's where my team helps go through it.
So Jim, I do want you to email me, though.
I do want you to send me some details.
I'm going to connect with Jim, with Justin on this one, and we'll figure out what's going on there in Montana together because this is a big one that we need to keep talking about and we can't let up on this one.
Jim, thank you for calling the show on that.
That was a story that we were very honored to kind of unleash on this show on Infowars.
Obviously, this is the platform where we aren't afraid to talk about these things.
And we'll keep talking about it.
We'll keep talking about it.
Jim, thank you for your coverage as well and looking into this issue.
We greatly appreciate it.
All right, guys, buckle up.
Robert Gouveya is going to be joining us Nasty next.
He's a criminal defense attorney.
We've got so much to catch up with him on.
unidentified
So don't go anywhere.
You're tuned in to the American Journal with your host, Breanna Morello.
I want to give you an update about that Montana story in just a little bit, that lab leak.
We're learning more about specifically what actually was leaked in that lab.
And guys, it's very, very concerning.
But I don't want to hold up our next guest because he has done an incredible job at working with our tough schedule over here.
I want to talk a little bit about the arrests.
As many of you guys know, we opened with the show about those three individuals who went inside of a church in Minnesota and decided to unleash what they call a protest.
It obviously isn't a protest, and it obviously is something that the FACE Act was pretty much drafted up for for people like this.
You know, they were totally, they decided not to.
And the pastor did repeatedly want to carry on with service, but apparently it looks like he was not able to do just that.
Delivery of Christian Services Interrupted00:09:51
One of those individuals who has since been arrested is William Kelly.
Now, this individual, I've seen a lot of videos about him online, doesn't seem to be in a great state of mind, but I want you to listen specifically to what he says here in clip 13.
He's a criminal defense attorney and he also streams the show Spotlight of Justice.
Catch him on X as well.
Make sure you give him a follow.
Robert, it's an honor to have you on the show today.
You know, we want to talk a little bit about the FACE Act, because I know that this is something that a lot of Americans were pushing for after what they saw unravel in Minnesota on Sunday.
You know, so many people were there to worship and they weren't able to finish service because of these so-called protesters.
What do you make of Kelly's claims there where he specifically is saying, I mean, it sounds like he's pretty much, if you just take that clip and you play it in front of a jury, it sounds exactly what the FACE Act was created to prevent from happening.
First of all, thanks, Brianna, for having us here.
It was very disturbing what we saw there.
And I think the three arrests are a good start.
But it wasn't just William Kelly.
It was also the rest of them.
I mean, we even saw Don Lamont outside before they went inside the church, all kind of talking about their intention to disrupt the delivery of services, which was exactly what the FACE Act was set up for.
And we went back and looked through a bunch of the other Biden prosecutions for FACE Act crimes, and they went wild.
I mean, they were throwing people in prison for years, like 57 months, I think was the max.
And what they were saying is that these people who they prosecuted and arrested were preventing the delivery of abortion services.
Many people just kind of hanging outside abortion clinics, praying, you know, kind of doing a civil protest outside abortion clinics.
They went to prison for years.
And when they were creating their cases and doing their investigations, they looked at their live streams.
They looked at their comments.
They look at the things that they said after the fact, just like this guy, just like William Kelly.
And Chantelle, the other woman who had her picture on the screen, and Neki Malevi, they've been doing the same thing.
They've been going around after the fact, talking about, yeah, they wanted to essentially get in people's faces and make them uncomfortable.
And the FACE Act, if the Biden administration can use it to prevent or to prosecute people who are preventing the delivery of abortion services, it also covers religious practice and religious worship.
And so in this case, we saw not only these three people, a bunch of others, I think, that hopefully are under the scope of this investigation who are also preventing the delivery of Christian services.
And so I think that what we saw was actually very, very nice developments from the DOJ because they moved relatively quickly on this.
For the prior FACE Act prosecutions, the Biden people, it took them years actually to decide to bring these cases.
There's a little bit more complex history there because they were actually prosecuting FACE Act violations from the Trump administration.
And then once the Dobbs decision came down, the abortion decision, they really ratcheted up that whole line of attack.
So it took them years, though, but here, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, Christy Noam, right, they got this thing done in a week.
And I think that there's going to be a lot more to come, hopefully.
And I want to ask you about the magistrate judge who's being called in the question here because there are reports and I don't think the DOJ has even confirmed any of this publicly, but there are reports that there was a certain magistrate judge in Minnesota who refused to sign off on the arrest warrant of Don Lemon.
They're saying that his name is Douglas Miko.
Apparently his wife also works at the, well, separately, but also works for the assistant attorney general in Minnesota, which is obviously A.G. Keith Elson.
So there's obviously a conflict of interest here.
Number one being that we now hear that this magistrate judge is refusing to sign off on the arrest warrant.
Can you just take it to another magistrate judge?
And number two, wouldn't a judge, shouldn't a judge just say, okay, there's a conflict of interest here and possibly bow out of being involved in any of this?
Yeah, you would imagine a judge like this would recuse himself.
Of course, we're discovering this right now.
So we're still waiting for the charging documents to all get dropped.
They just got arrested yesterday.
So presumably we'll get to see a little bit of a paper trail on this.
But yeah, absolutely.
I think this judge should have recused himself.
And it's even worse than the fact that just, you know, his wife happens to work for Keith Ellison, who is the attorney general there in Minnesota, the chief law enforcement officer.
And this is a magistrate judge.
So it's not an actual U.S. appointed judge, like an officially appointed judge.
He's almost like a judicial aide in a way.
And so he doesn't have the same authority as a regular duly appointed U.S. federal judge.
And so I think that there will be other avenues of attack that they can use to go to a grand jury, to try to basically get this judge receded off of any of their cases that handle, you know, Don Lemon, for example, and try to find a different judge, a different set of charges.
They could even go through a grand jury proceeding and bring a case that way if they think a grand jury would indict Don.
But the bigger issue, I think, with this judge is certainly his wife, yes, works for Keith Ellison, the AG, but Keith Ellison, the AG, jumped on a podcast with Don Lemon and was actually kind of playing patty cake with him after the fact, after this whole thing occurred.
So in other words, if the judge would have allowed Don Lemon to be indicted by the DOJ, and I think that there's plenty of cause there for that.
Don says he was just a journalist.
He was there before, during, and after, even after he was asked to leave, he was continuing to harass the parishioners, people who were there just to pray and kind of having conversations with them, getting in their faces.
And this judge, if he were to have, you know, basically no charge Don Lemon, I'm sorry, if he would have charged Don Lemon, he ultimately did a no charge, it would have been in direct opposition to his wife's boss who said on the podcast with him that he was protected by the First Amendment, which is completely erroneous.
I think he forgot the entire analysis about the FACE Act.
But if the chief attorney general, if the chief law enforcement officer is telling Don he's innocent and then another federal judge comes in and allows him to be criminally charged, I think that that's not going to bode well for the wife.
And this judge shouldn't have even made that decision knowing that there was this close proximity with his wife on Ellison's staff, essentially.
And then Ellison defending Don Lamond at every turn, hopping on podcasts with him, basically trying to set the tone and create a narrative that you can't charge Don.
And maybe that was persuasive on this judge.
So hopefully the DOJ is doubling down on this and demanding that that judge doesn't make decisions on mission critical issues when he's married to somebody who works for Keith Ellison.
But you can't instigate the crime and then report on the crime.
And these two were colluding together.
I think they were co-conspirators because she didn't have the microphone, the megaphone.
She didn't have the big audience.
And he didn't have the foot soldiers to go in there and interrupt this church.
So they worked together.
She was performing for him and he was covering her performance.
And so together, I think that they were part of this operation.
And for Don then to turn around and say, no, I'm just an innocent journal, that didn't apply to other journals on, for example, J6, who all got arrested and served prison time.
They didn't say, we're just reporting on things.
You can't arrest us.
They rounded them up and put them in jail.
So Don trying to use this journalist force field, I think, might stall this out a little bit.
But ultimately, based on the things that he did, right, there's indicia that he had intent, that he was there to obstruct, that he wasn't just there reporting as an independent journalist.
He was part of this operation.
And so hopefully the DOJ keeps the pressure on him and we get a non-biased judge who can look at this case fairly and apply the same standard that they would have applied to pro-lifers who were praying outside facilities.
I mean, Bev Williams is someone who I sat down with and spoke with her after she was released from prison.
And she was someone who they said that she committed violence, but it wasn't that.
She was just trying to sit down and do a sit-in protest outside of an abortion clinic.
And then one of the employees jammed their hand by opening up the door where Bev was sitting.
And that's how the injury was created.
But she was sentenced to three years in prison.
And this was a young mother who they were trying to take away from her kids.
And so if we're all playing by the same set of standards, yeah, that should happen.
And, you know, they give them the James O'Keefe treatment, you know, raid their homes.
And then when you ask for an explanation as to why the raid happened, give them a heavily rejected document as a justification and tell them, good luck with that.
You know, I was there when Steve Baker, and as you were just alluding to there, Steve Baker, JSIC's reporter, was inside the Capitol when everything was going down.
And because they believed that Steve had some conservative beliefs, they deemed him not as a journalist.
And so he was going to, he was facing prison time.
So if we're all playing by the same set of rules and Don Lemon needs a mug shot and I can't wait for it, I've already got the merch ready to go once we get that up and running.
I want to switch up yours a little bit because, you know, a lot of us have been waiting to hear from Jack Smith.
And yesterday, it wasn't so groundbreaking, the testimony.
I enjoyed his deposition more than the public testimony that we heard yesterday.
But there was an interesting moment where Jack Smith was asked about the confidential sources that were paid thousands of our dollars to during his investigation in Clip 14.
My recollection and understanding is the payment, the $20,000 that I approved was for a confidential human source to assist in the review of video and photographic evidence showing people who were attacking the Capitol, attacking police officers, obstructing the proceeding, and seeing if we could prove that some of those people had come directly.
They created evidence of, you know, bad phone call with Trump and Raffensburger in Georgia.
They said Trump was trying to insurrect the Capitol building when he said, go peacefully and patriotically protest, right?
They have been perverting evidence consistently.
They tried to throw him off the ballot so we couldn't even vote for him just by virtue of the fact that judges were upset with J6.
So $20,000 for a confidential human source that he doesn't even know who that person is.
It's like, that's a lot of money for somebody to just kind of throw away on an unnamed person for some reason.
So I think that they were probably manufacturing evidence and trying to identify areas that they could use that were useful because they didn't have anything else.
And I think about the opportunity cost too, the $35 million is probably a low estimate, but Trump had to come out of pocket to defend that, right?
So at least $35 million that we paid for, by the way, and then he has to come back and maybe double or triple that.
All of that is money that could have been used for the campaign.
Instead, he had to fight back against a political attack by illegitimate Jack Smith, by the way, who another, I think, bombshell of the whole hearing was that his oath was very problematic when he was originally appointed.
And we saw that the Mar-a-Lago, the classified documents case, got dismissed on the basis that Jack Smith is illegitimate because of the statutes that they used to create the special counsel, which were fake.
You know, they were not even really legitimate is what Cannon found out.
But yesterday, we also heard that his oath that he was supposed to take with a witness and a signature was also invalid.
And we went back and we looked at the timeline on this.
And I think this is extremely scandalous because remember, Trump got appointed or actually re-announced that he was going to run for president November 15, 2022.
So November 15, 2022, has not been indicted yet by Jack Smith.
Jack gets appointed November 18th.
So about three days later, Jack comes in, takes the first oath.
There's a huge problem with the first oath because it's missing a witness, essentially.
So he signed it illegally.
So then Jack, right after that, he's got an illegal oath.
He indicts Trump twice, June 8th, 23, August 1st, 23.
Trump gets indicted twice.
Then the DOJ, Merrick Garland, Lisa Monaco, and the rest of them, they came back in October.
So the second indictment is August 23.
Jack takes a second oath, October 23, and that's essentially to ratify the prior bad oath.
And so we have seen recently the judges just tripping all over themselves to throw out Trump prosecutor cases.
For example, Lindsey Halligan, Alina Abba, these two U.S. attorneys, bringing cases.
Judges on their own sua spontane just say, oh, you're illegal.
In fact, one of them was screaming in Halligan, saying you have to get off your cases or I'm going to refer you to the bar.
I'm going to refer you for ethics complaints because the judges are kind of vetting and validating Trump U.S. attorneys.
But Jack Smith never had that same problem.
And the judges, Judge Chutkin was going to allow him to run a trial in like nine months.
Bruce Reinhart was, you know, signing off search warrants for the case that Jack Smith ultimately inherited.
And nobody questioned any of it at all.
But we learned, even Jack, he's like, I don't remember, just like in that clip you played.
I don't remember who gave me the oath.
I don't remember the second oath.
I don't remember the reason for the second oath.
We all know what the reason is is because the first oath was invalid.
And if you have an illegally appointed U.S. attorney, those indictments should have never come down the line either.
And nobody caught that throughout the entire process.
In fact, Trump had to fight for it in Mar-a-Lago to get Judge Cannon to dismiss his case.
It was like a never-ending battle.
And so the ramifications of that, what are the consequences of that?
Did Merrick Garland, did Lisa Monaco, did Jack Smith know that all of this was illegal?
And then they just basically covered it up and tried to ratify it after the fact.
It's scandalous.
The whole thing was illegitimate from its inception.
And we're starting to learn more about it.
The question, of course, is what will the consequences be?
Will Congress make a criminal referral over to Pam Bondi or will Pam Bondi pick this up and run with it?
But we're still learning more about the Jack Smith case, and it's still kind of open because there's volume two of Jack Smith's report that we're battling about in Florida.
In fact, Trump just submitted an oppositional brief to prevent Judge Cannon from releasing that because volume one was already released.
That was the J6 case.
And it's a fake report created by a fake, illegitimate prosecutor.
So now we're trying to battle to keep the second volume from coming out, but that's taking place in Cannon's courtroom right now in Florida.
And Cannon, I have to say, is by far the fairest judge that we've seen thus far.
So we'll see how that pans out.
But she's been pretty solid on all of this.
I wanted to get your take on this.
This is a big story earlier this week.
And I just want to kind of hear what the next phase of all of this is, because obviously Bill and Hillary Clinton think that they are above the law and that they don't have to actually show up when they're subpoenaed to do so in front of a congressional committee.
And because of all of that, shockingly, nine Democrats on the House Oversight Committee voted to actually hold Bill in contempt, while I believe it was three sided with Republicans for the separate vote on Hillary Clinton.
So obviously they're fired up on this issue and it's something that both sides agree on, probably because they both signed off on the subpoena in the first place.
But what do you make of this?
And what's the next step moving forward?
Does this go straight to the DOJ and we wait for Pam Bonnie to do something, hopefully?
It should require a full House vote, is my understanding.
And then from there, it will go over to Pam Bondi as a legitimate criminal referral.
If I remember correctly, that's how it happened with Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon and the others who got held in contempt of Congress.
So it should be happening pretty soon.
And I, like you, was very surprised by this.
I thought, wow, this is interesting that Democrats, some of them, not all of them, are sticking to their guns, essentially, right?
They voted to issue the subpoenas for Bill and Hillary.
Then they threw a big fit when they didn't show up for the depot.
And we had James Comer and others come out in the halls of Congress and say, where are they?
Why aren't they here?
And at that moment, a bunch of Democrats kind of reversed and like, well, we don't need them.
You know, you didn't bring in these other people who you sent subpoenas to.
And Bill Clinton is a former president.
So we should, you know, be nice to him.
And that was, I think, an indicator that they were not going to vote ultimately to take this out of committee and bring it to the full floor for a contempt vote.
But a couple of them did to their credit.
And I think it's because they're pretty much anchored in on this.
I don't think that they realize that when they were going to send the subpoena out, that James Comer had evidence that Bill Clinton, he gave us these numbers.
17 times, apparently, Epstein went to the White House while Bill Clinton was president, which is just wild to me.
And that has not been, I think, a big headline that we've been seeing spread around from the media.
It's quite the opposite.
And then 27 times on the airplane.
So this criminal referral, and the Clintons are saying it's illegitimate.
The subpoenas are illegitimate.
There's no legitimate legislative purpose and blah, blah, blah.
But I think it's even maybe more legitimate than any of the J6 subpoenas because this is actually a bipartisan consensus in Congress.
We actually have Democrats on this committee who voted for it, whereas the J6 select committee was illegally constituted under the rules they just threw on, you know, two token Republicans.
So I think these actually carry more force and weight under the law.
And if Bill Clinton is going to say something like he's got presidential immunity for having Jeffrey Epstein over to his house over to the White House, then he can make that argument in criminal court.
But I would imagine, and this happened very rapidly under the last administration, when Liz Cheney sent the criminal contempt referrals over to Merrick Garland, they had Bannon and Navarro arrested quickly.
So I don't know exactly what the arrest procedure will look like for a former president.
I mean, they were gearing that up for Trump, but the Clintons, I expect to be referred over.
And I think that even some Democrats, as long as the Republicans stay unified in their votes, I think that they may even get some Democrats to flip this over and the Clintons may really be facing contempt.
We're going to take some calls on this portion of the hour.
We'll also take some calls in the third hour of the show as well.
So if you want to join the program, 877-789-2539 is the number to call.
That's 877-789-2539.
It's the number you're going to want to call into.
I just wanted to give you an update.
I actually just confirmed this with an FBI source.
Over at the FBI, they've just made another round of firings.
They've conducted this round, and it includes a lot of people who were involved in the Mar-a-Lago raid.
Kash Patel, the FBI director, has apparently ousted the field office heads, as well as additional senior agents tied to two of the criminal probes involving President Trump.
That's according to someone I've just actually spoken to.
The special agent in charge, Netalanta Field Office, has been dismissed, along with an acting assistant director overseeing the New York field office.
Now, again, folks, this is obviously something they've been calling on for a long time.
So this is all very important.
There was also apparently a former special agent in charge in New Orleans who has since been transitioned to a new role, but was also removed.
So that person's gone now.
That's kind of like the phase of the firings that they do there.
And then Miami, I should also add, up to six agents were let go due to their roles in those searches, specifically, though, the Mar-a-Lago raid.
So we are learning just that.
This has been confirmed that the director of the FBI has since made some new firings, which give us, you know, some hope.
We recently had, you know, the five-year anniversary of the January 6th stuff, and we talked about the capital officer turning off his body cam or whatever.
What always gets me is within a day of Brian Sicknick's death, a U.S. Capitol Police officer, hey man, the U.S. Capitol Police and the U.S. Justice Department both announced that his death was due to injuries from the attack.
And so they performed an autopsy and then they cremated him.
But just like within a few days, they took his body, I'm sorry, his ash to the rotunda, the Capitol Dome.
I mean, it took 11 years to build the Capitol dome.
It's 160 years old this year.
I mean, there's only been 43 people ever that have laid in state.
And this is because he got clobbered in the head with a fire extinguisher and it turns out he wasn't.
And then they said, well, it was a reaction to bear spray.
But then, you know, the autopsy says that's not what it was.
So I'm so sorry for that guy.
He didn't deserve to get drug into this quagmire.
But I'm just saying that to me, that's the stain that politics is so bad that you would put a guy in the same way that we put President Kennedy in there.
You're going to put him in there just because you're so quick to blame us that insurrection that happened, you know, where people were killed, so forth.
But not a word about, you know, the poor Air Force veteran that got killed.
If you do that, Tim, then you've ruined the narrative.
And so they needed those opportunities.
And again, a lot of those, and they kept counting the suicides, too, as deaths, saying that all these officers killed themselves afterwards.
I mean, it really wasn't that bad on January 6th.
So to blame it on J6 is wild.
But then also when you hear about all of this, when you hear specifically about the people involved and you look at the two officers that were there, you know, Dopey and his friend, you kind of go, ah, well, you know, this is why it happened because you guys were a bunch of cowards.
Okay, well, Chuck, I want to jump in here because I don't want to pivot from your opener when you said that we're going to lose the war itself.
I don't think that's the mentality we have here over Infowars.
You know, we claim all these victories.
And as you're detailing now, the Montana Lab story, which we broke on this show, is a massive victory.
Yeah, you could say it's a small one in regards to the much larger war.
But if we were a bunch of cowards and we had negativity in our hearts and we were just walking around preaching doomsday, guess what?
We would have been conquered years ago.
So thanks to the great work that's done here on InfoWars, where we have a platform where I could expose stories like the Montana Lab League story.
And now it's much bigger.
In fact, we're learning that this is actually a virus that was potentially leaked.
We are the reasons why there will be changes made.
As you heard, the caller who called into the show at the top of the hour, he's now saying that there's local lawmakers who, after seeing our report that we broke to you exclusively on InfoWars, that they're going to start circling around, getting answers, demanding answers.
And yeah, we don't agree with the bio lab.
That's something that we've been strongly against.
And so, Chuck, I tend to be a little bit more optimistic because if it wasn't for outlets like ours or the brave people who are out there giving these stories to us, like, you know, White Coast Waze was the one who went out there and got the FOIAs and they're very hard to obtain, as you heard the caller say.
But once he got it, he called me, let me know what he found, and we put him on air and we did the whole story.
So evil people exist.
They're in our country and we're going to keep ousting them.
I can't remember the third thing, but you get my point.
You know, people say, I'm a Christian, but they're not following my Christianity.
There's only one Christianity.
I mean, there's no, you know, interpretation is what people do, and that's dogma.
That's religion.
That's not spiritual.
That's not the word of God.
So, what I'm saying is, you know, we have Baal worship, which is abortion.
We have Bathomet worship, which is transgenderism.
We have statues everywhere in the United States dedicated to these real demons, these real spiritual entities that are at war, you know, that are in league with Satan and maybe fallen angels.
But we are in a spiritual war, and we have to know how to fight.
If you don't know how to fight, going back to Sun Tzu, one of the three things, he said, if you know the enemy but don't know yourself, you'll only win half the battles.
So don't go into it, you know, trying to argue with one of these knucklehead, you know, Satanists without knowing the word of God, or you're going to lose and they're going to go away with some, you know, their own moral victory.
You must know the word of God.
You must get deep into the word of God.
And if you are interested in fighting the spiritual battle, oh, I'm saved.
I'm good to go.
No, if you're saved, that means you're going to boot camp and you better get ready for war.
You don't get to sit back and do nothing.
That's one of the biggest lies these mealy mouth churches say is, well, you're saved.
So, you know, life is going to be great.
No, it is not.
That's when everything you start getting attacked and you must start defending and you must start going to war.
Get deep into the word and get ready for war because it's happening.
I mean, you know, Christ said that, you know, you'll be judged for my namesake.
You'll be persecuted for my namesake.
Well, that's what's happening.
These people went into this church in Minnesota and they persecuted them for Christ's namesake by saying they're not really Christians.
You know, it's there's different ways to, you know, that that can be interpreted, different styles and methods of attack.
This church was targeted because they were not armed.
Now, my church, I went to a little church here in Georgia, little church, maybe 200 people in at a time, and at least five or six guys were openly carrying, open carry.
Nobody would have broken into that church if they'd have done their quote recon because they knew that, you know, they might not get what they want.
You know, everybody said, well, Christ said, turn the other cheek.
Well, he also said one of his last things he said before being crucified is he told his disciples to go sell your plowshares for swords, you know, or go sell your cloaks for swords.
He knew there was a fight coming.
He didn't say just be little wusses and let them do what they want to you.
No, he said, get ready for the fight because the fight's coming.
People forget that.
That's one of these little tricks that they do, like I say, with the false word of God.
Can you imagine if all the individuals that are here protesting for no good reason, and if that were implemented into their lives, how much of a different story, you know, everything would be.
And when I say fasting, I'm talking about cleaning the system and what that does.
Try a three, four, five-day fast.
Get off of SSRIs because we know that they're autumn.
I mean, there's so much that needs to be cleansed here.
And the reason that I'm calling is that there's this, I feel it.
Please let me know if you do, but I feel there's a fatigue that's setting in overall with all of the all of the fraud that exists now and that's been exposed.
And don't get me wrong, I am, everybody just keeps doing what they're doing.
But what more needs to be done at this point?
What more needs to be done at this point?
How much more fraud and corruption, and specifically with what you talk about with having the big arrest, the big fish?
It needs to get there because that will carry Trump into, that will carry him past the midterms.
But there isn't this patience thing.
We can't wait and say, okay, well, we're going to just take our time and do this because that's what then leads back to, okay, what are we doing?
How much more fraud needs to be exposed?
Why are we sitting on this case?
It's a classic example to me is Jim Jordan yesterday during the Jack Smith hearing.
And you have, you know, the individual that, you know, obviously Michael Fanon, coughing under his breath and swearing.
And he's, Jim Jordan just says, we will not have this.
That guy, it doesn't take much to understand that that guy is a thug.
And a complete, I mean, you don't even, you don't have to dig too far or too deep and understand that these individuals, and it just leads to more of why are you enabling these individuals?
Why do we not go through and hold these accountable?
And the churches under attack here.
I mean, there's fashions in churches.
You know, you and Savage Dog were discussing this with homosexuality.
I mean, there are churches here with pastors that are, you know, it's Catholic, they're, you know, and they're homosexuals.
The one that was actually detained by ICE and he made this thing.
So how much does that play into what happened over in St. Paul?
I mean, it is just endless.
It goes on and on and on.
And like I said, everybody, just keep doing what you're doing.
But don't you feel there's a bit of fatigue simply because we're just not getting the big fish?
Well, I think, Chad, the word that they're using for that nowadays is actually called black pillar.
So if you, if you call it out, if you're, if you're exhausted with seeing the same results all the time, you are in fact a black pillar.
It's not going to work out well.
Like I've said before in the show, it's the new conspiracy theorist label, wanting accountability, real accountability, wanting these people on the left because they're so brazen, right?
Like as you just discussed yesterday during the hearing, seeing this guy go out there and be so brazen to curse in a congressional hearing.
I mean, I remember specifically Laura Loomer being dragged out, Owen Shroyer getting dragged out of congressional hearings.
I don't think they ever cursed, but to see what happened and they just allowed it to happen.
I was waiting to see what was going to happen.
I was waiting to see if they were going to drag him out, but they didn't.
They are just marinating in their own stupidity and they sit there amongst each other and just keep pitching these really bad ideas off of one another instead of maybe we could do something else.
Maybe there's a more effective way of protesting rather than ruining the life of a target employee.
And yes, I did wear red t-shirts and khaki pants.
That was my attire.
Actually, most of my family worked at Target at the time too.
So this woman really hit sore spot for the rest of us who are used to getting those carts, having to unpack them and run around the store and put it back on the shelves.
It's obviously not something fun.
So on behalf of all of my former and current Target employees, piss off, lady.
All right, folks, we got more to discuss in just a little bit.
Alex Rosen will be joining the show.
He just caught a bunch of repulsive child predators.
These individuals, some of them are even previously convicted.
A lot going on over here that we're going to dive into.
But, you know, this next segment, it's one of my favorite to do, not because of the subject matter itself, but because of the predators that are being caught.
Alex Rosen is doing incredible work with predator poachers, going out there and getting the worst of the worst off the streets.
And sadly, it's not something that's being done by local law enforcement or the federal government.
They do a little bit, but they don't do enough.
And Alex Rosen seems to always highlight that because every day he's catching someone and his catch rate is just insane at this point.
But Alex Rosen, again, is driving all across the country and he's catching these predators and his team is doing an incredible job at just that.
Well, it looks like he slipped through the cracks.
He was convicted in New Jersey when he was 16 years old of molesting a 10-year-old.
And to his defense, he told me he thought the 10-year-old was 12.
I guess I don't really know how that makes any difference.
But yeah, he got three years of probation for it, never saw the inside of a prison cell.
And predictably, 30 years later, and who knows if it's actually 30 years later, who knows what he's been doing in those 30 years, he's caught reoffending by trading and viewing and pleasuring himself to child pornography as young as babies and toddlers.
On his tablet alone, he said there were thousands of files of child pornography.
And yeah, he, of course, didn't want to go to prison for it.
He said he couldn't do prison.
And based on his face and what he's going to be in there for, I don't think he could do prison either.
But yeah, unfortunately, he was not quite arrested yet.
His devices were taken from him, though.
He did not give the passcode to his devices to us or the cops.
So they couldn't arrest him for child porn yet because they haven't seen it themselves.
However, as soon as they get into the devices, I mean, it's obvious what's on there and he'll have charges on him very soon.
So he has not yet been arrested, but we are waiting to see if they get into his devices, which I'm sure they'll gain access to to see if there is child pornographic images there.
But I think it's really interesting that you mentioned that he was 16 when this all went down originally for him.
You know, I obviously cover a lot of criminal cases.
And when it comes to minors, there seems to be more sympathy in the court system when it comes to them.
They think that there's some shots at redemption here, but you've obviously been working and catching the predators for quite some time now.
You know, although he was 16 at the time of all of this, do you think that someone like that should be re-released and has a shot at redemption?
Or do you think that these are the type of people that just need to be in cages for the rest of their lives?
No, I mean, if you go back to when we were 16, I certainly had no interest in 10-year-olds or 12-year-olds or even 13 or 14-year-olds, really, at 16 years old.
And it is genetic like that.
It's not like when they suddenly turn 18, they figure out they're a pedophile.
They've always been that way.
And I mean, we've put a 17-year-old away, Trevor Sullivan, he's doing 12 years right now in the Texas Department of Corrections.
And he was circulating child pornography.
And by the time he was 17 years old, we caught him.
He admitted to having two victims that were pre-pubescent in his own family.
So, no, these people never change.
When Trevor gets out, he's going to do the same things.
He's going to get caught 30 years later like Timothy does.
And no, they're just wired this way.
And they're wired to like children.
They're wired to go after children.
And there is no redemption for these people.
The only way to stop them is either lock them in a cage for life or just, you know, the ultimate accountable punishment, which is putting a bullet in them.
And it's so strange how controversial that is that forcing these people, putting them to death is somehow controversial.
I deem this as Alex, and I know you and I agree on the issue, that these are, we're putting animals down.
I mean, these are people that we can't allow to be around children.
Even if you put them in prison, they're going to likely reoffend.
I mean, we hear all these stories all the time of how someone's just arrested, they're apprehended, they're put in jail for a couple of days and they're sexually assaulted there too.
That's because you're putting them with animals.
And, you know, it's just really frustrating on how this idea is somehow controversial that we need to execute people who commit these types of heinous crimes, even when it's something that's very obvious, right?
Because I can understand that sometimes, you know, we don't 100% know, there's no physical evidence, so you might have your doubts there.
But when there's physical evidence of DNA inside of a child, I mean, that's all you need to do something like this, or there's actual footage of the person doing it.
That's all you need.
And so it's so frustrating, Alex, that we continue to allow them this grace period where we say, all right, well, let them be redeemed and let them go out there and try to do it again.
By the way, Alex, how about your take on this one as well?
Because, you know, I exposed Claudisu TSA.
The Biden regime was allowing people into our country who were convicted sex offenders in other countries.
And although they knew that they were convicted sex offenders, they'd have them just present a form to TSA to let them fly on commercial flights without IDs, by the way, which says that they're going to be going to wherever they're going, but they're also going to be taking these classes for predators as if it's going to be some way to redeem these people.
Right now, we have ICE agents who are going around.
They're trying to recapture these people who were put back onto our streets because of the Biden regime.
How do you feel about this?
Because we're watching, and again, you're not really a political person.
You are very just down the middle on these issues and truly want to be.
And I know, I know you're probably going to argue this one, but I deem you as a little down the middle on these issues because it's common sense to me.
It's not political.
When you're going out there and you're arguing these facts on social media, to me, it's just fair.
But how do you feel when you're sitting here watching these left-leaning liberals go out there and try to stop ICE agents from arresting convicted pedophiles, convicted rapists, and they have no care about the actual victims?
Now, I think, I don't like Trump personally, but I love ICE and I love deportation.
So I think it's ridiculous.
And, you know, I really expose the left because it shows they will just, they will just defend anybody if it's the opposite of what Donald Trump seems to support.
It is, I mean, it's truly just insane.
I mean, Trump's just come out and say that if Trump comes out and says he hates pedophiles, the left is going to suddenly start defending the Epstein list.
I mean, that's just how these people are.
And as for deporting them, I mean, it should be the most common sense thing.
Sex offender classes don't work.
One, we shouldn't be paying for an illegal immigrant sex offender class.
And two, we've caught multiple people either coming out of their sex offender class or that are in sex offender classes.
So none of them work.
And what the sex offender class end up doing, kind of similar to when they're in prison with these other people, they talk about their perversions and they get off on it.
This isn't like Alcoholics Anonymous, where they're all trying to get better.
I mean, these sex offenders hear their stories.
They have to talk about everything they did.
They have to be candid.
There's confidentiality.
They hear these stories and it gets normalized to them.
And that's a mass rumble.
I don't think there should be sex offender classes because, like I said, it's normalized it for them.
And yeah, the whole thing's ridiculous.
I think every illegal immigrant needs to get out of here, especially the sex offenders.
Well, all credit goes to our decoy mom who plays as a mom, essentially advertising her child.
She had the idea to face paint him because this guy, usually, I mean, these pedos are all messed up, but usually they have a story or they have something about them that's pretty unique.
We do these phone calls with them.
But Benjamin Godwin was the most boring person I've ever talked to, you know, pedo or not.
He was just a very unremarkable person.
So it was her bright idea to just like face paint him before I walked in to talk to him.
So, you know, he's just letting all of it happen because he wants to have sex with this 11-year-old kid really badly.
So he's just letting them do whatever, whatever they want to do, just so he can do this.
And yeah, no, it's certainly a humiliating end to his normal life for him to get caught with child pornography, meeting an 11-year-old with just ridiculous face paint on your face.
Alex, there was someone on X, and I don't remember what the count was right now.
I probably wouldn't even want to promote it.
Who's going after you for doing this?
They actually had more empathy for the guys who were being swept up into your bus rather than the actual victims of all of this, saying that you're just poor idiots who are just dumb enough to fall for your trap.
But, you know, I'll let you kind of give the rebuttal here because I don't deem them as poor idiots who are just falling for traps online.
I mean, they're trying to rape children and you're intervening there.
Why is it that people just don't seem to see that?
Well, it's, you know, a lot of women have this weird empathy for just crying.
You know, they just, their motherly instincts kick in when they see somebody being dominated in some way and just crying and they just see him as a lesser person.
So their sympathy kicks in.
And what that lady doesn't realize, you know, she tries to make excuses for this formerly convicted sex offender throwing a tantrum for getting caught with thousands of child pornography images.
She doesn't realize this guy has preyed on more innocent people than him.
I mean, he's not innocent.
This guy's preyed on innocent people.
This guy preys on innocent people every day when he pleasures himself to infants and toddlers.
And, you know, I guess his little crying charade, which by the way, had no tears.
I was looking at him in the eyes the whole time.
I was talking to him for an hour.
He had no tears coming out of his eyes.
She just completely fell for it and just had to assume that he was special needs or something.
No, this guy has a full-time job as a toll collector, which probably makes you worse than a pedophile if you're going to steal my money, you know, me being a Jew and stuff.
And now what's very concerning is something he said during this interview that it's not posted publicly yet.
But when I ask him about the two kids that his girlfriend has, he's, I guess they're in foster care because, of course, the girlfriend's a terrible caregiver being with him and whatever.
So he's able to be in the parking lot while she visits them once a week.
And he didn't say that I haven't touched those kids.
He said, I haven't been able to, which is, I think, is very telling, implying that he thinks about it.
He's just not able to do it.
And, you know, the fact that this lady has sympathy for this guy, who, by the way, has been on paper as being a pedo for 30 years, it's very sad.
And she claims that a lot of these people are mentally disabled that we catch, which, you know, we do about 25 of these a month.
There are a small handful, maybe like four or five who are mentally disabled each month.
But we just caught a mentally disabled guy in Midland, Texas, just like five days ago.
Tyler Carlton, he's currently in Midland County Jail for child pornography.
He admitted to molesting both his four-year-old brother and four-year-old sister.
I don't care if he's mentally disabled.
They're not going to look back in, you know, 20 years when they remember what happened and just think, well, the guy's IQ was under 90, so it doesn't count.
No, these mentally disabled people just do this evil thing, do these evil things even to get away with it because of ladies like this.
If you are just that crazy to where, you know, you can't control yourself, you're insane or whatever, then it's even more of a reason to be in jail because if you have no control over your actions, you cannot be in society.
They don't know when they argue the special needs thing, they're arguing for more prison time for them, not less.
No, and I think the goal here is to protect children at all costs.
And that being, you know, if you got if you got to throw them in the slammer, I don't care, do it.
Get them out off the streets and out of this world, truthfully.
I want to pivot a little bit, though, as for our last story here, because Thomas McKinley is the individual that you recently caught in Virginia.
Now, interesting enough, you're going to have to explain this to me, but you somehow, someway, got him to place a condom over his head to impress a child.
And, you know, folks at home right now, if you're looking to support work like this, because sadly, local law enforcement doesn't do enough and federal too to get these perverts off the streets.
Alex is donation-based.
And so if you'd like to support him, you could do so and his team as well.
Over at IFIT4Kids, that's where they go.
You could subscribe.
That's the best way to do so as well.
And you've got another platform too that I'm drawing a blank on right now.
I was just wanting to let everybody know this stormfront is coming in.
It's going all the way over to Tennessee.
And I just want to let everybody know, check on the people that are most vulnerable in the community.
If we get the odds that they're saying that we're going to get from south of Oklahoma City all the way down into Texas, there's a lot of people that's in the rural community and they're going to need help.
I mean, if you got a little extra, you know, put something in the grocery cart and just take care of the people in the community.
We got to stick together through things like this.
The other thing that I was wanting to talk to you about was Dan Bongino.
Dan Bongino going and saying that people are black pilled.
I don't think people are black pilled.
I think people are fed up.
And I think, you know, if you look at the progression going from white pill, red pill to black pill, that's just emotions.
That's one way they're countering our emotions.
And, you know, like the CAI talking points, conspiracy, you know, people are conspiracy, you know, conspiracy theories.
You know, Kim Pull hat wearing people.
No, it's because we're awake and we're seeing that there's evil in this world.
And evil is running abundant now.
It's just been turned loose.
Like Savage Dog said, you run up on one of these little rural community churches or any church, you're probably going to get some praying hands put on you.
Now, there, you know, granted, there are going to be hands put on you.
People are going to pray for you because you're Christians.
But I strongly suggest people, you know, out there that have this mindset that they want to attack the churches.
Better back off of that because that's when the cloaks will get traded for swords.
And one more thing, just want to say, proud to be an American and cross this team.
Now I'm with you on all of those points, especially, especially everything going on right now at the DOJ.
I think Americans are frustrated, but most importantly, your advice as we prepare for the storm.
Folks, check on your neighbors.
I know, you know, people tend to panic in these situations.
And if you're prepared, I am one of the preppers, so I don't panic in any situation these days.
But if you're one of those who isn't prepared, obviously consider trying your best to slowly purchase up things so you have your own prep ready to go.
But most importantly, like Bulldog just told you, check on your neighbors because there's a lot of people out there who will need your help if power does go out as well.
Bulldog, thank you for so much for calling.
Also, don't shovel the driveways if you're somebody with a heart condition.
I don't know how many times I've sadly have dealt with people who have shoveled their driveways and they pass out, they have a heart attack.
You have to be careful with that.
I don't think people realize how much energy it takes to shovel a driveway.
But if you have elderly neighbors, do not let them do that themselves.
But first off, I definitely want to say that all praise and glory to God, Jesus Christ, our Savior.
If you don't know him, ask him to come and reveal himself to you because that's the only way you're going to make it through life.
You got to have him if you don't.
So go get him.
And the main thing I want to talk about is, you know, I think the Trump administration has been doing a pretty good job.
Duffy Secretary Duffy's been doing a really good job of getting some of these unlicensed or poorly licensed or illegally licensed drivers off the road.
I've seen quite a bit of it going on.
That's good.
But another thing, and I'm really against government regulation, but that Biden administration brought in all these brokers.
There's brokers out there that are keeping 50% or more of the rate.
And, you know, that just doesn't make sense.
And there's got to be something done there.
They got to get rid of some of these auto-pen POTUS brokers out of there, out of the taking too much of the pie.
It's ridiculous, especially drivers that are trying to owner operator.
I mean, you can't survive.
You're basically just keeping your equipment running as it's depreciating, getting older, and that needs replaced, and you don't have the wherewithal to do that.
So something's got to happen on that front.
But a couple other things, real quick.
I wanted to say, men out there, if you got yourself already a good conservative woman, because there are women out there that are good, conservative one, I got one.
My wife is one.
Their value is so far up right now.
Make sure you let them know.
I mean, they've gone, they are top value.
They're the biggest investment and the biggest thing that you have in your life.
The most valuable thing, if you got one, you better let her know.
And if you don't have one, good luck, because I'm telling you, the ratio of women to men is probably two to one, women to men, but good women to men has got to be like 0.5 to 1 at the maximum right now.
So if you're out there and you find one, buddy, you better hold on because that's the biggest investment in your life and the most valuable asset you'll ever have is a good conservative woman because their value is through the roof.
Well, obviously, it wasn't short of evil and demonic people over at the Davos WEF meeting that was happening this week.
We've been covering extensively, obviously, and speaking to those in Davos.
But, folks, they're trying to replace God.
And you heard it straight from his mouth there, joining me to discuss.
I know she was fired about this yesterday is my girl Mel Kay, host of the Mel Kay Show and author of the book.
As many of you guys know, it's a great book.
Mel has up right now.
Oh, by the way, give her a follow on Rumble as well: themelkayshow.com is rumble.com/slash the Mel Kay Show.
Mel's joining us right now.
American Anonymous is the book as well.
Oh, Mel, it's a Friday, so the words are a little tough coming out of my mouth this morning, but they'll just have to replace you with AI if they want someone to be a little bit more, let's just say, perfect at this point.
But, Mel, we're excited to have you on today.
You and I were talking yesterday, and you were fired up about what was going on at the World Economic Forum specifically, though.
Their replacement of God.
I mean, they're just so bold to sit there and say that they're going to replace religion, and they don't even shy away from this.
What did you take away from the meetings that were taking place this week in Davos?
Well, you know, even more than that, the whole event is anti-human.
The theme to me was from Elon Musk talking about that we're going to have humanoid robots that now take care of our children, our pets, and our elderly.
That's part of the essence of being human: raising your children and caring for your parents and your pets.
I don't want to give that up.
He was saying basically that there's going to be more robots than humans on planet Earth and seemed fine with that.
That was a good thing.
And then, also, what you're talking about with Harari, this is a long game.
This is all about total track and trace surveillance control from birth to death.
What's the one thing that we know there is no God involved in?
That would be communism.
Communism is all about no God.
The state is God.
The state is answer.
And now the state apparently is AI with algorithms controlled by the same people that have created every issue since World War II to keep our country and the world off balance endlessly so that they can implement all of these long-term games that are now coming to a head.
And frankly, what we do have to look at here is who chose these people.
And none of them are elected.
They are all there because of their financial success.
And a lot of their financial success was off the backs of American taxpayers.
Certainly the control demolition and consolidation of the banking system in 2008, for which nobody was held accountable.
In fact, it was consolidated and those people ended up being rewarded, to tell you the truth.
So what we really have to realize is that this is not a, they're not coming there to tell us that this is coming in the future.
They're coming there to tell us that we have no choice.
This is how it's going to be now.
And I sent you another clip by the king of Davos.
That would be Larry Fink.
And the big issue with Larry Fink, because we're tokenizing everything.
We're going on the blockchain.
There's going to be one unified ledger.
This is all Agenda 2030.
This is it.
And that's why I keep saying to everyone, with all of the AI and all of the technology and all these partners from Google to Palantir to Elon Musk to Oracle, they are partners in the global public infrastructure, the entire world's infrastructure.
So, what I keep saying to people is: where is the sovereignty of the United States of America?
Where is the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, national sovereignty, individual liberty, all these things that matter in America?
Where is that in this cyberspace, this global, unified ledger of the global public infrastructure, which has been built for years?
This is not new.
They are just coming out and introducing it as if this is what we have to do.
Well, I have information for them.
No, we don't have to do any of it.
And frankly, yesterday I was watching the head of the Fed from Minneapolis of all places, and he said in a speech at Columbia, he doesn't understand what the benefit of the central bank digital currency is.
We already have Venmo.
The only benefit could be that there's zero privacy left in any transactions or basically anything you do.
And that is the whole plan.
So we have to really take a step back as American citizens who still believe in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and national sovereignty, which is the biggest battle here, and say, no, no, no, this isn't going to be given to the American people.
It's going to be up to us to decide if we want this future.
And for me, their utopia that they're pitching is our dystopia.
Their, you know, unlimited control over the universal ledger and all of that is a digital panopticon.
And as you saw this morning, our own government just voted to have kill switches and surveillance in our cars.
That is never anything that the United States government should be doing to anyone.
I mean, we are so past the point of the Constitution and Bill of Rights having a leading edge over everything in the world in the United States that keeps us, the United States, free, liberty, auto-determination, prosperity, property ownership.
They're taking it apart because what they are selling is global technocratic communism on a global scale.
And that's what they want.
A lot of these people did not hide it at all at Davos.
And like you just said there, there were 57 House Republicans that also sided with that to make sure that the government can shut off your car if they want to.
Folks, this just adds to the argument that it's not just two separate parties that we're working with here at the Uni Party and that they all side with this.
There's no legitimate reason for this besides the fact that they've all been bought off.
And there were so many of these people who I was surprised who didn't make their way to Davos this year.
But we even heard Tom Tillis, even while he was there, I know that there was a reporter who confronted him on the ground.
And he said that he is, his caucus is with the WEF.
So they're not even hiding other alliances.
They pretend like they're Republicans.
But again, it's all the same thing here.
And it's just really frustrating.
But Mel, there was a big difference, though, this time in Davos.
And Claude Schwab wasn't running the show this time.
It was two individuals who we're familiar with, obviously the CEO of BlackRock, and then there was a big pharmaceutical company CEO that's also running the show and all of this.
What did you notice the differences were this year around?
Well, first of all, Larry Fink was very tentative in his opening, but he did admit that this was an elite gathering of the people that control the world and that they have to regain the trust of the people.
Well, how exactly do you do that when you're telling the people that they have no choice about this dystopian surveillance future that they have been planning?
Again, I have said many times: how come the American people have not questioned why trillions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer pension funds go through BlackRock?
And at the same time, he is leading the World Economic Forum push to Agenda 2030, which I noticed as I watched the EU, particularly Canada, side on the world stage with the communist technate known as the Chinese Communist Party and China, that frankly, we are being forced into a situation where the people are walking eyes wide open into something they don't seem to fully get.
Agenda 2030 is a nation-state-ending track and trace surveillance technocracy model for birth to death of all people, all resources, of all everything in the hands of a very small group of people out of Geneva, Davos, Wall Street, and the city of London, I guess.
And at this point, we have to be honest, post-World War II, the infrastructure supranationally was built.
It's my belief that the Dulles Brothers, State Department, CIA, all of that was created to protect that supranational, basically financial structure that is really predatory and parasitic on the people of this planet.
And we have to start saying, no, this is not the way we're going to go.
And that means in everyday life, rejecting it.
You know, people walk up, they give their eye scans at the airport, not even questioning all the stuff we've seen with TSA and the list.
Like, why are you trusting the government with any of this stuff?
And that's the thing.
They're pushing us into a place where they're saying we have no choice.
And the most, I just want to mention the most disturbing panel of them all, of them all in my mind, was Randy Weingarten.
I call her Mal Weingarten, but Randy Weingarten, the head of the teachers union, which I've been telling people for years, is completely infiltrated by the global, it's the international labor organization under the United Nations, which of course is exactly what it sounds like, but also Education International.
This is the world curriculum.
That is what she does.
That is who she works for.
That is why she kept our schools locked down.
That is why all of that.
And she was on the panel with Gretchen Whitmer, of course, who has two people in jail for her fake kidnapping still.
And they were talking about melding the education.
She said there's 100,000 public schools in the United States, and she wants to learn and figure out how to meld industry and the World Economic Forum into our school system in the United States of America so that somehow now people, children, when they graduate from high school and college will have jobs that can pay for their lives.
A and B aren't related.
And in fact, they're the opposite.
So to me, the fact that the head of the teachers union is up there basically selling out our entire education system, which was sold out long ago.
Anyone that got put on remote learning during the lockdowns got a dossier open on them.
And that's our children with about 15 stakeholders, including Google, who is not on our side and who is a global entity of the World Economic Forum, along with their fake encyclopedia there, Wikipedia.
But what we're dealing with now is an open admission by the head of the teachers union that the education is no longer for growth and entrepreneurship and critical thinking and skills and learning.
It's really just about creating automatons for this Agenda 2030.
And at this point, I don't understand how we don't have a big referendum in America to abolish the teachers' unions.
They are not American anymore.
They haven't been for a long time.
They frankly are community organizers that are completely aligned with the global communism push of technocracy.
And I've had it.
And also, if you don't know that there was such a, what has happened to our children since COVID is so sad, but the education and the level of cognizant, cognition, and all of that is so destroyed because of the AI that is already being used.
And now they want to push AI completely into school and have every child have an AI tutor.
You know, Bill Gates talks about it.
In fact, Melania talked about it last week.
I think that this is a terrible idea.
Education until about, you know, 10 years ago, every generation became smarter, more educated, more able, more skilled until about 10 years ago.
And it's been declining.
What we are supposed to be doing for our children is giving them tools to outdo us.
And it's gone totally the opposite direction.
And there is nothing wrong with traditional education.
Everything wrong with AI education, especially when it's controlled by the World Economic Forum and their industry partners, as Randy Weingarten said, at the World Economic Forum.
That has nothing to do with America or education.
And that's why we have to end the Department of Education.
I would end the teachers' unions, but give education back to local authorities and states where it belonged.
It never belonged.
This is all part of Brzezinski and Kissinger's plan.
Don't forget, it wasn't until Brzezinski and Carter were in the White House that we even had a Department of Education.
And you can go back to the Rockefellers in the 30s circumventing higher education, but certainly K through 12.
And now we don't even know where the CCP ends and the World Economic Forum and the UN begins in our universities or in our K through 12 schools.
So we got a big problem with education.
And her being on the stage there was the most disturbing of all of the panels to me.
I can reject everything else, but somebody who's controlling the education system and the growing socialist progressive teachers union that is so far off the reservation when it comes to our children really should be the biggest wake-up call for everyone in America to understand we have been captured by this global public-private partnership and their international banking cartel.
And I believe Trump's trying to dismantle it.
And there was a lot of talk.
This really, the distraction here was that this was really about the currency economy and the central bank digital currency being forced on us, which again, Donald Trump promised we would not have in our country and certainly would not be connected to one universal global ledger.
And, you know, the fact is that we're still, and you can hear that things are getting kind of rough between us and the UK as well.
I mean, we were watching as the comments were kind of pouring in a little bit.
And their own prime minister, he's not siding with Trump on a lot of these issues.
And again, he was voicing concerns about even joining the Board of Peace.
And he's like, sit and stand by and kind of, and it just didn't make any sense when you were going through it all.
But there was something else that happened.
And I thought this was really telling.
You know, Jared Kushner is someone who I know a lot of Trump supporters were excited to see that he wasn't going to be campaigning with the president, that he was taking a stand out of politics, but he found his way over the WEF this week.
And it's concerning because the Board of Peace sounds good, but then he's got this whole fantasy plan for Gaza.
And so many conspiracy theorists were out there saying that the goal here is just to rebuild and to get all these big investors richer and richer and to build up this Gaza strip, their dream.
But the reality of it is, Jared Kushner is back there pushing this.
It makes me a little on edge when I watch him talk about what his plans are for Gaza.
What do you make of all of this?
Because I think it's concerning that he's front and center.
And again, I don't even see this being realistic, but this was what everyone was talking about when they criticized Israel for what they've done.
This is what they said what the goal was.
And it looks like Jared Kushner is showing us this.
The war in Israel had nothing to do with Israel or the Palestinians or the people of Israel.
It had to do with that land.
And don't forget about the port there and the strategic location of that port that they're going to build.
But also, I just want to say, this is going to be a total technate.
They're not even hiding it that it's going to be a total technocracy-run place.
But also, don't forget the main partners now, it looks like, are Qatar, Turkey, and Egypt.
So, this is a real game change.
I have to say, this is unprecedented, but what they are building there, and I hate to say this because people don't fully get it.
This is already built also in Ukraine and probably anywhere else that they're destroying and pretending to come in and save the day.
They're rebuilding as technates, which means internet of body, internet of things, full track and trace surveillance, full drones, full everything's connected, and everything is overseen by algorithms and AI.
This is they're slowly but surely doing that.
I also want to say that something came out that was not really explicitly put out there during the entire hellish situation that happened in Israel, which was that Hamas had to, it still controlled that area or did until recently.
And they were they had to be approving anyone that went into the Gaza Strip during the entire war.
And frankly, Hamas is a Muslim Brotherhood-funded terror organization.
And it looked like the three places that Muslim Brotherhood were pointed out in America to be the terrorist wings of the Muslim Brotherhood happened to be Turkey, Egypt, and Qatar.
So, what you're seeing here is something where it appears to me there's been some kind of agreement to turn this into some kind of also experiment of technocracy.
So, again, this doesn't seem much like a rebuilding of Gaza as it is of a total reconfiguring of that piece of land for a globalized future.
And I've said this from the start: I don't think the Ukraine war, nor do I think the Israel war had anything to do with either of those countries.
It's all about the global public-private partnership, the international banking cartel, and keeping control.
And most of all, don't forget, NATO's history has been very obscure to the American people.
It should have ended decades ago.
We pay, I believe, $900 billion worth of NATO.
And frankly, NATO is not a defensive force, and they continue to have wars everywhere around the world that NATO is involved in to continue justifying NATO's existence.
I think it's time for the American people to be briefed on exactly what NATO is, what it does, because at this point, if the UK and the EU and Canada are siding with China, NATO is over.
And you know what?
Without America, they all know that they can't defend themselves.
So why are we still playing this game?
We fought a war in 1776 to be an independent nation.
Right now, I don't care about anything.
I want to have great relationships with everyone in the world.
But in terms of I would like America to be independent again and all these Atlanticist groups from Chantham House and Council of Foreign Relations, which is probably the most powerful.
We know that Henry Kissinger had more loyalty to Chantham House than to anyone in the United States from what he said himself.
But a lot of these people have acted like America, particularly after World War II, was not separate from Europe.
We are separate from Europe.
In fact, we paid for the EU.
We paid for the entire, the taxpayers of the United States have been looted and lied to to pay for the entire Cold War, which was a war against communism that kept changing the enemy.
Then we paid for the entire war on terror, which, of course, was a war on a tactic that was eventually turned on us in America.
And then we paid for the entire globalist nonsense experiment since Bill Clinton.
And never forget that it was George Soros that wrote the NATO world order that convinced Bill Clinton to expand NATO.
He bombed Yugoslavia for no reason that I could see at all.
And then he, at that bombing in Yugoslavia, he hit the Chinese embassy by accident.
And the ideal after that was to allow China into the World Trade Organization.
And from that point on, we were distracted by Monolik Lewinsky while they were selling out our entire country to China.
So there's decades of lies that the American people deserve to know the truth about so that we can decide for ourselves what we want for our future.
We have a constitutional republic.
And that means that we, the people of the United States, pick representatives to represent us, not whatever is going on in D.C.
And as I said, Brianna, the best thing that could happen right now is that Scott Besson, who is right now the temporary head of the IRS, does a full and complete people's audit of all of our representatives that are elected in the House and Senate from 2020 forward.
Trillions of dollars left this country and disappeared.
Now they're voting to track and trace surveillance.
They're voting for warrantless 702 surveillance.
They're voting to turn off our cars.
They are not on the side of liberty, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, or national sovereignty or individual sovereignty.
So something is very wrong and we need to find out who's paid for and by whom.
And you know what, Bernie Sanders is out there like end States United and all this stuff.
End all the money in politics, if you ask me, and make lobbying totally illegal.
End these think tanks and let's audit everyone in there and make sure that the people that work in the United States of America to represent we the people, which is their job, are representing us because they're not right now.
They're representing Davos and the international banking cartel and keeping endless war happening for profit because they all make out in the Reconstruction.
It's the same model Smedley Butler talked about in World War I. All wars are bankers' wars, especially the ones that have gone on in the last four years.
This is what Larry Fink thinks regaining the trust of the people looks like.
No, regaining the trust of the people is giving us back our countries and letting us move forward as an independent nation.
Make America independent again and let us have relationships around the world that aren't based on fraudulent treaties from, you know, 50 or 100 years ago.
This is a 100-year plan that needs to end.
And thank you to the people from, I believe, Trump's financial people that were out there telling them globalism failed and we're done.