Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| So if we go to the section of this release letter, we can see that they redacted information to protect personnel privacy and information that could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarded invasion of personal privacy or could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of confidential sources, including a state, local, or foreign agency or authority or any private institution which furnished information on a confidential basis. | ||
| And in the case of record or information compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation. | ||
| So basically the implication here is that information in this FOIA request was redacted to protect the identity of informants on Infowars, informants against Infowars over the course of the last several years, as you'll see. | ||
| Now, enclosed after this release letter, It is a very simple document, an import form from the Federal Bureau of Investigation. | ||
| Now, this form, as you can see, is dated 6-28-2019, but there's some very interesting information enclosed here, despite the fact that it's 90% redacted, as you can see. | ||
| If you look down here in the middle of the document, you'll see that Infowars has been classified as a white, racially motivated extremist organization. | ||
| Under a Type 3 assessment, which began on 12... | ||
| Recently, an FBI bulletin dated May 30th, 2019, identified conspiracy theory-driven domestic extremists as a terror threat. | ||
| The bulletin states the FBI assesses these conspiracy theories very likely will emerge, spread, and evolve in the modern information marketplace, occasionally driving both groups and individual extremists to carry out criminal or violent acts. | ||
| However, the Bureau said another factor driving the mounting threat is the uncovering of real conspiracies or cover-ups involving illegal, harmful, or unconstitutional activities by government officials or leading political figures. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ten to twelve men. | |
| Three teams. | ||
| Three shooters. | ||
| The triangulation of five Clay Shaw and David Perry discussed too much before. | ||
| They've calibrated their sights. | ||
| They've practiced on moving parties. | ||
| They're ready. | ||
| It's gonna be a turkey shoot. | ||
| Beware those that question the manufactured narrative. | ||
| The military-industrial complex is watching you. | ||
| Sierra Nevada Corporation, an aerospace and defense company in conjunction with the U.S. military at Southcom, is conducting surveillance tests across six Midwestern states using high-altitude balloons, according to documents filed with the FCC. The Guardian reports the Pentagon claims the balloons are intended to provide a persistent surveillance system to locate and deter narcotic trafficking and homeland security threats. | ||
| The surveillance was authorized to be carried out from July 12, 2019 to 3 a.m. | ||
| Eastern Standard Time, September 1, 2019. And they are currently surveying South Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Missouri, and Illinois. | ||
| The balloons are connected through a mesh network which allows them to share data, possibly using a video capture system called Gorgon Stair, a surveillance system comprised of nine cameras capable of recording panoramic images across an entire city simultaneously. | ||
| Jay Stanley of the ACLU says, We do not think the American city should be subject to wide area surveillance in which every vehicle could be tracked wherever they go. | ||
| We should not go down the road of allowing this to be used in the United States, and it's disturbing to hear that these tests are being carried out by the military, no less. | ||
| There has been no response from the Pentagon, DARPA, Southcom, or the Sierra Nevada Corporation. | ||
| None of the parties involved would say whether the Midwest vehicle data would be deleted, stored, or passed on to other federal or local agencies. | ||
| Jay Stanley of the ACLU says we would like to know what they are doing with that data, how they are storing it, and whether they are contemplating deploying this in the United States. | ||
| says we would like to know what they're doing with that data, how they are storing it, and whether they're contemplating deploying this in the United States. | ||
| Because if they decide that it's usable domestically, there's going to be enormous pressure to deploy it. | ||
| Even more disturbing is that Sierra Nevada Corporation isn't the only company doing the tests. | ||
| Worldview recently did a dozen tests for a client they won't name, gathering data they won't reveal, protecting the privacy of the client while preying on the privacy of millions of average American citizens. | ||
| John Bowne reporting. | ||
|
unidentified
|
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about this. | |
| Get everybody and stuff together. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, three, two, one. | |
| Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to the American Journal on this President's Day broadcast. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's Monday, the 17th of February. | |
| And we're on the clock here to celebrate what the President is doing. | ||
| So I hope everybody out there is having a good President's Day. | ||
| We've got a lot to talk about, and almost all of it having to do with the President of the United States, Donald Trump. | ||
| Although in particular, what we'll be talking about today is a lot of European stuff as well, as there are peace negotiations, real ones headed by the U.S. for the first time since the conflict between the U.S. and Russia broke out through the proxy Ukraine three years ago. | ||
| So we'll talk quite a bit about that, and also about gold. | ||
| We're going to talk a lot about gold. | ||
| Where the gold is. | ||
| Did it ever exist? | ||
| Why are they shipping it around so frantically? | ||
| We have answers for you. | ||
| We'll take your calls throughout the show today as well. | ||
| Well, but let's begin today, as we do every day with our daily dispatch. | ||
| All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Monday, the 17th of February, 2025. | ||
| European leaders scramble ahead of Trump's Ukraine summit with Putin. | ||
| Leaders from Italy, Poland, Spain, Ukraine, France, Germany, and the EU are getting together to try to stop peace from happening. | ||
| Peace is about to break out. | ||
| We are on the cusp of full-blown widespread peace, folks, and the EU is activating to put a stop to it. | ||
| As U.S. and Russian envoys prepare... | ||
| To begin talks in Saudi Arabia on ending the war in Ukraine, European leaders have called an emergency meeting in Paris after being cut out of the peace negotiations. | ||
| Trump says he'll meet Putin to start talks to end the war in Ukraine. | ||
| And this could have been done three years ago, but they had to kill a million Ukrainian and Russians first. | ||
| Again, we'll get back into that. | ||
| But yeah, Europe missed out on their opportunity to be part of the peace talks by... | ||
| Purposely scuttling them the last few times. | ||
| That peace was on the cusp of breaking out. | ||
| Yeah, Europe is in for trouble very soon. | ||
| Really, they've put themselves in an impossible position. | ||
| Here's our next story. | ||
| British Prime Minister Starmer offers to send troops to Ukraine. | ||
| British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has vowed to send British troops to Ukraine as part of a peacekeeping mission to keep the war going, I guess. | ||
| British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has vowed to send British troops to Ukraine as part of a dedicated European-led peacekeeping force. | ||
| Starmer said securing a lasting peace in Ukraine is essential and that Europe should play a significant role in efforts towards that end. | ||
| Sweden has made similar comments. | ||
| So now they're talking about actually putting boots on the ground of UK and... | ||
| Yeah, it's... | ||
| So they want to start World War III. So essentially they are saying that if you try to stop the Ukraine war, then we will expand the war to be basically all of NATO against Russia, full-fledged World War III. Because that was always the intent in the first place. | ||
| But they're going to try to do that with everything they've got. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| We'll get back into the UK. We'll get back into Britain overall. | ||
| But I don't know if the UK can afford to send all these troops overseas. | ||
| I don't know if they realize this, but they are an occupied nation right now. | ||
| And they have sleeper cells of Islamic extremists just waiting for a chance to really pop off. | ||
| I wonder if all of the... | ||
| UK armed forces are sent and bogged down in Ukraine. | ||
| Who will protect London from the mobs, I wonder? | ||
| Meanwhile, UK refuses to weaken online censorship laws despite US pressure. | ||
| Britain reaffirms its commitment to stringent online censorship, rejecting any compromise in the face of U.S. trade talks or political pressure. | ||
| The U.K. government has firmly stated that its online censorship laws will not be softened to appease U.S. President Donald Trump or facilitate trade negotiations with the United States. | ||
| Technology Minister Peter Kyle repeated Britain's stance on maintaining strict digital speech regulations, shutting down any speculation of a shift in policy towards American AI firms. | ||
| And again, the fallout of the speech that J.D. Vance gave in Europe, sort of holding their feet to the fire over their lack of free speech principles. | ||
| After all, America may be one of or really the only country in the world with the First Amendment codified in its founding documents. | ||
| But that was an outgrowth of a European ideal long before America was even discovered. | ||
| I mean, that's what... | ||
| The Magna Carta had to do with, at least in part, all the way back in the 1200s. | ||
| So Europe had century upon century of development refining and expanding free speech laws overall. | ||
| And they've given all that up. | ||
| America simply codified it and solidified it, made it a permanent fixture of our written constitution. | ||
| European countries, for the most part, have unwritten constitutions. | ||
| That have at this point been entirely eviscerated and largely just don't exist. | ||
| Again, we'll get back to that in just a little bit, but this may be hinting towards what their strategy is to act like. | ||
| If we implement, if we restrict censorship, if we allow people to have free speech, then we'll be doing what Trump says. | ||
| It's a Trump talking point now. | ||
| Same way they say that opposing the war in Ukraine is a Putin talking point. | ||
| They'll actually just use that as a reason in and of itself of why they can't have free speech, because it's what Trump wants. | ||
| Just know that's coming. | ||
| Meanwhile, we have this. | ||
| Senator Rand Paul calls for the first Fort Knox gold audit in 50 years, tapping Elon Musk's Doge for verification. | ||
| FOIA requests show 7 out of 13 previous audits reportedly missing. | ||
| Senator Rand Paul has called for this overdue... | ||
| Long overdue audit of the U.S. gold reserves at Fort Knox, something that hasn't happened in nearly 50 years. | ||
| The demand comes as concerns grow over whether the 4,580 tons of U.S. gold supposedly stored at Fort Knox still exists or if bureaucrats in the Federal Reserve have been engaging in financial sleight of hand behind closed doors. | ||
| The call for transparency gained momentum when conservative news outlets Zero Hedge sparked debate on X, posting it would be great if Elon Musk could take a look at Fort Knox just to make sure that the... | ||
| Gold is actually there. | ||
| Last time anybody looked was 50 years ago in 1974. Musk quickly responded, surely it's reviewed at least every year. | ||
| To which Rand Paul fired back with the truth bomb, nope, let's do it. | ||
| The last known audit of Fort Knox's gold took place in 1986. The most recent comprehensive audit of U.S. gold reserves at Fort Knox began in 1974 and continued until 1986, during which approximately 97% of the gold was audited and placed under official joint seals. | ||
| The government committee, consisting of auditors from the General Accounting Office, U.S. Treasury, and the Bureau of the Mint conducted the review. | ||
| And it looks like there will be another review happening. | ||
| Shortly, if Rand Paul and Elon Musk get their way, which so far it does appear to be happening, that's your Daily Dispatch, of course, brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com and the AlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| Go to InfoWarsStore.com today. | ||
| As you know, we are very, very close to the end of the bankruptcy process. | ||
| As of right now, and as long as the website is still up, you can go to InfoWarsStore.com and stock up for maybe the last time on some of our bombshell world-changing products like Survival Shield X2, BodyEase, Ultimate Turmeric, and so many other iconic products on sale now at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Maybe your last time to get them. | ||
| I say get an extra few in case InfoWars is done away with by fiat in case we're... | ||
| Made ultimate victims of this lawfare against us. | ||
| Then you're going to want to have something to sell on eBay in 50 years. | ||
| When Infowars passes from modernity into the realm of legend. | ||
| Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Keep us on the air and in the fight. | ||
| And it may be your last opportunity to do that. | ||
| But everything's still available, on sale, and will be shipped out. | ||
| And you will receive it rapidly. | ||
| So shop with your mind at ease at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Now again, we're going to get into a lot of the stories from the Daily Dispatch today. | ||
| I'm going to start with clip number one. | ||
| This is Bill Still, who's a fantastic reporter. | ||
| He's been doing this for years. | ||
| And it's tempting for me to play like 20 minutes of Bill Still reports about gold in particular. | ||
| He's been talking about this for years. | ||
| And some interesting notes from one of his videos from all the way back in. | ||
| 2010, that I hadn't really thought about, but DOGE is on a mission, obviously, to cut down government spending massively, and that is obviously in a pursuit of lowering the deficit, getting rid of the debt, so we're not paying trillions of dollars on interest for money that a private organization, the Federal Reserve, is printing. | ||
| Here's the problem, though. | ||
| All of our money is debt. | ||
| All of our money is debt. | ||
| All of the money that we ever spend has interest on it. | ||
| So if you don't go to the head of the snake, if you don't get rid of the Federal Reserve, then you're never going to be able to pay down the deficit because every new dollar you print is more interest added on. | ||
| If you want to eliminate the spending deficit, you have to eliminate the debt-based currency that we're on. | ||
| And this may be a step towards that. | ||
| Other presidents have tried. | ||
| Other presidents have tried this, and it's interesting if you look back through American history and presidential history in particular, just through the lens of the president versus the banks, and you find that some of our biggest, well, some of the most legendary presidents, Andrew Jackson on his tombstone, right? | ||
| I killed the banks. | ||
| That was like his main mission in life was to get rid of the central bank. | ||
| There, obviously, JFK had some troubles as well. | ||
| Actually, you find out a lot of the people that have been either assassinated or forced from office in one way or the other was messing with the banking system a little bit too much. | ||
| In fact, this goes all the way back to the 1800s and the assassination of President Garfield. | ||
| And he had some interesting statements about the... | ||
| The state of gold. | ||
| Because gold also is not a perfect system and it can be manipulated by a few people, rich people buying up all the gold and manipulating market prices. | ||
| It's not a perfect system, but it's definitely better than the debt-based system we have now. | ||
| And Bill Still, years ago, did a report on the Federal Reserve, the lack of gold, the great gold heist that actually inspired Goldfinger. | ||
| And it's funny because if you were watching Alex Jones last night on his Sunday night show, he talked about Goldfinger. | ||
| Did a big long monologue about the Federal Reserve being sort of the first conspiracy theory he remembers hearing about when he was like five years old and how he really remembers it because he had just watched James Bond Goldfinger and he hears his family talking about how there really is basically a gigantic gold heist that emptied out Fort Knox. | ||
| It's all absolutely... | ||
| Fascinating, very interesting. | ||
| This has been talked about for a very long time by people in the know. | ||
| Of course, if you get somebody like Ron Paul, who is like the kingpin of our side of the aisle, he identified years ago that all of this other fighting that we're doing, while it may be necessary, while you may have to combat the different cultural poisons on their ground. | ||
| You have to meet them face-to-face. | ||
| At the end of the day, you're not going to solve anything until you get the head of the snake, which is the Federal Reserve and the debt-based monetary system. | ||
| Let's go to this report by Bill Still, clip number one, and his report, this must have been decades ago at this point, about the great gold heist at Fort Knox. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Naturally, gold prices immediately began to soar. | |
| Nine years later... | ||
| Gold sold for $880 per ounce, 25 times what the gold in Fort Knox was sold for. | ||
| One would think that eventually someone in the government would get wind of what was happening and blow the whistle. | ||
| The largest fortune in the history of the world, stolen. | ||
| Shades of the old James Bond film, Goldfinger. | ||
| Well, as a matter of fact, Ian Fleming, the author of the James Bond series, was head of the British counterintelligence service MI5. Some believe in the intelligence community that he wrote much of his fiction as a warning as many authors of fiction do. | ||
| If the removal of all the good delivery gold from Fort Knox can be viewed as a deliberate raid on the U.S. Treasury, then such an operation might well have been years in the making. | ||
| Namely, 40 years. | ||
| Certainly enough time for Fleming to get wind of it and try to prevent it. | ||
| So just how did the story of the Fort Knox Gold robbery get out? | ||
| It all started with an article in a New York periodical in 1974. The article charged that the Rockefeller family was manipulating the Federal Reserve to sell off Fort Knox Gold at bargain basement prices to anonymous European speculators. | ||
| Three days later, the anonymous source of the story, Louise Auchincloss Boyer, mysteriously fell to her death from the window of her 10th floor apartment in New York. | ||
| How would Mrs. Boyer have known of the Rockefeller connection to the Fort Knox Gold heist? | ||
| She was the longtime secretary of Nelson Rockefeller. | ||
| For the next 14 years, this man, Ed Durrell, a wealthy Ohio industrialist, devoted himself to a quest for the truth concerning the Fort Knox Gold. | ||
| He wrote thousands of letters to over 1,000 government and banking officials. | ||
| Trying to find out how much gold was really left and where the rest of it had gone. | ||
| Edith Roosevelt, the granddaughter of President Teddy Roosevelt, questioned the actions of the government in a March 1975 edition of the New Hampshire Sunday News. | ||
| Allegations of missing gold from our Fort Knox vaults are being widely discussed in European financial circles. | ||
| But what is puzzling is that the administration is not hastening to demonstrate conclusively that there is no cause for concern over our gold treasure, if indeed it is in a position to do so. | ||
| Unfortunately, Ed Durrell never did accomplish his primary goal, a full audit of the gold reserves in Fort Knox. | ||
| It's incredible that the world's greatest treasure has had little accounting or auditing. | ||
| This goal belonged to the American people, not the Federal Reserve and their foreign owners. | ||
| One thing is certain, the government could blow all of this speculation away in a few days with a well-publicized audit under the searing lights of media cameras. | ||
| It has chosen not to do so. | ||
| One must conclude that they are afraid of the truth such an audit would reveal. | ||
| What is the government so afraid of? | ||
| Here's the answer. | ||
| When President Ronald Reagan took office in 1981, his conservative friends urged him to study the feasibility of returning to a gold standard as the only way to curb government spending. | ||
| It sounded like a reasonable alternative, so President Reagan appointed a group of men called the Gold Commission to study the situation and report back to Congress. | ||
| What Reagan's Gold Commission reported back to Congress in 1982 was the following shocking revelation concerning gold. | ||
| The U.S. Treasury owned no gold at all. | ||
| All the gold that was left in Fort Knox was now owned by the Federal Reserve, a group of private bankers as collateral against the national debt. | ||
| The truth of the matter is that never before has so much money been stolen from the hands of the general public and put into the hands of a small group of private investors, the money changers. | ||
| So not only is this not anything new, this is like one of the main conflicts that has embroiled all of American politics for the entire existence of America. | ||
| The currency system, the gold trading. | ||
| Now right now, it's being reported that the Bank of England basically has no gold reserves left. | ||
| And they're saying it's taking like four weeks or something, maybe even be longer at this point, to get gold out of the Bank of England because they don't have any. | ||
| And apparently a lot of it has been sent to America. | ||
| This was noticed a while ago. | ||
| And of course we had on Kirk Elliott to talk about this a couple weeks ago. | ||
| He was one of the first to spot this trend. | ||
| The excuse given by the mainstream media is that they're trying to avoid potential tariffs, that Trump's going to come in and tariff everything, so they wanted to ship the gold in now to avoid having to pay a percentage on it. | ||
| That doesn't quite track. | ||
| It doesn't explain why they're shifting this amount of gold to the extent that the Bank of England can't even cover its withdrawals of people who have gold placed with them. | ||
| And of course, gold can still... | ||
| You can still have things like fractional reserve currency with gold. | ||
| That's probably what's happening with the Bank of England right now, right? | ||
| You give the bank your gold. | ||
| They say, yes, you have a pound of gold on ledger, an ounce of gold on ledger, or whatever. | ||
| And then they lend that gold out and just expect you not to come back and get it. | ||
| But if enough people try to get their gold out at the same time, there's not enough to go around. | ||
| The fractional reserve system can still exist with gold. | ||
| Makes it a little bit more difficult than just printing money endlessly forever. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| And of course... | ||
| Here's a story from Medium, the big gold robbery of 1935, the missing gold bars from Fort Knox. | ||
| One of the most puzzling incidents in the history of economics is the supposed loss of gold reserves from Fort Knox, the most protected vault in the United States. | ||
| In 1935, when the economy was uncertain, the U.S. government took strong actions to safeguard the assets by gathering gold reserves in Fort Knox. | ||
| Yet for many years, there have been whispers of large amounts of this gold, now worth around $15 billion, was quietly taken away and never properly documented. | ||
| The question of what has become of this gold has never been answered, leading doubts about the openness of the government and the actual condition of America's gold reserves. | ||
| So again, this isn't a heist like Goldfinger necessarily. | ||
| This isn't an Ocean's Eleven style heist. | ||
| This is the people in charge of the gold committing fraud. | ||
| It's an inside job, you might say. | ||
| Again, Zero Hedge is sort of taking a victory lap on this one. | ||
| Let's do it. | ||
| Rand Paul supports Fort Knox physical audit after Zero Hedge's suggestion goes viral. | ||
| It's one of the biggest questions over the past 50 years is whether the gold at Fort Knox, Kentucky is really there or if it's been plundered. | ||
| What we do know is the last audit of America's gold stash was conducted in 1974 when the U.S. Treasury opened just one of the 15 vaults at Fort Knox. | ||
| So politicians and reporters could swarm the site for a two-hour photo op where roughly 6% of the alleged amount held. | ||
| Adding to the complete farce, none of the bars being passed around the cameras were matched to a serial number, assayed or tested for purity, or even verified as U.S. holdings as foreign countries have previously stored their gold at Fort Knox as well. | ||
| Since there have been no independent verification of the roughly... | ||
| 4,580 metric tons supposedly held by the Treasury outside of the BS annual vault seal checks that don't actually analyze the gold. | ||
| Oh, and they've lost seven of those, by the way. | ||
| Various efforts have been raised to audit Fort Knox. | ||
| Most recently in 2021, when Representative Alex Mooney introduced the now dead legislation to audit America's gold holdings with a full assay, inventory and audit of U.S. gold, which would include a full account of gold transactions undertaken by the U.S. government. | ||
| In 2010, former Libertarian Representative Ron Paul called for an independent audit of Fort Knox. | ||
| It'd be nice for the American people to know whether or not the gold is there, Paul said at the time. | ||
| Well, now Elon Musk is on the case and this may be a task added to the Doge team. | ||
| um And like so many things, I mean, at least with something like USAID, if you're... | ||
| If you're low IQ, you can fall for the argument that actually this is aid. | ||
| Actually, it's a charity and they're cutting off food for hungry people or medicine for sick people. | ||
| That's all a lie. | ||
| It's a total scam. | ||
| It's complete fraud outright, and we'll get into that a little bit later. | ||
| But at least you can make the argument. | ||
| At least if you're low IQ, you could buy the argument. | ||
| If you trust the government, you could buy the argument that, yeah, we just had to spend $38 billion on whatever, dance classes and Timbuktu. | ||
| You really don't have an excuse for not just showing us the gold. | ||
| You claim you have the gold. | ||
| Supposed to be in Fort Knox. | ||
| Show us the gold. | ||
| What excuse would you have to not do that? | ||
| There isn't one. | ||
| I mean, there's no reason why you shouldn't be able to audit the Federal Reserve whatsoever. | ||
| So, they're terrified. | ||
| They're terrified of this. | ||
| There's a lot of scrambling going on. | ||
| There are big moves happening behind the scenes right now. | ||
| And we'll try to... | ||
| You know, puzzle them out and get a handle on exactly who's doing what here on the other side. | ||
| Quick commercial break. | ||
| Go to thealexjonesstore.com to support us, and we'll be right back with more on the missing gold. | ||
| Stay with us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, folks, welcome back. | |
| Okay, we've got so much news to get into. | ||
| I'm going to finish up talking about the gold stuff right here. | ||
| And now, just know that we talk about the conspiracy. | ||
| We talk about everything that we talk about. | ||
| It all filters up and funnels up. | ||
| I mean, the world conspiracy really is a pyramid-shaped organizational structure. | ||
| And the top of it is the banks and the Federal Reserve in particular. | ||
| The people, the private organization that for some reason has been allowed to control our money supply and therefore... | ||
| Control our country since its inception in 1913. Same year that basically everything terrible happened. | ||
| Then we're going to talk about, well, we're basically just going to talk about 60 Minutes. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| It seems like the mainstream media is in such disarray. | ||
| They're so just completely out of it and confused and frightened and anxious. | ||
| Frantic. | ||
| They can't quite get their act together to combat what Trump is doing. | ||
| And it seems like the deep state, the mockingbird press, has sort of consolidated their effort. | ||
| They've sort of retreated. | ||
| They're regrouping in what they have now. | ||
| Their one last remaining solid, stalwart piece of legacy media is 60 Minutes. | ||
| They've really focused their efforts on that. | ||
| And yesterday's 60 Minutes episode was just a masterclass in propaganda where they tried desperately to discredit everything Trump is doing, including trying to bring free speech back to Europe. | ||
| And I want to talk about all that, USAID, and so much more. | ||
| But then we also have the very, very real threat of World War III breaking out. | ||
| Again, in the same places that... | ||
| It always has been, just in a slightly different manifestation this time. | ||
| Ukraine-Russia was always a flashpoint for World War III because obviously NATO wanted to get involved and to have American boots on the ground, to go to direct war with Russia, to open up nuclear conflict with that nuclear superpower was always a major threat. | ||
| Now Trump's in office, he's going to bring about peace deals, but Europe is talking about putting its boots on the ground in Russia. | ||
| So still very much a thread of expanding into a wider regional NATO vs. | ||
| Russia war. | ||
| Just instead of America being the one pulling the strings, this time it'll be Europe basically pulling a kamikaze mission in Ukraine to blow up all of Europe. | ||
| In Israel and Gaza as well, there's a ceasefire and the Gaza bombing campaign has at least slowed down to a trickle. | ||
| And the ceasefire is holding as of now. | ||
| But looking at the calculus there, everybody's paying attention, including myself, you know, two weeks ago. | ||
| I'm saying the next move is obviously for Israel to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities. | ||
| And then Iran's, you know, counterattack will be devastating all of this coming about because of the changing conditions of talks between Iran and Israel slash the U.S. in which... | ||
| What had always been a conversation about Iran's nuclear weapons, we suddenly decided to demand they get rid of their entire ballistic missile program itself, which they're never going to do. | ||
| So the negotiations basically are designed to fail because they want the conflict to happen anyway. | ||
| So we still have World War III to talk about. | ||
| So we'll get into Europe and their free speech mess and just a bunch of crap about Europe right now. | ||
| But in particular, the war that's starting there. | ||
| So just a lot of major, major topics still to get into today. | ||
| But let's continue with the gold situation for the moment. | ||
| Gold Rush, why JPMorgan, HSBC are pulling bullion from the Bank of England. | ||
| Trade disruptions between the United States and Europe caused by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff threats has led to a big shift in the gold market. | ||
| A surge in gold prices in the U.S. driven by trade uncertainties has triggered a rush to transport gold from London to New York, creating one of the biggest movements of physical bullion in years. | ||
| Leading global banks, including JPMorgan Chase and HSBC, are capitalizing on the price gap between the two markets, using commercial flights to ferry gold across the Atlantic, the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday. | ||
| Gold prices have reached record highs amid concerns over trade policies, with the price of gold futures in New York soaring 11% this year to $2,909 per troy ounce. | ||
| Analysts predict the prices could soon surpass $3,000 per troy ounce for the first time. | ||
| Meanwhile, the gold prices in London have lagged behind, trading about $20 lower per ounce since early December. | ||
| Now, they keep blaming this or saying this is because of Trump's tariffs. | ||
| Uncertainty, you know, leading the case. | ||
| I mean, the excuse they just reiterated like four times in the first paragraph of this article. | ||
| Yeah, I'm a little bit suspicious. | ||
| It seems a little bit more likely that they knew Donald Trump was going to be auditing the gold reserves. | ||
| That they knew that Trump was going to be auditing the whole of government and would be checking not just the checking accounts of these various governmental organizations, but would also be... | ||
| Actually auditing the fiscal reserves of gold like Fort Knox. | ||
| And so, for about a week before Trump became president, and for about three weeks after, since then, the Bank of England has been frantically sending as much gold as they possibly can to New York. | ||
| Again, it's all, it's... | ||
| It's very interesting. | ||
| I mean, they're very insistent on this is about tariffs. | ||
| It's all about tariffs. | ||
| I'm a little bit suspicious of that. | ||
| Market participants have attributed this price gap to recent tariff threats by U.S. President Trump, who's criticized Europe's trade policies and hinted at further duties on the region. | ||
| Although gold is not directly targeted by these tariffs, the market has reacted sharply with traders exploiting the discrepancy. | ||
| So again, it doesn't even really make sense. | ||
| Trump has talked about tariffing. | ||
| He talked about tariffing manufacturing goods or raw materials, not gold. | ||
| So why would gold be affected so greatly? | ||
| It doesn't quite explain what's actually happening, which means there's a different explanation that they're not telling you. | ||
| To take advantage of the higher price in New York, banks are withdrawing large amounts of gold from London vaults and Swiss refineries, transporting it to the U.S. for delivery into future contracts. | ||
| J.P. Morgan alone has planned to deliver $4 billion worth of gold just this month. | ||
| The bank transports gold in high-strength vans to London's airports for loading it onto cargo holds of commercial jets. | ||
| Since COMEX contracts require gold bars of different size than those typically stored in London, some banks first send bullion to Swiss refiners to recast the bars before shipping them to the U.S. | ||
| Others bypass this step by exchanging gold in London for bars to meet U.S. specifications or sourcing metals from Australia. | ||
| So it's gotten to the point where the Bank of England is struggling to keep up with withdrawal requests. | ||
| Traders seeking to retrieve gold have, in turn, faced lengthy delays, prompting anxious calls to central bank officials. | ||
| The last major dislocation of the gold market occurred in 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic shut down Swiss refineries and grounded flights, disrupting the flow of bullion. | ||
| India brought home 200 tons of gold stored in England. | ||
| China's also stockpiling gold. | ||
| This is not something you do when you have a stable financial system. | ||
| It's something you do ahead of something like war. | ||
| Again, why are banks, U.S. banks, flying gold from London to New York from the independent code.co.uk? | ||
| Deep under London's Threadneedle Street lies an intricate network of tunnels holding the world's second largest depository of gold. | ||
| The Bank of England's nine heavily fortified vaults hold hundreds of tons of the precious metal, valued at more than $200 billion. | ||
| But now... | ||
| They are slowly being emptied over fears that President Donald Trump is about to start a global trade war. | ||
| Much of the gold has been shipped to New York City, where the commodity is for the moment worth substantially more than the U.K. capital. | ||
| U.S. Bank J.P. Morgan and the U.K.'s HSBC are two of the biggest names flying precious metal across the Atlantic to cover losses on short positions. | ||
| Again, these people are referencing the President's sweeping 25% import tax onto other metals, steel and aluminum. | ||
| Again, steel and aluminum are manufacturing components. | ||
| Gold, not so much. | ||
| I mean, it is, but only for like cell phones, little things like that. | ||
| It's much more valuable and more often used as a store of wealth, which is what this is really all about. | ||
| Traders are now nervous that Trump will impose tariffs on gold, even though he's never suggested that. | ||
| He has, however, talked about re-implementing the gold standard, amongst other things. | ||
| And again, we can get into the history of this. | ||
| Just know, people that have done this before or tried to do this before have either been assassinated or attempted to be assassinated at pretty much 100% rate. | ||
| I mean, you tell me about a president that tried to mess with the banks and I'll tell you about a president who was assassinated or who they attempted to assassinate. | ||
| Pretty much 100%. | ||
| I mean, how many times did they try to kill Andrew Jackson? | ||
| He's the one that killed the banks. | ||
| They killed James Garfield, who was very interested in eliminating the gold speculators' ability to manipulate the entire financial market. | ||
| Ronald Reagan had an audit and was shot, almost died and had to give up his presidency to CIA plant Vice President George Bush. | ||
| JFK, of course. | ||
| Tried to solidify and get his back towards and actually printed some bills, if I'm not mistaken, directly printed by the U.S., not by the Federal Reserve private banking institution. | ||
| And he was shot in the head in front of everyone. | ||
| So it's a pretty dangerous thing for Trump to be pursuing here. | ||
| And it's not a coincidence. | ||
| That you've got Musk and Rand Paul and obviously Trump talking about auditing gold reserves, places like Fort Knox, or even reimagining the currency system as we know it to include Bitcoin or gold or some combination of the two. | ||
| And having all of these tons of gold being shipped frantically as quickly as possible to the point that the Bank of England can't even meet its withdrawal demand. | ||
| Because they don't have the gold, you understand. | ||
| There's no other reason why you can't meet the withdrawal demand. | ||
| You just don't have it. | ||
| It's pretty wild. | ||
| Roughly 8,000 bars have been moved out of the banks of Alta over the past few months, equating to about 2% of its total stock. | ||
| And there's other aspects to this as well. | ||
| Of course, I'm sure we've all seen the images. | ||
| It's been going around recently as a meme saying, oh look, we found the weapons of mass destruction, and it's American army men. | ||
| In Iraq with a giant dumpster full of gold. | ||
| And it turns out that, you know, that was a big part of why we went into Iraq to seize the gold there. | ||
| Libya, of course, tried to do a gold-backed currency as well. | ||
| And we all know what happened to him. | ||
| So, if, I mean, it's like crossing Hillary Clinton or messing with gold and the fiat money system. | ||
| These are things. | ||
| They get a man suicided these days. | ||
| And it doesn't matter if you're the sovereign leader of an independent nation. | ||
| They'll still have you bayoneted to death for trying to mess with their control of the monetary system. | ||
| That in turn gives them control over literally everything. | ||
| So we're entering into a very interesting new phase of the information war where we have the head of the snake in the crosshairs and are moving in for the kill. | ||
| And that's when they're going to defend themselves most insanely, most vociferously. | ||
| I think we have one more video of this, but it's not. | ||
| It's just a little imagery of some of the gold reserves that should be in England, that were in England back when this video was done. | ||
| Gold storage, clip number seven. | ||
| There's something strange going on in the gold market, but it's from a BBC program just showing one of the vaults under the Bank of England. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Gold is here. | |
| This is one of nine gold vaults that we have here at the bank. | ||
| There's about 400,000 gold bars stored here. | ||
| And collectively, they're worth about 250 billion pounds, something like that. | ||
| So you can see there was gold at one point, but there's also been some scandals recently in like the last decade or so where gold bars being traded on the world market had tungsten cores. | ||
| Things like that. | ||
| So, who knows? | ||
| Who knows what the truth is? | ||
| All we know is that the people who must know the truth is, the people who are in control of the gold, are at this moment, frantically, as quickly as they can, and to their own detriment, sending as much gold as they can possibly get their hands on to the United States, for some reason. | ||
| For some particular reason. | ||
| And I guess you can speculate on what that might be. | ||
| Now, I do want to get into... | ||
| I basically just want to go through 60 Minutes because that is apparently the last remaining, the last standing propaganda outlet still pumping out the just absolute hogwash of mainstream talking points. | ||
| This one in particular is... | ||
| It's just a lie. | ||
| It's just not true, the way they're presenting this. | ||
| It's clip number 18, 60 minutes. | ||
| Again, it's like they're almost doing us a favor. | ||
| It's like, okay, what are the leftists scared of? | ||
| What are they telling their followers to focus on? | ||
| What defense are they playing? | ||
| Because that will then inform you about what offense you should play. | ||
| What are they concerned about getting the messaging right on? | ||
| And the first is trying to demonize Elon Musk's destruction of the USAID, Donald Trump's elimination of USAID as a program. | ||
| Let's go to this clip first and we'll get into some of the, basically the only effective argument being made right now about this. | ||
| Which, it's not even effective anyway. | ||
| It's a lie in and of itself, so we'll get to that in a second. | ||
| But here is a... | ||
| 60 minutes trying to make us feel sad for the people that have been robbing us and have now been cut off from the blank check funnel from USAID. Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
People are really scared. | |
| I think that, you know, 12 days ago people knew where their next paycheck was coming from. | ||
| They knew how they were going to pay for their kids' daycare, their medical bills, and then all gone overnight. | ||
| All gone overnight for Christina Dry and Adam Dubard fired this month in the chaotic shutdown of foreign aid distributed by the U.S. Agency for International Development, USAID. More than 8,000 USAID employees were sent home by the administration. | ||
| They're not looking for competency. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They're not looking for if you're good at your job. | |
| They're looking for peer loyalty tests. | ||
| And if you don't give it, you will be punished. | ||
| And they had to leave the building. | ||
| And these are folks who had decades and decades of public service serving USAID across administrations from, you know, George Bush to Obama to the first Trump administration. | ||
| And they were never able to walk back in the building again. | ||
| There was no process. | ||
| No one explained to them why they were being relieved. | ||
| To my knowledge, they received an email, and then if they didn't leave the building, they were escorted out of the building. | ||
| Yeah, they were fired. | ||
| Yeah, no, that's how it works. | ||
| Again, you just take out the descriptive words, and this story is nothing. | ||
| It means nothing. | ||
| They add in words like chaotic to characterize something that... | ||
| Wasn't necessarily chaotic. | ||
| A bunch of people getting fired. | ||
| Nothing chaotic about that. | ||
| Send out an email. | ||
| Your position has been eliminated. | ||
| Thank you for your time. | ||
| Goodbye. | ||
| And then the person is fired. | ||
| There's nothing chaotic about that. | ||
| But if you don't have the word chaos in there, then why you're even making the story doesn't make any sense. | ||
| Like, why would 60 Minutes do a report that's just like... | ||
| Inside the firing of employees. | ||
| That doesn't make any sense. | ||
| No, call it chaotic. | ||
| Act like this is some sort of crime being committed against them. | ||
| It's not, though. | ||
| And that was basically just a lie. | ||
| Just everything you just saw was just a big fat lie. | ||
| As Community Notes noted on X, and Elon Musk retweeted, saying 60 Minutes are such liars. | ||
| As the Community Notes states, all employees were offered eight months of pay and benefits. | ||
| So they make this video where it's when we're going, oh, you know, one day we have a job, the next day we're out on our butts, we have no help, we have to get childcare and pay for our rent, and how are we going to do it? | ||
| They all got eight months of severance pay. | ||
| I've never heard of somebody getting eight months severance pay. | ||
| I mean, I'm sure it happens. | ||
| It's the type of thing that happens when, like, a CEO destroys a company and moves on to the next company and gives themselves, you know, it's a 12-month severance pay. | ||
| Because they can. | ||
| Like the highest levels of the executive suite of a company, you might see something like this. | ||
| But for every single employee to be given three-fourths of a year in pay, two-thirds of a year, whatever's higher. | ||
| What are they whining about? | ||
| I mean, what are they whining about? | ||
| Mass resignation starts new defiance in second term. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| I can't see that. | ||
| But, yeah. | ||
| Good. | ||
| Good riddance. | ||
| Let them be gone. | ||
| Be gone. | ||
| Go away. | ||
| Shut up. | ||
| And, look, it's unbelievable how many positions are being cut right now. | ||
| And the latest, we showed you last week, the Google searches spiking of things like offshore bank account. | ||
| Or criminal defense lawyer. | ||
| These things not being searched really at all in D.C. until the day after Trump got inaugurated and suddenly lots of people were very interested in how to move money overseas and avoid prosecution. | ||
| Very suspicious. | ||
| Well now the latest trend is people looking at the housing market around D.C. and seeing the price crater as entire neighborhoods go up on the market because it turns out that By the way, the richest neighborhood in America is North Arlington, and everybody who lives there is just a scammer living off taxpayer money. | ||
| So great news for anybody in D.C. who's not a blood-sucking parasite. | ||
| Your house prices just dropped tremendously. | ||
| If you're looking to buy a home in D.C., you can thank Trump for the absolutely cratering house prices in that area. | ||
| And this story from Raw Egg Nationalists on Infowars this morning has another angle to the story. | ||
| Unemployment spikes in D.C. as doge cuts bite. | ||
| Washington, D.C. had one of the highest unemployment rates in the country in December 2024, standing at 5.5 percent, while the national rate was 4 percent. | ||
| Around 2.4 million people worked for the federal government, excluding post office employees, with nearly a fifth of that total employed in the Washington, D.C. area. | ||
| Well, now unemployment claims have spiked massively in the nation's capital as Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency go to town on government excess. | ||
| As NBC News reports, since Trump has taken office, nearly 4,000 workers in the city have filed for unemployment insurance as part of a surge that began at the start of the new year, according to Labor Department figures not adjusted for seasonal factors. | ||
| In all, just shy of 7,000 claims have been filed in the six weeks of the new year, or about 55% more than in the prior six-week period. | ||
| Filings rose to 1,780 for the week ending February. | ||
| Eighth, a 36% increase from the prior week and more than four times around the same period in 2024. The general rate of unemployment, by contrast, has remained largely unchanged, meaning that nationwide, there's not a big spike in unemployment requests. | ||
| In Washington, D.C., it's 50% higher than it was six weeks before, 36% higher than, I'm sorry, four times higher than the same period. | ||
| Last year. | ||
| So these doge cuts are reverberating out because, remember, this funding was designed to reverberate out. | ||
| You may be funding one organization, but that one organization is contracting out to their friends, is buying ad space on media. | ||
| All of that money goes into organizations and then gets fitted out to other organizations and then gets spread to other organizations. | ||
| So, again, you cut off the head of the snake. | ||
| You kill the body of the Hydra, and all these different heads rot away. | ||
| And that's what's happening right now, is you have millions of people doing absolutely nothing for the American people, but living off of American taxpayer dollars, living very highly off of taxpayer dollars, having their gravy train cut off, and they're going to have to go do something productive for once in their lives. | ||
| Now, the argument against this that I've seen put forward constantly is like, this is illegal. | ||
| They claim it's illegal. | ||
| They claim that what Elon Musk is doing, shutting down USAID or even auditing USAID, is somehow illegal because USAID was created by Congress and therefore it's Congress that has to be the one to shut it down. | ||
| Now that, on the face of it, is nonsense. | ||
| So what they're saying essentially is that Congress gets to create an organization in the 1960s and that just from then on... | ||
| It just can become a slush fund for far-left projects with absolutely no oversight, no justification for it existing, just an endless, infinite, blank-check slush fund for leftists, and you're never allowed to audit it. | ||
| You're never allowed to look into it. | ||
| Congress isn't doing that. | ||
| Congress isn't looking into it. | ||
| Congress is the one benefiting from it, largely, when you have Congress people sitting as board members in the NGOs that are receiving. | ||
| The billions of dollars from USAID. We do not have to just allow a totally pointless slush fund for leftists exist forever and never have it audited and never find out where our money's going. | ||
| That's ridiculous. | ||
| The executive branch is enforcing the law and ending fraud and waste. | ||
| and they're desperate to come up with a reason why they shouldn't. | ||
| All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
| This is The American Journal. | ||
| Second hour is on. | ||
| Again, 60 Minutes is the premier propaganda outlet for the deep state. | ||
| It has been for a long time, but it's sort of the last remaining effective one, I would say. | ||
| You would expect to see, I don't know, we just don't see that much from the left-wing media these days get spread around. | ||
| They aren't solidified on their messaging. | ||
| They're really just frantically scrambling to try to defend themselves against Trump's attacks. | ||
| When they have absolutely nothing to stand on. | ||
| Now, 60 Minutes is in the same position. | ||
| I think they're just more sophisticated than other people. | ||
| I don't really know how to put it. | ||
| Sophisticated is not the right word. | ||
| But they are trying. | ||
| They're trying to do this. | ||
| They're trying to, in a sophisticated way, frame what's happening with things like USAID as horrible when the reality is everybody loves it. | ||
| Everybody loves what's happening with USAID, except for the people directly affected by USAID being shut down, people that are getting their funds cut off. | ||
| So I'm going to go to clip 21 here. | ||
| This is a 60 minutes piece trying to downplay the corruption of USAID in a way that it's like the way they try to defend it makes it clear that this is an intelligence operation because they're running the same Psychological trickery that they always do. | ||
| You'll see exactly what I mean. | ||
| Let's go to clip 21 now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
About USAID, President Trump has said, quote, billions of dollars have been stolen. | |
| The whole thing is a fraud. | ||
| It's utter nonsense. | ||
| The most accountable aid agency in the world is USAID. I've written actually widely on this subject. | ||
| 40% of the staff are accountants and lawyers and people trying to make sure no money is stolen. | ||
| We've created systems to monitor that. | ||
| What they did was they went back 20 years to try to find things. | ||
| If you have to go back 20 years to find abuse, that means there isn't that much abuse. | ||
| USAID's spending in 2023 was $38 billion. | ||
| That's less than 1% of the federal budget. | ||
| Natzios told us there is waste and occasional fraud like any big agency. | ||
| Think of the Pentagon. | ||
| But the money, he says, is watched by officials, including those in the OMB, the Office of Management and Budget. | ||
| The question is, why did the Congress approve all these contracts and grants and programs all these years? | ||
| Why did OMB approve them? | ||
| Why did the State Department, F-Office, the F-Office controls all foreign aid spending. | ||
| Every line item in the USAID budget is approved by three different bodies. | ||
| The F-Office, OMB, and the Congressional Oversight Committees, of which there are four. | ||
| Four. | ||
| No one caught all these horrible abuses? | ||
| That's just not believable. | ||
| What's not, I'm sorry, what's not believable about that? | ||
| This is the thing. | ||
| They think that by claiming that all these government bodies had oversight should make you less suspicious of USAID. All you're doing is condemning these other government branches. | ||
| All you're doing is admitting that there had to be massive coordination between entire segments of the government to carry out this fraud because it's all fraud. | ||
| They never actually confronted the things that... | ||
| Elon Musk and Donald Trump are finding and cutting. | ||
| The list upon list upon list that have been published everywhere. | ||
| The $50 million for condoms to whoever. | ||
| I mean, we've been over the list a million times. | ||
| And it's millions and millions of dollars. | ||
| So it's funny. | ||
| He's like, they had to go back 20 years. | ||
| It's like, really? | ||
| Then why are people crying about their stuff getting cut right now? | ||
| If they had to go back 20 years, then why are they finding all of these programs still active and still receiving massive amounts of money to this day? | ||
| And why are all the people in these programs being fired today if they had to go back 20 years to find this stuff? | ||
| Saying that you have a bunch of accountants and lawyers doesn't give me any comfort. | ||
| All that means to me is, yeah, you've got a bunch of the experts who know exactly how to categorize everything and do the paperwork correctly to hide your criminality, to disguise the theft under the auspices of aid. | ||
| And, you know, whatever else. | ||
| Fighting hate speech. | ||
| Increasing atheism in Nepal. | ||
| Getting trans teens to stop vaping. | ||
| They are scrambling and desperate and trying to justify their expenses. | ||
| Saying things like it's only $38 billion. | ||
| The work of Doge is revolutionary. | ||
| And the left... | ||
| I mean, just tell how effective what's happening is because the left is absolutely scrambling to try somehow desperately to stop the American people from being super into what's going on. | ||
| They really are really desperate to tell you that it's not the fact that your money is being stolen by the billions that's the problem. | ||
| It's that Elon Musk is trying to stop it. | ||
| That's the real issue. | ||
| Now, again, if you want to point to Something that USAID is doing that's positive. | ||
| And I grant you there probably is a thing or two. | ||
| There's probably one or two things USAID is involved in that I would look at and go, yeah, you know, that's probably good. | ||
| Not a lot. | ||
| There's not a lot. | ||
| There's probably one or two things. | ||
| That's the hostage puppy situation. | ||
| That's, oh my God, you're going to kill a 71-year-old lady from Thailand if you cut this off. | ||
| And so now you're a murderer if you don't give me millions of dollars. | ||
| Even though the organization that was doing that pays their president like $1.2 million a year, and it's just all a giant grift. | ||
| I mean, it doesn't matter really what charity it is, but especially the government charities, 95-plus percent of the funds that go into it go just directly into the pockets of the people running the charity. | ||
| No help. | ||
| Nothing's ever actually done, and there's no demand for justification for spending the money. | ||
| Again, you can find contracts where they're paying some production company millions of dollars to produce ads to try to get trans people to stop vaping. | ||
| Is there any data on that? | ||
| Can you show that it was effective? | ||
| Did they even ever air the ads? | ||
| Do we even know what the purpose of it was? | ||
| What strategy they were taking? | ||
| Is this worth the money? | ||
| There's no clarification at all. | ||
| There's no demand that these people explain what they're doing and how they're spending our money. | ||
| They're just stealing it. | ||
| It's just fraud. | ||
| And it's this thing that the left does, where they go, basically... | ||
| Basically, these people steal money, and then they label it aid. | ||
| And then people go, oh, well, you're cutting aid. | ||
| That can't be fraud. | ||
| It's labeled as aid. | ||
| No, but it's labeled as aid funds, so it's not fraud, therefore. | ||
| Okay, so people who are defrauding you are just claiming it's... | ||
| Like, it's really not complicated. | ||
| They're very deliberately stupid. | ||
| They're being deliberately stupid right now. | ||
| And the way you can tell that the last clip that we just played from 60 Minutes comes straight from the intelligence agencies is because they take this tactic. | ||
| They always do. | ||
| They have these little patterns that you can recognize them by. | ||
| They don't say USAID has mechanisms to prevent fraud. | ||
| What he said was, quote, USAID is the most accountable aid agency in the world. | ||
| Just like how 2020 wasn't just a legitimate election where the fraud was minimum. | ||
| It was the safest and most secure election of all time. | ||
| USAID is the most well-regulated accountable aid agency in the world. | ||
| And all that means is that they have You know, carefully documented their fraud. | ||
| That's all that that means. | ||
| It's like, we have 70% of the people are accountants and lawyers. | ||
| It's like, okay, well then, how much of an aid organization is this really? | ||
| Oh, we're an aid organization, but 70% of our employees are accountants and lawyers? | ||
| It sounds like you're some sort of financial firm. | ||
| Sounds like your entire business exists to filter money and to make sure it's done in a technically legal way. | ||
| That's all that says to me. | ||
| So you have the manpower and the skills and the accountants and lawyers to make everything you're doing seem legal when it's obviously not. | ||
| And again, they try to... | ||
| I mean, they're just lying. | ||
| They're just lying about a lot of this. | ||
| They had to go back 20 years to find abuse. | ||
| No, they're cutting programs that exist as we speak that exist right now. | ||
| So what does that even mean? | ||
| How is that a talking point? | ||
| Did he go back 20 years? | ||
| What? | ||
| No, we'll go back 60 years. | ||
| The fraud's been going on since USAID was founded. | ||
| And it's like, why are they even arguing this? | ||
| We know 100% that at least certain USAID programs were clearly fraudulent. | ||
| Where you had the CIA running like color revolution. | ||
| Destabilization programs in places like Cuba, and they did it under the guise of an AIDS charity. | ||
| Well, we've really got to help stop the spread of AIDS in Cuba. | ||
| They sent a bunch of CIA agents to go down and start fostering revolution. | ||
| They can't even say, oh, this is totally legit. | ||
| It's on record. | ||
| We know that it's used to carry out foreign policy coups overseas. | ||
| Bring about regime change overseas and in America, by the way. | ||
| Because all they ever do is... | ||
| Everything they do is deconstructionist to whatever the organization is. | ||
| Or the entity is that they're being sent into. | ||
| And have you ever heard... | ||
| Have you ever heard somebody saying it's only $38 billion? | ||
| Have you ever heard an amount of money like $38 billion with the word only in front of it? | ||
| These are the same people that will hysterically cry crocodile tears and claim that Elon Musk spending however much money on Twitter, $4 billion on Twitter or whatever it was, that could feed every hungry person in the world. | ||
| Really? | ||
| Because you're spending $38 billion a year apparently on that exact goal and you've achieved absolutely nothing. | ||
| $38 billion every single year and they're like, it's... | ||
| It's just $38 billion a year. | ||
| It's just the size of entire industries, several times the size of the GDP of hundreds of countries. | ||
| It's like, what do you mean it's only $38 billion a year? | ||
| Again, 60 Minutes is the flagship propaganda outlet. | ||
| This is the best they got. | ||
| This is their best argument against what Elon Musk is doing. | ||
| It's claiming that they have to go back 20 years when everything they're cutting is these days, saying USAID is the most accountable aid program in the world, and basically saying, well, you know, Congress has oversight. | ||
| It's Congress's responsibility. | ||
| Well, what has Congress done? | ||
| Has Congress done an audit? | ||
| And again, it's whatever. | ||
| It doesn't even make sense. | ||
| If you wanted Congress to audit USAID, I mean, what would that look like? | ||
| So you have thousands of programs. | ||
| They'd all have to come in and try to justify why what they're doing is pertinent to U.S. national security or something that's worth spending taxpayer money on. | ||
| Well, what would that argument look like? | ||
| You have people coming in and talking about why it's important to have a black woman perform beat poetry in front of a bunch of wealthy Irish liberals to assuage their white guilt? | ||
| What's the argument for that? | ||
| It would be the entirety of Congress's If they were responsible for going through with a fine-tooth comb every penny the USAID sent. | ||
| Luckily, that's what Doge is for. | ||
| That's what Doge is doing. | ||
| Don't worry about it. | ||
| We got this, okay? | ||
| And I want to bring somebody on and debate this or something because I would like to know what their answer is. | ||
| You have this unaccountable slush fund that is apparently just sending millions of dollars to programs all over the world with no... | ||
| What is their solution to that? | ||
| Their answer is you just have to let that exist forever. | ||
| You can't look into what they're spending their money on. | ||
| That they just have a blank check, a book of blank checks from the American taxpayer, and it's illegal to find out what that is or to disagree with how they're spending it. | ||
| There is no argument for this. | ||
| The only argument you could say would be the USAID was made by Congress, therefore Congress should have the oversight of it. | ||
| Actually, logically tell us how that would work. | ||
| How would Congress audit this? | ||
| Are they even the people trustworthy enough to audit it? | ||
| One of the only other claims they can make is they're somehow suggesting that Elon Musk is doing this to make money. | ||
| Again, they're throwing in a bunch of random stuff that has nothing to do with what's going on to try to muddy the water and make people believe things that aren't true. | ||
| Things like They'll point to this big order of armored Tesla cars that the U.S. Army made. | ||
| And they'll say, look, Elon Musk is benefiting directly from that agreement was signed and agreed upon in December 2024 when Biden was still in office. | ||
| So they're just throwing these things in that just clearly have nothing to do with what's going on, that were settled before Trump was even in office. | ||
| They're pointing to those things and saying that that's Elon Musk benefiting from what's going on right here. | ||
| But even if it was, even if it was during Trump's presidency that Elon Musk was receiving some big order of armored Tesla trucks, or people point to Elon Musk and go, he's so worried about government waste, his companies have received billions of dollars from the U.S. government. | ||
| The difference is, he has companies that are doing things for the American government. | ||
| The American government is paying his companies to then, like, Fire rocket ships into space or provide them with Teslas. | ||
| If USAID was spending a bunch of money but were actually receiving things in return, that's entirely different. | ||
| It's the same thing they did with Trump where they talk about Donald Trump is corrupt because he had a group of soldiers stay at his hotel in Scotland one time. | ||
| That was one of the biggest scandals from Trump's first... | ||
| Administration was the fact that army officers stayed in his hotels, and so therefore their stay was paid for by the American taxpayer dollars. | ||
| Therefore, American taxpayers were paying Donald Trump, but paying normal prices for a legitimate service that he was providing. | ||
| Not like Joe Biden getting millions of dollars for putting his name on the organization, for connections with Hunter Biden. | ||
| The Biden crime family being the sort of pinnacle of government corruption in the way that they sell influence. | ||
| Providing nothing, building nothing. | ||
| They have no manufacturing plants. | ||
| It's just them. | ||
| It's just paying Joe Biden because he's vice president, selling out the American people. | ||
| Entirely different than paying a company, getting market rates for a service that you would have to get from somebody. | ||
| It just happens to be Donald Trump or Elon Musk in this situation. | ||
| In Musk's situation, probably Trump's as well, but Musk in particular, because he's the only one who can provide these things. | ||
| He's the only one that's run SpaceX. | ||
| SpaceX is the only one that can achieve some of the space missions that America pays him to carry out. | ||
| So again, just be clear. | ||
| What I'm doing here is just systematically telling you how the left is trying to play defense. | ||
| And how that defense is utterly incoherent, totally nonsensical, completely hypocritical. | ||
| So they have nothing. | ||
| They have nothing. | ||
| So why are they actually doing this? | ||
| That's the obvious question you have to ask after this. | ||
| If it was true that Elon Musk and Donald Trump and Doge was just going in and stealing money or cutting off services that America depends on, Then they would be able to say that. | ||
| Instead, they're lying about it all. | ||
| They're trying to compare it to things that are completely different and acting like we're the hypocrites because Elon Musk is cutting government funding while also receiving government subsidies. | ||
| But these are utterly different situations. | ||
| Elon Musk is not running a fake charity promoting atheism in Nepal. | ||
| He's a manufacturer that provides jobs and creates Customer goods here in America, some of which the government buys from him. | ||
| They just have nothing. | ||
| So if they had something to actually be mad about, then they would present that. | ||
| They don't. | ||
| So in any normal world with normal people who are honest and upright and good, then they wouldn't be against this. | ||
| I know it's kind of obvious. | ||
| We're in between like... | ||
| It's really difficult to explain and just so obvious it shouldn't need to be explained. | ||
| Because if Elon Musk was actually doing something bad, if Doge was actually doing something bad, they would point to that and be able to make that argument. | ||
| Because they don't have that thing. | ||
| They're saying all these other arguments. | ||
| So just clearly the only thing you need to come away with this knowing is like they're hiding the real reason they're mad. | ||
| The real reason they're mad is obvious because this is their gravy train because they are as aware as we are. | ||
| That this was the method by which the world was kept in the thralls of leftist domination. | ||
| That the entire globalist leftist superstructure that is genociding its own people and just destroying democracy wholesale is almost entirely funded by US taxpayer dollars under the guise of foreign aid. | ||
| Under the guise of humanitarian assistance to other countries. | ||
| They know that perfectly well. | ||
| But they can't just come out and say, we don't like you cutting off our secret taxpayer slush fund where we rig the elections and fraudulently manipulate the media using your money. | ||
| They can't just say that so they have to come up with all these other reasons. | ||
| The other reasons don't make any sense, which is why they're throwing everything at the wall, seeing what sticks, and nothing is sticking because none of it is valid or legitimate concerns. | ||
| And if they actually cared about this stuff, if they actually cared about things like conflict of interest, which they claim to care about with Elon Musk, claiming he has some sort of conflict of interest, despite the fact that the man is worth half a trillion dollars and doesn't need any money. | ||
| Donald Trump doesn't need any money. | ||
| These guys are billionaires. | ||
| Sort of one of the benefits of having billionaires doing this sort of thing is they aren't going to rob you like Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden did. | ||
| Right? | ||
| They don't need to. | ||
| They don't. | ||
| Need the money. | ||
| So let's go to clip number four here. | ||
| Because if they actually understood conflict of interest, that it wouldn't be Elon Musk and Doge that they'd be screeching about. | ||
| It would be the judges and the activists and the mainstream media even who relies on USAID, who's just trying to defend their own gravy train from being derailed. | ||
| They would be the ones they're calling out. | ||
| Here's older millennial on X and TikTok. | ||
| Asking if these people even understand what conflict of interest is, because if they did, the number one person they'd be complaining about would be the judge that recently put a TRO, temporary restraining order, on the executive branch and forced them to keep funding USAID. Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, look, I assume we all know what the term conflict of interest means. | |
| Good, since we're all aware of the definition of it. | ||
| I just wanted to point out that the judge who declared that Elon Musk and Doge could no longer hold back the funds from the Inflation Reduction Act, yet not only does his daughter work for the Department of Education, which Doge and the Trump administration plan on doing away with, but that judge also owns $250,000 in stock with a company that received $75 million from that act. | ||
| And was set to receive an additional $150 million later this year. | ||
| Now, look, I'm sure that's a coincidence. | ||
| However, if we wanted to dive a little deeper into that judge's finances, when we look at his investments, we'd see that he has like $1,000 of stock here, $1,000 of stock here. | ||
| In fact, the largest investment he has other than that company is $4,500. | ||
| So that company is the... | ||
| Only company he's invested for more than five grand. | ||
| And he's invested $250,000 about two months before the Inflation Reduction Act passed. | ||
| He has invested more than 20% of his entire net worth into this one company. | ||
| And that one company received $75 million from the Inflation Reduction Act and was set to receive $150 million more, which Doe's technically put a stop to. | ||
| But his order... | ||
| Forces that money to be distributed. | ||
| So him forcing Doge to release that money directly benefits him in millions of dollars worth of value for his stock. | ||
| Now look, I'm sure that's a coincidence. | ||
| I'm sure that wasn't the intention behind it. | ||
| But I would say that if I was a conspiracy theorist, it might sound like a conflict of interest. | ||
| Obviously, he's being facetious at the end. | ||
| If I was a conspiracy theorist, that'd be a conflict of interest. | ||
| The thing is... | ||
| It is undeniably a conflict of interest. | ||
| You don't have to speculate about whether this was his intent or not. | ||
| The fact is that by issuing this order, the judge directly benefited himself by the tune of millions of dollars. | ||
| So he should have recused himself from the outset. | ||
| The fact that he didn't means that there is a conflict of interest. | ||
| You don't need to figure out whether the judge meant to benefit himself, whether that... | ||
| You know, weighed on his decision. | ||
| The fact that it benefited him so greatly means you can't trust the decision on the face of it. | ||
| He should have recused himself. | ||
| The fact that he didn't, I would say, probably opens him up to criminal investigation. | ||
| So it's like, whether or not he did it purely out of greed and self-aggrandizement is a criminal matter, and you can go and try to figure that out. | ||
| But it's not actually necessary in determining whether or not there's a conflict of interest. | ||
| There absolutely was. | ||
| His ruling should be thrown out on that basis and ignored on that basis. | ||
| And then he maybe should be investigated, determine whether that was something that actually he consciously entered into. | ||
| But the suspicion enough is enough to justify completely throwing his ruling out. | ||
| The story's at Infowars. | ||
| Judge who halted Trump's spending freeze received $100 million in government money for his own NGO. Judge Jack McConnell, who halted Trump's spending freeze, received well over $100 million in government money for an NGO he'd been associated with for over a decade. | ||
| Judge Jack McConnell, who halted Trump's spending speeds, yeah, $100 million. | ||
| $128 million in total. | ||
| Last year alone, Crossroads, this organization, Crossroads Rhode Island, a nonprofit that McConnell has chaired for over a decade, received $18.6 million in government grants last year, over half of its $30 million in revenue. | ||
| Federal Judge McConnell must recuse himself immediately. | ||
| AFL has uncovered a major potential conflict of interest with Judge John McConnell, chief judge of the Federal District Court of Rhode Island, who halted President Trump's temporary spending freeze. | ||
| So there you go. | ||
| His family also donated nearly $700,000 to Democratic candidates and causes, including thousands of dollars to the two Rhode Island senators who recommended him for the job. | ||
| So it's all just pay to play. | ||
| I mean... | ||
| This is the most amazing thing ever. | ||
| Doge is literally just dismantling the pay-to-play networks that have choked this country. | ||
| And those very networks are now activated and trying to stop them, including the judges that they have placed in these positions, again, as a consequence of the play-to-pay methodology. | ||
| You see, there's entire industries in America that figured out, basically like, you know, the typical way you think of some sort of capitalistic endeavor. | ||
| There's a goldmine, and you have to invest the money and the equipment and the transportation to go mine the gold, and you hope that there's enough gold in there to offset the expense that it's going to cost you to mine it, and you actually have to have results. | ||
| Well, in that analogy, the American government is the goldmine. | ||
| They figured out, like, okay, we just need to start mining the American taxpayer funds, and we can become rich. | ||
| A couple hundred thousand to get some legislation passed to get us money as an NGO. Suddenly we're receiving tens of millions of dollars. | ||
| We can split some of that off, pay for, you know, donate to senators who can then recommend us a judge who can set in and then decide on our behalf when the question is asked whether these grants are legitimate or not. | ||
| It's all just taking the gold out of the mine. | ||
| Using the money you make from the gold to buy more equipment, to mine the gold more. | ||
| That's what's happening. | ||
| It's just you are the mine. | ||
| Your pocketbook is the mine. | ||
| Your taxpayer dollars is the mine that they're plundering and then reinvesting into the infrastructure to plunder the mine. | ||
| And it's the pay-to-play network that has been on the cusp of being exposed. | ||
| Little aspects of it have been exposed here or there throughout the years. | ||
| Finally, the whole thing is being identified. | ||
| And systematically dismantled by Donald Trump in his second term. | ||
| It's brilliant to see. | ||
| It's been necessary for a long time. | ||
| But of course, the swamp creatures are not just willfully exiting the swamp. | ||
| They're fighting back with everything they've got. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| Sorry, I'm too excited. | ||
| I'm cutting off the liner here. | ||
| We have a lot to cover in this segment. | ||
| I'm going to open up the phone lines for your calls as well, and we'll take your calls throughout the last hour of today's show. | ||
| We still have a lot more to talk about. | ||
| In this case, we are going to continue to take the 60 Minutes propaganda piece as our guideline of what to talk about. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| Before we get into that, let's... | ||
| We'll get into that. | ||
| We'll get into that. | ||
| Alright, so... | ||
| It's been pretty incredible to see the... | ||
| Outrage that J.D. Vance caused that's still reverberating six minutes in an entire segment on this to this day. | ||
| So last week, J.D. Vance went to Europe. | ||
| Not only did he give a powerful speech about AI, talking about how Europe is welcome to join America in leading AI development, but they have to stop relying so much on over-regulation. | ||
| They have to actually free up their Industries to develop and prosper and innovate in a way that regulation crushes. | ||
| That in and of itself was powerful, but just a taste, just a sampling of what was to come when he gave a speech basically raking Europe over the coals for their abandonment of free speech, meaning their abandonment of European culture itself. | ||
| Dedication to free speech, while solidified in America unlike anywhere else, is an outgrowth of and a continuation of the development of human rights and freedoms that occurred in Europe throughout the Enlightenment and Renaissance and just cultural development over the last thousand years. | ||
| That's what we're giving up. | ||
| That's what we're losing here is a thousand years of cultural development being stolen from us as we speak. | ||
| And so he criticizes this. | ||
| And it has absolutely infuriated Europe. | ||
| So what is my question? | ||
| And I don't know. | ||
| It's hard to even read or understand what exactly Europeans think about it because they don't have free speech. | ||
| Because actually they are tightly controlled. | ||
| Their speech is very much in the clutches of a... | ||
| It's hard to say whether Europeans were mad at what J.D. Vance said. | ||
| If they were mad, it's hard to say whether that's because they legitimately understood and disagreed with J.D. Vance or whether they themselves are the victims of the concerted effort to psyop the European people into giving up their basic rights so they aren't called bad names. | ||
| It's hard to say. | ||
| It's hard to say exactly what's going on. | ||
| But I think I have a little bit of a taste. | ||
| See, the BAFTA, which is like the British version of the Oscars, but it's for TV and radio and news as well, or movies as well, aired this weekend. | ||
| And they were mocking Donald Trump. | ||
| Now, to our radio listeners, you're going to hear a lot of laughs. | ||
| To our TV viewers, you'll see that when they cut to the crowd, Nobody's laughing. | ||
| So a bit of a discrepancy there. | ||
| But again, this gives you a little bit of insight into the British, the mindset of the British, the mindset of the European elite, and how they feel like Donald Trump is, again, like an existential threat to their order. | ||
| And they rely on, you know, condescension and mocking to make this point. | ||
| When in reality... | ||
| All that Trump and J.D. Vance as his deputy are doing are trying to save Europe from itself and trying to save the European people and the cultural achievements of the last thousand years from the small number of elite in Europe who are systematically eliminating those rights on the basis of hate or safety or some other excuse. | ||
| So let's go to clip 14 now. | ||
| This is the British BAFTA Awards. | ||
| This weekend with and him mocking Donald Trump and just the way that we've heard for 10 years, this stuff is stale and old and you can see from the video, nobody's actually laughing. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
A film about incredible architecture. | |
| In fact, it's the boldest architecture in film this year, apart from Donald Trump's hair and The Apprentice. | ||
| Donald Trump, of course, he says he hasn't seen The Apprentice because it's a 15. It's not on Nickelodeon. | ||
| See? | ||
| Donald Trump. | ||
| I've said his name three times. | ||
| It's like Beetlejuice. | ||
| I've summoned him. | ||
| Talking of villains. | ||
| Yeah, I don't know. | ||
| When I picture villains, I picture like sweaty little gremlin men in skirts. | ||
| That's just me. | ||
| For our radio viewers, the man you were just hearing talking was a very uncomfortable and anxious looking, very sweaty man. | ||
| He looked like he was about four feet tall. | ||
| Nobody was laughing. | ||
| People weren't even politely smiling. | ||
| However, somehow the sound of uproarious laughter came through the mics. | ||
| Donald Trump's hair? | ||
| Whoa, no way. | ||
| You're such a rebel. | ||
| Nobody cares. | ||
| Nobody cares anymore. | ||
| And I don't think anybody's falling for it. | ||
| Let's take a look, again, just to remind you, in case you need reminding, because the speech J.D. Vance gave has, again, it's really ignited a firestorm. | ||
| It shows you what can happen when you have an effective VP who can actually discuss the underlying fundamentals behind things like free speech and get to the heart of what's going wrong with our allies in Europe. | ||
| Our friends and cousins over there who have gone completely insane. | ||
| Let's go to clip 22. Here's a pure and unadulterated and unedited and totally legitimate video of J.D. Vance. | ||
| Here's the speech he gave, at least a portion of it, in Germany. | ||
| Or do you make it in Europe? | ||
| Somewhere in Europe he made this speech, again, calling out Europe for abandoning its own principles. | ||
| And first and foremost amongst those would be the principle of free speech. | ||
| Which is in and of itself free thought and the ability to think your own thoughts and know the truth. | ||
| Let's go now to J.D. Vance. | ||
| Here's the speech that all of this chaos is in response to. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'd say the worst thing about the conversation between myself and the left-wing supporters. | |
| This is not the right video. | ||
| The Vance clip should be... | ||
| All right, got the wrong one then. | ||
| Alright, we'll have to go to that in just a second. | ||
| That's weird. | ||
| I downloaded the wrong one. | ||
| I can try to tell you what it was. | ||
| If you give me two seconds, I'll drop it in there. | ||
| But essentially what he's saying is we know what you're fighting against, but what are you fighting for? | ||
| What are you actually trying to preserve in Europe? | ||
| You're abandoning everything that makes you European. | ||
| So, you know, what is the importance of Preserving Europe if Europe is nothing. | ||
| It means nothing, stands for nothing. | ||
| The people, doesn't matter who they are. | ||
| The ideas they have, doesn't matter who they are. | ||
| I mean, what is Europe fighting for? | ||
| It was pretty clear, you know, back in the day, you look at the arguments that the UK government was making to its people for why they had to go into World War II. It was about, you know, totalitarianism versus Freedom. | ||
| It was about things like freedom of speech that, of course, didn't exist in Nazi Germany. | ||
| We're going to have to figure that out in just a second. | ||
| I really wanted to go to that video of J.D. Vance explaining it because he really does do a great job illustrating exactly why the Europeans' failures to uphold the basic principles that define their culture. | ||
| Really makes everything that they're doing totally nonsensical and pointless. | ||
| Like, why are you defending Ukraine to the last Ukrainian? | ||
| Why are we wasting millions of lives and billions of dollars in Ukraine to defend democracy if you don't actually operate democracies? | ||
| What are we doing here? | ||
| Right? | ||
| I mean, why are you so vehemently against Russia if you're more totalitarian than Russia is? | ||
| The UK jails far, far more people for speech crimes. | ||
| Than anything that Rush has ever done. | ||
| We got the video. | ||
| Let's go to Vance in Munich. | ||
| Munich. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| Something different is happening now. | ||
| We're having some technical difficulties in this place, people. | ||
| I thought they had the video. | ||
| They lied to me. | ||
| We're running on some short crew today. | ||
| Well, we'll have to find that video because it is good. | ||
| But we can move on without it. | ||
| I just threw that in at the last second because I wanted to share some context with what 60 Minutes is now responding to as they did a whole segment about free speech in Germany. | ||
| And the whole thing got very silly. | ||
| Let's start with clip number two. | ||
| Here's CBS asking German prosecutors and officials about The limits of speech in that once great country. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Is it a crime to insult somebody in public? | |
| Yes. | ||
| Yes, it is. | ||
| And it's a crime to insult them online as well? | ||
| Yes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The fine could be even higher if you insult someone in the Internet. | |
| Why? | ||
| Because in Internet, it stays there. | ||
| If we are talking face-to-face, you insult me, I insult you, okay, finish. | ||
| But if you're in the internet, if I insult you or a politician- It sticks around forever. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| All right, well, let's pause it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The prosecutors explain. | |
| All right, first of all, the response from that CBS anchor, does that not terrify anybody? | ||
| The reasoning from the Germans is it makes no sense. | ||
| It stays around longer? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What? | |
| An insult is worse because it's online than in person? | ||
| This makes no sense. | ||
| Okay, alright, whatever. | ||
| Literally, that's just utter nonsense. | ||
| First of all, these people are fat and ugly. | ||
| I just want to insult them off the bat. | ||
| I just want to just... | ||
| Insulting people is illegal in Germany. | ||
| That's what they're saying. | ||
| And it's more illegal on the internet. | ||
| And then you have the CBS. Anchor being like, oh, yeah. | ||
| Oh, good point. | ||
| She's like smiling. | ||
| Like, that's so true. | ||
| Free speech should be illegal and doing it on the internet is worse than in real life. | ||
| I never thought of that. | ||
| Wow, yeah, that's so true. | ||
| She's like smiling and nodding along. | ||
| Just incredibly creepy. | ||
| No, it doesn't make any sense. | ||
| It's not smart. | ||
| It's not a good point. | ||
| It's absurd. | ||
| It's total nonsense. | ||
| It is literally what the First Amendment... | ||
| I've said it a million times. | ||
| When the First Amendment was written, when they said the press, they meant the printing press. | ||
| They meant the technology. | ||
| So here's a German person going, well, if you use technology to insult somebody, therefore it's worse. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| They're trying to make ideas illegal. | ||
| And they're trying to stop the spread of those ideas by targeting the technology that facilitates the mass awareness of these ideas. | ||
| Let's go back to that video and we'll close it out. | ||
| But again, CBS is very interested in the reasoning of how you can make words on the Internet more illegal than words in real life. | ||
| That's so smart, you Germans. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. | |
| German law also prohibits the spread of malicious gossip, violent threats, and fake quotes. | ||
| If somebody posts something that's not true and then somebody else reposts it or likes it, are they committing a crime? | ||
| In the case of reposting, it is a crime as well because the reader can't distinguish whether you just invented this or just reposted it. | ||
| That's the same for us. | ||
| The punishment for breaking hate speech laws can include jail time for repeat offenders. | ||
| I just want to be clear here. | ||
| 60 Minutes did not make this segment talk about what a horrifying totalitarian state Germany is. | ||
| You see from her facial expression to the way the whole thing is characterized, they're defending this. | ||
| They're acting like this is smart, like this is enlightened and progressive. | ||
| It's just censorship. | ||
| They can justify it by hate speech or whatever the hell else they want to justify it by. | ||
| They're just tyrants. | ||
| They're just... | ||
| Oppressing their people. | ||
| And arresting them for the words they say, the ideas they put forward. | ||
| So we just heard CBS News nodding happily along when being told that insults are illegal, insults on the internet are more illegal, and reposts can get you jail time. | ||
| And they're like, oh wow, yeah. | ||
| So enlightened. | ||
| We're so backwards here in the United States. | ||
| We're this crazy, wild west world where people can just say what they believe. | ||
| We're not as futuristic and progressive as you are with the state deciding what is true and what is not and arresting those who oppose it. | ||
| So again, 60 Minutes is not making it. | ||
| The only way this would make sense is if every time I cut back to the CBS reporter, she's got a look of horror on her face. | ||
| Or like disgust. | ||
| It's like, ugh. | ||
| How do you say things like that? | ||
| You're a disgrace. | ||
| You're a disgrace to humanity, basically. | ||
| Let's go to clip number three here. | ||
| CBS then joined a German police force as they were raiding an apartment with a SWAT team over a meme somebody posted online. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's 6.01 on a Tuesday morning. | |
| And we were with state police as they raided this apartment in northwest Germany. | ||
| Inside, six armed officers searched a suspect's home, then seized his laptop and cell phone. | ||
| Prosecutors say those electronics may have been used to commit a crime. | ||
| The crime? | ||
| Posting a racist cartoon online. | ||
| At the exact same time across Germany, more than 50 similar raids played out. | ||
| Part of what prosecutors say is a coordinated effort to curb online hate speech in Germany. | ||
| They're in favor of this. | ||
| Do you understand? | ||
| They want to model America's laws after Europe's. | ||
| Six armed agents breaking into a home and stealing a man's laptop and his cell phone because he posted a cartoon on the internet that they deemed to be racist. | ||
| Now, of course, the beauty of these speech crimes, if you're a tyrant, the real usefulness of them is that you don't have to show anybody what the cartoon is. | ||
| You would be then violating the hate speech, right? | ||
| You say, he posted a racist cartoon. | ||
| That's illegal. | ||
| The cartoon is illegal. | ||
| So we seized all of his stuff. | ||
| Say, okay, well, can we see the cartoon? | ||
| No, obviously not. | ||
| It's illegal. | ||
| So we just have to take your word for it. | ||
| So according to you, there was a racist cartoon that we're not allowed to see. | ||
| It's too racist. | ||
| But you're arresting him and seizing his stuff over it. | ||
| It's almost like I'd almost like to see the same segment with CBS News. | ||
| And, you know, they're going around, they're filming it, you know, and yes, we have to seize this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It was a hate speech. | |
| These computers were used to put up illegal material on the internet. | ||
| And they're like, yes, wow, so efficient the way you're doing this. | ||
| 50 raids across Germany. | ||
| That sounds like it's a really big threat. | ||
| So what exactly did they post? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's like, well, they were posting Jewish propaganda. | |
| They were posting pictures with the Star of David. | ||
| It's a Hanukkah candle, the menorah. | ||
| These illegal symbols? | ||
| It's like, wait, wait. | ||
| Wait, I thought I was for this. | ||
| Wait, I thought I was for this. | ||
| No, wait, that sounds very Nazi-ish. | ||
| It's like, no, you understand they're doing exactly the same. | ||
| This is just pure totalitarianism. | ||
| Now, the Nazis would have said that, you know, Jewish material is disruptive of the state. | ||
| And it's, I don't know if they'd say the word hate speech, but they had some equivalent to it to justify, you know, silencing a group of people and their ideas and anybody that posts material. | ||
| Similar to theirs. | ||
| It's the same thing, it's just in this case the opposite direction. | ||
| In this case it's being couched under a different word, different phrase, different excuse being used. | ||
| But would it really look all that different? | ||
| If the Germans were Nazis today, would what we just saw be any different except for what the content was? | ||
| And in that case the content would be... | ||
| Not racist cartoons. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He posted a not racist cartoon. | |
| He posted a cartoon that wasn't even a little bit racist. | ||
| so we've seized his computers and charged him with a crime and sent him to jail it's I mean, the real insane thing about it is they have this entire political construct. | ||
| The entire purpose of existing. | ||
| Is predicated on stopping the Nazis coming to power again while they are simultaneously engaged in and actually to fulfill that goal are doing the very same thing that the Nazis are doing. | ||
| So it's like you have this whole construct on this anti-Nazi principle, but you're violating those very principles in upholding the construct. | ||
| Do you not get how this is utterly nonsensical? | ||
| Makes no sense, even a little bit. | ||
| Here's maybe the... | ||
| Least sensical thing out of all of it, clip 19. Margaret Brennan, CBS News, says she thinks the Holocaust and the rise of the Nazis was a weaponization of free speech. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, he was standing in a country where free speech was weaponized to conduct a genocide. | |
| And he met with the head of a political party that has far-right views. | ||
| And some historic ties to extreme groups. | ||
| The context of that was changing the tone of it. | ||
| And you know that, that the censorship was specifically about the right. | ||
| I have to disagree with you. | ||
| Free speech was not used to conduct a genocide. | ||
| The genocide was conducted by an authoritarian Nazi regime that happened to also be genocidal because they hated Jews and they hated minorities and they hated those. | ||
| They had a list of people they hated, but primarily the Jews. | ||
| There was no free speech in Nazi Germany. | ||
| There was none. | ||
| There was also no opposition in Nazi Germany. | ||
| They were a sole and only party that governed that country. | ||
| So that's not an accurate reflection of history. | ||
| It's even less accurate than that. | ||
| We'll go to clip number five here. | ||
| There's an organization called FIRE with a senior fellow, Nadine Strosen, explaining how utterly fallacious this claim is, as if you needed more evidence. | ||
| But Margaret Brennan from CBS News just said that the Nazi Holocaust was a consequence of free speech. | ||
| Oh, you want free speech? | ||
| What are you, a Nazi? | ||
| This is how utterly insane we've become. | ||
| But historically, to call the Nazis free speech is absurd on the face of it. | ||
| Everybody knows that. | ||
| That's what Marco Rubio just said. | ||
| But it's even more absurd than you may realize. | ||
| Let's go to the video. | ||
| If Germany had only had anti-hate speech laws and had censored the Nazi speech, Hitler would not have risen to power. | ||
| the Holocaust would not have happened. | ||
| Some experts refer to that theory as the Weimar fallacy, referring to the Weimar Republic from 1918 to 1933, and the word fallacy because and the word fallacy because it is in fact not true that there was free speech for hate speech, including Nazi speech, during the Weimar Republic. | ||
| To the contrary, Germany then had multiple laws that restricted hate speech, insulting speech, speech that... | ||
| Advocated or might incite violence against various groups, including religious groups, laws against defaming or insulting a religion, including the Jewish religion. | ||
| And all of those laws were very strictly enforced, including by the leading Jewish At the time, there was a very large organization. | ||
| I think it's quite similar in concept to the Anti-Defamation League in the United States that had offices all over Germany and made sure that all of these laws were regularly enforced through both criminal prosecution and civil lawsuits. | ||
| And many of the leading Nazis were repeatedly prosecuted and convicted and even served prison times. | ||
| There were court orders suppressing the publication of various Nazi newspapers. | ||
| Pamphlets that were anti-Semitic were punished and were suppressed. | ||
| Hitler himself was actually banned from public speaking for several years. | ||
| We obviously know that despite the speech suppression, the punishment of speech, it was hardly effective. | ||
| The Nazis themselves, as well as many historians, believe that the net impact of those laws censoring Nazi speech was to amplify their message, to give them attention. | ||
| That they otherwise would never have received and to gain sympathy that they otherwise never would have received. | ||
| This is a common phenomenon that provocateurs to this day seek to take advantage of, the so-called forbidden fruits phenomenon, that people become more interested in an idea or an expression when it gets the publicity of being subject to censorship. | ||
| So again, that was Fire Senior Fellow Nadine Strosen explaining that not only is it utterly ridiculous claim that the Nazis were an outgrowth of free speech or that Nazis supported free speech itself, the Weimar Republic didn't even have free speech. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, welcome back, folks. | |
| We are just fully in upside-down world at this point. | ||
| Really, it's hard to know where the bottom of this is. | ||
| How much farther down can we travel, down the road of just complete insanity? | ||
| You've got mainstream media arguing that the Nazis came to power because of free speech. | ||
| Therefore, free speech equals you're a Nazi. | ||
| You want to speak freely, you're a totalitarian. | ||
| Wrap your mind around that one. | ||
| The people trying to create peace in Ukraine are the bad guys. | ||
| They're the warmongers, apparently, the people trying to... | ||
| Establish peace. | ||
| I mean, war is peace. | ||
| Truth is a lie. | ||
| Everything is utterly backwards at this point. | ||
| And thankfully, thank God, the people are not falling for this nearly to the degree that they used to. | ||
| And I don't know whether that's sort of a chicken and egg thing. | ||
| It might be because things are so... | ||
| Because the left is so insane and nonsensical that people are not buying it anymore, or because people aren't buying it anymore, the left is going insane trying to recapture what it's losing at this point. | ||
| It's one or the other. | ||
| Either way, the majority of the people, not just in America but throughout Europe, want free speech, want their governments to work for them, want actual legitimate democracy where their demands are met and the people are actually... | ||
| Provided for by the government, not their enemies exclusively benefiting from taxpayer dollars. | ||
| And you can see this, and you can see the left's utter inability to deal with this fact. | ||
| In this clip, clip 20, Hakeem Jeffries is left grasping for a response after ABC's John Carl reads off massive favorability numbers for Trump. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Donald Trump's favorability rating is actually higher than it ever was the first time around. | |
| Let me ask you, a recent poll by Marquette looked at several of the things that he has done or says that he is going to do, and 63% favor federal government's recognition of only two sexes, 60% favor deporting immigrants who entered the United States illegally, 60% favor expanding oil and gas production. | ||
| 59% favor declaring an emergency at the southern border. | ||
| Is there anything you are seeing that Trump is doing that you are in favor of, that you think is the right thing? | ||
| Let me say, as it relates to all of those issues, we're just at the beginning. | ||
| Yeah, he's got nothing. | ||
| No, he's got absolutely nothing. | ||
| Trump's approval rating It's just sky high across the board, higher than it ever was during his first term, and many times higher than Biden's ever was during his term. | ||
| People actually want results. | ||
| We actually want to see our government making major changes. | ||
| For how many cycles we had to go through of people demanding change and getting the exact same thing over and over, and any agent of change who came in and tried to solve things, like Donald Trump may be really the only one, but they screwed over Ron Paul. | ||
| They screwed over Bernie Sanders. | ||
| These are different ends of the spectrum, but at the same time, they both had disruptive plans for the United States government. | ||
| You saw what they did to Donald Trump. | ||
| This is what people have wanted the entire time. | ||
| We know the government has failed at everything it's attempted to do, has robbed us blind, and deliberately poisoned and destroyed us. | ||
| We've wanted change. | ||
| We're finally getting it. | ||
| And again, the Democrats. | ||
| Have absolutely nothing to fall back on. | ||
| They've alienated everybody. | ||
| Largely because of stuff like this. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 17. This is the fastest progression ever from that's not happening to okay it is happening and it's a good thing. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What does transgenderism in public look like to you? | |
| It's allowing men to be treated for the purposes of the law as women. | ||
| It's men taking 900 sports trophies from women in recent years. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, that doesn't happen. | |
| They didn't take 900? | ||
| They took 900. There's a report that just came out from the United Nations, actually. | ||
| 890 trophies and medals across 600 women who were competing, competitors, across 29 different sports and 400 competitions. | ||
| That came out like yesterday. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And they deserved them. | |
| It didn't happen, and they deserve them. | ||
| Okay, that is the logic I hear from the pro-trans crowd. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| They do deserve that. | ||
| No wonder they're losing everybody. | ||
| They're completely incoherent. | ||
| They make no sense. | ||
| They believe nothing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | |
| Welcome back. | ||
| This is the American Journal. | ||
| I'm your host Harrison Smith. | ||
| Third hour is on Infowars.com band.video. | ||
| In fact, I've not done a great job plugging today when that's foolish of me. | ||
| After all, the only way that we get money, the only way that we are on the air, the only way that we have been able to not just resist but actually stand up against and reverse some of the attacks against us is because of your support at Infowarsstore.com and TheAlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| This is from Raw Egg Nationalist posted this screenshot. | ||
| I genuinely could not think of a better advertisement for super male vitality if I tried. | ||
| So some dude on Facebook or something posted a picture of a super male vitality bottle as if it's like evidence or something. | ||
| And he says, on Wednesdays, I go through my apartment unit's dumpster to make sure there are no recyclables that tenants are throwing into the trash. | ||
| Today, I found this. | ||
| It's a type of steroid sold by Alex Jones on Info Space Wars. | ||
| He was banned from the internet for hate. | ||
| He was banned from the internet for hate. | ||
| I don't know if you know this. | ||
| Alex Jones, banned from the internet for hate. | ||
| It's taken by white supremacists who increase their testosterone and masculinity. | ||
| Gross. | ||
| I know which neighbor it was because there was also mail in the trash bag. | ||
| I'm not sure what I'm going to do, but I live across from an effing Nazi on steroids and I had no idea. | ||
| I had no idea. | ||
| I hope he's okay. | ||
| Somebody should check up on this guy. | ||
| He came into contact with super male vitality. | ||
| He might melt. | ||
| I mean, it's incredible. | ||
| It truly is something to behold. | ||
| You've got a soy boy, Actually digging through trash on his free time and finding out that his neighbor takes super male vitality and is reporting it as if it's a crime. | ||
| Not sure what I'm going to do. | ||
| What do you think he's going to do? | ||
| What do you think he's going to do? | ||
| Do you think he's going to confront the guy? | ||
| I mean, this could be a warning. | ||
| This person could be watching us right now. | ||
| If the crew can, let's zoom in on this guy's face. | ||
| If you're a neighbor with this guy, if you've seen this guy rummaging around your trash cans like a raccoon, if you've ever come out to your dumpster and found this pale-faced libtard sorting through your trash, just know you might have to beat up a twink. | ||
| If you're the person that this guy's talking about, just know he may confront you And you may be in the position where you have to fight this weirdo. | ||
| Fight this little dumpster diving weirdo. | ||
| Hey, maybe he's looking for recyclables. | ||
| Maybe he's looking for people's information. | ||
| We don't know. | ||
| We don't know. | ||
| But he is going through your trash and apparently opening your mail. | ||
| There's mail in the trash bag. | ||
| So he identified who... | ||
| It's just so creepy. | ||
| It's just so creepy. | ||
| It's so weird. | ||
| You throw away your super male vitality and your creepy leftist raccoon neighbor is like identifying who you are. | ||
| I really hope whoever this is is listening right now. | ||
| I really hope you get in contact with us and tell us about who this guy is. | ||
| And if he confronts you. | ||
| Because it's hilarious. | ||
| The Nazi steroid super male vitality. | ||
| It's literally, it's herbs. | ||
| It's cold press herbs. | ||
| It's a very good supplement. | ||
| It's a very nice supplement to increase your masculinity. | ||
| And apparently it's taken by white supremacists. | ||
| So that's how you know it's good. | ||
| That's how you know it's pure. | ||
| It's the white supremacists that are taking it. | ||
| How much you want to bet the dude he's talking about is like a black guy or Hispanic guy? | ||
| Because there's no irony, right? | ||
| There's nothing in them where they're like, he can't be a white supremacist. | ||
| He's not white. | ||
| He's going to come out and be like, my black white supremacist neighbor is taking steroids from Infowars. | ||
| Like, you mean your black Republican neighbor is taking supplements? | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Randall grew up, I see. | ||
| Folks, we see a lot of incredible things being done to the liberals these days. | ||
| They're frantic. | ||
| They're flailing. | ||
| They don't know what the hell's going on. | ||
| The number one thing you can do to infuriate leftists and to... | ||
| Metaphorically, slap the globalists in the face. | ||
| Let's go to InfowarStore.com. | ||
| Go to InfowarStore.com. | ||
| Get our top-selling steroid supplement today. | ||
| White supremacists only, okay? | ||
| You're not a white supremacist. | ||
| You don't get to buy this, all right? | ||
| This is called marketing through exclusivity. | ||
| Only white supremacists. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You'll have to join the waitlist. | |
| You'll have to join the waitlist and provide us your 23andMe DNA results. | ||
| Because after all, as we know, super male vitality is a steroid for white supremacists only, okay? | ||
| If you're black or Hispanic, you can buy it. | ||
| You just have to prove you're a race traitor, all right? | ||
| Just imagine if we were the people they think we are. | ||
| They are so disconnected and retarded. | ||
| It's truly spectacular. | ||
| I feel like legally I should make the distinction. | ||
| That was parody. | ||
| That was all a big joke. | ||
| Super Male Vitality, along with basically every supplement on Infowarsstore.com, is simply, and very, it's really not complicated. | ||
| It's the highest quality supplements we can find tailored to meet the demands of the modern world in order to counteract some of the poison in our food and water, some of the estrogen mimickers that are Doing a number to our very DNA and our genetics. | ||
| And we were just looking at a... | ||
| My brother-in-law found a picture of his father when he was 16. And it's a group of 16-year-old dudes in like a... | ||
| It must have been the 70s when the picture was taken. | ||
| Something like that. | ||
| Maybe even earlier. | ||
| 60s. | ||
| They looked like 35-year-old men. | ||
| Everybody was looking at the picture going... | ||
| Was it just how they carried themselves? | ||
| It's like, no. | ||
| Physically, they're more developed. | ||
| Physically, they have the testosterone. | ||
| I mean, men today are shadows of what men used to be. | ||
| And literally, at 16, they looked more manly than... | ||
| Well, than I look. | ||
| I'll say that. | ||
| I'm 35. I look younger than these 16-year-olds did because back then they... | ||
| Ate a lot of meat that wasn't poisoned with GMOs and weren't being bombarded with estrogen mimickers constantly. | ||
| So again, Infowars sells supplement. | ||
| We don't sell steroids, you idiots. | ||
| We're not white supremacists, you absolute blood-libeling scum. | ||
| They would know that if they listened to us for even a second, and they might also not be diving through the dumpster and spying on their neighbors like creepy little weasels. | ||
| Literal rodent behavior from the left. | ||
| Maybe a little super male vitality might get him out of the dumpster and back on track, but I'm not holding out hope. | ||
| Yeah, I know. | ||
| We don't actually sell super male vitality anymore. | ||
| The crew's like, we're not, we don't actually sell. | ||
| It's like, no, I know. | ||
| I know. | ||
| So actually, what really the truth is, that guy found a treasure in that trash. | ||
| Whoever threw that super male vitality bottle out, you're a fool. | ||
| You're a fool. | ||
| That product doesn't exist anymore. | ||
| That was a collector's item you threw in the trash there, sir. | ||
| So just know, if you've got a bottle of Supermail Vitality, treasure it. | ||
| Keep it secret. | ||
| Keep it safe. | ||
| Store it away in a safe. | ||
| Sell it on eBay later. | ||
| That's a collector's item, a limited edition memento of the second American Revolution. | ||
| What are you doing throwing it away? | ||
| And look, it's just a fact of the bankruptcy and what we've had to go through. | ||
| We've had to eliminate some of the products that we have on offer. | ||
| Some of our best-selling ones are still available. | ||
| Survival Shield X2, probably just... | ||
| Right up there, I mean, it's like Brain Force, Super Male Vitality, and X2. Those are like our sort of flagship products. | ||
| X2 is still available. | ||
| Brain Force Ultra, still available. | ||
| But Super Male Vitality is not being offered right now. | ||
| So if you have that, keep it. | ||
| And if you want something from Infowarsstore.com, go today to support us. | ||
| Keep us on the air in the fight and winning against the deep state attempts to shut us down. | ||
| By the way, we have this new product called Shilajit. | ||
| Shilajit. | ||
| I know how to say it. | ||
| It sounds like a curse word, but it's not. | ||
| It's actually an incredibly effective supplement. | ||
| I don't even understand it. | ||
| Alex was explaining the way that it's made in one of the commercials. | ||
| You've probably seen it if you're watching this stream. | ||
| But it's similar to the Irish sea moss, where there's just some things in nature that just are natural, incredible compounds that one way or another, for some reason, happen to include all of these essential vitamins and minerals that are found in nature. | ||
| And so instead of having to source it from like 100 different sources, you have one source and it has all of it. | ||
| And it's things like Irish sea moss and shilajit, super infused supplement, the daily boost in vitality. | ||
| And you're getting 25% off site-wide on TheAlexJonesStore.com today for President's Day only. | ||
| So today only. | ||
| Go to TheAlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| Celebrate President's Day by supporting this rebirth of the American Revolution. | ||
| The American Revolution 2.0, 1776 worldwide. | ||
| Really embodied by J.D. Vance giving that speech and the hysterical response from the Europeans. | ||
| So you're getting Shilajit at 35% off three bottles or 50% off if you subscribe to get one bottle a month. | ||
| And you're getting 25% off storewide at thealexjonesstore.com, which has a ton of new supplements that were not available at infowarsstore.com, but you can get those as well. | ||
| Whatever you do, we are glad that you support us. | ||
| And the free way to do it is, of course, by sharing the links, sharing the stories, sharing the news, and getting the information out there. | ||
| That's what it's all about at the end of the day. | ||
| We've got a few more videos to go to. | ||
| I am going to open up the phone lines for your calls this hour. | ||
| The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| Let's see, do we have that video of when America was great? | ||
| Okay, we got this guy was asked. | ||
| A leftist asked this guy, when was America great? | ||
| And he's got a great answer. | ||
| This, of course, is one of the things that, I mean, leftists, they're just so simple. | ||
| They go, when was America great? | ||
| And no matter what you say, they go, oh, so you liked racism? | ||
| Oh, so Jim Crow. | ||
| Oh, so you thought it was great under Jim Crow, did you? | ||
| Like, no, I didn't say it was great because of Jim Crow. | ||
| I said it was great because everybody was healthier and happier and unified. | ||
| The 1950s were pretty great, by the way, for black people too. | ||
| In case you're unaware, go back and watch some old videos of interviews with black people from the 60s, 50s, and 70s, and then compare them to interviews with black people today. | ||
| Pretty different situation. | ||
| So yes, everyone was happier in the 1950s. | ||
| No, it was not because of Jim Crow. | ||
| That was a negative. | ||
| That was not enough to overwhelm the absolute positives of having a coherent nation with wealth and prosperity and a capitalistic mindset. | ||
| Not yet destroyed and dismantled by the welfare state and the trick of things like affirmative action. | ||
| So this is just one of their go-tos, one of the leftist go-tos. | ||
| When was America great? | ||
| No matter when you say they call you a racist and it's very childish but doesn't work on this guy. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'd say the worst thing about the conversation between myself and the... | |
| That left-wing supporter, I presume, so that's great. | ||
| She purposely wouldn't exactly give me a chance to answer. | ||
| She was trying to, let's say, spark an emotional response by what she was talking about was slavery. | ||
| Because I guess she feels like, well, since I'm black, I have to relate to slavery, and that's got to be a hot-button issue. | ||
| Never mind the fact that I've never been a slave, don't know anyone, and I'm not a slave, of course. | ||
| She asked me the question on my head, when was America great? | ||
| I answered it like this. | ||
| America has been great from the very start because this nation was founded on the principles of freeing us from tyranny. | ||
| Okay, they were slaves and so forth. | ||
| But there were a lot of people of all colors, let's say white, in this nation that did not feel like that was correct. | ||
| And this nation from that time has been moving out of tyranny, from bondage in one way or another. | ||
| Whether it be from Britain or whether it be from slavery as a whole. | ||
| In case she doesn't know, there was a civil war. | ||
| And in part, I say in part, a whole lot of white people, if you look at history, died because they wanted this nation and people like myself to be free. | ||
| I believe that. | ||
| Wait a minute, let me get myself together. | ||
| Because when you talk about this country, I do love the country. | ||
| Because this nation gives you the right. | ||
| To move yourself up out of any poor... | ||
| Bad position that you're in like no other nation. | ||
| While some nations might step on you and say, hey, you're going to stay like that, or they have the classism, we don't. | ||
| What she's saying about this nation's horrible, basically saying, oh, it's just full of racism. | ||
| I should be stupid enough to believe that when I'm sitting right here and see people who are nice of all colors that do things, work together. | ||
| And this fool wants to take us back to a time when everyone hates each other. | ||
| Pretty brilliant. | ||
| That video is from Breitbart. | ||
| And that is the argument that we need to be making. | ||
| And we've talked about this so much, especially when it comes to just the very legitimate concerns that young people have about the economy. | ||
| And it's a very simple dichotomy that the globalists are running. | ||
| It is destroy capitalism, destroy America, make everybody miserable and hateful here so they can... | ||
| Say, you know, the problem is America. | ||
| The problem is capitalism. | ||
| The problem is white supremacy or whatever they want to call it. | ||
| It's all these freedoms. | ||
| You know, it's why we're Nazi Germany because we have freedom of speech. | ||
| I mean, they're trying to make America and our belief system and our foundational principles the bad guys so they can offer communism or socialism or some other control method as a alternative. | ||
| We have to make the argument. | ||
| That that's not necessary. | ||
| That the reason everything sucks now, because everybody gets that it sucks, you know, the classic thing is like, it's not that Zoomers are lazy, it's that they have no reason to work. | ||
| They'll work just as hard as their parents, except their parents were able to buy a house and have a stay-at-home wife and go on vacation twice a year and not work overtime, whereas the younger generations can work just as hard and own nothing. | ||
| And have to rent and not be able to afford a house. | ||
| And their wife has to work as well as they do, and so they have to buy daycare. | ||
| It's like everything is screwed up, and you have to acknowledge that. | ||
| Republicans feel like capitalism is being attacked or feel like America is being attacked, and so they want to disregard or discredit these complaints. | ||
| The complaints are legitimate. | ||
| You have to have empathy for people that feel like they're... | ||
| The future is stolen from them and are looking for an alternative system that isn't going to rob them. | ||
| And the only people pitching to them, the only people addressing their concerns are socialists and communists. | ||
| Now the obvious stupidity of that is that as we've become more socialist, as we have steadily over decades grown the size of government, had more government programs for more types of people in more different ways, the more We've moved away from conservative ideals the worst that everything has gotten. | ||
| Like in a very direct correlation that is because of causation. | ||
| It is like a one-to-one ratio. | ||
| So we have to make the argument the reason that everything is broken, the reason that you're working and not gaining wealth is because this system has been hijacked, warped, distorted. | ||
| And is no longer functioning the way it's supposed to. | ||
| We need to get back to the basics of the system, reestablish the American governmental program in a way that does what it was always meant to do, which is provide a fair playing field for everybody to do what they're capable of doing. | ||
| And the story I tell a million times, I mean, this was always the promise of America. | ||
| This is why people came to America. | ||
| Communists like hijacked some of our talking points and then try to act like what they're doing is really the logical continuation of the American Revolution. | ||
| It is the opposite of the American Revolution. | ||
| Capitalism comes about because of freedom. | ||
| We weren't fighting for capitalism in the Cold War. | ||
| We were fighting for God against atheism. | ||
| We were fighting for nation versus global homogenization. | ||
| And you have to actually make that argument. | ||
| You have to actually point out, you want a system that's fair, that doesn't keep people down, that doesn't keep people oppressed, where anybody from anywhere to excel, America's the place. | ||
| And America has the system. | ||
| It's the only one that has achieved what communism constantly promises and fails to achieve. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| I think I have one more. | ||
| Let's go to one more video before we go out to phone calls. | ||
| This one just because, I don't know, for some reason today when I woke up I was just thinking about like the Democrats and how they just have nobody. | ||
| They have like nobody that's good on their side. | ||
| Obviously we played the video last week that's still being talked about where the guy's like, who's the most masculine Democrat? | ||
| And there's not even an answer. | ||
| Like David Hogg maybe? | ||
| Okay, Chuck Schumer, really? | ||
| Is that the most masculine person you have? | ||
| Anyway, I was thinking about this. | ||
| Thinking about who the Democrats have. | ||
| And it struck me, I haven't seen Kamala Harris in a while. | ||
| Where did she go? | ||
| Remember her? | ||
| Y'all remember Kamala Harris? | ||
| She was vice president for four years, ran for president. | ||
| Y'all, you guys remember that? | ||
| That woman? | ||
| You remember how in a miraculous fashion we have been spared four years of her shrieking, cackling nonsense? | ||
| Let's go to clip number eight. | ||
| Here's Kamala Harris and her most recent public appearance, one of her first since being utterly defeated by Donald Trump. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| For those rights to be maintained, which means we have to be vigilant, and it's just the nature of it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, look at this beautiful play and everything that we know he had to suppress so much. | |
| But he knew, and he took those risks, but we have to... | ||
| And it doesn't mean we don't see the beauty in everything. | ||
| Right? | ||
| These things all coexist. | ||
| But I believe we fight for something, not against something. | ||
| Oh, wow, wow. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, my God. | |
| That's the word. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| All right. | ||
| With that on me. | ||
| I don't know, man. | ||
| She reminds me of a character like Tina Fey would play or something. | ||
| We dodged a bullet. | ||
| Kamala Harris sounds drunk as she rambles a bunch of nonsense to cast on Broadway. | ||
| Thank God. | ||
| Thank God we don't have to listen to that woman for four years. | ||
| We fight for something, not against something. | ||
| I know, right? | ||
| Yeah, so true. | ||
| Shut the hell up. | ||
| I think it's deep. | ||
| I'm not using the name in vain. | ||
| I'm saying thank God. | ||
| God has spared us from four years of that woman systematically cackling, condescending, and destroying our country from the inside out. | ||
| The lowest IQ of anyone ever to run for president. | ||
| It's just... | ||
| The Democrats are pathetic. | ||
| They're so utterly pathetic and are just collapsing in every possible way. | ||
| Your phone calls on the other side. | ||
| Stay with us, folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is the American Journal. | |
| We're going to go see your phone calls this final segment of the American Journal. | ||
| Before I do that, let me just give you an update as to what's going on with Ukraine as today. | ||
| The State Department, Marco Rubio, and others are gathering in Saudi Arabia to begin peace talks, ending this conflict. | ||
| If they can find a peaceable solution to this conflict, they will have thwarted the greatest designs of the globalists. | ||
| After all, there was always a plan for three world wars. | ||
| The first world war ended in the creation of the League of Nations. | ||
| The Second World War ended in the creation of the UN, as well as the founding of the State of Israel, which would eventually serve as the capital of the One World Government. | ||
| And the Third World War was supposed to sort of finalize things, be the final major move to totally reorganize humanity itself. | ||
| As we know, everything the globalists want to do, and are prevented from doing by things like human rights and our Constitution, All those things get overridden when you're in a state of war. | ||
| In other words, they can justify censorship by saying, well, we're at war and this is enemy propaganda. | ||
| They can totally reorganize any industrial system, any food supply chain. | ||
| They just get to commandeer it and say, well, it's a war effort now, so we'll set restrictions on food and fuel and all this other stuff. | ||
| I mean, everything they want can come from war. | ||
| And of course, the big move here is they've used America. | ||
| And now we're more of a threat than we are a benefit, so they want to spike the cannon. | ||
| They're trying to move the center of power away from the West, move it more towards the East, have a multipolar world with China dominating, but it's all about folding us into a one-world government. | ||
| A third world war was always the intent, and it appears as though it's supposed to kick off in Ukraine simultaneously in the Middle East and with China as well. | ||
| All of this has been... | ||
| Clearly, the intent of the deep state's actions all along. | ||
| So let me just get through some of these headlines and we'll go out to your calls. | ||
| Saudi Arabia to host U.S.-Russia talks on Ukraine. | ||
| As UK says, it's ready and willing to put troops on the ground. | ||
| So again, don't mistake this, that they're desperate for some peaceable solution and are just trying to stop the war in a way that benefits Ukraine. | ||
| They want world war. | ||
| And they're actually talking about sending UK and Swedish troops To fight in Ukraine directly against Russia, which would likely invoke Article 5 and bring NATO in completely. | ||
| They are about to flip the game board. | ||
| They see that Trump's about to checkmate them, and they're going to knock the board over. | ||
| Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Middle East Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, and National Security Advisor Mike Waltz are all traveling to Saudi Arabia for these talks with Russia over the war in Ukraine. | ||
| These are set to begin tomorrow. | ||
| U.S.'s Rubio in Riyadh. | ||
| Russia's Lavrov en route with Ukraine talks expected. | ||
| Kremlin says U.S.-Russia meeting expected on Tuesday in Riyadh will be devoted primarily to the resolution of the entire complex of Russian-American relations. | ||
| European leaders gather for a meeting over fear Trump has isolated age-old enemies. | ||
| This is the headline from AP News. | ||
| Basically, Europe has been cut out. | ||
| From the conversation, because they've had three years to come to a peaceful solution in Ukraine, and they've done nothing but aggravate the war, and now they're mad they don't get an opportunity to sit at the peace talk tables. | ||
| Well, you had three years to do this. | ||
| You failed, so now we're doing it, and you don't get a spot at the table. | ||
| Again, you could have, if you'd been trying this whole time to do this, I'm sure Trump would welcome the input, but... | ||
| Considering that you've done nothing but sabotage attempts at peace, literally sabotage attempts at peace, literally they had peace agreements signed until NATO functionaries like Boris Johnson went to Ukraine and scuttled them, okay? | ||
| Ukraine President Zelensky says, quote, I will never accept any decisions between the United States and Russia about Ukraine, never. | ||
| Okay, yes you will, you're a puppet, shut up. | ||
| President Trump says he's working on a plan for Ukraine to pay back the $350 billion U.S. has sent to Ukraine. | ||
| This, again, has got to be making Trump some major enemies, even if they weren't enemies before. | ||
| The whole plan was to use American taxpayers to destroy Ukraine and then rebuild it for the benefit of Goldman Sachs and BlackRock. | ||
| Now Trump is going in and saying, no, no, that's going to be American taxpayer money. | ||
| You're not going to get all of the rare earth minerals that you planned on. | ||
| This is always the plan, and they've been pretty open about discussing it. | ||
| Goldman Sachs being like, yeah, as soon as this war's over, we are going to hit the ground running and just take everything from Ukraine. | ||
| We are going to get it all back. | ||
| So they're going to use your money to wage the war, and then they'll reap all the benefits. | ||
| Trump is going in and saying, no, the American people are going to reap those benefits. | ||
| You owe us $350 billion, Ukraine, and we're going to get it back. | ||
| Zelensky rejects Trump's demand for $500 billion in rare earth minerals from Ukraine in exchange for continued military aid. | ||
| Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky shot down President Trump's request for $500 billion in rare earth minerals in exchange for continuing military aid. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So, okay. | |
| Trump's just like, hey, we're spending all this money. | ||
| You have rare earth minerals. | ||
| We'll take that. | ||
| Zelensky says, no. | ||
| Okay, buns get dried up. | ||
| Have fun being Russia. | ||
| Of course, that's not going to happen, but it could. | ||
| British PM Starmer offers to send troops to Ukraine. | ||
| As we said, this will be part of a European-led peacekeeping force. | ||
| See, it's a peacekeeping force to prolong the war. | ||
| Sweden does not rule out sending its peacekeeping troops to Ukraine. | ||
| Foreign Minister Stenergaard has said that their country does not rule out sending troops to Ukraine as part of any post-war peacekeeping mission. | ||
| The Polish foreign minister says there will be no united European army. | ||
| This is something the EU has been trying to get going for a very long time. | ||
| A united European army. | ||
| In other words, a supranational army not under control of any one government, but instead under control of the functionaries and elite that control the EU in an unelected capacity. | ||
| Volodymyr Zelensky says a European army was needed to fight Russian aggression if no satisfactory peace deal could be reached in America and if America withdrew her support for Ukraine. | ||
| Again, they rely entirely on us for security, and for once, the American power is actually being used for the benefit of the American people and American ideals as they go, as the Trump administration goes overseas and says, you start treating your people right, stop censoring your people, or you're going to have trouble with America. | ||
| Exactly how our influence should be wielded to progress American ideals, not to serve the dysfunctional globalist schemes. | ||
| So just know they're trying everything they can to prevent this peace deal from happening and to continue the war. | ||
| And again, the other hot spot of World War Three would be Iran. | ||
| And the threat of that has not gone away. | ||
| We've discussed it many times on this show. | ||
| But long story short, the negotiations with Iran were originally about their nuclear weapons. | ||
| They were willing to come to the table on that and not develop a nuclear weapon in exchange for peaceful relations in the region. | ||
| And so at the last minute, the negotiation shifted and suddenly the American negotiators are asking Iran to get rid of their entire ballistic missile program, which is completely infeasible. | ||
| It's like asking America to shut down Silicon Valley. | ||
| It's like, this is like a... | ||
| Primary driver of our economy. | ||
| No, we're not shutting that down. | ||
| So they're presenting Iran with completely impossible-to-meet demands, and Iran, in response, has basically cut off communication completely. | ||
| And the Supreme Leader of that country has basically said nobody is allowed to even talk to the Trump administration. | ||
| So those negotiations are going nowhere. | ||
| Likely, my prediction is the next big thing will be... | ||
| Israel striking the Iranian nuclear facilities and Iran responding in a very big way and possibly killing every U.S. soldier in the Middle East. | ||
| So no matter how much we want to stay out of it, if Israel attacks Iran in a big way and Iran counterattacks, they're going to kill American servicemen and they're going to bring America into the conflict, whether we like it or not. | ||
| So that's what's next. | ||
| So those are, again, they continue to be the two hot... | ||
| You know, pressure points of World War III. And we are moving towards peace. | ||
| But the closer we get to peace, the more dangerous the whole thing becomes. | ||
| And of course, all of this is key. | ||
| It's the keystone to the globalist plan. | ||
| They need World War III. They need American troops in the Middle East. | ||
| They need a war between Russia and Europe to fulfill their plans. | ||
| They need Europe and America to be defeated in a war. | ||
| Because we are a threat to them. | ||
| And that's what they're trying to do. | ||
| So what Trump is doing right now in trying to bring peace is the ultimate sword swipe against the Gordian Knot. | ||
| All of these problems are exacerbated and weaponized through war. | ||
| And if he can bring peace about, then you starve the beast of its food. | ||
| I mean, the beast lives on war, so we're cutting off its food supply here. | ||
| With that, we go to the phone calls. | ||
| And if I can, if people can keep it short, there's a lot of people I don't recognize the names of. | ||
| I'm going to go to them and see if we can get as many as possible. | ||
| Al in Philly is first. | ||
| I want to talk about President's Day. | ||
| Go ahead, Al. | ||
| You're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yo. | |
| Yo. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, man. | |
| Sorry. | ||
| How you doing, Harrison? | ||
| Listen, this is Al from Philly. | ||
| You know it's President's Day, right? | ||
| Yes, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There's a bunch of anti-president protests going on all over the country. | |
| And me and a couple of brothers are on our way to Doylestown, PA, right now to check one out. | ||
| I just wanted to say thank you for doing it, guys. | ||
| And I wanted to put it out there to all these deadbeats out there. | ||
| They don't buy anything from the store. | ||
| Just buy something. | ||
| Buy a coin. | ||
| Buy anything. | ||
| Help out the situation. | ||
| And I want to formally say you're welcome to the whole country for us letting it use the FAFO. | ||
| So that's a proud voice thing, and it always will be. | ||
| Yeah, sure. | ||
| Well, thank you very much for that call, Ali. | ||
| I hope you stay safe out there. | ||
| There are a lot of protests going on today. | ||
| For President's Day because that's America these days. | ||
| But it sounds like the Proud Boys are out in force in Philly at least. | ||
| Just stay safe and have a great time. | ||
| Happy President's Day, Al. | ||
| Let's go to Matthew on Long Island now. | ||
| In Long Island? | ||
| On Long Island? | ||
| Matthew on Line 5. Go ahead. | ||
| You're on the air. | ||
| Matthew, Long Island. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You there? | |
| Yes, sir. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm walking a crazy husky over here. | |
| Yo, Al. | ||
| First of all, I just want to say happy King's Day. | ||
| Bibi is our king, everybody. | ||
| So make sure you get a little shrine and bow and give your flowers to King Bibi. | ||
| But the other day, I interjected on a conversation. | ||
| These two guys were talking about how the Palestinians weren't even human and all this stuff. | ||
| So I had to inform the gentlemen that both of them share the same DNA. And can procreate with those subspecies people and also share the same organs. | ||
| So I said, what does that make you two? | ||
| I guess you guys are subspecies, too. | ||
| I said, all right, for me, I'm the king. | ||
| Yeah, so everybody make sure you hail BB today, right? | ||
| It makes life way easier. | ||
| Don't get all flustered with all the BS left and right. | ||
| BB is the king, and if you want to be a great swami like Alex Jones... | ||
| Whatever BB wants, BB gets! | ||
| Woo! | ||
| Yeah, we could talk about that, but I want to go to other calls. | ||
| Obviously, Trump is not exactly playing by Netanyahu's tune right now. | ||
| I tweeted out a video yesterday. | ||
| Actually, I think it was the Saturday emergency broadcast from Alex Jones where, again, he lays out... | ||
| Israel's role in sparking World War III with Iran, and it's just incredibly frustrating having people still buy this idea that Alex is somehow owned by Israel. | ||
| It's like, show me one person that's pro-Israel that right now is telling you Israel is about to bomb Iran and get America involved in the Middle East and telling Trump to avoid it. | ||
| There are some things that pro-Israel people would never say. | ||
| And that's one of them, and it's exactly how Alex Jones started his broadcast on Saturday, because at the end of the day, we're anti-war. | ||
| It's sort of like our defining thing. | ||
| It's kind of like how we got famous in the first place, was opposing the Iraq War. | ||
| Now Alex Jones came to prominence, opposing the Iraq War in the Middle East, but don't let simple history and logic and timelines confuse you. | ||
| Just keep spreading the libel against Alex, because you're totally not doing the job of the people you think you're fighting, morons. | ||
| Let's go to Steve in Alaska now. | ||
| Steve, you are on the air. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
| Steve, hello. | ||
| Steve in Alaska. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, can you hear me? | |
| Yes, go ahead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So, your comment earlier about all the presidents who've messed with the banks as getting eliminated or attempted assassinated, the only one being Andrew Jackson. | |
| Jackson ran on Jackson and no banks. | ||
| He eradicated the... | ||
| Bank of America, yeah. | ||
| Yeah, a centralized bank. | ||
| It's always been the same bank or it's been the Rothschild family or, as they've known, the Orsini's. | ||
| And if Trump does not cut ties with the bankers and get our money back under control, and that also means limiting our exposure with Israel, we will end up in World War III. Our currency will be dead. | ||
| And America will end up... | ||
| Basically dead. | ||
| And I hate to say that, because that's not what I want. | ||
| I want America to be here for my grandkids. | ||
| So that's something that Trump needs to do, has to do, must do. | ||
| Because if not, we will end up in World War III, like you're talking about with Iran. | ||
| Our soldiers will be killed. | ||
| And it's useless. | ||
| It's pointless. | ||
| And it's very avoidable, too. | ||
| So, yeah, and a lot of people don't know this, but Abraham Lincoln was also a victim of that assassination because of the banks. | ||
| He was going to stop the first central bank charter and started to speak on it, how he would not enslave the white man just to free the black man, enslave us to the bankers just to free the black man. | ||
| He made that comment, and yeah, he was killed for it. | ||
| Yeah, I'm telling you, it's a 100% correlation pretty much. | ||
| Presidents that got assassinated or attempted assassinated went after the banks and presidents that went after the banks almost got assassinated. | ||
| There's very little, there's practically no, you know, disruption to that pattern. | ||
| It's pretty much 100%. | ||
| Thank you very much for the call, Steve. | ||
| I completely agree and I think Trump understands what he's doing and is going after it in a way where he might actually succeed. | ||
| Of course, they've attempted to assassinate him, so he's already fulfilling that correlation, as I was outlining. | ||
| Thank you for the call, Steve. | ||
| Let's go to Joshua in Georgia now. | ||
| A Marine, welcome to the show, Joshua. | ||
| You're on the air. | ||
| Joshua, are you there? | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
| Yes, sir. | ||
| Can you hear me? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Before I start, I forgot I wanted to make this point. | ||
| Trump's first term, he was all, you know, what we call feeding the trolls on Twitter. | ||
| You know, somebody say something about him, blah, blah, blah, back at him. | ||
| But this time, it seems more like, and I know you're a South Park fan, the episode in South Park where Cartman's mom was trying to get Cartman under control and hired Cesar Millan, and Cesar just ignored him, and Cartman's jumping around for the bucket of chicken, and he just... | ||
| That's pretty funny. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I get that. | |
| And I think, you know, all these, you know, left-wing people are, you know, on Twitter and blue-haired people are crying and racing hell. | ||
| And they're just screaming for their, they're reee for their bucket of chicken and Trump's just... | ||
| Trump's just ignoring them. | ||
| You're so right. | ||
| You're right. | ||
| It's very different than the first time around. | ||
| Trump seems like he's just completely ignoring the noise. | ||
| And it's one of the things where... | ||
| I sort of always wanted Trump to be back on X because, you know, he's got one of the best X accounts ever, and him sort of going toe-to-toe with people on X would be extremely entertaining, but no, it's better this way. | ||
| It's better that he's just focused and not feeding the trolls and just getting things done. | ||
| I completely agree, Joshua. | ||
| Keep going, though. | ||
| I know that's not what you called in about originally. | ||
| Right, and make the Fefe great again. | ||
| Well, okay, so yeah, I'm a Marine, and... | ||
| Not under the contract. | ||
| For the last, what, 14 years, I've been called a racist, a Nazi. | ||
| I've been called, you know, all these things. | ||
| I've been down, I've been just in my face. | ||
| And, you know, we as conservatives, as Christians, we let it fly over our heads. | ||
| But they just won't stop. | ||
| And now it's to the point of treason. | ||
| Thomas Jefferson said the tree of liberty from time to time must be watered by the blood of tyrants and patriots. | ||
| We're going way too soft. | ||
| You know, I love what Trump's doing, but it's way too soft. | ||
| You know, CBS with their 60 Minutes nonsense. | ||
| Treason. | ||
| It's lies. | ||
| It's propaganda. | ||
| And, you know, we had that defector back in 1984 come on the talk show and said, this is our plan. | ||
| This is our propaganda plan. | ||
| And then Obama did away with the Propaganda Act. | ||
| I can't remember what it was called. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And it's time for it to end. | ||
| It's time to be prosecuted. | ||
| We got Pam Bondi, and when cash money gets in there, brother... | ||
| All bets are off, and I cannot wait. | ||
| I can't either. | ||
| No, I'm right there with you. | ||
| Same thing with the deportations. | ||
| They sort of stopped announcing the deportation numbers because they weren't as high as they should be. | ||
| We're very happy with what's going on. | ||
| It's better than many of us expected, but if we're going to save this country, a hell of a lot more has to be done in a very, very quick amount of time. | ||
| We've got four years, folks. | ||
| We've got four years, and... | ||
| If we don't get things right this time, if we don't act aggressively enough, once again, I mean, they're going to steal the election in 2028 and we're going to have Kamala Harris again. | ||
| Like, she's going to run again and we're going to have her as president and they're just going to undo everything Trump has done. | ||
| Like, just understand, what we're doing to them now has them seething. | ||
| They are, like, if they ever regain power again, look at what they've already done. | ||
| Look at what they're already capable of doing. | ||
| They've already done over the last eight years the censorship, the just open oppression, just absolute tyrannical activity. | ||
| If they get back in power, they're going to go all out. | ||
| For four years, they're going to be simmering, just waiting to try to steal the election, get back in power, and just crush whatever Trump did. | ||
| We have four years to make it impossible for them to do that. | ||
| Four years to... | ||
| Set things right in a way that is permanent and continuous. | ||
| That's a big effort. | ||
| So we've done a lot so far in the last three weeks. | ||
| It's been a lot of activity, but it's got to increase. | ||
| It's got to accelerate. | ||
| It's got to speed up. | ||
| The deportations have to speed up. | ||
| The prosecutions have to speed up. | ||
| And we have to see these people. | ||
| In handcuffs, the ones we know have committed crimes. | ||
| Enough investigations. | ||
| We don't have time for investigations. | ||
| They've already been done. | ||
| Time to present the evidence, get the convictions, and institute the punishment. | ||
| That cannot waste four years investigating what we already know to be true. | ||
| I completely agree, Joshua. | ||
| Could not agree more. | ||
| Let's go to Josh in New Hampshire. | ||
| Another Josh calling in here. | ||
| Line number 10, rather. | ||
| Go ahead, Josh. | ||
| You're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, Everson. | |
| How we doing now? | ||
| You know, what's funny is this, Josh, is also a Marine, sir, from 2012 to 2016. There you go. | ||
| So, twinsies, funny. | ||
| But the reason why I called in today was just to kind of help get some people off the fence with you guys' different supplements you have there. | ||
| I take kind of that Nurse Keith approach, where I'm ordering it for myself, my family, and then extras, and I just go out and say, oh, you got achy joints, you have high blood pressure, this or that, thyroid problems. | ||
| Here, take these to your doctor, ask them about them. | ||
| And we always get positive results. | ||
| When I've run out of you guys' products and you don't have them in stock, you try and go find products at, like, say, GNC or any other supplement store. | ||
| They're a quarter to a sixteenth of the potency, and you have to take, like, six to eight different pills to even get close to what you guys have. | ||
| So that's just absolutely amazing. | ||
| And my message for the globalists would have to be, if you guys are going to keep getting in my way of maintaining my health... | ||
| As a young 30-year-old who wants to make sure I live a long, healthy life, you guys got another thing coming. | ||
| And the thing with the gummies, I know Alex likes to talk about a lot. | ||
| Not to mention, I'm only a 12-month listener. | ||
| I've spent thousands of dollars with you guys just because I know this stuff works from trying it. | ||
| But yeah, those gummies, great for the kids. | ||
| That's the only reason why I buy them, because the kids can't swallow pills. | ||
| The CMOS, the Sambuscus, the iron, it's all amazing. | ||
| Everybody needs to get some. | ||
| Well, thank you so much, Josh. | ||
| And sincerely, thank you so much because we would not be here without you. | ||
| Oh, and don't forget the VIP. You've got to sign up for the VIP. I mean, why wouldn't you? | ||
| If you're going to buy something on thealexjonesstore.com, you should sign up for the VIP. It's going to save you money at the end of the day, depending on what you're buying. | ||
| But you get $40 in store credit for the $30 purchase. | ||
| So anything you buy that's over $30, just get the VIP and you'll be saving money. | ||
| VIP Club is very easy to join. | ||
| Of course, it... | ||
| It keeps us on the air and is a source of income that we can rely on every month, which just makes it easier for us to sort of plan into the future what we can do, how we can evolve, how we can grow, knowing that we have this core of support. | ||
| And that's what it is. | ||
| It's a hard core of supporters that keep us on the air and in the fight. | ||
| And so if you have ever been to Infowarsstore.com or TheAlexJonesStore.com, you are in this very elite circle of people who have kept this operation going. | ||
| Thank you so much, Josh. | ||
| I really cannot say how much we appreciate it. | ||
| We know that our audience is our hardworking people. | ||
| Everybody we talk to is on the job or is taking care of their kids. | ||
| We don't have a bunch of people just laying around with money from their parents. | ||
| We understand that when you spend money at the Alex Jones store or Infowarsstore.com that it was money that you worked hard for and we appreciate that and we do not take it for granted and we really can't express. | ||
| How thankful we are, and we hope that we show that by dedicating ourselves fully to this ultimate conflict to save humanity. | ||
| TheAlexJonesStore.com, and stay tuned. | ||
| Alex Jones, 90 seconds. | ||
|
unidentified
|
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | |
| Infowars.com forward slash show. | ||
| Go to the AlexJoneStore.com. | ||
| Get the very best supplements, the highest quality like Ultimate Turmeric, Ultimate CMOS, and so many other game-changing formulas that you will love and that will blow you away. | ||
| Then the widest selection of Patriot t-shirts and hoodies and sweaters and ball caps, and we're just adding more and more. | ||
| It is the biggest selection. | ||
| Over 400 different designs. | ||
| We are winning, ladies and gentlemen, but InfoWars is recognized as the tip. | ||
| Of the spear in the fight against the globalists, Elon's kicking their ass, Trump's kicking their ass because you've supported them. | ||
| But please don't forget about Infowars because in this fight, Elon and Trump, what they're doing is way larger and just incredible and amazing. | ||
| But you look then below that and we are the most effective. | ||
| We are now reaching the most people of any of the shows out there. | ||
| And not just the Patriot broadcast. | ||
| We're reaching over 100 million people a day, conservatively. | ||
| And that's because you stood with us and you supported us. | ||
| But these new viewers, these new listeners, they're not going to the AlexJonesStore.com and they're not getting product. | ||
| It is the hardcore viewers and listeners like you, the Patriots that helped launch this whole thing that are keeping us on the air. | ||
| You're not the Johnny-come-latelys. | ||
| You're the people that understand how important it is to support independent, patriot, pro-human, anti-globalist media that are enemies of humanity. | ||
| So get great products. | ||
| At the same time, keep us on air at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| I want to thank you all for your past support, and I want to encourage you now to take action. | ||
| Become a VIP. It's $30 a month. | ||
| Cancel any time. | ||
| Get $40 to spend in the store each month. | ||
| Special deals, special sales, special offers. | ||
| Become a VIP if you're going to buy anything because you make money on your first purchase when you do it. | ||
| Again, thank you so much. | ||
| Check out thealexjonesstore.com. |
Export Selection