Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| Geneva looks beautiful. | ||
| It is beautiful. It has a lake. | ||
| It has a shadow. It's very peaceful. | ||
| But there is a dark side to it. | ||
| Everything evil in the world related to demo side unfortunately comes from Geneva. | ||
| You have WTO in Geneva. | ||
| You have Gavi. Then you have the WEF, the World Economic Forum, which my father was a co-founder and left Karl Schwab out of disgust in the early 80s, that has diplomatic immunity. | ||
| I, as a Swiss citizen, right here now, declare that the WEF is not eligible anymore for diplomatic immunity. | ||
| I call on the Swiss authorities and security to arrest those people immediately. | ||
| Why? The WEF, WHO, Gavi, Big Pharma, Big Tech, Bill Gates, all advocated a global humanity injection by a bioweapon injecting nanolipids into 5.7 billion people. | ||
| And we Swiss are hosting them? | ||
| That's terrible. | ||
| We cannot tolerate any entity that promotes poison to be injected into humanity. | ||
| But you've done it. | ||
| I'm the victim. I'm dying from it. | ||
| And my mother too. | ||
| It's a democide and you'll be judged. | ||
| It will be corrected in the name of humanity. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Maybe there is a Geneva Swiss syndrome, but definitely there is a UN syndrome. | |
| Because people are so afraid of what's going on because the United Nations is occupied. | ||
| But people in there don't understand. | ||
| Those who understand, keep quiet or try to speak in different ways to help people to wake up. | ||
| So if you understand that, you know that this was very easy to carve a world government. | ||
| If you don't have a force that stops that and says, we the people is more important. | ||
| And that's what we're doing now. | ||
| We're trying to build a we the people movement that is very global. | ||
| Something completely different. | ||
| But what is going on in Geneva is the opposite at the moment. | ||
| There is no right to WHO to give any orders to dictate to the whole world like they have done. | ||
| And the Global Alliance for Vaccine Immunization, GAVI, got total immunity from the Swiss government. | ||
| You can find this admin.lex in the Swiss database. | ||
| Go and look. This is a coup d'état, clearly. | ||
| It's a global crime scene. | ||
| And we are bringing little pieces of evidence to people with humility, because in science, you always have a doubt. | ||
| It's a healthy doubt. | ||
| And I think that is a very important attitude. | ||
| I believe personally, Geneva has a better future. | ||
| Swiss neutrality has to be restored. | ||
| We have no future not being neutral. | ||
| The young people who survive through this will be the guarantors, hopefully, that such institutions can never again take foothold in our blessed country. | ||
| Never again. The snake head is in Geneva. | ||
| I call it a direct, clear and present danger to the Swiss population, but I can tell you it is being cut off. | ||
| If you have a house of cards, and this is a house of cards of a criminal, one card pulled by justice and the whole card house collapses. | ||
| But from hope alone it is not done. | ||
| Everybody must now change the spirit. | ||
| And all the vaccinated, the injected, knowing that they are poisoned. | ||
| We are the masses. | ||
| We are billions of people. Let's just stand up and say, stop. | ||
| We will not comply. | ||
| And in French, ni oubli, ni pardon. | ||
| Because we are the guardians of humanity and our light obliterates the darkness of evil. | ||
| Always. Welcome to World War III. It is the American Journal. | ||
| I am Chase Geiser filling in for the great Harrison Smith today. | ||
| It's an honor and a pleasure to be with you. | ||
| Don't be sad though because Harrison Smith is now hosting the War Room until Owen gets back from his federally assigned vacation. | ||
| All is well. I believe that Owen shared the information to send him letters and support. | ||
| I don't know if we have that readily available. | ||
| We can definitely show that later on in the show. | ||
| I'm certainly going to be trying to write Owen a letter at least once a week just to help him pass the time. | ||
| And I encourage you all to do the same and show your support. | ||
| I know from friends of mine and family members of mine who have actually served time that that makes a major difference. | ||
| World War III, folks. It seems to be on the cusp. | ||
| Yesterday, I was very proud that I was able to get through the whole show without mentioning Israel or Hamas once. | ||
| I think maybe it came up just briefly in one passing comment here or there. | ||
| But we were able to actually do a whole show without talking about it. | ||
| But that time has ended because this news is just too important. | ||
| I was actually in a debate with my wife last night about this issue specifically. | ||
| She is someone who has quite a substantial amount of sympathy for Israel and quite a lack thereof for Palestine. | ||
| And I can understand that. | ||
| And we were talking about why it is that the United States, that so many people in the United States of America are so concerned with what's going on in Israel, but we neglect or ignore or disregard so many other conflicts where innocents are harmed as well. | ||
| Like the Armenian deaths that are happening now or any given conflict with warlords in any given nation in Africa over a period of time. | ||
| Why is it that when bad things happen all over the world we don't really care but when they happen to Israel we care so much and I raise the point that I think it's because we have an emotional response to When something bad happens to the Jews because of what happened in the Holocaust, | ||
| I think there's an extra amount of sympathy emotionally that bypasses our rational part of our brain and goes straight to our compassion or our heart because it is so entrenched in our psyche, the terrible thing that happened during World War II to the Jewish people. | ||
| And that's not a bad thing in and of itself, but it does often keep us from being able to see both sides of a conflict. | ||
| It keeps us from extending our hearts to those who are innocent on the other side of a conflict. | ||
| Obviously what happened on October 7th to Israel was a terrorist act. | ||
| And we can debate about the details of whether this picture is real or this video is real. | ||
| But we know a terrorist attack happened. | ||
| And we know that innocent people were harmed by Hamas in Israel and that it was terrible. | ||
| That's a fact. No one's actually arguing against that. | ||
| But what we often fail to see is that there are innocent people in Palestine. | ||
| And I've been very critical of Palestine. | ||
| I've been very critical of all of the people in Palestine, especially Hamas. | ||
| But that doesn't mean that there aren't innocent people there. | ||
| And if we go to the Bible and we look at the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, there is a message in the Old Testament that That supports the argument that if there is one innocent person present, that person should be saved and not punished along with the wicked. | ||
| Which is what I was telling my wife. | ||
| I was telling my wife that a response was warranted, in my opinion, that Israel should have responded to what happened to them on October 7th, but that just indiscriminately bombing whole regions... | ||
| and killing civilians was not the appropriate response and I know that Hamas is accused and it's probably true I know that they're accused of intentionally putting their civilians in dangerous situations in dangerous areas or intentionally setting up their military operations in civilian areas so that when civilians are killed they can use that as propaganda against Israel I understand that As I told my wife in our conversation, | ||
| if somebody were using a human shield, a child as a human shield, would you shoot the child so that you could shoot the criminal or the terrorist? | ||
| No. And so just because Hamas may be keeping people or engaging in military operations or terrorist activity among civilians doesn't mean... | ||
| That Israel should go ahead and bomb anyway. | ||
| It does mean that Hamas is complicit in the deaths of innocent people in Palestine. | ||
| Absolutely. They are evil. | ||
| They are complicit in those deaths. | ||
| But that doesn't mean that you pull the trigger and do it anyway. | ||
| And so, when trying to navigate this situation, I think it's important that we realize there are innocent people here. | ||
| On both sides and there is evil on both sides. | ||
| I believe that Hamas is more evil than Israel, but I believe that Israel, the government of Israel, knew that this attack was coming and allowed it to happen to gain international support to commit a genocide. | ||
| I really believe that they don't know how to solve the problem in Palestine that they have being adjacent to these terrorists that they may or may not have Actually nurtured into being terrorists. | ||
| I'm not even going to take a stance on that in this point. | ||
| But they have a right to respond, but not the right to harm innocent people. | ||
| It's as simple as that. | ||
| And so when taking aside... | ||
| My suggestion was, why didn't they go in and actually make arrests? | ||
| Or why didn't they just target the leaders of Hamas instead of bombing the entire area? | ||
| And I think the reason is because Israel knows that it can't solve this problem that it has of this heavily terrorist area without killing all the innocent people too. | ||
| And unfortunately, what's going to happen is Israel is going to continue with this aggression. | ||
| It's going to rope in the United States, and it could potentially start World War III and even nuclear war among several different nations. | ||
| And all of those who survive in Palestine, whether it's in Gaza or in the West Bank, are going to hate Israel forever. | ||
| More than any other generation in their region down the road. | ||
| Every survivor in the region becomes an even more radicalized terrorist later. | ||
| It's what Ron Paul was talking about with blowback. | ||
| So we installed the Shah in 1979. | ||
| Look what happened 9-11 many many years later. | ||
| And I think Israel realizes this and I think they're just going to try to kill everybody or move everybody out. | ||
| Obviously it seems to be working because the Pentagon belatedly reveals two dozen U.S. personnel were wounded in a spate of drone attacks in Iraq and Syria. | ||
| So now the United States has civilians who are wounded by Israeli attacks. | ||
| The Pentagon revealed in a late Tuesday statement that in just the past week, U.S. and coalition forces have been attacked at least 10 times in Iraq, as well as three times in Syria via a mix of one-way attack drones and rockets, according to Brig General Pat Ryder, speaking to NBC. | ||
| But the real bombshell development, which Biden's defense officials have apparently sat on for several days, is that some 24 U.S. personnel were wounded in the attacks, according to the NBC statement. | ||
| Steve Watson goes on to write. | ||
| Two dozen American military personnel were wounded last week in a series of drone attacks at American bases in Iraq and Syria, U.S. Central Command told NBC News on Tuesday. | ||
| The Pentagon confirmed the attacks last week, but the number of U.S. casualties has not been previously disclosed. | ||
| So we are already seeing American victims of this conflict and victims of this conflict that are not victims at the hands of Hamas specifically here, but actually friendly fire, so to speak. | ||
| And this extends to what's happening here in the United States. | ||
| We see that this is having an impact on our domestic politics because the likes of Ron DeSantis Are ordering University of Florida to shut down pro-Palestine groups for violating laws against anti-Semitism. | ||
| So now the Republican Party, which for the last several years has been the party of freedom of speech, as soon as it's hearing speech it doesn't like, is backpedaling on its principled position of freedom of speech, the whole purpose of which is to allow speech that you disagree with or that you hate Because we're supposed to know that the laws we pass against our enemies, we are also held accountable to. | ||
| Stick with us, folks. We'll be back right after this break. | ||
| Make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ron DeSantis is now apparently against the freedom of speech floor. | |
| Florida Governor Ron DeSantis on Tuesday ordered the University of Florida to shut down their Students for Justice and Palestine group for violating Florida's laws against anti-Semitism, the Daily Signal reports. | ||
| So not only is he attacking the right to freedom of speech here with this group, but he's also seemingly attacking the right to assemble by not only calling for the speech to end, but for the group to be totally dismantled. | ||
| Keep in mind, I do not sympathize with the pro-Palestinian protesters. | ||
| And I don't really sympathize with the pro-Israel protesters either, except to the extent that those protests are explicitly about this attack that happened on October 7th. | ||
| I am not particularly fond of... | ||
| The culture in Palestine, I'm not particularly fond of the radicalism there or the terrorism there. | ||
| I don't support these protests. | ||
| I would not attend one. | ||
| And frankly, I don't think that I see eye to eye with hardly anyone at one of these protests. | ||
| Except maybe a few close friends who have a more nuanced position on their support for Palestine. | ||
| But I don't advocate that these protests be shut down. | ||
| That these people not be allowed to voice their opinions. | ||
| That they not be allowed to meet. | ||
| But apparently, Governor DeSantis does. | ||
| Governor DeSantis just ordered the University of Florida and the University of South Florida to deactivate their Students for Justice and Palestine groups for violating Florida's laws against anti-Semitism. | ||
| Here's an email. Sent to the presidents, it looks like, of the State University System of Florida. | ||
| During a holy Jewish holiday, the recognized terrorist organization Hamas launched an unprovoked attack on Israel. | ||
| Among those killed were babies, women, and elderly. | ||
| True. To date, approximately 1,400 Israelis have been killed, including 31 American citizens. | ||
| Governor DeSantis, our state university system, and the Florida college system have condemned these attacks. | ||
| They do mention the Israeli victims, who my heart genuinely goes out to, but they do not seem to mention any of the innocent Palestinian victims since this attack. | ||
| Hamas is responsible for this attack and claims it as Operation Al-Aqsa flood. | ||
| In the wake of this terror, military leaders of Hamas have called for the mobilization of Palestinians in support of the operation. | ||
| In response, in leading up to a day of resistance, the National Students for Justice in Palestine, National SJP, released a toolkit which refers to Operation Al-Aqsa flood as the resistance and unequivocally states, Palestinian students in exile are part of this movement, not in solidarity with this movement. | ||
| It is a felony under Florida law to knowingly provide material support to a designated foreign terrorist organization. | ||
| Here, National SJP has affirmatively identified it is part of the Operation Al-Axa Flood, a terrorist-led attack. | ||
| State University System of Florida has at least two institutions with active National SJP chapters. | ||
| These chapters exist under the headship of the National Students for Justice in Palestine, who distributed a toolkit identifying themselves as part of the Operation Al-Axa Flood. | ||
| So... They are officially declaring that Hamas is a terrorist organization, which I agree with, but I'm not sure that it has that legal status. | ||
| I have to look into that. | ||
| I know that the media has been reluctant to refer to it as a terrorist organization. | ||
| I know that the AP refuses to refer to Hamas as a terrorist organization. | ||
| I personally believe that it is, but I'm not sure that it legally is. | ||
| But apparently, Governor DeSantis and his administration in Florida has confidently come to that conclusion. | ||
| And not only have they come to the conclusion that Hamas is a terrorist organization, but they have come to the conclusion that the national SJP is providing material support. | ||
| Now, I was... I'm not a Seems to me that that would be covered under freedom of speech. | ||
| It's not the same thing as Joe Biden giving millions upon millions of dollars, billions upon billions of dollars to Nazis. | ||
| See, that would be a violation of the Trading with the Enemies Act or when Prescott Bush was... | ||
| On the board of a bank that was engaged in financial transactions with the Nazis. | ||
| See, that's the Trading with the Enemies Act. | ||
| That's a violation. That's material support to enemies of the United States or to terrorist organizations. | ||
| But I'm not sure that just coming out and saying as an organization, as a student organization, that you... | ||
| I'm not sure that that constitutes material support. | ||
| And I know that he's just trying to garner sort of neocon support for his campaign by using this sort of rhetoric. | ||
| But when push comes to shove... | ||
| This policy here, regardless of whether it's the law or not, the fact that it's being enforced is a violation of freedom of speech. | ||
| Regardless of whether or not it's protected by our First Amendment legally in this country, you are born with the inalienable right to say what you want to say and to assemble with whom you want to assemble. | ||
| And we have DeSantis here coming out and forcing these universities to shut down these student organizations. | ||
| Student organizations which I... We're good to go. | ||
| So you should know by now that I am opposed to radical Islam. | ||
| I am opposed to anti-Semitism. | ||
| I am opposed to genocide of all kinds, whether committed by Israel or by Hamas or anyone else. | ||
| But you should have the right to say how you feel. | ||
| Because after all, what is freedom of speech if not the expression of freedom of thought? | ||
| What are words if not thoughts shared? | ||
| Restrictions on freedom of speech are a form of restrictions on freedom of thought. | ||
| Obviously, the government doesn't yet have the ability to police our thoughts. | ||
| Maybe it does with voice-to-skull technology. | ||
| So it goes as far as it can, as it always does, and it will always seek to inhibit our right to freedom of speech because, after all, that's how individuals share thoughts with one another. | ||
| And engage in the thinking that is the collective consciousness of any culture. | ||
| And we see this campaign taking on several fronts, several different forms. | ||
| Israel demands that the UN chief resign after he says Hamas attacks did not occur in a vacuum. | ||
| Though I do find it hard to believe that any two groups of people would hate each other for no reason. | ||
| And we're going to get into Biden's press secretary doing a complete 180 in the next segment. | ||
| In the meantime, make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com, which is going to be back up by 10 a.m. | ||
| Central Time today. Make sure you bookmark it in your browser because we do have some great sales going on. | ||
| 60% off Brain Force Plus. | ||
| In the meantime, why don't you go over to Amazon and get a copy of The Great Awakening by Alex Jones and Let's get that book trending on Amazon. | ||
| Go ahead and go to Amazon.com, type in The Great Awakening by Alex Jones and get a copy today to show support and keep InfoWars on the air and support Alex Jones who fights like no one else for this country. | ||
| We'll be right back after this break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back to the American Journal-Aid. | |
| I'm Chase Geiser filling in for the great Harrison Smith, who is now hosting War Room until Owen Schroer returns. | ||
| And then you'll get your favorite host, America's favorite host, back. | ||
| On the American Journal, after claiming Monday that the Biden administration has not seen any credible threats to Jews and instead touting hate-fueled attacks against Muslims, Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre did a 180 and claimed that she misheard the question about the troubling rise of anti-Semitism. | ||
| What a convenient excuse. | ||
| Oh, I didn't understand the question. | ||
| It reminds me of RFK. Claiming that he didn't understand the question around abortion that we covered yesterday when he backpedaled. | ||
| Let's go ahead and run clip 10. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What is his level of concern right now about the potential rise of anti-Semitism in light of everything that's going on in Israel? | |
| So a couple of things. | ||
| Look, we have not seen any credible threats. | ||
| I know there's been always questions about credible threats. | ||
| And so I just want to make sure that that's out there. | ||
| But look, Muslim and those perceived threats To be Muslim have endured a disproportionate number of hate-fueled attacks. | ||
| And certainly President Biden understands that many of our Muslim Arab Americans and Palestinian-American loved ones and neighbors are worried about the hate being directed at their communities. | ||
| And that is something you heard the President speak to in his address just last Thursday. | ||
| Alright, I want to make something clear at the top because I understand how important moral clarity is, especially at this time. | ||
| So, when Jews are targeted because of their beliefs or their identity, when Israel is singled out because of anti-Jewish hatred, that is anti-Semitism. | ||
| And that is unacceptable. | ||
| There's no place for anti-Semitism. | ||
| Full stop. Period. | ||
| This is important to the president. | ||
| It's important to me personally and to everyone in the administration. | ||
| Following the Hamas terror attacks in Israel, which were the deadliest for Jews since the Holocaust, the president has been consistent and clear. | ||
| We must all do our part and forcefully, forcefully speak out against anti-Semitism. | ||
| And we must ensure that there is no place for hate in America. | ||
| It's so crazy to hear her say that because I agree with everything that she said in the second half when she walked it back and she said when Jews are targeted for their beliefs or identity, that is anti-Semitism and that is wrong. | ||
| I absolutely agree with that. | ||
| How come the same principles, the same logic can't be applied to when Americans are targeted for their beliefs or their identity and How is that not anti-Americanism? | ||
| When mega-Republicans are targeted for their beliefs and their identity, it's okay. | ||
| That's not anti-Americanism. | ||
| Because exactly what she said about why anti-Semitism is wrong to me is why anti-Americanism is wrong. | ||
| Why is it that patriotic Americans should be targeted for their beliefs, their identities? | ||
| Why is it that we should be continuously sold out to foreign interests and the interests of the political class of the United States of America, of the political class of the world, these globalists? | ||
| And then when we go to defend ourselves and our rights and our identities and our beliefs and our interests, we are targeted. | ||
| Literally targeted. | ||
| If you're a host on Infowars, you have a 33% chance of going to prison. | ||
| And you've got a 66% chance of being sued. | ||
| Meanwhile, we have a situation in which we see both parties supporting World War III. And I know for a long time in this country, people always talked about reaching across the aisle and how good that is. | ||
| About bipartisan support. | ||
| Oh, don't we just love a bill that has bipartisan support? | ||
| Don't we just want to compromise and work together? | ||
| Let me tell you something, folks. When you compromise, it's when both parties lose. | ||
| When you make a deal, both parties win. | ||
| But when you compromise, that means that both sides are making a sacrifice of principle. | ||
| I don't believe in bipartisanship. | ||
| I don't believe in reaching across the aisle. | ||
| And frankly, whenever I see anything bipartisan or with bipartisan support like this World War III we are about ready to engage in, that screams to me uniparty. | ||
| Let's see how Hillary Clinton responds to this criticism from a concerned American patriot. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Clip one. This is a clearly war-mongering speech. | |
| President Joe Biden is calling for $100 billion of funding for Israel, Taiwan, and Ukraine. | ||
| And we're supposed to just bundle these together and pretend like we're going to rush to World War III and we're all just going to let Hillary Rodham and Clinton sit here. | ||
| Okay? I'm sorry. | ||
| You know, this is not the way to have a conversation. | ||
| If you all have a conversation, you're welcome to come talk to me afterwards. | ||
| Okay, right. You're gonna wait for me, right? | ||
| Please, I do not believe you. | ||
| I will listen to you and I will respond to you. | ||
| I do not believe you. Respectfully, I do not believe you. | ||
| And the fact of the matter is that the American people's voice are what needs to be heard. | ||
| Yeah, they are being heard. Because our president is not speaking for the American people and neither are you. | ||
| Well, that's your opinion. That's your opinion. | ||
| Yes, that's my opinion. Well then, sit down. | ||
| We've heard your opinion. Thank you very much. | ||
| I'm not going to sit down. | ||
| I'm not going to stop working on behalf of human rights. | ||
| I'm going to exercise my free speech. | ||
| But it's not free speech when you are disrupting everybody else's opportunity. | ||
| Yes, it is. It is free speech. | ||
| This is free speech, everyone. | ||
| This is free speech. | ||
| That is not free speech. | ||
| This is people constructing narratives that are openly hypocritical. | ||
| I'm sorry. The incredible hypocrisy. | ||
| You tell me John Foster Dulles went with Eleanor Roosevelt to bring this Declaration of the Rights of Man. | ||
| John Foster Dulles was involved with the CIA! Oh yeah, we are brilliant in your historical cherry-picking. | ||
| The Pinochet regime, please, could you please inform me about the United States involved in these historical things? | ||
| Ms. Clinton, will you denounce Joe Biden's speech? | ||
| Will you denounce Joe Biden's speech? | ||
| Not just yelling about it. | ||
| So Frank, I want to turn to you. | ||
| You are from Uganda and Uganda's 2023 is by homosexuality and criminalizes LGBT conduct in Uganda. | ||
| He tried to push us to World War III. Do you understand? | ||
| It's not about Israel's Palestine. | ||
| It's not about football. | ||
| This isn't football. It's not Team America. | ||
| Well, I'm sorry. That's enough of that. | ||
| Some of us are on Team America despite our flaws. | ||
| What strikes me about that video specifically is when we see leftists protest at events like that, there's a couple of differences I want to point out to what we just saw there. | ||
| The first thing is typically when leftists barge in to an event like that, they do so in a large group. | ||
| They make a lot of noise outside. | ||
| They do it together as a social event. | ||
| The other thing is that when they do it, they're often doing it for attention. | ||
| And there's frequently a close friend or comrade, for lack of a better term, actually that's probably the perfect term, that's sitting next to them or right in front of them to make sure they can capture the video and get the face very clearly of whoever is speaking or being the greatest disruptor because it's about attention and social proof and virtue signaling when leftists do that. | ||
| But that man right there was wearing a hat. | ||
| Somebody in the back was filming him. | ||
| He went into a situation in which there was no one really there supporting him. | ||
| He went into the enemy territory and voiced his opinion. | ||
| You can hear the concern in his voice. | ||
| If you look at his outfit, if you guys can pull this up, he looks exactly like the Abraham Lincoln figure in Rockwell's famous free speech painting. | ||
| This guy is there by himself, not seeking attention, taking time out of his day for no reason other than to try to get a real answer from this woman who supports this conflict. | ||
| These conflicts. | ||
| World War III. We're going to get into more of the globalist agenda around this in the next segment, how it's impacting our farmers and how America is being sold out. | ||
| And how we're on the cusp of this war. | ||
| He looks exactly like that guy. | ||
| Stick with us. | ||
| Make sure you get The Great Awakening on Amazon.com today and visit defendjones.com today. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So much going on as World War III has begun. | |
| And it's not just about a military conflict, but it's about the selling out of America's sovereignty in exchange for assured wealth and power among our political class and a conspiracy among every nation's political class. | ||
| They're in a club, folks, and you're not in it. | ||
| Tyson Foods to bring bug based protein to U.S. markets after joining forces with world leader in insect ingredients. | ||
| All while, of course, our farms are being sold off and the economic situation is such that our farmers who do have land or equipment to farm the land can't afford to do so because the margins are getting tighter and tighter. | ||
| And let me tell you, folks, if we wind up in World War III against China, our farmers are going to feel the pain more than anyone because that would mean an embargo on exports of agriculture to China. | ||
| Tyson Foods announced a new partnership with a Dutch company that brands itself as the world leader in insect ingredients. | ||
| What a great slogan. | ||
| To foster more sustainable protein production. | ||
| So they're doing this in the name of climate change. | ||
| Let's bounce into clip six and then take it from there. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There's no doubt that there's a real attack on farmers happening on every corner of this planet, which logically poses one very obvious question. | |
| If you get rid of the farmers, you still need to eat something, especially protein, right? | ||
| Maybe they don't want the food production like it is right now. | ||
| I mean, we produce potatoes, and we produce milk, and we produce meat, and maybe there's a government who doesn't want us to eat anymore that kind of food. | ||
| And that turned to what? | ||
| Oh, insect bugs? | ||
| I don't know. Today, the European Commission has officially declared mealworms to be food. | ||
| It could be a game-changer for insect farmers. | ||
| They're now hoping to grow their businesses and turn insects into another source of protein for Europeans, even if just a niche one. | ||
| There's this top-down globalist idea that certain Western countries People have diets that they do not approve of. | ||
| In other words, they're more meat-based. | ||
| And they feel that humans don't need meat-based protein. | ||
| And they want to either force people to follow their paradigms, or they want to buy or accumulate farmland, and that's how they're going to farm it. | ||
| It's sort of like the Soviet Union or Mao's Cultural Revolution. | ||
| It's top-down, and it results in disasters. | ||
| The UN Food and Agriculture Organization in 2013, they put out this very bizarre report, and they said, we need Westerners to start eating bugs. | ||
| And that wasn't on anybody's radar. | ||
| We didn't eat bugs. It's disgusting. | ||
| And so they said we need a massive propaganda campaign in the media to convince them that they're going to save the planet. | ||
| Well, we're seeing that. NPR, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, the BBC, even Fox News, they've been peddling this idea that bugs are delicious and nutritious. | ||
| Now you've got all these celebrities eating bugs and teaching people that it's trendy and cool to eat bugs. | ||
| And as we speak, they are right now building the largest insect protein processing facility on the planet outside Decatur, Illinois. | ||
| They're building another one up in Canada. | ||
| They know there's not really demand for bugs right now, right? | ||
| How many Americans do you know that are clamoring for cricket sandwiches, right? | ||
| Practically none. And so I expect that as these food shortages develop, as the price of staples goes through the roof, people will say, okay, I'm really hungry. | ||
| My kids are really hungry. I can't afford a steak anymore. | ||
| So, all right, I'll just, I'll eat your stupid crickets. | ||
| Well, there you have it, folks. And notice that all those reports in that video were coming from globalist organizations, the likes of the United Nations, namely. | ||
| And this is something that's being forced upon us. | ||
| And they claim that it's about either climate or world hunger. | ||
| But if we know anything about governments, they love when a crisis comes because when a crisis hits a people... | ||
| The first thing a mass population will do is sell out their liberties and their rights in exchange for relief. | ||
| I don't believe that our government would prefer anything more than a food crisis or a food shortage in the United States of America because if something like that were to happen you can bet your bottom dollar, your worthless bottom dollar that everyone in the nation In terms of NPCs, | ||
| so 90% of people, would do whatever it takes to get food, sell out whatever rights they have to get food, to get relief from this pain. | ||
| Let's pop over to clip number seven and see the climate argument. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We all know how important insects are for the environment, but climate researchers say bugs could be a game changer in the fight to protect the planet in ways you may not have imagined. | |
| Tina Krauss has a story from London. | ||
| Adding some insects to the mix is customary in the kitchen in some parts of the world. | ||
| Now climate experts think the protein-packed pests could offer a real solution to the global food crisis. | ||
| Scientists in Germany are not pushing to get the critters on your plate. | ||
| They see another benefit. | ||
| Our interest is to make insects as an alternative for the use of soy bean-derived proteins. | ||
| Large-scale growth of soybeans has been blamed for extensive deforestation. | ||
| Since farming insects takes less land and water, these researchers believe bugs can become the livestock feed of the future. | ||
| To have a more sustainable production of proteins, we need alternatives, and I see insects as a perfect tool. | ||
| Experts also developed a fungi that converts organic waste into a diet for these soldier flies. | ||
| And you can make so many things out of insects to make the world better. | ||
| And with insect farming booming around the world, researchers are busy as bees looking for more climate-friendly fixes. | ||
| Tina Kraus, CBS News. | ||
| It's estimated up to 1.2 trillion insects are raised on farms each year as companies race to find a high-protein, low-carbon solution to feed animals and the world's population. | ||
| CBS Saturday morning. | ||
| We'll be right back. Let me tell you something, folks. | ||
| Starvation is not because there's an issue with food shortage. | ||
| Starvation is caused by bad economic and bad government policy. | ||
| The greatest example of starvation that I know of in history is between 1958 and 1962 during the Great Leap Forward when upwards of 100 million Chinese communist civilians starved to death. | ||
| And I know that there are reports that it had something to do with drought, but it had more to do with the fact that Mao was trying to industrialize China. | ||
| He was moving everyone from the rural areas into the cities, into the factories, and all of the communists... | ||
| responsible for the different districts or counties of China were too afraid to accurately report to the higher-ups within the Chinese Communist Party that they were not meeting harvest quotas. | ||
| Because after all, a communist regime is a very terrifying thing to be a part of, and you are always going to be terrified of your higher-up, and the pain goes downward. | ||
| So 100 million people starved. | ||
| We know that the Soviet Union caused the starvation of millions upon millions of Ukrainians when Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union. | ||
| Keep in mind that Ukraine is considered the breadbasket of Europe. | ||
| It's some of the most fertile land in the entirety of the earth. | ||
| And why is it that those who are farmers and they live in the most fertile area of the world are starving? | ||
| Well, it's because in communism, you have centralized government. | ||
| And the centralized government wants to seize all of the crop yields, all of the harvest, and then redistribute it to society. | ||
| And what they were doing was they were taking all the food that was harvested from the Ukrainians and the Ukrainians just weren't getting it back in time because centralized management of supply chains like that doesn't work as well as Adam Smith's invisible hand. | ||
| And so when we look at starvation throughout history, sometimes it's because of a natural disaster, but usually it's because of a policy issue. | ||
| I believe that even in the event... | ||
| Of the potato famine, was it not the case that the Irish starved because they were only allowed to eat potatoes and they weren't allowed to eat the other crops, which England took? | ||
| I've heard that recently. I haven't actually looked into it, but that would be yet another example of starvation being caused by policy and not the actual environment itself. | ||
| So when they're talking about food shortages, folks, it's either because they're lying and there simply isn't one, or it's because they're planning to orchestrate one. | ||
| And the reason they want to orchestrate one is because the more vulnerable you are, the more powerful they become. | ||
| Let's end this segment before we go to break with this clip from Shawshank Redemption. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Are you going to eat that? | |
| I don't know. | ||
| I hadn't planned on it. | ||
| Do you mind? Yeah. | ||
| That's nice and ripe. | ||
| Jake says thank you. | ||
| Stick with us, folks. We'll be back right after this break. | ||
| Make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com as soon as the store's back up. | ||
| Welcome back to the America Journal, folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm Chase Geyser filling in for the great Harrison Smith. | |
| He will be on the air on War Room this afternoon. | ||
| Make sure you tune in for that. Great guest coming up at the beginning of the next hour today. | ||
| I'm not sure if it's a secret or not. | ||
| Is it a secret, Weber? We've got Nick Fuente... | ||
| Ah, man, come on! | ||
| Someone of great intrigue will be here, and if you're still tuned in in an hour, you'll get to have one of the most magical hours of your life this week. | ||
| Spain's Canary Islands are under siege as 5,000 migrants arrive in a week amid historic surge. | ||
| In the past week, nearly 5,000 migrants have reportedly arrived in the Canary Islands as Spanish... | ||
| Archipelago of the coast of Africa. | ||
| Canaries are experiencing historic illegal migration wave with the island chain on track for more than 50,000 illegal entries this year. | ||
| This is happening all over. | ||
| Western culture is being infiltrated with refugees because the political class always sells out the people of its nations in a conspiracy to conglomerate power for itself. | ||
| We've seen the same thing happen here in the United States where we reported earlier this week that hundreds of terrorists have been apprehended at the border, which means that thousands have likely gotten through unchecked. | ||
| Tens of thousands of people of interest have been reported at the border, which means perhaps hundreds of thousands of people of interest have gone unchecked. | ||
| Trump warns that the US is more vulnerable from inside terror attacks than ever before. | ||
| Donald Trump warned Tuesday that America's more at risk from terror attacks from within than ever before in the history of the country owing to the wide open southern border. | ||
| And he's absolutely right. Here's what he said he's going to do about it in clip four. | ||
| ...to the United States. | ||
| I don't think a lot of good things are going to happen. | ||
| And I will implement strong ideological screening of all immigrants. | ||
| If you hate America, if you want to abolish Israel, if you don't like our religion, which a lot of them don't, if you sympathize with jihadists, then we don't want you in our country and you are not getting in. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right? We don't want you. | |
| They want the enemies of America coming in through an open border, and they want the patriots in America to be in prison. | ||
| A Florida woman is sentenced on felony charge for actions during a January 6th capital breach. | ||
| This from Washington. A Florida woman was sentenced on Monday, October 23rd, 2023, on a felony stemming from her actions during the breach of the U.S. Capitol on January 6th, 2021. | ||
| Her actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election. | ||
| This, of course, is from justice.gov, if you can't tell. | ||
| Leslie Gray, 57, of St. | ||
| Cloud, Florida, was sentenced to 12 months and a day in prison, 12 months of supervised release, $2,000 in restitution, and a $100 special assessment by U.S. District Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. | ||
| Gray pleaded guilty to a felony charge of obstruction of an official proceeding on June 1, 2023. | ||
| It goes on to say, according to court documents, Gray traveled from her home in Florida to Washington, D.C. on January 4, 2021, to protest Congress certification of the Electoral College. | ||
| After arriving in D.C. on January 6, 2021, Gray went to the U.S. Capitol building and joined the crowd gathered at the premiere of the east front of the building, which was barricaded and patrolled by police officers. | ||
| An hour into the protest, Gray joined the mob in surging forward, advancing past the barricades and up to the steps onto the east front of the Capitol, ignoring United States Capitol Police officers ordering the mob to stop. | ||
| Gray live-streamed Facebook videos of her activity around and inside the Capitol that day and recorded her fellow rioters picking up and removing police bike rack barricades. | ||
| So she entered the people's house and is now going to prison for a year and will always be a convicted felon. | ||
| Outstanding. Just outstanding. | ||
| We're going to get more into this dichotomy of the leftists, the globalists who run our country, the political class wanting to imprison those who love this country and import those who hate it. | ||
| Make sure in the meantime you visit defendjones.com or defendowen.com and show you support there. | ||
| And make sure you go to amazon.com and get a copy of The Great Awakening. | ||
| Make us trend on Amazon. | ||
| Show the world we cannot be censored. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
| I'm Chase Geiser filling in for Harrison Smith. | ||
| It's an honor and a pleasure to be with you. | ||
| I will be with you until after Christmas. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Earth of the Messiah. | |
| Harrison Smith can be found, viewed, listened to, and seen on the War Room during that time. | ||
| So make sure you tune in this afternoon and show support for the War Room. | ||
| Keep us on the air. Keep the War Room on the air so that we have a nice, warm seat waiting for the great Owen Schroer when he returns. | ||
| Truly a fearless guy. | ||
| I don't know Owen that well. | ||
| I've interacted with him several times. | ||
| All pleasant. My office is just a couple of doors down from his. | ||
| I try not to bother him when he's preparing for his show. | ||
| But he's truly a fearless guy and he really is a free speech martyr. | ||
| This is not something that he was doing for money or for attention. | ||
| If he hadn't gone on January 6th, I'm sure that he would have kept his job here at InfoWars with his salary. | ||
| This is something that he's doing because he believes in freedom of speech and because he's fearless. | ||
| And not all people can be fearless. | ||
| I would describe Owen Schroyer as a fearless person. | ||
| I would describe Alex Jones as a fearless person. | ||
| But there's a distinction between what it means to be fearless and what it means to be brave. | ||
| To be brave is to have fear and decide or summon the will to overcome it. | ||
| I hope that I'm a brave person. | ||
| I would like to think of myself as a brave person. | ||
| But to be fearless is another level. | ||
| It's a higher echelon. | ||
| It's a higher form of enlightenment. | ||
| And it's something that we've seen from our president, Donald Trump, in his recent statements. | ||
| Let's run clip two. | ||
| Those people have no problem. | ||
| If you want to challenge the result of an election, they hound you. | ||
| Look what happened this weekend with two good people. | ||
| They hound them and they scare them. | ||
| But we don't get scared. | ||
| We don't get scared. I'll tell you what. | ||
| I don't mind being Nelson Mandela because I'm doing it for a reason. | ||
| I'm doing it for a reason. | ||
| We know that our founding fathers were willing to die for their principles They were brave and fearless But this recent report shows that Mark Meadows isn't even willing to go to trial for his. | ||
| Ex-Chief of Staff Mark Meadows granted immunity, tells Special Counsel he warned Trump about 2020 claims, according to sources. | ||
| This is abcnews.go.com, so who knows if their sources actually even exist. | ||
| Meadows said Trump was dishonest on election night, according to sources. | ||
| First of all, how can you be dishonest on election night? | ||
| Because there was no way on election night before the election, I believe, was even officially certified. | ||
| How can you be dishonest about an outcome that's yet to be determined or before any investigations or verifications have come in? | ||
| Mark Meadows, White House Chief of Staff, speaks to members of the media. | ||
| Former President Donald Trump's final Chief of Staff in the White House, Mark Meadows, has spoken with Special Counsel Jack Smith's team. | ||
| What a great guy, that Jack Smith, with his gag orders. | ||
| He might as well be DeSantis. At least three times this year he's spoken with Jack Smith, that is Mark Meadows, including once before a federal grand jury, which came only after Smith granted Meadows immunity to testify under oath, according to sources familiar with the matter. | ||
| Because they don't actually care about sending people to prison. | ||
| They don't actually want to convict anyone of anything. | ||
| That's why they negotiate these plea deals. | ||
| It's not about putting these staffers away. | ||
| All the political class wants to do, all the leftists want to do, is ensure that they can slander... | ||
| And disparage Donald Trump as much as possible. | ||
| So they'll give anybody an awesome plea deal as long as they're willing to testify against Trump. | ||
| We saw a similar instance with Jenna Ellis reported yesterday. | ||
| The sources said Meadows informed Smith's team that he repeatedly told Trump in the weeks after the 2020 presidential election that the allegations of significant voting fraud coming to them were baseless. | ||
| A striking break from Trump's prolific rhetoric regarding the election. | ||
| According to the sources, Meadows also told the federal investigators Trump was being dishonest with the public when he first claimed to have won the election only hours after the polls closed on November 3rd, 2020, before the final results were in. | ||
| So he's not really being dishonest unless he knows that he's wrong. | ||
| Let's say, for example, that the election was legitimate and that there was no fraud. | ||
| Let's just hypothetically conjure up this dream and walk through it. | ||
| That doesn't mean that Trump was being dishonest when he claimed otherwise. | ||
| He could very well have believed otherwise. | ||
| The left constantly accuses Trump of being a megalomaniac and egomaniac, egotistical, psychopath, sociopath, narcissist. | ||
| Isn't one of the symptoms of those conditions delusion? | ||
| So on the one hand, they're implying that he's a delusional person. | ||
| On the other hand, they're implying that he knew he was lying. | ||
| He knew what was really going on. | ||
| It can't really be both. | ||
| It seems to me that it would be one or the other. | ||
| So to say that he lied or that he was being dishonest really isn't fact. | ||
| It's sort of baseless. | ||
| He could have been wrong. | ||
| He may have been wrong. | ||
| But I don't think that he was lying. | ||
| I don't think he was wrong either for that matter. | ||
| Obviously, we didn't win, a source quoted Meadows as telling Smith's team in hindsight. | ||
| Oh, a source! Trump has called Meadows, one of the former president's closest and highest-ranking A's in the White House, a special friend and a great chief of staff, as good as it gets. | ||
| Descriptions of what Meadows allegedly told investigators shed further light on the evidence Smith's team has amassed as it prosecutes Trump for allegedly trying to unlawfully retain power and spread lies about the 2020 election. | ||
| Lies like the ones that they told about the 2016 election. | ||
| Lies like the ones they tell us every single day. | ||
| Meanwhile, another spineless testimony against Trump from Michael Cohen. | ||
| Trump and Michael Cohen come face-to-face at a New York fraud trial. | ||
| Michael Cohen, Donald Trump's former lawyer and longtime fixer, confronted his ex-boss face-to-face for the first time in five years on Tuesday when he testified that the former president personally authorized the fraudulent inflation of his net worth and property valuations. | ||
| With Trump looking on, Cohen appeared at Trump's civil fraud trial in New York, where he told the court about his knowledge of the inner workings of the Trump organization. | ||
| Cohen was an executive vice president and counsel to Trump for years, and he alleged that he and the company's former chief financial officer reverse engineered Trump's financial statements to meet valuations that Trump arbitrarily elected. | ||
| So, we're supposed to trust Cohen as he testifies that he's a liar. | ||
| He's testifying that he's a liar, and based on that credible testimony from a liar calling himself a liar, we're going to use that in order to back up these claims that Trump was lying about his net worth for financial purposes. | ||
| A crime, allegedly, which had no victims for loans which were paid back. | ||
| Meanwhile, more swampiness happening in Congress. | ||
| Emmer drops out of the House Speaker race after Trump calls a rhino supporters bail. | ||
| House GOP chaos continues after Representative Tim Emmer, who earlier in the day won an internal ballot for nominee, dropped out. | ||
| Emmer won the GOP nomination over House GOP Vice Chairman Mike Johnson from Louisiana in a secret ballot. | ||
| But in a secondary roll call vote, 26 Republicans voted present or for another person, according to House GOP Conference Secretary Lisa McClain. | ||
| Fall members vote present and for a specific candidate. | ||
| Emmer could only afford to lose four Republicans and still win the speakership on the House floor. | ||
| His withdrawal after a group of Republicans made clear they wouldn't back him on the House floor. | ||
| The move also came after former President Trump called Emma a rhino and said that voting for her would be a tragic mistake. | ||
| So that's a beautiful thing that we see populism taking hold again. | ||
| And I wish we had enough time in this segment because Bannon had a lot to say about this populist movement and what's happening here. | ||
| We're going to make sure that we go into that in the next segment. | ||
| But it looks like what Gates has accomplished in the House of Representatives is not a sign of chaos in the House, but a sign of American populism finally taking hold and standing up against the RINO establishment, which is really the Uniparty establishment, which is really the political class itself. | ||
| We're about ready to cut to break, so make sure during the break you visit defendjones.com or defendowen.com and show support for these great fearless leaders, these free speech martyrs, and help keep Infowars on the air, help keep these voices loud and active and broadcasted across the entire globe. | ||
| Also, if you have a moment, go to Amazon.com and get a copy of The Great Awakening for yourself, get a copy for your friends, and get a copy for your family as well to help us trend and show the censors that we will not be silenced. | ||
| Stick with us, folks. | ||
| We'll be right back after this break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So where are we? | |
| The historic fight I just want to make sure that you understand the historical nature of what you've accomplished, because it's been extraordinary. | ||
| The cartel and the apparatus have had a grip on The capital, not just the administrative state and everything they've got in the executive branch, but they've had in the capital where they have a system that the incentives are to reward themselves to spend more money. | ||
| Because they have a perfect mechanism and the Federal Reserve can just print the... | ||
| So you have the fiscal irresponsibility, that would be the fiscal side of the spending, can be backed up by a central bank that will back up monetarily that irresponsibility. | ||
| That's how we brought the nation's finances to the brink of chaos. | ||
| And we've called this every step of the way. | ||
| Why? The math is not that hard. | ||
| I would like to say, oh, this is so complicated. | ||
| It's not complicated. Pretty straightforward. | ||
| And now we have a time to break that cartel. | ||
| You have taken out the leadership that they've spent 10 or 12 years building up with all those operatives and all those staffers and all that for the cartel. | ||
| You've done it in three weeks. | ||
| Now it's not done yet. | ||
| It's far from done. | ||
| But we're towards the end. | ||
| What did Churchill say? | ||
| It's not the beginning of the end, but it's the end of the beginning. | ||
| That's why Emmer and then snuffing out any hope of McCarthy coming back is the end of the beginning. | ||
| As we take it on and go to the next phase. | ||
| But this is 100% you have accomplished. | ||
| What they call the pressure campaign. | ||
| Remember, the media told you, oh, it's terrible, it's backfiring. | ||
| Don't look like it's backfiring from here. | ||
| Looks like it's dead on. | ||
| And they don't like hearing from you. | ||
| When was pressure ever constituents calling up and saying, hey, here's what I think. | ||
| Here's what I would recommend. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's what I would vote for you to do. | |
| That's called Vox Populi. | ||
| And they don't like it. | ||
| 202-225-3121. | ||
| This afternoon, they're going to make their pitches. | ||
| This evening, they're going to have their votes in conference. | ||
| Tomorrow, they're going to come to the floor. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're going to rock and roll all week. | |
| Another epic week in the nation's capital. | ||
| Wrong phone number there. | ||
| The phone number is 877-789-2539. | ||
| Again, that's 877-789-2539. | ||
| And good news, our Infowarsstore.com site is up and running again. | ||
| So if you... Oh, it isn't? | ||
| I thought it was. Up locally. | ||
| Oh, okay, gotcha. It should be up any moment then, in the next hour, hopefully. | ||
| Yeah, everybody, hey, sorry about that. | ||
| We were doing maintenance overnight on the InfoWars store, and it will be back up in about 30 minutes. | ||
| It's up locally for us here in the building on our internet, but if you're having difficulties going to InfoWarsstore.com, what we're doing is we're kind of switching up the backbone of our sales, and... | ||
| The software that handles that. | ||
| So here in about 30 minutes, if you've been waiting to pull the trigger on a product, by about 10 a.m. | ||
| Central, you should be good to go. | ||
| Perfect. Thanks for that feedback there, Weber. | ||
| I appreciate that. | ||
| So we just saw Bannon speak about this cartel, as he calls it, this sort of cabal of these central bankers. | ||
| And the central banking system and the fractional reserve banking system are designed to enrich the political class. | ||
| Because our founding fathers set up our government, they set up our constitution so that if the federal government were to coin money, it would have to do so with precious metals. | ||
| And so the federal reserve was created as a private bank as a way to circumvent that rule. | ||
| And since the U.S. currency is created by a private institution, it is able to bypass the backing or the standard of a precious metal, like a gold standard. | ||
| And what happens is our political class, which is supposed to vote to raise taxes and agree, our representatives that we elect are supposed to agree to raise taxes, Before taxes are raised, is able to actually tax us through inflation by printing money. | ||
| So when they print money and they give it only to their little club, they're not actually taxing us because they're not taking dollars out of our accounts, but they are taxing us through inflation because they are ensuring that they have a greater proportion of all the dollars that exist. | ||
| So rather than Having $10 and then taking $5 of your $10, they just make it so that there's a total of $30 and they have 20 of them. | ||
| And so then they have two-thirds of all the wealth instead of half. | ||
| And this is how we've been taxed without proper legislation or representation for over 100 years now. | ||
| And this is why our political class has formed into a uniparty and why that uniparty has become globalist and conspired with other uniparties of nations leading all over the world. | ||
| why organizations like the UN exist, why organizations like the WHO exist or NATO or the WEF is because they conspire together to control currency and to ensure that when inflation is conducted, it disproportionately benefits their political class. | ||
| So they print money and then they give government contracts out to either businesses that offer services or aid in humanitarian areas or to military contractors. | ||
| That's why they always love war. | ||
| That's why all of the world wars, including this one that we're in now, all three world wars have occurred within 100 years of the establishment of the Federal Reserve Bank. | ||
| Wasn't ever a world war before that. | ||
| And every government has attempted to do something like this in the past. | ||
| If you look at the fall of Rome, one of the main reasons that the empire collapsed was because they were debasing their currency. | ||
| And the reason they were debasing their currency is because it was a way for the leadership to tax the people without taxing the people without actually having to collect. | ||
| You just make the currency cheaper. | ||
| That's what they're doing. | ||
| And that's why you see news headlines like the U.S. will act decisively if Iran attacks its personnel, according to Blinken. | ||
| He told the United Nations on Tuesday it does not seek conflict with Iran, but Secretary of State Blinken warned that Washington would act swiftly and decisively if Iran or its proxies attacked U.S. personnel anywhere. | ||
| It's why you see headlines like Israel sees Gaza ground invasion inevitable insists no U.S. veto. | ||
| In fact, it will insist on U.S. support, and we would love to support them, not because we care about Judeo-Christian values or because we feel bad for the innocent Jewish people there, but because our government wants any excuse it can have to print more money, especially since we're facing a crisis of our currency. | ||
| It's why we see headlines like U.S. forces in Iraq, Syria have been targeted 13 times in the past week because, by the way, if we're being targeted, then that's a justification for us to engage in a conflict. | ||
| It's why we see the U.S. Army giving its only two Iron Dome batteries to Israel... | ||
| It's why we see our leaders, like hypocrite New York Governor Hochul, visiting Israel wearing body armor that she banned in New York. | ||
| But it's also why the people may end up with a speaker that is actually populist, because we are catching up to this. | ||
| We are catching on to this, just like Bannon says. | ||
| We are aware of this corruption. | ||
| And now we have reports that Mike Johnson wins the House GOP's latest speaker nomination. | ||
| Some Republicans are bullish that Johnson will solve the conference's seemingly impossible math problem. | ||
| Representative Mike Johnson won a closed-door contest on Tuesday night. | ||
| That's late last night to become his party's fourth speaker nominee. | ||
| Now the Louisiana lawmaker faces the same task that felled the three previous aspirants for the job, securing the 217 votes. | ||
| He needs to win the House floor. | ||
| And I am happy with this nomination. | ||
| I am pleased with the endorsements that I have seen come his way. | ||
| I am glad it is not another swamp creature like McCarthy or Emmer or the likes of any of these others who have voted every time to fund Ukraine. | ||
| I'd like to have an American as Speaker of the House. | ||
| Stick with us, folks. We'll be back right after this break. | ||
| Make sure you visit defendjones.com. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
| I'm Chase Geyser. We have a great guest coming at the top of the hour. | ||
| Nick Fuentes is going to be joining us today. | ||
| This should be a fascinating conversation. | ||
| So I'll be taking calls for the next 27 minutes. | ||
| Make sure you call on 877-789-2539. | ||
| Again, that's 877-789-2539. | ||
| I want to hear what you have to say, what you think about the show so far today, the news. | ||
| First up, I want to hear from Henry in Chicago. | ||
| Henry, what's on your mind this morning? | ||
| Good morning. Thanks for taking my phone call. | ||
| What's in my mind is that, first of all, I want to say we've got to get rid of the deep state. | ||
| We need to abolish the Federal Reserve and get rid of the enforcement agency, which is the IRS, they're coming after us with weapons. | ||
| And not only the IRS, but the FDA, the USDA all got weapons. | ||
| They're going to come after us. | ||
| And people need to wake up. | ||
| Also, I need to point out, because no one is pointing this out, Article 1, Section 8, Paragraph 1 of the Constitution says, all the taxes have to be spent for the welfare of the United States, not Israel, not Ukraine, not any other country. | ||
| And any politician that violates the oath to the Constitution should be impeached. | ||
| Why are they stealing our money, number one, and sending it away? | ||
| They're taking over 40% of our income. | ||
| Now, we need to get rid of the 16th Amendment, which is unconstitutional. | ||
| The Supreme Court ruled that any ruling by the Supreme Court that does not apply to the Constitution can be nullified. | ||
| So we need to start getting our money back. | ||
| This is why this country was funded against taxes. | ||
| And this country was funded on dissent, not consent. | ||
| So we need to take our country back. | ||
| You know, forget about this politician. | ||
| So, yeah, we're going to take care of you. You're violating the Constitution on the Article I, Section 8, Paragraph I, to send our money to other countries. | ||
| And also, people need to realize what's going on in the Middle East is part of the Nazi agenda. | ||
| Israeli people do not realize that the government is run by Nazis, same with our country. | ||
| People don't realize that we lost the war against Germany. | ||
| They got the Nazis on the board or the scientists here. | ||
| And people need to wake up. | ||
| We're no longer a republic. | ||
| We're run by precious government. | ||
| Yeah, that's true. We need to fight back. | ||
| I mean, we need to protect our Second Amendment because people do not realize any other country that doesn't have a Second Amendment, they violate the right. | ||
| That's why our founders gave us that right. | ||
| It should not be infringed. | ||
| And any politician that starts to ban your right to own guns is violating the Constitution. | ||
| They took an oath. So we need to impeach them. | ||
| People need to start looking at the Constitution. | ||
| That's why they don't teach it anymore in schools because they want you to be dumb and compliant. | ||
| Sorry. I was born free and I will die free. | ||
| And like I tell people, our country was funded on dissent, not consent. | ||
| So stop playing games. | ||
| Stop demanding that they don't send money to any other country. | ||
| And stop sending our money. | ||
| And we need to get rid of the IRS and the Federal Reserve. | ||
| Because the Federal Reserve is a I like what you said about emphasizing the simple fact that our politicians took an oath. | ||
| They took an oath to protect the Constitution in our current form of government, which is why it boggles my mind that we constantly hear this rhetoric from mostly the left, but definitely both the right and the left, that X, Y, Z is a threat to our democracy. | ||
| When the word democracy isn't mentioned once in our Constitution, this is a constitutional republic. | ||
| And if you've taken an oath to protect our Constitution and to protect our current form of government, advocating for democracy is to advocate for a different form of government. | ||
| And I know it's semantics and it's rhetoric, but any politician who advocates in favor of democracy, in my opinion, is either intentionally or inadvertently a traitor. | ||
| I just feel that way. | ||
| I think you should be impeached for advocating for democracy unless you're trying to have a constitutional amendment to our Constitution in order to change it to a democracy. | ||
| That's really the only time that democracy is legitimately practiced. | ||
| The reason that our deep state and our government and our politicians always spend all this money overseas and say that it's because it's in the interest of our national security is because of what you said about the Constitution today. | ||
| Our taxes have to be spent for the welfare of the citizens of the United States of America and so they always put everything in the guise of being in the interest of our own national security. | ||
| To protect them from that stipulation, I do appreciate your call, Henry. | ||
| That was an awesome call. | ||
| Great feedback there. Let's hear from James in Indiana. | ||
| How is it that we can hold our country accountable and do things like shut down the Federal Reserve or the IRS or take our tax money back when the courts themselves are corrupt? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, absolutely. The courts are complete garbage. | |
| What they're doing to President Trump is a national disgrace. | ||
| You have lawyers that should have been giving President Trump advice, but now they're having all these felonies drop to go against President Trump. | ||
| It's not about justice. | ||
| They put murderers in witness protection programs. | ||
| It's all about destroying whoever's targeted, and they love when other people use your information because it saves them time on making up fake evidence. | ||
| what's happening to Owen Schroer is a national disgrace. | ||
| The government's going after anyone that speaks out. | ||
| We have a problem here in Indiana where the IG came out and stated that veterans will use the news media to get what they want, but that translates into if you speak out against these corrupt agencies, the federal government's coming after everybody. | ||
| It's a complete atrocity. | ||
| Yeah, I agree with you wholeheartedly there. | ||
| And we even have politicians on the right now calling for the censorship of freedom of speech. | ||
| They're not prosecuting or persecuting anyone yet, but they are trying to shut down organizations, which brings me to my next call. | ||
| I want to talk to Bart in Florida about Ron DeSantis and his free speech laws. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What are your thoughts, Bart? But it looks like he's controlled opposition. | |
| I don't really like the Palestinian point of view, but I think they should be able to talk, even though I don't like them. | ||
| And I'm pissed off as hell that they locked Owen up. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is an injustice, and he must be released. | |
| 100%. 100%. How long have you been listening to Owen? | ||
| The first time I called him was... | ||
| Well, I've been listening to him since 2015, but the first time I ever called on his show was like 2018. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wow, long-time listener. Yeah, and I'm praying for you, Owen. | |
| I want everybody listening, I don't care what religion you are, pray for Owen right now. | ||
| Absolutely. Thank you so much for that call and for showing support. | ||
| And you guys can show support for Owen by sending him letters while he is in prison. | ||
| His details are on the screen right now. | ||
| You can go to defendowen.com and support him as well so that when he comes back from his federally sponsored vacation, he is well positioned to take up the mantle again and lead in the front line of the Infowar. | ||
| Next up, I want to hear from Christian Supremacist in a giant garden. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What's up, brother? Hey, brother, how are you doing? | |
| Yeah, you caught me in the middle of getting a bagel. | ||
| Yeah, I'm a Christian supremacist and I believe everyone should love each other and live in peace and we all live on a garden and the Bible's real. | ||
| That's right. I'm a supremacist. | ||
| I'll fight and I'll die for my cause. | ||
| We're all one. I love you all. | ||
| Everybody come together. | ||
| We're all one. | ||
| I'm a Christian supremacist, baby! | ||
| Let's go! Woo! | ||
| There you go, man. Beautiful call. | ||
| I appreciate it. Let's hear up from Donald in Baltimore. | ||
| Donald, what's on your mind? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I'm calling because I see a lot of callers calling. | |
| And I heard you yourself say that Rome fell. | ||
| Rome never fell. Rome fell back. | ||
| That government is still in effect. | ||
| It's just behind the scenes, and it exploded because it's got to go to the corner of the Bible. | ||
| Everybody keeps getting in these gray areas and worrying about how the thing's going to take place. | ||
| God told the Lion Spirit, how you going to convince Ahab to go up to Ramagilead? | ||
| He used the Lion Spirit to do that. | ||
| God said, I kill him and make him alive. | ||
| Y'all keep playing the devil. | ||
| That was just somebody with horns in his nose where God pulled his chain anytime he wants you to carry out his will. | ||
| The problem was man fell. | ||
| He brought death into this world. | ||
| And how God brings the ending to that is how God brings, whether you like it or lump it, God's going to bring an end to that. | ||
| And how he orchestrates whoever he got, the players in the game, People get your attitude. | ||
| They talk about our government, take our guns. | ||
| Some spirits can't wait to come get you a gun. | ||
| One angel killed 140,000 Assyrians. | ||
| They can't wait. They're looking for that one that stands out and says, I'm going to fight. | ||
| What you fighting for, Jeff? | ||
| It's a dead system. | ||
| You're fighting to say, can I keep my pool? | ||
| Can I keep my house? | ||
| Can I keep my shiny things? | ||
| No, God said it got to end. | ||
| That's death. This is a death situation that people are trying to make life in. | ||
| The only one who can make life in a dead situation is God. | ||
| That's why he gave us Jesus Christ, to bring life to us. | ||
| Everybody's talking about fight your way out. | ||
| The only way you fight your way out is with prayer and being on the Lord's side. | ||
| If you're on any other side, you're a loser. | ||
| Wow, great call, Donald. | ||
| That's something to think about. Very good stuff there. | ||
| Stick with us, folks. After this break, we will be right back, of course, with our great guest, too, coming up at the top of the hour, Nick Cuentes. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal. | ||
| I am Chase Geiser, filling in for the great Harrison Smith, who will be hosting the War Room until after Christmas, while I will be here filling in... | ||
| Right out of the gate, I want to take a call from Taylor in North Carolina. | ||
| Taylor, what's on your mind? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, can you hear me? | |
| Yes. Alright, hey Chase, how you doing? | ||
| I'm good. Number one, I love you guys. | ||
| And I really, really hope people start giving all that they can to you guys. | ||
| Because I listen to you every day. | ||
| I don't really have to listen to anything else, because where else are you going to get unbiased reporting? | ||
| Because it's just amazing to see that play out in real time with Harrison having his own viewpoints and opinions, you having your own viewpoint and opinions, Alex having his own viewpoint and opinions, and none of you guys ever cross each other. | ||
| And that is just fantastic. | ||
| So I really hope people start buying the products and just start giving. | ||
| I actually had a very emotional conversation about that My wife this morning was on X or Twitter, whatever, whatever. | ||
| And I'm trying to spread as much information as I can, as unbiased as I can, using you guys as an example. | ||
| But I came across a video of Alex and someone had called in giving him crap about not doing anything for Owen. | ||
| And, you know, I... The response that Alex gave was just so, like, you could see it in his eyes. | ||
| He's not lying. | ||
| I'd love for you to send that to me in a DM, by the way. | ||
| Taylor, I'd love for you to send me a Twitter DM with that link. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'd love to see that. Absolutely. | |
| Absolutely. It's just so heartfelt. | ||
| So, like, heart-wrenching. | ||
| And you yourself, like me, myself, I'm just a guy. | ||
| You know, I'm struggling every single week. | ||
| I got two kids. Trying to keep them away from all the horribleness. | ||
| We just got done moving to a place where it's like a small hometown. | ||
| And we're just strapped. | ||
| And I just started taking the supplement. | ||
| I just started taking, let's see, DNA Force Plus, the real red pill, the turmeric. | ||
| Just started taking all of them. | ||
| Taking the iodine, I wish I could have started earlier. | ||
| You know, I really wish I could have. | ||
| I've been listening to you guys for years, but oh my God, absolutely. | ||
| So is my wife. My wife is the one who is skeptical. | ||
| Within just a few days, she started saying, wow, we really need to work into the budget to keep you on these things because she can see a difference. | ||
| If she can see a difference, Then it's working because it takes a lot for her to... | ||
| I know the feeling, man. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I know the feeling. But my main reason I'm calling in is you see all the demonstrations. | |
| You see all the demonstrations with pro-Israel, pro-Hamas, pro-Palestine, all that stuff. | ||
| I'm just sitting here going, why? | ||
| Why can't people like me, and of course I have my own answers to my own question, and I've got to figure it out myself. | ||
| So, I mean, I'm in the same bucket, but... | ||
| Why can't we, the people that see what's going on, those with eyes and those with ears, why can't we have our own pro-America demonstrations, leave everything out of it, and just say, this is what we care about. | ||
| These are the things. | ||
| Forget everything else. | ||
| And I mean, I'm not being heartless when saying that, because everyone that is being affected by Palestine and Israel, all the innocent people, That's terrible. | ||
| But our place is not over there. | ||
| Our place is here. | ||
| Our place is for our own people. | ||
| And if we are to do anything, then we need to use our political prowess to vocalize that we condemn violence and slaughter of any innocent, regardless of who they are, regardless of what region. | ||
| And we need to start calling out demons for who they are. | ||
| You know, whenever I'm trying to spread as much as I can on X, as unbiased as I can, I'm human. | ||
| I got emotions. | ||
| I make mistakes. I try to apologize for the mistakes that I make. | ||
| But it's kind of up to us to be our own MSM, and it's kind of up to us to do our own pro-America demonstrations and just, you know, really show that it cut right through, cut right through the bullcrap, because At this point in time, a majority of the people feel the way that we do. | ||
| It's a faction of the people that either go left or right. | ||
| There's more of a majority that is silent that feel the way that we do And they need to stop being silent. | ||
| Taylor, it's coming. We need to stop being silent. | ||
| It's coming. I'm so glad that you called. | ||
| First of all, it's touching how I can hear it in your voice how emotionally invested you are in this country, in this movement, and the circumstances that we're in. | ||
| So I really do appreciate your call, and I appreciate the plugs and the support. | ||
| And I agree with everything that you said. | ||
| I don't think that the leftists or that the globalists realize the enemy that they're creating, just like Israel doesn't realize the enemy that it's creating, because everyone who survives in Palestine is going to come back with a vengeance, whether it's 10 years from now, whether it's 20 years from now, whether it's two weeks from now, it's going to happen. | ||
| When you do an injustice on a people, you catalyze a blowback. | ||
| It's happened all throughout history. | ||
| And it's happening now in America, because I know that millions upon millions of the listeners out there in America are going to sleep at night, wondering how they're going to pay their mortgage or whether or not they're ever going to be able to make a down payment on a house. | ||
| I know that millions of Americans are concerned about whether or not they can afford their grocery bill. | ||
| They're concerned about sending their kids to public schools when the public schools are teaching Marxism and they can't afford to send them to private schools. | ||
| I have felt the pangs of middle-class Americans struggling. | ||
| I know what it's like for your income to stay the same for several years while all of your expenses go up. | ||
| When you go to the grocery store and you come out with less than is on your list, when your politicians constantly lie about you and to you and disparage you and endeavor to imprison you just because of what you believe and who you support, there will be a reckoning in this country. | ||
| The only thing that we have to worry about as patriotic Americans in my opinion is making sure We're good to go. | ||
| So prepare now before you are in that excited, emotional state. | ||
| Prepare now for how you believe you should react when your country is yours again. | ||
| We've got a great guest coming up in the next segment, Nick Fuentes. | ||
| I'm very, very excited to speak to this fascinating, fascinating person. | ||
| In the meantime, I want to make sure that we have an opportunity to watch a clip of something he said recently. | ||
| Go ahead and run clip nine. | ||
| I'm going to be really honest with you. | ||
| I don't care that much about this conflict. | ||
| Just like I really don't care that much about Russia and Ukraine. | ||
| But, just like with Russia and Ukraine, this conflict has severe consequences for our adversaries. | ||
| And what are we? | ||
| We are an American sovereignty movement. | ||
| You understand what that means? | ||
| We believe that the American people should have sovereignty over their own country. | ||
| It means that we should be able to determine, we Americans should be able to determine how our country is run and what happens in our country. | ||
| We don't have that right now. | ||
| Right now our government is captured by foreign interests. | ||
| One of which is Israel. | ||
| One of which is the... | ||
| Jewish maximalist Likud party in Israel which dominates our government the Likud regime in Israel has captured our government they're responsible for the censorship they're responsible for the war in Iraq and if Israel's genocide of Gaza is going to rally international support against them then once again This becomes a situation where the enemy of our enemy becomes our friend. | ||
| And so, although I'm an American and I'm an America-first-er, and on some level I am ambivalent in a true sense about the outcome of these conflicts, we have to recognize their strategic importance. | ||
| America is the seat of the liberal empire that controls the world. | ||
| And we are enemies of that liberal order because of our old world views. | ||
| And so to the extent that Russia is rolling that back, or China is rolling that back, to the extent that Israel is being led into a trap which will alienate it from the world and diminish its influence, then we have to support these causes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We have to be strategic about it. | |
| A little bit there from Nick Fuentes, who will be joining us at the beginning of the next segment, the beginning of the hour. | ||
| Very excited to be speaking to him. | ||
| In the meantime, make sure you go to Amazon.com and get a copy, at least one copy, of The Great Awakening. | ||
| We want to make Alex Jones trend. | ||
| We want to make The Great Awakening a bestseller on Amazon so we can slap the face of all those who endeavor to censor truth, all those threatened by the truth. | ||
| Go to Amazon.com and purchase your copy of The Great Awakening today. | ||
| You may have noticed that any semblance of the definition of democracy by the full-blown Uniparty occupying the U.S. | ||
| Capitol is a twisted merging of propaganda, gaslighting, and feigned And I'd like to ask any Democrat senator here that would like to speak to Rashida Tlaib. | ||
|
unidentified
|
She still has a tweet up condemning Israel for a hospital attack. | |
| Uh, stop. | ||
| No. It's a fair question, Senator Graham. | ||
| We are here together. | ||
| Not to talk about the problems at home, which are many. | ||
| It's a fair question, Senator. I've got my own view of what to say. | ||
| You're not going to screw this up. | ||
| I'm not trying to screw it up. Get this guy out of here. | ||
| Now let me tell you. I live here. I'm an Israeli. | ||
| I want an answer to the question. | ||
| I'm an American. | ||
| And I am too. And I believe in free speech. | ||
| According to the martyrs! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Cornell University professor Russell Rickford called the Hamas killings exhilarating. | |
| So when our three branches of government endures what would be described as an insurrection, the country club on Capitol Hill looks the other way, so that the emerging Marxist infiltration can continue forward. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We have students in this country who are specifically calling for and celebrating the killing of Jews, and we can't condemn that on the floor of the Senate? | |
| And certainly President Biden understands that many of our Muslim Arab Americans and Palestinian American loved ones and neighbors are worried about the hate being directed at their communities. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's not a threat! It isn't! | |
| They think we're joking! | ||
| As O'Biden's Banana Republic administration continues to investigate losses that resulted from the breach of the U.S. Capitol on January 6th, claiming that the approximate losses suffered as a result of the siege at the Capitol totaled $2,881,360.20, stating that the amount reflects, among other things, damage to the Capitol building and grounds and certain costs borne by the U.S. Capitol Police. | ||
| The DOJ's amount, a pitiful drop in the bucket compared to the estimated $2 billion in damages, the most expensive in U.S. history according to insurance companies, that the left waged on middle America during the St. | ||
| George Floyd riots. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This poor man got his business caught on fire. | |
| Hey! Merrick Garland's arbitrary yet vicious DOJ says the Department of Justice's resolve to hold accountable those who committed crimes on January 6, 2021, has not and will not wane. | ||
| We at the Department of Justice will do everything in our power to defend the American people and American democracy. | ||
| But everyone knows, including the DOJ, that history will ultimately reveal that January 6th was an elaborate trap set up by those that would destroy America and install Obama's puppet president, Joe Biden. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There's like a hundred people at the Biden inauguration. | |
| It's dystopian. | ||
| 1,069 defendants have been charged in nearly all 50 states. | ||
| Four of those had to plead guilty to the federal charge of seditious conspiracy, which is idiotic on its face. | ||
| These patriots, many of them whose actions reflected reverence for Congress, would never overthrow their own government. | ||
| Thank you, officers. God bless you guys. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you for your patience. | |
| We really appreciate it. Specifically, the U.S. Capitol Police, we had sued for records the January 6th videos. | ||
| And of course, Nancy Pelosi's Congress said, no, we can't have anything under law. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That was an assault on our democracy as Jim Jordan assaulted our democracy on January 6th. | |
| They just wanted answers to an election that voted in a globalist pawn who had campaigned from his basement and miraculously received more votes than President Obama in the wake of countless election tomfoolery. | ||
| The right to petition government for redress of grievances is the right to make a complaint to or seek the assistance of one's government without fear of punishment or reprisals. | ||
| It is the O'Biden's DOJ that violated the law. | ||
| More than 310 defendants have been charged with corruptly obstructing, influencing, or impeding an official proceeding or attempting to do so. | ||
| Does any of that sound familiar regarding what we just witnessed as supporters of Palestine stormed the Capitol? | ||
| Doubling down on the tyranny, the Justice Department is appealing the length of prison sentences for four Proud Boys leaders convicted of seditious conspiracy in the U.S. Capitol attack. | ||
| The insurrection is very real, but it didn't occur on January 6th. | ||
| 2021. The insurrection began on December 23rd. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
| I'm Chase Geiser, hosting the show today through Christmas. | ||
| And with us, we have a very special guest, Nick Fuentes. | ||
| I'm hurting you, man. How are you doing? | ||
| I'm good. How are you doing? I'm doing well. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You want to dive right in? Yeah, let's go. | |
| Let's jump in. All I know about you is what I've read about you, which means I know nothing about you. | ||
| That's right. Because nothing I read is true. | ||
| Right. So let me just dive in with the hardball questions. | ||
| Six million Jews or not, Holocaust. | ||
| Wow. Dead serious. | ||
| Dead serious? Yeah. I think that's a lot. | ||
| I think it's a little exaggerated. What would you say the real number is? | ||
| I don't know. See, I'm not really an expert, but it got to a point in my life where I said, I'm tired of getting beaten over the head with this very over-the-top narrative where I was talking a lot about immigration on my show and I was talking about influence of Israel and social conservatism. | ||
| And they came out strong and said, well, you're this white supremacist, neo-Nazi, Jew hater, all this kind of stuff. | ||
| And, you know, there was a specific time in my career back in 2019 where I was stirring up a lot of controversy, making a lot of noise. | ||
| And they came at me for a joke that I made on my show where somebody did a super chat on my stream and they said, what if the cookie monster had six million cookies in so many ovens? | ||
| And I said, I don't know. | ||
| It sounds like a lot of cookies. | ||
| And they went in real hard with this narrative that I'm some kind of denier, hater, something like that. | ||
| And over time, I started to look into it and I said, why is it that they care so deeply that we accept that narrative about that atrocity? | ||
| And it led to a lot of questions about how atrocities are used to bludgeon people in America to accept a certain political agenda. | ||
| And so I started to became more interested in the motivation behind questions like that. | ||
| Well, I think just like with this situation in Israel and Palestine and like with 9-11, they like to drum up these atrocities. | ||
| to create a certain victim narrative and that is supposed to evoke an emotional reaction in people and that's intended to manipulate their passions into supporting war or not acknowledging certain types of elites and so for example with the Holocaust narrative you find that Whenever anybody talks about Jewish overrepresentation in media, | ||
| government, whenever you talk about the influence of the Israel lobby in Washington, they always beat you over the head with, well, what about the Holocaust? | ||
| You know, but what about the six million? | ||
| Right. Well, that's what I started with. | ||
| Right. Yeah. And you know, for me, it's like, I don't really see what one has to do with the other. | ||
| We have to analyze what the elites are, who they are, what their motivation is, what their agenda is, because there are things going wrong in this country. | ||
| And we have to acknowledge who these people are. | ||
| And then they put up this roadblock with Holocaust to prevent you from necessarily exposing what that's all about. | ||
| Would you consider yourself anti-Semitic in the actual definition of the term? | ||
| is a pretty subjective thing, just like with racism. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| You know, if I ask you, like, are you racist? | ||
| All conservatives know that's a totally loaded question. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Because I think most conservatives think that racism means you hate black people for being black. | ||
| And I think anybody would say no. | ||
| I think 99.9% of people would say if that's racism, then no. | ||
| And I would say the same. | ||
| I think that's a primitive and barbaric way of thinking. | ||
| But we know that the term has become subjective. | ||
| And they say, well, if you believe certain things about how this country should be governed, you're racist. | ||
| They say if you think we should control our border, you're racist. | ||
| And it's like... Well, under that definition, I guess I am a racist because I do want to control the border. | ||
| And I think the same is true with anti-Semitism. | ||
| If the definition is, do you hate Jews for being Jews? | ||
| The answer is no, I don't hate anybody. | ||
| I don't hate anybody because I'm a Christian, so I love everybody. | ||
| And so I don't have any hatred for groups or individuals. | ||
| I mean, even our enemies were called to love. | ||
| But the definition of anti-Semitism is something that, like the definition of racism, isn't just about hating a group for who they are, or even hating a group at all. | ||
| There's a new definition of anti-Semitism that's being pushed. | ||
| By certain groups, like the International Holocaust Remembrance Society. | ||
| I forgot about them. Yeah, it's easy to forget, you know, because they never remind us of that. | ||
| But they're pushing this new definition. | ||
| This is also the State Department's definition, where they say that if you accuse an American Jewish person of having allegiance to Israel, that's anti-Semitic. | ||
| And it's like, well, wait a second. | ||
| I mean, we know that guys like Ben Shapiro... | ||
| And Dennis Prager and Mark Levin, we know they have an allegiance to Israel. | ||
| I think they would even explicitly state that. | ||
| Of course. I would be surprised if Ben Shapiro wouldn't explicitly state that he prefers Israel over America. | ||
| Well, it's funny you say that, because he will acknowledge that he does. | ||
| Right. But I had an encounter with Shapiro seven years ago when I was 18 years old, and I tweeted, I didn't even reply to him, but I was on Twitter as a teenager, and I said that there are Jews that put Israel first, and we need to be America first. | ||
| He quote tweets me at that time, this is December 2016, and says, well, to accuse any Jew of having a dual allegiance is a surest sign of anti-Semitism. | ||
| I was like, what? But I read your coverage. | ||
| I read the Daily Wire and it's overwhelmingly pro-Israel. | ||
| And so you're right. And it's just like the left. | ||
| You know, the left does something similar where they say replacement migration isn't real. | ||
| White genocide isn't happening. | ||
| But then they'll turn to their audience and say, we can't wait until whites are a minority. | ||
| And we can't wait until all these Hispanics come in and Texas goes blue and Nevada goes blue and Florida goes blue. | ||
| And it's the same thing with these Zionists. | ||
| They, on the one hand, say, well, it's anti-Semitic to say, We have loyalty to Israel. | ||
| And then they'll turn around and they say, well, America has to support Israel in every case. | ||
| So back to the original question, you know, am I anti-Semitic? | ||
| I don't hate anybody. But under this very subjective definition, which they're pushing, and again, which the CIA World Factbook, this is their definition. | ||
| The State Department is their definition. | ||
| I'd be considered that for stating what you just said as a fact, which is that a lot of these American Jews... | ||
| Let me put it to you this way. | ||
| I don't mean to interrupt you. I'm sorry. | ||
| Go ahead. How does your view of the Jewish people differ from Adolf Hitler's? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well... That's a loaded question. | |
| And I'm not trying to set you up. | ||
| I know these questions sound ridiculous, but I'm just fascinated at the answer. | ||
| Well, you know, the thing about Hitler is that's a whole other subject. | ||
| We could get into that. We don't have to. | ||
| Because it's a big topic. No, I'd love to. | ||
| It's a big topic. | ||
| But I think that people need to consider about Hitler and the Nazis that... | ||
| As Christians, we believe in real evil, right? | ||
| Yes. We believe in real demons. | ||
| Like, I don't think that demons are metaphorical. | ||
| I think they're real. I think that Satan is real and Satan works in the world. | ||
| And there's something curious, which is that the American political landscape sits in the shadow of Adolf Hitler, this dictator. | ||
| Our entire moral framework is bounded by Hitler. | ||
| The best people are considered the least racist, the least Hitler-like. | ||
| And the worst people, the most immoral, are considered the most racist, the most Hitler-like. | ||
| And me as an American and a Christian, I say, wait a minute. | ||
| I say, Satan is the ultimate evil, and Christ is the ultimate good. | ||
| Now, we can say that Hitler, to the extent that he had concentration camps and to the extent that he was a killer, we could say that that was bad. | ||
| We could say that that was inhumane and that was cruel. | ||
| By the same token, there were a lot of war crimes being committed in World War II. Dwight Eisenhower ran concentration camps against the Germans. | ||
| They bombed Dresden. | ||
| We interned the Japanese. We interred the Japanese, and the Japanese killed Chinese and did horrible war crimes. | ||
| And so Hitler is often singled out and isolated. | ||
| But what I want to say is that that is not the basis of my moral framework. | ||
| Now, when we look at people like the Jews... | ||
| It's in their religious text, the Talmud, that Jesus Christ is burning in hell. | ||
| Now, to me, that is very offensive as a Christian. | ||
| I find that to be very immoral. | ||
| And so I think that Christians and Americans have to sort of rethink the moral language, this fixation with Hitler and he's the ultimate evil. | ||
| I want to say, no, the people that are against Christians, the people that are against Christ are the ultimate evil. | ||
| Not some dictator from the 1930s. | ||
| I mean, we could say that Hitler and Stalin are right there together, but nobody cares about whether anybody supports Stalin or Lenin or Mao or anybody like that. | ||
| And I know we're coming to a break, but it's a big topic, and I think that people have to sort of rethink a lot of their assumptions on these things. | ||
| I've never heard that perspective before, and I think that's very, very compelling. | ||
| Make sure you stick with us, folks. We're going to be back in the next segment with more from Nick Fuentes. | ||
| In the meantime, make sure you visit Amazon.com and order a copy of The Great Awakening by Alex Jones. | ||
| Nick will be with us the rest of the hour, and he will be engaged in a debate with the one and only Alex Jones at the top of the hour. | ||
| So stay tuned, folks. | ||
| We'll be right back. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal. | ||
| We have a fascinating and controversial guest with us today, Nick Fuentes. | ||
| And I don't say the word controversial to distance myself from him, but because he is controversial, and that's a good thing. | ||
| True. So, you mentioned earlier in the show today... | ||
| Just briefly in passing, while you were making another point about the disproportionate representation of Jewish people in institutions like mass media, Hollywood, the implication was maybe government too. | ||
| What is your explanation for how that came about? | ||
| Well, I think they work together, and that's really the long and short of it, you know, because I don't think that anybody denies that this is the state of things. | ||
| A lot of people don't like to acknowledge it, but if you acknowledge it, I think people are eventually forced to admit that it's factually true, and a lot of times they take credit for it. | ||
| You can read, there's an article in LA Times that came out 10 years ago, and there's a Jewish writer who says we should be proud. | ||
| We should be proud that the Jewish people are influential in Hollywood and media and in all these other sectors. | ||
| So it's really indisputable as a fact. | ||
| And then people like to say... | ||
| Because it's sort of an inconvenient thing. | ||
| They like to say, well, this state of affairs came about because, well, Jewish people happen to be more educated in their higher IQ. And I think a lot of people find that to be a plausible explanation. | ||
| But then we find that there are a lot of high IQ groups. | ||
| White people are very high IQ. Asians are very high IQ. And yet, Jews remain overrepresented in the Ivy League schools, in Hollywood, in these other places, more so than these other high IQ groups. | ||
| And what we find is that What they're able to do, I think what makes them exceptional, is that they're tribal. | ||
| They're a people that are loyal to their own tribe. | ||
| They're very race loyal. | ||
| And I would say that white people in America are very much the opposite of that. | ||
| And white people have been indoctrinated to consider that a bad thing, any degree of race loyalty. | ||
| I think that white people like to consider themselves altruistic and magnanimous towards other races. | ||
| I think white people like to feel like They're promoting diversity and like they're tolerant for differences in different cultures, customs, and kinds of people. | ||
| We conquered you. Here's your casino. | ||
| Exactly. Right. Or we feel sorry for slavery. | ||
| You know, hey, I'm not racist. Look at these black people that I work with or that I'm friends with. | ||
| Whereas I think Jews, we all recognize, are very tribal people. | ||
| I think that they stick together and they like to support each other. | ||
| Like the Rothschilds. | ||
| Why were the Rothschilds so successful? | ||
| Why were they able to build... | ||
| An apparatus in Europe where they had complete trust and where they had this basically primitive form of open source intelligence. | ||
| It's because they were family. | ||
| It's because they spread out into all the major capitals and they could trust and rely on each other because they were brothers, because they were related. | ||
| And that's actually a perfect example. | ||
| You could say, well, why were they successful in banking? | ||
| It's because they were family. | ||
| They were a tribe and they were working together across borders and in different countries. | ||
| And there's something similar, I think, that has happened in America. | ||
| And all you have to do is look at the Zionist movement as another example where they help each other. | ||
| And so I think that when you look at America as a truly open society, an individualistic society where we consider it a virtue that we have this competitive capitalist system and it's a meritocracy, it rewards the most competent, competitive individual. | ||
| It's sort of like they're playing a team game and we're playing an individual game. | ||
| It's sort of like a free-for-all for everybody else and they're playing a team death match to do like a gaming reference. | ||
| And so, you know, you consider the analogy of like a soccer match. | ||
| If one team is a real team, they're all wearing the same jersey. | ||
| But the other side, everybody's wearing a unique jersey. | ||
| And one team only passes to their own players. | ||
| But the other side, they pass to everybody. | ||
| They pass to the people with the other jerseys and the other side. | ||
| And you ask, who's going to win the soccer game? | ||
| It's going to be the team. | ||
| And so I think that that's indisputably the attribute that sets them apart and makes them exceptional. | ||
| And I think that's what accounts for that. | ||
| You mentioned differences in IQ among groups, and I've been tossing this around in my mind for a couple of years now. | ||
| One of the things that often crosses my mind is when you think about the Asian community, which traditionally has a higher IQ, I'm often fascinated by how You often see Asians who are perfect pianists. | ||
| They can play Beethoven perfectly. | ||
| They can play Mozart perfectly, which is absolute technical precision. | ||
| They can even imitate the emotional precision. | ||
| It's beautiful. But you don't often hear of a famous Chinese composer. | ||
| Then on the other hand, you have the Beethovens and the Mozarts who can do all the composing. | ||
| Who knows how they sounded when they actually played. | ||
| Maybe they were sloppy. Rachmaninoff was notoriously sloppy when he actually played, but was a sophisticated composer. | ||
| And I often thought that In the Chinese culture, you have an emphasis on discipline and not an emphasis on freedom. | ||
| So you can get really good at something, but you lose that creative element that's associated with freedom, freedom of thought. | ||
| And it seems to me that the most brilliant creators throughout history, regardless of the culture that they've been in, have been in a perfect equilibrium between discipline and freedom. | ||
| Like, if you have no discipline, then you're just sloppy and you suck like a lot of art today, right? | ||
| But if you have that balance... | ||
| And so the point that I'm trying to make is... | ||
| Given that different cultures produce different outcomes, regardless of the actual ethnicity or genetics of a population, is it possible that the Jewish culture rather than internal favoritism exclusively is more conducive to success? | ||
| Well, you're right that when you look at the different races, they really do fundamentally have different minds. | ||
| They have different aptitudes. | ||
| And, you know, the Asians, it's not just that they're high IQ and proficient in math and science. | ||
| They're also far more deferential and collectivist than Westerners. | ||
| Europeans are far more individualistic. | ||
| And you can see that in their different cultures. | ||
| In China, it's been an empire for 3,000 years, and it's built on conformity. | ||
| Whereas in the West, it's highly individualistic and... | ||
| And so they do have, although there's a quantitative differential in IQ, they're also qualitatively different as well. | ||
| And they're different culturally. | ||
| And I think that we underestimate these genetic differences. | ||
| Those really are fundamentally genetic differences. | ||
| And thousands of years of people breeding in an Asian society versus European society, they produce a different physical appearance. | ||
| They also produce a different psychology as well. | ||
| Sure. With regard to Jewish culture, you're right, because they do place an emphasis on education, and specifically, they're a legalistic people, because there are people that worship the law. | ||
| That's what the religion is based on, is the 613 commandments in the Torah, and And the religion now after Jesus is based on the interpretation of the 613 commandments. | ||
| It's called the Talmud. And all the debate and disputation between the rabbis about how do we interpret and apply the law. | ||
| That's why there's so many Jewish lawyers. | ||
| They're legalistic people. | ||
| They've worshipped and interpreted and followed the law for thousands of years. | ||
| And they argue about the law too, like lawyers argue about the law. | ||
| Exactly. Precisely. | ||
| But by the same token, you have to keep in mind that no other group, regardless of the extent to which they place an emphasis on education, like Chinese people we know, place a great emphasis on education. | ||
| So do American ethnics. | ||
| You know, I'm Italian, Mexican, and Irish, and any American ethnic will recognize the sort of immigrant mindset. | ||
| It's very important that their kids went on to become educated. | ||
| Very important that they went to college and became doctors or lawyers or professionals. | ||
| For example, in Chicago, all the Italians worked in the sewers. | ||
| Now, in any case, because I know we're running out of time. | ||
| What's that? Just like Mario. | ||
| Like Mario, yeah. So in any case, but that didn't make them overrepresented in Hollywood media finance because they weren't working together in the same way. | ||
| They had a monopoly on plumbing. | ||
| That's right. That's why they run the sewers. | ||
| Stick with us, folks. We'll be right back. | ||
| Make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I have heard an update that it is now live. | |
| Check out InfoWarsStore.com today and be the reason that InfoWars is still on the air. | ||
| Stick with us. | ||
| We'll be back with more from Nick Fuentes after the break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Through the lens of the American Journal, Chase Geyser captures the mosaic of American life. . | |
| Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
| We have an excellent guest today. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Nick Fuente joins us. | |
| I have really enjoyed the conversation so far. | ||
| Thank you for taking the time to speak with me. | ||
| I know you're here for the big guy, but the fact that you tuned in early, came in early to talk to me for a little bit, means a lot, man. | ||
| I appreciate it. Thanks for having me. | ||
| It's a great show you guys. Absolutely. | ||
| So, what do you want to talk about next? | ||
| What do you... Do you think we're on for World War III? Yeah, I think we're headed towards that. | ||
| Absolutely. What does that look like? | ||
| Well, it's a confrontation fundamentally between the United States and China. | ||
| And much has been written about this, that these great power conflicts, they come from the falling and the rising hegemon throughout history. | ||
| And this has been studied, whether it was World War I and World War II. You mean like fourth turning type stuff? | ||
| No, I mean, the fourth turning gets into the idea that history is cyclical. | ||
| Right. And that there's a pattern to these different generations. | ||
| And Spengler writes about that. | ||
| Strauss writes about this. | ||
| Neil Strauss, that is. But I'm talking specifically about the balance of power in the world between great powers, hegemonic powers. | ||
| And so, like World War I and World War II, one way to look at that is they're really the same conflict. | ||
| Right. And the conflict then was fundamentally about Great Britain versus Germany. | ||
| The Great Britain following the Napoleonic Wars was the hegemon. | ||
| They defeated Napoleon and for a hundred years there was the Pax Britannica. | ||
| They essentially reigned supreme and they created a global stability. | ||
| when Germany began to rise at the end of the 19th century because of the Industrial Revolution, they fundamentally altered that balance of power. | ||
| And there was a destabilization that occurred because Great Britain was the power that ran the world. | ||
| Now there's this new kid on the block that's able to exert itself in Africa, in Europe. | ||
| And so one way to look at World War I and World War II is how do you resolve a balance of power in Europe and the world where there's two superpowers? | ||
| It's not just Britain, but it's also Germany. | ||
| Then you have the same thing with the United States and the Soviet Union. | ||
| The United States and the Soviet Union were the two hegemons. | ||
| It was a bipolar world order, two poles, which is Moscow and Washington. | ||
| And they balanced each other out and they achieved an equilibrium, a stability. | ||
| When the Soviet Union fell, this was actually destabilizing... | ||
| Because it allowed the United States, unchecked, to expand all over the world. | ||
| And that's where you get the war in Iraq. | ||
| That's where you get the global war on terror. | ||
| It's because there was no one in the world that could check the power of the United States so they could undertake these unilateral dramatic actions. | ||
| Thankfully, the United States was a relatively benign hegemon. | ||
| Now that the United States power is declining in relative terms, meaning that China is becoming vastly more powerful because of its economy, Russia has recovered because Russia is a large resource-rich nation with a large conventional and nuclear military. - Sorry. Russia has recovered because Russia is a large resource-rich nation They were momentarily weakened because of the fall of the Soviet Union. | ||
| But Putin, elected in 1999, has rebuilt Russia. | ||
| So in absolute terms, they've recovered a great deal of power. | ||
| They're intervening in global conflicts in West Africa and the Middle East. | ||
| And so the rise of China and Russia... | ||
| And them coming together as recently as an unbreakable alliance, it has diminished the United States in relative terms. | ||
| 20 years ago, China and Russia could not challenge the United States. | ||
| Now in terms of firepower, China and Russia roughly equal the firepower of the United States. | ||
| China and Russia in terms of economy, now some say because of the COVID recession that maybe China will never overtake the United States. | ||
| But certainly they're far richer And a greater engine of global economic productivity than they were 20 years ago. | ||
| We're roughly equal. And so as a consequence now, the sort of frontier of American hegemony is being pushed back by China and Russia. | ||
| And it's a very clear fault line. | ||
| You could literally, over the next 10 years, you could put dots on the map, and these are data points, and draw a line around them. | ||
| And that's sort of the new frontier of the American periphery as Russia and China push against American power. | ||
| So one of those data points is Ukraine. | ||
| Where NATO tried to expand to Ukraine, but Russia invaded and pushed back. | ||
| That's a data point. That's the new border. | ||
| One data point is Niger, where it used to be in the Franco, the Afro-Frank sphere of influence. | ||
| It's a former French colony. | ||
| Now there's Wagner, Russian-backed coups in Burkina Faso, in Mali, in Niger. | ||
| Those are other data points. | ||
| Now in Israel-Palestine, Hezbollah, which is backed by Iran, which is backed by Russia, is putting a check on Israel. | ||
| They got 100,000 guys with 150,000 missiles in southern Lebanon. | ||
| They're putting a check on Israel. | ||
| That's another data point. | ||
| And then in the future, it's going to be Taiwan, where Beijing has long desired the reintegration of Taiwan. | ||
| And maybe they'll make a play within the next 10 years. | ||
| When would be a better time than now? | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| And so the question about World War III is this question about the rising and these sort of... | ||
| It's this power of China that is bursting at the seams. | ||
| America's tried to contain China and Russia. | ||
| We've tried to circumscribe them and contain them, but they can't be contained because of their economic engine and because of their resources and their military power, and so they're pushing back. | ||
| And it's creating these sort of geopolitical tectonic plates shifting. | ||
| And just like... Just like the regular tectonic plates, it's causing earthquakes, it's causing shaking, instability, which is all these conflicts on several continents. | ||
| So every time one of these things happens, it carries with it the risk of a widening and an escalation that leads America into a confrontation with China and Russia, just like in Ukraine. | ||
| There's a risk that the United States and China enter a shooting war. | ||
| There's talk about a tactical nuclear weapon being deployed. | ||
| As the United States puts its aircraft carriers in the eastern Mediterranean, and China's putting destroyers in the Mediterranean, and the United States is backing Israel, and Russia's backing Syria. | ||
| There is a development this week. | ||
| Israel's bombing the airport in Damascus and Aleppo to prevent Iranian flights from supplying Hezbollah. | ||
| What is Aleppo? Right? And so now the Syrians are using the Russian airbase. | ||
| So Russia's being brought in now to this conflict. | ||
| And so there's this chance that a local conflict between Palestinians and Israelis, or specifically Hamas and Israel, becomes a global conflict. | ||
| As it widens and escalates, it brings in Iran, it brings in Syria, it brings in America, it brings in Russia, China. | ||
| Excuse me. And the same is true in Taiwan and Niger. | ||
| So we have never been at a higher chance of World War III than we have been since the end of the last World War. | ||
| And that's because the changing balance of power. | ||
| So when we're talking about changing balances of power, there's a macro element, right? | ||
| So my question is, how much of this has to do with just macro trends? | ||
| How much of it is inevitable? | ||
| And how much of it is because Joe Biden sucks? | ||
| Yeah. Well, it's not inevitable because there can be a peaceful transition from a unipolar world order to a multipolar world order. | ||
| It requires a lot of communication because unlike the world wars of the 20th century or the Napoleonic War, We have nuclear weapons. | ||
| And so that's a huge disincentive for great powers to go to war. | ||
| But what can happen is miscalculation. | ||
| That's the biggest problem. Where one party underestimates the willingness of the other side or the desperation of the other side. | ||
| Like with Russia. Vladimir Putin can't lose this war. | ||
| Because if he does, the Russian state will collapse. | ||
| If Russia is strategically defeated in Ukraine, it will lead to the collapse of the Russian state, which is unacceptable because Russia has the largest arsenal of nukes. | ||
| A failed state can't have a massive arsenal of nukes. | ||
| So Russia is very desperate Now maybe the United States underestimates the desperation of Putin That he may employ all means at his disposal Including nuclear weapons to win the war Maybe Putin would use a tactical nuke A small, low-yield warhead To achieve a tactical victory And to deter further NATO involvement So those are the types of miscalculations that can occur That's why communication is required. | ||
| Now, where the Biden administration comes in is that they're always unwilling to back down. | ||
| The United States, because of hubris, is never willing to seek an off-ramp. | ||
| It's always upping the ante. | ||
| Now, we don't have any cards here because our economy's weak, our manufacturing's weak, our military's weak. | ||
| Morale's low. Exactly. | ||
| Our population's obese. | ||
| We couldn't even recruit a military, but we're always upping the ante, bluffing. | ||
| And the problem is that China and Russia are going to call our bluff, and we're going to have no choice but to escalate. | ||
| Stick with us, folks. We have one more segment left with Nick on this show this morning, and he will be joining Alex Jones at noon Central Time, one hour into the Alex Jones show today. | ||
| Make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com and be the reason we're still on the air. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
| Last segment of the show this morning with Nick Fuentes. | ||
| He will be on the Alex Jones Show an hour in to debate Alex. | ||
| Tell me a little bit about this debate. | ||
| How did this come about? What are you going to talk about? | ||
| I didn't even know that there was any dispute until this morning. | ||
| Well, you know, me and Alex have sort of had this back and forth for the last 10 or 11 months. | ||
| Ever since my last appearance on his show, we've sort of been exchanging words on his show and on my show. | ||
| And, you know, lately I've just simply disagreed with this coverage of Israel-Palestine. | ||
| And I want to say this. I love Alex Jones. | ||
| He's an icon. It's indisputable. | ||
| He's an American legend and I've been following him for years. | ||
| So it's no disrespect. | ||
| I'd never come on here to disrespect him as a guy or anything like that. | ||
| But... I noticed that on his show he said that the Palestinians blew up this hospital on Friday. | ||
| Right. He was showing that footage that allegedly had the rocket falling out of the sky coming from the alleged Hamas location. | ||
| I remember that episode. Yeah. And you know what? | ||
| I think there's a good argument on both sides. | ||
| Not to cop out and be cringe or whatever, but it's true. | ||
| I mean, it is, quite frankly, equally plausible because the Hamas rockets are primitive and they miss. | ||
| Right. At the same time, Israel has bombed a lot of hospitals. | ||
| So, regardless of what happened here, Israel has bombed other hospitals, and Hamas has accidentally shot stuff. | ||
| Their rockets have misfired, too. | ||
| So, both parties have a motivational lie about it. | ||
| The Palestinians would want to lie about it to and sends the Muslim world so that the Muslims will come bail them out. | ||
| And the Israelis, if they were responsible, they would want to lie about it because they don't want Hezbollah to come in and invade. | ||
| So, you know, it's plausible both ways. | ||
| But I looked at that clip and I said, you know, the thing is about this hospital is that, in my opinion, a lot of the Zionists are using that to maybe take away from the war crimes Israel is committing and say, oh, this hospital that blew up, oh, that was just a misfire. | ||
| And it's like, well, what's the purpose of that narrative? | ||
| I think, and Alex Jones has said that Israel blew up the church and has blown up other hospitals. | ||
| But I feel like when people hone in on these sorts of things, it's sort of meant to undermine a lot of the Palestinian claims about the war crimes and the nature of what's going on. | ||
| So I said, you know, it's interesting that Alex seems to be so aware of this information war, you know, these media narratives when it comes to things like 9-11 or about mass shootings or about other things. | ||
| I said, but on this one, I said, I just don't agree. | ||
| I feel like maybe he's missing that narrative. | ||
| And so he came back and he challenged me to a debate. | ||
| He said, Nick Fuentes has two weeks to come on my show or I'm going to unload on him when he's not here, which I respect, you know, because he really gave me an opportunity to come on here and confront him. | ||
| And I said, yeah, I'll show up. | ||
| I took the first flight out here. | ||
| So we'll be debating about Israel-Palestine. | ||
| And, you know, I think we both play it up. | ||
| Because he's a brilliant entertainer. | ||
| So he plays it up. | ||
| I play it up. But really, we agree with each other on most things. | ||
| And I think he's an amazing guy. | ||
| So I think it's going to be friendlier. | ||
| No, sparks are going to fly. | ||
| It's going to be the debate of the century. | ||
| But I do think we have a genuine disagreement. | ||
| I think it'll be a really good conversation. | ||
| Who was the most difficult person that you've ever debated? | ||
| That's a tough question. Honestly, I've won them all. | ||
| They were all easy. Yeah. | ||
| What am I going to say? | ||
| Was there any one that you walked away from, though? | ||
| Something really stuck with you that you had to look into more? | ||
| Not really. | ||
| The only debate that I really didn't love my performance was actually with Jay Dyer, who's a friend of InfoWars. | ||
| I think he's a tremendous guy. | ||
| He's an East Orthodox Christian, and we're friends. | ||
| But this guy's like a heavy hitter, theologian. | ||
| This guy's studied for 20 years. | ||
| And not emotional. No, no. | ||
| Just very, almost like autistic in a good way. | ||
| Very logical and erudite. | ||
| But he's a true, he's read all the church fathers. | ||
| He's read the Bible. I mean, cover to cover and knows it by heart. | ||
| I mean, he knows his stuff. And we did a debate about Catholicism. | ||
| And, you know, I am Catholic and I think that it's a pretty simple issue. | ||
| I think although there are, you know, people who bring in a lot of sources, it's a pretty fundamental debate about the authority of the papacy and And there's a few excerpts in the Bible that you either believe support the claims of the papacy or don't. | ||
| And there's a few philosophical arguments that you can make. | ||
| And so I think it's a pretty simple debate. | ||
| But he was able to come in and just dazzle Just throwing everything in the kitchen sink, which I just don't have that breadth of knowledge. | ||
| So I think that was maybe the only one where I was like, you know, maybe he got me a little bit. | ||
| Doesn't mean I think I was wrong, you know, because I think it's a simple discussion. | ||
| But that was a tough one. | ||
| The religious debates are tricky because it's such a difficult issue, you know. | ||
| Yeah, well, like we were talking about during one of the breaks, since the Reformation, everybody's got their own ideas about what's going on, because there's no sort of top-down authority, and that's basically the difference between Catholicism and Reformed Christianity, is this idea of you interpret it on your own, or there's a top-down sort of word of God to you type thing. | ||
| And if you talk to a lot of Catholics, a lot of, many of them, most of them, I would argue, haven't read the Bible, compared relative to other faiths. | ||
| Well, and that's, yeah, that's historically true that... | ||
| No Bible in the pew. Yeah. | ||
| Well, and you're right. | ||
| And that's because Protestants and Catholics view the Bible in a different way. | ||
| You know, Protestants are, well, we say they're sola scriptura, meaning that the Bible is the deposit of faith and revealed wisdom. | ||
| And Catholics believe it's the church magisterium. | ||
| We believe that the Bible is part of it, but it's not the only part of it. | ||
| Protestants believe that the faith comes from the scripture. | ||
| And we believe that scripture is infallible and it's a revealed word of God, but... | ||
| We also believe that God, what he really did was leave a church with St. | ||
| Peter. But the devil can't infiltrate the Bible. | ||
| The devil can't infiltrate a church. | ||
| Well, but people read the Bible. | ||
| Right. So the devil can get in the middle of that process. | ||
| But, you know, and that's a disagreement. | ||
| And listen, I love Protestants. | ||
| I respect all. I love all Christians. | ||
| Would you ever marry a Protestant? | ||
| She converted. Yeah. | ||
| You convert it, you know? | ||
| But you're right. I mean, Catholics use the Bible really as a worship book. | ||
| They use it. And the Catholics will hear the entire Bible in a three-year cycle. | ||
| Of course. If they go. They read it. | ||
| Right. That's right. And you're right. | ||
| It is a problem. A lot of Catholics don't go to Mass and they don't, you know, they've sort of lost their faith forever. | ||
| And it's unfortunate, I think, for Catholics. | ||
| Evangelicals, Protestants are leading the charge. | ||
| They're sort of leading a new great awakening in the United States. | ||
| And, you know, I guess the good news is the impetus is on Catholics. | ||
| We got to go out there and evangelize too. | ||
| But it's a good competition because we're all out there trying to win souls for Jesus. | ||
| You know, what could go wrong, right? | ||
| Absolutely. So obviously there's a major populist movement happening in this country. | ||
| It's something that has really swept me off my feet personally in the last couple of years, especially. | ||
| Basically since November of 2020, I was like, I got to do something. | ||
| After I saw January 6th, I was so mad that it was framed as an insurrection that that's what inspired me to start my podcast and build my following, and here I am, right, just a couple years later. | ||
| Do you think that as Christians we make the mistake of idol-worshiping our nationalism? | ||
| I think there is some of that, yeah. | ||
| I think that, now me, I come from the dissident right. | ||
| I come from like the alt-right of like, I never identified that way, but I came from that milieu a little bit earlier in like 2016, 2017. | ||
| And I think there is a lot of like race... | ||
| I think there is a lot of even ideological idolatry. | ||
| It's even a problem with a lot of Catholics. | ||
| There's a lot of Catholics that are now very into this traditionalist thing, like going to the Latin Mass and all of that. | ||
| And it's almost like they've put... | ||
| Catholicism as an expression of right-wing political ideology before Catholicism as a tool for us to know God, as a tool for us to get connected with our Father and our souls. | ||
| And so I think that that is actually a huge problem across all denominations and in the whole scene. | ||
| I think that we have to recognize, first and foremost, We're Christians. | ||
| Before we're Americans, before we're white, before we're anything, we're Christians. | ||
| We're created beings by God. | ||
| There's one way to heaven. | ||
| That's through Jesus. | ||
| And I think we'd probably, I mean, we'd be better off spiritually, pragmatically, if we were to embrace and accept that fact. | ||
| That being said, politics is important. | ||
| You know, I think the Christians have to regain control over the society because there are a lot of Christians, and there's a flip side of this, that say that we have to ignore politics. | ||
| We have to retreat and go into the backwoods and pretend this stuff isn't happening. | ||
| But this is coming at the detriment of our children because, you know, a lot of Christians, they may want to say, well, we're worried about the kingdom. | ||
| Let the world be the world. | ||
| We're worried about what happens next. | ||
| You'll cite Hebrews, and you're a citizen of the kingdom of God. | ||
| Right. Right. But the problem with that is it's the children that are being corrupted in the school system by pornography, by drugs, by the sewer of a culture. | ||
| Not the Italian sewer. | ||
| Not the Italian sewer. | ||
| No, the Jewish sewer. | ||
| No, kidding. But they're creating... | ||
| That's true. I mean, they do run the porn companies, but that's another subject. | ||
| But these children are being stolen from God by the devil through this culture, and I think it's our job as Christians to get in the way of that, and it's our job to fix that, you know, because we're called to improve the body of the church. | ||
| Well, it's been a real pleasure to have you on the American Journal this morning. | ||
| Thank you for joining us. I do appreciate it. | ||
| Fascinating conversation. I could talk to you for hours. | ||
| I can tell. Likewise. | ||
| Make sure that you visit Infowarsstore.com and get Brain Force Plus at 60% off. | ||
| It lights me up like a Christmas tree. | ||
| be the reason we are still on the air and stay tuned because Nick will be on with Alex. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Matthew in Wisconsin, thanks for calling in. | |
| You're on the air. Hey, I love you guys. | ||
| First off and foremost, I need to pray for Infowars. | ||
| I want to pray Yeshua HaMashiach, Jesus Christ the Messiah. | ||
| Pray blessings and power upon Infowars, Harrison Smith, but especially Owen Schroer and Alex Jones right now. | ||
| I love you guys. And also, I need to plug. | ||
| I need to plug your products right now. | ||
| I have to, I gotta admit, alright? | ||
| I was on drugs. I was on heroin. | ||
| I was on meth. I was on everything. | ||
| And then all of a sudden I came across, the first product I took was Brain Force. | ||
| I was a tweaker. All I wanted to do was drugs and I tried Brain Force and I'm telling you what, it changed my life, alright? | ||
| I started taking Brain Force. | ||
| That was the first product I bought and then I got everything else. | ||
| I'm off the drugs. | ||
| All I do is take InfoWars. | ||
| I can't even plug all of them. | ||
| I take them all right now. | ||
| Instead of drugs, they're so much better. | ||
| I'm telling you, it changed my life. |
Export Selection