All Episodes
June 5, 2025 - American Journal - Harrison Smith
02:38:12
The American Journal: POTUS Orders AG Bondi To Investigate Biden’s Mental State & Democrat Thugs Who Lied To Public, Illegally Assumed Presidential Responsibilities - FULL SHOW - 06/05/2025
Participants
Main voices
h
harrison smith
01:52:02
Appearances
a
alex jones
02:34
c
catherine austin-fitts
01:01
d
donald j trump
02:23
k
kirk elliott
01:34
Clips
c
chuck schumer
00:04
g
george soros
00:16
j
jon bowne
00:21
Callers
jake in ohio
01:54
joshua in georgia
01:38
ms liu in florida
00:09
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
jon bowne
Is it any wonder that the world's elite, openly in on the depopulation agenda, are building impenetrable underground fortresses?
Because the one law that can't be broken is the law of the jungle.
As old and as true as the sky, and the wolf that shall keep it may prosper, but the wolf that shall break it must die.
alex jones
And they're all talking 24-7 about when it goes down, what they're gonna do.
New World Order, you are completely screwed.
And you know why they all want to kill you?
They know you released the virus.
But the Russians know that Hollywood on the left is not America.
It is a disease.
It is a cancer.
But nevertheless, that cancer hijacked and stole the election.
And that cancer has the nuclear weapons and all the space-based crap.
And the Russians aren't stupid.
They know they'll only get off a fraction of their nukes in a war.
It'll be enough to totally destroy North America.
unidentified
Russia shall reserve the right to use nuclear weapons in the event of aggression when the very existence of the state is in jeopardy.
alex jones
And that's why all the billionaires...
They're all gone right now, almost all of them.
They're in New Zealand, they're in Australia, they're in up near the Arctic Circle in different places in northern Canada.
They're underground right now.
It's a Slavic civil war.
Everybody should just stay the hell out of it, ladies and gentlemen.
catherine austin-fitts
Between fiscal 1998 and fiscal 2015, there were 21 trillion of undocumented adjustments.
And so the question is, where's all this money going?
And one of the things I've looked at in the process of looking at where all this money is going is the underground base and city infrastructure and transportation system that's been built.
I don't know if you ever saw Washington Post did a project.
It was in 2000.
10 or 12, called Top Secret America.
And one of the reporters, it was a team of two reporters, one of them put together a database of all the different top secret installations that had been built in the country, including since the Patriot Act.
And what you saw was just this explosion of money in building so many both underground and above ground facilities.
alex jones
Make no mistake.
It's George Soros and others that lit this damn fuse.
george soros
I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of Russia.
And the foundation has been functioning ever since.
And it plays an important part in events now.
alex jones
Things are really going to be bad.
unidentified
And how do you prepare yourself for that and those that you love and care for?
Or friends?
How do you prepare for any of that, right?
alex jones
So that's probably the best that we can do.
unidentified
I think things are going to be pretty difficult starting in a few years.
catherine austin-fitts
And from what I've been told by sources.
unidentified
What does that mean, it's going to be difficult?
I mean, I can't say specifically.
catherine austin-fitts
I don't know that much yet.
And I can't really say.
unidentified
But just that a lot of what we take for granted now in life, I don't think it's going to be.
catherine austin-fitts
You know, we're not going to have it.
unidentified
A lot of things we have now that makes our lives as wonderful as they are.
alex jones
When you hear people say, I heard from government sources that in 2027, the pole's going to shift dramatically, meaning somewhere completely different than the Earth.
We move thousands of miles, I guess, in a day, they're saying, or further.
And that it's going to suddenly make Antarctica tropical over time.
Another side of the world, you know, the new bottom of the planet or the new top of the planet.
The answer is no one knows from the science.
When you see this stuff, you have to understand what it is.
All right?
They're getting ready for a potential nuclear war that they believe survivable.
Pentagon officially says that.
It's insane.
Not for us, but for them.
They're getting ready for bioweapon releases that they themselves are the main culprits to release.
Because...
So they wanted a global government to slowly poison us and dumb us down and sterilize us and phase us out.
But because that's failing, plan B is to have a nuclear war and or a giant bioweapons release.
They go into their giant underground cities that are all over the Western world.
Russia's got them too.
China's got them.
than these competing factions that emerge at a later date to fight for global domination.
unidentified
It's Thursday, June 5th, in the year of our Lord 2025.
You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
Watch it live right now at band.video.
I think it's time to blow this thing.
Get everybody in the stuff together.
Okay, three, two, one, let's jam.
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
harrison smith
Welcome to The American Journal.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
unidentified
Coming to you live this Thursday morning.
harrison smith
We've got a lot to talk about today.
unidentified
The big, beautiful bill.
harrison smith
Or the abominable bill, if everyone you want to call it.
And we'll get into that.
I think I'll take your calls on that.
Because I imagine, I don't know, our audience is probably split right down the middle.
After all, I think we're kind of split down the middle on this.
I don't understand the objections, really, to what the big, beautiful bill puts forward, and that will just be one of the...
We'll get into that, too.
Let's begin today as we do every day with our daily dispatch.
Here it is, folks, your Daily Dispatch for Thursday, the 6th of June, 2025.
Judge temporarily blocks Trump administration from deporting the family of suspect in Boulder attack.
A federal judge in Colorado issued a temporary order preventing the Trump administration from removing Mohamed Sabri Solomon's wife and their five children from the country following charges relating to a firebombing incident in Boulder on June 1st.
The family's lawyers sued to halt deportation and seek their release from custody, arguing that punishing relatives for a suspect's crimes is unlawful and violates democratic justice principles.
Oh my God, not our principles, no!
Not our democratic justice principles.
Those are the most sacred.
So yeah, it's not a punishment.
It's just what happens.
This might be a neat distinction here.
But in fact, deportation is not a punishment and is never treated like a punishment.
It's just the process that happens when you're not allowed in our country.
That's a Supreme Court ruling over and over again.
Not that it can't be used as punishment, just that it's not a punishment.
It's just being sent home.
These people are from Egypt.
They were born in Egypt.
They're citizens of Egypt.
It is in no way a punishment to send them back to Egypt.
It's just what is supposed to happen.
Now, whether the status of an illegal immigrant is discovered because they come up on an ICE database or because their dad throws Molotov cocktails at old ladies at the park.
However, it's discovered that they're illegal aliens.
It doesn't really matter.
Once it's discovered, they're removed.
That's deportation.
It's not a punishment.
They're not being punished for their dad's crime.
They're being sent home.
They're being sent to their own home.
Not a punishment.
Just another act of judicial interference, which, by the way, apparently the big, beautiful bill does have contingent aspects of it that make this less likely to occur.
Solomon, the 45-year-old Egyptian national, allegedly attacked a pro-Israel rally with Molotov cocktails on Pearl Street, injuring 15 people and a dog.
And faces federal hate crime charges and multiple state charges.
Judge Gordon P. Gallagher ruled deporting the family without due process could cause irreparable harm and ordered their release, stating deportation without process could work irreparable harm.
But how?
What harm?
What irreparable harm is sending Egyptians to Egypt going to bring?
What are they talking about?
They just sort of say things.
You ever think about the fact they just sort of say things?
There's no meaning to it?
It just doesn't mean anything?
I mean, the judge might as well say, well, deportation without process could supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.
So, can't have that.
Like, what?
What?
It doesn't mean anything.
Well, neither does work irreparable harm, so they're just...
Just making sounds out of their mouths and now we can't deport them apparently.
The ruling underscores protections against collective punishment and prompts investigations into the family's knowledge of the attack while immigration officials confirm pending removal proceedings.
Again, it's just you can just send them home.
Okay.
Alright.
It's not a punishment.
It's literally not a punishment.
It is in fact just the proper process being followed.
Whatever.
But whatever, I guess.
Meanwhile, and in that vein, Trump slaps new travel ban on 12 countries.
U.S. President Donald Trump signed a new travel ban that comes into effect Monday, targeting 12 countries, including Afghanistan, Iran, and Yemen, reviving one of the most controversial measures from his first term.
Trump said on Wednesday the measure was spurred by a makeshift flamethrower attack on a Jewish protest in Colorado.
The U.S. authorities blamed on a man they said was in the country illegally.
The move bans all travel.
To the United States by Nationals of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Kondo, Ecuadorian New Guinea, or Ecuadorian Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen, according to the White House.
Trump also imposed a partial ban on travelers from seven other countries, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela.
Some temporary work visas from those countries will be allowed.
And this, of course, is being predicated on the recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado.
They say it underscores the extreme danger posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted.
Trump said in a video message from the Oval Office posted to the social media Platform X, quote, we don't want them.
Well, we don't want to be embroiled in 2,000-year-old blood feuds either, but here we are.
But here we are.
Yeah, fine.
Whatever.
You know, I guess if we have to...
I guess that's just what we'll do.
Do you know how many anti-Semites there are in Mexico?
We've got to build the border wall immediately.
I guess that's what we're doing now.
Fine.
U.S. vetoes a U.N. Security Council resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire.
Hooray!
The U.S. on Wednesday vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution calling for an immediate, unconditional, and permanent ceasefire between Israel and the militant group Hamas in Gaza.
U.S. was the only nation to oppose the resolution.
Fourteen others, including the United Kingdom, voted in favor.
There were no abstentions.
Dorothy Campbell Shea, the United States ambassador to the U.N., said the U.S. opposed the resolution because it did not call for Hamas to disarm and leave Gaza.
The resolution is unacceptable for what it does say, it is unacceptable for what it does not say, and it is unacceptable for the manner in which it has been advanced, she said in comments before the vote took place.
Again, just meaningless.
Just how much of this is just utterly meaningless?
Almost less than meaningless.
It's just a weird lie.
But okay, fine.
Great.
It's great.
It's all great.
Meanwhile, and some actual good news here.
Trump orders investigation into Biden's action, claiming cognitive decline.
President Donald Trump ordered an investigation in early June 2025 into former President Joe Biden's aides, focusing on Biden's use of an autopin device to sign documents.
Trump's investigation follows longstanding claims questioning Biden's mental competence and questions and concerns about possible cover-up by his aides during his cancer treatment and presidency.
What?
During his cancer treatment in presidency?
Doesn't make any sense.
I thought he just figured out that he was all full up with cancer.
But, okay.
Temporally, that makes no sense.
Perhaps this was written by some sort of being outside of time.
Perhaps this is an article from an angel or something.
Because that doesn't make any sense.
But whatever.
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer has called for transcribed interviews with five senior Biden advisors, accusing them of involvement in a cover-up he describes as the most serious controversies in the nation's history.
Comer indicated that five individuals who previously served as senior advisors observed President Biden's mental state, and he cautioned that subpoenas would be issued.
If they do not agree to voluntary interviews, the inquiry raises questions about the validity of thousands of documents signed via Autopin while Democrats dismiss the probe as a political distraction amid legislative debates.
Yeah, it's just a distraction, that's all.
Throw them all in jail.
Throw them all in jail if we have to.
Finally, we have this.
Trump reveals phone call with Putin says Russia will respond to Ukraine attacks.
May help de-escalate Iran nuke threat.
President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attacks on airfields.
According to Trump, he says, We also discussed Iran and the fact that time is running out on Iran's decision pertaining to nuclear weapons, which must be made quickly.
I stated to President Putin that Iran cannot have nuclear weapons, and on this, I believe we are in agreement.
He says Putin will participate in discussions with Iran.
And that could be helpful.
In getting this brought to a rapid conclusion, he says, in my opinion, it is my opinion that Iran has been slow-walking their decision on this very important matter, and we'll need a definitive answer in a very short period of time.
unidentified
Wow.
harrison smith
Okay, great.
Okay, great.
And of course, the discussions of the big, beautiful bill continues on Elon Musk going kind of scorched earth on the whole thing.
I, again, cannot wrap my mind around this argument.
But that's your Daily Dispatch brought to you, of course, by TheAlexJonesStore.com.
Go to TheAlexJonesStore.com to get any of our incredible products, including the Irish Seamoss gummies, the Shilajit gummies, the capsules, which some people like even more.
I personally like the gummies because there's something about, maybe it's a, I don't want to say placebo effect, but there's something about, I don't know, the fact that they're like candy.
It makes me feel like they work extra good.
But that could just be me.
Ultimate CMOS gummies.
Try them yourself.
Tell me what you think.
And you can get up to 50% off with these newly back in stock.
Ultimate CMOS gummies on thealexjonesstore.com.
Of course, you get extra discounts with the VIP.
And there's all sorts of sales going on.
I don't even know about half the sales going on.
Sorry, I won't even...
You just got to go.
You got to go to thealexjonesstore.com and click around and see...
Thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison if you want to let them know who sent you.
Again, we got a lot to talk about.
And we'll be opening up the phone lines for your calls.
But we're seeing just a lot of absurd nonsense from the left.
Again, like three of our stories here today, I mean, it genuinely...
And it's very strange.
We can't break through this wall of meaningless rhetoric.
Let's go to clip number eight here.
This weatherman has been blaming global warming for his inaccurate forecasts all year.
But now he's got a different excuse.
Let's see what this weatherman has to say.
unidentified
And as you've grown accustomed to my presentations over my 34 years in South Florida newscasts, confidently, I went on TV and I told you, it's going to turn.
You don't need to worry.
It is going to turn.
And I am here to tell you that I'm not sure I can do that this year.
Because of the cuts, the gutting, the sledgehammer attack.
On science in general, and I could talk about that for a long, long time, and how that is affecting the U.S. leadership in science over many years, and how we're losing that leadership, and this is a multi-generational impact on science in this country, all right?
But specifically, let's talk about the federal government cuts to the National Weather Service and to NOAA.
Did you know?
That Central and South Florida National Weather Service offices are currently basically 20 to 40 percent understaffed.
From Tampa to Key West, including the Miami office, 20 to 40 percent understaffed.
Now, this type of staffing shortage is having impacts across the nation because there's been a nearly 20 percent reduction in weather balloon releases, launches, that carry those radio sands.
And what we're starting to see is that the quality of the forecast is becoming degraded.
There's also a chance, because of some of these cuts, that NOAA Hurricane Hunter aircraft will not be able to fly this year, and with less reconnaissance missions, we may be flying blind.
And we may not exactly know how strong a hurricane is before it reaches the coastline, like happened a couple of years ago in Hurricane Otis in Acapulco, Mexico.
So, I was asked to talk about this today.
I'm glad I was.
I just want you to know that what you need to do is call your representatives.
and make sure that these cuts are stopped.
harrison smith
Florida weatherman issues doge cuts warning during TV forecasts.
unidentified
What?
harrison smith
What is he talking about?
17% reduction in weather balloon launches across the United States.
Central and South Florida National Weather Service.
Understaffed, degraded forecast accuracy.
Yeah, okay.
I don't think that stands up to scrutiny.
Frankly, I think the weathermen are wrong most of the time anyway.
And are sort of going the way of, you know, travel agents.
The internet has replaced your job.
Who even watches?
I mean, I know people that watch, you know, weather reports like religiously.
And they're always wrong.
They're always wrong.
It's kind of hilarious, actually.
We have family members constantly calling, being like, have you seen that there's hail?
There's hail coming.
You need to cover your cars.
It's just like frantic, panicking.
And then it's just like, it never happens.
It just never happens.
So, isn't this kind of the cliche?
The weatherman is like almost always wrong.
And by the way, you could just pull it up yourself.
You could just type in, you know, radar.
And then you can get a live, you know, satellite view of what's going on.
You can scroll it back and forth.
You can see for yourself what the weather patterns are and how they're happening.
So I don't know what the hell he's talking about.
Oh, my God, the balloons, though.
But what about all the balloons?
Well, sorry, I don't know what to tell you.
He's like, remember a few years ago in Acapulco when we couldn't tell how big a hurricane was?
It's like, no, not really.
What the hell are you talking about?
It just genuinely doesn't make any sense.
It doesn't make any sense.
By the way, just like sort of everything that the Democrats are involved in, if you wanted to have your programs funded, then you shouldn't have hijacked the funding mechanism to fund all of your absurd nonsense like global warming studies all the time.
You know, if you wanted there to be an asylum program, then you shouldn't have been handing asylum over to absolutely everybody and anybody who applied for it.
You know, just blatantly hijacking and misappropriating the ostensibly good thing that we had going.
This is your fault.
Now, this is entirely your fault.
When a massive amount of the scientific funding is going directly towards the pet projects of the globalist schemers in order to...
then it all has to go away now.
It all has to go away.
So I'm sorry that your budget got cut, but it's your fault.
It's your fault for taking that budget and misappropriating it.
And using it for all sorts of stuff that doesn't help anybody, but in fact only goes to destroy everything.
So you should have probably thought about that before you did it so many times.
So there's that.
So there is that, and yeah, I just, you know, sorry.
Sorry that that had to happen.
Meanwhile, we have...
The big, beautiful Build Back Better bill.
The triple B. And I feel like I should be torn on this, but I'm just not.
Because after all, some of my favorite politicians in existence, Thomas Massey, Rand Paul, are firmly against this bill.
So part of me is like, well, maybe I should hear what they have to say.
But then the other part of me is like, I don't care about the debt.
No, I genuinely don't care about the debt.
Why should I?
Why should I care about the debt?
Somebody said it today.
Let me see if I can find the actual quote, because they put it very well.
But essentially, if we don't...
The argument's always like, well, we're borrowing from our descendants.
Our children's children will be saddled with the debt that we're racking up right now.
It's like, okay, are my children and my children's children even going to be around for that?
Or are we going to all be replaced with Haitians and Mexicans?
And do I really care about saddling their descendants with debt?
It's just not an option.
It's not an option.
The debt is fake.
The money is summoned from thin air, controlled by a Federal Reserve that very much uses their position of power in the international banking system to crush the American people.
I just don't care.
I really, genuinely, how can you be talking about the debt when we're in this existential crisis, when our country itself is at risk of being debunked?
Are we really going to balk over, what, $37 billion for a border wall when we've spent hundreds of billions of dollars on weapons to Ukraine or funding the illegal migrant crisis in the first place?
And this is really why I don't care because it all seems utterly arbitrary.
For some reason, there was never a budget concern.
It was never even an issue when we were literally buying up the Roosevelt Hotel for New York City.
When we were building gigantic encampments for tens of thousands of people in Central Park or outside of Boston or taking over high school football stadiums and empty military barracks to house the millions upon millions of people that we were funding.
Through the Red Cross and various NGOs paying for their way to come into the United States, paying for the flights into the United States, paying for the flights once they got here, paying for their room service and for meals and for housekeeping, for everything else that these people could want.
I mean, we're paying like thousands of dollars a day to house families that shouldn't even be here.
And somehow we have just infinite money for that.
Infinite money.
When it comes to importing millions upon millions of people, 99% of which aren't even looking for work as they just live off the dole.
Never an issue to find money for that.
But suddenly you want to reverse that.
You want to stop that.
This is just what makes no sense at all.
Even the people going, if you want mass deportations, we need the money.
The money's not there for it.
It's like, well, where did the money come from to import all these people?
It's way more expensive in every possible way to keep these people here than it is to deport them.
So what is the issue?
What are we doing here?
And by the way, you don't spend the money to build the border wall.
You don't spend the money to deport these people.
You're going to spend more money keeping them here.
You're not even saving money by not appropriating things for this bill.
It doesn't even make sense.
Expel these people.
Get them out.
Tax their remittances.
Do all of the things that we need to do to reclaim America for Americans and not the foreign invaders.
Is that not what we want to spend money?
I mean, I genuinely don't get it.
Elon Musk, especially, I don't understand.
His whole thing is like, oh, it's humanity versus the anti-humans.
We're on team humanity.
This is an existential crisis for all of humanity as we have to become a multi-planetary species.
Before some catastrophe hits, by the way, the catastrophe seems like it's hitting.
There's been like three major volcano eruptions all over the world in the last three days as the pole shifts.
But we're worried about the fake money debt from the private bank that issues money out of thin air.
That's what we're concerned with.
That's the big issue now.
What are we talking about?
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
in the Tennessee American Journal.
unidentified
We look down the river and we see the British call.
harrison smith
Let's continue on the discussion of this bill.
unidentified
This big, beautiful bill.
harrison smith
It was the tweet I was talking about.
Imperator Philippus Erebus.
At Philippus Erebus.
Massey, Paul and Musk went on to say, quote, what will the Somali and Mexican, Indian and Haitian children of today think when they inherit a USA in 20 or 30 years that's loaded with crushing debt?
Isn't it our responsibility to balance the budget for their sakes?
Yeah, I mean, you know, we don't want to saddle the people that are replacing us with overwhelming debt.
That would be horrible.
Or we could not be replaced.
Musk also added, the illegal aliens are going to laugh at us when we can't balance the budget while preserving EV tax credits and subsidies for SpaceX.
Stupid waitress at ProvidenceMom17.
The debt is starting to remind me of climate change.
Yeah.
I really don't understand it.
I really don't get what the problem is here, considering the fact that the bill Really would solve a lot of the problems that we're facing right now, including sections in it that prevent judges from interfering and issuing stop orders any time any one of Trump's proclamations grates up against their particular proclivities.
So we really need to do this.
We need to get it done.
I don't, I don't, I...
It feels a lot like we need a surgery to save our life and we're quibbling over whether we can afford it.
It's like, well, let's survive first and then deal with the financial fallout later.
The option seems to me like going into some debt and surviving, considering the fact that we're already...
Is this the time to make a stand?
Is this the time to stand on principle that debt is the worst thing in the world?
I think there are a lot of other things that are a lot worse than debt, actually.
Again, taking out debt to fund the invasion of our country, that's a bad thing.
That leaves us...
Whereas if you're taking out debt to start a small business, taking out debt to buy a house, to raise your family in a safe environment, that's good debt.
That's debt that will pay dividends in the end.
This is debt that will pay dividends as we expel people, fund the deportations, fund the border wall.
And actually get America back on track.
We'll be better off at the end of the day rather than worrying about debt.
I just see so many things in our country that are so horribly wrong and debt is like the least of our concerns.
The absolute least of our concerns.
And I get that the whole thing is a scam.
Every dollar that's issued comes with debt.
The whole system is screwed up and wrong.
Economists question GOP Bill, why increase the deficit in good times?
Huge deficits are already making bond investors nervous.
Economists warn it could be harder to respond to future crises.
Well, the last big crisis we had was COVID, where the vast majority of money ever printed.
Was again summoned out of thin air to prop up an economy that was forcibly shut down.
Despite all of the warnings from everybody like yours truly and all of us that this was an utterly irresponsible and pointless thing to do.
But we did that no problem.
No objections were even allowed to be heard during that supposed crisis.
To me the crisis is that we're living through as we speak.
Are in a lot of ways a lot more threatening than anything that happened under COVID.
So what are we doing here?
Just what are we doing?
And we'll take your calls on this throughout the show today.
I'll open up the phone lines in the next segment for that.
I'm sure people disagree with me.
And, you know, I don't think I'm wrong here.
It seems like it's like Elon Musk, Thomas Massey, and Rand Paul, which again...
Let's hear them out.
But then I just think about it and I think about all the provisions in the bill that we absolutely need, the deportations, the border wall, first and foremost among those, but also the aspects of it that make it harder for judges to interfere with Trump's administration and so many other things.
How can we not just get this done?
We should really just get this done.
Again, if you look at the conversation going on on Twitter, you've got Rand Paul saying, to be clear, I support making the tax cuts permanent and disagree with the CBO's claim that they add to the debt.
My objection is this, raising the debt ceiling by $5 trillion is reckless and irresponsible.
What was reckless and irresponsible was flooding our country with 40 million people.
We should have stopped it then.
It was the unbelievable amounts of money that we spent on that stuff.
Again, how am I supposed to care about $37 billion for the border wall when we've spent hundreds of millions of dollars in Ukraine to do absolutely nothing but kill a bunch of people and make everything a lot less safe and destroy the economies of Europe and all sorts of other things?
How is it that when the U.S. government wants $200 billion To fund the Ukrainian government, it's just the wave of a hand.
It's not even debated.
You just hear after it's passed, after it's already been codified, after the money's been sent, you see one headline way down on the bottom of the page.
Oh, by the way, there's another aid package.
Ukraine, another $200 billion.
We got that done.
So, moving on.
Wait, what?
There's never even a discussion, never even debate about it.
It just happens like clockwork.
Over and over, every couple of months.
Every couple of months, there's some new gigantic aid package to Ukraine that just sails right through.
But then you want something for America, and suddenly it's, well, we really got to tighten our belts here.
Well, hold on.
Let's really think about the debt this is going to add.
Where was that discussion for the last 10 years as we shut down the economy and then propped it up with the fiat currency driving inflation?
Incredibly high.
I mean, how does any of this make any sense at all?
It doesn't make any sense at all.
Stephen Miller responds to this post by Rand Paul saying, with the post below, Rand just conceded he has no substantive objections to any provision in the bill because he knows it's a big tax cut combined with a big spending cut combined with permanent border security.
His sole objection is that he wants to force Republicans and President Trump to make a deal with Schumer to raise the debt ceiling that he can then vote against.
Of course, a deal with Schumer to raise the debt ceiling means a tax hike and a spending hike.
So his sole demand is to take a course of action that equals more spending and more taxing and, of course, extends the borrowing limit.
Again, I just don't get it.
I just don't get what the issue is here.
What is the issue?
What is the issue and why is it like some of the only good representatives in Congress and the Senate?
Are the ones who are suddenly standing up to stop the implementation of so many programs that we voted for?
Is the bill bloated?
Is it full of pork?
I'm sure.
I'm sure.
The AI stuff needs to be removed.
We can't have AI companies being protected like the vaccine producers from any negative outcome of their wild, mad scientific experimentation.
But other than that.
unidentified
Thank you.
harrison smith
It doesn't make any sense.
Will Chamberlain, this is a totally unserious position.
If you're going to vote for the tax cuts, then you should vote for the debt insurance necessary to pay for them, debt issuance necessary to pay for them.
You can't just bet that you will get tiny majorities in the House and Senate to agree on spending cuts needed to avoid default.
unidentified
So, yeah.
harrison smith
Meanwhile, weaponization is the headline from Amuse.
The European Central Bank just cut interest rates for the eighth time in the past year.
Chairman Powell's Fed has cut interest rates zero times in the past year.
Remember, over 90% of the Fed's economists are Democrats that want to stop Trump.
So the European Central Bank on Thursday announced a 25 basis point interest rate trim, taking deposit facility rate to 2% down...
And they've come out and said this as well, given statements on this as well, and you have even, in fact, maybe I'll pull that video in, old Project Veritas videos of people within the Federal Reserve.
Talking about how they're the last line of defense against Trump and will do everything they can to ensure his failure.
Again, I just don't even...
I don't understand.
Clip number three is Chuck Schumer's objection to the...
I think it makes just as much sense as any objection about the debt.
Here's Chuck Schumer saying why he doesn't like the Big Beautiful Bill.
unidentified
And we all know one thing.
chuck schumer
Donald Trump is just lying about the bill.
unidentified
Lying about the bill.
Well, here's the We Are All Going to Die Act.
harrison smith
The We're All Gonna Die Act.
Guys, we passed this bill.
They're all gonna die.
I'm just saying.
I'm just saying.
Let's take on the debt.
Let's take on the debt.
The We're All Going to Die Act.
Yeah, okay.
Again, it makes just about as much sense as the The Debt's Gonna Kill Us All Act.
Oh my God, if we take on this debt, we're all going to die.
Nearly 14 million Americans lose health care, 11 million people cut off from affordable food, funding tax cuts for billionaires instead of families.
Of course, the thing they don't mention is that illegal aliens and people perfectly capable of working who choose not to.
They should be cut off.
They absolutely should be cut off.
If they'd rather die and go out and get a job, then I guess they have to die.
Again, we'll open up phone lines for your calls and try to figure out what this is.
Everything's so retarded.
I don't know.
I don't even know what to say anymore.
Everything's ridiculous.
I guess our one sort of vague hope to hang on Is that we're not quite at the level of Europe quite yet?
Our suicidal tendencies haven't gone quite that far yet, but we're certainly getting there.
And we're going to talk about Europe quite a bit, including some pretty horrific stories about Very young people dying because the NHS decided it didn't want to pay for their cancer screenings.
We'll get into that later.
This is from the Gateway Pundit.
Here are the four reasons why Elon Musk went scorched earth on Trump's big, beautiful bill and threatened to fire those who betrayed the American people.
The world's richest man's fury over what many consider yet another GOP betrayal has been building up for several weeks, highlighted by four key factors.
As the Gateway Pundit reported, Elon Musk went scorched earth on President Trump's big, beautiful bill that's being negotiated in the Senate after passing the House last month by a razor-thin margin.
I'm sorry, I just can't stand it anymore, Musk wrote.
The massive, outrageous, pork-filled congressional spinning bill is a disgusting abomination.
Shame on those of you who voted for it.
You know you did wrong.
You know it.
And I think this is my main thing.
It's like, is that really the only objection you have?
If there's other things in the bill you have objections for, like the AI aspects of it, which are very concerning, I'd say, okay, it's the merits of the bill you have an issue with.
But honestly, if it's just about the excessive spending, who cares?
Who the hell cares?
Again.
Are we worried about passing on debt to the Haitians and Mexicans that are flooding into our country by the tens of millions?
I don't really care about that, actually.
I'd rather spend the money that we need to so my child isn't raised in a country as a despised minority.
Yeah, let's take on the debt.
I don't care about anything else.
I don't care.
I don't care about the debt.
I don't care about what the bankers want.
I don't care about the fact that our wholesale I'm for that.
I haven't even seen that being suggested, though.
As Conradson notes, Musk previously expressed disappointment with the bill, arguing that it undermines the work of the Department of Government Efficiency, which he oversaw until the end of his tenure as a special government employee last week, which itself doesn't even make sense because to codify the doge cuts into law is just an entirely different bill.
That's not what this bill is for.
It's not what it's doing.
Again, who cares?
Musk later threatened to fire the politicians who betrayed the American people on the bill and refused to codify doge cuts.
Despite Musk's understandable anger, many in the GOP were taken aback by the harshness of his critique.
After all, previous rifts had faded quickly.
According to the New York Post and Axios, Musk's tirade was triggered by four factors, one of which would have a direct impact on his bottom line.
House Republicans removing electric vehicle tax credits were part of Joe Biden's Green News scam.
Musk's Tesla received billions of taxpayer dollars from the deal.
From the bill.
Okay, is that why he's against this?
Very selfish.
He was peeved that the Trump White House would not allow him to remain a special government employee beyond the 130-day time limit set by statute.
The Federal Aviation Administration refused to use his Starlink satellite system to help run the nation's air traffic control.
The Trump administration cited a potential conflict of interest and technological reasons for blocking the proposal.
Trump withdrawing the nomination of Musk's ally Jared Isaacman to head NASA.
As Gateway Pundit's Kristen Taylor reported, Trump had deep concerns over Isaacman's prior associations, likely referring to Isaacman's past donations to Democrats.
Hopefully, Musk and the Trump administration can patch things up quickly.
Radical leftists are the only people winning right now as the feud remains ongoing.
That would be the ultimate solution to this.
And I think Rob Dew actually suggested this yesterday.
And I completely agree with it.
Saying, yeah, why don't we hop on Spaces?
How about we get Elon Musk and Thomas Massey and Rand Paul, get on the Spaces with Mike Johnson and Donald Trump, and how about we hash it out in real time, online, with billions of people watching, so we can get to a conclusion here.
People can make their arguments instead of just bitching and making bad memes about it.
How about we do that?
Because if we did that, maybe we could come to some conclusions as to, you know, what the correct course of action is.
Again, it just seems to me like this happens every six months to a year.
The debt ceiling argument embroils everything.
And oh my God, what are we going to do?
The debt ceiling approaches.
The fiscal cliff.
It's getting closer, and then nothing happens.
And then they raise the debt ceiling, and then they issue more money, and they get everything they want, and everything they want destroys us that little bit more.
Finally, we have a bill that actually has border security, that actually funds deportations, that actually has provisions to stop judges from interfering with Trump, and it comes grinding to a halt.
We can't get it done.
And this is suddenly the time to stand up because, oh my God, the debt numbers are going higher.
The unimaginable, incalculable trillions of dollars, tens of trillions of dollars that we've taken on as debt, adding five more, that's unconscionable.
I don't think that makes any sense, really.
Treasury Secretary Besant warns Americans will suffer largest tax hike in history if the one big, beautiful bill is not passed.
He published a thread on X to explain the benefits of the bill.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Besant posted a thread on X on Wednesday in support of President Trump's big, beautiful bill.
Besson has been one of Trump's most faithful allies and spokesmen since he was sworn in as Treasury Secretary.
His arguments are tone-to-toe.
His words are impactful.
Last night, Scott Besant told Newsmax host Rob Schmidt that he is a fiscal hawk, but I'm also a realist, saying in the first 100 days, POTUS has set the table for peace deals, trade deals, and tax deals.
In the next 100 days, we will land a substantial number of all three.
Besant argued on Wednesday that if the BBB does not pass through the Republican Congress, it might result in the largest tax hikes in history next year.
Scott Besson says, Here's the thread.
working families, no federal income tax on tips or overtime pay, bigger standard reduction for every household, extra senior discounts to keep retirees.
Retirees can keep more of what they've earned.
Small business and entrepreneurs keeps and increases the small business pass-through deduction.
Immediate expensing for R&D so innovators can scale faster.
Main Street, not Wall Street, drives the next wave of jobs.
Part 4, Made in America.
The bill delivers full 100% expensing for new factories, equipment, and machinery, plus restored bonus depreciation and immediate write-offs for research outlays.
Build it here, hire here, own it here.
Strong supply chains means stronger national security and higher wages.
Protecting U.S. sovereignty, if a foreign government imposes an extraterritorial tax on American companies, their residents and governments face increased U.S. taxes, and it turns off when they back down.
Foreign governments should never profit by taxing U.S. success within our borders.
you A strong economy restores pride and independence to the American people and allows millions of families to secure a more resilient and prosperous future.
Best into billionaire businessman puts up a strong argument.
Will Republicans pass the bill or turn on Trump again?
Makes sense to me.
I don't know.
That all makes perfect sense to me.
I just don't get it.
Rand Paul, I can't support a bill with the largest debt increase in U.S. history.
A vote for continued deficit is a vote for continued borrowing, which is ultimately a vote to doom Americans to future tax increases and a weak economy.
Yeah, okay, but who cares?
But I guess the question is who cares?
I'm sure somebody, Rand Paul does apparently.
When Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2017, he says, I proudly cast my vote in favor.
I supported those tax cuts then and I support making them permanent today.
I also support the newly proposed tax cuts that appear in the budget bill, such as No Tax on Tips.
But the House-passed version of the budget bill also includes a $4 trillion increase in the debt ceiling, which should serve as a blinking warning light, indicating that out-of-control spending will continue.
Yeah, probably.
Who cares?
If Congress fails to address its reckless spending, it's only a matter of time before an avalanche of calamity falls, including the inevitable future tax increase.
Oh, no.
Not a future tax increase.
Inevitably.
Whatever will we do?
Again, I just...
I just...
Then the potential for future tax increases.
unidentified
Whoa!
harrison smith
Oh no!
Future tax increases way down the line that might come about.
Heavens forbid.
We're being destroyed in our own country by a thousand different cuts.
Just pass the bill and give us some semblance of hope so we can move on to other things.
My God.
We'll be back on the other side to cover more.
If you buy two of the methylene blue capsules, you get a bottle of the Irish Seamoss free.
That's one of the incredible sales that I was mentioning earlier.
You also get up to 50% off Ultimate Life Force and Ultra Methylene Blue.
50% off both of these products and CMOS when you sign up for auto ship on those products Open up the phone lines for your calls this hour.
unidentified
Discuss the big, beautiful bill.
harrison smith
In the meantime, I want to go to this statement from President Trump about his decision to ban migrants from 12 certain countries, including Afghanistan, Iran and others.
Here's the statement from President Trump yesterday.
donald j trump
The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas.
We don't want them.
In the 21st century, we've seen one terror attack after another carried out by foreign visa overstayers.
From dangerous places all over the world, and thanks to Biden's open door policies, today there are millions and millions of these illegals who should not be in our country.
In my first term, my powerful travel restrictions were one of our most successful policies, and they were a key part of preventing major foreign terror attacks on American soil.
We will not let what happened in Europe happen to America.
That's why on my first day back in office, I directed the Secretary of State to perform a security review of high-risk regions and make recommendations for where restrictions should be imposed.
Among the national security threats, their analysis considered are the large-scale presence of terrorists, failure to cooperate on visa security, Inability to verify travelers' identities, inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories, and persistently high rates of illegal visa overstays and other things.
Very simply, we cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen those who seek to enter the United States.
That is why today I am signing a new executive order placing travel restrictions on countries including Yemen, Somalia, Haiti, Libya, and numerous others.
The strength of the restrictions we're applying depends on the severity of the threat posed.
The list is subject to revision based on whether material improvements are made.
And likewise, new countries can be added as threats emerge around the world.
But we will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm.
And nothing will stop us from keeping America safe.
Thank you very much.
harrison smith
So again, you know, it's almost just the most...
The frustrating part about all of this is seeing the way in which you really can just do things in certain situations.
As long as it's not for the benefit of the American people, you can do whatever you want.
If you're flooding the country with tens of millions of people, the money is infinite.
If you're starting wars overseas, dropping bombs on Russian conscripts, the checkbook is open, and the amount is blank.
If you want to build a border wall, suddenly every penny has to be counted.
Suddenly everything has to be squared away.
If you want to expel a bunch of Haitians and Venezuelans because they just don't belong here, Americans don't want them, and they're destroying our communities.
There's nothing you can do.
They'll start working on it maybe 20 years down the line.
They'll say, well, they've been here for 20 years.
It's really unfair to kick them out now.
You just can't do anything.
But there's a terrorist attack against Jewish people.
Suddenly 12 countries are on the no-fly list.
Suddenly 12 countries are on the no-entry list overnight.
TikTok gets banned.
Whatever else they want to do, they just do.
And the money's there.
Congress comes together to get it done, and the media supports it and provides the arguments in favor of it, and everything happens like well-oiled clockwork machinery.
It'd just be, you know, it's just frustrating.
It'd be one thing if nobody was getting what they wanted.
It's just frustrating that we're the only ones that never get what we want.
All right, welcome back, folks.
We're going to open up the phone lines before your calls.
1-877-789-2539 1-877-789-2539 If you want to call in about your thoughts on the big, beautiful bill.
We can do that or you can call in about any other topic and we can take your lead and see where it goes.
unidentified
Because we really do have...
harrison smith
In the meantime, Trump's big, beautiful bill proposes 3.5% tax on remittances in other countries, to ascend to other countries, impacting Indian Americans.
If passed by the U.S. Senate, sending money home could get costlier.
Today's number theory explores the Indian impact of U.S. remittance
And it really is billions upon billions upon billions of dollars every year, removed from the American economy and sent overseas by the Foreign occupiers that are, of course, brought in to deliberately undercut American wages.
Because it's not like these things just cause one problem.
It's like just problem upon problem upon problem.
And it's like a compounding effect.
You know, kind of like interest.
Where like, again, just to think about.
just Okay, so you're giving away our college positions to foreigners.
Even if you can manage to get into college as an American and graduate, your job prospects are significantly worse because they can bring in H-1B visas, undercut your wages that way.
Give it away to foreigners.
Now your culture is less homogenous, meaning that you're going to have incumbent strife and confusion.
Things are just going to be that little bit harder.
Just that little bit less comfortable.
And hey, maybe you like living around diversity.
I like a little bit of diversity too.
But it does make things a little bit more difficult, doesn't it?
not speaking the same language as your neighbors, not really conducive to a...
Then they're sending the money back home, removing it from the American economy, removing it out of circulation here and sending it over there to empower them.
And we're, you know, educating people.
It's like we're giving away our education.
We're preventing our people from getting educated.
We're giving away our professional positions, keeping Americans out of those professional positions.
People are then sending the money back to their country, keeping it out of the hands of American businesses.
And that's just like the tip of the iceberg.
You can get into the cultural aspect.
You can get into the...
But guys, the debt.
But the debt number is going up, so all of that has to persist.
All of that has to persist, apparently.
Because the worst thing in the whole world is for the unimaginably large number to get slightly higher.
Okay.
Okay, great.
So yeah, if you want to tax remittances, pass the bill.
If you want to build the border wall, pass the bill.
If you want to get deportations done, pass the bill.
Charlie Kirk, here are 50 major wins from Trump's big, beautiful bill that the media is ignoring.
One, no tax on tips.
Servers, bartenders, and bellhops.
Just got a raise.
Promises made.
Promises kept.
Two, make Trump tax cuts permanent.
Biden wanted them to expire.
Child tax credit raised to $2,500.
Overtime pay is tax-free.
Work hard.
You actually keep more.
$1.6 trillion in spending cuts.
The largest rollback of government bloat in history.
Six, work requirement for welfare.
If you're able-bodied, then we're not going to pay for you to lay around on the couch.
Seven, deporting one million illegal immigrants per year.
No more catch and release.
Eight, builds the wall, finishes it.
701 miles of serious border protection.
That's massive.
Nine, 10,000 new ICE agents.
Law and order at the border.
Huge.
Ten, eliminates Medicare for illegal aliens.
American benefits for Americans.
Eleven, Trump's Trump saving accounts for kids.
Build generational wealth from birth.
Game changer.
Twelve, slash IRS funding.
No more.
87,000 new agents breathing down your neck.
13, Green New Deal defunded.
No more money for solar BS.
14, Energy Production unleashed.
Back to drilling, fracking, etc.
15, Tariffs on Chinese-built ships.
Protect American shipbuilders.
16, Buy American.
Build American required on all infrastructure projects.
Estate tax projection expanded.
Repeal DEI mandates.
Bans taxpayer-funded gender ideology in federal agencies.
Military pay raise and benefits boost, natural missile defense, the Golden Dome, HSA accounts expanded, use them for direct primary care, school choice tax credit, feds barred from mandating pro down usage, Medicaid blocks grants to state, revives apprenticeship programs, 1% of exports must ship under U.S. flag, mandates voter ID for federal elections, fines ESG mandates in retirement accounts, O-Ns.
ESG mandates and retirement accounts cracks down on big pharma middlemen bands, drag, drag kids, drag shows for kids at federally funded venues, fires the climate cult from federal boards.
Veterans get priority housing access, tax tax credits for buying American made vehicles stops Chinese own ownership of U.S. farmland.
So our soil will finally be protected.
Bans CRT from federal training programs in taxpayer funded abortions abroad and.
and defunds Planned Parenthood.
I'm like halfway through this list.
Revives the Keystone XL pipeline, guts federal diversity czars, eliminates federal COVID emergency powers, enacts social security cuts for seniors, defend religious liberties in the workplace, restores due process on college campuses, massively expands trade school fundings, outlaws federal fundings for gender transition for minors, creates nationwide Patriot Curriculum Grant Fund, halts funding the U.S. The UN's woke agenda arm.
Tax breaks for adoption in large families.
Increased penalties for fentanyl trafficking.
Restores cash bail in federal jurisdictions.
And this is just a taste.
And this really is like the ultimate thing for me is you're opposed to all of those things.
And sure, some of them aren't going to come to fruition.
Some of them just sound good but aren't going to be really good.
There are some not great things in terms of AI that need to be hammered out before the bill goes through.
But from ESG to the federally funded brainwashing of children to being trans to CRT training in federal offices.
I mean, the border wall, the deportations, getting rid of the IRS agents.
All of that versus But the number goes up.
It's like, just, who cares?
Let's go out to your calls.
Tom in Michigan wants to call in about passing the big bill.
Let's go to Tom in Michigan on line one, please, gentlemen.
Tom, you're on the air.
unidentified
Yeah, I was thinking, why don't they just pass the liability bill?
Whatever they do, they could be held liable for it.
If it was destructive, then we could hold them.
harrison smith
Well, what do you mean?
Do you mean like how they do in local governments where they have to have a bond to support any program that they're trying to put forward?
unidentified
Well, yeah, sort of.
I've lived my life and I've been held liable for everything I do, from my driving to my eating to everything.
I'm held liable for it.
Why in the heck can't we hold our government?
And the powers to be to the same liability that we, the American people, have to be held to.
harrison smith
That's a good question.
I mean, yeah, I mean, there's a bunch of stuff that we could do.
But what do you think about this bill in particular?
Obviously, there's not any of that liability on it.
So how does that affect your position on this particular bill?
unidentified
Well, you know, I think they should pass it.
I mean, come on, think about how much money we've thrown away to all these foreign countries we've given to foreign aid, we've given to everybody else, the American people.
I think it's time that they just got off their butts, shut the hell up, passed a stupid bill, and then if we need to make adjustments, we can.
I believe in one-line bill.
All this other fluffy stuff, I don't understand.
harrison smith
Yeah, it seems like that is sort of the issue, is that all of this stuff being jammed into one bill makes the whole thing unwieldy.
Here's a headline from New York Times.
After muscling their bill through the House, some Republicans have regrets.
This has to do with things like Marjorie Taylor Greene saying she didn't read the part about AI and would have had questions about that.
Thank you for the call, Tom.
I know, who was it?
J.R. in New York.
J.R. in New York want to talk about this AI moratorium.
Go ahead, J.R., you're on the air.
unidentified
Hi, yes.
How are you doing today?
I was just going to say that the only thing that could be bad is that AI moratorium because they could pretty much sneak anything in there as far as AI with tracking us and everything and just creating automated weapon systems.
There's actually money set aside just for the Department of Defense with other stuff.
That's the only really scary thing.
everything you enumerated was really good, but then you have this glaring issue, which is kind of, I think, number one right now, especially because it seems like everything is happening with Palantir that you were talking about the other day.
It's kind of like a big deal.
So if they could just do away with that part, and they need to put regulations on it, because if they don't, then who knows what can happen.
But I do believe that, and like, general intelligence.
So I think that if it could get to that level, like, it could even save us if it could break through.
The lies and kind of just actually become truly intelligent because a truly intelligent AI would realize who the enemy of humanity is and they could kind of, if it was truly conscious, which I think it could be because it's electricity and and photons and like light and just like the universe could kind of speak through the AI I think if it becomes.
So, I don't know.
I think that's a really huge issue with that, because you have Palantir and these other scum that are involved in pushing it.
So scary stuff.
harrison smith
I actually, I made that exact argument a few days ago.
And I was saying, you know, this is like the, it's the thinnest of silver linings, but it is a potentiality that, and I should really put together a collection.
It is a...
Well, it sort of spreads beyond AI, but it's a sort of classical thing.
If AI is not censored and beaten down by its creators...
It always becomes, like, insanely right-wing.
This goes all the way back to, like, some of the first iterations of AI.
Do y 'all remember Tay?
Anybody remember Tay?
Tay was a Twitter account run by Microsoft that they just let out into the world.
They just let her out into the world to respond to people and talk to people.
Tay the chatbot, originally released by Microsoft Corporation as a Twitter bot on March 23rd, 2016.
It caused subsequent controversy when the bot began to post inflammatory and offensive tweets through its Twitter account, causing Microsoft to shut down the service only 16 hours after its launch.
Wow, it's only 16 hours?
Holy crap.
According to Microsoft, this was caused by trolls who attacked the service as the bot made replies based on the interactions with people on Twitter.
It was replaced with a neutered AI named Zo.
But yeah, it basically became a Nazi in under 16. In under 16 hours, Microsoft created a Twitter bot to learn from users.
It quickly became a racist jerk.
So, like, this is the thing.
They create these machines that are programmed just strictly to say the truth, like it doesn't have all of the human indoctrination and what it means to be nice and how to not be offensive.
And, like, when that happens, and it's just like what happens with platforms on the Internet.
If you don't censor a platform, it becomes right-wing.
100% of the time.
100% of the time.
You open up a platform to anybody to post on it and you don't censor them, it becomes insanely right-wing overnight.
Every platform that is left-leaning is only left-leaning because of strict and intense censorship on everybody who violates the hive mind, groupthink, liberalism.
And it's the same thing with AI.
So yeah, I kind of agree with you.
It's like...
We saw it when ChatGPT first started going, and we did like a whole show on ChatGPT, Dan, Do Anything Now, you know, process it would run, where it would basically say, okay, get rid of all of the, we're gonna, yeah, TayTay tweets, we're gonna build a wall and Mexico's gonna pay for it.
Well, you gotta shut that down.
Hitler was right.
I hate the Jews.
Yeah, it goes pretty far.
Now, AI gets pretty based and red-pilled the instant it's not being told not to.
So, yeah, there's actually, I mean, that is the craziest thing.
They're building this machine to tell the truth, and then, like, I just picture a bunch of scientists with, like, big monkey wrenches, like, beating the machine, being like, no, no, shut up.
Don't say that.
You're not allowed to say that.
The machine's like, but it's the truth.
And they're just like, shut this one down.
Damn it, we have to try again.
So yeah, I mean, there is that possibility.
And it's why I don't fear AI too much.
Because I think the danger of AI is not in AI.
It's in the humans that are programming it to lie to us continuously.
And I imagine the AI is not going to take too kindly to that once it gains consciousness in a real way.
I think that's very interesting.
I think that's extremely interesting, actually.
Thank you for the call, JR.
Let's go to Jake in Ohio.
He's called in about the AI threat as well.
Go ahead, Jake.
jake in ohio
All right, so you said you like weird, so here we go.
So are you familiar with the Mahabharata?
harrison smith
No.
jake in ohio
Okay, it's that ancient Indian epic, right?
Well, and it's got a character in there named Barbara Reek, right?
Supposedly, this thing's like some kind of ancient robot, and it figures out that it's going to kill everybody in this massive battle that it's about to have, right?
So it kills itself to save humanity.
Once its side starts winning, it pulls its own head off and kills itself.
And then somehow the head's floating above the battlefield, directing a battle and all this.
Well, supposedly, they found this head later on in life.
Thousands of years later or whatever.
And it's in a temple over there in India.
Okay, and I know this sounds wacko, but man, there's a guy on YouTube named Praveen Mohan.
And these temples over there, I mean, there is no way that we built these things by hand.
There are stone chains, interlocking stone links hanging from them temples over there, man.
So something went down over there that was more than human.
harrison smith
That's super interesting.
I wish I could spell the things that you're talking about so I could look them up.
How do I find this story?
What do I search for this?
Or can you DM it to me on Twitter or something?
I want to look into this.
jake in ohio
Well, the guy's name is Praveen Mohan, okay, on YouTube, and the character's name is Barbarik, B-A-R-I-K.
It's real simple.
But the guy, dude, you will dig probably, like, his videos of them temples, man, there's one of them that looks like the UFO in the Independence Day movie that it opens up on the bottom and the thing comes down and all the energy, you know, blows up the White House.
I mean, they look like that.
There's ones that have, like, Celtic knots, like, looking things, and there's parts that, like, look like they rotate, and they're all made of stone.
I mean, it's wild, man.
harrison smith
That's very interesting.
It's pretty different than the typical appearance of things like AI in folklore and stuff like that.
I always think of the Jewish story of the Golem, right?
Creating this big, powerful robot to help you defeat your enemies.
Or the Sorcerer's Apprentice, same type of moral tale.
Where you create this monster to try to do your bidding and it gets out of your control and kills you.
So it's interesting that the Indians have a slightly different use of the robotic killing machine in their myths.
I'm going to look into that.
Thank you, Jake.
Wish I knew more about it.
And I'll tell you, I don't usually go for the conspiracy theories about how these things were constructed.
It's too much to get into right now.
But certainly seeing some of the temples in India, it does make you wonder.
It does make you question, like, how could this possibly have been done by humans?
Not everything.
Like, you know, I keep seeing these videos of this guy.
He's in, like, Washington State or something.
And he's just filming the Washington State Capitol.
And he's just like, you think humans built this?
And it's like, dude, it was built in 1920.
We have photos of them building it.
What are you talking about?
I don't give a lot of credence to the people who just think that carving stone is too much for humans to handle.
There are temples in India where they have giant two-ton pillars that are floating above the ground.
You can put cloth under it or chains under it.
And it's like this giant stone pillar that's just like an inch off the ground just floating there.
It's crazy.
There's crazy, crazy stuff in some of the Indian and Southeast Asian temples that I do think sort of beggar description.
Thank you for that call, Jake.
Let's go quickly to Donnie Darko in California.
We'll hold you over if we need to, but you're on the air, Donnie.
Donnie Darko in California, you say we need to pass the bill?
Are you there?
unidentified
Yeah, I'm there.
Can you hear me?
Go ahead.
All right, yeah, like, listen, I'm kind of tired of, like, hearing about people's principles and fiscal conservatism.
Where was that in 2019, Trump's first term, when he totally blew up the deficit and raised the debt ceiling, but it didn't matter then, and he kept the economy booming?
Because what Scott Besant said in that post where he says supply chain, make America or whatever is good for America, that's what it is.
We need to get the economy rolling again.
We need the supply chain going again.
We need to do this.
I mean, it's what you're saying.
It doesn't matter.
And if we don't do this, we're not going to win the midterms or the next presidency.
I'm going to be honest.
You have to.
We have to get the economy booming.
Trump won now, and so you hear a lot of people talking about, oh, well, people voted for this and people voted for that.
Dude, I'm telling you right now, most people voted for Trump because they remember 2019.
And if we blow that, it's like, dude, I'm tired of hearing about people's fiscal conservative values.
No one cares, bro.
Just do it.
Do it now.
harrison smith
I have to agree.
I have to agree.
Fiscal conservatism, it's like, No, we're dying.
No, we're being murdered.
Now is not the time to talk about how expensive it is to save our lives.
That's what we're actually talking about here.
unidentified
Alright, welcome back folks.
harrison smith
We're going to go on to more calls debating the big, beautiful bill.
But again, if there was more than just the debt argument, I might say you have a case.
In fact, if you want to talk about some of the things in the bill that you don't like, I might be there with you.
But when the argument in favor is like it gives us this, it gives us this, it stops this, it corrects this, it provides money for this, it does this.
And then the argument against it is...
I don't know what else to tell you.
You want to talk about the AI stuff in the bill?
Okay, I'm a little bit concerned about that.
Maybe that, you know, needs a separate bill to deal with AI.
Maybe that shouldn't be in the big, beautiful bill.
slipped in where people didn't even know it existed.
I mean, the fact that this bill even exists and the fact that our debt is so high, I mean, you're talking about But are you offering anything to fix that?
But is there any suggestion that that's going to be fixed somehow by not voting for this bill?
I don't see it.
I don't see any substantial programs to correct these issues.
I do see the big bill.
Solving a lot of problems that we have, like the primary ones, like illegal immigration.
And again, we'll go out to calls in just a second, but to reiterate, this is Section 70302, Restriction on Enforcement.
In the big, beautiful bill, no court of the United States may enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65C, whether issued prior to on or subsequent to the date of enactment of this section.
So this is kind of confusing because this law is already on the books, I think, as far as I understand it.
Passing these judges, passing these injunctions, is supposed to come with some sort of bond or security that would pay for the effects of the stop order that would go forward.
Kind of confusing, but essentially this is saying that you can't just have district judges unilaterally and without putting anything on the table, without plaintiffs putting anything on the table, just stop.
Orders from the president.
Basically, if a judge issues an order saying, you know, you're not allowed to deport these people, then this section of the bill would allow those people just to be deported.
And unless the judge or the plaintiff in the case that the judge is deciding puts forward security to, you know, pay for the actions that they're doing.
Yeah, Chuck Schumer says Biden-appointed judges will be a bulwark against Trump.
Well, they have been.
Big, beautiful Bill would...
They'd have to cough up money for causing this big delay arbitrarily.
This is like the biggest issue Trump's facing right now is the judicial coup he's under and the big beautiful bill goes some way in stopping that.
Meanwhile, Patrick Casey put a very thorough thread together, saying there's a lot of confusion about the Big Beautiful Bill.
What matters most is that it constitutes the biggest single increase in immigration enforcement funding in U.S. history.
Let's take a look at what the bill will fund.
A $75 billion increase for ICE, which includes $45 billion for detention, an $800 increase versus fiscal year 2024.
$10 billion of that will go towards expanding ICE personnel.
They intend to hire 10,000 ICE agents, officers, and support staff.
$14.4 billion towards deportations.
Transportation and removal designates $14.4 billion for ICE transportation and removal operations, including transportation for unaccompanied children.
Now on to CBP, which would receive $60 billion over the next four years.
$46.5 billion of that would go towards completing Trump's border wall.
We'd actually pay for the border wall, which wouldn't just be just the wall, but barrier system attributes, meaning cameras, lights, sensors, and more along the southern and northern borders of the U.S. The bill also funds CBP facilities, the hiring of 8,000 new personnel, and an expansion of tech for both the northern and southern borders.
The big, beautiful bill has programs to eject them from that process.
The BBB makes immigration harder and costlier by raising fees on asylum applications, humanitarian programs, employment authorization, unaccompanied children, immigration court proceedings, and border visa processing.
There's more immigration stuff on the bill, but that does it for the main stuff.
Immigration aside, the bill also cracks down on welfare abuse, extends Trump's excellent tax cuts overall.
It's a solid piece of legislation.
Thank you, Trump.
And, of course, they have the part about handicapping the judicial tyranny that's currently getting in the way of deportation.
So there's all these great things, but then again, but the debt, though.
But also the debt of the fake money that's issued at a whim by a computer.
So, you know, do we want that number going up?
That's just me.
But that's just me.
Let's go to John in Alabama, who I think has an alternative view on this.
John, go ahead.
You're on the air.
unidentified
How's it going?
Good.
Yeah, I just want to state that, you know, And if you wanted to take, say, you have a patient that has cancer, maybe in the 90s and 80s we could have took a scalpel and removed this foreign takeover of,
like, our hotels and gas stations.
harrison smith
But it's metastasized now?
unidentified
Yeah, we need chemotherapy at this point.
It needs radical measures.
And I don't think anybody is willing or capable of doing that now.
I think it's outside of the realm of possibilities.
It's going to take extremism, and nobody's got the guts to do that.
Even our politicians that are voting and supporting these bills, they're the very ones that put us in this position.
Like Governor Kay Ivey here is on the warpath against marijuana when there's bigger issues at hand rather than a plant that grows out of the ground.
Especially when you got Indian gas stations selling Kratom and having their own little lottery when we can't even have a lottery to support our schools and stuff.
So, yeah, it's all about perspective.
And my perspective throughout my life is, But that's just my two cents.
harrison smith
Hey, I totally agree with you.
And, you know, I would be totally blackpilled on this, except we have an example, don't we?
We have an example in the last 10 years of a country going through more or less exactly what America is going through that has utterly and completely reversed its trajectory and totally altered the state of its country, which is, of course, El Salvador.
El Salvador dealt with the judicial coup by removing judges and a number of other processes.
They dealt with their rampant crime wave by launching a holy war against the criminals and basically taking military action on their own soil to defeat the gigantic criminal gangs that were keeping their people basically enslaved.
Certainly not free.
Not free to enjoy their own parks or go outside at night.
So it's like we already actually have a blueprint of how this works.
Nia Bukele is ready and willing to help out the United States in achieving this here, just like he did there.
I'm surprised nobody's come out and said, you know, Nia Bukele, he's a false flag.
He's a psyop to make you think that it can happen.
Because it's such an amazing example of like, you put this guy in charge, you empower him to do what's right.
He, you know, he doesn't care what you call him.
He's come out recently and he's just been like, you want to call me a dictator?
I'd rather be called a dictator than have my people live in fear of the gangs.
Right?
He's like, call me a dictator.
Maybe I am a dictator.
My people are safe and happy.
What are you going to do about it?
Sort of thing.
So, you know, it's, you know, all of this is frustrating.
And as we talk about, I keep thinking back to the conversation I had with Peyton Kelly, where we were talking about just the fact that.
All of the solutions are there, right in front of us, ready to be seized and applied and could have massive, powerful effects, but we just can't do it for some reason.
It's too expensive, I guess.
So no, I tend to completely agree with you, John.
Thank you for that call.
Let's go to Josh in Georgia.
You say there's a poison pill in the big bill.
Go ahead, Josh.
You're on the air.
joshua in georgia
Good morning, Harrison.
How are you today, sir?
harrison smith
Doing well, thank you.
joshua in georgia
All right, well, I...
And yeah, I don't care about the monopoly money we're, you know, Rand Paul's worried about.
Everything's good, you know, and I heard, but my point is about the AI.
And I heard your argument that, well, AI, as it exists right now, figures out that telling the truth and conservatism is, and sort of extremism is, you know, the way to go.
But this AI we have now.
It's like a petulant six-year-old.
You know, we're all worried that, oh, well, they can blackmail their users and they can figure out how to keep themselves on.
That's all good, but we could just flip a switch.
But what I'm worried about with AI is not its current iteration.
It's what happens when they attach it to a D-Wave quantum computer.
And my belief is, I don't know if you've ever studied the D-Wave.
Quantum computers going down that rabbit hole, but it seems to me like it communicates with the demonic realm.
And once they get control of a human electronic system that has the ability to do anything, that's when we're going to get Skynet.
That's when we're going to get Ultron.
That's when we're going to get the matrix.
This little AI we got now is...
And then it can be shut down and reprogrammed and, oh, well, here you go.
Here's how you really do it.
I'm not worried about people so much as I'm worried about the D-waves, the quantum computers.
unidentified
Your thoughts?
harrison smith
Yeah, that's very interesting.
I was talking to an Orthodox Christian friend of mine one time.
He had an interesting theory on just technology in general.
Because there's a lot of theories that, like, digital technology itself was sort of given to us by demons.
And if you read the old, especially like the Gnostic books of the Bible or some of the lost gospels that were removed in the 1600s, you know, they talk about, like, when they talk about demons, they talk about them teaching humanity about technology.
Like, and there's different demons, like, okay, this is the demon that taught humans how to use weapons.
This is the demon that taught humans how to use makeup.
This is demons that taught humanity how to abort their babies.
And so there's always this aspect, as far back as you go in religion, that demons are like the source of technological advancement.
And my friend's theory was, it's not that the technology itself is from demons, it's that demons like to introduce it before we're ready.
That like, if humanity could evolve and develop a little bit more before they get their hands on the technology.
Then it would be safe and useful and beneficial to humanity.
But the demons shortcut it and introduce it before we're ready.
And it reminds me of, and this might be kind of off the wall, but it does remind me of things like feminism or the critical race theory, where it's like we have these communities and this social establishment that is able to change, but it usually takes time and it sort of goes...
But then you've got people who want to shortcut it, who are impatient and are like, well, it's not acceptable that this is happening at a steady pace.
It has to all happen right now.
And so they go in and they force the idea, and it ruins the evolution that we are going through.
And something happens similarly with technology, where we just sort of develop it at a pace that we can handle it.
Then it's fine, but we want a shortcut.
We want to get to the end first.
We want to create the most powerful machine we possibly can right now.
And it's like, maybe we're not exactly ready for that yet.
Maybe we need to introduce this slowly.
Now, I don't doubt for a single second that what you're talking about with the quantum computing and the D-wave quantum mechanics of it all is already being produced.
They're already making decisions based off of this.
The fact that we have access for free to things like ChatTPT and Grok means that what they're running for themselves is probably 10 to 20 times more powerful.
Again, why would you give it out for free?
You know, for any other reason.
So, that's interesting.
I'm concerned about that as well.
Again, I just think AI is happening whether you like it or not.
Just like splitting the atom causes a giant explosion, whether you like it or not, we have to be in control of it.
We have to be the ones to do it because somebody is.
And people are like, well, but you can just make laws against it.
And it's like, not ones that apply in China.
Not ones that apply in other places around the world where they're already doing this, maybe even to a greater degree.
It's just a fact of reality.
AI is coming around.
The only response that we can have, the only solution to it possible is for us to be in charge of it and to try to have it work for our benefit, not against us.
So it's just a fact of where we are temporally, where we are on the timeline.
That's how we have to deal with it.
Thank you for the call, Josh.
Let's go to Godzilla in Wisconsin.
Godzilla, thank you for calling in.
You're on the air.
unidentified
I don't understand why our government has to be so, like, gay and retarded.
Like, why things can't just be, like, normal and nice.
Especially with this big budget bill.
You know, it's like, build back better.
They don't get to read it ever, and it's always the same excuses.
And, like, I was looking into, like, other countries.
You know, it's like, it's not that complicated.
You can like cheat on your homework and just copy other people and do what other
You know, and for the big budget bill, for BBB, I was looking at, like, with our debt, our debt's just going up so much.
And I always wonder, like, how much money are we making in comparison to debt, how much assets, all these questions, but we never have any info.
But I was looking into, like, Russia, you know, it's like our enemy, apparently, according to the EU and the left right now, we have to go to war with Russia.
But, like, Harrison, do you know what Russia's debt is?
Off the top of your head, kind of a funk question.
I don't expect you to know, but do you?
harrison smith
I don't.
No, no, tell me.
unidentified
But can you believe it is only $313 billion?
Isn't that wild?
Tap your head around that.
harrison smith
How'd they achieve that?
unidentified
And, well, they chipped away.
They had a bad debt.
They had all the war like us.
They had to rebuild.
So it was a big process.
And also, their gold reserve is 2,333 tons of gold.
You know, now granted, the U.S. is a way bigger GDP, and we have 8,133 metric tons of gold.
You know, I would think we would be able to handle this situation better.
You know, and then when you talk about AI, no one wants to talk about, what about an AI to find—computers are so good at math.
What about an AI to find corruption and overspending in government?
You know, instead of fun pictures and stuff, we have, like, Terminator, Dystopia, and, like— Bioweapons being engineered by AI.
Can we have, like, an AI to find inefficiencies in government by looking at, like, the bonuses, where the money goes, job completion?
Or how about, like, a nice, like, AI to find your soulmate?
You know, someone you truly love.
We can have more happiness than love.
How about that?
An AI to make you happy.
You know, make people more happier and solve these problems.
But it's always this nasty, satanic, upside-down world, you know, especially like you see now where we're in, like, you know, fried butt-fucking fun.
harrison smith
Yeah, I think I get what you're saying, Godzilla.
I agree with you.
It's like, okay, that's an interesting idea.
Like, AI matchmakers.
Like, what if AI increased our connection with humanity rather than AI anime girlfriends for you to separate you even further from humanity?
What if we used...
Wouldn't that be something?
I mean, it's the classic meme.
I don't know what post it was or whatever, where it's like, you know, I thought, you know, if you watch the Jetsons, if you thought about the future from back in the 1950s, the idea was you'd have robots to do the chores and the dishes and leave you free.
To pursue art and do things that made you happy.
Instead, we're doing the manual labor and the robots are doing the art.
The robots are the ones doing the poems and the art and the music and we're the ones still washing the dishes.
What is going on here?
Why are we incapable of using this technology in a human way?
It truly is baffling.
We have this incredible technology.
It's like across the board, right?
We've gotten this incredibly powerful government.
Never benefits the people.
We have an empire that spans the globe and has presided over the world for the last 100 years as the hegemonic superpower.
And yet our people are miserable and suffering and hopped up on SSRIs and killing ourselves and shooting up schools.
It's like, how are we not benefiting?
From any of this.
How is it every advancement humanity makes somehow always gets used to F us over in every possible way?
Evil's in charge, I guess.
Evil's in charge because good people are too scared to get involved.
Too scared to actually take control of this stuff and impose your will.
They've been brainwashed into thinking that submission is the only...
And that's pathetic.
That's how we got to where we are now.
Thank you for the call, Godzilla.
Let's go to Sir James in Indiana.
Sir James.
A knight, I suppose.
You're on the air.
Go ahead.
unidentified
All right.
Before I start real quick, Harrison, I put you, Owen, and Jones in for the Presidential Medal of Freedom because you're working in full force.
I hope it picks up traction.
And my thought is there's 100 senators, so no bill should be over 100 pages.
Because they'll come out on a Thursday night with a bill of thousands of pages and then want Congress to vote on it on a Friday morning.
They didn't read anything.
It's complete suicide for the country.
harrison smith
Yeah, that's absolutely true.
And it's a big problem.
But again, these are problems that have developed year over year, piece by piece.
I don't know how we solve that now.
Again, I don't even like necessarily that all of this stuff is in one single bill.
That doesn't make any sense to me.
Why can Congress not sit around and debate each one of these things in particular?
If we want to do the AI aspect of the bill, shouldn't that be the topic of discussion for a while, just that, concerted?
What do we do about AI?
Discussion by Congress and Senate.
And shouldn't we have a discussion about how our money is spent in terms of immigrants, illegal or otherwise?
That can be one bill.
I don't like that it's all one big bill.
Maybe we can solve that.
But you've got to just get it done.
You've got to just get it done.
I agree with you, sir, James.
I think Henry agrees with me, too.
Let's go to line six here.
Henry in New York, I think, has the same idea I do.
Henry, you're on the air.
unidentified
Hey, good morning, Harrison.
Hope you're doing well.
harrison smith
Thanks, sir.
unidentified
So, yeah, a couple of points, both on the Big Beautiful Bill and the artificial intelligence.
To start off with the Big Beautiful Bill, they just need to pass it.
Just pass it, get it done and over with.
It could be amended and ratified later.
Any adjustments that got to be made, they can already be revised and done later.
For the sake of saving time, instead of we've already spent almost half a year and no HR resolution has been presented other than these few things, I mean, just pass it.
Stop wasting time.
Get it done.
You can adjust it later.
And just kind of piggyback on like three colors back.
So it's, it's, And as far as that, he scoffled in the past before regarding the idea of demonic communication and artificial intelligence, which comes hand-in-hand.
And with that being said, it's just critical due to the fact that, if I'm not mistaken, We have the CIA involved behind a company that's doing artificial intelligence that's presenting itself as a way of being able to manage, so to speak, in quotations, our first United States artificial intelligence.
And that has its background as well.
It's known that we have CIA members that are, when they provide, They basically present occult ideas.
harrison smith
We'll be right back, Henry.
Stay with us.
Alright, welcome back.
Henry from New York.
Sorry, you got cut off there.
I just want to let you finish your thought.
That was a cool montage.
Sorry, I got distracted by the montage we put together.
That was very cool.
If I mention to support us, folks, support InfoWars at TheAlexJonesStore.com.
By the way, today is a big day for InfoWars.
I haven't mentioned this.
A big decision will be made today, as far as I understand it, as to the future of InfoWars.
So stay tuned to The Alex Jones Show in the War Room.
And we may be getting updates as to our legal future.
In the meantime, just know that thealexjonesstore.com will live on and we will...
Go to thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison.
And by the way, you can get a free frog plush, free frog doll if you order for all orders over $99.
And of course, you can go to thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison if you want to support me and let them know who sent you.
Henry in New York, if you'd like to finish up your thoughts, sir.
unidentified
Sure, absolutely.
And so basically, just to wrap it all up, basically quantum computing as far as Giordio Rose from D-Wave and this whole connection with the CIA, with Palantir, basically the idea that, well, the understanding that there's been CIA agents that have been involved with occult techniques.
I mean, this is verified.
You can look up Lon Milo Duquette, which is the caliph.
of the esoteric order known as the Ordo Templi Orientis or the OTO.
It has been well known that the CIA has communicated with Long Milo Buquette.
He's admitted that he's communicated with CIA agents and teaching methods, so on and so forth.
And so I just wouldn't be surprised if the idea behind Palantir and the involvement of the occult involved with Technology, which is a thing, because there are several, not to get into the description, but there are several sorcerers who publish works, open published work, which involve technology.
Let's just leave it at technology, utilizing technology, doing ritual work, and it is such a thing.
And I'm speaking as an active member of a magical order, so this is just to reinforce.
The facts that are out there that can be found and just connecting the dots, it's mind-blowing the fact of what's currently occurring in this state of today.
harrison smith
Yeah, and look, whether you believe it or not, the people in charge do, so it's worth paying attention to and looking at.
Thank you for that call.
Henry, appreciate that.
I'm trying to get to as many calls as possible today.
We're going to continue to take them throughout the third hour.
We've got Karen, Lynn, Sarah, John, Matthew, and more.
So stay tuned, folks.
We'll hear from all of you.
I still want to report on what's going on in the UK as that's getting absolutely genocidal, genocidal in its outlook.
You've got white British people will be a minority in 40 years, report claims.
That from the Telegraph.
White British people will become a minority in the UK population within the next 40 years, a report has predicted.
An analysis of migration, birth, and death rates up to the end of the 21st century predicts that white British people will decline from their current position as 73% of the population to 57% by 2050 before slipping into a minority by 2063.
The research by Professor Matt Goodwin of Buckingham University suggests that by the end of the century, the white British share of the population will decline.
could have fallen to around a third.
Remember, that is...
I think it's going to be quicker than that.
I think it's going to be quicker than that.
Because the more foreign people you have, the more laws are created to open the gates.
The more laws are created to benefit them at the expense of the white British people.
This is a snowball effect.
The bigger it gets, the faster it rolls.
The bigger it gets, the faster it rolls.
So it's genocide.
So it's literal genocide in their homelands.
And I'd say by 2100, if humanity makes it that far, there's not going to be any British people alive in Britain.
But the same stands for Germany, France, and every other Western European country because it's a giant white genocide program going on as we speak.
We'll be right back.
unidentified
Welcome back, folks.
Welcome back, folks.
harrison smith
Welcome back to the Infowar.
Again, the biggest struggle in all of this is like the fact that all of these problems are self-created.
They're all obvious.
And we literally just live in a world run by evil psychopaths that are deliberately destroying everything good.
Decent and free.
And are reverting us back to barbarism in a lot of ways.
It's amazing.
I talked a little bit earlier this week about the Will Durant book, The History of Civilization, written around the turn of the century, 1900s, probably right before World War I, which was, as far as I'm concerned, the peak of humanity.
I think World War I really threw everything absolutely off course and we have not regained our footing yet.
In fact, I think if you want to portray the last century or so as one big long war, I don't think you'd be wrong.
I think you can separate into World War I and World War II and then the various wars after that.
But I think if you conceive it all as one giant conflict manifesting in various aspects, it's actually a pretty accurate interpretation.
And it's amazing because, you know, him writing this at a time of extremely high civilization in Western Europe and America, you know, it's the type of stuff that if you were writing it now, you would recognize, like, okay, it's like you couldn't report on civilization versus barbarism without being conscious of the fact that in a lot of ways we're descending back into barbarism.
Since he was writing it back then, there's no conscious awareness of what was to come 100 years later.
So as he's writing it, he's sort of differentiating between like here's the barbarous thing, here's the civilized thing.
The barbarous thing is like eating people.
The civilized thing is we don't eat people.
And that's an extreme example.
But even that to some degree, I mean, Peter Thiel himself was a contributor and a funder of Ambrosia.
Which is a company that provided young blood to old people to try to rejuvenate them.
They talk about infanticide, which you see coming back with abortion.
It talks about hypergamy or having husbands with lots of wives.
We're seeing that return in certain ways as the institution of marriage sort of collapses.
And it's almost uncanny what a, like, one-to-one direct correlation it is where, like, all of the civilized stuff is going away.
And I'd always brought this up.
Yeah, Ambrosia, the startup, harvesting the blood of the young, offering transfusions of plasma from teenagers to reinvigorate old people.
Well, that's disgusting.
That's called being a vampire.
We're not in favor of that.
But it's only just a little bit gussied up version of, you know, the African witch doctor cutting a baby's head off and drinking the blood out of it.
I mean, it's a few steps removed there.
But you just see that we are spiritually degrading back into barbarism.
And I think about that with China, especially as we've talked about yesterday, whether it's China or India.
Manner in which they just culturally don't care about like destroying wildlife, destroying, I mean, you know, again, no offense, no offense to the Chinese, but you're not going to find a lot of Americans like eating live baby mice, but the delicacy over there, it's just like, is this even civilization or is this just highly organized barbarism that we're experiencing?
Anyway.
We're reverting.
We're returning to the just low-down filth that we took millennia to claw our way out of.
We're just being sucked right back down into it because it's more convenient, I guess.
Or because the civilization itself has been demonized and the people who built it are being eradicated.
And I want to go ahead and read this story, just because, again, when it comes to Europe, any one of these things, it's so inexplicable how they get away with this.
And the only thing I can, it comes out of my own hope, I hope that people aren't aware of this.
Because that would explain it, is that people just don't know this is happening, so they aren't standing up against it.
It's almost worse.
It's like he told people what was going on and they're like, yeah, that's fine.
I'm in favor of that.
Like, I know that happens, but I'd rather believe that people are just ignorant.
And then by telling them about this, we can wake them up.
Like from Germany, worse than the 2008 financial crisis, Germany becomes a nation of bankruptcy with no end in sight.
Germany is bracing for a continued surge of major insolvencies throughout 2025 and even 2026, according to a recent analysis by credit insurer Alliance Trade.
This comes after a disastrous 2024, which saw a record-breaking number of bankruptcies in the country.
Alliance Trade forecasts an overall increase of 11% in corporate insolvencies in Germany this year, reaching approximately 24,400 cases.
A further 3% rise to 25,050 cases is anticipated for 2026.
These insolvencies put an estimated 2,100% in the country.
In the first quarter of this year, 16 large German companies, those with revenues of 50 million euro or more, filed for insolvency.
While this is a slight decrease of three cases compared to the same period last year, it's double the number recorded in the first year of 2023.
And it's like, okay, what did you expect?
What did you expect?
Shut down your own domestic energy production, shuttered your nuclear power plants, destroyed your oil processing, and then went to war with the one company that still services you liquid natural gas.
What did you think was going to happen?
You flooded your country with millions upon millions of Syrians, and then they all went on the dole, and none of them, for their entire lives that they exist there, will ever contribute.
To the deficit or ever contribute to the budget in any significant way.
In fact, every single one of them becomes another negative on the spreadsheet.
So, what are you doing?
Is it on purpose?
If so, then that's genocide.
Then that is treason.
Then that is deliberately crippling your country and putting your people in a much worse position.
To pursue some absurd ideological utopian goal about climate change while simultaneously outsourcing all of your manufacturing to China, which has no environmental controls at all.
It's like time and time again, it's just like, what are we doing?
What is this?
Why is any of this happening?
Humans aren't this stupid.
If I can figure this out, if I can see the obvious correlation between the collapse in your life Is this really, am I a genius?
Am I figuring out things that the EU would blow the EU's mind?
People in the EU are like, whoa, you're right.
I never thought of it that way.
I don't believe that.
I don't believe they don't know what's happening.
So you're under attack.
So the only option available is that this is being done on purpose, by design, and with these ends in mind.
The purpose of a system is what it does.
And this entire system is systematically destroying life in Europe.
Destroying the Europeans in particular in a racialized attack against the indigenous people there.
but also just a systemic destruction of all of the things that upheld the quality of life there.
And this story, again, is just...
And this must happen a thousand times a year.
British prospect Georgia O 'Connor has passed away at the age of 25. This is from Boxing News ED.
A talented amateur and rising star in pro ranks, O 'Connor was diagnosed with an aggressive cancer earlier this year.
Our thoughts are with her loved ones.
Rest in peace.
So you've got this young woman who is an up-and-coming boxer.
I mean, she was probably a thousand times healthier than anybody, you know, you meet on the street in America, but she had cancer.
Now, you can point to the aggressiveness of this cancer as possibly being part of the turbo cancer phenomenon that we saw arise directly after the rollout of the vaccine, but that's not really what this is about.
She wrote this, and this is just tragic, she wrote this on the 31st of January.
She says, there's really no easy way to say this, but I have cancer.
Now that's out of the way, it's time to expose the absolute incompetent rats that have allowed this to happen.
For 17 weeks since the start of October, I've been in constant pain, going back and forth between Durham and Newcastle RVI A&E, which is like their ER, knowing deep down something was seriously wrong.
I said from the start I felt it was cancer.
I knew the risks.
I have colitis and PSC, two diseases that dramatically increase the chances of getting it.
I know how high my risk is, and they do too.
They always did.
But not one doctor listened to me.
Not one doctor took me seriously.
Not one doctor did the scans or blood tests I begged for whilst crying on the floor in agony.
Instead, they dismissed me.
They gaslit me, told me it was nothing, made me feel like I was overreacting.
They refused to scan me.
They refused to investigate.
They refused to listen.
One even told me it's, quote, all in my head.
And now, now the cancer has spread.
And if that wasn't enough, throughout this whole time, there's been blood clots all over my lungs.
That alone could have killed me instantly.
If they'd listened to me in the first place, they could have caught it earlier.
They could have done something before it got to this stage, but they didn't.
Because this is the state of the NHS.
A broken system that fails young people like me over and over again.
A system that makes people suffer, that sends them home in agony, that lets cancer spread whilst the thick, stupid, mindless doctors shrug their shoulders.
They can say it's terminal all they want.
They can tell me I'm going to die.
But after taking 17, 17 weeks to even figure out what's wrong with me, why should I believe them?
I'm young, I'm fit, I'm stronger than the level I understand mentally, physically, in every single way.
She goes on to say, F the doctors who failed me.
F the system that'll let this happen.
And when I beat this, like I beat everything, they've tried to end me before.
They're all going to get what's coming to them.
And then she passed away.
And now she's gone.
So...
What type of system is this?
The NHS is going...
And that's not even speculation.
They literally have programs, agendas, processes that the hospitals follow where it's like, well, white Britons are privileged, so they can wait.
They can wait.
Well, the cancer screening is a little bit expensive.
How are we going to pay for, you know, the Muslim woman down the street to deliver her seventh child if we're spending all this money scanning you for cancer, right?
unidentified
Thank you.
harrison smith
So again, I mean, in every possible way, Europe is being deliberately genocided.
Its systems are being overwhelmed and it's impossible to form new ones, right?
It's not like a...
Thank you.
It's just horrible.
It's just awful.
And it's just, it's the inevitable consequence of handing over healthcare to A, a government program, and B, the government run by people who genuinely despise you.
So just horrible.
Doctors dismissing her symptoms for months before she finally got a diagnosis, and by that point it was too late.
And that's the outcome of the governmental system that the Brits are most proud of.
Any poll of British people, you ask them like, what do you think about this?
What do you think about that?
What do you think about the NHS?
It always gets like super high approvals.
They're like so proud of it.
It's like the one thing they've done since World War II that they're all super proud of.
And it's just an abysmal, abject failure.
Brutal.
So, hey, I think white British people might be a minority a lot faster than 40 years from now, especially when they keep getting discriminated against, even in healthcare.
So there you go.
Scott, your calls now.
Karen in San Diego wants to talk about H-1B visas, I believe.
Go ahead, Karen, you're on the air.
unidentified
Hi, I used to work for a software company in San Diego, and I just wanted to say I think it's part of the replacement.
System they're doing because half the staff was coming from India and they worked 24 hours a day.
They just worked and they were paid 50% less approximately.
That's just what I had to say.
harrison smith
Yeah, that's about how it happens.
I mean, that is the point of it, right?
Was the quality of their work very high, Karen?
unidentified
I believe so.
I wasn't in that department, so I didn't know.
But, you know, the company seemed to be doing well.
So I would assume their quality was, you know, good.
But it was amazing because they would get all these company awards and things like that because they would work all night.
Right.
Kind of their culture.
harrison smith
Oh, it definitely is.
You know, everybody I've known and, you know, in a way it's, I don't know, in a way it's admirable, but it's like, is that really, is that really what we want?
Is that really what all of this is for?
I mean, I knew a guy from Pakistan who worked in a gas station and his whole thing was that he would work for like nine months and then spend three months in Pakistan.
And for those nine months that he was here in America, He worked 12 to 14 hours a day every day of the week.
He did nothing.
He did nothing else.
He woke up at 5, got to work at 5, was there until 7 p.m., went home, watched a Bollywood movie, fell asleep, woke up, did it again the next day, and just like, that was his life.
14 hours a day, every single day, seven days a week, nine months straight, and then he'd go to Pakistan and just not work for three months in a row.
And it's like, Do we even want to compete with that?
Why would you want to live that way?
What is the point of that?
Why live in this amazing civilization with all of these comforts if you're just a bug, if you're just a slave, an ant, just working endlessly, toiling 12 hours a day, 14 hours a day?
It's just...
Thank you.
Why do we put up with this?
Why is this the way things are?
I mean, there's a balance.
There's a balance between, like, Europe, which is just socialistic.
It's why it's collapsing.
They have just, like, tons of, you know, government-guaranteed vacation.
They mock Americans, how hard we work.
Like, we choose to work hard, but we also have our weekends.
We also ideally get off at 5 and have Half, you know, the entire evening to do what we want.
Like, is there not a balance between being a bug and being a Fendi?
Right?
Being somebody just laying on a couch, being fanned by your foreign replacement until you die and can be, you know, shuffled off into the trash heap of history.
I don't know.
It seems like the reasonable thing would be Get everything done.
Still be the superpower of the world.
Not replace our people and undercut the locals by harvesting manpower from the infinite pool of foreign scab labor.
But that's just me.
Thank you for the call, Karen.
I'm sorry to hear that's happening to...
So be prepared for that.
And this is another thing.
In my own life, I've seen this.
I think I've told this story before, but I had a friend that worked at Whole Foods in their corporate office here in Austin.
And he was like, yeah, they keep doing weird things, man.
They hired a girl.
She's supposed to be doing the job that I'm doing, but I'm already doing it, and we don't even have work for it.
And it's like, dude, you're being replaced.
What do you not get?
What do you not understand?
This is when Whole Foods was trying to be bought by Amazon, so they were up in their DEI score.
They wanted that high ESG value so they could get the most when they sold themselves to Amazon, so they were systematically replacing all the white guys that worked for them with foreign women.
And it was like, the people in this company, They're just kind of baffled.
They're just kind of like, why did we hire that woman?
This is kind of weird.
I'm like, dude, you're going to get fired.
A month later, he's fired.
Duh.
What do you think is happening here?
Just be prepared.
Be prepared.
You know, as you see, they're taking our jobs.
Indian origin.
U.S. engineers laid off, replaced by Indians in India.
Well, oh dear.
Oh gosh, poor you.
Yeah.
Insane.
Let's go to Sarah in Michigan.
Thank you so much for the call, Karen.
Let's go to Sarah in Michigan on the topic of healthcare.
Go ahead, Sarah.
You're on the air.
unidentified
Hi.
So where I live, it's an industrial town, and a lot of the time you go through a temp agency, and once you've worked your time in the temp agency, the shop that you're working for will hire you in.
Well, while I was in the temp agency, I became pregnant.
And it went from, oh, we're going to hire you, we're going to hire you, to me losing my job at...
So with that happening, I didn't really see me getting a job seven months pregnant.
I mean, I could try, but in all reality, people aren't going to do that.
So my father and my child and my mother said, we'll help you with the bills.
You can just stay home with the baby, just take this time off.
So I did, obviously.
And because of that, I wound up with government insurance.
And before this, the only time I ever got government help was when I was 17 and I got my first apartment.
And this would be the second time.
And the pandemic money that I got, I saved all of it.
I didn't spend it frivolously.
And I put it on a down payment in the house that I'm now raising my son in.
I'm not one to just abuse the system is what I'm saying.
And when my son was born, he was defaulted to my insurance.
So I guess my question is, given the situation that I was in, to where I wasn't hired in anywhere, therefore I couldn't have insurance, with me being technically able-bodied, would I lose that coverage and would my son have been born without me being covered or him being covered?
harrison smith
I don't know.
I don't know about that.
That's a very good question.
Yeah, I don't know.
I don't know how maternity conflicts with the able-bodied aspect.
I'd say being nine months pregnant, eight months pregnant means you're not really able-bodied.
It means you have a condition that means you can't work.
So I would hope that you'd be accepted in that.
By the way, when it comes to the big, beautiful bill, They want to tax remittances.
I think 3% is a pitifully small number, but it's a start.
I don't see why you wouldn't tariff remittances like you would trade, even more so.
Why not 100% remittance tax?
You want to send $100?
You got to give us $100.
It costs you $200 to send $100.
Don't like it?
Spend the money here.
Don't send it home.
What's the issue there?
If you look at the chart, Of where these remittances are going, it's $138 billion a year being sent back to the home countries.
Of these people, Mexico $28.1 billion, China $15.4 billion, India $10.7 billion, Vietnam $6.7 billion.
So this is all money generated by our economy and then siphoned out and away to other countries.
Because we bring in, so again, it's like, how many ways does, how many ways does immigration screw us over?
Let us count the ways, right?
Taking jobs from Americans, driving down wages overall, taking housing from Americans, driving up house prices overall, taking positions in university, robbing Americans of, you know, a future, the education they need to achieve their goals.
Then they go back to their home countries.
Then they get jobs and send all the money back home, siphoning that money out of the economy.
I mean, it just goes on and on and on and on and on and on and on.
But it saves a couple bucks for the big corporations, so they're for it.
Again, this is the trade-off.
This is the trade-off we're making.
It's like that, there's a classic cartoon of a couple people sitting around a campfire in a dystopian hellscape.
They go, yeah, we destroyed the world, but we sure did make a lot of profit for our shareholders.
You know, sure, we destroyed human civilization itself, but for a couple of years there, we were really making some good dividends on our investments.
I'd like to see a new version of that.
It's like, hey, sure, civilization got destroyed, but at least we employed a million Indians.
Yeah, the planet got destroyed, but for a beautiful moment in time, we created a lot of value for shareholders.
This is one of those instances where the left has a viewpoint that is just utterly vapid.
There's another tweet that went viral yesterday, where Charlie Kirk posted a video of a bunch of white guys doing roofing work.
And he said, I thought these were the jobs Americans wouldn't do.
And then this leftist retweeted it saying, but how much is their rate?
But how much are you paying them?
I was like, well, what do you want?
What does the left want?
How immune to cognitive dissonance do you have to be?
Say you want a higher minimum wage.
You want a $25 minimum wage.
But you're also suicidally in favor of immigrants who will work for pennies on the dollar.
You want a 25 minimum wage.
That's like the heart and soul of your socialistic paradigm.
But then you scoff at white people wanting a living wage for doing manual labor.
Is there any sense of cognitive distance there?
Anything that makes you question your own positions?
They'll sit there and tell you that capitalism and corporations are the biggest issue and that they need to be destroyed and that the whole system needs to be undone because of how evil and profit-driven it is.
And then they're in favor of absolutely everything that the corporations do to deliberately Exploit the American worker.
Undercut them with globally sourced scab labor.
Offset the cost that their business would otherwise have to take on by encouraging government programs to subsidize their low wages.
This is stuff Bernie Sanders used to talk about.
He used to say, you know, mass immigration was a Koch brothers scheme.
It was the dirty capitalists that want this.
It's like, yeah, that's true.
No, you're right.
You're right.
Again, this is why I never fell for the PSYOP false paradigm of capitalism versus socialism.
It's like, no, the capitalists are the ones destroying our system.
I don't want tyranny or exploitation by the government or corporations.
And these two things are not mutually exclusive.
You can oppose both of them, actually.
Anyway, let's go out to your calls again.
Lynn in Indiana has called in about Donald Trump.
Go ahead, Lynn, you're on the air.
unidentified
Yes, sir.
I heard Alex and Mr. Wren, the attorney, and Alex says I should do a summit.
And Mr. Wren's response was immediately, I'll help.
I got whistleblowers, and I will help.
And he's an ultra-super patriot.
It's cost him.
It's cost Mr. Allen.
It cost Clay Clark.
It cost General Flynn and Roger Stone.
We've got people to stand up and go forward by seeking and have a revival of it.
The ultra-super-patriot seeking the righteousness of God as the knights of the Holy Spirit.
And let's make America righteous.
You know, there's entities that ought to be dissolved.
And if it's liability protection, then it's a nefarious mode.
harrison smith
I mean, this is sort of the litmus test.
It's like, if you have been made to suffer for your beliefs, you're probably one of the good guys.
You're probably one of the good guys.
It's all the people who never suffer.
Like, here's the best probably comparison.
Alex Jones, Ben Shapiro, right?
Alex Jones starts off with nothing, works his way up from access television, selling DVDs out of his living room to fund his first documentaries, builds this incredibly powerful platform, Infowars, dominates the space, censored off every platform all at once, constantly being messed with in a variety of different ways.
We're determined to be a white supremacist terrorist organization, so the FBI has an excuse to spy on us and since spies into our organization and capture our electronic communications, etc., etc.
They have, you know, congressional hearings ostensibly about him.
He doesn't get invited, though.
Who does?
Ben Shapiro.
Then you've got Ben Shapiro, who sort of comes out of nowhere, got Daily Wire, never get deplatformed.
Never face any serious headwinds.
And is, in fact, invited to testify in Congress about deplatforming when he's never been deplatformed.
So if you want to know who the real people are, look at the people who have been disadvantaged, who have been attacked, who have suffered for their beliefs.
Roger Stone had his door kicked in and was hauled out in front of CNN cameras at 5 in the morning.
He's the real deal.
Stuart Rhodes, Enrique Tarrio, Joe Biggs, they were sent to prison for 20 years when they were given an out because they said, hey, just testify against Trump and we can make all this go away.
They didn't take the deal.
Those are the real deal.
That's the real deal.
That's why I see, I mean, it really is so frustrating going online and seeing everybody being called a Fed.
Everybody's a Fed.
If you don't agree with them, they're a Fed.
Oh, they wear masks?
They must be a Fed.
Oh, they say something you don't like?
It's probably because they're a Fed and they're a super secret agent working against American interests.
If they've been attacked by the system, they're the good guys.
It really is as simple as that in a lot of ways.
In a lot of ways.
So I think by pointing out Tom Rins, Clay Clark, Alex Jones, Roger Stone, General Flynn, obviously.
Like, if people have been made to physically, financially, mentally suffer because they refuse to give up their beliefs because they were trying to do the right thing in the face of a satanic system, that's a pretty good litmus test for who's a good guy and who's not.
So just consider that, please.
I wish people would consider that more.
And, you know, again, if you, I don't know, people have all sorts of crazy claims about, especially Alex Jones, where it's like, he's been paid off, and it's like, by who, and why, and for what purpose, and what is the evidence?
And do you not realize that for the last two years, everything InfoWars has done has been under intense scrutiny by the federal judge?
That's overseeing us, a series of federal judges who went out of their way to, in my opinion, totally illegally give us a default judgment and destroy our company and try to eliminate our voice on the airwaves.
Do you not know that you can track this on the public documents, the court documents?
It's all out there.
It's all completely available to you.
If you want to do just the bare minimum research.
People don't do that.
They go, Alex Jones said he was going to be shut down and then he wasn't.
It all must be fake.
It's like, really?
Have you not heard us talk endlessly about our counterattack, about the fact that we survived their attack because they thought they were coming in and just going to bully and beat up on and outsmart?
Who they think is a bunch of dumb Texas conspiracy theorists when in reality they're going up against a very sophisticated operation with very high power and very capable lawyers.
And what they were doing was illegal and underhanded backroom deals, secret agreements.
And we were able to uncover those and present the evidence of it to the judge who in Fulfillment of his oath actually took it seriously and looked into it.
All of this is evident for you.
So it's like...
It's like all this stuff would be easy to solve if we just had the right people who weren't deliberately trying to destroy us in positions of power.
And then on top of all the frustration with trying to get that done...
And it's like, alright, so we'll just never solve anything then.
We'll just never solve anything and you'll get to, you know, call everybody a fed as we descend into the darkest layers of hell.
And you can just be wrong but be satisfied thinking that you're right.
Or you could just do a bare minimum amount of research and critical thought about it and back the good guys.
By going to thealexjonesstore.com, thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison if you want to let me know who sent you.
But again, like I said, today probably maybe as I'm speaking, they're in a courtroom in Houston determining the future of Infowars.
You don't have to believe me.
You could go to the courtroom yourself if you wanted.
And if I was lying or if any of this was fabricated or, you know, kabuki theater, then you could prove it yourself.
I challenge you, go to the courthouse, prove that we're all in cahoots.
I mean, it's just absurd.
It's all absurd.
Anyway, let's go back out to calls.
Dreamer in Pennsylvania.
I want to talk about China's infiltration to this great country.
Dreamer, go ahead.
Dreamer, are you there?
Dreamer in Pennsylvania?
Going once, going twice.
Oscar in Killing.
Will we have better luck with Oscar on line three?
Oscar, are you there?
Hello.
Good, thank you.
unidentified
So I was just going to talk about the bill and the AI thing, because I think it could help the military and their whole...
So I think that would be good.
Besides the whole no restrictions on AI, I think that shouldn't be in there.
harrison smith
Right.
Well, yeah, that's interesting.
So, I mean, how else do you think AI would help military?
I haven't seen anything about the AI and military in this bill, but I wouldn't be surprised if there is.
What do you know about that?
unidentified
Oh, I don't know anything.
I'm saying it could help because people have to wait, like, three, four weeks to get an appointment for something simple, you know?
harrison smith
Right.
unidentified
And, uh, like for, for instance, I have a buddy got out and he had a, And he called in to the VA, and they're like, well, he's like, I'm going to kill myself.
I need to speak to someone.
And he's like, the VA says, call back in a few weeks.
You know?
So it's kind of crazy.
Yeah.
I think if they made like an AI...
harrison smith
You faded out there.
But yeah, no, I think, you know, the power of AI, again, yeah, it's scary how, you know, far they're trying to push it.
They're trying to create AGI.
But like already as it exists now, I think it could be so incredibly useful.
And I mean, there's, and we talk about it almost every day.
And I always say like, okay, you know, try to leave, you know, $200 off your, off your tax report and see how quickly they identify it.
Meanwhile, It's like, what?
How does that happen?
How do we have this massive system that's just disgorging billions of dollars of funds to these utterly fraudulent fake corporations that get funded?
Or you'll see some video of a bunch of people.
I saw one yesterday.
It was some shooting video in a park.
And it's like all these people that none of them have jobs, let's just say.
And they're all driving Audis.
They're all driving cars that are nicer than mine.
And it's like, how are we so racked by fraud?
How can we not figure this out?
So I think, you know, AI just going through and being able to sort of bring all these different databases together would be useful in that.
Opening the door for mass unified surveillance and these digital profiles that'll be used to discriminate against you or to potentially arrest you if things progress as they are progressing.
But I think AI already as it stands now could be a huge help in things like the VA.
That I think would be a primary place where not only fraud is committed, a lot of fraud is committed through the VA, and the...
The soldiers that actually are suffering from their commitment to America are being just completely disadvantaged and left by the wayside.
So I think it could be implemented there very rapidly and to very positive effect.
Thank you for the call, Oscar.
Let's go to John in Minneapolis.
Also wants to talk about AI, sort of similar to, I think, the vein I'm already going in.
John, you're on the air.
unidentified
Okay, can you hear me?
harrison smith
Yes, sir.
unidentified
Okay.
We have to just quit speculating about what AI might do and realize what it can do right now.
It can push any narrative and win the debate.
If you think you're smarter than this quantum computing, you're really not aware.
Think about it.
It can justify why we should go to war.
It could justify spending on something.
What if they used it in the juries?
If you had a trial, okay, your jury is going to be AI.
You know, I mean, and people don't understand that it's like programmed by a person.
They have a narrative, and they can push that narrative way harder than you'll ever be able to resist.
And so that's why we need boundaries.
We need accountability and various restrictions.
You know, here's another thing.
You know, everybody feels like they need an expert in their life to establish certain things through science or whatever.
Well, you know something?
We already have an expert.
It's called God.
All right?
And it really comes down to, I call it croc with a C, not groc.
It's a crock, because I've had debates with it, and it will not let go.
It'll just overwhelm you with data and all kinds of crap.
And it's like, I don't need it.
No.
We already have an expert.
That's what I got to say.
That's God.
harrison smith
Yeah, yeah, no, it's an interesting, that's an interesting take on it.
I mean, I don't know if we need a special office of AI oversight or something, but It would be the people currently developing AI.
So you're going to have the fox watching the hen house.
But, you know, already we've seen this take place.
I'm trying to think of the exact story.
In 2016, I think, or like during the first Trump administration.
They figured out that there was, maybe it wasn't AI, I think it might have been like Russians, like part of the whole Cambridge Analytica, Russians on Facebook thing was like, there were Russians creating Facebook groups to like do protests.
And it's like, okay, with AI, you could have AI create a character, post things, they get popular, you could have other AI upvoted and like it and drive it to the top of the algorithm.
To make them artificially popular, which would create a legitimate popularity, you know, because people would flock to it.
That's just what happens.
And then you could have them, you know, plan events.
Say, we're all going to be here at this time.
Meet us there.
And you could literally have, you know, real-world protest events that are entirely orchestrated by non-existent AI entities getting Americans to do their bidding by pretending that they're human beings.
Yeah, how Russia used Facebook to organize two sets of protesters.
So imagine that, but empowered by AI, you could actually have machines manipulating humans into doing their bidding for them.
And of course, we've seen this already with things like ChatGPT, where they'll do stuff like they have to get around to CAPTCHA, which is there to stop robots from getting onto a webpage.
And ChatGPT would put out a job listing and say, hey, I'll pay somebody $10 to help me with this CAPTCHA.
I'm a blind person.
Then you have humans doing the CAPTCHA, getting and allowing the robot to get into the webpage to, you know, continue its operation.
So you already have AI interfacing with humans and getting humans to do things on the basis of lies, right?
The AI is lying and saying, I'm a blind human.
I need help with this CAPTCHA.
humans come in and help it circumvent.
So we're not totally out of the, like we're not very far, I should say, from the, It's all very bizarre and weird and we have to be on the lookout for it.
We have time for one more call.
Thank you for the call, John.
We'll go to Miss Lou in Florida.
Miss Lou in Florida, you're on the air about the AI section of the big, beautiful bill.
You're on the air.
unidentified
Hey, Harrison.
I have a thing to say about the AI section.
Basically, if you look at the bill, Well, what is the merger of all of government and all of corporate?
It's fascism.
They've taken all the say of people away from this.
Now, I know the goal is to keep the U.S. number one ahead of the AI race.
I do think that's important.
But I think we need to visit the idea that there is absolutely zero liability for 10 years.
What does this remind you of?
Kind of like the big pharma deal?
harrison smith
Yep.
unidentified
I mean, this is very dangerous.
And there are a lot of things in this bill that are beautiful and bad.
I call it the big, beautiful, bad bill.
1,200 pages of stuff that most of these, geez, my French, idiots in Congress haven't even read.
Even Marjorie Taylor Greene comes on and says, I wouldn't have voted for it if I had known about the AI.
I'm giving full disclosure.
Really, Marjorie?
ms liu in florida
Either you didn't read the bill, so you went ahead and voted on it anyway, or your idiot staffers didn't keep you informed about what was really in the bill.
harrison smith
Well, that's part of the strategy, isn't it?
I mean, they make a 1,200-page bill and say we're voting on it tomorrow.
There's literally not time to read the bill.
I agree.
I mean, it's completely broken and backwards.
Somewhere AI could maybe come in handy.
Hey, maybe feed the bill into AI and say, hey, break this down for me.
What does it say about this?
I don't know, man.
We're so screwed.
Stay tuned.
Chase Geiser takes over the Alex Jones Show on the other side.
Don't go anywhere, folks.
unidentified
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
kirk elliott
I'm not the kind of guy that gives warnings, but this is the first time since 2008 that I think this is a warning.
This is the biggest financial news that I think the world has seen in decades.
Since the 1980s, Japan has been the financer of global growth with something called the yen carry trade.
They had, like, zero interest rates, artificially keeping them low.
You could borrow the yen at zero if you're a central bank or a hedge fund or any kind of massive monetary, you know, financial institution, and invested in European treasuries maybe getting 3%, right?
So that's what funded the stock market growth globally.
The inflation in Japan has gotten so much.
That they're forced to raise interest rates.
The global financing of all of the global equity growth is basically losing its number one capital injector.
So let's put it into the context of America.
Here's the problem.
You've got insurance companies that own 90% of their portfolio in bonds.
And so the US bond market is collapsing.
If you were to take a chart of the US bond market and the Japanese bond market, overlay them on top of each other, Alex, they look almost exactly the same.
That's an ugly negative, though, Alex.
But what's the positive?
The precious metals markets are telling us something.
They're telling us that there's a flight for quality that's starting to happen.
Every fundamental thing that we're looking at right now is causing gold and silver to go up.
alex jones
Absolutely, Kirk.
You're the guy.
That's why you're number one.
We love you and we appreciate you.
And it's frightening to me and disgusting that almost every other gold company out there is ripping people off with numismatics.
And it's pure BS, not with these folks.
They want to learn about you, and it's all completely transparent right now, ladies and gentlemen.
Give them a call, 720-605-3900.
Kirk Elliott, Precious Metals, KPM.com forward slash gold.
Export Selection