Judge Arthur Ingeron barred Donald Trump from delivering a closing argument in his New York civil trial, sparking claims of selective free speech enforcement. Meanwhile, the DHS reported 1,900 migrants sheltered at a California school amid weather delays, while Texas faced lawsuits over border security efforts against Mexican cartels and Hezbollah. Callers debated Trump’s economic record, Epstein’s alleged ties to intelligence agencies and blackmail, and Hunter Biden’s unprosecuted corruption—highlighting perceived double standards in justice and media bias against conservatives. [Automatically generated summary]
The border crisis in Eagle Pass and Piedras Negras has worsened in recent weeks because the arrival of thousands of migrants has forced the closure of an international bridge to vehicles.
We are doing everything we can within a broken system to incentivize non-citizens to use lawful pathways, to impose consequences on those who do not, and to reduce irregular migration.
It's all over the news. The US military is down there facilitating and running the open border and cutting down barbed wire that the Texas Guard put up and the state police put up.
No, on the contrary, they are suing Ken Paxton, Greg Abbott in the state of Texas for Texas' attempts to put some buoys in the Rio Grande trying to secure Texas' territorial sovereignty against the Mexican drug cartels and, frankly, Hezbollah and some radical Islamic groups that control large swaths, operationally speaking, of the U.S.-Mexico border.
So they're actually — not only are they not trying to mitigate the damage, they're actually throwing fuel right into the fire, trying to make it worse.
What happens now If you're talking about all these different people that have penetrated, all these different intelligence operative sleeper cells that have penetrated our southern border, what are the kind of extortion points, the pressure points, that are used from within?
unidentified
This morning we found out from none other than the New York Post that 1,900 migrants from Floyd-Bennefield are being transferred to James Madison High School tonight at 5 p.m.
for an overnight stay due to inclement weather conditions.
We warned about this.
Floyd Pettifield is susceptible to flooding, storms, winds, etc.
It's not an acceptable place to house people.
But neither are our public schools.
Our schools are not migrant or homeless shelters.
They're places of learning for our children, paid for by our taxpayer dollars.
Our children, our school community, our families should not have to bear the brunt of a migrant crisis.
We have the effects of climate change, poverty, increasing level of authoritarianism, the very many challenges that are at the root cause of the displacement of people around the world.
I am Chase Geyser, your host this morning, filling in for the great Harrison Smith, who will be hosting The War Room this afternoon.
He's been doing a great job this week.
I love watching him on The War Room.
Owen will be back next Monday.
He is taking a week off to spend time with family this week.
And obviously there have been quite a few new developments over the last several days.
It's coming up on the end of the week. I can't believe how fast these weeks fly by.
And I think they're going to continue to get faster and faster as we approach this election in the fall.
It's going to be a crazy year.
If we thought 2016 was crazy, if we thought 2020 was crazy, I think this is going to be the craziest of them all.
You know, we had a caller call in earlier this week, and I can't remember the details of the call or what the topic was about, but Mike Johnson came up, the new Speaker of the House.
And I expressed to the caller that I didn't trust the Speaker, and he responded with the same sort of sentiment.
And I don't even necessarily think that he's a bad guy.
It's just that he's very clearly an establishment guy.
And I know that McCarthy was a problematic Speaker of the House, and I know that what Matt Gaetz did was really cool, and it showed the establishment how we can hold them accountable.
But it seems to me that we just replaced McCarthy with a little bit more of an agreeable version of McCarthy.
I mean, the policies seem to be virtually the same.
This just is a friendlier guy that's a little bit more likable.
And I showed on this show weeks ago, right after he was put into the office of Speaker of the House of Representatives, an ad that he ran that featured the flag of Israel.
Like I said a million times before, I don't have an issue with people who support Israel.
Israel doesn't bother me as much as it bothers others.
I just don't want our politicians sponsoring and showing favoritism to any country other than our own.
Is that too much to ask? It makes me sick to see any other nation's flag fly.
It makes me sick to see members of our military holding up the Chinese flag when Xi Jinping visits, which it's my understanding is illegal.
But that certainly took place.
And not only did Iran these...
Ads featuring the flag of Israel and talking about always standing with Israel.
Not only did the Biden administration, the clip you just saw there, have our own servicemen carry a flag of another nation.
But now we have Speaker Johnson pledging to stand shoulder to shoulder for the defense of Taiwan.
This is a very important issue for the entire world, and certainly for us as well.
We certainly want to help in the defense of Taiwan.
It's very important to us today. We want to deter the Chinese Communist Party and any military provocation.
U.S. Congress stands with our friends and stands for democracy and the principles that you all are trying to advance.
We have an important relationship.
We want to strengthen that. And your visit here is a good, strong show and a support for that relationship.
unidentified
Thank you, Mr. Speaker, for your time words.
On behalf of the people and government of Taiwan, I'd like to express our deep appreciation to you, Mr.
Speaker, and to the United States Congress for your long-standing bipartisan support and commitment to enhancing Taiwan's security, safeguarding our democratic system, and promoting our bilateral economic partnership.
The robust Taiwan-U.S. relationship is based, as you mentioned, on shared values such as freedom and democracy.
And we look forward to continue working with you, Mr.
Speaker, and the U.S. Congress to further strengthen our rock-solid friendship.
Rumors have been circulating that China may attempt to basically annex Taiwan this spring.
Now, I know that Xi Jinping just met with the Biden administration in San Francisco and outwardly, explicitly, the Xi Jinping administration has said that it doesn't plan on doing anything like that in the near future.
But it's just the kind of thing that you say, no matter whether or not you're going to do it.
So it's hard to believe. I mean, the Japanese told us they weren't going to bomb Pearl Harbor and everything was going to be fine and they were going to continue peace talks.
But That's what you do to have an element of surprise.
You act like everything's okay.
And it's just interesting to me to see representatives from Taiwan coming to visit with Speaker Johnson.
And if you'll recall, within a day or two of Speaker Johnson becoming the Speaker of the House, there was a very interesting phenomenon that I noticed.
And it was... Biden's Twitter and Speaker Johnson's speech, all mentioning the importance of the Indo-Pacific partnerships, specifically regarding Australia and some others in the region.
And I'm thinking to myself, why is it that these two leaders from opposite sides of the political spectrum are both using the term Indo-Pacific on the same day?
I mean, it wasn't like the same event.
It wasn't any sort of conference.
There was just a speech from Speaker Johnson and there were some tweets from Biden and they both mentioned how important Indo-Pacific partnerships were.
It's so bizarre and it seems to me likely that this is coming up because there's some sort of conversation happening behind the scenes that the public is not aware of or privy to about the likelihood of a Chinese annexation of Taiwan like this year.
And I can't think of a better time, strategically speaking, for China to do something like that because Russia obviously took advantage of this Biden regime, this Biden administration's dementia to be more aggressive in Ukraine after years of a pause over there.
We've seen that Hamas attacked Israel after somewhat of a pause relative to the attacks on October 7th.
And now we see this posturing of China about ready to annex Taiwan.
It seems like now would be the best time to do it.
Now would be a better time than any.
They don't know what's going to happen in the fall.
They don't know if Trump's going to be elected again or if it's going to be some leftist.
And the United States is really crippled by all the aid that it's given our so-called allies.
I mean, we've given millions upon millions of dollars, billions even, I think, to Ukraine.
And we're giving more to Israel constantly.
And we're pumping money into these programs for the illegal immigrants.
It was too expensive for us to actually fund the building of the wall or fund an increase in Border Patrol.
It's too expensive to actually deal with these immigrants properly, but we have all the money in the world when it comes to transporting them all over the country, paying for their hotels, paying for their apartments, getting them integrated with programs that can help them find jobs, putting them in our high schools and making the kids stay at home and take the classes remotely like we covered yesterday.
So we're spending all this money on our own invasion.
We're spending all this money on the Ukraine invasion.
And we're spending all this money on this conflict between Israel and Gaza.
Now's the best time for China to take Taiwan.
We're divided politically.
We're financially just wrecked.
Our military is incredibly weak.
You can tell just by the sort of desperate tone in the advertisements from our military to try to recruit new members.
They're begging people who left the military because of the vaccine mandates to come back.
It's embarrassing. So we've got the weakest military ever.
We've got the weakest currency ever.
We've got the weakest economy ever.
If China's not going to do it now, when are they going to do it?
We'll get more into the details in the next segment.
In the meantime, make sure you visit Infowarsstore.com and check out some of the amazing deals that we have going on right now.
Now, they're only going to be going on for, I believe, the remainder of the week.
Make sure you check it out. Get the mega super sale up to 60% off free shipping and double Patriot points now at Infowarsstore.com for some of our most popular...
I use several of these products every single day and they have made a tremendous difference in my life.
I'm here diving into Mike Johnson and his support for Ukraine, his support for Israel, and his support for Taiwan.
A lot of other countries coming up.
In the agenda for this new speaker, not so much about America that I've gathered so far.
And like I said, I'm not saying he's a bad guy.
He's probably a good guy.
But he's obviously a neocon who believes in this sort of internationalist, globalist, American policy of policing the entire world and controlling the entire world.
And that policy has repeatedly led to just increased suffering for the American people.
This just came across the desk.
Mike Johnson urges fellow Republicans to leave him alone on social media.
Apparently, people are really tearing into him for some of these globalist items.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, Republican in Louisiana, called behind closed doors on Wednesday for his fellow Republicans to stop criticizing him and his budget negotiations on social media, per two sources inside the room.
With just days to avert a partial government shutdown, conservatives are slamming Johnson's top-line budget agreement with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, alleging it does not go far enough to include GOP priorities and cut spending.
So yeah, I mean, this is neocon stuff.
The neocons spend a ton of money, and we're never going to get anything cut.
He's going to negotiate the same way McCarthy did.
McCarthy was faced with basically an impossible problem.
And just putting a new person sort of behind the problem doesn't necessarily make it less impossible or more possible to solve.
So, the Hill covers this the same way, saying Johnson risks the same fate as McCarthy with Spennydale.
It's the same problem.
There's no easy solution to it, so you have to be creative.
You have to think differently. Frankly, you have to represent the interests of the American people, I think.
And maybe it's just me.
Maybe I'm in a bubble. Maybe it's just me.
But I think that Americans are sick and tired Of seeing however many billions of dollars go to these nations that are very questionable nations with very questionable levels of so-called democracy.
When every time you drive to work, if you live in any city with over 100,000 people living in it, you drive past a litter of Homeless people passed out on sidewalks or people walking around on fentanyl.
I can't tell you. Driving to work just yesterday, I saw at least three people just walking, talking to themselves in sort of a maniacal, manic state of mind.
And when we have our own society, our own civilization, our own country crumbling right before our eyes, It just feels like betrayal to see so much money go somewhere else.
I don't know why. Are they just that sold out?
Are they just that corrupt?
Are they getting that much kickback?
Is the military-industrial complex that sophisticated?
Surely we could spend the same amount of money here somehow and have the same amount of corruption.
I would much rather have our politicians getting kickback on services that are actually helping the American people than getting kickback on these foreign nations.
I don't understand it.
And they're all the same.
I mean, Nikki Haley is like the female version of Elizabeth Warren.
Excuse me. The Republican version of Elizabeth Warren.
She's like the female version of the Patriot Act.
If the Patriot Act was a person, it would be Nikki Haley.
I mean, we're talking the same exact stuff that's going on with Mike Johnson if she gets elected.
Apparently Christie ends his anti-Trump crusade.
Christie ended his long-shot presidential campaign Wednesday in what could be a major boost to Nikki Haley's chances in New Hampshire, even as he pointedly declined to push the anti-Donald Trump movement toward her.
And there's this hot mic story.
We're going to run the clip here in a second.
There's this hot mic incident.
Of Chris Christie basically bashing Nikki Haley.
And I want you to listen closely to this.
I don't have an opinion yet.
But I want you to listen closely because we're going to take calls at the end of the show today.
I want to know if you think that this hot mic incident was actually a deliberate leak or whether it was a legitimate hot mic situation.
Do you think that Christie knew that he was being recorded and it was going to be leaked?
Or do you think that he was just legitimately taken off guard here?
unidentified
Let's go ahead and run the clip. People don't want to hear it, Wayne.
They don't want to hear it.
We know we're right, but they don't want to hear it.
And there's, you know, we couldn't have been any clearer if we couldn't have been any more direct or worked any harder, so, you know.
And let's not forget she spent $68 million.
Yeah. She spent $68 million.
Yeah, that's what you get.
Yeah, I mean, look, she spent $68 million so far just on TV. Spent $68 million so far, $59 million by DeSantis, and we spent $12 million.
I mean, who's punching above their weight and who's getting a return on their investment, you know?
And she's going to get smoked.
And you and I both know it.
She's not up to this. Notice how she spent $68 million on TV alone.
And we have to think about television a little bit differently than we used to.
There was a time in this country where everybody watched TV every night.
I remember... We're good to go.
People used to do that. I just thought about that for the first time in probably a decade this week.
And so the point I'm trying to make here is she's spending $68 million on TV alone.
There's a very specific demographic that's watching TV. She's targeting older Republicans.
Older Republicans who can be charmed by a fairly good-looking conservative woman who comes off like a valedictorian.
I can just see it now. I can see the audience that she's targeting, the conservative audience she's targeting, that still believe that 9-11 was a fluke terrorist act perpetuated by or perpetrated by people who hate America just because of our freedom.
And they're watching Nikki Haley and they're saying, boy, she's the whole package.
She's pretty and she's smart.
But she's spending that money like crazy on TV because she's targeting a very specific branch of the Republican Party.
And I don't have a problem with boomers and I don't have a problem with older conservatives.
My parents are older conservatives.
I understand you don't have time to dig through things and do the investigative journalism that Alex Jones does or to just...
Scour through emails constantly to really realize what's going on if you're an average, just sort of retiring person in the United States of America.
And I've noticed this since I started working here.
When I spend time with my family, I'm shocked by how little they know about what's going on.
Because I'm in an environment where everybody's sort of on the same page here at Infowars.
The crew's brilliant. Jones, obviously, is brilliant.
Harrison's a genius. Owen's brilliant.
We're all on the same page about what's going on.
But it's because we focus on this stuff all day, in and out.
And there's an entire base of the Republican Party, of the conservative party, that they just get their information from a mainstream news outlet like Fox or CNN or whatever.
And they love Nikki Haley because she comes off like this valedictorian, conservative sort of pageant gal.
She's got all the right answers to all the questions, but it's the same stuff that got us into this mess, folks.
It's changing every day. So apparently Trump has suggested that he's decided on a vice president.
Quote, I know who it's going to be.
The former president at a town hall on Fox News on Wednesday suggested he has made up his mind on a running mate, but then he declined to provide details.
Former President Donald J. Trump, the frontrunner in the Republican presidential primary, said on Wednesday that he knew who he would choose to be his running mate.
I can't tell you that really, Mr.
Trump said, when asked about a potential vice president at a Fox News town hall in Des Moines.
I mean, I know who it's going to be.
And it's really interesting that he's already made up his mind because so many things can happen.
So much can happen between now and the end of this primary.
And one would think that there would be opportunities for certain individuals to really blow it over the next six months.
And there would be Opportunities for certain individuals to really come into the limelight and shine and be awesome.
So the fact that he already knows who it's going to be is very interesting to me.
Obviously it's somebody that he knows.
It's somebody who's been around for an extended period of time.
And if he's already made the decision, that must mean that he's got a very specific agenda or role in mind for that person.
Obviously, the vice president as an office is a role in and of itself, but the vice presidency can be used in different ways.
It can be directed in different ways because it's sort of just sort of a ceremonious position.
I mean, you're the president of the Senate and you vote when the vote is tied to split the vote, but Vice President's a very sort of malleable position.
And if we look at Trump's speeches and everything he's been saying and everything he's been going on about, he's been discussing, obviously, election integrity quite a bit lately.
He's been discussing corruption quite a bit lately.
And a lot to do with these persecutions, these prosecutions, and this sort of insurrection claim that's being made against his supporters.
And so I don't really know who comes to mind in the context of those major issues.
Who would be a good vice president to deal with things like election integrity?
Who would be a good vice president to deal with this sort of persecution stuff going on that we see?
I mean, I'm assuming it's going to be a lawyer because most of his campaign issues are sort of litigious issues.
Obviously, all politicians, everything they do is about legalese and But fascinating to me that he's already made the decision.
When we take calls at the end of the show today, I want to hear from you and who you think it's going to be or who you think it should be.
In other news, I'm going to jump right into this shock video.
California jewelry store worker shoots masked marauders during an armed robbery.
An armed employee sent gun-wielding thugs fleeing for their lives during an attempted robbery at a jewelry shop in California this week, according to reports.
Let's go ahead and run this clip.
unidentified
This is clip one. Two guys creeping up really quick, so I was like, it's a robbery.
Two armed men intent on robbing a jewelry store in Oakland's Fruitvale neighborhood got more than they bargained for when a worker opened fire at them.
I believe I told the story on air before about how I found using Facebook ads some jewelry thieves in California and I submitted all their contact information to the police.
They never even followed up. And there's so many details about this story that are pertinent here.
The first thing is, an extended magazine in California is illegal.
A drum magazine in California is illegal.
So it proves that just because something's illegal doesn't mean that it's not going to happen.
We always hear from the left that they want to increase gun regulation, increase firearm regulation.
They want to put limits on...
Magazine capacity and basically the aesthetics of rifles so they don't look like assault rifles, so they call them.
And we know, we've been saying this from the right forever, that all it's going to do is it's going to keep these weapons out of the hands of law-abiding citizens and the criminals are still going to have them.
I remember when I moved to California, the first thing that I did because I wanted to follow the laws was I had to register my Glock 19 and And I had to leave my default magazines behind, the magazines that came with the firearm, because they were too high capacity.
Anything over 10 is illegal in California, or at least was at the time.
And so I had to order from Glock on their website these 10-round magazines.
And I remember getting them, and they were so dinky.
I gave it to one of my friends here in Texas when I moved to Texas as a gag gift.
He thought it was hysterical to see a 10-round magazine for Glock.
And I'm just thinking about this.
I was just trying to follow the law.
I'm moving into an apartment with my new wife.
I've got this firearm. I want to do everything right.
I'm starting a life. I just want to do everything right.
Clean slate. And I disagree with the law, of course.
And I disagreed with it then.
I'd probably do something different now.
Like, whatever I want.
But... I'm an example of somebody who followed the rules.
And if I were to come up against a criminal who had...
An extended magazine, that would have been a disadvantage for me.
I mean, obviously in a one-on-one instance, it's relevant, sort of.
But if you're shooting well, then it's less relevant.
But the point is, the criminals are going to do whatever they want, whenever they want, always.
And this is the importance of the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms and the right to have whatever gun you want.
And frankly, I am very surprised that When viewing this story, that the store owner wasn't arrested.
I mean, there are other stories that we've covered on this network of California homeowners defending their home with their firearm and then having their firearm taken away or being charged.
It's amazing to me.
And it's not just the issue of the firearm, the Second Amendment rights in California, but it's also the fact that It's just yet another symbol, another example of the decline of our civilization.
This sort of stuff is just not supposed to happen.
I know that jewelry shops are often in bad neighborhoods and pawn shops are often in bad neighborhoods because people want to pawn their stuff for cash and maybe there's drug problems and stuff associated with it.
I get it. You're always going to have good parts of town and bad parts of town, but I just, and maybe I'm being naive, you'll have to tell me, I just believe that there was a time in this country where being poor didn't mean the same thing as being a criminal.
Where you could be poor and have some dignity rather than just doing crazy stuff like this.
Risking your life to steal jewelry from a jewelry store?
Come on! And of all the places that are going to be armed, it's going to be a jewelry store?
Either you want it to work forward thinking, you want everybody to have the ability to say how they feel, what they want to move forward, or you don't.
Or you want somebody who says, I'm going to be on day one, I'm going to be a dictator.
Who says it to you? Tells you.
I'm going to put you people away.
I'm going to take all the journalists.
I'm going to take all the gay folks.
I'm going to move you all around and disappear you.
If that's the country you want, you know who to vote for.
If that's not the country you want, you have to make a decision.
They may like that, but I believe the people of the United States will make themselves very clear.
Because people keep telling them what they're doing.
So, the first thing that's interesting about that clip is, right in the beginning, she says, if you want to live in a country where you can say whatever you want, she's supporting the administration that's In more trouble than any other administration for explicit, just brazen violations of First Amendment rights.
We're talking about regimes and entities, deep state entities within our government that systematically, intentionally, and explicitly requested for individuals and individual posts to be removed from social media platforms.
This is an administration where the government goes in behind closed doors, communicates with these big tech platforms, and asks them to remove posts or individuals from these platforms.
There's censorship right there.
And Trump never said he was going to disappear gay people or journalists.
Ever. And frankly, if we want to talk about disappearing people...
Let's talk about the fact that Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill himself.
Let's talk about what happened to Seth Rich.
Let's talk about what happened to the journalist Julian Assange.
Let's talk about what happened to the, what is it, over 900 people now that have been convicted as a result of their behavior on January 6th of 2021 who have disappeared from their families' lives.
So I've seen more people disappear from In the last four years, then I think disappeared at all in the last four decades because of their political beliefs.
You want to talk about disappearing journalists?
Julian Assange, perfect example.
Edward Snowden, perfect example.
Where'd he go? Oh yeah, he's not here anymore.
He had to escape to Moscow, of all places.
Not friendly to journalists, but friendly to this one.
You want to talk about disappearing gay people?
How about the fact that the government knew that several medical products were spreading HIV and AIDS in the 80s and they let it roll for years?
How about the fact that our government did hardly anything to address the AIDS issue for like 10 years?
At all. I can't believe Whoopi Goldberg is talking to me about disappearing gay people and disappearing journalists and freedom of speech and an aversion to dictatorship.
I mean, think about it.
If she actually believes that Trump will declare himself dictator on day one and can declare himself dictator on day one, what does that say about the office of the President of the United States today?
If whether or not we have a dictator is dependent on the personality and character of the individual in office.
I purport that even the most ruthless, power-hungry person in our system run properly could not declare himself dictator as President of the United States.
If you put Mussolini in as President of the United States of America, it should be impossible for him to make himself dictator.
It is not legal in this country.
It's impossible. And it's obvious that when Trump was giving that speech about being dictator for one day, he was speaking tongue-in-cheek.
He was in jest. It was very, very clear to me.
And he said a couple things about the Constitution that rubbed me the wrong way.
I understand when people are sort of averse to some of the language that he uses sometimes.
I understand when he might say something that makes you uncomfortable for a second because he's slipping or whatever.
I get it. He's a bombastic person.
He's going to say stupid stuff sometimes.
That's off-putting. But the guy is not a dictator.
And he didn't orchestrate any sort of an insurrection.
And he didn't censor any journalists or gay people.
Frankly, during his candidacy, the first time, he said on stage that he would put Hillary Clinton in jail if he was president.
Remember? Because he'd be in jail.
And he never did it.
He never pressed any charges on him.
Obviously, that was a mistake.
I think what he was thinking was, you know what?
That's not a gracious thing to do.
I think when he finally got into office, he was just so happy to be there, relieved that he won the election in 2016, that he decided he was going to show mercy to his defeated political opponent.
Mercy he should never have shown because we know that if you don't crush your enemy entirely in war, they do come back with a vengeance.
If you don't eradicate every last ounce of your enemy, they come back to get you.
And I think he, honestly, I think he showed mercy to the Clintons.
They go way back. She was at his wedding.
Yeah, she's corrupt. Yeah, she's evil.
It was a hell of a campaign.
It was really brutal. I'm just not going to push for this persecution, this prosecution of political opponents.
It's a bad look for me.
It's a bad look for the country.
I'm not going to do it. And when he showed mercy to them, what did they do but spy on him, come after him, accusing him of Russian collusion, a lie, accusing him of quid pro quo,
a lie, something that Biden explicitly bragged about doing with Zelensky on video when he was vice president, when he threatened to withhold foreign aid to Ukraine unless they fired the prosecutor that was looking into Burisma while it was paying Hunter.
And so he showed them mercy, let them live, and they came back with a vengeance.
You know, this is going to be a sort of niche example.
But if you've ever watched Dragon Ball Z, and I know there's a listener out there that watched Dragon Ball Z, in the very first season, I believe that Goku shows Vegeta mercy at the end, and Vegeta makes one last dish.
Nope, it's the Frieza saga.
Goku shows Frieza mercy, gives him a little bit of energy so he can survive after this ridiculously long episode of fighting.
And as soon as Frieza has his energy back, a little bit of energy, he attempts to kill Goku who just saved his life.
Anyway... That's what happens if you don't crush your enemy entirely.
You can try to show mercy. You can try to take the noble path.
But these people are evil.
And that's not going to change just because they have some sort of sense of karma or duty to reciprocate any mercy that's been shown them.
Yeah, here's the clip right here.
They don't feel that way whatsoever.
So the fact that Whoopi can go up there and sit down and act as if she's some sort of sage because she played the wisest person in Star Trek Next Generation or because the pottery scene in Ghost was so good.
I just don't even understand it.
You have Chippy Kimmel coming up on stage the other day.
Talking about how if you didn't graduate from college, you don't have any authority to talk about whether or not the vaccines are safe.
As if that makes a difference in an argument, whether or not someone has credentials.
Yet, you don't hear him criticizing Whoopi Goldberg because she doesn't have a degree in political science.
We are surrounded by morons interpreting the world and shoveling their interpretation into our face.
All over the place. All over.
All these shows where they sit around their tables and they're perfectly well lit and their $500 makeup and their $500 hair.
And they just gossip and they gossip and they don't accomplish anything.
They just perpetuate their own worldviews.
They're not challenged by anything, at least at InfoWars.
In our last report, we brought you the secret migrant facility at 1211 East Apache Street in Phoenix.
When we stood outside the facility, the buses, seeing me, wouldn't even stop to pick up or drop off passengers for fear of having me report on what they were doing.
So if you zoom in there you can see the line of migrants at this Welcome Center, waiting to be picked up by the bus.
The bus comes on the hour.
It's almost two o'clock.
They're in a line coming out of the center.
We're gonna follow that bus all the way to the airport and interview the bus driver.
So we decided to start following the bus that departed on the hour every hour from this location to Phoenix Sky Harbor.
The first thing that happened to us was the bus stopped on the side of the road.
The driver got out and started taking video of us.
He's recording us. Do you have this?
Should I get out and talk to him? Yeah.
Okay. Let's go. Come on.
Hi, sir. Hi.
He's filming us.
So we're following this bus.
It says American Nation Tour on it, but the website's down, so we're gonna try to figure out who's contracting them.
Then, to our shock, the driver of the bus turned on his rear taillights and began to attempt to back into us, apparently trying to ram into our vehicle.
Yeah. This bus driver is currently driving recklessly trying to evade our ability to report on him dropping off the migrants at the airport, trying to evade our journalism.
We have a First Amendment right to film.
And ask questions.
Here we go. In fact, the swerving and evasive maneuvering by the bus was so violent that we actually lost track of this particular bus.
We went back to 1211 East Apache Street and followed the next bus on the hour.
We decided to meet them at the airport and get out of the car before the bus arrived.
But when the driver saw us do that, the bus refused to unload the migrants at the terminal Because I was standing outside with my iPhone.
She's trying to record me.
Ma'am, they're evading us.
They won't let the immigrants off the bus.
They won't let the migrants off the bus.
She's blocking traffic.
All right, let's get back in the car.
They're not gonna let them off the buses?
This woman was gonna let them off...
But then she saw me, started filming me, and she keeps going!
So standing outside, the bus sat at the terminal outside the door for several minutes before the driver called the Sky Harbor Police.
Hi. She's on the phone.
She is afraid to open the door of the bus.
So we're going to sit here and see what's happening.
So this bus has been evading us for quite some time, pulling up first to the terminal prior, now pulling up to this terminal.
She's taking video of us, if you can zoom in on the phone there, and afraid to open the door and let the migrants out into the airport.
I honestly don't know what Hunter Biden could do at this point to redeem himself at all.
I mean, he came out a couple of weeks ago saying that Elon Musk was dangerous and The new ex-platform under Elon is disparaging his name, despite the fact that everything everybody says about him or shows about him is stuff that he recorded of himself on his own laptop that came out.
And I've heard of people getting cease and desist letters for criticizing him and publishing information or talking about the details of the laptop and the corruption.
It's obvious that the guy's a criminal, but just as like a moral exercise...
How would one graciously handle his situation from this point forward?
Everything happened on the laptop, all the hookers and the crack and the cocaine and the drug problems and the child abuse and the corrupt business dealings and just the embarrassing footage.
Hours upon hours of it.
Jack Maxey told me I think that there was over 40 hours of pornography on his laptop.
And this was before he was even done going through it.
I think it was 40 hours is what he said if I remember correctly.
It's one full work week of just watching porn.
Make sure you clock out. So, hypothetically speaking, all we know about him, how could he possibly respond graciously?
I mean, should he just come out and say, I engaged in some behavior that was criminal because of my drug problem and I'm absolutely humiliated about it and ashamed of it and I admit to everything.
Should he go to these hearings and just concede when he gets drilled time and time again?
I don't know what the answer is. Maybe it's impossible to sort of respond graciously to this sort of news coming out.
I want to show clip three, too, just to see what happens as he storms out of this committee hearing room.
This is a different clip, right? Let's run clip three.
unidentified
Gentlemen, time's expired.
Chair recognized Ms. Green from Georgia for five minutes.
They're really, really good for campaign promotions where you can cut sort of compilation or highlight reels of all the awesome things you said while you were on the committee.
And I'm not criticizing MTG or any of these other members directly.
I'm just saying generally speaking...
When has a committee hearing actually resulted in the imprisonment of anyone?
Has there ever been an instance where there's been committee hearings and people have actually gone to prison for the crimes that they committed?
It seems to me that the crimes Hunter Biden committed basically span the entire spectrum of crime to just sort of regular street crime all the way to the most sophisticated white-collar crime all the way to political crime and bribery and frankly treason.
I mean, you want to talk about insurrection.
We saw this debate last weekend where we were arguing about whether or not January 6th was a planned insurrection.
That is the intentional, violent overthrow of an existing government.
That's what an insurrection is, right?
Or an overthrow of an existing government.
And it seems to me that...
Everything Hunter Biden has done, if you actually look at it and study it, read the emails, read the text exchanges, watch the videos if you can stomach it.
Everything that he has done, I can't think of a single January 6th protester who did something more inappropriate than the litany of things that Hunter Biden has done.
And I know the left always says he's not running for president.
He's not the politician.
Well, it always loves to say that it's like a straw man argument.
We're attacking the wrong guy. But that's such a bad counterpoint.
Because all the corruption that he was engaged in was because his father was vice president.
He even admitted in an interview that he would not have been on the board of Burisma had he not been the son of Joe Biden while Joe Biden was vice president of the United States of America.
They were working together.
They were conspiring together.
You want to talk about conspiracy.
They conspired together to rob us.
Not just you, not just me, but us, the American people.
They robbed us, man.
Let's see this other clip.
The crew's mentioning to me. I have a reporter asking Hunter about leaving the courtroom.
unidentified
Let's watch it. Please, I'll answer your question if you'd be quiet and let me make a statement, okay?
I mean, obviously there's different kinds of marijuana.
Or was he just trying to rub it in his face that everybody knows you're a crackhead?
unidentified
They just want to know if he was mixing it with cheese or if he was mixing it with baking soda, like what variety of substance he was cutting it with, I think, probably.
Yeah. I remember that interview of him saying that he was so desperate for crack at times that he would literally scour the rug for any bit of crack that he could possibly find.
I mean, obviously this is a sick person.
I do feel bad for him, human being to human being, for having Joe Biden as a dad and what he's had to go through and all of his addiction problems.
But in my opinion, this is clearly an example of someone who was already evil and got involved in bad things.
Not somebody who got involved in bad things that then made him do evil things he wouldn't normally do.
It seems to me that there is just a deep-rooted sickness in this man.
And you can see the decline. Even if you look at the photographs, there's that famous photograph of Joe Obama and Hunter.
I think they're at a basketball game.
It looks at least like they're at a basketball game.
And how much better Hunter looks.
I mean, it's just 10 years ago. He looks so much better in that image than he does now.
And we saw him on the balcony of the White House tweaking out.
And we saw the look on Jill Biden's face.
As she sort of signaled to Joe that Hunter was obviously high.
This is right around the time that they found all that cocaine in the White House.
Nobody prosecuted, of course.
But this is somebody who is a member of the political class and has not really faced any repercussions for his actions because of his membership in the political class, in the club that we're not a part of.
While 1,250 so-called insurrectionists are facing jail time because of their involvement in a protest that got rowdy and was instigated by the feds?
And I don't know how we fix this justice system.
Maybe this is what Trump has in mind when he says that he has a vice president already lined up in mind.
Maybe he has some sort of a plan or a strategy for how to fix this double standard in our justice system where if you're friends with the right people, if you're a member of the political class, if you participate in the same crimes as those who would persecute you, then you will be covered.
But if you support the political opposition, if you're a dissident, then merely showing up to the wrong place at the wrong time can be enough for over 20 years in prison.
Unbelievable, folks. Make sure you visit Infowarsstore.com.
Be the reason we are still on the air.
I know it feels like we're winning because we're back on X and there's been a lot of good things happening, but we still need your help.
We cannot stay on the air without you.
Infowarsstore.com. Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
I am Chase Geiser, your host this morning.
We are going to be taking calls for the next 30 minutes or so before the one and only Christon T. Harris joins us at the top of the hour.
I want to make sure to be able to get some of your calls, and I think he's only going to be with us for 30 minutes, but we're going to be calling for just to make sure we can get some of it.
So call in 877-789-2539.
Again, that's 877-789-2539.
Open lines, as always.
Talk about whatever you want. I want to hear from you over the next 40 minutes or so before the great Kriston Harris joins us.
So we see that Politico is downplaying the Epstein list and child trafficking as MAGA conspiracy theory.
And I've sort of embraced the term conspiracy theory.
It doesn't actually have anything inherently wrong with it.
It's a theory that a conspiracy happened, and theories oftentimes are true.
In fact, theories are a very important part of the scientific method.
So if you love science so much, then you should have a theory about a conspiracy.
Because you've got to test those theories in order to prove whether they're true or false.
Liberal publication Politico accused conservatives of being obsessed with conspiracy theories surrounding pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, the Clintons, and child trafficking.
And as far as I can tell, the only people who are obsessed with child trafficking are the ones that are actually doing the child trafficking.
Alex Rosen was on with Alex Jones yesterday.
I thought he was a fabulous guest.
He was also on with Harrison Smith in the afternoon on War Room.
And since he started...
And you'll have to remind me of the name of his Rumble channel.
Is it Predator Poachers?
Yeah, Predator Poachers.
They have caught over 600 pedophiles since 2019.
600. And it's a shame that that's just a drop in the bucket.
But it's not some MAGA conspiracy theory that pedophiles are running rampant in our civilization.
It's not some MAGA conspiracy theory that political elites are engaged in sexual activity with underage girls.
I mean, it's documented in the court filings that Epstein had underage girls on his island That he slept with the underage girls, that Ghislaine slept with the underage girls, that they were pawned off to these celebrities, whether it's Prince Albert, whether it's any of the others.
It's real. It's not even a conspiracy theory anymore.
It's a convicted case.
And I guess the left could pawn it off as sort of a fluke thing.
Like, hey, this guy happened to be very influential because of his financial status and the work that he did in the finance realm.
He happened to be very influential.
He happened to know a lot of very high-profile people.
But It's not really connected to the human trafficking part.
He was just a bad guy that happened to know everybody and they all went to his island because it was really nice and private and secluded.
But when you are deliberately shipping the most powerful people in the world to an island and videotaping them having sex with underage girls, that's an intentional conspiracy.
And the two were very connected.
And you see these examples of Epstein getting gifted houses and how is it that he had all this money and You have the Eric Weinsteins who come out and say that they actually met Epstein and talked to him about finance.
And Weinstein said that he left under the impression that something very bizarre was going on.
He did not get the sense from Epstein that he actually knew anything about finance to the extent that he sort of feigned that he did.
He got the sense that it was a front, that he wasn't really a finance guy, that he was some sort of operative.
And the finance thing was just a cover.
And I trust the Weinstein brothers, both of them.
I think they're both brilliant men.
I don't even agree with them half the time on politics.
I think they're good people and I think they're honest and I think they're brilliant.
And so when you have someone who fakes their financial status, who deliberately over the course of years recruits young women to go to this island and...
Pushes these high-profile people into being photographed with him and going to the island with him and then records the whole thing and secretly keeps the film and then has fake passports on top of it.
It seems quite a bit like a conspiracy to me, like he was conspiring to blackmail powerful people.
Right? It's not some MAGA conspiracy, and I don't even think it's necessarily even a right-wing conspiracy.
I mean, there were right-wing figures that were blackmailed as well.
And I don't know whether or not the allegations against Dershowitz are true or not.
I've been on a call with Dershowitz before for a public sort of press conference that I moderated yesterday.
And I know that Dershowitz has been on this show before.
He's a famous criminal defense attorney, so I don't want to disparage the guy.
But he would be an example of somebody who would kind of land on the right side of the political spectrum, who was involved in this Epstein stuff.
And the Bill Gateses are the leftists, but Trump was involved too.
He wasn't on the island. He wasn't doing any of this...
Underage stuff, this illegal stuff, but it's very clear from these documents that Epstein was really trying to get Trump in a position that he was compromised.
So it's not some MAGA Republican conspiracy theory.
This is a human trafficking network, a predator network that encompasses the entire political class, regardless of what political party the individuals are affiliated with.
How is it a mega conspiracy?
Why is it that the left just refuses to acknowledge that the system itself is satanic?
It's evil. It's the antithesis of God and all that God stands for.
It's the antithesis of Christ and all that Christ said and taught.
It's like they want to trust the state so bad.
It's like to them it's heresy or blasphemy to suggest that the state isn't good because the state is their God.
The definition of God is a being that is omnipresent, omniscient, and all-seeing.
So all-seeing, all-knowing, ever-present.
That's the definition of God.
Just at a basic, rudimentary, philosophical level.
That's what the left believes the state is and should be.
The left believes that the state should be all-powerful, all-present, and all-knowing.
And so they have replaced God with the state and they have worked incessantly, tirelessly to ascribe the same attributes that only God has, the attributes of God by definition to the state.
And then when you speak out against the state, it is like heresy to them.
It's like blasphemy.
And so when they hear that there's human trafficking at the highest levels possible, they don't hear accusations of political corruption.
Thank you.
They hear the disparagement of God himself because the state is their God.
That's why they're so averse to this.
That's why all these documents were hidden.
That's why Epstein gets out on a $3,000 bail or whatever after all those crimes that he committed.
That's why this continued to go on after he was a known predator for an extended period of time.
That's why it's all covered up.
They're all trying to To keep the state appearing as God.
Good morning. Have you seen the story in the People's Voice that Prince Andrew's ex-girlfriend says that the Mossad agents were so aware of 9-11 happening before it took place that Jeffrey Epstein and his associates bought tickets on the hijacked airplanes knowing ahead of time that they were going to be hijacked.
They wouldn't be on the manifest of the planes because they didn't actually get on the planes, but there would be a record of the purchase of the ticket.
Somebody in the audience needs to do a FOIA request specifically about this to see if any plane tickets from September of 2001 were found in his properties.
Because it sounds like he would have bought them to have them as sort of like a...
Right, physically. Right? Alright.
Yeah. Somebody needs to do a FOIA request on that.
Then it should be free. That's fascinating, man.
unidentified
Anything else on your mind this morning? No, that's about it.
Yeah. So, if you write more than half the time as president, that would be like a good presidency, you think?
unidentified
I just feel like he's so full of manure most of the time, and he's not really drilling down to the real issues.
He's just sort of shining us as a salesman, which is great for the economy, but You know, when he talks about the economy collapsing and whatnot, you know, he played a big part in that.
He had the printing presses going early on with the stimulus money.
And I just have a hard time with people that can't admit their mistakes.
When I look at the first Trump term, I put it at like a 75% success rate.
I think that about three out of four things that...
That Trump did were good.
Just generally speaking, I think the first three years were great.
The last year was terrible, obviously, and I think he made some bad decisions.
But a 75% good decision rate for a president of the United States, in my opinion, is overwhelmingly positive.
I can't imagine any of the other candidates, either of the left or the right or independent candidates, getting three out of four things right in office.
unidentified
Vivek. This is going to be the real litmus test, you know, of whether he's for real or not, because last time, man, he just instantly surrounded himself with swamp creatures, and it was pretty disappointing.
I'd love, you know, I want to see Michael Flynn in there.
I want to see Vivek in there.
I want to see Robert Kennedy Jr.
in there. I don't want to see any more of these swamp creatures.
It's possible. Do you think Vivek's a plant, and the whole time he's been running for president, knowing that he's going to be vice president, just to make Trump look good?
unidentified
I'll tell you. If those two got together, it would be hell on earth.
Somewhere in the cabinet, he needs to be up there.
A lot of people criticize him because he made a lot of money in the pharmaceutical business apparently years back.
What do you think about that? You know what?
unidentified
I'm glad you said that.
As far as Trump...
With the pharmaceuticals.
I don't know if Trump picked that product.
I think that product was shoved on him.
Yeah. Mass produced on him.
Knowing that it would give him a bad name.
Because Trump was looking at other ways of taking care of so-called COVID. Because we know...
I listen to lots of you guys every day.
But... He had other recommendations, but that's what the companies made for him was these products that actually did the opposite instead of helping people and ended up making it more worse for them.
But I don't think Trump picked those products.
I believe they were shoved on him, mass-produced on him, and without his...
It's all, you know, low-key, and it looks like a regular backpack until people see that InfoWars logo, and they give you the thumbs up, which does happen out here in California more than the media will admit to.
So, thanks again for another great broadcast, Chase.
I'm going to take off and let the other callers get on.
Yeah, no problem. This is coming from a former Trump supporter.
I voted for him. Listen to you guys every day.
Really well-versed and agree with 99% of everything you guys say.
And I experienced this a lot with my friends as well.
Finding it difficult to hear all of the, I don't want to say excuses or apologists, but saying that Trump's been pushed around about the vaccine or taking advantage of or compromise.
Yeah, well, one thing that I've learned, I own an advertising business that I run on the side, and I've worked with a lot of business owners, and I have found that the smaller the business, obviously, the more hands-on the owner is, and the larger the business is.
The more delegation the CEO has worked into the infrastructure.
It just makes sense, right?
Elon Musk can't do everything that Tesla does.
He's the CEO. He can't do everything at X. He can't do everything at SpaceX or any of these other companies that he owns.
And so if you look at Trump, he's this billionaire sort of real estate mogul.
And his entire life, he has had to rely on the people under him in order to make things happen.
He can't go into every single room of a hotel and make sure that the drywall was done properly.
He doesn't have time for that because he's on a macro level.
What I'm just sort of intuitively assuming, and this is not me being an apologist for him, but what I'm assuming happened is he got into the presidency, he put a team together, and similar to the disciples, for Jesus Christ, I'm not trying to compare Trump to Jesus, but similar to the disciples, there were some bad apples, right?
Yeah. And I think that he trusted the wrong people.
And you can say that that's not his fault because those people were dishonest.
But you can also say that it was his fault as a leader.
He should have made sure that he had trustworthy people under him that he was listening to.
But there is no way that Trump had the same amount of time that you or I had to look into this stuff.
He's got to deal with a million different things every single day from the Oval Office.
He just had a bad team, and he trusted him, in my opinion.
That's not an excuse, but it is an explanation.
unidentified
What do you think? I do agree with you.
I think that could definitely be an option.
The only thing that kind of steers me away from that is RFK Jr.'s book.
I read the whole book about Fauci, and it's a 28-hour long book.
I'm sorry. We're coming up on the break in seven seconds.
I want to hear your thought. We're going to have you back on, and we'll let you finish your thoughts on this.
Thank you so much for tuning in. Okay, thank you.
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
We do have Kriston Harris coming on after the first five minutes of the hour today, but I do want to continue the conversation we were having in the last segment with Josh.
Josh, I left off by saying that as president, you have to delegate and trust the people under you.
Maybe he didn't have the time or ability to look into the details that we as the audience did on these vaccines.
Maybe it's reasonable that he overlooked some of the details.
What were you going to say in response to that, man?
unidentified
Yeah, so I've heard RFK Jr.
state multiple times, whether it's a podcast or on his book, that he was approached for the COVID task force, and Trump did communicate with him heavily in the beginning.
And then...
Supposedly, according to RFK, Trump had a meeting with Pfizer, maybe took some money, and then didn't use RFK for the rest of the COVID task force.
I know that Fauci's already the head of the NHI or whatnot, so he's going to run things.
But I guess for Trump to just expel RFK like that, not really give him a voice during this whole situation, Yeah, but it's interesting that he reached out to him initially.
So I wonder what happened, because it sounds like he was earnestly pursuing an outcome, like a real outcome.
Yeah. At first.
unidentified
I think his intention at first was right with RFK, and then maybe, you know, the heat that he got from everybody around him, having RFK close to him, maybe that was too much to handle at the time, you know, around the election.
Yeah. I guess that's the only thing I can come up with, but I just want to let everybody know that we should hold everybody accountable.
And just because you can't admit that you're wrong, that's not an excuse to not admit you're wrong when innocent people have died.
So I've lost family members.
I have a twin brother who developed Hashimoto's for no reason after he got vaccinated.
So it is real, you know, and people shouldn't overlook it just because they want Team Red to win.
No, no. They said definitely a black man, probably like Ben Carson or a Byron Donald type.
So, you know, Ben Carson was specifically said and, you know, I think they're still kind of up in the air and they don't want to give away any Well, interesting.
If Gavin Newsom is actually the candidate, it would be interesting to see Trump pick a Larry Elder, because Larry Elder ran for governor against Gavin Newsom.
unidentified
Sure, yeah. That would fit that kind of way.
Yeah, that would be a good run-up there.
But I think Van Carson's got a long history with Trump, too.
They get along being a doctor and a very smart man.
You know, Chase, it's great to finally get a chance to talk to you because I got a chance to watch what you were talking about when I did fill in for Harrison Smith there and the great work you guys do over there to aggregate honest, genuine information.
And it's amazing the amount of attack you guys are under on a day-to-day basis.
So I'm blessed to be on a network that is known to be tried and true and literally be the forecast to the future.
I should mention that The Rundown Live is also on Band.video, which we plug on our show every day because we really appreciate everything Alex has done to bring awareness of the New World Order, the globalist agenda, and these scum like Jeffrey Epstein, which, as we know, is in headlines everywhere.
And everyone seems to be captivated around the story of Jeffrey Epstein.
And we've been paying attention to it dearly at The Rundown Live, as I'm a reporter and The only reporter that was at the Glenn Maxwell trial every day for five weeks, as well as the reporter who released all the stenographer's witness testimonies.
Some broke dude out of Milwaukee did that, not CNN or Fox.
So that's how we know about the videotapes, the $40,000 or 40,000 videos and images and hard drives.
That were acquired. Kelly McGuire testimony available on therundownlive.com.
You can go there and read all the stenographer witness testimonies of all four victims.
So if anyone wants a backstory about what's going on with Elon Maxwell, and let's not forget, I famously had my photograph taken by Isabel Maxwell, and the next day I conveniently was robbed.
My Airbnb was broken into, my laptop was stolen.
But that's all fuel to the fire on why I'm interested in this, why I want to expose this scum, and some of the things that I think that the mainstream and people out there are not paying attention to.
We know that the mainstream is really running around with and discussing who did Epstein Have on his island and, you know, the sex scandals that might be involved with potential candidates.
The Sarah Ransom claims of videotapes existing.
There's just a lot to dive into here.
But I think the most important thing is what they are not talking about with Jeffrey Epstein.
Let's just imagine, hypothetically, that I sit down next to you at a bar.
We don't know each other. We strike up a conversation because...
The TV behind the bar shows Epstein in a headline.
And let's just imagine that I'm an average American working class person and I don't really follow the news that much.
I just know that there's this Epstein guy and apparently Bill Clinton might have gone to his island and it might have been inappropriate.
What would you say to someone if you were filling them in at a bar that the public just isn't generally aware of or isn't part of the conversation that's just like mind-blowing?
Well, I think the first thing we should pay attention to is the fact that on record, he's been charged with assaulting minors and young females and children, per se.
And he was acquitted.
And the question is, is why was he acquitted?
And he's been accused of this in multiple cases by Virginia Roberts, now known as Virginia Jeffrey.
One of the witnesses just died, Carolyn, mysteriously drug overdose when she stopped doing drugs.
And the family wants law enforcement to look into it.
But they said there's nothing to look into.
There's a whole lot of things going on here.
But in this island, famous people would go and they would partake in debauchery with young underage children.
You know, young girls.
And at times, Jeffrey Epstein would purchase young children to come to his island.
And he would be their steward as he would traffic these young girls to elitists and politicians and judges and famous musicians who...
Who knows who all took part in it.
But it all happened in a little island called Little St.
St. James, which he bought, it is believed that Les Wexner, when I was sitting through the court case, was his handler.
He was the one that gave him a large piece of property.
And he also is the guy and steward of Victoria's Secret.
And as we know, that implicates a lot of other additional individuals who were in those business circles.
And that being said, Jeffrey Epstein later was arrested and he was in jail.
And allegedly, they claim he hung himself, but even his brother, Mark Epstein, believes that he was murdered.
So, with the people that were brought to the island, were they aware that these girls were underage, or was it intentionally ambiguous so that they could be blackmailed?
Well, I believe in my research that this was potentially a honeypot.
And this is going into my question I asked you earlier.
You know, follow the money. What was it that Jeffrey Epstein did to accrue this kind of money?
There's a video right now with the comedian Louis Black going around.
And Louis Black is talking about how he visited Jeffrey Epstein's place.
And he had a whiteboard where he was talking about being an arms dealer.
Was he really an arms dealer and a trafficker as well and that was part of the honeypot because we know that he used the same plane that the government used on occasion And the question is, what was his implication with government?
Why was he getting off of these horrible crimes that would put anyone away in jail?
Why is Ghislaine Maxwell sitting in prison at a resort-style prison, giving etiquette classes and working for a law firm, claiming that she's going to get off on her next trial?
I think it's all because of these potential Mossad ties, and the honeypot was just a blackmail operation.
I believe full-heartedly that there could have been, there was extortion.
I think that he had an evil plan to seed the world with his own DNA. He talked about impregnating women at large at his Zorro Ranch, which was never raided by the feds, by the way, which is weird considering it came up in a Glenn Maxwell child that Clinton and Hillary may have visited Zorro Ranch.
Well, okay, so we know that there's this infamous video going around of Megyn Kelly discussing that we may still hear from Jeffrey Epstein, right?
And I think that might be more in the fashion of old videos or recorded testimonies, but...
If we entertain this idea, if Epstein is still alive, sipping margaritas on some island with Osama bin Laden and possibly Saddam Hussein, it wouldn't take much to have a deep fake made of photographs and aggregate of the media and said, oh, here's Jeffrey Epstein's dead body.
Or, you know, all they would have to do in their surveillance system is run a photograph of Jeffrey Epstein through it and get a false positive of some homeless dude and switch out the body.
It's very plausible that that could happen and he's under witness protection if he was Mossad-tized or had Mossad-tized or was an asset to the CIA.
Now, I don't have any evidence to support this, but there is some precarious things being said around the media by mainstream when they want to dub independent media as aggregating conspiracies themselves.
Stick with us, Christon. This is a fascinating topic, and it's great to talk to somebody who's investigated this and looked at the details so thoroughly because it's so easy to just go through headlines, and nobody wants to read the 2,500-page documents that get released.
And to have you on is really a pleasure.
We're going to get more into this on the other side.
In the meantime, folks, make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com and check out the game-changing New Year's specials from InfoWars, which are here for this week.
I think it's going to end this week, so check it out now on InfoWarsStore.com.
And be the reason we are still on the air by getting our products up to 60% off plus free shipping and storewide double Patriot points.
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
We have Christon T. Harris with us this morning.
Christon, I want to ask you a few special questions, specific questions that I sort of marked down during the break that came to mind.
Can we dive in a little bit to...
Yeah! What Trump's relationship with Epstein was, how the friendship soured.
The reason I want to bring that up is not because I'm trying to put Trump into this conversation, but because it seems like the mainstream media and Trump's political opponents are incessantly trying to associate him with this scandal, despite the fact that when you look into it, it doesn't seem like there was ever any wrongdoing, any legitimate wrongdoing. Witness testimonies were recanted, things like that.
So what exactly was, if you know, Trump's friendship or relationship with Epstein, and why did it suddenly end?
Well, from my understanding, Epstein was a person who went to Mar-a-Lago, and he actually harvested some of his girls from Mar-a-Lago and may even have recruited women, according to the Ghislaine Maxwell-Jeffrey Epstein trial that I was in attendance at, and I think it's rather interesting that there are some ties there, but I'm not quite sure if there's any real evidence of wrongdoing.
Sarah Ransom has come forward and claimed that she, in testimony, just had conversations with a woman who claimed Trump was at Epstein's Manhattan place.
And that he liked perky nipples in the young girls.
But no one knows whether or not those are genuine testimonies because she recanted those.
And now she's come out again and is trying to double down.
Obviously, we've seen photographs of when the raid happened on his Manhattan home.
And We've been told that there are countless videos.
There were discs that were labeled.
But whenever we have a new release or update regarding this Epstein story, all it seems to be is like flight logs and just named people and testimonies.
Never any of the videos discussed or shown.
I mean, obviously, they probably can't be shown.
But why is it that the videos have sort of fallen off the map?
Okay, so the backstory to this is very interesting because during the Ghislaine Maxwell-Jeffrey Epstein trial, the FBI, under the Kelly McGuire testimony, talked about how Jeffrey Epstein must have been tipped off that the FBI were going to raid his home.
And when they went there, they cut open his safe and they had a whole bunch of hard drives.
And when they came back, they couldn't acquire him because they didn't have a warrant for him.
But when they came back, the hard drives were missing, conveniently.
But they did claim to acquire him from his lawyer days later.
And during the proceedings, they went on to say that they had somewhere near, I think, 40,000 images and videos, which they only used 40 images in the trial.
So what happened to all that data and information?
And my question is, what is it being used for?
Could that data be used to blackmail powerful individuals?
I think this gives a good window into the way our government may be run.
And I think Larry Nichols, the former bodyguard of the Clintons, shed some light on that as well, talking about how they would get people in power who could be blackmailed.
Well, how are they getting this blackmail information?
Not only was Jeffrey Epstein an arms dealer, most likely, but He also was trafficking women and setting up a honeypot and filming videos to hold people or extort people or hold people accountable or have it be part of some kind of initiation that they can now be part of his circle.
Now, I'm not quite sure exactly to what extent all that occurred, but the idea that they had hard drives upon hard drives, they blacked out photographs, They blacked out binders.
They blacked out names.
And they were very careful in the proceedings to even name individuals when they had full ability to name people and the lawyers chose not to.
There's a lot of things that make you go, hmm.
And we should also pay attention to these correlations, things like Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton.
Well, who was Hillary Clinton's campaign manager?
John Podesta, right?
What was his link to Jeffrey Epstein, if anything?
Because you would think that they may have crossed paths, you know, spirit cooking and hanging out with Mariana Abramovich and all the things we've learned from the WikiLeaks, per se.
So I think that there's a big wedge in the door of information that can be investigated, and there's a lot of questions people need to ask.
Was Jeffrey Epstein an arms dealer?
Where did he get his money from?
And what part does that play in him getting exonerated of hideous charges?
Having been in the room for these testimonies and being just sort of on the ground for the story in a way that basically no one else has been, Were you under the impression that Epstein was working for someone, or was this his own extortion scheme?
I think everyone in politics, for the most part, had some idea of what was going on with Jeffrey Epstein and who he was.
The question is, why would they still do business with a guy who was essentially an accused pedophile after he was accused?
And the evidence was pretty substantial.
And people like Bill Gates still doing business with him.
And Jeffrey Epstein tried to get in close to the science circles because he wanted to see the planet with his own DNA and impregnate a bunch of women at Zorro Ranch.
There's this whole bizarre transhumanist aspect of things.
There's a science aspect of things.
There's all these individuals that could be extorted or blackmailed.
And I think that's where we really need to pay attention to it, that our government is compromised.
And obviously, I think Hunter Biden and Joe Biden knew this, and they knew to stay away, and they probably didn't have to visit.
Jeffrey Epstein. Where was Hunter Biden?
Wasn't he in a different country where he could probably get away with it?
And with us, we have Kristante Harris, a distinguished journalist who has had his eyes on this Epstein case in a more in-depth way than perhaps anyone else.
So we were talking a little bit about this extortion racket and how there was evidence that he likely worked for other institutions, not necessarily just doing this for himself.
Did you see any evidence brought forward that there were ever, was there ever any digital evidence of actual Extortion or blackmail threats, like an email exchange where, hey, you better do this, green energy policy, otherwise we're going to release XYZ, anything like that? I'm not saying that there isn't any or that there is none that exists.
Yeah. Well, and I was thinking about this over the break, and I guess it's obvious, but perhaps it should be stated.
It's obvious. Very important to realize that the fact of the matter is if you're going to do something like this, if you're going to try to seek out sexual activity with underage women, that's typically something that people do by themselves very hush-hush.
The fact that We're good to go.
I think is meaningful.
It wasn't just a sex thing.
Because if it was just a sex thing, then it would have just been individuals doing this privately.
The fact that it was groups going and sort of participating in this together and enjoying this debauchery together seems to me to imply that it was really...
It was a network that was more than just a sex thing.
There was something more going on with the recorded videos and all that stuff.
Obviously, there was some sort of extortion happening.
The real question is for who and why.
And the other question that comes to mind for me is whether or not Epstein was engaged in this activity before he was caught the first time and perhaps then flipped and became an asset.
What do you think about that? I think it's a possibility, but I think it's more likely that he learned the ropes from somebody like Les Wexner of Victoria's Secret.
But it is a possibility.
We don't know for sure.
But hypothetically, at some point, Epstein made the decision to start filming whether to protect his own rear end from, you know, people coming out forward and saying this is going on.
And him saying, well, I got a videotape of you being involved with a minor.
Who are you going to tell?
It was kind of one of those things where I feel that the elite feels like they have immunity from this kind of behavior and that they can partake in it.
Right.
They can do it.
But nobody else can.
They're, you know, they're part of a special class.
And how many of how much of this was blackmail and how much of this was people just going to party with Jeffrey Epstein?
I'm not quite sure.
But we do know that majority of this did take place at Little St.
James, Zorro Ranch, and at his Manhattan home where he had a place called The Dungeon.
What a nice place, right?
We got a room called The Dungeon.
unidentified
And what is that? Ironically, he died in a prison cell.
And... I think that there was a lot of people that were involved and a lot of people knew this.
So to answer your question, I think the Bidens knew.
There's no way they couldn't with the intel.
I think that our agencies knew.
Obviously, the FBI knew because somebody at the FBI tipped them off that he was going to be raided.
The CIA absolutely would know.
If they know what you're looking at on Facebook or what you're looking at on the Internet, you don't think they know what Jeffrey Epstein was up to?
You don't think that they had photographs or blackmail on him.
I think that him being a weapons dealer, an arms dealer, as well as a trafficker involved in these kind of things gave him a special class of protection because he was involved with people that might be deemed untouchable.
You could bring the whole system down.
And if you can bring the whole system down because of these crimes, it's a crime almost so big that they can't prosecute.
I full-hearted believe that 2024 here is going to be a wild year.
I think it's going to be a crazy year politically, especially as a protest reporter covered things like January 6th and Kenosha unrest and being a witness in the Rittenhouse trial and all these different things.
I think that this year is a wild card year, and I think anything goes.
So I wouldn't doubt that maybe there are some videos of Jeffrey Epstein that do surface.
That do bring credibility to this being a honeypot.
Jeffrey Epstein was heard saying that in 2016, if people knew what he knew, that the 2016 election would be canceled, whatever that means.
And look at the candidates.
We had Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.
So I think that All cards are on the table.
I think all bets are off.
I think there's a power struggle.
The elite, as we know, the United States is heading towards financial ruin right now, $34 trillion in debt.
I think that there's a lot of other things that they're trying to take our attention off of with this case as well, including Fauci's recent grilling in Congress there, amongst other things.
But I'm kind of concerned.
I would like to see people held accountable.
I would like to see people arrested.
You know, Bill Clinton sitting on vacation somewhere as all this information is coming out.
And he still claims that he's only been hanging out with Epstein only a handful of times as where flight logs showed dozens of times him being on the plane and potentially visiting places like Little St. James or his Manhattan complex.
So I would like to believe that there's potential that they could go after these individuals.
The question is, is how do you separate business associates from people who actually took advantage?
Like you mentioned, I don't believe Louis Black potentially was involved in any kind of trafficking as a comedian.
A whole bunch of comedians hung out with Jeffrey Epstein.
There was situations like that.
So how do we separate that from real traffickers?
The main thing here is we got to identify the people that visited the island.
We have to ask questions.
They need to be drilled by our justice system.
And we need to make sure that our government is purified of this horrible evil that seems to be spreading.
Not only that, just think about all the children that go missing from crossing the border or in the United States or through CPS.
We cleared the lines for Christon when he was on as a guest.
He was fascinating to talk to, fascinating to listen to.
Go ahead and call an 877-789-2539.
I'm going to try to get to a couple of calls this segment if they come in at time.
877-789-2539.
In the meantime, I do want to cover this story on the desk.
Judge Angeron bars Trump from giving closing argument in rigged New York civil trial.
So not only are they trying to bar Trump from being able to run for office, not only are they trying to bar Trump from exercising his free speech, but now they're not even allowing him in his own trial to make a closing argument.
Former President Donald Trump has been barred from making his own closing statements in the New York City civil trial against him.
Liberal Judge Arthur Ingeron ruled Wednesday.
Trump had planned to deliver part of the closing statement himself in the fraud trial, which is his constitutional right.
But Ingeron told Trump's attorneys in an email exchange that the former president would have had to limit his court statement to what is permissible in a counsel's closing argument, that is, commentary on the relevant material facts that are in evidence in application of the relevant law to those facts.
So they don't even want him to make his own closing argument.
And it's funny because when I think about closing arguments, I think about some of my favorite movies or books, famous movies or books.
To Kill Mockingbird, famous closing argument.
The Fountainhead, Ayn Rand, famous closing argument in court.
Scent of a Woman, famous closing argument.
I mean, these sort of hallmarks of American literature or American film where...
When an injustice is done to us by society or civilization or just life in the human condition, the idea that we can go to a courtroom in America, similar to the Rockwell painting, Free Speech, the Abraham Lincoln likeness, we go to a courtroom in the United States, we can stand up, face our witnesses, face our accusers, and make our argument to defend ourselves.
Unless you're Donald Trump, unless you're a political dissident, unless you're a member of the opposition to the establishment political class, not only will they determine what you can say outside of the courtroom, but they'll prohibit you from speaking within the courtroom.
And if you try to show up in protest, then they'll throw you in prison.
Let's hear from Taylor in Vermont.
Taylor, what's on your mind? Hey, can you hear me okay?
You sound great. All right, perfect.
unidentified
I actually just pulled over.
Anyways, I wanted to just introduce myself.
I've been a long-time listener since 2008, so I've been listening since I was 18 years old.
I'm 33 now.
I've called a few times, and I've called around a couple hundred times, but I don't know if it was something wrong with my phone or something.
Anyway, I was a Ron Paul delegate back in 2012 and I just wanted to talk about priorities here with Vivek Ramaswamy and I've been a political analyst for a very long time and I would actually like maybe in the future we could set up if I could get on the show just for a segment and just I have a lot of knowledge to get out there and Like everyone else, we all want to spread the truth.
I understand. Let's hear what you have to say on the phone first, and then we can date before we get married.
unidentified
Yeah. Appreciate it.
Yeah, anyway, it's an honor to talk to you guys, but I wanted to talk about Vivek Ramaswamy, and he's an extraordinary candidate.
I want to say he's on par with Ron Paul.
As far as the media's turning, they're rubbing their eyeballs and pretending that he's not there, you know what I mean?
He's such an extraordinary candidate.
And the counterargument from the other side as well, you know, he's a Soros, he's Obama 2.0, he talks like Obama.
But if you look at his, what he's saying, and then...
TikTok has banned a six-minute speech that I actually put up on my channel.
It's actually kind of a spin-off Infowars.
It's called Info Victories.
I founded it in 2017.
And Vermont, we're known as kind of like the Democratic territory and Bernie Sanders territory, but there's actually a lot of independent conservatives and liberty.
There's a liberty movement here in Vermont.
It's just We're just a blip on the radar.
You know, we get three electoral college delegates or electoral college points.
Not sure, but I've been out of...
Anyway, it's just about myself.
I've been listening for a long time.
I've been an analyst for a long time.
I've been listening to you, Harrison, Owen.
I've been listening to Alex since 2008.
And I'm just super excited to have this opportunity to...
I wanted to talk about some Epstein stuff people didn't bring up.
I think also, I'm sure you're familiar with the saying like drinking the saint's blood, that part of the whole adrenochrome life extension stuff and harvesting stuff is also just, it's kind of sad that it's just them wanting to get high, that they're drug addicts and they have like near death experiences and trippy experiences when they're ingesting the blood of somebody who thinks they're dying.
And the idea around adrenochrome is that when someone is frightened, their blood produces adrenaline, and a byproduct of adrenaline is adrenochrome.
And if you consume that...
Then it has all sorts of like health benefits or life extension benefits or youth benefits, right?
So you have to terrify like a young child so that this chemical is produced in the blood and then you have to immediately drink the blood before the chemical goes away.
Is that right? Well, the blood is giving the age reversal benefits by having young blood in you as they've done with life studies and that one rich guy who's taking his son's blood.
The adrenochrome in torturing them is just for them to get high.
You know, but... The adrenochrome stuff has gone on for so long, and I think it's part of how Alex Jones says they're getting these messages from the demonic side.
If you don't have enough vitamin D3 in your body, which particularly happens in the winter months because sun and your skin Produce vitamin D3 naturally.