All Episodes
Jan. 12, 2024 - American Journal - Harrison Smith
02:11:41
Skull & Bones Embraces Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion - The American Journal - FULL SHOW - 01/12/2024
Participants
Main voices
a
alex jones
06:09
c
chase geiser
01:31:05
Appearances
d
denis rancourt
02:28
g
greg reese
02:21
j
jon bowne
01:54
Clips
c
clay higgins
00:18
m
matt infowars
00:28
m
mika brzezinski
00:17
Callers
icarus in wisconsin
01:17
william in arkansas
01:25
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
InfoWars. Tomorrow's news today.
alex jones
Tuesday night, a bizarre story broke in New York with Orthodox Hasidic Jews with a three story deep tunnel going on.
And I held my time because I wanted to get more information.
I want to be able to report on it.
And the story has been mega viral.
But again, I want to do my own research before I comment it.
Now that we've analyzed the footage, it doesn't look too good.
You've got dirty mattresses that look like they have blood, stains and other things on them.
You've got baby high chairs and just piles of garbage.
And just looking at the footage, it looks like human trafficking to me.
So we hear this constant Trope that this stuff's going on underground.
And I'm like, no, it's going on at the Texas border.
It's going on publicly.
But then, literally, you start to see this and you have to say to yourself, It looks bad.
And then you've got the way they freaked out and went crazy once the police got there and attacked everybody.
And this just shows how much evil is going on in our society.
You know, at first I thought, well, maybe they think it's the end of the world, or maybe they're dealing drugs or hiding diamonds or, you know, something under there.
Because a lot of that goes on in New York City.
But now, looking at the footage, The limited footage police released, it looks bad.
It's not just one high chair.
It's not just children's accoutrement here and there.
It is all over the place.
So, I ask the question, why are the New York police filling it up with cement?
Why is it all being sealed and covered up?
You can't trust the FBI. They've covered up the whole Jeffrey Epstein operation.
They've covered up all the rest of the garbage.
No. Who is going to go in there and do a forensic examination of what's happening?
Because everybody's acting like, oh, the New York police are in there to end this, whatever it is.
But instead, they're dumping concrete down in it and sealing it.
I want an investigation of what's going on in those subterranean tunnels.
Because it was Ted Gunnarsson Former head of the FBI in L.A., you name it, that I first met like 28 years ago, only been on air a few years, who said, and it came out, it was true, he documented it, that all these private schools and stuff in L.A. had subterranean tunnels where they were transferring kids to be molested.
And later it came out in some of the fighters' investigations, he was telling the truth.
He had a top-rate clearance, did a great job.
He retires, becomes a PI, gets hired for some Hollywood cases, and then Satanism kept coming up and molestation of children.
He couldn't believe it, but it was all there.
So this does not look good, ladies and gentlemen.
Why would you carry baby highchairs and dirty mattresses covered with all sorts of fluids down through these pits into the ground?
Looks really sick.
And we know hundreds of thousands of children every year have been brought in since Biden got in.
Huge human trafficking.
They had met over 90,000 now missing.
If I had to guess what was going on in there, something really was creepy going on, I think it was probably some type of weird ritual assaulting children.
And I think the news came out.
I think there were whistleblowers inside.
And I'm speculating here, but I think the police covered it up.
So the police aren't the persecutors here.
I'm saying, and I'm speculating, but at gut level feels like they're part of a cover-up.
So I'm not going to be pardoned.
Of this, and you shouldn't be part of this at the border, or with Epstein, or with the globalists, or the CIA, or the Mossad, or any of it.
We need to have a real investigation.
The question is, who's going to do it?
So I demand the state of New York, but it's run by Hochul.
I demand the Justice Department, but it's run by Biden.
Well, who does do an investigation?
Yeah, all that Pizzagate stuff's coming out to be true, isn't it?
Three-story deep tunnels with a bunch of little kids' stuff and little kids' clothes and all the rest of it.
And then people climbing up out of holes in the ground.
Doesn't look good, folks. We'll be covering it tomorrow on the Friday show, 11 a.m.
Central, infowars.com, forward slash show.
And while we're still here at X and Real Ox Jones, evil's being revealed, folks.
She'll be ready to face the horror.
unidentified
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
InfoWars.com forward slash go.
It's Friday, January 12th in the year of 2024.
And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Chase Geyser.
Watch it live right now at band.video.
Come back, folks.
chase geiser
It's Chase Geyser on The American Journal this morning.
An honor and a pleasure to be with you.
What a great weekend it's been.
unidentified
I really enjoyed being the host of the show this week.
chase geiser
But I'm excited to see Harrison back in his chair on Monday morning.
And Owen Shroyer back in the war room after a week of much-deserved time with family.
Since we never know where to begin at the beginning of the show and all the options, let's start with a little lighthearted story.
We're going to run clip one here in a segment.
Good Samaritan Body Checks Porch Pirate Fleeing Police.
A Good Samaritan is being praised by authorities after helping police take down a fleeing suspect in New York.
Let's go ahead and run the clip. Yonkers Police Department, Dispatcher 19.
unidentified
I just saw somebody on my ring camera.
Just steal two packages.
Headquarters of 201. Caller is not home, but saw this on the ring camera.
He took a box and a parcel.
Camouflage jacket, white hoodie, gray sweatpants, black backpack.
Excuse me. Hi.
Stop right there. Stop.
Stop. Stop.
Stop. Running back to St.
John's. St.
John's Church. Well, they got them.
chase geiser
I've never heard the expression porch buyer before, but I guess it's just somebody who goes around looking to see if there are packages on porches and stealing them.
Amazon packages, things like that.
Spikes around holiday season because people are having shipments sent to their house, which makes it sort of more heinous that it's not just a common thief, but it's a holiday thief, holiday time thief.
Well, there you go. They got them.
That's great. Nobody even had to get shot.
Maybe we don't need guns after all, folks.
You can just chase after them and catch them.
And, you know, it's funny, when I look at the homeless population in the United States, when I look at the criminal population here in the United States, they don't manifest this look of desperation that you would expect.
When I think of homeless people or poor people, when I read stories in the Bible about struggling people and homeless people, I don't imagine someone who is...
Well-closed, cleaned up, or certainly not overweight.
But it's a problem that's unique in the United States that even our criminal class, our homeless class, our most impoverished, are obese.
I was telling the crew the other day, I went to Walgreens and I was waiting in the pharmacy area.
And I don't know if this is something that is universally true across all locations.
But they have a couple of chairs in the waiting area.
for people to sit in while they're waiting for their prescription to be filled and I noticed that they have this chair that is not like a normal chair They have two or three normal chairs, and they have this chair that's like something in between a chair and a bench.
At first, I thought, oh, it's a two-seater that's just set up as one sort of unit, one chair.
But I looked, I was like, no, that's too small to be a bench, but it's way too big to be a chair.
And then I realized that they have now widened the chairs, and there is sort of an obese option for people at the pharmacy to sit in if they're Basically too wide for the standard chairs.
So I sat in and I felt kind of bad.
I felt kind of like I parked in a handicapped spot sitting in that chair.
But my wife and I could have sat right next to each other and it was designed for one person.
And we see this happening all over our culture, all over our society.
We see reports that the...
There it is. Airlines are going to...
Now offer discounts to obese people if they want to buy two adjacent seats so they have more sitting room.
And they make it sound like it's something they do as a courtesy to the larger among us.
But the fact of the matter is they're actually trying to help out average-sized people who don't want to sit next to a gigantic person on an airplane for an extended period of time because they tend to flow over into the seat that you purchased.
And I don't know what to make of it.
I mean, I get it.
Some people are going to be obese. Some people have thyroid problems.
And I'm not trying to disparage people for their health or the way they look.
We've all got our own vices.
We've all got our own thorns in our sides.
But sometimes it just astounds me, whether it's anything, how long people let a problem go before they wake up and they just can't even recognize themselves.
And I don't even just mean physically, I mean in terms of their character, other issues as well.
It's like what they say about bankruptcy.
They say it comes very slowly and then all at once at the end.
It's like, what were you thinking for this extended period of time?
The feds are suing developers of Massive Colony Ridge, illegal immigrant community in Texas.
Thanks to the hard work of Operation Burning Edge, we're finally seeing some action against Colony Ridge, a huge illegal alien community north of Houston that has been growing unrestrained for many months now.
It reminds me of that famous clip of Alex Jones.
One of the first clips I ever saw of Alex Jones was when he was covering the free underwear that we were giving illegal migrants at the border.
And he holds up this giant, basically giant tighty-whities.
And he says, we're being invaded by South American walruses.
It all ties in.
The entire crumbling of our society, everything is related.
Every bad thing that happens is connected.
Federal government is suing the developers of Colony Ridge, which we now know contributed enormous amounts of bribe money to the Texas state legislature, including numerous U.S. congressmen and Governor Greg Adams himself, to rubber stamp their approval of Or this massive illegal migrant development.
And I still, for the life of me, can't really figure out with certainty why it is that our federal government is sponsoring this.
Why it is that our federal government is not just allowing this, but actually funding it.
And I've got different theories.
I've talked to them about it on air.
I've talked to you about it on air. I've heard from callers about what their thoughts are, but...
For the life of me, I can't get a solid reason why they would want this massive influx of migrants into our country.
The best guess I have is that they want the terrorists to come in along with the regular migrants so that they can use another terrorist attack to usher in World War III. But after all we've seen from MKUltra, And all of the mysterious manifestations of that project in terms of the terrorists and serial killers or shooters, famous shooters that it concocted.
It doesn't seem to me that our government actually needs to import radicals into the country in order to catalyze the terrorist event.
It seems to me there's plenty of people already here.
They've got the technology.
They've got the psychological understanding.
They've done the experiments, which they destroyed the documents for.
They could basically turn anybody they wanted into a terrorist.
Any college student who volunteers for a psychology experiment for a little bit of extra cash on the side could be unwittingly walking into an MKUltra experiment like Ted Kaczynski did, where he was tortured and psychologically abused for an extended period of time before, of course, himself becoming infamous In the way of killing innocent people.
I don't know. I don't know that everybody he targeted was innocent, but it doesn't make it right regardless.
I actually read his book recently a couple of times this year.
What's it called? Industrial Society in its Fall or something like that.
I can't remember the exact name of his book.
It's a little short manifesto.
Part of how they caught him, I believe, is his brother recognized the writing that they published.
In the newspaper when they were looking for them.
Industrial society and something.
And its future.
And what's amazing to me about these people, some of the most evil people throughout history, frankly, what's amazing to me is how dead on and correct they are about defining the problem.
But then how...
Way off they are in the solution or the conclusion that they arrive at.
So he lays out some amazing problems in this little manifesto, talking about how technology is taking over everything and people are being displaced and leftist psychology versus right-wing psychology or traditional psychology and how there's this just sort of innate rift and hate between the two psychological profiles of a leftist versus a patriot.
I mean, he does some very sophisticated things.
unidentified
things.
chase geiser
He's obviously a high IQ individual who's been disturbed and tortured.
But MKUltra had no problem turning him into the Unabomber.
No problem.
So why would they need to import these migrants?
I still can't for the life of me figure out why they're bringing these people in.
I guess it's just to inflate the different districts during the censuses, but that's every 10 years.
They can get more representatives in democratic states.
I don't know, folks.
What do you think?
unidentified
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
chase geiser
I am Chase Geiser, your host this morning.
You may have heard this story about Johns Hopkins DEI. Of course, that's diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Johns Hopkins DEI officer publishes diversity hit list labeling able-bodied Christians, English speakers as privileged.
A woke newsletter disseminated to staff at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland.
Reminds employees that privilege isn't just reserved for white people, but is also enjoyed by non-handicapped people, Christians, middle class wage earners, and even people who know how to speak English.
So now, I think we've officially arrived at a place in our culture here in America.
I think we've officially arrived at a place where the left is incapable of naming anyone who is doing well at all who isn't doing well because of privilege.
This is an idea.
It's a term.
It's a soft blow sort of accusation that's used to undermine the integrity of our system and the claims that our system has made for hundreds of years about the nature of the individual and the feasibility or possibility of the American dream for anyone who sets their mind to it and works hard.
I mean, after all, that is really ultimately...
From a cultural standpoint, I'm not talking legally, but from a cultural standpoint, that is the American promise.
The American promise is, you come here with nothing, you work hard, you follow the rules, and you're a good person, you're going to have success.
You're going to have a good life in this country.
That's the promise, culturally.
And for a long time, it's true. It's probably still, in large, true, though it's becoming more difficult.
The path is narrower and narrower to any sort of success or making ends meet.
We know that there's record amounts of credit card debt.
We know that there's record amounts of bankruptcies.
We know that financially speaking, it is getting more and more difficult for your paycheck to actually pay for a reasonable middle class lifestyle.
That being said, it's still possible.
It is. And it happens in other countries too that are much more corrupt than our own.
Even in the likes of Russia.
I'm certain that in Ukraine there were people that were successful as well before this war just by how corrupt they are.
And so this promise that no matter who you are, no matter what your immutable characteristics are, really flies in the face of Marxism because at its heart, Marxism and critical theory are all about this idea of the oppressor versus the oppressed.
And everything is about a will to power.
It's very sort of Nietzschean in that sense.
And in any society or relationship, according to the Marxists, there are those with power and there are those without power.
And those with power exploit those without power.
That's the idea that Marx had about capitalism.
That's what he thought about our sort of political infrastructure.
And so it becomes an issue if, in fact, in reality...
You can become successful without oppressing anyone else.
You can just work hard and with determination regardless of your immutable characteristics, your race, your religion, any of the other details about you that had nothing to do with your character and everything to do with just your genetics or how you're born or where you're born.
These immutable characteristics that cannot be changed.
If you could be successful regardless of those, then it shatters the entire leftist philosophy, basically their entire argument that they make to their base, whether their base is even aware of it or not, which is that if you're suffering, it's not your fault.
It's because someone else is imposing that suffering upon you.
And they use that idea to weaponize their base and divide it against the other side in America who remembers when America had one cohesive culture where people could disagree about a few things but ultimately agreed on primary principles.
Hard work, dedication, treating others as you want to be treated.
Judeo-Christian values, for lack of a better term.
I know that's a controversial term now.
When I say Judeo-Christian values, I'm talking about people who follow things like the Ten Commandments, even if they don't even believe in God or Christianity.
We had a culture that practiced elements of Christianity, even if they weren't believers for a long period of time.
Now we have a culture that just straight up defies and hates it.
I mean, we have people that are pirate poachers going around literally breaking one of the Ten Commandments, stealing from door to door.
Instead of selling Bibles and encyclopedias, they're going and they're just stealing packages.
And so we have these letters that come out Males, whites, Christians, mid-aged people, just being mid-aged means you're privileged, able-bodied people, middle and owning class.
They call it owning class.
That is very Marxist because you got to remember, folks, the main thing about Marxism is that there are no private property rights.
There should be no private property.
Everything must be public and collectivist.
And so ownership itself is ascribed with this connotation of oppressor class.
The absurd newsletter from John Hopkins Office of Diversity, which is an office that should not even exist at any of these universities, none of our federally funded higher education institutions should have any of these DEI offices because, frankly, they're in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
They are racist just in the other direction.
So at first, they don't seem racist to a generation of people in this country who saw racism only go one way for many years.
When it goes racist the other way, you don't catch it at first, and then you see stuff like this, and you're like, oh, wow, we really lost track of things.
We're like, people that lost track of our weight, they have to sit in the chair and a half at Walgreens or buy two tickets at an airline.
The absurd newsletter from John Hopkins' Office of Diversity, Inclusion, and Health Equity.
Remember, equity is equality of outcome.
So if you're advocating for health equity, that means that everybody should have the same amount of health?
So what do you do with the really sick people?
Do you just kill them? Or what do you do with the really healthy people?
Do you have to make them sick? Health equity doesn't even mean anything.
This office points out the word of the month is privilege before proceeding to claim a laundry list of social groups are granted privilege in the U.S. Of course, we've gone over that list.
Quote, privilege is a set of unearned benefits given to people who are in a specific social group.
See, unearned. You just got it because of this oppression that you inherited.
This is the claim of the newsletter sent by Chief Diversity Officer Sharita Hill-Golden and obtained by X account AtEndWokeness.
Privilege operates on personal, impersonal, cultural, and institutional levels, and it provides advantages and favors to members of dominant groups at the expense of members of other groups.
So, oppressors who exploit the oppressed.
It's literally, this is Marxist philosophy being sent out at Johns Hopkins University.
Of course, we have the screenshot here of the actual message that was sent out.
In the United States, female continuous privilege is granted to people who have membership in one or more of these social identity groups.
Again, I'm just going to read them real fast.
White people, able-bodied people, heterosexuals, cisgender people, which I don't even...
I guess cisgender is when you identify as the gender of your birth.
So I'm a cisgender person, apparently.
Males, Christians, middle or owning class people, middle-aged people, and English-speaking people.
This is just Marxist propaganda going out to our college students.
And, of course, there was a ton of backlash.
We're going to get more into it in detail on the other side of this break.
In the meantime, go to Infowarsstore.com to be the reason we are still on the air.
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
There is just something about...
unidentified
Intro to this song. It is one of the best intros of any song I've ever heard.
It's like Up There with Fortunate Son.
chase geiser
There's something about it. It just vibes.
You can almost see the Apache helicopters fly in over the jungle.
As you hear the intro, some of these songs are just iconic.
It's amazing how music can put you in a mood.
It's almost like a time machine sometimes.
If I listen to a song that I've listened to in years, I immediately get put back in a different chapter in my life, like mentally.
So we were covering in the last segment this Sharita H. Golden DEI message that was sent out to students at Johns Hopkins University where basically she said that privilege is the word of the month and if you're white, able-bodied, heterosexual, cisgender, male, Christian, middle or owning class, middle-aged, or English-speaking, then you're privileged and privileged.
Everything good in your life is because of that privilege, and that privilege is because of your oppression and exploitation or your people's oppression and exploitation over others.
So you haven't earned any of it, and you should be aware of the fact that things are going really well for you because of the evil of the people on your side.
And technically, you should probably make sure that you tip your server because, you know, everything good in your life is...
Directly and oppositely correlated by terrible things happening in other people's lives.
It's Marxist, commie stuff.
As one commenter on X correctly noted, the African American DEI official who lords over which group is deemed privileged...
Appears to exercise the most privilege since she's seemingly above reproach and criticism due to her race and sex.
Black female chief diversity officers are more privileged than nearly everyone covered under that list.
They're paid far more than the average middle class person.
And they have the privilege of being hired and treated above criticism because of their race and sex.
And there's some truth to this.
Everybody's so terrified of being called a racist.
Everyone actually hates racism so much that they do anything they can to just be as far away from that label as possible.
And some of this has been happening.
I mean, we saw some very questionable things happen at Harvard over the last few weeks.
Harrison did a great job reporting on that.
I happen to agree with Harrison. It didn't occur to me until I listened to Harrison report on it.
But I think that the real reason that There was that resignation at Harvard had nothing to do with the plagiarism.
The plagiarism was just the excuse.
The real reason was because she wasn't on the right side of the Zionist debate.
The Zionism debate going on.
So this list, though, at Johns Hopkins, reveals how adherence to the DEI, again, that's diversity, equity, and inclusion agenda, is being instituted at a university level to professors and educators who then indoctrinate students with the racist, woke teachings.
And you've got to keep in mind, folks, that since our universities take so much money and rely so much on...
Funding from the federal government, that has given the federal government a disproportionate amount of leverage over the nature of these institutions.
Perfect example is the Title IX regulations that came out while Barack Obama was president.
Now, when Barack Obama was president, I think it was called the Dear John letter.
There was basically a policy just issued out unilaterally from the executive branch that there was a certain way to handle allegations of sexual assault on college campuses.
And if your university did not handle these allegations of sexual assault on campus in the designated way by the federal government, Then your university would be subject to the eradication of federal funding and federal support.
And I know a lot of universities rely on things like tuition.
And a lot of universities rely on things like the endowment of their successful graduates years later.
But the fact of the matter is, whether you go to a private university or whether you go to a state college or a public university, chances are overwhelmingly likely that That that institution receives some sort of substantial federal funding that helps keep the lights on, helps fund research, things like that.
Especially these major institutions like the Johns Hopkins' and the MIT's and the Harvard's.
Because the best and brightest are there, so the federal government invests in these institutions and ensures that cutting-edge research can be done there.
And so... As an example, and I don't know if you recall this, I recall this because I was in college and I actually had to face some of this.
If you're falsely accused of sexual assault in college, you as a male do not have a right to face your accuser like you do in the court of law.
You as a male do not have the right to...
Cross witness, get a cross testimony, cross examine the witness.
So you can't hear the accusations made against you.
In some instances you won't even be told who made the accusations against you.
You can't cross-examine the witness or face the accuser because that's insensitive.
And the university has to act immediately just when these accusations are raised because if they don't follow all the Title IX regulations, then they're subject to losing their funding.
And so you see things like DEI manifest.
It's different, obviously, from...
Sexual assault issue or the Title IX issue.
Title IX, of course, originally being a law just to make sure that there was an equal and opposite sporting opportunity for women in college as there was for men.
So if there's a men's basketball team, there should be a girls' one too, that sort of thing.
Of course, now we don't even know what the definition of men and women are anymore in this country.
But when you see things like this DEI push, it is the government leveraging its financial...
Power over these institutions, they've become financially dependent on the government, just like our states have.
It's leveraging its power over these institutions to enforce a political agenda, policies, even sort of, I would say, this skirts right on the edge of violations of our rights.
I mean, DEI is certainly a violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
When you have things like no whites on campus day, that's explicitly illegal and racist.
Which is why, of course, Brent Weinstein became sort of famous.
And so there was an abundance of backlash to these comments.
I think because it comes out in the context of what happened at Harvard.
So we have this other sort of woke example from Sherita H. Golden at Johns Hopkins.
There was a tremendous amount of backlash basically forcing her to issue a statement Retracting some of the claims that she made.
And so keep in mind folks that what I'm about ready to read to you, this retraction statement that followed up the message that we went over in detail, is not a genuine expression of regret or genuine acknowledgement of a mistake that was made.
This is a feigned apology because we saw a glimpse of what's really going on psychologically in the minds of these people.
So the original message that went out is actually what Sharita thinks.
This is how her mind operates.
This is how the DEI sort of brainwashed software installed on the minds of students and faculty members alike at universities.
This is how it runs.
This sort of cognitive dissonance doesn't make any sense, but it's installed and it's the program that runs.
What we saw from the original statement that went out, the original email that went out, is what they actually think constantly.
It is the voice in their mind, assuming that they even have one.
So let's hear what her response was.
Dear colleagues, yesterday I sent the January edition of a monthly Diversity Digest from the Johns Hopkins Medicine Office of Diversity, Inclusion, and Health Equity.
The newsletter included a definition of the word privilege, which upon reflection, I deeply regret.
Yeah, I lie. The intent of the newsletter is to inform and support an inclusive community at Hopkins, but the language of this definition clearly did not meet the goal.
In fact, because it was overly simplistic and poorly worded, it had the opposite effect of being exclusionary and hurtful to members of our community.
They're not going to say it was hurtful to white people.
Keep in mind, if this had gone the other direction, she wouldn't have said members of our community.
She would have said people of color in our community.
The people of color. They always call out the race of the minority who is the brunt of racism, but they never call out the race of the majority when it's the brunt of racism.
I retract and disavow the definition I shared, and I am sorry.
I will work to ensure that future messages better reflect our organizational values.
Sincerely, Sherita H. Golden, MD, MHS. I don't buy it, folks.
I can't wait to take calls later on in the show and hear what you guys think about this.
Stay tuned, folks. Make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com.
I'll meet you now more than ever.
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
I am Chase Geiser, your host this morning.
I just can't seem to get away from this Secret Society stuff.
Interesting article on the desk, and I haven't had a chance to read it yet, so I'm not going to cover up this segment.
Skull and Bones and Equity and Inclusion.
So it ties in exactly to what we were talking about in the last segment.
I'm anxious to take a look at it during the first five at the top of the hour.
Take a break and play a report and look through that and see if I can cover it.
But what's fascinating to me is...
When I first started doing this sort of thing, whether it was broadcasting here or covering any sort of news on my podcast, you rely a lot on the headlines and the articles when you first start because you're nervous and you don't really know what you're going to say and you don't You don't know how much should you prepare?
How many clips should you prepare? Should you practice before you go on air?
These are the things that cross your mind.
Because it's nerve-wracking. You don't know how many tens of thousands of people are going to be listening.
You don't want to blow it because you want the opportunity again.
And now that I've been doing this for a while now, I don't even know when I first came on as a guest host.
It must have been 2022.
So this will be my second year in to doing this sort of thing every once in a while.
I've learned something having read for the first time over the course of the last 18 months, thousands of articles.
And it's not an exaggeration, thousands of articles.
We probably print 30 articles a show, so in a five-day period of hosting the show, it's 150 articles that you read through.
You show for a number of weeks.
It's thousands and thousands of articles.
I mean, the amount of trees that have been cut down just for Infowars to print articles over the last 30 years is mind-numbing.
And as you get the hang of it, you realize that the art of...
And I'm not an expert by any means.
I have so much to learn about this.
Alex is the greatest of all time.
And the Rush Limbaugh's.
The art of... Talk radio.
This sort of dying thing that's turning into podcasting.
It's about stream of consciousness more than it is about preparedness.
It's about a lens through which you interpret the world more than it is about knowing all the details.
It's sort of the difference between talk radio and investigative journalism.
As investigative journalism, you go out, you do the research, you try to find a story, and you report something that no one yet knows to the world.
Famous example of Spotlight back in the 90s, revealing all the corruption within the Catholic Church.
That's what investigative journalism is, but broadcasting or talk radio isn't really investigative journalism.
It's taking what the world already knows and making sense of it through a lens, whether it's the CNN lens, whether it's the Infowars lens, whether it's the Fox News lens, whether it's the Joe Rogan lens.
There's always a lens.
There's your own lens.
And that's really the difference between talk and investigative journalism.
Talk radio hosts aren't really journalists in that they don't go out and try to find a story so much as they interpret that which is being reported in a way that's more reasonable than that which is being reported.
And the reason I mention that is because now when I look at a story about a bizarre newsletter that goes out to all of the students at Johns Hopkins University, like we covered, It's not just one sort of bizarre instance of someone saying something in passing that could be interpreted as like a microaggression against my race or my religion or who I am as an immutable person.
You realize that these headlines as you begin connecting the dots...
They all reinforce a greater theme.
I don't know if you were lucky enough to have a talented English teacher in high school, but I was.
I went to a really small school. I talked about this the other day.
There were 80 kids in my graduating class, and I was very close with my English teacher.
I mean, I stayed after class.
We would debate things like religion and talk about literature and movies and music, and the guy meant a lot to me.
He actually baptized me in his church.
I know it sounds weird as an audience member.
It was all kosher and legit.
Just really close. And since he's basically expressed that he doesn't want to speak to me anymore because he thinks I'm a white supremacist since I supported Trump, he's a major leftist.
Lost his mind. Lost religion too.
And the reason I bring him up is because...
He'd probably be so upset if you heard this since he hates what I do.
The reason I bring it up is because everything...
That I do now and that I have done basically since high school in terms of the work that I do is all through the lens of some of the things that he taught me in that English literature class.
I can't even believe it.
It's not just about reading a book and explaining what happened in a five-paragraph essay.
It's about how do you look for The metaphor.
How do you determine what the theme is of a book?
How do you look for the symbolism within a movie or a book or an article and then identify what theme or philosophy or idea or value that reinforces?
Good example is Dune.
Great movie. The new one with Timothy Chimelay.
Some people were disappointed when they went to that movie because they thought that they were going to see this intense sci-fi action thriller.
And what they were met with was a three-hour long, basically perfect adaptation of a book that is a science fiction book, but it's basically a political drama.
And if I hadn't taken this class from my English teacher in high school, I took several classes with him over the years because one teacher taught a lot of classes in a small school.
I wouldn't, as a consumer, understand that that movie, and this is just an example, is not about a dispute over resources on a planet and cool action sequences.
That movie is about a young man coming of age and having the courage to become what he was destined to become.
And when you watch the movie through the lens of what it actually is supposed to mean, you see all sorts of symbolism.
You have more than one birthright, boy.
So is he the Duke's son or is he his mother's son?
And in the end, when he says things like, my way leads into the desert, that's him acknowledging that he's accepted his fate to take on the leadership of his dead father and...
That which he inherited from his mother in order to unite the native people.
I mean, it's powerful stuff.
It makes the movie so much more enjoyable.
It makes all art so much better.
It's not boring. It's not slow.
Because every scene is meaningful when it's done correctly.
It's why the old Star Wars movies are so much better than the new Star Wars movies.
Because the old ones actually had meaning and the new ones are just sort of regurgitated political propaganda crap.
And so when I apply those skills to these headlines...
And these articles and the statements that our politicians make, you realize that these are all just tiny moments in a giant propaganda war that is on for your mind.
And the left and the establishment and the globalists are fighting so hard for you to believe the lie, while the likes of Infowars and Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan, whether they're even mean to or not, are fighting so hard for you to just find out what the truth is and broadcast it.
Sometimes we get it wrong, but we never lie to you.
We don't have to lie to you.
Everything is crazy enough.
We don't have to lie to you to sell products.
The products work. They come after us for about everything that we say, everything that we do, but we never get in trouble over the products because they work.
They don't really say anything about the product.
So yeah, we test it in the lab. It's all the stuff.
It's 1000% your daily value of B12 and whatever.
If you look at reports, they have to criticize what we say because they can't criticize what we sell.
And they're criticizing what we say because they're threatened by an awareness of the truth when this war on for your mind is about whether or not the people are going to believe the big lie, the great lie, or whether the people are going to believe the truth.
And that's really where we're at now.
This is the greatest challenge, in my opinion, that we've ever faced in the war for your mind, in the info war.
Because we have arrived at a very crucial point where...
There has been a mass awakening to the fact that the establishment has been lying for decades.
Now people realize that the political class whether it's Republicans or Democrats is lying at the highest levels.
Now people realize that the intelligence community is lying at the highest levels.
Now they realize that the pharmaceutical companies are lying at the highest levels.
They realize since this pandemic happened and the Biden thing happened and all these wars, they realize that all the establishment systems, the infrastructure that we were raised to trust and believe in, in commercial after commercial of happy sick people taking happy drugs with some side effects spoken very quickly at the end of every segment.
We realize that everything that we thought was true has been a lie.
That's step one in victory.
When there's a great realization that That we've been lied to.
Now the reason this is such a crucial point in this Infowar is because now that people know who's lying to them, how do they determine who to trust?
How do they determine then who's telling the truth?
Are we lost? Are we wandering in the desert as a people?
How do we align people on one message, one truth, to unite this political movement against anti-Americanism?
greg reese
More on the other side. Dennis Rancourt has a PhD in physics.
He is a former tenured full professor and has published over 100 articles in leading science journals.
Rancourt and his team have used all-cause mortality data to prove there have been about 17 million deaths as a result of official COVID-19 measures, but not from COVID, which was a lie.
denis rancourt
As far as I can tell from all-cause mortality data that we've been studying extensively for a long time, there's no There was no such thing as a viral respiratory pandemic.
greg reese
He explains all this in his essay entitled, There Was No Pandemic, which you can find on his substack.
denis rancourt
There was no pandemic, in the sense that there was not a particularly virulent new pathogen that was spreading and causing death.
That is not what happened.
What happened was huge assaults against vulnerable people by many different methods, and every time you did that, you caused excess mortality.
In all the countries where they were not doing that, there was absolutely no excess mortality, even if it was a jurisdiction that was right beside the one that was doing this.
greg reese
Rancourt explains a science of psychological murder that has been officially studied and documented for well over a century.
It wasn't just the spike protein that killed us.
It was the whole damn thing.
denis rancourt
Psychological stress and social isolation are dominant determinants of an individual's health.
That causes a suppression of your immune system And you're going to get some kind of infection, cancer, heart disease, and very often the lungs are very exposed to the environments and they're subjected to all the bacteria that you live with all the time.
You get bacterial pneumonia.
And it's a huge killer when a society is stressed, meaning all of its individuals are stressed.
The kind of psychological stress that kills you is when your entire world is turned upside down.
Your whole life you thought you had a place in the world and it's gone.
That will kill you within a very short time.
We always occupy a dominance hierarchy, a social dominance hierarchy.
That is how we organize our societies because we are social animals.
It is a fundamental truth of how we organize societies.
The stress that is intended to keep you in your place within that dominance hierarchy is an everyday chronic stress.
And the stressors have to keep changing how they're going to stress you because you get habituated to the stress.
So they have to randomly hit you with hard things every once in a while to really make sure you understand what your place is.
That stress is one of the biggest determinants of health.
But we have to admit that medicine itself is a massive killer.
It's a massive cause of premature death of individuals.
greg reese
Modern Western medicine is officially recognized as the third highest cause of death.
It was designed to be a way of controlling the population.
denis rancourt
The role of medicine as an institution in our society is to maintain the dominance hierarchy.
And to put them in their place, it's just part of that institutionally.
greg reese
Financed by the Carnegie Foundation and published in 1910, the Flexner Report was used to outlaw natural medicine practices in America.
The Rockefeller Foundation then funded a new kind of medicine.
An inverted form of healthcare that utilized petrochemical drugs and experimental surgery to keep people sick, and in many cases, kill the patient.
As Dennis Rancourt has pointed out, this is how societies have been run for centuries.
A declassified document entitled Geomagnetic Factors in Spontaneous Subjective Telepathic Precognitive and Postmortem Experiences, as well as Decades of Trauma-Based Mind Control Research, shows us that the CIA and our governments are well aware of the deadly effects that traumatizing a population can induce.
They are killing us with fear and trauma.
This is known as psychogenic death or psychosomatic death.
It is the phenomenon of sudden death brought about by strong emotional shock.
Chairman of the Department of Physiology at Harvard Medical School, Walter Cannon, called it voodoo death because mind control is the main method used in voodoo rituals, which is well understood by our world leaders.
unidentified
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
chase geiser
I am Chase Geyser.
Your host this morning, the crew and I went over the details of this Skull and Bones and Equity and Inclusion article.
And what at first seemed like a puff piece is actually a really interesting take on what's going on.
So many of you are familiar with Skull and Bones.
Skull and Bones is the elite secret society that many substantial influential members joined.
While they were students at Yale.
It's been around, I believe, since the 1830s, was it?
19th century sometime.
It's the oldest of these clubs at Yale.
And it's been the subject of several movies.
I believe there's a movie literally called Skull and Bones.
It might have even been made for TV about it.
But the most famous movie that I can think of about Skull and Bones is the movie The Good Shepherd with Matt Damon, Alec Baldwin of all people, about the formation of...
The CIA and how the sort of Ivy League elite class established the intelligence community.
Many of the original leaders of the intelligence agencies and the intelligence community were members of these exclusive fraternities at their prestigious institutions.
And it makes sense on the surface why this would be the case.
One reason, of course, is just plain old nepotism and favoritism, things like that.
But there's actually a more sort of...
And I'm not somebody who is an apologist for Skull and Bone, so please don't take this the wrong way.
But it makes sense that if you're going to start an incredibly well-funded...
Intelligence agency, with spies and secrets and trust being pivotal right after World War II and into the Cold War, it does make sense to me why some of these founders of these intelligence communities seem to have been involved in these organizations.
Because if I know anything about organizations like this, there is a massive amount of vetting and trust, at least there used to be, That goes into whether or not you can get into these clubs.
I mean, by the time you get into an Ivy League school or a school as impressive as Yale or Harvard or others, by the time you get into those institutions, and I've often said that it's more impressive to get into Harvard than it is to graduate from Harvard, you've already gone through a tremendous vetting process.
And so it's sort of, and it's not necessarily the case anymore because it's been so politicized, but if you got into Harvard in the 60s or the 70s, it's because you were a baller.
You knew somebody awesome, or you were related to somebody awesome, or you were just an outstandingly impressive young man or woman, right?
So imagine this sort of Incredibly difficult vetting process just to get into the university.
And then once you get into the university, only 15 people a year are allowed into these highly exclusive secret societies on campus.
Details of which have sort of leaked.
It's hard to know what's true, what isn't true.
But it's definitely very sort of alarming.
Some of the details, very Bohemian Grove-esque.
Some of the things going on at Skull and Bones.
With allegations that they have Geronimo's skull and they actually have real skulls and bones there and allegations that they have sort of demon possession rituals and they do this weird sort of wrestling and feces with urine and they have to lay in a coffin and tell their worst secret to the entire group.
It's sort of Epstein-esque without the human trafficking element but it's very much like a sort of blackmail we've all got something on each other ring so this builds trust.
So by the time you get into these exclusive universities, by the time you're one of the 15 of that exclusive group that gets into an institution or a fraternity like Skull and Bones, you are pretty much set as somebody who's going to be trusted until you screw up by the future powerful elite in the country.
That was at least the way it was in the past.
I think it's deteriorated, frankly, since then.
And we're going to get into this article and talk about the details of it.
Let's just go ahead. Do you have the clip ready of Jones in 2013 talking about Skull and Bones?
Let's run this clip. I've run it before, but it just fits so perfectly.
Let's run this and then dive into the article, please.
alex jones
Do you know what goes on at Skull and Bones?
Well, I have a family audience, so I can't say.
They have sexual rituals where they believe they are possessed by entities, basically space aliens.
These are people that had gay sex...
Hundreds of times in coffins, begging for spiritual entities to possess them.
Hollywood should want to hire him to play the next Silence of the Lambs because there's no actor that can look this whacked out crazy.
John Kerry, ladies and gentlemen, is a member of a satanic death cult.
They believe entities possess them in pits of feces.
I mean, we have a Secretary of State who has asked entities to enter his body while having sex in large vats of feces with men peeing on him.
unidentified
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening now.
chase geiser
I found that clip back in August.
Every once in a while, if I want to listen to...
Every once in a while I get a wild hair when I'm working and I want to listen to a really old Alex Jones broadcast.
So I'll go over to Prison Planet and I'll just pull up whatever the broadcast was exactly 10 years ago on this day.
And that was one of the clips that I saw back in August.
I was like, alright, what was going on in 2013 August on this day while I was doing an all-nighter here?
I listened to that clip and I thought, oh, that's just too good.
Let's dive into this article a little bit.
I'm going to try my best not to read too much of it to you because it's a long article and it doesn't have a whole lot of bullet points, but there's some details that we went over.
Matt, feel free to chime in if anything comes to mind because I know that you've scoured this article fairly thoroughly.
Skull and Bones is this incredibly exclusive fraternity.
It used to be a fraternity. Now they allow women, apparently.
At Yale, that's been associated with the likes of Bush Sr., Bush Jr., the intelligence community.
Those rituals that Jones was talking about in 2013 were depicted in the movie The Good Shepherd, which is actually a very good movie with Matt Damon and Ali Baldwin.
And so there was, despite how ridiculous it sounded, there is some veracity to what he was saying.
And so, Vanderbelts, Rockefellers, Buckleys have all been in skull and bones.
Three bonesmen would go on to become president of the United States.
The traditions, including oaths of secrecy upon admission and antics, stealing the gravestone of Yale's founder and the rumors about them that the bones tomb contains several human skulls are legendary and an intense source of campus gossip.
But what used to be this exclusive club for basically political...
Royalty in America, our own sort of form of royalty with these dynasties that have gone through with these institutions that accept people based on nepotism and favoritism and political sort of favoritism, just generally speaking.
What used to be a club for the sort of the future elite of just people with blood that goes way back in American history.
I mean, real sort of Romulus and Remus founding blood of America.
A lot of the original bones meant people like that.
It was kind of like an exclusive almost royalty type thing.
Apparently they have fallen victim to some of these, and I guess we're just going to have to go into it more in the next segment because we're going to come up on a break before I'm done with this.
But they've fallen victim to some of these DEI things.
That's why I wanted to talk about it because we spent a lot of time talking about this Johns Hopkins letter that came out and then the retraction and then obviously the Harvard resignation that happened earlier this month.
But they started doing some fishy things.
So back in the 60s, during the Civil Rights Movement, they realized that they'd never had a black member, so they started allowing black people in, which is great.
They should never not allow black people in because they're black.
In my opinion, that would be racist.
I mean, it's a private club. You can do whatever you want, but not the right thing to do necessarily.
In 1991, apparently, they admitted their first female.
So it's not a fraternity anymore, I guess, because it's not just a brotherhood.
Now they have a gal in there. I'm sure many of the heterosexual brethren, bonesmen, were relieved for that initiation that they didn't have to have sex hundreds of times in coffins and feces with other men.
Finally, a woman! But apparently they have recently gone through what is called the tomb on campus.
All the elite clubs on campus are called tombs.
And they've taken down portraits, decorations, memorabilia that seem to feature an exclusively sort of of European descent class.
They've replaced it with all examples of sort of diverse people of color members.
unidentified
I mean, even the welter stuff is getting into our secret society.
chase geiser
It's more on the other side. Welcome back to the Front Info Warriors.
This is the American Journal. I am Chase Geiser, your host.
unidentified
This morning we are talking about skull and bones.
Memento Mori, you are going to die.
One day. That's why we've got to live now.
chase geiser
We've got to win the war now.
That's why the globalists are trying to just devise immortality.
They don't want to face judgment. They're just trying to postpone it as much as possible.
But eventually it's going to come and get them.
So, we've been talking about this DEI stuff happening in our institutions, and it's abundantly clear based on this article, which is absolutely fantastic.
Good job, Rose, on this article.
How this diversity, equity, inclusion culture, this woke culture, this Marxist critical theory, it's all about oppressive versus oppressed, has even seeped in to the most exclusive topic.
Echelons of secret societies in the United States of America.
Secret societies that have produced directors of CIAs, presidents of the United States, astonishingly successful, influential people of which we have buildings, universities, roads named after.
And I'm reading through this article here.
Unbelievable piece. So, Three Bonesmen would go on to become President of the United States.
Their traditions, including oaths of secrecy upon admission and antics like stealing the gravestone of Yale's founder and the rumors about them that the Bones tomb contains several human skulls, are legendary and an intense source of campus gossip.
Obviously, we saw the bit of Jones talking about it in 2013.
You guys are familiar with Skull and Bones.
But there in the tomb, surrounded by oil portraits of former Bonesmen, all white, all chosen by the Society's Alumni Board, The current members felt overcome not by the achievements of those who had come before them or by the possibilities that lay ahead, but instead by the organization's long history of exclusion.
Yeah, it's a secret society.
The whole point is that it's exclusive.
You moron.
If you don't like exclusion, then don't join an exclusive secret society.
unidentified
You idiot! Unbelievable.
chase geiser
And this reminds me, I just want to mention it before I go on to this article.
If you guys can find the scene from The Good Shepherd where they're in the cabin and they all stand up as Bonesman alumni and Angelina Jolie says something to the effect of Bonesman first and then God or something like that because they do like a Bonesman thing before they pray.
I want to show the audience this clip if you can find it.
If not, it's no big deal because I just want to give them a sense of what the culture is at this echelon here.
So the students did what they felt had to be done.
They pulled the portraits down and replaced them with homemade signs criticizing the secret society's record of keeping people of color out of its ranks.
So you join an organization that you hate, and then you change it.
I mean, I guess it's like a color revolution, right?
Like I said, I'm not an apologist for Skull and Bones.
Obviously, it's produced some very questionable people that have done some very questionable things.
I don't like the CIA. I don't like either of the Bushes.
I don't like this sort of bizarre nepotism that goes on.
And I don't like satanic sex cults, just generally speaking.
And I don't know if they're really having sex with each other in pits of feces, like Jones said.
Maybe they're just mud wrestling while the other members are peeing on them or something.
I don't know. Either way, it's disgusting and weird and bizarre.
And I do believe that they do have to lay in a coffin and share with the room in an Eyes Wide Shut-like ritual the biggest secret of their life as a form of just trust-building.
And I imagine that the lying in the coffin has to do with memento mori, this famous Latin phrase, remember your death.
Hence the skull and bones.
You're going to die. It's a common theme in secret societies.
So, this was not the only act of Skull and Bones' rebellion in 2019.
During an all-expense paid trip to meet with George W. Bush in Texas that year, one or more members confronted the ex-president who wrote in his 1999 autobiography, quote, I joined Skull and Bones, a secret society so secret I can't say anything more, end quote, and criticized him for leading America into the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, yada, yada, yada.
And so, article goes on.
There's more examples of this. Skull and Bones is the oldest of Yale's senior societies.
It was formed in 1832.
Until the 1960s, there had only been white members in the organization.
And criticized for its elitism and discrimination, they faced pressure to disband, but instead they adapted.
I'm sorry, did you say something? I heard something in my ear there.
So, Skull and Bones admitted its first black member in 1965.
Obviously, this is a year after the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
I can understand why they would maybe make that change that year.
In 1975, they tapped the head of Yale's recently founded gay student organization.
And reading this article the first time, how bizarre is it that we have gay student organizations?
I mean, imagine if I started a formal student organization at my university, at my college, and it was just for guys who really wanted to lay blondes.
Okay? You gotta sign this, you know, paperwork that you love blondes.
You gotta wear the t-shirt that says, I love hot blondes.
We drink blonde, tall blonde beers.
Everything we do is about blondes.
We just love blondes. Like, just imagine how bizarre that is.
My nephew in high school...
Got in trouble for wearing a hoodie that said, I love hot moms on it, to school.
Went to public school, high school.
When the principal pulled him aside, he said, why is it that the LGBTQ kids can have rainbow shirts and all the gay stuff shirts, but when I express my sexual preference, hot moms, I suddenly am in trouble.
And they actually let him wear the sweater after he made that argument because they realized it might actually be a violation of his rights at a public school to refuse him the right to express his sexual preference as a 15-year-old kid.
The whole thing is so ridiculous.
Why is it that we have college groups centered around sexual preference?
It's just bizarre to me. I mean, it's fine.
You can do whatever you want, but it just seems kind of stupid that we do that.
In 1991, the Bonesmen tapped their first Boneswoman, so we see this sort of progressive approach.
You know, they're adapting with the times and organizations have to adapt.
I understand. Today, the idea of Skull and Bones selecting someone whose dad was a Republican president seems inconceivable.
Did you guys find that clip? In short, Yale secret societies are now filled with students who as a matter of political conviction consider wealth and privilege indefensible, but who as members of Yale's most elite clubs enjoy enormous advantages.
As is always the case, those with the actual privilege, the actual advantages, accuse others of exploiting and oppressing.
So that they can perpetuate their status as a political leader, a political power in the United States of America or in the various institutions that they're in so that they're immune to being fired, immune to being imprisoned or persecuted or prosecuted so they can get away with things like plagiarism, so they can do whatever they want.
I just can't imagine the audacity of someone at Yale being one of the 15 people accepted in the most powerful secret society in the history of our nation, skull and bones, and then having the audacity to say that they hate privilege.
Because I can't think of a person any more privileged than that to be 19 years old in one of the most powerful secret societies of all time with direct connections to former presidents who are still alive.
Existing politicians, other Yale graduates, I mean, unless you screw up, you are set for life if you join an institution like that because you're always going to have an in for a place of leadership in any major government institution.
I'm not saying it's right, but to criticize privilege, to say that you hate privilege from such a place of privilege is just the definition of hypocrisy to me, folks.
Stick with us. More news on the other side.
Make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com.
New Year's sale is going to end, I believe, this weekend.
unidentified
So now's your chance to get 60% off some of our products and free shipping, double Patriot points, store-wide.
chase geiser
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
unidentified
You know, at the beginning of the show today, we went over that good Samaritan who body-checked the Forge Pirate.
chase geiser
It's pretty cool. It's a pretty cool clip.
unidentified
Some thief just getting caught red-handed.
chase geiser
I didn't notice until just now, but the next clip on the clip sheet here, clip two, which I want to run in a second.
Canadian police warn that posting videos of package thieves could violate their privacy.
So, on the one hand, we have all this footage showing a porch pirate getting tackled and arrested for being the dirty thief he is.
On the other hand, we've got the leftists in Canada advocating for the privacy of people who steal off of...
Other people's private property, it's their front porch.
I mean, the real violation of privacy here is that your property is being stolen off of your property by a criminal, right?
It's not a violation of privacy to upload the video of the actual thief.
Come on! Let's run clip two and see what it says.
unidentified
Provincial police are urging Quebecers to not post those clips online because they say there could be a case for defamation.
You cannot post the images yourself because you have to remember that in Canada we have a presumption of innocence and posting that picture could be a violation of private life.
Instead, he says if anything is stolen, call 911.
If you get some proof that somebody might have stolen something, Please.
chase geiser
Please. Absolutely disgusting, these people.
You're going to violate the criminal.
This could be defamation because now everybody knows what they look like and what if they didn't actually commit a crime as if any institution actually cares about innocent until proven guilty anymore.
I mean, we've seen trials all the way from Trump to Jones.
That it's guilty until proven how guilty, right?
No juries, just...
All the juries there is to determine how severe the punishment should be.
Not whether or not there should be a punishment at all or whether one's guilty at all.
We've seen this time and time again.
That's so stupid.
I mean, I know it's a colloquial.
It's sort of like a... Not colloquial.
It's an anecdotal example.
And maybe it's not actually indicative of a bigger term.
But we've been talking about how you interpret the little things, the little metaphors, the little details that reinforce a main theme of a work of art.
And in this creation, that is God's work of art, there seems to be a theme of good versus evil on every single little detail that I see from this corporate media, this mainstream media, this legacy media press seems to reinforce the theme that there is a war on for your minds.
And it's whether or not you're going to believe the lie or discover the truth or find the truth.
And so while you're not allowed to post videos of people on your property stealing your property, videos that are captured with doorbell cams designed for security and explicitly for this specific type of thing, while you're not allowed to post those videos, we know that for 20 years under the Patriot Act, the government was constantly...
Spying on our webcams, reading our emails, listening to our phones.
We know now that the government can turn on your phone without it even turning on and listen to whatever conversation is going on in any room that any smartphone cellular device is in.
I don't know how the technology works, but we've seen reports from countless veterans, countless SEALs, countless podcasts, countless instances of the government being able to listen to any microphone.
Even if it's not connected to a power source, guys, in some instances.
And so they can spy on us.
They can watch us in the privacy of our homes.
They can listen to us in any room that has a smart device or in our cars.
They can stop our electric vehicles from running.
They can lock us in the cars.
They can shut down the cars. They can take over the autopilot and drive the car to the police station if they need to while we're in it.
And now we're seeing this report here.
From the great Adan Salazar, the EU wants to spy on Europeans' Internet use.
The European Commission is an EU legislative body with regulatory authority over digital technology.
The EC's EIDAS Article 45, a proposed regulation, would deliberately weaken areas of Internet security that the industry has carefully evolved and hardened for over 25 years.
The article would effectively grant the 27 EU governments, this is the New World Order, This is the new world government.
The one world government. It would grant the 27 EU governments vastly expanded surveillance powers over internet use.
And the funny thing, the ironic thing here is that in Europe, they have what's been referred to as a right to be forgotten that they protect.
So if you don't want anything about you, as I understand it, to appear on the internet in Europe, and of course there's ways around this.
People can use VPNs and look like they can basically go to the internet as if they're from the United States, even if they're in England or wherever.
But in the European Union, you can reach out and submit a request to basically be forgotten.
And your name, your identity, as I understand it, will be scrubbed from every social media platform, every search result.
You can disappear yourself on the internet there, apparently.
I don't know if it's still true.
I know it was true years ago.
I was reading reports about it. And so while these EU politicians advocate for more regulations on these social media platforms, they advocate for privacy rights on behalf of...
European Union citizens and they do things like force every website to update its cookies policy.
Remember when that law passed and all of a sudden you had to click accept again like a million times you still do on all the cookies on all these websites and all the data regulations are different and Facebook has...
A subscription version, apparently, of their platform in Europe for people that don't want their data to be sold because the law forces that.
These politicians, the point I'm trying to make, these politicians, they advocate for all these rights, for all these privacies, for all these measures, right as they themselves violate these same rights.
It's like a compensation thing, right?
They turn on a little bit of the cold faucet as they turn up the heat on the other side so you don't feel the temperature change as the consumer.
And so while it seems like Europe has all these privacy protections for its citizens, its civilians, even though they don't even have sovereignty over their own borders anymore, they've been basically invaded by radical Islamists, I mean, frankly, I think that Europe would be better off if it was occupied by Russian Orthodox Christians than by these radical Islamists.
So anytime I hear Nikki Haley or any of these politicians talk about how Russia wants to invade all of Europe, I think, thank God somebody's coming to save it!
Because it's already fallen.
But while they come out, these politicians, these globalist leaders who talk about the importance of privacy, they simultaneously screw you in the back door.
With the policies that they have that empower the government, that empower this surveillance.
You've got Sweden coming out the other day saying that it's going to join NATO as soon as July and that they should brace themselves for World War III. They should brace themselves for war.
The Minister of Defense comes out and says, hey, if we join NATO, we could get involved in a war fairly quickly because if you join NATO, you've got to get involved in any war that NATO gets involved in.
So they're constantly pushing us into these globalist organizations.
And the only way to manifest globalism is world war.
If you want one world government, you're going to have to have a world war.
I mean, if you look at the League of Nations, it came as a result of World War I. If you look at the United Nations, it came as a result of World War II. If you look at NATO, it came as a result of the Cold War.
All of these global conflicts have only served to benefit those who would seek to conglomerate all world power.
And seize it for themselves and maintain it for themselves.
And so if you got the increase in the size of NATO, an organization that was only ever supposed to exist to counter Russia in the context of a Cold War, to counter the Soviet Union, a country which does not exist anymore, these organizations still exist.
If we see these globalist organizations expand...
It's a direct correlation to the likelihood that we're about ready to explicitly get involved in more conflict again in the European theater on massive scale.
And this conflict isn't going to be like the last time Congress actually legally declared war, which was 1941.
That was the last congressionally declared war that the United States was involved in.
All these other conflicts, just spontaneous executive orders.
But it's not going to be like that in World War III. It might not even be nuclear at all.
It's going to be things like, oh, we haven't had power for nine months.
I don't know where the food is.
They don't have to bomb us to destroy us.
I mean, the reason you bomb cities in the first place is to cut off roads and supply chains.
But you can do that through cyber warfare now, through propaganda warfare now.
You don't even have to actually destroy physical infrastructure to destroy all of the technology that we rely on.
and they're seeping in.
They're not only attacking our infrastructure, but they're trying to win over your mind, going so far as to install chips in mines that can control your predisposition to taking risks.
unidentified
Folks, there is a war on your mind, literally.
chase geiser
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
We are going to be taking calls throughout the third hour.
Make sure you call in 877-789-2539.
Again, that's 877-789-2539.
Open lines. Talk about whatever you want.
Thank you. The sooner you call, the more likely I am to be able to get to you.
So call now. The crew's going to screen the calls.
And after this segment, in about 10 minutes or so, we'll start to take the calls.
And if they come in quickly and get screened quickly, then I might even be able to get to some in the next 10 minutes.
So the crew gets a chance.
Throw the board up on the screen and make sure you call on 877-789-2539.
Adan Salazar writes on Infowars.com.
What do you call a war with China, plus a war with Russia, plus a colossal war in the Middle East?
That's a great headline, obviously.
The answer is World War III. You call that World War III. So we've been bombing the Husis in Yemen.
And I'm just going to be totally transparent.
I'm going to be totally honest with you about this issue.
First thing I want to say is I believe in Ron Paul's theory of blowback.
I believe that virtually every single instance of these conflicts or our involvement, especially in the Middle East over the last 50 years, has actually created generations of terrorists and created enemies of America because of some of the unjust things that we've done.
Now, that doesn't justify anything that these terrorists do.
Ted Kaczynski isn't justified for the Unabombing or any of his bombings that he did just because he wrote a good manifesto about the injustices of the world or just because he was a victim of MKUltra.
That's not what I'm saying here.
I'm not saying that I like these terrorists.
I'm not saying that they're good people. I'm not saying that they're not radical extremists and they're problematic, okay?
But... They hate us for reasons.
And it's not because they hate our freedom.
And it's not even because they think that we're infidels.
It's because we're constantly screwing with everybody.
We are the bully on campus.
The United States government, not Americans, American people.
American people are great, but the U.S. government is the bully in the playground.
And so... We're good to go.
Reservations or criticisms of the Biden administration's unilateral decision to respond to these strikes with explicit military violence without congressional approval.
And we hear this time and time again every time there's a conflict, but like I said in the last segment, the United States has not legally, as it's supposed to, declared war on any nation since 1941, as I understand it, unless my research is incorrect.
And I know that there was legislation that was specifically passed that Biden voted for and spoke to in terms of invading Iraq and some of these military operations that we've been involved in.
I know Congress has been involved in these military conflicts and approving things like aid to enemies and troop involvement, things like that.
Don't get me wrong. I understand that Congress has had its hand in this, but we have not formally declared war on a nation in approaching 100 years since the Great War.
World War I. World War II, rather, 1941.
And so we see this US-UK striking Houthi militia targets in Yemen.
I, at this point, don't even know whether or not it's even true that any of our aircraft carriers or naval vessels actually ever got attacked in the Red Sea.
It's possible that it's true.
I'm not even saying that it's definitely a lie.
But we've gotten involved in conflicts before because of lies about naval vessels getting struck.
Right? Like the Lusitania.
What was the famous one from Vietnam?
I'm drawing a blank right now. What was the black flag operation that got us into Vietnam?
Can't remember. Yeah, Gulf of Tonkin, right?
So, when people talk about these Houthi attacks or these rocket attacks or these Iranian strikes or whatever, these drone strikes on our vessels in the Red Sea or civilian vessels in the Red Sea or commercial vessels in the Red Sea, My first thought is, yeah, but how do you know? You know?
Like, how do you actually know it happened?
And they're just like, well, it's being reported everywhere.
There's pictures drawn. Yeah, I know.
And it probably did happen.
Do you really know?
Because if you're talking about war, if you're talking about World War III, you better be sure.
I mean, the only thing that kills more people than a global world war...
Is a global vaccination after a fake pandemic.
17 million people, allegedly.
According to the new reports from scientists I trust.
Rankard, of course, who was on Jones.
Weinstein, who I trust.
Is a brilliant. Biologist, virologist, I guess, would be the term.
So, if you're going to talk about 17 million minimum dead, I mean, they really want hundreds of millions dead for their depopulation agenda, which is real, folks.
Then you better know for sure.
And I'm not one to support a war or a conflict at any scale, let alone World War III, because the New York Times has a picture of a drone above a U.S. vessel in the Red Sea and talks about exchanges of rockets or bombs or fire between the two.
Maybe. Maybe it happened.
Maybe it didn't. Why do we have ships in the Red Sea at all anyway?
Why do we care what happens in the Red Sea?
Maybe we should leave.
Maybe we don't belong there.
So US-UK strike Houthi militia targets in Yemen.
The US and UK began carrying out strikes on Houthi militia targets in Yemen in the early hours of Friday.
A brand new article up.
Washington and London had vowed to retaliate against attacks on shipping in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden.
So they're saying that civilian or commercial vessels are being interfered with because of these attacks.
are being harassed.
And that's why we were there.
And that's why we're responding.
The Houthis have pledged support for Gaza during the fighting between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas.
They have been launching drones and missiles at merchant vessels, as well as warships patrolling the vital waterway.
Maybe.
The Houthis are a Shia Islamist militia that rose to power following the wave of protests known as the Arab Spring, which swept the Middle East in the early 2010s.
Do you remember the Arab Spring, folks?
Do you remember how involved Twitter was in the Arab Spring, making sure that different radical extremist militias or uprisings all over the Middle East had the information and the details they needed to successfully overthrow their governments?
Do you remember... How confident everybody was in the mainstream media that after the government of Egypt was overthrown by the Egyptian military in an insurrection, in a coup, that Twitter loved that one, they were so confident that there was going to be a peaceful transition of power between the military in Egypt and a new government now.
They love insurrections when it's sponsored by them, when it's funded by them.
The only federally sponsored, federally funded insurrection our government acts like it hates is the one that happened on January 6th that wasn't even really an insurrection.
All the other ones, they seem to love.
They seem to adore installing the Shah in 1979 in Iran.
They seem to adore the Arab Spring, which has resulted in an astronomical sum of...
Opiate exports and human trafficking and just grotesque, primitive injustice.
I mean, brutal stuff.
Swarms of people in Iraq, Afghanistan.
As we left, just taking all the weapons, selling them to Hamas, terrorizing people so afraid to stay in their home country that they would rather clutch on to the wing of an aircraft.
And ride that wing or attempt to ride that wing all the way back to the United States knowing that they would die.
Then stay. That's how terrible this extremism is.
And they're just importing it all across Europe.
Now they're advocating, even Netanyahu implying, that the United States should take the people that currently reside in the West Bank or in the Gaza Strip as refugees.
When we know that over 50% of them supported Hamas in the last election in, I think, 2006.
I know that a lot of them are innocent, but a lot of them are terrorists, guys.
Terrorist sympathizers, real ones.
And that doesn't mean that Israel's right.
I don't necessarily agree with Israel. I don't care about Israel either.
I only care about America. But both these sides are pretty shady, folks.
And we're supposed to bring them here into the United States.
When the innocent people, the innocent civilians who are faced with being ruled by these very people...
The same thought process, the same theology, the same politics would rather clutch on to the wing of US military planes flying out of the country and fall to their deaths than stay behind and face that radical extremism.
If they're willing to do that to get away from it, then why the hell would we ever import it into our own country?
Why the hell would we ever get involved in these world wars?
Why would we do things like bomb these countries so that the terrorists have a talking point and get more radicalized and more supported?
unidentified
The more injustice we do upon the world, the more injustice it will bring upon us.
chase geiser
This is ancient ruling numbers, folks.
unidentified
Stick with us. Calls for the third hour in just a few minutes.
Call on 877-792539.
Again, that's 877-7925-49. - Corruption has run its course. that's 877-7925-49. - Corruption has run its course.
jon bowne
It's 2024, and the minions of the Biden administration are inevitably being fed to the wolves.
In hubris-riddled desperation, Hunter Biden yet again stormed the hill to defend his privileged outpost as the bag man in a foreign pay-to-play family business scheme tied to the goals of the New World Order.
The child-man byproduct of a lifetime surrounded by federal goons and philandering politicians Took his Benedict Arnold dog and pony show to his contempt of Congress hearing only to feverishly race for the exits once the rhetoric hurt the child man's ears.
unidentified
It does not matter who you are, where you come from, or Who your father is or your last name?
Yes, I'm looking at you, Hunter Biden, as I'm speaking to you.
You are not above the law.
I believe that Hunter Biden should be held completely in contempt.
chase geiser
I think he should be hauled off to jail right now.
unidentified
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Excuse me, Hunter.
Apparently, you're afraid of my words.
jon bowne
Whoa! In an unprecedented outcome, the House will now vote on recommending criminal charges against the child of a sitting U.S. president as the GOP enters the final stages of an impeachment inquiry into the president himself.
Meanwhile, Alejandro Mayorkas, dubbed the architect of the devastation, Finally garnered an impeachment proceeding that laid out the brutal facts against him.
unidentified
On Secretary Mayorkas' watch, Customs and Border Protection has recorded more than 8.1 million encounters at America's borders, including more than 6.7 million at our southwest border alone.
For comparison, CBP recorded just over three million encounters nationwide from fiscal year 2017 to 2020.
Jay Johnson, President Obama's former DHS secretary, previously said that a thousand encounters a day, quote, overwhelms the system, end quote.
On Secretary Mayorkas' watch, encounters have never averaged less than 3,000 per day, even going as high as 10,000 to 12,000 per day.
clay higgins
It's not about money.
We spent less money in 2019 than we did in 23, a lot less.
Through DHS, and we had the border under control.
It's policy that has changed, and who is driving that policy?
Secretary Mayorkas.
unidentified
It strains the resources, and it is wildly intimidating to our local law enforcement, where they have maybe a police force of three or four in a community of 2,000, and yet they have four or five illegal grows that are populated by illegal immigrants, Mexican cartel members, Chinese syndicated crime organization members, with... Semi-automatic rifles abundant and they are unwilling to go in.
jon bowne
Mayorkas should be investigated even further as to his knowledge and involvement of the massive foreign criminal operations infiltrating the American heartland under his watch.
unidentified
Throughout Oklahoma, law enforcement comes into contact daily with foreign nationals who have entered our country illegally or who remain here illegally or both.
In Oklahoma, out-of-state residents can't legally operate a GROW through OMMA or be registered with the Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics.
Since the standing up of the Organized Prime Task Force, there have been 15 illegal GROW operations shut down per day.
And you track it all the way back to mainland China.
That is the source of the problem.
jon bowne
The Mockingbird Media and the Uniparty establishment would have us all believe that this is merely business as usual, just two sides of the aisle muckraking as the election season ramps up.
mika brzezinski
How have you been coping personally with the onslaught of accusations against your husband and your family, including and especially Hunter, showing pictures of him during vulnerable moments in his battle with addiction, on the floor of the house, This would crush any family.
unidentified
Mika, I think what they are doing to Hunter is cruel.
jon bowne
However, Hunter Biden and Alejandro Mayorkas are far more than pawns caught in the political storm.
They are minions of a strategic globalist mafia threat.
unidentified
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
chase geiser
I'm Chase Geiser, your host this morning.
For this hour, we are going to be taking calls.
I see the board lighting up here.
I'm excited to talk to everybody. All right.
Let's hear first from Ashley in Chicago.
Ashley, how are you doing in Chicago?
Can you hear me? I'm sorry?
unidentified
How are you doing? Yeah, I can hear you.
chase geiser
Hi. Thanks for calling.
unidentified
Is this Chase? Yep.
Chase? Hi Chase.
Hi, I wanted to talk about Pluto transitioning into Aquarius.
It's been on my mind a lot lately.
Well, I'm into astrology heavily and I know it's a huge date coming up because not only is Pluto moving into Aquarius, it's conjuncting the Sun at the very end, 2958 Capricorn.
Because the upper elite, I think they use astrology.
I think they're going to plan around this date.
It's January 20th.
And also, Mercury moves out of the shadow period that same day.
chase geiser
So what's going to happen? What does that mean for the sake of the audience?
unidentified
For the sake of the audience, I would just say to keep your eyes peeled because I think the upper elite, I think they use astrology and I would think that they're going to plan something around this date.
I don't know exactly what would happen, but it's It's a pretty rare occasion when it does happen.
And I think it's been, it was in Capricorn since 2008.
So it's moving into a quiz.
It's going to have to retrograde back to just a little bit longer.
But it's finishing up its course.
I think that's why everyone's feeling really heavy energy right now.
It's at the very end, at any end of a sign in astrology.
I mean, there's a lot of chaos.
I think they're planning around this specific date.
chase geiser
Interesting. Thank you for your call, Ashley.
I appreciate that. It's very interesting.
If something crazy happens on January 20th, I'm going to think of you as the new Nostradamus.
Ashley, I appreciate your call. Thank you for calling and listening.
Joe in Texas. Joe, what's up?
unidentified
Hey, good morning. Good morning.
Okay, so to some of your points there, I have two things.
First thing is, if you'll remember, maybe you do, maybe you don't.
About a year ago, the U.S. seized an oil tanker.
Off of our coast. I believe it was the Gulf Coast.
And we drained the oil out of it.
And then we towed the tanker back into port.
Well, come to find out, the tanker that Iran seized the other day is that same tanker that was re-registered and painted.
chase geiser
They stole it back?
unidentified
Yeah. We stole the U.S. They stole it back.
Yeah, right. Exactly. It's their tanker.
chase geiser
So it's like what O.J. did when he got busted robbing that house.
He was stealing all his own stuff.
unidentified
So Iran claims that they have a warrant, a judicial warrant, I don't know if it's something their court issued or if it's an international court, but they have a warrant to have seized the vessel and all its content.
chase geiser
So these allegations of commercial vessels being attacked and stuff like that, has this been trumped up by sort of our side of the mainstream media as an example of Iran attacking commercial vessels and it's just not getting reported to us that it's actually their vessel?
unidentified
It's absolutely insane.
But, you know, you and I laugh and probably everyone that's listening to this laugh because it's so horrific and we're so not surprised.
And we have that aha moment.
I knew that we were up to something and bam, there it is.
And so if you sort of source this particular story, I got it from Lava Girl, which you can find on, you know, a web search or whatever.
And she'll have all the perps and everything.
And then the other thing is that, and this is kind of reasonable and rational, but we're ramping up our presence in the Pacific up against the Taiwan election for this weekend.
So I just wanted to let everybody know that we're ramping up our military presence in the Pacific in case something goes down.
chase geiser
Yeah, I'm thinking March, April.
Something big is going to happen in Taiwan.
That's just my intuition about it.
These are the whisperings that I hear.
I know that Xi said he's not going to take Taiwan.
But if China's ever going to do it, now's the time.
Because this is the weakest we've ever been as a nation, in my opinion.
And it may be, hopefully, the weakest that we will ever be.
unidentified
What do you think? Well, I'm a little concerned about January 20th now, I have to say.
chase geiser
Pluto's going to go into retrograde, man.
We can't even decide if it's a planet or not.
unidentified
Right. What we all can agree on is that we all believe that somewhere between the very moment that we're talking and about a year and a half to two years, we're in a lot of trouble.
chase geiser
Yeah, that is.
And that's a heavy truth.
And it's not hyperbolic.
Because no matter what happens in this election, whether it's legitimate or illegitimate, whether Joe Biden wins or Trump wins, no matter what happens, there is going to be an extremely activated portion of the population that's not going to be thinking rationally.
unidentified
And it's all, as we believe, as I believe, it's all constructed.
It's all part of this massive effort to take us down, to take the population down, to do the whole thing.
I'm not going to get into what everybody believes or doesn't believe, but The basis is that it's all constructed, and it's all constructed so that there's a problem, and then they can find a solution, present the solution, and you're so desperate to take the solution that you fall into authoritarianism and tyranny.
chase geiser
Let me ask you one more thing before I let you go.
Why do you think it is that Taiwan is so important to both China and the United States?
unidentified
I think for China...
It's kind of like a Cuba thing, right?
So for China, it's right next door.
If you look at the map, You know, you could probably drive from Austin, Texas to Dallas, Texas, right?
So if you kind of look at that from China, you could say a strategic piece of that is that, you know, we can't let a U.S.-dominated or military presence into Taiwan because we have a Cuba thing up against the U.S. thing.
So I can see that.
For us, it's Once you move forward in a trench in trench warfare and you take the trench, you don't give the trench back.
And so in a lot of ways, we have Taiwan in a trench piece, not militarily, not with our flag.
chase geiser
Somewhere like North Korea and South Korea, right?
They just agree not to mess with each other.
unidentified
You know, so we have a demarcation piece and we have a demilitarized zone in between the Chinese Sea, in between Taiwan and China extensively.
So, you know, we both agree that we're not going to violate that.
This election this weekend, depending on who gets in there, I don't think it means a lot.
Xi's already been over there and negotiated.
Both sides have been from Taiwan and negotiated with Xi.
And Blinken and all of us, they've negotiated.
And Blinken himself has been into China.
And when he says that what they talked about is what happens post-election in their relationship.
chase geiser
Yeah, but we were in communication with Japan right before Pearl Harbor, too.
If they wanted to surprise, they would continue with diplomacy as usual.
But I'm with you, Joe. Joe, I really appreciate your call, by the way.
Thank you. All of your insights and all your thoughts.
I hope you call in again. I'd like to take more of your calls in the future.
Let's hear from... William in Arkansas.
unidentified
What's up, William? A little more on your skull and bones.
william in arkansas
When you have an institution like that, that's so embedded within our society, that is social hearing, what more can you expect to be led by the nose?
The sheep are being led by the nose.
They have been for a long time.
We can have all the little debates and the chit-chat about this and that and point the finger, but the reality is we're all on Normandy Beach being slaughtered, and we're sitting here discussing it, right?
As institutions like that, on a daily basis, through your major investment funds, Wall Street, whoever, whatever, they stole the gold standard from us.
Everybody with big money and even those that knew better that said, well, I can't change nothing, blah, blah, blah, what can I do?
The next day you were buying gold because you could afford it, and maybe now you're selling it because you had the kind of money that you could buy it in 71.
You know, working people can't do that, right?
It takes way too much than just two or three minutes with soundbites.
To get out the reality of the trouble we're in in this nation.
The gentleman before you stated quite a bit of truth in the fact that in the next year and a half or two, we're in trouble because we won't act for the blue in the flag that binds the union together.
chase geiser
Absolutely. William, I gotta let you go because we're coming up on a break in five seconds here.
Make sure you guys visit InfoWarsStore.com and call in for the remainder of the show today.
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
I am Chase Geiser, your host today, taking calls throughout this hour.
Just a quick update. Yesterday, Rand Paul made an announcement on X. We might get some statements from him today.
I don't know who's going to chime in about this primary.
I don't think he's formally endorsed anyone yet.
Maybe we'll hear from him today. He says, I've been watching the GOP primary closely for a while now.
No duh, you're a senator and you're a member of the GOP, but I understand you've got to set up a little context.
And I like various aspects of several candidates.
Republicans like President, real Donald Trump, Governor Ron DeSantis, and Vivek Ramaswamy.
He goes on, he says, I'm interested in the ideas of some independents too, such as Robert Kennedy Jr.
Wow. And I like Rand Paul, but he literally hasn't said anything yet.
As I look over the field though, this is my favorite part.
I don't think I yet have a first choice.
But I do know one thing. Count me in as hashtag never Nikki.
And this is the first time that I've seen this hashtag.
I'm sure that he didn't just come up with it today.
It's too good not to have been used already.
But he's right about that.
Nikki Haley is the Patriot Act embodied.
She is the female version of the Patriot Act.
She is the Republican version of Elizabeth Warren.
She is one who advocates that there be no anonymity on the internet, yet she does not use her given name.
She's the one who allegedly, according to some reports I've seen from the great Laura Loomer, who I don't always agree with, but I'm very impressed with her, generally speaking.
She's like the conservative Karen.
I'm really glad that she's on our side.
We have some reports from her that she, Nikki Haley...
Asked her husband to start going by his middle name some 10-15 years ago instead of his given name, which I believe is William.
I think he was William Michael something.
She said, you look more like a Michael.
He started going by Michael and then she allegedly had an affair with someone on her staff named William.
And it's personal stuff.
I know it's nitpicky. It's just sort of stupid conservative talking point stuff.
I'm not trying to be that guy.
But I like to use any sort of example I can of just the ridiculousness of this person because I'm terrified about her actual policies.
I'm terrified when I see campaign ads that show conflict with China and Russia at the same time because to me that says it's an ad for World War III. I'm terrified of seeing ads that depict these nations as just inherently our enemies when it's not really abundantly obvious why or how they are.
I mean, obviously the CCP is a terrorist organization.
It's an evil organization, but it's not inherently our enemy.
Obviously, Vladimir Putin has done some very questionable things.
People die all the time around him, Clinton-style, for criticizing him.
Journalists disappear, planes crash when there's alleged coups orchestrated by leaders of militant groups that kill those...
Leaders who feel like they're safe, they think they're safe, they think they've been pardoned and they're dead weeks later after they're pardoned.
I know that Putin's a backup. He's not inherently our enemy.
We've never been at war with either China or Russia as far as I understand, as far as I know.
Why is it that everybody is so convinced in our country that That Vladimir Putin is some antithesis to America.
That he is this villain, this antagonist in the story of Earth in the 21st century.
Why? I mean, if you ask a leftist why they hate Vladimir Putin so much, why they think he's evil, what would they actually say?
I suppose they would say that he invaded Ukraine in a brazen act of aggression.
It was a more vulnerable country that posed no threat to Russia, and he just invaded it, resulting in the death of hundreds of thousands of people.
To which I respond, Nikki Haley comes out every day and says, I'm not for funding Ukraine.
I'm not for the U.S. fighting for Ukraine.
We should just be giving them weapons because we want to end war.
She literally said that. She said we need to give them the weapons they need to defend themselves because it's about preventing war.
How is arming one side of an active war preventing a war?
Is that not perpetuating?
Especially when it's the losing side.
When you help a losing side, you delay the end of the war.
If you help the winning side, you can actually expedite the end of the war, right?
But if you help the losing side, you delay...
The end of the war.
I mean, these hundreds of thousands, at least, who have died or been displaced in Ukraine, are as a result of our interference in this war, our pushing of our puppet Zelensky to not concede when he had the chance, to not negotiate when he had a chance at the beginning of the conflict. our pushing of our puppet Zelensky to not concede when Keep in mind, when Putin first invaded Ukraine, he was referring to it as a Russian military operation.
And all of the implications were that it was going to be brief, it was going to be fast and effective, And frankly, it was in many ways fast and effective.
But I think Putin was surprised that there was so much international interference with the Zelensky administration that basically just interfered with what would have been a speedy sort of negotiation and surrender.
A speedy loss of territory like the last time with Crimea.
And frankly speaking, the fact that the international community has been so involved in this conflict, despite the fact that Ukraine is not a member nation of NATO. It is not in NATO. And this is why the conflict started in the first place, because Russia doesn't want Ukraine to join NATO. Ukraine is actually forbidden from joining NATO in accordance with the negotiations at the end of the Cold War, as I understand it.
I could be wrong about this. Any of the callers, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
So we were going back on our deal when the Soviet Union collapsed after the Berlin Wall came down, after these Eastern European republics broke apart from the Soviet Union and became their own nations.
We are going back on a deal that Ukraine would never join NATO. That was part of the deal.
Russia did not want NATO on its border.
I believe the word Ukraine literally means borderland.
It's supposed to be like a buffer between NATO or the Western world and Russia.
For all sorts of reasons. And I think Russia, Putin, has been proven right...
To some extent. Because we've basically treated Ukraine as if it was a member of NATO, despite the fact that it's not.
I mean, we haven't put any troops on the ground for them, which is what they really need.
But in every other way that any member of the European Union, any member of NATO, the United States, and others, in any way that we could support them without physically fighting the war for them, we've done.
Which is like 90% of the war.
And then 10%, of course, is the boots on the ground.
And so Putin was right that this is an international movement.
This is an international community that wants Ukraine to be under the international globalist control so it can leverage that geographic advantage.
It can leverage that control over Russian exports, which account for 71% of the Russian economy, Russian energy exports.
We want that, the globalists, not we really, but the globalists want that control so that they can bully Russia into losing an ever-increasing amount of its own national sovereignty.
Partially because the international community is terrified of who may become the leader of Russia down the road this century after Putin's gone.
This is going to be somebody who has a tremendous amount of power, a tremendous amount of nuclear weapons at his disposal.
And given that their system is not exactly designed for peaceful transitions of power among honest men, that's why we're trying to have as much control as possible over it.
I will take your calls in the next segment, I promise, folks.
Stay tuned. Welcome back to the American Journal.
I am Chase Geiser, your host.
unidentified
For the next 30 minutes, we are going to be taking calls.
chase geiser
So many calls on the board right now.
You guys are really calling in.
I don't even know who to talk. Oh, I know who I want to talk to.
I want to talk to Willie in Philly about Flat Earth.
unidentified
What is up, Willie?
What's up, my man? How you doing?
Good. Thanks for calling. I sent two videos in to you guys, and one, because you kind of, I re-watched a video of you when you were listening to me when we had our last conversation, and you were kind of smirking at things.
chase geiser
I know, and I wasn't trying to be disrespectful, man.
I do respect you.
Sometimes these ideas catch me off guard sometimes, you know?
unidentified
Well, the videos that I sent you were like those aha moments for me where I was like, holy crap.
Yeah. If you can watch, if they show you the videos, I don't know which ones you're going to play or which ones they're playing in order, but one of them is a GoFast rocket.
It's a private rocket launch by private individuals.
They funded it. They took the video from the perspective of the rocket.
It shows it going up to 75 miles and then coming to a dead stop.
Yeah, it's on the screen. I think it's going from 3,500 miles an hour to a dead stop.
Without exploding, without anything.
Yeah. The second one, I don't know if it's showing that, but the second one is actually a plane flying above the clouds where you can see the sun below the clouds.
chase geiser
Yeah, but I looked into that a little bit later on in the day.
Isn't that because the sun is so bright that it's an optical illusion that it appears like the clouds are behind it?
unidentified
No. Well, in that same video, there's other parts of it where it shows the corporal rays coming, where if the sun was further away, it would light up the whole side of the Earth, if that was the case.
But since it's so close, it's actually the beams are spreading out, like fading out.
chase geiser
So the theory is that there's a ball of fire within our atmosphere.
I mean, if clouds are going behind it, that means that there's a ball of fire floating in the actual sky.
unidentified
Exactly. Which means it's a lot closer than we think it is.
And a lot of the information that they give us, it's just not true.
chase geiser
Yeah, and like I said, I'm going to re-emphasize it.
I respect you, and I'm trying to be cool, and I'm glad you called.
I love talking about this stuff, but this sounds so silly to me.
unidentified
Maybe it's my fault, man. Well, what scares me is, you know, you can't go to the Antarctic.
chase geiser
Yeah, yeah.
unidentified
You've got to get approval. What bothers me is that in December, the first week of December, they had their first airliner fly down there.
It's kind of like people in history, from our perspective, it's kind of like people jumping ship and leaving here, you know, places and actually, I think it was a Norwegian airline that was the first one to fly down there and land on ice.
So they're taking passengers, not, you know, individuals, not private individuals, but their, whatever, research teams and so forth, they're actually flying planes down there.
So you know you can't go to Antarctica, you can't explore it, So it's just so much that you have to question to make you think, okay, well, what are they hiding, for one?
And two, you know, it's not what it seems.
The moon is closer.
They're saying the moon is about 33 miles in diameter and the sun is the same in diameter.
chase geiser
Let me put it to you.
This is where I struggle, man.
This is where I struggle with this particular conspiracy theory.
Other conspiracy theories that I believe, like JFK being assassinated by the CIA and Mossad for the sake of Israeli nuclear proliferation, That's like one conspiracy, right?
The problem I have with the flat Earth thing is...
I'm just going to be totally transparent with you.
Obviously, I haven't really looked into it, so I could be just totally off base about this.
But I'm not only hearing that the Earth is flat, but I'm also hearing that there's a firmament dome around the Earth in addition to the Earth being flat.
I'm also hearing that the sun is actually within the atmosphere and much smaller than we thought.
I'm actually hearing that the moon is some sort of projection on top of it that reflects the continents accurately of the planet.
I'm also hearing that Antarctica has an ice wall around it.
And it's like in order for this conspiracy theory to work, the flatter theory to work, there have to be like nine astronomical lies or nine astronomically difficult things to believe that are all true.
Otherwise, it kind of falls on its face, right?
Gotcha.
unidentified
I see that everything that we've said is true.
It changes your hope.
chase geiser
I'm sorry, could you say that again? I couldn't hear you.
unidentified
I think that changes everything.
If you do the research and see that all these things are true, it changes your whole perspective about basically everything.
chase geiser
Now, have you counterbalanced?
You know how in a court of law, you've got closing statements from the prosecutors and then the defense gets to do a closing statement?
After you hear the closing statement of the prosecutor, you're likely to be convinced of the guilt of the defendant.
But then once you hear the defense closing statement, it can change your mind back.
I know that you initially believed in the round earth and then you went down the rabbit hole and now you believe in the flat earth stuff.
Have you done the bounce back iteration where you've looked at all the reasonable counters to all the points made in the flat earth community?
Or are you just at the stage where you've learned all this stuff?
unidentified
No. I've gone back and did the research and say, okay, well, maybe let me go back to my global perspective and say, okay, are they writing the same things?
And it's something where you can do yourself.
You know, you can take a P900 camera and go out and try and see miles away.
If you can see so far miles away, then that means Europe isn't as round.
It's not as round as they say.
But there's a world record where you can see 800 miles.
From one mountain peak to another mountain peak, based off of their measurements of a round Earth, it should be like 90 miles under where you can't see.
It should be no way on Earth that you can see 800 miles and see something.
So how can it be round?
I mean, how can it be globe?
It has to be flat. You have radio waves that go across the ocean.
I think there's another thing that just came out, new technology, where you actually have to have line of sight kind of thing.
chase geiser
Here's what I'd like to do. Since we talked about this for most of this segment, we talked about it for a whole segment yesterday, I want to give other callers a chance to talk.
But what I'd love for you to do, if you have the time and you're willing, and I promise that I'll honor this, I would love for you to send me a direct message on...
On X or on Instagram, either one, at RealChaseGeyser.
And if you take the time to just type out all of these points and not only send all the links like you did yesterday, I promise that I will specifically look into every single point that you make and try to come up with the round earth explanation.
And then we can just have a little bit of a back and forth because I'm interested in...
I'm sick of talking about the flat earth thing because what happens is I hear about it and then I never look into it.
And so there's no progress made.
I want to know why I believe the earth is round.
And I still do believe the earth is round, but I concede that the flat earth community has done a lot more investigation in this than I have.
It doesn't make them right, but I need to come up with these counter arguments so that I can deal.
Because you're not the only person that's called about this.
You're not the only person that's replied to me about this.
I'm going to have a friendly, just cool, fun back and forth with you on some of these issues.
Maybe we'll get to the bottom of it together.
How's that sound? Sounds good.
I appreciate you, Willie.
matt infowars
I just want to say one thing.
I was looking into the largest sight line on Earth.
Largest sight line appears to be 334 miles.
chase geiser
Now, is that from the same elevation?
Because if you're standing on a mountain, obviously you can see really far away.
matt infowars
No, no, no. It's from mountain peak to mountain peak.
unidentified
Mountain peak to mountain peak. Huh.
matt infowars
It is Mount Dankova, Kyrgyzstan to Hindutaw, China.
chase geiser
Interesting. Okay, so we're going to come up on a break here.
Go ahead, Willie. I'm sorry, I didn't know you were still with us.
unidentified
If he can see that far, world record, then it's got to be flat.
Because if it's supposed to be 8 inches per square mile or something like that, and that should be miles and miles and miles underneath We got a different number than the number that you had, right? We've got to exit out of this segment with the Who song.
matt infowars
What I will say, Willie, is that maybe this is going to be a great topic for the next InfoWars debate.
chase geiser
Yeah. Flat Earth debate is a great idea, actually.
That's awesome. Willie, thanks for your call.
I appreciate you, man. I respect you.
I love having this conversation with you, and I'm excited to keep interacting with you.
In the meantime, folks, make sure you go to InfoWarsStore.com.
We're going to come up on a break here in about 30 seconds.
Then after the break, we'll do one more segment of calls.
So stay on the line if you're on hold now.
I'll try to get to you. But go to InfoWarsStore.com and take advantage of the game-changing New Year's specials from InfoWars, which are here and may not be here for much longer.
I think this weekend may be the end of it.
Get up to 60% off, plus free shipping and double Patriot points on some of our best products right now.
and it's a 360 win because not only are you supporting yourself in your own health, you're keeping this operation on the air.
unidentified
It is an honor and a pleasure to have been with you this week, folks.
chase geiser
We are coming up on the last segment of the American Journal.
I'm Chase Geiser, your guest host today.
Harrison Smith hosting the War Room this afternoon.
We're back from normal schedule next week, starting on Monday.
Ellen will be back hosting the War Room.
Harrison will be back in the chair that he belongs in, the throne of the American Journal, which I just keep warm when he is busy doing other things for the Infowar.
In the meantime, let's take some calls for the next 10 minutes or so.
All right. Let's hear from Barton, Georgia.
Replacement migration and bombing of the Guidestones.
unidentified
Yeah, it's been a year and a half, two years, and they still have not made an arrest since my mock concession.
But I want to touch on illegal immigration and how it's affecting my life.
I went to the store a few days ago.
And somebody tried to sell me some dog food, heroin, meth, coke.
If you're a drug addict, come to Atlanta.
It's a buffet of heroin, coke, and meth.
This place is going down.
chase geiser
Wow. And what does that have to do with the immigration?
Was it specifically an illegal migrant trying to sell you the stuff, or was it just the cartel getting all the stuff in?
unidentified
Well, no. It was an American, but the drugs are coming through with the so-called migrants.
I mean, there's massive amounts of drugs everywhere here, Jason.
chase geiser
Yeah, it's crazy. I was watching a podcast interview the other day and there was an expert on and he was talking about how what the cartel does is it bribes the Mexican border security officials and they're paid as highly as $40,000 a month.
And they're given a tip or a list of license plates and times to ignore.
So when you see this plate on this car at this time, just let them through.
And they take the bribe. It's half a million dollars a year just to let somebody through every once in a while across the border when the border is wide open.
It hardly even weighs on your conscience to do that because they're going to get through anyway somehow.
So you might as well take the half a million, right?
unidentified
Right.
chase geiser
So there is a gigantic industry for the cartel around importing, I guess, exporting drugs to the United States, importing them into the United States.
And everybody is paid off.
All the officials are paid off.
None of these nations in South America or Central America have any incentive to do anything about it because their economies rely on people coming over here and working and sending money back to friends and relatives.
In the home homeland.
And so, yeah, it's it's it's just a terrible thing.
It's just embarrassing.
And the part that's so offensive to me about it is that it's not that they're failing to protect the border, but it's that they're sponsoring the invasion of the United States.
They're actually funding it. They're not even on our side.
If they were on our side and failing, I would be upset, but I wouldn't be just livid and betrayed and insulted and hurt over it.
But basically, every bad way I can feel about this, I feel because of the audacity of these evil people at the top of our government.
Let's hear next from Brendan in Canada.
Brendan, what's on your mind? Hello?
I can hear you. Sound good. Yeah, I'm just calling.
unidentified
I was just going over the repo market for the bank.
They had $2.3 trillion in there for liquid injections overnight, and it's down to $600 billion.
And they have a Treasury General account that they have $750 billion in that's going to basically extend that repo market until right before the election.
And then they had 1.5 million full-time jobs lost, and they added 776,000 part-time jobs.
242,000 of them are second jobs, and 290,000 are like Uber, Lyft, and delivery.
chase geiser
That basically sums up Bidenomics in one go.
The difference between Bidenomics and Trump economics is Trump economics, you had one great job.
Bidenomics, you have three crappy jobs.
unidentified
Right, but do you ever find out a concern that maybe even under Trump the market will collapse anyways?
chase geiser
Oh yeah, I think they're trying to kick the can so it happens right after he gets elected so they can just blame it on him.
unidentified
Yeah, it's kind of crazy.
Can I just plug two podcasts that would be good for people to watch?
Hershey Financial and Peter Schiff, I'm sure you know.
But those two guys are always good to watch.
You guys do a great job.
Nervous as hell. Have a good day.
chase geiser
Thank you so much.
I appreciate you calling in. I appreciate you calling in.
Okay, so let's hear next from Randy in Colorado.
Randy, what's on your mind? I can hear you now.
unidentified
Hey, my brother from another mother.
People say Masons are bad, but we're not.
We're out here exposing it just like everyone else.
Hey, listen, Alex the other night was talking about Eagles, you know, how symbolically they...
You know, they're freedom in America, and they're known as raptors.
What are they pro at? They're pro at killing the snakes.
You know, I really believe that we are all eagles in this fight.
Absolutely. You know, you mentioned earlier about lies.
Lies require other lies in order to maintain themselves.
You know, they're fragile, like spiders' webs.
You know, you touch them, you pop a hole right through them.
It's easy. But the truth...
When you speak a truth, it instantly resonates.
You only have to speak it once.
It can't be unheard.
It's all powerful.
It resonates in you forever.
Absolutely. Real problems, you know, like real problems, they don't need to be sold or explained or, you know, like white supremacy, all this stuff.
That's not real. They're trying to manufacture these problems.
It's all manufactured, like one of the first callers said, you know, wars, famine, poverty.
It's all being engineered by people, evil people.
This is good versus evil, you know.
When you look at things like the Ukrainian crests, When you look at the symbolism there, it's the same symbolism as the Kazarian Tamaga.
This Kazarian Tamaga is basically the Moloch's sigil.
Did you ever notice that?
chase geiser
That's interesting. It's just overwhelming to take some of these calls and hear all the wisdom that comes, all the insights that come.
I've gotten to a point now where I just don't even know what to believe is true about anything at all that I've ever been told or taught.
Have you hit that point?
unidentified
Well, that's all by design, right?
If you're confused and you're vibrating erratically, you can't focus on truth, the light, the true knowledge.
You're all over the place.
You're scattered and you're weak. That's what they want.
You know what I mean? You were talking earlier about Ukraine being pivotal and a buffer to Russia.
And if you think back, Putin...
They hate Putin, but you're being trained to hate, you're being tricked to hate Putin.
I mean, he might not be the best guy or whatever, but Russia was a threat to the World Bank.
The Rothschild central currency, the Kazarian Mafia, was Rothschild-based, and Putin rejected that.
chase geiser
Absolutely. Randy, thank you for your call.
We've only got about three minutes left.
There's two callers I want to have on at the same time.
I want to have Global Hawk and Kim on.
Global Hawk is located on the globe, and Kim is...
In Florida, so Kim, as I understand it, you agree with the Flat Earth Caller, and Global Hawk, you counter the Flat Earth arguments.
Let's hear the counters first from Global Hawk, and then Kim, just go ahead and respond to him, and I'm just going to moderate this.
icarus in wisconsin
Okay. Hey, Chase.
Yeah, I was wondering if we are in a flat plane, why it says in the Bible that we're on a 3D circle.
Which would be a sphere. And also why we needed to invent things like over-the-horizon radar.
Which is radar that's specifically designed to go on a globed Earth.
Because if it was a flat Earth, our radar would go forever.
chase geiser
So it would just bounce out. Okay, interesting.
unidentified
Kim, what do you think? Well, I think that there's a lot of scientific evidence that goes...
And like you said, the Bible actually proves with over 250 scriptures...
icarus in wisconsin
The shape of the earth.
unidentified
And Hebrews knew the difference between a circle and a ball.
So both of those are in the Bible, which kind of negates what he just said.
But you can use a periscope as an example.
How would a periscope work on a ball?
It would not. How would a long-range missile hit a human being?
It wouldn't work. I mean, there's lots of different examples.
Even a compass doesn't work to go south.
icarus in wisconsin
It only goes north.
chase geiser
Interesting. Adam, what do you think?
Excuse me, Global Hawk, what do you think?
I accidentally called you Adam. It's okay.
icarus in wisconsin
I got it, Chase. Well, she said in the Bible with interpretations what they meant by circle or sphere.
It doesn't say anywhere in the Bible that it was flat.
It does say circle. And then missiles are...
It says, God, you're in the face.
The face of the deep.
And the face is a...
It's a...
chase geiser
It's a math term.
icarus in wisconsin
A face. It's a geometry.
It's flat. A face.
God drew upon the face of the Earth.
Yeah, you can have a face on a sphere like you have a face on your head, which is sphere shape.
unidentified
A mathematical face. I've seen some flat faces.
Yeah. Some faces are flatter than others.
icarus in wisconsin
Why do we have over-the-horizon radar if the Earth is flat?
How do you know it exists?
Because they say it does?
chase geiser
We never went to the moon.
unidentified
So you can take everything NASA said as a lie.
icarus in wisconsin
All the pilots and radar technicians are also in on it.
chase geiser
We've only got about 25 seconds left before the end of the show.
I think we did make some substantial progress in this debate.
I would love to see the debate.
I think it's a great idea.
I'm going to push for it. I love both you guys.
Thank you for being cool and respectful and for calling in.
What a fun show today.
Great show today. Great week this week.
Thank you for calling. I know Harrison's excited to speak with you next week.
unidentified
Make sure you stay tuned for The Alex Jones Show right now, followed by Harrison Smith hosting The War Room this afternoon.
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
InfoWars.com forward slash show.
alex jones
Please listen to me very carefully.
If you don't have enough vitamin D3 in your body, which particularly happens in the winter months because sun and your skin produce vitamin D3 naturally.
If you don't have enough vitamin D in your body, you will get viral infections and the viruses will replicate in your body.
That's the number one cause of viral infection and viral replication and illness.
Vitamin D3 is so incredibly important.
We have the highest quality organic vitamin D3 back in stock winter sun for 40% off with free shipping and double Patriot points for the new year.
So this 2024 Do the right thing.
Protect yourself. Protect your family.
Get Wintersun at InfoWarsStore.com and then more importantly, take it.
It's the highest quality.
Wintersun, 40% off, free shipping, double Patriot points, InfoWarsStore.com.
But whatever you do, get vitamin D3 organic and take it.
Vitamin D3 is beyond critical.
Export Selection