Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| I'm very confused about the Genius Act. | ||
| I thought there was a deal made by the president to make sure that included was going to be the central bank digital currency. | ||
| There'd be no possibility of a backdoor to get that. | ||
| So where are we? | ||
| This was a closed rule. | ||
| Johnson did not allow us to make amendments to the Genius Act, to make an amendment to put a ban on CBDC in the Genius Act. | ||
| We were told, you don't have a right to amendments. | ||
| You don't get to do your legislative process anymore. | ||
| You just have to vote on it. | ||
| And they forced it through, making what I think is a fake deal. | ||
| And I wish the Freedom Caucus had held, but they didn't. | ||
| They want to work and they want to pass the president's agenda and I do too. | ||
| But I'm not willing to go along with the pathway to a central bank digital currency in a cashless society where none of us can control our money. | ||
| Because I don't trust the government and no one else should trust the government. | ||
| And just because this administration is committed to that doesn't mean that a future administration will not lock down our bank accounts if we are not doing and saying what they want us to do. | ||
| We've already been there. | ||
| That was the past four years. | ||
| When you go past one of these number plate cameras when you, quote, shouldn't, you won't be able to challenge the fine because the fine will be taken out of your digital account the moment you transgress. | ||
|
unidentified
|
At the world's busiest airport in Atlanta. | |
| All right, you're fully verified. | ||
| The TSA checkpoint has gotten a high-tech upgrade. | ||
| You're going to take your ID, insert it into the card reader. | ||
| Using this facial recognition camera system to compare a flyer's face to their picture on their ID in seconds. | ||
| The Genius Act, already greenlit by a bipartisan Senate, claims to slap a federal harness on stable coins. | ||
| Stable coins aim for price stability through mechanisms like backing each coin with reserves of cash, bonds, or other assets. | ||
| The Clarity Act is a tug of war over who gets to leash these digital assets. | ||
| Will it be the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the CFTC, potentially prying them loose from the SEC's iron grip, a move the crypto rebels have been howling for. | ||
| The anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, championed by Republicans, aims to slam the door on a central bank digital currency, citing nightmares of government snooping and control. | ||
| Yet many warn of a sinister back door, a legislative sleight of hand that could see these bills, if watered down in the Senate or hitched to must-pass juggernauts like the NDAA, could pave the way for a CBDC Trojan horse. | ||
| It's really hard to overstate how dangerous it is. | ||
| It is literally the mark of the beast system, a global social credit score, the ESG corporate governance systems right down into your smart devices, your phone, the smart appliances, the AI, surveilling everyone in lifetime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You don't expect your air-fry chips to come with a side of surveillance, but research has found they might. | |
| Do I need umbrella for tomorrow in London? | ||
| From tracking locations to listening to conversations to knowing your gender and date of birth, our devices, in some cases, are acutely smart. | ||
| And so it's really the ring of Sauron to bind everybody together with total control. | ||
| And we have the head of the IMF and the World Bank and the International Bank of Settlements and the head of the UN and all of them. | ||
| We have Tedros, the head of the WHO, saying we need a global central bank digital currency to control everything you do, to lock you down during new pandemics they've got planned. | ||
| This is the mechanism. | ||
| It'll be your internet ID. | ||
| It'll do everything. | ||
| And if we think as populist and conservatives and Christians and common sense people that we've been debanked and harassed as conservatives before, this is exponentially more dangerous. | ||
| And the big international banks that the Federal Reserve is part of, private, they have said this is their holy grail and they're really, really trying to roll it out. | ||
| And so the fact that there is a pathway to this with a digital central bank digital currency dollar in this genius act and then only MTG and you and it's Monday, January 27th in the year of our Lord 2025. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And you're listening to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| I think it's time to blow this scene. | ||
| Get everybody in stuff together. | ||
| Okay, three, two, one, it's camp. | ||
| Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to the show. | ||
| This is the American Journal. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Coming to you live today from our secret headquarters here in Austin, Texas. | ||
| My mic's all wonky. | ||
| We're getting things set up here. | ||
| We got a really big show for you today. | ||
| Lots, just absolutely tons of news to get to. | ||
| And I think I'm just going to play the full 10-minute press conference from Tulsi Gabbard yesterday. | ||
| Usually I don't like to go the clips longer than two or three minutes at the max, but in this case, if you haven't heard it yet, you got to hear the whole thing. | ||
| Tulsi Gabbard, of course, referred Obama and his compatriots to the DOJ yesterday. | ||
| And we'll see if anything comes of this. | ||
| We'll talk about what's really happening behind the scenes, if this is something that's legitimate and will end in people like Barack Obama in handcuffs, or if this is just a distraction from Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
| I have my theories. | ||
| I'm not sure if we're able to take her calls out of this studio. | ||
| We had some trouble with that last time, but if we can, I will take her calls on that topic. | ||
| But what she lays out is pretty incontrovertible. | ||
| It's pretty much the rock-solid proof of everything that we've been telling you the entire time. | ||
| So I'm just going to show you that whole clip in just a little bit. | ||
| We'll do the daily dispatch first, and then on the other side, we'll show you that 10-minute clip of Tulsi Gabbard just laying out not only that Hillary Clinton was on tranquilizers and all this other insane stuff, but that Barack Obama and his intelligence community very deliberately withheld information from Donald Trump while pushing falsified information, again, knowingly, committing what I would consider, at the very least, treason adjacent. | ||
| So we'll show you that video in just a second. | ||
| But first, we'll begin today, as we do every day, with our daily dispatch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
*Bell rings* | |
| All right, here it is, folks. | ||
| Your daily dispatch for Thursday, the 24th of July, 2025, Justice Department told Trump his name may appear in the Epstein files. | ||
| That's from the Wall Street Journal. | ||
| A major breaking bombshell news story. | ||
| Oh my gosh, his name may appear in the Epstein files. | ||
| This, of course, has been known forever, and we've reported on this forever. | ||
| Your name being in the Epstein files is not certification that you did anything wrong, and Jeffrey Epstein and Trump were associates, and that's been known and acknowledged by everybody forever. | ||
| Bondi also told the president at the meeting that Justice decided to not release more Jeffrey Epstein documents because of the presence of child pornography and the need to protect victims, which, of course, is just absurd because you don't have to release that stuff, at least not uncensored. | ||
| Again, just that to me is just absolutely absurd. | ||
| That's like, does that mean that we can never prosecute child pornographers? | ||
| Does that mean that we can never, ever prosecute sex crimes against children that have photographic evidence because that would require presenting the photographic evidence? | ||
| Come on, this is a, what we in the business call a ridiculous farce. | ||
| That's what this is, a ridiculous farce. | ||
| But the other irony is that it's to protect victims, which is ironic because the victims are the ones demanding that these things be released. | ||
| So, again, the scramble to try to cover up Epstein on the right is continuing and combining with the left's scrambling to try to associate Trump with Epstein. | ||
| And it's just all a bunch of nonsense. | ||
| And it's all a whole bunch of nonsense. | ||
| Again, they just keep coming out with these supposedly bombshell stories that are either literally nothing, like some letter written by somebody named Donald 25 years ago or whatever it was, or this claim here that Donald Trump's name appeared multiple times in the Jeffrey Epstein documents that don't exist. | ||
| Remember, the Jeffrey Epstein documents don't exist, but Trump's name is in them. | ||
| Okay, wrap your mind around that one. | ||
| Again, it's just, it continues. | ||
| And I do think, I can't help but think that this has more than a little bit to do with the claims being made by Pam Bondi about going after Obama. | ||
| But we'll get to that. | ||
| Speaking of Pam Bondi, Pam Bondi cancels appearance at anti-trafficking summit over medical issue. | ||
| Quote, I'm sorry to miss all my CPAC friends today, Bondi said in a statement, which is a little ironic, I guess. | ||
| I guess it's a little bit ironic that the Attorney General has to cancel their appearance at the anti-trafficking summit while simultaneously covering up for the greatest human trafficking scandal to ever hit American politics. | ||
| That's a little bit ironic. | ||
| She's like, maybe I'm not the best person to appear at an anti-trafficking summit when for the last few weeks, my entire life has been defined by my inability or unwillingness to expose the human traffickers engaged in these sordid activities and now currently running our government. | ||
| So she's not feeling very well. | ||
| So I guess she's not feeling very well today, and we hope she gets better. | ||
| Meanwhile, in brutal document release, the Russia hoax is finally exposed. | ||
| Official claim that Putin aspired to help Trump was based on four pieces of evidence, all bogus, even ridiculous, according to a long suppressed report just released by DNI Tulsi Gabbard. | ||
| Again, we'll show you the full 10-minute dissertation by Tulsi Gabbard, where she laid out exactly how this scam was pulled off. | ||
| This is Racket.news. | ||
| It's a Substack article by Matt Taibbi breaking it down. | ||
| We'll get back to that and explain exactly, piece by piece, how this RussiaGate collusion scam was implemented and covered up and used to destroy the first administration of Donald Trump. | ||
| Meanwhile, from ground news, new form of type 1 diabetes identified in black patients. | ||
| Published in the Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology Today, an international team identified a non-autoimmune form of type 1 diabetes in children and young adults across Cameroon, Uganda, and South Africa. | ||
| I bet diabetes is going to feel pretty stupid when they realize race is a social construct, huh? | ||
| Stupid diabetes. | ||
| And finally, we have this. | ||
| U.S. green lights $322 million in arms sales to Ukraine as Trump unveils novel funding strategy. | ||
| Oh, joy. | ||
| Oh, good. | ||
| What an interesting number, too. | ||
| $322 million. | ||
| 322. | ||
| That rings a bell, doesn't it? | ||
| Approval of Hawke and Bradley systems mark a pivot in Trump's policy, a new arrangement demanding European nations cover cost of U.S. military equipment and substantially raise NATO defense outlays. | ||
| So yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean it. | |
| Thank you. | ||
| Is anyone keeping track of how much we're sending to Ukraine? | ||
| I can't help but feel like at least once a week for the last two years, I've read another headline About another couple hundred millions of dollars. | ||
| At this point, like we don't even reply, we don't even mention it. | ||
| It's just like on the third page in the newspaper, they just like casually drop, like, and another $500 billion is going to Ukraine. | ||
| This time, a novel new funding mechanism. | ||
| Yes, they are sneaking it in through the back door. | ||
| And just do we have any idea? | ||
| Is anybody keeping account? | ||
| Is anybody keeping track of this? | ||
| Because I'd like to know, because I'd like to be made aware of exactly how much of our taxpayer money has been funneled to this boondoggle, murderous nonsense in Ukraine. | ||
| $322 million. | ||
| Tack it on. | ||
| Just pile it on, I guess. | ||
| The sales package announced by the State Department Wednesday afternoon and communicated to Congress by the Defense Security Cooperation Agency are intended to bolster Ukraine's capability to defend against ongoing Russian aggression, particularly persistent aerial assaults. | ||
| The approvals underscore Washington's continued role as a crucial ally in Kiev's protracted conflict. | ||
| So. | ||
| So. | ||
| So that's not what we voted for. | ||
| So that's actually the opposite of what we voted for. | ||
| Which is frustrating again. | ||
| We'll get back into this later. | ||
| But Godspeed to the Ukrainian people who are apparently staging massive protests in an attempt to oust the Zelensky government because of their blatant corruption. | ||
| We can only hope that they can bring down this ridiculous regime and bring peace to the area once again. | ||
| That's your daily dispatch brought to you, of course, by thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| Go to thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison to let them know who sent you. | ||
| Take advantage of the bombshell deals we have on offer today. | ||
| And just know that when you go to thealxjonesstore.com, not only are you getting a fantastic product, not only are you now able to be liable for these awesome new truck giveaways, you're getting the great discounts. | ||
| There's so many things, so many reasons to go to thealexjonesstore.com, but perhaps foremost amongst those is the fact that we told you so, and we told you so so very long ago. | ||
| Everything that is now coming out, be it Jeffrey Epstein, Barack Obama, Russia Gate, Hillary Clinton being on the verge of death all the way back in 2016, InfoWars was right about it all. | ||
| I'm going to go to a long clip now. | ||
| This is the press conference Tulsi Gabbard gave. | ||
| This 10 minutes, if this is legitimate, if they really are going to go after Obama, which they absolutely should, this 10-minute speech could be a defining moment in American history. | ||
| Here's Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence, yesterday, laying out the case against Barack Hussein Obama, former president, for committing treason while in office. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. | |
| I'm going to go over the key findings from the House Intelligence Report, which investigated the claims that were made by an intelligence community assessment ordered by President Obama and published in January of 2017. | ||
| First, Putin's principal interests relating to the 2016 election were to undermine faith in the U.S. democratic process, not show any preference of a certain candidate. | ||
| In fact, this report shows Putin held back from leaking compromising material on Hillary Clinton prior to the election, instead planning to release it after the election to weaken what Moscow viewed as an inevitable Clinton presidency. | ||
| In the January 2017 intelligence community assessment that President Obama ordered, John Brennan, who was CIA director at the time, and the intelligence community intentionally suppressed intelligence that showed Putin was saving the most damaging material that he had in his possession about Hillary Clinton until after her potential and likely victory. | ||
| The report goes into great detail about the information that Russia and Putin had on Hillary Clinton, which included possible criminal acts, like secret meetings with multiple named U.S. religious organizations in which State Department officials offered, in exchange for supporting Secretary Clinton's campaign for the presidency, significant increases in financing from the State Department. | ||
| They also had documents that showed the patronage of the State Department to State Department employees who would go and support Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. | ||
| There were high-level DNC emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's, quote, psycho-emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness, and that then Secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers. | ||
| Then-CIA Director Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious substandard sources to create a contrived false narrative that Putin developed a quote-unquote clear preference for Trump. | ||
| Brennan and the IIC misled lawmakers by referencing the debunked steele dossier to assess quote-unquote Russia's plans and intentions, falsely suggesting that this dossier had intelligence value when he knew that it was discredited. | ||
| The intelligence community excluded significant intelligence and ignored or selectively quoted reliable intelligence that contradicted the intelligence community assessment's key findings on Putin's alleged support for Trump. | ||
| Including this intelligence reporting would have exposed the ICA's claim as implausible, if not ridiculous. | ||
| The intelligence community assessment omitted reliably sourced information, such as how some Russian intelligence officials were quote-unquote planning for candidate Hillary Clinton's victory, while others assessed neither Trump nor Clinton would respect Russia's interests. | ||
| As was reflected in the ODNI documents that we released on Friday, multiple intelligence community assessments released in the months leading up to the November 2016 election concluded that Russia had neither the intent nor capability To impact the outcome of the U.S. election. | ||
| On December 5th of 2016, the FBI and ODNI gave the House Intelligence Committee its first post-election classified briefing in which there was no mention of Putin aspiring to elect Trump by either agency. | ||
| The Presidential Daily Brief, drafted on December 8th of 2016, stated that no Russian or criminal actors impacted vote counts. | ||
| This document was pulled just hours before it was to be published due to quote-unquote new guidance. | ||
| If it had been published, it would have been briefed to both President Obama and President-elect Donald Trump. | ||
| On December 9th, 2016, a National Security Council meeting was called to gather President Obama's senior national security officials, which included CIA Director Brennan, then Obama DNI James Clapper, Susan Rice, and others. | ||
| Following that secret meeting, DNI Clapper's assistant sent an email to the intelligence community with the subject line, POTUS Tasking on Russia Election Meddling, tasking ODNI leaders to create a new assessment per the president's request. | ||
| The House Intelligence Committee oversight report that we released today reveals that, quote, unlike routine intelligence community analysis, the intelligence community assessment was a high-profile product ordered by the president, President Obama. | ||
| It directed senior intelligence community agency heads and created an intelligence community assessment limited to just five analysts using one principal drafter. | ||
| This is not something that occurs in the normal path of producing an intelligence community assessment that reflects the views across the intelligence community. | ||
| The production of this intelligence community assessment was subject to unusual directives directly from the president and senior political appointees, especially the former director of the CIA, John Brennan. | ||
| The House Intelligence Committee oversight report also shows how later that same day on December 9th, Brennan ordered the publication of quote-unquote sub-standard reporting on Russian activities, which had previously been withheld from publication of prior assessments because the information was judged, quote, to have not met long-standing publication standards. | ||
| Some of the information later used in the Obama-ordered assessment over the objections of veteran CIA officers was, quote, unquote, unclear or from unknown sources. | ||
| The Intelligence Committee's oversight report reveals that CIA Director Brennan overruled senior CIA officers who challenged the Obama-ordered intelligence assessment, stating, quote, we don't have direct information that Putin wanted to get Trump elected. | ||
| Yet, the Obama-directed assessment was published on January 6, 2017, which explicitly stated, quote, we assess Putin and the Russian government aspired to help President-elect Trump's election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him, end of quote. | ||
| The CIA and FBI, then led by John Brennan and James Comey, expressed high confidence in this judgment, while the NSA expressed moderate confidence. | ||
| Yet as the report we released today shows, the ICA, the Intelligence Community Assessment, did not cite any report where Putin indicated helping Trump win was an objective. | ||
| The opposite is true. | ||
| With regards to the Steele dossier, we now know that one of the source documents that the Obama administration used in the creation of this intelligence assessment in January of 2017 was none other than the discredited, unverified Steele dossier. | ||
| The House Intel report states, quote, contradicting public claims by then CIA Director Brennan that the dossier was not in any way incorporated into this intelligence assessment, the dossier was referenced in the intelligence assessment's main body text and further detailed in a two-page assessment annex. | ||
| John Brennan lied, and he denied using this dossier in this intelligence assessment that President Obama ordered because he knew it was discredited. | ||
| It was a politically motivated, manufactured document. | ||
| He directed senior CIA officials to use it anyway. | ||
| CIA officer told the House Intelligence Committee staff as they investigated this, quote, the director of the CIA, John Brennan, refused to remove it. | ||
| And when confronted with the dossier's many flaws, responded, quote, yes, but doesn't it ring true? | ||
| Even the bipartisan Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report published in 2020 criticized the FBI's handling of the steel dossier, noting its completely unverified nature and purposeful sidestepping of intelligence community procedures in its use. | ||
| Now, President Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey, and others, including their mouthpieces in the media, knowingly lied as they repeated the contrived narrative that was created in this January 2017 intelligence community assessment with high confidence as though it were fact. | ||
| John Brennan, as CIA director, stated in a memo to his agency staff in December of 2016, saying, quote, there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election. | ||
| This was reported by NBC News, confirming that Brennan, along with James Clapper and James Comey, agreed with the CIA's assessment that Russia intervened to help Trump win the presidency. | ||
| As Obama's Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper was tasked with overseeing the creation of this assessment in January of 2017 by President Obama, and he expressed confidence in its findings. | ||
| In a 2018 interview with the Harvard Gazette, he talked about how he provided Trump with the same classified assessment that President Obama received, which included the high confidence judgment that Putin directly ordered the hacking and election interference. | ||
| Clapper then went on to add, I think they, the Russians, actually influenced the outcome. | ||
| This is a brief summary of the details that you'll find within the House Majority Staff's report in their investigation into the Obama-directed January 2017 intelligence community assessment. | ||
| That leads us to the very same conclusion that we announced in the release of our documents on Friday. | ||
| The implications of this are far-reaching and have to do with the integrity of our Democratic Republic. | ||
| It has to do with an outgoing president taking action to manufacture intelligence to undermine and usurp the will of the American people in that election and launch what would be a years-long coup against the incoming President of the United States, Donald Trump. | ||
| Absolutely bombshell stuff. | ||
| Gabbard uses a surprise White House appearance to attack Trump's enemies on the Russian investigation. | ||
| That's how ABC News characterizes it. | ||
| InfoWars, Tulsi Gabbard and Caroline Levitt detail, RussiaGate hoax investigation and answer press questions. | ||
| Again, we can go over this in detail in the next segment. | ||
| Suffice it to say, long story short, it was Obama. | ||
| At the end of the day, it was Obama and the intelligence community heads that we've talked about ever since it happened. | ||
| Comey, Clapper, Brennan, McCabe, et cetera. | ||
| Just like we've always said it was. | ||
| Again, this is one of those things where it's like, yeah, it's good it's being revealed. | ||
| It's not news to anybody that's been paying attention. | ||
| And it should end in criminal charges and Barack Obama getting his mugshot taken, not because of some fabricated claim about a loan that he paid back, but because of treason, because he committed treason against our country. | ||
| and his legacy is over. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're listening to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Yesterday was a day we've been waiting a very long time for. | ||
| Apparently. | ||
| Apparently, yesterday is a day we've been waiting a very long time for. | ||
| And that is for a government official in a position capable of doing something about it has come out. | ||
| Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence, has said that Obama directed a, quote, years-long coup and treasonous conspiracy against the American people and Trump. | ||
| And she confirms, in fact, that this has been sent over to the DOJ for prosecution under whatever charge they deem necessary. | ||
| Let's go now to clip 16. | ||
| This is Tulsi Gabbard answering that question explicitly. | ||
| Yes, this is not just a press conference to make people aware that this is the beginning of the legal process that if allowed to actually pursue justice will end in, at the very least, Barack Obama being charged with something with significant jail time. | ||
| And if we want to actually solve the problem that this Tulsi Gabber just laid out for us, there should be a lot more arrests along with him. | ||
| But here's Tulsi Gabber answering the question, is this just talk or are there charges coming? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. | |
| Do you believe that any of this new information implicates former President Obama in criminal behavior? | ||
| We have referred and will continue to refer all of these documents to the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate the criminal implications of this. | ||
| Correct. | ||
| The evidence that we have found and that we have released directly point to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. | ||
| There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead. | |
| Director Gamber, thank you. | ||
| Just two questions. | ||
| The president, yesterday you conferred that the former president, based on what you now see, do you believe President Obama is guilty of treason? | ||
| I'm leaving the criminal charges to the Department of Justice. | ||
| I'm not an attorney, but as I've said previously, when you look at the intent behind creating a fake manufactured intelligence document that directly contradicts multiple assessments that were created by the intelligence community, the expressed intent and what followed afterward can only be described as a years-long coup and a treasonous conspiracy against the American people, our republic, and an attempt to undermine President Trump's administration. | ||
| The Senate intelligence conspiracy, of course, this is how the Daily Beast is reporting on it. | ||
| Gabbard posts derange infographic to prove Obama claims. | ||
| House Intel or Trump's Intel chief goes all in on Russia Gate conspiracy as administration looks to distract from the Epstein outrage. | ||
| Look, there might be some truth to that. | ||
| There might very well be some truth to that. | ||
| I mean, they've tried everything else when it came to Epstein. | ||
| I think what's happening here is they realize that the Epstein thing's not going away, and they need something really big to distract from it. | ||
| So it's not even like this is a distraction, like meaning that's not real. | ||
| It could very well be that they're like, all right, we got to announce this Russia gate investigation that we're actually doing, like they're actually doing it, but maybe they're being forced to do it because they need a distraction from Epstein. | ||
| I'm not really sure. | ||
| What we do know is that when it gets to these higher levels, there are various factions. | ||
| While they're all more or less unified on the ultimate goal, globalism, destroying nationalism, and hating white people, etc. | ||
| There are different factions and different power structures that compete with each other and play off of each other. | ||
| So I mean, this may be the Epstein folks throwing the Obama folks under the ground or under the bus in order to distract from their nefarious activities. | ||
| It could certainly be something there. | ||
| And I don't think the timing is coincidental that here at the height of the Epstein mania when the Republican Congress is going to vacation early rather than release the documents about the pedophile blackmail ring. | ||
| And the Trump administration just handcrafts this scandal out of whole cloth as a present for the Democrats. | ||
| Again, just ridiculously absurd, absurdly bad PR. | ||
| Although, again, with Trump, there's always this thing where it's like, it could all be a trick, I guess. | ||
| I mean, it's kind of funny now. | ||
| We've got videos, and I'll go to these later because I want to stick to the Obama thing. | ||
| I'm trying not to conflate the Obama and the Epstein scandals. | ||
| There's a lot of overlap. | ||
| Now I'm just lost the plot. | ||
| So anyway, they may be just throwing Obama under the bus and trying to steal attention away. | ||
| Will this actually result in Obama going to prison? | ||
| We've got a lot of doubters out there saying this is all just a charade. | ||
| I guess it's up to Pam Bondi now. | ||
| So there's that. | ||
| It's on her desk, and we'll see where this comes, where this goes. | ||
| Trump's longtime rage at Obama roars back amid Epstein fur. | ||
| Man, Trump sort of lost his touch here. | ||
| If this was supposed to be a distraction from Epstein, it doesn't seem like it's working. | ||
| It seems like it is instead just further evidence of Trump's desperation to distract from Epstein. | ||
| What Tulsi Gabbard laid out is absolutely clear. | ||
| Again, if y'all can bring up that Daily Beast article, it's like you've got a conspiracy. | ||
| You've got an outright conspiracy. | ||
| And again, it's funny for people to act like the intelligence community doesn't conspire in secret. | ||
| Like, what do you think the intelligence community was created as? | ||
| Like, that's what it does. | ||
| Everything it does is secret. | ||
| All it does is conspire. | ||
| Anyway, Trump's intel chief goes all in on the Rushgate conspiracy as administration looks to distract from Epstein outrage. | ||
| If we can scroll down, so they got Tulsi as the just crazy conspiracy person. | ||
| DNI Tulsi Gabbard took to social media on Wednesday with a series of bizarre infographics as she doubles down on explosive claims about the 2016 election. | ||
| President Donald Trump and his team have turned on unsubstantiated conspiracies about Barack Obama when pressed with ongoing questions about convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
| You know, if y'all can print out this story for me, I think I need a physical copy. | ||
| I need a physical copy of that so I can illustrate some things. | ||
| But I want to go now to a video from Caroline Levitt. | ||
| Again, this is the same press conference. | ||
| This is just her sort of summing up in a minute or so what Tulsi Gabbard explained in those 10 minutes in case you're confused, like the authors of The Daily Beast, that I guess, again, it's just, do I take them seriously? | ||
| Do I act like The Daily Beast is writing that article in good faith? | ||
| Because we can pretend that's the case. | ||
| But we all understand that they know exactly what they're doing, right? | ||
| That this isn't hard to understand. | ||
| This isn't hard to comprehend, right? | ||
| If you can understand the idea that Vladimir Putin wanted Trump to win, so he bought some Facebook ads to sway the election. | ||
| Like if you can understand how Trump colluded with Russia, I think you can understand the complicated nuance of the intelligence community framing Trump. | ||
| Right. | ||
| So I don't believe that Daily Beast is like confused at what Tulsa Gabbard is laying out. | ||
| I don't believe that for a single second. | ||
| And again, we've known all of this forever. | ||
| Tulsi Gabbard, as far as I'm concerned, except for the thing about the Russians having, you know, DNC emails that talk about Hillary Clinton's tranquilizer use. | ||
| Okay, that's confirmation of what we assumed, but we didn't know it. | ||
| But the rest of the stuff, we just sort of already knew. | ||
| We've sort of already known this forever. | ||
| It's just that the media is in on it. | ||
| And that's the other thing that you have to realize. | ||
| Just like COVID, just like so many other things, just like weapons of mass destruction or whatever else, it's important that InfoWars is here so you can look back to 2016. | ||
| Go grab our archived videos from the first Trump administration or even before he was elected. | ||
| And it was never confusing to us how this came about, how or why this happened. | ||
| Somehow we knew that this was the intelligence community conspiring to falsify evidence to get a fake warrant on Trump to try to stop him from being president. | ||
| Somehow we all knew that this was going on and the mainstream media all missed it somehow. | ||
| No, they're in on it. | ||
| They know exactly what they're doing and they're in favor of it. | ||
| I bet if you ask them probably even now, maybe that's sort of the thing is that you can present them with this information and you can show them that Obama conspired with the FBI and the CIA and the five Eyes and any number of international forces to frame Trump to try to stop him from having a successful presidency. | ||
| And most leftists will probably say, yeah, good. | ||
| Good. | ||
| They were their heroes. | ||
| They were saving America from its own choices. | ||
| They're not against this. | ||
| They're just hypocrites. | ||
| Again, I laid it out yesterday. | ||
| Either this was bad, and Obama needs to be held to account, and Brennan and Clapper, and they all need to be held to account, or Trump just needs to do this to all of his enemies. | ||
| Let's go to this Caroline Levitt video where she, again, just lays out in no uncertain terms exactly what was explained by Tulsi Gabbard. | ||
| On another matter, over the past few days, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has unveiled shocking new evidence that former President Barack Obama and top aides in the Obama administration conspired to subvert President Trump's 2016 election victory and undermine the democratic will of the American people. | ||
| While publicly pretending to engage in a peaceful transfer of power, in private, former President Obama went to great and nefarious lengths to try to sow discord among the public and sabotage his successor, President Trump. | ||
| The new evidence released by the Director of National Intelligence, who is here with me today, confirms that the Obama administration manufactured politicized intelligence, which was later used as the justification for baseless smears against President Trump in an effort to try to delegitimize his victory before he even took the oath of office. | ||
| The truth is that President Trump never had anything to do with Russia, and the Russia collusion hoax was a massive fraud perpetuated on the American people from the very beginning. | ||
| And the worst part of this is Obama knew that truth, and so did all of the other corrupt officials involved in this scam, including former CIA Director John Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former FBI Director James Comey, former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and many others. | ||
| Director of National Intelligence Gabbard's report further confirms what we already knew. | ||
| There was no collusion, no corruption, except on the part of Barack Obama and the weaponized intelligence agencies at the time. | ||
| And I think the most important point of that, again, just drives to the heart of the hypocrisy of the left, that they were having conniption fits over the idea that Trump might potentially not support a peaceful transfer of power. | ||
| That everything about January 6th is around the peaceful transfer of power. | ||
| It's the ultimate symbol of our democracy. | ||
| It's the ultimate sacred act that to disobey it is treason. | ||
| It's the peaceful transfer of power. | ||
| Meanwhile, while the Democrats are crying and wailing and gnashing their teeth about the peaceful transfer of power, the Democrats themselves are working behind the scenes to make it impossible to peacefully transfer power, deliberately undercutting their opponents. | ||
| So it's like the number of aspects of just like criminality that come into this and conspiracy and manipulation. | ||
| Again, they couldn't get away with any of this if the media wasn't complicit in it. | ||
| If the media didn't treat the intelligence community as if they were God himself and their every word was gospel truth, if they actually questioned the statements that were being made, especially the statements that are verifiably and obviously false, they felt like interrogating those concepts, even momentarily, it was obvious from the beginning that this was all completely and utterly fraudulent. | ||
| And that's not even getting in to Peter Strzzok and the insurance policies, et cetera, et cetera. | ||
| Now, will anything actually come of this? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| What I do know is something has to come of it. | ||
| What I know is if we want America to continue to exist, something has to come of this. | ||
| The good news for us is that we don't have to do anything precedent-setting. | ||
| Right? | ||
| I might be a little, you know, well, it's never happened before. | ||
| Arresting a former president? | ||
| Well, guess what, dumbasses? | ||
| You set the president. | ||
| You arrested Donald Trump over the most flagrant bull crap the world has ever seen in an attempt to destroy him. | ||
| Now it's the Republicans' turns, not to make up just random nonsense about a loan that Obama paid back, but about the treasonous activity that we have him committing on record in collaboration with the treasonous actors in our intelligence communities. | ||
| And they have to be punished and thrown in jail. | ||
| They have to be. | ||
| They have to be, they have to be, they have to be. | ||
| It's just there is no other option here. | ||
| And nobody on my side is going to be satisfied until we see people in handcuffs. | ||
| All the talk in the world is just nothing. | ||
| It's just nothing. | ||
| It's pointless. | ||
| It's worthless. | ||
| We need results. | ||
| We need action. | ||
| We need finality. | ||
| To undermine faith in Israel. | ||
| Otherwise, shut up. | ||
| Right? | ||
| I think we're all feeling this. | ||
| And at this point, you know, again, if this had happened three months in, if we hadn't spent six months watching Trump sell America out to Israel, cover up the Epstein files, continue the Ukraine war, expand the Iran, the war with Iran. | ||
| If none of that had happened, we'd be popping champagne today, right? | ||
| What Tulsi Gabber did with her speech yesterday was monumental and huge. | ||
| And the fact that it's been put to the DOJ, we should be celebrating this, but I don't think anybody is going to blame anybody else for wanting to hold off on the celebrations for the time being. | ||
| Waiting for the proof to arrive. | ||
| Waiting for the validity of these statements to be confirmed and for the criminals that tried to steal our birthright are made an example of. | ||
| Until then, stop talking. | ||
| Stop talking. | ||
| I'm telling you, my daughter is two years old and she just figured out that she can say she's doing something and not actually do it. | ||
| And that's how I feel. | ||
| I'm like, all right, come sit in your chair. | ||
| She's like, okay. | ||
| And then she just keeps doing what she's doing. | ||
| And I'm like, can't just say, okay, you got to come do the thing. | ||
| That's how I feel with this. | ||
| Hey, will you throw Obama in prison? | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Okay, you're not doing it, though. | ||
| You can't just say, okay, you can't just say you're doing it and not actually do it. | ||
| So the crew printed out this Daily Beast article for me. | ||
| And I want to do a little bit of live editing here. | ||
| If we can go to Document Cam. | ||
| Gabbard posts, we'll just go ahead and what we're going to do here is just remove the editorial words and see if we can't get to the truth. | ||
| Gabbard posts infographic to, and we'll remove the scare quotes, to prove Obama claims. | ||
| Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, took to social media on Wednesday with a series of, not bizarre, just infographics. | ||
| They're just infographics. | ||
| They say they're bizarre. | ||
| Why are they bizarre? | ||
| What is bizarre about them? | ||
| Are they carved into lead? | ||
| That would be a bizarre way to do infographics. | ||
| Oh no, it's just pictures of people with descriptions of their activities and lines connecting them to other activities from other people with which they were associated. | ||
| So it's an infographic. | ||
| So there's nothing really bizarre about it. | ||
| You just don't like the information that it presents to you. | ||
| Okay, so we'll just remove the word bizarre there. | ||
| So with a series of infographics, as she doubles down on explosive claims about the 2016 election, that's a little editorial, but we'll leave it because they are explosive claims. | ||
| Doubling down is usually a term used when you're talking about somebody being wrong and doubling down. | ||
| So we'll erase that and just write as she makes. | ||
| She makes explosive claims about the 2016 election. | ||
| President Donald Trump and his team have turned to unsubstantiated conspiracies. | ||
| Well, that's not the right word because they are both substantiated and they are conspiracies. | ||
| So have turned to conspiracies. | ||
| We'll just, in fact, I should just substantiated. | ||
| Actually, highly substantiated conspiracies about Barack Obama. | ||
| Then it says, when pressed with ongoing questions about convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, well, that is not actually have anything to do with the story that you're telling. | ||
| So we'll go ahead and remove that. | ||
| We'll remove the out-of-left field context that's meant to frame the entire article in a less believable way. | ||
| We'll just remove that arbitrary and artificial injection into the article of unrelated information designed explicitly to just lower the, or I should say, increase the gullibility of the people reading the article. | ||
| On Wednesday, Gabbard announced that she declassified the House Intelligence Committee staff report on the intelligence community assessment in the 2016 election at Trump's direction. | ||
| Well, look, actual facts. | ||
| Look, a single sentence without a rhetorical flourish meant to tell you how you're supposed to react to the facts. | ||
| She then proceeded to post a new series of highly produced graphics highlighting what the Trump administration claimed were Obama-era lies about the election. | ||
| Okay, so this sentence is a little tricky. | ||
| I think we can do it. | ||
| She then proceeded to post a new series of not highly produced, they're just graphics. | ||
| Again, these words just don't mean anything. | ||
| Highly produced. | ||
| What's highly produced about them? | ||
| They were done in Photoshop? | ||
| Well. | ||
| Yeah, was it as highly, yeah, the Daily Beast produced highly, highly produced and unsubstantiated graphic art. | ||
| Literally more highly produced than her graphics. | ||
| Moving arrows? | ||
| They had to go through and isolate his hand so it went in front of her face. | ||
| They spent more time on this picture than Tulsi Gabber did on her infographics, just so we're clear. | ||
| Just so we understand when they say things like highly produced graphics, it doesn't actually mean anything at all. | ||
| Literally nothing. | ||
| Literally nothing. | ||
| But it's there to insinuate, to give you the idea that these graphics are somehow not legitimate or not. | ||
| They're just graphics. | ||
| They're just graphics, guys. | ||
| Okay, so she then produced to proceed to post a new series of graphics highlighting, and here they say what the Trump administration claimed. | ||
| Now, that again is just superlative and unnecessary. | ||
| We can just release that whole section of the sentence. | ||
| So instead, what we have is she then produced a new series of graphics highlighting Obama-era lies about the election. | ||
| See, when you get rid of all of the excessive, unnecessary, opinionated words in this article, what you find is that the director of national intelligence published evidence that Obama collaborated with the intelligence community to commit treason and try to destroy the first presidency of Donald Trump. | ||
| Then you add in words like highly produced, unsubstantiated, fabricated. | ||
| Like these words don't mean anything. | ||
| They don't add anything. | ||
| They're only there to manipulate the people reading the story so that even though they are presenting the facts, those facts are so surrounded by and overwhelmed by these opinions, then you're left believing a lie. | ||
| It's the latest in a series of information dumps Gabbard has made while arguing Obama officials manufactured claims that Russia worked to influence the election. | ||
| Well, this is interesting because I can just erase like the first half of this sentence, and it actually is true. | ||
| So then by erasing chunks of the first sentence and the first half of the second sentence, what we're left with is she then proceeds to post a new series of graphics highlighting Obama-era lies about the election. | ||
| Obama officials manufactured claims that Russia worked to influence the election. | ||
| Oh, look, it's the facts. | ||
| Look, they're buried. | ||
| You know, half of the article is facts and the other half are things to make you think that those facts don't say what they actually say. | ||
| Again, we will. | ||
| We'll get into what these facts are, and we'll continue to elaborate on just how thoroughly Barack Obama was involved in this, but you should be able to read these things for yourself. | ||
| All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
| This is the American Journal. | ||
| We are talking about the bombshell revelation by Tulsi Gabbard of what we've known all along. | ||
| And this is the thing. | ||
| You can get kind of lost in the weeds. | ||
| Obviously, the strategy of the left is to try to just obfuscate and confuse everybody as to what exactly is happening here. | ||
| Let me lay it out very, very, very clearly to you. | ||
| It's not difficult. | ||
| The powers that be conspired to try to stop Trump from being elected. | ||
| And when they failed, their backup plan was to hobble his presidency by saddling it with these claims of Russia collusion, stopping him from doing anything, most importantly, stopping him from interfering with their planned war against Russia. | ||
| Because it's not, don't think for a single second that it is a coincidence that Russia is the country that they chose to frame Donald Trump with, because they knew that if he had this media narrative going that he was a Russian agent, then that would force his actions against Russia's interest. | ||
| Because anything he did that it was remotely in favor of Russia, they'd be able to point to as evidence that he was serving Russia's interest. | ||
| So because they had long planned to start a war in Ukraine, try to weaken Russia through a proxy war before ultimately committing a regime change operation there in an effort to destroy a nationalistic bulwark to their globalist combine. | ||
| So they needed Trump to be influenced away from Russia, pushed away from Russia as much as possible. | ||
| And the best way to do that is frame him as being a Russian puppet so that on his own volition, he'll go out of his way to not fulfill that assumption and work against the interests of Russia and continue to exacerbate the conflict between us. | ||
| And of course, this came to a head when he called Ukraine and was trying to get information about the corrupt activities of American statesmen in that country, including Joe Biden and his son Hunter, but just tons of other people as well. | ||
| And they impeached him over it, again, as a defensive move to stop him from looking in to the facts of the case. | ||
| And because once you start pulling on that string, the whole sweater unravels. | ||
| So again, I think it's important to, I guess people who don't know this go back and try to understand it. | ||
| Should have grabbed more clips. | ||
| One of the most disturbing things about the press conference yesterday is Tulsi Gabbard lays out, again, and it's not complicated, it's not hard to understand. | ||
| She's a very clear speaker. | ||
| It's very obvious what she laid out. | ||
| And it was very disturbing what she laid out, that the president of the United States deliberately withheld exculpatory evidence so that they could continue to push a lie knowingly in a politicized attempt to weaponize the intelligence agencies against their political opponents. | ||
| That's just like a huge deal. | ||
| That is a gigantic deal. | ||
| And again, obviously we've known this forever, but for this to come from the director of national intelligence at the podium at the White House, you would think, one would think that even if just to maintain the bare semblance, the appearance of objectivity, | ||
| the people, the reporters in the White House press briefing room, when they heard this, would be outraged by it, would be astonished by it, would want to ask questions about how far this goes and if there are people still in the administration that maybe holdovers from this cabal. | ||
| I mean, this is a big deal. | ||
| Instead, they're defending him. | ||
| And this is the really incredible thing about the mind control of the globalists and how they've sort of reached critical mass in their mind control efforts. | ||
| They don't have to give out talking points. | ||
| They don't have to distribute position papers telling everybody under their control how they're supposed to feel. | ||
| They know it already. | ||
| They know it already. | ||
| So when they say that Obama was caught, and here's the evidence, here's the documents of him, you know, conspiring with the intelligence agencies to try to ruin Trump's presidency, they just immediately start arguing with her. | ||
| They just immediately start going, oh, well, if this was the case, then Trump was already president. | ||
| Why didn't he do it then? | ||
| Well, one of the people that you named, John Ratcliffe, is still working for your, so why haven't you fired him? | ||
| And they just know automatically we're not supposed to believe this. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the American Journal. | ||
| We'll move on because I don't know how much more there is to say about what Tulsi Gabbard revealed yesterday, except that it's basically everything that we've already known. | ||
| I mean, this is the thing. | ||
| If you were there in 2016, it's like you watched them throw Hillary Clinton into a van like a sack of potatoes. | ||
| And now it's like 10 years later, they're like, Hillary wasn't healthy. | ||
| It's like, yeah, we know. | ||
| No, we know. | ||
| No, we're aware. | ||
| Next, you're going to be telling me Pizzagate is real. | ||
| Next, you're going to be telling me Michelle Obama is a man. | ||
| Again, the sad thing about this is that any of this has to be explained to anybody, that the media is acting stupid and pretending like they didn't know. | ||
| This is a story from back in 2017. | ||
| Obama's campaign paid $972,000 to a law firm that secretly paid Fusion GPS in 2016. | ||
| It's by Sean Davis on the Federalist, again, all the way back in 2017. | ||
| Obama's campaign organization has paid nearly $1 million to the law firm that funneled money to Fusion GPS to compile a dossier of allegations against Donald Trump. | ||
| Former President Barack Obama's official campaign organization has directed nearly $1 million to the same law firm that funneled money to Fusion GPS, the firm behind the infamous Steele dossier. | ||
| Since April of 2016, Obama for America has paid over $972,000 to Perkins Cooey. | ||
| Records filed with the Federal Elections Commission show the Washington Post reported last week that Perkins Cooey, an international law firm, was directed by both the National Democratic Committee and Hillary Clinton's campaign to retain Fusion GPS in April of 2016 to dig up dirt on then-candidate Donald Trump. | ||
| Fusion GPS then hired Christopher Steele, a former British spy, to compile a dossier of allegations that Trump and his campaign actually colluded with the Russian government during the 2016 campaign. | ||
| Though many of the claims in the dossier have been directly refuted, none of the dossier allegations of collusion have been independently verified. | ||
| Lawyers for Steele admitted in court filings last April his work was not verified and never meant to be made public. | ||
| So again, Obama's campaign pays Perkins Cooey, who then employs Fusion GPS, who gets Christopher Steele to compile this fake dossier that the FBI then uses, despite knowing it came from opposition research, despite knowing that the claims were unverified, despite knowing that it was entirely false, pretended to believe it in order to get the warrants to spy on the Trump campaign under the assumption that once they started spying on the Trump campaign, there would be something they could get them for, right? | ||
| And if nothing else, then they would send Russian assets themselves. | ||
| The intelligence agencies would provide provisionary visas specifically for Russian agents to come into the country to go meet at Trump Tower with Trump administration officials to then point to that and say, see, they're meeting with Russian officials, even though it was the FBI themselves who sent the Russian officials in the first place. | ||
| Because we're dealing with just, this is spycraft. | ||
| This is intelligence community work. | ||
| This is what they do 24 hours a day, seven days a week. | ||
| It's crap like this. | ||
| And they're manipulating everybody. | ||
| But again, it's obvious. | ||
| It's imminently observable. | ||
| It is apparent to anybody with the ability to apply logic to a set of circumstances. | ||
| And again, as we go through this Daily Beast article, and we'll move on because we've got a lot of other stuff to talk about. | ||
| And again, I guess the question here is, is Obama going to be in handcuffs? | ||
| Is John Brennan going to be in handcuffs? | ||
| And if so, what happens then? | ||
| If so, are these leftist groups, the likes of Antifa, who just two weeks ago staged a murderous ambush, a multi-stage, highly coordinated military action against ICE agents, not to mention the ongoing insurrection encampment in Portland, the violent riots against immigration officers in LA, the Black Lives Matter crowd. | ||
| How would they respond to the arrest of Barack Obama if you have Democrat politicians, like they do every other time this happens, going out and stoking the fires and riling them up and telling them that the riot is the voice of the unheard calling violent attacks, | ||
| peaceful protest, an attempt to cover up the actions of their foot soldiers attacking their enemies at their orders because the President of the United States is seeking criminal charges against people who've committed criminal actions I wonder. | ||
| I wonder if I wonder how the left feels about Obama. | ||
| If he got arrested, would they even care at this point? | ||
| I don't even know. | ||
| Then again, they just hate Trump anyway and would use this as an excuse. | ||
| And a certain point, I guess it just like it just doesn't matter how hypocritical they are. | ||
| I guess it's just a fact we need to accept and move on from. | ||
| It is going to be funny, however, watching them cry about a former president being arrested. | ||
| So I just, for the sake of our country, these trials have to go on. | ||
| They have to be charged. | ||
| They have to be arrested. | ||
| They have to be thrown in prison. | ||
| This just has to happen. | ||
| And whatever it comes in the fallout of that, well, it'll just happen. | ||
| DOJ launches Strike Force to investigate Obama team's weaponization of Russia hoax against Trump. | ||
| A federal strike force is made up of teams of investigators from multiple agencies working together to take on complex cases. | ||
| The DOJ announced Wednesday the formation of the Strike Force in response to new revelations of how former President Barack Obama and member of the intelligence community fabricated the Russia hoax that haunted President Trump's first term and cost American taxpayers millions of dollars. | ||
| Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement that the strike force will assess the evidence and investigate potential next legal steps related to a damning 2020 report released this week by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. | ||
| So I guess this would be like what would we say? | ||
| This is like one-eighth of the way there. | ||
| I'm trying to think. | ||
| As far as I'm concerned, like if I was president, my priorities would be Jeffrey Epstein and that blackmail ring and the cover-up and the murder and the Mossad infiltration. | ||
| It would be COVID-19 and the vaccine poison, the creation of the lab leak, the lies to Congress, the cover-up, the shutting down schools and permanently injuring millions of people, as well as the massive deaths and the rise in turbo cancer, all that stuff. | ||
| Okay, we haven't seen any movement there. | ||
| Obviously, the abstain files are not seeing any movement on. | ||
| In fact, quite the opposite. | ||
| Then we have the 2016 election, but then we also have the 2020 election. | ||
| So out of all of these, this is the first one that's actually shown some sign of movement. | ||
| But so far, nothing real has happened. | ||
| All we have is this bizarre and highly produced infographic. | ||
| Oh, what's that? | ||
| It's just an infographic. | ||
| Never mind. | ||
| It's just a very normal infographic. | ||
| It's actually not a very good infographic. | ||
| It could have been done a hell of a lot better. | ||
| It ain't great. | ||
| It ain't great. | ||
| But even instead of just like focusing on the facts of it, I think it's more valuable to try to teach people how they themselves can read this information and glean the truth from it. | ||
| Like I said, if you erase about half of this Daily Beast article, then it is a true article. | ||
| However, the facts are constantly obscured by just inadequate information or straight-up opinions. | ||
| And the next line here is pretty great. | ||
| However, as Gabbard continues to release the documents, she has strategically conflated two separate Russian activities in her messaging. | ||
| The documents determine Russia did not attack election infrastructure or hack the election, but the intelligence community did find that Russia tried to influence the ballot. | ||
| Okay, well, the intelligence community finding that Russia tried to influence the ballot doesn't actually mean anything, does it? | ||
| It doesn't actually mean anything. | ||
| They didn't actually present proof that this happened. | ||
| They never actually made the case. | ||
| Even if Russia tried, like, what does that even mean? | ||
| It means that they didn't do it. | ||
| Right? | ||
| So you can take this paragraph, and it's multiple sentences, and out of all of it, there's about 10 words that actually should be in the article. | ||
| So you can just release, however, as Gabbard continued to release a document, she has strategically conflated two Russian activities in her messaging. | ||
| No, she hasn't. | ||
| This is the part that's true. | ||
| The documents determine Russia did not attack election infrastructure or hack the election, and the rest of it is unnecessary. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| So again, I'm just, I want to teach you that in this Daily Beast article that is replete with lies, the truth exists, and you can find it. | ||
| She accused officials of promoting the lie that Vladimir Putin and the Russian government helped President Trump win the 2016 election. | ||
| The report itself directly states Russia worked to undermine the election. | ||
| What was less conclusive in that specific report was Russia's preferred candidate, which was the whole point. | ||
| I just want you to understand, A, how bad this is, how bad our situation is, and B, how we got here. | ||
| The situation is bad enough that just everything is a lie. | ||
| Our own government works against us constantly. | ||
| Even when we follow the rules and do everything right, they label us domestic terrorists, kick down our door in the middle of the night, haul us away at gunpoint. | ||
| It's really bad. | ||
| It's really, really bad in America right now. | ||
| And the reason it's that bad, the way that we got here, is articles like this, is this type of activity. | ||
| Do you think the intelligence community could get away with what it gets away with without the media deliberately obscuring reality? | ||
| Without articles like this designed in a very sophisticated way to drive people away from the truth? | ||
| This requires a universal ubiquitous conspiracy at every level. | ||
| Almost a again, it's hard to explain. | ||
| It's hard to even fathom how this mind control works, like how thoroughly controlled these people's minds are. | ||
| Again, the director of national intelligence comes out and says the former president weaponized the intelligence community against his opponent and he is being referred to the DOJ for criminal charges, possibly up to and including treason, for which the death penalty is the ultimate consequence. | ||
| And in response, instead of shock and horror at what was revealed, every question asked was trying to downplay it, was trying to poke holes in it, was trying to, and like it just doesn't, it just doesn't make, it just doesn't make any sense. | ||
| You present these people with something they've never seen before, and they just immediately know that they're not supposed to believe it, and they're supposed to look for ways to undercut it. | ||
| Like that's, and it's, it, it truly is wild to see how this works. | ||
| So again, it's not complicated. | ||
| It's not hard to understand. | ||
| Russia did not prefer Hillary or Trump. | ||
| That's pretty much all you need to know. | ||
| So all of the claims of Trump's Russia collusion were all false. | ||
| And again, just goes on and on. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| We can just move on. | ||
| But it's just when you, like, when you start thinking about everything that's gone on, all that she talked about, Tulsi Gabbard, was after the election, which wasn't even where most of the criminality took place. | ||
| This was the cover-up. | ||
| Really, what she's talking about here is just the cover-up of the Rush occlusion narrative, which started back in early 2016 with the intention and the design of spying on Trump, releasing, you know, leaking information, | ||
| screwing over his campaign, covering up for the crimes of Hillary Clinton, including the Benghazi emails, including the private server, including the Pizzagate emails that were exposed, including the pay-for-play and the, you know, selling Stingray weapons to terrorists in al-Qaeda, funneling them through Libya, which is why Benghazi was attacked in the first place. | ||
| They cover all of that up while simultaneously launching fake warrants against Trump. | ||
| I mean, you're talking about surveillance. | ||
| You're talking about just manipulating the warrant process, crime upon crime upon crime. | ||
| And none of that is even included in this. | ||
| This is just the cover-up. | ||
| This was after Trump was elected, what they did to try to sweep up and cover up and perpetuate this narrative to lay the groundwork for impeachment later on and to perpetuate the antagonism between Russia and America with the intention of starting a war between Ukraine and Russia as a proxy against the nationalistic forces arrayed against the globalist schemers. | ||
| We can move on. | ||
| We can move on now. | ||
| But I do want to point out just how sort of incestuous all of this is. | ||
| So you've got Perkins Cooey. | ||
| So you've got Obama paying $1 million to Perkins-Cooey, who hires the Fusion GPS, who gets the steel dossier. | ||
| Now, Trump gets back into office in 2024, and he wants to go after these agencies or these law firms like Perkins Cooey and a few others. | ||
| And he basically says, you people tried to destroy me. | ||
| I'm going to take your license away. | ||
| I'm going to punish you somehow. | ||
| I'm going to use whatever authority I have to stop you from doing what you did to me and other people. | ||
| So let's say Perkins Cooey, what should I write? | ||
| What do they say? | ||
| They say like pro bono. | ||
| So then these law firms go, you know what? | ||
| We understand. | ||
| We're sorry of what we did. | ||
| We are going to, you know, please don't, please don't destroy us. | ||
| Please don't, you know, take away our ability to function. | ||
| In return, we'll do pro bono work for you. | ||
| Do you know what the pro bono work they are doing for Trump is? | ||
| It's writing the anti-Semitism laws. | ||
| It's writing the anti-Semitism Awareness Act and getting that passed. | ||
| That's what Perkins Cooey is doing in apology for trying to destroy Trump, as well as being one of the leading forces behind the January 6th political persecutions. | ||
| Law firm says Trump order targeting it specifically is an attack on the rule of law. | ||
| The law firm Perkins Cooey is suing the Trump administration, alleging that a recent executive order targeting the firm is unconstitutional and aims to punish it for representing clients and causes that are opposed to the administration. | ||
| President Trump signed an executive order last week addressing risks from Perkins-Cooey LLP that accused the firms of dishonest and dangerous activity that sought to overturn laws and elections and said it racially discriminates against its own attorneys and staff through its diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. | ||
| In the lawsuit filed Tuesday in federal court in Washington, D.C., and again, this was back in the beginning of Trump's second administration, attorneys for Perkins-Cooey called the executive order an affront to the Constitution and our adversarial system of justice. | ||
| Its plain purpose is to bully those who advocate points of view that the president perceives as adverse to the views of his administration, whether those views are presented on behalf of paying or pro bono clients. | ||
| But of course, what Trump was doing was accusing Perkins-Cooey of a range of nefarious actions over the years, allegedly seeking to undermine Democratic elections as well as the integrity of the U.S. courts and law enforcement. | ||
| The order specifically mentions the firm's representation of Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign and the role attorneys at Perkins-Cooey played in the creation of a dossier of unsubstantiated allegations about the possible Trump-Russia ties. | ||
| The lawsuit pushes back against any allegations of wrongdoing. | ||
| It notes that Trump filed a lawsuit in 2022 against Perkins Cooey, Hillary Clinton, and others alleging a conspiracy against Trump. | ||
| The case was dismissed months later by a federal court. | ||
| Michael Sussman was charged by the Democrat by the Justice Department, special counsel in connection with his work related to the dossier. | ||
| A jury found him not guilty at trial. | ||
| Trump's order also accuses the law firm of racial discrimination because of its diversity, equity, and inclusion practices. | ||
| And so Perkins Ku, in order to avoid this punishment from Trump for trying to undercut the rule of law and overthrow the results of the Democratic election, they said, don't worry, we're going to offer pro bono work and we're going to write anti-Semitism laws for you to put into place. | ||
| You're welcome. | ||
| You're so welcome. | ||
| As well as a number of other things. | ||
| I'm trying to remember exactly what it was, but it's nothing good. | ||
| It's all just like, yeah, so they're writing, they're going to be writing laws that just like to criminalize language. | ||
| What, what? | ||
| And like at a certain point, you got to admire it. | ||
| You almost got to admire it. | ||
| Like they're, they get caught doing something bad, but they're powerful enough that they're not, they don't actually get punished for it. | ||
| And so they're like, we'll do pro bono work. | ||
| And they just write laws that make it illegal for you to criticize them. | ||
| They're like, that's our community service. | ||
| What? | ||
| Oh, it's just infuriating. | ||
| It really is just infuriating. | ||
| these people need to be put in prison I'll say for now. | ||
| I got to find where the actual... | ||
| This is the problem. | ||
| If I don't... | ||
| But if I don't compile everything before the show, I just can't find it because Google just hides everything. | ||
| And I have to sit here and figure out exactly how I'm trying to say it. | ||
| President, the real losers in Trump's law firm deal aren't who you think. | ||
| Wealthy firms may be spared punishment. | ||
| Their needy clients will pay the price. | ||
| Earlier this month, U.S. judge, a federal judge, made the right call declaring President Trump's executive order targeting the law firm of Perkins Cooey utterly unconstitutional to justify the penalties the president sided purely political reasons, including the fact that the firm had represented Hillary Clinton, his opponent, in the 2016 Democratic presidential race. | ||
| Yeah, well, why is Rudy Giuliani losing everything he owns? | ||
| Why is he being forced to give up his father's watch? | ||
| Oh, because he was President Trump's lawyer? | ||
| Again, just try. | ||
| Try to find an example of these people complaining about something that they themselves haven't done. | ||
| Everything they complain about, they do first. | ||
| It's just crazy. | ||
| So the Trump administration is demanding a pledge of nearly $940 million worth of pro bono legal services collectively to the administration, basically saying, you know, if you don't want to be punished, you've got to give us nearly a billion dollars worth of pro bono work. | ||
| Initially, the pro bono work would include assisting veterans in making the justice system fair. | ||
| Since then, the White House has said the firm should be called upon to provide free representation to coal companies, to police accused of use of excessive force, and the White House itself, the White House has already told the firms the president intends to use their pro bono work for implementing their America First agenda. | ||
| So what they ended up actually doing is writing the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act. | ||
| They're like, you'll assist veterans in getting health care and making the Justice Department safer and helping coal companies. | ||
| Or maybe you'll have to defend police in their use of excessive force. | ||
| And then at the end of the day, it's like, oh, no, actually, there's writing laws saying that you can't criticize Jewish people. | ||
| And that's the work that they've done for us. | ||
| Thanks, guys. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the American Journal. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Support us by going to the AlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| Go to thealxjonesstore.com slash Harrison to let them know who sent you. | ||
| We got massive deals going on there. | ||
| And of course, it keeps us on the air and way out and ahead of the rest of the news. | ||
| As if you were one of the people who were shocked by Jeffrey Epstein's arrest and subsequent murder in 2019, you're about 15 years behind the curve in terms of knowing who Jeffrey Epstein was and what he was up to and what the purpose of his activities was. | ||
| And, you know, I still am just, I don't know, I mean, they're going to have to like teach courses about the way this Epstein case has been handled by Trump. | ||
| It is so baffling. | ||
| It is so nonsensical. | ||
| One of the only ways I can make sense of it, and I don't even think this is the case, but this would make all the puzzle pieces fit, is if this was 5D chess. | ||
| Because right now you've got Democrats demanding that they release the Epstein files for the first time ever because they've been convinced that the reason Trump doesn't want to release them is because he's in them. | ||
| So they think that by releasing them, that'll hurt Trump. | ||
| But there's way more Democrats on that list than Trump than Republicans. | ||
| And Bill Clinton was way, way closer of an associate to Jeffrey Epstein than Donald Trump ever was. | ||
| But like now, it's just, this is it's so crazy. | ||
| It's so crazy. | ||
| Because you now have articles that just the entire article is just about Trump being friends with Epstein. | ||
| It's a different headline. | ||
| This is Wall Street Journal Justice Department told Trump in May that his name is among many in the Epstein files. | ||
| But again, it doesn't mean that he's guilty of anything. | ||
| His name is just in the list of phone numbers or whatever that Epstein had. | ||
| Nobody's denying that they knew each other. | ||
| Is this one I was just looking at? | ||
| I mean, the whole thing, it just allows them to write articles now that are just like, you know, Donald Trump's best friend, Jeffrey Epstein, Epstein, who was friends with the president, Donald Trump, for a long time, and they were great associates. | ||
| And now Donald Trump is covering up the Epstein. | ||
| Epstein and Donald Trump and Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
| Jeffrey Epstein being covered up by Donald Trump. | ||
| And it's just like, this is so stupid. | ||
| It is impossible to even understand how badly Trump messed this up, which again is why I'm like, okay, the only, like, either he's a genius and this is all working perfectly because he's getting all this attention on the Epstein fault. | ||
| Not that it was necessary. | ||
| Because that doesn't even make any sense. | ||
| It doesn't even make any sense that way. | ||
| So, no, that's not the case. | ||
| That's not what's happening here. | ||
| But this is from an hour ago. | ||
| Justice Department officials are expected to interview Ghillain Maxwell, the Jeffrey Epstein associate, serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for sex trafficking in Tallahassee, Florida on Thursday. | ||
| According to two people with knowledge of the situation, Todd Blanche, the number two official at the department who brokered the meeting, is in Florida. | ||
| Though it's not clear whether he would attend or conduct the interview, one of those people said the interview is part of the department's effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details about Trump's interaction with high-profile figures, including President Trump. | ||
| Really, it just really is hilarious how much they have just taken this. | ||
| And now Donald Trump, like, it's just, you, like, how could you have handled this worse? | ||
| How could you have handled this worse? | ||
| Donald Trump was never a suspect in the Epstein files. | ||
| They would point out that he was friends every time it came up. | ||
| But we've got the Epstein victims saying, like, on record in their depositions, they're asked, like, who were Jeffrey Epstein's associates? | ||
| Who were his friends that helped him do this? | ||
| Who do you conspire with? | ||
| And their answer is Bill Clinton. | ||
| Their answer is, if you want to know about what Jeffrey Epstein is up to, ask Bill Clinton. | ||
| He was his best friend. | ||
| That's according to the victim. | ||
| Stories about them traveling around going. | ||
| I told a story when I was on with Alex Stein, a Jeffrey Epstein victim, was also a guest, and she said that Bill Clinton introduced her to Jeffrey Epstein by saying, meet the king of America. | ||
| So somehow, it's gone from Trump had nothing to do with Epstein. | ||
| And in fact, as soon as he learned he was under any suspicion at all, immediately kicked him out of his club. | ||
| One of the prosecutors who was investigating Epstein is on camera saying, I reached out to everybody I could that knew Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
| Not a single person returned my call except for Donald Trump, who said, I'll give you anything you want. | ||
| What do you need? | ||
| I'm here to help. | ||
| And again, it just goes on and on and on. | ||
| So you go for years. | ||
| Not only is Donald Trump totally not associated with Epstein in any real way, but he is the one pushing it. | ||
| He and his functionaries are the ones talking about Epstein. | ||
| Jeffrey Epstein visited Bill Clinton's White House at least 17 times in two years. | ||
| And yet somehow, Trump has handled this so badly that every article has framed this entire thing as if the only reason Epstein was ever even talked about because he was such good friends with Donald Trump. | ||
| And all of his activities involve Donald Trump. | ||
| And the cover-up is to protect Donald Trump alone. | ||
| Bafflingly bad handling of this situation. | ||
| Inexplicable, insane, insane. | ||
| Again, Trump was the one pushing this. | ||
| Trump is on the campaign trail saying we're going to release the Epstein files. | ||
| And in the last few months, it's gotten to the point. | ||
| This is that same article. | ||
| It's just the scrolling sort of New York Times constant update article. | ||
| They say Ghislaine Maxwell, Justice Department officials are expected to interview Ghislaine Maxwell, the former girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein, who's serving 20 years since for sex trafficking. | ||
| Two people of the knowledge said this is over the investigation into Mr. Epstein, who died in 2019 while awaiting trial. | ||
| Mr. Trump, a former friend of Mr. Epstein, has sought to redirect attention from the matter. | ||
| Lawyers for hundreds of Mr. Epstein's victims said the executors of the financier's estate have a copy of a book in which Mr. Trump was reported to have signed a body poem as a drawing for Mr. Epstein's 50th birthday. | ||
| The lawyer told the MSNBC that he believed the estate would be willing to give the book compiled by Ms. Maxwell in 2003 to federal authorities. | ||
| Mr. Trump has denied signing the book and he's actually launched lawsuits for defamation about those claims. | ||
| Trump at the Fed. | ||
| Mr. Trump is set to visit the Federal Reserve on Thursday. | ||
| His administration keeps up its attacks on the central bank over its management of the economy and revelations at its headquarters, or renovations at its headquarters, rather. | ||
| So again, I just, I cannot, I cannot understand how it's gone from this being a major right-wing talking point, a tool in Trump's toolkit, something that Democrats were terrified of even referencing because they knew how closely the Democrat or elite are tied up with Epstein. | ||
| It has gone from pure, like this, this is, I'm trying to like think of another, like something else that could happen that would be like the equivalent of this. | ||
| I mean, this would literally be like you open up the newspaper and it's an article about how Donald Trump created transgenderism and how Donald Trump is trying to force men who dress like women into women's sports and how transgenderism like kind of wasn't even a thing until Donald Trump brought it up. | ||
| And now Donald Trump is forcing women to compete with men by this thing he made up called transgenderism. | ||
| Even that's not even, it doesn't even quite do it justice. | ||
| Like, how do you how do you mess up this badly? | ||
| I genuinely don't know. | ||
| I genuinely don't know. | ||
| Now, there was a request to unseal a lot of the grand jury information about Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
| That, however, was unfortunately blocked yesterday by a federal judge with demon eyes. | ||
| I would say that her eyes are those of some sort of demon, like a cartoon demon. | ||
| Like if you ever watch anime and you see an anime drawing of a demon, that's sort of how her eyes look, if the crew can find them. | ||
| And there's an interesting connection there. | ||
| I guess the judge's name is Rosenberg. | ||
| And coincidentally, get this, she's married to former state attorney for Palm Beach County, Michael McCoff. | ||
| Rosenberg is Jewish. | ||
| As distant soap notes, wait a second, you're telling me that the federal judge who won't release the Epstein grand jury documents is married to the Florida district attorney who stonewalled the West Palm Beach police chief when he was trying to charge Epstein back in 2008? | ||
| Incredible coincidence. | ||
| So you've got Pam Bondi, who was Attorney General or some high-up position, and yeah, they're the eyes. | ||
| They're the weird upside-down eyes. | ||
| I have anything you can particularly point to. | ||
| It's just there's something uncanny about her, isn't there? | ||
| I'm not. | ||
| Yeah, right. | ||
| She looks like she cut her face out of a paper bag or something. | ||
| I don't know how to explain it. | ||
| Like it's a homemade Halloween mask of some sort. | ||
| She's a weird-looking lady. | ||
| She's a weird-looking lady, but she's married to the guy who was in charge of the Epstein case in Florida. | ||
| All the way back in 2005, 2008. | ||
| Isn't that a coincidence? | ||
| You know, Pam Bondi helped get him the deal as well. | ||
| Alex Acosta was involved in the early prosecutions of Epstein. | ||
| That's where the claim that he belonged to intelligence comes from. | ||
| Isn't that coincidental? | ||
| Isn't that strange that the judge who blocks the release of Epstein's grand jury documents just so happens to be married to the man who was the prosecutor against Jeffrey Epstein and gave him the sweetest of sweetheart deals, where he could even fly to other countries. | ||
| He could go visit the Virgin Islands as long as he was back within 24 hours. | ||
| That was his punishment. | ||
| That was his house arrest. | ||
| So the Jeffrey Epstein case begins in 2005 in Palm Beach County, where it was later revealed in Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal case that his sexual abuse of children here began a decade earlier in the 1990s. | ||
| Maxwell enlisted Epstein's chauffeur and traveled all over the country to find girls for Epstein. | ||
| She picked up one of the most spotlighted ones, Virginia Robert Jouffre, at Mar-a-Lago, where the 15-year-old and her father worked. | ||
| And again, when Trump found out about it, he kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| And this is just going through the timeline here. | ||
| I'll just go ahead and do the search because I found it earlier. | ||
| Michael McCoff. | ||
| Epstein is released from jail to spend one year on house arrest, but is allowed to travel frequently, such as to his private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands, as long as he's back within 24 hours. | ||
| His lawyers asked to end house arrest early, a request rejected by Kirscher's successor, Michael McAulf. | ||
| I don't know how the hell to pronounce his name. | ||
| McAuliffe. | ||
| A few potential violations of his house arrest are documented in state attorney's files, but no one takes action. | ||
| A violation could have sent Epstein back to jail. | ||
| Well, yeah, if he wasn't a Mossad agent, he'd go back to jail. | ||
| No, a normal person would go back to jail for violating the terms of their release. | ||
| Not Jeffrey Epstein, though. | ||
| Not Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
| Jeffrey Epstein gets caught running a nationwide pedophile sex trafficking ring. | ||
| He gets put on house arrest where he can leave for 24 hours and go to the Virgin Islands if he wants. | ||
| And he never actually has to spend any time behind bars. | ||
| And whenever he violates the very lenient conditions of his release, nothing happens. | ||
| He didn't work from jail, though. | ||
| He just didn't go to jail. | ||
| I don't know if the audience could hear that. | ||
| Matt just said he worked from jail. | ||
| He didn't go to jail. | ||
| It was overnight. | ||
| No, he would, they would literally chauffeur him. | ||
| The sheriff or the whatever law enforcement would pick him up from the jail in the morning, drive him home or to his office, and then drive him back to jail at night. | ||
| And he'd stay there at night. | ||
| But if you got 24 hours, that means he could sleep in the Virgin Island. | ||
| He didn't even have to really go back and check in. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It just, he just was allowed to get away with it. | |
| It's not that complicated. | ||
| And the next time he's arrested is in 2019, but he's been abusing women for the 15 years in between that. | ||
| And all of the people involved in this early whitewashing fake conviction are all back on the scene now helping to continue to cover it up, including the wife of the prosecutor who was in charge of his case. | ||
| It's just wild. | ||
| It really is. | ||
| It really is. | ||
| And then you have stuff like this. | ||
| To Epstein's first prosecutors, victims were prostitutes. | ||
| There's an article from all the way back in 2019. | ||
| Ever since Jeffrey Epstein became a pariah for abusing dozens of teenage girls at his Palm Beach mansion, federal prosecutors have been blasted for engineering the deal of the century for the uber, wealthy, sexual predator. | ||
| But in a twisted saga, but the twisted saga started and could have ended with the public official originally handling the case, former Palm Beach County State Attorney Barry Kreischer. | ||
| You know what? | ||
| I got a bad feeling about this. | ||
| What's Barry Kreischer doing now? | ||
| So Barry Kreischer apparently acted as if Epstein's teenage accusers were prostitutes who eagerly sold their bodies to buy clothes at the mall instead of treating them like high school girls who said they'd been sexually assaulted by a man four decades their senior. | ||
| Kirscher decided he didn't believe them, but based on a review of the state attorney's investigative files, no one from Kirscher's office, Kreischer's office, ever interviewed the girls or their parents. | ||
| His lead prosecutor declared more than once that there were no victims in the case, adding to documents obtained by the post. | ||
| Finally, Kreischer found a secret way to sync the case. | ||
| He took it to a grand jury where only one victim testified. | ||
| It was the first time same sex crime case was presented to a grand jury by his office. | ||
| 13 teens gave police nearly identical accounts of how the politically connected financier used his wealth to exploit the underage girls. | ||
| Yet the task of convincing jurors that Epstein was a predator fell on the shoulders of one 14-year-old girl. | ||
| Kreischer's office then undermined its own witness, who told police she'd been fondled by naked Epstein while she gave him a massage, sources close to the grand jury proceedings told the Post. | ||
| Prosecutor Lana Belo-Halvek peppered the girl with questions about her social media pages, The sources said. | ||
| The girl's MySpace account supplied by prosecutors to two prosecutors by Epstein's lawyers portrayed her drinking liquor with boys and talking about sex. | ||
| Unmoved by her testimony, the grand jury came up with one charge of solicitation of prostitution, what a John would face. | ||
| So basically, the children that he was abusing were treated like prostitutes by the prosecutor charged with bringing justice and ensuring their safety. | ||
| Two years later, South Florida U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta negotiated the much-maligned secret deal that allowed Epstein to avoid federal prison. | ||
| So. | ||
| So I just, you know, it takes a village, doesn't it? | ||
| They say it takes a village to raise a child. | ||
| No, it takes a community, a society, to cover up something this large. | ||
| This is not the action of a single individual. | ||
| And that may be, you know, the major outcome of this, is that they act like this one guy somehow has all of these people working to cover up for him. | ||
| All of these people making sweetheart deals, calling his victims prostitutes, the media coming in to obfuscate things, make it look like this is all about Trump saving his own ass. | ||
| I mean, it just goes on and on and on. | ||
| And it requires the complicity or the collaboration or the actual participation of all of these people. | ||
| Now what could explain that? | ||
| Intelligence is the only thing. | ||
| Intelligence is the only thing that explains this. | ||
| Again, everything about the way Epstein is being talked about right now is just at the height of absurdity as they frame it. | ||
| As now, like, if you didn't really know about Epstein, started reading the newspapers now, you would think the entire thing revolves around Trump. | ||
| And that Trump was his number one client, and that Trump was his best friend, and Trump, and like the only reason Epstein was ever arrested was because of you know, Trump is a bad guy. | ||
| It's like it's really beyond comprehension just how badly they have failed in every possible way to handle this situation and how they've given Democrats absolutely everything they need to frame it dishonestly. | ||
| And I can't blame them for having a field day. | ||
| I just hope they get what they ask for. | ||
| I just hope they get what they want. | ||
| I hope they get what they want and that he gets released and that we see all of the dirty deeds Bill Clinton and his friends got up to. | ||
| Because it sure as hell wasn't Trump the entire time. | ||
| We'll move on. | ||
| Let's go ahead and go to clip number six here because this is what I'm talking about. | ||
| This is the genius move. | ||
| That's how this was posted. | ||
| A genius move. | ||
| The House Democrats were able to pass a motion in the GOP-controlled House Oversight Subcommittee to subpoena all the Jeffrey Epstein files. | ||
| Let's watch clip number six. | ||
| Document into the record listing the members of this committee and their individual calls to release the Epstein files. | ||
| Sauna, without objection. | ||
| The subcommittee stands in recess, subject to the call of the chair. | ||
| Point of order. | ||
| Are we not going to take the vote? | ||
| We're in recess. | ||
| That was a previous order. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Mr. Chair, we need to take the vote for the motion. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're in recess of the previous order, which passed without objection. | |
| We would move to those votes. | ||
| This is not a border conversation. | ||
| We have the previous order. | ||
| This would be moved until after deliberation. | ||
| We have planned. | ||
| When are we back in session for this committee subcommittee? | ||
| After votes? | ||
| So to the call of the chair at that state. | ||
| so And now we will be calling up Ms. Lee's motion as amended. | ||
| All those in favor say aye. | ||
| Aye. | ||
| All those opposed, no. | ||
| No. | ||
| Any opinion of the... | ||
|
unidentified
|
I have it. | |
| Any opinion, chair, the no has it. | ||
| Recorded vote, sir. | ||
| Recorded vote is called for. | ||
| The clerk will read the call the roll. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mr. Gosar. | |
| Mr. Biggs. | ||
| So you hear the Republicans are all voting no, but the Democrats are voting yes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Aye. | |
| Again, I can only hope that this is, maybe, maybe this is the intended outcome of Trump. | ||
| Like, you've got Democrats who are just like, they're like giddy. | ||
| They're like laughing. | ||
| They're like, ah, the eyes have it. | ||
| We're going to release the document. | ||
| It's like you, I don't know. | ||
| Are they just playing into Trump's hands? | ||
| Is that what's happening? | ||
| Because as far as I know, and from all the evidence I've ever seen, testimony for people that have no reason to like or want to help Donald Trump at all, from the victims of Epstein to the lawyers of Epstein to the prosecutors involved, every one of them ubiquitously has said Donald Trump not only wasn't involved, he actively worked to stop Epstein's activities. | ||
| And yet the Democrats are demanding they release The files. | ||
| The Democrats think that they have Trump up against the rope here and that Trump really doesn't want them to release the files. | ||
| This might all be reverse psychology. | ||
| Forget 5D chess. | ||
| It's just simple reverse psychology. | ||
| No, Democrats, don't release the Epstein files. | ||
| No, please don't. | ||
| Don't do that. | ||
| We would hate that. | ||
| All right, folks, welcome back. | ||
| Third hour of the American Journal is on. | ||
| I'm going to go to a special report. | ||
| Alex Jones posted on his Twitter earlier today. | ||
| It's the most important thing you need to know about the Epstein scandal and the subsequent cover-up. | ||
| Here's Alex Jones. | ||
| You can follow him on X at RealAlex Jones. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. | |
| 18 days ago, when the Epstein case attempted gaslighting mega scandal began, and they put out that Justice Department memo, I went on air that Monday, came out Sunday night, and I said, this is Trump. | ||
| I said, it's not Vambondi. | ||
| And all of Trump's surrogates basically attacked me and said that I was insane and it was just some big mistake. | ||
| And then that afternoon, Trump came out through social and said, no, this is what he wants to move on. | ||
| And the next day, he attacked the reporter at the White House and said, how dare you stand on the graves of dead kids or whatever to go to Texas. | ||
| And then his surrogates began to really attack viciously anybody that asked questions. | ||
| That was a giant slap in the face to everybody. | ||
| And I said, dude, this is going to be a mega scandal. | ||
| Congress is going to have hearings. | ||
| You don't have to wait till the Democrats get in. | ||
| The Republicans are going to have them. | ||
| And this could derail the entire MAGA Trump revolution that we really need because we were facing total financial collapse. | ||
| Trump's agenda on tariffs and trade and everything's working. | ||
| The border, it's working. | ||
| He's doing a great job. | ||
| Now, then, about a week into it, I had time to analyze everything and do my research, talk to all my sources. | ||
| And I said, this is what it is. | ||
| The Comeys on record, Brennan and Clapper and others, have had the files and what they want to be in the files forever. | ||
| And they dropped it down on themselves that they had the big cache of truckloads of material in New York. | ||
| Bondi found out about it from whistleblowers that I first broke about, who weren't bad, but it was through the Great Bond. | ||
| They were manipulated into it, obviously, that, oh, we've got all this stuff here. | ||
| They go grab the files, and boom, it's salted with innuendo and recycled garbage that we saw in 2016, 2017, and on. | ||
| And I said, watch, you'll start seeing that be leaked out. | ||
| And of course, he's in the files because these are just endless voluminous amounts of different FBI investigations and interviews, investigations into the five different Jane Does that turn out to be fake, that accused Trump of raping him with Epstein, all the rest of it. | ||
| And then sure enough, that's now what's coming out of the Wall Street Journal. | ||
| And quote, he's in the files. | ||
| And that Trump learned in May that he was in the files. | ||
| And that's when he had Bongino and them come out and say, shut this down, move on. | ||
| He wouldn't have said release them before if he had thought of the fact they did that. | ||
| So my analysis with all the key data and logic has been proven right. | ||
| That said, it was an unmitigated disaster coming out and just trying to tell everybody, move on. | ||
| Look at the great job I'm doing. | ||
| And that set the table for what you're about to see. | ||
| Now, to all of the MAGA supporters out there, the Democrats are on record running giant human trafficking and sex slavery and pedophile operations, and they're externalizing it openly in the culture through the schools and systems with our children. | ||
| You got the famous CIA projects, MKUltra, with all the sex slavery and mind control, and the CIA stuff in Germany with 30,000 kids placed with convicted pedophiles, all that stuff. | ||
| And the Podestas and Hillary and the emails delivering kids to the hot tubs, you know, to the farmhouse in upstate New York to John Podesta and his brother in the Washington Post openly saying, look at my dangerous art. | ||
| It's all this pedophile art. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So that's all proven. | |
| So we should be spending our time on that and remembering who they are, remembering what they want to do to this country. | ||
| Remember what Mayorkis and Biden did with the kids. | ||
| The Tom Homan's already saved over 35,000 of these kids and growing. | ||
| And then the jury's out on Trump, see what comes out, look at it, go where the truth leads us. | ||
| I don't believe it's going to lead to anything substantive. | ||
| But regardless, the jury's out there. | ||
| The corporate media gives anybody attention. | ||
| You know, there's been a Trump supporter that attacks him. | ||
| And a lot of people just are totally into going after Trump now. | ||
| Well, just remember what's on the other side of Trump. | ||
| The Democratic Party, Hakeem Jeffries, and the rest of them. | ||
| So the jury's out on Trump. | ||
| All right, well, folks, we'll be right back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Stay with us. | |
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| We're going to move on now to another topic that is getting more and more attention from the right people. | ||
| It's sort of a multi-layered crisis that we're dealing with because it is the economic as well as the demographic replacement of white people in their own countries. | ||
| And, you know, part of it is pure just jealousy, racial animus. | ||
| Literally people just saying, you know, why do you get to have a nice country and my country is so crap? | ||
| I deserve what you have. | ||
| And just demanding that they have it. | ||
| But it has another positive consequence in terms of if you're a globalist piece of scum. | ||
| And that is that you convince young people that capitalism has failed. | ||
| And that they have to, you know, become socialist or something. | ||
| Which is, you know, hilarious because everybody right now is going, and we'll show a video in just a second, just very sort of typical video, typical sentiment of like the average, you know, American white person out there now. | ||
| And mostly revolves around comparing your life to your parents and comparing your life to your grandparents and going, what the hell went wrong? | ||
| And going, man, my parents had it so easy. | ||
| And then my grandparents had it so much easier than them. | ||
| I mean, we're all in that boat. | ||
| My grandfather, my dad's dad was a chemist for Shell. | ||
| And they had to do like some sort of, I don't know, their bought up or something, but basically they offered him early retirement. | ||
| So like my grandmother never worked. | ||
| My grandfather worked as a chemist until he was like 55 and he just flew around on a little plane and had multiple houses in multiple states. | ||
| And it's like, okay, so how in two generations did we go from one income being enough not only to raise a family and have a nice house and own your house, but enough to retire on and go on vacation and, you know, own a house in Colorado? | ||
| And how did we go from that to I can't afford a one-bedroom apartment building? | ||
| Something went majorly wrong here over the last 60 years. | ||
| Wonder what it could be. | ||
| Let's go to clip number two here. | ||
| Is the American Dream Dead? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. | |
| Audio. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Eating terms, why I make over three times the federal minimum wage and I cannot afford to live. | |
| Explain it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I do not want to hear the pull yourself up from your bootstraps, work 90 hours a week. | |
| That's not the goal, guys. | ||
| No, it's not the goal. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It should not be our standard. | |
| Agreed. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Should not be our standard. | |
| I'm tired of people being complacent with this uniparty. | ||
| Both of them fing us over. | ||
| When my parents were my age, they both made less than half of what I make, and they lived alone. | ||
| I cannot afford to live anywhere alone. | ||
| A one-bedroom apartment, $1,800. | ||
| Two-bedroom apartments. | ||
| This generation is locked out of living on their own. | ||
| Who the f can afford that? | ||
| It is embarrassing to come out and say that it is a struggle to survive right now. | ||
| I'm sorry, dude. | ||
| I feel free. | ||
| People are struggling. | ||
| And do not get me started on what my grandparents were doing. | ||
| They $3,000 house. | ||
| And yes, I understand inflation and all of the bullshit they have been pulling with the Fed. | ||
| Why are we allowing it? | ||
| Why are we allowing it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
And then I clock out of my shift. | |
| I am. | ||
| Big one coming up here. | ||
| I have to go home. | ||
| And I checked the news. | ||
| Another 65 million to a country nobody can find out on a map. | ||
| sigh What are we doing? | ||
| Where has the plot gone? | ||
| We have lost it, folks. | ||
| We have fing lost it. | ||
| The American Dream is dead. | ||
| It is. | ||
| That's sad. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Gone. | |
| That is sad. | ||
| I've forgotten. | ||
| I've forgotten. | ||
| The American Dream is dead. | ||
| And what do you think he blames that on? | ||
| What do you think he blames that on? | ||
| What do you think he blames that on? | ||
| Because he's exactly right, and you can't deny that he's right. | ||
| And it is bullcrap to say pull yourself up by the bootstraps when you're being screwed over so relentlessly and robbed from so relentlessly and discriminated against so relentlessly at every pass. | ||
| Meanwhile, meanwhile, you've got foreigners who have been living for two years in a five-star hotel, getting their beds turned down every day, getting their laundry done for them every day, being provided free childcare seven days a week, and given a job, and their job will pay for a lawyer for them to go argue at the immigration court to make sure they stay here. | ||
| The American people are being screwed relentlessly. | ||
| And all of our money and all of our wealth and all of our prosperity is being looted from us in real time, continuously. | ||
| Yes, in part to pay for wars, in part to pay for Israel to have free college for all of their students, partly just having our money expropriated and sent back to the homelands of the invaders that now occupy us. | ||
| And it really, it really is relentless and completely unfair. | ||
| And the thing I wish people would realize is that our decline and that your life's decline and that the quality of your life going down is directly related to and dependent on and a consequence of progressivism and socialism. | ||
| Unless you look back at your grandparents' generation, right? | ||
| This guy's like, don't even give me a story about my grandparents. | ||
| They had it perfect. | ||
| $3,000 house, two cars, wife didn't have to work. | ||
| And it's like, oh, is that because they were so progressive and socialist? | ||
| Is that because two generations back, they were communistic and we've just become more conservative over the time that's passed? | ||
| Or is it the exact opposite? | ||
| And is it that in the 50s, there were no immigrants. | ||
| There was none of that. | ||
| Yeah, and then you get the mindset of these people. | ||
| We'll go to that video next. | ||
| We'll go to clip number three here. | ||
| And this is illustrated for a number of reasons. | ||
| Not only is it the infuriating reality of the people that we are welcoming into our country, it's a reminder that it ain't just America this is happening. | ||
| Here's a video from Australia of a Chinese TikToker explaining what her parents in her community says about white people. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| I thought white people were all poor growing up because where I grew up, it was like really fucking white, right? | ||
| And so the only people that I saw driving like older cars or kids at school that had like holes in their shoes or people that lived in less nice suburbs, like they were all white, right? | ||
| This is because everyone was white, right? | ||
| But in a place like that, all the Chinese people know each other. | ||
| And all my parents' friends who were Chinese, they all had businesses, so they all drove nice cars and lived in nice suburbs and stuff. | ||
| And my parents would also tell me like, oh, like, you know, like white people, they're lazy, like they don't think about their future. | ||
| They don't think about like saving money or investing for their future. | ||
| They just want to spend their paycheck the second that they get it and like live in the present, right? | ||
| So I thought they were all like that. | ||
| And then with what I was seeing about like what cars people drove and where they lived and stuff, I was like, oh yeah, that checks out. | ||
| So the way that I saw white people was like the, how some people have the like, oh, immigrants are all polar stereotype, but the other way around. | ||
| And like, I didn't know that the immigrants are polar stereotype existed, right? | ||
| Because so when we go back to China, my parents were like, okay, when you go out, like speak Mandarin to each other, don't speak English to each other. | ||
| Because if they know that you were raised abroad, you'll be a target for pickpocketing because no one like stays abroad and raises a family abroad if they weren't able to like build a life for themselves there. | ||
| Like if you don't make it, you come crawling back with your tail between your legs, right? | ||
| So like comparatively to like the like regional place in China, it's like, okay, they got money. | ||
| So like you don't want to be a pickpocketing target. | ||
| So you speak Mandarin to each other so they don't know that you grew up like that you're raised abroad, right? | ||
| So I thought that like immigrants all had money. | ||
| Like I thought immigrants all like they're chilling and that white people are poor. | ||
| Like is this a unique experience? | ||
| Because like I don't know anyone else who thought that and everyone that I tell this to is like may what the f right? | ||
| But like I don't know that's what I thought when I was a kid like when I was really little like obviously I realized later on that that's not how the world works but sure it sort of sort of tells you a lot doesn't it sort of tells you a lot especially when you look at the way Australia has gone farther than maybe any other country in suppressing its native white population and just laws against them even existing. | ||
| It's just completely insane. | ||
| So you've got these groups of immigrants who come over incredibly wealthy, right? | ||
| All the natives of the country, the Australians, holes in their shoes, dirt poor. | ||
| But now it's like, oh, you have white privilege. | ||
| So that's an excuse for us to expropriate even more money and even more land and even more prosperity from you. | ||
| Even though your kids have holes in their shoes and the Chinese people are driving around in jaguars, you just have an innate privilege that you have to be punished for. | ||
| And then the immigrants, this is a fundamental misunderstanding between the natives of these countries and the immigrants. | ||
| The natives think they're being friendly, think they're being generous, think that they are involved in some sort of reciprocal exchange of goodwill. | ||
| And the foreigners think that they're idiots. | ||
| They think the natives are morons. | ||
| And they're taking them to the bank. | ||
| They're robbing them blind. | ||
| And Homath at itisHomath on X laid this out. | ||
| And this is sort of in line with everything we've been talking about this week. | ||
| Homath says, when third worlders call Americans dumb, what they usually mean is, quote, didn't do something evil when you had the opportunity. | ||
| Like those honor system food stands out in rural areas where the sign says, please put cash in the box. | ||
| They'll just steal from those and say you're dumb for letting them. | ||
| You know, like psychopaths. | ||
| This is because they don't have access to higher levels of thought. | ||
| They've never actually had the idea of do the right thing because I should. | ||
| They only know avoid punishment. | ||
| And by very, very far, most of the newcomers are limited to this style of thinking. | ||
| So I don't even know. | ||
| I don't know if I agree with that last part. | ||
| Because I think the woman we just saw, I don't think it's a lack of IQ. | ||
| I don't think it's a lack of higher level understanding. | ||
| I think it's just basic immorality. | ||
| You can be smart and evil, but it's actually a very successful combination. | ||
| She's not stupid. | ||
| Her parents aren't stupid. | ||
| It's not that they don't understand the consequences. | ||
| It's just, but the heart of the issue is absolutely true. | ||
| They don't think that you're nice for letting them in. | ||
| They think you're dumb for letting them in. | ||
| think you are dumb for not stealing things not taking advantage of things so So one of these has to change. | ||
| One of these has to change. | ||
| And I can't help but just see this sort of ubiquitous reality. | ||
| And the division is not clear. | ||
| It's very bizarre. | ||
| It's not like you can say, like, half the world is this and half the world is this, and then it applies to everything. | ||
| But it's like every topic breaks into two distinct sides, and those two sides always share a similarity with the other two sides anything else breaks down to. | ||
| I'm probably not explaining this well, but I feel like I just am constantly saying the same, I'm expressing the same idea, but about different concepts. | ||
| So the Democrats are ruthless and will throw you in prison, even though you didn't do anything wrong. | ||
| And they'll have fake show trials about January 6th. | ||
| I mean, they're just ruthless. | ||
| They're just ruthless and Brutal, and they don't give a damn about precedent or law or anything. | ||
| And the Republicans think we're all playing a game, think we're all adhering to the rules, refuse to even do the things that the Democrats have already done because they don't want to reinforce the precedent that was set. | ||
| Like, it doesn't even make sense. | ||
| But Republicans think that they're being moral. | ||
| The Democrats think they're being stupid. | ||
| The white people think we're being moral and generous and charitable. | ||
| The non-white people think we're being stupid. | ||
| And in all of these situations and all of these dichotomies, one side has to change. | ||
| Which side do you think should change? | ||
| In a perfect world, if I had a magic wand, obviously, I would say that I want the Chinese people to change. | ||
| I want the Chinese Australian immigrants to not be condescending, exploitative jackasses. | ||
| But I don't have a magic wand. | ||
| And so far, being exploitative jackasses is working out really, really well for them. | ||
| There's not a lot I can say that could dissuade them. | ||
| It's not a choice. | ||
| We have to stop being nice. | ||
| We have to stop being nice. | ||
| Our niceness is not appreciated. | ||
| Our generosity is not reciprocated. | ||
| Our openness, they perceive as a vulnerability to exploit. | ||
| Our kindness, they've misinterpreted as weakness. | ||
| And it has to stop. | ||
| This has to stop. | ||
| Let's go down to clip number 15. | ||
| Again, this is remaining a big issue and becoming an even bigger issue because of the catastrophic state of the job market, the hopelessness of young people who see their economic prospects basically non-existent and getting, you know, and diminishing over time. | ||
| And a big part of that is the H-1B visas, not the illegal immigrants, but the legal immigrants that are brought over specifically to fill jobs that Americans have been fired from. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 15. | ||
| This is Vice President J.D. Vance going after Microsoft for firing Americans while still applying for H-1B visas. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| A massive shortage of these jobs. | ||
| And by the way, you see some big tech companies where they'll lay off 9,000 workers and then they'll apply for a bunch of overseas visas. | ||
| And I sort of wonder, that doesn't totally make sense to me. | ||
| That displacement and that math worries me a bit. | ||
| And what the president has said, he said very clearly, we want the very best and the brightest to make America their home. | ||
| We want them to build great companies and so forth. | ||
| But I don't want companies to fire 9,000 American workers and then to go and say we can't find workers here in America. | ||
| That's a bullshit story. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What did your Microsoft say when you brought that up with the Microsoft? | |
| I have not. | ||
| I just became aware of this a couple weeks ago. | ||
| Somebody sent me an article about this, and they said, well, maybe it was Microsoft. | ||
| It was fired, I think, 9,000 people. | ||
| And then I was like, wait a second. | ||
| Record profits, record market cap, but also saying they're desperate for workers. | ||
| So I have not yet had that conversation with Microsoft in my defense I just found out. | ||
| We will have that conversation. | ||
| Of course, Microsoft is far, far from the only organization doing this. | ||
| JD Vance issues H-1B Visa warning. | ||
| Warning? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Nobody seems to be taking this seriously. | ||
| This should have been stopped years ago, and the people who do it should be punished, I genuinely think. | ||
| Especially, I mean, they should at least be charged. | ||
| I think what I don't understand is you've got 9,000 people laid off from Microsoft as they simultaneously apply for 6,000 H-1B visas, and not a single one of those 9,000 employees feels like it might be worth it to file some sort of wrongful termination lawsuit. | ||
| Not one of them, really? | ||
| Do they get big payouts or something? | ||
| Like, are they being paid for a year's salary or something because they don't want to lose that? | ||
| How is there not a class action lawsuit or something? | ||
| I mean, how are they allowed to do this? | ||
| How are they allowed to do this? | ||
| And they're really not. | ||
| I mean, the way the H-1B visa program is supposed to work is not supposed to allow this, but obviously rules only apply in certain cases. | ||
| Walk in verse, WIV reports uncensored on X. America's tech workforce is being erased in real time. | ||
| New federal data shows H-1B, OPT, and H-4 visas now capture 82% of all new U.S. tech jobs while American citizens face layoffs, wage collapse, and foreclosure. | ||
| And a lot of these cases happen immediately after an Indian CEO is hired. | ||
| And it's like a very common thing. | ||
| In fact, this is one of those great examples of everything that I'm talking about. | ||
| If I can find it, I might have to look for it during the break. | ||
| But there's an Indian guy talking about what he does to maintain his H-1B status. | ||
| And he basically is just lying and collaborating with other Indians to work together and get the white people fired. | ||
| Yeah, it's a very, very, very common thing. | ||
| And this is the issue that we're dealing with. | ||
| Gen Z men with college degrees now have the same unemployment rate as non-grads, a sign that the higher education payoff is dead. | ||
| College degrees, men with college degrees now Have the same unemployment rate as non-grads because all of the high-paying jobs that require education are going to foreigners very deliberately, very explicitly. | ||
| Why do we allow this? | ||
| Why is this ever allowed? | ||
| And how is it that 9,000 Microsoft employees, for no fault of their own, are laid off so they can be replaced with Indian scab workers and not a single one files a lawsuit? | ||
| Am I crazy? | ||
| Wouldn't it just, you just think one out of 9,000 might go, hey, I just got fired so the Indian that runs the country can hire the Indians that they're bringing in on H-1B visas. | ||
| This is wrong. | ||
| I'm not going to stand for it. | ||
| I'm going to get millions of dollars of payout if I succeed in this lawsuit for wrongful termination based on discrimination, an abject violation of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and the Civil Rights Act. | ||
| Not one of these people. | ||
| I think all 9,000, why isn't there some lawyer out there? | ||
| I mean, this could be a literally a billion-dollar case. | ||
| Is there any lawyer out there calling these 9,000 people going, hey, I think we have a class action lawsuit on our hands here? | ||
| I think we can sue Microsoft for firing you without cause in order to replace you with... | ||
| I mean, you know. | ||
| Maybe I don't know how the world works, but it seems to me like you might want to do something. | ||
| You might want to have something against the destruction. | ||
| All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
| Talking about how the American people, specifically young American people, have had their future stolen from them and handed over to people who despise them. | ||
| And how it continues unabated. | ||
| And indeed, is only increasing in certain respects. | ||
| About 58% of recent Gen Z graduates are still looking for full-time work compared to 25% of earlier graduates like millennials, Gen Xers, and baby boomers before them. | ||
| As millions of Americans prepare to graduate this spring, their chances of landing that crucial first job, the one that kickstarts a career, appear increasingly uncertain. | ||
| Beyond a cooling economy burdened by tariff-related uncertainty, the rise of artificial intelligence is now threatening entry-level jobs that have long functioned as gateways into the workforce, according to Anish Rahman, LinkedIn's chief economic opportunity officer. | ||
| In a recent op-ed for the New York Times, Rahman compared the current disruption to the collapse of manufacturing jobs in the 1980s. | ||
| Now it's our office workers who are staring down the same kind of technological and economic disruption, he wrote, breaking first is the bottom rung of the career ladder. | ||
| So 58% of people who graduated last year still haven't landed a job. | ||
| Not even an entry-level job. | ||
| Meanwhile, you can read stories of Indian people working four different jobs here because their wages are subsidized. | ||
| And the H-1B visa program is designed to replace American workers. | ||
| I mean, what it's supposed to be is that you're supposed to advertise for a job. | ||
| And if you cannot hire somebody, like if you genuinely go out and look for people to hire and you just can't find anybody, then as a last resort, you can go to the international scab workers. | ||
| That's not how they do it, though. | ||
| They fire everybody and bring them in. | ||
| So they're just in abject violation of the law, but it doesn't seem to matter, apparently. | ||
| If Microsoft wants to do it, they get away with it and nobody even sues. | ||
| Of course, people pointing out they were replaced with cheap labor, cheap foreign labor. | ||
| And it was that. | ||
| And, you know, there's a couple of different issues. | ||
| Like there's the American-born issues, right? | ||
| So you can divide it by American-born. | ||
| You can say, okay, 82% of all new jobs went to foreign-born in the tech sector. | ||
| And that's foreign-born. | ||
| But then you can break it down further and go, okay, the article from, you know, after Black Lives Matter saying, corporations promised to hire more people of color, and they did. | ||
| It's like 97% of all new executive jobs in three years, 97% went to non-white people, non-white men. | ||
| Okay, so you're deliberately excluded because of your race and ethnicity from higher-level jobs. | ||
| So they're deliberately just explicitly discriminating against you and not hiring you. | ||
| While they are also bringing in millions upon millions of foreign workers to work for super cheap labor, a huge number of which, by the way, are here forever and never leave. | ||
| Microsoft cut about 4% of jobs amid heavy AI bets. | ||
| It's from July 2025. | ||
| Microsoft Mechanics I mean, there's got to be some major reset. | ||
| How is it that, like, nothing ever helps us? | ||
| Like, this is something that's been going around. | ||
| Elon Musk put out an image of one of the Optimus robots delivering food, replacing the, like, woman on roller skates. | ||
| And I retweeted somebody saying, yeah, why don't we put the robots in the bauxite mines first? | ||
| Why don't we put the robots in the mines first? | ||
| And all of the jobs where human interaction and familiarity is necessary, those are still run by humans. | ||
| Why do we have robots making art and I'm still doing the damn dishes and I'm doing the laundry? | ||
| Why is it that instead of the creation of intelligent robotics, how does that make our life worse? | ||
| Like, what is going on? | ||
| How is it that incredible new technology whose only purpose should be to make our lives better, why does it always make everything worse? | ||
| I mean, is it an accident? | ||
| Is it a coincidence? | ||
| Are we cursed? | ||
| Like, what is going on? | ||
| What is going on that every time some new miraculous, marvelous invention happens, it just makes everything worse for everybody? | ||
| Why is this the case? | ||
| Genuinely, what the hell? | ||
| So you've invented robots that can tirelessly do the work humans don't want to do, and somehow that makes our life worse. | ||
| Somehow, instead of our burden being lifted and humanity's, you know, sweat and work and, you know, physical labor we have to do, how about instead we get to like hang out and drink smoothies while the robots do all the work? | ||
| Why is it that this incredible invention comes about and what happens is we all just lose our jobs and our lives become worse. | ||
| And the billionaires, you know, tack on another decimal point to their bank accounts and everybody else just falls into poverty. | ||
| What the hell? | ||
| I mean, genuinely. | ||
| It doesn't make any sense. | ||
| It doesn't make any sense. | ||
| Actually, maybe this could be a skit or something where it's like I buy an Optimus robot for my household. | ||
| And then it's just like, we have to do a bunch of work for it. | ||
| It's like it's just sitting there watching TV and we're having to like scrub it or something. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Cause it's like, because it just doesn't make any sense. | ||
| This is how it feels is it's like, you know, your spouse comes home and goes, I got a robot. | ||
| I got a robot. | ||
| It can do house chores. | ||
| It can fold the laundry. | ||
| It's a humanoid self-driving robot that we brought into the house. | ||
| And you would think that that would mean you wouldn't have to do chores anymore. | ||
| Everything would be clean. | ||
| Your food would be made for you. | ||
| You could get a massage from it at night. | ||
| I mean, you would think it would improve your life, right? | ||
| But what if instead they bring the robot in and it doesn't do any chores? | ||
| And it actually just like, I don't know, gets on your Amazon and starts ordering itself stuff. | ||
| It's just, how is it? | ||
| How is it that with every new iteration of technology, our lives get worse? | ||
| Why is this happening? | ||
| Because it's a choice, because it's a choice that's being made because the people doing it, they don't want to make your life better. | ||
| That was never their design. | ||
| If they wanted to make your lives better, there's a million, billion things they could do. | ||
| They deliberately do none of those because their goal is to make your life worse because they hate you. | ||
| It's what it is. | ||
| It's what it is. | ||
| So AI becomes a reality and it makes our life worse. | ||
| We could all at this point have Rosie the Robots like the Jetsons. | ||
| But instead We're getting fired from our jobs We could always We could offload all of the difficult, dangerous jobs to these robots, and then we could just exist. | ||
| Maybe that's the future. | ||
| Maybe the future is some messed up economy where there's a program where you receive a robot when you're born and the robot just does the work and you get the salary for it. | ||
| So everybody will just have a robot clone that they send out to work for them while they benefit from it. | ||
| I mean, that is what kind of should happen. | ||
| Like you would think if you were designing the world and you had humanoid robots, wouldn't that kind of be the setup you'd take? | ||
| You'd go, well, wait, instead of spending eight hours a day scrubbing cars at a car wash, I can just have a robot do that. | ||
| Now the job's getting done and I can just hang out, pursue creative activities or whatever. | ||
| But no, no, no, no. | ||
| Everything always gets worse. | ||
| Everything always gets worse. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Again, I just don't know why. | ||
| It's like I... | ||
| It's like I bought a Roomba. | ||
| I bought a Roomba and it just, instead of sucking up dirt on the vacuum, it just goes around spraying foam everywhere. | ||
| It's just like, well, wait a second. | ||
| This is retarded. | ||
| Wait a second. | ||
| Something has gone horribly wrong here. | ||
| And I think it's the choices that you made. | ||
| Again, it's just, it's emphasizing the fact that like, whether it's this like extreme individuality that is like makes you just not care about one another or something, but I really think it's just about the death of community and the death of nationalism. | ||
| That like even the robber barons, at least they built libraries, right? | ||
| At least Andrew Carnegie built the New York library. | ||
| At least he did something for somebody. | ||
| And I guess we just lost that spirit. | ||
| We're like, okay, isn't Microsoft an American company? | ||
| Shouldn't they just want to have that? | ||
| Shouldn't they be like Henry Ford trying to pay their people a good wage and trying to just maximize the positive beneficial aspects that your company is providing to the world? | ||
| Why and the real crazy thing about it is if you fire somebody and then hire their Indian replacement, I guess you shave off, I mean, what, $20,000 a year. | ||
| You're a multi-billion dollar company. | ||
| But laying off the white American and hiring the Indian guy could shave a percentage of a percentage of a percentage off your overhead. | ||
| And that's worth it to you because it doesn't cost you anything. | ||
| But what you're doing is you're destroying this guy's life. | ||
| And that's kind of thing. | ||
| It's like, is that really how much we're worth? | ||
| That you're going to destroy our lives. | ||
| I mean, that's what I, especially, I mean, if you're in a long career and like, you know, look at the articles I'm reading, like graduates can't get hired. | ||
| Nobody can get hired. | ||
| Nobody can get jobs. | ||
| Job market's impossible. | ||
| They're definitely not hiring white guys. | ||
| So like imagine you're an engineer at Microsoft. | ||
| You've been working there for decades, possibly. | ||
| Getting laid off from that job ruins your life in a very real way, especially if you can't get another job, which you probably can't. | ||
| It's not like India is offering high-paid jobs for American people. | ||
| It's not like this is a reciprocal thing. | ||
| So it's just this brutality and the cold-heartedness of these people willing to destroy an American life to save 0.000001% on your overhead. | ||
| I guess fire 9,000 people, well, you're going to save 0.001%. | ||
| So that's worth it, I guess. | ||
| You just have to destroy 9,000 lives. | ||
| You just have to put 9,000 families into uncertainty about whether they'll be able to pay their rent or whether their house will be foreclosed upon, whether they'll have to dip into their kids' college savings as a stopgap measure. | ||
| Maybe a person loses their insurance they were relying on and suddenly they can't afford the $10,000 a month diabetes medicine that they require. | ||
| But it just doesn't matter to them because they want to save a cent every $3 that they receive. | ||
| So they'll destroy your life. | ||
| And it's just the heartlessness, the callousness, the greed, the lack of community, the lack of building anything up. | ||
| And the fact that there are billions upon billions upon billions upon billions of dollars being confiscated from Americans and being poured into the coffers of immigrants who are being given your job and a place to stay and healthcare and everything else that they could possibly want, | ||
| even though they've never contributed once to our country. | ||
| So I just, I don't know, man. | ||
| It just doesn't make any sense unless our country is being run by cabal of psychopaths who hate us. | ||
| That's the only way this makes sense. | ||
| It's the only way this makes sense. | ||
| It's the only way this makes sense. | ||
| 30 to 40% of all H-1B visa holders are eventually granted green cards. | ||
| Each H-1B conversion to permanent residency also brings one to two family members. | ||
| Let's do the math. | ||
| There are around 600,000 H-1B workers in the United States. | ||
| Roughly 210,000 of them will be given a green card. | ||
| Those 210,000 will immediately bring in roughly an additional 315,000 family workers. | ||
| Current H-1B workers represent around 525,000 new permanent residents and eventual citizens. | ||
| The federal government does not provide statistics, by the way, on the true number of conversions, so that's just an estimate. | ||
| So they're not temporary. | ||
| They're not, you know, here for the time being. | ||
| It's a pathway to their residency. | ||
| And hey, if they want to start a business of their own, plenty of, you know, grants to give out and privileges to provide to them that are excluded from natives. | ||
| America's tech workforce is being erased in real time. | ||
| U.S. Signal's intention to rethink job H-1B lottery foreign worker program represent betrayal of U.S. computer science students, advocacy group argues. | ||
| Remember, that's even compounded by the fact that so many of the positions in our college are given to foreigners who then get the education and go home with it. | ||
| So for every one Indian or Chinese person we have in an engineering program in America, that's one less American in that engineering program, that's one less engineer in the work pool. | ||
| So we educate them, we fund them, we hire them, well, at every pass, screwing over our own. | ||
| And that's not even getting into the internal domestic issues of racism and discrimination that is obvious and everywhere. | ||
| And it's finally for the first time in my life, and I know this because this has been obvious since I was a baby, right? | ||
| As a little baby, as a little kindergartner, I somehow had the ability to see through the lies that are still befuddling most Americans, it seems. | ||
| When, as a kindergartner, it never made sense to me why white people were being discriminated against. | ||
| It's just like one of those things that's like this has been going on for decades where just white people are hated and white people are discriminated against and criticized and excluded from certain jobs or positions or scholarships or whatever else. | ||
| And then we're constantly told that we're privileged and that we have nothing going wrong for us. | ||
| So for my whole life, plus double my whole life pretty much, since the Civil Rights Act, it's just been legal to discriminate against white people in this country. | ||
| And I guess we've just sort of dealt with it for the last 60 years, but it's finally gotten to the point where like it's gone too far. | ||
| People are noticing this for the first time. | ||
| For the first time ever, people are just recognizing that it is hypocrisy to constantly rail on inequality, constantly rail on discrimination and bigotry while actively and explicitly discriminating against a group of people for their immutable characteristics. | ||
| I mean, I know this is like a kindergarten should, kindergartner should be able to see the glaring hypocrisy in this entire program, but apparently this just hasn't happened until now. | ||
| And finally, for the first time in my life, people in the American Congress are pointing out the flagrant hypocrisy of these programs, the absolute discrimination that white people face in this country, and the incredibly damaging effects this is having across the board in every possible way. | ||
| Thank you for noticing. | ||
| Finally, now let's do something about it. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 12 here. | ||
| America's civil rights regime has been used to engineer a radical new social order built upon the deliberate dispossession of huge swaths of our country, the white people. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| Let me begin with a hard but necessary truth. | ||
| For at least the last decade, America's civil rights laws have been used not to prohibit discrimination, but to institutionalize it. | ||
| The modern civil rights regime, both inside and outside of government, has been wielded like a weapon, not to safeguard the equal rights of all citizens, but to engineer a radical new social order built upon the deliberate dispossession of huge swaths of our country. | ||
| Rather than protecting the constitutional order of the founders, it has become the vanguard of a revolution in the political, legal, social, and even moral underpinnings of American society. | ||
| The revolution has gone by many names, affirmative action, anti-racism, social justice. | ||
| Today, it most commonly is referred to as diversity, equity, and inclusion, or DEI. | ||
| But whatever the name is, in every instance, it amounts to the same thing. | ||
| A new racial caste system sanctioned and enforced by the administrative state. | ||
| Americans never voted for any of this. | ||
| It slunk in through the back door, cloaked in bureaucratic doublespeak and soothing euphemisms. | ||
| But today, it has wrapped itself around all the great institutions of American life. | ||
| Our schools, our businesses, our government, and even our armed forces. | ||
| This is interesting. | ||
| Apparently, Trump just gave a speech on this exact topic. | ||
| I wasn't expecting this, but I'll drop the video in. | ||
| This just dropped minutes ago. | ||
| While I'm on the topic of Americans being replaced by workers, Trump has made this statement, guys. | ||
| Tell me when you got it in. | ||
| We'll go to it. | ||
| He's exactly right that Congressman, America's civil rights regime has been used to engineer a radical new social order built on the deliberate dispossession of the American people. | ||
| Let's go now to Donald Trump saying the days of American tech companies replacing American workers with Chinese and Indians are over. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| And perhaps most importantly, winning the AI race will demand a new spirit of patriotism and national loyalty in Silicon Valley and long beyond Silicon Valley. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| For too long, much of our tech industry pursued a radical globalism that left millions of Americans feeling distrustful and betrayed. | ||
| And you know that. | ||
| Everybody knows that. | ||
| Everybody in this room certainly does. | ||
| Many of our largest tech companies have reaped the blessings of American freedom while building their factories in China, hiring workers in India, and slashing profits in Ireland. | ||
| You know that? | ||
| All the while dismissing and even censoring their fellow citizens right here at home. | ||
| Under President Trump, those days are over. | ||
| We need U.S. technology companies to be all in for America. | ||
| We want you to put America first. | ||
| You have to do that. | ||
| That's all we ask. | ||
| That's all we ask. | ||
| By the way, the congressman that we heard from earlier is Eric Schmidt. | ||
| Why don't you give that name? | ||
| Tell you who to support. | ||
| There he is posting, America's civil rights regime has been used to engineer a radical new social order built upon the deliberate dispossession of huge swastika country. | ||
| And look, one day, one day, I swear, we will be able to get over the fear, the cowardice that stops people from saying the truth. | ||
| We're getting there. | ||
| This is a step in that direction. | ||
| What is the swath, Mr. Schmidt? | ||
| Senator Schmidt, when you say built upon the deliberate dispossession of huge swaths of our country, who are you talking about? | ||
| Who's being discriminated against? | ||
| Who is it? | ||
| Can you Tell me. | ||
| Why don't they say white people? | ||
| Why can't they say white people are being discriminated against? | ||
| Why do they have to say huge swaths of the country? | ||
| It's white people. | ||
| It's okay to defend white people. | ||
| We're being attacked. |
Export Selection