Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
Russia's deputy president, Yed Mediev, Dmitry Mediev, and of course their president, Putin, have continued to threaten that if more missiles are moved into range of Russia, they will start attacking NATO have continued to threaten that if more missiles are moved into And now that there are US aircraft carriers in range with hypersonic missiles, he said this isn't basically a threat. | ||
It's a promise on behalf of the Russian Air Force that we may attack you. | ||
China says they own the South China Sea. | ||
They're a thousand miles away, literally attacking fishing boats in the Philippines. | ||
unidentified
|
Philippine Coast Guard divers cut an underwater cable and unmoor a 300-meter floating barrier that China placed to prevent Philippine fishing vessels from accessing the Scarborough Shoal. | |
A gesture that underscores Manila's growing defiance of Beijing's claims to the prime fishing grounds. | ||
The tiny mid-ocean outcrop, seized by China in 2012, has become a global geopolitical flashpoint. | ||
And attacking oil drilling platforms off the coast of Vietnam. | ||
I think Putin is out of line saying that the U.S. aircraft carriers can't be in the Mediterranean. | ||
That's a free open sea. | ||
And there's Russian nuclear submarines off our coast. | ||
unidentified
|
Admiral James Fogel, the commander of US naval forces in Europe, is particularly concerned about this submarine, the Severodvinsk, nuclear-powered and armed with land-attack cruise missiles with a range greater than 1,000 miles. | |
The Severodvinsk is a brand new class of submarine, and it's very capable, it's very quiet. | ||
So that's the most important thing, I think, in submarine warfare. | ||
When you say quiet, you're saying harder to detect, harder to track. | ||
Yeah, that's what I'm saying. | ||
Does that sub? Come down into the Atlantic? | ||
Suffice it to say that the Russians have increased their presence in all bodies of water around Europe and in the Atlantic. | ||
Pentagon officials told 60 Minutes that last summer, the several events slipped into the Atlantic Ocean and for weeks evaded all attempts to find it. | ||
In peacetime, losing a Russian sub in the Atlantic is embarrassing. | ||
In a crisis, it could be a disaster. | ||
Think about the global infrastructure that rests on the bottom of the ocean. | ||
You're talking about the undersea cables? | ||
That's correct. Those fiber optic cables carry 99.4% of the data exchanged over the internet by the U.S. and its allies and trading partners. | ||
Depending on your point of view, they are either the backbone or the Achilles heel of the world economy. | ||
So we're going to threaten to nuke Russia because they got nuclear weapons off our coast? | ||
This needs to stop. | ||
It needs to stop right now. This is out of control. | ||
I'm not going to sit there and back any one group and then distort my research to comport with that group. | ||
I'm an American, I'm a Christian, I'm a father, I'm a patriot, and I'm pro-America. | ||
But our country's hijacked by the worst criminals the world's ever seen. | ||
China's run by a client state that's just as bad as the globalists. | ||
Russia didn't start this war. | ||
The globalists admit they started it nine years ago, overthrowing the Ukrainian elected government. | ||
So I've been against the war, but I'm also against Russia escalating. | ||
But NATO's escalating, so that's just how this is going to work. | ||
Putin orders air patrols over the Black Sea to carry Kinzhal missiles that are anti-ship. | ||
I mean, there's the Mediterranean right there, U.S. aircraft carriers. | ||
There's the Black Sea a few hundred miles away from each other. | ||
So this is going downhill real, real fast. | ||
The Gonzal Dagger is a Russian nuclear-capable aeroballistic air-to-surface missile. | ||
It has a claim range of more than 2,000 kilometers, 1,100 miles. | ||
Our plane's MiG-31 armed with Gonzal missiles. | ||
They are known to have a range of over 1,000 kilometers at speed Mach 9. | ||
So what he's saying is we've loaded nuclear missiles on our aircraft a few hundred miles away from you, and their range is over 1,000 miles. | ||
unidentified
|
And this is not a threat, it's a message from the Air Force to the U.S. Ballistic missiles follow a parabolic trajectory, a predictable arc that goes up and down like a ball. | |
It means they can be detected early in flight. | ||
Hypersonic glide vehicles work differently. | ||
They exploit physics using drag and friction so they can fly in all directions like an aircraft, but at super-fast speeds, making them very difficult to detect until it's too late. | ||
You can talk about who runs the world. | ||
BlackRock, the Chi-Coms, all the different organizations and groups. | ||
Rothschilds. | ||
We have a nuclear war. | ||
How are all you Harvard scum running the country in the ground and back in China going to feel when you and your family's getting vaporized, you murderous trash? | ||
Man, not video! | ||
Welcome to the American Journal-Immorant. | ||
I am Chase Geiser filling in for the great Harrison Smith for the next couple of months while he hosts the War Room in the Afternoon. | ||
Of course, you know why. We are waiting eagerly for Owen Schroer to return. | ||
One of his big asks before going away to prison was that the War Room still be here when he return and we are doing everything that we can to make sure that happens. | ||
Make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com and be part of the reason that the War Room will still be on the air when Owen returns. | ||
I'm confident that it will be. | ||
I've heard no rumblings or murmurings otherwise, and we are holding down the fort until a great patriot returns to the team here at InfoWars. | ||
I want to talk a little bit about RFK today because he has sort of been an anomaly that has boggled my mind. | ||
Just when I forget that he's a Democrat, he seems to tweet something that reminds me whether it's something about the Second Amendment or whether it's something about universal basic income. | ||
I'm constantly reminded that he's a socialist just when I forget because he does say so many things that I agree with. | ||
Obviously, he has been an antagonist of Big Pharma for decades now. | ||
He's been accused of being an anti-vaxxer, though he says that he's not. | ||
He's just someone who looks into the details of what's going on with these vaccines and reports the truth. | ||
The real studies, the real details about the dangers of some of these products made by Big Pharma and sold year after year. | ||
After all, these vaccines have been, are now, and will always be a source of recurring revenue. | ||
I don't know if any of you are small business owners. | ||
I'm sure that many of you listeners are. | ||
I am a small business owner myself. | ||
And one thing that I have come to learn in business is that if you can establish a business that has some form of reoccurring revenue, it's much better than solving a problem one at a time and finding new clients. | ||
What I mean to say is if you're a web developer, for example, and you simply charge a flat rate to make websites for businesses, you're always in the business of A, completing websites, and B, finding new clients. | ||
Whereas if you can find a way to get recurring revenue in place... | ||
You always want to focus on finding new clients but it's not as critical to your business because you have that expected revenue every month. | ||
And that's why these pharmaceutical companies love drugs that people have to use regularly over an extended period of time, even their whole life. | ||
Vaccines being a main source of revenue, of recurring revenue for them, namely things like the flu vaccine are incredibly lucrative for these pharmaceutical companies because people get them every year. | ||
They get them for their children, we get them for the elderly, and all ages in between. | ||
This is guaranteed income that these companies can expect and report to their shareholders. | ||
They love diseases or illnesses or conditions that require repeat treatment because that means recurring revenue. | ||
That's why, in my opinion, we haven't seen things like cures for cancer, cures for diabetes, cures for hemophilia or other conditions that are recurring, because these pharmaceutical companies don't have really a financial interest in solving problems that create perpetual income for them. | ||
And RFK has been one to call out the lies that the pharmaceutical companies have an incentive to tell in order to ensure that this income is guaranteed. | ||
And what I've really been struggling with has been whether or not RFK actually wants to be president or whether or not he's actually a DNC plant. | ||
If we look at the current political climate, we have a situation in which the Democrats will do anything that they can to split the vote against Donald Trump to ensure that whoever the Democratic nominee is, whether it's Joe Biden, Michelle Obama, Gavin Newsom, or another, will win the election. | ||
If they can divide the opposition, then they can ensure victory in the next presidential election. | ||
So I've been wondering recently, and I've tweeted things to this effect, I've been wondering whether or not they ran RFK as sort of a Trojan horse, and they coordinated with RFK to ensure that he be refused ballot access in certain key states as an excuse to run as an independent in the hopes that his run as an independent would split the Republican vote And ensure a Democrat be ushered in. | ||
If you look at the numbers in the various swing states of those who voted for Joe Jorgensen, for example, during the last presidential election, she being the libertarian candidate, it made a difference. | ||
If Joe Jorgensen would not have run and would have endorsed President Trump, then the libertarians would have wound up with a Republican in office, Trump, I know that the Libertarian Party has its values, its convictions, its principles, and I respect that about them. | ||
I'm not criticizing them for that, but if it weren't for the campaign of Joe Jorgensen, I believe that Donald Trump would be president. | ||
So is it possible that RFK is part of a Democratic plan, a DNC plan, to split the vote against Trump? | ||
We know that Democrats aren't really going to vote for him because the Democrats love the COVID vaccine so much. | ||
Traditionally, it's been Democrats who have been critical of vaccines as a whole. | ||
But we know that there was disproportionate support for the vaccines among Democratic voters, and RFK has been branded by the Democratic news media, by the mainstream narrative, as this kooky, conspiratorial, out-of-sync, anti-vax loon. | ||
They branded him that way, regardless of whether it's true. | ||
And so by having him run as an independent, it risks less Democratic votes for the Democratic candidate than it risks votes from Republicans. | ||
After all, one of the main criticisms of Donald Trump has been that he was behind Operation Warp Speed. | ||
One of the main criticisms on the right of Donald Trump has been that he is behind the vaccines that were forced upon us and that wound up causing so many of these illnesses and Side effects, whether intended or not, that were lied about. | ||
And I don't hold Trump accountable for that because I believe that Trump was actually consistent with his platform. | ||
He believed in right to try the whole time. | ||
He put out this vaccine as an option for people, and I think he was tricked by his administration, which you can hold him accountable for allowing himself to be tricked and surrounding himself by pariahs and bad people. | ||
But I don't think that Donald Trump had any intention of forcing vaccines upon you, and I don't think that he had any knowledge that these vaccines were problematic. | ||
You can hold him at fault for that, but the intent, I believe, was good. | ||
But what wound up happening was he ushered in these vaccines that were ineffective and not nearly as safe as purported. | ||
And when he lost the election, whether legitimately or illegitimately, Joe Biden... | ||
Broke his promise to the Americans that he would not mandate the vaccine. | ||
Mandated across the board as far as he could within the government and ensured that the climate was such in the private sector that even though there was no legal mandate, it was in effect mandated. | ||
People taking the vaccine against their will because they feared losing their jobs or they wanted to go to a family friend's funeral. | ||
And so in effect what happened was the right Looked at what Trump did with criticism. | ||
And it's reasonable. | ||
And so with an RFK run as an independent, it's much more likely that those who would have voted for Trump will vote for RFK than those who would have voted for Joe Biden will vote for RFK. So it makes me wonder whether or not RFK has been a plant the whole time, whether or not he's actually coordinating his campaign with the DNC to ensure that no Republican is elected. | ||
Because it doesn't seem to me so reasonable that there's a legitimate path to victory for him. | ||
However, in the next segment, we will get into that. | ||
There is another side to this coin that is less conniving that I want to dive in. | ||
It's possible that he is earnestly running for office and that there's a reasonable path to victory, similar to what Vivek is doing. | ||
But this DNC plant seems like a reasonable take as well. | ||
We will take calls in the next hour. | ||
I want to hear what you think about RFK, whether you think he's a plant, whether you think he's a legitimate candidate, whether you think he actually sees a path to victory. | ||
In the meantime, make sure you visit Infowarsstore.com. | ||
Get Brain Force Plus at 60% off. | ||
This is one of my favorite products that we sell. | ||
I take one as often as I can remember it, and it does change the way that I think. | ||
It's an instant way to change your state of mind to make you more productive, happier, and Welcome back to the American Journal, | ||
folks. We have been diving in on the RFK candidacy and exploring whether or not he's a legitimate candidate or whether or not he's actually a DNC plant. | ||
Part of a greater strategy to split the Trump vote So let's do a little background check on RFK. I've got this report here. | ||
This is from 2012 from Politico. | ||
RFK Jr. moved his wife's grave. | ||
RFK Jr. had the body of his wife, Mary Richardson Kennedy, dug up and moved to an unidentified plot in the empty opposite end of the cemetery, according to a New York Daily News report. | ||
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. won a court case against her siblings to have her buried at St. | ||
Francis Xavier's Cemetery near the Kennedy compound in Hyannis, Port, Massachusetts. | ||
Mary Richardson Kennedy died in May at age 52 after hanging herself in her Bedford, New York barn. | ||
A gravedigger who helped move Richardson Kennedy's body last week said her husband didn't realize how crowded the original area was. | ||
She had been buried near Eunice and Sergeant Shriver. | ||
So they had this funeral and they do this photo op in sort of the traditional part of the cemetery. | ||
And then the next day, I believe they had her moved or they had her move very quickly after to a location in the cemetery where her grave is completely isolated. | ||
Right now, the area is empty except for her. | ||
This is in 2012. | ||
This article was written. | ||
There is no marker identifying her, just two American flags and three religious statues. | ||
One of them, the statue of the Mother Mary. | ||
Kennedy moved the body without informing Richardson Kennedy's brothers and sisters, whom he had to sue in order to get her body there anyway. | ||
According to their lawyer, he declined to comment to the Daily News. | ||
So that's the first questionable thing. | ||
It's not that big of a deal. It's not that relevant to whether or not he would be a good president. | ||
But you have a situation in which he's suing her family after she commits suicide in a barn to bury her in one location, does the photo op in that location, and then has her moved to a completely isolated remote location of the cemetery immediately after the funeral takes place, as if he didn't look or make a decision about and then has her moved to a completely isolated remote location of the cemetery immediately I mean, who buries someone in a location without looking at it beforehand and then changes their mind? | ||
That almost never happens, if ever. | ||
There was multiple reports about this. | ||
unidentified
|
you Thank you. | |
And the interesting thing about this as well is this wouldn't be the first example of Kennedy doing something hypocritical. | ||
So we have this other report here where RFK Jr. | ||
says that his wife, Cheryl Hines, not him, urged party guests to be vaxxed for COVID. This is from the New York Post in December of 2021. | ||
RFK being the candidate most widely known because of his open criticism of the COVID vaccines. | ||
This is someone who has been a lifelong Democrat. | ||
This is probably the most notable Democrat figure who's come out against the vaccines. | ||
Of course, he's labeled in the article as anti-vaxxer Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who took a jab at media reports that guessed that his holiday party had to show proof they were vaccinated. | ||
The Kennedy scion claimed he didn't know his wife, actress Cheryl Hines, had requested in a digital invitation that all guests at the party held at the couple's California home be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 or test negative for the coronavirus before attending. | ||
So we have somebody who's Written a whole book on the dangers of vaccines. | ||
Someone who's come out against the COVID-19 vaccines, who can't even keep his own house in order as far as vaccine policy is concerned. | ||
How are we supposed to expect that he can keep the country in order? | ||
He says, Here's what I think happened, folks. I think that they wanted to have a Hollywood party, a Hollywood holiday party in California. | ||
Hines, being an actress, knew that all of her friends that she wanted to attend, all the bigwig Hollywood celebrities that she wanted to attend were leftists, knew that no one would come to the party unless there was some sort of vaccination stipulation or at least negative test stipulation. | ||
And rather than just opting for proof of a negative test because she wanted as many people to come to the party as possible, she put in the invitation that proof of vaccination would be sufficient in an effort to ensure that as many people would attend a superficial holiday party as possible. | ||
And I believe RFK when he says he probably didn't know this was going to happen. | ||
Or maybe he knew and just allowed it to happen. | ||
But this is just utterly embarrassing given the platform that he is running on. | ||
Not exclusively an anti-vax platform, but predominantly one. | ||
And it just calls into question, in the context of what he did with his funeral situation with his former wife, it calls into question his character. | ||
But I do think that there is a path to victory that could be an alternative... | ||
Interpretation of what's going on here. | ||
I don't think I have enough time in this segment to really dive into it to the extent that I want. | ||
So I'm going to cut back to it in the next segment. | ||
So what I want to do is touch on really quickly and update on the Uniparty situation and the Speaker situation in Congress before bouncing back to RFK in the next segment. | ||
Zero Hedge reports, and the backdrop of the controversies about who is to be voted Speaker of the House of Representatives is the awareness that this role is third in line for the presidency. | ||
This is something that is more important now than ever, given that... | ||
Joe Biden is basically running on a lithium-ion battery and nobody wants Kamala Harris to be president, so third in line is actually sort of more second in line, I think, in a lot of the minds of the people in leadership and the people of America. | ||
The current president seems barely functional. | ||
The number two in line is absent without leave, never qualified in any sense, and is universally regarded as a joke, if she is regarded at all, which she mostly is not. | ||
That leaves the Speaker of the House very close to the center of power. | ||
For many people in Washington, this is a huge problem. | ||
The Uniparty decided some years ago never to allow another populist, meaning someone who actually responds to the public in reality and not just in rhetoric, near the center of power. | ||
This is why they're going after Trump. | ||
This is why they don't want a populist in power, because anyone who holds himself accountable to the people of the United States of America is perceived as a threat to the political class. | ||
When the spot suddenly opened up thanks to a vote pushed by a rebellious member, it threw the place into chaos. | ||
Chaos being a good status of Congress as far as I am concerned because anything that renders them ineffective, inefficient, and powerless seems healthy given all of the ills they throw or cast upon the American people. | ||
Jim Jordan of Ohio stepped up as the most respected and popular member among the grassroots of the party. | ||
Everyone has seen him on television. | ||
In his activism, he is everywhere at once and a passionate opponent of business as usual on Capitol Hill. | ||
By any normal standard, he was a shoo-in provided the grassroots gets their way. | ||
Phones lit up for days and days. | ||
I even called in to Granger's office threatening to run against her for Congress if she didn't vote to support Jim Jordan. | ||
Thomas Massey of Kentucky, one of the few national politicians with real backbone combined with high intelligence, has the highest respect for Jordan. | ||
And here is what Massey wrote in the thick of battle. | ||
These are important words. | ||
He said, I've taken thousands of votes during my time in Congress. | ||
No roll call has been as clarifying as the one for Jim Jordan, the speaker. | ||
Why isn't his election easy here? | ||
Because his leadership represents a credible threat to the unchecked growth of our bloated federal government. | ||
Stay with us, folks. We'll be right back after this break. | ||
Visit Infowarsstore.com. | ||
More on RFK Jr.'s strategy for the White House to come in the next segment. | ||
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
I am Chase Geiser. Subbing for Harrison Smith until after Christmas. | ||
While Harrison hosts the War Room in the afternoons, make sure you tune in and show your support for him while he is hosting the afternoon show. | ||
And let's keep InfoWars on the air until Owen gets back. | ||
And beyond, of course. | ||
Okay, so we dove in in the first segment to... | ||
The conspiracy theory that RFK Jr. | ||
is working with the DNC in order to split the vote to ensure that Trump doesn't win. | ||
In the last segment, we talked about how RFK Jr.'s convictions may actually be shakier than they seem. | ||
He's been an antagonist of the vaccines for quite some time. | ||
However, at his own holiday party, he had a proof of vaccination requirement. | ||
For the COVID vaccine. | ||
And we know that what he did with his former wife when she died by burying her, having a photo op at the funeral, and moving her body immediately afterward was questionable in the least. | ||
In this segment, I want to talk about an alternative interpretation of what's going on, how he might actually have a path to the White House. | ||
And in the event that this interpretation is true... | ||
I hope and pray that he is the moderate patriotic American that he has convinced so many on the right that he is. | ||
Of course, we'll dive into more details about whether or not he believes anything he says as far as policy is concerned. | ||
So I was doing a little bit of research and I actually worked with ChatGPT to just get some clarifications to make sure I was on the up and up about how elections work in the United States. | ||
Obviously we know that elections in the United States are not based on a popular vote. | ||
They are based on an electoral college vote. | ||
270 votes being necessary to secure the victory. | ||
And traditionally here in the United States, we have had a situation in which either the Republican or the Democratic candidate meets the minimum requirement of electoral votes to win the presidency. | ||
We don't have a third party. | ||
We barely have a second party. | ||
We basically have a unit party, but we do have a two-party system in name, at least. | ||
And we do have one candidate from each party that runs in every election, and it's always one or the other, at least since Abraham Lincoln has been a Republican or a Democrat back and forth. | ||
But what happens if no candidate receives the 270 required electoral college votes? | ||
What happens if there's a third candidate that gets enough electoral college votes that none of the three have the 270 minimum required? | ||
I've got it here pulled up on this sheet. | ||
In that event, if no candidate gets the necessary 270 electoral votes... | ||
It can happen with more than two strong candidates. | ||
The 12th Amendment mandates that the House of Representatives chooses the president from the three candidates who received the most electoral votes. | ||
So in the event that Joe Biden, Donald Trump, and RFK Jr. | ||
are the top three candidates, but none of them have the 270 votes, it is up to the House of Representatives to determine who the next president will be. | ||
Assuming that Republicans in the House don't actually support Trump and that they're rhinos, which they seem to be because they haven't elected Jim Jordan, there's a good chance that a compromise would be made in which an RFK would be selected over a dementia-ridden president. | ||
And the controversial Donald Trump who doesn't seem to get in line with the political class's corruption and swampiness. | ||
Here's a full list of states where Donald Trump could be kicked off the ballot. | ||
This was a report from September 8th of 2023. | ||
Donald Trump is facing calls to be blocked from running for president in 2024 over allegations that his actions around January 6th violated his constitutional oath. | ||
And it seems that the legal interpretation here is that the federal government can't do anything about keeping him off the ballot, but that the individual states may be able to. | ||
Colorado, for example, on Wednesday, a lawsuit was filed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, crew, watchdog group and Republican figures, including former Congresswoman Claudine Schneider and former Colorado Senate Majority Leader Norma Anderson, to have Trump removed from Colorado's ballots over claims including former Congresswoman Claudine Schneider and former Colorado Senate Majority Leader Norma Anderson, to have Trump removed from Colorado's ballots over claims the New Hampshire. | ||
In a joint August statement, New Hampshire Attorney General John Formella and Secretary of State David Scanlon announced that they are looking into the potential applicability of the 14th Amendment with no regards to the upcoming presidential election cycle. | ||
Both Formella and Scanlon added that they have not taken any position regarding whether the 14th Amendment can be applied to Trump. | ||
Of course, they don't have an opinion on this. | ||
They're only elected officials who've actually looked at the Constitution and definitely have opinions on matters like this. | ||
John Anthony Castro, long shot Republican 2024 presidential candidate, also filed a complaint in a New Hampshire court arguing that Trump should be banned from the state's primary ballot while arguing the former president engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States. | ||
In Michigan, an important state, Robert Davis, an activist who is known for frequently attempting to sue political figures in Michigan, also filed a suit arguing that Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson should bar Trump from office over insurrection allegations in August. | ||
In Arizona, a very important state, there's a long-shot chance that Trump could end up being barred from the ballot, although current state laws are in the former president's favor. | ||
Secretary of State Adrian Fontes Said he does not have the authority to bar Trump from the Arizona ballot next year. | ||
The Arizona Supreme Court ruled in 2022 that only the state's Congress has the power under what is known as the Disqualification Clause. | ||
So if Arizona's Congress decides that they don't want Trump on the ballot in Arizona, that would be enough for potentially eliminating that possibility for him. | ||
And so, if we have a situation in which various states, and there could be more than just this article of states, decide that after Trump is convicted, which I think he will be convicted not because he's guilty, but because our courts are kangaroo courts, if he's convicted, they can use that as an excuse at the state level to take Trump off the ballot in several states, whether they're swing states. | ||
Or whether they're states that are just loaded with rhinos. | ||
And then you have a situation in which Trump would get many electoral votes in the other states, but not reach the 270. | ||
And Joe Biden may not be able to reach the 270 minimum himself. | ||
And RFK wouldn't have to convince America to vote for him. | ||
He would simply have to lobby Congress, the House of Representatives, to vote for him. | ||
Keep in mind, this could also be what Vivek is thinking. | ||
Maybe Vivek is thinking that he could be elected in this event if he could get more votes than the top candidates. | ||
Of course, the option will only be for the three candidates among House members as far as voting is concerned to put a president in office. | ||
But if there's anything that can be said about Kennedy is they have a knack for wrangling the political class in their favor regardless of what the people think. | ||
Of course, they were very popular among the people. | ||
But there is actually a path to victory for RFK here. | ||
So there's really a couple of options here. | ||
One option is that RFK is working for the DNC and is intentionally running on their behalf, secretly on their behalf, in order to split the vote against Trump to ensure that the Democratic candidate gets elected. | ||
That's the one option. | ||
The second option is that he is banking on Donald Trump's Being removed from the ballot in several key states and perhaps being able to win the vote in several key states to such an extent that no candidate has the 270 minimum electoral votes required to be elected so that it goes to the House in which he could lobby the House for the presidency with a fraction of the vote. | ||
I mean, imagine if The candidates were in the 260s or 250 ranges in electoral votes, the two main candidates, and he had 25 or 30 of them, and the House voted for him. | ||
I mean, this would be an example of a president of the United States being elected with less than 25% of the popular vote. | ||
It's possible in our system for that to happen, and this could be the angle that he's going for. | ||
So in the event that that happens, we're going to dive into the next segment. | ||
On his policy, specifically, because all anyone seems to know about him is his position on vaccines. | ||
Everybody always seems to forget that there are other policies that candidates have to have in their platform, and presidents obviously have to have in their presidency. | ||
So we'll dive in in the next segment. | ||
Make sure you visit Infowarsstore.com in the meantime, and be the reason we are still on the air. | ||
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
I am Chase Geiser filling in for the great Harrison Smith. | ||
This is the last segment of the hour. | ||
We will be taking calls in the next hour. | ||
Sometime during this segment, I'm going to open up the lines and give out the number. | ||
Just to let you know, CJ. This segment, I want to touch on some of the RFK policy issues. | ||
These are just a couple little issues I want to touch on because there is a possibility. | ||
It's slim but not insignificant that he could actually be the president if his electoral college approach works. | ||
2024 Democrat presidential nomination hopeful Robert F. Kennedy Jr. | ||
has sent confusing messages on where he stands on Second Amendment rights as he's now declared he would favor an assault weapons ban. | ||
I'm going to use the pen instead of the highlighter because Sean loves that when I do that. | ||
So, obviously, this article was written in July. | ||
He is not the Democratic presidential hopeful. | ||
He is now running as an independent. | ||
Despite this, in recent months, Arthur Cave Jr. | ||
stated his support for Americans' constitutional gun rights. | ||
However, during a News Nation town hall on Wednesday, he gave a different answer when asked whether he would favor prohibiting what leftists call assault weapons if he were president. | ||
The host asked the environmental lawyer and anti-vaccine activist... | ||
If he would sign an assault weapons ban law given the strong support such a measure enjoyed among Democrat voters. | ||
In a marked departure from his previous statements, Kennedy answered affirmatively, if we can get a consensus on it, if Republicans and Democrats agreed and it passed Congress, I would sign it, he declared. | ||
I don't even know what to say about this sort of thing. | ||
We've talked about this so much just as a national debate over the last hundred years. | ||
There's so many different angles that I could take this. | ||
On the one hand, he wants to say that he's a Second Amendment rights activist or proponent. | ||
Because that's the right thing to say, especially if you're trying to split the Republican vote away from Trump. | ||
And then on the other hand, he says exactly what Democrats want to hear, that he would sign a ban on assault weapons. | ||
First problem is what is an assault weapon? | ||
We all know that that's a slippery slope. | ||
And we also know that the number of those killed by tyranny far surpasses the number of those killed by firearms in this country every single year. | ||
People seem to forget the facts that Alex Jones mentioned on that famous Piers Morgan clip that all the tyrants ban the guns before they take over and kill everybody. | ||
A private firearms ban is one of the first things that happens in a tyrannical administration before there's a mass slaughter of people. | ||
We seem to fail to realize that That maybe this attack on Israel on October 7th wouldn't have been so bad if people were allowed to have a firearm in their homes. | ||
We see images of burnt babies burnt inside the homes that were lit on fire. | ||
I don't know if they're true or not. They probably are. | ||
I'm sure that there were babies that were killed. | ||
Do you think that The terrorists would have been able to burn as many Israeli homes if the people occupying those homes had a weapon, even just a handgun, so at close range they could stand up against Hamas carrying M4s. | ||
And I don't understand why it is That Democrats don't want Americans to have weapons, weapons of war, but as soon as declarations are issued that everybody in Ukraine is to be given an assault weapon, for lack of a better term, I know that that's a political term and not a technical term. | ||
They seem to be fine with those weapons being given to civilians in Ukraine in light of war. | ||
And they seem to disregard the reason those civilians need those weapons and the reason we have the right to those weapons here in the United States. | ||
They seem to have no problem with the United States paying for those weapons. | ||
And then we have a situation in Israel in which everybody's attacked. | ||
Nobody mentions the right to bear arms on the left. | ||
But as soon as the government of Israel states that it's going to call up 300,000 troops and arm them and arm everyone in the country as far as is needed and declares war on Hamas, the left wants the government of the United States to fund that. | ||
And when it comes to the debate around health care issues, And health insurance, we see signs at leftist protests that healthcare is a human right. | ||
And that's the argument that they use, that the government should pay for it. | ||
But the right to bear arms is a human right, and it's the one that's explicitly stated in our Constitution. | ||
So if the government, if my taxes are going to be forced to pay for your health insurance, shouldn't your taxes be forced to pay for my assault weapon? | ||
Shouldn't the government have to pay for my AR-15 if the right to bear arms is my right? | ||
If that's the argument used to pay for my healthcare, then I want a check for the $1,500 that I spent on my AR. I want a check for the $500 I spent on my Glock. | ||
I want a monthly stipend from the government for the ammunition that I purchased to protect myself from the government. | ||
Not only has RFK been flip-flopping on the Second Amendment issue, which means that he doesn't really have a position except for whatever's popular, and we know that in a constitutional republic, whatever's popular isn't supposed to matter because it's not a democracy. | ||
If the majority of people don't want me to have rights in a constitutional republic, they don't have the power to take my rights away from me. | ||
It doesn't matter what most people think in our country. | ||
Your rights are your rights no matter what. | ||
That's the difference between a constitutional republic and a democracy. | ||
But RFK Jr. | ||
has flip-flopped wildly on abortion ban comments. | ||
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. | ||
appears all over the place when it comes to abortion. | ||
In an interview with NBC News on Sunday, this article of course is... | ||
Weeks old, if not months old. | ||
He said he'd sign a federal three-month abortion ban, a rather restrictive position for a Democrat to hold. | ||
Quote, Kennedy said at the Iowa State Fair. | ||
He was asked if he would sign a federal ban to that effect. | ||
Quote, yes, I would, he responded. | ||
But hours later, Kennedy's team walked back those comments claiming in a statement to The Hill that the candidate misunderstood the question. | ||
Quote, he does not support legislation banning abortion, end quote, the statement said. | ||
But Ali Vitale, the NBC reporter who asked the question, didn't buy it. | ||
She posted the full transcript of the exchange to Twitter, saying that she asked the question multiple times to make sure we're understanding, even at one point saying I was surprised by the stance. | ||
So he doesn't seem like a person with a backbone as far as convictions on policy is concerned. | ||
He seems to be a typical political class person. | ||
Who will take whatever stance is popular in rhetoric and do something different in practice if it suits the political class. | ||
He seems to me to be a flip-flopper who exhumed his dead wife's grave, moved it to a remote location of a cemetery after suing her family after her suicide in a barn. | ||
After that, he goes on to write books, An exercise is activism against vaccines, all while forcing people to prove their own vaccination status before going to a party that he hosts in Hollywood for the Hollywood political class to satisfy his wife, who is an actress. | ||
Then there's the likelihood that he's running just as a ploy to split votes away from the Republican candidate And if that's not the case and he's actually running because he sees a path to victory, that means that he's content with being the President of the United States with a major minority of support. | ||
Because his only path to victory in this case is if neither of the two main candidates gets the majority of Electoral College votes. | ||
In which case, he would sit in the White House knowing that less than 20% of the population voted for him. | ||
But he's a Democrat. | ||
He believes in democracy. | ||
There are major threats to our democracy in place in this country, but I'm okay with being the president with less than 20% of U.S. votes. | ||
unidentified
|
This guy is a piece of SHIT, guys. | |
Because no matter which way you cut it, no matter which interpretation of what's happening is true, he's a terrible person as an individual. | ||
He's potentially conspiratorial against a Republican election. | ||
Or he thinks that he's good enough to be president with less than 20% support. | ||
Now, I'm not a Democrat by any means. | ||
I don't believe in democracy by any means. | ||
I believe in a constitutional republic. | ||
I don't think that you have to have a popular vote in order to be a legitimate president in this country because I support the Electoral College. | ||
But I certainly would like more than 20% support for whoever's elected. | ||
I mean, it's one thing if, hey, he only had 45% of the vote, but he got most of the electoral college. | ||
That's one thing. Hey, he only had 10% of the popular vote, but he got the majority of Congress to vote for him. | ||
When Congress has a terrible approval rating in and of itself, that's another thing entirely. | ||
So I highly encourage you not to vote for RFK in any case. | ||
Because this guy is bad news. | ||
Stay with us, folks. We will be back after this break. | ||
We got more great stuff coming. | ||
I'm going to be taking your calls in the next hour. | ||
Make sure you call in 877-789-2539. | ||
Again, that's 877-789-2539. | ||
I want to know what you think about everything that we've been covering this morning, specifically the RFK stuff. | ||
What interpretation you think is right, what you think his aims really are, what you think his policies really are, make sure you call in 877-789-2539 and visit infowarsstore.com during the break. | ||
Stick with us, folks. | ||
We'll be right back. | ||
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
I am Chase Geyser filling in... | ||
The great Harrison Smith, while Harrison Smith covers the war room in the afternoon until Owen Schroyer's much-awaited return. | ||
I want to hear from Tim Lassley first. | ||
Tim, you are an American hero. | ||
I'm really glad that you called in. | ||
unidentified
|
What's on your mind? Well, I appreciate your perspective and your deep dive onto RFK. It doesn't sound like he's all that. | |
But the one thing that kind of My interest in the guy was that he seemed to be the only one that would be willing to take on the CDC, the COVID shots, and the child vaccine schedule. | ||
I don't see Trump doing that because he's implicated. | ||
So I really appreciate your deep dive, but we need some sort of conversation in order to get all candidates on the same page, and so it's not like this radioactive hot potato where they just push it off to the side and wait for the newest distraction to show up. | ||
This is something that's affecting generations and generations. | ||
If we just allow ourselves to be distracted by the minutia of it all, instead of the actual agenda that the New World Order has implemented, and then now we're seeing... | ||
This is why RFK came out. | ||
He wrote the book. He could be a plant. | ||
I get it. But can we use his momentum towards that direction for our benefit and not allow him to undermine us or put us in a worse position? | ||
Do you think that's possible? Yeah, I do think it's possible. | ||
And we were talking about this during the break because I did some pretty explicit bashing of RFK during the last segment. | ||
And I said to Weber here, RFK is somebody, I've liked everything that he said on the podcast that he's been on. | ||
I haven't read his book yet, but I'm sure that it's very convincing and good. | ||
I'm sure that I agree with it. | ||
He's somebody that I would have a beer with. | ||
Despite everything that I said, okay? | ||
Because I'm not a perfect person either, and I'm just being critical of him because this is a highly tense political environment, and I'm adamant about my position as far as who I want to be president in the fall. | ||
So I'm just going to be explicitly clear about that. | ||
And so I think it is good that he has written the books that he's written, that he's done the work that he's done. | ||
And I think it is good that he is coming out as this independent or Democrat leaning person who has been antagonistic toward these vaccines because I am opposed to them as well. | ||
And I wish that Trump would take a similar stance and say, look, I was always a right to try candidate. | ||
And so I wanted people to have an option. | ||
But I never thought that it would get to the point where people were forced to take something dangerous. | ||
And I think that that would work for him if he did that. | ||
I think it would come out and it would work. | ||
And so I agree with you that we need to get on the same page about these vaccines and not get distracted by all this stuff. | ||
I'm just concerned that people, because they like RFK Jr., because he's charming as hell... | ||
And he says a lot of very sensible, reasonable things. | ||
I'm concerned that a lot of people who are disenfranchised with Trump are going to vote for him. | ||
And what's going to end up happening is we're going to have a Joe Biden or Gavin Newsom or Michelle Obama or Kamala Harris in office, you know? | ||
unidentified
|
So do you think he's a Trojan horse knowing that the vaccine is such a hot-button topic that they put him in just so that they could have that controlled opposition in them? | |
I wouldn't say that I believe that with 100% confidence, but I think it's likely. | ||
You know what I mean? I think it's either that, or he thinks that he can get in with a congressional vote if he snags enough electoral votes away from either candidate in the fall. | ||
unidentified
|
Okay, well, you know, with that being said, there's millions of people that are now getting a better description of what the vaccines are. | |
They're finally understanding what's destroying their families. | ||
So, his run definitely has a benefit towards society. | ||
I don't necessarily, I don't trust any of the candidates at a certain point, because they all have implicated themselves with being co-opted, or at least owned years ago. | ||
With Trump, he was on Fox talking about how he was the father of the vaccine, and that he was upset that they had the Johnson & Johnson, the recommendation was that nobody would take it, and he was afraid that nobody else would take the other vaccines and stuff like that. | ||
He was on the news talking about that. | ||
So there's a lot of, I mean, it's really a fog of war, political war. | ||
So I just encourage everybody to not throw... | ||
Don't back Trump a thousand percent. | ||
Don't back RFK a thousand percent. | ||
Don't worship a false idol or think of these people as messianic figures. | ||
Very good. Thanks for your call, Tim. | ||
We've got to go to break. I'm sorry to cut you off, man. | ||
I'm really glad that you called in and shared your perspective as well. | ||
I think everything you said is very reasonable and I always appreciate your feedback on this stuff. | ||
Stick with us, folks. We'll be back right after this break. | ||
visit InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
We are taking calls and breaking balls. | ||
1-877-789-2539. | ||
Again, that's 877-789-ALEX. Colin, I want to hear what you think. | ||
Right out of the gate, I want to take Johnny from Denmark. | ||
Johnny, what do you think, man? | ||
You with me? Hello? Hey, what's up, Johnny? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. Great. | |
Thanks. Yeah, doing another great job. | ||
Actually, when I talked to him yesterday, I said I had a new nickname for you, and that's that you are Chase the Continual Geyser, spelled G-E-Y-S-E-R. That's what my wife says, you know what I mean? | ||
You've got to say that in more of an Alex Jones type of accent. | ||
My wife called it Geyser. | ||
You're doing a great job. | ||
You're already in my top five of all-time full-show hosts. | ||
Thank you. I appreciate that. | ||
Oh, yeah. Well, likewise. | ||
You're doing a great job. I just wanted, being the punctilious... | ||
OCD person that I am, depending on your perspective. | ||
I just wanted to make a couple of corrections yesterday. | ||
I listened to myself on replay. | ||
And I said that I had made... | ||
About 100,000 Danish crowns worth of purchases over the years. | ||
It's actually $100,000 worth of purchases. | ||
That's fine. 71 months. | ||
It's actually 73 months. | ||
70 exactly orders in 73 months. | ||
In any case, I started out thinking I was just going to go on... | ||
I agree with you. | ||
He's a piece of dumb. And actually, you could have gotten a lot harder into him than you did. | ||
Because of all publications, believe it or not, the New Republic had a good article about him. | ||
And it was RFK Jr. | ||
was a compulsive womanizer. | ||
And yes, we should care. | ||
And this is an important point. | ||
I don't know if you know it, because you obviously researched a lot, but there's always more out there. | ||
But much of the reason, evidently, that his wife was driven to suicide was that he... | ||
Bobby was a compulsive womanizer, and he actually—I'm just going to read from this article here. | ||
The Post matters here, meaning the New York Post. | ||
The Murdoch paper is a cheap source of details on the womanizing, and journalists tend to steer away from its reporting unless certified elsewhere. | ||
Occasionally, though, it produces actual tough journalism. | ||
It was so shortly after Mary Kennedy died when a friend of theirs gave the tabloid two diaries dated 2001, kept by Bobby. | ||
Documents, which neither Kennedy nor his lawyer denied were his, totaled 398 pages, each with a ledger in the book on which he listed 37 women by first name only and ranked them with numbers 1 through 10 based on how far he had gotten with them sexually. | ||
In other words, 10 is a home run. | ||
Like a kid in high school, Kennedy used the numbers to represent how far they'd gone towards sexual intercourse. | ||
One entry log, three women a day. | ||
A source who has seen the diary said what was interesting, and this is important, was that he portrays himself as a victim of all the encounters with women. | ||
He was ogling after women in the environmental movement. | ||
He has so much dirty laundry, it's almost unclear. | ||
And I agree with you, he's particularly dangerous because he's so charming. | ||
He's kind of like Obama, you know? | ||
He's well-mannered, doesn't raise his voice. | ||
You want to like the guy. | ||
But that's the reason why he's so dangerous. | ||
Kennedy's are the royal family of the United States. | ||
Everybody just puts him on a pedestal because JFK got assassinated. | ||
And it's really easy to want to like a Kennedy. | ||
We think of them as the leaders of a country in a better time. | ||
unidentified
|
Yes, indeed. And just speaking of that, before I get to who I think is the only candidate we could trust, and I think, you know, if CJ gave you enough information, just on the vaccine issue, they got away with literally mass murder with a vaccine. | |
Kennedy in 1962, I believe, JFK, with the National Vaccine Act, and then this horrible law that was passed. | ||
Which basically indemnified vaccine companies unless it was intentional fraud. | ||
Teddy Kennedy, his brother, was behind. | ||
And then, of course, Bobby talking about safe vaccines and how he was proud that his kids got all 69 vaccines under schedule. | ||
And all of a sudden, he just speaks in a fourth tongue. | ||
No problem at all. | ||
And talked about how he's the anti-vaccine candidate. | ||
Indeed, you would like his book. | ||
I'm... On the real Anthony Fauci. | ||
But it was essentially, as Dr. | ||
Shiva points out, the essential points were pretty much plagiarized from Shiva without giving him credit. | ||
And Shiva, as he points out, he's a candidate that gives The right information at the right time. | ||
It's really easy to do it two years later. | ||
But I know, personally, from having tried to tell people the vaccines were horrible in 2020 and being regarded as a general madman to now people saying, oh yeah, yeah, looks like you were right. | ||
Now it's an easy time to do it. | ||
In fact, it's in vogue to sort out the vaccines now. | ||
Now, why do I like Dr. | ||
Sheila so much? Let's look at his credentials. | ||
And I would direct people to his candidacy at one of his websites. | ||
He has a lifetime record of public service. | ||
First of all, he's brilliant. He's like a one in a billion polymath. | ||
I mean, he's literally one of the smartest, most informed people alive. | ||
And second, he's always championed the cause, the populist cause, even when it wasn't popular. | ||
And he talks out against Bobby, and he has any number of videos about Bobby. | ||
Yeah, well, thank you for sharing the information about him. | ||
I'll certainly be checking out his campaign and looking into some of the research or writing that he's done. | ||
I do want to take one more call before we go to break. | ||
Can we cut to Joseph in Kentucky? | ||
Joseph, what's on your mind? | ||
unidentified
|
Hey, how's it going? There's so much to unpack, but honestly, I take it almost as Alex's stance about I don't think there's going to be an election come this next year. | |
And if there was, I mean, hopefully there is, but RFK or Donald Trump would be my vote better than Dementia Joe or Big Mike, you know, so... | ||
I mean, there's so much. | ||
I mean, man, but I could see a false flag coming. | ||
Something happened on US oil, then a new draft, state emergency, yada, yada. | ||
Next on down the line is going to be Kamala. | ||
And like you said, Gavin Newsom is going to be their guy. | ||
I'm worried about Gavin because I fled Gavin in California. | ||
I've lived in blue cities and red states. | ||
I've lived in red cities and blue states. | ||
I grew up in Illinois. I lived in Tennessee. | ||
I moved to California and I lived in Texas. | ||
And I'll tell you one thing for sure. | ||
Democrat governors suck. | ||
No one's happy. Everyone's poor. | ||
Taxes are high. People just vote for them because they're bleeding hard and they're not thinking about anything. | ||
Gavin Newsom is perhaps the worst thing that's happened to California since Nancy Pelosi. | ||
unidentified
|
Well, I mean, look at Illinois. J.B. Pritzker. | |
You're statistically more likely to go to prison if you've been a governor of Illinois than if you're a high school dropout in Illinois. | ||
That's how corrupt Illinois is. | ||
That's how corrupt the Democratic machine is. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, I'd say the big thing right now is for people out there is get prepared and have a game plan when it does go down. | |
I mean, China is getting ready to take Taiwan, and who do we owe $36 trillion to, you know? | ||
And what is our biggest moneymaker for? | ||
Yep. So, I mean, the next thing you know, there's going to be a draft. | ||
If people are going to get drafted next year, something like that's going to happen. | ||
Yeah, something crazy. And 2024 is going to be, yep. | ||
I believe it, man. You think that Israel, everybody right now wants to pay the pity flag, you know, oh, Hey, let me feel sorry for Israel-Palestine. | ||
Let me feel sorry for the LGBTQ plus community. | ||
Let me support all that. Oh, hey, Black Lives Matter, but guess what? | ||
It's all a distraction. It's not going to matter at all when the shit hits the fan, so to speak. | ||
Thanks so much for your call, Joseph. | ||
I appreciate it. And in that vein... | ||
I want to encourage everybody to go to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
This is something that I did before I started working here. | ||
I highly recommend that you get Life Select at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
I know that we're really pushing the Brain Force Plus. | ||
The Brain Force Plus at 60% off is an awesome deal. | ||
But given that we're coming up on World War III, given that we're faced with such high inflation, there is no less expensive way to feed yourself or your family for 30 days at a time than Life Select. | ||
So even as an alternative to expensive groceries, it's a great decision. | ||
But in the event that we have a major World War III event, a black flag event, in the event that our supply chain is cut off, it's always good to have three, six months, or even 12 months of storable food that lasts for 25 years on the shelf, folks. | ||
We don't own our farmland like we used to. | ||
Make sure that you have what you need for your family in bad times. | ||
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
I am Chase Geyser, your host today. | ||
And for the next couple of months, breaking news, Vivek Ramaswamy has released a full interview. | ||
With the one and only Alex Jones. | ||
I believe the interview was recorded right here in our studio at the Command Center here in Austin, Texas a couple of weeks ago. | ||
It is on YouTube and we are encouraging as many of you as possible to watch this video on YouTube. | ||
We want to make Alex Jones trend on YouTube because after all, they banned us. | ||
So it'd be a nice slap in the face to the leftists, to the globalists, to the communists that run that company, Google, if it would trend. | ||
So we highly encourage you. | ||
We're going to show a one-minute teaser trailer of the episode and then get back to the news this morning. | ||
Go ahead and run it. What we believe the actual right way forward is for our country. | ||
So with that said, I've been looking forward to this conversation for a long time. | ||
I'm excited about it. Alex Jones, it's good to see you, man. | ||
Vivek, thanks for doing this because when they censor you and de-platform you, they can then steal your identity and misrepresent what you've said and done and then build a straw man. | ||
No, no, no. The judge says, give me the marketing material. | ||
Vivek. Personally, a little bit blushing here. | ||
unidentified
|
That's what it's supposed to be. You're not participating in the process. | |
Yes. And transferring the power themselves. | ||
That's the new world order. | ||
That's global. It's actually the old world order. | ||
unidentified
|
It is. You're right. Awesome. | |
I had the pleasure of interviewing Vivek as well on my podcast, which I gave exclusively to band.video. | ||
You can check out that full interview as well at band.video. | ||
But right now, if you were to go to the YouTube video of Vivek interviewing Alex Jones, that's great. | ||
We're also going to be showing a large portion of that interview right here on this stream, this show this morning after our guest, Christina Tobin, comes on at 10 o'clock Central Time. | ||
So at 10.30 a.m. Central Time, we will be streaming a significant portion of that interview. | ||
But if you want to watch it on YouTube, we do want to make it trend. | ||
Make sure you share the link as well. | ||
Don't just watch it, but share it. | ||
And be part of the reason that InfoWars is still on the air. | ||
Be part of the fight against censorship. | ||
And if you guys want to find that clip that we've been running as an ad for Vivek calling for the uncensoring of Alex Jones, it might be cool to run that at the end of the segment. | ||
I know it'll take you a minute to pull it up. | ||
Let me know when you have it ready. In the meantime, let's take a call. | ||
I want to hear from O'Brien in Maryland. | ||
O'Brien, what's on your mind? Yes. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you for taking my call. | |
Absolutely. So, today is the day that the clock player, the man, the myth, the legend, Owen Schroer, is now basically having $80 to be incarcerated for what? | ||
Just telling the truth. | ||
A pretty much very sad day for us all, but we all kind of, for some of us, we kind of realized this was kind of actually going to happen sooner. | ||
Sooner or pretty much later. | ||
We just want to actually have our best wishes for him and hope he doesn't get off like Jeffrey Epstein because we don't want to lose people like him in this deal with everything happening so close like the war between Hamas and Israel and all and whatnot. | ||
So we give our best And hopefully he gets out of jail safely and safe in town. | ||
Yeah, I think he will. | ||
He'll be okay. He's in a minimum security facility. | ||
There's only 24 fights a year in the facility that he's in. | ||
So unless they put somebody up to it, I think he's going to be okay. | ||
But he knows how to follow the rules and be on his best behavior. | ||
I expect he'll be back for Christmas. | ||
But thank you so much for your call and your support for him. | ||
It is only a matter of time before they stop going after the Alex Joneses and the Owen Schroyers of the world. | ||
And they start coming after you. | ||
And that's why it's important now more than ever to go to Infowarsstore.com and be the reason we are still on the air. | ||
Support us in any way that you can. | ||
And don't be afraid to speak out because the consequences of speaking out now are far less terrifying than the consequences of saying nothing until it's too late. | ||
In the meantime, let's take another call. | ||
I want to hear from Devin in Indiana. | ||
Devin, what's on your mind? Yeah, so I actually heard of RSK from Sir Logan's podcast, where he did a little segment with him. | ||
unidentified
|
He just let him talk, basically, and tell him everything that he's going to do if he wins the presidency. | |
And I was actually interested because he kind of comes off as anti-establishment. | ||
And I think that's something we need. | ||
But he talked about all these executive orders he was going to say when he got into office, like vaccines, like reducing mandates and making more regulation in that field. | ||
And then he talked about cleaning up our poison environment, about how our water supplies are poison, our soil has covered in pesticides to try to reduce all that. | ||
And so, like, initially I was pretty interested. | ||
I was like, okay, yeah, this is something we need. | ||
And I was having a conversation with my mom last week about, like, she's pretty obsessed with RFP right now. | ||
And, like, understandably, but, like, I was like, I don't think you understand a vote for RFP is kind of a waste of time, right? | ||
Like, he's only splitting the vote between the Democrat and the Republican Party. | ||
The people that are loyal to Trump are always going to be loyal to Trump. | ||
That's not a bad thing. I think something's good because he brings his values. | ||
And, you know, values are more important than anything. | ||
If you have people with integrity and values, then your country's always going to be strong. | ||
And you don't need someone like RFK to come and regulate the vaccine and stuff like that. | ||
Because if these people have integrity and values, they're going to know what's good for them. | ||
They're going to know what's good for them. You know, it's not really necessary. | ||
If we get someone in that's going to preach values, get John back in the family, the nuclear family back together, you know? | ||
I don't really think RFK is going to do what we need to do, whereas Trump can do everything that he's going to do. | ||
Plus, he can also do what RFK is trying to do. | ||
He can do the same bans on vaccine. | ||
He can do the same thing with the skin in the water and stuff like that. | ||
So I don't really think that it's worth the vote to vote for our FK right now. | ||
Maybe next election, but I think Trump has it this time. | ||
Yeah, I'm with you on that. | ||
And here's the thing. | ||
It's really appealing when the entire political system is broken to just vote for any third option. | ||
That was why so many people supported Bernie. | ||
That's why so many people supported Trump. | ||
That's why so many people support RFK. | ||
When you hate what's happening, you always just want to go for the outsider. | ||
But there is no greater outsider than Donald Trump. | ||
And we're going to take more calls in the next segment. | ||
We're going to dive more into that. | ||
Make sure you call in 877-789-2539. | ||
Again, that's 877-789-2539. | ||
And make sure you check out the Vivek Alex Jones interview on YouTube. | ||
We're going to end this segment for the last minute with this clip of Vivek calling for the de-censorship of Alex Jones. | ||
With respect to Alex Jones or anybody else being censored from Twitter, if Twitter's a free speech platform, which is what Elon Musk's thesis for running the platform is, free speech means that there's no such thing as a wrong opinion. | ||
We fought an American revolution in this country for what? | ||
For the vision that we the people... | ||
Decide in a constitutional republic how we settle our differences through free speech and open debate in the public square. | ||
Now that old world monster wears its ugly head again saying that, no, no, no, we don't trust the people. | ||
unidentified
|
I reject that vision. The American Revolution rejects that vision. | |
That is what the World Economic Forum agenda is about. | ||
It is a 1776 question. | ||
I stand on the side of the great uprising. | ||
Standing up and saying, absolutely not. | ||
Heck no to the great reset. | ||
We the people decide as citizens of sovereign nations how we actually determine our future through self-determination. | ||
Make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com and be the reason that we are still on the air. | ||
be the reason that we are fighting for free speech. | ||
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
I am Chase Geiser taking calls for the rest of this hour. | ||
At the beginning of the next hour, we have a fantastic guest who will be joining us. | ||
I'll tell you more about that later. | ||
And at the end of the third hour, we are going to be blasting... | ||
The Vex interview with the one and only Alex Jones before Alex Jones is live on the air for the Alex Jones Show at 11 a.m. | ||
Central this morning. Make sure you stay tuned for that and stay tuned for the great Harrison Smith who will be hosting the War Room for the next couple of months while Owen is away on a little vacation. | ||
Right out of the gate, I want to hear from Clown Car in Coney Island. | ||
Clown Car, where were you yesterday, man? | ||
Honk, honk! Yeah, no, I was on hold, and then quickly before he came to me, somehow we must have got disconnected, but I'm here listening every day. | ||
I'm a dedicated InfoWarrior. | ||
I'm on a mission from God, and Harrison's doing a great job at the War Room. | ||
You're doing a great job here. | ||
And Alex, of course, is plotting and planning to take over the world like Pinky the Brain, and I'm with him. | ||
So my feelings about what's going on with Kennedy, yeah, they found a niche of people who were, like, on the borderline, like, Yeah. | ||
So you're a tough guy. | ||
You know, you're not going to force vaccines on people. | ||
So you're, you know, you're pushing it good. | ||
And then you explain to everybody how all your children have been vaccinated and stuff. | ||
But the party forgot was gun control. | ||
So that's what it basically comes down to. | ||
Almost every candidate that's ever ran recently has been against, you know, letting people have their own weapons in their home to protect themselves, as the Second Amendment says, from the government. | ||
So, I mean, if he's going to be one of these guys that pushes that, how far is he going to hold that? | ||
You know, you don't really hear much of that. | ||
You just hear a lot of the vaccination talk from the guy. | ||
And, you know, he reminds me of Dr. | ||
Joe Biden, you know. He's got COVID again. | ||
Oh, my God. You know, there's a funny talking point. | ||
Like, I tried to point to everybody, you know, that week. | ||
A lot of people... One great thing about finding new Infowarriors today is it doesn't take 20, 30 years for them to be validated. | ||
You know, some of these young kids today are hearing stuff on the show. | ||
They're repeating it to their friends. | ||
They're like, wow, what do you got? | ||
ESPE? Are you like a psychic? | ||
How do you know, you know, what's going on? | ||
So, you know, I think one of the things that we're winning over the youth, the youth as, you know... | ||
Fred, Gwen would say, and my cousin Vinny, the youth is where we're going to find the actual, you know, the real warriors, info warriors, and the fighters that are just seeing things right in front of their face that are not right. | ||
I mean, you can only lie to a child so much before a child doesn't believe you anymore. | ||
That's true. Here's an idea that's been bouncing around in my head for a couple of months that I want to run by you and get your feedback on, Clown Car. | ||
What are there, like three firearms for every person in America? | ||
To me, the whole Second Amendment debate is so moot on the side of the Democrats because even if they were to pass laws making all firearms legal, not just assault weapons, but any gun illegal, if they were to come in and do that, it would be, practically speaking, impossible for them to enforce that. | ||
So there's been a part of me that has been hoping that they'll do it so that they can come to my house and take it. | ||
Let me point out one bigger thing. | ||
Number one, they're never going to come to your house and take it. | ||
They're going to make you relinquish it, just like they did with that movie where the kids were getting kidnapped. | ||
They did that in Australia in real life. | ||
Well, I'm going to explain to you why they put that movie out at that specific time. | ||
Because that was at the specific time when everybody was like, I will not put a chip in my body, nor my child's body. | ||
unidentified
|
Then they watched that movie and were like, oh kid, we're going to get chipped. | |
Yep. So it took all those who were on the side of no chipping, no electronic, to maybe that might be a good thing, you know, protect my child. | ||
So, like I said, the 40 babies, every time it comes up for every war, babies and babies and old people, babies and old, oh my god, you gotta help the old, you gotta go get vaccinated, save old people, you don't wanna kill your grandmother. | ||
It's a fear tactic that's way beyond a PSYOP. It's really gotten control of people. | ||
Like I started to say before, I could have said to people, hey, anybody who got COVID this week? | ||
And everybody was on sequence. | ||
Oh, Joe Biden? Dr. | ||
Joe Biden? Got it. | ||
And I'm like, wow, that's amazing that you know that, but you don't know what the freaking vaccine is. | ||
You don't know what everything else is that I'm trying to explain to you. | ||
You don't want to understand. | ||
You don't want to listen. You don't want to do your own research. | ||
You don't want to do diligence. | ||
They turn around and call me crazy. | ||
I tell you what, 100% I'm crazy. | ||
I'm crazy about life. | ||
I'm crazy about God. | ||
I'm crazy about love. Christina, I love you. | ||
We're getting married. I just became a grandfather the other day. | ||
Congratulations. Thank you so much, bro. | ||
And what I'm trying to say is now, my fight is even stronger and more passionate than ever before. | ||
I'm not going to give up. | ||
People see me out there. They come up to me. | ||
They say, yo, I heard you on Infowars. | ||
People come up to me and even just strangers. | ||
Like, are you the guy for Infowars? | ||
unidentified
|
Oh my God, I ran into you. | |
Yo, it's pretty wild. | ||
unidentified
|
That's awesome, man. I had a couple of young kids. | |
They were like 12, 14 with their mother at Nathan's. | ||
unidentified
|
And the one kid goes, yo, I think that's the clown call from Infowars. | |
They came over, they talked to me. | ||
Yo, I sent pictures and everything. | ||
I sent like a little interview I did with the kid. | ||
unidentified
|
So you have 12-year-old Infowarries out there from Washington, D.C. | |
His name is Aiden, listening every day and learning the lessons of his life from Infowars. | ||
So I just want to let you know you guys are making a bigger impact on the youth. | ||
And I think that in the end, the youth is not going to be Lord of the Flies. | ||
They're going to be Infowarries. | ||
That's the truth, man. | ||
Thanks so much for your call, Clown Car. Always a pleasure to speak with you. | ||
Let's speak with Chad in Arkansas. | ||
Chad, what are your thoughts on Vivek and Obama's similarities? | ||
unidentified
|
Hey, Jace. Yeah, hey, thanks for always making this show engaging. | |
The calls, it's always more interesting than the news to me. | ||
Yeah, so I just saw the other day, I don't know if it's true or not, but I was pretty convinced. | ||
It was a video, and it showed Vivek side-by-side with Obama, and it looked pretty clear that all of these lines Vivek was given Were exactly what Obama had said. | ||
And if that's, you know, what makes Biden famous for being a plagiarist, then I think that's something we should look into. | ||
Do you think it's possible that they just kind of came up with the same joke? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, you'd have to watch it yourself. | |
I hear what you're saying. | ||
Could it just be that they're talking about common themes or something? | ||
No. When I saw it, but like I would say, that's something we've got to keep in mind. | ||
Mind control. Every video we watch, we're going to have a tendency to be persuaded to think it's Yeah, that's true. | ||
If your own thoughts are words in your head, then the words that you consume outside of yourself are sort of like thought implants, so you have to be careful what you consume, or at least aware that while you're consuming it, it's not your own thoughts that you're running through the infrastructure of your brain. | ||
It's someone else's, so you have to be really careful about that for sure. | ||
unidentified
|
Hey, can I say a couple things real quick? | |
One, I just want to say... | ||
You know, I'm somebody that doesn't trust the system, but I trust other people like yourself and all this. | ||
Thank you. And so, well, first, you were talking about the Second Amendment stuff. | ||
I mean, you know, Trump has said a lot of stuff that's very anti-Second Amendment when he was like, hey, yeah, we're going to look into taking guns away from people preemptively. | ||
Yeah, so I just want to say that even though I have a lot of doubts, I appreciate Infowars. | ||
I think it does the best of the whole alt media in talking about what we need to talk about. | ||
I used to criticize the channel for being maybe too friendly to Zionism, but I think that's an unfair thing to say. | ||
I think they do the best at letting what we need to talk about be said, and I look forward to seeing More examples of how we can focus on what we're doing. | ||
That's what I care about. | ||
Because I think all this government stuff is going to go away. | ||
I think that technology is taking over. | ||
I care about freedom of speech and all that. | ||
But when you look into really how you're going to control that, I mean, just where InfoWars is at, that's where it's going. | ||
How we're relating, even being able to connect through communication. | ||
So anyway, I just appreciate what you do. | ||
Thank you so much. | ||
I appreciate your call. | ||
It's true that InfoWars is the future of communication. | ||
The InfoWar is on, and InfoWarriors all over the world are uniting. | ||
Make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com and be a part of the war effort. | ||
Right now we have 60% off for Brain Force Plus. | ||
This is a last chance flash sale while supplies last. | ||
Make sure you check out Brain Force Plus. | ||
This is one of my top two or three favorite products on the store. | ||
It actually works and you will notice a difference the first day that you take it. | ||
Visit InfoWarsStore.com and be the reason we're still on the air. | ||
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
We are having a great show this morning. | ||
A lot of great callers. Thank you so much for calling in at 877-789-2539. | ||
I'm going to take more calls for this segment. | ||
This is the last segment of the hour, and we have a great guest coming up who I will tee up at the beginning of the hour. | ||
And make sure you stay tuned because the last 30 minutes of the show today, we are going to be showing Vivek's new interview with the one and only Alex Jones. | ||
If you just can't wait, make sure you go to YouTube and watch it now. | ||
Or if you want to watch this and watch that later, at least share the link to the YouTube interview now. | ||
So that we can make it trend on YouTube. | ||
We want to slap the globalists at YouTube in the face and show them that despite all their efforts, they simply can't censor Alex Jones. | ||
It is impossible to silence the truth when the truth refuses to give up. | ||
First up, I want to take Amanda in Phoenix. | ||
Amanda, I see here that you're frustrated with single issue voters. | ||
unidentified
|
What's on your mind this morning? Yes, in regards to, I mean, it's more than just JFK and Trump, but it seems like People always concentrate on a single issue to disregard a candidate for all else they've ever done. | |
So, for example, with Trump, they want to disregard him because he hasn't avidly come out against vaccines, but forget about all the other things that he's been helpful for. | ||
And so I'm so grateful for InfoWars because you guys have really taught me to see the whole picture and understand the long game and read between the lines because there's more at play than just Next year's presidential election, but the implications from wherever sits that office. | ||
Yeah, that is so true. | ||
And I think the reason that people are so inclined to be single-issue voters is because most people don't have the time to look into stuff. | ||
There's not a lot of people that are listening to Infowars while they're at work. | ||
I mean, there are, but in terms of the context of all 350 million people in the United States, not a lot of people can consume the news, do the research, go to bidenlaptopemails.com and do search words. | ||
There's just not a lot of time for that. | ||
So people rely on late-night TV, Sort of comedian hosts for their news, or they rely on whatever they see in their Twitter or Instagram feed, and they don't look into anything. | ||
And when you don't look into anything, it's very easy to make a voting decision based off of a single issue. | ||
And I would say that if you are going to be a single issue voter, which I don't recommend, but if it's the only option for you in your mind to be a single issue voter, then vote for Trump because everyone who hates America hates him. | ||
So if we want to look at the candidate that's the most... | ||
Of a threat. The greatest threat to the political class, to the establishment, political elite, to globalism, to internationalism. | ||
If we want to look at the candidate or vote for the candidate that's the greatest threat to them, then we have to look at the candidate that they hate the most. | ||
Who's the candidate who they're trying to convict of crimes that he did not commit? | ||
Who's the candidate that they're trying to get off of ballots in every swing state and more? | ||
Who's the candidate that the RINOs are reluctant to support, that they were reluctant to support the last election and the election before that? | ||
Who is the candidate that is feared by those who have been selling America out or explicitly hate America the most? | ||
And that's Donald Trump. So if you're going to be a single-issue voter and you actually want what's best for this country or you actually believe that you love this country, then vote on the one issue, the fact of the matter, that Donald Trump is the most hated person by all of those who hate America. | ||
Thank you so much for your call, Amanda. | ||
I do appreciate it. | ||
Let's hear next. From Jefferson in Virginia. | ||
Jefferson, I'm going to take a chance with you. | ||
What's up, buddy? Good morning, Chase. | ||
Thank you. | ||
I appreciate it. I'm not following your logic on RFK and the vote in the House. | ||
Not the full Congress. | ||
I don't see how RFK gets enough votes from the states. | ||
You get one vote for each state. | ||
There's 27 Republican states. | ||
There's 23 Democratic states. | ||
I don't see how he peels off so many votes from Trump and Biden that he gets to beat both of them. | ||
Yeah, so if he gets enough electoral votes that neither of the two main candidates reaches 270, then Congress votes on the top three candidates for presidency. | ||
The House does. Just the House, yes. | ||
Just the House. It's not everybody in the House. | ||
It's by conference. So you have 50 states. | ||
So there's 27 Republican states. | ||
There's 23 Democratic states. | ||
How does Trump lose... | ||
How does Trump lose 13 Republican states or something? | ||
You know, Trump can lose twice as many states as Biden and still win. | ||
Yeah, so my concern in that event is that it drastically reduces the number of people that RFK has to convince to vote for him. | ||
And I'm concerned that there's enough rhinos in the House of Representatives to That they would vote for RFK as like a compromise. | ||
That's just my concern. I'm not saying that's likely that it's going to happen or that's definitely going to happen. | ||
But if you see the lack of support or the lack of commitment to Jim Jordan for the speakership, it indicates that we have a rhino problem. | ||
And I'm not convinced that everybody in the House of Representatives who's a Republican would vote for Trump if they had the option. | ||
Right, but it's not an individual vote by members. | ||
That's what I keep saying. It's the state's One vote per state. | ||
So the total to win is 25 or less when there's three candidates. | ||
So the rhinos don't matter in that respect in that they'll be outvoted in their individual states by people that aren't rhinos in the representation. | ||
So I'm just not seeing how this pans out in any way. | ||
I mean, RFK might peel a lot of people away from But I don't think it's going to happen that he's going to peel away from Trump in the state. | ||
Anyway, we'll see what happens, but I doubt it's going to come to that. | ||
Yeah, you could be right. It's possible that there's a fourth interpretation here and that the reason he's running is so that it comes to that so Trump can win in the sort of runoff congressional election scenario. | ||
Right, right. Interesting. | ||
Yeah, thank you for your call. I appreciate it, Jefferson. | ||
Let's see if we can get some more calls in the queue. | ||
Make sure you call on 877-789-2539 ahead of this amazing guest that we have at the beginning of the next hour. | ||
We're going to talk more about some of these alternative candidates in the next hour and the importance of open debate in the next hour. | ||
We know that traditionally speaking, only the candidates that have the most support by the establishment parties have a voice in the debates that are hosted. | ||
And traditionally speaking, that's been very important because... | ||
Broadcast media, major mainstream news networks have sort of been the sole voice with the reach necessary to sway votes or reach American voters at all. | ||
and so it's been a big deal when people have been disbarred or ineligible for these establishment debates and so what happens to these alternative candidates how can we hear the views of these alternative candidates if we're not satisfied with the establishment candidates we're going to talk more about that in the next segment i will bring it up then in the meantime i want to hear from sean in colorado sean what's on your mind hey chase can you hear me okay | ||
You sound great. What's up man? | ||
All right. Yeah, I'd just like to talk about this great deception that's coming up. | ||
And unfortunately, a lot of people aren't reading their Bibles. | ||
And people aren't ready for what's getting ready to take place. | ||
And the fact that we have a rapture coming, it gets a lot of people's blood boiling. | ||
I know Alex Jones doesn't believe in a rapture, but there is proof of a pre-tribulation rapture, I believe, in our Bibles that Paul preached about in 1 Thessalonians 4.17. | ||
When we are caught up, when those are dead in Christ, we'll rise first, and those that are alive and remain will be caught up together in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. | ||
This moment has to take place before Revelation, because during Revelation, pretty much your objective to be saved is you're going to have to die for Christ to be saved. | ||
You're going to have to deny the market abuse, which is the central bank digital currency, make no mistake, and it's coming soon, so we know we're almost there. | ||
And we're waiting for the revealing of the Antichrist book. | ||
This rapture is going to take place, and when it does, it's going to be blamed away with an alien abduction, and that's going to be the massive event that's going to get people to start worshiping these fallen ones who are getting ready to be revealed onto Earth. | ||
And yes, there's a Project Blue Beam. | ||
Yes, there's holograms, but make no mistake, these fallen ones are going to reveal themselves. | ||
It's going to be very real. | ||
And yes, they will use some of those holograms for false flags, but some of those holograms can also be referred to as the image of the beast, which is referred to in Revelation 13. | ||
How people won't just take the mark, but they'll worship the image of the beast. | ||
So that's going to be connected with some of these holograms. | ||
You know, the fallen ones, these drake-tailed reptilians, these greys, these are the offspring of the fallen angels. | ||
They're very rural. Creatures, UFOs are very real. | ||
Their technology is going to be on full display, and this is going to be the massive event that's going to get people to worship. | ||
Because right now, Chase, people don't worship anything. | ||
They worship themselves, right? | ||
But you've got to get to a point where something massive happens to get people to start worshiping the beast. | ||
All right. We're going to go to break in like 40 seconds, and I'm with you, and I appreciate your perspective on this, but let me blow your mind. | ||
What if the rapture happened in 66 AD and ended with the fall of the temple in 70 AD? What if Josephus wrote about it? | ||
What if the prophecy was fulfilled then? | ||
What if 10,000 years ago when there was a mass extinction event on this planet, humans were able to escape to the moon while the planet was struck and that the UFOs we've been seeing have actually been us coming from the moon to bring civilization back to the level that it was before everything collapsed? | ||
What if that's true? Make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com and get Brain Force Plus today. | ||
would be the reason we're still on the air. | ||
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
I am Chase Geiser filling in for the great Harrison Smith. | ||
But don't worry, he is still with us on the War Room in the afternoon for the next two months while Owen is on vacation. | ||
We anxiously await Owen's return. | ||
Hopefully he'll be back by Christmas. | ||
I think he will. We've got a great guest coming up in the next segment. | ||
I'll talk more about that in the next segment. | ||
In the meantime, I do want to touch on a couple little cute stories here. | ||
There's a video out now that Trump says he dreams of punching Biden in his fake nose and says there'd be plastic all over the floor. | ||
During an appearance in Derry, New Hampshire Monday, Donald Trump went on a diatribe about how he dreams of punching Joe Biden in the face and watching his fake nose splatter all over the floor. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's run clip three. But did you ever hear some of these people talking about the viciousness? | |
When you see them in a restaurant, you go in there and you know what you do to them, right? | ||
unidentified
|
If I ever did that, if I ever did that, problems. | |
And then remember when Biden, I'd like to take him to the back of the barn. | ||
I dream of that. You know what I do with him? | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, I do. | |
Poof, poof, poof. | ||
That hit him right in that fake nose. | ||
That fake nose. | ||
They'd have plastic lying all over the floor. | ||
But I don't want to say that. | ||
So when he says it, they say, oh, he said, remember when he was doing that? | ||
I'd like to take him to the back of the barn. | ||
You know what you do with him? You just look at him and you go like this. | ||
But... So he can say that, and they say, oh, did you hear him? | ||
If I said it, they'd say I was violent. | ||
I was violent. | ||
There's two standards of justice. | ||
It's a very bad thing, but it's... | ||
unidentified
|
Wow, wow, wow, wow, wow. | |
And meanwhile, to counter that video, we have another recent video from Biden stopping mid-speech to go to the Situation Room, which sounds a lot like he pooped his pants. | ||
Let's take a look at that clip, clip two. | ||
But did you ever hear some of the... | ||
unidentified
|
I apologize. I have to go to the Situation Room with another issue that I have to do with. | |
But thank you, thank you, thank you. | ||
Oh my God. Oh my God. | ||
There we go. There we go, folks. | ||
Sleepy Joe Biden interrupted the speech he was delivering Monday to tell his audience, I have to go to the Situation Room. | ||
It reminds me of that video of when George Bush was first notified of what happened on 9-11 while he was reading to a class of students. | ||
But I don't think there was a real situation. | ||
I think Joe Biden just pooped his pants, frankly. | ||
The Biden administration runs the third largest budget deficit in U.S. history while Joe is in the situation room. | ||
The Biden administration ran a 1.695, that's almost $1.7 trillion budget deficit in fiscal year 2023. | ||
Three... | ||
It was the third largest deficit in U.S. history. | ||
The only time the U.S. government ran bigger deficits was during the COVID years of 2020 and 2021. | ||
Of course, it's not fair to criticize Trump for that because everything was locked down because of this fake pandemic leaked by our enemies, both foreign and domestic. | ||
The government closed out the year with a $170.98 billion deficit in September, according to the final monthly Treasury statement of the fiscal year. | ||
That was more than double the projection. | ||
The deficit would have been even higher had it not been for an accounting move in August that reversed student loan forgiveness. | ||
So while Biden is forgiving student loan debt and not giving any compensation to those who actually paid off their loan debt or paid cash for college... | ||
We are seeing radical funding to all of our enemies abroad. | ||
Make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
We've got a great guest coming in the next segment. | ||
In the meantime, we would love for you to go check out Brain Force Plus. | ||
If you haven't tried it yet, now it's 60% off while supplies last. | ||
This is a great opportunity for you to try Brain Force Plus if you haven't tried it before or to get some for the future. | ||
If you already have some, this is a great deal which will end very soon, very quickly. | ||
So if you plan on using Brain Force Plus beyond your current supply, go ahead and get some for the future now and be the reason that InfoWars is still on the air. | ||
I highly recommend this product. | ||
It makes me think more sharply. | ||
It makes me focus better. | ||
It increases my memory, my capabilities, my attention to detail. | ||
It has been a great alternative to ADD medication. | ||
I highly recommend Infowarsstore.com and Brain Force Plus at 60% off today. | ||
Welcome back to the American Journal. | ||
I'm Chase Keiser. How about a round of applause for our producer, Matt Weber. | ||
What an awesome, awesome producer. | ||
So glad to have him in the studio. | ||
You got a shot of him? Yeah, he's giving himself an applause. | ||
He's that kind of guy. Welcome to my show! | ||
unidentified
|
Doing really well. Thank you so much. | |
I've been traveling extensively, but I wanted to make sure I could make it on this interview today. | ||
Thank you for having me. It's awesome to have you. | ||
You are absolutely welcome. So give the audience a little bit of context about what this is, what's going on at freeandequal.org, what you're doing. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, I've been at it for 25 years in the electoral arena. | |
I am an election reform expert. | ||
And after over 10 years of collecting signatures and billions to get candidates on the ballot, which I just secured an independent presidential ballot drive that I'm excited to announce in the future in more detail to get on the ballot throughout the United States. | ||
In 2008, I started Free and Equal Elections, which is a nonprofit organization, and we hosted our first nationally televised presidential debate in 2008. | ||
Fuller surprise-winning journalist Chris Hedge was our moderator. | ||
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. | ||
Jimmy Dore and I are going to be co-moderating a presidential debate this winter and we have another moderator we'll be announcing very soon. | ||
That's awesome. I'm surprised you guys haven't reached out to me yet. | ||
Tell me a little bit about the principles of free and equal. | ||
What catalyzed the start of this organization? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, I interviewed with Rob Dew a long time ago on your show, a big fan, and so I'm glad we're connected. | |
Free and equal elections. | ||
Your question again? Tell me about the principles and what catalyzed your decision to start it in 2008. | ||
unidentified
|
Yes. Our principals really, gosh, after working as the independent or as the ballot access coordinator for independent Ralph Nader, he took me to this rally called Open the Debates Rally. | |
And he taught me that the Commission on Presidential Debates, which is controlled by really just two parties, they stole it from the League of Women Voters in the early 70s. | ||
And he said that it's a debate. | ||
I mean, that's how Jesse Ventura got elected as the governor of Minnesota. | ||
And told me about the importance of the debates. | ||
And so the principal's inspiration, we're seeing so much censorship, Lack of freedom of speech. | ||
That's why I love being on platforms like this and many others that truly speak the truth. | ||
It's so important to bring candidates together across the political spectrum. | ||
And that is really the values of free and equal elections. | ||
We want to transform our elections, bring about political transparency. | ||
And we're also implementing a blockchain voting app, an application for the first round of our series of debate, which will evolve into an app where the people can vote. | ||
Because there's over 100 candidates running for president. | ||
And the people will be able to vote, ranked-choice voting, the top six candidates they want to have in our debate. | ||
So, really, I see so much chaos happening in the world. | ||
And we see this every cycle, 30, 50 years. | ||
And it's time for us to unite like we have never done before. | ||
And I feel this presidential debate series, we're going to hold at least three presidential debates next year, is really the spark of an independent movement evolving here. | ||
Absolutely. So just for the sake of the audience and for myself, frankly, what are some of the challenges that third party and independent candidates face in our current system? | ||
Is it basically impossible to get on the ballot in many areas if you're not a Republican or a Democrat? | ||
unidentified
|
It is very challenging, a lot more challenging for third-party candidates to get on the ballot than Democrats and Republicans. | |
So for an independent, having just placed a bid and it was accepted, it takes over 938,000 ballot signatures for an independent to get on the ballot throughout the United States. | ||
So this is very challenging. | ||
What I have submitted is not only getting 938,000 valid signatures, but they have to be 100% verified, which we're doing 100% verification, as well as a 20% cushion on top of those petitions. | ||
And then there's going to be volunteer signatures submitted. | ||
So my roots go back since 1998, when my father ran for governor of Illinois. | ||
And I saw that it took 25,000 signatures for a third-party candidate to get on the ballot while it was only 5,000 for D's and R's. | ||
My father was wrongfully knocked off the ballot. | ||
So I am really an advocate for opening up the elections, and I'm an expert when it comes to getting candidates on the ballot throughout the United States. | ||
It is very challenging. I look forward to helping the Libertarians cross the finish line where I can to piggyback and state off an independent presidential ballot drive, as well as multiple parties, because I truly believe in more voices and more choices. | ||
Awesome. So tell me a little bit about Free and Equal's upcoming debate. | ||
When exactly is it, and how can people view it? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, we just locked in a 360 immersive venue. | |
It's such a dream come true. | ||
The network is really bringing it to people. | ||
Jimmy Dore has helped promote it. | ||
We're donations. | ||
The people have donated over $10,000 online through freeandequal.org. | ||
So if you want to support, you can go to freeandequal.org. | ||
Help us hit our $30,000 goal. | ||
It will be in Los Angeles this winter. | ||
So before that Super Tuesday in March is when we're gonna have it. | ||
And as soon as we lock in our third moderator, Jimmy and I are confirmed to co-moderate together, then we will book the venue for the, or the date for the presidential debate. | ||
And then there will also be a window of time where the people will be able to vote those top six candidates. | ||
So you can see a lot of different parties that are going to freeandequal.org and individuals supporting to make this debate happen. | ||
It is truly a people-powered movement. | ||
We have so many volunteers And so many coalitions from different parties and organizations like Rage Against the War Machine last February. | ||
They came out, a lot of those people come out to help to make this presidential debate series and so many more across the spectrum and independence as well. | ||
When do you anticipate the final six candidates will be formally decided? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, our app is being built by Colin Cantrell of Nexus.io, his father having been the co-founder, creator with Elon Musk of SpaceX. | |
So the development stage is going through very quickly right now. | ||
We have people where they can register at freeandequal.org to get more details. | ||
So our teams are reaching out to all the candidates. | ||
I hope we can get every single one of the 100 campaigns to let them know about this app and to sign up. | ||
And as soon as we have the updates when that date, when that vote will start, They will get an email. | ||
So hopefully, I mean, the next month or two, it depends on when we land the date for the presidential debate, and we'll allow for enough time ahead of time for the people to vote in the top six candidates. | ||
And let's say one of the candidates like Biden's voted in as the top six. | ||
If he does not accept that invitation by a certain amount of time after being voted in, then we will allow the seventh candidate in and so on. | ||
That makes a lot of sense. | ||
That's very, very cool. | ||
I'm really curious to know, just from like a business entrepreneurship standpoint, what were some of the greatest challenges when you started the 501c3 in 2008 that you had to overcome? | ||
And what sort of advice would you give people who are interested in starting organizations similar to yours in this sort of political sphere trying to mitigate some of the problems with our establishment system? | ||
unidentified
|
I would say some of the biggest challenges, number one, was getting candidates to confirm. | |
I had just worked as the ballot access coordinator for independent Ralph Nader, and Bob Barr was a libertarian candidate at that time, and he only wanted to debate Ralph Nader, and Nader came back and said, well, I only do a debate with libertarian Bob Barr. | ||
And I was like, well, how does this make you different from the mainstream Democrats and Republicans that are excluding lesser-known candidates? | ||
Like, the Greens and Constitution Party candidates need to be there. | ||
So I was able to overcome that hurdle. | ||
Luckily, Ralph Nader agreed to be a part of our— joined our first presidential debate with Constitution candidate Chuck Baldwin. | ||
So that was a difficult challenge. | ||
And I learned throughout the cycles the second biggest challenge was holding these debates at universities. | ||
Universities, they pride themselves on open speech. | ||
Events that we've tried to hold, I also put on, I don't want to go too much detail, but I put on festivals called United We Stand Festival. | ||
For about eight years now, annually, uniting conscious artists and thought leaders and organizations, coalitions, and holding the universities, our first annual in 2014, UCLA. Wow, I had to sue them for breach of contract and prevail because they We canceled one of our events. | ||
Fortunately, the show still went on somewhere else. | ||
But I found a lot of hostility and a lot of control between the deans and advisors over the students. | ||
And that's something we're going to reform, of course, as well. | ||
So I have found that to be challenges overall, our largest ones, when it comes to building an idea for the people. | ||
Great question. Yeah. | ||
We want you to stay with us, Christina, for the next segment. | ||
We're going to cut to break here in about 10 seconds. | ||
Make sure you guys visit Infowarsstore.com during the break and stick with us because we're going to be back with more from Christina Tobin on FreeAndEqual.org in the next segment. | ||
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
We are with a great guest today. | ||
Christina Tobin is the founder and chair of the Free and Equal Elections Foundation. | ||
It's a 501c3 nonprofit organization dedicated to ensuring an open and honest election process in the United States. | ||
She's with us today to talk about the 2024 presidential debate. | ||
Christina, I really enjoyed having you on the show this morning. | ||
Thank you so much for joining us. I want to ask you a little bit about the organization and how it operates in between elections. | ||
As we know, there's a presidential election cycle every four years. | ||
Does the organization do work in the congressional space at all or in the state-level space at all? | ||
unidentified
|
I want to hear all about it. Yeah, that's another great question is that we have a bigger vision. | |
So as we build out the presidential debate series, at least three debates into 2024, we will be also implementing United We Stand, that music component into it. | ||
And that's strategic because that app, You can go to freeandequal.org and learn more about it, and you can sign up to be able to vote the top six candidate that you want in our first round of live debate. | ||
We'll be eventually listing every single candidate running for office, currently in office, that will be running for office. | ||
And so the debate series will break out into a United We Stand tour into 25 and 26. | ||
And we will definitely have candidates that are running for office. | ||
I'll be urging every single candidate that ran for president to run for Congress in all different levels, state, federal, whatever level. | ||
But Congress is really key. | ||
And I feel when we replace the majority of Congress, Democrats and Republicans alike that are not representing the people, they'll be holding to the powers that be. | ||
You know, InfoWars knows us better than any media outlet going after our truth seekers, you know, from Alex to Matt Taibbi, Julian Snowden. | ||
I mean, we have a lot of pardoning that's going to be happening, I feel, hopefully this cycle, electing an independent president or independent-minded president, but definitely into 2020. | ||
26 and 2028. | ||
So when we replace the majority of members of Congress with accountable individuals, we're going to see that our elections are going to transform. | ||
We're going to bring about political transparency. | ||
So there's a bigger mission at hand here, for sure. | ||
So I want to ask you, what do you think is going to happen in 2024? | ||
unidentified
|
Anything's possible. | |
We've learned with the last couple elections. | ||
We have a lot of flaws within our electoral system. | ||
I mean, the fact that it takes as many signatures as I said, 938,000 for an independent to get on the ballot as president, and it's only about 25,000 for Democrats and Republicans, that's unconstitutional. | ||
And that gerrymandering is a problem. | ||
These voting machines, I mean, follow the money. | ||
We have a lot of room for improvement. | ||
I just say we have a lot of flaws. | ||
So what I see happening in the future is we're going to fix these things. | ||
I don't fault I don't know. | ||
I don't know. | ||
But once somebody, an outsider, gets elected, or, for example, when Ross Breaux back in 1994 got into the debates, they made sure nobody could get into the Commission on Presidential Debates since then. | ||
Many feel the elections were taken away by Dr. | ||
Ron Paul, Donald Trump. | ||
They have every reason to believe that, because we have flaws within our electoral system. | ||
So anyone's on the table. | ||
There's more independent voters than there are Democrats and Republicans now according to the Gallup poll. | ||
And I think we're going to see even better polls, like the People's Poll, form through our blockchain app, which is another flaw within our electoral system, media, celebrities. | ||
I mean, we can keep going on and on. | ||
So it's anyone's game. | ||
I think the people are going to unite like we never had before. | ||
And our presidential debate, we're here for candidates to have conversations and respect one another's viewpoints, as different as they may be. | ||
And for the people to decide which candidate they want to have evolve through our presidential debates and ultimately bring those voices to the candidate, those candidate ideas to the people so they can vote who they feel will best represent them as president in the coming election. | ||
As far as these 938,000 signatures that are required for independent candidates to be on the ballot, what's the time frame these candidates have to get those signatures? | ||
I've noticed here in Texas, if you want to be an alternative candidate for governor or for another party to get on the ballot, for example, you have sort of a short window to get the 10% of signatures from the last number of voters who voted for governor, for example, here. | ||
How much time do you actually have to get your name on the ballot? | ||
Can you start now for a 2028 campaign or do you just have a small window? | ||
unidentified
|
For an independent, you can start in 33 states. | |
But there's layers to be able to start. | ||
The campaign needs to file a declaration of intent form. | ||
I think Massachusetts is the earliest one in early November. | ||
And then there's petitioning requirements beyond the declaration of intent. | ||
They have to have electors on various petitions, a vice presidential substitute, but some you just have to announce your vice president. | ||
So I think the campaign I'm representing will announce, hopefully, a VP soon. | ||
That'll make it easier. That's just things that the petitioning process forces you or makes you do. | ||
January, Utah is the first petitioning deadline. | ||
January 6th, Richard Winger, ballot access expert of ballot access news, I worked very closely with for decades, knows a lot of the rules and has taught me. | ||
And January 6th would be the earliest deadline. | ||
There's so many different restrictions for ballot access across the board. | ||
Some states, seven states, require congressional breakdowns where you have to get X amount of signatures in different Congress. | ||
There's just a lot of tricks and bringing in the top election law lawyers and experts together for a campaign and multiple campaigns is the way to run a successful ballot drive. | ||
And also working with the best circulators throughout the industry and firms and individuals that I know in the network will help us to succeed with a drive of that magnitude. | ||
But it is very costly. | ||
And that is not okay. | ||
And I do foresee one day when we replace most members of Congress and that transitions the legislature, We're going to see these restricted ballot access barriers cease to exist, as well as many, if not all, of the electoral flaws that I've mentioned and more I have yet to mention go away, fade away. Absolutely. | ||
So we've just got about a minute left. | ||
Lastly, I want to hear about your goals for the organization and where you would like to see the country by 2028. | ||
What do you hope to achieve in the next five years or so? | ||
unidentified
|
I hope to achieve in the next five years or so. | |
Our goals are, of course, to become... | ||
I feel we're on our way to become the next or the mainstream presidential debate. | ||
We see the current system Crumbling, expiring. | ||
The people are really yearning for a new paradigm to build. | ||
I've been at this for 25 years. | ||
I'm 42 now and I'm just getting started. | ||
Knowing there would come a day in history where we would need to unite our world, our country, more than ever and with the Seemingly intentional divisiveness and chaos and hurt that's happening in many countries, Gaza, Palestinians, even Israel, across the board equally. | ||
The need for us to unite is more than ever. | ||
I foresee this independent movement, candidates that are running all different types of candidates from different parties uniting for a greater cause that is bigger than any one person, any one candidate that wins. | ||
I foresee us replacing the system, most Democrats, or almost all, and Republicans alike, with independent individuals. | ||
Candidates that may be running on party lines. | ||
The blockchain app will allow the people to see the candidates beyond the political parties because the Constitution has no mention of parties. | ||
We've been warned forefathers' parties are evil, and I have seen firsthand within national third parties that as they become larger parties, They inevitably become infiltrated. | ||
I think we can already see that within the mainstream Democrats and Republicans. | ||
So I see compassion. | ||
I see that love will win. | ||
And I see that there are more of us than there are of them. | ||
So that rhymed. I didn't mean for it, too. | ||
Freeandequal.org, if you can support our debate today. | ||
It's a people-powered movement. | ||
I really appreciate you guys having me on and all the work that you do. | ||
It's our pleasure. Thank you so much. It was an honor and a pleasure to have you, Christina. | ||
When they censor you and they platform you, they can then steal your identity and misrepresent what you've said and done and then build a straw man and transferring the power to themselves. | ||
That's the new world order. | ||
That's global. It's actually the old world order. | ||
It is. You're right. It's really just the old world order in new world clothing. | ||
Don't let anybody hold you back. | ||
Amen. Just do it. | ||
unidentified
|
Presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy. | |
Vivek Ramaswamy, a Republican running for president. | ||
We should not be apologetic to stand up and speak for the truth. | ||
Let's talk truth. | ||
I'm talking today to somebody who I'm meeting for the first time. | ||
I met him a few minutes ago for the first time. | ||
I actually don't know a lot about him. | ||
The number one thing I know about him is that everybody has told me not to talk to him, which is what made me want to actually sit down and talk to him. | ||
The United States of America were founded on free speech and open debate. | ||
It's in the First Amendment for a reason. | ||
And so you know what? | ||
It's... That we've become a culture that wants to censor free speech and open debate. | ||
And I think that part of the American way of life is we don't just embrace moderate ideals. | ||
That is an extreme idea. | ||
The idea that you get to speak your mind as long as I get to in return. | ||
That's a wild idea. | ||
For most of human history it was done the other way. | ||
And that's what makes America great. | ||
That's what makes America itself. | ||
And so if somebody tells me, don't listen to this person, my reaction is, you know what? | ||
I'm going to listen to them. I'm going to keep an open mind and hear what every person has to say because I'm a human being. | ||
Each of us as Americans is a human being. | ||
We can judge for ourselves what we believe the actual right way forward is for our country. | ||
So with that said, I've been looking forward to this conversation for a long time. | ||
I'm excited about it. Alex Jones, it's good to see you, man. | ||
Vivek, thanks for doing this because when they censor you and de-platform you, they can then steal your identity and misrepresent what you've said and done and then build a straw man. | ||
Yeah. And that's why they fight so hard. | ||
99% of the things they say about me aren't true. | ||
They never show a clip. They just say, I've done these things I haven't done. | ||
And it reminds me of them saying that Trump said, after the thing that happened in Virginia, in Charlottesville, that he said, Hispanics are horrible criminals, bad people. | ||
He didn't say that. He said they're wonderful, good people, but there are also a lot of bad people coming across the border. | ||
They wouldn't show the clip. | ||
They would just say he said that. | ||
But he had a big enough bully pulpit to override that, and so it doubled the number of Hispanics from when he first got elected towards the end of his first term. | ||
Who understood that it was a lie and they embraced him because of that. | ||
But that was because he could show them the actual clip and show them that there had been a lie. | ||
I'm not as big as Trump. | ||
I'm probably like 5% of the pull he's got. | ||
And so I have been successfully in many ways destroyed. | ||
I mean, they built another Alex Jones that's not me. | ||
And that's why they say don't ever interview Alex Jones because they're going to hear something that probably most people are going to agree with. | ||
Yeah, so it's interesting. | ||
I think that, I mean, I wouldn't be here if it weren't for the fact that, you know, somebody came up, I don't know if it was someone from your team or someone who's part of your, you know, one of your followers or something suggested it. | ||
And I said, okay, well, several people are saying, suggest, talk to this guy. | ||
Let's see if that's something we're open to. | ||
And then the reaction that I get is, no, no, no, no. | ||
This is a guy. You don't want to talk to. | ||
It's going to be politically toxic for you. | ||
And my view is, no, no, no. We're the United States of America. | ||
So I have no idea if I'm going to agree with everything you're going to say or not. | ||
But I'm curious about this. | ||
Here's your comeback. Lester Holt last week did a really important interview, or two weeks ago, with the Ayatollah Khomeini, the leader of Iran. | ||
Now, that guy is praising the attacks on Israel. | ||
It's terrible. I think he's a bad guy. | ||
Yeah, Khomeini's not a good guy. | ||
It doesn't mean I want World War III with them either, and Hezbollah, who's got sleeper cells in America on our open border. | ||
But that said, everybody doesn't attack Lester Holt interviewing the leader of Iran, the religious dictator. | ||
Okay, so you see Hamas publishing videos of kidnapping Israelis, killing Israelis, dead bodies, whole houses shot up with dead families. | ||
That's posted on Twitter. | ||
That's okay. I actually think that's... | ||
I mean, I guess free speech, as long as it has an advisory on it, the kids don't see it. | ||
Okay, it's horrible. First Amendment, I don't agree with it, but I understand it needs to be shown. | ||
That's where I'm at, is free speech and open debate. | ||
I haven't killed anybody. I'm not storming Israeli towns and murdering people en masse or coming on powered hang gliders, slaughtering people, but they don't want this to be heard because when I see your message, and I'm not kissing your ass, it's just true, you are the most informed person I don't use this to attack him, | ||
which is true. Geopolitically, you name it, compared to anybody I've ever basically interviewed, and Tucker Carlson's super smart, and I would say has more charisma, but he's a close second. | ||
Your grasp, because I see the random questions you're asked, of just a wide spectrum of things is amazing, and your understanding that America, the idea of a free market competitive culture, is something the globalists can't have because they have a competing corporate Oligarchy or tyranny and cashless society social credit score they're setting up with the ESGs. | ||
And that's the potential of America is so powerful because people aspire to that. | ||
America has to be wiped out with political correctness and all the rest of it so that the whole world can be leveled down to one giant third-world population that BlackRock and the megacorporations can exploit and control and, quote, control our behavior, as Larry Fink said. | ||
So congratulations on the work you've done. | ||
The number one candidate I support is Donald Trump. | ||
If something happened to him, I would support you for president. | ||
And I'm very, very impressed. A lot of people say, well, five years ago his views were a little bit different. | ||
Well, so were mine. | ||
And so people say, well, he wasn't perfect in the past. | ||
Well, I'm not perfect today. | ||
We have to be ready as the world awakens the real political system to have converts to liberty and freedom in Americana. | ||
And so the fact that you are a leading light, really promoting the truth is amazing. | ||
And the few people that criticize you saying, well, you know, he just showed up on the scene. | ||
Well, that's what happens with innovation and ideas. | ||
Of course, you didn't just show up on the scene, but exploded on the national scene. | ||
And so I really appreciate your campaign. | ||
I think it's the best thing out there. | ||
When you watch these Republican debates, they're unwatchable except for you. | ||
My listeners all agree, the crew all agrees, that why don't we just have you up there for two hours? | ||
Because there's nothing but talking points and canned garbage from the rest of them, because I can tell you run your campaign. | ||
All the rest of these people are told what to say, and they're looking at polls and numbers, and it's synthetic. | ||
With you, it's real. They're puppets, and that's not even their fault, actually. | ||
I've realized, at first I would think I'm running against these other candidates. | ||
They're puppets of a broken super PAC puppet master system, and that's just the state of American politics today. | ||
And my view is, you know, if you look at some of the stuff that I've written in my books, my first, you know, book, Woke Inc., even years ago, I agree with 90, still 99% of what I said, but I've moved a little bit. | ||
And that's good. We're human beings. | ||
That's why I'm having this conversation. | ||
That's why people listen to contrary voices. | ||
We're human beings, not partisan hacks. | ||
We're supposed to respond to information and think about it and evolve our views. | ||
That's what it means to be a thinking human being, at least to me. | ||
And the globalists have come out in the open. | ||
Yeah. I mean, I was talking to Tucker Carlson just the other day. | ||
I went and visited him in Maine. And we did some hunting and stuff. | ||
And he was like, man, I'm more radical than you now. | ||
And we were sitting there talking because the world, it's out in the open. | ||
The globalists have taken the mask off. | ||
So I know you've been a pro-freedom of speech, liberty guy for a decade or more. | ||
All I'm saying is... | ||
What you say is dead on. | ||
I mean, I sit there and I watch it and I go, gosh, I wish I could nail it. | ||
And I'm not kissing your ass. It's true. | ||
I appreciate it. Nail it, nail it, nail it. | ||
And regardless of what happens, we need people like you at the top of government that actually know the subjects and aren't just getting talking points from the donor class. | ||
Yeah. So let's just, since we're meeting for the first time, Just a few minutes. | ||
I mean, your audience is probably very well familiar with this, but in your own words, it's just to hear it without... | ||
I didn't Google any of this beforehand. | ||
It said I don't want to be biased. What's your journey to the views that you have now? | ||
I mean, what gets you going in terms of your mission? | ||
You're clearly passionate guys, want to revive the essence of our founding ideals of the free exchange of ideas, not be controlled in a way that impedes the sovereignty of the United States. | ||
I know these topics animate you. | ||
But what personally got you to that place right now? | ||
I had a lot of family that worked in the sharp end of the stick in U.S. intelligence. | ||
And they never really told me any of the classified or secret stuff. | ||
But my uncle was high level. | ||
I ran contra and a bunch of other stuff. | ||
Oh, really? See, I wouldn't have ever guessed that. | ||
You're, what, parents or uncles? | ||
Just a lot of people, yeah. Okay, a lot of people in your family were in U.S. intelligence. | ||
Well, I mean, back during the 70s, 80s and stuff, before they went from Humet to electronic intelligence, there was a mobilization of the population against the Russians and others. | ||
Yeah. And so, yeah, I mean, I had a lot of family. | ||
I went to a family reunion. | ||
It was like a Soldier of Fortune convention. | ||
unidentified
|
And they would talk about... | |
One of the things that's true about the American way is that... | ||
We're not founded on moderate ideals, right? | ||
The ideals that set this country into motion. | ||
I love that we have a map behind this, right? | ||
Old world England had a different view. | ||
And let's just smoke it out. | ||
We can say agree or disagree before we get to the agree or disagree. | ||
At least let's get the best version of the view on the table, which is that people, ordinary people cannot be trusted. | ||
To sort out their differences on climate change or racial injustice or whatever it was back in that era. | ||
For their own good. | ||
It's not just that the kings or the aristocrats say, hey, I want to enrich myself and do it at the expense of the people. | ||
That's what many who are frustrated with monarchy might say. | ||
It's an arrogance. But it's actually an arrogance found in what they think of as benevolence, which is to say that, no, no, we're not doing this for us, for our power, and we'll come to the modern version of this in a second. | ||
We're doing this for the sake of people who cannot be trusted and left to their own devices because it's for them we're doing it, which is even more dangerous than somebody who comes in and says, oh, we're just doing it for my own rich, my own private personal gain. | ||
No, no, no. That's not the view. The view is the people cannot be trusted to sort out their differences through free speech. | ||
I mean, the idea you get to speak your mind as long as I get to in return. | ||
The idea that there's a republic where your vote and my vote count equally. | ||
And that's why they can't compete. Because the rest of the world starts aspiring to that. | ||
You've got to bring that down so people stop aspiring. | ||
So that British Empire model, now the BlackRock Global Banking Empire, which they admit with the ESGs and everything, you're absolutely dead on. | ||
And if you expand on that... | ||
But I just want to get the view on the table so people understand. | ||
Because there's a lot wrong with it. | ||
But at least to understand. | ||
Put yourself... The way I am, Alex, is... | ||
You could try something on like a set of clothes. | ||
I agree. Any good general gets in the mind of the enemy. | ||
Yes. And then you say, okay. | ||
Here, I've got to understand why it fits. | ||
I've got to really try it on. | ||
Understand why it doesn't fit. | ||
Then it doesn't fit, you put it back on the rack. | ||
Then you understand your own views better. | ||
Well, that's right. This laissez-faire competitive system is way more sexy. | ||
And in 1950, we had half the world's wealth. | ||
We were 4% of the population. | ||
Now we've become globalists and crony capitalists. | ||
Give me those facts again. Sorry, you're going pretty fast there. | ||
That sounds interesting. In 1950, the United States had half the wealth in the world. | ||
Is that right? Because of our invention. | ||
Immediately post-World War II. Yeah, absolutely. | ||
Post-World War II, we had half the world's wealth, and we were 4% of the world's population. | ||
As measured by GDP, probably. | ||
As measured by GDP. Half the GDP of the world. | ||
What is it today? I should know these things. | ||
It's gone down a lot. I think it's in the high 20s, early 30s. | ||
Yeah, sounds about right. Maybe a quarter to a third. | ||
I haven't looked at it in a while, but what I'm getting at here is what you said is so dead on. | ||
In fact, I need to make that point more. You can pull these clips up. | ||
Remember when Obama... | ||
Went to Latin America the last few months of his administration. | ||
Then he went to a bunch of countries in Africa. | ||
And he gave the same speech, Vivek, in every country. | ||
He said, quote, you can't have cars in air conditioning. | ||
The world's gonna heat up and burn up. | ||
Now here's a guy flying on a giant jet with dozens of aircraft. | ||
After that, he has private jets. | ||
He has houses at basically sea level in Martha's Vineyard and, you know, Hawaii, though he said we were already supposed to be underwater by 2017, though they keep just buying Al Gore, all of them, oceanfront property, right, you know, not up on cliffs or something, you know, like Martha's Vineyard. | ||
They're bearing that cross. Absolutely. | ||
They're bearing that cross for the rest of us. | ||
Well, I mean, that's it. They're on private jets. | ||
People like Ted Turner has like five kids. | ||
He says, I want to depopulate 90% of the world's population. | ||
Look it up. Him on Charlie Rose. | ||
Well, he has five kids. | ||
He has jets. He has palatial compounds. | ||
But you in Africa, you can't aspire. | ||
You need to live in this we'll-eat-the-bugs world. | ||
WEF rationing for the good of the earth while the ruling class lives like kings and goes around in their giant super yachts. | ||
To mountaintops in Davos. | ||
With carbon footprint thousands of times an American, and an American's carbon footprint is 30, 40, 50 times than somebody in Congo. | ||
So in Congo, you don't get anything. | ||
And so it's the decision to not industrialize those countries. | ||
And that's how they control third world countries. | ||
And then they sit back and say, well, that's why you're in squalor, because you're not as good as us. | ||
We're going to take care of you. | ||
But now that same inherent elitism, beyond racism, It's now being used against the West, and they're now impoverishing the West as a political tool of control. | ||
Yeah, so this is the modern, old-world European ugly monster rearing its head again. | ||
Yes. Which is fascinating, right? | ||
Because we fought a revolution. | ||
We fought that in 1776. | ||
We said, on this side of 1776, on this side of the Atlantic, we do things differently. | ||
Where, you know what, we the people do sort out our differences in a constitutional republic. | ||
Where every citizen's voice and vote counts equally with free speech and open debate. | ||
That's what we thought. And every little while, that ugly monster rears its head again. | ||
World War I was in some ways the physical conflict of that old world European monarchical worldview. | ||
Well, that was because the British Empire, who was the villain of that war, Not in World War II. Hitler was the bad guy there after the first side treaty. | ||
They literally said the German problem, the Austrian-Hungarian Empire, because it was dominant in industry science. | ||
It was taken over, not with the military, but with all of its inventions. | ||
So it was kind of the new America, but it was run by another royal family, so they had to kill the Archduke Franz Ferdinand and start World I, so you're dead on. | ||
And so this battle plays itself out every century or so in different ways. | ||
And I think right now we live in another one of these 1776 months. | ||
Fourth turning. Yeah, that's one way to put it. | ||
I'm familiar with the evolution. | ||
Let's use the analogy of America, the United States, and India. | ||
I call it, I'm saying this for 20 plus years, that's why they do want me off air. | ||
You ask, what do I stand for? Americana, freedom, soft power, people aspiring to be like America, making us the best. | ||
American exceptionalism. American exceptionalism. | ||
Take India. Controlled by the British, kick them out, now wildly successful because you guys actually got control of your government, had your own resources. | ||
Same thing. I would call that 1776 worldwide. | ||
And that's not America controlling things. | ||
It's the idea of freedom, idea of the people, the idea of loving your nation, empowering the individual, and a meritocracy. | ||
Meritocracy, what a word. Well, it's a bad word these days. | ||
It is. Well, I mean, I go back and I look at World War II. And almost all of our generals got there through meritocracy and grew up on little farms or in poor areas of cities, and there was almost nobody whose dad or granddad was an admiral who was there. | ||
In fact, it was almost discrimination against the aristocracy was what America was doing, because George Washington was being discriminated against by the aristocracy, even though he was really part of it. | ||
He was mad. That was one of the big reasons that even the, quote, elites of America fought the British elites, because they were tired Well, I'm actually your cousin, but I'm not a lord, so I can't ship products out of the colonies. | ||
And so if the rich guys want freedom, and they finally set up for themselves, that will have to trickle down. | ||
And that's why they can point at America's beginning and say we weren't perfect. | ||
But it was the idea of the process, and as more people get into that, that's the victory. | ||
Now you look at who is the leaders of the military. | ||
They'll have some token people. | ||
Oh, look, a black guy, you know, a white lady or whatever. | ||
But that's—but if you actually look, it's a bunch of bluebloods whose grandfathers were in control at the end of World War II when America absorbed the British Empire and became this new globalist system. | ||
So America is like the engine and the brain, along with the British intelligence. | ||
Of this very evil thing. | ||
I love America. I mean, I've got Jones. | ||
I mean, I've got a Welsh last name. | ||
I'm not an Anglophile, but I'm not an Anglophobe. | ||
But the system of the British Empire and the ghost of it through BlackRock and its Royal Institute of International Affairs and the CFR and these corporate management boards are devolving the governments while they expand them and transferring the power to themselves. | ||
That's the New World Order. | ||
That's global. It's actually the Old World Order. | ||
It is. You're right. It's really just the Old World Order in New World clothing. | ||
That's exactly it. And that's what we got to understand. | ||
And so the optimistic side of me says that what a special time it would have been to be alive in the spring of 1776. | ||
I mean, it was a special time to be alive. | ||
You got Thomas Jefferson, the age of 33. | ||
People say, I'm old. I'm young. | ||
Well, I'm old compared to Thomas Jefferson. | ||
He was 33 when he wrote the Declaration of Independence. | ||
Absolutely. Genius. You have people who are the pioneers, the explorers, the unafraid, that said, you know what, we are going to not just be victimized by this. | ||
We're going to chart a new way forward. | ||
Well, 33 was the moment we live in. | ||
I totally agree. 33 was old back then, because a lot of people died young. | ||
You either die young or live a really long time, but the average was we didn't live as long. | ||
You're absolutely right. People were married by 16. | ||
People were explorers by 16. | ||
And Thomas Jefferson lived a long time, but by 33, he was leading a revolution against an empire that had never been... | ||
And an inventor, and he was inventing things. | ||
He was an engineer. He invented the swivel chair, invented a bunch of other things, too, while he's running the Declaration of Independence. | ||
That spirit... In some ways, would history have produced the Thomas Jeffersons and the Alexander Hamiltons of the world if it weren't for the fact that they had this oppressive regime to stand up against? | ||
I think probably not. | ||
No, I totally agree. You're talking about that again. | ||
So this is an opportunity, the moment we live in. | ||
Because I am sick and tired, even myself, of... | ||
I don't know if you've read some of the books I've written or anything like this, of pointing out the problem. | ||
I've got plenty of that. This is our opportunity now. | ||
We're not just going to throw up our hands and complain about it. | ||
This is our moment to revive. | ||
I agree. My wife's a huge fan. | ||
Thank you. Tell her thank you. What's her name? | ||
Erica. Erica, tell her thank you. | ||
She almost got up this morning, but we don't have anybody to take care of my daughter. | ||
She's got to get her to school. How old's your daughter? | ||
Six and a half. Oh, it's good age. | ||
I've got four children, three with my first wife and then one with her. | ||
Oh, good for you. She's six and a half. And I don't mean to interrupt. | ||
You're so dead on. I see you talk about this is our 1776 moment. | ||
I really mean that. This is an opportunity. | ||
It is. Instead of being the leftist mind, we're being attacked. | ||
We're being oppressed. Let's give up and complain. | ||
Let's innovate. Let's out... | ||
Let's use this pressure, like lifting weights or jogging or climbing a mountain, to get stronger. | ||
That which doesn't kill me only makes me stronger, to quote Nietzsche. | ||
unidentified
|
And this is 1776 Part... Matthew in Wisconsin. | |
Thanks for calling in. You're on the air. | ||
Hey, I love you guys. | ||
First off and foremost, I need to pray for Infowars. | ||
I want to pray Yeshua HaMashiach, Jesus Christ the Messiah. | ||
Pray blessings and power upon Infowars, Harrison Smith, but especially Owen Schroer and Alex Jones right now. | ||
I love you guys. And also, I need a plug. | ||
I need to plug your products right. | ||
I have to... I got to admit, alright? | ||
I was on drugs. I was on heroin. | ||
I was on meth. I was on everything. | ||
And then all of a sudden I came across... | ||
The first product I took was BrainForce. | ||
I was a tweaker. All I wanted to do was drugs, and I tried BrainForce. | ||
And I'm telling you what, it changed my life, all right? | ||
I started taking Brain Force. | ||
That was the first product I bought, and then I got everything else. | ||
I'm off the drugs. | ||
All I do is take InfoWars. | ||
I can't even plug all of them. | ||
I take them all right now. | ||
Instead of drugs, they're so much better. | ||
I'm telling you, it changed my life. |