Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| - This was an important study Let me give you some context. | ||
| I was contacted by a graduate student at the University of Michigan School of Public Health, where I'm an alumni, and we had an approved project through the School of Public Health to do an examination, a systemic review of all the autopsies that had been published in the peer-reviewed literature. | ||
| So we used the standard, what's called PRISMA methodology, where we searched for every paper possible. | ||
| We sorted through hundreds and hundreds of manuscripts because deaths can be reported as different clinical syndromes are coming out after the vaccine. | ||
| We arrived at 44 papers, 325 autopsies, Then we took each one of the autopsy results out and we put it as a single line item with all the clinical description. | ||
| And then we submitted that to adjudication, a blind adjudication. | ||
| Three doctors who were expert in looking at pathologic specimens all had bona fide evidence in the autopsy lab. | ||
| And then we came to an agreement on the cases and we found that 73.9% of all the cases It was either the vaccine as the direct cause of death or it significantly contributed to the death. | ||
| The deaths occurred within a week or two after taking the last shot and far more than 50%, the single cause was a cardiovascular cause of death. | ||
| A Lancet study on COVID vaccine autopsies found that 74% were directly caused by the vaccine and not mere coincidence. | ||
| Titled, A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Death After COVID-19 Vaccination, The study examined autopsy data from countries around the world of individuals with one to three doses of various COVID vaccines. | ||
| Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, all of whom died on average two weeks after their last dose. | ||
| Each of these autopsy cases were reported to, quote, include COVID-19 vaccines as a possible cause of death. | ||
| This new report was written by nine doctors, including Dr. | ||
| Peter McCullough, and technically the study is a pre-print paper awaiting peer review. | ||
| However... Within 24 hours of its release, The Lancet removed the paper stating, quote, The study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. | ||
| But is that true? | ||
| Or is The Lancet participating in a cover-up by censoring medical data that supports the conclusion that the COVID vaccine is in fact dangerous and deadly? | ||
| According to the study itself, the aim of their review is to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccines and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis. | ||
| We searched for all published autopsy and necropsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18, 2023. | ||
| 323 autopsy cases from 44 published papers were reviewed, and three physicians independently scrutinized each of them to determine whether COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death. | ||
| They found that a total of 240 deaths of the 223 were due to COVID vaccines. | ||
| About 74% of the autopsies. | ||
| The study also found that the cardiovascular system was mostly implicated in the COVID vaccine deaths, followed by blood and bone marrow issues, and finally the respiratory system. | ||
| The average time of death after vaccination was 14.3 days, and was most commonly a week after the last vaccination was administered. | ||
| Despite the heavy weight of these absolute bombshells, the doctors behind the study conservatively interpreted these findings by stating, quote, Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings. | ||
| Yet, Lancet censored their study. | ||
| So even though a variety of doctors from around the world cited the COVID vaccine as a cause of death in hundreds of autopsies, and this information has been reviewed, verified, and published by a team of doctors, apparently the conclusion that the vaccine killed those people is not supported, according to Lancet's I guess it's no surprise that one of their biggest research financiers is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. | ||
| I'm sure they're just following. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's Friday, July 14th, year of our Lord, 2023. | |
| And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| I think it's time to blow this thing. | ||
| Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to the American Journal. | ||
| This Friday morning, infowars.com, band.videos, where you go to share these links. | ||
| We've got a lot to talk about today. | ||
| We'll be taking your calls throughout the show. | ||
| Three major surprise announcements yesterday. | ||
| We'll get into it. Again, we'll take your calls throughout the second two hours of today's program, and we'll get to all of the video clips, news stories you've come to expect here at InfoWars. | ||
| Let's just get right down to it. | ||
| Here it is, your Daily Dispatch. | ||
| All right, here it is, folks, your Daily Dispatch. | ||
| For Friday, the 14th of July, 2023, From PostMillennial.com Breaking, Biden calls up U.S. military reserve units to deploy to active duty in Europe in Operation Atlantic Resolve. | ||
| Presidential action posted by the White House on Thursday revealed that the president, under his authority as commander-in-chief, is calling up the U.S. military reserve units to deploy to active duty in Europe. | ||
| It's called Operation Atlantic Resolve. | ||
| It's the official name of the unofficial operation supporting the war in Ukraine and is in response to Russia's invasion of the Donbass region. | ||
| Operation Atlantic Resolve has been funded under the European Deterrence Initiative and it is intended thus far to strengthen NATO, the U.S. military in Eastern Europe, but is not called on Americans to fight to defend Ukraine. | ||
| Yeah, no, it's definitely not. | ||
| No, definitely not going to fight to defend Ukraine. | ||
| Obviously not. Of course, they are. | ||
| Of course, that is exactly what's going to happen. | ||
| And again, we've been pointing to this for a while now. | ||
| Not just the... | ||
| Continued support of Ukraine and the fact that there are American special forces operations in Ukraine going on right now. | ||
| We already have boots on the ground fighting on behalf of Ukraine against Russia. | ||
| That's some of the stuff that was revealed from the discord leaks. | ||
| The military documents leaked by one of the Pentagon contractors, but In addition to that, I've been seeing other signs we've talked about on this show. | ||
| Just little things. | ||
| Little things like opening up oil fields in Alaska for drilling. | ||
| Just something totally outside of what the Biden administration normally does. | ||
| And you think, is this in preparation? | ||
| Because they know that we are going to actually need some domestic production once we launch a full-scale war against the rest of the world. | ||
| But in addition to that, we have 300,000 NATO troops clustering at the border of Russia. | ||
| Earlier this week, that was announced. | ||
| Yeah, we're going to war, folks. | ||
| They really, really, really want us to get into World War III. Unless we stand up and stop them, that's exactly what's going to happen. | ||
| Don't know how many times in the last year and a half we've been looking at what's going on and Being uncomfortably reminded of the run-up to World War I or World War II, you look back in history and you go, how did they not know what a catastrophe this would be? | ||
| Couldn't anybody have foreseen what was going to happen? | ||
| And wouldn't absolutely anything be preferable to the just mass slaughter of World War II? Couldn't people have seen that this was going to become a meat grinder, that millions upon millions of young men, entire generations, would be wiped out in a senseless, worthless conflict that brings the world nothing but misery? | ||
| Couldn't they have seen that this was going to happen? | ||
| Of course, now here we are in 2023, seeing it happen, watching it spiral out of control, barrel ceaselessly towards this ultimate conclusion, and Nobody's doing anything to stop it. | ||
| So we can stop it. | ||
| We can absolutely stop it at any point. | ||
| There's a choice we're making. | ||
| And how this all ties in is another thing we'll cover in the show today. | ||
| But the fact that there's no small... | ||
| There's a part of this that's not too small. | ||
| I mean, it's actually a pretty large part that the Biden administration, Biden himself, and Hunter Biden... | ||
| Victoria Nuland and Anthony Blinken, all of these people and their nefarious dealings with Ukraine. | ||
| Are we going to war to cover up the fact that the Bidens took bribes from Ukraine? | ||
| Are we going to start World War III because Joe Biden needed to make a couple extra million bucks with the Sun Hunter and then cover it up? | ||
| Because that... Again, appears not to be a small part of this calculus. | ||
| And again, we'll get to it later in the show. | ||
| We'll expand on that a little bit. | ||
| But... Coinciding with this, White House looks to prevent oversight of Ukrainian aid. | ||
| The Joe Biden administration has come out in opposition to Congress, creating an inspector general's office to oversee weapons transfers to the Ukrainian government. | ||
| The National Defense Authorization Act includes a provision that will create an inspector general for the proxy war in Ukraine, modeled after the Special Inspector General for Afghan Reconstruction, SIGAR, Initialism there. | ||
| Cigar John Sopko detailed the rampant American failures during the Afghan war for years. | ||
| His quarterly reports routinely embarrassed American officials who tried to portray the situation in Afghanistan as approving. | ||
| Sopko has warned that an inspector general's official for the Ukraine war is needed to be established to prevent a repeat of the situation that American aid created in Afghanistan, which saw massive corruption. | ||
| So, yeah, the Congress, after having spent hundreds of billions of dollars, sent weapons to Ukraine, want to make sure those weapons are actually being used for their intended purpose, you know, killing Russians and getting us into World War III. But the White House doesn't want the money to be kept track of. | ||
| The White House argued that creating an inspector general for Ukraine was unnecessary, as the Department of Defense was already monitoring transfers. | ||
| Which is kind of hilarious because wasn't it like a week ago that the Pentagon suddenly realized there was a $6 billion accounting error? | ||
| It turns out we have another $6 billion to spend. | ||
| Clearly it's not exactly the most tightly run ship. | ||
| Clearly there's a little bit of leakage here or there. | ||
| But the White House is insistent that nobody look into it. | ||
| Nobody ask questions about where these hundreds of billions of dollars are going. | ||
| Are they going to fill the coffers of the very same people that bribed the Bidens again? | ||
| It's a tangled web being weaved. | ||
| From CNN, Secret Service concludes cocaine investigation. | ||
| No suspect identified. | ||
| The story broke during the show yesterday, but just to catch us up, the Secret Service has concluded its investigation into the small bag of cocaine found at the White House and has been unable to identify a suspect, according to a statement from the U.S. Secret Service. | ||
| Hmm. Yeah, just I can't figure it out. | ||
| It's just the most highly surveilled and secure location, maybe on the entire planet. | ||
| But apparently they can't find out who left the baggie of cocaine. | ||
| Yeah, it was Hunter Biden, obviously. | ||
| I mean, I don't think I'm going out on a limb saying that. | ||
| But it could have been any of the other journalists or White House aides. | ||
| Wouldn't be surprised for that entire operation being fueled by drugs illicit or otherwise. | ||
| Just ridiculous. And we can do a little compare and contrast to the way that identifying people at the White House seemed a lot easier when they were Trying to scare you about COVID. And they have these graphics where you just see every single person in the Rose Garden. | ||
| Everybody who's had COVID is highlighted. | ||
| They can tell you exactly where they were and when. | ||
| I mean, they can track everybody constantly anywhere near the White House. | ||
| But somehow they just can't figure out who it is this time. | ||
| It's just a slap in the face. | ||
| It's just disrespectful, honestly. | ||
| That's what all this seems like to me. | ||
| It's just like... These people are just lying to your face knowing they can get away from it, get away with it. | ||
| Another big story that broke, totally surprising yesterday. | ||
| Twitter begins paying Andrew Tate, D.C. Drano for their contributions, amongst many others. | ||
| But this is the headline from Washington Post from a seething and furious Taylor Lorenz. | ||
| Far-right Twitter influencers first on Musk's monetization scheme. | ||
| People started getting messages from Twitter saying, you know, because of your influence, we've decided to send you a check for your contributions and advertising share of the revenue. | ||
| The first beneficiaries appear to be high-profile far-right influencers who tweeted before the announcement how much they've earned as part of the program. | ||
| Ian Miles Chong, Benny Johnson, and Ashley St. | ||
| Clair touted their earnings upwards of $10,000 in some cases. | ||
| Andrew Tate posted he'd been paid $20,000 I didn't get anything. | ||
| No money for me. | ||
| That's alright. Good for them. | ||
| I think this is great. And who's going to want to go to Threads? | ||
| You can stay on Twitter and earn tens of millions of dollars. | ||
| Tens of thousands of dollars. Welcome back. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, this is the American Journal. | ||
| Finishing up with our daily dispatch here. | ||
| Teacher instructs 10-year-old to, quote, make sure this email is deleted after private communications about students' gender identity in Olympia, Washington. | ||
| A teacher in the Olympia School District was privately communicating with a 10-year-old student about her gender identity and even invited the girl to her house and suggested she set up a private email account and delete messages. | ||
| Quote, otherwise, when your mom looks, you will be outed instantly. | ||
| Alicia Perkins, who has put a spotlight on the policies of the Washington School District, obtained thousands of emails and documents as part of a public disclosure request and turned them over to the Undivided podcast. | ||
| According to host Brandi Cruz, the emails from the summer of fall 2022 between Jennifer Knight, a teacher at Centennial Elementary School, and one of her fifth grade students. | ||
| In an email to school staff on April 28th, Knight said that the student, a biological girl, would now be using he, him, they, them pronouns. | ||
| Crew Knight, the teacher wrote referring to the class, has a student who's recently changed her name and pronouns in school, and this email is to inform you all of that change because you work with this child in some capacity. | ||
| The student, quote, has opened up to me in these last few months and has just requested this change. | ||
| Please understand that this change is his right and is not to be questioned. | ||
| Please also know that we are not going... | ||
| ...that they are not going by this change at home, and we will not be discussing this with the family. | ||
| District policies allow for teachers and staff to conceal gender identity and other related issues from the student's parents, similar to the state policy, which reads, quote, In general, school staff should not share a student's transgender or gender-diverse status, legal name, or sex assigned at birth with others who could include other students, school staff, and non-school staff. Knight sent the student private emails, which included statements such as, You need to get a personal email set up so we will still have a way to communicate. | ||
| I would take you into my home anytime you need. | ||
| Again, if you're watching InfoWars yesterday, Alex went off on this for like a good portion of the show. | ||
| And for very good reason. | ||
| I mean, what is this other than child grooming, pedophilia, all but legal kidnapping? | ||
| You've got a 10-year-old girl who is... | ||
| Being groomed, being seduced by a teacher who... | ||
| I mean, you can almost hear it in this email announcing that she will now be going by he, they, them pronouns. | ||
| It's like a victory. | ||
| It's like a conversion to this new religion. | ||
| It's like, yes, we've done it. | ||
| We've gotten another one. | ||
| And now she will be amongst us and... | ||
| This teacher telling this little girl, my home is open to you anytime you need. | ||
| If your parents find out and get mad that me, an adult, all but stranger as a teacher, has been grooming you to be a transgender, maybe put you on puberty blockers, you know, they're going to get mad. | ||
| So when that happens, just know you have a safe place with me, your real family, your new family. | ||
| I mean, it's just... Again, I mean, I don't know what else there is to say about this other than this teacher should be arrested. | ||
| Anybody involved in this should be arrested. | ||
| Literally for their own safety, like for their own sake. | ||
| Because if this continues, and again, I'm shocked. | ||
| Honestly, just like thoroughly shocked that this... | ||
| Hasn't resulted in some vigilante justice yet. | ||
| Because this is not a unique story. | ||
| This is not an isolated event. | ||
| This is happening across the country. | ||
| There's entire communities and networks who dedicate themselves to this. | ||
| Grooming children. Seducing them away from their parents. | ||
| Trying to convince them to be some sort of sexual deviant. | ||
| And maybe it's because the kids who are... | ||
| More likely to be in a vulnerable position to be seduced are not the kids who have parental involvement, who maybe are kids who have grown up with single mothers, you know, maybe the dad's not around, you know, maybe the parents are working two jobs, don't have time to be Supervising their children 24-7. | ||
| They have to rely on childcare or after-school care. | ||
| Maybe these people sort of know which kids to pick and they don't try to get the kids with parents that would do anything about it. | ||
| But again, I am absolutely shocked that we have not seen stories where You know, fathers learn that this is being done to their kid, and they don't bother calling the cops and don't bother going to complain to the school board, but rather just take justice into their own hands. | ||
| Honestly, I'm shocked it hasn't happened yet. | ||
| I don't think it's good. I don't want it to happen. | ||
| I also don't want kids to be seduced by their teachers into a permanent biological change like Putting themselves on puberty blockers or castrating themselves or chest binders or any of the other outrageous things they're doing. | ||
| And again, not just like... | ||
| Not just the fact that they're doing it. | ||
| The fact that they're hiding it. | ||
| They know... That it wouldn't be accepted by the parents. | ||
| They know that they have to conceal it. | ||
| Actually telling a 10-year-old child to set up a personal secret email to communicate with this adult and then delete the emails so the parents don't find out about it. | ||
| Just put yourself in this parent's position. | ||
| What if you found out this had been happening? | ||
| For one thing, you may not even notice a change. | ||
| What if you do notice a change going on in your child? | ||
| You're like, what's going on here? | ||
| You're trying to deal with it. | ||
| You're taking them to therapists or something. | ||
| The whole time, this is happening behind your back. | ||
| This is being concealed from you. | ||
| Maybe you go to the school. | ||
| You go to the teacher and go, you know, is everything okay at school? | ||
| Because she's been acting a little bit. | ||
| She's a little bit withdrawn. She used to be really outgoing and would tell me about her day, but now she's She refuses to talk to me about it. | ||
| I'm just worried something's going on. | ||
| And the teacher sitting there going, yes, I'm transitioning him. | ||
| Your child is a him, not a her. | ||
| And I will protect him from you. | ||
| And just goes, oh, no, she's doing fine. | ||
| She's doing great. Like the dishonesty, the deception, just lying to parents' faces as they literally seduce your child. | ||
| Like, what would you do as a parent? | ||
| How would you respond to this? | ||
| It's kind of hard to say. It's kind of hard to say. | ||
| Because my immediate reaction to this type of thing, I'd have to temper it a little bit at least, right? | ||
| Because like, yeah, a kid being seduced by their teacher is not a recipe for success, but it also wouldn't be a recipe for success if my child's father... | ||
| Was in jail for life because he murdered a teacher in cold blood. | ||
| So, you know, you'd have to sort of temper the rage a little bit and go, okay, what's best for our kid here? | ||
| How do I get justice for this without, you know, doing further, inflicting further damage to my kid? | ||
| It would be, I don't know. | ||
| All I'm saying, all I'm saying... | ||
| That until my kids are 18, any adult that tells them, quote, I would take you into my home anytime you need, and tells them to keep their communication secret, explicitly to keep it away from me or my wife, that person has forfeited their right to existence. | ||
| They've crossed a line that nobody could or should Allow them to cross. | ||
| So, again, for their own sake, for the sake of the people involved in this, there needs to be some sort of law enforcement correction to what's going on, because otherwise, things are going to start to get out of control. | ||
| They're introducing your children out from underneath you. | ||
| Time to fight back. Welcome back, folks. | ||
| Again, nobody has warned you...about what was coming more than Infowars. | ||
| Please support us as we continue to warn you about what is to come, as we continue to try desperately to inspire some modicum of resistance to this now open conspiracy of world domination, which includes just all of the most horrific things you can possibly imagine, such as pedophilia, right? | ||
| War. Just... | ||
| If you had to pick what are the two worst things in the world, those might be the top two. | ||
| Abusing children and the senseless murder of widespread war. | ||
| And yet, it's these two things that seem to be the ultimate goal of so much of what the left does. | ||
| Truly, sickeningly evil. | ||
| There's like this spiritual aspect to this. | ||
| It's like undeniable. | ||
| Why is it that... | ||
| this like... liberal mindset... is just inextricably tied... | ||
| to just the worst sin you can imagine? | ||
| It's just completely... utterly insane... | ||
| And it is, they all are like intimately tied together. | ||
| I don't even know how you can elucidate this other than just point out that these things are inextricably tied. | ||
| I'll give you an example. So you've got this woman, this teacher in Olympia, Washington. | ||
| Her name is Jennifer Knight, K-N-I-G-H-T. She sends an email to, well, she basically grooms this child, right? | ||
| Takes this kid with apparently some mental issues, some problems with their mental health. | ||
| Convinces this kid that they're trans. | ||
| And yeah, literally convinces the kid that they're trans because, we'll see in just a second, once the kid was removed from the teacher, they stopped being trans. | ||
| Big surprise, right? You've got this kid that maybe doesn't have the best home life. | ||
| Maybe they're in a vulnerable position because... | ||
| They don't have great parental involvement in their life. | ||
| This is just speculation, but maybe they do have some mental health issues of some sort, have trouble connecting with other kids. | ||
| They're 10 or 11. | ||
| They're probably starting to hit puberty. | ||
| They're probably going through some changes, maybe having trouble with... | ||
| Growing up, as literally everybody does, and here comes this teacher to convince them that the solution to all of their problems has become trans. | ||
| You'll be so cool and hip if you're trans. | ||
| It's the solution to everything. | ||
| That's the problem, is you were born in the wrong body. | ||
| Your male soul was put in a female body by, I guess, a stupid or mean God. | ||
| Like, I don't know... Again, the spiritual aspects of this are certainly prevalent and important. | ||
| But again, starts emailing this little girl. | ||
| Tells her, I would take you into my home anytime you need. | ||
| Says you need to get a personal email set up so we have a way to communicate. | ||
| Says make sure this email is deleted when we're done because otherwise when your mom looks, you will be outed instantly. | ||
| Saying, I kept emailing you, but I was worried that your mom interfered before you saw my messages. | ||
| Literally driving this kid away from her parents as you try to seduce her. | ||
| Just mind-boggling that this is going on. | ||
| And then the school defends them. | ||
| The school actually doubles down on their policy of keeping this stuff away from parents. | ||
| Again, this isn't a one-off. | ||
| This isn't a single predator targeting a kid, and it's been discovered, and the whole country condemns it. | ||
| This is the new age. | ||
| This is the new status quo. | ||
| The school district is behind the teacher. | ||
| They reinforce that this is, in fact, the policy of the school. | ||
| In a May 9th email to the student's mother, The teacher asked for an in-person informal conference because, quote, I'm concerned about her mental health, her self-esteem, and how she feels about herself is low, and I think an in-person meeting and talking together would help Taylor feel supported. | ||
| I don't have all the answers, but I was hoping we could chat and see if we can brainstorm some ways to support her. | ||
| Right? And even in this, the deception that's in there, the fact that behind the scenes... | ||
| The teacher's calling her a him. | ||
| But when she talks to the parents, she conceals that. | ||
| She doesn't say, you know, I think your kid has gender dysphoria. | ||
| Like, even if you honestly believed it was gender dysphoria, and were just up front about it, that would be different than what's going on here. | ||
| What's going on here is they're concealing the gender dysphoria, so-called, that the teacher invented and implanted into the mind of the kid. | ||
| Like, I wonder if... | ||
| I wonder how much, like, just the lack of people having kids is contributing to this. | ||
| Because I don't know, if you don't have a kid, maybe you don't realize how easy it is to trick children. | ||
| I don't know, if you're an adult, you don't spend a lot of time around kids. | ||
| Maybe you think 10-year-olds and 11-year-olds, that's old enough to be making their own decisions. | ||
| Yeah, it's not. | ||
| Not by a long shot. | ||
| Go volunteer at a kid's camp or something. | ||
| Go see how well put together the 11 and 10 year olds are. | ||
| You could literally convince them of anything. | ||
| They don't know anything. Kids don't know anything. | ||
| they're completely innocent of literally everything the just the level of of evil that is necessary for a predator like this to see a 10 year old kid with mental issues and to lock onto them like a shark locking onto a tuna i mean I mean, it's just predator, predator, predator. | ||
| That's all these people are. | ||
| So in the following month, Knight was discussing how the student should be concealing the emails from her parents in addition to inviting the minor to stay at her home. | ||
| Perkins told Cruz that the student's family has moved her out of the district and the child has gone back to identifying as a girl. | ||
| Knight's employment status with the district is currently unknown. | ||
| In a statement to Cruz, Susan Gifford, the district's executive director of communications and community relations, reiterated its policy, which allowed for concealing gender identity from parents. | ||
| So they doubled down. | ||
| Well, this is our policy, actually. | ||
| It is our policy to allow teachers to talk about sex with the children and to hide their activities from the parents. | ||
| We're progressive. They say staff are expected at all times to maintain appropriate boundaries with students and follow the Washington Code of Professional Conduct. | ||
| If we believe these expectations are not being met, we will investigate and take appropriate personnel action. | ||
| But none of what this teacher did is outside of the bounds of what they say they want to do, what the progressive stance is. | ||
| It's that if your kid says they're transgender, even if they've never said it before and you planted it in their head and they go, oh, yeah, maybe that is what's happening. | ||
| Like, you have to respect it. | ||
| And if parents don't respect it, they'll take your kid away. | ||
| So in the state... Take your child from you and maybe give them to the predator that took them in the first place. | ||
| So, I mean, none of this is like outside of the bounds of what they find acceptable. | ||
| The people in the school district would sympathize with the teacher. | ||
| They'd go, you did what was right. | ||
| Right. | ||
| It was really heroic how you saved that child from their bigoted parents who want them to grow up to be normal. | ||
| The school district is known for its radical activism. | ||
| And most recently, fourth and fifth grade students at Lincoln Elementary were taught graphic sex ed curriculum by Planned Parenthood, which include depictions of vaginas and penises as well as intersex private parts without their parents being informed. | ||
| Additionally, due to shrinking enrollment, the district planned to cut music classes. | ||
| It felt promoted white supremacy culture and significant institutional violence. | ||
| Institutional violence. . | ||
| In 2022, the school district's board also appointed Taluana Reed, a Black Lives Matter radical and Antifa ally, to fill a vacant director position. | ||
| Maybe I'm a white supremacist. | ||
| Maybe I'm a white supremacist after all. | ||
| Hey, if music is white supremacist and not raping or castrating children is white supremacist, I guess I'm just going to have to embrace that label because apparently that's everything you people stand against. | ||
| And I'm against you. Obviously, we're going to move on to some... | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I guess... | ||
| There's just so much to deal with. | ||
| It's like... We're literally doing everything we can to start World War III. They're calling up 3,000 reserve units to be sent to Eastern Europe to join the 300,000 NATO units that are now being arrayed at the border of Russia to lead up to ultimate conflict with that country. | ||
| For again, just no reason. | ||
| Just no reason at all. Although, there may be reasons tied into the corruption at the highest level. | ||
| As we've known forever, I mean, when you go back to look at our coverage of the first Trump impeachment, we called it out then, and even before then, but... | ||
| Certainly at that point, it was obvious what was going on, that Trump was trying to pull the string to unspool the sweater of Biden corruption. | ||
| And we pointed out then, like, Ukraine is a hotbed of corruption. | ||
| It is a place where the CIA and the Soros initiatives and the Victoria Newlands and Anthony Blinkens of the world had their fingers in the pie for quite a little while. | ||
| So we said then they had to stop Trump. | ||
| My take on the impeachment at the time was that this was a defensive maneuver. | ||
| In other words, the impeachment wasn't an offensive maneuver trying to get Trump out of office. | ||
| It was a defensive maneuver impeaching Trump in order to stop him from investigating and starting to put the pieces together that would expose a massive mosaic of corruption. | ||
| We'll get into that. | ||
| We'll get into the Ukraine war and the increasing likelihood of World War III in just a second. | ||
| But is that more or less important than the fact that even without a war, our country has been conquered and taken over and our children being subjected to And sexualized programming by the very people that we hire to teach them math and sing songs with them at elementary school. | ||
| I don't know. Hard to say. | ||
| hard to say and it seems like the traitors and sociopaths within our own walls need to be dealt with certainly before we do anything overseas i do want to tell you to go to infowarsstore.com as we have been right about all of this we We have been pointing out all of this. | ||
| Not because we're special and have some sort of unique insight that's not easily attainable by anybody with an open mind and the ability of observation. | ||
| It's really all it takes. | ||
| It's really not that difficult to figure out. | ||
| When my dog is sitting next to her food bowl and jittering excitedly and wagging her tail and drooling, I know she's hungry. | ||
| Like you look for signs and you come to a conclusion. | ||
| Dog can't tell me she's hungry, but I'm pretty sure she's hungry. | ||
| When you've got a bunch of creepy sexual degenerates with no children trying to seduce your child into changing their sexuality and... | ||
| They're pedophiles. | ||
| Like, you can see where this is going. | ||
| You can look at the signs. You can look at the evidence. | ||
| Look at the pattern that's emerging. | ||
| You can play it out in your own head and see where it ends up. | ||
| It's really not that complicated. | ||
| It's not some sort of speculation. | ||
| It's just observation. All this should be obvious. | ||
| We apparently are the only ones... | ||
| Willing to express what is obviously going on, and we have been for years. | ||
| Finally, I mean, it's becoming so apparent at this point that some of the more traditional, seemingly alternative, but still very much inside the bounds of the Overton window, like those types of right-wing organizations, are starting to have this same type of sort of extreme rhetoric that InfoWars has been Making a center of its brand for the last several decades. | ||
| So it's good to see people finally come around to it. | ||
| But we're sort of running out of time here as a civilization. | ||
| So we'll continue our mission. | ||
| Please do support us by going to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| InfoWarsStore.com. The Patriot Pride Month is on now. | ||
| Double Patriot points, plus up to 60% off some of our top-selling products, including water filters and air filters, 10% off. | ||
| Really incredible products, and of course, necessary to keep this operation afloat. | ||
| So again, we just covered this school district in Washington. | ||
| Teacher coordinating with and trying to seduce. | ||
| Even the stuff where it's like, I kept emailing you, but I was worried your mom interfered before you saw my messages. | ||
| It's not even that there's like a back and forth. | ||
| It's like this needy 30-whatever-year-old woman repeatedly emailing a 10-year-old kid. | ||
| Did you get my last email? | ||
| Did you think about that? | ||
| What have you thought about that? Your mom didn't hear us, did you? | ||
| Did she? You can always come over to my house. | ||
| Are you there? Are you getting my emails? | ||
| Your mom didn't find them, did she? | ||
| Like, just like, I kept emailing you, but you didn't respond. | ||
| It's like, this is a 10-year-old child you're talking to? | ||
| Unbelievable. Absolutely unbelievable. | ||
| But again, it's not a one-off. | ||
| It would be one thing if we lived in a society where when this type of thing happens, it was a national news story. | ||
| Nobody condemned it. Nobody realized what a horrifically wrong thing to have happened this is. | ||
| But we don't live in that world. | ||
| We live in a world where the entire establishment, government, corporate, sick world is going along with this. | ||
| Let's go now to video number three. | ||
| This is Gavin Newsom. | ||
| He keeps it a little bit vague as he talks about this. | ||
| He tries to convince everybody he's a human in the very beginning. | ||
| I'm a human being with four children. | ||
| Great. But I'll explain exactly what's going on on the other side. | ||
| Here is Gavin Newsom standing up for parents in California. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hi everybody, it's Gavin Newsom, father of four with two young elementary school kids, and I want to talk to the parents of the Temecula School District. | |
| We've been paying close attention, as I know you have, particularly with school coming up on August 14th. | ||
| You're worried, I'm worried, we're all worried about access To information, access to the latest social studies books that are being made available quite literally to hundreds of thousands of kids all throughout the state of California but are being denied to the kids in the Temecula district. | ||
| That social studies book is being censored by the local school board. | ||
| I know that's created a lot of anxiety. | ||
| The last thing we need is more anxiety and more stacking of stress. | ||
| So I want you to know that we're moving forward, the state is moving forward in purchasing and procuring those social studies books. | ||
| Your kids have the freedom to learn, and you have the freedom to access those books, the same books that hundreds of thousands of other kids throughout the state are accessing. | ||
| So rest assured, we'll be sending those books down in very short order. | ||
| And let's do our best, all of us, to soften the edges of these debates and to make sure that we provide accurate information and the freedom for our kids to learn. | ||
| That, after all, is the California way. | ||
| Access to information, freedom to learn. | ||
| They don't want to ban books, and they're going to utilize all the power of the government to make sure that kids have access to information. | ||
| They just care so much. | ||
| You might be kind of confused at the end of this. | ||
| Like, what the hell is he talking about? | ||
| What book? What book is being denied, kids? | ||
| Why is California so insistent that kids read this book? | ||
| He left it a little bit vague because he kind of has to. | ||
| Because it wouldn't have sounded exactly the same if he said something like, you know, the school board decided not to purchase a social studies book that lionizes a pedophile, Harvey Milk, and that anti-pedophilia groups... | ||
| Protested this and decided not to purchase the book for their school district. | ||
| School board made a decision not to incorporate the radical LGBT agenda into their curriculum so we as the state of California will overrule them and make sure that your child is introduced to the gay propaganda lionizing and celebrating as a hero a man who was a pedophile. | ||
| It wouldn't have maybe had the same ring to it, right? | ||
| You better stick to those vagaries like freedom to learn, access to information. | ||
| No, it's about a book that featured Harvey Milk, who was pretty open. | ||
| It's not even debated at this point. | ||
| When he was 30-something years old, he was in a relationship with a 16-year-old. | ||
| The dude was a minor. | ||
| The kid was a minor, and Harvey Milk was in a relationship with him. | ||
| They didn't want that type of person being celebrated and lionized by the school board. | ||
| Or by the school, by the kids. | ||
| From Anthony Cabasa, Gavin Newsom tells Temecula school parents that he's aware the school board is banned to social studies book by controversial author Harvey Milk due to his relationship with the minor. | ||
| Says California State will purchase the books to send to students directly and will fine the school board for incompetence. | ||
| They simply make a decision about what they want to teach their kids, since that's against the orthodoxy of the new gayocracy, new transocracy, ruled by freaks. | ||
| So now not only are they going to send your kids directly the gay propaganda, they're going to fine you for trying to resist. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. | ||
| We've got a lot to talk about. We're going to open up the phone lines for your calls in this second hour and into the third hour of today's program. | ||
| This is the American Journal coming to you live on this Friday morning. | ||
| Just looking at the priorities of some of our elected officials and how this plays out sort of over and over, maybe in slightly different variations, but always on the same theme. | ||
| Always following generally the same playbook. | ||
| And it's that you have radical leftists who have an ideological hatred of anything normal or decent or good or righteous or just anything... | ||
| That keeps society running and functioning normally and gives people a sense of purpose and belonging and understanding of the world around. | ||
| They want to tear all of that down. | ||
| And so they write books that are made for children, that confuse and alienate them from their actual culture. | ||
| They write these books, they print these books, they either take the normal textbooks and inject this stuff into it, right? | ||
| They'll teach about a historical event, but it'll be from a certain perspective with a clear ideological purpose behind it. | ||
| And they'll inject that into a normal social studies book or math book or any other textbook. | ||
| Or they write explicit books where it's just like cartoon, hardcore pornography, showing gay sex, telling kids how to meet up with adult men on the internet, telling them it's a good thing, that they need to hide it from their parents, like just instructing them in the most devious and reprehensible behavior the world has ever seen. | ||
| And they just get it in. | ||
| They get it into the classroom. | ||
| They set up little library selected books. | ||
| How to be gay. | ||
| They get it in. And the parents usually have no idea at first. | ||
| They don't realize this is happening. | ||
| They only realize that it's happened when the kid brings the book home from school or starts acting weirdly and the parents start investigating and realize what's going on. | ||
| But they get it in under the line. | ||
| Squeeze it in there, and then once the parents realize what's happening and push back, then the parents are castigated as Nazis, book burners. | ||
| You're trying to stop children from learning because you just hate learning for no good reason. | ||
| You just hate your own children and want to keep them from learning about the world around them, you evil Nazi. | ||
| It happens over and over and over again, whether it's race or sex or whatever leftist extremist ideology that they're implanting in kids' heads these days. | ||
| This is how it always happens. | ||
| So this is what's happened again. | ||
| It's a school book. Harvey Milk is talked about, discussed, and treated as a hero, celebrated. | ||
| And the parents in the school district don't want their kids being taught that. | ||
| What happens? The governor of the state, Gavin Newsom, The political powers come sweeping in to not just enforce the teaching of this, but actually punish the people for resisting it. | ||
| They're actually now fining the school board for not going along with the transgender gay indoctrination. | ||
| Truly and utterly insane. | ||
| CNN has the story about it. | ||
| Parents in the southern city of Temecula are pushing back against the local school board's recent decision to reject a social studies curriculum that includes gay rights after some board members claimed there was not enough parental involvement in the process and made comments attacking gay rights activist and politician Harvey Milk. | ||
| This person said, I find the inclusion of sexually based topics and the glorification of a known pedophile who happened to be an advocate for gay rights to 10-year-olds morally reprehensible and inappropriate, board member Danny Gonzalez said. | ||
| We're talking about Harvey Milk. He will now be fined and punished by the state for daring to oppose them. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. We are going to go ahead and give up the phone number now. | ||
| Give up the phone number. If you want to call in, the number to dial is 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| Taking your calls throughout the rest of the show today. | ||
| And just to finish up with this before we move on to other and possibly more important notions, events going on around the world, just finish up here with this because this is, again, it's about like what is the government prioritizing? | ||
| What do they see their role as in this society? | ||
| Is the government there to dictate what we teach our kids and to punish us if we want to teach them something different? | ||
| Is the freedom of religion in this country just doesn't come into effect when it comes to sexuality? | ||
| Doesn't make any sense. | ||
| This is happening again not just in America but Canada and other places as well where like the official stance is like yes we have freedom of religion or freedom of belief but you must be Inclusive. | ||
| You must support pride. | ||
| You do not have a right to opt out of the gay propaganda. | ||
| And you're not welcome here if you resist us. | ||
| It's totally insane. | ||
| Totally and completely ridiculous. | ||
| And again, the way this is phrased and the way it's always phrased is this is book burning. | ||
| This is censorship that the Corporations and the textbook publishers and the governmental powers that are all conspiring to force gay propaganda on your kids are somehow the beleaguered underdogs who are standing up against the big bad Christians who are trying to let kids grow up in a world of innocence. | ||
| And that's how they always phrase it, and you see so much virtue signaling about this, where it's like, hmm, just reading another banned book today. | ||
| Gavin Newsom's put out tweets like that, where he's reading To Kill a Mockingbird, and he's like, read a banned book today. | ||
| Don't let anybody stop you from learning things. | ||
| It's like, okay, you people are the ones who are actually banning books. | ||
| The only books that are actually banned these days are books that offend the leftists. | ||
| And sometimes they're banned, sometimes they're rewritten. | ||
| Because the suppression, the actual suppression of information isn't coming from parents just rejecting books for their kids or school districts choosing a non-political textbook over a political textbook. | ||
| Like, that's not burning or banning books. | ||
| Those books are still available. | ||
| Anybody can go get them. | ||
| If you're a parent and you want to teach your kid to be gay, It is child abuse, but go ahead. | ||
| You can teach your kid. | ||
| Nobody's stopping anybody from doing this. | ||
| People are trying to resist the forcible indoctrination of this stuff. | ||
| But then there's things like Dr. | ||
| Seuss that are actually banned. | ||
| They're banning Dr. Seuss from the left. | ||
| Insane, but true. They're rewriting Roald Dahl books. | ||
| To be more inclusive. And this is the publishing companies doing this. | ||
| This is the distribution companies refusing to carry books that oppose their stance. | ||
| Huckleberry Finn or Tom Sawyer being outright banned because of the language that they use. | ||
| Children have a right to learn. | ||
| They have a right to access information. | ||
| But not if it offends our modern sensitivities. | ||
| And again, you got to just look at what people in power like Gavin Newsom are choosing to focus their ire on and what they consider to be suppression of information or book burning or something like that. | ||
| Which is so interesting because then you have stories like this. | ||
| These are the books that are really censored. | ||
| From thejc.com, the Jewish Chronicle. | ||
| Amazon removes, quote, racist book which claims Jews conspired against the Catholic Church. | ||
| Four different versions of the book are being offered for sale on the website. | ||
| Amazon has been urged to remove a controversial book which claims Jews conspired against the Catholic Church. | ||
| The book from 1962 was written by a group of Mexican priests under the pseudonym Maurice Pinay and is filled with anti-Semitic rhetoric. | ||
| Or the truth. I mean, but it's sort of six of one, half a dozen of the other. | ||
| Sort of tomato-tomata situation. | ||
| Four versions of the book are being offered for sale on the website, with two being sold by Amazon directly. | ||
| The book claims to have, quote, a magnificent and imposing compilation of documents and sources of undeniable importance, which prove a great conspiracy against the Catholic Church. | ||
| In the item description of the book, the authors say Judaism is an enemy of the Catholic Church. | ||
| They also write that Jews, Masons, and Communists are using the Catholic Church to further the aims of atheistic communism. | ||
| Okay. Where's the lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Where's the lie, though? | |
| I mean, okay. | ||
| In addition, they say Catholic clergymen are, quote, betraying the Holy Church and, quote, assist Communists, Masons, and Jews in their subversive activities. | ||
| Speaking on Tuesday, the campaign against anti-Semitism urged Amazon to remove the product from sale immediately. | ||
| The spokesperson said, Okay, but what if there are Jews being subversive? | ||
| Is this somehow anti-Semitism? | ||
| You're somehow claiming that every Jew is participating in this? | ||
| I mean, how many books are written on like a monthly basis today that makes the most outrageous claims about white people or Christianity? | ||
| Totally unfounded. | ||
| Just totally ridiculous. | ||
| Actually having tangible negative impacts on just the fabric of our culture around us. | ||
| But like, then what if I were to write a book Talking about how a bunch of Jews were working to ban books that were critical of them. | ||
| I mean, is that not what we're reading? | ||
| Is that not what's happening right now? | ||
| You've got a campaign against anti-Semitism. | ||
| You've got Jewish groups demanding that Amazon remove a book that is critical of their religion or the Jewish people. | ||
| But if I were to write a book saying that Jews conspired to remove books that are critical of them, would my book then get removed for spreading anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, even though that's what's actually happening right here in this article, being celebrated by the Jewish Chronicle? | ||
| Can you tell the truth about what's going on? | ||
| And where's Gavin Newsom? | ||
| Is Gavin Newsom going to make a video going, we have a right to information. | ||
| We have a right to freedom of thought. | ||
| We condemn the campaign against anti-Semitism for trying to deny our children access to this information. | ||
| Obviously not. Obviously he's not going to do that. | ||
| Because some book burning is good in their eyes. | ||
| Some censorship is reasonable and good and beneficial. | ||
| But if you want to stop kids from learning about gay pedophiles and treating them as heroes, then it's a big issue. | ||
| Then not only will they force the book on your child, they will punish the school district for even attempting to resist. | ||
| Really, this type of book is the only book that's actually banned these days. | ||
| Again, it's from 1962. | ||
| It's from 60 years ago or more. | ||
| It's like a historical artifact. | ||
| You can disagree with it or not disagree with it. | ||
| You can look at the information and determine for yourself whether it's significant or valuable or not. | ||
| Nobody's forcing this book on kids. | ||
| Nobody's trying to get this book into elementary schools. | ||
| Teach kids about the subversive nature of Jews. | ||
| They're just putting it up for sale. | ||
| Hey look, here's a book written by a Catholic priest in an attempt to defend their faith against subversive influences of all shades and types. | ||
| Communists, Masons, Jews. | ||
| That's apparently extremely highly offensive. | ||
| It must be deleted and this is not some sort of Nazis. | ||
| This isn't book burning. | ||
| This is good and beneficial and positive censorship apparently. | ||
| Amazon spokesperson says, we're always listening to feedback and take these concerns very seriously. | ||
| The title flagged is being removed from sale. | ||
| Yeah. You can write about anything. | ||
| You can read about anything. You can buy books about anything. | ||
| You can teach little kids about absolutely anything. | ||
| Gay, sex, transgenderism. | ||
| You never, ever talk about the Jews acting as a collective. | ||
| Never. All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
| This is the American Journal, infowars.com, band.video. | ||
| We'll go out to your calls this segment. | ||
| We're talking about... | ||
| We'll move on now. We'll talk about the war in Ukraine, the latest NATO summit, and some troubling signals. | ||
| Seem to hint that we are moving full steam ahead towards direct and open conflict with nuclear-armed Russia. | ||
| 300,000 NATO soldiers now... | ||
| Being deployed along the Russian border while the White House has just called up American military reserve units to deploy to active duty in Europe in Operation Atlantic Resolve. | ||
| Presidential action posted by the White House on Thursday revealed that the president is calling up U.S. military reserve units to deploy to active duty in Europe in what's been called Operation Atlantic Resolve. | ||
| They're deploying 3,000 total members at any one time, of whom no more than 450 may be members of the individual ready reserve as they deem necessary and to terminate the service of those units and members ordered of whom no more than 450 may be members of the individual ready President Biden is readying military forces to deploy to Europe. | ||
| He made a promise to the American people in March 2022 that U.S. troops would not be sent to fight in Ukraine on behalf of that nation's border or in service of waging war against Russia. | ||
| Of course, there have been and continue to be American soldiers on the ground in Russia, I mean in Ukraine, fighting Russia. | ||
| This has been revealed by the Discord leaks, exposing that actually a number of Americans have died in Ukraine. | ||
| We also have heard from officials on the American NATO side saying, well, we deploy NATO soldiers, but you put them in a Ukrainian uniform, now it's a Ukrainian soldier. | ||
| See how that works? It's called a false flag. | ||
| We love doing them. Sending cluster bombs. | ||
| Obviously, just what is an open war crime. | ||
| The White House is also trying to prevent oversight of Ukrainian aid. | ||
| The NDAA includes a provision that will create an inspector general for the proxy war in Ukraine modeled after the special inspector general for Afghans reconstruction. | ||
| Just making sure the money is going where it's supposed to be going. | ||
| Of course, we've heard stories throughout the last year of weapons showing up elsewhere in Africa, weapons that were sent to Ukraine showing up in Africa, of some of the Ukrainian officials responsible for the distribution of these weapons, buying themselves new million-dollar homes on the Black Sea. | ||
| Multi-multi-million-dollar homes, I should say. | ||
| Yachts and all sorts of other stuff seemingly getting very rich while their country is being destroyed in war. | ||
| And just like the COVID relief funds, we're still just now learning about the scams that took place three-plus years ago when the COVID relief funds were robbed to the tune of $100 billion. | ||
| But the White House doesn't think that the American people or their representatives in Congress have a right to actually just make sure that the money we're spending and the weapons we're sending are actually going to what they're intended to go to. | ||
| Not that it's even a good thing that they're going there, but it's at least better that they go to the people that they're intended to go to rather than be resold to some terrorist group in Africa for the benefit of a Ukrainian oligarch. | ||
| Half of Politico letter foreign policy experts calling for more arms to Ukraine have ties to arms industry. | ||
| This is a report from Infowars.com. | ||
| An open letter signed by 46 foreign policy experts calling for more arms ships to Ukraine that was published in Politico failed to mention ties of nearly half of the signatories to the defense industry. | ||
| Allegedly glossing over conflicts of interest, the Washington-based Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft claimed. | ||
| So on June 5th, Politico published an open letter entitled Ukraine needs a roadmap to NATO membership ASAP, calling for Western leaders at the NATO summit in Vilnius, Lithuania this week to commit to supplying Ukraine with weapons, fighter jets and tanks and sufficient qualities to prevail on the battlefield. | ||
| The letter argued that the Washington leaders helped facilitate a comprehensive transition of the weapon system being used to wage war against Russia. | ||
| Make sure it's up to NATO standards. | ||
| Basically, this letter calling for just more weapons, more coordination, more war. | ||
| And they forget to mention that half of the people who signed the letter have ties to the arms industry. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| the executive from Nabisco is telling you you need to eat more cookies. | ||
| Like, yeah, obviously, yeah. These are people who profit by death and destruction. | ||
| They profit by war. They profit by conflict. | ||
| They're doing everything they can to increase those things. | ||
| From InfoWars, Biden authorizes military to call reservists to active duty to support Ukraine war. | ||
| And here's the actual order from WhiteHouse.gov. | ||
| Ordering the select reserve and certain members of the individual ready reserve of the armed forces to active duty. | ||
| If there's anybody in our audience that is one of these people, I really want you to call in. | ||
| I really want you to call in if you are a reserve unit and have been called up for Operation Atlantic Resolve. | ||
| How do you feel about being sent to Europe to fight this pointless, horrifying war? | ||
| What Do you think about being the first in what could very well be millions of American young men and women being sent overseas to fight for basically the Bidens and a bunch of Ukrainian oligarchs? | ||
| How do you feel about that? | ||
| I wonder. I know how I'd feel about it. | ||
| Finally, we have this story from the Japan Times. | ||
| Zelensky gets less than he wanted from NATO, but takes home real gains. | ||
| The Ukrainian president's performance at NATO summit this week was vintage Volodymyr Zelensky. | ||
| Go in hard, push allies beyond their comfort zone, and go home with less than you said you wanted, but more than seemed likely only a few months ago. | ||
| Zelensky left Western leaders in Vilnius with little choice but to publicly snub his demand to set a clear path for Ukraine to join the U.S. military-led alliance. | ||
| U.S.-led military alliance. | ||
| But the summit's assurances of unwavering support, new pledges of military aid, and a framework for security guarantees against Russia showed how far Ukraine has already moved towards the Euro-Atlantic camp during the war. | ||
| So again, he didn't get everything he wanted, but he did get 300 NATO soldiers deployed. | ||
| He got promises for new weapons of dubious legality and all sorts of other commitments that will contribute to this endless cycle of Senseless murder. | ||
| Again, we'll go out to your calls, but the first call I want to go to is Simon. | ||
| He's been keeping a track of all of this, the whole NATO event. | ||
| We only have about a minute left, so if you're okay with it, Simon, we'll wait until the next segment. | ||
| We'll hear what's been going on from you a little bit longer than this one minute. | ||
| But again, let me just tell you, Infowars... | ||
| Has been on the same... | ||
| Like, we've had the same stance since I was in middle school, basically, right? | ||
| The reason I first started listening to InfoWars is because I hated the Iraq War and it seemed like there was only one outlet in America that was pointing out the hypocrisies, the lies, the deception, the destruction of that totally pointless and now largely recognized as absolutely ill-advised the destruction of that totally pointless and now largely recognized as absolutely ill-advised adventurism in It's not that hard. | ||
| It's not that hard to figure out what side InfoWars is going to be on. | ||
| It's the side of peace. It's the side of innocence. | ||
| It's the side of justice. | ||
| It's the side of reality. | ||
| And I really hope you can support us in this mission that we've been on for the last 20 plus years by going to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| InfoWarsStore.com. It's the only way we get support. | ||
| Alright folks, welcome back. | ||
| Simon in Florida calling in about what the outcome has been of NATO. Simon, thanks so much for calling in. | ||
| I agree with the headline that we just read, saying that Zelensky still got a lot, but didn't get quite everything he was hoping for, because, again, it's a defensive alliance. | ||
| You can't join a defensive alliance once you're already in a war. | ||
| That should be obvious to anybody, but they're trying to do it anyway. | ||
| Thanks for calling in. What is your reading, and have you been paying close attention to what's been going on in Lithuania this week? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. I imagine so. | |
| Okay. It's important to realize that that hasn't been the only game in town. | ||
| There's been a lot of other stuff going on, both with the Iranians and also in Indonesia with the ASEAN conference, which is just wrapping up as we speak. | ||
| But in terms of the NATO meeting in Vilnius, it's important for folks to understand that there are actually essentially two outcomes from the NATO side of things. | ||
| And then a Russian response. | ||
| So we have this massive 90 paragraphs, some of which were a page long, NATO communique, which was essentially negotiated in advance and gave Zelensky and Ukraine some of what they wanted. | ||
| And he reacted very strongly to that. | ||
| And they literally had to send diplomats to him to intervene and say, don't go off the deep end, otherwise you're going to completely destroy your carefully crafted warrior hero public image in Western Europe that we've carefully cultivated. | ||
| So he was much better behaved the next day. | ||
| And in return, And this is what the article from the Japan Times that you were alluding to actually got a very large promise, but not from all 31 members of NATO, | ||
| but from the seven members of the G7. So they put out a declaration which in many regards could actually be seen as a framework convention for the individual countries To fill in bilateral security guarantees to Ukraine. | ||
| So that's America, Germany, France, Italy, Britain, Japan. | ||
| I've missed one. | ||
| But anyway, you get the idea that even though it's not a collective promise from NATO, Those are major components of NATO, and they're all making promises to them. | ||
| Now, the somewhat shocking thing is the Japanese obviously are involved in that. | ||
| They've now become a partner nation with NATO through this thing called the ITPP, which is the Individually Tailored Partnership Program. | ||
| That also has been extended to Australia, New Zealand and South Korea. | ||
| And this is part of the mission creep of NATO, very much extending its activities now into the Indo-Pacific, which has obviously got the Chinese hopping mad, and they're reacting very, very strongly to that. | ||
| So it's important for people to understand that it's not just the NATO track, but it's also the G7 track, which is not, as is usually the case, talking about economics, but they're talking about military. | ||
| It's so interesting, Simon, how the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is suddenly getting involved in the South Pacific. | ||
| I mean, you know, talk about mission creep. | ||
| It's creeped on the other side of the world. | ||
| So, I mean, what's your takeaway and what's Russia's takeaway from this? | ||
| Because obviously they got the 300,000 NATO troops on the border. | ||
| They got Sweden closer than ever to joining NATO. More mission creep. | ||
| And then you've got Biden and his White House releasing this, or basically summoning up, 3,000 reservists to be sent to Europe in Operation Atlantic Security or whatever it's called. | ||
| I mean, how close are we to outright conflict, do you think, and does Russia think? | ||
| Well, I'll deal with that directly. | ||
| And I actually, you know your diehard fan, Penn and Hodges, We're in Nebraska, and they have that rumble show called Road to Liberty. | ||
| They reached out to me, and we did a whole hour last night talking about the Russian response. | ||
| And obviously, we don't have anything like that kind of time, but I'll just give you a rough idea. | ||
| So you're familiar, I'm sure, with their spokeswoman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Maria Zakharova, who, unlike many of our American government representatives, actually has a PhD in history. | ||
| They put out a response that, if you could imagine Rodney Dangerfield from Caddyshack doing a stand-up comedy routine with punchline after punchline after punchline, or maybe... | ||
| Chevy Chase roasting Ronald Reagan. | ||
| This is how it reads, right? | ||
| It's got things like, the collective West refuses to accept the rise of the multipolar world and intends to use every instrument at its disposal, including military methods, to defend its hegemony. | ||
| Another one, it says, the alliance is unable to adapt to new geopolitical reality and real security requirements while magnifying the alleged threat in the United States and its vassals intend to use NATO as the main instrument of their global hegemony and containment of the centers the alliance is unable to adapt to new geopolitical reality and real security requirements while | ||
| And it goes on and on and on like that with, you know, those two are slightly similar, but real riposte after riposte. | ||
| Now, bear in mind... | ||
| But this is playing very, very well in the rest of the world other than NATO. And if you look at how the Russian foreign minister was received at the Asian conference yesterday and today in Jakarta, in Indonesia, he literally was being blocked by crowds like a rock star. | ||
| I mean, you know, he's a 70-year-old, rather erudite, naturally-dressed foreign minister. | ||
| Much like our famous Secretary of State, Baker and Schultz. | ||
| You remember that they were really highly regarded in the world of diplomacy. | ||
| And the same really applies to Sergei Lavrov and his very skilled spokeswoman, Maria. | ||
| I mean, it sounds like Russia is sort of giddy about what has happened at NATO. They're sort of happy to see the cracks in the facade and are sort of reinvigorated by seeing NATO sort of stumbling its way through this conflict. | ||
| Well, the line, as we often discuss, and you've obviously realized this for many months, Both in relation to Russia's choices and also the forces aligning against China. | ||
| The lines are being drawn very, very starkly. | ||
| In the NATO community, they twice demanded the unconditional withdrawal of Russian forces from the entirety of Ukraine, whose borders and territorial sovereignty NATO is very keen to uphold. | ||
| So they obviously don't seem to care very much about the U.S. southern border. | ||
| And in their declaration, they insisted that that area would include Crimea. | ||
| Now, the real problem there is, and some people have made a distinction whether they're asking for withdrawal, not for surrender. | ||
| But given that Russia regards Crimea as being an integral part of it, as it was for a couple of hundred years before Christoph Wilde-Brunk decided to transfer it from Russia to Ukraine in the 1950s, This is still leading to men and women, in some cases, being thrown into this meat grinder. | ||
| And so we see now it looks like Ukrainians are going to mobilize an additional 200,000 new conscripts. | ||
| At the same time as we see America, who are going to be calling up a combination of 3,000 reservists combined with the 450 individual ready reserves. | ||
| But I fear that's the thin end of the wedge. | ||
| Oh, we're just getting started, Simon. | ||
| Thank you so much for your very valuable insight. | ||
| I've just tweeted out the link to the video with Roads to Liberty and Simon, so if you want a full breakdown, go to my Twitter, Harrison H. Smith, and I've linked it there. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is Infowars. | ||
| It's Friday, 14th of July. | ||
| 9.47 a.m. | ||
| Central Standard Time, and I regret to inform you, he's still doing it. | ||
| He's still doing it. | ||
| He's still being the creepiest old man To ever walk the earth, let alone occupy the Oval Office. | ||
| Here's some breaking video posted just a minute ago. | ||
| Joe Biden just molesting another child. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. There he is. | |
| Playfully nibbling a stranger. | ||
| A terrified child squirming, trying to get away from him. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Just what? | |
| Just what? Oh my god. | ||
| It's literally every day with this guy. | ||
| It is literally every single day with this dude. | ||
| You know, he fell down the stairs again yesterday. | ||
| We didn't even show the video. It's like, we don't even have enough time of the day to cover all of Biden's either just physical infirmities or just general creepiness. | ||
| So there he is. Again, just creepy stranger. | ||
| Trying to nibble a child who clearly is not comfortable and is not okay with this strange man getting this close to her. | ||
| Even the mom is kind of like, look at the baby, the baby's literally just trying to get it out of the mom's hands. | ||
| Just like, drop me on the ground, drop me on my head, just whatever you have to do to get me away from this clear predator. | ||
| just her her unformed uh you know instinctual mind just like run run run away run away now run leader of our country folks Thank you. | ||
| Top man overseas representing us. | ||
| Just creeping on children left and right. | ||
| Literally every day. | ||
| Literally multiple times a day with this guy. | ||
| Again, it's like maybe if it's his grandkid and the kid's laughing and it's like, okay, all right. | ||
| We'll just stop talking about it. | ||
| We'll stop looking at it. Ugh. | ||
| Let's go back out to your phone calls now. | ||
| We'll continue to talk about Operation Atlantic Resolve. | ||
| Let's go to Tim in California, line number eight. | ||
| Thanks for calling in. Tim, you're on the air. | ||
| I just couldn't help but think that there really had to be this enormous cost for removing 2,500 troops out of Afghanistan in time for the 20th anniversary. | ||
| So that you could have a photo op. | ||
| And he sure enough got his photo op. | ||
| It was him looking at his watch with the 13 coffins going by. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's right. Yeah, I'm sorry. | |
| But even just if there were nobody harmed or killed, just giving up Bagram Air Force Base wasn't worth bringing 2,500 troops home. | ||
| But if we're going to send, you know, 3,000 out to just another deal, that just definitely proves it definitely was not worth leaving. | ||
| We should have left the 2,500 there. | ||
| We should have at least destroyed the billions of dollars of weaponry before we left it behind. | ||
| I've heard in my personal life, people that were in Afghanistan say they were specifically instructed not to destroy the weapons that they left behind. | ||
| In other words, the typical way that you leave a country like that is if you have to leave material behind, you spike it so the enemy can't use it to their own ends. | ||
| They were going to do that, but they were specifically told not to do that. | ||
| They left it to the Taliban on purpose, apparently, maybe setting the stage for another little follow up to Afghanistan later on down the road. | ||
| But yeah, just a nice reminder that we barely make it out of one conflict before they rush us into the next. | ||
| Final thoughts, Tim? | ||
| Yeah, we owned the night until we left whatever it was, thousands of night goggles there, which have now been sold off to how many ever countries for how much ever money. | ||
| And now we don't own the night anymore, et cetera. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Also, you talked about your $100 billion of co-relief fraud. | ||
| It was actually $200 billion. | ||
| 17% of the $1.2 trillion distributed by the SBA was wasted in fraud, according to the SBA report on 627 by Inspector General Hannibal Mike Ware. | ||
| Thank you for that, Tim. Thank you for that correction. | ||
| I'm sorry. It was twice as much as I said it was. | ||
| Yeah, that's my point. All these numbers get mixed up in my head. | ||
| It's hard to keep them all in order. | ||
| Sorry, $200 billion worth of fraud from the COVID relief. | ||
| Fraudsters potentially sold over $200 billion in COVID relief aid. | ||
| Watchdog says that from the mainstream media. | ||
| Thank you so much for that call, Tim. | ||
| And what a world. | ||
| What a world. Let's go now to Angus in Pittsburgh. | ||
| I think Angus may have gotten the wrong message when I was talking about it earlier, but thanks for calling in. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Angus, you were on the air. Yeah, I mean, no, I didn't get the wrong message. | |
| I will. If you'll give me a moment, I'll speak on it. | ||
| I realize you have to squeeze in a lot of callers. | ||
| When in the Bible, when in the Bible did we change the wording from Hebrew to Jew? | ||
| I don't know. Okay, do you remember Francis Bacon who said, what is a lew? | ||
| L-E-W? I don't know that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, it says, prick us, do we not bleed? | |
| Tickle us, do we not laugh? | ||
| Wrong us, shall we not revenge? | ||
| So we changed the name, the wording in the Bible from Hebrew to Jew. | ||
| And the very first time you see the word Jew, And the Bible is 2 Kings 16.6. | ||
| It's not even mentioned. | ||
| And when it's mentioned, they're actually fighting against the people of Israel. | ||
| 2 Kings 16.6. | ||
| Now, to get to your other question, they're using mercenaries, okay, in Russia. | ||
| Vladimir Putin, the prime minister, excuse me, the president of Russia, is waiting for us to have our border crisis. | ||
| He's waiting for us to go bankrupt. | ||
| And then they're going to invade on the West Coast with both China and possibly Saudi Arabia. | ||
| That's what I think will happen. | ||
| Yeah. And as far as Simon, okay, as far as Simon, this guy, they use names for little boys and girls to play games with, like Simon says, and Simon says, Do you live in China? | ||
| Do you live in China? | ||
| Do you live in Russia? | ||
| Just because somebody has an English accent doesn't mean that they're intelligent. | ||
| I'm going to stop you right there, Angus. | ||
| If you think we're fooled by Simon's accent, you are sorely mistaken. | ||
| I don't know if we've ever had a caller as dedicated to staying on top of this stuff. | ||
| As Simon is. If anybody else, if you want to call in Angus and give us great information about ongoing world events that aren't being covered by anybody else, you're more than welcome to provide your interpretation. | ||
| Simon is the only one who apparently does it, so we rely on him and generally I agree with his interpretation of just about everything. | ||
| He's clearly an extremely smart dude, but more important than being smart, he's extremely informed and dedicated to staying on top of world developments. | ||
| So... And one of the reasons that we go to Simon so often and for so long is almost as an example of what we want callers to be like. | ||
| To be giving us information because we're just human beings here. | ||
| We can't stay on top of everything. | ||
| We can't be watching developments in the South Pacific at the same time that the NATO events are going on at the same time they're trying to trans our kids here. | ||
| We rely on the audience being that Those repeater stations feeding us the news so we can send it out to our audience. | ||
| If you disagree, call in and tell us how you disagree. | ||
| If you have a different interpretation, call us and give us your different interpretation. | ||
| But if you just don't follow these things, then come on to criticize Simon for following these things. | ||
| You really don't have a criticism. | ||
| You have a complaint that, you know... | ||
| Frankly, I don't care. I don't care. | ||
| I don't care. Simon has been incredibly valuable in keeping us up to date and has helped us to break some of the biggest news we've ever broken sort of over and over again. | ||
| So many of the things that Simon contacts us about and then tells us on the show, you see in headlines several days later. | ||
| But he's on top of it because, again, he dedicates his time to actually doing the research that really we should all be doing. | ||
| So thank you to Simon for calling in once again. | ||
| And we'll go now to... Our next call. | ||
| Andrew in New York has a lawsuit against Cisco. | ||
| Go ahead, Andrew, you're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, there's a lawsuit against Cisco for working with the Chinese Communist Party. | |
| Basically, Cisco gets my great pleasure out of telling the Chinese Communist Party where the Falun Gong are, who are basically a spiritual group. | ||
| Yep. One of the various groups in China that they've been using, like, organ harvesting on. | ||
| Yeah. I hadn't heard. | ||
| I think I remember you maybe called in and told us about this earlier. | ||
| I hadn't looked into it. | ||
| Here's the headline from a week ago in Los Angeles Times. | ||
| Lawsuit alleging California tech giant aided Chinese torture may proceed, Ninth Circuit says. | ||
| Yeah, so I hadn't heard about this. | ||
| This is San Jose-based technology giant Cisco Systems, and two former executives aided the Chinese government in tracking and torturing adherents of the Falun Gong religious movement may proceed to trial. | ||
| The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Friday. | ||
| Thank you. The saga surrounding a BBC presenter's alleged creepy behaviour once again takes a giant wrecking ball to the notion of ideological consistency. | ||
| The TLDR is that Hugh Edwards, a 61-year-old married BBC news presenter with five kids and an always reliable amplifier of the message, Someone who proudly includes his pronouns in his bio was accused by a young person's parents, presumably male, of paying £35,000 for the then 17-year-old to send him in decent pictures. | ||
| The parents claimed that this money was then used to fund the youth's drug addiction, but the youth, via his lawyer after the media had run the story but not named Hugh Edwards, Denied that any of that happened. | ||
| Then the police said no crime had occurred. | ||
| But then numerous other people came forward to reveal they'd been sent, quote, abusive, creepy and inappropriate messages by Edwards, including BBC staff. | ||
| After days of speculation, Edwards was then publicly named by his own wife, who said all the stress caused by the press attention had caused the BBC presenter to have a mental health crisis and check himself into a hospital. | ||
| The mental health excuse was then immediately swallowed by every single one of Edwards' shit-lib defenders and colleagues. | ||
| And the entire story was reframed to ensconce Edwards himself as the victim. | ||
| Imagine if Nigel Farage or any GB news presenter or anyone on the right had been merely accused of soliciting perv pics from teenagers, or had merely been accused of sending abusive, inappropriate messages, then had cited my mental health as an excuse. | ||
| Would shit-libs rush to defend their privacy while expressing deep concern for their mental health? | ||
| Of course not, they'd do the exact opposite. | ||
| They'd immediately believe the very worst of the accusations, then decimate their reputation and demand they never be allowed to have a public platform ever again. | ||
| But Hugh Edwards has got pronouns in his bio, so his reputation must be defended at all costs. | ||
| When the accusations are levelled at him, it's nothing more than homophobic abuse. | ||
| His right to privacy must be resolute, despite his BBC wages being paid by the taxpayer via the licence fee. | ||
| Interesting, isn't it, how it's always in the public interest to wreck someone on the right's reputation. | ||
| Never for someone who has the correct opinions. | ||
| Lefty liberal Twitter, when Nigel Farage reveals he can't get a bank account, serves you right, you must have done something. | ||
| When Hugh Edwards is under investigation for sexual misconduct, be kind, let the investigation finish, respect his privacy. | ||
| If you're not in the club, they'll destroy you for nothing. | ||
| If you're in the club, they'll defend you no matter what. | ||
| Fellow BBC presenter John Sopel demanded that Edward's private life be left alone. | ||
| A courtesy that wasn't extended to Boris Johnson when the shit-libbed media went full-court press with a story about an argument Johnson had with his girlfriend inside his own house. | ||
| They also constantly wet the bed over Johnson and the Tories breaking lockdown rules. | ||
| But astoundingly, Edwards gets a free pass. | ||
| Despite allegedly travelling to another county violating lockdown rules to meet another young person he found on a dating app At his flat, doesn't matter, he's got pronouns in his bio. | ||
| Michael Fallon was forced to quit as defence secretary because he tried to kiss a woman during a lunch 14 years beforehand. | ||
| Didn't have pronouns in his bio, though. | ||
| The metropolitan elite rushing to Edward's defence is now going to exploit this for even more censorship. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm sure all the liberal elite panjandrums who are defending Hugh Edwards this evening and condemning The Sun and rallying to the defence of the BBC, I'm sure their response will be, well, it's outrageous that this poor man was ever named. | |
| You know, the mother that his wife would never have felt under pressure had his name not been revealed on social media. | ||
| We need to clamp down on this kind of wild west that is social media. | ||
| That'll be their response. More censorship, not an examination of the mores of BBC employees. | ||
| Also observe how the narrative now becomes about immoral, gutter-pressed Sun journalists intruding into Edwards' private life. | ||
| Making Edwards the martyr, giving him the moral high ground. | ||
| When if any of these accusations about messages or meeting people, and there are now numerous, turn out to be true. | ||
| Edwards has allegedly been cheating on his wife and kids for years. | ||
| Which again, it may not be illegal, but it's rancidly immoral. | ||
| There's not even any discussion about that. | ||
| The whole narrative is about how he's the real victim, again, because of mental health. | ||
| What about his poor wife and children? | ||
| Same thing happened when Schofield announced he was gay and had been misleading his wife for 27 years. | ||
| All right, folks, that is the latest from Paul Joseph Watson. | ||
| Hey, look, another smart Brit. | ||
| We're overflowing with snarky intelligence Brits. | ||
| It's wild, the Hugh Edwards saga, Bandai video. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. Third hour has begun on this Friday edition of American Journal. | ||
| Infowars.com. Band.video. | ||
| Infowarsstore.com. The one and only place that you can go to support us. | ||
| We don't take money from anybody else. | ||
| Just you. Just you, the Info Warriors out there. | ||
| Whether you're calling in, posting our videos, helping us to spread the message on social media, telling your friends and family, Thank you for being a part of this movement and contributing to this effort to rescue humanity from the clutches of the globalist machine. | ||
| It really is an epic time to be alive. | ||
| It really is an incredibly important time period that we're in right now. | ||
| I, for one, really appreciate The fact that if humanity survives, if we're able to succeed and destroy the breakaway civilization that wants to replace us all with robots, a thousand years from now, people are going to look back and say, gosh, I wish I could have experienced that. | ||
| I wish I could have lived through this time period of unrestrained Rhetorical combat that's going on all the time. | ||
| It's funny because I read stories about ancient Rome. | ||
| I think how cool would that be to be able to go down to the forum, see the greatest orators of all time, Cicero, Cato, going toe to toe, arguing with each other. | ||
| What would it feel like to be in the crowd, hear the boos and hisses, the cheers, feel the energy subside, see people You know, debating, being humiliated, or achieving victories. | ||
| I mean, that would be like, God, if I'd give anything to be able to just spend an hour walking around the Roman Forum listening to this, you know, at the heights of the Roman Republic. | ||
| And then you're just like, wait, that's literally where we are now. | ||
| Oh, wait a second. It's just on computers now, but it's actually a very similar kind of world that has developed since 2016. | ||
| I mean, prior to 2016... | ||
| There wasn't a lot of, like, mix between pop culture and politics. | ||
| You know, celebrities would endorse people, but in general, it was like, debates were very dry and, you know, happened on Fox News and CNN and da-da-da. | ||
| But then with 2016, it's like now the entertainment that we, that a lot of us spend our time indulging in are, like, intellectual debates and debates about ideology and... | ||
| It's just cool. | ||
| It's just really cool. In Rome, you can go to the Coliseum or whatever, you can see a gladiator show, but the main entertainment was the politicians suing each other and arguing out in the open air, and you get to hear all the combat, which again is interesting because it's fun to see the verbal ripostes But it also has actual tangible effect, | ||
| like the outcome of some of these arguments determine the trajectory of the state and therefore the trajectory of the world from that point on. | ||
| What a monumental time to be alive and what a unique position that we all find ourselves in to enjoy and contribute and actually shape the future through this informational combat. | ||
| It really is amazing stuff. So we... | ||
| Have dedicated ourselves to the Infowar. | ||
| We will continue to strive as we might to champion humanity against this dystopian sci-fi level death machine that's trying to ensnare us. | ||
| And we hope simply that you can support us in this mission by going to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Let's go back out to the calls. | ||
| Let's go to Mike in New York. | ||
| Let's talk about the idea of indoctrinating your own kids before they do. | ||
| Go ahead, Mike. You're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, good morning, Harrison. | |
| I just want to hit a quick topic, and then at the end, I was wondering if you can give my son a little birthday shout-out to his birthday this weekend. | ||
| Of course. Awesome. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, so I want to start with... | |
| I'm getting really tired of hearing everyone whine and complain about what they're doing to kids and stuff, and... | ||
| I think the solution is for the kids not to be looking up to low testosterone men and be looking up to men that fulfill their natural order on this earth. | ||
| So, like, for example, like, I don't have a ton of time. | ||
| I work a lot. And, you know, when I get home, I make sure, my son is six, I make sure that he's following me, because they already want to follow you. | ||
| I just make sure that I'm taking care of my order. | ||
| So, like, If I'm getting home from work and, let's say, in the most mild extreme, my wife is telling me what to do around the house and kind of, you know, running the show, right? | ||
| That's kind of the mild level. | ||
| If that's happening, and your son, and, you know, I have a daughter too, but I think they're coming after our sons more. | ||
| So that's why I'm recircling around this. | ||
| But if he's seeing you getting bossed around by the wife, you know, he's going to notice that and he's going to walk it. | ||
| He's gonna carry that out in his life. | ||
| The other thing, on the most extreme end, you know, what if he were home and he sees me trying on my wife's clothes? | ||
| You know, what are they gonna do? | ||
| What are these kids gonna do? | ||
| They're gonna have no idea, you know? | ||
| So I don't think we have to wake them up as far as like, they're kind of vials coming to get you, you know? | ||
| It's not like that, because it's like, you know, it's not like there's a boogeyman, but it's like, just fulfill your natural order and, you know, let them watch you do that, and they're gonna know what to do. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Right. You know, that's really what it is. No one will be able to touch them. | ||
| Absolutely. I mean, I totally agree with you. | ||
| You're absolutely right. And I think it was Alex that said, you know, in the Alex's War documentary, he goes... | ||
| If you want your kids to listen, whisper. | ||
| I think kids internalize and learn a lot more from just observing you when you don't realize it than if you actually sit down and try to tell them about how the world works. | ||
| I've noticed it in my own life, literally making me a better person just because I'm like, I don't want my son to see me just come home and watch TV. He's going to think that's the thing he's supposed to do. | ||
| Whatever I do, he thinks is normal. | ||
| He thinks is the way it's supposed to be done. | ||
| Yeah. You know, or even things like, like with my dog, my dog's in the way, you know, I'll usually just kind of like shove her out of the way with my foot. | ||
| She's a big dog. She's fine. | ||
| I'm not hurting her or anything. | ||
| But I'm just not particularly, you know, kind or, you know, particularly like, oh, excuse me, sweetie, please. | ||
| I'll just be like, out of the way. | ||
| And then I see my like my son doing that. | ||
| And I'm like, oh, man, I just set a bad example for him. | ||
| Because maybe he doesn't understand the nuance of, like, I'm not actually shoving her. | ||
| I'm still being gentle. | ||
| But anyway, it's the type of thing that goes, okay, all right, I need to watch everything I do because he's always watching me. | ||
| And anything I do will suddenly go into his file system of this is the way you behave, this is the way you treat people, this is the way you act. | ||
| So I think you're exactly right. | ||
| On the other hand, it's like... | ||
| Yeah, indoctrinate your kid. | ||
| At the same time, you don't want your kid out there being indoctrinated, right? | ||
| You can teach your kid, like, say you teach your kid self-defense in case, God forbid, he ever has to, like, defend himself physically against somebody. | ||
| At the same time, you don't then want somebody to attack him, right? | ||
| You want your kid to be able to defend himself, but you really don't want... | ||
| Him to ever have to defend himself. | ||
| So, you know, we can do both, but I completely agree with you. | ||
| What's your son's name? | ||
| Or you don't have to give me his name, but how old is he turning? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, no. No, I can give you a name. | |
| His name's Dyer, D-Y-E-R. He turned six years old this weekend. | ||
| Dyer, happy birthday. | ||
| Happy sixth birthday. | ||
| You're going to be a hero and a true patriot. | ||
| You're a good American already, only at six. | ||
| How do you do it? Amazing stuff. | ||
| Thank you for that, Mike, and congratulations to Dyer for turning six. | ||
| What a monumental achievement. | ||
| Six years old. I remember being six. | ||
| Actually, I'm not sure if I do remember being six. | ||
| I remember being eight, generally. | ||
| All right, we're going to go out to your phone calls. | ||
| More on the other side, but first, again, let me remind you, Please go to the InfoWord store, not just to support us, but to support yourself. | ||
| As the previous caller was just mentioning, I already forgot his name, but as Dyer's dad was pointing out, Even if the world around you is changing, you can protect yourself against the negative influences. | ||
| And in that way, at least mitigate their effect to you and your family, whether it's air filters, water filters, or the supplements. | ||
| We have so many ways to protect yourself against the globalist interventions at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Patriot Pride Month. Double Patriot points and up to 60% off our top-selling products. | ||
| Welcome back. This is American Journal. | ||
| Let's go to Ben in Indiana now. | ||
| Ben in Indiana, you have skepticism about the movie Sound of Freedom. | ||
| I know some people do. | ||
| What is your skepticism as it relates to this film? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's not my skepticism. | |
| It's what I'm seeing on Instagram. | ||
| But morning, Harrison. Thank you again for all that you guys do. | ||
| God bless the Infowar viewers and all that you guys do. | ||
| And a quick plug for Red Pill Plus. | ||
| Been taking it since April. | ||
| I've lost 30 pounds. | ||
| Thank you guys so much. | ||
| Oh, congratulations. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
My skepticism is... | |
| Thank you. | ||
| And again, on the last caller, he did a great job. | ||
| There's so much to talk about. | ||
| But the skepticism about the sign of freedom is not mine. | ||
| It's what I'm seeing on Instagram is people saying that Jim Caviezel is a Freemason, that he's doing the sign of cymbals, and that the guy... | ||
| What is his name? | ||
| Tim Ballard. | ||
| There was this fake Instagram report... | ||
| sexual, what is it called, where he would basically, he did sexual assault, that he was on the sexual assault register offenders, but it said weight zero. | ||
| So it's like, I think it's them attacking these people because maybe they were a part of that at one point, but they've awakened and seen the devil for what it is out there. | ||
| You know, so it's not my skepticism. | ||
| I believe they're on the right side. | ||
| I believe this needs to be shown. | ||
| But I just wanted to get your point of view because it's like... | ||
| It's a concert attack as soon as someone stands up for what they believe in, even if they were a part of it. | ||
| They're a part of Hollywood, in a sense, because they're a part of this movie. | ||
| But it's like, it's so sad to see that people that stand up for it get attacked right away. | ||
| And it's by some of our own people that are believing, you know, that they say that's conservative. | ||
| And I understand you even say you have to have your skepticism about everything that you see. | ||
| But I wanted to get your point of view, Harrison. | ||
| Yeah, I mean... It's kind of interesting for me because obviously I'm a little bit skeptical of it too, not in the sense that I don't think it's a good movie. | ||
| I mean, I haven't seen it and honestly I'm probably not going to see it because it just is not the type of thing I want to go watch a movie about. | ||
| I don't know. But I think it's sort of exactly what we need. | ||
| It's like a sort of James Bond-esque thriller about something in the real world, about concerns that we should really care about. | ||
| I think that's a great thing. | ||
| At the same time, I am a little bit skeptical or a little bit suspicious of films, highly produced films that... | ||
| Are trying in some way to co-opt a cultural movement for their own gain? | ||
| Basically, I reject the idea that it's like you have to support this movie and you have to go out and see this movie and tell other people to see this movie. | ||
| If you're right-wing, then that's required of you. | ||
| It's not. Obviously, it's not. | ||
| If you want to see it, go see it. | ||
| If you don't, don't. I don't understand the... | ||
| Controversy around it, because the controversy around it isn't coming from the people on the right. | ||
| You know, in my observation of how this movie came about, it didn't start with people on the right saying, oh, this is so important. | ||
| This is, you know, exposing QAnon or whatever. | ||
| Like, Jim Caviezel would go do interviews where he would talk about child trafficking, and those clips went a little bit viral. | ||
| I'm talking about how real it was, talking about the research he did in preparation for the role. | ||
| There was a little bit of that, but then it was the mainstream media saying, this is a QAnon conspiracy theory movie. | ||
| And that was, when it first happened, that's what we talked about on this show, comparing it to something like Goodfellas, where it's like, It's a true story. | ||
| This really happened. And of course, you know, it's based on a true story. | ||
| Who knows what the details are, what they got right and what they got wrong, what they needed to change to make it more dramatic, to make the movie more compelling. | ||
| The creative license is always there. | ||
| But it would be very weird if the true story of something like Goodfellas came out and all of the media was like, this is crazy, this conspiracy about a mafia existing and criminal activity happening in an organized fashion. | ||
| That never happened. It's like, okay, that's weird that you're coming out and saying that because this is the true story. | ||
| this is a actual documented series of facts so why are you so insistent that people not see this movie where is the mainstream media so concerned about people seeing this movie and that's where you saw the the ball really start rolling and people started picking this up going okay if they're so against this this must be something really powerful and good and we need to all see it and and promote it | ||
| i'm not about to promote a movie that i haven't seen and i'm not getting paid to promote, so... | ||
| Go see it if you want. Don't go see it if you want. | ||
| That's my take on it. I do think it's good that high-budget movies like this are being made. | ||
| I think it's amazing that it actually outperformed some of the biggest budget movies of all time, like Indiana Jones 5, defeating Disney, who actually tried and succeeded for five years preventing this movie from coming out. | ||
| So that's another whole aspect of this story, that Disney somehow intervened and stopped this movie from coming out. | ||
| It was supposed to come out while Trump was still in office, I believe. | ||
| There's a lot of drama behind it. | ||
| But yeah, Indiana Jones... | ||
| I mean, my God, one of the most popular and celebrated series of all times, trilogies of all times, by Disney. | ||
| They spent something like $300 million on production alone, meaning they may have spent upwards of a billion dollars on this movie once marketing and everything else is taken into account. | ||
| And it gets beaten by Sound of Freedom with... | ||
| A $15 million budget. | ||
| That is awesome, incredible, and represents a major cultural victory regardless of anything else, right? | ||
| Regardless of Tim Ballard's legitimacy, regardless of the QAnon conspiracy theory. | ||
| The fact that a high-production-value, conservatively-themed action movie, thriller movie, outperformed Indiana Jones 5, a flagpole film. | ||
| From one of the main movie studios in Hollywood, that alone is the story. | ||
| Like, that by itself hopefully is a signal to other filmmakers and investors going, there's a goldmine to tap here. | ||
| Let's start making more of these. | ||
| Telling people that there is a real audience for true stories like this that tell... | ||
| Maybe uncomfortable truths about the world. | ||
| I mean, I would love to see following Sound of Freedom, you know, the new James Bond, the new Jason Bourne, the new Mission Impossible. | ||
| But this time where they're fighting the World Economic Forum and Klaus Schwab, where they're uncovering the weapons trafficking in Ukraine. | ||
| I mean, this really blows the doors open for so many films to follow after, and that's such a good thing. | ||
| And if it can raise awareness about human trafficking, who's going to complain about that? | ||
| And again, I've seen things about... | ||
| Tim Ballard, Tim Ballard, whatever his name is, maybe not having his story straight quite so much, giving interviews where things that he says are contradicted by the record. | ||
| I don't know. I really haven't looked that much into it, so I can't speak to his truthfulness or the truthfulness of the story. | ||
| But just like any story, it has creative license, and the central theme of what it's based on The reality of human trafficking is absolutely real. | ||
| And if you can make a just solid, good movie that includes this as a theme, then I think that's a wonderful thing. | ||
| What I really would have liked would just to see this being treated like any other movie. | ||
| I would have liked the mainstream media not to castigate it as some right-wing conspiracy thing. | ||
| And I would have liked to have seen the right-wing also just treat it like a really good... | ||
| Entertaining Hollywood movie. | ||
| I mean, we can take over this culture. | ||
| We can create art that outperforms Indiana Jones. | ||
| That is amazing. Folks, out to your phone calls again at this segment. | ||
| But first, we have some late breaking news. | ||
| Since we are talking about Hollywood, we have yet another announcement of yet another classic childhood fairy tale. | ||
| Being taken over by yet another set of politically correct swaps. | ||
| Some swaps going on. | ||
| Now, I think it's absurd to claim that creativity is dead, right? | ||
| People are like, there's just no more stories to tell. | ||
| A lot of complicated input has brought us to where we are now. | ||
| But... In the studio system, in the traditional legacy Hollywood production system, creativity is absolutely dead. | ||
| I don't think I need to tell you this. | ||
| Go through a list of movies being made. | ||
| You will not find an original story. | ||
| You will not. They don't exist. | ||
| And even just one layer of unoriginality would be like a breath of fresh air. | ||
| In other words, if they were just adapting... | ||
| A book? That's one level of non-originality. | ||
| That would be a revelation. | ||
| It would be unprecedented. | ||
| We don't even see that anymore. | ||
| Now everything is layer upon layer upon layer of unoriginality. | ||
| Things like the Marvels. | ||
| The Marvels is going to be the next big tentpole Disney Marvel production. | ||
| So that's a sequel to Captain Marvel that is a gender swap version of a cartoon character that itself was a reformation of another cartoon character. | ||
| So it's like, instead of just being like, this is an adaption of a book, it's like, this is a sequel to a gender swapped character Character from a comic book that's based on another comic book. | ||
| It's a sequel to a sequel to a prequel to an interpretation of an interpretation of a sequel of a sequel. | ||
| It's like, it's wild. | ||
| Wild how creatively bankrupt Hollywood is right now. | ||
| And again, there's lots of things that contribute to this. | ||
| Things like the fact that movies are expected now to make a billion dollars. | ||
| So movie studios will routinely spend $200 billion making movies. | ||
| Hard to take risks when $200 million is on the line. | ||
| You can't exactly try something untested and then spend $200 million and just see how it goes. | ||
| Although that probably would have been the better choice than spending something like $250 million on the Indiana Jones 5 remake, which apparently probably won't make back its budget. | ||
| It'll probably be a flop. It'll probably lose money at the end of the day. | ||
| Maybe a lot of money. | ||
| So maybe eventually the money will run out and they'll learn to correct themselves, but Just overall, looking at the creative bankruptcy of Hollywood is like... | ||
| It's like weird. | ||
| It's like actually weird. | ||
| Almost every major movie that comes out now is a live-action remake of a cartoon that doesn't need it and is not as good as the original by a long shot with actors that don't appear like the originals whatsoever. | ||
| How every single major intellectual property, Star Wars and Indiana Jones, every single one has been remade, and every single one has taken the main character, who's usually a male, who's now old. | ||
| They've turned him into an old, depressed, pathetic inversion of what they were before. | ||
| And now we have this. | ||
| This is the latest from this morning. | ||
| The new Snow White character. | ||
| Has been announced. Snow White and the Seven Politically Correct Companions. | ||
| First pictures of the new Disney live-action remake show Princess walking with diverse band of merry men and women after a row over using dwarf actors. | ||
| So these are the seven dwarves. | ||
| There's only one dwarf. | ||
| The rest are a very diverse array of kind of weird-looking people. | ||
| Kind of weird-looking people. | ||
| I don't know. What does this remind you? | ||
| I mean, it's like Snow White and the obnoxious theater kids. | ||
| Snow White and the Renaissance Fair B team. | ||
| Snow White and the self-congratulatory Dungeons and Dragons group. | ||
| I don't know. I don't know who these people are, who they're supposed to be. | ||
| Well, I know who they're supposed to be. Sleepy, dopey, grumpy. | ||
| They're supposed to be the dwarves. They're not dwarves, though. | ||
| Oh, well, one of them is. One of them's a dwarf. | ||
| A midget, a little persite. | ||
| I can't remember what the politically correct thing is. | ||
| And also, Snow White is... | ||
| not white. | ||
| Definitely not Snow White. | ||
| Mirror, mirror on the wall. Who's the fairest one of all? | ||
| The mirror responds... | ||
| How dare you? | ||
| How dare you, you racist, fair... | ||
| You mean pale? You mean white? | ||
| Who's the whitest one of all? | ||
| Who do you think you are? | ||
| Just incredible. So, yeah, we have a Latina, Snow White, and we have seven, I don't know, Antifa members, like... | ||
| Like, just compare that to just an image of the original. | ||
| Just the iconic imagery of the original with the cute little funny dwarves with their long beards and baggy clothes. | ||
| The beautiful princess singing to birds. | ||
| The evil stepmother. | ||
| The wicked witch. | ||
| And then just imagine what the new one's gonna be like. | ||
| Just imagine what the new one is gonna look like. | ||
| Compared to the really jaw-dropping beauty of the original. | ||
| Right, that was the first one that really set Disney apart. | ||
| And, like, before Snow White, animated movies were just, like, Mickey Mouse just, like, bouncing. | ||
| And just, like, Betty Boop just, like, turning inside out and just being like, wah! | ||
| Like, it was just, like, crazy, wacky, weird stuff. | ||
| And then, like, Snow White comes out and it, like, wins an Academy Award. | ||
| It's just, like, utterly beautiful. | ||
| Yeah. And entertaining, and the lesson is a good one, right? | ||
| It's a lesson against jealousy. | ||
| It's a lesson against envy. | ||
| It's a lesson about how your exterior beauty is oftentimes a reflection of your interior world. | ||
| And of course they're going to act like any backlash to this is like racism or something. | ||
| Racism and sexism. | ||
| It's like, well, tell you what, why don't you stop systematically destroying our childhoods and we won't complain about it. | ||
| How about that? How about you just don't make this movie at all? | ||
| That's an option. If you're going to make it, make it so it's good. | ||
| But they're not going to do that. | ||
| I mean, it's just... It's so pathetic. | ||
| And of course, all of this is the result of drama from Peter Dinklage not wanting dwarves to be cast as the seven dwarves. | ||
| I remember at the time that this happened, it was all these dwarf actors being like, You realize how few roles there are for dwarves in Hollywood? | ||
| Here comes a movie where it calls for seven main characters that are dwarves. | ||
| A beloved children's tale. | ||
| All these dwarves out there, like dwarf actors, being like, this is my lifelong dream. | ||
| I've always wanted to play one of Snow White's seven dwarves. | ||
| That would be a dream come true for me. | ||
| And then it's Peter Dinklage, who achieved massive success, just unparalleled for any other... | ||
| Actor with dwarfism ever before by playing a little person in Game of Thrones. | ||
| He climbs up the ladder and then slams the door shut behind him. | ||
| Nobody else should be able to achieve success like me. | ||
| I can do it, but when you do it, it's bigoted and hateful. | ||
| And so now none of them are dwarves. | ||
| None of them are dwarves. One of them is a black woman. | ||
| One of them is a white guy. | ||
| One of them is a dwarf. I mean, I don't know. | ||
| I don't want to be hateful here. Yeah, while we're talking about Hollywood, it's just like... | ||
|
unidentified
|
This... | |
| This is an opportunity. | ||
| This is an opportunity. | ||
| This and The Sound of Freedom and Indie5 and all of this, the collapse of Hollywood, the writer's strike that is still going on, the actor's strike that just started. | ||
| Now is the time to start making movies because people are just desperate for something original and entertaining and not saturated in this liberal BS. I'm ready to inform you, ladies and gentlemen, that Snow Brown is trending on Twitter. | ||
| It's just a shame. | ||
| It's a damn shame. | ||
| We're going to take your calls. | ||
| I just want to keep talking about Snow White. | ||
| I've worked on movie sets, and you can tell when you're on a movie set how good the movie's going to be. | ||
| You can tell whether you're really making magic and something good is happening here. | ||
| Or if you just go, you know what? | ||
| I'm here to do camera op. | ||
| I'm going to do a really good job being a camera operator. | ||
| And I don't know about the rest of what's going on. | ||
| This seems like a piece of crap that I'm working on right now. | ||
| But you know what? No one's going to be able to complain about the camera op that I'm doing. | ||
| That's sort of the attitude that you have to take. | ||
| Just like, hey... I'm doing my role. | ||
| I wouldn't have cast that dude, but they did. | ||
| I might not want my name attached to this movie eventually, but I'm going to do a good job. | ||
| I'm going to do my part. I've been hired for this role, so let's just get it done. | ||
| But you generally have a good... | ||
| I just really... | ||
| I really would love to be like a fly on the wall. | ||
| These executive meetings... | ||
| When these decisions are made... | ||
| Like, presented to the crew. | ||
| Some Disney executive, like, very excited to present the new Seven Dwarves! | ||
| And it's just like, these people? | ||
| Just these renaissance fair rejects? | ||
| You just see everybody like... | ||
| Like, earlier this week, I covered the story about how Joe Biden is a complete jackass when he's out of sight, right? | ||
| In personal life, and the Oval Office is just a seething hive of, like... | ||
| Hatred and anxiety and everybody's bitching at each other constantly and it's the same with Kamala Harris and it's the same with Facebook. | ||
| It's inside the cult-like atmosphere of Facebook where everybody's afraid to speak up and everybody's miserable but they all have to pretend to be happy or else they get censured by the executives. | ||
| I mean, can you imagine the level that this has to be happening on Facebook? | ||
| Sets in Hollywood right now. | ||
| Just the camera operator, the drone operator, whatever he is, just going, you know what? | ||
| I just need a paycheck. I just need to make some money. | ||
| I'm just going to block this out of my memory as soon as I'm done with it. | ||
| Are those the drawers? Wow, no, it's so exciting. | ||
| We've got a little different direction than the original. | ||
| It's going to be so modern. | ||
| This can be so appropriate for modern audiences. | ||
| This is really embracing. | ||
| What are the terms they use? | ||
| They always have these terms that are just like reflective of a modern audience. | ||
| It's just like no modern audience wants to see this. | ||
| No modern audience is going to pay to see this. | ||
| No modern audience is going to Make this a classic. | ||
| Nobody will be, you know, buying the 20th anniversary Snow White DVD 20 years from now. | ||
| Unlike the original, nobody cares. | ||
| And then, of course, the studios are going to claim that it's racism. | ||
| They're going to claim that it's sexism. | ||
| To try to... But, like, there's no way. | ||
| There's no way that the... | ||
| Like... | ||
| This conversation, you know, the controversy that this has already brought up and will continue to bring up, translates to positive reception. | ||
| Like, it just doesn't. I was just thinking about this morning, that video that went viral when they first announced that The Little Mermaid was going to be played by a black woman. | ||
| And it was a little black girl. | ||
| Probably between 7 and 10 years old. | ||
| You know, little elementary school, little black girl watching the trailer and turns around to the camera and is like, why is she black? | ||
| Why did they make her black? | ||
| She's white. It's like, these are beloved characters that people have grown up with and know really well and have an idea in their mind about who they are. | ||
| It's not racist. | ||
| Because, hey, I... I know this is maybe shocking to the lizards out there, to the robots. | ||
| Humans can actually empathize with and see themselves in people that don't look like them. | ||
| Little black girls can actually see themselves in the original Ariel, okay? | ||
| Little boys can even see themselves in Snow White or Mulan. | ||
| Doesn't mean they're transgender or gay, right? | ||
| You can actually, we actually have human connections that are Substantial and don't require coddling. | ||
| And then I just think about, like I watch a lot of, well, not as much anymore, but like anime, you know, things from Japan, where it's just like, when they portray Americans, it is a hilarious caricature. | ||
| You've never seen an American in an anime that's not, like, blonde hair, blue eyes, like a big mustache, who's just like, haha, I'm in charge now! | ||
| I'm American, dang it! | ||
| We're in charge! Let's go play some baseball! | ||
| And it's just, like, it's funny. | ||
| It's hilarious. It's shockingly accurate. | ||
| So I don't get it. | ||
| I don't get the mindset of, like... | ||
| You're making fun of me? | ||
| Is that what I look like to you? | ||
| It's like, I don't know. | ||
| There's got to be some self-confidence. | ||
| Some like being able to laugh at yourself. | ||
| Some knowing that an inoffensive portrayal of a race or ethnicity or whatever shouldn't bother you at all. | ||
| And even an offensive one, you should... | ||
| No, that's not a personal reflection on you, so what are you getting mad about? | ||
| I don't know. This is hilarious to me. | ||
| This just came out. It's trending in multiple ways on Twitter right now. | ||
| Snowbrown, Dwarves. | ||
| It's trending as well. This is really catching fire to the internet right now, but it's almost like they're doing it on purpose. | ||
| I just like to imagine a world where it's announced first images from new, live, Snow White adaption. | ||
| Of course, I'd like to see them not continuously adapt movies from 80 years ago, but regardless, if they're going to do it, wouldn't you love to see this image come up and people are like, is this AI? Is this AI? Because she looks exactly like Snow White. | ||
| How do they find an actress that looks exactly like the cartoon Snow White? | ||
| That's amazing! And the dwarves! | ||
| The dwarves look so good! | ||
| They look just like the cartoons! | ||
| How do they even do that? | ||
| Wouldn't that be a wonderful thing to see? | ||
| I'm sure somebody will generate it on AI. I'm sure you can just type in a mid-journey or whatever, like, live-action version of Walt Disney's Snow White, and it would just come up with really... | ||
| Really good-looking image. | ||
| And that alone would make it a billion dollars. | ||
| If they literally just were making a faithful adaption of the original, people would throw money at it. | ||
| Just going, thank you for not ruining this with PC bullcrap. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| Yeah, people have already done it. | ||
| Yeah, it would have been amazing. | ||
| Would have been very nice to see, but instead we got what we got. | ||
| I wonder if the... Let's go to your phone calls. | ||
| Let's go to Peter in Florida. | ||
| Thanks for calling in, Peter. You're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, Harrison. So I recently reread the Declaration of Independence for the first time in probably 15 years, and I was just astonished at some of the similarities between the modern-day federal government and the British Crown at the time, specifically obstructing of justice, making judges dependent, erecting new offices to police the population, and then they even mention importing armies of foreign mercenaries. | |
| But I kind of want to talk about how that relates to the Second Amendment. | ||
| So most people think of the Second Amendment as self-defense, and the image that's invoked in your mind is someone breaks into your house and you shoot them. | ||
| So you're allowed to answer violence with violence to protect yourself. | ||
| But when you consider the fact that the government is trying to castrate your child, that's violent. | ||
| The government is releasing criminals from jail who then might go on to kill you is violent. | ||
| And allowing invaders to come in and kill and rape and poison you with drugs is violent. | ||
| So it's just clearly I don't really understand how people don't understand that collective self-defense In relation to these policies is justified, which was ultimately the impetus for 1776. | ||
| Yeah, no, we've said it a million times. | ||
| I mean, it sort of puts us in a weird position because we need a revolution because things are so messed up right now, but we don't need anything new. | ||
| Everything that we complained about is basically enumerated in the Declaration of Independence. | ||
| Just change the names around. | ||
| Just replace the king with the president, with the deep state, and you have a perfectly valid document for today's world. | ||
| I think it's a very good point, Peter, and very well said. | ||
| That's going to do it for us, folks. | ||
| We'll see you bright and early Monday morning. | ||
| We'll be right back. The globalists aren't just targeting us through the poison shots or the electromagnetic 5G or the GMO crops. | ||
| They're hitting us with hundreds of chemicals that the EPA has authorized companies and industry to use. | ||
| One of the top pesticides used is atrazine. | ||
| The allowable level the government admits that they allow to be in your water supply is enough to sterilize you and basically turn your son into a feminized mutant. | ||
| Look it up. Don't let them do this to your family. | ||
| We have the very best gravity-fed filter system out there. | ||
| Highest rated at half the price of leading competitors. | ||
| The Alexa Pure, ready to ship to you right now. | ||
| We have replacement filters for folks who have already gotten it. | ||
| It does 10,000 gallons before you replace them. | ||
| It is amazing. It's great for your home, your business. | ||
| You can put swamp water in it, tap water, well water. | ||
| Almost everything's contaminated. | ||
| This is how you take control of the fluids in your body and counter the globalist onslaught. | ||
| Get yours today at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| For a limited time, we're running a 10% discount. | ||
| That is a huge discount to start at the lowest price out there. |
Export Selection