All Episodes
Nov. 8, 2023 - American Journal - Harrison Smith
02:11:57
US & Israel Planned To Annex Gaza Before Hamas Attack | Why WWIII Is For Control Of Gaza - The American Journal - FULL SHOW - 11/08/2023
Participants
Main voices
c
chase geiser
01:09:45
g
george papadopoulos
15:51
Appearances
g
glenn beck
04:53
g
greg reese
04:56
j
jon bowne
02:20
m
matt gaetz
03:09
Clips
a
alex jones
00:37
j
joe biden
00:17
k
karine jean-pierre
00:05
m
merrick garland
00:34
m
michael yon
00:56
Callers
leslie in nevada
04:35
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
That was never great!
One, two, three, four!
Slavery, genocide, and war!
jon bowne
While America sleepwalks through the 2020 decade with a treasonous zombie criminal at the helm.
joe biden
The most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland is white supremacy.
unidentified
You from Syria? No! Hey, why is it a big secret?
joe biden
According to the United States Intelligence Community, domestic terrorism from white supremacists is the most lethal terrorist threat in the homeland.
alex jones
The Nashville shooter, the trans woman-to-man, who went into the little Christian school and shot those little kids and shot those teachers.
The manifesto was suppressed when it happened, and we now have confirmed from insiders it was the Justice Department suppressing it.
karine jean-pierre
Our hearts go out to the trans community as they are under attack right now.
alex jones
This monster was brainwashed and poisoned by leftist propaganda.
Reportedly from the sources, she was a total brainwashed leftist on a bunch of psychotropics that love BLM, you name it.
unidentified
Arrested after police say she She crashed her car into a building thinking it was a Jewish school.
Police say the woman told them that she did it on purpose after seeing an Israel school sign on the door.
She also reportedly made references to quote her people back in Palestine.
A Jewish man has died from injuries after a confrontation with protesters.
The incident happened Sunday as Palestinian protesters gathered near the intersection of Westlake Boulevard and Thousand Oaks Boulevard.
And this evening we received word from the Jewish Federation of Los Angeles that the man has died.
joe biden
The most lethal terrorist threat to the homeland today, white supremacy is terrorism.
jon bowne
Joe Biden wouldn't know a threat to the United States if it bit him, and it nearly did.
China is flooding every inch of Earth with its rising dominance.
As a military power, China's Navy is now the largest in the world.
The dollar is now openly regarded to be on life support.
As Foreign Policy magazine reported, BRICS is likely to strip the dollar of its hegemony over global trade even if it doesn't have a single currency.
BRICS currently comprises Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, but will soon be joined by Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE this coming January.
Estimated to represent nearly half of the global GDP by 2040.
BRICS also expands control over commodities and increases leverage in financial holdings.
China has quietly taken control of larger portions of key global trade arteries, including the Suez Canal and the Panama Canal.
Meanwhile, thousands of military-aged Chinese men flood into the United States from Chinese camps located in Panama. - I cannot stress enough how important Panama is.
michael yon
It is absolutely vital, right?
And Panama is being destabilized and it's being taken by the World Economic Forum and the Chinese Communist Party.
jon bowne
China's Belt and Road Initiative, racing up through South and Central America, is built on the back of a compromised U.S. president, allowing nearly 8 million illegals, partly comprised of foreign military-aged men and terrorists in the United States under his three-year term, dwarfing the amount that came in under two terms of Obama and one term of Donald Trump.
While Klaus Schwab's This is a city that will consist of about 30 million people if it goes according to plan.
michael yon
It's most of Netherlands, part of Belgium, and part of Germany.
That's the tri-state. We're good to go.
Weaponized migration.
The weaponized migration are one weapon that they're bringing to the war.
They're like the tanks, right?
They've also got, they're building the new Silk Road.
jon bowne
While more U.S. banks continue to fail and the West is in a state of kinetic terror-driven chaos, once the dollar has been sufficiently diminished, central bank digital currencies will flood the globe, unleashing a totalitarian nightmare the world can barely imagine.
John Bowne reporting.
unidentified
Good morning, everyone.
chase geiser
This is the American Journal.
It is an honor and a pleasure to be back with you.
I had such a great weekend, an awesome time on TimCast with Tim Poole and Ian Crossland and Hannah Claire and the others from that podcast.
What a great time it was to be in a different state doing something special on another show that was fun, but I'm so glad to be back.
I missed you guys all very much.
I know that Harrison misses this show very much as well, and don't worry, you can always see him in the afternoon on War Room.
But, uh, also keep in mind that we are probably gonna try to have Harrison, I haven't told the crew about this yet, we're probably gonna try to have him do, uh, Fridays, just to sort of touch base with you guys, uh, and I'll do the War Room on Friday afternoon, so that's not, uh, in the books yet, but...
Very exciting things going on.
Very exciting times. So much news to cover.
Obviously we had a bunch of major elections the other day.
We've got this Trump lawsuit going on.
We've got World War III starting sort of in the Middle East.
And it's hard to know where to begin.
So I think the best place for me to start would be with the clip of Trump's lawyer.
She had an awesome sort of press conference the other day.
Very impressive woman.
Let's do clip 14.
unidentified
Coming from the judge who has already predetermined that my client committed fraud before we even walked into this courtroom.
I'm not here to hear what he has to say.
Then why exactly am I being paid as an attorney and why exactly are taxpayer dollars being used in this courtroom?
The answer is very clear.
Because Ms. James wants to stand right here like she did this morning and call my client a liar.
Call the company fraudulent and make a name for herself.
She said this morning that the numbers don't lie and they won't lie in this case.
Well, Ms. James, I have a message for you.
The numbers didn't lie when you ran for governor.
And that's why you dropped out.
And the numbers don't lie when President Trump runs for office in 2024.
And those numbers are loud and clear.
This country is falling apart.
And if we don't stop corruption in courtrooms where attorneys are gagged, Where attorneys are not allowed to say what they need to say to protect their clients' interests.
It doesn't matter what your politics are.
Everyone has a right in this country to get up and put a defense.
I don't care who you are.
You have a right to hire a lawyer who can put objections on the record.
You have a right to hire a lawyer who can stand up and say something when they see something wrong.
But I was told to sit down today.
I was yelled at and I've had a judge who is unhinged slamming a table.
Let me be very clear. I don't tolerate that in my life.
I'm not going to tolerate it here.
And you know what? You shouldn't either.
Because not every American citizen gets a camera and a microphone.
And what I'm seeing is such a demise of American judicial system and democracy.
Ms. James came out this morning and said that she knew Mr.
Trump. And she always calls him Mr.
Trump because it tells her that he was the president.
But the 45th president of this country, one of the best presidents we've had, Has built a great company.
It's worth a ton more than that statement of financial condition.
And she doesn't know how to get out of it because her politics won't allow her.
She calls him a bully.
She says he's going to bring out racial slurs.
He's going to say things today and taunt her.
Well, Miss James, you taunted him before you came into office, before you saw one record, one statement of financial condition.
You taunted him.
You said his administration was too male and too pale.
Those are her words.
She said that she and Michael Cohen We're going to be his biggest nightmare, where I have some news for you, Ms.
James. Michael Cohen folded, lied, and crumbled.
Your star witness, along with all the DAs and corrupt AGs, need to be paying attention to what happens when you let us take the stand, when you let my client speak the truth.
And the judge can tell me to sit down, and he can try and shorten my client's testimony, but it is loud and clear.
They've got nothing. They've got nothing but their politics.
She's got nothing but her Soros backing, which we discovered recently.
And I am sick and tired of seeing it.
Pay attention, America. Pay attention.
Because when you're in court one of these days, and you don't have a lawyer that has a microphone, and you don't have a lawyer that can go on TV, and you've got judges gagging them, what are you gonna do?
We need to fix this country.
And we need to stop what is happening in this courtroom.
President Trump is worth a lot more, and she wasn't ready for it.
She doesn't understand it.
And before she rushed to judgment, she should have thought about attacking somebody with over 50 years of real estate expertise who changed single-handedly the skyline of New York City.
She picked the wrong person, and her politics will fail for it.
chase geiser
She's got nothing but her Soros backing.
Trump lawyer Alina Habba denounces New York AG Letitia James sham trial.
Legal counsel Alina Habba forcefully rebuked the proceedings inside a New York City courtroom Monday, where she says she was railroaded and unlawfully gagged as she attempted to defend her client, former President Donald Trump.
In a passionate statement to reporters outside the courtroom, as we just saw, Habba, who's representing Trump in his civil fraud case, strongly criticized Democrat New York Attorney General Letitia James over the kangaroo court trial, which she says will fail and ultimately waste taxpayer dollars.
She said this morning that the numbers don't lie and they won't lie in this case, Habba said.
Well, Ms. James, I have a message for you.
The numbers didn't lie when you ran for governor and that's why you dropped out.
And the numbers don't lie when President Trump runs for office in 2024.
Those numbers are loud and clear.
Abbott went on to say the country is on the verge of tearing apart if Democrats don't stop unlawfully using the justice system to systematically target political opponents and spoke out against her treatment in the courtroom by Judge Arthur Angeron, who she depicted as unhinged.
So I am hopeful about this attorney's statement that we are going to see the just outcome here for Trump, that nothing's going to stand up.
But in a kangaroo court, it doesn't really matter whether or not things stand up or not.
I mentioned last week when I was on air that Jenna Ellis's confession reminded me a lot of Otto Warmbier's confession in North Korea.
He was that student, of course, that was studying abroad and was arrested for allegedly stealing a poster or taking a poster off of the wall of the hotel that he was staying in.
And of course they made him do this very humiliating sort of North Korea style confession on television.
And they sentenced him to I don't know how long it was.
It was years of hard labor.
And basically he ended up dying.
And they didn't even get him back to the United States until Trump was president, though he was taken prisoner under the Obama administration.
And I think they said it was botulism, but it seemed like he'd been tortured.
I mean, this is just, it was a brutal thing that happened to this kid.
I actually know someone who knew him from church camp when they were kids.
And so when you have a kangaroo court, it doesn't really matter whether or not you're guilty or innocent.
If everything's fixed, if the game is rigged.
And so that's the real question here.
And some of these things that we see happening to Trump remind me of what we've seen happen to the likes of Alex Jones, things like judgments and determinations being made without a jury, things like gag orders, things like not being able to read your own contract as it pertains to the case that you're under, where Trump wasn't allowed to read the clause in his contract about some of the details regarding the case at all.
And the only reason they really care about this is because they actually know that Trump's gonna win.
They know that he could win. And I think that it might actually imply that he, in their minds, they know that he won last time.
Because if they thought they beat him last time, and if they thought they could beat him this time, then why would they waste so much time, effort, and energy going after him, prosecuting him, and persecuting him when they could just move on?
It's because they know he's a real threat.
We'll get more into that in the next segment.
But CNN poll just recently said that Trump narrowly leads Biden in hypothetical rematch, and I believe these numbers are backed up by other outlets as well, including the New York Times.
One year out of Election Day 2024, former President Donald Trump narrowly leads President Joe Biden 49% to 45% among registered voters.
In a hypothetical rematch in the latest CNN poll conducted by SSRS, Biden's re-election chances are buffeted by deeply negative approval ratings, a stagnant sense that things are going poorly in the United States, diminished support among key voter blocks, and a widespread sense that he is not up for the job.
Keep with us, folks. We're going to get into more details in the next segment, more great news to cover today.
In the meantime, make sure that you visit InfoWarsStore.com.
It is the reason that we're still on the air.
It is the reason that we're able to come to you with the truth and broadcast through and past the mainstream narratives that seek to blind you.
There is a war on through your mind. Help us find it at InfoWarsStore.com.
Welcome back to the American Journal, ladies and gentlemen.
New article from the Washington Post.
How Trump's court appearance played out in his New York fraud trial.
We covered some of what his lawyer said in the last segment.
Some of how this kangaroo court is playing out.
Grievances, insults, tangents.
Trump brings his 2024 campaign into the courtroom.
I love how they frame it as if he's just exploiting or using this as an opportunity.
I mean, of course he would. Of course he should.
But they make it like it's his character fault that he's being dragged into this court.
Monday's testimony in a civil case offered a glimpse of the extraordinary intersection of a presidential candidate's political strategy and conduct in court.
New York Donald Trump portrayed himself as the victim of election interference and a political witch hunt.
He talked about crime in the streets of New York and he decried the weaponization of a judicial system that he alleges, without evidence, is unfairly targeting him.
Without evidence? Well, if he knows he's innocent...
Then that would be evidence as far as he's concerned in terms of being justified in forming his own personal opinion about it.
But the former president wasn't speaking at a campaign rally in Iowa or New Hampshire.
His typical venue for airing grievances, baseless claims, and other invective, according to the Washington Post here.
Instead, he appeared Monday inside a courtroom here in the city where he has spent most of his adult life New York Attorney General Letitia James was alleging that he and his company falsely inflated property values to gain lending advantages.
And Trump was on the witness stand.
As he testified for several hours at 60 Center Street, Trump insulted James, calling her a political hack.
He frequently sparred with the judge in the case, New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engeron, at one point saying he called me a fraud and he didn't know anything about me.
Trump at times looked annoyed or bored.
I'm sure it was annoying and boring.
Holding his hands in his lap as he faced questions from Kevin Wallace of the Attorney General's office about the Trump Organization's past financial statements.
Trump shook his head and sat back in his chair as his lawyers argued with anger on.
He called the process a crazy trial.
So not only do they want to charge him with crimes that he didn't commit, crimes that have no victim, by the way.
So the lender is not a plaintiff in this case.
They just brought this suit against him because they were digging desperately for anything they could find.
But they are deriding him now for not having a good attitude about the fact that he's in these sham trials.
I've never heard of anyone going to court or facing a lawsuit over lying on financial records for a loan that they paid off in full.
It doesn't make any sense to me whatsoever that this would be done.
And I... I can't even fathom how they would stack a court with so many entities, so many individuals who so brazenly hate this man.
As the lawyer, of course, said, as we went over in the last segment, they were refusing to even refer to him as President Trump.
They were calling him Mr. Trump, which is incredibly disrespectful.
I wouldn't even call Biden Mr. Biden.
If I was interacting with Joe Biden, I would call him Mr. President, even if I insulted him, just because you have to have respect for the office.
So this is a court, a judicial system, a Department of Justice that totally disregards and disrespects half of the country.
They hate the entire movement that he stands for.
His slogan, it's not me thereafter, it's you.
I'm just in the way, was absolutely correct.
And the fact that they're treating him with such disrespect here, especially before he's been convicted of anything, is just indicative of the real motive behind the crime that is this prosecution, that are these prosecutions.
Speaking of mistreatment, we've got breaking news here on Infowars.
Congress investigating the mistreatment of journalist Owen Schroer in federal prison.
Let's go ahead and run clip four.
matt gaetz
I was very heartened by your discussion of site visits to our prisons to get a first-hand understanding of what's going on there.
Sometimes members of Congress have had challenges doing that.
Could you give us some advice if we wanted to glean those benefits and get that first-hand experience?
What's the best way for us to go about that with your team?
unidentified
Thank you, Congressman. So if you have your team reach out to our Office of Legislative Affairs, we will be happy to make that arrangement.
matt gaetz
Thank you so much. Does the Bureau of Prisons retaliate against people based on constitutionally protected speech?
unidentified
I have been very clear that retaliation will not be stood for on my watch.
matt gaetz
And you're confident that that's being observed throughout the Bureau?
unidentified
I'm confident that message has been delivered, and if anyone engages in retaliation, we will hold them accountable.
matt gaetz
Are you familiar with the matter of John Strand?
unidentified
That name is not familiar to me now.
matt gaetz
So Mr. Strand was a witness at a hearing that we had regarding some of the civil rights concerns of people who had interacted with the Department of Justice in January 6 matters.
He was convicted, sentenced at FCI Miami, and I'd received word that he had been placed into enhanced confinement and into higher acuity securing as a consequence of information that others had put out on his and I'd received word that he had been placed into enhanced confinement So is that something, does that ring a bell to you?
unidentified
Congressman, I wouldn't be able to speak to an individual's circumstances regarding their behavior inside our institutions.
What I can assure you Is that if an individual is placed in our special housing unit, it would be for conduct that happened inside the institution.
matt gaetz
So what's a special housing unit?
unidentified
A special housing unit is one of our restrictive housing placements that could include disciplinary segregation, protective custody, and would house individuals that Either were it harm to harm themselves or others or had actually engaged in misbehavior inside our institutions.
matt gaetz
What I'm worried about is that Mr.
Strand gave us testimony about some of his concerns.
And as you know, people give us testimony.
We sort through what's right and wrong and should be acted on and shouldn't be acted on.
It's not gospel. It's just testimony.
But then thereafter...
People were posting on some of his social media platforms his concerns about the treatment he'd received at the Bureau.
And then I sent a letter to you concerned about that, because like you, I don't want anyone retaliated against for constitutionally protected speech.
And thereafter, I got a letter back from the aforementioned Office of Legislative Affairs in your office, and they say, in part, Mr.
Strand was moved to a secure housing unit with increased supervision and frequent employee contact on September 26, 2023.
Pending completion of an investigation.
So I guess my question is, is that like akin to what we would normally think about as solitary confinement?
Those words? Secure housing unit with increased supervision and frequent employee contact?
unidentified
We would use the word restrictive housing.
matt gaetz
Okay. So what's this then?
Because this guy's a non-violent, he was never violent toward anyone, so I'm just wondering why the assets that we fund for the highest acuity violent people would be used for this purpose.
unidentified
Congressman, we use that special housing unit for individuals that I don't know what he was found to be guilty of by our hearing's administrative process that would warrant his need to go into restrictive housing, but I assure you we have administrative processes That people have to go through it before those placements actually occur.
matt gaetz
Yeah, I get that you can't know the conditions of every single prisoner throughout the Bureau.
This is one I've ripened and sent to you because I am worried that throughout our Department of Have you heard of the matter of Owen Schrayer?
unidentified
No, that name is not familiar to me.
matt gaetz
Very similar fact pattern.
You know, somebody who'd sort of spoken out, was prominent in the public, was convicted as a consequence of activities on January 6th, and now feels as though there's specific Bureau of Prison retaliation.
chase geiser
Stick with us, folks. We'll be right back.
visit Infowarsstore.com.
More on this story in the next segment.
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
I am Chase Geiser, your host today.
We saw a five-minute clip in the last segment of Matt Gaetz inquiring as to the way the January 6th protesters are being treated.
He mentioned our very own Owen Schroer by name.
And... Though his discourse was polite with the woman that he was questioning, obviously there is tension in the space and there isn't a lot of awareness going on, I don't think, in our Department of Justice, our justice system, what the other hand is doing, so to speak. And it seems to me entirely unfair that we would have a situation where Owen Schroer is facing his I believe what I'm hearing is the rest of the month in solitary.
I don't know if that's true or confirmed, but that's what Harrison mentioned to me yesterday when we were speaking in the halls here at the headquarters of InfoWars.
It was interesting because in that testimony when Gates was inquiring these sort of solitary confinement scenarios are supposed to occur because of something that the prisoner does inside of the prison and it seems that they actually put him away because we broadcast his recorded outbound call.
And I think that they were trying to put him away for broadcasting from prison or something.
I don't know what the details are, but I'm hearing that it's going to be the rest of the month.
I'm not sure if that's true. Obviously, we're praying for him.
Write him a letter if you can.
I've written him one. I need to write him another one.
Those types of things make the time go by much more quickly.
Going on through this article here, Breaking Congress Investigating Mistreatment of Journalist Owen Schroyer in Federal Prison, Alex Jones breaks down the powerful footage of the House Judiciary Subcommittee investigating the disturbing reports.
Of course, you can see that on band.video.
During Tuesday's House Judiciary Subcommittee hearing, Representative Matt Gaetz grilled Bureau of Prisons Director Colette Peters about disturbing allegations of political retaliation by the agency.
He says, My office has received disturbing allegations of political retaliation by the U.S. Bureau of Prisons against John Strand, USA, Nolan Schroer, 1776.
I'm looking forward to taking up Director Peters on her offer for on-site visits to investigate how J6 defendants are being treated.
My office has received disturbing allegations, he goes on to say.
That will be very interesting to see what he discovers when he goes.
Of course, they can always clean things up.
It's like going to visit the Soviet Union during the Soviet Union.
Even though the whole place was starving and in shambles, they would only take you to the nice places.
So they clean everything up when they bring in a visitor to do the inspections.
And then that might not actually be an accurate reflection of how things are.
Of course, if he has the opportunity to speak with prisoners, then maybe he'll have the opportunity to hear the real story.
Though even that can be shaky if you look at the history of Jonestown.
And what happened when that was investigated and when I believe it was a senator or congressman went to Jonestown and a couple people had to slide him a really sly note to let him know that things weren't right there.
And so even if he does, even if Gates does get time with these prisoners one-on-one to get their feedback on what they're experiencing, it doesn't necessarily mean that they'll feel comfortable disclosing with them how things are really going on.
During the hearing, Gates raised alarm to Peters, disturbing allegations that Owen Schroer and others were being mistreated in order to send a message to other people.
Of course, we heard her response there.
He has replied to Peters by expressing concern about the prosecution of anyone related to the events of January 6th, as well as eagerness to conduct site visits to monitor how prisoners are being treated.
So I'm anxious to see how that plays out.
It's a developing story. And as you know, we will keep you updated and informed here on Infowars.
Just to segue from the January 6th prisoner situation, we do have the January 6th persecution going on of our very own President Donald Trump.
Headline here from NBC News is January 6th riot was a culmination of Trump conspiracies to overturn 2020 elections, special counsel says in a new filing.
So now they can just really stretch the truth as to what makes one complicit or culpable for the actions of a mob.
And they can stretch out anything that he ever said on air, on the internet, on At any rally and try to steer that or interpret that in a direction suggesting that what happened on January 6th is because of Donald Trump and it's not because Donald Trump was calling anybody to violence but it was a combination of the fact that there were too few police officers there.
There were bad actors in the crowd and by bad actors I mean members of the intelligence community and there were a few actually criminal either protesters or Antifa or whatever.
So that combination of things led to this happening, and I think that the establishment was totally happy with this happening because they knew that they could use it to leverage and wage a war on half the population for the next four years to secure their political power.
And that's when we really started seeing the white supremacy rhetoric, the greatest threat to our national security being domestic terrorism or right-wing extremism.
Let's hear from Mary Garland in clip eight here.
merrick garland
The number of open FBI domestic terrorism investigations this year has increased significantly.
According to an unclassified summary of the March intelligence assessment, the two most lethal elements of the domestic violence extremist threat are racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists and militia violent extremists.
In the FBI's view, the top domestic violent extremist threat comes from racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists, specifically those who advocated for the superiority of the white race.
chase geiser
The claim from Jack Smith's office is that Donald Trump is responsible for the events at the U.S. Capitol on January 6th because they were the culmination of his conspiracies to overturn the 2020 presidential election, Special Counsel Jack Smith says in a new filing in the former president's federal election interference case.
election special counsel jack smith says in a new filing in the former president's federal election interference case the filing is in response to trump's motion to strike inflammatory references to the violence of january 6 2021 from his criminal indictment on four charges related to his alleged efforts to interfere with the certification of joe biden's electoral victory senior assistant special counsel molly gaston called trump's motion a meritless effort to evade allegations that he was responsible for events at the capitol that day
The filing is in response to Trump's motion to strike inflammatory references to the violence of January 6th, 2021 from his criminal indictment on four charges related to his alleged efforts to interfere with the certification of Joe Biden's electoral victory.
the thing that's so ridiculous to me about this is if donald trump really wanted to have an insurrection then how come nobody that was there nobody who was there was armed Thank you.
He definitely could have incited violence if he wanted to.
He could have ramped up the rhetoric and he could have said, you have a second right amendment to carry a firearm anywhere in this country.
I don't care what the rules in DC are.
I'm the executive in DC right now.
Come to DC. Bring your AR. Show them what...
The right to bear arms actually means he could have said all those things.
That would have been way more inflammatory than him just saying, hey, let's peacefully protest and fight to save our republic.
Let's encourage them or show them that we don't want them to certify the election.
That's all he really said.
And every candidate, every campaign for like 100 years has used rhetoric like, we're going to fight hard and we're never going to give up and we're going to fight back and we're going to punch hard, we're going to hit hard.
These are metaphors or just sort of colloquial expressions that we have about competing with someone.
I mean, even if you go to like a high school basketball game, you'll hear rhetoric from cheerleaders that could be interpreted as inciting violence.
Like, go fight, win!
Are they telling the basketball team to fight the other basketball team?
No. So, they're taking this stuff out of context.
Obviously, he did inflame the tension in the political climate by speaking what he believed, that the election was stolen.
But what's he supposed to do?
Just keep his mouth shut? Is he just supposed to be quiet?
Because last I checked, you have the right to freedom of expression in this country.
And I guarantee you that even if Trump hadn't said anything...
All of those who doubt the outcome of this election now would still doubt the outcome of the election.
So they're just trying to get him prosecuted and convicted of any crime they can to try to encourage or provide an avenue for the state legislatures to get him off the ballots so that he's not a competitive contender for the presidency.
And once they have secured that, We're gonna hear things like announcements of Hunter Biden being pardoned.
We're gonna see a shift later on in the election cycle.
Where Joe Biden isn't going to be the candidate anymore and they're going to usher someone in sort of last minute very secretly and quickly so there isn't a lot of time to prepare any sort of counter campaign against them.
And then with RFK running as an independent they're going to try to split the vote against Donald Trump and that's how they're going to usher in a candidate that we don't even know who it's going to be yet.
The candidate for the Democrats is not someone who we are certain who it's going to be yet.
That's what's so creepy about this.
Stay with us, folks. We'll be back after this break.
Make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com.
Check out our awesome deals today.
Ultra 12 is back. Experience the power of V12. I love that stuff.
I take it every day. It tastes delicious.
Get us 40% off.
Shop now at infowarsstore.com and be the reason we are still on the air.
Welcome back to the American Journal, ladies and gentlemen.
I am Chase Geiser, your host today.
More international developments underway.
We'll step away from this, talk about this prosecution of Trump, and let's talk about other elections that are going on around the world, or lack thereof.
Putin looks set to run for president in 2024, and there's no opposition.
This is typical for what we've seen in Russia since the collapse of the Soviet Union.
We see these elections that don't really seem or feel like elections.
Maybe they are, I don't know. There's never opposition.
Maybe because anyone who seems to oppose Putin has a tendency to get in a plane accident.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has reportedly decided to run in the March 2024 presidential election.
Pretty late in the game for somebody running for president of a major country.
But with no competition, I guess you can make those decisions later.
You have that luxury. With little to no opposition in Russia, it's likely that Putin will be in office until at least 2030 and could continue his tenure until 2036.
That's actually good news.
I'm not somebody who is a major fan of Putin.
There are some things I like about him. The first thing I like about him is he's obviously very smart.
The second thing I like about him is he definitely loves his country.
And the third thing, which is related to the second, is I just like any leader who's a populist of their own nation, like a nationalist of their own nation.
He's all about Russian sovereignty.
He believes in national sovereignty, which I support.
But I am aware that he does things like blow up airplanes, arrest members of the press.
Obviously, everyone feels too intimidated to run against him.
So there's definitely a heavy hand in terms of what's going on in Russia.
But the nice thing about him is we know that when he is the leader of Russia, we don't seem to have nuclear war with Russia.
That's one of the major national security risks or threats of Russia is what happens when Putin leaves.
He either ages out, retires, or he dies.
We don't really know who's going to replace him and that person could be a loose cannon.
So what if a maniac replaces Putin and is suddenly responsible for the second largest or the third largest or even the first largest?
I don't know where they rank now.
Nuclear arsenal in the world.
That's why Russia's always been a national security problem for the United States.
That's why we always do everything we can with NATO to try to bully them and keep them in a corner and make sure we can sanction them and control their economy.
Because we know that just because we're getting along with one leader, just because there's peace with one leader, doesn't mean that there will be peace with the next.
Analysts say that the bitter truth in modern Russia is that there is no one left who can really oppose Putin.
Russian President Vladimir Putin delivers a speech during the concert marking the city day on September 9th, 2023 in Moscow, Russia.
Putin and Moscow's mayor, Sobyanin, is expected to be re-elected this week, took part in the festive event.
So, he's going to be running in the spring, but the funny thing about this is...
We have been supporting Ukraine based on the fact that Ukraine is the only democracy in the region.
Ukraine is a democracy, and this is a dictatorship that's been coming down on them.
But they're actually having, if not, it is at least a faux election.
They're having an election in the spring.
And Zelensky has come out and said that it's not the right time for elections in Ukraine.
So Russia's going to have an election, but Ukraine's not.
Let's go ahead and run clip three from the other day.
unidentified
If you can't give us some financial support, okay, okay, please, give us a credit, and we will give you back money after the war.
chase geiser
Yeah. So now Zelensky is so desperate for resources that he's begging individuals to loan money to Ukraine in this war effort.
That's how bad things are getting. And one of the things that concerns me about what's happening with him is he seems to be the only one within or among the leadership that is still deluded enough to believe that he can save Ukraine from losing this war.
His leaders seem to be murmuring and having rumors and making statements that are sort of doubtful or antagonistic toward the positive outcome perspective.
And when you have a situation like that, I feel like he's going to get Valkyrie'd.
Of course, Operation Valkyrie being the famous assassination attempt of Adolf Hitler during World War II, when the war was clearly being lost, the war was clearly not going to be a victory for Germany, but Hitler hadn't acknowledged that yet, was refusing to allow people to retreat, was still running the war as if there was hope for victory, even though there was no hope for victory.
And when you have a situation like that, Suddenly you have members of your leadership who have to decide between their men or their sort of duty to follow orders.
So if you are...
In a position of leadership and you've seen hundreds or thousands of your men die in combat.
You've seen men shipped off who don't come back.
You've heard the reports from your comrades in the field about how terrible things are going.
And then you go up to somebody like Zelensky and they say, no, we're going to do this counteroffensive.
We're going to do this, this, this, that, this.
We're never going to negotiate with Russia.
You start to think, all right, well, would the right thing for me to do to be to follow orders or would the right thing for me to do...
Would that be for me to have like a military coup?
So I think he's really bringing himself close to that sort of situation where there's going to be a military coup.
And even months ago, his leadership was complaining about him because he was skimming a disproportionate amount of the aid for himself.
So we know that there's so much corruption in Ukraine that they've been stealing large portions of the aid, the over $100 billion that we've given them, all the leadership, including Zelensky.
And there were murmurings that generals and other leaders in his cabinet were Sort of disgusted with Zelensky for taking too much for himself and there wasn't enough for them to skim or the right proportion of their fair share.
So if they were disgruntled at him then and now he's sending them into combat situations where there's really no hope for victory and he's sending their men, people they are actually affectionate for, into combat situations where there's no victory or hope for victory, then you're really just setting things up for a military coup in Ukraine.
And I'm sure that Putin could find a way to sponsor that fairly easily.
You pay people off, you promise to pardon them, and they take over the country.
All of a sudden you have a puppet government running Ukraine.
It'll still be Ukraine in name, but it would be run by Russia because everybody would be installed by Russia, similar to how we attempt to install people all over the world, although we're not very good at it.
And that would be the circumstance, especially since we know his approval ratings have gone down in light of his corruption and the pain of this war.
And he's shutting off the elections like that.
That's just asking for it.
Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a Monday address that it is not the right time for elections in Ukraine as the end of his five-year term approaches.
So as he argued in his Monday video address that Ukraine should not have to deal with elections as it continues to attempt to fend off Russia, which invaded Ukraine in February of 2022.
He previously had not ruled out Ukraine holding a presidential contest next year, though elections are currently suspended in the country under martial law.
And finally, the waves of any politically divisive things must stop, he said Monday.
We must realize that now is the time of defense, the time of the battle that determines the fate of the state and people, not the time of manipulations which only Russia expects from Ukraine.
I believe that now is not the right time for elections.
And giving society all the necessary answers so that there is no room left for conflicts and someone else's game against Ukraine, he said.
Presidential elections in Ukraine are scheduled to take place every five years, with the next one slated for next March.
Zelensky was sworn into office in May of 2019, meaning that his five-year term is set to expire in a few months.
Ukrainian First Lady Olena Zelenska said in September that she did not know whether her husband would run for re-election in 2024.
She also said at the time that the country's ability to organize a free and fair election could factor into whether he would run for a second term.
Man, if I were him, I would have the elections and I would not run.
That might be his way to survive.
I ran a poll on my Twitter account the other day.
Where I asked a few, I asked what the audience, what the followers thought.
What's going to happen to Zelensky?
One of them was like assassination was an option.
Another one was forced resignation but peaceful.
I think one of the options was voluntary resignation.
And it's so evenly split.
I've never seen a poll like that where it was just that evenly split among the different outcomes.
Nobody really knows what's going to happen, but pretty much everybody knows that he's not going to win the war and he's not going to be the president of Ukraine for very much longer.
We're going to cut to a break and we're going to cover more news in the next hour.
In the meantime, Ultra 12 is 40% off at InfoWars store.
After being sold out for months, Ultra 12 is finally back in stock and being made available at an unprecedented discount of 40% off.
Ultra 12 from InfoWars Life took the familiar Secret 12 formula and singled out one powerful ingredient.
Made with methylcobalamin, The most effective and expensive form of B12 available, Ultra 12 provides you with twice the B12. Because B12 is a necessary nutrient that isn't found in any vegetables, it can be difficult to attain.
Instead of getting painful B12 injections or taking weaker formulas, you can support your energy production with the superior form of B12. With a single ingredient, Ultra 12 can help you.
I highly recommend that you visit InfoWarsStore.com today.
All of our products are amazing.
I take the B12 every day.
I'm going to take some actually during this break.
And we'll be back in the next hour with more news, followed by a special guest and calls in the third hour.
glenn beck
The Biden administration has just put forward a plan for digital equity.
And it is a plan for all internet services and all infrastructure.
According to FCC Commissioner Carr...
President Biden's plan hands the administrative state effective control of all internet services and infrastructure in the country.
Never before in the roughly 40-year history of the public internet has the FCC, or any federal agency for that matter, claimed this degree of control over it.
The plan calls for the FCC to apply a far-reaching set of government controls that the agency has not applied to any technology in the modern era.
He went on and said Congress never contemplated the sweeping regulatory regime that President Biden asked the FCC to adopt, let alone authorized the agency to implement it.
As with everything else the Biden administration is doing, his broadband policies are failing.
And the building of internet infrastructure in this country, the price of it, has gone through the roof.
FCC wants new 5G broadband services.
But it's all needlessly been blocked and delayed by new broadband infrastructure policies.
Regulatory red tape.
So the government is blocking the private sector from doing it.
And then using that to say, see, we need to take complete control.
This is breathtaking control of all information.
The rules that are suggested and are going to be voted on quick, hurry next week.
The federal government has a roving mandate to micromanage nearly every aspect of how the Internet functions.
From how Internet service providers allocate capital, where they build, to the services that consumers can purchase.
From the profits that ISPs can realize and how they market and advertise services to the discounts and promotions that consumers can receive.
If...
The FCC will be empowered for the first time to regulate every ISP's service termination terms, use of customer credit, account history, credit checks, account termination, among other items.
He said...
This plan reads like a document drawn up in the faculty lounge of a university's Soviet Studies department.
It includes plans to empower the FCC to regulate every single aspect of the internet for the first time ever.
You have an FCC policy advisor who has just read the plan.
He said, quote, to call it extreme or radical doesn't do this proposal justice.
Phil Kirpin has just come out and said, Biden is turning digital discrimination into a pretext for regulating everything for equity.
This is so far-reaching.
That it will mean, even the blaze, because we are on the backbone of the internet, we can be completely separate, everything.
But because we're on the backbone of the internet, we will now have to comply by government FCC regulations.
I have done broadcast under FCC regulations for 48 years.
I know what FCC regulations are like.
I also started before Reagan, I think it was before Reagan deregulated the radio waves and television waves.
I will tell you that those regulations Today would put this show out of business.
I could not do what I do today if they just went back to the regulations that were in the FCC back in the 40s and 60s and 80s.
chase geiser
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
I am Chase Geiser, your host today.
And what we saw in that first five minutes of the hour was Glenn Beck commenting on these new sweeping regulations that the Biden administration seems to be a proponent of, or advocating, or actually manifesting.
Regarding how the internet works, and of course, like everything, tyranny kind of comes in the guise of helping the vulnerable, helping the poor, protecting the rights of some group.
And so they make it about equity, but it has nothing to do with that.
The U.S. is to spend $42 billion to make internet access universal by 2030.
White House on Monday divvied up $42 billion among the nation's 50 states and U.S. territories to make access to high-speed broadband universal by 2030 as it launched a new publicity campaign for President Joe Biden's economic policies.
The funding under the Broadband Equity Access and Deployment Program was authorized by the $1 trillion 2021 infrastructure law Biden championed.
Spending will be based on a newly released Federal Communications Commission coverage map that details gaps in access.
Texas and California, the two most populous U.S. states, top the funding list at $3.1 billion and $1.9 billion, respectively.
But other less populous states like Virginia, Alabama, and Louisiana cracked the top 10 list for funding due to lack of broadband access.
These states have large rural areas with less internet connectivity than their major cities.
Of course, Starlink is basically just going to solve this anyway.
It's the biggest investment in high-speed internet ever because for today's economy to work for everyone, internet access is just as important as electricity or water or other basic services, Biden said in a White House address on Monday.
Of course, this is the type of language that politicians use when they want to get something sort of reframed as a utility or a basic right so that they can then control it.
And they issued a fact sheet.
Regarding this, this is on June 26th of this year.
It sort of went under my radar until I saw that Glenn Beck clip.
Fact sheet, Biden-Harris administration announces over $40 billion to connect everyone in America to affordable, reliable, high-speed internet.
It goes on to say high-speed internet is no longer a luxury.
This is from the WhiteHouse.gov.
It is necessary for Americans to do their jobs, to participate equally in school, access healthcare, and to stay connected with family and friends.
Yet more than 8.5 million households and small businesses are in areas where there is no high-speed internet infrastructure.
And millions more struggle with limited or unreliable internet options, just like Franklin Delano Roosevelt's Rural Electrification Act brought electricity to nearly every home and farm in America.
President Biden and Vice President Harris Are delivering on their historic commitment to connect everyone in America to reliable, affordable, high-speed internet by the end of the decade.
Okay, so what are the details?
Awards range from $27 million to over $3.3 billion per state, depending on population and gaps in connectivity.
With these allocations and other Biden administration investments, all 50 states, D.C. and the territories now have the resources to connect every resident and small business to reliable, affordable, high-speed Internet by 2030.
We go on to talk about Internet for All.
Today's announcement of BEAD, which is the acronym, of course, funds, is just one component of the Biden-Harris administration's effort to ensure that everyone in America has access to affordable, reliable.
They say the same stuff over and over again because they just really want to drill it into your head, guys.
In recent weeks, the administration has announced over $700 million in USDA Reconnect Awards and over $900 million in NCIA Middle Mile Awards and launched the Online for All campaign to increase ACP enrollment and visibility.
Beyond B, billions have already been announced or distributed to all states and territories to build out high-speed internet.
So, basically, they're framing it as this major connectivity program.
And they have this fact sheet here, but...
The FCC commissioner has called Biden's equity plan for internet control sweeping unprecedented and lawful.
So it sort of ties into that funding to get everybody on the internet.
The Federal Communications Commissioner, Brendan Carr, is calling the Biden administration's digital equity plan for all internet services and infrastructure an unlawful power grab.
So how does this play out as an unlawful power grab?
Quote, President Biden's plan...
Hands the administrative state effective control of all internet services and infrastructure in the country.
Never before in the roughly 40-year history of the public internet has the FCC, or any federal agency for that matter, claimed this degree of control over it.
Indeed, President Biden's plan calls for the FCC to apply a far-reaching set of government controls that the agency has not applied to any technology in the modern era, including Title II common carriers, Carr said in a statement on Monday.
Carr previewed an important FCC vote next week on November 15th about whether to implement the president's plan.
Tweeted, next week the FCC will vote on President Biden's plan to give administrative state effective control of all internet services and infrastructure.
I oppose Biden's sweeping unprecedented and unlawful plan.
Congress never contemplated the sweeping regulatory regime that President Biden asked the FCC to adopt, let alone authorized the agency to implement it, he said.
He explained that the Biden administration's broadband policies are failing and the costs of building internet infrastructure in this country have skyrocketed due to its economic policies.
While the FCC has been looking to expand new 5G services, it has needlessly blocked and delayed new broadband infrastructure builds because of regulatory red tape.
If passed, the FCC would be empowered for the first time to regulate every ISP's service termination terms.
Use of customer credit, account history, credit checks, and account termination among many other items.
This is the one sentence right here at the bottom that matters.
This is what Glenn was talking about.
So the ISP is the internet service provider.
They are the ones that actually provide you with internet at your house.
Many of us have Verizon or Google Fiber or AT&T. And as you know, if you moved from one part of town to another part of town or one city to another city, oftentimes when you go to a new location, there may only be one option.
Because it's a very difficult business to get in with a lot of regulation, so there aren't a lot of people that are just running around as internet service providers.
So there's a couple of big names, a few big names that have really gotten into the business, and they pretty much have the monopoly on it, sort of like big tech.
And so if this legislation passes, the FCC would be empowered for the first time to regulate every ISP's service termination terms.
So, your internet service provider can terminate their service to you for a number of reasons.
I haven't looked at all the terms directly.
I haven't even read the terms for my ISP, for example.
But I imagine if you're doing illegal things on the internet, then your internet service provider can cut you off.
Like... Things like underage, nudity, inappropriate content like that.
If you're engaged in terrorist activity, if you're sending money to organizations that you're not lawfully allowed to send money to, if you're purchasing illegal substances over the internet, things like that, the ISP can cut you off.
Or if they just don't like you, I imagine that they can.
But now, if the FCC is going to have that sort of jurisdiction, then all of a sudden...
We become vulnerable as a people, not only to whether or not a corporation is woke, but to whether or not the politicians in charge of the FCC are comfortable with the things that we say and do on the internet, or the things that we say and do at all.
So Infowars, obviously, is a very controversial news platform.
It's constantly reported on by the mainstream media because they don't want you to watch us because we are their competitor.
And they lie about us and then they shut us down so that we can't respond on any traditional platforms, any big tech platforms.
But imagine if it wasn't just the Googles or the Twitters or the Facebooks or the Instagrams that got together and conspired to censor Infowars, but if it was just up to some committee at the FCC to say, you know what, we're not going to allow that company to have internet in its building.
Then we would never be able to broadcast to you unless, of course, we were just using our cell phones somehow.
But this is a path to censorship and control that is unprecedented.
It's very ugly. And you'll see, like we read from the White House and the other announcements regarding this plan, they frame it as a way to make sure that everybody has high-speed internet all over the country, like it's going to help poor people or people in rural communities.
It's going to help kids do better at school.
And really what it's about is making sure that they have all of the control over the internet, how it's used, tracking everything that's done on the internet, All of your data, every website you've ever gone to, every embarrassing thing you've ever done, said or viewed on the internet, the government then would be able to look at that traffic, look at that feed and Potentially leverage that information.
It seems to me to be a very, very serious violation of personal privacy.
Probably the Fourth Amendment.
I hope that it doesn't hold up.
But this seems to me to be very inappropriate.
We're going to cut to break right now.
We'll be back in the next segment with more news.
Make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com today.
Check out the Ultra 12, which is back.
Experience the power of B12. It's 40% off.
You can shop now. We're doing a great job with the graphics on InfoWarsStore.com.
That looks awesome. I can't wait to have some.
unidentified
B12.7. We'll take it with this folks.
chase geiser
We'll be right back. Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
This song always makes me want to watch The Office so badly.
It's such a good song. It was my...
Yeah, Office Space.
Excuse me. I always mix them up. That was my hooky song whenever I would pretend to be sick in high school.
I would watch Office Space.
unidentified
Hooky song. Hooky movie.
chase geiser
So, a couple of great reports coming out from warroom.org.
Great work. Coming from the writers over there and, of course, Steve Bannon.
Tying together, Hunter Biden's Chinese firm brokered illicit weapons deals for Qatar and Libya, which fund Hamas.
Moreover, Hunter Biden's Chinese firm helped Iranian company access sanctioned funds and broker illegal oil deals.
Of course, we know that Iran is responsible for funding Hamas as well and supporting and trading Hamas.
And then finally, Google-backed, Biden-linked tech firm behind Central Bank Digital Currency Fund's nuke program that fines and penalizes users for sharing misinformation.
So the Bidens have successfully positioned themselves for their entirety of their careers to expand the deep state, empower the deep state, and make money off of it at the same time.
And it's probably why they've never actually come under any sort of judgment, because a lot of the things that they found a way to make money off of are things that our deep state wants so badly.
We know that after 9-11, it was used as a pretext to usher in the Patriot Act, which was then, of course, used to create mass surveillance both domestically and abroad.
And, of course, that came out as the fact of the matter with Edward Snowden, and he had to flee the country to Russia, of all places.
But nobody was held accountable here.
And even though most of the Patriot Act has expired, it's almost certainly the case that the government is still doing all of the same things that it was doing before.
After all, whenever the CIA or the FBI gets caught doing anything corrupt, it never seems like anyone actually is held accountable.
We get reports from these institutions that, oh, they changed management or they moved someone to a different position, similar to the reports that we heard from the Catholic Church after they got busted for moving pedophiles from parish to parish.
And so we see here that speaking of pedophiles, we've had the Bidens Investing in these sort of deep state operations, making millions upon millions of dollars on kickback, lining their own pockets to the tune of millions upon millions of dollars, 10% for the big guy,
of course. And no one's ever held them accountable because why would the Department of Justice or the FBI or the CIA get in the way of these politicians who are basically operating as operatives on their behalf?
So if the intelligence community wants Iran or Hamas or Libya or Qatar to be armed so that there's likely to be terrorism in the Middle East, which they could then use as a pretext to get us involved...
So that we can protect the petrodollar.
Why would they stop these politicians from doing this?
And frankly, we've seen from the emails that many of the communications and relationships that Hunter Biden had were with people that were, if not in the intelligence community, people that were formerly in the intelligence community.
So it was all sort of just one conglomerated mass of power and corruption of which no one to this day has been held accountable.
And there's no way that Hunter's ever going to go to prison for any of this, because we know that if...
Joe Biden is about to leave office.
The first thing that he's going to do is just do a universal pardon across the board.
And it's a common misconception that you actually have to be charged with a crime in order to be pardoned for it.
Mass pardoning is something that the president can do.
Nixon was not charged formally with any crimes.
And he was pardoned and let off the hook.
So I think what's going to happen is Hunter's going to get pardoned.
Biden's going to step out at some point.
And That's going to be the end of the story.
I think they're going to actually get away with it.
I could be totally wrong about this, but it seems to me that the evidence has been publicly available for, what is it now, three years?
2019, 2020?
It was the summer of 2020, I think, that this laptop really became public information.
So we've had researchers, journalists, individuals looking into this laptop, the texts, the emails, the details of it for years, four years now, three years now.
And no one has been held accountable.
And our intelligence community is always acting like it's doing an investigation or collecting more evidence.
But how much more evidence do you possibly need to collect?
I mean, it was all on the laptop.
I think the reason that Hunter Biden hasn't been prosecuted any further yet is because I think he's cooperating.
He's flipped. And he's working for him.
He was working for him before on the one hand, but now that he's busted, he's working for him on the other hand.
I suppose the worst case scenario for him would be that he would get Epstein'd or something of that nature.
But they wanted Joe Biden, of all the people, of all the 350 million people that could be president of the United States in this country, the Democrats decided to run Joe Biden not because he was some sort of brilliant mass of talent and charm, but because they knew that he was entirely malleable and that he was compromised.
So if you're entirely compromised in terms of the intelligence community knowing every crime that you've committed, knowing every crime that your son has committed...
Both personal crimes and sort of inappropriate crimes in terms of behavior with minors and things like that, and actual political crimes, political corruption.
If the intelligence community knows all that about you, they can come to your door and they can say, I'm sorry, I know you wanted to retire, but you are going to be president.
The upside for you is that you'll be able to pardon Hunter, and no one's going to get in trouble, but you're going to do everything that we say while you're the president of the United States.
And that's why we've had a president who's been on vacation more than he's been We're good to go.
And so rather than have our country led by the whim of any given person every four or eight years, they do everything they can to make sure they can compromise our leaders as much as possible, because after all, that is how they can control them.
And so while every wrong decision seems to have been made by this president along the way, it does seem to be conducive To an intelligence agenda.
If the intelligence community wants us to be involved in World War III for one reason or the other, if it's because they want to unseat Iran before the next leader comes in Iran and has nuclear power, or if they want to protect the petrodollar and ensure that oil is perpetually traded with U.S. dollars, whatever reason that they want us to be in the Middle East, they have catalyzed that environment with this president.
By having him make every wrong decision, every seemingly stupid decision, we are in a position now where we can get back to the Middle East.
And we know that the intelligence community wants us in the Middle East for one reason or another.
If we don't know the reason, we know they want us there.
Because after 9-11, they had us invade Afghanistan.
And then they had us invade Iraq over the lies of weapons of mass destruction.
Then for some reason we decided to assassinate Gaddafi or wipe him out for who knows why.
So for some reason, the powers that be want us in the Middle East.
And it could just be as simple as military contractors wanting the business.
But I think the reasons are more nefarious and intentional than that.
I think it has to do with the petrodollar.
And so we have a compromised president, if not compromised by China, then compromised by our very own intelligence community, which has become the unchecked fourth branch of government held accountable by no one.
Stick with us, folks, a great guest in the next segment.
George Papadopoulos will be joining us.
Visit InfoWarsStore.com and make sure you don't go too far away.
Great guesses on your side.
Welcome back to the American Journal.
Ladies and gentlemen, I am your host today, Chase Geiser.
And with us for the next two segments, I have a very distinguished guest.
George Papadopoulos is a former member of the Foreign Policy Advisory Panel to Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign and a former advisor to Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Dr.
Ben Carson. I highly recommend this book.
I did actually read this book Check them out at GeorgePapa, P-A-P-A, 19, on X. George, it's an honor and a pleasure to be with you.
I think you've gotten married since the last time we spoke.
unidentified
Is that right? Yes.
george papadopoulos
Thanks a lot for having me, Chase.
Yes, I have. We have gotten married since the last time we spoke, and a lot of things have been going on, both personally and, of course, nationally and internationally.
So it's great to be back with you.
chase geiser
Well, congratulations on your...
Obviously, there's a lot going on in terms of the intelligence and foreign policy stuff going on right now.
And so I am a layman who just looks into things with the limited critical thinking skills that I have.
And I find myself, perhaps because I'm just a conspiracy-leaning guy, leaning toward, for some reason, the intelligence community wants us to be involved in World War III other than just a...
Sort of sense of kinship for Israel and Judeo-Christian values, kind of how they say.
What's really going on, man?
george papadopoulos
Well, look, Chase, I don't think you're wrong to have, you know, some kind of thinking outside the box tendencies, if you will, because as you explained at the introduction, look what we've gone through as a country since at least 2016 with the intelligence agencies.
We've had the intelligence agencies subtly interfere in the 2016 election and then overtly in the 2020 election.
And now the intelligence agencies, with the help of the media and the so-called kangaroo courts, are trying to thrust a former president in prison to prevent him from actually ascending to the White House.
So there's actually no reason for you to really put so much confidence in what the intelligence community is telling you because they've actually been proven to be liars and they've been proven to not look out for the interests of the United States and its citizens.
Now, moving forward and talking about the current situation, you're absolutely right.
If you follow the narrative that's been established since October 7, October 8, is that the Israeli border security, let's say, between Gaza and Israel proper was breached by a group of Very unsophisticated people from Hamas who really don't have training, don't really have sophisticated arms, don't have the ability to really maneuver throughout the external world.
And this border was breached.
It led to over 1,000 people shamelessly killed.
It was, of course, a horrific and disgusting act when any civilians are murdered.
And then that, of course, resulted in this overwhelming response by the Israeli forces based on its right to survive, its right to self-defense, etc.
We've heard this narrative over and over, over the last, I don't know, 15 years, ever since Hamas was established in Gaza.
Now, what's interesting...
About the current situation and something that I've really been involved with since 2010 and just looking at the current, you know, trade routes and the energy situation is that Israel and its situation geopolitically and even geoeconomically is not the same as it was in the 67 war, in the 73 war, or even when Hamas was founded before 2010.
In 2010, natural gas and oil was discovered for the first time in history offshore Israel.
This was a project that I was very intimately involved with from 2011 up until 2015, right before I advised Ben Carson and Donald Trump.
And that's really why I was targeted with all the spying and all this nonsense, but that's a different story.
And at the same exact moment, you had this collapse of relationships between Israel, Turkey, and Egypt because of the Muslim Brotherhood coming into power, Turkey becoming this Islamist powerhouse.
So Israel found itself isolated.
And so what did it have to do?
It had to build these new alliances with Greece, with Cyprus, with the United States, and India.
So people keep asking, "Why is India so supportive of Israel all of a sudden?
What's all this stuff going on with Modi, with Netanyahu?
Why do you see all the Israeli flags waving with the Indian flags, all this kind of stuff?
And the reason it's happening...
It's because at the UN General Assembly, just three or four weeks ago, I think it was four weeks ago, Netanyahu held up a map of the Middle East, and he said, two years ago when I came to this UN General Assembly, I was holding up a picture of a bomb showing how close Iran was apparently to a nuclear weapon.
Today, meeting at the UN General Assembly, I'm showing a new trade map, a new architecture of the Middle East that redefines borders, redefines trade routes, and energy.
And this is what we're working on.
That map that he showed—and this is public knowledge.
This isn't conspiracy stuff.
He was at the U.N. General Assembly holding this.
It shows a trade route from India through the United Arab Emirates into Saudi Arabia and Israel, exporting goods into Europe.
Now, why is this interesting?
Because during the Trump administration, you had the Abraham Accords.
And those Abraham Accords, the United Arab Emirates, of course, was part of that.
Saudi Arabia now is in discussions, or have been in discussions, to build an alliance with Israel.
And India and Israel have actually ossified this geopolitical relationship over the last five years or so under Modi.
So what I'm trying to say here is, the moment that this new trade corridor, that actually the United States is backing openly with Biden, To really overturn or usurp the Chinese trade route that they have sought to establish called the One Belt, One Road. You had this massacre happen.
You had this tit-for-tat.
You had all of this carnage once again.
And I believe—and I'm not saying that the Israelis did an inside job.
I'm not saying that at all. But what I'm saying is that I think that the attack by Hamas was a perfect excuse— By the US intelligence community, by the Israelis, by the West in general, to really eradicate Hamas once and for all, no matter what the cost was to the civilians, to Gaza, the Palestinian people, in order to create this corridor that actually goes directly through what is part of Gaza.
And if you just look at the map, you'll understand exactly what I'm talking about here.
So it's called the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor.
And I posted it on X. If people are interested, they could follow the map of what I'm talking about here.
So what I think is really happening is that's one issue.
And the second issue, probably even more important than that, people keep saying, why is Turkey, which is NATO's second largest military, Why is Turkey all of a sudden thrust into this conflict?
Why is Turkey all of a sudden not meeting with Antony Blinken?
Why are they saying that we don't recognize Netanyahu anymore?
Why are they hosting these multi-million people rallies calling for Turkish troops in Gaza, Turkish troops in Jerusalem?
The reason that this is happening is because Turkey has been vying with We're good to go.
Historically, all of this trade from Asia into Europe goes through the Suez Canal.
Egypt gets around $8 billion through transit fees a year in an impoverished country that's run by a military dictatorship.
And I know Egypt very well because I actually had organized the meeting that Trump had with Egypt's president while he was a candidate at the UN General Assembly.
And Egypt, the reason you see Egypt say, hey, we're not taking in the Palestinians, we don't want these people, is because they understand that if they take in the Palestinians, two things are going to happen to them.
One, Hamas is simply going to launch rocket attacks from their territory into Israel.
And two, it's going to allow them to be in direct competition with the Israelis for this trade route.
So that is a really, I guess, short...
chase geiser
Wow. We have to cut the break here in about 10 seconds, so stick with us.
We've got one more segment with you, George.
I have so many questions. I could talk to you for hours.
Thank you so much for joining us this morning.
We'll get more into it in the next segment, folks.
Make sure in the meantime you visit Infowarsstore.com and check out Deep State Target on Amazon today.
Get George's book. It is outstanding.
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
I'm Chase Geiser, your host today with a very special guest, George Papadopoulos.
Thank you so much, George, for being so gracious with your time and sharing a piece of your expertise with us this morning.
When I look at things like all of the weapons we seemingly foolishly left behind in Afghanistan and different reports, I'm hearing that this attack on October 7th had been planned for a couple of years, basically since we left Afghanistan.
And then taking that into consideration with the fact that we know Mossad is a very sophisticated intelligence organization, we know it was the 50-year anniversary almost to the day of Yom Kippur, it seems to me very hard to believe that they didn't know it was going to happen.
I'm not saying that Israel as a government planned it, but do you think that they were complicit?
george papadopoulos
Well, look, I mean, heads have to roll.
I mean, no matter what really happened here, really the blame squarely is on Netanyahu, because at the end of the day, the prime minister's principal duty is to protect his citizens, right?
So I don't think Netanyahu is actually going to survive this politically.
I mean, he's facing corruption, you know, charges simultaneously with this fiasco, and I don't think this is going the way that the Israelis hoped it would, because it's very simple.
The Middle East is not the same Middle East it was in 67, 73, 2008, 2003, or even five years ago.
Things are moving very quickly.
The Middle East today is actually probably more unified, meaning the Muslim world I think?
And a lot of this has to do with China brokering the Iran-Saudi Arabia deal over the last year, is that even the Shiite Muslims with the Sunni Muslims are uniting and condemning what's going on.
And when you add Russia in the Middle East, which really controls all of Syria, Wagner Group now sending anti-air defense systems into Lebanon to basically protect Hezbollah in the event of a conflict in the north, and China openly condemning Israel and saying we're supporting and China openly condemning Israel and saying we're supporting a Palestinian state, with the United States now sending military into the region, it doesn't bode well for the United States citizen or the United States taxpayer because if COVID,
it doesn't bode well for the United States citizen or the United States taxpayer, because if COVID, if World War III is a new COVID, which that's what it really looks like is happening, because instead of actually focusing on the domestic home front, securing our because instead of actually focusing on the domestic home front, securing our border, and helping the American citizen, what's He's just launching all these foreign wars to distract people, to raise inflation, to destroy the economy,
And I think if this situation continues to heat up with any of these people, with any of these countries, including Russia, China, Iran, Turkey, then I think we're going to see another rally around the flag type of distraction into this election year.
And that's something that I hope the American people see right through.
Vote this guy out.
Get Trump back into office or somebody, you know, similar to him, which I don't think there is in this GOP field, and really set America back on course because this is actually where we're going.
chase geiser
With the changing landscape abroad, is there any path forward for China to do something like subvert the dollar in terms of being a global reserve currency?
Now that Ukraine is basically going to be under control of Russia...
And I'm not sophisticated in this space.
Obviously you are. That's why I'm talking to you.
But it seems like they could replace a lot of their trade, their agriculture imports from the United States with working with Ukraine through Russia then to sort of supplant that.
And they could become independent of the United States in a way that they haven't been for the last, basically since the Great Leap Forward.
If that were the case, would there be an avenue for them to switch the reserve currency, change how OPEC exchanges or trades oil from the dollar to the yen?
george papadopoulos
I'm very happy that you've mentioned that because in the first segment, this entire new trade route that I was describing, the redesigning or the restructuring of trade and energy is actually all part of China's plan To really embolden the BRICS to replace not only the U.S. as the preeminent superpower,
but also the dollar as the reserve currency into this more multidenominational currency system or a BRICS-led dollar replacement or even digitization of currency.
And let me give you some examples of what's happening as well.
World War III, in my opinion, has already started, and it started in Ukraine, but there's a lot of action on the continent of Africa, too.
People really aren't focusing on what's happening there, but there have been four coups in various African countries over the past year and a half.
As a colonial, ex-colonial power in Africa, and that's where Wagner Group with Russia is really supporting a lot of these coups going against France and basically muscling the French government into telling them, look, two things are going to happen if you keep supporting Ukraine.
One, you're going to have problems in your ex-colonies, which are your sources for most of your natural resources and minerals and uranium.
And two, we're going to get these countries to join BRICS. And that's why South Africa is now a major country in this new BRICS alignment.
You have Brazil. And what the Americans and the Europeans are terrified about, especially the Americans, are seeing these African countries actually align closer with Russia and China.
So watch a lot of what's happening in Africa because it's very important regarding that.
And the second thing is...
By this trade structure that China's developing called the One Belt, One Road, the reason I believe, and this is speculation at this point, but I think I'm going to be proven right, I think the reason that the Americans and the Europeans now are trying to make India the hub of this new trade corridor to basically try to replace China as the world's manufacturing hub is because they lost Afghanistan and China and Russia are building these railroads,
these pipelines, all of this stuff from China into Turkey, then into Europe.
That's what their goal is. But they don't want India to go and join this group with BRICS, because if India, with a population of over a billion, a potential new economic superpower, joins BRICS, it's game over.
So I really think that's why you almost see the Biden administration now desperate We're good to go.
Why is Biden all of a sudden, Bernie Sanders, all these people so hawkish, so war-prone in Israel when the Democrat Party has gone so to the left and are actually kind of anti-Israel, anti-this pro-Israel stance?
And their main reason is, based on what you just said, it's about securing the dollar, It's about hindering BRICS and it's about cutting out the Chinese as the global manufacturing hub.
Now, when you combine all of these together, it's going to be inevitable that there's going to be a conflict because it's a zero-sum game.
Either the US wins or China wins, and then you have the Russian aspect as well.
So this is where, unfortunately, we're all going, and it really has to do with finance, with the dollar, with trade.
And with oil and gas and the people are left behind.
chase geiser
So that explains why we have such an interest in supporting Israel aside from the sort of traditional semantics that our politicians use about Judeo-Christian values and things like that.
Why did we have such an interest in Ukraine?
I mean, it seems so reckless to me that we would give them billions upon billions of dollars knowing that they were inevitably going to lose.
We could have got the same outcome for free, right?
george papadopoulos
So what was going on there? Ukraine is another hornet's nest.
Ukraine basically—and look, when people say that this was an impromptu or random invasion by Putin into Ukraine, I just laugh at it, right?
Because you have to put yourself in his position.
Imagine if Russia or China or Iran, let's say one of these axis of evil countries, if you want to call them that, began to finance fringe elements within Mexico who had aspirations of reclaiming lost Mexican territory in the American Southwest, Texas, et cetera, along the border.
And that group not only was financing these fringe elements with these aspirations of reclaiming territory, but also this group and this country, which was harboring these elements, was going to be part of a security guarantee with those countries that potentially would was going to be part of a security guarantee with those countries that potentially would have missiles and even nuclear Now, of course, the United States would never allow Mexico to become that type of country.
That's what Ukraine essentially was on the verge of becoming ever since the coup attempt in 2014.
What that was really all about, in my opinion, was cutting out the Russians from trading with Europe, making Ukraine this NATO vassal state to be aggressive towards Russia.
It failed. The Russians are going to win, and the American taxpayer loses once again.
chase geiser
Thank you so much for joining us, George.
It's an honor and a pleasure to be with you.
I hope you have a great rest of your day.
Always fascinating to speak with you.
And make sure, audience, that you guys check out Deep State Target on Amazon.
It's an outstanding book.
unidentified
book.
chase geiser
He's really, truly a brilliant mind in this space.
greg reese
The dark cabal, herding us like sheep, is only able to maintain its power by staying invisible.
The most effective way of maintaining invisibility is and always has been the art of dividing the masses.
This psychological operation, known as divide and conquer, has been deployed for all of recorded history because it works, especially with organized religion, which is ruled by dogma Rather than a personal relationship with God.
Dogma is a belief doctrine dictated by a church.
And if you were born into a dogmatic family, then you were raised to believe their dogma.
As a result, you will see all conflicting religious dogma as evil.
You will be divided and conquered.
The main religions used to divide and conquer mankind are the three Abrahamic religions.
Judaic dogma teaches the Jew that they are a member of the chosen race destined to rule over everyone else as a teacher of God's law.
Islamic dogma teaches that all of mankind must somehow submit to Islam.
And while there are reportedly 40,000 different denominations of Christianity, most Christian dogma teaches That Christians will live in paradise for eternity while everyone else burns in hell.
Many people raised in these religions have been able to personally connect with God and liberate themselves from the divisive dogma.
But many others are stuck in group mind think.
They conflate Holy Scripture and a priest class with God and put their faith in a doctrine written by man.
It has become the most powerful form of mind control, and so whoever controls the Holy Land controls the world.
In Revelation 2-9 of the King James Bible, it warns of the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
We are beginning to see this today with the Zionists who say they are Jews and are not.
With the help of the United Nations, the British Crown, the Vatican, the Nazis, and the Rothschild banking dynasty, the land formerly known as Palestine was conquered with bloodshed, lies, and bureaucracy.
The Zionists, who claimed to be secular, declared the land to be Israel, home of the Jews, and successfully thrust the once thriving Middle East back into the Middle Ages.
The relatively peaceful region was soon transformed into an unending war zone.
Decades of U.S. war crimes radicalized many of the Muslim population into becoming terrorists.
The creation of the State of Israel in 1948 would have never been successful if it were not for the Jewish Holocaust.
Even though the Palestinians had nothing to do with it, the Holocaust was effectively used as an emotional excuse for what would otherwise be an illegal land grab.
And while few deny that Hitler was murdering Jews, many have pointed out that six million would have been logistically impossible.
So why the number six million?
For several decades preceding World War II, the Zionists repeated the mantra six million, referring to the death of six million Jews.
A six followed by six zeros can also be read as 66, which can be read as two-thirds.
Certain radical sects of Judaism and Christianity believe that two-thirds of the Jews must perish.
It appears as if the Zionists created Israel as a sacrificial altar to make this happen, repeating the lesser magic mantra of what they want to make manifest.
Today we are seeing Zionists begging for genocide, calling out to kill them all, and gaslighting us into thinking there never was a Palestine, while saying we should flatten it and turn it into glass.
We are seeing Christian pastors cheer for mass murder, pastors saying that Israel should make the Gaza Strip a parking lot, and several evangelical pastors who speak as if Christ will only return if we provide him the blood sacrifice taught in their extreme dogma.
As Israel pushes forward, radicalized young Muslim men who have had their homes destroyed by American bombs are now spread throughout Western nations.
The stage is set for the Holy War, and many are willing to murder in the name of their dogmatic beliefs.
Extremists of all three religions are being used by the hidden hand to foment this war, while the Catholic Church has been making preparations for a one-world religion solution.
Divided, we will be conquered.
But united, we could learn to live as one, in peace.
Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese.
unidentified
We'll be right back.
And you can tell I'm resting.
Answer the question.
I, would you stop screaming?
Answer the question.
The answer is no.
And here's the thing.
Answer my question, you authoritarian.
alex jones
Carrying it.
unidentified
We're in. Hello?
alex jones
Yes, turn the radio off.
unidentified
Hello, yeah.
Turn the radio off.
Go ahead.
Turn it off.
Good.
Yes.
I love it.
alex jones
I'm sorry.
I love you, Frank.
Go ahead.
unidentified
Yeah, yeah. Can you hear me?
Yeah! Of course I can hear you!
I just went to ya!
alex jones
877-789-2539.
chase geiser
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
I am Chase Geiser, your host today.
We're going to be taking calls this hour and covering more news.
Make sure you call in 877-789-2539.
Again, that's 877-789-2539.
And let us know what's on your mind today.
Great guest. The last couple of segments, George Papadopoulos is such an impressive man, such an expert on foreign policy and everything going on in the world, around the world.
It was really delightful to hear from him.
I highly recommend if you missed that, check that out later on band.video.
And make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com today and be the reason we're still on the air.
This new report from Dan Lyman.
UK allies suspend participation in Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces after Russia's withdrawal.
The United Kingdom and its allies have decided to suspend participation in the Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, otherwise known as the CFE, after Russia's withdrawal, the Foreign Office said on Tuesday.
In response to Russia's move, quote, the UK alongside its allies has decided to suspend its participation in the treaty and to work with like-minded nations to develop and implement voluntary stabilizing measures, the office said in a statement.
Earlier, the Russian foreign ministry said it had already notified all states' parties to the CFV treaty of its decision to withdraw from November 7th.
The Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe was signed in Paris, France on November 19, 1990 by the Planet Potentiaries of 16 NATO member states and 6 Warsaw Pact member states and entered into force on November 9th of 1992.
So, seems like things are continuing to fall apart in Europe and the surrounding regions.
Basically, everywhere in the world seems like things are falling apart.
I had never heard that theory that George Papadopoulos shared with us during the last couple of segments.
About the trade routes that go directly through the Gaza region and how this could be a dangerous competitor to China, which would explain why China is backing Iran and Iran is backing, of course, Hamas in an effort to maintain some sort of control over the region to prevent a competitor from coming in.
But it does seem that this conflict is actually all tied to maintaining the United States government And the US dollar is the global reserve currency.
That seems to be the real motive behind this.
It's all about trade and monetary policy.
And I think our intelligence community is using that as an excuse to allow or support these atrocious things from happening, whether it's atrocious things that happen to the Israelis or atrocious things that happen to the Palestinians, because they think in a Machiavellian way, they think in a way That is utilitarian.
It's okay to kill one innocent person if it means you're going to save 10 innocent people down the road.
So it's okay for this conflict to amount to tens of thousands of innocent casualties or deaths, even if they're women and children, as long as it maintains the dollar as the global reserve currency.
Because after all, if there's a collapse of our currency and a total shift in power dynamics, economic dynamics worldwide, it does have an impact on the lives of our people.
That's what they're thinking. And so they perpetuate these wars.
They do these sanctions that catalyze these nations to wanting to get out of the dollar because we manifest our control over them through these sanctions.
And so they create the problem that they aim to solve, but I think in their own twisted way, they actually think that they're doing the right thing, our intelligence community, some of them at least.
And that's part of what's so disturbing about it.
Everybody always thinks that they're right, and that's the reason we're supposed to have checks and balances in our government.
Because our founding fathers understood that no matter how good one's intentions are, similar to the Ring of Power in Lord of the Rings, you cannot wield absolute power and maintain absolute character.
So we're supposed to have checks and balances to ensure that no individual branch or person or politician has the opportunity to get too carried away with power.
But as a result of World War II, which ultimately came as a result of the establishment of the Federal Reserve Bank, We have this giant military-industrial complex and this giant intelligence community that is the unchecked fourth branch of government.
Make sure you call on 877-789-2539.
Again, that's 877-789-2539.
Right off of the bat, let's hear from Hammer Hardy in Florida.
Hammer, what's up? Hey, Chase.
unidentified
Good morning. How's it going? I'm doing good, man.
chase geiser
How are you doing? Good.
unidentified
Glad to hear it. I'm calling because...
I wanted to say right off the bat, I'm disappointed in some of the members of the Christian community.
I'm Christian myself, and I keep hearing over and over again that because of what Hamas did to Israel, then that justifies what Israel is doing to Hamas.
And as a Christian, We're supposed to be holding ourselves to a higher standard, but I hear so many people reverting back to the Old Testament when we're supposed to be going off of the teachings of Jesus.
But even if we put that aside, would we as Americans allow ourselves to use that same type of logic?
And going off of Owen Schroyer, he always says if a standard can't be applied evenly, then it's not logic, it's propaganda.
So let's just put ourselves in their shoes.
America and American citizens are constantly being attacked by Mexican drug cartels.
So does that mean that by that same standard, America can go in and just indiscriminately bomb Mexican citizens and take over their land because Mexican drug cartels won't stop attacking us?
Because that's the logic that's being used to defend the actions of Israel.
chase geiser
That's kind of what we did with Afghanistan and Iraq, right?
We had these terrorists that flew into the buildings, and then we invaded one country and then another country over weapons of mass destruction that didn't exist.
And then we finally assassinated the culprit, Osama bin Laden, the alleged culprit.
He was in Pakistan. He wasn't even in the countries that we invaded.
And I don't know what the numbers are. You guys would have to look it up.
But I think as many as a half a million people Yeah, and Obama, Well, yeah, and not only that, but Obama, he had bombed an entire wedding ceremony to get one guy.
unidentified
And he was put down for that, and we didn't accept that as an acceptable excuse.
He got a lot of beef for that.
Unfortunately, nothing was really done about it, but nobody praised him for it.
But it seems like, I don't know, it's like, you know, anytime Israel does something, all the teachings of Jesus just go out the window with the Christian community.
And it's really, it's shameful, man.
I mean, lack of a better word, I'm embarrassed.
chase geiser
Well, I saw the same thing, too, from the political side.
Not even the Christian side, but from the political side.
We had a lot of right-wing influencers on Twitter who have been tweeting and advocating on behalf of the January 6th prisoners for two years as protected free speech.
They were just protesting, whatever.
And then as soon as you see stories of arrests of Palestinian protesters in like France or something like that where they can actually arrest people for their speech, we have our conservative voices celebrating their arrest.
It's like, whoa, you either believe in free speech or you don't, isn't that right?
unidentified
Yeah, absolutely.
And you're either America first or you're not.
chase geiser
100%, Aaron. Thank you so much for calling in.
and I appreciate it.
Can we run clip six?
unidentified
Government was trying to do the right thing.
Try and help our peers and we're going to invest in humanitarian aid and all this other stuff all over the world.
Meanwhile, he's signing executive orders and using covert action to kill more people than any other president ever in history to try to keep America safe.
Because even in Obama's eyes, priority number one was not global civilization.
It was the United States.
But he kept a barrier between the two.
Like, the predominant political view of how career politicians manage the White House.
chase geiser
And then you were saying Trump is the...
unidentified
Trump came in... We'll be back after this break.
chase geiser
visit InfoWarsStore.com.
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
I am Chase Geiser, your host today.
Make sure you call in 877-789-2539.
Again, that's 877-789-2539.
I want to hear what you think about the news today and everything happening in the world.
Interesting dynamic going on between David Axelrod and Obama in the news.
Axelrod is famous for being...
Basically Barack Obama's Karl Rove.
A lot of people attribute Barack Obama's success in 2008 in terms of actually winning the election with Axelrod's campaign management.
And Karl Rove and David Axelrod even did a masterclass together online where you can learn about how to win a campaign.
They sat next to each other.
They were very friendly.
And it was funny to watch that because obviously they are polar opposites in terms of politics.
But they agreed on almost everything when it comes to the details, strategies, expertise around how to win a campaign.
Axelrod, of course, was part of a groundbreaking campaign in that it was really the first campaign in which social media was a major factor.
In 2008, Facebook had taken off enough, had enough critical mass that it was imperative that any candidate have a strong presence on social media.
And ultimately...
He helped Obama win that election.
So he's come out and sort of backpedaled some statements that were made before and said that he did not explicitly tell Biden to drop out.
David Axelrod's comments came shortly after he issued a viral tweet on a New York Times-Siena College poll that showed Biden down by 4 to 10 points in key battleground states.
After posting on social media that Joe Biden should consider whether to stay in the 2024 race, David Axelrod insisted in an interview that he was not calling on the president to suspend his campaign.
It's overreacting to say I told him to drop out, said the political architect of former President Barack Obama's victories.
I didn't do that.
He's the only one to make the decision and if his decision is no, I'm the best person to take this on.
And he will. X-Rod added.
So I don't really know how you can walk that back.
if you're telling somebody they should reconsider whether or not to do something, you're basically telling them you have substantial doubts about whether they should do it, right?
If it's somebody that you're close with, they trust.
But the interesting thing about him walking this back is we know that Axelrod is very close with Barack Obama, given that he's responsible for two of Barack Obama's presidential victories.
And this article starts with Obama wanting Biden out.
The king is angry with his pawn and wants a new one.
When Palestinians attacked Israel on the 7th of October, raping, torturing, beheading, and even burning to death civilians, Biden waited 48 hours before finally addressing the atrocities, perhaps delaying in the hope of Israel doing something so he could blame both sides.
Israel did not provide that opportunity for...
Response to the rape, torture, and slaughter of civilians by the Palestinian military.
So instead, Biden said, in this moment, we must be crystal clear.
We stand with Israel. We stand with Israel.
And we will make sure Israel has what it needs to take care of its citizens, defend itself, and respond to the attack.
Can we go ahead and run clip 15?
unidentified
Oh, no audio on it.
chase geiser
Well, this is him giving a speech and basically saying that we're always going to stay with it.
So, the article goes on to say, this infuriated the anti-Semitic racist who put Biden in the Oval Office, Barack Hussein Obama, who is now seeking to oust Biden and install Kamala Harris as president via the next stolen election.
Anyone else would be an admission by Democrats that they screwed up in 2020.
So, I think we have Obama pretending to be on Team Biden.
We have Axelrod pretending to be on Team Biden, but everybody in the Democratic establishment knows that it's time for these people to get out.
Okay, let's start taking calls.
Let's do Johnny in Denmark.
unidentified
Yeah, welcome back, Chase.
chase geiser
How are you, sir? Hello. Great.
unidentified
Nice to have you back. Welcome back.
Thank you. Yeah, you hit another great, not only grand slam today, but out of the park.
A tape measure job in center field.
I love today's show.
Thank you. You're welcome.
Thank you.
And I'd just like to compliment your supplement and your perspective.
Mr. Papadopoulos' perspective, my fellow Greek-American, on what's happening there.
And that's one thing I really appreciate about InfoWars analysis.
This is a very complex problem, and there are many dimensions to it.
So the analysis is necessarily multidimensional.
And as you mentioned before, Mr. Papadopoulos brought a new perspective to it today.
I'd like to bring another one.
And this is one that Dr.
Shiva harps on. I'm kind of Dr.
Shiva's de facto ambassador.
And that ties in with the themes that you were talking about, too, about support of the petrodollar and the world's reserve currency.
There are 2 billion, with a B, barrels of petroleum in the Israel-occupied territories.
Yep. Besides the petrodollar, there's 200 trillion with a TR cubic feet of natural gas.
And there's kind of, in my opinion, a global imperialist two-step going on here between Ukraine and Israel.
chase geiser
What they did over all the machinations in the Ukraine and destroying the Nord Stream pipelines I like where your head's at, because we think about this conflict as like a religious conflict or who has a right to the land conflict.
That's the narrative that's being pushed in the media.
They're saying that this is about whether you're anti-Semitic or Islamophobic or whether or not the Palestinians actually had a right to the land first or whether Abraham gave it to the Jews.
And they're trying to frame it as if it's this religious or racial issue.
And perhaps for the people on the ground, it is.
But in terms of the powers that be that are actually funding and orchestrating what's happening, it has nothing to do with any sort of religious values, in my opinion.
It's all about trade.
It's all about securing power.
It's all about making sure that our currency is strong and competing with China.
And they're thinking the same way. So we see these conflicts happen back to back to back to back, not because there's suddenly some new development in a religious...
Feud between two groups or a racial feud between two groups.
It's because the power dynamics are changing in a much more logical way than just zealotry.
Thank you so much for your call, Johnny. I appreciate it.
Let's hear from Josh in North Carolina.
unidentified
Oh, hey, man. Good to hear you.
Yeah, I kind of like what you guys were just...
It segues into what I was going to talk about, but my angle is a little bit more religious in that I think what people are a little bit glossing over here is that the Bible is not just A religious book, there's historical proof that's corroborated from other writings,
secular writings and manuscripts, and even archaeology proves a lot of the claims of the Bible pertaining to the issue of Israel and just them coming back into the land, them being scattered.
So the fact that it dares to make these projections or prophetic statements and assertions and then it comes to pass, Yeah, that's why people listen to InfoWars, right?
chase geiser
Because Alex Jones has made so many predictions that have come true.
And so you know you can trust it.
It's the same with the Bible. It's one of the things that's unique about the Bible compared to other religious texts is that so many of the prophecies seem to have come true.
unidentified
Very much so. And then, so, just kind of honing a little bit more in on that aspect of it, and then just with history, and now we are having, though, revisionist history related to that area.
chase geiser
Yeah, absolutely. Stay with us, Josh.
We're about ready to cut to break, and I don't want to cut you off before you get into your next thought.
I'll take you on the other side, though, and let you finish your thought.
In the meantime, guys, visit InfoWarsStore.com.
You'll be the reason we're still on the air.
We've got some awesome deals with Ultra 12, which is back in stock.
Get it now. Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
I am Chase Geiser, your host today.
Make sure you call on 877-789-2539.
Again, that's 877-789-2539.
Josh from North Carolina, I want to make sure you get a chance to finish your thought, and then we'll move on.
unidentified
Yeah, thanks, Chase.
I appreciate it, man. Yeah, and ultimately, all I'm trying to say is that I think that people are kind of more focused, and it's fair.
I get that. It kind of Yeah.
Yeah. To call that religious war, if that's what they would want to deem that, fine. There might be geopolitical aspects of that war as well in tow with the religious defense for Israel.
I believe that it is justified.
I don't believe what the media is saying.
And I totally believe that Hamas, with what they've shown in the past, did those heinous acts.
It's barbaric to another level.
chase geiser
Yeah, I agree.
unidentified
It really is. And I don't think Israel is trying to do that.
chase geiser
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt you, but the concern is...
How much of a response is a disproportionate amount?
And ultimately, it's sort of a moot question because I don't think the conflict that we're witnessing is actually about getting even with Hamas.
I legitimately just believe that Israel, for strategic and trade purposes, and the United States backs them on this, wants to have complete control over Gaza.
And so that's why they're wiping everyone out.
They want to make it such an uninhabitable place for the Palestinians that they either die or they leave.
And that's why we're seeing this sort of massacre happen.
Obviously, anytime innocent people are killed intentionally or with disregard, that's problematic.
But again, this conflict is not about just getting revenge for October 7th.
They're using October 7th as an excuse to actually just take the territory, in my opinion.
unidentified
Okay. Last question then on that.
Sure. To your premise.
But in the end, even...
It's, you know, and I'm passionate, and I know you are too, because nobody wants people, innocent people, to die.
I think we're morally on the same page there.
Yes. More so, I'm looking at it from the standpoint of...
Unfortunately, there is collateral in war, and even the Bible speaks about wars and rumors of wars.
It's inevitable with the human race.
We're fallen people.
But I'm just looking at it from the standpoint of how many times is Israel going to be attacked without The stated goal of their opposition is to annihilate them.
I don't think Israel's saying—they're saying eliminate a faction within the Palestinian region.
I don't think their objective is to wipe out all the people.
And I think, ultimately, from a religious standpoint, it's kind of— It kind of always beers back and forth between the religious and the political.
But, you know, and I'm willing to be wrong on some of my assertions.
You know, I recognize that I could have...
chase geiser
I guess that's the difference between Israel and Hamas, in my opinion, is Hamas intentionally wants to kill civilians.
That's their mission. Israel just doesn't care if it does.
Like, it doesn't go out to kill civilians, but if it does, it doesn't seem to care.
So there's not like a good versus evil here, in my opinion.
I'm talking about Israel as a government, too.
I'm not talking about the Jewish people or the Israeli people, per se.
But I think we have, like, sort of a neutral approach to civilians versus an intentionally antagonistic one.
And that's why I lean more in favor of Israel here.
But at the same time, I acknowledge that there is an unjust amount of innocent people being killed because it's more convenient to For Israel to just do it that way.
It's easier for them to just level the entire region than it is for them to go knock on doors and clear houses because they would get killed doing that.
It would be like Vietnam only in a city.
And just like you said, with collateral damage being inevitable, we saw with Nagasaki and Hiroshima, you drop a big one and even if it lands on a military target, there's a lot of civilians that die.
It's not something exclusive to Israel in terms of You know, a civilization or a nation killing civilians, knowing that civilians are going to die with an attack.
So thank you so much for your call, Josh. I appreciate it.
Let's hear next from Alex from Michigan.
Alex, what's on your mind, man?
unidentified
Hey, thanks for taking my call, man.
Yes, sir. I disagree with Greg Reese's report.
What about it, man? And I just...
I just wanted to...
Read some scripture and kind of, we can discuss secular facts, but I kind of just want to let the Holy Spirit flow.
Okay. You know, like, we can discuss secular facts about the Jesuits, Freemasons, and I support you having a discussion with Leo Zagami.
I think that would be a wonderful discussion on your show.
chase geiser
I'd love to. About, yeah.
unidentified
And so, yeah, I'll just read some scripture because people talk about the New Testament and the Lord Jesus Christ, but, you know, They don't want to talk about the writings of the apostles, like the Apostle Paul, which is the apostle to the Gentiles, and Romans 11 refutes replacement theology.
But the gospel that I feel like commissioned to discuss with you is 1 Corinthians 15, 1-4, Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also you have received, and wherein And he was seen by many,
and it goes on. But that's the gospel, that the Lord Jesus Christ died for our sins and was buried and risen again.
And we're in this grace dispensation.
It's called dispensationalism where Ephesians talks about the dispensation of grace where everybody has this free gift chance to be saved right now before the 70th week of Daniel begins.
chase geiser
I can't remember, Alex.
Are you a preterist or not?
unidentified
No, I don't believe the 70th week of Daniel happened like in 70 AD. I think that's all BS, Jesuit BS. What was I going to say?
chase geiser
I didn't mean to interrupt you. I just wanted to ask.
I'm sorry about that. That's okay.
You were talking about this passage that you just read and how it's the main message of Christianity.
unidentified
Yeah, just getting the gospel out.
That's the info where 1 Corinthians 15, 1-4, everybody should memorize that and just start memorizing scripture like the Protestants did.
That was our motto, sola scriptura.
Against all the Pope's heresies, like replacement theology, because that's what the Pope believes, replacement theology.
What is replacement theology? It's this belief that the Church replaced Israel, and people read all these verses, like Galatians, out of context, like, you know, because there is no difference right now between Jew and Gentile, like, I'm a Jew, and there's no difference between...
chase geiser
Right, because you're grappling into the line of Abraham when you get baptized, right?
unidentified
Well, with the Church, like, there's no difference.
If you believe right now, like, Revelation 5, 9, like, there's all these different races in the Church.
It's not just Israel.
Right. But Israel has this special place with prophecy with the Abrahamic covenant.
Right. It's the Levitical covenant that doesn't really matter, like, the Levitical priesthood that's temporarily suspended and doesn't really matter and will be done away with in New Heaven and New Earth after Millennial Kingdom, described in the end chapters of Ezekiel.
And so we believe that the future Antichrist will be the Pope, according to Daniel 9.26, because the Messiah was cut off.
chase geiser
Where does Daniel 9.26 say?
unidentified
That's the timeline for the Messiah.
To all Jews listening, that's our Messiah timeline, Daniel 9.24-27, the prophecy of the 70 weeks.
chase geiser
How is it interpreted that it's going to be the Pope that's the Antichrist?
unidentified
Well, we see when Messiah is cut off in Daniel 9.26, it says Messiah will be cut off, and the people of the prince who are to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary.
And so it was the Romans who destroyed the city and the sanctuary.
So we know it will be a Roman Antichrist, which either—so the Caesars— Alex, we're coming up on a break, man.
chase geiser
I hate to cut you off, but I gotta let you go.
Thanks so much for your call. I appreciate it.
In the meantime, guys, make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com.
Take advantage of these great deals and be the reason we're still on the air.
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
I am Chase Geiser, your host today.
This is the final segment of our show today, followed by the great Alex Jones hosting the Alex Jones Show.
And then, of course, you'll have Harrison Smith on the war room this afternoon, replacing the great Owen Schroer, who we all love and miss, who will be back with us very soon.
Right out of the gate, let's take a call from Don in Michigan.
Don, what's up? Can you hear me, Don?
Well, we'll have to bounce back to him.
Oh, did he come through? We'll bounce back to him.
Next up, then, let's hear from Leslie in Nevada.
Leslie, what's on your mind? Hi, Chase.
leslie in nevada
Thanks for taking my call.
What I wanted to talk about is the fact that I think that what's happening to Owen Schroer is China decloaking as in full control of our government because they have been using this technique where they rot us out from the inside.
And the Chinese do this all the time.
They wait.
They wait until they're absolutely certain you're so weak and so pathetic that when they do rise up, they just flip you over that you just fall.
And crumble like a like a board that has been eaten by termites that look sound until you put foot on.
Yeah.
And what is happening to Owen Schroer is exactly the types of things that happen to Chinese citizens when they are grabbed by their government.
And this is what I've been concerned about for the last 10 years, because China, the Chinese government, the communist government desperately wants to hurt the average American, like Otto Warmbierk.
Do you remember who Otto Warmbier is?
chase geiser
Yep. I'll never forget. We actually talked about him on the show today.
leslie in nevada
Oh, good.
Because he should be on our lips every single day.
Because that is what is waiting for every American should China actually gain control of us.
There are so many more of them than us.
It would be simple for them to do what they do to the Uyghurs and assign a Chinese Communist Party member to every family who lives inside the family.
chase geiser
Yep. And if you think about the Great Leap Forward, estimates range from 50 to 100 million people dying of starvation between 1958 and 1962 because of communism under Mao in China.
Yet, if you poll or survey the current Chinese population...
There's still a major cult of personality around Mao.
So how is it that a leader who is responsible for the death of 100 million people, that means that everybody in China knows or is related to someone who died of starvation between 58 and 62.
It wasn't that long ago.
Yet they still idolize Mao as this cult of personality, as this hero of the Chinese people.
That is the strength and the extent of the power of communism, Marxism, Over the minds of people who have been so beaten down and oppressed that they reach sort of a state of mass Stockholm syndrome.
leslie in nevada
Stockholm syndrome. Yeah. Yes.
That's exactly what it is.
It is mass Stockholm syndrome.
And it's being foisted upon American people through, my goodness, through Hollywood and the flash rates.
They have taken MKUltra live and all of us In the United States are living in a giant open-air experiment dealing, it's a combination, Milgram experiment and MKUltra, where they have used torture on television in association with flash rates to brainwash us against our will.
And this type of brainwashing is so dangerous when people awaken from it, and that's the other problem we face.
When we finally do awaken those who have been brainwashed, nobody's happy when they first wake up.
unidentified
Right. It's like waking up in the Matrix.
leslie in nevada
Yes. Right? Yes.
chase geiser
Just like in the movie, it's like, oh, this is what I took the red pill for?
Wow! You know?
leslie in nevada
Right. No, I have talked to dear friends that I've had for 25 years who are willingly going back into the Matrix to close their eyes because it's genuinely too painful for them.
It is too painful to come to the realization that the nation we were promised was not the nation we were born into, and that we're going to actually have to do something like the followers of Gandhi did when they went down to the ocean to take salt.
We're going to have to take our lumps.
We're going to have to stand up, do what's right, even though we're going to be punished for it, even though we're going to get hurt for it, even though some of us are really going to die over it, which is terrifying.
If we're not brave enough to stand up for the children now, you know, we have to do it nonviolently.
Because if we do it violently, they have a monopoly on violence.
They know what to do with it.
They will ram it up our butts.
Can't have that. It has to be nonviolent.
And really, taking the Gandhi route and the Martin Luther King route, and we need to start having teach-ins where we sit down together, sitting down, being quiet with each other, being patient, and talking to each other.
I mean, I've seen people here in my own very small, unincorporated town arguing with each other when what they should be doing is working together to make sure that Las Vegas doesn't come up the mountain and eat us.
When they run out of food.
chase geiser
Yeah.
leslie in nevada
Because, yeah, because Las Vegas...
their late need, They put all of their sewer water in there to recycle it and reclean it and drink it again.
And here in our valley, we have an aquifer.
And it's already been said that Las Vegas is trying to figure out some sort of side drilling technique like they use in the oil industry.
You know, they can drill sideways oil wells to tap into others.
It's a technique of thieving.
Well, they're talking about feeding our waters the same way.
And this is the Mojave.
Yeah. Liquor's for drinking and water's for fighting.
chase geiser
Yep, that's right. Leslie, I'm going to let you go because I've got to get on to more callers and I want to show a clip that you made me think of, actually.
Thank you so much for your call. I do appreciate it, though.
Let's run this clip seven about...
I was just thinking about it in terms of Stockholm Syndrome and mass formation psychosis and manipulation.
This coming from the World Economic Forum.
unidentified
Listen to what this lady says. The good news is the elite across the world trust each other more and more.
So we can come together and design and do beautiful things together.
The bad news is that in every single country they were polling, the majority of people trusted that elite less.
So we can lead, but if people aren't following, we're not going to get to where we want to go.
chase geiser
There you have it. The elite trying to manipulate the masses into following them.
Let's see if we can get a hold of Don in Michigan again this time.
Don, are you there this time? Yeah, Chase.
unidentified
I was out in the garage. I'm sorry.
You guys came to me quicker than I thought you did.
That's okay. What's up, man? I just want to let you know I wrote a letter to Owen Sunday and I'm going to write another letter in a couple days.
I'm going to try to write one every week and keep his spirits high.
Hopefully, I mentioned to him, if he ever gets out of solitary, I suggest he hits the yard and keeps his wiffle ball skills good because I'm going to smoke him in a rematch if I ever make it back to Austin.
So hopefully he'll get a laugh out of that.
chase geiser
That's awesome. Thank you so much for writing him.
I know that means a lot to those who are incarcerated and I know that he's been receiving a lot of mail.
Even if you're self-conscious or just a listener or somebody who hasn't interacted with him, sending him just a little note, words of encouragement, I'm sure would mean a lot to him.
I need to write him a letter today, too.
I wrote him one last week, and this week I will be writing him another one as well.
What else is on your mind, Doug?
unidentified
Good job, buddy. Not too much.
The info wagon was broke down for a week, but I got it back on the road.
Awesome. Out there representing every chance I get, making you guys proud, hopefully.
chase geiser
Awesome. Well, thank you so much for calling.
I appreciate it. We've just got a couple of minutes left of the segment before the Alex Jones show begins.
I'm not going to take any other calls because I just don't think there's enough time.
But I do want to bring up this one New York Post article.
It came out just a couple of days ago.
Joe Rogan holds all the cards as his Spotify podcasting deal is set to expire.
Podcast King Joe Rogan may ditch Spotify for another platform, possibly even joining Elon Musk's X after his contract expires next year.
If Joe Rogan does decide to join X, he should make it a stipulation of his contract that Alex Jones and Infowars be reinstated.
I think he would probably have that kind of leverage if that deal were to come about.
And I highly encourage Joe.
I hope he's listening or someone on his team is listening to consider that as a stipulation because it would be awesome to have Alex Jones back on as well.
And we, of course, would love to be streaming to the X audience directly.
The wildly popular host of the Joe Rogan Experience, which draws an estimated 11 million listeners per episode.
That is huge. Signed an exclusive licensing deal with Spotify that paid him a reported $200 million in 2020.
Remember the original reporting?
I think it was $100 million, but $200 sounds like the final number.
But with Spotify cutting its ballooning costs as Rogan's contract comes to an end, industry experts said the podcaster is in the driver's seat.
It's a situation where you are damned if you do, you're damned if you don't, research founder Richard Kramer told The Verge.
If you do keep them, Spotify will be locked into paying Rogan as much or more than before at a time when they need to contain costs.
If you don't keep them, then it's really tough because your biggest property and source of sales within the ad business locks.
Thank you guys so much for being part of the American Journal this morning.
I will be back on the air with you tomorrow morning at 8 a.m.
Central. Make sure you tune in.
Make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com.
We do have Ultra 12, which is now 40% off at InfoWars Store.
After being sold out for months, Ultra 12 is finally back in stock and being made available at an unprecedented discount of 40% off.
Ultra 12 from InfoWars Life took the familiar secret 12 formula and singled out one powerful ingredient made with methylcobalamin.
CJ, I knew I was going to get it wrong.
It's the most effective and extensive form of B12 available.
unidentified
Matthew in Wisconsin.
Thanks for calling in. You're on the air.
Hey, I love you guys.
First off and foremost, I need to pray for Infowars.
I want to pray Yeshua HaMashiach, Jesus Christ the Messiah.
Pray blessings and power upon Infowars, Harrison Smith, but especially Owen Schroer and Alex Jones right now.
I love you guys. And also, I need to plug.
I need to plug your products, right?
I have to... I gotta admit, alright?
I was on drugs. I was on heroin.
I was on meth. I was on everything.
And then all of a sudden, I came across...
The first product I took was Brain Force.
I was a tweaker. All I wanted to do was drugs, and I tried Brain Force.
And I'm telling you what, it changed my life, alright?
I started taking Brain Force.
That was the first product I bought, and then I got everything else.
I'm off the drugs.
All I do is take InfoWars.
I can't even plug all of them.
I take them all right now.
Instead of drugs, they're so much better.
I'm telling you, it changed my life.
Export Selection