All Episodes
July 13, 2023 - American Journal - Harrison Smith
02:11:54
The American Journal: Illegal Aliens Automatically Registered to Vote in Some States, Analysts Warn – FULL SHOW - 07/13/2023
Participants
Main voices
h
harrison smith
01:40:01
Appearances
a
alex jones
01:04
c
chip roy
02:20
c
christopher a wray
02:39
d
darrin mcbreen
03:39
g
greg reese
03:20
Clips
v
vivek ramaswamy
00:37
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
greg reese
- The Sound of Freedom was completed five years ago, but Disney fought them in the courts to keep it from being released.
Hollywood employs several convicted pedophiles, and mostly at Disney and Nickelodeon, who specialize in children's programming.
And have even rehired pedophiles after they've served light sentences for raping child actors.
Hollywood has been abusing children since its inception, including child actors of the 1930s, such as Shirley Temple, Mickey Rooney, and Judy Garland, who wrote that she was constantly molested behind the scenes by powerful men, including MGM co-founder Louis B. Mayer.
And nothing has stopped Hollywood from continuing this horrific abuse.
It has been known for decades that governments have systemically abused children.
Beginning in the 1960s, the German government began placing thousands of foster children into the homes of single pedophiles and continued doing it up until the 1990s.
Thousands of Catholic priests have been accused of raping children, and no justice has ever come of it.
Jeffrey Epstein was targeting individuals and recording them raping children as a form of blackmail so that powerful entities could control them.
Epstein has disappeared, and so has his little black book.
Many have claimed that Hugh Hefner was doing the same thing for the CIA that Epstein was doing.
In 1976, Hefner's Playboy magazine published erotic nude pictures of a 10-year-old girl, and nobody seemed to care.
The effects on these children can often be fatal, whether it's from blunt trauma or suicide.
And those who survive most often struggle with it for their entire life.
unidentified
To me sexual abuse It kills a child.
I think it kills the spirit of a child.
I think it kills normalcy in a child.
So I just have spent a great deal of my life, you know, walking around really as a dead person in a sense because I almost feel like I was murdered.
greg reese
Child abuse has been used as a form of trauma-based mind control because it often forces the child to disassociate, which has been known to create multiple personalities.
MKUltra whistleblower Kathy O'Brien came from a family of multi-generational child abuse that sold her to the U.S. government.
unidentified
I developed a compartment in my brain, a little area behind amnesic barriers that was actually the neuron pathway shutting down in my brain in order to compartmentalize the memory of the abuse so that the rest of my mind could function normally as though nothing had happened.
My father's sexual abuse expanded into child pornography, and he was sending this child pornography of me through the U.S. mails.
And he was caught.
The pornography was confiscated by a criminal faction of our government.
A local politician approached my father and told him that he would receive immunity from prosecution if he would sell me into the CIA's MKUltra Project Monarch.
greg reese
Some families practice incest and pedophilia to gain power and to maintain it.
Inbred Jacob Rothschild explains it here while reading a quote from his inbred relative, James Rothschild.
unidentified
In our family, we've always tried to keep love in the family.
In this sense, it was more or less understood since childhood that children would never think of marrying outside the family so that our fortune would never leave it.
You couldn't write that today.
greg reese
Our entire system is profiting from child slavery.
About $10 billion a year in the U.S. alone.
And our entire government seems to be involved.
Congress has paid millions of our tax dollars to cover up their sex abuse crimes.
Thousands of children are being trafficked across our southern border.
And now it's become trendy to castrate children and turn them into a so-called transgender.
And if we the people don't do something about this, then the blossoming surveillance state will have a solution.
Don't be surprised if our children are soon monitored 24-7 under the guise of keeping them safe because we have failed to do so.
While we cannot expect to rid the earth of all evil, something obviously needs to be done.
Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese.
unidentified
It's Thursday, July 13th, year of our Lord, 2023.
It's Thursday.
And... You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
Watch it live right now at band.video.
harrison smith
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome to The American Journal.
I am your host, Harrison Smith.
Glad to be here with you today.
PeopleWars.com, band.video.
We've a lot to discuss today, a lot of videos to show you.
We'll be going over some of the...
unidentified
some of the hearings from yesterday.
harrison smith
I don't know if we're supposed to feel good about these.
I don't know if we're supposed to think that this is making some sort of difference.
Seems like every week, maybe every two weeks, we get Republicans wiggling their finger at the FBI and Literally nothing else happens.
But we'll show you the clips from it.
We'll talk about what was revealed accidentally or on purpose.
And we'll check out a number of other pretty good videos as well.
But we'll begin today, as we do every day, with our Daily Dispatch.
All right, here it is, folks.
Your Daily Dispatch.
Daily Dispatch for Thursday, the 7th of July.
Wait a second. The 13th of July.
It's Houston Day, 713.
2023. FBI Chief Chris Wray grilled by GOP over social media collusion censorship.
Quote, they lied.
Oh, he's been grilled alright.
He's got like a flame grilled whopper up there.
Just accepting no blame and admitting he did nothing wrong and Basically just being a smug a-hole in front of the Congress.
I don't know if disappointing is the right word, because I think you have to actually have some desire or some expectation for something to actually happen to be disappointed.
This is just yet another little...
A little show they've put on for us.
House Judiciary Committee Republicans took aim Wednesday at FBI Director Christopher Wray after a federal judge ruled that the Bureau colluded with social media companies to throttle free speech.
That was conservative in nature.
Chairman Jim Jordan kicked off a tense hearing by citing a Louisiana federal judge's decision last week that revealed government agencies reached out to Big Tech to help suppress posts about COVID-19 vaccines, masking measures, lockdowns, and the authenticity of first son Hunter Biden's laptop, among other issues.
Jordan, who quoted at length from the ruling in his opening statement, noted that the FBI has declined to answer when companies like FBI asked whether the laptop was Russian disinformation, which misled millions of Americans about its content before the 2020 election.
And a lot of stuff was revealed during this, but absolutely nothing of substance in terms of...
Any corrective measures.
You know, hearings, unless I'm mistaken, the point of a hearing, the point of sort of back and forth like this would be to try to suss out, try to discover, try to do a little questioning to figure out what exactly happened.
We know what happened.
It's very weird.
It's like you've already had the trial.
They've already been declared guilty.
The evidence has already been presented.
And the guilt is beyond any reasonable doubt.
And yet, the trial just keeps going.
And yet, they just keep calling witnesses and keep questioning the person that they have already declared guilty.
It's like, now it's time to move to the punishment phase of this criminal activity and the justice that should come after.
But it's just...
Again, it's not disappointing because...
What do you expect? I mean, it's the same thing over and over and over and over and over and over.
It's the same thing for the last five years.
It's been the same thing over and over.
It's been the FBI being utterly and irretrievably corrupt, just flagrantly violating every law they possibly could.
The first one on the books for free speech.
I mean, that's like the main one, right?
and yet they just run over it like a steamroller launch falsified investigations into presidential candidates i mean we've known all of this for five years so what are we doing we're just going to talk about it more we're just going to talk about it again we're just gonna have another meeting talk about everything that we already know okay great yeah wonderful good i mean there's some little details that we missed it doesn't matter doesn't matter the whole thing should be burned meanwhile war effort in shambles as hawks turn on each other at nato summit
Yeah, hasn't been the most congenial NATO summit in recent memory.
Bloomberg is just out with a devastating behind-the-scenes account of a hot-headed Zelensky at NATO summit in Vilnius and the growing Western backlash in the face of his obvious frustration at what's being seen as ingratitude for the steady flow of billions of dollars in arms to Kiev.
Apparently even the mainstream media agrees with our own assessment of the Ukraine leader having thrown a tantrum as he complained about the weak and absurd NATO stance on Ukraine's membership.
The blistering tweet he issued in English while en route to Lithuania exposed cracks in the alliance, as Bloomberg highlights in the opening of a very revealing Wednesday piece.
Well, Volodymyr Zelensky was running hot ahead of his sit down with NATO leaders on Tuesday evening.
The Ukrainian president has been angered earlier in the day by what he said was an absurd reluctance to give his country a clear timeline on membership.
That outburst in turn riled the partners who have funneled billions of dollars of weaponry and aid to Ukraine's defense against the Russian invasion.
The U.S. had been given no warning before Zelensky unleashed his attack on social media.
We'll get more into what exactly is happening at the NATO summit.
Later in the show, as it does seem like there are cracks in the facade starting to form.
We can only hope that this military alliance follows the same trajectory as perhaps some sort of deep sea submersible.
When you see the cracks in that hole, it's not long before total implosion.
Wouldn't that be nice to see NATO just evaporating?
FBI director... Oh, okay.
Well, these are a little out of... I put these out of order, but back to the FBI director, and we'll return to this and show you these videos.
He claimed... Christopher Wray claimed he's not sure if there were any undercover agents on January 6th.
Who's to say? I mean, who's to say?
If there were any...
Your guess is as good as his, I guess.
Director of the FBI Chris Wray says he's not sure if there are any undercover agents at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2020, when questioned about the matter by Congress on Wednesday.
Wray sat before the House Judiciary Committee.
Under questioning from Republican Representative Andy Biggs, Wray said, I'm not sure if there are any undercover agents on scene on the day of the Capitol riot in January 6, 2021.
Who's to say? It's hard.
I don't know. We just don't know if there were or not.
It's hard to say. Wouldn't you just love to see the Congress just be like, just like place him under arrest?
Just like the House committee chair will now direct the sergeant at arms to place the witness under arrest for contempt of Congress and remove him to a safe location while we can establish a committee for truth and reconciliation to get to the bottom of this.
And Chris Ray's just like, what?
No, I'm supposed to be on a private plane to an island in five minutes.
It's like, ah, sorry, dude, sorry.
We're the Congress, so we're actually in charge.
So hands behind your back.
Up against the wall, and we'll get to you just as soon as you get to all of the January 6th prisoners that have been in prison for two years.
So just sit and wait, see how it feels, and we'll get to you eventually.
Wouldn't that be nice? Wouldn't it be nice if our Congress and our duly elected representatives who actually have to contend with a population of their constituents actually had power over the deep state, unelected, unaccountable actors?
Wouldn't that be something else? I think it'd be great.
You have one of the representatives from Texas throw a lasso around his neck and just Around the horn of the saddle and just right off into the sunset.
It saved the country, after all.
Isn't that the point? House Republicans accidentally released a trove of damning COVID documents.
This story from The Intercept.
House Republicans on the subcommittee probing the origins of COVID-19 virus appear to have inadvertently released a trove of new documents related to their investigation that shed light on deliberations among the scientists who drafted a key paper in February and March of 2020.
The paper, published in Nature Medicine on March 17, 2020, was titled The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2 and played a leading role in creating the public impression of a scientific consensus that the science had emerged naturally in a Chinese wet market.
The paper was subject to a hearing on Capitol Hill Tuesday, which coincided with the release of a report by the subcommittee devoted to the proximal origin paper.
It contained limited screenshots of emails and Slack messages among the authors laying out the case that the scientists believed one thing in private that a lab escape was likely while working to produce a paper saying the opposite in public.
Well, look at that!
Hey, what do you know?
Another set of public figures whose crimes are open, admitted, with the evidence being without question and above any reasonable or unreasonable doubt.
And yet they're free and out walking around, having committed a crime against humanity and locked you in your home for two years.
All right, folks, this is American Journal coming to you live from the InfoWars studios.
here in Austin, Texas.
Finishing up with our Daily Dispatch, our final story comes from LifeSite News.
New York State's Acting Health Commissioner.
Hey, wait a second.
This is an old story.
This is an old story.
I got tricked. I got tricked by Twitter into thinking this was a news story.
I hadn't seen it before. Apparently this is from January 6th of 2022.
Let's cover it anyway. New York Health Commissioner says she blew hospitalizations out of proportion to push COVID shot for kids.
New York State's Acting Health Commissioner affirmed late last month that she played up extremely rare pediatric COVID-19 hospitalizations to promote injecting all children five years old and above with the experimental and abortion-tainted COVID chabs.
The promotion of the universal vaccination in young children comes in spite of evidence that children face very minimal risk from COVID-19 and ignores the thousands of reports of serious adverse events and deaths connected with the experimental shots.
During a December 28, 2021 press conference, Acting Health State Health Commissioner Mary T. Bassett said the number of pediatric COVID-related hospital admissions were small.
And while children are not having an epidemic of infection, a handful of rare pediatric hospitalizations were given center stage in a recent health alert to promote pediatricians and families to seek the protection of vaccination for young children.
Bassett's statement comes after she warned of a striking uptick in pediatric COVID-19 hospitalizations.
They weren't real.
They weren't real. 50 pediatric hospitalizations among a population of 4 million children under 18 who live in New York.
Meanwhile, it's unclear whether the children recorded were even hospitalized with COVID-19 or not.
This is an older story.
My apologies.
See, they don't... It's like it's hard to...
I gotta look for the date.
This doesn't usually happen to me. I'm usually pretty good at this.
But a lot of people are talking about this story for some reason.
So it was there at the top of my list today.
Again, it sort of points to what I guess you could call like decentralized false flag operations where the dishonesty and just the general paradigm of the mainstream media is formulated in a way that people know that they can just lie and they feel justified in lying.
Again, the example we always point to, which is Just the best, because the guy admitted it.
It was a guy who, during 2016, during the campaign, was a gay guy who drew a swastika on his own church, in his words, because people didn't realize the threat that we were under.
In other words, the mainstream media and the left hypes up fear of some boogeyman.
The people on the right laugh at them and point out that their fear is unfounded and that the claims they're making are without merit.
And that makes the left mad.
I mean, they're wrong.
Any reasonable person would go, well, it wasn't actually true.
You know, Trump isn't actually a Nazi.
Gay people aren't actually under threat of violence because Republicans don't want to pay more in taxes or whatever.
But they don't do that. They don't have a reasonable reaction.
And it's almost like there's another thing in true crime that happens all the time.
I notice it quite a bit.
I don't know if I can explain this well.
It's something you just have to kind of understand.
unidentified
How, like, people...
harrison smith
How do I put this?
Alright, so if you're guilty of a crime, but there's no evidence that you're guilty of a crime...
But somebody suspects you of that crime and is pretty sure that you did it and accuses you of that crime?
The criminals, like these narcissistic psychopath people that, like, they'll, like, kill somebody and then they'll be in this interrogation room and the police will be, or their friend or whoever will be like, we think you did it.
And they get actually mad, like literally mad, even though they did do it.
In their mind, it goes, well, yeah, I did do it, but they don't know that I did it.
So the fact that they're accusing me without any evidence, that's an attack on me.
They accused me even though they have no reason to suspect me because I covered my tracks so well.
I covered my tracks so well that their accusation of me, their suspicion of me is really an attack on me because of...
You know, because they have no evidence to say that I did this.
Like, I don't know if you get what I'm trying to put across here, right?
But it's like, these people lie.
The left lies. We go, yeah, I think that's a lie.
And they go, well, you don't have a reason to believe that that's a lie.
So they, like, get mad that you don't believe them.
Even though they are lying, and they know they're lying.
But to them, it's like, but you should be believing me because I should be And because you don't believe me, that's an attack on me.
It's weird, but that's actually the way there.
There's some weird psychology there that I've seen even in friends of mine that are or former friends or whatever you want to call them that would lie all the time and you call them out on their lies and they get really mad at you even though they are lying to them it's like you don't have any proof so you should be believing me the fact that you don't is an attack on me it is unfair because you haven't seen anything to hint that I'm lying but you still know that I'm lying so like there's something in that here where They go,
I'm a very concerned doctor, and I'm very concerned about all the pediatric hospitalizations.
You go, I don't believe you.
I don't believe you. I think that's a lie.
I think you're lying because you just want to get people to take the vaccine.
You're setting up sort of a vague false flag rumor to try to get people into fear.
And they go, well, hold on.
I'm the expert. I'm the official.
I'm the one who knows everything.
I should be given the respect.
These people should listen to me because I have all of the authority.
I have all of the accreditation to speak authoritatively on this.
So the fact that they're not listening to me, even though I am lying, it's really an attack on me for daring to oppose my authority.
And then they get mad at you for calling out their lies.
Sort of thing that happens over and over again.
And again, it's because these people know I can lie about this and the media will run with my story.
And even if I'm caught lying about this, it'll be long after the intended effect has taken course and the media won't crucify me.
The media won't be mad at me for lying.
They'll understand. They'll think I'm a hero for taking this burden on myself.
Of trying to do something and be active to illustrate to people how dangerous this could be, even though it actually isn't.
But it could be, and they don't know that it's not, so them saying that it's not is really insulting me, the doctor, the authority, the person in charge.
And so the point of all this is that there is this through-line of narcissism and psychopathy that runs through all of the leftist actions.
Obviously, there's bad people on the right and useful idiots on the right, obviously.
It's not as much a left-right thing in a clear delineation, but way, way more people on the left have this attitude.
Way more people on the left...
And you saw with the John Doyle ask me anything or change my mind segment that he did where again he would like prove that what these people were saying was wrong about racial disparities or whatever and they would get so mad at him for questioning it even though he was right and they knew he was right they're like he should know he's not allowed to question this all right welcome back ladies and gentlemen The very big show ahead we have for you this Thursday morning.
Infowars.com band.videos where you go to share the links.
We've got a lot of videos of the...
The finger wagging.
The great...
Sound and fury signifying nothing.
The hearing that Christopher Wray had in front of Congress yesterday.
Again, disappointment's not the right word because you have to have some sort of expectation to fall short of in that regard.
I don't know if anybody here's holding out any hope that Congress will find their backbone anytime soon and actually do something rather than just talking about doing stuff.
It really is...
I mean, it almost feels like we shouldn't even play the videos.
It almost feels like false hope.
It feels like It's like tantalizing you with like, oh, look how mean and angry the Republicans are.
Oh, they are certainly on top of this.
But you know it's not going to come to anything.
You know nothing is going to happen.
There's nothing in this except for political gamesmanship and showmanship where they're trying to get the best viral TikTok clip.
Against the FBI. Meanwhile, the FBI is just in the background just kicking in doors, arresting grandmothers, right?
Pointing guns at children's faces, arresting political opponents, investigating Trump endlessly, relentlessly, using falsified evidence over and over again.
It's like they don't care. They couldn't care less.
Nothing the Republicans...
Actually do, has any tangible effect on the relentless tyranny being increasingly poured down America's throat.
So I'll show you some clips, but just fair warning, I guess.
We'll get to those in just a second.
I do want to tell you to go to Infowarsstore.com.
The July 4th Super Sale is still on, folks.
It... Still going on.
You're getting up to 60% off, plus double Patriot points on almost all of the products on InfoWarsStore.com, plus you're getting those double Patriot points which you can spend on products later.
Just about everything on the store is on some sort of discount, some more than others, including entire lines of products such as the InfoWarsMD products at massive discount.
Whoa, wait a second. Wait a second.
There's a glitch in the system.
Glitch in the matrix. Their new sale?
Alright, folks. You are the first people to learn about this because we have just seen a live update on the Infowars store.
It turns out, folks, July is Patriot Pride Month.
It's Patriot Pride Month!
That's awesome. So it looks like you're still getting massive discounts.
On just about all the products, plus the double Patriot points.
Celebration of Patriot Pride Month, or what Jesse Lee Peterson calls White History Month.
July just feels white.
unidentified
It just feels white, doesn't it?
harrison smith
No, you don't have to be white.
You just have to be a patriot. You just have to be an American citizen.
Love your country. Love God.
Love, truth, justice, and the American way.
Go to InfoWarsStore.com right now to support us in this mission to save this great nation from the clutches of the globalist octopus.
And in fact, on that note, I want to go to this video that Vivek Ramaswamy posted yesterday.
This is an absolutely brilliant article.
Response he has to a Democrat voter questioning him about his use of the term nationalist.
Something we've said at this show for a very long time and seems obvious to me, seems weird that more people don't get this, but nationalism is not a divisive thing.
It is literally the opposite of divisive.
It's saying that despite our differences and without destroying or diminishing those differences, we have something that connects us that's higher than any of those differences.
Nationalism would just be an extension of your family, essentially.
And I know even people on the right don't like this talking point because they basically respond to the very...
A ghettoized, like, separated racial construct that exists right now.
And it makes sense.
I mean, when you've got every other group other than white people, very strong in-group preference, and they aren't shy about being like, we hate white people, we want to tear down white people in general.
There's no... A taboo against black nationalism or Latino nationalism, right?
You'll see, like, spray paint all around Austin.
It's like, Lo Raza, the race, right?
This is our race. We are reconquering, the reconquist of Texas.
Like, it makes sense that in this political atmosphere, white people would just go, would just listen to what the extremist racialists are saying and just go, okay, okay.
This is how it is. This is our team.
My team's the white people. Your team's the black people.
And we're against each other.
Which the solution to that is to go, but you're both Americans, right?
Like, we're both Americans.
Like, families, you know, brothers can fight and bicker with each other.
But then, like, if you're all at a bar and some stranger throws a bottle at your brother, you're going to get up and fight that guy because at the end of the day, you and your brother are on the same team.
You are a part of a family.
By nature of your closeness and the fact that you grew up together.
And that's the only thing people go, well, they're not like us.
There's this racialization.
They're not like us. They're not on our team.
It's just like, but... There is a landmass called America.
We all live here.
We all live and die based on how successful this country is run, right?
It's not something that's being imposed on you.
It's just a fact of reality.
We are all American.
We all suffer or succeed based on all of our collective success.
It's not even a choice to be made.
It's just an observation being made.
We all are in it together as a nation.
And when push comes to shove, we need to have each other's backs.
We're on the same team at the end of the day.
And you go, well, but that guy doesn't like me and I don't like him.
It's like, well, that's his problem.
He needs to get over that because...
How are you going to win the game when you're trying to fight the other team and your own team at the same time?
All you're doing is guaranteeing that your team loses, meaning you lose.
So you're guaranteeing your own loss by not coming together and actually fighting with your fellow American rather than trying to tear them down.
As if the Chinese are going to welcome you with open arms or the globalist superstructure global government is going to benefit you in any way.
Vivek Ramaswamy says it better than I ever could, so let's go to him.
This is clip number three. He responds to this question about nationalism by saying, I am not a, quote, global citizen.
unidentified
Let's watch. I get uncomfortable with American nationalism.
harrison smith
She says I'm not comfortable with American nationalism.
vivek ramaswamy
Yeah, interesting. See, so one of the reasons I'm in this race is I actually do call myself an American nationalist, but I don't think nationalist has to be a bad word.
Because in other countries and cultures for most of human history, being a nationalist meant you identified with an ethnicity or a language or a monarch.
But in the American context, I think it's a commitment just to a set of ideals that were enshrined in the Constitution that actually unite us across our diversity and differences.
unidentified
I would agree, but you're going to have an uphill battle with the word.
That concept sounds great.
vivek ramaswamy
So I care about the concept more than the word, but I brought up the words as you mentioned.
harrison smith
It's such a democratic response, right?
vivek ramaswamy
...is what I care about. I think that can unite us.
You say you're a Democrat? Yes.
harrison smith
Okay. It's such a democratic response.
Well, I agree with you.
You are right. The word is the right word.
It is a good thing, but you're going to have trouble, you know, selling that.
It's like you really do uphold appearance over the truth.
You really do uphold, like, whatever the social milieu is over just, like, what reality is.
Yeah, nationalism is good.
She'll never say that.
She'll never admit that, even though she knows it's true.
Even though she did just admit to Vivek, well, yeah, that is true.
But the word, though.
Oh, but the word, though?
The men on TV told me the word is bad, so I refuse to like it.
And I'll actually bring it up as a bad point against you.
unidentified
All right, welcome back, folks.
Got yourself, girl.
harrison smith
So, so much to cover.
It's hard to even get into the details of this stuff when there's so much to say just about the framing of it and the way it's covered in the media.
We're going to be joined by Dorothy Moon in the third hour.
She's the chairwoman of the Idaho Republican Party and has served three terms in the Idaho Legislature, a state representative for District 8.
Very excited to talk to her about a major story that came out earlier this week.
As well as about what you can do to get involved in local politics and hopefully recreate the success they've had in Idaho by recreating the model they've used to achieve it.
And we have a lot of it. We'll go to the videos in this segment of Chris Wray, the FBI director, being questioned by Congress and absolutely nothing coming from it.
But there's some slip-ups that he made that were pretty bad.
But there's this headline on Twitter from Daily Mail.
Scientists at the center of COVID lab leak cover-up admit decision to downplay theory was political because they feared a blank show from China.
So I searched that to find the headline because somebody had screenshotted the headline.
So I wanted to find the actual article.
And what came up was a New York Times story from one day ago.
And the headline is, scientists, comma, under fire from Republicans, comma, defend Fauci for promoting the proximal origin.
I guess we don't really need to get into it.
It's just, I... If there would be one thing that I would want to do with my position here behind the desk, be to, like, try to teach people how to read these headlines properly.
Because what's incumbent in these headlines, what's embedded in there, is fault.
It's victimizer and victim.
The reality is that Fauci lied.
These scientists lied in a coordinated, preemptive fashion, publishing papers and writing articles and spreading rumors they knew to be untrue for political or otherwise Selfish reasons.
That's what actually happened.
The Republicans are responding to that.
You know, this is...
Should be obvious.
And so then when you see it being reported as scientists under fire from Republicans defend Fauci, it puts the impetus as if the Republicans are just attacking Fauci for no reason.
Attacking the scientists for no reason.
Where did this chain of events start?
Did it start with scientists just out there just mixing things in beakers and just, you know, turning up the Bunsen burner there?
Let's test things.
Only Republicans just, like, kick the door of the lab down and they're like, ah!
Ah, you are—we're going to destroy you!
unidentified
We're going to make up lies about you for no reason because we hate science.
harrison smith
Like, is that what happened or— Was everybody listening to the scientists and obeying the scientists and giving the scientists the benefit of the doubt, even though people like us over here at InfoWars were yelling into the microphone, they're lying, they're lying, they're lying.
Look at all the lies they're telling.
Look at all the falsehoods that are being proven to be untrue.
Like, we're out here actually yelling, trying to point to the...
But at the time, you know, everybody listened to them.
Everybody, well, they are the scientists.
They are wearing the white coats.
But they do put themselves across as if they know what they're talking about or are in charge.
We better listen to them.
Only two, three years down the line have documents and emails and discussions showing that they were lying the entire time.
So you have to deal with that.
So the start of this chain of events was the scientists lying about all of this.
And yet, and so they lie.
The Republicans go, hey, it looks like you're lying.
They have to scramble to defend themselves against the truth.
They have to scramble to try to cover up the cover-up, try to lie about the lie.
And the way the New York Times reports it is scientists under attack by Republicans.
And it's not the only one. There's another story from the New York Times today that is framed in exactly the same way, which is why it's important, I think, to actually go over this, because It's a tactic that they use continuously.
Day in, day out, it never ends.
Yeah, here you go. This is exactly what I thought, right?
New York Times says...
Hold on, don't bring it up.
Got to get around the block there.
New York Times, GOP's far right seeks to use defense bill to defund Ukraine's war effort.
Again... The image that is embedded in your mind by reading this is the far right, these radical extremists.
They don't care about the well-being of the country.
They don't care about their friends and family.
They don't care about just presiding over a well-functioning and peaceful and prosperous country.
No, they're far right. They must have some deep-seated, hidden racist agenda that's really behind what they're doing.
And again, this isn't This isn't me saying that.
This is just like, this is what all of these articles do.
This is what all of these headlines are carefully designed to portray.
Because, as we've said a million times, the point of the media is to tell the truth in a way that leaves you believing a lie.
The way that you would come away from this believing the truth would be something like Republicans call for peace amid devastating Ukraine war with no end in sight, right?
You've got this massive, unrelenting, unquestioned war, right?
New York Times never... I wrote an article that wasn't positive about the Ukraine war.
If anything, it's like, the Ukrainians are not doing as well because we haven't given them enough weapons and we need to support them even more.
It's the only hint of criticism you'll find is them criticizing us not doing even more to progress and inflame this conflict overseas.
You'll never see that.
So... I don't know if it's even something I can teach, because it's different with every headline, and yet the theory, the theme is the same in every headline.
And I have had success with this on a personal basis with people who are actually open-minded, who actually want to know the truth, that are actually curious, and you read a headline, and they go, well, that just, that makes sense.
I mean, I don't get what the deal is with that.
A headline like one of these.
They go, scientists under fire from Republicans defend Fauci and COVID origins.
Like, what's wrong with that?
Isn't that what's happening? The scientists are under fire by the Republicans, and Fauci's defending himself.
You have to kind of explain, like, well, look at the position it's taking.
Look at the presupposed facts that it just assumes that you agree with, and in a way, sort of puts you in the position of agreeing with.
And again, I've had this where I've had a conversation with a woman who literally had to go through CNN headlines, and each one should be like, well, what do you think they're saying in this one?
I have to go, okay, well, here's the position they're coming from.
Here's what they're trying to express.
Here's what they're trying to get you to believe.
Here's why they believe this.
She's like, oh, yeah, that does make sense.
So, I mean, maybe you can do it on a one-to-one basis.
Maybe by, like, showing examples we can illustrate the deceptive...
Because, again, these aren't... Leftist papers, right?
This isn't the left-wing equivalent of Infowars.
We're like, we're very right-wing.
We're very upfront about that.
We're very obvious about our perspective and where we're coming from.
The key part of the deception is to maintain the air of being unbiased.
Maintain the air of just reporting the facts, ma'am.
In reality, you can see through the curtain, you can pierce through the veil, and what you see is deeply biased reporting, but done in a way that you have to be able to see through it.
So I hope the Infowars audience can see through this crap.
I hope they can recognize what's actually happening here.
And again, if it was some sort of...
Some sort of...
What's a famous murder case?
I mean, I don't want to use OJ because he got declared not guilty.
But, right, it'd be like reporting like...
Like OJ... OJ Simpson saddled with...
O.J. Simpson saddled with extremely expensive shoe repair bill after blood is spilled on his fancy suede shoes.
Like, you mean when he was allegedly stabbing a woman to death?
Is that what you're talking about?
Like, he's not the victim in this.
It's like, but it is true. It is true.
He did have to pay a lot to get his shoes cleaned of all the blood that was on them.
Yeah, dude, because he was the one in the first—you get what I'm saying?
Like, you have to be able to read through this, because most people sit there and read it and go, oh, poor AJ, or poor OJ. He—just another thing he's got to deal with, another expense he has to take on his back.
These brand-new shoes he liked so much, his fancy Italian loafers having to be cleaned— By a shoe repairman.
Ugh, poor guy. It cost him so much money.
I mean, those are expensive shoes, and blood doesn't come out easy.
It's like, you're missing the whole point.
Yes, what you're saying is true, but you gotta backtrack to, what was the impetus of this whole event?
Where'd the blood come from?
Who spilled it? Why was he there in the first place?
Like, once you start asking these questions, then it's like, okay, why did they report it as if it was O.J. Simpson being the victim?
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Second hour has begun, and the third hour of this show, we will be joined by Dorothy Moon, the chairwoman of the Idaho Republican Party.
We'll talk about a number of very important stories coming out of that very unique state, Idaho.
But I want to go now to a video.
We're going to do a little magic trick here.
I'm going to fade away, and in my place is going to appear the one and only Darren McBreen.
He just put out this report on band.video.
It's called, Who's Behind the Sound of Freedom?
Sabotage in Movie Theaters.
Here is Darren McBreen, clip number six.
darrin mcbreen
Just when you thought the deviant left couldn't possibly sink any lower, there are now widespread reports of movie theaters purposely sabotaging the sound of freedom.
Here's what's going on.
The internet is being flooded right now with testimonies from people who are having a bad movie experience while trying to watch the anti-child trafficking thriller, Sound of Freedom.
Interruptions, distractions, and just plain bizarre occurrences in movie theaters all over the country.
Everything from fire alarms going off, there's AC units that are not working properly, the volume turned all the way down, even the movie pausing in the middle of it, like somebody actually hitting the pause button.
And there's other reports of the movie fast-forwarding, like somebody's hitting the fast-forward button.
So totally bizarre and there's also reports of people looking online where it says the movie is totally sold out but then they get to the movie theater and there's hardly anybody there.
So very strange and way too many occurrences for all of this to be just a coincidence.
Like I said, there's numerous reports of these things happening all over the country the past couple of days.
Now, the CEO of AMC Theatres has responded to the negative feedback.
They're saying that this is, it's all conspiracy theory.
That this is misinformation on TikTok and Twitter, and they want to put the ridiculous conspiracy theory to bed.
They're saying stuff happens.
You know, bulbs break, AC units go out, sometimes the volume levels aren't set right, etc.
And I'm sure in some of these instances, they're right.
Shit happens. But this is way too much to ignore.
And like I said, this is happening all over the country right now.
And we're getting reports from everywhere.
Heavyweight champion boxer David Nino Rodriguez, he said he went to the movie and he had a horrible experience.
And he believes that theaters are making the viewing experience uncomfortable on purpose.
And these are the kind of reports that are coming in right now.
Here's what I think is going on and what's not going on.
I don't believe that this is a case of woke corporate movie theaters sabotaging the movie.
I mean, this isn't Target selling satanic gay merchandise to children or this is not like the infamous Tranny Bud Light implosion.
Those corporations sabotage themselves in the name of wokeism.
Now, if anything, AMC Theatres, we should applaud them for showing this movie.
Thank you, AMC Movie Theatres, for showing this.
I mean, this might be the most important film you'll ever see.
So we should all applaud these movie theaters for showing The Sound of Freedom.
I think this is a case of random, woke libtards who work at some of these movie theaters, and they believe the Mockingbird Media's narrative that Sound of Freedom is like a QAnon conspiracy theory movie for Trump supporters.
They're the ones who are individually acting alone and sabotaging the movie.
And I think AMC theaters, they need to look into this more closely, find out who's behind it, find out who's doing this.
And fire these people.
Get rid of them all immediately.
And if any of you out there, if you know who any of these people are, my advice to you is don't let these people anywhere near your children.
harrison smith
Brilliant stuff. Darren McBreen's media rival.
You can find it on band.video.
Who's behind the Sound of Freedom sabotage in movie theaters?
I'd seen reports of that, but I didn't realize until I saw Darren's report just how widespread it was and that the AMC CEO actually had to respond to it.
So clearly something is really going on.
This is more than just one or two instances.
This is a trend that people are noticing.
unidentified
Great stuff. Welcome back, folks.
harrison smith
The second hour is on here at Infowars.com, band.video.
We just have so much to talk about.
We're going to go to some videos now of the FBI hearing yesterday.
If anyone was watching the Alex Jones show yesterday, I'm glad I'm not the only one.
I've done the same thing, and I'm glad I'm not the only one.
He's like, all right, we're going to go to this...
We're going to go to this live FBI hearing.
It comes on. It's Sheila Jackson Lee just being like, as we know, white people are evil.
And he's just like, turn it off. Turn it off.
I can't do it. I can't even listen to one second of these people talk.
It's true. It's absolutely true.
It's nauseating having to listen to these people.
That's why, I mean, when you see Owen Schroyer stand up and yell at Jerry Nadler, stand up in one of these hearings, it's I mean, it's one thing when you're sitting and watching it on TV and you just feel so frustrated that these people are just lying through their teeth.
But when you're in the room and they're 20, 50 feet away from you, it's really hard not to do what Owen Troyer's doing in this footage right now.
It's really hard not to stand up And just call them out on what they're doing.
It's so infuriating.
So, we've cut out a lot of that nonsense.
Cut out a lot of the Democrat bootlicking that we see.
Very strange. Very odd.
Very odd. I guess as a young man, I would have maintained the delusion that the left and the right, we can come together.
The idea of opposing Government overreach.
Liberals don't like it because it's a violation of people's rights, and it can be used to target certain minority groups, and it can be used to snuff out nascent political movements before they can threaten the system.
That's something liberals would be for, right?
And Republicans, we can get behind Exposing the corruption of the FBI because we're all about small government.
We want a government that works and a government that is moral and upright and maintains our sacred rights.
Maybe back when Obama was president or whatever.
We could have maintained this delusion or illusion that this would be something we could come together on.
But suddenly Donald Trump gets thrown in the mix and liberals are just like, thank you, Mr.
Boot. Thank you for stepping on my neck.
Thank you for doing the brave work of stomping on my and my compatriots' necks.
Without you, we might float away.
Thank you for stomping on our necks with everything you've got, you beautiful, lovely white men.
It's very weird. It's a very bizarre situation that we're in.
But we're in it, so let's deal with it.
Got a couple videos here. Do we have the one with Matt Gaetz talking about the FBI having the lowest level of trust in the FBI's history?
Yeah, it should be in that folder.
Well, I guess we'll go ahead and start with clip number five here, and then we'll get to some of the other ones.
This is Chip Roy asking Christopher Wray about FBI agent Brian Outen We're good to go.
christopher a wray
I believe that's in the Durham report.
chip roy
And Danchenko explained that the dossier allegations were BS, yet the FBI did not reveal that to the FISA court.
Instead, the FBI continued to use those allegations in two more sworn FISA applications about President Trump and Putin, correct?
christopher a wray
Well, again, I want to let Mr.
Durham's report speak for itself.
chip roy
Okay, but as director of the FBI, those are the facts of the FBI under your watch.
christopher a wray
Well, no, sir, I'm sorry.
It's important. Not under my watch.
chip roy
Those are the facts. I'm getting to the part under your watch.
The FBI conducted an internal investigation of Auten and sought to suspend him, but Auten appealed, correct?
christopher a wray
I can't discuss a specific pending personnel matter.
chip roy
Okay, well, according to recent reports, those are the facts.
Nevertheless, in 2020, after Senators Grassley and Johnson highlighted evidence of potential financial crimes and corruption against the Biden family, the FBI assigned Auden to compile an assessment which was used to characterize the Biden revelations as Russian disinformation.
The evidence Grassley and Johnson had collected were mostly financial records and could easily have been corroborated as authentic.
And by then, the FBI had the Hunter laptop in its possession for over a year, so it knew the lucrative payments of the Bidens from corrupt and anti-American regimes were authentic.
How on earth did the FBI empower an agent under investigation for potentially corrupt performance and abuse of FISA? In one politically fraud investigation, a Democrat-operative-driven case against President Trump To play a key role and to undermine a second politically fraught investigation, a case against the Bidens.
How is that possible?
How can you allow that to occur in the Federal Bureau of Investigation, as my colleagues on the other side of the aisle say the elite law enforcement agency of the United States?
christopher a wray
How does that occur? I can't at the moment discuss a pending personnel matter.
I can tell you that every employee who in any way touched The Crossfire Hurricane matter has been referred to our Office of Professional Responsibility.
chip roy
Are you concerned about this activity by the FBI and what was communicated to the FISA court?
christopher a wray
Does that concern you as the director of the FBI? I consider the conduct that was described in the Durham report as totally unacceptable.
And unrepresentative of what I see from the FBI every day and must never be allowed to happen again.
chip roy
And have there been consequences as a result?
Has Mr. Auden, has he had consequences?
christopher a wray
Well, again, I can't speak to pending personnel matters.
As you would perhaps remember from your own time in law enforcement, Because we were working closely with Mr.
Durham and I assigned agents to help him, at his request, we slowed down the administrative process to allow his investigation to complete itself.
Now that it is complete, our personnel processes are very much ongoing.
chip roy
Well, I think it is more than troubling that, under your watch, we see that this continued to occur, and you have Auten being—continued to be empowered after there was an investigation and after there was an effort by the FBI to look into why he would go to the FISA court and give wrong information.
I mean, the issue here has been wrapped up in a cloud of politics, but the fact is the American people deserve to know how the FISA court is being abused and how it's being abused against the former president and against them in light of the reports that we saw Mr.
Johnson from Louisiana put forward that was in a court filing, in a court report.
I want to move on to another topic.
harrison smith
I mean, what do you even say to that?
There's this wall of bureaucracy.
This wall of doublespeak.
It's like impenetrable.
You just can't get through it.
None of this is confusing or nuanced.
It's a very simple sort of game they play.
They get caught.
It's like beyond just getting caught doing something bad.
This guy, Brian Outen, as Chip Roy just pointed out there, Representative Chip Roy, He suppressed the Hunter Biden laptop investigation through social media and participated in the Mar-a-Lago investigation despite being under disciplinary review, whatever the hell that means.
For deceiving the FISA court with Steele dossier to spy on the Trump campaign.
So Chris Wray in his response is like, I was appalled at what the Durham report uncovered.
I do not think that's acceptable at all for the FBI to engage in that behavior.
And it's like, okay, the people that engaged in the behavior and were caught in the Durham report, these people, did you punish them?
It's like, no, no, we promoted them.
No, we promoted them. We put them in charge of more politically sensitive matters that they could...
You know, have corrupt influence over.
We did it more. So you're just lying.
Like, we just have to sit here and let these people lie to us.
Let these people use bureaucratic doublespeak to just avoid any consequences at all.
I mean, the Republicans weak-kneed, spineless maggots that they are.
They just want to hear that Brian Auten's gotten a slap on the wrist.
Well, he's been demoted, and we decreased his pay by $1,000 a year.
Republicans would be like, oh my god, thank you.
Wow, thank you for doing something to save the FBI. These people need to be tried for treason.
These people are seditious.
This was the coup.
This makes January 6th look like a walk in the park.
What they did behind the scenes to use a corrupt, falsified evidence to get a FISA warrant, to spy on a presidential campaign in an attempt to overthrow the will of the American people.
We don't want discipline.
What else to put it?
unidentified
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
harrison smith
We're going to go back to some of these videos from yesterday's big event.
The finger wagging, the great talking to.
Oh, the FBI is shaking in their boots, folks.
Shaking in their boots. Honestly, it would be fun to be an FBI agent, wouldn't it?
If I was Chris Ray, I'd just go all out.
I'd just, like, wear dark sunglasses.
Just, like, lean way back in my chair.
Just, like, when they say something, just be like, whatever, dude.
unidentified
Just, like, don't care. Like, whatever.
harrison smith
When they're just like, you are a tyrannical madman who's censoring Americans in violation of the First Amendment.
unidentified
Just like, yeah.
harrison smith
Okay. Like, it'd be the same.
It'd be the same outcome. Be the same outcome.
Actually be more entertaining.
I would almost, just out of sheer entertainment factor, prefer if the FBI just like was just petulant, kind of like sarcastic jackasses.
Because nothing annoys me more than the bureaucratic corporate doublespeak.
Nothing is more annoying than people who are just lying to your face, flagrantly committing illegal acts, flagrantly covering up for political purposes, shielding themselves in this, like, well, it is an ongoing investigation.
You know I cannot get into personal matters right now.
Like, just...
Just spit in our faces.
If you're going to metaphorically spit in our faces, just do it.
Just have the respect for the American people just to show us the disdain that you have for us.
Don't try to hide it in like, I wish I could, sir.
But as you know, the processes that we adhere to and we are very careful to report everything.
As you know, I assigned agents to help Mr.
Durham with his report. And I was very...
I think it's very important what he's...
Just... Just go, John Durham was a chump.
I'm in charge. Just...
You guys take your little five minutes to say your little piece.
I'm gonna put these sunglasses on, put an earbud in, go to sleep.
You guys wake me up when it's over, and I can go back to screwing you over and destroying the Constitution right in front of your faces, okay?
Can we do that? Because I'm the FBI. Whatever you say up there, your little dais makes no impact whatsoever on my behavior or my agent's behavior.
Wrap this up quick. I gotta hop on a plane to Geneva to get my orders from the reptilians.
Like, if they were just open about what they were doing...
It would actually be like, okay, good.
Well, at least they're not trying to hide it.
I don't know. Do the Chinese have it better than us?
Would it be better to be in a just like full-on communistic totalitarian state where they're just up front about it?
Because we are in one. There's no difference.
We are in that state.
It's just we have to put up with the act like we're not.
And it's infuriating because it's so dishonest.
It's so deceptive. It's so rhetorically repulsive to have to not just hear these people speak in this self-righteous tone, but then hear the Democrats back them up on it and hear the Republicans say, Vacillate between trying to sound tough and like they're sticking it to him and also, oh, but we are very proud of you, but we do love you very much, sir, but please stop destroying our country now.
Thank you. It's just like, oh, God.
Ugh. It sucks.
This all sucks. Jim Jordan actually made this comparison to Communist China with the FBI. Let's go now to clip number 11.
Here's Representative Jim Jordan accusing the FBI of operating like the Chinese Communist Party.
christopher a wray
Really, any company of any size in China is required by Chinese law to have what they quaintly call a committee.
Which is essentially a cell inside the company whose sole function is to ensure that company's compliance with Chinese Communist Party orthodoxy.
If we tried to install something like that in American companies or if the British tried to do it in British companies or any number of other places, people would go out of their minds, and rightly so.
unidentified
Agreed. Well, thank you.
I'd like to work with you more on that, and I'd yield the balance of my time to the chairman.
Thank you. But that's exactly what you did, and the judge said it last week.
Every week you were meeting with big tech companies saying, hey, look at this.
harrison smith
This violates your policy.
Take this feat of Americans down.
unidentified
You were doing the same darn thing you just described to Chinese about.
harrison smith
You know, the Chinese have the Communist Party apparatus.
They're embedded in the corporation.
Which again, hey, for one thing, at least they're up front about it.
At least they don't try to hide it.
Try to claim that they are the protectors of democracy.
They're just like, no, we're communists and we control the country, so we control your company.
Bing, bang, boom. It's not that complicated.
Oppose us and we'll just destroy your company right now.
We'll just take it from you. Wouldn't that be nice if they were just upfront about it?
In this case, however, we have actually not just one of these tumors embedded within companies...
We have a couple. We have a couple various ones.
So in places like Twitter and Facebook and YouTube, not only do they have a liaison that coordinates with and communicates on a daily, if not hourly basis with the FBI to eliminate dissidents from their platform or silent if not hourly basis with the FBI to eliminate dissidents from their platform or silent stories or suppress stories that are politically That does exist.
But there's also the people who quit the FBI and get a job at big tech the next day and then use their position in that big tech company to exclusively carry out the orders of the FBI within the company.
So not only is there like the connection between the FBI and the social media companies, which, by the way, Chris Wray brags about when he's at the World Economic Forum Davos meeting earlier this year, where he talks about how important it is and how effective and impactful it is to have the cooperation where he talks about how important it is and how effective intimate coordination between the spy state and private companies.
I was one of like Christopher Wray's big talking points.
I'll find the clip.
During the commercial break, I'll show you in the next segment.
So not only are they open about this, the coordination and cooperation, they have cells embedded within these companies of ex-FBI agents, hundreds of them inside Twitter, carrying out the work of the censors.
You also have, in not just the social media companies, but every corporation...
The diversity and inclusion office, the HR office, that exists solely for the purpose that Chris Ray just described.
Having a group of people inside the company whose entire purpose is making sure that the company and all of the employees adhere to the modern orthodoxy.
I mean, what do you think diversity, equity, and inclusion means?
What do you think these offices do all day?
What do you think the people who are employed for hundreds of thousands of dollars do with all of their time?
They aren't making anything. They aren't engineers.
They aren't inventors. They aren't copywriters.
They aren't customer service people.
No, they exist there to be little communist police to make sure that the orthodoxy is being upheld, to insist and provide pressure from within to correspond with and cooperate with the pressure from the advertisers on the outside and all the various nefarious groups putting pressure to insist and provide pressure from within to correspond with and cooperate with the pressure from the advertisers on
I mean, whether you picture it as communist China is whether you picture some dystopian, you know, futuristic world like the hands made tale where like the church has its agents and all the companies.
That exists already in multiple forms right now.
What do you think is behind all of this?
Welcome back, folks.
Coldwarstore.com is where you go to support us.
It is Patriot Pride Month.
Celebrating by giving you the best sales of the year at InfoWarsStore.com.
We're getting up to 60% off plus double Patriot points for Patriot Pride Month.
InfoWarsStore.com. Keep us on the air.
I'm telling you, there's nothing more important now than truly understanding the full scope and scale in a holistic fashion of what is happening across the world, specifically here in America.
InfoWars has been focusing on this for several decades and We've been right the entire time, and now we're seeing it come to fruition in really, personally, I think, devastating and upsetting and sort of terrifying ways.
Okay? So, in the last segment, we heard Christopher Wray just perfectly describe not just the actions of the progressive cult That embeds itself in corporations and then forces the corporations to bend to their will under threat of destruction.
But they have a partner in this with the FBI, as the FBI does the very same thing, and certain corporations that they see as strategically valuable, such as social media companies and media companies.
This is, again, not outside of the designs and strategies and agenda of the World Economic Forum global economy.
Government Great Reset tyrants.
So let's go now to a clip from February of this year.
This is Christopher Wray at the World Economic Forum event in Davos.
Switzerland, describing in no uncertain terms the way that the FBI and other intelligence agencies are very excited about stakeholder capitalism that the World Economic Forum presents, which is, of course, a fancy way of saying neo-feudalism,
that is, neo-fascism, that is, the cooperation and intimate collaboration between the unelected Unaccountable deep state spy apparatus and corporations to destroy your rights and impose their will upon you.
So let's go now to that clip from February of this year.
christopher a wray
And I think the sophistication of the private sector is improving, and particularly important, the level of collaboration between the private sector and the government, especially the FBI, has, I think, made significant strides.
Pretty much every technology we could talk about today, we see both great opportunity but great dangers in the wrong hands.
harrison smith
And of course, in that speech, he goes on to elaborate how specifically the social media companies have been very valuable in this.
This isn't a conspiracy theory.
This is a conspiracy.
This is the people in charge working behind the scenes to destroy your rights, to spread falsehoods, to cover up truths in a top-down fashion from behind the scenes.
If you ask Chris Ray, I'm sure he'd say, well, but the difference is that these are private companies that are choosing to do this with us, which only works if you're dumb and an idiot and don't actually know how things go.
Like, yeah, the Communist Party, again, in China just goes, you will have our people in your company, whether you like it or not.
That's the law. It's happening.
You think Facebook or Twitter could have just slammed the door on the FBI? You think they could have just said, nah, we're not doing it.
We're a private company and we refuse to participate.
You don't think there would have been a massive backlash?
You don't think there would have been then some sort of ADL-sponsored advertiser boycott?
Or even, like, an internal union strike or something where the company gets taken down from the inside by their agents that are already embedded within, willing to act on the orders of their globalist masters.
I mean, obviously, this was not a choice the company was making.
Even if it was... It's like, well, yeah, he did, they did lie, they did violate the First Amendment, they did destroy your freedoms and rig a presidential election, but they wanted to.
It was their choice to do that, so it's okay.
No, obviously it's not okay.
None of this is okay. All of this is a literal existential threat to the survival of the republic as it stands.
And they want to focus on January 6th.
They are focusing on January 6th.
And we'll return to that in just a second.
But in the meantime, let's go now to clip number eight.
This is the FBI director for Christopher Wray sort of accidentally confirming that Joe Biden is under investigation for accepting bribes from Ukraine.
unidentified
Let's watch. Did Joe Biden take payments from Burisma or any other foreign companies as vice president, president, or private citizen Biden?
christopher a wray
As you may know, there is an ongoing investigation being led by the U.S. Attorney in Delaware, Mr.
Weiss, appointed by President Trump in the last administration that our Baltimore field office is working with, and I would refer you to him as to what, if anything, can be shared.
unidentified
So the president is under investigation?
christopher a wray
I'm not going to confirm or speak to who is or isn't under investigation for what.
unidentified
I'm simply going to tell you- So he's not under investigation?
christopher a wray
I didn't say that either.
By longstanding department policy and practice, I'm not going to be confirming or denying who is or isn't under investigation.
harrison smith
Yeah, you kind of did though.
Yeah, but you kind of did actually.
Again, you just don't expect anything to come from this.
The FBI is absolutely out of control.
And again, it's not just... This isn't something intangible.
This isn't something vague or conspiratorial that we have to suppose what's going on behind the scenes.
It's right there in front of your faces.
All of the evidence is there for their corrupt activity.
The entire timeline, we've been watching it unfold from 2016 until today.
The corrupt activities, the covering up of actual crimes, the creation of non-crimes in order to justify spying and falsifying investigations to shut down the duly elected president.
I mean, these are treasonous activities.
This is the literal governance of our country being subverted right in front of our faces and nothing is being done about it.
The most of the Republicans can even muster is to demand that somebody be demoted or censured or somehow get a slap on the wrist.
These people should be in prison for decades for this treasonous activity.
And you can just compare.
You can just compare what the FBI has done to what the victims of the FBI have done.
In other words, the FBI rigged an election in 2020 by suppressing information through social media, violating the First Amendment, rigging an election, destroying any semblance of democracy that we may have left by a coordinated and deceitful action around the Hunter Biden laptop, as well as a number of other things.
They created and used fake evidence from a political campaign to destroy the chances of a rival political opponent from getting elected and then to destroy his entire presidency through the falsified Russiagate investigation.
Just literally destroying the very foundation and structure of our entire government from the Bill of Rights to the separation of powers to the system of checks and balances.
One by one, they are taking a sledgehammer to these pillars, and the whole thing is about to collapse.
Compare that to what somebody like Stuart Rhodes did, where one day in January, he was near the U.S. Capitol and And he also possessed guns hundreds of miles away in a different state.
Which to you is more reflective of a treasonous action?
Of sedition?
The deep state, unelected spy masters?
Openly coordinating with the media and social media and platforms to destroy the duly elected president?
And then to destroy his chances of getting re-elected?
And to disobey his orders, lawfully given?
Or a guy walking around the Capitol grounds not even going into the building during a protest that got a little bit out of hand?
Which to you sounds more like treasonous activity?
Which to you sounds more like sedition?
And if wandering around the Capitol, innocently wandering around the Capitol, gets you 18 years in prison, what does the FBI action deserve?
And we're going to return to that question because it gets worse.
unidentified
Welcome back, folks.
Tennessee, Green.
harrison smith
This third hour, we will be joined by Dorothy Moon, chairman of the Idaho GOP. Chairwoman, I should say, of the Idaho Republican Party.
I'm very excited to talk to her about a number of major stories going on in that very interesting state, Idaho.
unidentified
I want to talk about this story.
it...
harrison smith
Again, I'm sort of at a loss for words here.
There's a certain point where it's just like...
unidentified
You just have to ask...
harrison smith
What? Like, why?
What is happening here?
Why are these people so awful?
What is driving them?
What are they getting out of this?
Why are they doing this to us?
Because again, you can...
Look at everything the FBI has done.
Some of it is sort of intangible.
It's sort of like, well, they were presented evidence, and so they were trying to follow it.
Sure, maybe it wasn't totally up and up, but they still had a duty.
Well, we thought that maybe that...
But in other cases, this DOJ, of which the FBI is a subsidiary, Is destroying the lives of innocent people with a alacrity and a savagery that honestly leaves me speechless.
Again, just think about what the FBI has done just in the last couple years, just what we know undeniably to be factually true without even the shadow of a doubt.
We have the names. We have the dates.
We have the documents. We have the communications.
We have absolutely everything.
Some of it isn't even stuff that they're hiding.
I mean, when you have...
I know we all know this, but it's like you've got...
The Spygate investigation in the first place, the claims of Trump being a Russian agent.
They use that to get a FISA warrant.
They want to spy on him. They think that they can do parallel construction.
So they spy on him for Spygate, assuming that they'll catch him on tape saying something about an illegal action that then they will then charge and ignore the falsified evidence that they used to get him.
So they do a falsified FISA warrant investigation.
To try to destroy the chances of a presidential candidate.
Once he's in office, they ramp up this investigation and actually destroy his presidency to a large part and give the left just infinite ammo to undermine his lawful administration.
Even before that, you have them letting Hillary Clinton off the hook for the document The email server.
You've got them surveilling Catholic churches and saying that they're domestic terrorists, saying that white supremacy is the number one threat, and then actually fabricating and reassigning non-political crimes into the hate crime domestic terror category in order to beef up the numbers to match the perception, the lie that they're selling.
You've got them going undercover on January 6th and causing a lot of the problems there and then refusing to acknowledge or admit it.
But saying, we don't know if there were undercover agents, but also you can't see the footage because of all the undercover agents.
It makes no sense. This is all just obvious right in your face.
You've got the Hunter Biden laptop and them writing the letter saying that it was Russian disinformation and then working within social media to censor that.
They also censored COVID-19 They also worked with a foreign government, the Ukrainian government, to silence critics of the Ukraine-Russia war.
They've kicked down the doors of anti-abortion protesters, fathers of seven with young children pointing guns in their faces to haul him off and try to throw him in jail.
They've arrested 87-year-old Jewish women outside of abortion centers praying for the babies.
I mean, they are on a war path.
They are ruthlessly...
Taking a jackhammer to every foundation of this country that has upheld us for the last several hundred years.
From the highest office of the presidency to the lowest street activists, they are on the hunt for anyone who opposes them, and they were eradicating them with a terrifying efficiency.
Using January 6th as a honeypot with the undercover agents inside, with the cooperation of the Capitol Police, removing barriers and letting people in, purposefully withholding backup so that the police would be outnumbered by a million people and be impossible to retain them, opening up the doors from the inside, having police stand at the doors and usher people inside.
A peaceful protest.
They got out of hand for a couple hours.
At the end of it, five protesters were murdered, some in cold blood at point-blank range, by the police themselves.
Ruthless, horrifying, unacceptable.
It's the end of our country.
This is the end of democracy.
This is the end of the republic.
This is it. We are watching it in real time burn around us.
Again, some of these things are theoretical, intangible, right?
Would Hunter Biden's laptop led to the presidency going to Donald Trump?
We don't really know. We can't go back in time and undo it, but maybe we don't.
Oh, by the way, also, did I mention that the FBI scuttled all of the investigations into the voter fraud?
Did I mention that, that we had people with Lawful affidavits explaining exactly how they witnessed or were unwittingly a participant in this robbing of the election and that Bill Barr at the DOJ and his FBI counterparts took control of that investigation and then destroyed it.
Did we mention that? Or the Hunter Biden Burisma investigation?
That even the Attorney General in Delaware, the prosecutor in Delaware, said he didn't have control over and was squashed by the FBI who refused to allow him to bring the federal charges that would have been applicable to the crimes that Hunter Biden committed.
I mean, the list of FBI malfeasance It's almost unending.
This is only the stuff that we know beyond a shadow of a doubt.
This is not speculation.
Everything I've just listed is provably true beyond any shadow of a doubt.
The left doesn't care. The media doesn't care.
The FBI doesn't care. Congress seems impotent to do anything about it.
And you know what they're doing? They're spending their time and energy...
Trying to put Stuart Rhodes, leader of the Oath Keepers, in jail for longer than the 18 years he's already been sentenced.
Stuart Rhodes never went in the Capitol, never attacked anybody, never told anybody to attack anybody, never told anybody to go into the Capitol, had no weapons on him or even in the same city or state that the protest took place.
Never assaulted a police officer.
Never told anybody to assault a police officer.
Never was aware of anybody assaulting a police officer.
He did nothing to anyone.
Nobody was victimized by Stuart Rhodes.
Nobody was injured or harmed in the slightest by Stuart Rhodes.
If Stuart Rhodes was completely absent on January 6th, the entire day would have gone exactly as it went.
He had no impact on the millions of people...
Rushing into the Capitol while he was nowhere near them.
He had no impact on people who were in his same organization without orders and without direction going into the Capitol to also not commit any crimes and not commit any violence.
But they wanted to make an example out of Stuart Rhodes.
They wanted a scalp to hang on the wall as a symbol to everybody else.
So they've charged him and succeeded in sentencing him to 18 years in prison.
18 years.
It'll be 2040 by the time he sees the sun again.
It'll be 1840 if the earth even makes it that long before he can hug his kids.
He did nothing to anybody.
All the evidence they have consists entirely of text messages, where he uses a little bit salty language, and by getting people who are in his organization, who did commit crime, who did assault police officers, going to them and saying, hey, we know you assaulted police officers.
We could send you away for 100 years, but you give us Stuart Rhodes on a silver platter, and we'll make sure that you get treated nicely.
That's the evidence that they had.
He coerced testimony from other people in his organization and text messages where they took everything out of context, where he's saying, if we don't solve this, there will be a civil war.
In other words, if we don't get a political solution to this issue, it's going to keep spiraling out of control and going to be really bad.
And they say, see, he's calling for civil war.
You know all of this. He's been sentenced to 18 years, and now the Justice Department is appealing that prison sentence Demanding that he be sentenced to the full 25-year prison sentence that they wanted in the first base.
They're actually appealing the 18-year sentence saying it's not long enough.
These people are sick.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Third hour of American Journal has begun here on Infowars.com, banned.video.
Please support us by going to Infowarsstore.com.
That is the only way. We have any support whatsoever.
It keeps us free.
It keeps us independent. It keeps us on the air and in the fight against an ever and increasingly tyrannical system of global, corporate, governmental, unified control.
Entering very, very treacherous waters here.
We're going to expand out our view a little bit to the global situation now.
Yesterday we showed you a video in the EU Parliament of a man really laying into the EU and explaining to them that they are not a democratic organization.
Farthest thing from it, explaining to them that they are, in fact, a tyrannical group of bureaucrats who imposed their will on an unwilling populace.
He wasn't very popular after that speech, but...
People who tell the truth aren't popular with liars.
I don't know what to tell you about that.
We have another video, again from the EU, again from the EU today, this time exposing the dishonest framing and lie that surrounds the NATO organization.
Here is, again, a woman at the EU explaining that it is high time to dissolve the murderous military pact known as NATO. Let's watch.
Clip 10. She says, Wasn't it NATO that waged war in Afghanistan for 20 years with hundreds of thousands of civilian deaths and war crimes?
Is all of this called defense?
Second myth, NATO is an alliance of democracies and the rule of law.
This is already historically an outright lie.
We only need to recall NATO members Portugal with the fascist Salazar regime and its brutal colonial wars in Africa.
The illegal wars of the US and its allies have cost the lives of 4.5 million people over the last 20 years alone, according to the analysis of the renowned Brown University in the US. Is this what a commitment to international law looks like?
Third myth, that NATO defends human rights.
And this, while in Guantanamo, detainees continue to be tortured.
Or while journalist Julian Assange is facing 175 years in prison in the U.S. for making public war crimes committed by NATO member U.S. It couldn't get any more mendacious than this.
The truth is simple.
Whoever is a member of NATO participates in a warfare alliance that aims at expansion and tramples on international law and human rights.
Whoever is a member of NATO loses his domestic democratic sovereignty because it is always the U.S. that hegemonically enforces its interests.
And whoever is a member of NATO sacrifices the social security of his population by the massive policy of high armament.
Every fifth child in our country is now poor, but the German military budget grows and grows.
unidentified
This is a disgrace.
harrison smith
It's high time to dissolve this murderous military pact.
After 78 years, it's time for the U.S. to withdraw its troops, including nuclear weapons, from Germany.
What we need is peace, not NATO. She's right, and it just sucks that it's not us doing it either.
None of that was done for our benefit.
You think people are being tortured in Guantanamo to protect us, the American people?
You think we killed four and a half million people?
Are we better for it? If you'd kill that four and a half million people, you'd have something to show for it.
We have nothing. Alright folks, welcome back to the show.
This is the American Journal. I am your host Harrison Smith, Infowars.com, Band.video.
Very happy to welcome my guest Dorothy Moon.
She is the chairwoman of the Idaho Republican Party and has served three terms in the Idaho legislature as state representative for District 8 where she earned the Idaho GOP Outstanding Republican Legislator Award.
Dorothy's career in public service is focused on the advancement of individual liberties and reducing the size and scope of government.
Her website is DorothyMoon.com, and you can find her on Facebook at Dorothy Moon for Idaho.
Welcome to the show, and thanks for coming on, Ms.
unidentified
Moon. Thank you, Harrison, for having me.
harrison smith
I appreciate it. Well, I'm very happy to have you on specifically to talk about this story, which sort of dovetails into everything we've been talking about on the show today.
We're talking a lot about FBI corruption, the narrative of which we've been starting about 2016.
But this is a really incredible story from the Idaho Tribune.
The title is this.
Exclusive bombshell new whistleblower document reveals multi-agency criminal conspiracy to spy on and entrap law-abiding Americans.
Well, What's this about?
And I understand this goes back to 2014 and the Bundy standoff situation.
What's been uncovered recently?
unidentified
Well, recently, as far as the Bundy situation goes, is Putin 2.
So the whistleblower who originally more or less got these gentlemen exonerated who were incarcerated for nearly two years awaiting trial and not being able to go out and defend themselves.
And work with their attorneys to work with them more deeply to get them out of jail.
The families, of course, had to provide for their families by working or getting help and donations.
So it's just a horrible deal.
But this Wooten is the one who really brought out the information in the federal courtroom.
And then there was this Wooten 2, which has been under wraps.
It's a very lengthy document.
I think the detainees are looking at what they're going to do with this information.
But it is frightening to know that the collaboration, the scriptwriting that these agencies have done to harm American citizens is alarming.
harrison smith
Yeah, and of course we see it continue today with the way that they are hunting down patriotic Americans who maybe happened to get wrapped up in a protest that got out of hand or, you know, something else.
People that don't actually represent a threat to either their fellow Americans or the American system as a whole, and yet they're being treated literally like Al-Qaeda, like ISIS cells in our country.
I mean, it's completely insane.
Do you think that Idaho in particular has been targeted for this type of action?
Because what we're seeing in some of these documents, I hope this isn't going on everywhere.
I mean, why were they so insistent on getting the Bundys?
They're willing to make such absurd claims and take such measures.
unidentified
Well, it all comes down to the federal land issues.
And so you have the U.S. Forest Service and the BLM who actually manage 63 or mismanage, however you want to look at it, 63% of Idaho land.
When I was a legislator, I represented District 8.
I had 16,000 square miles in very rural Idaho.
So we would see U.S. Forest Service try to pull people over for speeding on a state highway.
We had grazing allotments reduced.
If a fire came close to their area, they just made the rancher take their cows off of the entire allotment.
So as a legislator, I saw how The BLM and the Forest Service were infringing on the rights of my district and my constituency.
The issue with the Bundys is that two of them were in my district.
Ammon Bundy lived in Emmett, which is in Jim County, and Scott Drexler lived in Custer County, which was also part of my district.
So I was pretty much involved because the gentlemen of the 19 total incarcerated in Nevada were citizens of Idaho.
There were three other ones.
Also, so that we had five Idahoans that were incarcerated.
I believe they should not have been detained.
They should have been released until there was a trial.
So, again, they could have prepared better and not been locked up for that amount of time.
I mean, the hardened criminals aren't even held for two years and denied their freedoms and liberties until they go to trial.
So you're literally guilty and had to prove yourself innocent.
That is not due process in the United States.
So, anyway, that's how I became involved years ago.
And the Wooten letter coming out, this Wooten 2, it does reveal how our federal government—we should not live in fear of our federal government.
But, you know, here in Idaho, we are such an expansive geographically, as our state is.
A lot of mountains, a lot of small communities.
And I don't know why they look at Idaho, because we are a bastion of liberty and freedom.
And we do want — you know, we're a Second Amendment rights state.
We love to carry our guns.
We have — you know, a lot of people hunt.
We have grizzly bears and wolves here.
Of course you want to protect your family.
So it's a given that we are a very self-sufficient type of people here, and we want the federal government out of our lives, and maybe that's where the angst comes from.
harrison smith
Yeah, or maybe the embarrassment that the federal government feels at some of the images that we've been playing on screen here, showing them backing down against peaceful resistance.
The citizens coming together to protect and support one another, no shot being fired, but just by sheer showing up in force of numbers on horses and waving flags, actually forcing the federal government to back down.
I mean, there's no way they're just going to Hang their hat in shame and take it on the chin here.
And I wonder if that has something to do with it.
Again, from this article from the Idaho Tribune, the document, which is being called Wooten 2, expands on allegations made in an 18-page memo and details the tactics used not only against Bundy Ranch protesters, but also outlines the ongoing warrantless Military-style surveillance operations and social media misinformation campaigns being conducted by the federal government against U.S. citizens.
So this is still going on to this day, this level of surveillance and misinformation campaigns and intervention against the people of Idaho.
Is that right? That's correct.
unidentified
And, you know, remember on the Bundys, their issue down in Arizona was the fact of the grazing allotments.
And they were saying that they did not pay their appropriate grazing allotment.
They were just running their cattle on the land for free at no benefit to the American citizens.
Public lands, we all own them.
So anyhow, you know, the main issue again is that once they've lost Once the charges were dismissed, they should have just walked away.
The federal government should have walked away, but that isn't what happens.
Just like the trial.
So the first trial was not the top tier of defendants.
The first trial was held, and then a lot of them, they weren't convicted.
So what do they do? They put them in a second trial to go after them again.
And at a cost of a taxpayer of almost a quarter of a million dollars each, I sat in the courtroom a few times to see what was going on, and it was just unbelievable.
And the Judge Navarro had no choice but to dismiss the case because of the malfeasance on behalf of the BLM and their special agents.
harrison smith
Bureau of Land Management, just not to get confused with those acronyms.
Yeah, absolutely. And what about this misinformation campaign?
Because this has so many different layers of the trials and the surveillance and investigation.
But the misinformation campaign, this article says, was similar to a military operation and intelligence gathering operation and was in regard to constitutionally protected First Amendment activities and akin to the intelligence preparation of the battlefield.
So, I mean, this was the...
Federal American government treating its own citizens like enemies on the battlefield and unleashing all of their warfare capabilities against them.
Why? I mean, what did they do?
And again, why is it so important to them?
It just seems like such an overreaction to me.
unidentified
Well, it's perception.
The federal government wants to make it look like they're there to protect the American people from someone grazing cattle in the middle of a desert where there's hardly any grass.
And I mean, in an area, an area that most people would not even attempt to make a livelihood at ranching.
So the federal government didn't want the perception that they were attacking American citizens when in essence, that's what was happening.
harrison smith
That's exactly what was going on.
We're going to be back on the other side to talk more with Dorothy Moon.
She is the chairwoman of the Idaho Republican Party.
She served three terms in the Idaho legislature.
You can find her website at DorothyMoon.com.
And again, the article that we're discussing is from the Idaho Tribune.
And there's text messages that have been released from a federal agent.
And they say things like, you'd think they were taking down some heavily armed cult that was enslaving children and making drugs.
That's the way they were treating American citizens for peacefully and lawfully asserting their constitutionally protected rights.
It's been going on for a while, folks.
This didn't start in 2016 with Donald Trump.
It's been going on for a while.
It's just ramped up since then.
We'll discuss more on the other side with Dorothy Moon.
Alright, welcome back. Ladies and gentlemen, this is the American Journal.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
My guest is Dorothy Moon.
She is the chairwoman of the Idaho Republican Party.
Her website is DorothyMoon.com and you can find her on Facebook at Dorothy Moon for Idaho.
Still a lot to talk about. This will be our last segment with her, so we'll try to get it all in here.
We began by discussing this article.
Bombshell new whistleblower document reveals multi-agency criminal conspiracy to spy on and entrap law-abiding Americans.
This dates all the way back to 2014 and the Bundy Ranch standoff.
It includes the FBI and the Bureau of Land Management and a number of other nefarious organizations working against the American people.
But just to expand it out a little bit, I because I follow the Idaho Tribune on Twitter, Idaho is sort of constantly in my awareness.
So, you know, it's constantly in my feed and there's some very interesting things going on in Idaho.
One thing I've noticed is that the left really doesn't like Idaho and they really want Idaho to be different than what it is now.
and they're doing everything they can to try to bring that change about So it's sort of become a quiet, you know, it doesn't quite have the fanfare that something like California or Florida has, but it's become a real battlefield in the national struggle for identity.
Why is Idaho become that, and what are some of the effects that you're seeing as an elected representative there?
How is this manifesting in Idaho politics?
unidentified
Well, it's really sad.
We have an unbelievable amount of Californians and folks from Oregon and Washington moving to Idaho because they're refugees from their states that have gone down the tubes because of the Democrat policies and the woke corporatism there.
They move here and they think they're coming to a state that is very conservative, and that isn't really the truth.
Sadly, we have, you know, grocery sales tax exemption.
We can't get rid of porn in libraries.
Libraries, public or school.
We can't get an educational savings account bill passed.
So even though we claim to be a conservative state, we are really lacking on getting the bills that we need to protect the citizens of this state and keep our conservative values alive.
So that's a real problem.
And we have definitely grown the grassroots in the Republican Party because a lot of these Californians now are here and Americans and Washingtonians.
And I'm telling you, they are activated.
So the grassroots in this state, this party is run by the people.
And I made that clear when I became chair a year ago.
And I don't work for the ivory tower.
I don't take my orders from any of the elected officials statewide.
So I'm just saying things have changed and they don't like it.
But that's what we have to get back to.
The Republican Party has faltered.
We haven't been able to move the ball for the issues to protect not just Idaho, but all states and the country in general.
So we have got to get the message.
We are run by the grassroots, and we have to adhere to our Republican platform and honor the Constitution.
And I think one of the biggest issues with COVID and the COVID lockdowns and everything that we experienced here in Idaho It was unacceptable.
We were on lockdown longer than any other Republican state in the union.
harrison smith
Right, and I think one of the main issues, as I understand it, is that divide between the establishment and the grassroots.
That Idaho has been nominally Republican, but the Republicans aren't acting like it.
And now you have this sort of nascent bottom-up movement of true Republicans and true conservatives, real America firsters, and liberty lovers actually getting into power, getting into office, and forcing that change and really being aggressive in Idaho politics against and forcing that change and really being aggressive in Idaho politics against both the left and the establishment useless collaborator Republicans, which I think is
Can you speak a little bit to that, the divide in Idaho between the establishment Republicans and sort of the grassroots that I feel like you sort of represent more?
unidentified
Well, you know, the issue is that, you know, we have a lot of large corporations in this state, and most of them, their founding was very conservative.
You know, we have a lot of mining industry, logging is huge, and ranching.
And those original industries that used to be the main promoter of our economic wills are now being taken over by Micron, Meta.
So we have a lot of new woke corporatists coming in.
And that's very alarming.
In fact, we had a drag queen show on 9-11 in front of our beautiful capital in Boise.
And if you were to see who all the sponsors were, it was alarming.
Not just corporations, but also some government agencies here in Idaho.
We sounded the alarm, and that's when it was very obvious.
How many people that have moved here are not going to move here from California and invest everything they have to settle and finish out their lives in this beautiful state to see it fall into the hands of the far left?
So the fight is on. As I said, the Democrats have got their eyes on here, just like Colorado.
The Rocky Mountain Heist playbook is in play right now.
harrison smith
Yeah, well, and what I like about Idaho is, from what I can see, you guys aren't taking it lying down.
I mean, there's actually a really big fight going on right now, and you guys have had some pretty impressive victories.
I know we don't have too much time, but can you tell me about things like the ranked choice voting, and I understand there's a referendum, or I'm not using the right word, but dissolving the FBI has been bandied about, that phrase.
Can you tell me a little bit about that?
unidentified
Sure. So we just had our summer meeting in Chalice, Idaho, in the middle of the mountains, which they didn't like that either.
But anyway, it was a fun event.
It was great. And the resolution on the FBI was more or less that if the FBI is going to continue to work against American citizens and violate their constitutional rights, they need to dissolve.
Again, we have 63 percent of our lands are federal lands.
So we're kind of held hostage here in some places.
And sometimes the heavy hand of these agencies and their law enforcement, it's too much.
And I think in this resolution it lists out numerous atrocities that have occurred over time by the Bureau of Land Management.
Make sure I say that. That's what we're calling for.
The letters have gone out to our congressional delegation asking them to please—either they—there's a lot more transparency in the Bureau of Land Management, and that we can understand how they're working and not that they're working in the shadows to hurt American citizens.
harrison smith
Yeah, so what about ranked choice voting really quick?
I understand this is a big issue in places like Idaho and Colorado as well.
Ranked choice voting, I'm a little suspicious of it.
What's the Idaho GOP doing on that front?
unidentified
Well, we're very suspicious of it.
So is the RNC, the Republican National Committee.
We passed a resolution in January to prohibit ranked choice voting in the state of Idaho.
The party did. We got it to our legislators.
They ran it through. We got the legislation through along.
Republicans all voted for it, and then our Republican governor signed it.
However, now the Democrats, though, uh-oh, we're the first ones in the United States to prohibit ranked-choice voting.
This is the scheme that kept Sarah Palin from becoming Alaska's Congresswoman.
This is the scheme that has taken over Colorado.
So this has been implemented in states, and every one of them have fallen to Democratic hands within two years.
The Democrats know how to use it.
So you don't get your first choice.
It's more than likely going to move to a very liberal Republican or moderate Republican instead of a true conservative Republican when you put Democrats and Republicans against each other and you have to pick your first, second, third, fourth, however many selections you have.
It is a scheme.
You cannot even explain it within 15-20 minutes for people to understand it.
The idea of continually trying to confuse the American electorate and then they're just going to give up voting and then the Democrats win.
That's the whole idea.
But we did pass the law and now the Democrats are pushing an initiative.
To change our constitution, to open our primaries.
harrison smith
Oh my gosh.
Yeah, that's what our voting system needs.
A little bit more confusion and uncertainty.
No, it's totally absurd. So you're having major victories.
It's DorothyMoon.com.
Dorothy Moon for Idaho on Facebook.
Chairwoman of the Idaho Republican Party.
Thank you so much for coming on, Ms.
Moon. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Two more segments left in today's show.
Sorry I haven't opened up the phone lines yet today.
I think I'll keep them close.
I have two more stories to cover.
We'll cover the first one, NATO, in the first segment.
And then we'll get to the second one, which is the new COVID revelations in the last segment.
I'll make up for it by opening up the phone lines nice and early tomorrow morning.
We'll have an open line Friday where we'll be able to take all of your calls and talk about all of the incredible stories from this week.
It's my fault, you know, trying to balance and juggle all of this stuff on top of being a bit under the weather, on top of having children that are under the weather, on top of expanding and transforming the info war in a myriad of different ways.
You've probably seen it.
We are really ramping up our social media game right now, getting just millions upon millions of views.
Millions of views we don't even know we're getting sometimes.
On TikTok and some other account has uploaded a video of ours that has several million views.
Like, we don't even realize it.
But, you know, hopefully people are getting the message.
Hopefully they can find their way to Infowars.com to see the stories and watch the shows and hopefully go to Infowarsstore.com and support us.
But regardless, the job is done once the information is out there.
I mean, that's the point of it. And so we're really having massive success on that.
But that takes a lot of time and effort that our crew is dedicating to it.
Obviously, really everyone at Infowars, I feel like, is on this push.
Owen, of course, streaming after hours on his own site and also making some pretty accurate predictions, actually.
Yesterday, I saw a video of his.
Basically saying we're never going to find out who had the cocaine in the White House.
Just making that guess.
Just saying we're never going to find out.
They're never going to tell us. And now as of, let's see, less than an hour ago, Edward Zoll on Twitter wrote, Breaking Now, White House cocaine investigation is over and no suspect can be identified.
Given that the most secure facility on earth with cameras and badge reader access panels everywhere, do you think this is true?
So just pointing out that, you know, once again, InfoWars tomorrow's news today.
In this case, credit goes to Owen Schroer for predicting that outcome to the cocaine in the White House scandal that will be swept under the rug and completely forgot about within a week or two.
But, like, this is, it's...
It's because this isn't a job for us.
This isn't something we just clock in and clock out and do the bare minimum like so many people do with their jobs.
I mean, for us, this really is a mission.
This really is a lifestyle. This really is something that we aren't looking for an excuse not to do our job, which is how I feel.
You know, waking up in the morning, you can probably hear it.
I just still have a stuffy nose. I'm not 100%.
I need to be taking more vitamin and mineral fusion.
I need to be taking more advantage of our supplements.
I haven't been keeping up on that.
That's my fault, but I'll probably stop by the...
Secret stash we have here and grab some supplements to try to just get over this persistent.
But hey, this is what happens when you have preschoolers and they're around a lot of friends and those friends are sick.
You get sick. A little summer cold.
But, you know, for all my life, before I worked at Infowars...
If I had an excuse, if I could go, hey, listen to my voice.
I'm really sick. I can't come in today.
I mean, that's like, yes, yes, I'm sick.
I don't have to go into work.
It's the opposite here.
It's like, dang it, I'm sick.
I got to get into work, though, but I got to keep going.
We got to do this.
We got to win the info war.
So, I mean, hopefully you can support us in this mission.
Hopefully you understand the intensity with which we do everything here at InfoWars, the growth that's happening behind the scenes, the changing with the times, and again, just getting back in the action after what feels like about a year of just not being able to go full speed, not being able to just focus entirely on the InfoWars with all the lawsuits and everything distracting us.
Again, it's not our fault.
It's just we have to deal with it.
But now is the time. Things are increasingly dangerous, increasingly tyrannical.
Things are speeding up.
2024 is coming faster than we know, and it really is important if we want what I hope we all want, which is a peaceful, political, electoral solution to the problems that we're experiencing right now.
This is game time.
This is the time that we need to be focusing and to be expanding in these ways.
So we are doing it. We are all in in this mission.
It's win or lose for us.
There's no backing down or folding at this point.
So I hope you can support us in this by going to InfoWarsStore.com.
We will continue to do the...
We'll continue to do our part, and we just hope that you continue to do yours in spreading this information, helping us get the information out, telling us the information we need to know, being an integral and all-important part of this Infowar.
And, of course, going to InfowarStore.com and providing the funding that we need to prosecute this information war.
So, thank you so much for everything that you do, and I hope that we can do enough to To rescue this world from the clutches of the globalists.
Now, in that vein, there have been some very interesting developments in the NATO meeting in Vilnius, Lithuania, over the last couple days.
None of them good.
None of them positive developments.
Although, maybe that's not true.
After all, there has been some little bit of friction, little bit of the attitude of people getting sick of Zelenskyy.
Being a permanent charity case.
Dressing like a janitor.
And demanding more and more dangerous weapons.
From Matt Nilsen on...
Twitter says, One gets the impression that they are really preparing for a war with the Russian Federation, hoping that something will happen to the nuclear triad.
A very dangerous game.
A million soldiers from NATO now array themselves against Russia, just waiting for the green light to launch World War III. For, again, no discernible purpose as the excuses that they use to justify this constant aggression, constant ramping up of political violence, support democracy.
This just doesn't exist.
Doesn't exist in Ukraine. Doesn't really exist in Europe.
Just about every major political policy at this point brings misery and chaos to the people that it's supposed to serve and is entirely coordinated in a top-down fashion by a very tiny group of elite at the World Economic Forum and other major banking combines.
NATO says that Ukraine will no doubt join alliance when the war with Russia ends.
That's what Lloyd Austin, the U.S. Defense Secretary, told CNN on Thursday.
There's no doubt that Ukraine will become part of NATO after Russia's war against the country ends.
Well, that's nice, isn't it?
Isn't that nice? I mean, it does kind of, I don't know if you thought about this, but justify Russia's actions, right?
The whole point was that the expansion of NATO was in violation of treaties that had been signed and agreements that had been made, promising not to encroach further on Russian territory.
And yet you have persistently done just that.
And it was Russia's concern that Ukraine would fall into the hands of its geopolitical enemies and NATO, which is why they took the action that they took.
So you are kind of confirming what the Russians were using to justify their military action.
So that's kind of interesting.
But again, they haven't even offered a reasoning as to why we should be putting our lives on the line.
our money on the line, or even our reputation on the line to support Volodymyr Zelenskyy But I guess we're doing it.
I guess that's another aspect of democracy.
You don't explain it to the people.
You don't ask the people what they want to do.
You don't try to keep your policies within the realm of things that your constituents approve of and support.
You just do whatever the hell you want and then you manipulate the population through the media to support you in your suicidal warmongering.
We'll be right back on the other side to talk more about it.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
NATO is not quite the love fest that they may have wanted it to be.
We'll get into why in just a second, but before we do that, let's emphasize the fact that the things they do agree on are lies.
Isn't that interesting? Lies like democracy, free speech, right?
They claim to represent peace and prosperity and freedom and gay sex and free speech and democracy and liberalism.
I mean, that's what they're all about, right?
Except obviously not.
Obviously, it's their way or the highway.
Obviously, NATO has been a primary mover in the creation and exacerbation of dozens of wars over the last several decades.
According to the woman we saw speak earlier, according to a Brown University study, over 4 million people dead because of actions that NATO has taken.
Now, a lot of this is blamed, rightfully so, on the American government, but by...
The American people.
What have we gained from this?
What have we earned from this?
Was it worth it to kill four million people?
Well, in the ensuing several years, our country has been invaded by foreigners.
Our prosperity is collapsing.
Inflation is out of control.
People can hardly afford to put food on their table.
The places that we bombed and invaded and instigated violence in have We're good to go.
Probably made a bunch of money out of it.
Probably all the weapons being sold has filled somebody's coffers.
But overall, we have been nothing but a useful tool for these scumbags, these connivers, these warmongering psychopaths who have killed literally millions of people.
And then we get the blame.
We don't get any of the benefit, but we certainly take the blame, and we certainly take a reputational hit.
Now people around the world hate us, and lucky for the bankers, they have China on the rise, ready to take our spot as the benevolent instigators of geopolitical changes.
So we're going to get screwed.
We have been screwed.
We are slated for absolute destruction.
And none of this has benefited the American people whatsoever, and yet we've been led down this path by deception, by coordinated actions between the media, the establishment, academia, and their bootlicking foot soldiers, courtesy of the WEF, social media and everything else.
And if you really look at it, I mean...
The numbers alone expose what a blatant deception so much of the talk about liberalism truly is.
This video went viral about five months ago.
I can't think of this guy's name.
You don't remember what this guy's name was?
He did a speech about being woke and had some 15 minutes of internet fame, but he points out That in Russia 400 people in a single year were arrested for things that they said on social media in that same time period 3,300 people in the UK were arrested for things they said on social media.
So if the whole point of NATO getting us into a nuclear conflict with Russia was a fight between liberalism and autocracy, a little bit weird that there's about 10 times as much tyrannical anti-free speech arrest taking place in the UK... Then took place in Russia,
a much larger and more populous country than UK. So, I mean, even the populations, and maybe it's 20, 30, 40 times higher than Russia in a per-population basis.
So NATO's having a little bit of trouble.
On top of that, you've got EU Commissioner Thierry Breton, we covered this yesterday, warning social media companies to turn up the dial on censorship or else...
Yes, if you don't submit to the demands of the centralized global government, then your company will be raided by French special forces and taken over.
You know, democracy.
You know, liberalism and democracy and freedom, the things we're fighting for.
Also, Ukraine canceled the elections.
Also, you're getting 15-minute cities and millions of migrants, and they're shutting your farms down and eliminating your industrial capabilities and eliminating your ability to produce energy by yourself and quite literally orchestrating your downfall into and they're shutting your farms down and eliminating your industrial capabilities and eliminating Despite widespread and majority opposition to these moves, they're doing it anyway because democracy, obviously.
So that's just to lay the groundwork for you.
Remind you that what NATO claims to represent could not be farther from the truth.
It's a pack of liars and thieves and scoundrels and warmongers and mass murderers.
unidentified
Thank you.
harrison smith
Just so we're clear. UK defense minister is actually pushing back on the endless...
unidentified
I don't even know how to put it.
harrison smith
The endless gifts being given to Ukraine.
Ukraine defense minister says what everyone is thinking.
We are not an Amazon delivery service for weapons to Ukraine.
Fans of the never-ending current thing are unhappy about the off-the-cuff comments made by British Defense Minister Ben Wallace, who was overheard at the NATO summit in Lithuania, telling the press that he'd warned Ukraine it should stop treating the UK like an Amazon delivery service for weapons.
Hilarious and true. And I'm not sure if he expressed this to Zelensky, but Zelensky was certainly there.
That is a little bit of what Zelensky reminds me of, right?
Yeah. When I order something online, if it doesn't show up right away, you know, no big deal.
We'll wait. Things get lost in transition.
You know, it's something that happens.
But Zelensky's the type of guy that, like, he'll order something from Amazon.
If there's any delay, he's on the phone with Amazon.
He's talking to their manager.
He's demanding some sort of compensation for the suffering that he's gone through for having to wait a day longer for his pink fuzzy slippers or whatever the heck.
He's ordering, right? It's just...
I guess the point I'm making is he's a bad, unpleasant guy that we shouldn't give anything to.
I don't know if I need to make that.
You can look at his face. Incredible, isn't it?
Meanwhile, this is how the overall meeting in Vilnius is being treated.
We have this story from Infowars.
War effort in shambles as hawks turn on each other at NATO summit.
Apparently, even the mainstream media agrees with our assessment that the Ukrainian leader is having a tantrum as he complains about the weak and absurd NATO stance on Ukraine's membership.
The blistering tweet he issued in English while en route to Lithuania exposed cracks in the alliance as Bloomberg highlights in the opening of a revealing Wednesday piece where they say Volodymyr Zelensky was running hot ahead of his sit down with NATO leaders on Tuesday evening.
The Ukrainian president had been angered earlier in the day by what he said was an absurd reluctance to give his country a clear timeline on membership.
That outburst in turn riled the partners who have funneled billions of dollars You can call it attack.
You can call it whining and bitching and complaining.
Ingratitude. Just general peevishness.
David Sachs reports on Twitter, a fraught meeting in Vilnius.
Despite Biden's best efforts to put a happy face on it, Vilnius will be remembered as the NATO summit where tensions boiled over.
Zelensky denounced the alliance's admission policy as absurd and disrespectful.
UK Secretary of Defense Ben Wallace chastised Zelensky for ingratitude.
Lindsey Graham attacked the Biden administration for weakness.
Ben Hodges criticized Jake Sullivan for lack of strategic bravery.
Even NAFO mascot Adam Kinzinger.
Apparently NAFO is some sort of really cringy forced meme where it's people that love NATO. They call themselves the North Atlantic Fellas organization or something.
Hashtag fellas. It really is like the most like Reddit atheist fedora tipping cringe.
It actually makes me uncomfortable to even talk about, but it's Adam Kinzinger for you.
But apparently he's no longer a fella.
The optics were even harsher than the words, with NATO elites turning their backs on a frustrated Zelensky.
Biden's assurance that Zelensky is stuck with the U.S. may come as cold comfort to both nations now that the Ukrainian counteroffensive has failed to meet expectations.
Huge amounts of expensive Western armor lays in ruins on the battlefield, smoldering.
Ukraine casualties are horrific, and the U.S. has run out of 155 millimeter artery shells to give, forcing Americans to debase itself by sending cluster bombs.
The war effort is increasingly a shambles and the war party is starting to turn on one another.
Maybe we will be saved after all.
Maybe the world will be rescued from the brink of nuclear annihilation by the sheer ineptitude and just personality of the NATO members.
Maybe their own Sick personalities will get in the way of their desperate desire to kill millions in a nuclear hellfire.
We can only hope, folks.
We'll continue to cover it here on InfoWars, InfoWarsStore.com, where you go to support us.
Stay tuned. The Alex Jones Show begins in 90 seconds.
alex jones
Don't go anywhere. Yeah, they have control of the central banks.
They have a lot of power, but they can be defeated.
But some of their operations are going to take decades to stop.
But one thing you can do right now is take control of your body and your family's body by purifying the water that you drink and that you cook with.
And you do it with the highest quality gravity fed filter out there.
This thing does 10,000 gallons.
You can sit there and put hundreds of gallons through it a day.
It purifies very quickly and it cuts out thousands of chemicals to non-detectable levels.
This is what I use, which my family uses.
It's the very best system out there for the lowest price.
For a limited time, 10% off on top of that exclusively.
At Infowarsstore.com on the Alexa Pure water filtration system in stock and replacement filters for folks that need those in stock.
Get it today and it funds the Infowar.
Don't procrastinate. This is one of the main areas we can take control of our lives and stop the globalists from hitting us with poison that they allow in the water supply.
Export Selection