Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| These people are devil-worshipping pedophiles. | ||
| And they've got their operatives everywhere who are spiritually ignited and spiritually energized against us. | ||
| And they're in the banks, they're in the police departments, they're in the law firms, they're in the universities, they're in the schools, they're everywhere. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because when you have this type of consolidation, apostasy is much easier when people band together. | |
| The whole Tower of Babel episode needs to be understood in the light of Genesis 3.15. | ||
| The devil in this story is trying to consolidate humanity in open rebellion against God to destroy the holy line, to totally corrupt and demoralize the world so that the promised Messiah who would crush the serpent's head would not be able to come. | ||
| In one great apostate united system against God, you might call this a new world order. | ||
| One like Vladimir Putin has now upset this balance of the new world order that they were trying to achieve by going into Ukraine. | ||
| The French government, and you know they're doing this just to hold Apple hostage and get a bunch of money. | ||
| They're not doing it because they care. | ||
| Maybe the scientists do, but not the government itself. | ||
| Because, oh my god, the new iPhone has way more radiation than the other ones, so do these droids, and it's causing massive illnesses and cancer in rats. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because it has been ordered to pull its iPhone 12 from the market in France. | |
| A government agency there says the gadget produces a radiation level that is too high in some cases. | ||
| The test found when the phone is in a person's pocket or held close to the body, it emits nearly two watts per kilogram more than what's allowed by European countries. | ||
| Recently, Consumer Reports in the United States advised that nobody keep a phone in their pocket. | ||
| And this is just a little simulation here of the radiation as it's moving. | ||
| And one of the things we know is that the dielectric constant of the penis and the testes is rather high because they're full of fluid. | ||
| The more fluid in a part of the body, the higher its absorption will be. | ||
| And this is just a simple illustration of the dose to the gonads and the bone marrow. | ||
| And that is why, in fact, this is one of the secrets of cell phones. | ||
| They are always tested in a holster. | ||
| Yeah, because it's 5G enabled. | ||
| Now, we already had the studies 10 years ago. | ||
| They were studying 5G that it's way worse than regular cell phone radiation. | ||
| Normal cell phone radiation from the towers and the phones causes massive brain tumors, massive breakage of DNA. We've been spending years covering all that. | ||
| It's a fact. | ||
| Here's Wired Magazine. | ||
| 5G smartphones cause cancer. | ||
| Big wireless doesn't want you to know. | ||
| Mind control by cell phone. | ||
| Scientific American. | ||
| And then they can put over different wavelengths to actually control your brain with the carrier that's on it, developed by the DARPA and the CIA. Doctors says children particularly vulnerable, the dangers of 5G. 5G danger. | ||
| Hundreds of respected scientists sound the alarm about health effects of 5G networks go up nationwide. | ||
| Cancer cluster at California elementary school results in removal of Sprint Shell Tower. | ||
| Even the teachers are dying. | ||
| It's like saying, do you smoke light, filtered cigarettes, or do you inhale cigars? | ||
| You're going to get lung cancer quicker inhaling cigars than smoking light cigarettes. | ||
| They're still both bad. | ||
| Apple, it's now been caught sending out memos to their employees to cover this up. | ||
| And it's going to be just like cigarettes. | ||
| They knew cigarettes gave you cancer 150 years ago. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Those people that have a 5G phone and thinking, oh, I can just turn off 5G on my phone. | |
| You can't turn off that level of radiation. | ||
| And I've been saying that for so long. | ||
| It's like, you know, there are certain things that that phone carries, certain antennas, certain pulsations that you cannot switch off. | ||
| What we're going to be seeing now is them trying to strip back the regulations. | ||
| They're trying to say, like, Apple needs two weeks to, you know, counter this argument. | ||
| It's all within regulation. | ||
| The regulation, the standard, is to test on the dummy Sam. | ||
| So the damn Sam is literally feeling too radiated by an iPhone 12. That is what's going on. | ||
| The iPhone 12 with the dummy is feeling too much radiation. | ||
| But the average leftist globalist, they don't think second-order, third-order development. | ||
| They're not actually following a dialectic. | ||
| They use dialectics on us, but they don't go by the same rules they have for us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They know how to manipulate. | |
| Welcome to the American Journal. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Tuesday, February 18th, after the date. | |
| We're coming to you live from the InfoWars studios here in Austin, Texas. | ||
| We have a lot to talk about today. | ||
| Major peace conference beginning in Saudi Arabia. | ||
| As, of course, Donald Trump fulfills his promise of... | ||
| At least trying to end the global conflicts that threaten us with nuclear hellfire in World War III. We have a lot to talk about today. | ||
| But I saw something this morning that derailed all of my previous plans. | ||
| Yesterday we took 60 minutes and sort of used that as a roadmap, countering the propaganda, and also knowing that... | ||
| The left is frantic and flailing and desperate right now, and that watching 60 Minutes sort of gives you a playbook of what the Democrats are prioritizing, what the deep state is messaging to its adherents. | ||
| We got something similar today. | ||
| The New York Times came out with a video report about the NPC meme. | ||
| You remember that one, right? | ||
| Like five years ago? | ||
| You remember that really old meme? | ||
| We don't even talk about that much anymore. | ||
| Well, they finally got around to learning about it, and they're trying to teach their followers about it, and it is truly something to behold. | ||
| So I want to go to that. | ||
| The video they put out, 17 minutes. | ||
| So I'm like, do I spend the entire show on this one video? | ||
| Do I go through this one 17-minute video for three full hours? | ||
| Because I absolutely could. | ||
| We'll get through it as much as possible. | ||
| Because again, that's what we're here for. | ||
| That's what we're here to do is combating the Democrat propaganda. | ||
| And I think now maybe our mission needs to be educating sort of like the average boomer normie. | ||
| We forget these people are out there. | ||
| But usually they have a completely inverted view of what Donald Trump is doing or what the Republicans' motives are. | ||
| Now they don't really have anything. | ||
| The mainstream media isn't telling them exactly what to think. | ||
| They're sort of getting a bunch of uncertainty thrown at them. | ||
| I'll show you a video a little later. | ||
| Owen Schroer went to some of the President's Day protests at the Texas Capitol. | ||
| And you get the same sense there. | ||
| Not that this is anything particularly new. | ||
| After all, early on in Trump's presidency, they were holding an impeached Trump rally and could not answer the question, what should he be impeached for? | ||
| They just had no idea. | ||
| Thought they were being attacked when you asked that question. | ||
| Crazy. | ||
| So it's not like that's anything particularly new. | ||
| But there's like a different flavor to it now where they don't even have their talking points. | ||
| Normally you go to one of these things. | ||
| And you can pretty much predict exactly what everybody's going to say. | ||
| They all have exactly the same talking points. | ||
| They call exactly the same people the exact same names. | ||
| This time it's like they don't even have anything to repeat. | ||
| They don't even have any mantras guiding their activism. | ||
| They're just sort of flailing. | ||
| And it's pretty wild. | ||
| So I think this is an opportunity for us. | ||
| Hopefully, I really do hope we could break through some of these people. | ||
| It really is. | ||
| Kind of depressing when you think about what our fellow Americans have lived through for the past 10 years. | ||
| And then knowing that there are still people just walking around out there. | ||
| No idea. | ||
| Just absolutely no idea. | ||
| They're getting COVID vaccines. | ||
| They think it came from a pangolin. | ||
| They think that January 6th was an insurrection. | ||
| I mean, they're walking around. | ||
| In public. | ||
| Believing these things. | ||
| And we have to help them. | ||
| We have to really help them figure out just what's going on in the world around them. | ||
| It's very sad to see them so utterly wrong about everything. | ||
| And you would think that enough just monumental lies being exposed would be enough to shake their faith even just a little bit. | ||
| But no. | ||
| But no, that's not what happens. | ||
| I mean, you would think from Russiagate to COVID. To defund the police. | ||
| I mean, you would think at a certain point they would start asking questions. | ||
| Well, we'll get into it. | ||
| I'll save it for the NPC video. | ||
| Sometimes it just hits you. | ||
| Sometimes it just, you go, look, I know everybody's not maybe as far down the road as I am. | ||
| I get that. | ||
| I don't expect everybody to be, to have 20 years of studying this stuff under their belt and be able to see through it all. | ||
| But like, just not even once, not even once you feel like, Asking the question how these known lies can be spread by the entire media landscape. | ||
| We'll get into it. | ||
| We'll get into it. | ||
| Stay tuned. | ||
| We got a lot of news to cover. | ||
| We got RFK Jr. doing some big things. | ||
| I want to talk about Norm Eisen a little bit today. | ||
| I know Alex talked about him quite a bit yesterday, but I want to sort of give a little history lesson and an overlay, an outlier of exactly who that guy is and what he represents. | ||
| And we have some more European news as well, but let's just get into it. | ||
| to it. | ||
| Here it is, your Daily Dispatch. | ||
| All right, from Bloomberg.com, Russian war, Trump-Putin teams to talk in Saudi on Ukraine as Europe fumes. | ||
| Oh, they're fuming, all right. | ||
| Top U.S. and Russian officials held talks in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday to discuss how to end the war in Ukraine without anyone from Kiev involved, fueling concerns about a rapid push for a deal by two powers that may leave Europe on the sidelines. | ||
| No, Europe has been left on the sidelines. | ||
| They are currently on the sidelines. | ||
| The game is being played. | ||
| The field is peopled by the players in their uniforms. | ||
| Europe, not among them. | ||
| They had a chance to end this war three years ago. | ||
| They didn't take that chance. | ||
| They chose instead to kill hundreds of thousands of people for no established goal. | ||
| So, no, they don't get to participate anymore. | ||
| That's not complicated. | ||
| Shouldn't be confusing. | ||
| Should be a lesson for you. | ||
| And it's funny because they literally don't want peace. | ||
| I mean, Europe doesn't want peace. | ||
| Zelensky doesn't want peace. | ||
| Why would they be a part of the peace talks? | ||
| Why would you invite somebody in who's This stated goal is the opposite of what the talks are trying to achieve. | ||
| This makes no sense. | ||
| They're like, peace? | ||
| We don't want peace. | ||
| We must continue this war. | ||
| It's like, alright, well we're having peace talks. | ||
| We want to be a part of it. | ||
| Peace? | ||
| We want to be a part of the peace? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's like, no. | |
| Just no, no. | ||
| No, no, no. | ||
| Meanwhile, top Social Security official exits after a clash with Musk over Doge data. | ||
| The acting commissioner of the Social Security Administration left her job this weekend after a clash with billionaire Elon Musk's U.S. Doge service over his attempt to access sensitive government records. | ||
| Three people familiar with her departure said Monday. | ||
| Michelle King, who spent several decades at the agency before being named as its acting commissioner last month, left her position Sunday after the disagreement, people said. | ||
| And of course, the numbers of coming out of Social Security are staggering and unbelievable. | ||
| Funny to see the left try to hide what's actually happening. | ||
| Like Elon Musk and Donald Trump said, yeah, we're paying hundreds of people, Social Security, that are 150 years old. | ||
| Totally impossible. | ||
| So people started saying on X, started posting, well, that must be because they operate in this coding language. | ||
| In that case, if you don't have a birth date, then it just resets to the standard date of 1875, and therefore, that would be 150 years. | ||
| So there's not 150-year-old people. | ||
| They just don't know how to read a database. | ||
| They come up with a very plausible-sounding explanation for why there's so many 150. Then they come out with the actual numbers, and it's like, no, that's actually not at all what happened at all, even if that was a good excuse. | ||
| Again, I mean, the Democrats have just absolutely nothing. | ||
| And this is basically how all of their arguments go, where it's like, yeah, Social Security is paying 150-year-old people. | ||
| That doesn't seem right, does it? | ||
| That means they're paying dead people. | ||
| They're paying people that don't exist. | ||
| I mean, somebody who's not them is getting the money. | ||
| It's not good, right? | ||
| They're paying 150-year-old people. | ||
| And they're just like, you idiot. | ||
| You don't even know how to read this database. | ||
| Actually, it's because of this. | ||
| And they're like, no, no, no. | ||
| See, there's this many 120-year-old people, this many 130-year-old people. | ||
| It's just many 140 and this many 150-year-old people. | ||
| It's not just a thing. | ||
| And first of all, the excuse they come up with is, oh no, it's not that there's 150-year-old people. | ||
| It's just that our data bank is utterly broken and constantly says the wrong date. | ||
| It's not that there's fraud going on and that we're paying 150-year-old people. | ||
| It's just that all of the data that we run on is fraudulent and wrong and not correct. | ||
| And for some reason, automatically resets to just the wrong number. | ||
| So it's fine. | ||
| So it's all fine, right? | ||
| No, it's totally fine. | ||
| There's not 150-year-old people. | ||
| It's just the entire system is utterly unreliable, and we have no idea how many people of any age are collecting Social Security, okay? | ||
| So it's fine. | ||
| So it's fine. | ||
| So that's the excuse, first of all. | ||
| Then they're just completely wrong, and then they just... | ||
| Move on like nothing happened. | ||
| They just don't acknowledge that they were completely wrong about whatever they were saying. | ||
| Because they're disinformation artists. | ||
| Again, we'll get back into that, but some of the stuff that we're hearing. | ||
| Something like, apparently, officially, apparently, we are paying Social Security to 390 million people. | ||
| Okay, there's 350 million people total in the country. | ||
| There should be no more than like 75 million people on Social Security. | ||
| There's more people receiving Social Security than there are people in the United States, let alone people over 65 actually able to receive Social Security. | ||
| So the whole system is utterly broken and at a certain point, as Elon Musk likes to say, at a certain point. | ||
| Ineptitude is indistinguishable from fraud and have to be treated the same way. | ||
| We'll get back into that. | ||
| Meanwhile, Hochul weighing whether to remove Eric Adams as mayor. | ||
| The champions of democracy, folks. | ||
| The governor will meet in Manhattan on Tuesday with key leaders to discuss the path forward. | ||
| Ah, yes. | ||
| Just like the founders established. | ||
| As governor, Hochul has the power to remove Adams, who's the mayor of New York City, and says she has come under increasing pressure from fellow Democrats to exercise it amid Adams' numerous scandals, including an alleged quid pro quo with the Justice Department to drop criminal charges against him in exchange for aiding the Trump administration's including an alleged quid pro quo with the Justice Department to drop I mean, what do you even say about this, right? | ||
| Bye. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Is it even worth it to point out what shameless hypocrites the Democrats are? | ||
| Like, does that even matter anymore? | ||
| Is it even a question? | ||
| Every day, all day, all they talk about is democracy, our sacred democracy. | ||
| We have to start a war with Russia for democracy. | ||
| We have to throw Trump in prison for democracy. | ||
| We have to get rid of free speech to save democracy. | ||
| And then they're just constantly engaged in the most flagrantly undemocratic processes you've ever seen. | ||
| The governor just like, I think I'll unilaterally remove the mayor because our lawfare against him didn't work. | ||
| Again, the Democrats do this. | ||
| It's sort of the win-win situation they set up. | ||
| See, they want to destroy somebody for whatever reason, right? | ||
| They're white. | ||
| They're male. | ||
| They're Catholic. | ||
| They're... | ||
| Mayor Eric Adams, and they don't want their city being destroyed by illegals. | ||
| Whatever reason, somebody receives the ire of the Democrats. | ||
| Now, the Democrats, kind of like the Israelis in the way that they deal with their enemies, right? | ||
| There's an extremism there. | ||
| And really, this is pervasive in political conversation. | ||
| These days, we talk about it all the time, where it's like, people are like, Oh, I disagree with that guy. | ||
| Now, me, when I disagree with somebody, that's where it ends. | ||
| I'm like, I disagree with that guy. | ||
| He's kind of dumb. | ||
| He's silly. | ||
| Whatever. | ||
| For Democrats, it's I disagree with that guy. | ||
| I want his children to be fatherless. | ||
| I disagree with that guy. | ||
| He should be killed by an assassin. | ||
| His children should be put in a cage. | ||
| And sexually assaulted by African men while I watch. | ||
| Like, they have this, like, crazy extremism, right? | ||
| So it's like, okay, you disagree with somebody. | ||
| Eric Adams is like, these immigrants are destroying our city. | ||
| We can't afford this. | ||
| And they're like, we have to put him in jail now. | ||
| We have to throw him in jail for life. | ||
| We have to deprive him of his freedom. | ||
| We have to storm his house with a SWAT team, take everything he's ever owned, confiscate all of his communications, and send him to prison immediately. | ||
| He disobeyed us. | ||
| So that's like, that's their own, so somebody disagrees with them, they're like, unleash the hounds, lawfare, find something on him. | ||
| So they launch investigations, they investigate everything he's ever done, ever said, they find anybody close to him and offer them a sweet deal if they can, you know, you can have a sweet position, or maybe, hey, we found you on a different charge, and we're gonna send you to jail if you don't tell us something to help us get Mayor Adams in jail. | ||
| They just... | ||
| It's all hands on deck. | ||
| Find something to destroy this person's life utterly. | ||
| They disagreed with us. | ||
| They disobeyed us. | ||
| See, sometimes that works. | ||
| Sometimes they find something. | ||
| Sometimes you do the investigation and you find evidence and you prosecute it. | ||
| However thin the claim and, hey, sometimes you have to turn a misdemeanor into a felony. | ||
| Sometimes you have to do a little workaround around the... | ||
| Limit, prosecutorial limits that you're supposed to be under. | ||
| You've got to do a lot of underhanded stuff to get it done, and sometimes that works. | ||
| But if it doesn't, then it's okay. | ||
| You haven't lost yet, right? | ||
| You still have a couple options. | ||
| Then you can just release the investigation. | ||
| Sure, you might not have found anything criminal, but you probably found some embarrassing things. | ||
| And even though he was... | ||
| Innocent of the crime you were investigating him for, and he was never even charged, let alone found guilty, you can still release the investigation in order to smear him sort of in the trial by the public and destroy his reputation and life that way. | ||
| So that's a good strategy. | ||
| Now if all of that fails, as it has with Mayor Eric Adams, then you can just... | ||
| Drop all of the pretense about being a democracy or following the rule of law, and you can just have some sort of authority step in and remove him by fiat, and that's just the way it works. | ||
| Now, it gets a little deeper than that. | ||
| That's the main problem with the Democrats, basically, is that they're able to launch these investigations based off absolutely nothing. | ||
| Maybe they find something, maybe they don't. | ||
| Either way, they release the information. | ||
| Benny Johnson and all these people who were investigated because they thought maybe they were foreign agents taking foreign money to spread propaganda. | ||
| They thought that was the case, apparently. | ||
| Totally fake, right? | ||
| It was totally fraudulent in the first place. | ||
| But they investigate. | ||
| They find they're totally innocent, had no reason to be investigated, right? | ||
| If you're innocent, the government doesn't have a right to search through all your stuff and then publish what they find. | ||
| But that's what they did. | ||
| That's what they did. | ||
| It's totally innocent, not convicted of a crime, not even charged with a crime. | ||
| In the investigation, it was proven that they were victims of a crime, but you take everything that you investigated the victim for and you release it in order to smear them in the mainstream media. | ||
| It's just how they do it. | ||
| And if all that fails, then you just have some sort of authority with the ostensible authority to do this, and they step in and remove the person by fiat. | ||
| Now, it's even funnier. | ||
| Has Kathy Hochul been elected? | ||
| I don't actually remember because she wasn't elected originally. | ||
| I mean, this is why when you look at just one story from the Democrats, right? | ||
| Hochul weighing whether to remove Eric Adams as mayor. | ||
| On the face of it, it's like, wow, how undemocratic. | ||
| You're talking about just unilaterally removing a guy because he's friendly with Trump, because Trump is working with him. | ||
| Trump is trying to get you to stop the politicized charges against him. | ||
| I mean, this is just totally disgusting. | ||
| It's an aberration. | ||
| Flagrant attack against our system in like a thousand different ways. | ||
| But then you think about it for a little bit and you're like, okay, Kathy Hochul wasn't even elected. | ||
| She might have been in between now and then, but she was originally appointed because Cuomo was kicked out of office for killing a bunch of old people to boost COVID numbers by sending infected people into nursing homes. | ||
| You look at a Republican scandal and it's just literally non-existent. | ||
| Like, Donald Trump peed in a bed in Russia. | ||
| Like, what is the evidence of that? | ||
| There is none. | ||
| Well, where did the claim come from? | ||
| His political enemies. | ||
| It was a Hillary Clinton smear. | ||
| So what is there to this? | ||
| Absolutely nothing. | ||
| It's just a flagrant lie that they're going to repeat for the next decade. | ||
| That's kind of the structure of a Republican scandal. | ||
| The Democrat scandal, you've got the DEI mayor of New York, who probably is corrupt. | ||
| Getting investigated for not letting legal immigrants destroy a city. | ||
| And then you've got the governor that wasn't elected wanting to remove him. | ||
| The governor originally put in that position because the previous governor basically committed mass murder to achieve his political ends. | ||
| And also didn't have a sexual assault thing. | ||
| He was a sexual assaulter too. | ||
| So that's the type of scandal with Democrats. | ||
| With Republicans, it sounds really bad, and it turns out it just is vapor. | ||
| It just doesn't exist. | ||
| With Democrats, it sounds pretty bad at first. | ||
| Then you think about it, and you're like, wait, this is like nine layers of bad. | ||
| This is the governor who killed people and sexually assaulted people being replaced by an unelected official. | ||
| This unelected official now removing a mayor because he didn't want to, because he actually wanted to allow law enforcement to do their job. | ||
| These people suck. | ||
| I just don't even know what else to say about it other than our country cannot survive with Democrats. | ||
| I don't know what we need to do. | ||
| We got four years and all these people need to be in jail or something. | ||
| I don't know what the solution is. | ||
| But it's only one side. | ||
| There's only one side that is constantly embroiled in stuff like this. | ||
| And it's constant. | ||
| It is constant. | ||
| We don't even cover Because most of it doesn't happen in New York City. | ||
| It just happens in small towns and stuff where Democrats just take over, bankrupt the entire town, start fights in the city hall, and just burn it all and leave. | ||
| And it's just we're left to pick up the pieces. | ||
| It really is constant, and it's like there's something wrong with these people. | ||
| There's a lot of things wrong with these people, and we'll talk about what that is later. | ||
| We're going to get into mental illness quite a bit. | ||
| Meanwhile, Delta Toronto plane crash. | ||
| 18 people injured. | ||
| All 80 aboard survive. | ||
| A plane has flipped over. | ||
| A Delta Airlines plane flipped upon arrival at Toronto's Pearson Airport and ended up on its roof Monday. | ||
| Now, this is interesting because in the last major plane crash, Donald Trump blamed DEI. And people got very mad at him for that, despite the fact that it was directly related to the reason that the crash happened. | ||
| But they were mad because they claimed he didn't have any excuse. | ||
| Now those same people who were mad that Trump blamed DEI for a plane crash are now blaming Trump for a crash that happened in Canada. | ||
| I don't know who needs to hear this. | ||
| Toronto is in Canada. | ||
| Canada, for the time being, not a part of America. | ||
| This was not Trump's fault. | ||
| I saw Morgan Freeman today going, this is Trump's fault for cutting the FAA. Like, really? | ||
| Did you hear a plane crashed in the Congo? | ||
| Was that his fault too? | ||
| A plane went down in China a couple weeks ago. | ||
| Was that also Trump's fault? | ||
| And did you notice that there have been several plane crashes since the one at Reagan International? | ||
| Does anybody care to recognize that Donald Trump has not blamed DEI for those because it... | ||
| It wasn't related to those, and then he blamed DEI for the first one because it was directly related. | ||
| Nobody seems to have noticed that. | ||
| Finally, we have this. | ||
| RFK Jr. is already taking AIM and antidepressants, saying he's going to look at side effects and undisclosed dangers of SSRIs. | ||
| We'll be back on the other side to explain just what a good move this is. | ||
| It's fantastic. | ||
| That's your daily dispatch. | ||
| Infowarsstore.com to support us. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the American Journal. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| We are fighting the information war, and we certainly are winning. | ||
| And I want to reiterate something that I said a couple weeks ago, which is that there's a double-edged sword to the vast majority of people being NPCs, for lack of a better word. | ||
| And I'm seeing this in the wild now. | ||
| I'm seeing it in the wild in real life. | ||
| And it's the meme. | ||
| That used to be our meme, basically, that you'd sit there and go, hey, you know, there's a satanic cabal that hates humanity and is actively destroying civilization to enslave us all. | ||
| And you say that to a normie and they're like, whoa, crazy, man. | ||
| So did you see the game yesterday? | ||
| It's like, you don't care. | ||
| So they can just do whatever they want and you just don't care if you're not told to do it. | ||
| That's a little upsetting. | ||
| That's kind of... | ||
| Depressing to know that people just don't care. | ||
| And they're just like, as long as I can grill, rape my daughter, right? | ||
| As long as I can grill, end my bloodline, it's fine. | ||
| That's very depressing to know that's the case. | ||
| But now that we're the ones doing things, it turns out this is a massive benefit. | ||
| And I keep seeing people post stuff. | ||
| Reddit is where a lot of this happens. | ||
| Where it's people going, I try to tell my co-workers that Trump is a fascist and that Elon Musk is destroying the government and they say, I don't care, I just want to keep watching the game. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's like, yeah, yeah. | |
| It's your turn. | ||
| It's your turn now to have to desperately try to wake up your fellow Americans finding it incredibly frustrating that nobody cares. | ||
| It's a little different, obviously, because for us, we're talking about things that actually exist and matter, and you're not, so it's not actually the same one-to-one. | ||
| But the point is that it's the silver lining, that yes, it's upsetting because it would be great if people would just stand up against what has been going on for the last several decades, wouldn't be in this situation. | ||
| But now that we're in charge and just doing things, you can just do things. | ||
| You can just do it, and 99% of people have no idea, don't care. | ||
| They just don't care. | ||
| They're just going to keep doing whatever they do. | ||
| They're just going to do their day-to-day business, and I totally don't care what the government is up to. | ||
| So this is great. | ||
| This is great and amazing and wonderful. | ||
| I can find you some examples of that here in just a little bit, but my dad sent me something yesterday. | ||
| Don't forget my screen, but... | ||
| He said he had dinner with his friend. | ||
| He said it's a sobering reminder that we should not be overconfident. | ||
| He thinks Trump is a dangerous buffoon. | ||
| He says all of the other presidents for 20 plus years were adept at maintaining the status quo. | ||
| Texting out last night, ever since then, it's just been like stuck in my head. | ||
| Just picturing this. | ||
| Normie dude, very nice. | ||
| He's got a family. | ||
| Cool guy, right? | ||
| Family friend of ours. | ||
| Very normal, sort of upper-middle-class American dude. | ||
| And it's just, it's like, what could possibly make him think that Trump is a buffoon? | ||
| How could you possibly retain that belief? | ||
| After 10 years of Donald Trump expertly evading every trap set for him, dominating everything he puts his mind to, I mean... | ||
| How can you still sustain that level of delusion for this long? | ||
| But that's what's stuck in my head, and that's what I feel like we have a responsibility to confront here. | ||
| And in our personal lives. | ||
| This is like, it's not like a, it's less of a fight we're trying to win. | ||
| It's more of souls we're trying to save. | ||
| It's more of like a missionary action that we need to be involved in here. | ||
| Because you've got a bunch of people out there. | ||
| They don't know the good news. | ||
| They aren't aware. | ||
| Not to compare what we do with Christianity or religion. | ||
| I mean, it's just politics that we're talking about at the end of the day. | ||
| But that is sort of the mindset that I'm coming to this with. | ||
| Not, you idiots, how dare you believe this? | ||
| I hate you. | ||
| But rather... | ||
| You poor, deluded fools. | ||
| I would love to help you understand what is going on in the world around you. | ||
| You have been blinded and deceived by evil people. | ||
| And luckily for you, I know what's going on. | ||
| I have the answers. | ||
| And I can lead you out of the darkness that they've put you in. | ||
| That's my mindset as sort of a missionary. | ||
| Mormon kind of mindset. | ||
| That's what we need. | ||
| We need well-dressed young men in short-sleeved button-down shirts. | ||
| We need pairs of them going around to neighborhoods on bicycles, knocking on doors. | ||
| Have you heard of Donald Trump? | ||
| Are you aware of what he's doing? | ||
| Do you know that he's defeating a satanic cabal that was millimeters away from enslaving the planet? | ||
| Are you aware of this? | ||
| And are you as thrilled as I am? | ||
| Are you still living in darkness? | ||
| So we're going to try to do this. | ||
| We're going to try a little outreach here. | ||
| By which I mean we're going to relentlessly mock the worldview that keeps them enslaved. | ||
| Let's go to clip number nine here. | ||
| The New York Times has done an expose on NPCs. | ||
| Now this is an old me. | ||
| It seems about five years old that they finally got around to learning about it. | ||
| And again, while we make fun of this and mock it and laugh at it and are entertained by it, what we're actually studying here is the tit-for-tat back and forth on the battlefield of the information war. | ||
| So right now, as we keep talking about it, the Democrats are in disarray. | ||
| They have no idea what to do to fight back. | ||
| They're flailing. | ||
| They're desperate. | ||
| They're defending things they shouldn't defend. | ||
| They're ignoring things they should probably be paying attention to. | ||
| They're running around like chickens with their heads cut off. | ||
| 60 Minutes, we showed you, gave a good outline of what the deep state prioritizes, what they think is important to push. | ||
| Primary amongst that would be censorship. | ||
| They're celebrating what Germany does, and we can get into that a little bit more today as well. | ||
| But that was sort of the roadmap we took yesterday, was 60 Minutes. | ||
| And just going, okay, knowing that this is a deep state broadcast, Then while we don't believe what we hear from the Deep State broadcast, we can still learn a lot by learning what they want us to know. | ||
| What they're telling us isn't true, but we can get truth out of it. | ||
| So that's what we're doing here with the New York Times. | ||
| They realize that the Democrats are in disarray and they're trying to give them a unifying message. | ||
| And they're trying to staunch the bleeding right now is what's happening. | ||
| The Democratic Party is flailing, failing, totally. | ||
| Despised by the vast minority of Americans. | ||
| And they're trying to stop that trend and just slam on the brakes and go, don't worry, it's good to be an NPC. Actually, being an NPC is cool, okay? | ||
| So let's go to this video and crew can keep their finger on the button because I will be pausing it. | ||
| The whole video is 17 minutes. | ||
| I probably will get through. | ||
| 30 seconds of it, because I'm going to be pausing it a lot. | ||
| But let's go to it and see what the New York Times has to say about the NPC meme from five years ago. | ||
|
unidentified
|
A few years back, the online right became enamored of a new epithet for liberals. | |
| "NPC," short for non-player character. | ||
| Non-playable character. Non-player character. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What, you don't know about this? | |
| Do I get to tell you the NPC meme? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| This is the most important meme for a lifetime. | ||
| Please do. | ||
| The term was lifted from video games, where an NPC refers to the computer-controlled characters that populate the game while you, the live player, make actual decisions. | ||
| NPCs don't have minds of their own. | ||
| They don't have agency. | ||
| They're automatons. | ||
| You might have seen these memes. | ||
| Featureless gray faces, sometimes surrounded by liberal icons. | ||
| Elon Musk loved posting them. | ||
| Liberals in this story thought what they were allowed to think, said what they were allowed to say. | ||
| And once you identify it, it's like the Matrix. | ||
| Like you see Agent Smith everywhere. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Believe all women. | |
| Refugees welcome. | ||
| I anticipate that's going to be the new NPC download. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Like any good insult, the NPC meme served a dual purpose. | |
| It contains a kernel of truth about its target. | ||
| We liberals can be conformist. | ||
| We can be too afraid to offend. | ||
| We can be overly deferential to institutions. | ||
| We can be cowed by the in-group policing that we inflict on ourselves. | ||
| And a little quick to take up whatever the cause of the moment is. | ||
| Alright, I love that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But the real purpose of the NBC insult was... | |
| Let's pause it. | ||
| I wasn't sure. | ||
| I really thought this was AI at first. | ||
| The mouth doesn't quite line up with the sound. | ||
| And I was like, this is some sort of parody. | ||
| This has to be some sort of parody. | ||
| Now, one thing he doesn't explain is the NPC meme doesn't just come from video games. | ||
| That's a great way to understand it. | ||
| Obviously, that's where the term NPC comes from. | ||
| But it also has to do with scientific studies that have said that some percentage of the human population doesn't have an internal monologue. | ||
| Words in their head. | ||
| They sort of just receive images, process it in real time and then output it. | ||
| But they don't have an internal monologue. | ||
| It's like a scientific thing. | ||
| So it's not just about politics. | ||
| It's about whether or not you are consciously engaging in the real world, whether you are formulating thoughts for yourself or whether you are literally just a vessel for somebody else's opinion. | ||
| So there's a scientific... | ||
| You know, history to this as well that I guess they might not be aware of. | ||
| He's like, like all good insults, there's a kernel of truth. | ||
| Yeah, a little bit. | ||
| There's a little kernel of truth. | ||
| It's like, yeah, you know, liberals can be too conformist. | ||
| Yes, we are afraid to speak out. | ||
| Yes, we do get cowed by our own side. | ||
| Yes, we do believe things that are patently untrue. | ||
| Yes, we continue to believe them. | ||
| Even when they're proven untrue. | ||
| Do liberals think for themselves? | ||
| No, of course we simply believe what we're told. | ||
| Even if that belief contradicts what we believed yesterday, it doesn't bother us because we have no continuity of thought, continuity of mind. | ||
| Yes, so all of that's true. | ||
| We admit, liberals... | ||
| Ideas universally fail completely and we never learn from it and we always suggest the same thing over and over regardless of how many times it fails horribly. | ||
| And yes, the people that we try to help end up being hurt by our very policies and yet we persist in those policies in some sort of mindless adherence to an ideology over reality and the results of the projects we're engaged in. | ||
| Yes, all of that is true. | ||
| Yes, it's true that when the mainstream media says something, no matter how ridiculous on the face of it, we believe it completely, okay? | ||
| So there's, yeah, there's a kernel of truth in the NPC meme, all right? | ||
| The little kernel of truth in that we are thoughtless automatons controlled by signals sent to us by our enemies, okay? | ||
| All of that is true, and I admit it, all right? | ||
| You see what they're doing here is they're Trying to shield themselves from the criticism of being conformist cult members because they know that that is where their strength lies. | ||
| They know that without the cult-like atmosphere of their political side, they wouldn't have any support at all. | ||
| So they have to reinforce that it's okay to be conformist. | ||
| A massive dysfunction at the heart of the liberal mindset. | ||
| It's just sort of, you know, it happens sometimes because they're so caring, okay? | ||
| They're so caring and they don't want to offend anybody. | ||
| So, yeah, he says, you know, something like, we're cowed by our own side. | ||
| Yes, liberals get cowed by their own side sometimes. | ||
| You know, you're cult members. | ||
| No, you can't just be like, yeah, sometimes a member of our group gets their own ideas and the rest of us viciously beat them back into conformity. | ||
| Yeah, that happens sometimes, okay? | ||
| We admit it. | ||
| Just because you admit it doesn't mean it's good, doesn't mean it's fine, doesn't mean it's therefore okay. | ||
| That's really bad. | ||
| Again, the way he's just admitting this outright. | ||
| As if it's like no big deal. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Seems like a firmware update. | |
| Yeah, no, this is the firmware update, exactly. | ||
| This is the self-actualizing firmware update. | ||
| Yes, you know, we admit liberals claim to be motivated by empathy when we are heartlessly vicious against anybody who slightly opposes us. | ||
| Yes, you know, all of that is true. | ||
| But it's fine and it's good. | ||
| Just like, okay, dude. | ||
| Alright. | ||
| No, that's... | ||
| So, in fact, can we back it up a little? | ||
| I just love the liberal leftist just admitting outright that the left is conformist. | ||
| They intimidated each other into conformity. | ||
| They lie and believe lies. | ||
| And they don't change their mind when the lie is exposed. | ||
| They continue to persist in the lie. | ||
| Like, he's just admitting all of this outright. | ||
| He's like, so sure, the NPC meme's got some validity. | ||
| Everything they say about us is correct, and we are utterly retarded conformist robots. | ||
| Sure, so, you know, that's why the meme is popular. | ||
| Like, yeah, no, we know. | ||
| Oh, we know. | ||
| We're aware of what the meme is talking about. | ||
| Let's go back and hear this guy again. | ||
| Admit. | ||
| For all of us, liberals are all of the worst things in the world. | ||
| Let's listen. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We liberals can be conformists. | |
| We can be too afraid to offend. | ||
| We can be overly deferential to institutions. | ||
| We can be cowed by the in-group policing that we inflict on ourselves. | ||
| And a little quick to take up whatever the cause of the moment is. | ||
| A little quick to take up what the cause of the moment is. | ||
| Because they're so empathetic. | ||
| See, they're so empathetic and loving. | ||
| Sometimes they're just so eager to do good that they don't do their due diligence. | ||
| And hey, can you blame them? | ||
| I mean, it happens, right? | ||
| No, no. | ||
| What you're saying is that without actually looking into anything, you are able to be led around like a dog on a leash by people who are easily able to trick you because you're stupid. | ||
| Sometimes we latch on to whatever the cause of the day. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Because you have no actual beliefs. | ||
| You have no principles. | ||
| Whatever new shiny dog toy, the powers that be, wave in front of you, that's the one that you desperately want right now. | ||
| And it's like a dog with two toys, right? | ||
| The dog is not consciously thinking, like, that toy is superior to mine. | ||
| It's just there's something instinctual that without even expressing it in words, it's just like they just have an insatiable drive to have the thing. | ||
| And it's like... | ||
| They aren't being driven by thought. | ||
| And this is what the NPC meme is. | ||
| This is it in the heart of it. | ||
| Non-NPCs are thoughtful. | ||
| They think about what they're being presented with. | ||
| They choose for themselves, regardless of pressure from outside sources, what they think the right thing is. | ||
| And then they have the tenacity and the wherewithal to pursue what they think is right, regardless of the consequences or lies that they're told about it. | ||
| That's what being a non-NPC means. | ||
| Being an NPC means, yes, you latch on to whatever the cause du jour happens to be without having a solidified, grounded belief system to operate in and to say, we oppose this type of thing. | ||
| It's just like they just throw something in front of you and that's the thing that you care most about. | ||
| And it's not that it's a conscious decision to care about it. | ||
| This is the thing I'm trying to express. | ||
| They're actually able to activate the emotions of their NPCs. | ||
| So I'm saying the thing about the dog and the instinct. | ||
| It's like, it's not that these people are consciously going, this is the new thing? | ||
| I think I'll believe it now. | ||
| It's that they get told the black men are being murdered by the police and it breaks their heart and they start weeping and they start literally having a visceral adrenaline pumping chemicals in their brains firing. | ||
| On all cylinders. | ||
| And like they're actually physically, physiognomically hijacked by the powers that be. | ||
| That's what we mean by the signal going out. | ||
| The newest NPC download. | ||
| Is that they're able to take something that people don't care about, don't know about. | ||
| It's not a part of their general worldview. | ||
| They don't actually care. | ||
| They're just able to present something, whatever it is, in front of the liberals. | ||
| Even if it's just utterly fraudulent, on the face of it, right? | ||
| On the face of it. | ||
| Another example would be like the COVID lab leak thing. | ||
| On the face of it, just without any outside force, you should be able to have logicked out in your own mind, okay, this probably came from a lab. | ||
| It looks like there was a lab right here. | ||
| They're doing all the same research. | ||
| Makes sense that that's where the lab comes from. | ||
| They understand that, so they send the signal out to NPCs. | ||
| If somebody says it comes from a lab, they're a conspiracy theorist. | ||
| This is dangerous. | ||
| They're questioning science, and they hate Chinese people. | ||
| So then the NPC, without ever thinking about it, without ever applying even the slightest conscious thought to what they're doing, they are then inculcated, indoctrinated. | ||
| It's planted into their mind to have an emotional response when they hear something that's true. | ||
| So when you go, I think it came from a lab. | ||
| Literally, again, without their conscious awareness, chemicals are firing in their brain, causing them anxiety, going, get away, get away. | ||
| Fight or flight. | ||
| This is scary. | ||
| You're scared and in danger. | ||
| Denounce this person immediately. | ||
| And it's not conscious. | ||
| It's like a dog seeing a shiny new toy. | ||
| They aren't thinking, gee, what a nice new toy. | ||
| I like how red it is. | ||
| They're just slobbering. | ||
| It's just they're... | ||
| Their body just starts producing saliva. | ||
| They're not consciously producing saliva. | ||
| It's just happening. | ||
| These are just Pavlovian instincts that they're directing the whole of America with. | ||
| I told you this was going to take forever. | ||
| Let's go back to the video, please. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But the real purpose of the MPC insult was self-congratulation. | |
| The right was full of live players. | ||
| You could see it in their willingness to offend. | ||
| 100%. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What is a woman? | |
| Can you tell me that? | ||
| I'll say what I want to say, and if the consequence of that is losing money, so be it. | ||
| I want to pause it right there. | ||
| Like, they use these clips that are just the perfect embodiment of an NPC meme. | ||
| They go up and they ask these young women, what is a woman? | ||
| And the women just, there's no response. | ||
| They just smile. | ||
| They're NPCs. | ||
| They don't know what they're supposed to say. | ||
| They haven't been loaded. | ||
| If you're playing Skyrim, what do you think happens if you ask the shopkeeper about, you know, elves who fought drag? | ||
| The response hasn't been programmed in. | ||
| They can sell you things and get mad at you for stealing and then comment on the weather because they have those responses programmed in to their NPC brain matrix. | ||
| These people don't have that programmed in yet. | ||
| And so when you ask them about something, they just smile like idiots and literally don't even act like they understood you. | ||
| It's like, what is a woman? | ||
| And they're just like... | ||
| Do you realize how weird that is? | ||
| Do you realize how if you go up to any group of people for all of time in any culture, anywhere in the world, any point in history, and ask them a simple question like, what is a woman? | ||
| The response you would get would either be like, what the hell are you talking about? | ||
| What is a woman? | ||
| What type of question is that? | ||
| Are you an idiot? | ||
| Why are you asking this? | ||
| What are you up to? | ||
| It would be like a conscious response, something like flaring up going, this guy's asking what a woman is? | ||
| Does he not speak English? | ||
| Are you asking what the word woman means? | ||
| What are you saying? | ||
| Or it would be like, what is a woman? | ||
| It would be like a female human. | ||
| You would just define it. | ||
| It would be easy. | ||
| So it's like... | ||
| Hard to explain. | ||
| Sometimes they have responses programmed in. | ||
| In the absence of a response programmed in, there is still the underlying awareness that there's something they should be saying. | ||
| They just don't know what it is. | ||
| Right? | ||
| They know they shouldn't just answer what they believe because they know that that's been described as bigoted or whatever. | ||
| They in a weird way know what they're not supposed to say, but they don't know what they're supposed to say, and so they glitch. | ||
| They glitch out. | ||
| They can't figure out exactly what it is that they're supposed to say. | ||
| So this is very sad. | ||
| This is a very sad situation for them to be in. | ||
| And it's not self-congratulatory as it is... | ||
| I don't know how to put it. | ||
| I guess it is. | ||
| You know, I guess it is sort of self-congratulatory, if you want to put it that way. | ||
| To say it's more just like celebrating. | ||
| It's like we want you to not be an NPC. We want everybody to be player characters. | ||
| It's not that we are, you know, free and better than everybody else. | ||
| We're mocking them for, you know, being stupid and because we like feeling greater than them. | ||
| We're mocking NPCs to try to wake them up. | ||
| Because they're not NPCs. | ||
| They're human beings. | ||
| They're conscious human beings with souls and a mind that can be freed. | ||
| We believe that. | ||
| So when we're mocking NPCs, we're casting a net out and trying to reel them in. | ||
| We're trying to bring them out of Plato's cave. | ||
| We're trying to shake them awake from their stupor and try through... | ||
| Because you can try to argue with them. | ||
| You can try to explain it to them. | ||
| You can try to be patient with them. | ||
| It doesn't work. | ||
| It never works. | ||
| They're NPCs. | ||
| Try to explain the finer details of republicanism to a guy fishing in Legend of Zelda. | ||
| There's no point. | ||
| So we think maybe, maybe by mocking the mindless and remote-controlled attitude they have, maybe they can be shamed into being a human being again. | ||
| And that's what we want. | ||
| We want to all be human beings together. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, welcome back, folks. | |
| Look, we're not going to spend the whole day on this. | ||
| I'm going to spend a little bit longer on it. | ||
| What this represents is the panic of the Democrats, the panic of the mainstream media, because they are in full retreat right now. | ||
| They are being defeated. | ||
| All they have is their informational control. | ||
| All they have is their domination of the cultural institutions. | ||
| They're losing that. | ||
| This is the very beginning of a very long period of destruction for them. | ||
| They're trying to mitigate the losses as best they can. | ||
| And part of that, and the primary part, it seems, from the New York Times is... | ||
| To reorient the current framing, the current framing now is, if you're a white dude for Harris, or if you're a Biden voter, or a Pelosi acolyte, you are a moron. | ||
| You're not cool. | ||
| I mean, nobody likes you. | ||
| You're probably ugly and sad, depressed, and on a bunch of pharmaceuticals. | ||
| And you're weak. | ||
| I mean, this is the problem, right? | ||
| When they're like, who's the most masculine Democrat? | ||
| And the answer is probably AOC. You know, it's like it's not a good look for the Democrats. | ||
| So they're trying to stem the cultural erosion they're experiencing right now, which is what you're seeing with this New York Times pathetic NPC radio signal. | ||
| And this is the real thing to understand. | ||
| The people at the top are not NPCs. | ||
| The guy making this video is not an NPC. Thinks about the NPCs the same way that we do, just with an evil filter, an evil twist, right? | ||
| We see American people being fooled, being lied to, being controlled like a robot, having their emotions hacked by lies, and we... | ||
| We hate that. | ||
| And we're like, you need to wake up. | ||
| You're not a cattle. | ||
| You're not a piece of livestock. | ||
| You're a human being. | ||
| You've got to wake up. | ||
| You've got to think for yourself. | ||
| You've got to stop letting these people lie to you and fool you. | ||
| We want you to join the ranks of the human. | ||
| Arise up out of the mire of the NPC. These other people, the people in the New York Times, they also think of the average American as an NPC. And they think, therefore, I get to dominate and control them. | ||
| That we need to keep them happy as NPCs. | ||
| Because really the only problem will be if they learn that they're NPCs and realize how bad they are, then they're going to come after us because we're the ones who have destroyed everything. | ||
| So our side sees them as NPCs and we want to uplift them. | ||
| Their side sees them as NPCs and want to keep them in that state of subjugation. | ||
| So that's the important thing you need to understand. | ||
| This dude, Ezra Klein, he also thinks of the Americans as NPCs. | ||
| He made this whole video to try to sue the NPCs into being NPCs, trying to tell them it's fine you're an NPC. It's good, actually. | ||
| It's because you're so empathetic and loving and giving. | ||
| Don't let those Trump supporters convince you that you need to think for yourself. | ||
| That's dangerous, okay? | ||
| Go back to the video. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Did you tell me that? | |
| I'll say what I want to say, and if the consequence of that is losing money, so be it. | ||
| Their mistrust of institutions. | ||
| Are you a conspiracy theorist? | ||
| That is a pejorative, Senator, that's applied to me, mainly to keep me from asking difficult questions of powerful interest. | ||
| I'll say it again. | ||
| Do your own research. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They're eagerness to debate. | |
| Yeah, do your own research. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Or they'll not even say out loud. | |
| It depends on what you mean by equality. | ||
| You know, just shut up and obey. | ||
| I just reject that completely. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This became part of the Trumpist right self-definition. | |
| They were the nonconformists. | ||
| We are now the party of freedom. | ||
| And the Party of Speech. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The coalition that wasn't made of automatons. | |
| In fact, we are just the f***ing party. | ||
| And that's what America needed. | ||
| Live players. | ||
| Yes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And here we are in 2025. And at this point, I'm willing to concede at least half the argument. | |
| American politics does have an NPC problem. | ||
| Possibly a lethal one. | ||
| But it's not on the left. | ||
| Oh, really? | ||
|
unidentified
|
You just spent the last two minutes explaining how it is on the left. | |
| Is on some level trying to do, or at least saying they're trying to do. | ||
| Government is too gummed up by process and protocol. | ||
| It is too hard to hire and fire in the civil service. | ||
| Even if I agree with the goals of many DEI programs, and I do, many of them don't achieve those goals. | ||
| Some of them make the problems they seek to fix worse. | ||
| There hasn't been rigor at looking at which is which. | ||
| Let's pause it. | ||
| We gotta go back to this on the other side. | ||
| I won't say too much longer. | ||
| I gotta hear where he's going with this because he's doing the same thing that he did before. | ||
| Yes, liberals are all mindless retards. | ||
| Sure, you have a point there. | ||
| I'll concede you that. | ||
| Like, okay. | ||
| And? | ||
| Folks, I got so many videos to show you. | ||
| I got depression to talk about. | ||
| I got Doge to talk about. | ||
| I got the negotiations taking place in Saudi Arabia to talk about. | ||
| We got a lot to get into. | ||
| I gotta finish up. | ||
| I gotta see where this guy's going with this. | ||
| He's saying we do have an NPC problem in America, but it's not on the left. | ||
| Even though he just spent the last two minutes explaining how accurate the NPC meme is, how the left does intrinsically have tons of problems related to the fact that they don't think for themselves, they don't consider the cause du jour, the whatever activist cause happens to be the flash-in-the-pan outrage machine at that moment. | ||
| He admits all of that. | ||
| Now let's see how he's going to try to reverse this. | ||
| And again, just thinking about this from the Infowar perspective and saying, what is he trying to do with this? | ||
| Who is this message for? | ||
| The message is for the NPCs. | ||
| The message is for the normies. | ||
| This message, well, it's for two people. | ||
| It's for the normies and it's for the super normies. | ||
| It's for the people that think that they're enlightened because they believe what they read in the New York Times. | ||
| They think they're intelligent and informed because they swallow wholesale the lies that are pumped out to them from very sophisticated looking scumbags, right? | ||
| So he's going to try to, again, I see this and I'm like, okay, he admits the liberals are all retarded. | ||
| He admits that the MAGA side are like the mavericks. | ||
| We don't like doing what we're told. | ||
| We don't like bowing and adhering to things that don't make any logical sense. | ||
| So far, I'm watching this and I'm going, did I make this? | ||
| I mean, this all sounds totally true. | ||
| Let's see where he goes from here because watching through the mind of the normie, the message they're getting is, yeah, sometimes liberals are a little conformist, but that's just because they love each other so much and Republicans Are all actually competing with each other to be the most, you know, awake and nonconformist. | ||
| And really this is just sort of, you know, a petulant anti-disestablishmentarianism, right? | ||
| They just want to be the outsider. | ||
| That's the message that they're getting across. | ||
| Again, I'm just trying to figure out why they'd make this for the NPCs, because that's who it's made for. | ||
| Let's go back to the NPC broadcast for the NPCs about the NPCs. | ||
|
unidentified
|
American politics does have an NPC problem. | |
| Possibly a lethal one. | ||
| Yes, you're killing us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But it's not on the left. | |
| Wrong. | ||
| I can make a generous case for a lot of what the Trump administration is on some level trying to do, or at least saying they're trying to do. | ||
| Government is too gummed up by process and protocol. | ||
| It is too hard to hire and fire in the civil service. | ||
| Even if I agree with the goals of many DEI programs, and I do. | ||
| Many of them don't achieve those goals. | ||
| Some of them make the problems they seek to fix worse. | ||
| There hasn't been rigor at looking at which is which and getting rid of the bad ones. | ||
| There is actually a good argument for auditing USAID. We probably should convert more of what that agency spends to cash grants and direct public health support. | ||
| Wow, great idea. | ||
|
unidentified
|
How the government manages software procurement and builds and maintains digital services. | |
| All right, we get it. | ||
| We're right about everything. | ||
| Why are you saying this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I was saying all this before the election, too. | |
| Okay, so you voted for Trump? | ||
|
unidentified
|
All that is well known, including among liberals. | |
| Oh, great. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Many liberals have spent a lot of time trying to think about how to fix these problems. | |
| And so it is a genuine failure of Democrats that they did not put more energy into making the government faster and better. | ||
| And more responsive when they were in charge. | ||
| How the hell did the Biden administration pass $42 billion for broadband in 2021? | ||
| No, it's a great question. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let us agree. | |
| In the 21st century in America, high-speed internet is not a luxury. | ||
| What is up with this scary music in the background? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It is a necessity. | |
| And basically nothing to show for it by November of 2024. That is a Wawa station back there behind me. | ||
| They recently got $733,000 to build an EV charging station. | ||
| Unfortunately, all you see right now are gas pumps, though. | ||
| At this point, I got to just keep watching. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Times they get $7.5 billion for electric vehicle chargers, but only build a few hundred of them by the end of their turn. | |
| I genuinely don't understand what point they're trying to make. | ||
| They're just admitting that Trump is right about everything. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why is it all so slow? | |
| Why? | ||
| Democrats became champions of a government that often didn't work. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And that's part of the reason Trump won. | |
| Not the only reason. | ||
| Not the biggest reason. | ||
| It's not as important as the price of eggs. | ||
| But when people feel the government isn't working, the party promising change beats a party rallying in defense. | ||
| When Elon Musk says that the election gave Republicans a mandate for reform, he's not totally wrong. | ||
| This is the craziest thing. | ||
| All right, so they're admitting that we're right about everything. | ||
| Let's go ahead and pause it. | ||
| They're admitting that we're right about everything. | ||
| Again, what they're trying to do is portray, it's complicated, but I get it. | ||
| I get what they're doing. | ||
| I understand it now. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| This is their really desperate attempt. | ||
| They know they can't. | ||
| This is it. | ||
| I figured it out. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| This is the reset. | ||
| This is the signal going out to the NPCs now. | ||
| It's, we cannot win by resisting this. | ||
| We have to co-opt it. | ||
| That is the message going out to the NPCs right now. | ||
| Is, we let it get too far. | ||
| We let the corruption go too deep. | ||
| We gave Trump a mandate. | ||
| Now we need to act like this is our thing. | ||
| We are actually the champions. | ||
| We are actually the ones who have always talked about this. | ||
| That's what they're trying to get across to people. | ||
| That'll be the new talking point. | ||
| It'll be, of course we want to downsize government. | ||
| Democrats have always wanted to downsize government. | ||
| We just wanted to do legally in a way that was safe and structured. | ||
| Not this chaos. | ||
| They're just doing it in a chaotic way. | ||
| And that's what's so bad about it. | ||
| But what Trump's—we've actually—really, he's working for us. | ||
| Actually, we always wanted this. | ||
| They realized they can't stand up against what Trump is doing, so this is the message to the NPCs that now we are going to try to hijack, co-opt, and derail what's going on from the inside. | ||
| Because I understand if they're just being obstinate— I mean, actually, we've wanted to do this for a long time. | ||
| We have a lot of great plans for it. | ||
| Do you mind if we maybe help you a little bit? | ||
| And they're going to try to disrupt it, interfere with it, and continue their operation that way. | ||
| That is the signal that's going out. | ||
| I figured it out. | ||
| That's what it is. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Why else would the New York Times make a video where they're literally admitting But Donald Trump is right about absolutely everything. | ||
| I just keep saying it as like a skit or something where it's like, you know, somebody's like, hey, you know, I might fire this guy. | ||
| And you're like, hey, he's a good guy. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Did the copier catch fire when he was using it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| Okay. | ||
| Has he gotten in fights in the break room several times with women in the office? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Did we catch him smoking crack in the bathroom stall? | ||
| Yeah, I admit. | ||
| Yeah, we did. | ||
| Okay, and that's a problem. | ||
| I admit that's a problem. | ||
| Okay, I'm not going to pretend that's not a problem. | ||
| All right? | ||
| It smelled like crack in here for like a week. | ||
| Of course that's a problem. | ||
| We don't want to fire the guy. | ||
| It's like, why are you admitting all of these horrible things and then saying, but we're not going to come to the same conclusion you are? | ||
| It's baffling. | ||
| It's bizarre, but it's all psychological trickery. | ||
| That's all we're seeing here. | ||
| I got to watch another minute. | ||
| We'll watch one more minute, and then we'll move on. | ||
| But this is really something to behold. | ||
| So, so far he's just admitted everything we say about everything. | ||
| All right? | ||
| DEI sucks. | ||
| Even if I agree with the goals. | ||
| All right, well, you shouldn't agree with the goals anyway, but is this not... | ||
| Crazy. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Let's go back to the guy. | ||
| I mean, he's literally admitted that we're right about everything so far. | ||
| So far he's admitted we're right about everything, that Trump is doing the right thing, that all the things that are concerning to... | ||
| MAGA are accurate and true and good, and the left is incapable of thinking for themselves. | ||
| He's already established that that is absolutely true. | ||
| Let's see where he goes with it from here. | ||
| The public. | ||
| You have a majority of the public vote voting for President Trump. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We won the House, we won the Senate. | |
| People voted for major government reform. | ||
| This is kind of funny. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There should be no doubt about that. | |
| But look at how Musk justifies that mandate. | ||
| The proof is that Republicans control the House and the Senate. | ||
| Yes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So why not write some bills? | |
| Sure, Republican majorities are narrow, but bipartisanship here, it wasn't out of the question. | ||
| Oh, really? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Democrats were defeated and ready to deal. | |
| Oh, were they? | ||
| Their own voters wanted them to deal. | ||
| Oh, did they? | ||
|
unidentified
|
A January poll by CBS and YouGov found that 54% of Democrats wanted their congressional representatives to work with the Trump administration. | |
| One month later, February, and now 65% want all-out opposition. | ||
| That is a lot of political capital the Trump administration burned in just one month. | ||
| So there it is. | ||
| Let's pause it. | ||
| That's a lot of political capital the Trump administration burned in one month. | ||
| I'm trying to think of how to express this. | ||
| So, again, that's the point in line with exactly what I was just saying. | ||
| They're like, no, this is all good, but why not? | ||
| Do it through the legislature, okay? | ||
| I get that you're doing it this way that's super efficient and there's nothing I can do about it when you do it that way. | ||
| But, like, why wouldn't you just do it this way where I can, like, interfere with it the entire time? | ||
| Like, why wouldn't you do that? | ||
| Why wouldn't you do it through the legislature where nothing will ever get done and we can do parliamentary tricks to waylay the process forever and eventually scuttle it or at least... | ||
| Pack it full of tons of stuff that we want on top of what we're letting you. | ||
| Why not do it that way? | ||
| Total abject desperation. | ||
| That's what this is. | ||
| This is the equivalent of them just begging Trump, stop beating them up. | ||
| I'm going, no, I deserve this. | ||
| It's fine. | ||
| I'm not resisting you. | ||
| Big fluffy gloves on first. | ||
| Can you put inflatable boxing gloves on your hands before you keep punching me? | ||
| I think it would be the best for all of us. | ||
| What is he talking about? | ||
| Bipartisanship. | ||
| This is the thing. | ||
| They obstruct endlessly. | ||
| Relentlessly. | ||
| They've already launched impeachment inquiries. | ||
| It's been three weeks. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| The idea that bipartisanship was ever a possibility is an utter farce. | ||
| On top of that, why the hell should Trump give you a chance? | ||
| You've tried to throw him in prison for his entire life on multiple occasions. | ||
| You've shot at him twice. | ||
| And now you're sitting there going, but you won't let us in the process? | ||
| This is a desperate, desperate attempt to portray the completely appropriate response to their disruptive, hateful, illegal activity. | ||
| They want to portray the response to that as if it's bad. | ||
| As if they get to abuse us endlessly. | ||
| Try to eradicate our rights wholesale, disinformation governance boards, throwing our friends in prison for 20 years for a crime that happened in a city they weren't even in. | ||
| They think they can literally kill us, imprison our friends, crush us in the most brutal and uncaring way possible, and then we have to give them a seat at the table when we win? | ||
| And then we're the bad ones? | ||
| For not bringing them into a coalition when we actually achieve victory despite their cheating and their viciousness? | ||
| The balls on these people, I'm telling you. | ||
| The absolute chutzpah of sitting there going, Trump burned all this political capital. | ||
| The Democrats were willing to work with him. | ||
| My God. | ||
| You're Hitler. | ||
| You should be in jail. | ||
| I wish somebody would shoot you in the head. | ||
| But now that you're in charge, you're just going to cut me out? | ||
| Really? | ||
| Just cut me out like that? | ||
| Absurd. | ||
| Utterly ridiculous and absurd. | ||
| This is... | ||
| This is what they have, right? | ||
| This is what they have. | ||
| By the way, we've had two appointees to Trump's cabinet, both of whom were diehard kingpin Democrats until last year. | ||
| RFK Jr. comes from the Democratic family. | ||
| He was a scion of the Democratic Party, not... | ||
| One Democrat voted for him. | ||
| Tulsi Gabbard was a frontrunner for the presidency as recently as 2020. In the Democratic Party, not one Democrat voted for her. | ||
| So you tell me where this bipartisan willingness was. | ||
| You tell me where the failure of Trump... | ||
| To reach out bipartisanly. | ||
| Trump's the one who nominated the Democrats to key positions in his cabinet. | ||
| The Democrats are the ones who refused to vote even for Democrats because they were Trump supporters. | ||
| So just understand everything this guy is saying in terms of bipartisanship and Democrats willing to work. | ||
| It is just a ridiculous lie. | ||
| A flagrant fabrication. | ||
| All right? | ||
| This was never a possibility. | ||
| And I gotta go back. | ||
| I gotta go back to it. | ||
| I gotta go back. | ||
| Let's keep watching. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And for what? | |
| I've covered Washington for decades now. | ||
| There's gray in this beard. | ||
| If this was about policy, Trump and his team would have gone to Congress. | ||
| Overly dramatic, the violin music. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They could have crafted much larger reforms using a wider set of powers. | |
| Oh, could he? | ||
|
unidentified
|
And they wouldn't be facing down the courts in the way they are now. | |
| Oh. | ||
| What they wanted wasn't policy. | ||
| They didn't want to go line by line through USAID and figure out what worked. | ||
| Why should we? | ||
| Yeah, we don't need to listen anymore. | ||
| We don't need to listen anymore. | ||
| We don't need to listen to you anymore. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| They wanted to just do things in an expedited fashion. | ||
| They didn't want to be mired down arguing over every little instance, every penny spent. | ||
| They didn't want to give a chance to the people robbing us to try to rhetorically justify why they're stealing millions of dollars from us. | ||
| Can you believe it? | ||
| Why won't they just do the process in a way that we can interfere with and destroy and prevent from happening? | ||
| So just amazing. | ||
| So literally an NPC broadcast to NPCs about how it's good that they're NPCs and about how it's bad. | ||
| That Trump and MAGA are not NPCs. | ||
| I'm telling you, how much of that did we get through? | ||
| What's our time code there? | ||
| Six minutes. | ||
| There's ten minutes left of that. | ||
| We're going to move on, but I don't know, maybe the crew can watch it and find any clips that are particularly hilarious because these people. | ||
| And that's really what I wish doing this show three hours a day, five days a week, years on end. | ||
| If I can just get people in the mindset of being able to watch something like this and just blast through the propaganda. | ||
| Just see it for what it is. | ||
| These people are like... | ||
| You understand what we just saw? | ||
| They probably spent a million dollars producing that. | ||
| They had public relations firms. | ||
| They had academic groups who study the spread of memes, identify which meme to focus on, carefully construct this pitch to the American people. | ||
| What we just watched is just one less than half of a Extremely sophisticated PSYOP. Just flat out. | ||
| They cannot win on the argument. | ||
| They cannot actually confront what Trump's doing in an honest way and have the American people go along with them. | ||
| They know that they're in a very tough spot. | ||
| These people are waking up. | ||
| They're aware of their tactics now. | ||
| They're aware of... | ||
| What these people are willing to allow to happen to us, to our country. | ||
| They spent the last week defending the wholesale expropriation of our taxpayer funds for their private interest. | ||
| They know they cannot stand on facts. | ||
| They cannot stand on reality. | ||
| They have to create this false reality to feed to their NPCs to keep them in the dream state, keep them in the matrix. | ||
| And not let them escape. | ||
| It's very, very sophisticated stuff that we're seeing in operation here. | ||
| And I think we'll close out this segment by going to a video that just completely debunks everything that guy was saying. | ||
| Absolutely everything. | ||
| And that is when Owen Troyer goes and actually talks to these people in real life about what they actually believe. | ||
| We do have that video, right? | ||
| I didn't bring it in. | ||
| Dang it. | ||
| Alright, I'll have to bring that in. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because... | |
| Because Owen... | ||
| I mean, he goes to these things and... | ||
| I mean, these people wish they're... | ||
| They're badly programmed NPCs. | ||
| They're NPCs from 90s video games before they got the AI all dialed in. | ||
| And they're just sort of wandering around looking like they're doing something. | ||
| But not actually achieving anything. | ||
| I'll find that video here in just a second because it would be a nice little bookend. | ||
| Let me tell you in the meantime to go to thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| That's thealexjonesstore.com to keep us in the fight and on the air. | ||
| And by the way, I don't know if you noticed during that entire segment, Alex Jones was featured multiple times. | ||
| InfoWars was featured multiple times. | ||
| Just know that our enemies identify us as the... | ||
| True mavericks. | ||
| We are the ones who are breaking the spells of the NPCs. | ||
| We are the ones who are shattering the paradigm that keeps these people in this state of imposed ignorance, stupidity, and dependency on the mainstream. | ||
| In fact, let's go to clip number eight here. | ||
| This is another good one. | ||
| Again, comparing the NPC versus the real human being dichotomy. | ||
| This is a YouTuber, I guess, or a content creator called King Randall. | ||
| He made two videos, one saying he'd vote for Kamala Harris, another for Donald Trump. | ||
| Here's what he found. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I made two separate videos before the election. | |
| One of the videos said I was gonna vote for Kamala Harris. | ||
| The other video said I was gonna vote for Donald Trump. | ||
| And I just wanted to see the mixed reactions from people and how people would react, because I do a lot of work from my hometown, do a lot of work from my community, I work with young boys. | ||
| And I never said who I was voting for. | ||
| But I made those two videos because I wanted to show people how they are in reality. | ||
| I made the Donald Trump video, and I made the Kamala Harris video. | ||
| Under the Kamala Harris video, you definitely had some Trump supporters like, well, we understand that you may have a different opinion or whatever, but we still support what you do. | ||
| Maybe you'll wake up one day, etc., etc. | ||
| You know, things like that. | ||
| It wasn't nothing vile, wasn't no bad comments or nothing. | ||
| I made the Donald Trump video. | ||
| I got people that unfollowed me. | ||
| I got people saying they can't support nothing I do no more. | ||
| I got folk calling me all types of names, etc., etc. | ||
| But... | ||
| What's crazy is all of the Kamala Harris supporters have become what they accuse Trump supporters of being. | ||
| When you say you support Donald Trump, y'all be ready to kill him, y'all ready to burn him at the stake. | ||
| You call them all types of names, you unfollow them, you don't care what they're doing for their community, none. | ||
| If you support Trump, if you, I hate you so much, etc, etc. | ||
| But all the people under the post are the Trump supporters when I said I was going to vote for Kamala. | ||
| It was all love anyway. | ||
| They was like, well, we still support what you're doing. | ||
| We still going to donate. | ||
| We still love the work even though you don't have to support Donald Trump, etc., etc. | ||
| So I've only received hate from the people that call themselves the tolerant side, the side that's supposed to be about love, the side that's not about hate. | ||
| But it's crazy because anytime somebody doesn't agree with you, all you spew is hate. | ||
| All you give is hate. | ||
| So it's funny how everybody who call themselves Democrats, you have turned into what you accuse the Republicans of being. | ||
| By the way, Republicans were never that. | ||
| Again, it's not like they're hateful and they're hateful. | ||
| No, we were never hateful. | ||
| They call us hateful to justify their own hate. | ||
| And it's not just imbalanced. | ||
| It's totally inverted. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Let's talk about mental health, shall we? | ||
| As we know, mental health, physical health, spiritual health, all of these things deeply intertwined. | ||
| And deeply under attack by the modern world and the powers that be in a very deliberate and conscious way. | ||
| In other words, these people aren't doing things, thinking everything's fine, and eventually they realize that they're wrong and they're upset at that. | ||
| They know from the beginning what they're doing. | ||
| Like we always say with the... | ||
| Atrazine, when Alex Jones says they're putting chemicals in the water to make the freaking frogs gay, it's because they knew perfectly well the effects that atrazine had on endocrine, as an endocrine disruptor, on hormones. | ||
| They know that. | ||
| And you would think that this would go into a pro and con list kind of thing where you go, okay, the pro is massively reduces pesticides. | ||
| This will save us this much money. | ||
| There are positives for using. | ||
| Pesticides of any sort. | ||
| You put that on the pro column. | ||
| And then on the con column, you would have things like utterly eviscerates all surrounding wildlife, destroys wetlands around the area, causes massive hormone disruptions in the people that eat the food covered in the pesticides. | ||
| You would think that would be in the con column. | ||
| The real thing you need to understand, the true awakening here, is understanding that for these people, Disrupting hormones, limiting the masculinity in American men, distorting and disrupting the sexual impulses of creatures, any creatures, humans, or animals. | ||
| That's a good thing. | ||
| They like that. | ||
| They want that. | ||
| That's in line with everything else they do. | ||
| And you don't have to take my word for it. | ||
| Take theirs. | ||
| How many times have they told you that masculinity is toxic? | ||
| So you think if you told them, well, there's this chemical that crushes testosterone production and kind of, in a way, makes boys into girls, can totally disrupt the hormonal balance and feminize young men, do you think they're sitting there going, oh no, oh my gosh, that would be terrible. | ||
| They have as a primary impetus for them, a primary driver for them, acknowledged, spoken about. | ||
| Disgust is destroying masculinity. | ||
| They want to do that. | ||
| That is one of their primary goals. | ||
| They say it all the time. | ||
| They won't shut up about it. | ||
| So just understand, when they have this pro and con list about using things like atrazine, the fact that it feminizes boys and is just hugely destructive to overall health, that's on the pro side for them. | ||
| They like that. | ||
| They want that. | ||
| They're in favor of that. | ||
| Just understand where we're at, who these people are, why they make the decisions that they do. | ||
| And I, for the life of me, cannot fathom being in the mindset of people from outlets like Mother Jones. | ||
| It says RFK Jr. is already taking aim at antidepressants. | ||
| This was announced yesterday. | ||
| Hours after being confirmed, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. issued a statement that laid out sweeping plans for his first 100 days in office. | ||
| Chief among his goals was to combat what he called a growing health crisis of chronic disease. | ||
| The document called for the federal government to investigate the root causes of a broad range of conditions, including autism, ADHD, asthma, obesity, multiple sclerosis, and psoriasis. | ||
| Conspicuously absent was any... | ||
| See, if he went after childhood vaccines, it would be a bad thing. | ||
| See how they're phrasing that? | ||
| See how they're framing this argument? | ||
| He didn't go after childhood vaccines, and that's not a good thing because they don't want him to go after childhood vaccines. | ||
| It just shows how dishonest he is. | ||
| See how that works? | ||
| See how they set up a little win-win situation for themselves? | ||
| But the document they say that he published about his first 100 days did zero in on another one of his fixations, a class of widely prescribed drugs that treat depression, anxiety, and mood disorders. | ||
| The government, he said, would assess the prevalence and threat posed by prescription of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers. | ||
| Kennedy has repeatedly railed against what he sees as rampant overprescription of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, commonly known as SSRIs, which treat depression and anxiety and include medications like Prozac and Zoloft. | ||
| And then it goes on to just say the NPC talking points, right? | ||
| This is your NPC download ready for you, sir. | ||
| As with his previous assertions about vaccines, many of his statements about these drugs are not backed by science. | ||
| He's not trusting the science. | ||
| Beep boop. | ||
| This is bad. | ||
| Beep boop. | ||
| In a 2023 livestream on X with Elon Musk, he claimed that tremendous circumstantial evidence suggested that people taking antidepressants were more likely to commit school shootings. | ||
| They say actually most school shooters were not taking those drugs. | ||
| Evidence shows. | ||
| I'd like to know where they're getting this data. | ||
| Because it's one of the things where it depends on how you classify these things. | ||
| In other words, if you look at, when you say school shooting, you picture Sandy Hook or Columbine, Roger Uvalde, you picture like a massacre of school shooting. | ||
| In which case, the majority of those cases are definitely on a variety of psychological drugs. | ||
| Just about every single one of them. | ||
| You'd be hard-pressed to find one. | ||
| Where a person who shot up a school didn't show some sort of psychological trouble beforehand, right? | ||
| Hard to locate a teenager in America willing to shoot up his school that didn't show some evidence of mental illness at some point and get put on treatment. | ||
| It's not an unexpected thing. | ||
| You would think you could make the argument that correlation is not causation, but... | ||
| They don't do that. | ||
| They deny it outright. | ||
| So maybe what they're doing here, because if you look at school shootings in the way that people think of it, in the vernacular, when you say school shootings, you picture one of these big bombshell massacre horror shows. | ||
| But then if you just list out shootings at schools, 90% of school shootings are gang-related. | ||
| It's black kids shooting each other on school property. | ||
| But it's not counted. | ||
| So maybe if you take in, maybe if they're going off that list, leftists can be a little bit selective about which they're using. | ||
| So if they take the list of just every shooting at a school, you find a lot of that gang-related violence just spills over from the streets onto the school property, then yeah, I don't think the gangbangers in St. Louis are on SSRIs. | ||
| That's true. | ||
| But when you're talking about the mass murders, Transgender people are carrying out these days or the Parkland shooting, things like that. | ||
| Yeah, they were all on SSRIs. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| And they say on the bottle, they say, you know, may cause homicidal, suicidal thoughts. | ||
| But they try to cover this up. | ||
| And this is what I mean. | ||
| This is the mindset I don't understand. | ||
| They're like really desperate to downplay SSRIs, downplay the effects, and act like the science is settled and that there's no problem with this. | ||
| But why? | ||
| Why would they? | ||
| Want to defend this class of medications. | ||
| I really don't get the impulse here. | ||
| Because it turns out that about three years ago, in July of 2022, it was published that depression is not caused by chemical imbalance. | ||
| That's headlined from the Telegraph, and it was everywhere. | ||
| Everybody should have seen this. | ||
| This is one of the craziest stories ever, in my opinion, because you have this... | ||
| Class of antidepressants that supposedly functions by fixing a chemical imbalance in your brain. | ||
| These things are prescribed for decades. | ||
| People are hooked on them. | ||
| Totally. | ||
| Zonked out with a physical addiction that is almost impossible to break. | ||
| You never really get back to how you were before once you are on an antidepressant regimen full-time. | ||
| And then decades after these medicines are prescribed and people are taking them, the scientists admit, yeah, we actually have no idea why they work, how they work. | ||
| Turns out that the chemical imbalance theory that we're operating on is completely untrue. | ||
| This bombshell revelation is made, and then just nothing happens. | ||
| Whoa, what? | ||
| So you've got this entire class of psychiatry. | ||
| Predicated on the idea that depression is caused by chemical imbalance in the brain, it's discovered that there's not a chemical imbalance in the brain and nothing changes. | ||
| They keep prescribing the same stuff with the same reasoning, even though they figured out that it's all faulty. | ||
| It's all based on faulty, false science. | ||
| That's not true. | ||
| Like, it's crazy enough that a story like this would come out, but it happens every once in a while. | ||
| Right? | ||
| Some really popular medicine comes out. | ||
| Oh, actually, it's the cause of this particular cancer or whatever. | ||
| And then you remove the drug from the market. | ||
| Right? | ||
| Then there's some sort of... | ||
| So it's like the story itself is crazy, but then the fact that the story just came and went and nothing changed. | ||
| They just admitted that the entire scientific corpus on depression is fraudulent. | ||
| They admit that. | ||
| They write articles about it. | ||
| They write scientific papers about it. | ||
| Then they just file it away and just continue on like nothing happened. | ||
| That's the craziest part. | ||
| Story's crazy by itself. | ||
| The fact that nothing changed afterwards is inexplicable. | ||
| It's crazy. | ||
| This was two years ago. | ||
| This is from 2022. Depression is not caused by chemical imbalance. | ||
| Major reviews suggest low serotonin levels are not a factor. | ||
| And the condition is more likely to be linked to stressful life events. | ||
| Depression is not a chemical imbalance in the brain, and scientists have no idea how antidepressants work. | ||
| This from a review by the University College of London. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| And you're just still prescribing SSRIs. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Crazy. | ||
| All right. | ||
| One in six adults in England are currently prescribed antidepressants, most of which act by maintaining serotonin levels. | ||
| The new analysis suggests depression is not actually caused by low levels of serotonin. | ||
| Instead, depression may be more strongly equated with negative life events which lower the mood, the review found. | ||
| Yeah, it turns out depression is not an inexplicable, a genetic imbalance of chemicals in your brain. | ||
| It's because humans get sad when bad things happen to them. | ||
| That's what they just said. | ||
| Yeah, it's negative life events. | ||
| When bad things happen to you, you get sad. | ||
| Then doctors labeled that depression, came up with a crackpot theory about chemical imbalance, prescribed drugs based off the crackpot theory that's totally baseless. | ||
| And now we have one in six adults in England on these drugs permanently forever. | ||
| From National Post, around the same time, doctors have stopped believing that chemical imbalance causes depression. | ||
| They didn't tell us. | ||
| Psychiatry is known for some time that the serotonin theory of depression, the notion that too little of the brain chemical can be the cause of depression, a decades-old hypothesis and deeply entrenched trope in society that helped promote a class of antidepressants taken by millions of Canadians is wrong, says Montreal psychiatrist Dr. Joel Paris. | ||
| You want to know why it took so long for the truth to come out? | ||
| Paris, a professor at psychiatry at McGill University, wrote in an email, I'm afraid it has something to do with the toxic relationship between industry and academia. | ||
| Drug companies encourage doctors to prescribe often and heavily and have paid academic psychiatrists to promote their products. | ||
| So you read something like this, and again I have to ask, what is behind the mindset of the likes of Mother Jones who continue to defend this outrageous practice? | ||
| Not only do you know that the drugs don't function how they think they do, to and of itself is enough to stop it. | ||
| When you look into it, you understand that it's a capitalism. | ||
| Don't these people hate capitalism? | ||
| It's a capitalism thing. | ||
| It's an industry thing. | ||
| It's a, we can make money by getting people hooked to this useless drug, so let's pay doctors to prescribe it. | ||
| Crime. | ||
| It's corrupt. | ||
| It's a scam they're pulling on everybody. | ||
| Mother Jones is out here defending it with everything they've got. | ||
| Two months after a major review found no support for the hypothesis that depression is caused by lower serotonin activity or concentrations, no convincing evidence of a chemical imbalance, the paper is still stirring controversy. | ||
| Its authors say they've been ridiculed and attacked and accused of dog-whistling to far-right commentators who have groundlessly linked antidepressants to mass shootings. | ||
| Responses from psychiatrists have been oddly contradictory, ranging from nothing new here. | ||
| Of course we knew it was never serotonin. | ||
| It was never that simple. | ||
| Two criticisms that it's premature to toss out the serotonin theory outright and that the authors missed some studies and interpreted others incorrectly. | ||
| So again, we're in this position where Republicans take an accurate, fact-based position, and the left rejects that position on the basis of the right holds this position. | ||
| So the right wing simply observes reality, says, hey, these SSRIs, not based in science and have massive, horrifying side effects, we should look in to the correlation between SSRI prescriptions and mass shooters. | ||
| The left says that must be a right wing conspiracy because right wingers can never actually have legitimate concerns about anything ever, right? | ||
| We've learned this. | ||
| We know this. | ||
| We talk about... | ||
| Medicine's being described on faulty science. | ||
| We must have, it must be because we're Nazis. | ||
| I can't make sense of it, but that's the case, alright? | ||
| We know this. | ||
| We're told this over and over. | ||
| Nothing that Republicans believe is legitimate. | ||
| We always have an ulterior motive. | ||
| Even when it's manifestly true what we're saying, the left will deny reality rather than acknowledge that we might be telling the truth. | ||
| So again, it's a mindset I can't fathom, I can't understand. | ||
| Genuinely can't. | ||
| So I don't care if it's a leftist talking point. | ||
| If it's correct, it's correct. | ||
| Bernie Sanders goes out and says Open Borders is a Koch brother project. | ||
| They want lower wages. | ||
| Welfare is a corporate welfare system where Walmart can pay lower wages because they know the taxpayer will make up the difference. | ||
| They can keep people at less than living wage. | ||
| When Bernie Sanders says that, I know he's a communist. | ||
| I know he's a socialist. | ||
| I know he's motivated by really bad motives. | ||
| But that is correct. | ||
| He is right about those things. | ||
| And it would never enter into my mind for a second to try to discredit that obviously true statement because it's the left wing saying it. | ||
| They have this view of the right wing that is incomprehensible to me. | ||
| It seems the main criticism of this. | ||
| Article of this new massive review and study showing that SSRIs. | ||
| Do not do what they think that we do that they do. | ||
| Serotonin is not, there's not a chemical imbalance in the brain. | ||
| The review that discovered that is being criticized. | ||
| The main criticism is that antidepressants work, Monkrieff said. | ||
| It doesn't matter how they work. | ||
| It doesn't matter that the original idea, the original theory of how they work is unproven. | ||
| They work, and that's all that matters. | ||
| That's all that matters. | ||
| And I've told you this a million times. | ||
| I've told you it a million times. | ||
| Because if you actually ask the doctors, they'll tell you they don't know. | ||
| They'll prescribe you antidepressants. | ||
| And when you say, how does this work? | ||
| They'll say, we don't know. | ||
| They'll say, we think it lowers serotonin or limits serotonin reuptake, which heightens your level of serotonin. | ||
| But we don't really know. | ||
| We don't really know. | ||
| But we know that it cures depression. | ||
| It's like, really? | ||
| So I take this, I won't be depressed? | ||
| Well, no, not really. | ||
| No, you'll just be addicted to these for life, actually. | ||
| And if you ever stop taking them, you'll be real depressed. | ||
| To Moncrief, it matters because whether they work or not depends on how we understand what they're doing. | ||
| If they're not correcting a serotonin imbalance or reversing some underlying mechanism of depression, what are they doing? | ||
| We have no idea. | ||
| We have no idea. | ||
| They're messing with brain chemistry on the basis of the belief that is brain chemistry being out of whack that causes depression. | ||
| It's not true. | ||
| And they don't know what it's actually doing. | ||
| So there's no way they can say this doesn't attribute to mass shootings. | ||
| They have no idea what the effect in the brain it actually has. | ||
| They know that symptoms of depression seem to go down. | ||
| They can't tell you why or how. | ||
| And again, this just gets to the heart of like, what is the purpose of psychiatry? | ||
| What is the purpose? | ||
| I mean, you know what also technically works as an antidepressant, at least for some people? | ||
| Alcohol. | ||
| But if you know the function of why it makes you feel good, you wouldn't prescribe it, would you? | ||
| Weed? | ||
| Weed's another one, right? | ||
| If you're depressed and sad and anxious, if you smoke some weed, it might feel better. | ||
| You don't prescribe it to people with a mental condition, though. | ||
| I mean, it's just insane. | ||
| And, of course, this is an extremely pertinent issue because of the sheer numbers of people on these drugs. | ||
| With, of course, women and young adults, young women in particular, This is getting from The Guardian, so it's UK. And | ||
| again, all of this is predicated on this, at this point, thoroughly debunked and totally fraudulent theory that it had to do with chemical imbalance in the brain. | ||
| It doesn't, so what does it actually have to do with? | ||
| What they find is that it has to do with Bad things happening to you in your life which make you sad. | ||
| So if I had to guess why women are prescribed antidepressants more than men, it's because women's lives are more out of order than men's are. | ||
| They're more denaturized. | ||
| They're less connected with reality, less comfortable in the modern cultural landscape. | ||
| Because the modern cultural landscape is... | ||
| Distorted beyond recognition is completely outside of natural human experience. | ||
| And by going against your nature, you're causing anxiety. | ||
| By trying to suppress the very legitimate feelings that evolution has given you to survive and pass your genes on can be very mentally incapacitating. | ||
| So what women are dealing with right now is not a chemical imbalance in their brain. | ||
| What they're dealing with is being told by the culture to suppress their natural inclinations. | ||
| And women are more vulnerable to group pressure, peer pressure, and cultural influence than men are. | ||
| It has to do with testosterone. | ||
| It's another aspect of the chemical warfare going on. | ||
| And they're more likely to seek therapy than men. | ||
| But here's where it gets really pernicious, where this whole thing sort of folds in on itself. | ||
| From SciPost, published a few days ago. | ||
| Depression might unlock a more independent mind at the ballot box. | ||
| People experiencing symptoms of depression may be less likely to vote strictly along party lines, according to new research published in the journal Political Psychology. | ||
| The study found that as depressive symptoms increase, the influence of a voter's usual party loyalty on their vote choice decreased. | ||
| This suggests that individuals with higher level of depressive symptoms might base their voting decision on factors beyond their long-held political preferences. | ||
| I have a different interpretation. | ||
| I would say that this is... | ||
| Likely caused by just a lack of optimism. | ||
| If you vote for one party, you tend to believe in that party and have hope that that party will be able to achieve something. | ||
| If you are instead depressed and blackpilled, you probably don't have that same type of hope and optimism. | ||
| But you understand they think this is a good thing. | ||
| They're like, being depressed makes you more independent. | ||
| Which is a good thing. | ||
| It makes you more able to look at the issues on an individual basis and not be fooled by party loyalty. | ||
| Maybe you should be depressed. | ||
| Maybe it's a good thing you're depressed. | ||
| Maybe we'll win more elections if more people were depressed. | ||
| Maybe this is a feedback loop where depressed people keep voting for things that increase their depression, which make them more depressed, which makes them more likely to vote for the things that make them depressed. | ||
| Feedback loop that we need to interrupt before it consumes us completely. | ||
| And by the way, I mean, we have so, so, so many images like this one. | ||
| Liberal women most likely to feel lonely often. | ||
| Liberal women least likely to be completely satisfied with life. | ||
| Where it is a... | ||
| It's completely dependent. | ||
| There's nothing like independent about these variables. | ||
| The more liberal you are, The more lonely you are, the more conservative you are, the more satisfied with life you are. | ||
| And there's example after example after example about this. | ||
| So again, you've got the brain not functioning correctly is like the greatest boon to the Democrats. | ||
| I'm sure everybody remembers the headline, disabling parts of the brain with magnets can weaken faith in God and change attitudes to immigrants, study finds. | ||
| So your brain functions in a way on purpose. | ||
| This study in particular had to do with your fight or flight, whether you're able to defend yourself or recognize danger. | ||
| When you destroy that, you become liberal. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, welcome back, folks. | |
| Again, we have a lot more to talk about today. | ||
| Including things like this. | ||
| Doge reveals, from Gateway Pundit, Doge reveals $4.7 trillion of taxpayer money went into a government black hole and is untraceable. | ||
| On Monday, Elon Musk's Doge revealed the federal government did not trace $4.7 trillion in payments. | ||
| $4.7 trillion in payment were left blank, making it nearly impossible to trace, Doge said. | ||
| The Treasury access symbol. | ||
| Is an identification code linking a Treasury payment to a budget line item, standard financial process, Doge explained in a post on X. In the federal government, the TAS field was optional for around $4.7 trillion in payment and was often left blank, making traceability almost impossible. | ||
| As of Saturday, this is now a required field, increasing insight into where the money's actually going. | ||
| Thanks to U.S. Treasury for the great work, Doge said. | ||
| Trillions of dollars of taxpayer money went into the federal government black hole. | ||
| They've exposed literally trillions of dollars of waste in the first few weeks of Trump's second term. | ||
| Last Wednesday, Real America's Voice White House reporter Brian Glynn asked White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt about the trillions in fraudulent Medicare and Medicaid payments that have been going overseas. | ||
| Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene held her DOGE subcommittee hearing earlier in the day and announced the group's finding. | ||
| The subcommittee found $2.7 trillion in improper and fraudulent government payments since forming their subcommittee. | ||
| This number came from a report late last year on government waste. | ||
| And it is literally just trillions of dollars completely being wasted. | ||
| And again, I'm glad they're finding out about the waste. | ||
| I'm glad they're finding out about the fraud. | ||
| Some of the deep state operatives in cutting their funds off. | ||
| I want to see these people in handcuffs. | ||
| And I'd like to see it sooner rather than later. | ||
| These people have committed crimes against humanity, the likes of which the world has never seen. | ||
| Alejandro Mayorkas alone single-handedly flooded this country. | ||
| With tens of millions of foreigners, God only knows what that has cost the American people in lives, in services, in effort, in resources. | ||
| God only knows. | ||
| The things that they have done to this country are only possible if they're in charge of a giant, unaccountable, and incredibly powerful bureaucracy. | ||
| Because I want to try to relate this, try to put in context what this level of crime is, but an individual could never commit crimes at this level. | ||
| Being at the top of these organizations has so far basically given them a pass. | ||
| Basically saying, look, if you were an individual, you would be punished for this, but because you're in charge of DHS, We're just going to pretend like this is all fine. | ||
| It needs to be the exact opposite. | ||
| In other words, if you smuggle a single human being across the United States border, that's a jail sentence. | ||
| That's a crime. | ||
| Alejandro Mayorkas presided over an industrial-level conveyor belt. | ||
| He didn't just smuggle one person over, which you'd go to jail for. | ||
| He smuggled tens of millions of people over. | ||
| He lost 300,000 children. | ||
| He robbed us of tens of billions of dollars. | ||
| He sold out our country from underneath us. | ||
| And he's walking around? | ||
| And he just gets to act like this is all fine and good because he was appointed to a government position? | ||
| It should be the opposite. | ||
| It should be the opposite. | ||
| When you're in one of these positions, it should not give you protection from prosecution. | ||
| It should make you that much more vulnerable to prosecution. | ||
| And we're hopefully seeing some of that. | ||
| I'll show you the clip on the other side. | ||
| Tom Homan has announced he's going after AOC. She's holding webinars, seminars, where she's instructing foreigners how to break American law. | ||
| Yeah, put her in jail. | ||
| Make an example of her of all of them. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Can you believe we're already in the third hour of the American Journal? | ||
| Thanks so much for being here with us on this Tuesday, the 18th of February. | ||
| We've got a lot more to talk about in the final hour of today's program. | ||
| I do want to remind you to go to thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| Go to thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison. | ||
| If you're going to get anything from the Alex Jones store, Go to thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison. | ||
| I gotta give a shout out to Modern Warfare with Alex Jones on X. I don't even know if I believe what he's posting. | ||
| We haven't had this affiliate link operation going for too long. | ||
| The man posted that he has made like $34,000 off of it. | ||
| I'm like blown away. | ||
| I believe it. | ||
| The man hustles. | ||
| He comments on just about every one of Alex's posts and any post of mine that does well. | ||
| But I don't know if he's posting his affiliate link or what, but apparently he can make a lot of money for this. | ||
| And I'm not. | ||
| So I'm jealous of Modern Warfare with Alex Jones. | ||
| And by the way, you can sign up as well. | ||
| You can sign up as well. | ||
| And if Modern Warfare with Alex Jones is anything to go off of, you can make a living out of this. | ||
| This could be your full-time job. | ||
| Having an affiliate link to thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| But I've not made one one-hundredth of that through my affiliate link. | ||
| So apparently I need to double down on that. | ||
| Folks, if you want to support us, if you want to support me in particular, you've got to go to thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison so they know who sent you. | ||
| And so I can make even a fraction of the amount that Modern Warfare is making. | ||
| Good for him though, man. | ||
| What can I say? | ||
| What can I say? | ||
| And you can sign up too. | ||
| Go to thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| And sign up for the affiliate link, and you can get a link to spread, and you can create content, you can repost our stuff, add the link, and you get a percentage of anything purchased through that link. | ||
| So, of course, we appreciate you keeping us on the air and in the fight, obviously. | ||
| I just, I didn't realize. | ||
| I didn't realize what I could have been making this whole time. | ||
| So Modern Warfare of Alex Jones has inspired me to be more aggressive with my... | ||
| Pushing of the affiliate link. | ||
| Thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison, folks. | ||
| Go there today for all of your Infowars needs. | ||
| And, of course, you support us in this fight, and myself in particular. | ||
| You go to thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison. | ||
| So let's go to some of these videos first. | ||
| Tom Homan has some unkind words for Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez. | ||
| And we'll just go to it here, but, you know, they're... | ||
| The left, of course, is freaking out about this. | ||
| I need a phrase to summarize. | ||
| I don't know what it is, but we need a phrase to summarize whatever this phenomenon is. | ||
| We covered it. | ||
| I mentioned it a second ago when the YouTuber was named King Randall talking about the left is just vicious, hateful freaks that will curse at you and call you all sorts of names if you disagree with them, even politely. | ||
| Whereas... | ||
| Trump supporters, you can be like, I think you're all Nazis and deserve to die. | ||
| And Trump supporters would just be like, oh, bless your heart. | ||
| Right? | ||
| There's got to be a word for the imbalance here. | ||
| Because it's pretty ubiquitous across all these topics. | ||
| It's not, they're doing a thing, we're doing a thing, they get punished, we don't. | ||
| Or vice versa. | ||
| It's not, yeah, they're tyrannical. | ||
| And we're mad at that. | ||
| We're tyrannical, but it's fine when we do it. | ||
| It's not even. | ||
| It's dis-even. | ||
| We don't go after our political enemies. | ||
| They call us tyrants. | ||
| They do go after their political enemies. | ||
| They think they're the champions of democracy and free speech. | ||
| It's wild how this happens. | ||
| So this is another situation like this where they go out of their way. | ||
| To openly fabricate charges against people who have not committed crimes because they're politically motivated to destroy them. | ||
| Eric Adams and Donald Trump. | ||
| They do that. | ||
| They actually do that. | ||
| Now, we, on the other hand, are in favor of politicians being charged with crimes when they commit crimes. | ||
| And that's what AOC has done. | ||
| AOC, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, is not American in any sense of the word. | ||
| And she's showing this by showing her loyalty. | ||
| Belongs to people outside of the United States. | ||
| And she's actually making informational content instructing foreign people how to evade American law. | ||
| That's a crime. | ||
| That's a crime. | ||
| I don't know how much more clear it could be as a crime. | ||
| That's a crime. | ||
| That is a crime. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| Same thing we were just talking about with Alejandro Mayorkas. | ||
| If it was an individual, they'd be in jail. | ||
| For some reason, Democrats get to a position of power. | ||
| Instead of being under more scrutiny, they get to do whatever the hell they want. | ||
| And then they get to say it's politicized charges when they get called out. | ||
| So here's Tom Homan saying he has launched an investigation and asked the DOJ to go after AOC. Let's watch. | ||
| If you give that up to DOJ, what I find disturbing is that any member of Congress wants to educate people how they evade law enforcement. | ||
| You can claim you're educating those constitutional rights, okay, you can keep that claim. | ||
| What she, in fact, is doing is telling people don't open your door, hide in your home, don't talk to ICE. We're talking about people who are in the country illegally, committed a crime, they're a public safety threat, they've been convicted of serious crime, and they've been ordered and removed by a federal judge. | ||
| So it's like AOC and others don't want ICE to enforce the laws that they enacted. | ||
| She's a member of Congress. | ||
| You can't go after her. | ||
| Do you think others should? | ||
| No, I think I've asked DOJ, where is that line of impediment, of interference? | ||
| Now, if someone stands in your way, prevents you from arresting somebody, put your hands on you, that's impediment. | ||
| But what line is telling people to hide from mice, not open the door? | ||
| Where do you cross that line on impediment? | ||
| So I simply ask the Department of Justice, give us that line. | ||
| You have talked to them about this. | ||
| That's what you're saying? | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wow. | |
| We'll see where that goes. | ||
| Tom Holman, I'm out of time. | ||
| Trump supporter czar is basically begging for permission to arrest AOC. Yeah, well, she keeps committing crimes, so she has to be stopped. | ||
| Wouldn't be that. | ||
| If they're worried about getting arrested, they could just stop being criminals. | ||
| There's always that possibility. | ||
| It's always an option. | ||
| Stop being and supporting criminals at any time they choose. | ||
| Now, this next video almost goes back, clip number four here. | ||
| It almost goes back to the first thing we were talking about with the NPC meme. | ||
| This is what is inspiring the NPC meme video that we saw. | ||
| It is the approval rating of Donald Trump. | ||
| It is that the mainstream media, the lefty superstructure, knows that they've lost. | ||
| They've lost the hearts and the minds of the American people. | ||
| They've lost the fight for control of the U.S. government. | ||
| Now we have to solidify this. | ||
| We have to consecrate our victories. | ||
| We have to solidify the achievements we've gained. | ||
| Make sure they continue beyond. | ||
| I mean, this whole program, this whole operation could grind to a halt as early as like next year. | ||
| 2026, there's midterms. | ||
| If they're able to... | ||
| Get majorities in the House and Senate. | ||
| It's nothing but obstruction for the next two years. | ||
| We have to be doing a lot this year and next year, but just operating as if we have a month, right? | ||
| We have to be acting as if we only have a month to get these things done because there's an urgency here that I'm not seeing reflected in Trump or Trump supporters right now. | ||
| Regardless, the left is frantic and scrambling because they recognize That they are losing power in a very real way. | ||
| And I'll get to the real tangible shift that we've been waiting for. | ||
| It's finally happening, where mainstream media is truly dying. | ||
| I'll show you the death knell for mainstream media on the other side. | ||
| First, here's the dirge. | ||
| First, the funeral dirge, and then the death knell of mainstream media, and the left is control of American culture. | ||
| Let's go to clip number four. | ||
| Talk a little bit about Mitch McConnell and the chance he's gonna become a folk hero. | ||
| It ain't gonna likely happen. | ||
| Ain't gonna likely happen because I want you to look at his net approval ratings. | ||
| He is underwater. | ||
| With everybody, he has got the ultimate, or might say, some might say, sad trifecta of being underwater overall. | ||
| Minus 39 points. | ||
| 39 percentage points more of the electorate disapproves and approves of the jobs that he has done. | ||
| How about Democrats? | ||
| He's 58 points underwater. | ||
| My goodness gracious, the chance that all of a sudden, just because he cast three votes against Trump, that he'd somehow become a folk here with them, is absolutely, frankly, insane. | ||
| And then with Republicans, of course, he's gone up against Trump before, and that's why he's 17 points underwater at Republicans. | ||
| When you're underwater with Democrats, Republicans, and overall, the chance that you're going to become a folk hero, it seems rather low to me, Paula. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It does indeed. | |
| All right, of course, the next question is, how does his popularity compare with that of President Trump? | ||
| Yeah, so, you know, I think Donald Trump... | ||
| We'll like these numbers. | ||
| All right, so let's take a look. | ||
| This is the net approval rating I got overall and I got with Republicans. | ||
| Look how much higher Donald Trump is overall versus Mitch McConnell. | ||
| Look at that. | ||
| Trump is on the positive side of the ledger at plus three. | ||
| Mitch McConnell, of course, underwater overall at minus 39. So Trump is 42 points higher than Mitch McConnell is overall among Republicans. | ||
| Of course, Donald Trump very popular there with a plus 82 point net approval rating. | ||
| Of course, Mitch McConnell, again, underwater at minus 17. So you do the math quickly here. | ||
| 82, 17. That is nearly 100 points higher that Donald Trump is, net approval rating-wise with Republicans, than Mitch McConnell is. | ||
| The bottom line is that when it comes to the popularity battle, Donald Trump comes out way, way, way ahead of Mitch McConnell. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, okay. | |
| But is this just a problem with majority leaders? | ||
| Is this like a heavy-as-the-head situation? | ||
| I mean, put this into historical context. | ||
| Where does he stack up against other majority leaders? | ||
| Yeah, I always like going through the history books, right? | ||
| I love spreadsheets. | ||
| I love history books. | ||
| So let's go take a look through the history books. | ||
| We'll take a look at the net popularity ratings of GOP Senate leaders, their final ratings as majority leaders. | ||
| Take a look here. | ||
| Mitch McConnell again, underwater at minus 39 points. | ||
| How about his predecessor, Dr. Bill Frist from the great state of Tennessee? | ||
| He was underwater too, but he was only at minus eight points. | ||
| Trent Lott was at plus five points from the great state of Mississippi. | ||
| And of course, Bob Dole from the great state of Kansas, he was above water as well at plus six points. | ||
| The bottom line is Mitch McConnell, a historical anomaly when it comes to Republican leaders. | ||
| He is far, far, far more underwater than any of the past GOP leaders over the last 40 years, Paula. | ||
| Oh, boy. | ||
| Donald Trump's approval rating, 99 points higher than Mitch McConnell among Republicans. | ||
| Negative 39 approval rating. | ||
| Pack it in, Mitch. | ||
| Pack it in. | ||
| I mean, there should be a threshold. | ||
| Shouldn't there? | ||
| Shouldn't there be? | ||
| If you're negative 39, like if your approval rating is at a low positives, it's bad. | ||
| He's at negative 39 amongst your own party and negative 58 amongst Democrats. | ||
| Maybe you get kicked out of office. | ||
| Something's not tracking here. | ||
| How does a man despised by everyone keep getting elected? | ||
| Doesn't make any sense. | ||
| I get that the left hates Trump, but the right loves Trump, so it sort of offsets. | ||
| How is it that the left and the right despise Mitch McConnell and he gets re-elected 10,000 times and he's been there for 400 years? | ||
| Something is deeply broken in our system. | ||
| Now, the fact is, the reality is that Mitch McConnell has systematically, over decades as a career politician, he has basically drawn all of the funding of the Republican Party. | ||
| It goes through him. | ||
| He's the filter through which funding passes. | ||
| So, he's established through corruption and back deals and double dealing. | ||
| He's established a system by which... | ||
| He controls the money and therefore doesn't have to have approval of the voters. | ||
| He's found a little workaround for the Republic. | ||
| And again, I want to relate this back to what the guy was saying about the NPCs. | ||
| The New York Times article about the NPCs making this completely hysterically fraudulent claim. | ||
| That the Democrats were willing to work when Trump first got into office. | ||
| Democrats were willing to work. | ||
| Bipartisanship was available. | ||
| It was on the table. | ||
| When is it going to get through to the rhinos and the rats? | ||
| Nothing you ever do will be good enough for the left. | ||
| You can destroy your own career. | ||
| You can destroy your family legacy. | ||
| Ask. | ||
| In any of the Republican mainstays, ask Liz Cheney how that worked out for her. | ||
| Ask Mike Pence how that worked out for him. | ||
| These fools that believe the mainstream fabricated worldview, like Liz Cheney and Mike Pence. | ||
| They're convinced that what they see on CNN is true. | ||
| Everybody hates Trump. | ||
| If I come out against Trump, all these leftists will love me. | ||
| They completely... | ||
| Dynamite their own career. | ||
| They betray their patron, political patron in Donald Trump. | ||
| Betray the American people. | ||
| Backstab their voters. | ||
| And then they turn around to the people that they did it for. | ||
| And the people that they did it for are like, we want you to go to hell. | ||
| They're like, if we could, we'd press the button right now and vaporize you. | ||
| You bigot. | ||
| So who are they doing this for? | ||
| What is the benefit here? | ||
| What are they getting? | ||
| You can take one path where you can save the country, and you can be a hero, and you can be massively popular, and you can support Trump, and you can help save the nation and achieve all of the goals that you apparently have been in D.C. for 100 years to try to achieve, and have success and popularity and a long career. | ||
| You can be celebrated at the end of the life, or... | ||
| You can betray your every principle. | ||
| You can betray your own voters. | ||
| You can crush any chance of America to actually regain its liberty and basic human rights and protect the Constitution. | ||
| You can betray all of that and be despised by everybody, and they choose the let's be despised by everybody path. | ||
| I don't know why. | ||
| I don't know what calculus they're doing, but that's the choice they keep making. | ||
| Okay, I guess. | ||
| I had another article somewhere. | ||
| It wasn't even one I thought I was going to talk about today because it's just so silly. | ||
| Mike Pence emerges as one of the few Republicans willing to challenge Trump 2.0. | ||
| Okay, and? | ||
| Nobody heard of Mike Pence before Donald Trump. | ||
| The one thing we know about Mike Pence is he's a backstabbing scumbag. | ||
| So what exactly do you think he's going to do? | ||
| What exactly? | ||
| What is this Hail Mary you're throwing? | ||
| Mike Pence emerges as one of the few Republicans willing to challenge Trump to... | ||
| In other words, Mike Pence emerges as one of the few Republicans who has so irreparably damaged his own career that he'll never be able to get back in the good graces of Republicans by being Trump. | ||
| So now he's got this desperate Hail Mary last-ditch effort move to try to be the anti-Trump Republican and hope that that makes him popular. | ||
| Okay, uh, what? | ||
| Okay. | ||
| If you say so. | ||
| If you say so, good luck, Mike. | ||
| This weekend, he posted an article he pinned more than a decade ago about the limits of presidential power after Trump claimed that he who saves his country does not violate any law. | ||
| Mike Pence is emerging as one of the last Republicans in Washington willing to publicly criticize the new administration. | ||
| Well, good for him. | ||
| Well, good for him. | ||
| Hey, he's got to do something, right? | ||
| Again, just the desperation is palpable. | ||
| They got absolutely nothing. | ||
| They got Mike Pence. | ||
| Mike Pence is now on their team. | ||
| He'll be despised more than anybody else. | ||
| So again, when it goes to the bipartisanship, it just... | ||
| If the liberals were legitimate, like we are, then when people do things for them, they would appreciate it, like we do. | ||
| See, we're very against the Democrats. | ||
| When Tulsi Gabbard decided to leave the Democrats, we embraced her and welcomed her with open arms. | ||
| When RFK Jr. decided that he would actually help Donald Trump rather than working against him, we welcomed him back. | ||
| When the governor of Florida, Ron DeSantis, who was only in office because of Trump's support and who had a very important role to play in the second iteration of MAGA and could have been a powerful ally for Trump, he instead decided to stab him in the back, work against him, try to supplant him as the leader of the MAGA movement and loyal Trump supporters to a man. | ||
| He said, stop being a dirtbag. | ||
| Stop being a scumbag. | ||
| We're not voting for you. | ||
| The only thing you've done here is cripple your own chances by betraying the very person that helped you get to where you are. | ||
| Now then, when he dropped that and supported Trump again, we said, okay, fine. | ||
| Who cares? | ||
| Great. | ||
| You're back on our team. | ||
| Stop being a petulant, ambitious little traitor. | ||
| Good. | ||
| Don't do that again. | ||
| This is the normal way things should go. | ||
| These people, the left, will sit there and say, we just want a principled Republican. | ||
| It's not that we're just immovable communists. | ||
| We just, you know, Trump, he's so brash. | ||
| He's so stupid. | ||
| He's a criminal. | ||
| We have all these other reasons why we hate Trump in particular. | ||
| We just want to return to the time of George W. Bush when there's mutual respect. | ||
| You know, we want there to be a viable, vibrant Republican opposition. | ||
| We need that in America. | ||
| And so Mitch McConnell's like, oh, that's me. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I betrayed Trump and I'm a principled Republican. | |
| They're just like, F you, Mitch! | ||
| Screw you. | ||
| We hate you even more than Trump. | ||
| It's like, just stop believing them. | ||
| Just stop. | ||
| Just stop. | ||
| Just stop falling for their lies. | ||
| It's really not that difficult. | ||
| It's like, stop betraying your friends for your enemies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Is this my political genius? | |
| Why don't you start holding seminars in Washington, D.C. about how not to destroy your entire legacy by opposing the very people that... | ||
| Got you to power in the first place? | ||
| Is this a complicated thing for people to understand? | ||
| Mitch McConnell seems not to be aware of this. | ||
| Now, the story I was saying earlier, the true death of mainstream media is finally happening. | ||
| We've been waiting for this forever. | ||
| Talked about a little bit earlier this week or last week, I can't remember which, where we're saying it's unique now to express concern about something and then have that concern addressed by people in Congress. | ||
| Anna Polina Luna. | ||
| She's launched this task force. | ||
| We raise our hands and go, this is a little suspicious. | ||
| We don't trust this. | ||
| Why are you trying to get in between us and disclosure? | ||
| And she had to respond. | ||
| And she came out and made a video and made a response trying to quell everyone's confusion. | ||
| Up until now, the primary... | ||
| I don't want to say the primary power of the mainstream media, but... | ||
| The fuel of their fire, the reason why, despite having no audience and no actual importance and no ability to... | ||
| Nobody watches them. | ||
| Despite not having an audience at all, they still wielded power and could get things done and could put outsized pressure on politicians because it was a closed ecosystem where nothing was real until it was on the mainstream media. | ||
| You could have millions of people expressing a concern online if the mainstream media ignored it to the politicians that didn't exist. | ||
| That barrier has been broken. | ||
| That divide has been shattered. | ||
| And you now have, especially with J.D. Vance leading the way, commenting on and responding to people online, which completely removes the last vestige of power mainstream media. | ||
| Clings on to. | ||
| I'll explain exactly what I mean on the other side. | ||
| But this is the sea change, folks. | ||
| This is the major shift. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back, folks. | |
| We've got some breaking news to bring you here in just a second. | ||
| I'm going to go through some of these headlines I've been able to get to yet. | ||
| I said earlier in the show that we'd be doing a breakdown of Norm Eisen. | ||
| I had some technical difficulties with my laptop, though, so I'm going to save that for tomorrow so I can really compile it and give you a full-fledged breakdown. | ||
| Just because you've got to get a full-spectrum view of Norm Eisen in particular, but the whole corrupt lawfare establishment. | ||
| We'll do that tomorrow. | ||
| We won't do that today. | ||
| I have a lot more videos still to show you. | ||
| Yeah, a lot of videos to show you. | ||
| First, what I was talking about previously. | ||
| For a long time, the reality has been that the Internet has replaced mainstream media. | ||
| Is the place to find breaking news. | ||
| It's a place where people's real opinions are expressed. | ||
| Still, mainstream media had this stranglehold on politics, largely, because most politicians are not exactly the most tech-savvy people. | ||
| And, of course, it's comfortable. | ||
| It's nice having the network system to rely on. | ||
| And to know that there's like three or four channels you have to pay attention to and everything else you can just sort of ignore. | ||
| That's sort of how it's been for a while. | ||
| This started to, this perception, this illusion of the mainstream media dominance obviously has been crumbling for a while. | ||
| It's been hard to maintain that illusion because of the low viewership numbers on CNN and other places where they're getting, you know, Outdone by I Love Lucy reruns on Nick at Night. | ||
| Mainstream news anchors go from hosting the nightly news and getting tens of millions of viewers. | ||
| They get fired. | ||
| They create a personal channel. | ||
| They can't get a thousand people to watch live. | ||
| The fraudulent nature of mainstream media has been exposed. | ||
| I think what really started accelerating the total collapse... | ||
| Was the podcast strategy that Trump employed during the campaign. | ||
| I think when people look back at this time period, like when historians are studying the development of politics in America, they're going to look to what Barron Trump got his dad to do as a major sea change moment in American history. | ||
| Where... | ||
| It actually became preferable to go on podcasts rather than mainstream news. | ||
| And politicians had to lead this. | ||
| Politicians had to make the choice where to grant importance, right? | ||
| When they only go on Fox News, Fox News seems very important. | ||
| When they choose to go on Joe Rogan and Theo Vaughn, suddenly that becomes the important platform to have. | ||
| And the Democrats didn't quite realize this. | ||
| They tried to sort of make up for it. | ||
| They did a few podcast appearances here or there, but they were still operating as if it was the mainstream media. | ||
| And we've seen since, and I haven't talked about it much here, but it's come out, like the discussions between Joe Rogan and Kamala Harris, and they're trying to negotiate, okay, you have to come here. | ||
| And Kamala Harris is trying to influence Joe Rogan, trying to act like, well, you have to come to us. | ||
| And Joe Rogan's like, no, I don't. | ||
| I don't have to. | ||
| I'm not. | ||
| So if you want to come on, you come to me. | ||
| If not, I don't need you. | ||
| The power dynamics have really shifted monumentally. | ||
| And J.D. Vance is now sort of solidifying this. | ||
| So it happened during the campaign. | ||
| The podcast strategy was huge and monumental and cannot be overestimated in the change that it has wrought to the information landscape. | ||
| Long overdue. | ||
| Should have been a long time before this that Trump was ignoring Fox News and CNN and focusing on the alternative independent media like Joe Rogan. | ||
| Now it's happening to an even greater degree. | ||
| Anna Paulina Luna responding to people on X about being suspicious. | ||
| Like nobody in mainstream media was suspicious of Anna Paulina Luna and the disclosure thing, right? | ||
| People on the left. | ||
| You know, just hate everything about it and are just like, oh, this is terrible. | ||
| They're, you know, Trump is so dangerous. | ||
| He's releasing classified information. | ||
| This is such a big problem. | ||
| And they're just saying the thing they're always going to say. | ||
| They're never going to support it. | ||
| The right wing just says, yeah, this is great. | ||
| Wonderful. | ||
| The right wing mainstream media is celebrating this. | ||
| It was the alternative media that was saying, well, hold on. | ||
| What's your motive behind this? | ||
| Why are you doing this? | ||
| And it was us she was responding to. | ||
| I don't know anybody else who was mounting this pressure campaign that she was trying to. | ||
| That was us. | ||
| That is the major change. | ||
| That's the ultimate death knell of the mainstream media. | ||
| Is when people stop responding to them and start responding to the people on X. And that's exactly what J.D. Vance is doing. | ||
| So there's this exchange from J.D. Vance and Mehdi Hassan. | ||
| And it's great because J.D. Vance just absolutely scorches him. | ||
| Just utterly eviscerates his argument completely, which is great and worth reporting on in and of itself. | ||
| But more important is the fact that the vice president is responding to expos. | ||
| That the political discussion is now fully outside of the control of the mainstream media. | ||
| And the mainstream media always wants to maintain control, obviously. | ||
| They want politicians thinking that what they provide is valuable and they need to do what the mainstream media wants. | ||
| It's always been the politicians that make that true. | ||
| By believing the importance of mainstream media, they grant importance to the mainstream media. | ||
| By only responding to concerns the mainstream media brings up, that's giving them all of the power in the world. | ||
| Now that we're outside of that paradigm, now that it's normal people, average anonymous accounts or Just personal conversations happening on X. Completely outside of their own mainstream media. | ||
| That is removing their source of power. | ||
| That is shattering the illusion of their importance. | ||
| And this is what we've been waiting for the entire time. | ||
| Should have happened a long time ago. | ||
| But it's ridiculous that the mainstream media gets to gatekeep all conversations. | ||
| When it comes to politics, that is being shattered now with the help of J.D. Vance. | ||
| J.D. Vance unleashed a scorching rebuttal to far-left reporter Mehdi Hassan during an online confrontation that has since gone viral. | ||
| Vance, who had just delivered a powerful speech in the Munich Security Conference last week, criticized European leaders for their assault on free speech, condemning their use of misinformation laws to suppress dissent and control political narratives. | ||
| Mehdi Hassan said this on X. So, he's like, I know you're out there criticizing Europeans for arresting people over memes, but have you seen this? | ||
| And J.D. Vance responds, yes, dummy. | ||
| I think there's a difference between not giving a reporter a seat in the White House press briefing room. | ||
| And jailing people for dissenting views. | ||
| The latter is a threat to free speech. | ||
| The former is not. | ||
| Hope that helps. | ||
| Hope that helps, Mehdi. | ||
| Hope this elucidates what your issue is. | ||
| Yes, it is a threat to free speech when the government can determine what is and is not valid political expression. | ||
| Saying that one news organization who refuses to abide by your request doesn't get the privilege of one-on-one contact with you – That is not a threat to free speech whatsoever. | ||
| On that note, somebody had a good takedown of this. | ||
| Cuddled a fluent professional at Feels Desperate on X. And I completely agree. | ||
| Just because he didn't say Gulf of America and said Gulf of Mexico, you're going to deny him a White House press briefing pass? | ||
| And it's like, well, they're the ones who put out an order saying we're going to capitalize black and not white. | ||
| They're the ones who change the names of literally everything and then call you a white supremacist if you disagree with it. | ||
| So it's funny the lack of awareness that they have. | ||
| Where it's like you literally just do to them what they've been doing to you for years. | ||
| It's like in The Simpsons when somebody laughs at Nelson. | ||
| He's like, is that what it's like? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right? | |
| It's his thing. | ||
| Constantly, anytime anybody's heard, he's, ha ha! | ||
| And somebody laughs at him, and he's just like, what? | ||
| Is that what I've been doing to people? | ||
| It's like, yeah. | ||
| Oh, you don't like it. | ||
| Oh, you don't like it when some sort of arbitrary speech law is enacted, and you're forced to conform to it, or else you lose privileges and rights. | ||
| Oh, is that you? | ||
| That feels bad to you, does it? | ||
| Well, ha ha. | ||
| Deal with it, scum. | ||
| From Gateway Pundit, acting director for Social Security Administration steps down after blocking investigation into fraud scheme exposed by Doge. | ||
| Commissioner Michelle King, acting commissioner appointed last month, has been forced out after an attempt to stonewall an investigation into massive fraud within the agency. | ||
| An investigation spearheaded by Elon's Department of Government Efficiency has... | ||
| Determined, King's abrupt departure comes after Musk's team requested access to critical data that could expose widespread abuse and fraudulent claims draining the Social Security Fund. | ||
| They tried to block that when Doge insisted that they be able to investigate and audit these funds and where they were going and the processes by which they were dispersed. | ||
| She decided to resign instead. | ||
| Now, clip number 13, an Inspector General audit. | ||
| Has found the Social Security Administration has mispaid $72 billion over an eight-year period. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There was an Inspector General audit last year that showed over an eight-year period, the Social Security Administration made almost $72 billion in improper payments, a little less than 1% of payments in that time period. | |
| Now, the report also says that most of these improper payments were overpayments, not payments to deceased people or people who didn't qualify to receive these payments. | ||
| At the same time, Jose, this effort by Doge is to go through this. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, and also $72 billion, and that's without a comprehensive search. | ||
| I mean, that's significant. | ||
| That's MSNBC. You can almost feel that last guy halfway through his sentence. | ||
| He's like, wait, I'm not supposed to be saying this. | ||
| So Social Security, the acting commissioner wants to... | ||
| Quit rather than go through an audit. | ||
| But without even a comprehensive targeted audit, they found $72 billion. | ||
| The guy from MSCBC is like, $72 billion? | ||
| And they weren't even looking for it? | ||
| That is not great, but let's not freak out here. | ||
| He realizes halfway through, he's like, oh wait. | ||
| Excuse me, I'm not supposed to be boggled at how much our... | ||
| Social Security apparatus is just pouring into the abyss. | ||
| And of course, this is just the tip. | ||
| It's the very tip of the iceberg. | ||
| They're going to find staggering. | ||
| I mean, they already have found staggering stuff. | ||
| And like you said, they haven't even started looking. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| Over 25 million Americans are registered aged 100 and older, with some purportedly older than the U.S. Constitution itself. | ||
| The information released by Musk aligns with the audit conducted by the Social Security Administration in 2015. Showing that again, you're paying out to people who have been dead for 50 years. | ||
| Okay, so it's a massive issue. | ||
| And they're scrambling to try to prevent this issue from being identified, let alone corrected. | ||
| Okay, but it's happening. | ||
| Now, by the way, on the note of the speech that J.D. Vance gave in Munich, of course, part of this trip, not only was he laying down the law, again, using the power and might of America to actually progress American ideals, to say, we'd love to work with Europe on AI, but you've got to stop the regulation. | ||
| We'd love to be partners in rebuilding democracy with Europe, but you've got to get rid of the hate speech laws that are antithetical. | ||
| To the basis, the foundational beliefs that run our countries. | ||
| And now of course they're going to Saudi Arabia to kickstart peace talks with Russia over this. | ||
| All of these things are anathema to the left and liberals. | ||
| They're infuriated and embarrassed that America would support free speech and want peace. | ||
| They want war and control. | ||
| And they're actually... | ||
| Breaking the law to insist this. | ||
| Clip number six is a Democrat congressman admitting he is just violating the law. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Alex, the Trump administration's policies are changing not by the day, but by the hour. | |
| And I think that's a reflection of the fact that they have no policy. | ||
| There's no doctrine. | ||
| There's no policy. | ||
| They'll put out a tweet, then they'll pull it back an hour or two later. | ||
| The problem with that is that none of this is funny. | ||
| None of this is comical because it has really real consequences to our partnership, to our allies. | ||
| I am here in Munich because I refuse to let Donald Trump and J.D. Vance and Secretary Hegseth and others be the voice of America to Europe and to the world. | ||
| There is a group of us here that are engaged in diplomacy, are engaged in discussions to let them know that there's a lot of people in America who understand that our economy is tied to Europe, that our peace and prosperity is tied to Europe, and that we can't pull back into our own borders and forget what's going and that we can't pull back into our own borders and forget what's going Okay, so that's treason. | ||
| Okay, what that guy's admitting there is sedition and treason. | ||
| I'm not joking. | ||
| I'm not being hyperbolic. | ||
| That guy needs to go to jail. | ||
| The DOJ needs to be releasing a statement today saying we're charging him with the Logan Act. | ||
| He just admitted in no uncertain terms. | ||
| He said we're here doing diplomacy. | ||
| Nobody has authorized him to do diplomacy. | ||
| He does not speak for the American people. | ||
| That Donald Trump and Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth do not speak for America. | ||
| That is exactly what they do. | ||
| That is the point of the election that we had. | ||
| Is that they are the ones duly authorized to speak on behalf of America to foreign actors. | ||
| This guy is just appointing himself. | ||
| He's a congressman. | ||
| He does not have the right to claim to be speaking for America with foreign diplomats, leaders of foreign countries, and foreign entities. | ||
| That is a crime he's committing, and he's openly admitting not only that he's doing it, he's doing it with intent and purpose. | ||
| It's not like he's just going and having personal conversations and maybe he's talking about business a little bit. | ||
| He's saying, I am here as a diplomatic mission claiming that I speak for America, claiming that I am in a position to speak on behalf of Americans. | ||
| Nobody elected into that. | ||
| You cannot self-appoint yourself. | ||
| As a member of the American government to be making diplomatic agreements and decisions on behalf of the United States, nobody has granted them that right. | ||
| This is like a cashier at McDonald's trying to go and make corporate decisions for McDonald's. | ||
| You have not been authorized to do that. | ||
| You can't do that. | ||
| You can't call up the media and say, yes, I am a spokesperson for McDonald's. | ||
| I speak on behalf of McDonald's. | ||
| Let me tell you what McDonald's believes. | ||
| You're not authorized. | ||
| You're not the one appointed to make these statements, to make these agreements. | ||
| He needs to be charged. | ||
| It's called the Logan Act. | ||
| He needs to be charged with the Logan Act. | ||
| There's never been, in my experience, a more clear-cut example. | ||
| And there have been things in the past, right? | ||
| You have like... | ||
| John Kerry going over to Iran early on in the Trump administration, meeting with Iranian officials in a pseudo-official capacity. | ||
| But we don't really know what they talked about. | ||
| We don't know what his motives were in going there. | ||
| It's a little bit unclear. | ||
| It's right on the cusp, right on the line. | ||
| You're not an official with America, but you're over there acting like you are. | ||
| That's a little bit weird. | ||
| That's a little bit suspicious, but we don't really know. | ||
| This guy comes out and says it. | ||
| Representative Jason Crowe. | ||
| Democrat says, I am here acting in the role of a diplomat telling Europeans that the duly elected president of the United States and his deputies do not represent America and I speak for America instead. | ||
| That is just a blatant crime. | ||
| He needs to be arrested. | ||
| He needs to be charged with the Logan Act. | ||
| Maybe they find him not guilty. | ||
| But he's guilty. | ||
| But he obviously is guilty. | ||
| The Logan Act here. | ||
| Enacted 30th of January 1799, a United States federal law that criminalizes the negotiation of a dispute between the United States and a foreign government by an unauthorized American citizen. | ||
| The intent behind the act is to prevent unauthorized negotiations from undermining the government's position. | ||
| Jason Crow gets up and goes, I am negotiating on behalf of the United States to undermine our official position, as stated by Pete Hegseth, Marco Rubio, and Donald Trump. | ||
| Okay, so if this guy is not punished for this, then what does that mean? | ||
| I don't want to make too big of a deal out of it. | ||
| He's just some random congressman trying to puff up his own importance, but he's claiming to be violating the law. | ||
| So I just want to make it abundantly clear how cut and dry this is. | ||
| Some random congressman doesn't get to go and act and speak on behalf of all of America and tell European leaders, ignore the president of the United States, this is what America, I mean, it's just verbatim, black and white, prima facie, violation of the Logan Act. | ||
| 100%, it is a felony, punishable with imprisonment for up to three years. | ||
| He needs to be punished, okay? | ||
| It really is insane how brazen these people are. | ||
| They have to be put in their place. | ||
| This is a call out to Donald Trump and whoever in the Trump administration is in charge of this type of stuff. | ||
| You gotta punish these people. | ||
| Now what they're trying to do is not just treasonous and a violation of the Logan Act. | ||
| They're doing it in pursuit of extending and continuing the pointless and hugely destructive war that we started. | ||
| Okay, that's the main thing that they're fighting back against. | ||
| They're trying to destroy free speech and continue war. | ||
| European leaders' emergency talks yield to zero results other than vague promises of defense spending increases with no consensus on sending peacekeeping troops as the European Union frantically tries to figure out what exactly their position on Ukraine is considering the fact that they do not have the capability of defending Ukraine. | ||
| But refuse to acknowledge that fact. | ||
| U.S.-Russian officials propose a peace plan and lay groundwork for cooperation in Riyadh. | ||
| U.S. and Russian officials have held diplomatic talks in Saudi Arabia without any Ukrainian officials present on Tuesday. | ||
| These groups, led by Secretary of... | ||
| State Marco Rubio and his Russian counterpart, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, are seeking terms for peace agreement in Ukraine as well as negotiating a potential meeting between Trump and Putin themselves. | ||
| They proposed a framework that could involve a ceasefire, elections in Ukraine, followed by the signing of a peace agreement. | ||
| And yes, it really was just that easy. | ||
| Could have been done three years ago, hundreds of thousands of lives, hundreds of billions of dollars. | ||
| God only knows what strife and chaos and misery could have been spared if they had just... | ||
| Had this mindset from the beginning. | ||
| Instead, they have done everything they could to exacerbate this war because they are criminals of the highest degree, true, evil monsters. | ||
| These are monster people, okay? | ||
| Now, they have had this meeting. | ||
| After this meeting with Russia's foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, this statement was made. | ||
| We'll go to clip number 12 now. | ||
| Appoint our teams, respectively, that have worked very quickly to re-establish the functionality of our respective missions in Washington and in Moscow. | ||
| For us to be able to continue to move down this road, we need to have diplomatic facilities that are operating and functioning normally. | ||
| We're going to appoint a high-level team from our end to help negotiate and work through the end of the conflict in Ukraine in a way that's enduring and acceptable to all the parties engaged. | ||
| The third point is to begin to work at a high level as well to... | ||
| Begin to discuss and think about and examine both the geopolitical and economic cooperation that could result from an end to the conflict in Ukraine. | ||
| Folks, it's happening. | ||
| The reset in Riyadh. | ||
| Kiev has been left out, and maybe for that reason, peace plans are falling into place. | ||
| It was a major promise of Trump's campaign. | ||
| He's already fulfilling it. | ||
| The peace talks are already bearing fruit. | ||
| And it may be in very short order that Russia and America can settle the fake differences that have been conjured from thin air by our deep state who need an enemy because they live off of war. | ||
| The war is ending. | ||
| The beast is being starved of its sustenance. | ||
| And we may actually be normalizing relations with Russia, ending the war in Ukraine, and averting the threat of World War III as long as Europe doesn't get cute. | ||
| And start nuclear conflict because they can't bear to be proven wrong. | ||
| They're very angry, very desperate, and probably willing to do insane things. | ||
| We're in a very dangerous period at this point for false flags to re-kickstart and stop the peace that Trump is bringing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | |
| InfoWars.com forward slash show. | ||
| All right, so the left are some of the greatest unintentional comics ever, except when you realize the people that are living under the mind control really are victims. | ||
| I mean, they really love to be soy boys. | ||
| They really love to have low testosterone. | ||
| It's in major studies that they, on average, the more leptish you are, the lower your testosterone is, even if you're a 15-year-old, you're a 20-year-old man. | ||
| So Raw Egg National has posted this this morning. | ||
| I went and looked. | ||
| It's true. | ||
| This is hilarious. | ||
| Then it made me think about some of the news articles and things that have come out recently that I didn't cover. | ||
| Look at this. | ||
| On Wednesday, you can talk for an hour about this guy. | ||
| On Wednesday, I go through my apartment unit's dumpster to make sure there are no recyclables that tenants are throwing into the trash. | ||
| Today, I found this. | ||
| It was a little police state busybody digging through people's trash. | ||
| Little Stasi. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Little, little, little totalitarian. | |
| It's a type of steroid sold by Alex Jones on Infowars. | ||
| He was banned from the internet for hate, for exposing tyranny. | ||
| It's taken by white supremacists to increase their testosterone and masculinity. | ||
| This guy's a real liberal when you go look it up. | ||
| I know which neighbor it is and was because there was also mail in the trash bag. | ||
| Oh, you're reading this mail. | ||
| That's even better. | ||
| I'm not sure what I'm going to do. | ||
| Oh. | ||
| But I live across from an effing Nazi on steroids, and I have no idea. | ||
| And the feed, people responding, I could do a whole hour just comedy-wise on this. | ||
| Now, what did I think of when I saw this? | ||
| It says, I generally couldn't think of a better advert for supermodal vitality if I tried. | ||
| This is hilarious. | ||
| Hey, study, testosterone treatment turns Democrat voters more conservative. | ||
| Here's the big study. | ||
| Right there for yourself. | ||
| There's another one. | ||
| The actual study. | ||
| Testosterone in politics. | ||
| They're literally soy boys. | ||
| So, these people are literally emasculated, deranged ghouls. | ||
| And he thinks it's illegal that somebody has a herbal supplement. | ||
| By the way, Super Bowl Vitality sold out. | ||
| It's a great product. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But... | |
| You can get libido rx that's the powdered same basic formula at info war store.com and it's amazing great for men great for women well it does the bedroom is amazing but it's so good for your whole body the chemicals the food water suppress the hormones you're supposed to have this stuff just helps your body release what you need and separately shilogy and we've got the highest quality Up to 50% off right now on a big sale. | ||
| Introductory at thealexjonesstore.com is the superfood, superfood, super complex with all these crazy amino acids and naturally occurring peptides that just do insane things. | ||
| Look at the Shilogy. | ||
| You'll see it's been all the rage for thousands of years and you get an even bigger rage. | ||
| And we've got the best, the cleanest, the highest quality right now. |
Export Selection