All Episodes
June 4, 2025 - American Journal - Harrison Smith
02:38:31
The American Journal: FBI Arrests Chinese Nationals For Smuggling Biological Pathogen Into US As Post-COVID Global Biowar Heats Up - FULL SHOW - 06/04/2025
Participants
Main voices
h
harrison smith
01:35:18
r
roger stone
15:09
Appearances
j
john campbell
02:37
k
kirk elliott
01:34
m
maria zeee
04:15
y
yuri bezmenov
03:27
Clips
a
alex jones
00:21
m
matt infowars
00:13
p
pete hegseth
00:30
Callers
icarus in wisconsin
03:32
jefferson in virginia
00:11
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
This conversation is with Mr. Yuri Alexandrovich Besmianov.
He was the son of a high-ranking Soviet Army officer.
He had an outstanding career with the press agency of the Soviet Union.
It turns out that this is also a front for the KGB.
He escaped to the West in 1970 after becoming totally disgusted with the Soviet system, and he did this at great risk to his life.
He certainly is one of the world's outstanding experts on the subject of Soviet propaganda and disinformation and active measures.
When the Soviets use the phrase ideological subversion, what do they mean?
yuri bezmenov
Ideological subversion or active measures, "Aktivne meropriyatia" in the language of the KGB or psychological.
What it basically means is to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interests of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.
It's a great brainwashing process and it's divided in four basic stages.
The first one being demoralization.
A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information.
The facts tell nothing to him.
unidentified
Do you believe then that men can become pregnant and have abortions?
Yes.
What has this world come to?
It's come to a world where drug kids actually exist.
And people do ketamine on a couch.
yuri bezmenov
The next stage is destabilization.
Economy.
unidentified
There are some dire predictions on where the world economy is going.
yuri bezmenov
Foreign relations.
unidentified
Some of the world's superpowers could be on a collision course.
yuri bezmenov
Defense systems.
unidentified
The US Army is cutting back its expectations due to, quote, unprecedented recruitment challenges.
yuri bezmenov
The next stage, of course, is crisis.
unidentified
Folks!
We're in a crisis.
yuri bezmenov
After crisis, you have so-called the period of normalization.
unidentified
When we say getting back to normal, we mean something very different from what we're going through right now.
yuri bezmenov
The demoralization process is basically completed already.
I could never believe it when I landed in this part of the world that the process will go that fast.
This is exactly what the KGB and Marxist-Leninist propaganda wants from Americans.
To distract their opinion and attention from real issues of the United States.
To have a bunch of duped Americans, then Americans who are healthy, physically fit, and alert to the reality.
unidentified
What is your ideal political or social structure?
Communist utopia.
yuri bezmenov
That's why my KGB instructors specifically made the point, try to get into These are the people who AGB wanted very much to recruit.
All these professors and all these beautiful civil rights defenders, they are instrumental in the process of subversion only to destabilize the nation.
When their job is completed, they think that they will come to power.
That will never happen, of course.
The psychological shock when they will see in future what the beautiful society of equality and social justice means in practice, obviously they will join the links of dissenters.
Marxist-Leninist regime does not tolerate these people.
In future, these people will be simply squashed like cockroaches.
Nobody is going to pay them nothing for their beautiful, noble ideas of equality.
The United States is in the state of war.
The initiator of this war is the world communist system.
unidentified
The only solution is communist revolution.
That's right.
We need communists.
That's what we need.
yuri bezmenov
This is it.
This is the last country of freedom and possibility.
unidentified
Okay, so what do we do?
What is your recommendation to the American people?
yuri bezmenov
The immediate thing that comes to my mind is, of course, there must be a very strong National effort to educate people in the spirit of real patriotism, number one.
Number two, to explain them the real danger of socialist, communist, whatever, welfare state, big brother government.
If people will fail to grasp the impending danger, nothing ever can help United States.
You may kiss goodbye to your freedom, including your precious lives.
I know Americans don't like to listen to things which are unpleasant.
I tried to get the message across to my horror.
Nobody wanted even to listen.
Least of all to believe what I had to say.
The time bomb is ticking with every second.
The disaster is coming closer and closer.
Unlike myself, you will have nowhere to defect to.
United States, wake up.
unidentified
It's Wednesday, June 4th, in the year of our Lord, 2025.
And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
Watch it live right now at band.video.
I think it's time to blow this thing back.
Get everybody in the stuff together.
Okay, three, two, one, let's jam.
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
harrison smith
Welcome to the American Journal.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live this morning from the abortion.
Headquarters here in Austin, Texas.
We're going to be joined in the third hour by Roger Stone.
Very excited to talk to him.
I want to get into Letitia James for one thing, but also just how and what Trump is doing.
I stumbled into a Blue Anon rabbit hole yesterday that I'm excited to tell you about.
Apparently they track his golf game and Whenever he, thank you, whenever he is, I guess he hasn't been golfing in six days, and so they're hoping that he's dead.
They got some theories, folks.
They're doing some theorizing, and it's very, very funny.
So I'm going to show you some of that stuff.
We got censorship, of course, and some pretty major news stories that I don't know what to make of.
To make of these, we'll get into them.
I'll show you what we know.
We will be doing some speculating today.
Very big show.
We'll open up the phone lines in the second hour for your calls.
Let's begin today as we do every day with our daily dispatch.
unidentified
*Bell rings*
harrison smith
Here it is, folks, your Daily Dispatch.
For Wednesday, the 4th of June, 2025, Chinese couple charged with smuggling a biological pathogen Into the United States, a Chinese researcher in Michigan and her boyfriend have been charged with smuggling a biological pathogen that, quote, can cause devastating diseases in crops into the United States, according to federal charging documents unsealed Tuesday.
Yunqing Jian, 33, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Michigan, and her boyfriend, Zheng Yong Lu, 34 were charged with multiple counts, including conspiracy to defraud the United States, smuggling goods into the country, and making false statements to investigators, the complaint says.
Liu was entering the country at Detroit Metropolitan Airport in July when border officers found the pathogen, a fungus known as Fusarium graminarium or something, in his backpack.
According to the complaint, the small clumps of reddish plant material were discovered in four plastic baggies tucked into a wad of tissues.
Liu and his girlfriend researched the pathogen as university students in China, the complaint says.
Since 2023, Jian has been working at the University of Michigan's Molecular Plant-Microbe Interaction Laboratory.
Liu initially told the officer that he did not know what the materials were and that somebody must have planted them in his bag.
He then told a completely different story, the complaint says.
Liu stated he intentionally hid the samples in his backpack because he knew there were restrictions on the importation of materials.
Liu confirmed that he had intentionally He was just so desperate to research, of course.
An examination of Liu and Jian's electronic devices discovered WeChat messages from 2022, in which they discussed smuggling seeds in the United States, saying, quote, I put them in my Martin boots, Liu wrote, according to the complaint, in a small bag, the Ziploc bag, very small.
So they were smuggling in.
A fungus that could have potentially wiped out a large portion of American crops, which I think is, you know, kind of an act of war, kind of a little bit a gigantic act of war.
So you can add that to the reasons why we shouldn't be welcoming hundreds of thousands of students from our geopolitical opposition.
unidentified
Makes you wonder what people were smuggling in when they were crossing the border when we take, you know.
A look at all the Chinese nationals.
harrison smith
Yeah, maybe it wasn't a great idea to leave it totally open.
FBI arrest Chinese nationals for smuggling biological pathogen into U.S. as post-COVID power biowar heats up biowar.
That's the headline from Infowars, or that's the headline of our show.
So we will talk about that a little bit more later.
Elon Musk called it disgusting and a disgusting abomination with whatever savings Doge may have achieved about to become a drop of urine in the ocean by the big, beautiful bill, which codifies exactly zero.
Of Doge's cost-saving efforts raises the debt limit by $5 trillion and increases the deficit by $2.5 trillion over 10 years.
Former Doge head Elon Musk pulled no punches on Tuesday, calling the legislation a massive, outrageous, pork-filled abomination.
Same quote, I'm sorry, I just can't stand it anymore, Musk wrote on X. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.
In a subsequent tweet, Musk wrote, Congress is making America bankrupt.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump on Tuesday slammed Senator Rand Paul after Paul appeared on CNBC's Squawk Box, saying he's just not open to supporting a $5 trillion in debt increase.
And again, we can get more into this.
It just shows what a pathetic joke our Congress is, that they, for the first time, had what you could call the right-wing equivalent of George Soros on their side, the richest man in the world, ready to go to the mat for them.
And yet, they couldn't do it.
They couldn't handle it.
They couldn't make a single positive change.
And I think a lot of the budget talk is a little bit of nonsense, after all, from even just what Doge uncovered.
I forget the cuts.
Just understanding what it is we've been spending money on shows these people are not serious about cutting costs in any way whatsoever.
And I'm not that serious about cutting costs either.
I think there are bigger priorities we have here.
Now, should we be spending $5 trillion a year?
No, no, probably not.
But where that money goes is a lot more important than how much it is, in my opinion.
But anyway, we can get into that more later.
Meanwhile, family of Colorado attack suspect taken into ICE custody.
DHS and ICE are taking the family of Boulder attack suspect Mohamed Salomon.
into custody for investigation.
Secretary Kristi Noem confirmed that Solomon's family is in ICE custody and stated they are investigating their knowledge of the attack.
FBI officials report that the attack resulted in at least 12 victims with two still hospitalized.
Federal officials are investigating whether Solomon's family provided any support for the attack.
We actually have a video that the guy made right before the attack.
We can show you that a little bit later.
Meanwhile, Hegseth orders Navy to strip the name of gay rights icon Harvey Milk from ship.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered the Navy to take the rare step of renaming a ship, one that bears the name of a gay rights icon, documents and sources show.
Military.com reviews a memorandum from the Office of Secretary of the Navy, the official who holds the power to name Navy ships, that showed the sea service had come up with rollout plans for renaming the oiler ship USNS Harvey Milk.
And I guarantee you, Breathed a sigh of relief at not having to tell people that they are on the USS Harvey Milk anymore.
Yeah, we can get into this.
Most people pointing out that when Harvey Milk was 33, he groomed and apparently somehow married, whatever that means, a 16-year-old boy.
We'll shortly be seeing the renaming of the USS Roman Polanski, the USS Jeffrey Epstein.
All these names will have to be renewed, I guess.
But yeah, a hilarious thing to do on the first day of Pride Month.
Very top-level trolling going on there from Pete Hegseth.
We can cover that more later, but why would you ever name a Navy ship out of a gay rights icon?
You would think the Navy would be doing everything it could try to not be gay, but I guess that's their character.
Meanwhile, private sector hiring rose by just 37,000 in May.
The lowest in more than two years, ADP says.
U.S. private sector added 37,000 jobs in May 2025, the lowest monthly increase in over two years, according to ADP data released Wednesday.
The slowdown follows a $60,000 job gain in April and missed market expectations of roughly 115,000, signaling waning hiring momentum.
Employment in goods-producing sectors decreased by a total of 2,000 jobs, with losses including 5,000 in the natural resources and mining sector and 3,000 in manufacturing, while construction added 6,000 new jobs.
Annual pay grew 4.5% for those staying in jobs and 7% for job changers, with ADP chief economist Anello Richardson noting that pay growth remained at robust levels despite slower hiring.
And we can get into the economic situation here.
Maybe this, if nothing else, can be another arrow in the quiver in terms of the arguments against bringing in hundreds of thousands of foreign workers.
If our job growth expectations are significantly lower than they should be, maybe we don't need to bring in 10 million Indians to build jobs that don't exist.
Just a suggestion.
And finally, we have this.
Why are so many people having strokes in their 20s, 30s, and 40s?
Quote, we've never had patients so young.
While the alarming trend has been stumping medical professionals, one expert has shared some intriguing theories with the post.
A 14.6% increase in strokes amongst people aged 18 to 44 from 2020 to 2022.
What could it be?
Whatever could it be, we wonder.
Started around 2020.
Really ramped up through 2022.
Probably climate change.
If I had to guess anything, it would be climate change or maybe white supremacy.
We don't know.
We're just not sure.
The strokes come as a huge surprise to, well, everyone, especially since the people having strokes were, in all common standards, healthy.
Adani believes that both of their strokes, these are two people, 24 and 23, who have The strokes were embolic, which means they originated elsewhere in the body and traveled to the brain instead of forming directly in the brain's blood vessels.
Both were taking oral contraceptives, which are known to increase the risk of stroke, he said, noting that Aubrey had a patent form in oval or a hole in her heart, which likely contributed to her stroke by allowing a clot to bypass the lungs and travel to the brain.
As for the overall increase in strokes among younger adults, the exact reasons are not fully understood.
Yeah, it was the vaccine.
No, it's the vaccine.
It's definitely the vaccine.
It's 100% caused by the vaccine.
Now, I'm just saying that as some dude from Texas with absolutely no expertise in the matter, but the basic ability to recognize patterns and understand the temporal world.
I understand how time works.
And looking at 2020 through 2022, I see only one significant medical change take place, and that is the rollout.
Of the vaccine that causes holes in your heart.
So I think I've identified it.
Somebody call the doctors.
They need to know this.
Apparently they've completely missed out on everything going on constantly for the last five years.
I don't know where they've been.
But they're blaming literally everything else.
Everything else.
Increased stress, long working hours, physical inactivity.
Caffeine, contraceptives, they're blaming climate change and the weather.
They're probably blaming stress.
It's Trump's fault for getting elected.
It makes everybody scared and then they die.
No, it was the vaccine.
It was actually just the vaccine.
That's what it was.
So I'm going to say that was the vaccine.
Again, I mean, they're blaming, I'm not kidding, literally everything except for the vaccine.
They don't mention the vaccine once.
In this article, they talk about Adderall.
They talk about energy drinks.
It's the vaccine, though.
But what about the vaccine that's obviously causing this?
Have you considered that for a single moment?
That, of course, is your daily dispatch brought to you by the AlexJonesStore.com where you can now get ultramethyleneblue capsules.
So one of the only downsides of methyleneblue...
If you don't drink it like, you know, teeth-staining red wine, you might leave some evidence of your positive addiction.
If you're taking methylene blue, it'll turn your mouth blue if you don't drink it right.
But now we have these capsules.
Circumvince that and delivers all of the power of the ultramethylene blue USP grade product from the alexjonesstore.com.
No blue mouth, just results.
It's the unmatched clarity of ultramethylene blue capsules.
They deliver 10 milligrams of USP grade methylene blue paired with vitamin C for added stability and effectiveness.
Encapsulated in a plant-based convenient formula.
This supplement is made right here in the USA under strict manufacturing standards.
Now, Methylen Blue, it is a product that is so powerful, I do feel the need to warn you.
Talk to your doctor first.
It can actually have some negative interactions with certain medicines, so make sure that you, that Ultramethylen Blue is right for you, and stop by TheAlexJonesStore.com to get Ultramethylen Blue capsules today for an introductory price.
TheAlexJonesStore.com slash Harrison.
If you want to let them know who sent you.
Now, I got a lot of videos to get to.
Since we're on the topic of health, let's go to clip number three first, as this is something that we've been warning about for a while.
Bill Gates' Appeal product, A-P-E-E-L.
It is a coating that they put on fruit that keeps it fresh longer, but also kind of poisons it.
Also, it is not healthy material.
On the skin of the fruit that seeps through the skin into the fruit itself or of course you're just eating it if it's an apple or something like that.
Up till now it has been not approved for use on organic foods but now and probably without you know labeling it or telling you so-called organic fruit may have this deeply inorganic product sprayed all over it.
Let's go to clip number three.
unidentified
This is crazy news.
Bill Gates' food coating is now approved on organic produce.
Appeal, the Bill Gates-backed company, has now been officially approved for use on U.S. organic produce.
Yeah, that's right.
The same organic fruits and veggies you trust to be pure and chemical-free?
Well, they're now being treated with a chemical coating designed to make them look fresh longer.
But here's where it gets shady.
Regulators approved Appeal as a fungicide.
Not a coating.
A technical loophole that slides it under organic certification rules.
So while you think you're buying clean, untouched food, you're actually getting produce treated with compounds that critics warn may leave behind residues like arsenic, lead, cadmium, and palladium.
Sure, they tell you it's all within FDA limits, but do you really want that on your plate?
On X, backlash is exploding.
People are calling it a betrayal of the organic label, slamming Bill Gates' involvement, and even reporting rubbery, weird textures on bananas and avocados.
Some grocers are already banning appeal.
But here's the bigger question nobody's asking.
If the organic label can be quietly compromised, what's next?
And how much of what we're eating is already part of a system we never agreed to?
Because this isn't just about longer-lasting fruit.
It's about control over the entire food supply.
Bye.
Thank you.
harrison smith
Be aware of appeal.
It's absolutely absurd.
unidentified
Where do...
harrison smith
Where to even begin here?
We got so much to discuss.
More attacks on Russia by Ukraine hitting a bridge yesterday, destroying it for the third time as they continue to fight.
Again, that pointless war.
And maybe we'll pick up on that in the next segment because I've got a video I want to show you about that.
We got lefties interfering and stopping a law enforcement operation, thinking they're stopping ICE, but really they're interfering with a gigantic drug bust.
Let's go to a couple clips here.
See the problem is, sorry, I'm running out of time, and I have a lot of these, a lot of videos are a little bit longer than we have left.
Let's go to clip number 14 here, since we're still on the topic of...
Uh, uh, We are in a very serious biological war, whether we recognize it or not.
Let's watch.
john campbell
A warm welcome to this talk.
Now, the FDA in the United States has just approved a new vaccine, an mRNA Moderna vaccine, with known serious adverse events and known multiple other adverse events.
This is disappointing, to put it mildly.
I think we have to assume that the American bureaucracy and the FDA is more of an oil tanker, which is going to take a while to turn around rather than a sailing yacht, which can tack quickly.
Let me immediately give you the evidence for this claim.
Here we are.
This is the letter granting biological licence application approval.
and really quite a concerning event.
Now, this is the...
Now, it should probably work out from this.
This is an mRNA vaccine that produces spike protein.
I know, I know.
The lipid nanoparticles will go everywhere.
I know.
Serious adverse events of this vaccine, from the manufacturer's own information, serious adverse events were reported by 2.7% of participants.
Who received this new vaccine?
The comparative vaccine, it was 2.6%.
So the new vaccine, 2.7% serious adverse events.
The older vaccine that is replacing, 2.6%.
And of course, presumably, this is a vaccine to combat JN1 variant.
Now, let's just...
Incidents of serious adverse events.
I would not dream in clinical practice of giving a treatment that had a 2.7% risk of serious adverse events, unless there was a really big risk.
There was a really big risk-benefit analysis.
So if the patient's about to die of something, of course it's an acceptable risk.
But for any benefit you would get from this, 2.7%, I just find this bemusing.
This could possibly be authorised.
Participants received either this mRNA-1283, which is the new one, or this mRNA-1273, which is the old Moderna vaccine.
Now, the key thing here is, obviously, you can see that what they're doing here is comparing their new vaccine with their old vaccine.
Not a placebo.
Not a placebo.
So they're comparing one of their vaccines with another one of their vaccines and saying, ooh, isn't this good?
We're getting benefit from it.
harrison smith
Yeah, no placebo trial.
Now, Secretary Kennedy has come out with this statement yesterday.
I want to address those of you who have anxiety about the FDA's limited approval of the new mRNA COVID vaccine for high-risk populations.
Moderna has agreed.
To a true placebo-controlled trial of the new vaccine, which is similar to existing mRNA vaccine, but uses the smaller protein.
The FDA will monitor and collect data throughout the trial for every adverse outcome, not just the table list of expected outcomes.
FDA will scrutinize every aspect of the trial.
We will deliver on our promise to use gold standard science and common sense.
And of course, most people are responding to him saying, well, that's nice, but shouldn't you do that trial before the approval happens?
Seems like you're doing things a little bit backwards and also As Lauren Witzke points out, a baby must receive six COVID shots.
Six COVID shots be considered fully vaccinated.
That is an issue.
unidentified
Welcome back, folks.
We'll talk a little bit about Ukraine now.
And I want to say that...
harrison smith
There's sort of a strange thing happening right now, which is that people who should know better are acting ignorant to the reality of a simple fact here.
I'm probably going to blow some people's minds with this.
Ukraine doesn't exist.
Let me say that again.
Ukraine does not exist.
It's not real.
It's not real.
There's a landmass called Ukraine.
It's not a sovereign country, and it hasn't been for well over 10 years at this point.
So you've got these attacks going on these like the drone attack taking out a lot of the nuclear bombers the bridge attack I took place yesterday And you've got people I have got it's The CIA was involved in Ukraine's surprise drone strike deep inside Russia.
Is that shocking to some people?
Wait, what do you mean shocking?
No, Ukraine itself, the so-called nation of Ukraine, has been under direct CIA control for over 10 years at this point.
It's not a democracy.
It's a dictatorship led by a puppet of the CIA.
And it has been that for the last, you know, at least 10 years.
Maybe more like 20. But let's go to, this is a video from a YouTuber called PaxTube.
And he did a much longer history of Ukraine.
Ukraine and Russia.
Basically laying out the path of how we got here from all the way back in the late 80s and early 90s.
But I just want to go to a few minutes towards the end where he talks about the fact that America has puppeteered Ukraine directly since at least 2014.
unidentified
Let's go now to clip number 11. In 2019, the Rand Corporation released a paper titled Extending Russia.
Which plotted a plan for America to weaken Russia.
One of the chief parts of this plan was to continue arming Ukraine and to brainwash Europe into opposing Russia with America.
They spoke about using mass media propaganda to turn the western world into Russian enemies.
In the reports section about Ukraine, it openly states in the risks section that Ukrainians could suffer immensely from America getting further involved in the region.
They are quite frankly cavalier about expending Ukrainian lives to accomplish their goals.
So by the time the 2020s rolled around, with Ukraine actively being funded and armed by the United States as they waged war on ethnic Russians, this is probably the moment Russian officials decided they would have to go to war with Ukraine.
Ukraine was turning into a militarized anti-Russia battering ram, getting better armed and more dangerous every year.
The New York Times confirmed this by releasing an article in 2025 detailing how since 2014, NATO military officials were directly training and arming the Ukrainian military.
Finally, in February 2022, Russia entered the war directly on the side of its ethnic separatists.
This began the conflict that makes headlines today.
As the conflict escalated, NATO countries responded by getting rid of any ambiguity that they were with Ukraine and fully backed it as a proxy against Russia.
America alone under genocide Joe Biden sent over $300 billion worth of weapons.
It's been declassified that the post-Maidan Ukrainian state was fully dependent on the US militarily and economically.
This means that despite the Russia-Ukraine war being framed as a war over sovereignty, Ukraine never had sovereignty to begin with.
Russia came out of the Cold War as a new country that could engage in a fresh start.
But from the beginning, it was hamstrung by aggressive financiers who wanted to plunder its resources.
Then, when a Russian president defeated those financiers, America sought to undermine Russia in every conceivable way it could, whether it be supporting internal rebellions or destroying its allies.
And today, Donald Trump has continued the policies of past American administrations.
Including even engaging in bad faith diplomatic outreach to Russia.
Remember Hillary Clinton with the reset button.
Secretary of State Pete Hegseth has gone on record telling Europe to re-arm to fight Russia so America can focus on China.
That is not de-escalation.
pete hegseth
The U.S. is prioritizing deterring war with China in the Pacific, recognizing the reality of scarcity.
As part of this, Europe must provide the overwhelming share of future lethal and non-lethal aid to Ukraine.
This means donating more ammunition and equipment, leveraging comparative advantages, expanding your defense industrial base.
As the United States prioritizes its attention to these threats, European allies must lead from the front.
unidentified
Do you hear that, Europeans?
America started this war, and now you need to finish it on the front lines.
Die fighting Russia, just like the Ukrainians are.
Europeans, please don't fall for this.
So, who is the main party to blame for the Russia-Ukraine war?
It's America.
It's always been America.
It will continue to be America until the American state ends its policy of seeking unipolar world domination.
Russia isn't the country here seeking to dominate the world.
And ultimately, what has the Maidan revolution brought Ukraine?
It's essentially been destroyed.
And NATO is happy to feed as many Ukrainians to their deaths as it can simply to hurt Russia.
Hundreds of thousands have died, while millions of Ukrainians have fled and may never return.
The Ukrainian economy is in tatters, while the Russian economy is growing faster than many European countries.
The tens of thousands of sanctions which were meant to destroy Russia failed.
The world has observed all of this.
In 2024, another US-backed color revolution in Georgia failed.
The Prime Minister of Georgia even declared there will be no Maidan in Georgia.
In the last four years alone, we have seen two attempts from overseas to stage and finance a revolution, but both failed.
As a result, the third attempt at a revolution will fail too.
In Georgia, of course, there will be no Maidan.
You know what Maidan has brought to Ukraine?
Some people want a repeat of that scenario in Georgia, but there will be no Maidan in Georgia.
And while all this is going on, the American government, for all its attempts at world domination, has disgraced itself in the eyes of the planet with its backing of a genocide in Palestine by Israel.
The Russia-Ukraine war didn't start in 2022.
The fighting may have started in 2014, but the aggressive anti-Russian policies of America and NATO are the true cause of the conflict.
NATO's record stands as follows.
Engaging in offensive actions against sovereign countries as a self-described defensive alliance.
Reneging on promises and assurances that were taken in good faith.
Sponsoring color revolutions that turned stable countries into civil war-ridding craters.
The American, British, and French governments have continued all of this with both Democrats and Republicans in office.
So when people ask you, who's to blame for the Russia-Ukraine war?
Now you know the answer.
This has been PAX, and thank you so much for watching.
harrison smith
So that again is PAXTube on YouTube, and that video is titled something like, Who's to Blame for the Ukraine-Russia War?
And again, that was just the last five minutes.
The whole thing is about 30 minutes long, and it goes all the way back to the early 90s, laying out the history of the collapse of the Soviet Union, the era of looting essentially that occurred subsequent to that, and then Putin coming in and...
Punishing the looters for it and just the repeated actions of the United States making promises to Russia and then betraying them sort of over and over again.
And again, you saw that clip from Pete Hegseth talking about how China is our primary enemy.
If you look at the globe like a risk board, it's pretty obvious who you'd want on your side during a war.
With China, and it would be Russia.
Russia would be an amazing ally to have, aligned with the West, culturally, racially aligned with Europe.
Wouldn't they be a great ally to have two superpowers, Russia and America, combined, fighting against the Communist Chinese?
And we can get into China too.
Just meanwhile, in the realm of Ukrainian news, Remember this person, Sarah Ashton Cirillo?
If the crew can bring up a picture of him, you'll probably recognize him.
The Supreme Court in Russia convicted 47-year-old U.S. citizen Sarah Ashton Cirillo, a former Los Angeles-based journalist who enlisted as a military medic.
We've been sentenced now to 20 years in prison.
A transgender journalist who joined the Ukrainian military has been sentenced to 20 years in a harsh Russian penal colony.
The Supreme Court in Russia convicted in absentia 47-year-old U.S. citizen Sarah Ashton Cirillo, a former Los Angeles-based journalist who enlisted.
She is found guilty of spreading false information about Russian armed forces, participating as a mercenary in an armed conflict.
She traveled to the U.S. several times on behalf of Ukraine's defense minister and was labeled a terrorist by Russia last year.
And of course she would make the videos talking about how important it was that we support Ukraine, how anybody that didn't is like a racist or something.
Who knows?
Who knows what argument they were making, whatever it was.
It was a lie.
A complete and outrageous lie.
But I want to go to another...
And this is a weird one.
This is a weird one.
The only information I can find about this comes from...
I don't know.
I don't know what to tell you.
Black dudes on TikTok.
I don't know why.
They're the only ones reporting on this.
I don't know if it's true or not, but what happens is Usually the way it goes is there's some TikToker who's making some insane claims and are like, trust me, I have inside sources.
And this is really like a pretty regular thing where it's like some guy being like, guys, Hillary Clinton has just been arrested.
I know.
I have it on good authority.
It's classified.
But just trust me, Hillary Clinton has been executed in Guantanamo Bay.
And you're like, all right.
And so you take that, but they sound like they know what they're talking about.
So you go search it up, and there's just nothing.
There's just absolutely nothing there to corroborate what they're saying.
This case is a little bit different.
I got sent this video.
It seemed extraordinary.
It seemed like a wild claim.
But then I search it, and there's actually some smoke here.
I don't know what the fire is, but there's certainly some smoke.
So I'm going to play you one of these videos.
Clip number two.
Sitting U.S. Congressman Jerry Nadler caught with military-grade drone warfare tech in his office.
Again, this is unconfirmed.
This is kind of just speculation, but I'm going to present it to you since it has been going around.
The videos are going viral.
People are talking about it.
And in searching it, you find something certainly happened.
There was a raid of some sort.
What they found...
Let's go to the video.
unidentified
Well, the media fed you distractions.
Taylor Swift, trans parades, TikTok diplomacy.
President Trump's DHS conducted a classified raid on the Democrat representative Jerry Nadler's office.
What did they find?
What they found shocked the agents.
We're talking about military-grade encrypted drone hardware, remote global trigger modules linked to strike systems that can bypass NATO's defense shields, secure digital schematics used in Ukraine's deep drone strikes against those 40 Russian planes that you saw on the Russian airbase that were destroyed, and confidential access keys tied to a shadow ops network.
That spanned outside of the U.S. command.
So let me say this louder for the people in the back.
A sitting U.S. congressman was sitting on global war tech stored like it's paper stationery whatever.
This is crazy.
Paper clips.
Erasers.
This isn't misplaced paperwork.
This isn't mishandled intel.
This is possession of an active warfare system by an unauthorized civilian authority.
And guess what?
DHS agents also found, well, they found hard drives, payment ledgers, routine logs, proof that this wasn't a one-off incident.
It's actually something that's been happening.
It was a pipeline, a military to foreign handoff, a war machine operated from within the Democrat Party itself.
The drone systems coded for international activation, link through VPN and encryption layers, sitting just miles from the Capitol dome, right under your nose.
That's not incompetence.
That's not partisanship.
That's treason with a desk job.
Now you understand why they had to try to take Trump down.
Now you see.
He wasn't just talking about draining the swamp.
He was cracking into their weapons cache.
So here's the firebomb truth.
A U.S. congressman had the keys to untraceable drone hardware.
Tech designed to kill without fingerprints, folks!
Did you hear me?
And he wasn't guarding it.
He was guarding the secret that it was in fact there.
If DHS hadn't moved, we would never know.
But now we do.
Every American with a shred of patriotism should be asking, who else has this tech?
How deep does this treason run?
Who had privy to this knowledge?
And what was the mission that Nadler was helping arm from behind the Iron Curtain of the United States?
Because this isn't Watergate.
This isn't even Iran-Contra scandal-level stuff.
This is Congress running a back-channel war room with hardware meant for U.S. enemies, folks.
And if they were willing to sell out drone triggers, you'd better believe you were already sold out.
Fire them.
Jail them.
Strip them from office.
Because America was never meant to be governed by foreign agents in disguise.
Nice.
harrison smith
And what I'm used to is then going to Google or Yandex or DuckDuckGo or whatever it is, searching whatever they're talking about and finding just literally nothing.
And I just brush it off and ignore it and turns out not to be true.
In this case, you search it and you find story after story.
Democrat Representative Natler demands probe after DHS briefly detains aid.
Quote, very threatening to liberty.
Manhattan Representative Jerry Nadler demanded an investigation into the Department of Homeland Security after agents briefly handcuffed one of his aides last week during a heated confrontation in his district office.
Quote, this was totally unacceptable.
These tactics are totally unacceptable, and they needed a warrant.
In my office as a congressional office, it's a completely separate branch of government.
Nadler raged to CNN News Central.
I'm demanding.
I'm asking for an investigation, he added, noting he plans to ask the House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan for a probe generally of ICE tactics, which are frankly very threatening to liberty.
Apparently the incident took place on May 28th after Nadler's staff witnessed DHS agents detaining migrants in the building where the congressman's office is located, which also contains an immigration court.
Nadler's aides and allowed migrant advocates who'd been tracking immigration and customs enforcement activity into their office The Congressman's Chief of Staff, Robert Gottheim, told the New York Times.
DHS alleged Nadler's team had been harboring rioters in the Congressman's office, a characterization Gottheim flatly denied.
So, the official story is that you've got aides to Jerry Nadler.
Interfering with ICE activity and like harboring people that are trying to go and stop the lawful arrest of illegal immigrants.
But then you've got video after video, that's just one of them, but like a bunch of videos saying essentially the same thing, that actually this was a raid of Jerry Nadler.
I'm doing weird drone tech.
Again, I don't know if it's true.
It sounds far-fetched to me.
But it's just, it's like literally the first time that one of these videos has some amount of substance to it.
So I thought it was worth looking into.
And, you know, even in the way that they are responding to this, they're basically saying that, yeah, DHS is lying.
That's not really what they were doing.
The incident which happened last week led to the brief detention of one of Nadler's staffers by DHS agents who said they entered the Congressman's Manhattan office searching for protesters.
One agent accused Nadler aides of harboring rioters.
The episode has infuriated Nadler and other Democrats in the Capitol who have long accused President Trump of ignoring the separation of powers and crashing through legal guardrails, particularly in his effort to deport people living in the country illegally.
Recently, the administration has escalated its deportation campaign with an aggressive new strategy of arresting people at immigration courts where claims of asylum are typically heard.
On Monday, Nadler called the administration's conduct outrageous and accused DHS of, quote, lying about the details surrounding the episode.
He's calling for an investigation into what he considers an abuse of executive power to target political adversaries.
They barged in, and in barging in one of the offices, a very big, heavy-set fellow pushed my aide, a very petite young woman, and then said she pushed back, and they shackled her and took her down.
So, again, either this was something much larger.
Than the immigration aid or immigration raid, rather.
Or this is what it appears to be, which is staffers of a congressman interfering with ICE activity and feeling untouchable, feeling above the law, physically confronting police agents and then crying when they get handcuffed for it.
And this is a increasingly common scene.
And we have actually several videos from yesterday of people interfering with these arrests.
And it sort of just goes perfectly in line with what we've been saying they're going to do.
Causing interference and then forcing Trump to escalate and crack down since what's happening here is perfectly lawful.
And in some cases, unfortunately.
And then Hakeem Jeffries gets up and says, you know, ICE agents have to identify themselves and are not allowed to wear masks, and we have to be able to see their faces and names so that we can basically punish them for Carrying out their lawful orders.
It's pretty insane.
What's happening here.
And it's.
It really is forcing.
Trump to either.
I don't know capitulate.
And like not arrest people if enough.
I mean I'm trying to be nice here but.
Dim seek to grill Kristi Noem on DHS handcuffing of Nadlerade.
Yeah, so they're going to play the victims.
I mean...
I really, really genuinely hope that Trump is being goaded into more extreme actions.
Like the latest...
But their latest thing is Taco, right?
T-A-C-O.
Trump always chickens out.
And they're like prodding him.
They're like, ah, you're just a chicken.
You're just a coward.
You say these big things, but you always chicken out.
And it's like, yes, good, good.
Goad him more.
Goad him more.
Send out more overweight morons to bumble into ICE agents.
And get themselves arrested.
Goat him more.
Do him more.
I mean, these people are so entitled.
They genuinely think they're above the law.
You've got, you know, ICE raids going after rapists and wife beaters and drug traffickers.
And you've got all these, again, just leftist morons who are only doing this because they know they can get away with it.
It's the only reason.
None of them would actually go to jail for any of this.
Just like the judge that got arrested.
She never thought she'd get arrested.
She thought that she could help a criminal fugitive escape custody and that the administration would just go, darn it, you got us.
You got us.
You helped that criminal alien escape and now there's nothing we can do.
Now, what you can do is arrest them and throw them in prison for a very long time, and then they can cry about it, but they won't do it anymore, and that's what we have to do.
maria zeee
A CIA analyst is 100% sure that the CIA had some involvement in the massive Ukrainian drone strike on Russian airfields, according to the Gateway Pundit.
Ex-CIA analyst Larry Johnson says Ukraine could not have pulled this off on its own and that it bears the fingerprints of a CIA and or British MI6 operation.
It goes on to give us a little bit of the history of the attack and the mainstream narrative is that the operation took upwards of 18 months to plan and execute and was personally overseen by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
The article says, sorry folks, but I don't buy it.
This attack was not something a guy like Zelensky, whose skill set includes being a former homoerotic dancer and actor, was prepared for.
Really?
Have a look at this guy.
He is going to get us into World War III?
That would be one comedic, literal, idiocracy-level entry for the history books.
Something else to note, the attack, according to mainstream reports, took out 41 aircraft, or roughly 34% of Russia's fleet of strategic bombers, yet other knowledgeable sources, such as former British diplomat Alastair Crook, estimate the number of lost Russian bombers at closer to 7, or roughly 5%, of the country's overall fleet.
The Western media is always going to take information from Kiev at face value.
Rather than question it or compare it to what the Russian media is reporting, and that is certainly true.
Anyway, it's fair to say that whether it was 5%, 10%, or 34%, what happened on Sunday in Russia was a major propaganda victory for Ukraine and an embarrassing intelligence lapse for Russia.
Will it change the trajectory of the war between Russia and Ukraine?
Absolutely not, it says, and that trajectory has been going in Russia's favour for months.
But one big unanswered question is how much, if anything, was known about this attack in the bowels of the Washington Deep State in Washington, D.C.?
Did the President himself know about it?
The official line is that he did not.
However, that doesn't mean the US government wasn't involved.
As former CIA analyst Larry Johnson said Monday in an interview with Judge Andrew Napolitano, the US government would likely strive to give the president plausible deniability for an operation like this, which took place some 2,700 miles inside Russia and away from the front lines of the ongoing war.
In a NATO proxy war against Russia, with Ukraine serving as the proxy...
Quote, I guarantee you, he said, quote, at least one, if not more officers within the Central Intelligence Agency knew about this and may have even been involved with the planning for it and the operation of it.
End quote.
When pressed by Napolitano on how confident he was that multiple intelligence agencies may have been involved in an operation at this scale, Johnson responded, 100%.
Just the operations of initiating, of turning the drones on.
Think of the process.
You've got them hidden under this roof, so the roof has to open it up.
That requires an external command.
The reports are they were using the Russian phone network.
Maybe, but I think Starlink, Elon Musk's operation, was involved with this as well.
You can't rule out satellite communications as a source of overhead imagery.
Hey, it was reported, and I see no confirmation of it, that US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth was watching the attack in real time, which means, if true, he absolutely knew it was coming on.
The article concludes by reiterating that Johnson, a streetwise former CIA analyst, is saying he's 100% sure that someone in the CIA was aware of this attack and may have been involved in helping to pull it off.
It also calls into question who is really roaming the country if the president didn't know about the attack.
And if the president did know about it, well then the article claims he doesn't have a leg to stand on by claiming to be a peacemaker.
The article says, quote, the Kremlin's gloves are going to come off, either as a result of this escalation or the next one.
But they're going to come off and we are going to World War III with Russia, which means we'll also at some point be fighting China, Iran and North Korea.
It concludes with, quote, pray for peace, prepare for war, because with each passing day we are getting closer.
Why?
Because the globalist Luciferians who run the puppet politicians want it.
They want it because they feel...
Your data is valuable.
harrison smith
Big tech companies give us features for free.
Fox.
You can find many, many powerful reports there.
Follow Vigilant Fox on X. We'll be back on the other side, talk a little bit about environmentalism.
What about environmentalism?
Real environmentalism.
Not climate change, but you know, the Chinese.
Alright, welcome back folks.
This is the American Journal.
I'm going to go ahead and open up the phone lines for your calls at this hour.
We'll be joined in the next hour by Roger Stone.
The number to dial.
If you want to sound off on what's going on in the world.
1-877-789-2539.
1-877-789-2539.
Give us a call.
We still have a lot to talk about today, but I want to talk about something that I talked a little bit about yesterday and mentioned kind of regularly, I guess you could say, but it's the idea that our system is not made for everybody.
I hate to say it.
An open, liberal system is only made for people who can handle it.
Who can manage it.
Who have the self-control or I don't even know what.
Some sort of intangible aspect about them.
It makes them unwilling to take advantage of something just because they can.
And I just want to emphasize to people, again, I think this is something that the whole drive for equality has people truly believing that all cultures are equal and that the European values that surround them so thoroughly, they can't even see them anymore.
It's like how the fish isn't aware of the water that they're swimming in.
I think European people sort of project their own feelings about things onto everybody else and that's a deadly practice in a lot of ways.
What I mean by this is that Europe, European peoples and Americans in particular are sort of the only environmentalists out there.
As a whole, as a collective, obviously I'm not talking about individuals, I'm talking about statistically or, you know, as nations.
If you actually care about the earth, you would be against like everything we're against.
It's not, you know, capitalism that's destroying the world.
It's the Chinese.
It's the Chinese to a large degree.
And the Indians.
And now America and Canada are welcoming millions upon millions of people into their country, into their countries who have absolutely no respect for the natural world.
And it's going to have really devastating consequences.
And I bring this up because it's sort of the perfect example to highlight what I mean when I say You know, our system requires good people, decent people, thoughtful people for it to even operate.
It's a very common, you know, libertarian talking point to be against things like fishing licenses.
Where it's like, I gotta go to the government and beg permission and pay them a fee to throw bait in the water and pull out a fish.
Like, it seems totally...
Have regulations over fishing.
It's like, just let us fish.
We can just fish.
It's fine.
We don't need to go get a permit.
But it turns out, if you don't force people to buy licenses to fish, if you don't actually patrol the rivers and stop poachers, There's not going to be any more fish left.
So this guy posted a video.
His name's claw at wit underscore tomahawk.
He says, normies have no idea how illegals are just five years away, max, from irreversibly damaging our delicate fish populations.
He says he ran into three different groups of Indians netting the Salt River, Arizona, back in November, just like this, all in one afternoon, pulling out hundreds of trout and bass.
We can watch this video.
I believe I put it in the folder there, clip number 19. You guys know that's very illegal, eh?
You see a guy with a net in there?
unidentified
You guys know this is very illegal, what you guys are doing?
What's your guys' names?
You're netting fish, yeah.
You're netting fish, which is extremely illegal.
You go to jail for that.
Do you guys understand that?
I've been videotaping you guys for a while.
What's your guys'names?
What's your guys'names?
harrison smith
And again, you just, you repeat that over.
So you said you ran into three different groups of people doing this exact thing.
And it's like, to me it just sort of goes to the heart of the mindset.
The heart of the issue with, like, bringing in people who are just completely different than you.
And I don't know how else to say it.
But, like, have you seen India?
Have you seen the rivers in India anytime soon, anytime recently?
They're mostly trash.
They're mostly trash and dead human bodies.
And it's disgusting.
And it's completely disgusting.
So it's like, yeah, on one hand, it seems outrageous that you have to beg permission from the government to fish.
On the other hand, we're bringing in millions of people who see rivers full of big fish, bountiful nature, and are just like, here's our opportunity.
If they see an opportunity, just get as much as possible.
And it's like, okay, we're not going to have fish anymore.
How do you not understand this?
How do you not understand that if you take hundreds of trout out of a single river and you've got multiple groups doing this down the river, next year there's not going to be any trout.
And you're just going to be like, well, whoops.
And just move on to the next river, I guess.
Like locusts?
I don't know.
I don't know.
But it's kind of a common thing right now.
In fact, let me...
And lots of videos are being posted about this.
This was from Paul at Woman Definer on X. 70 years of wildlife conservation in North America is being undone by mass migration.
In this video, the game warden catches an Asian couple poaching.
As he searches them, everyone else leaves because they were also poaching.
So let's go to this new video now.
unidentified
Are you guys trying to hide the muscles?
No.
Come on.
Did I see your license?
No snails, no crabs, okay?
Alright.
You guys have any snails?
No.
No snails?
No.
Anything in the bucket?
Any crabs?
What's in the cooler?
It's, uh, Junita.
Okay, show me.
roger stone
Hey, you guys!
unidentified
I need to check your catch.
Wait right there for one second.
I thought you said no snails.
What?
No snails.
No snails.
It's mine.
It's mine.
The only one is mine.
Hey, guys, who caught the snail?
It was in this cooler.
So who caught it?
No, no, it's gonna ask.
It's in your bucket.
We don't know who it is.
Who caught it?
We don't know.
I think because there's a man that will call us, and he just throw that scanner with the We'll take your word for it.
All this?
harrison smith
Yeah, that was some guy.
No, it wasn't us.
It's just in our cooler.
It wasn't us, though.
So again, this is a cultural thing.
And it's just a total lack of...
Yeah, I don't know.
I don't know what we think we're doing.
In Canada, they're bringing in over a million people in a single year to that country.
Something like 900,000 Indian visas for permanent residents into Canada.
Canada is going to look like India.
And all these beautiful rivers full of, you know, teeming with fish that the bears eat, that just, I mean, the whole circle of life, the whole natural cycle is going to be irreversibly disrupted by mass migration.
Again, I mean, just think about the tragedy of one river With three different groups, discovered by this one guy fishing, just wandering down the river in a single day, finds three different groups of people, each one of them pulling dozens and dozens and dozens of fish out of the river.
They're going to kill the river.
They're going to kill everything.
Everything's going to die.
And it's not just like on an individual basis.
Whole countries act this way.
I mean, we've covered it ad nauseum at this point, but Will Tanner...
The reason that Africa's megafauna, namely elephants and rhinos, is being driven to near extinction is that the East Asians are prolific poachers who have no care for or thought of the natural environment or the animals in it.
Similarly, vast Chinese fleets are sweeping over the ocean like fleet-sized vacuum cleaners, leading it utterly denuded of life.
The most just casus bellum currently in existence is how they're doing their best to leave the world devoid of wildlife.
And they should be destroyed before they can do so.
And of course, we've talked a lot about the Chinese fishing fleets that have been going on for years.
Chinese fishing fleet in 2020, this was all the way back five years ago, where you've got these massive city-sized flotillas of ships just in international waters off the coast of places like Peru and Argentina.
and they completely destroy all life They use electrified nets that they just drag across the bottom of the ocean, killing everything it touches.
And it's just...
Why are we allowing this to take place?
Especially when you consider the suicidal lengths that our governments are willing to go to fight for the earth and stop carbon production.
They'll make your gas stove illegal.
Car illegal.
They'll do everything they can to crush your ability to just live your life.
All predicated on saving the earth.
Meanwhile, you've got these populations like in China and India who just systematically destroy all life around them and then move on to a new area.
And of course, whether it's Intended or not, the obvious outcome is perfectly in line with the actual goals behind the climate change movement, which is to destroy humanity's ability to actually subsist off of the natural bounty of Earth.
Like, if you can kill all of the fish in the ocean, then it's fish in tanks that are going to be your source of food.
Much more easy to control.
You have to have access to it.
By permission, you can't just go out and find this stuff.
And it really is, at the end of the day, about utterly destroying the bounty of Earth, and so it can be replaced with factory farming, or the equivalent.
As many people have, you know, noticed all of this.
People saying, you should see what they did to Madagascar during the coup in 2008 and 2000.
Nine Asian boats pulled up near the shore and starving locals brought them ebony, rosewood, lemurs, anything of value.
They looted the island.
Other people suggesting that America launch a fleet of underwater drones to drill holes in their ship.
From Africa to South America, China's fishing fleet outstrips the competition.
Said to be the most comprehensive of its kind, a survey says China's fishing fleet operated more hours in 2016 than the next 10 biggest nations combined.
It's going for like a decade straight, China's had these floating cities, these massive flotillas of fishing ships off the coast of everywhere except for China, getting as much as they possibly can.
Absolutely no concern about preserving the population.
Like if you talk to people who fish lobsters in Maine or crabs in Alaska, there's a very scientific method that they go through to guarantee that The harvest is just as big the next year.
You don't take crabs of a certain size or lobsters of a certain size.
You only take the amount that is excess.
So the next year when you come back, it's all been replenished and you can do that indefinitely.
Then it takes one year, one year, and it was like two years ago, China showed up and just took all the crabs.
They just get as many crabs they possibly can.
They get all of the crabs there in Alaska.
And so the following year, the Alaskan crab fleet goes out, and there's no crabs.
They don't come back.
They don't just regenerate if you take all of them.
And they're doing this systematically, and the powers that be are allowing them to do that.
You never hear a word about this from the people who will get up there and cry crocodile tears over climate change, carbon emissions, acting like we're killing the earth by cooking on a gas grill.
Well, meanwhile, with their permission, with their silence, if nothing else, the Chinese are just systematically destroying life on Earth.
Totally.
Now, they've got a solution.
They've got a solution to this.
It's things like this building.
Don't forget they use electrified netting to dredge the ocean of all life.
Supposedly, this collection of sea animals is to feed pigs.
In these hellacious, multi-story CAFO concentrated animal feeding operation buildings, which is even more absurd given that pigs eat just about anything.
So they strip the oceans of life to send seafood back to China to feed pigs that are kept in gigantic, I mean, hellish is hardly even gets to it.
China's bid to improve food production.
Giant towers of pigs.
You know, this is the vision of the future that they want.
The vision of the future I want would be like small farms, family farms, raising a couple dozen cattle, a couple pigs, some goats.
They can sell it to a, you know, larger processing, manufacturing plant that can work it out.
But ideally, you want to be eating animals that have healthy lives themselves or outside, eating grass, eating, you know, things that are nice.
The vision of the future for them is food production exists entirely of livestock that never sees the sun, never steps outside, never even moves because they're born, birthed, raised, pumped full of antibiotics and slaughtered in the same cage where they're artificially inseminated.
Just like this inhuman mechanized factory farming hell world where instead of just Humanity existing off the bounty of the Earth.
Humanity exists as the product of this industrial process.
And it's horrifying and outrageous and especially absurd when you consider how crazy we're being in terms of saving the Earth from climate change.
Matt, you have some thoughts on this?
unidentified
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I actually had spoken over this past Christmas break when I was in Mexico.
I actually spoke to one of my wife's family friends.
matt infowars
He's a reporter who has been to China many times, and he told me about actually how they farm and harvest pigs using AI right now.
unidentified
It's really, really scary just because...
They breathe on a sensor.
The sensor calculates the macros that these pigs need to eat, and then it calculates how much they're going to grow from their food that day.
And then from there, it predicts how much bigger they're going to get and where they're going to be at the end of their life cycle.
And then it already starts selling their parts to.
And it's calculating that in real time every day, each day as it feeds.
And, you know, this guy is talking about how efficient China is and everything like that.
And the one thing that stuck out in my mind, I said, you know, when do we become the pigs?
harrison smith
That's exactly what I was thinking.
Yeah, how convenient that would be.
unidentified
It's really insane.
How they're doing this.
You talk about inhumane.
It's the furthest thing from natural.
harrison smith
Yeah.
No, it's disgusting.
And of course, you know, like, it's not healthy, right, to have, I mean, the headline we just showed, a million pigs, a million pigs in a single tower, a single, like, communist-style apartment block with a million pigs being raised, you know, born, raised, and slaughtered in a single building.
And so you have to pump a full of antibiotics in order to get the food that you need to feed them.
You've got to practice GMO practices or...
unidentified
Those are happy pigs.
harrison smith
Yeah, it's like...
No, it's just utterly disgusting.
But yeah, it gives you a view of like what...
I mean, look at that.
It gives you a view of how these people see the world and like what is – what is the difference between a pig and a human in that case?
Like literally you vision a, And it's basically that.
It's like, well, you just need to, you know, everything you do needs to be controlled.
And, you know, don't worry about human relationships.
Everything will be digital.
And, you know, we can inseminate pigs artificially.
Let's do that to humans too.
And it's just like everything good and human and natural is being destroyed.
So everything can be in this pre-programmed.
Roboticized artificial intelligence matrix of just useless slop.
Endless slop.
And then there's stuff like this.
Michael A. Arut.
I don't know how to pronounce his name.
Can you please help me understand how de-industrialization of the UK and Germany will save the planet?
it's a chart of annual CO2 emissions.
And you can see that while United Kingdom and Germany
China, since around 1950, has skyrocketed up 12 billion tons of CO2 emissions, which, again, I don't even think is that big of an issue, but just, like, I'm just trying to get across how not just absurd the current So-called environmental concerns are, right?
Because all environmental concerns now have been subsumed within the climate change agenda.
I don't hear people talking about saving the rainforest from deforestation.
I don't hear people talk about saving the fish from Chinese fishing fleets.
Every environmental concern that, like when I was a kid, it was like you'd have the rainforest people, you'd have the clean water people, the clean air people.
It's all just CO2 now.
They've decided the only thing that matters is the heating of the earth.
Which itself is absurd because Earth routinely plunges into ice ages, which are the real concern.
But all of it has been subsumed in the concern for CO2 production.
And we have to crush our own manufacturing, crush our own industrial base.
Germany is bankrupt to a degree that they might not ever get out of because they've chosen willingly to commit suicide.
On the altar of climate change, while all of their industry just moves to China and produces more CO2 than any other country combined by a factor of 10. But that's just part of it.
The other part is the ignoring of the actual ecological disasters being wrought by these people and even bringing them over as immigrants with no respect for nature, no respect for animal life, and seeing our rivers Teeming with fish as just an opportunity to get as much as you can in this brief time period.
Who even knows what the future holds?
So just kill all the fish now, and then next year, wonder why you're starving.
It's just absurd.
All right, welcome back, folks.
unidentified
We're going to go off your phone calls this segment.
harrison smith
In fact, let's go to Mushroom Boy.
Mushroom Boy in Wisconsin.
If you want to talk about fungus warfare.
These Chinese nationals that were found with this pathogen, apparently studying in U.S. labs.
Chinese scholar at University of Michigan tried to smuggle biological pathogen into the U.S., according to federal agents.
You've got to wonder how many of these haven't been caught.
Go ahead, Mushroom Boy, you're on the air.
icarus in wisconsin
Hi, it's Mushroom Man, actually, in Maguanago.
That's okay, though.
The Weber, I think, is just playing a joke.
Yeah, I'm really into mushrooms.
I do it partially for work.
I think they're super interesting.
You know, like, the biggest thing with mushrooms is that they're, like, super advanced.
They're sometimes more advanced than AI.
Like, they beat AI in designing the Tokyo subway.
harrison smith
I've heard that.
icarus in wisconsin
And I'm concerned that they're going to pull like a COVID style thing with It took fungus by using AI to run simulations to evolve fungus to attack organic life on Earth, specifically like humans and agriculture.
and you can kind of see this in movies, or TV shows, pardon me, and video games like The Last of Us.
And it took fungus, 10 million years.
Imagine this, Harrison.
10 million years to figure out how to eat wood and grow on wood.
And in the insect world, there's tons of fungus, fungi that, there's tons of fungi that like attack different insects, specific fungus.
harrison smith
Yeah, I was going to say, that reminds me of the, there's like, you know, you'll see pictures where, you know, an ant will get infected with a fungus and it will, and it takes over the, Yeah, fungus are creepy, man.
That's a very, very deep concern.
I mean, just that alone, that they can take over the brain function of ants and use the ant's body, force the ant to climb up to a high point so it can release its spores and help it spread everywhere.
Yeah.
Fungus is incredibly creepy and incredibly useful.
It's a bizarre form of life.
icarus in wisconsin
And Bill Gates' new anti-fungus, anti-decomposition preservative spray, I guarantee you that like majority of the fungicides, it's a gender-bending chemical because the best way to attack fungus is by attacking the way it reproduces.
So I wouldn't be surprised, you know, like how the elitist Satanists try to make the frogs gay, that they're trying to make the mushrooms, fungi, and the insects gay also, so they don't reproduce.
Killing all life on Earth, you know, destroying the ecosystem and God's grand design.
harrison smith
Yeah, that's kind of weird, because as I understand it, it's like, you know, as different as we are from amphibians or insects, it's still, you know, it attacks basically the central nervous system.
You know, it has the same effect on humans, obviously, are a lot bigger and more robust, so it doesn't kill us, but it just has these, like, minor alterations and enough exposure over time can change behavior or, you know, alter your physiology.
I would think that fungus were different enough from us that, you know, whatever you use to kill fungus wouldn't affect humans as directly as something like atrazine, but still a very, very big concern.
I guess just another vector of attack that we have to be aware of.
I want to go to another caller.
Any final thoughts, Mushroom Man?
icarus in wisconsin
Yeah, I'll be real quick.
Just imagine the pandemonium with COVID, but if it was something on the skin of people, like they lose their hair or they have mushrooms growing out of them, it'd be people marked with this stuff, so it'd be way worse.
And then I think obviously there'd be like a psychedelic component where people would like lose their minds and like hallucinate and be crazy.
You know, I don't know if you ever took mushrooms before, but.
harrison smith
Yeah, I love them.
Yeah.
Yeah, yeah, they're good.
So what do you know about this?
I mean, what do you know about the fungus that was being smuggled in?
Had you ever heard of this stuff, or do you know anything about Fusarium graminarium?
icarus in wisconsin
It's just like how they have the Wuhan lab.
They have labs in China and U.S. and Russia developing like...
We've seen all these weird insects from Asia come to the U.S. and disrupt the population here.
So it's just another stuff they're cooking up in the lab, probably in response to the terror.
And actually, this stuff also probably goes on nonstop, just part of modern warfare theater.
That's incredibly creepy.
It's like an ultimate weapon.
You can't trace it back.
It's self-replicating.
You know, every breath you take on planet Earth, you're essentially breathing in, like, 10 parts per million of mushroom spores, you know?
You're breathing in some spores, so your body is able to handle it, and we can handle it, but it's only a matter of time.
Eventually, it's going to happen naturally, just like it did with the trees.
Trees used to grow, like, huge, like skyscrapers, until mushrooms figured out how to, you know, eat different parts of the tree, the bark.
The roots, you know, that's another big problem with the mushrooms is that they're able to act like a natural AI network.
unidentified
They're really smart.
harrison smith
Yeah, and if people don't know what you're talking about, basically they used, they had like a map.
I don't know how exactly it worked, but they had a map of Tokyo.
icarus in wisconsin
They had a map of Tokyo.
harrison smith
Yeah, they had all the different subway parts, and they basically put sugar or some sucrose on all of these different...
So yeah, even without brains, they have this bizarre analytical aspect to them where they're able to find the most efficient way.
Slime mold grows networks just like Tokyo Rail System.
Talented dedicated engineers spent countless hours designing Japan's rail system to be one of the world's most efficient.
They could have just asked slime a mold when presented.
With oat flakes arranged on pattern of Japanese cities around Tokyo, brainless, single-celled slime molds construct networks of nutrient-channeling tubes that are strikingly similar to the map of the Tokyo subway system.
So, yeah, it's a bizarre, you know, new frontier in, I guess, human conflict.
And this particular fungus that they've caught the Chinese people smuggling in, It's a strain of plant pathogen that causes head blight, according to the criminal case, a disease that can devastate wheat, barley, maize, and rice.
And yeah, as you point out, it's self-perpetuating.
You let it go and it just destroys and feeds itself and increases power as it consumes.
Thank you for the call.
Let's go to Jay in Kansas because he wants to talk about the Bill Gates Chemical Spray Appeal that's now being put on organic.
Go ahead, Jay, you're on the air.
unidentified
Hey, Harrison.
Yesterday you were having a little issue with enunciating Worcester.
It's not Worcestershire.
I'm from Massachusetts.
They don't teach you to speak English up there properly for whatever reason.
harrison smith
Worcester, all right.
unidentified
But, yeah, I go into the, and like I told the guy there that I spoke with when I called.
I don't like to shop at Walmart, but I'm a truck driver, and sometimes that's what we have to do.
And I always get those halos, and I love the halos.
harrison smith
The little oranges, yeah.
Yeah, I love them.
unidentified
So I grabbed this bag, and I threw it in the buggy, and away we go.
And I come out to the truck, and I open up the halo there, but it's not a halo.
I didn't recognize it right away.
And there was a little sticker on it that said teal, and I'm like, it was terrible.
And I found that some of them were even rotten on the inside.
They looked great, but they tasted like trash.
I threw them away.
harrison smith
Wow, and they had the appeal spray on them?
unidentified
I don't.
The name of the sticker that was on it was Peel.
harrison smith
P-E-E-L.
unidentified
Two E's.
P-E-E-L.
And it was horrible.
I like the halos.
And, of course, I like the supplements, and I just got another order that was delivered, and I don't understand why you haven't called me to give me one of those Raptors or that Tesla Tesla.
harrison smith
The Cybertruck?
unidentified
I was kind of expecting that, but...
harrison smith
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
We have to be upfront about that, but hey, keep shopping at the Alex Jones store, and you might just get lucky.
Thanks for the call, Jay, as always.
Yeah, I mean, it's sad, but you gotta start looking for that stuff.
Avoid products with the appeal label.
And I think now they are, I don't know if legally they have to say that they're, you know, have appeal on them, but usually they'll have a little sticker that says it.
And my advice is avoid those products because, you know, an orange's skin is not, it doesn't stop chemicals from getting into the orange.
You can't just like coat an orange or an apple or a banana.
In some sort of, you know, estrogen mimicker and expect it not to seep into the meat of the fruit inside.
It's not how it works.
It just seeps right in.
Now, before we go out to other calls, there's a few.
Yeah, there's a little appeal label.
Eat Me Avocado.
And it's Nature's Pride.
And you see the appeal label there, meaning it's been covered with the plastic from Bill Gates.
Crazy stuff.
I want to cover two more stories here before we got to phone calls.
First, U.S. computer engineering grads face double the unemployment rate of art history majors.
Double the unemployment rate of art history majors.
U.S. computer engineering graduates report a 7.5% unemployment rate, the third highest among all majors, and more than twice art histories.
3%, according to Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
The New York Fed's report, based on the 2023 census data, shows that while STEM degrees are commonly linked to strong job prospects, several humanitarian majors are currently recording better employment outcomes than their technical counterparts.
And you have to wonder how much of that has to do with the fact that the primary recipients of H-1B visas are engineering grads.
So, again, you just have to think about how suicidally absurd our entire system is.
That hundreds of thousands of foreign students take up roles or positions in universities being trained to be engineers.
They then just go back to their home countries or they're employed here taking the job that an American would have.
And then simultaneously we're importing hundreds of thousands if not millions of engineers from places like India who have earned degrees overseas because we can pay them less.
And provide them less comfortable living places and they'll be satisfied because where they come from is a third world country that doesn't live up to the living standards that we've grown to expect.
It's just retarded.
It's just utterly stupid, beyond ridiculous.
And it would be one thing if we were just doing one and not the other.
If we were pumping out engineers out of our universities and there were just so many jobs that we had to bring people over from overseas, that's how it's always presented.
That's not the case.
Our engineers are unemployed, and yet we're bringing in hundreds of thousands.
Our students are being disadvantaged because we're bringing in people from overseas to study in our universities and then take that knowledge and learning and expertise back to their countries.
It's just, unless your purpose was destroying our country, you would never set it up this way.
This is ridiculous.
It's completely suicidal on a societal level.
And I don't know why we put up with it.
I really don't.
And there's one more thing.
This is so typical, I guess you could say.
Leftists are engaging in post-ironic true flag attacks against Jewish Americans, and Bibi's first instinct is to blame the white woke current and Tucker Carlson.
So according to officials, Netanyahu is deeply troubled by developments in Washington, particularly the growing influence of the separatist white woke current within Trump's orbit.
And by figures like conservative commentator Tucker Carlson.
And as Mel at Village Crazy Lady notes, the D.C. guy, the guy who murdered the two students or the two Israeli diplomats outside of the Jewish Museum, he was a Latino commie who says he loves Jews and hates white people.
And the Colorado guy, the guy who threw the Molotov cocktails, is an Egyptian who's only been in the U.S. for two years.
And yet, Netanyahu is trying to blame white conservatives.
Why?
Because we won't send our sons to die in Iran like he wants us to.
And again, I just, I don't know how else to put it.
Like, this is the thing.
What do you even say to this?
It's like, you've got radical leftists who despise white people, hate white people.
Their whole identity is surrounded by fighting non-existent white supremacy.
So they blame white people for what's going on in like Gaza, in Israel.
They're like those damn white...
He was a Hispanic guy.
Latino, Latinx, whatever the appropriate racial designation is.
Not white.
And his writing that's come out is just viciously anti-white.
He's like, I hate white people.
All white people should be killed.
And I love Jews, and Jews are the best.
Okay, so white people get the blame for what's going on in Gaza, and then Netanyahu blames white people for the violence against Jews carried out by non-white people who hate white people.
And it's just like, what did we do?
What did we do to deserve this?
It just makes no sense.
It just makes no goddamn sense at all.
You've got two groups fighting each other, and both of them constantly talk about how much they hate white people and how it's white people's fault, the fight that they're in.
We're not doing anything.
We haven't done anything.
Why is it all predicated on hating white people?
Because white people are the real threat to the power structure.
That's why.
Because white people actually pose a threat because we are not like other people.
And at the end of the day, Chinese are going to submit to authority because that's their culture.
Other people don't have the...
It's only white people who have this streak of independence, who established human rights and all this other stuff, and it's an existential threat as long as there are white people around.
So you've got non-white people on both sides fighting each other, blaming white people, and at the end of the day, as long as white people are hurt or destroyed.
That's all that really matters to them.
And it's very annoying.
It's very frustrating.
We haven't done anything.
It's not us doing it.
So why do we keep getting the blame?
Genuinely, why do we keep getting the blame?
I covered the thing yesterday.
Palantir.
Palantir, the tech that they're using to slaughter Palestinians.
The tech that they're using to spy on white people to crush the Great Reset or the Great Replacement conspiracy theory to destroy far right and stop white people from ruling their own countries in Europe.
And the whole thing is written by this left is about how Palantir is an upholder of white supremacy.
And it's just like, what did we do?
Why do we keep getting blamed for everything?
Genuinely doesn't make any sense.
Infuriating.
White people get blamed when they're fleeing genocide in South Africa.
It's like, what did we do?
What did white people do?
The classic meme is like, you know, they're never going to forgive your ancestors for teaching their ancestors to eat with a fork.
It's like, what did we do?
What did we do to you?
Honestly.
We need to learn history.
We need to learn what these places were like before white people showed up.
Hellish doesn't even begin to describe it.
But the final thing, this is one of those things.
The big battle now in politics is over the budget.
And I'm just personally kind of sick of hearing about the budget.
It's where the money's going.
And I have so many people responding to me on Twitter being like, no, you don't understand.
If, you know, the interest is too high and we can't afford it and we're going to go bankrupt.
And it's like, guys, they print money from thin air, okay?
We don't have to be in any debt and we shouldn't be in any debt.
And what we should do is just cancel all the debt, close the Fed.
Start issuing real money again from the U.S. government.
We should just end the Fed.
And all of that debt, it's all fake.
It's not real.
None of it's real.
It doesn't matter at all.
What matters is where you're spending the money.
And look, if Congress cared about lowering the budget, then they probably wouldn't be spending hundreds of billions of dollars a year on programs like USAID to pay Norm Eisen to come out with a podcast.
You know, every quarter.
So I don't think they care about the budget in the first place.
And I don't care about the budget in terms of the size of the number.
And the way to think about it is like, okay, Donald Trump at points in his career has been billions of dollars in debt.
But somehow he survived and actually maintained his billionaire status.
How did that happen?
Well, the debt he was taking was to build buildings, was to build high-rise buildings.
That generate millions and millions and millions of dollars a year, year over year.
Because you're investing the money that you're spending in something that will turn a profit in the near future.
So if we spend exactly the same amount of money as we do today, but spent it on education, patriotic education, spent it on infrastructure, getting jobs to the American people, if you spend it on stuff that actually paid a dividend at the end of the day, It actually wouldn't matter what the debt was.
Instead, we spend trillions of dollars paying for a billion Indians and Chinese people to live on the dole or to subsidize their hiring and employment.
And it's like if you think about it as a family, if you are taking out a big debt, but it's to pay for college for your kids so you can get a good job, so you can grow, Healthcare that you need to continue to exist.
That's very different than taking out millions of dollars in loans to pay for your wedding, your parties, to pay for sports cars that you crash.
It's not the debt that's the issue.
It's where the money's going.
It's what it's being spent on.
And I'm just sick of being the side of the political spectrum.
Whose only solution to anything is to just cut the budget.
Well, meanwhile, the budget never gets cut.
It never gets any smaller for my entire life.
It's only ballooned larger and larger and larger.
And we have never seen even the slightest benefit from any of it.
Certainly nothing has ever been done that would pave the way for economic expansion into the future.
It's nothing but contracting as we continue to pour money into babysitting the third world or waging wars overseas.
Or spying endlessly on our own people so that nobody complains about these things.
It's just...
I mean, I'm just so sick of talking about the budget.
Every six months it's this dog and pony show?
Oh, we're gonna have to shut down the government.
Oh, no, we have to pass this.
Well, we'll just pass it now, and then we'll...
It's just like it's exhausting.
It's retarded.
It's stupid.
It's pointless.
The money's fake and summoned from thin air anyway by a private bank that's totally unaccountable and for profit.
So, if you want to just upset the entire financial system, like Hitler, I'm for it.
Okay?
If you want to tell me that I have to take a cut, I can't get infrastructure, we can't pay for Medicare or Social Security while simultaneously we spend billions and billions and billions of dollars.
On stuff that only makes us weaker, I'm done talking about it.
It's stupid, pointless, and negative.
Let's go to Hammer Hardy in Florida.
Hammer Hardy, you're on the air about the leftists attacking federal agents in places like Minnesota.
Go ahead.
Oh, he dropped.
Sean in Colorado.
Go ahead.
Woke Right and the division on the right is your topic.
You're on the air.
unidentified
Yeah.
Hi, Harrison.
I do want to talk about this woke right.
I believe it was a topic you guys brought up.
I'm not sure if it was on your show or Owens or what.
But nobody really kind of weighed in on it and thought it was important to talk about.
But it's obviously a big issue right now because this divide is getting greater with Elon calling out Trump and Trump calling out NetYahoo.
It's kind of all over the place.
So I just like to explain to people that, uh, There's an understanding.
There's a truth that needs to be recognized within this truth or community because it's so divided and it's just all over the place.
You have people saying things like Christ consciousness, and that's just a complete psyop in and of itself.
I mean, you know, these truthers just completely deny, you know, the man who came to die on the cross for our sins.
I mean, and then you have truthers that are, you know, like I say, blindly supporting Israel or, you know, blindly supporting Trump.
And then you have truthers out there like Nick Fuentes and, you know, Kanye West who think that Hitler is a good guy.
So there really needs to be, you know, we really need to have a talk about what's going on here, especially when it pertains to Israel.
And I know you guys call out, you know, Trump.
For what he does and stuff, and that's great.
harrison smith
Yeah, to me, I'm sorry, we're coming up against a commercial break here.
We'll be joined by Roger Stone, the other side.
To me, it's the ideological divide that gets us.
I just treat everything sort of on an individual basis, and it's not that difficult.
unidentified
Welcome back, folks.
harrison smith
We've got Sean in Colorado on the line.
We'll be joined shortly by our guest.
You talk about the woke right and division on the right.
I mean, there's no such thing as woke right.
This is a smear brought up in an attempt to silence people.
Popularized by James Lindsay.
But he just gets utterly destroyed any time he brings it up.
And he just persists in using this label.
I don't think there's such a thing as woke right.
Again, I think you've got these ideological traps that people fall into.
That is just...
In other words, your religion or even your nationality or ethnicity, it really shouldn't have anything to do with whether or not you think what's happening in Gaza is legitimate or not.
At least I don't.
I don't understand the fact, like, should you kill tens of thousands of children?
I don't think so.
No, I don't think that's a good thing to do.
I think that's wrong and bad and doesn't make me an anti-Semite.
And I think it's weird for people who use their religion or ethnicity to somehow justify approving or, you know, co-signing such a thing.
I mean, I think it's a lot of fabricated division on purpose and it's weird because It's like people try to cause division and then claim you're causing division by responding to the division they're causing.
And it's just exhausting and annoying.
And again, James Lindsay, like, he said something about, you know, you're causing division by being woke right.
And it's like the word woke right is, by definition, division.
Like you are setting a line in the sand and saying everybody on this side is the right and everybody on that side is the woke right.
The phrase itself only exists to cause division.
Arguing against it is not causing division.
It just makes no sense.
I mean, what do you think we should do, Sean?
The division on the right that's constant and beyond frustrating.
I mean, it goes on forever, and it's every week there's some new thing.
It was Glenn Greenwald last week.
Who knows what it'll be this week, but it's this constant division being fostered on the right.
And most of it has to do with ideologues.
Extrapolating one thing out to mean everything.
I mean, Glenn Greenwald's a great example.
Where it's like, the guy's a good reporter.
He's exposed some really crazy stuff.
He worked with Edward Snowden in revealing that stuff.
He's done great work exposing spies in America and the influence of Israel and all this sort of stuff.
I see that as totally separate and distinct from whatever weird degenerate crap he gets up to in his bedroom.
And people are like, you can't just not care about that.
He represents conservatism now?
It's like, no, what the hell are you talking about?
He doesn't represent conservatism.
He is not a conservative spokesperson because he writes good reports.
It's like, it doesn't matter.
Why are you falling for this obvious psyop to divide people and to discredit people that do good work and that expose lies of people?
It doesn't matter.
But it's like this ideological test.
It's like, actually, you have to condemn him and throw him under the bus.
And it's like, yeah.
He gets up to creepy, weird stuff.
He probably shouldn't have kids.
I don't think he should be able to adopt his kids.
He was like a pornographer and ran like a pimp for gay prostitutes in Brazil, according to certain reports that I've read.
All of that's disgusting.
I condemn it all.
Dudes is still a good reporter.
Is that too complicated for people to handle?
too much is that too nuanced for people i have to choose either he's he should be burned at the stake or he's an angel and a saint and i i Everything is like this.
It's so annoying and it's constant.
What do we do about it, Sean?
unidentified
Well, Harrison, it is a big problem and it's a divide and conquer thing and it's all done by design and I'd just like to simplify it and bridge the gap within our resistance and try to get people on one page.
Christians and patriots.
To understand the Bible and what's all happening right now in these last days leading up to Revelation.
And I always sound the alarm on, like I say, the raptor and stuff every time I call in and just kind of war game that.
I tell people that because it's really important to just be ready to be taken at any moment as if Christ was to come right now, you know?
harrison smith
You know, Sean, I don't know.
I think maybe you sound like a fed.
I think everybody except for me is a fed.
Welcome, and this is the American Journal.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, joined today by the one and only Roger Stone.
Roger, welcome to the show, sir.
roger stone
Great to be back with you, Harrison.
That's a good-looking necktie you got there.
harrison smith
Oh, thank you very much.
I was anxious about it.
The crew was trying.
They were going, it's a great time.
I was going, it's not Roger Stone level.
I should have worn a better one, but I appreciate that compliment, and it's always on my mind.
Now, I know you don't have too much time with us, so let's get right into it.
Is that we've got these crimes that go back like a decade, for example, Russiagate, that we haven't seen a lot of movement on.
And I don't want to forget about it.
I don't want this just to, you know, fall to the wayside and we're the only ones talking about it.
But it seems like there's some developments in that regard.
Can you lay out to us what's happening with the Russia collusion hoax from a decade ago?
roger stone
First of all, I think it's important to understand that the Russian collusion hoax is the greatest single dirty trick in American politics.
It's the greatest single abuse of power by the federal government.
It's nothing less than the full use of the authority of the United States and the extraordinary capability of the intelligence agencies to try to remove a duly elected president utilizing two pieces of evidence.
The Steele dossier and the false claim that the Russians hacked the DNC, which they didn't, to remove Donald Trump.
And at this point, we know, based on John Durham's report, that this is a plot that was hatched in the Oval Office.
Barack Obama was there.
He's probably protected by the Supreme Court ruling regarding presidential immunity, but Joe Biden was in on it.
Susan Rice was in on it.
John Brennan was the ringleader.
James Comey, the FBI director, was in on it.
Andrew McCabe was in on it, and so on.
This is treason, in my opinion.
There's no statute of limitations on the crime of treason.
And then yesterday, we learned that the FBI hid a very substantial number of documents and data under a secret classification.
And therefore, I think it's safe to assume that John Durham, whose report kind of proved everything I just said, but lacked a lot of colorful detail, probably never had these documents.
We don't know if the Inspector General of the Justice Department had these documents, but John Brennan, for example, in my opinion, I wrote a piece on this last week, he's guilty of treason.
He should be tried for treason.
He should be charged with treason.
There is—and I just hung up with my lawyers.
I'm contacting the FBI to see what among these documents may pertain to me and was not provided to my defense attorneys at trial, which they have an obligation under discovery to do.
So the other problem you have, though, Harrison, is if you indicted any of those people I just named, including Hillary Clinton, Jake Sullivan, John Podesta, because they were all— They all committed crimes as well.
If you indicted them in the District of Columbia, they would get acquitted.
No Democrat, no partisan case will be fairly decided there.
You may remember that the Special Counsel John Durham did end up indicting a guy named Sussman, Michael Sussman.
He was at the very, very bottom of the totem pole in the Russian collusion hoax.
Indicting Michael Sussman is like indicting the guy who drove the getaway car for double parking and letting the bank robbers get away.
And even he, they couldn't even get a conviction against him.
So you will get no justice in the District of Columbia, not assuming federal prosecutors.
If Kash Patel determines that there are crimes, and I think that's pretty clear, then the Justice Department would have to determine how and where to charge these people.
harrison smith
Oh, and it's just, you're exactly right.
I mean, it's almost impossible to even describe the level of malfeasance that took place here, because it wasn't just the Russia collusion hoax, knowing, I mean, the dossier they knew was fake, and yet they used it to get the FISA court warrant spying on, I mean, literal treason, and then the cover-up on top of that, which is a whole other host of crimes.
Does this have to do with the—we played the clip, Dan Bongino saying we found a room, a room that the FBI tried to hide with us.
Is this—was that part of this discovery?
roger stone
That is the beginning of this story, that on day two, they clarify it as there was a very specific place where the documents were hidden in their computer system where not everybody could see it, done quite purposely.
Look, in my own case— My lawyers asked for Robert Mueller's final unredacted report, and the judge denied it to us.
She said she would read the report in her chambers and give us the portions that were relevant to Roger Stone.
She left out the part that we learned about on December 23rd, 2020, when a federal judge finally ruled that the DOJ had to release the whole thing, in which Robert Mueller admitted that he found no evidence of Russian collusion.
WikiLeaks collaboration, or for that matter, any other crime against me.
So, but of course, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Associated Press, none of them have ever reported that.
So why did they try to destroy me?
There was no Russian collusion for me to lie about.
And if the charge was lying under oath to Congress, well, there's a long line ahead of me, Dr. Anthony Fauci, Hillary Clinton.
James Comey, John Brennan.
The difference being, they lied under oath about material matters.
A misstatement that doesn't hide any underlying crime, a misstatement that has no motive, therefore an honest misstatement, is not a violation of the False Statements Act.
So I think most people, if you watch InfoWars, you know.
I was really charged, not because I did something wrong, but to pressure me.
into testifying against Donald Trump.
After spending $30 million to investigate the Russian connection and finding nothing whatsoever, they wanted me to be the ham in their ham sandwich, and I refused to do that, refused to lie.
By the way, I had already passed two polygraph tests pertaining to all of this.
So it is an outrageous Dirty trick.
It's a massive abuse of power.
It makes Watergate look like small-time stuff.
The only thing that comes close in terms of the size of the scandal, Harrison, is the cover-up of Joe Biden's cognitive condition.
harrison smith
Right.
And, I mean, these guys clearly don't seem to have very much fear of paying the price.
I mean, you've got James Comey tweeting out an assassination threat.
Essentially, to Donald Trump.
The next day, you know, he's on TV going, ah, that was nothing.
And by the way, the FBI really needs to be concerned about how they're being politicized.
Everything is a projection with them.
They have politicized, you know, persecution against yourself, Owen Troyer, so many other people we know on our side.
They're the ones who literally, I mean, the most egregious violation of the fundamentals of democracy ever with the Russia collusion hoax.
Everything they do is projection, but they seem...
I mean, they don't even seem concerned that they'll ever be brought to justice, despite the immense amounts of crimes we know they've committed.
How do we get justice?
What do we need to do to strike, you know, the fear of justice into them?
Because they seem completely untouchable at this point.
roger stone
What you say is entirely true.
I watched John Brennan.
John Brennan, an admitted communist, admitted under oath.
John Brennan, who got caught red-handed spying on a Senate committee that was investigating his illegal use of torture.
John Brennan, who sources say, credible sources say, Actually converted to radical Wahhabism when he was the station chief in Rinna.
John Brennan, who sent a list of 26 individuals who were friends or associates of Donald Trump, including myself, to British, Canadian, New Zealand, and Australia intelligence, asking them to spy on us, to bump us, as they say, so that he would have deniable plausibility.
I mean, I I'm appalled that Tulsi Gabbard is firing members of the national security staff who are not loyal to Donald Trump or his vision and who are leaking like a sim.
I'm appalled that John Brennan's not in prison, to be honest with you.
unidentified
Right.
harrison smith
I am too.
Comey's another one.
I mean, he was a ringleader here.
Do we need to go back to Lisa Page and Peter Strzok?
I mean, they're admitting in their own text messages what they were involved in.
And this, I think, is like the overwhelming frustration.
It's like we have them all.
We have them all in their own words admitting what they did.
So like, what more do we need?
He keeps going out and killing.
We have all the evidence and they just won't arrest him.
And we just have to sit here and keep reporting on his crimes.
What is it going to take?
How many more investigations do they need to do?
Is it purely political, the barriers, the obstacles to getting justice in any one of these cases?
roger stone
I wish that I could answer your question, but I don't know the answer.
One of the barriers clearly is, and I think this is a If you charge any of those people in D.C., they'll get acquitted.
The facts, the Constitution, the evidence, the record, the rules, none of these things matter in D.C. None of them.
In fact, in my case, I was never even allowed to mount a defense.
All defenses that I anticipated the judge would disallow.
So there may be a calculation that it would be more politically damaging to try these people.
And have them be acquitted because of the rigged nature of the trial in D.C. But even when they do get caught, take this FBI direct agent, Charles McGonigal.
He was central to the Russian collusion hoax.
He was one of the main perpetrators.
He got caught taking bribes from a Russian oligarch.
And they charged him for that narrow crime.
But if you look at it, So in the end, he gets what amounts to a slap on the wrist.
Look, I have a lot of confidence in Kash Patel.
I know him very well.
I do think these things take time.
I recognize a lot of our people are impatient.
I myself am impatient.
But at the end of the day, the only act I see here is
and the lenders made $40 million in That's the only place where I see any of these people being held responsible.
No place else in the federal government is anyone else being held responsible.
harrison smith
Yeah, it's infuriating.
And again, I am one of these people that's so impatient about this.
And it gives me some level of reassurance that people like yourself are – trust these guys and think they're working towards the right ends.
But it's like to me this is sort of an existential – Do we even have the ability to decide who represents us or not?
And if they're able to just sort of delay and push things back for Trump's administration, I mean, this seems like the last chance to me.
This seems like the last chance we have to regain control of this deep state that has so flagrantly violated our fundamental values and laws.
And I admit, I'm very impatient.
So, I mean, what do you—do you think we're— That Trump's going to be able to pull it off?
Is he going to be able to get some of these people behind bars or at least pull them from the power that they still obviously exert like James Comey?
Again, he seems just utterly confident in his ability to do whatever the hell he wants and he's not going to pay the price for it.
Is Trump going to be able to pull this off in this term?
roger stone
First of all, the president's got quite a bit on his plate and I think he's doing extraordinarily well at his most important focus, which is not having World War III.
I would say that's a higher priority.
than recalibrating the scales of justice for those who hold off the Russian collusion hoax.
Not that that's not important, but the president is just working very hard to avert a world war, both in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict and also in the Middle East.
And his speech in Saudi Arabia...
No more nation building.
This was a slap in the face to the neocons.
At the same time, he's got to rebuild our economy, particularly in time for the midterm elections, because I don't need to tell you this.
If the Democrats retake the House, then you're going to see the same fake investigations, impeachment motions and so on.
Right back where we started from.
So the president...
Now, those who say, oh, you guys just want revenge, this is about retaliation.
No, what we want is one single justice system, not a two-tier justice system, where there are different rules for Roger Stone than there are for Anthony Fauci.
Who I'm convinced is perhaps the greatest mass murderer in history.
Anthony Fauci lied under oath in the U.S. Senate when asked about gain-of-function funding coming from the United States to the Wuhan lab.
That is a fact.
That is a serious material crime.
Congressman, pardon me, Senator Rand Paul is absolutely correct.
He should be prosecuted for that.
harrison smith
Absolutely.
And of course, when it comes to I mean, there's a reason that they went with Russia collusion.
I mean, they were trying to drive Trump away from Russia when he tried to look into what was happening in Ukraine.
That was when the first impeachment came about.
So, I mean, the situation we're in now is only possible because of what they pulled off during 2016 and driving him away from Russia.
And, I mean, clearly that was their intention to start war with Russia and did a lot of this in service of that.
I know, again, we don't have too much longer with you, and I appreciate you coming on today.
And, of course, I didn't even mention people can, of course, find your website, stonezone.com, and follow Roger Stone on X at Roger J. Stone Jr.
The Big Beautiful Bill, can we talk about that for a second?
Because there's a lot of division.
Elon Musk called it abominable.
Rand Paul, Thomas Massey, not for it.
But a lot of other MAGA supporters say this is the way we get the wall, this is the way we get the deportations.
What's your breakdown of the Big Beautiful Bill as it stands now?
roger stone
I'm a strong supporter of the big, beautiful bill.
I don't think it's perfect.
It really isn't structurally the right place to do spending reduction.
The tax cuts are absolutely crucial.
If the tax cuts are not renewed in January, then America will get a 68% increase in federal taxes, the largest single tax increase in American history.
And tax cutting, tax regulation, pardon me, tax reduction is one of the key elements of the president's plan.
Also, of course, we do away with the tax on tips, the tax on Social Security.
We have a tax credit for those who buy a vehicle, a car, or a truck made in the United States.
There's a lot of important stuff in there, and therefore I'm for the big, beautiful bill.
Now, it does not go far enough in terms of spending reduction.
Elon Musk has done a brilliant idea of proving that this is not some abstract theory, but he identified it not millions, not billions, but trillions of waste, fraud, and corruption.
These need to be done in rescission bills.
They're sending the first one up.
It's $94.8 billion, which sounds like a lot of money, but it doesn't.
It would knock out the outrageous spending and expenditures by USAID, which has become just a slush fund for the deep state, for which they pay for all kinds of crazy things.
Revolutions abroad, color revolutions in other countries, $130 million to the New York Times.
That's a lot of subscriptions, isn't it?
harrison smith
Yeah.
And again, just a drop in the bucket to the full scale and scope of the waste that we know goes on continually.
And I guess the biggest frustration to me is not even with Trump.
It's not with Elon.
I get the pressure that they're under and the things they're having to deal with.
It's the Congress.
It's the congressman.
I mean, we gave them the House, we gave them the Senate, and they seem incapable of doing anything for the American people.
What can we do as citizens to get them to realize the situation that we're in, that we're in an existential fight for the fate of America, and they're sitting there twiddling their thumbs and bickering over God knows what, or it's Lindsey Graham in Ukraine trying to start war with Russia.
I mean, what do we have to do to get through to these people?
Is it even possible?
roger stone
You raised an excellent point.
So here's something we don't know.
If Lindsey Graham and Senator Richard Brumenthal, the hero of the Vietnam War, lied about seeing combat there, if they urged Zelensky not to go to the table or not to negotiate for peace, well, then I would argue that they are guilty of violation of the Logan Act.
And no, there's no special immunity for U.S. senators.
The Logan Act applies to every U.S. citizen.
Now, notice I said if.
We don't know the substance of their conversations.
But if they urged him not to negotiate peace, they'd be in violation of that law and they could be prosecuted.
There's a perfect example.
Our problem here lies in the fact that we have control of the House by three seats.
And therefore, any three members can bollocks the entire works by voting a speaker saying, I won't vote for this unless I get that.
So we really need to do two things.
One, we have to make it clear to those rhino establishment Republicans who will not get behind the America First agenda that they are going to face primaries in 2026.
Let's start with Tom Tillis, for example, the guy who torpedoed the nomination of Ed Martin, who would have been terrific as the U.S. attorney for D.C. He should face a primaries.
And the president, frankly, in my opinion, should put his political machine, his political muscle behind that challenge.
If a senator gets away with betraying the president, then pretty soon every senator believes they can do that with impunity.
But we have problems within our own party in the sense that in the House caucus, half the members are establishment Republicans who don't really want to do anything, Harrison.
They just want to get reelected and go home.
That's all they want.
And then you have fire breathers like Anna Paulina Luna and Tim Burchett and others who want to burn the place down correctly, want to reform the system radically.
And if you're Mike Johnson, you've got to get a majority to do anything.
unidentified
Thank you.
harrison smith
Yeah, and again, what doesn't make any sense to me is even for their own Political future, what are they doing?
Like Tom Tillis or Lindsey Graham or any of these guys, it's like, how do they not see the shifting winds, the way that the American populace is feeling?
Even if they're just full of themselves and want power to themselves, they're doing everything they can to drive their voters away and they're going to be removed from office if they don't get their act right.
I'm glad more and more people are making that threat, including Elon Musk, including Ken Paxton, including a lot of other people running against them.
All I can say is that I feel like we've done enough.
I feel like Roger Stone and Alex Jones, we've suffered enough and gone through the trials to get these people in power, and now we have to sit and watch them waste our time.
It's incredibly frustrating.
Roger Stone, as always, thank you so much for being with us.
So glad you could carve us out of your very busy schedule.
The website, stonezone.com.
Follow Roger on X at Roger J. Stone Jr.
Thank you for being here, Roger.
roger stone
Great to be here, Harrison.
God bless you.
harrison smith
God bless you.
We'll be right back, folks.
unidentified
Don't go anywhere.
harrison smith
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
unidentified
We've got time for a few more phone calls here.
harrison smith
We've got some empty lines if you want to call in.
1-877-789-2539.
We'll go out to those in just a second.
Jackson in Virginia will be first.
But I want to, honestly, I want to read this whole, It's the answer to the question, why is it that when there is a racial conflict of some sort, Why is it that the relations of the white victim immediately come out and try to downplay the racial aspects of the crime that was committed?
Obviously, Austin Metcalf stabbed and killed by Carmelo Anthony.
And the next day, his dad is out there.
Austin Metcalf's dad is trying to say, don't make this about race.
Don't.
unidentified
And basically sort of jubilates.
harrison smith
Clearly, this is an aspect of the conflict that deserves investigation.
And yet every time it seems, you've got the white family coming out and using very similar words, very similar phrases.
To try to downplay what's going on.
Well, there's a organization, there's a branch of the government that a lot of people haven't heard of, and Oren McIntyre lays it out here.
Academic Agent X dropped a bombshell report about a secretive agency with the job of silencing Americans and covering up anti-white violence.
Let's talk about the Community Relations Service.
The Community Relations Service, CRS, was formed under Title X of the 1964 CRA.
And it has a level of confidentiality similar to the FBI.
Virtually nothing CRS agents do is entered into the Republic record.
The CRS is basically immune to the Freedom of Information Act requests.
All notes drafted by CRS agents are destroyed, and those agents may invoke confidentiality privilege for both Congress and the courts, which they have done previously.
This is a bizarre level of secrecy for an agency that's theoretically geared towards community relations.
The CRS is not a neutral organization.
They're explicitly charged by the government with furthering the political goals of the civil rights movement.
These goals have included increasing black representation, transgender youth visibility, and planting mosques in Christian towns.
The purpose of the CRS, as described by one of its founders, Bertram Levine, was to prevent white backlash to the CRA, the Civil Rights Act.
The CRS helped to found groups like the Southern Christian Leadership Conference to harass, quote, lily white towns and organize mass demonstrations.
The CRS was involved in the forced integration of Catholic communities in Boston, and when 17-year-old Michael Faith was stabbed in 1974, CRS was on the scene immediately not to help the victim or protect the community, but to prevent white students from fighting back.
The CRS repeatedly threatened to pull the FCC license of local news stations unless they affirmative action hired black anchors.
They also produced propaganda films with big stars like Bill Cosby.
The CRS was involved in guiding and downplaying race riots.
In 1965, they worked with black leaders like Franklin Florence, who was a student of Saul Alinsky.
The goal was to allow rioting, but control it so it didn't escalate to the level where white residents would react.
And I think that is an extremely important point.
They aren't there to stop the rioting.
They're there to stop the rioting from going so far that there's a reaction.
And if you look at the plan of the globalists, that's basically it in a nutshell.
It's how do we destroy these nations without doing so to such a degree that the people in the nations fight back against us.
Like, that's it.
If you want to ask what the globalists are doing, why they do things the way they do it, it's that function.
It's that algorithm that they run.
How far can we push it?
Before it's too far.
Because they know that if they went far enough, the American people, as well-armed as we are, as patriotic as we are, with the streak of rebellion in our DNA, we could put an end to it.
So they know they've got to push the limit without exceeding it.
They've got to go just far enough to tear us apart from the inside out without doing so in such a way that makes us angry and makes us put a stop to them.
The CRS coordinated with law enforcement and used carefully placed propaganda to prevent many white residents from reacting to multiple black riots across American cities from 67 through 72. The CRS also set up Operation Rumor Control, which still operates to this day.
Rumor Control.
It manipulates local media sources to control reporting on the damage done during riots and downplay the role of civil rights leaders in instigating them.
Fiery but peaceful, remember.
The CRS is responsible for stage managing the entire Trayvon Martin incident, including parading the family before Congress, carefully managing protests in Stanford, Florida, training activists, and astroturfing progressive organizations like Dream Defenders.
CRS was critical in increasing effectiveness of movements like Black Lives Matter.
They train left-wing activists through a program called Marshall Training, coordinate the distribution of supplies from water to jumbotrons, and coordinate media coverage to ensure good optics.
The CRS has a playbook to manage and create spontaneous protests across the U.S. in favor of all manner of left-wing causes, including Black Lives Matter marches in Ferguson, pride events in small conservative North Carolina towns, and protests against Columbus Day in Colorado.
And you've seen the pattern.
A white victim is killed by a minority assailant.
Family members come out and make gratuitous and obviously scripted statements downplaying the racial motivation on camera.
The spokesman calls for fogginess and forgiveness, I think he's saying, and peace.
Condemn anyone who would use the incident as a rallying point.
The common script is not an accident.
It's coordinated by the CRS.
The spokesman is usually an older male who encourages everyone to focus on the character of the victim, not the horrific nature of the attack or the motivations of the attacker.
Baby Gravy 9, Roy Ignatialis, documented such an event after the murder of Donald Guisti, who was killed by two Somalis.
There's evidence that not only did CRS stage manage the response to Guisti's murder, but they were responsible for the resettling of Somalis in Lewiston, Maine, where the victim was from since at least 2004 when they started moving there.
The quick response to Guzzi's murder occurred because CRS was already on the ground, playing an active role in manipulating and controlling the community response to importation of Somalis.
Remember, documentation can be hard to find because the CRS is immune to FOIA requests and congressional investigations under Title X of the CRA.
But there's hard evidence that they've been involved in coordinating response to riots and murders for decades.
The Trump administration has expressed interest in dismantling the CRS, and they have the power to do so.
I'm calling on Donald Trump and J.D. Vance to take action and end this heinous agency's manipulation of the American people.
And this comes from an original video from Academic Agent X. And of course, it's not just the CRS that does this.
There's a variety of so-called NGOs, which of course all get their funding from the federal government in the first place.
But they come in and stage manage this sort of stuff.
And again, it's not about preventing the crime from happening or getting justice for the crime.
It's about making sure that there's not political outrage to actually solve the problems that are leading to these crimes.
So I think it's an extremely important point.
I think at the very least, you could perhaps remove some of their protections, remove some of the ability that they have to classify their activity.
I think this is an outrageous PSYOP campaign by the federal government, and it's led us to where we are now because there's – You know, and again, I mean, this just goes to everything that we talk about where white people are, have been psyoped into like not even recognizing that they're under attack and actually, you know, being in support of it.
And again, it's, I don't know, it's easy for me to look at this objectively.
But it seems impossible for most people.
Let's go to clip number one here.
This is in the UK, because again, this is happening across every Western country.
It's not just America that's engaged in this sort of stuff.
But even in just the very beginning of this video, we won't play the whole thing because I do want to go to calls, but it's a, I believe it's a member of parliament in the UK talking about the rape gang prosecutions that were prevented from happening because of the race of the people involved.
And again, I think our audience probably aligns with me in genuinely just being baffled, utterly baffled, nonplussed even, at how people treat race when it comes to crime.
Let's go to clip number one.
unidentified
For many years, the rape gang scandal was covered up because people were scared to say that the majority of perpetrators were of Pakistani origin.
harrison smith
Let's just pause it right there.
That alone is such a crazy statement.
They were afraid of prosecuting a crime because the people committing the crime were Pakistani.
I know it's obvious.
I know this is something that we deal with literally every single day.
But do you ever think about that?
Do you ever just stop and think about the fact that they're willing to let little girls be raped in a systematic fashion?
Rather than be called racist, when it's not even racist, it's just who they are.
It's just, okay, who did the crime?
That guy.
Well, that guy's Pakistani, so therefore we can't punish it.
Like, it's so wild.
Like, it's so baffling.
It just does not make sense that this is the way that our minds have been programmed to work.
It's insane.
It is completely insane.
They let a million British girls That's what that means.
Because they were Pakistani, if it had been white people, it would have been shut down immediately.
They had the capability.
They had all the evidence they needed.
They knew how it was happening.
They let it occur because to them, letting a million British girls be raped systematically was preferable to being called a racist.
If that's not at the heart of every issue that we deal with, Yeah, I don't know.
I don't know how we got here.
All I know is we got to get over it.
We got to get over that fear.
You got to just do the right thing.
And again, this is what I mean when it's like the ideology screws everything up.
Because to me, you treat all these things independently and objectively and you say, these guys are bad because they were doing rape gangs.
Oh, but they're Pakistani.
Okay.
And so what?
Punish them.
Lock them up.
What are you talking about?
It's mind-blowing that this is the case.
And then the other side is like, see, so all Pakistanis are bad.
We should kill all the brown people who are evil.
And it's like, what are we doing here?
Just treat it like a crime that was committed and that the people committed it need to be punished.
Is this really impossible for us to grasp?
Is this impossible for us to do?
I don't care.
About the identity.
I just want justice.
I don't care about the ethnicity of the people doing the bombing.
I want the genocide to stop.
Like, can we just treat these things as if they exist in a vacuum and just solve these problems?
It's so utterly infuriating and we can't do it largely because we have these federal programs going out there, warping everybody's perception and framing things in a way that makes it impossible for justice to be achieved because it gets...
At the end of the day, the guy killed the other guy, and that's all you need to know, right?
This guy stabbed that guy.
Oh, but their races are different.
It doesn't matter.
Except that in the races, I mean, the people are donating to the guy who stabbed the other guy, and now we have a really big issue because suddenly it's ideological.
It's infuriating.
It's persistent.
Never ending and we just need to free ourselves from these mental shackles that keep us from doing just obviously good, right, just things.
That's my take on it.
So CRS, abolish it or at the very least strip them of their ability to act in complete secrecy and open them to FOIA requests so we can see what's really been behind the manipulation of the racial conflicts in this country to bring us to the point where we are now.
With that we go to Jefferson in Virginia.
I want to talk about the Golden Dome.
The Great Golden Dome.
Go ahead, Jefferson.
You're on the air.
unidentified
Hey, thanks, Harrison.
You know, it's amazing.
I was just on X, and you were talking about the very thing I stumbled upon, the CRS service.
It's amazing.
back in 1964, they knew they were going to need to have a secret sort of police that would go around and intimidate local news stations and stuff and tell them they needed to not report on the rioting in a way that caused people to actually react to it.
But anyway, But what happened to John Ratcliffe, the CIA director?
Where is he?
jefferson in virginia
We have this attack on the Russian triad, nuclear triad, and somehow the Ukrainians pulled this off, and our CIA didn't know anything about it.
harrison smith
Yeah, I doubt that.
I doubt that.
I mean, apparently the White House didn't know about it, but that's kind of a big issue, isn't it?
unidentified
That's a huge issue.
And I'm really kind of surprised that John Ratcliffe hasn't been called into the Oval Office where Trump says to him, what did you know?
When did you know it?
Why didn't I know about it?
Well, what is the point of having a national intelligence director if you guys don't talk to each other and tell me what you're talking about?
This is a bigger story that we're all sort of missing right now.
Mike Flynn is on top of it, and it needs to be spoken about more often.
They're sort of leaving Trump out of the loop and trying to drag us into some sort of major conflict over Ukraine.
Ukraine's losing, and they're just lashing out with these desperate attacks that are just going to cause potential escalations that make them drag us all into something we don't want to engage in.
harrison smith
Yeah.
Well, that seems to be the ultimate goal.
I mean, if they wanted this to end, it would have ended a long time ago.
It's suicidal as far as I can tell.
But, you know, hey, there's infinite numbers of third-worlders to replace all the Ukrainian dead, so I guess the powers that be aren't actually that concerned with the level of death that they're creating.
It's brutal and horrific beyond explanation.
Anything else, Jefferson?
unidentified
No, how many Indians are going to migrate to Ukraine to repopulate that country when this war is over?
harrison smith
Well, there's an infinite number of them.
Like, you need to understand what these populations are capable of.
I mean, they could literally replace every single person.
If every single person in America of any race, color, and creed was replaced with an Indian person, and every single person in Canada...
There would still be a billion people in India.
There's 1.4 billion Indians.
There's 400 million Americans and Canadians combined.
You could take 400 million Indians away from India.
They'd still have a billion people there.
Do we understand what it means when you're opening up immigration in an uncontrolled, unrestricted fashion to this level of population?
It just means that they could take over the whole world By just moving.
I mean, no one's trying to stop them.
So, we should try to stop them, I guess is what I'm saying.
It's completely insane.
Thank you for the call, Jefferson.
Let's go to Andrew in Missouri now.
Andrew in Missouri wants to talk about government corruption.
Go ahead, Andrew.
unidentified
Hi, what's going on?
I want to talk about some local government corruption, if possible.
harrison smith
Go ahead.
All right, we'll come back.
All right, go ahead, Andrew.
You're on the air.
unidentified
I wanted to go over local government corruption.
I had actually called out my local government for not having, like, owners or bonds on record and working with NGOs to help with the 15-minute city thing where they were moving people who had illegally crossed the border into our town using the archdiocese and non-profit groups to put up, like, assisted living, assisted housing, and the government-assisted housing.
Where they were using the federal government to pay for their housing.
And what they're doing is they're using church groups and church organizations and NGOs to work their way in to each county.
And while the counties are doing this, they're letting banks pop on the county record and grab people's properties with like a notary stamp.
And they're committing fraud on the county record using the MERGE system, which stands for Mortgage Electronic Registration System.
And they're using that system to illegally go on the county record and take people's property.
Basically, some LLC will pop up, say they're a debt collector, and say now you owe a full loan mortgage.
harrison smith
And they kick people off their land and then take it over to build low-income housing there?
unidentified
Yes.
And they do it in mainly populated areas, and it's like a game of attrition.
So it's a 10-15 year period where they slowly inflate the property value to then tax you out of your house.
How they do that is they go around with the city assessors.
And each year they inflate it a little bit more so they make a little bit more money.
So each time, if you're an older person on a fixed income, what that does is it changes your income amount for the year.
And sometimes it's like so bad to where over the last five years, like my property itself has went over $100,000 more than what I purchased before.
Right.
harrison smith
And then, of course, that also will tempt you to sell it because, you know, you'll – Why pay crushing property tax when you can just sell it for a profit?
It's a way of squeezing you and getting you to give up your property while seeming to do something good for you.
unidentified
And then I found out while I was digging on the county record that none of these, uh, uh, uh, city employees or the elected officials actually have O's and bonds registered with the state on the UCC with the secretary of state.
Uh, the UCC stands for, That's where every city official, public official, anybody who's elected into office that deals with the people's money, that's where they're supposed to be registered at.
And I can guarantee most of the counties are not.
And this isn't just my county.
This is every county across the United States.
harrison smith
Yeah, I believe it.
I mean, the corruption is widespread.
That's absolutely true.
Thank you for the call, Andrew.
Very disturbing stuff.
Let's go to Mark in California now, online one.
Go ahead, Mark.
You're on the air.
unidentified
Great.
Hey, it's great talking to you again.
A quick note, because you guys are like the best investigative reporters.
I mean, Italy, Syria.
Here you're talking about the UK.
just outstanding work.
They used to have a mechanic investigate a car, and then they would go to the repair shop, and this guy would say, oh, no, this car needs like $1,000 in repairs.
But you guys are the number one investigative reporters.
I mean, you go to any news station, you could find out what the weather is in any place.
But you guys...
And that's my point.
Here in California, we were told, and it's all over the Internet, that we had a $73 billion deficit.
Now that's huge, $73 billion.
Now here, May of 2025, we're told that we only have a $12 billion deficit.
So our governor is so amazing that he was able to reduce our deficit by $61 billion in 14 months.
Could you explain to me how he did this?
Is this kind of like the Kennedy magic bullet or what happened here?
harrison smith
I think the crew just whispered in my ear.
I think we figured it out.
It's not that it went from 73 to 12. It's that there's an additional.
$12 billion budget deficit.
I think it's the opposite of what you're saying.
It's California faces an additional $12 billion budget deficit, Newsom says.
So I think instead of going from 71 to 12, it's gone from 71 to 83, which isn't good, but may explain the difference there.
Does that explain it?
unidentified
Nobody's covering that.
Nobody's saying we got an $83 billion deficit.
harrison smith
Wild.
That is absolutely insane.
Yeah, I mean, California is just being torn apart.
Now it's gone viral, the report that Matt Baker actually broke on our show the other day where San Diego just arbitrarily changed the laws about parking, that you're not allowed to park 15 feet from a curb or from the corner, but the curbs aren't marked to show that.
And so people don't know that they're parking illegally, so they're getting tickets, and they're just doing all of these little minimized, And I guess it's to pay off the massive budget you guys have for all the wonderful government services you enjoy.
You know how your streets are clean and your beaches are lovely and there's no crime or homeless there.
I mean, you've got to pay for that, right?
Right?
This is the crazy part.
Yeah, drivers beware.
New parking law impacts 16,000 San Diego intersections, but only 100 have updated signs or red curbs.
So they're still writing tickets for people that park illegally, but there's no signs telling them that they're parking illegally.
And they changed this law without letting anybody know in order to raise some extra funds.
Because you need all those funds to deal with all the problems that the government has created.
Because your streets are flooded with homeless.
The drug problem's out of control.
The illegal immigration problem is destroying small businesses.
The beaches are having to be closed because you can't afford those apparently.
But somehow you're still $83 billion in debt.
unidentified
Yeah.
harrison smith
Make it make sense.
No, it doesn't.
It's all just blatant corruption, graft, and manipulation.
Destroying America from the inside out.
All we can do is tell you about it.
And encourage our audience to take action, get political, get involved, and rectify some of this stuff because it's not going to be done without you.
Stay tuned, folks.
The Alex Jones Show begins in 90 seconds.
unidentified
Don't go anywhere.
kirk elliott
I'm not the kind of guy that gives warnings, but this is the first time since 2008 that I think this is a warning.
This is the biggest financial news that I think the world has seen in decades.
Since the 1980s, Japan has been the financer of global growth with something called the yen carry trade.
They had like zero interest rates, artificially keeping them low.
You could borrow the yen at zero.
If you're a central bank or a hedge fund or any kind of massive monetary, you know, financial institution, and invested in European treasuries, maybe getting 3%, right?
So that's what funded the stock market growth globally.
The inflation in Japan has gotten so much that they're forced to raise interest rates.
The global financing of all of the global equity growth is basically losing its number one capital injector.
So let's put it into the context of America.
Here's the problem.
You've got insurance companies that own 90% of their portfolio in bonds.
And so the U.S. bond market is collapsing.
If you were to take a chart of the U.S. bond market and the Japanese bond market, overlay them on top of each other, Alex, they look almost exactly the same.
That's an ugly negative, though, Alex.
But what's the positive?
The precious metals markets are telling us something.
They're telling us that there's a flight for quality that's starting to happen.
Every fundamental thing that we're looking at right now is causing gold and silver to go up.
alex jones
Absolutely, Kirk.
You're the guy.
That's why you're number one.
We love you and we appreciate you.
And it's frightening to me.
That almost every other gold company out there is ripping people off with numismatics.
And it's pure BS, not with these folks.
They want to learn about you, and it's all completely transparent.
Right now, ladies and gentlemen, give them a call.
720-605-3900.
Kirk Elliott, Precious Metals, KPM.com.
Export Selection