Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 19, 2023 - American Journal - Harrison Smith

01:50:02

The American Journal Full Show 1-19-23

Source

Participants

Main voices

harrison smith

01:21:06

Appearances

klaus schwab

01:32

Clips

alex jones

00:01

anthony fauci

00:20

antonio guterres

00:20

barack obama

00:47

benjamin netanyahu

00:04

christopher a wray

00:27

john oliver

00:03

stephane bancel

00:55

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		This is the American Journal.
		I am your host, Harrison Smith.
		Very big show we have for you today.
		So many videos from the World Economic Forum.
		We'll be talking about the war in Ukraine.
		A bunch of stuff coming out about COVID as well.
		Very big show. Your phone calls as well as a filmmaker's guest in the third hour.
		But first, I want to go to this video.
		It's Rebel News' Ezra Levant, who was on our show, was it yesterday or the day before?
		He actually was able to confront the CEO of Pfizer, Albert Borla, on the streets of Davos, Switzerland.
		Let's watch. Mr.
unidentified		Borla, can I ask you, when did you know that the vaccines didn't stop transmission?
		How long did you know that without saying it publicly?
		Thank you very much. Why won't you answer that question?
		I mean, we now know that the vaccines didn't stop transmission, but why did you keep it secret?
		You said it was 100% effective, then 90%, then 80%, then 70%.
		But we now know that the vaccines do not stop transmission.
		Why did you keep that secret?
		Have a nice day. I won't have a nice day until I know the answer.
		Why did you keep it a secret that your vaccine did not stop transmission?
		Is it time to apologise to the world, sir?
		To give refunds back to the countries that poured all their money into your vaccine that doesn't work, your ineffective vaccine?
		Are you not ashamed of what you've done in the last couple of years?
		Do you have any apologies to the public, sir?
		Are you proud of it?
		You've made millions on the backs of people's entire livelihoods.
		How does that feel to walk the streets as a millionaire on the backs of the regular person at home in Australia, in England, in Canada?
		What do you think about on your yachts, sir?
		What do you think about on your private jet?
		Are you worried about product liability?
		Are you worried about myocarditis?
		What about the sudden deaths?
		What do you have to say about young men dropping dead of heart attacks every day?
		Why won't you answer these basic questions?
		No apologies, sir.
		Do you think you should be charged criminally for some of the criminal behaviour you've obviously been a part of?
		How much money have you personally made off the vaccine?
		How many boosters do you think it'll take for you to be happy enough with your earnings?
		Who did you meet with here in secret?
		Will you disclose who you met with?
		Who did you pay commissions to?
		In the past, Pfizer has paid $2.3 billion in fines for deceptive marketing.
		Have you engaged in that same conduct again?
		Are you under investigation like you were before for your deceptive marketing, sir?
		If any other product in the world doesn't work, as promised, you get a refund.
		Should you not refund to countries that laid out billions for your ineffective vaccine?
		Are you used to only sympathetic media so you don't know how to answer any questions?
		Is that it? Shame on you, sir.
		Shame on you. That's Albert Bourla, the boss of Pfizer.
		His people were pushing us around a little bit.
		Mate, he's pretty fit.
		I don't reckon he's had one jab.
		I'm huffing and puffing a bit.
		At least I didn't have any myocarditis.
		I dare say he's shocked that in his safe space at the WEF here in Davos that he was...
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Incredible work from the Rebel News crew.
		WEFReports.com is where that was published.
		You can also see that video and share it on Infowars.com.
		Yes, folks, we just saw the longest walk of Albert Borla's entire life.
		I have a prediction to make.
		I think the Rebel News crew is going to be deported from Switzerland by this afternoon.
		Anybody want to place any bets?
		I think the authorities will be involved.
		Asking questions to a public figure in public on the street?
		No, no. Not in Davos.
		Not when the world government is in town.
		Just absolutely great stuff.
		Great questions. And the perfect response.
		Total and utter silence from the person who...
		Well, it's a primary mover in the poisoning of the entire world.
		A genocider. A mass murderer.
		Incredible stuff. We'll be back.
		Don't go anywhere. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
		Yes, this is the American Journal.
		You're watching us on Infowars.com or Band.video.
		We are coming to you live from the Central Texas headquarters of the Freedom Movement, the Infowars World Headquarters.
		We have a lot to talk about today.
		More videos than you can possibly imagine from the World Economic Forum.
		Each more... It's more tyrannical and bizarre than the last.
		It really is pretty wild.
		But we're not going to talk about the World Economic Forum exclusively today.
		We have a lot of other stuff to talk about as well.
		Although it's all pretty deeply intertwined since all the things that we're going to be talking about are of course the outcome of the policies pursued by the World Economic Forum themselves, including the war in Ukraine, which has taken some very, very interesting turns in the last...
		A few days or even a few hours.
		Let's just get into it. Here it is, your daily dispatch.
		All right, here it is, folks.
		Your daily dispatch for Thursday, the 19th of January, 2023.
		U.S. set to finalize massive security aid package for Ukraine.
		Oh, goody. Including striker combat vehicles for the first time.
		The U.S. is set to finalize a huge military aid package for Ukraine, totaling approximately $2.5 billion worth of weaponry, including for the first time striker combat vehicles.
		Two sources briefed on the next tranche of aid, told CNN the package is not yet finalized.
		One of the sources said, but it could come before the end of the week.
		The new aid, one of the biggest packages to be announced since the war began last February, would also include more armored Bradley fighting vehicles, The other person briefed.
		Combined with the strikers marks a significant escalation in the armored vehicles the U.S. has committed to Ukraine in its fight against Russia.
		Again, we're going to talk a lot more about this later, but basically all of the rhetoric is bad.
		War-mongering psychopaths just doing everything they can to continue this.
		Senseless, purposeless, meaningless bloodshed for as long as humanly possible, including the Prime Minister of Finland saying that this would last 15 years if that's what it took.
		And Zelensky saying, we'll attack Moscow.
		And Russia saying, the more weapons you send to Ukraine, the closer we get to nuking your butts.
		So, you know, everything is spiraling out of control there.
		And again, they haven't even bothered to tell us What the hell we're fighting for or why.
		It makes no damn sense at all, and we'll get into it a little bit later.
		Meanwhile, another big international story here.
		New Zealand leader Jacinda Ardern announces shock resignation before upcoming election.
		New Zealand Prime Minister announced Thursday she will stand aside for a new leader within weeks, saying she doesn't believe she has the energy to seek re-election in the October polls.
		Speaking at a news conference, Ardern said her term would end February 7th when she expects a new Labour Prime Minister will be sworn in, though depending on the process could be earlier.
		The decision was my own, Ardern says.
		Leading a country is the most privileged job anyone could have, but also the most challenging.
		You cannot and should not do the job unless you have a full tank, plus a bid in reserve for those unplanned and unexpected challenges.
		I have to say, it's actually a very mature thing to say, lady.
		It's actually kind of interesting.
		Of course, her entire prime ministership has been an abysmal failure.
		I believe she was the first...
		Female Prime Minister in New Zealand.
		They made a big deal of this. She was young, just 37 years old when she became Prime Minister.
		A young woman, a mother, and then of course her entire term has been marked by tyranny, collapse, failure, imprisoning her own citizens for refusing to take an experimental medical vaccine, and now she's resigning in disgrace.
		Better luck next time, ladies.
		Elon Musk blasts the World Economic Forum saying unelected world government the people never wanted and never asked for and don't want.
		Twitter CEO Elon Musk slammed the World Economic Forum on Wednesday as it continued its annual summit in Davos, Switzerland, calling it an unelected world government that nobody wants.
	Gee, it's almost like he watches Infowars.
	You would think he'd let us back on Twitter.
	Yeah, that's true.
	Accurate. Facts check, 100% true.
	They are a world government that nobody asked for and nobody wanted, meaning they are tyrants that, by all natural law, deserve to be overthrown at the very least as a start.
	So, you know, let's do that already.
	So again, by talking trash about Elon Musk, shut up.
	Just shut up. He's clearly on our side.
	It's ridiculous. That's gonna be another topic, by the way, that we're gonna discuss.
	We'll get to it later. It's in the Daily Dispatch.
	More evidence here from the Gateway Pundit.
	FOIA requests reveal there were no DOJ investigations on election fraud after the 2020 election, as Bill Barr claimed.
	In December 2020, U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr said there was no evidence of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election.
	Barr said there was no evidence of widespread voter fraud defying President Donald Trump's ongoing efforts to reverse the results.
	Barr repeatedly repeated this claim several times since leaving office as President Trump's attorney general.
	Now there's proof that Bill Barr is and was lying.
	On Thursday, former Trump advisor Jeffrey Clark, the director of litigation at the Center for Renewing America, joined Steve Bannon on the war room.
	Jeffrey Clark told Steve that the Center for Renewing America sent out FOIA requests to 12 U.S. attorney districts from the 2020 battleground states.
	Bill Barr, it turns out, sent out a memo on November 9, 2020, saying there should be no investigations of the elections.
	Jeff Clark told Steve Bannon the FOIA requests have come back from every district but one with no documents.
	No investigations were done as a result of that memo.
	There's only one of these 12 districts that has yet to come in, and as the Eastern District So again, there were claims of voter fraud.
	There were people on the ground signing under oath affidavits, making statements that if they were proven to be false, would send those people to prison.
	Means you can probably trust that sort of declaration.
	Many of these claims, evidence, video of it actually happening, audio of the people coordinating behind the scenes, explaining how to use the COVID rules to circumvent the surveillance requirements that they needed.
	Just an infinite amount, it seems, of evidence of the blatant fraud or at least potential fraud in the 2020 election.
	And Bill Barr, the attorney general, took it upon himself to send out a memo demanding that nobody in the DOJ even respect these assertions or certainly not investigate the claims being made.
	And then they go on TV and say there's no evidence because they didn't look for it.
	They didn't look for it, so they didn't find it.
	So then they go out and say there is no evidence.
	People think conspiracies are some thing where you have to weed out this.
	It's not that complicated.
	We've known this for a long time.
	We've known this for a long time. We didn't know about the FOIA requests that have come back proving that there was never any investigation.
	But we knew a long time ago that Bill Barr sent out this memo telling people not to do this.
	Conspiracies aren't that complicated.
	One side cheats.
	The other side is in charge of the investigatory body that sends out memos saying, don't investigate this.
	Conspiracy over. And then the media doesn't cover it, doesn't report on it.
	You know, and just repeats what the person who's leading the investigation or non-investigation says.
	It's so simple.
	It's like really not complicated at all.
	It's obvious. It's in your face.
	People just don't do anything about it or seem to care.
	So it's not that people don't know.
	Nobody's doing anything, so it just keeps happening.
	Finally, we have this. Donald Trump prepares his return to Facebook and Twitter.
	Mounting a comeback for the White House, Donald Trump is looking to regain control over his most powerful social media accounts with access to his Twitter account back.
	Trump's campaign is formally petitioning Facebook's parent company to unblock his account there after it was locked in response to the U.S. Capitol riot two years ago.
	He's going to come back, folks.
	He's going to be back on normal social media.
	That is at least the claim that's being made.
	I, for one, am here for it.
	I'm Team Trump, 100%.
	Down with DeSantis, down with the naysayers.
	Donald Trump, 100%.
	Well, we can explain this a little bit later.
	But suffice it to say this.
	Donald Trump is the leader of this movement at this point.
	He knows more than we'll ever know.
	He had access as president to the actual intelligence briefings.
	He understands the true metagame that's being played here in which fear is the real virus and Donald Trump is the cure.
	Well, I'll explain what I mean a little bit more on that later.
	We'll be talking about Donald Trump's comeback and...
	Yeah, people need to realize...
	It's Donald Trump or America's over.
	That's the conclusion I've come to.
	It's the only choice. He's a vaccine salesman.
	Alright, great. Wow, you're so creative.
	I can't believe it. Alright, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
	This is our Thursday edition of the American Journal.
	So glad you're here with us today.
	We're going to talk about the war in Ukraine.
	We're going to talk about the WEF, the World Economic Forum.
	I have so many videos from the World Economic Forum that are just absurd.
	And we'll get to those in just a moment.
	First, I want to play a video from the UK where a group I hadn't heard of but am extremely excited about has had some major victories.
	They're essentially doing what we advocate for here quite a bit on Infowars.
	It's taking the Some of the leftist tactics and applying it to our side.
	In this case, it's direct action against stores selling things you don't think they should sell to children.
	Again, the only thing I know about this is this video that was posted.
	If what this kid is saying is true, it's...
	Amazing. It's really just a fantastic way to go about things, and it's having success.
	I think this should inspire everybody.
	We're going to reach out to this kid and try to get him on the show, because I think it's really amazing what he's doing.
	His name's James Harvey.
	His Twitter is JamesHarvey2503.
	He put out this video. I guess there's a candy shop in London or in England somewhere called Kingdom Suites.
	And so, you know, they called it a sweetie shop, but a candy shop for little kids.
	And they were selling sex toys in this...
unidentified		Children's candy shop, but they're not doing it anymore Here's James Harvey to tell you why you may remember the kingdom of sweets or as we like to call it the kingdom of filth, which is a child sweetie shop That is kind of selling sex toys out in the open for children to grab Yeah, we've been there a few times now. We've actually taken the stuff off the shelves placed on the floor I was actually detained by police of one of them, right?
		and well We've just received news now that someone's actually gone down there and they are no longer selling sex toys in the sweetie shop.
		So this is just another victory that we've had recently.
		As you know, the club kids is now being changed to 18 plus rather than 14 plus.
		You've had the boots removed, making their own drag queen kits for three-year-olds, taking off the shelves, you know.
		Victory after victory recently, and, you know, it just goes to show direct action works, yeah?
		Congratulations to everyone involved for not only complaining, but sharing the video and making our voices heard.
		Thank you. Just awesome stuff.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		They, uh, using direct action, just, you know, peaceful non-cooperation and, uh, really kind of small-scale protests, but they're having success in it.
		I think that's Absolutely incredible.
		And you can take a note from this young guy.
		And I hope the globalists take a note too.
		They have sown the seeds of the whirlwind.
		They will soon reap in the young.
		We can only hope.
		Now I want to go to this...
		What was the website?
		Yeah, I didn't know what the website was.
		Students Against Tyranny.
		Students Against Tyranny. Do you know...
		What's the website exactly?
		Do you know? StudentsAgainstTyranny.com So yeah, just incredible stuff.
		Great work, fellas.
		Now I want to go to this next video.
		We're going to talk about the World Economic Forum.
		Their number one concern at this point is eliminating free speech.
		Here's a video from our good friend Robot Polisher to tell you why that might be.
unidentified		Clip number six. The good news is the elite across the world trust each other more and more.
		This was an interesting trust, a case test of people's trust.
		The bad news is that in every single country they were polling, the majority of people trusted that elite less.
		So... I just think there is a real market for, you know, for the truth.
		I'm trying to take this gamble on being a truth-telling politician and hoping that that works for me.
		I have a constituency that I'm trying to keep healthy, and I can't get them to take a COVID vaccine because of misinformation that's propagated on the internet.
		Truth-telling politician.
john oliver ▲ ● ▼		Misinformation has been linked to violence and deaths.
unidentified		Disinformation, what it attacks is trust.
unidentified		This is all about trust.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		It's really about trust. Liars will tell you to trust.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		People who tell you the truth say don't trust anybody.
unidentified		The trust in news is eroding completely.
		The news is way down here when it comes to trusted institutions.
		Once you see trust decline, what you then see is societies start to fracture.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Liars want you to trust.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		You can trust us. Honest people want you not to trust anything because we know everybody else is liars.
unidentified		Trustworthy sources. Scientists, academia, Lidifact or Snopes or factcheck.org.
		The CDC, FDA, World Health Organization.
		Coronavirus.gov that's run by the CDC. It's updated every single day with the latest guidance.
		We will continue to be your single source of truth.
		It actually makes me feel safer.
		We should be more intensive in delivering trustworthy facts and information for the people.
		To differentiate and elevate trustworthy sources of information.
		That makes me feel better. And a lot of American consumers want that level of security.
		Ultimately, what we're trying to achieve there is some measure of public safety, right?
anthony fauci ▲ ● ▼		We want to really make sure that this Vaccine hesitancy that we see around gets overcome by the truth.
unidentified		This is something I really care deeply about.
barack obama ▲ ● ▼		People are dying because of misinformation.
unidentified		The concept of preserving public safety, even under the banner of free speech, is actually something that we've accepted for a long time.
barack obama ▲ ● ▼		Keeping people safe.
unidentified		Platforms, when it comes to content moderation, do have a responsibility for trying to keep people safer, and they can do more.
		Healthy information environments being so critical to solving the world's problems.
		Gender disinformation can be very unsafe for a lot of people, and so I think that's where we want to go with it.
		Solving the world's problems.
barack obama ▲ ● ▼		You just have to flood a country's public square with enough raw sewage.
barack obama ▲ ● ▼		You just have to raise enough questions, spread enough dirt, plant enough conspiracy theorizing, that citizens no longer know what to believe.
unidentified		What?
barack obama ▲ ● ▼		Once they lose trust in their leaders, in mainstream media, in political institutions, in each other, in the possibility of truth, the games won.
anthony fauci ▲ ● ▼		We went from sequence to getting the vaccine in people's arms.
unidentified		In less than a year.
barack obama ▲ ● ▼		Clinically tested the vaccine on billions of people worldwide.
anthony fauci ▲ ● ▼		There was no cutting corners.
anthony fauci ▲ ● ▼		Safety was not compromised at all.
benjamin netanyahu ▲ ● ▼		Israel became, if you will, the lab for Pfizer.
anthony fauci ▲ ● ▼		There was absolutely no cutting of corners at all.
unidentified		We have come a long way in terms of what we can do to manipulate genetic codes.
		Genetic editing. Will the vaccine change my DNA? Absolutely impossible.
		Cells can be reprogrammed, which then can develop in the cells of any type in the body.
		It's actually an injection. It's a Harvard-funded lab.
		These are people who are actually going in and altering your DNA. Altering your DNA. Altering your DNA. Literally breaking up the DNA. Yes, it does sound like science fiction, but it's really, really promising at this point.
		The mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy.
		If we had surveyed two years ago in the public, would you be willing to take...
		Gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body, we would have probably had a 95% refusal rate.
		You're editing your genes.
		I mean, that's probably going to be a big concern for a lot of people.
klaus schwab ▲ ● ▼		It changes you.
		It's you who are changed.
		And of course, this has a big impact on your identity.
unidentified		You began to do that kind of gene editing.
		Some people worried that...
		You were changing what it means to be human.
klaus schwab ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, of course.
unidentified		Editing your genes, I mean, that's probably going to be a big concern for a lot of people.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		We'll all be robots.
		Another absolute banger from Robot Polisher at Robot Polisher on Twitter.
		Incredible stuff. Folks, we'll be back on the other side to show you some clips of what they're talking about at the World Economic Forum this year.
		And as we do, I hope that you remember to go to Infowarsstore.com.
		We are your outlet standing against the globalists at the World Economic Forum.
		Support us in this mission.
unidentified		Infowarsstore.com. You're watching The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
		Watch live right now at band.video.
		Our projections show that by the year 2025, not only America, but the entire planet will be under the protection and the dominion of this power alliance.
		The gains have been substantial, both for ourselves and for you, the human power elite.
		How do we change the way people are thinking about this and talking about it?
		And why is it that allegedly wise adult human beings, CEOs, some of them, United States senators, some of them, a whole bunch of those, want to ignore science and want to ignore mathematics and want to ignore physics and somehow cannot bring themselves to do what we need to do.
		And when you start to think about it, it's pretty extraordinary.
		That we, a select group of human beings, because of whatever touched us at some point in our lives, are able to sit in a room and come together and actually talk about saving the planet.
		I mean, it's so almost extraterrestrial to think about, quote, saving the planet.
		If you said that to most people, most people, they think you're just a crazy, tree-hugging, lefty, liberal, you know, do-gooder, whatever.
		And there's no relationship.
		But really, that's where we are.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Justanotherchannel.com.
		That, of course, can be found on band.video under the Just Another Channel tab.
		That's called They Live John Kerry at Davos 2023.
		It'd be a lot harder to figure out what these guys were up to if they didn't model their speaking pattern and everything else after, you know...
		Ruthless villains from 1980s movies, but apparently they just can't help themselves.
		So it's all just absurdly obvious what they're trying to achieve.
		And of course they recognize that in order for them to bring about their desired outcome...
		Well, let me just say that their desired outcome they recognize and they know is not beneficial for...
		The people that it will be imposed upon.
		So they know that in order to impose it upon people the number one thing you got to get over is those people not wanting it to be imposed upon them which means you have to silence those people.
		It's all about destroying the ability for regular people to speak up against them because they realize that only by this power of censorship are they able to bring about their the ends that they desire.
		So They're not being shy about this.
		They're not being coy about it.
		They're just coming out and saying what they're planning on doing.
		If anything, they're being too descriptive and too upfront about it.
		Like we could all benefit from a little subtlety.
		EU Commission VP tells the World Economic Forum America will soon have hate speech laws.
		And again, they're not saying that this might come.
		They're not saying that this is needed.
		They're just telling you what they're going to do.
		They're just telling you, here's what's coming down the pipe.
		Doesn't matter if you like it or not.
		Doesn't matter if you want it or not.
		Doesn't matter if we've even...
		That's the beauty of not having to argue about it.
		They don't even have to make the argument.
		They don't have to explain why this is a preferable thing in order to get you to go along with it.
		They're just going to impose it upon you.
		And they're open about this at this point.
		Let's go to clip number 15 first.
		The UN Secretary General openly commands politicians around the world to shape public opinions themselves.
antonio guterres ▲ ● ▼		Let's watch. But politicians need to understand.
		And sometimes we are faced with these kind of challenges.
		It is better To take today decisions that will eventually be not popular, but it will be essential to be able to shape the public opinion itself.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Again, I don't need to translate that.
		I don't need to tell you what he's really, he just is saying it.
		And in fact, what he's saying, if you do read between the lines, if you do just think about it for a little bit, right?
		He's just publicly announcing that, you know, if people are allowed to come to their own conclusions and allowed to form their own opinions, then it would make their job harder because the people's opinions would be against what they want to do.
		And so they understand that they have to first lay the groundwork of molding public opinion to fit their designs.
		It's manufacturing consent.
		Liberals used to be able to see this for what it is.
		Now, they're all in favor of it.
		And again, they're just being open about it.
		Clip number 24 is that European Commission VP. So we've just heard from the President of the UN. Now we hear from the Vice President of the...
		Basically the executive branch of the European Union.
		Here she's saying that now, you know, very soon the U.S. will be under the same style of hate speech laws that are currently keeping Europe from doing anything about the things that the World Economic Forum is committing to it, right?
		Can't speak up against it because it's, well, it's hate speech and soon going to come to America courtesy of our unelected world leaders at the World Economic Forum.
unidentified		Let's watch. Well, we need the people who understand the language and the case law in the country.
		Because what qualifies as hate speech, as illegal hate speech, which you will have soon also in the US, I think that we have a strong reason why we have this in the criminal law.
		We need the platforms to simply work with the language and to identify such cases.
		The AI would be too dangerous.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, it would be too dangerous.
		Yeah, I think they'll use it anyway.
		I think they already are. Actually, in fact, I know they already are.
		But again, it's not that they think they have the best ideas.
		It's that they want power and they're going to take it.
		And they know they don't have the best ideas.
		And so they have to silence people with better ideas because they prefer their ideas more.
		And we can actually see this in action.
		Clip number 32 is the Moderna CEO, Stephanie Bensell.
		Speaking at the World Economic Forum this year, criticizing the countries that even dared to have a debate about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine.
unidentified		Let's watch. The extent of this misinformation when it comes to vaccination, I think, as somebody who works in the media, I mean, that was just overwhelming to see all of that across all the channels, right?
stephane bancel ▲ ● ▼		Yes, and I exactly agree with panelists, which is, I think, in some countries, you know, you saw scientific debates in national TV at primetime.
		So you can imagine how people were scared.
		You know, Ben, as Seth said, a lot of political debate in some countries and the US was kind of maybe one of the worst places in the world.
		And you saw the differences of countries where all the parties would say, you know, this has been approved by the regulators, clinical studies have been done, you should get your vaccines and so on.
		And then, as Seth said, I mean, the social media was just terrible.
		Just terrible. And so at a time of uncertainty where people were scared for their loved ones, you know, many people, you know, locked down.
		It was very hard for everybody from a just mental health standpoint.
		When you can't police with all that environment, you could see some countries where you have scientific debate and political debate and social media, if you have those three things, the vaccine rate is very, very low.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Absolutely. Yeah, you know, it's much easier for us to work in the countries where everyone agreed on the same thing and there were no dissenting voices.
		Yeah, obviously it's easier for tyrants when nobody's allowed to disagree with them.
		What an amazing discovery you've uncovered.
		It's, wow, how did nobody realize this before?
		Of course, they'll be the first to tell you the real big issue, the real big problem at the top of the list of issues they're having to confront, the World Economic Forum.
		Isn't necessarily people talking bad about the vaccines or talking differently about climate change.
		Really what they're concerned about is people talking about them.
		All these conspiracy theories about these loving and generous people.
		That cannot be tolerated.
		Here's Klaus Schwab in the opening remarks of World Economic Forum this year.
klaus schwab ▲ ● ▼		Cooperation in a fragmented world.
		At the beginning of this year, we are confronted.
		With unprecedented and multiple challenges.
		We need to overcome the most critical fragmentation.
		And the most critical fragmentation is between those who take a constructive attitude and those who are just bystanders, observers, And even go into the negative, critical, and confrontational attitude.
unidentified		We must confront the people that have a negative attitude about us.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Would you vote for this guy?
		I didn't think so. Alright, welcome back ladies and gentlemen.
		This is the American Journal.
		We're going to continue with our coverage of the World Economic Forum.
		Here in this segment, we'll probably continue that into the first five of the next segment.
		I'm probably not going to have time to take your calls today because we're actually going to be playing a special interview with Mark Passios that Alex Jones did.
		We'll be playing that at the 9.30 time slot at 10 o'clock.
		We'll be joined by Miriam Heinen.
		She is an investigative journalist and filmmaker who's just made a new documentary about the George Floyd event.
		Very interesting. I watched it yesterday.
		And I'm excited to ask her some questions.
		And so we have a lot to cover.
		We're going to talk about Trump. We're going to talk about the war in Ukraine.
		But for now, we're going to continue our coverage of the World Economic Forum.
		I hope that you can go to Infowarsstore.com and support us.
		We really make it easy to do.
		We have a giant hill to get over, but that's not a big burden on you.
		Every dollar you spend at InfoWarsStore.com is another step up that hill, is another push at our back getting us over this obstacle.
		So anything that you can do to help us at InfoWarsStore.com, if just donating five bucks or a dollar, just whatever you got, it would help us more than you could possibly know.
		If everybody listening right now did that, we would never have to ask again.
		We would never have to.
		It would be over.
		So just if you don't mind, if you don't mind, go to InfoWarsStore.com.
		Help us stay on the air.
		And best of all, you get a fantastic supplement that will improve your life and you'll see incredible positive results from those, especially if you find something that can make up for some sort of lack of nutrition that you have currently.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Thank you.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		And we'll get more into it later.
		I was having a funny conversation with my dad about the products at InfoWars.
		But we'll get into it later. I want to get to these videos from World Economic Forum, but I won't be on air if you don't go to Infowarsstore.com, so I've got to ask you to do that.
		Please, Infowarsstore.com.
		We really appreciate it, and you will too.
		It's mutually beneficial.
		That's what it means to be a 360 win.
		Now, we just talked about how...
		Free speech is the number one concern of the World Economic Forum.
		They really can't have all of these pesky little fellow human beings speaking up against them.
		They're in charge, don't you know?
		They have taken for themselves the mantle of leaders of the world.
		Nobody elected them. Nobody voted for them.
		Their policies are horrific as they are genocidal.
		But they're in charge now apparently because the banks say so, because the corporations say so, and because the media is in their pocket.
		It's absurd, but that's what it is.
		One of the interesting things about this, and we'll see how we make our way through this here.
		But as I've said for a very long time, the reality of the Great Reset is that it is more accurately called the Great Combination or the Great Collaboration.
		Something along those lines.
		It's The remaking of the world from one in which nation states hold sovereignty to one in which unelected cabals of corporatists run the world completely above and without accountability.
		That's all it is. It couldn't be more obvious.
		And so it's interesting when you see things like The Twitter files be exposed.
		The whistleblowers from the FBI come forward and talk about the way the FBI is cooperating with the big tech to censor American dissidents.
		And you see a lot of people sort of naively expecting the FBI to back off of this, expecting the FBI to act like they've been caught because they have.
		They were secretly engaged in censorious activity against American citizens via the private company of Twitter or Facebook, some big tech corporation.
		Any other time in American history, this would have been a major scandal.
		This would have been something that the FBI either had to explain or explain why it was wrong, explain why what they were doing is right.
		The problem is not that...
		The FBI is doing this necessarily.
		The problem is that the American people no longer value free speech as a human right.
		So when they're told that the FBI is doing this, their mind goes to, oh good, the authorities are protecting us from the dangerous ideas.
		That's the big problem here.
		And you can tell that's the problem because the FBI has not acknowledged the Twitter file releases.
		They have never made a statement about the whistleblowers.
		They did fire the whistleblowers.
		They did, you know, We're good to go.
		I'm going to play a clip from Chris Ray here showing exactly that, that not only are they not concerned that the American people know that they're engaged in big tech, they're overseas telling an audience of foreigners how they're about to ramp up that censorship and even, to a greater degree, cooperate and intertwine themselves with big tech in order to censor more American people.
		And as we go to this video, think...
		Just for a second about what you're actually seeing.
		You're about to see the head of the FBI, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the domestic police force, federal police force here in America, overseas, front of an audience of foreigners, which he shouldn't even be there anyway.
		Why is the FBI there?
		Why is a representative for the FBI overseas having secret meetings with world leaders from other countries completely outside of the purview of the American press or the American government or anything of the sort?
		The fact that he's even there is a slap in the face to the American people in any...
		Legitimate law enforcement capacity, he should be here working on problems here in America.
		Instead, he's cooperating with foreign powers to censor the American people on behalf of their global unelected government.
		It's really incredible. Let's go to clip 27, where again, Christopher Wray slaps us all in the face.
		Just spits in our eye and tells us, yeah, we're cooperating with big tech, and we're going to do it even more in the future.
		It's very exciting. Let's watch.
christopher a wray ▲ ● ▼		And I think the sophistication of the private sector is improving, and particularly important, the level of collaboration between the private sector and the government, especially the FBI, has, I think, We've made significant strides.
christopher a wray ▲ ● ▼		Pretty much every technology we could talk about today, we see both great opportunity but great dangers in the wrong hands.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		The level of collaboration between the private sector and the government has made significant strides.
		So it's a different way of framing it, right?
		On one hand you say, huh, it looks like the federal government is engaged in censorious activity violating the First Amendment by cooperating with and outsourcing their tyranny to private companies to carry out their orders in the secret, in the background, cooperating. Or you could say That the collaboration between private sector and government entities has made significant strides in the recent past.
		Like, they're not apologizing for this because they know that they don't have to, right?
		They don't feel bad about doing this.
		They're telling you they're going to do it more.
		Which makes me really think that maybe the Twitter file release was just the announcement to the American people, this is how we do things now.
		That may be it. Now let's look at clip number 30.
		Here's Alex Karp, interview in Davos.
		Alex Karp is the co-founder and CEO of Peter Thiel's company called Palantir.
		Here's him explaining how he's using the technology that he's developed in cooperation with governments to silence political dissent.
unidentified		Let's watch. Look, we built PG, which single-handedly stopped the rise of the far right in Europe.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		We can stop it right there, right?
		PG is Palantir Gotham, commercially available AI-ready operating system that improves and accelerates decisions for operators across all roles and all domains.
		And he just said it quietly there, as if it's not a big deal.
		He said, we created Palantir Gotham, which single-handedly stopped the rise of the far right in Europe.
		What? The CEO of Palantir just admitted that his AI single-handedly stopped a political movement from growing in Europe.
		I would think there would be some pretty significant follow-up questions as to how they did that, who they were working on the behalf of, and what gave them the right to think that they have the authority to To go in and stop a nascent political movement in its tracks by using AI manipulation of information channels.
		Pretty insane, right?
		But all of this is in service of a goal.
		The goal is actually explained by Klaus Schwab in clip number 20.
klaus schwab ▲ ● ▼		Let's watch that. Who will really command the fourth industrial revolution and its technology like artificial intelligence?
unidentified		What's your sense of who's best placed at this time to lead the world into the fourth industrial revolution?
		Because you pretty much created this term.
		We're seeing the kind of technological strides that China has made with Huawei, with the 5G technology.
		Do you believe that this could potentially be China's time once again?
klaus schwab ▲ ● ▼		We should make here again, let's say, a differentiation.
		On the one hand, we have state capitalism.
		On the other hand, we have shareholder or private capitalism.
		So it's a clash between two systems.
		I believe that state capitalism in the short term provides certain advantages because you can mobilize in a concentrated way a lot of resources to reach.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		In other words, the other faction, the stakeholder faction, is them.
		So just read through the lines here.
		When they're talking about the Fourth Industrial Revolution, who will have control of the AI that will transform the world?
		And Klaus Schwab is saying, us.
		We are. So we have to silence everybody from talking about it, then bring in all the corporations, and then we'll have complete power.
		Welcome back, folks. This is the American Journal.
		Second hour has begun.
		We're taking a little break at 9.30 to play an interview with Mark Passio that Alex Jones conducted.
		That I think you will all enjoy.
		But right now, I want to...
		And actually, we're going to do a follow-up to that last segment.
		On the other side, in the next segment, we're going to be following a thread from Michael Knowles, where he talks about another major threat to free speech here in America and really around the world.
		Before we do that, I want to show you a video of former Vice President and man-bear-pig hunter Al Gore...
		Going on the most unhinged, shrieking rant about climate change I've ever heard in my life.
		It is just...
		It's just bonkers.
		It's just insane. But of course, we know that...
		The World Economic Forum is conducting and carrying out a plethora, a swath of very high-level psychological operations.
		The key for all of those being fear.
		We know physically, like biologically, reaction to fear is to shut off the thinking part of the brain and to revert you to an animalistic call and response style of mindset.
		And that's their biggest weapon. That's their greatest weapon because if people were to be able to think clearly and rationally about the things that were being proposed, they would never succeed.
		So they circumvent and override the logical part by appealing to the emotional part in the most powerful way they know how, which is to inspire fear.
		Fear of white supremacy will be used to destroy free speech.
		Fear of the virus was used to destroy the entire world's economy and convince people to take a vaccine that's going to kill them.
		Fear is always the needle for whatever...
		Fear is the delivery system for whatever they want to inoculate your society with.
		Here's Al Gore.
		Taking this to a whole other level.
		I mean, hysteria doesn't even enter into it.
		Reminder... Science is still sort of out on this.
		Still sort of not confirmed either way.
		Whether the climate is changing at a particularly rapid rate.
		Whether that rate of change is being affected by pollution or the sun.
		None of this is really all that certain.
		And maybe that's why he has to get so emotional about this.
		You typically don't have to get emotional about things that are true and easy to explain.
		But here's Al Gore. Just going totally mad at Davos in Switzerland yesterday.
unidentified		Let's watch. So in answer to your question,
		I would say we have to have a sense of urgency much greater than we have yet had.
		And we need to make some changes.
		The floods and the tidal waves and the dinosaurs coming alive again!
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		And it's just like, okay, alright, calm down, calm down.
unidentified		He's like, and the migrants! The millions upon millions of migrants!
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		And it's like, well...
		Wait, wait, wait, what?
		No, it's not the migrants he's mad at.
		It's the reaction to the migrants that he's infuriated at, right?
		These millions upon millions of migrants!
		Can you imagine a billion migrants?
		We need them here now!
		We have to shut up! We can't have people argue back against it!
		I mean, it's just... Just insanity, folks.
		So, these people are insane.
		They are going insane. They are getting more and more desperate.
		They are desperate to inspire fear in you about whatever they can get you with.
		Are you scared about climate change? No.
		Well, then you should be scared about the vaccine.
		You're not scared about the vaccine, then you gotta be scared about migration.
		If you're not scared about migration, you gotta be scared about this.
		You gotta be scared about the fear mongers.
		The fear mongers are the real thing you gotta be scared of.
		Those people telling you to be scared, they're the real threat, and they're gonna kill us all.
		I mean, this is... This is how they're going to destroy the earth.
		This is how they're going to take over the earth.
		This is how they have taken over the earth.
		This is the method. This is the plan.
		This is the program. Now you know it.
		Now you can explain to other people.
		Now they can free themselves from this cage and think clearly and reject the fear.
		That's all it takes. Oh, man.
		You know, I didn't think we'd have time to open up the phone lines.
		I almost want to open them up now.
		Because I just saw on Twitter...
		One of our regular callers, Patty from Boston.
		He says this, I mean, it's almost perfect.
		Almost don't even have to hear. I'll just talk to you here, Patty.
		Wake up. Just wake up.
		Wake up. You're sleeping.
		You're still sleeping. You think you're awake.
		You're in a double dream state.
		You're deep within the Inception Machine fractal consciousness.
		He says this, based in Pilled Pod on Twitter.
		The WEF is about as relevant as the United Nations.
		It's not. Nobody gives an F. And they've won.
		And that's it. That's victory.
		They have succeeded.
		They have won.
		Can you imagine?
		Can you imagine believing that when the CEO of Pfizer and Moderna and head of the FBI and about 20 high level federal government officials from the United States and the leaders of the biggest corporations in the world and the editor and the leader of The New York Times and the editor and the leader of The Washington Post and the, you know, heads of just the biggest corporations in the entire world are all gathering together at a summit.
		But it doesn't matter.
		But they can't do anything.
		They have no power.
		They're nothing.
		It doesn't matter.
		It's just all of the most powerful people in the world all getting together and setting policy.
		But don't pay attention to it and it won't affect you.
		It has no influence.
		Like the UN.
		What's the UN ever done other than, you know, flood Europe with migrants all over the world?
		Also, flood America with migrants.
		Also, impose rules on countries all over the world.
		Also, they have an army that they deploy into war zones to carry out military operations.
		But who cares? Who cares?
		Just ignore what they're doing.
		Again, it's the last bastion, the last safe house and refuge of the liberals is I just am going to close my eyes and pretend it's not happening.
		It is happening. It's obvious.
		It's right there in front of your face.
	It's going on. There is no reasonable ability for anybody to ignore or pretend that it doesn't have an effect.
	It obviously does because you see it in your life in front of your very eyes.
	But if you close those eyes and turn off your consciousness, then sure, it doesn't matter.
	None of this matters. And they're just getting together to...
	Whatever, drink champagne and talk about the hookers they had last night.
	Sure, maybe they're just doing that, maybe.
	Or maybe, just maybe, they're doing what they are obviously doing and telling everybody that they're doing, which is forming a world government by entrapping and Bringing into the fold all of the world leaders from every country in the world.
	It's just baffling to me.
	It's just baffling.
	The World Economic Forum doesn't matter.
	And what they're doing doesn't have an effect.
	It's just the most powerful people in the world getting together and discussing things.
	It's not like they have any power.
	It's not like Christopher Wray has any power.
	It's not like BlackRock has any power, right?
	Right? It's not like Moderna or Pfizer have any power on Earth, right?
	I mean, it's just...
	This is how we lose.
	This is how humanity loses.
	It's not us. It's not people actually talking about this.
	It's the people like...
	Old Patty, who...
	Is providing them cover, is giving them cover, is working on their behalf.
unidentified		Just wild. Yeah, yeah.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		No, no, no. He's like the person in the Matrix who sells out all of his friends to be put back in the Matrix because he's told he can have a fast car when he does.
		Yeah, that's the guy.
		That's the guy, right? This is like you break out of the Matrix and you wake up.
		You pull the thing out of your mouth.
		You see like aliens flying around.
		You go back into the Matrix. You're like, there's aliens.
		It's crazy. This isn't the real world.
		This is fake. And the people there are just like, who cares?
		Yeah, but it doesn't matter.
		So there are big aliens flying around in the real world?
		Like, it doesn't matter. Who cares?
		Like, okay. Going to Plato's cave.
		These are shadows. This isn't the real world.
		They're just like, yeah, so what if we're in a cave chained to a wall?
		It's fine because they love us.
		Just incredible. It really is incredible.
		I feel sorry for you, Patty.
		I mean, I feel sorry for people that are born blind.
		I can't even imagine what that would be like.
		But to willingly blind yourself, that's a whole other level.
		The World Economic Forum is as relevant as the UN. It's not.
		It's not relevant. UN, the federal government, not relevant.
		State government, not relevant.
		The biggest corporations in the world, not relevant.
		The media conglomerates, six companies that own 90% of the media output in this country.
		All the leaders of every one of those companies all gathering in one place at one time to discuss the future of Earth and to say in no uncertain terms that we will be masters of the planet.
		But it doesn't matter.
		But who cares? But stop paying attention to it.
		But ignore it. Ignore it.
		It's just incredible. See, that's the key.
		That's what they really want.
		I'm realizing now. They don't want censorship.
		They want a world in which censorship is not necessary.
		A world in which people are like Patty from Boston.
		A world in which you don't have to stop people from complaining because nobody thinks to complain.
		A world in which you don't have to silence your critics because nobody even knows that you're doing what you're doing.
		They want a world where they can control the levers of power at every different level Sector of government and society and civilization and commerce without ever even being without the people under them even being aware that they exist.
		That's the key. That's what they want.
		They don't want censorship. Censorship is a necessity for them.
		They're Primary or superlative desire is 1984 Newspeak.
		People can't even conceive of the words to express the idea of revolution.
		That's what they want. They don't want people who are trying to speak up and then they have to shut them up.
		They want people who the idea that they could speak up would never even enter into their mind.
		The idea that maybe you should be concerned about the leaders of your world gathering together and discussing openly how they're going to enslave and or die.
		They want to be able to do that without anybody speaking up against it, without anybody caring, without anybody wondering what they're doing or why they're doing it.
		They want a world of this.
		They want a world of blank fluoride stares.
		But why do you care?
		Just let them exploit you.
		Just don't have children and eat the bugs and live in a pod and pay no attention to how it got this way.
		Just deal with the rising crime.
		Just deal with not...
		Feeling at home in your own country anymore.
		Just deal with the endless war and the manufactured viruses and labs and the vaccines that make you more likely to get the disease.
		Just accept it all.
		Act as if it's all totally normal and coming out of nowhere and just appearing yesterday.
		And nobody knows where it came from, but we all have to accept it now.
		Just be a mindless, purposeless sheep who doesn't even question the motives of the shepherd.
		It's That's the goal.
		That's the ultimate goal. They've achieved it in people like Patty from Boston.
		They have achieved it in the vast majority of liberals in this country.
		Because, you know, there's a certain point.
		I was talking to my friend. I was telling you all about the story, Paralandra, the C.S. Lewis sci-fi where the devil is trying to corrupt the Eve character, and there's another character there arguing against him.
		I was telling my friend this story, and he was talking about the prophet Elijah.
	I think they're the same one.
	But you know, it's the type of thing where you can argue with somebody and they might disagree with you.
	That's fine. You can't convince.
	Then you can show them by example that you're right.
	And if they still don't believe you, then they're a lost cause.
	There's nothing you can do, right?
	We're not speculating here.
	We shouldn't... We're not trying to convince anybody of anything.
	We're just showing people what's real.
	We're just showing people reality.
	The sky is blue. Grass is green.
	Dogs run on four feet.
	Cats lick themselves to clean themselves.
	And the world elite gather in Davos to form a world government and impose their policies on the rest of the world without even the remote...
	A facsimile of democratic appeal.
	That's just what's happening.
	You can either argue for that.
	You can explain why that's a good thing that that should be happening.
	You can argue why it's a bad thing that could be happening.
	Or you could take that third route, the route they want you to take, which is willful ignorance in which you say, I don't believe it's happening.
	It's the last refuge.
	It's the last little hidey hole of the liberals as they refuse to acknowledge or contend with what's actually happening in the real world.
	Their last and final place of refuge will be, I just don't believe it's happening.
	I just... We'll remain willfully ignorant.
	I can see it happening.
	It's happening right there in front of me.
	But if I close my eyes, then it's not real to me.
	Alright folks, we got a little distracted there.
	Now last segment, let's get back on track.
	We're going to go through this very informative and interesting thread by Michael Knowles on Twitter.
	You know, we know, we talk about censorship so much here, but You really have to understand the number of different ways that our free speech is under attack from like every different angle.
	You've got the big tech censorship.
	You've got the manufactured narrative coming out of the mainstream media.
	You've got the intelligence agencies cooperating and coordinating all of this activity as the centralized hub of so-called truth tellers.
	You've got the disinformation board that they created and then said they disbanded but are still actually disbanded.
	So you've got the speech controls from the government, speech controls from the corporations, speech controls from the media outlets, speech controls from your fellow human beings who are radicalized and turned into extremists through these various channels.
	It's coming to you from everywhere.
	I mean, even let alone the big corporations that are pumping up their ESG scores by donating to NGOs whose primary purpose is the censorship and distortion of truth.
	Leave that to the side.
	You've got the activist wing of the left that will get your company, doesn't matter how small it is, to disown and destroy you if you don't go along with them.
	So it's at an individual level.
	It's at a societal level.
	It's a full-out From every different angle, attack on your free speech using whatever they can claim is the excuse they need.
	Hate speech, racism, anti-Semitism, climate change denial, COVID vaccine hesitancy.
	I mean, it doesn't matter, right?
	It's just like all the things they impeach or charge Donald Trump for.
	None of it matters. The purpose is they want to get Trump.
	They want to destroy our speech.
	speech.
	They want to shut us up so we can't oppose them in any meaningful way.
	And the way that they do that is through censorship.
	The way they get censorship is by invoking one of these fear causing crises that they themselves have created.
	It's the simplest program you could ever imagine.
	Just people like Patty are willfully blind to it.
	Michael Knowles says this, if you thought the Twitter files were as bad as it gets for the trust and safety of big tech merging with government, you ain't seen nothing yet.
	Safety by design might be the biggest tech threat you've never heard of.
	The World Economic Forum, the Australian government and a radical bureaucrat named Julie Inman Grant are using it to impose their woke ideology onto the internet for everyone worldwide.
	He Here is how. Again, fantastic thread.
	Michael Knowles, full credit there.
	Go to Twitter to find it or to my substack to find a link.
	You may remember Julie Grant, the Australian e-safety commissioner, from this viral World Economic Forum clip last year in which she proposed a recalibration of free speech.
	We've got to recalibrate free speech.
	Until it's a little less free.
unidentified		Let's go to clip number 12. We are finding ourselves in a place where we have increasing polarization everywhere, and everything feels binary when it doesn't need to be, so I think we're going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online, you know, from freedom of speech to the freedom to be free from online violence, or the right of data protection to the right to child dignity.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		The right to child dignity.
		That's a good word for pedophilia, folks, but it doesn't...
		Matter, right? They're saying it.
		They're open. They are saying this.
		But it doesn't matter. Remember, ignore this.
		Ignore that this is happening. Be a good liberal and pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
		After beginning her career in D.C., Grant tried to become a safety antagonist, her words, at Microsoft, Adobe, and pre-Elon Twitter.
		She left big tech after her push for safety by design fell flat and she went where her scheme for control was welcome.
		The Australian government and the World Economic Forum.
		World Economic Forum.
		I believe we have this video as well.
unidentified		Let's play clip number nine. I spent 22 years in the technology industry working at Microsoft, Twitter, and Adobe.
		Often people refer to me as the poacher turned gamekeeper because now I regulate the companies.
		And I was an abject failure in terms of being that safety antagonist inside the company and getting them to do the right thing.
		So I brought the concept of safety by design to Microsoft 10 years ago when I kind of got the She's amazing.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Honestly, we can take it down.
		I struggle to even conceive of what these people's lives are like, right?
		You just come up with this idea where you're like, I've got this clever new phrase to couch censorship in.
		I call it safety by design.
		And then she's just appointed to these companies.
		Who is hiring her to do this?
		And she's just like, so then I'm in charge of supervising the company and making them conform to these rules I made up.
		It's just like, how do you even get to that position?
		Like, who gives you the authority to do that?
		And then at the company, like, there's just some lady that's there all of a sudden that's just, like, demanding that you, like, write algorithms to silence people.
		And she's just like, I'm in charge now.
		I'm here to tell you how to do that.
		It's just, I don't even get... How this whole thing operates, except that you've got literally a mafia working at the higher levels just placing people different places to see how it works.
		But she apparently just gets...
		As she puts it, an abject failure in this weird attempt to worm her way into tech companies and then change it from the inside.
		Just a total subversive snake here.
		The eSafety Commissioner operates programs everyone can all get behind, such as removing child pornography.
		But the programs don't stop at the line of legality.
		The office also seeks to suppress whatever it deems harmful.
		Every so often, we hear what that means.
		Let's go now to clip number 11.
unidentified		That the app stores, frankly, have a role to play as a bottleneck.
		And I guess we did see some creative deplatforming around January 6th in the capital siege.
		But, you know, nobody's been holding app stores accountable for road platforms that might be hosted on their stores.
		So it's very broad.
		We have something called the basic online safety expectations that looks at safety by design and basically says to companies, These are the basic safety standards we expect you to live by.
		And if you don't, or if we cannot tell that you are enforcing your own, you know, terms of service and standards consistently and fairly, then I can compel transparency reports.
		So, you know, I can start to ask those questions.
		Well, how How does that safety feature actually work and is it really working?
		Or I can ask questions about how are you dealing with this really wicked problem like recidivism on your platforms?
		You know, are you really enforcing your real names policy?
		Are you picking up signals when high volume cross-platform attacks?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Again, so she just appoints herself to this position and then, you know, demands censorship.
		What's amazing there, she actually uses a term I use, slightly different, but I always talk about civilizational choke points, right, or civilizational bottlenecks, where you can have this massive corporation that has people of all different views, but you can have one position there that's like an HR person that can control the public output for that entire company.
		And so they put themselves in these positions.
		So she actually uses the term bottleneck, which is another good term for it.
		She says the app stores are a bottleneck.
		In other words, they're a nexus of control.
		If you can get your hands on the app store, then you don't have to censor all the different apps.
		You have the bottleneck.
		You have the civilizational control point that you can get all the rest of it.
		So it's amazing that she comes out and says that and says it's very useful for us to then force everybody else to abide by our safety rules.
		Again, you've got to give it to the liberals.
		By just saying everything is for safety, it works.
		When the new SS is created, it'll be called the Safety Squad, and they'll be going around making sure everybody's safe by killing the dissidents.
		It'll be amazing. In between Grant's apparent desire to have app stores ban more than Parler and her mockery of middle-aged Caucasian men, And you might have noticed two key mentions, harm and basic online safety expectations, which fall under safety by design.
		So what is safety by design? Safety by design is the notion that government regulators cannot possibly keep up with innovation, so liberals' regulatory preferences need to be built into the technology itself.
		This is already operating in Australia, courtesy of the World Economic Forum, as she got a job there through them.
		And of course, this is already being enacted by many of the technological companies, you know, on their own design.
		And this is, of course, the fulfillment of what we covered from the World Economic Forum, the merging of private and public into one censorious, unquestionable power grid.
		All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
		Third hour of American Journal has begun.
		We'll be joined by Miriam Hanain.
		Filmmaker, very, very shortly in the next segment, in fact.
		Still have a lot of stories to cover and some more videos to show you.
		We'll be talking to Miriam about her new documentary about George Floyd showing the real timeline before, during, and after the event that led to the year we know as 2020 and the Black Lives Matter riots and everything.
		It was a very interesting movie. I got to watch a screenwriter yesterday.
		We'll talk to her about that.
		But I do want to take a moment to...
		I forgot to just tell you. I mean, I don't know.
		I don't know what to say and what not to say.
		This is all, it's all above my pay grade.
		But essentially, you know, we just played 30 minutes of, you know, an Alex Jones interview with Mark Passio.
		I've read his name a million times.
		I've never had to say it out loud. We're good to go.
		So if you've heard me say something on air, that's what the deal is.
		So I don't know anything that you don't know if you watch the Alex Jones show.
		He tells you what the real deal is.
		But it was sort of a...
		I sort of sense a change in atmosphere.
		It seems like we're getting to the end of the crisis that we're under.
		It doesn't mean we're out of it yet. We're still deeply in the crisis.
		But to paraphrase Alex just now, he says we're about half a mile away from the end zone, from the finish line here.
		We've been running a marathon.
		It's been... Devastating to us.
		It's been a very hard struggle, but we've made it almost and we're almost there.
		We're almost over the finish line. If we could just make it through the next couple of months and remain on top and stay in the black, then we can really be over all of this.
		And it's sunny uplands on the other side.
		But until we do that, we still desperately need your help.
		And even then, we're going to need your help.
		But it's so complicated what's going on behind the scenes, all the changes that we've been having to make, all of the I mean, you see me and you see my crew here, usually four or five people, you know, sitting in the editing bay.
		That's... This is nothing.
		You know, every show has that crew, and then we all have editors, and then all of the social media, and all of the coordinating, and then all of the customer service, and all of the...
		I mean, this really is a big company, but we've made a lot of changes, and a lot of stuff's going on behind the scenes.
		It's really kind of an uplifting thing, not that we're out of it, and it's all smooth sailing from here, but it's like, we know it's been hard, but a little bit longer, just a little bit longer, And it'll be smooth sailing or at least smoother sailing than it is now.
		So it's good and bad news, right?
		The good news is we're almost over it.
		The bad news is that means this is when it gets really tough.
		This is when people are going to want to give up.
		This is when people are going to think that InfoWars is going away forever, and that can have a self-fulfilling kind of situation.
		If you believe that, then it comes true.
		If you think, well, Infowars is going away, so why would I support them?
		It's just going to go away. That's not the case.
		If you believe that, then we will go away.
		If you act like that, then we will go away.
		But if we can just get through this last couple months and if we can make up that $200,000 a month lack that we've had for a little while, then not only will we make it through this, we'll be able to expand.
	We've sort of contracted at this point.
	Not very much.
	There haven't been big layoffs or anything like you see everywhere else across the media and technological landscape.
	There hasn't been any major large-scale layoffs or anything like that.
	So we haven't constricted as much, but we've tightened down what we do and how we do it and gotten everything working a little bit better.
	So now once we get through this, we're primed for explosion.
	We're primed for growth of really exponential in an exponential way.
	And so I hope you can support us in this.
	I hope that you appreciate sort of the transparency that we have here because as Stephen Crowder is revealing more and more these days, the other alternative news sites might not be as legit as you would expect.
	InfoWars, I can just...
	I don't know. I just guarantee you, personally, everything you see is exactly what you get.
	All the products are amazing.
	All of the money goes directly back into this.
	Alex Jones is sacrificing his own life and his own fortune to bring you this information.
	We just hope that you can help all of us with this mission by going to Infowarsstore.com.
	Keep us on the air. Get us through these next couple months.
	It's going to be harder than ever before, but once we're through it, it'll be better than ever before.
	So help us get to the finish line.
	Help us close out this marathon.
	Infowarsstore.com. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
	The third hour of the American Journal has begun.
	Infowars.com, band.videos, where you go to share these links.
	And I hope you go to Infowarsstore.com to support us.
	I'm Harrison Smith, your host with me.
	Joining me today as my guest is Miriam Hanane.
	Hope I'm pronouncing that right.
	Miriam Hanane, she's a veteran investigative journalist and director of the award-winning documentary, The Vanishing of the Bees.
	She has contributed to products you may recognize, such as Stop World Control and Plandemic 2.
	Miriam is also a functional medicine coach from the Institute of Functional Medicine.
	She's been tracking and researching the George Floyd story from day one, unearthing buried information by scouring hundreds of articles, pulling court documents and covering three trials, conducting original interviews, connecting the dots in her latest documentary called The Real Timeline.
	You can find The Real Timeline on mymoviesplus, mymoviesplus.com, slash the-real-timeline.
	Her website is miriamhanane.com.
	The website for the documentary is georgefloyddocumentary.com.
	And again, the documentary is called The Real Timeline.
	It was a fascinating watch.
	I got to see a screener of it yesterday.
	Thank you so much for joining us, Miriam.
unidentified		Thank you. Nice to meet you, Harrison.
unidentified		I'm happy to be here.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Very nice to meet you as well.
		The movie was extremely interesting.
		Just tell us about the movie. Give us the pitch for it.
		Tell people what this movie is and why you wanted to make it.
unidentified		I want to just set the stage.
		I understand that people have fatigue, George Floyd fatigue, but this was the event that ushered in the color revolution, and you haven't seen It this way, the event this way.
		And it is really to illustrate a book that I'm still working on called George Floyd, a multi-layered PSYOP examined.
		And this really just looks at 7.30 to 9.30.
		Since there were all these body-worn camera footage, I literally purchased the footage from the government.
		A lot of segments that people have not seen ever, Despite these two years of constantly keeping George Floyd in the headlines, this was the event that also allowed us to go from virus to violence overnight.
		And the I Can't Breathe slogan, which was used in 2014 with Eric Garner, was also coming into play in lockstep with the mask mandates that came in, at least in Minnesota, Minneapolis, literally on May 26th.
		So I'm curious, you know, to get your impressions.
		For the first time as a viewer, I was able to see the entirety so that I can come up with a theory for my book.
		But the book is, there's like 10 times more truth bombs than the film.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I thought it was fascinating. I mean, you talk about George Floyd fatigue, and I understand how people would be kind of concerned about that.
		But I feel like it's been long enough that to revisit this for me and to see the footage again, footage I've seen a hundred times, but to see it again, it had a different context.
		And so to explain, the movie's called The Real Timeline.
		And so what you're watching is almost...
		The George Floyd event play out in real time from all these different angles.
		So it's not just the body cam or just the cell phone footage.
		You're intercutting between those and you're cutting to security footage of the store, showing how all the players, where everybody is at any certain time.
		So it puts it in a whole different perspective.
		And as you pointed out, you already answered my question, but I was going to ask how you got this footage because there is footage that I haven't seen anywhere else and things I haven't seen before.
		Regardless, you know, despite the fact I've covered this story for two years.
		So that was fascinating. So you actually went and personally got this footage that's not available anywhere else, some of this.
unidentified		I purchased all the exhibits from the Derek Chauvin trial.
		So, for instance, people following the incident, the body-worn footage camera for Derek conveniently rolls under the Squad 320.
		But I was able to see what is on it when he puts it back on.
		And yeah, again, given that no one was really looking for the truth and just toting the mainstream narrative, I think very few people did what I did, which was buy the footage to lay out for the people, because the people were fooled.
		And only some Black lives seemed to matter, not all of them.
		And that's why also Maurice...
		Is featured in the film Maurice, who was with George that day that I happened to interview and befriend.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yes, you have exclusive interviews with people that were there on the day.
		Again, body cam footage I hadn't seen before.
		And to me, the overwhelming impression, I was sort of taking notes the whole time because that's the other thing.
		It's a very, very interesting story.
		I mean, you know, it took about as long as the movie takes to watch.
		And it's amazing knowing what's to come, knowing how this event changes the world, really, and changed America irrevocably from that point on.
		And yet the interesting thing is the utter ordinariness of it.
		They had no idea that this would become what it became.
		And so you see the police and even the EMS, they're treating it so casually.
		It's so normal to them.
		And that alone was kind of like this unique experience of watching these people not know that they were participants in a world-changing event.
		Very unique in human history, I think.
unidentified		Yes, I'm also trying to show what a psychological operation looks like.
		And I think that they do compartmentalize certain players.
		It's kind of like Reno 911, and not everyone knows what it is that they're taking part in, but it's interesting always to see the amount of rookies also that And to punish people, like the rookies, like Thomas Lane, who literally did compressions on George, was found guilty of aiding and embedding and basically not doing enough.
		And people don't realize, for instance, George Floyd is still in the news every single day.
		Just yesterday was an oral appeal that was live-streamed.
		And will this keep George in the headlines?
		They recently... Sentenced Alexander Kang.
		And ABC put out the results, the sentencing, before the hearing even began.
		And I caught that.
		But, you know, I'm so suppressed and shadow banned that, you know, normally that would go viral or make the news that these media whores are complicit in cover-ups.
		So I really hope that people, my goal was to lay it all out.
		and have people think for themselves because they purposely leaked Darnellis film or had Darnellis footage go viral and withhold the other body worn camera until people's perceptions were already formed.
		Right.
		So, yeah.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		And I'll say, you know, you also have another point where you actually have body cam footage from a previous arrest of George Floyd, where he acts exactly the same.
		And it's I mean, that to me was one of the most striking things.
		When I watch your movie, to me, it was like what killed George Floyd.
		You can't even just say it was one thing.
		It's every—it's America. America killed George Floyd, right?
		Because it was—it's the drugs.
		It's the crime. It's the lack of, you know, basic control people have.
		It's then the reaction that George Floyd has to just being pulled over by the cops.
		And that was the craziest thing. It happened this—it happened— You know, in the event where he was killed.
		But it also happened at that previous time where the cops just go up to George Floyd.
		It's like, hey, how you doing, man?
		Can I see your drive? And he's just flipping out.
		Don't chew me out! And he's going insane.
		And it's just... It's such an interesting thing just to sit back and watch this all unfold in real time.
unidentified		It was fascinating. Harrison, that 2019 arrest, it was a stink operation.
		It was a narcotics stop.
		And there is theories and motions that have been filed to try to garner whether George Floyd was an informant, whether for the FBI or the MPD.
		And I discovered that Maurice, for a hot minute, was an informant for the MPD.
		And there's also unwitting informants.
		And as I highlight in the film, if anyone really cared about this man's black life, why aren't we talking about or are they talking about the fake fentanyl and the source of this fake cash?
		Like, there's no real investigations, despite having more than 30 FBI agents on this website.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah. That was another totally fascinating part of the documentary where you actually track where this money may have come from.
		You cover an actual bust of like a train car full of fake money that they caught and then they didn't even invest.
		It was totally fascinating.
		Well, we've We're good to go.
		Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. My guest is Miriam Hanane.
		She has just made a movie called The Real Timeline.
		It's a documentary about the George Floyd event.
		Just the event, not necessarily...
		I mean, you include information about what happened afterwards, but this is really the timeline of that about an hour and a half period that really permanently altered the course of the trajectory of world history.
		Even if you think you know What happened that day?
		I guarantee you there's going to be stuff that you haven't seen before because there is exclusive footage.
		Miriam got exclusive interviews with some of the people involved that are included in there.
		There was one particular moment that, to me, I do not have an answer for.
		It's that moment where one police officer, and I just, it seems so unbelievable.
		It's like crazy to even say, but it literally, do you know what part of it?
		He signals the crowd.
unidentified		It's crazy. I want to say that I've watched all of the footage hundreds of times to really listen to something called details, because details' lives matter, and we're living in a mediocre age.
		I just want to also tell you, Harrison, that I got into this, I'll blame and thank Zach Voorhees, the Google whistleblower who has been on Infowars many times, and we were in the jungle escaping the RONA regime.
		And he asked me to, it was May 25th, to come inside and he asked me to choke him.
		And I'm like, what? He's like, I'm doing the George Floyd challenge.
		And from there, it just, it's been nonstop that I haven't tapped out and paying attention to the details.
		But in reference to that, that one, that is kind of like, The nugget in the film, catching that and watching it over and over again.
		And I remember showing it to Zach and he's like, I don't know.
		And then I'm like, oh yeah, I'm going to watch it from to Tao's camera and see what happens.
		And sure enough, you see the hand signal and all the people walk in unison that would end up being the bystanders after the fact.
		And I worked in Hollywood.
		I know what it's like to be an extra person.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I mean, that one moment, it is very weird.
		So the crowd that gathers around that's filming and sort of shouting at the cops, they're not there.
		The cop turns around, and I don't know, I cannot come up with another explanation for this.
		He turns around, makes this hand movement where he beckons towards, and then the whole crowd appeared.
		It's It's wild, and I'd never seen that before.
		So that alone, I think, was interesting.
		But I was saying before, and I'm sorry if I'm just sort of rambling, but I just watched it last night, and I was taking notes the whole time.
		Thank you. Well, it was fascinating.
		And some of the things I'd just forgotten.
		For example, I'd forgotten that, yeah, this is it.
		It's so strange.
		That was so weird.
		So one of the things I'd forgotten was that George Floyd...
		The dude was 6'6 and 240 pounds.
		I mean, that alone puts the whole situation in a different context because if you can just imagine trying to contend with a 6'6, 240 pound man who is kicking and fighting and thrashing, it puts the whole thing in a different perspective.
		But it was just little things like that, that even if you know the George Floyd case, revisiting it in this way, I found very valuable.
unidentified		Thank you. I mean, definitely they have not seen the event Like this, in consecutive order, they've purposely or the media And the government has arguably purposely given it to them out of order, focusing on Darnella's footage.
		You know, she won a Pulitzer Prize for her journalism.
		And 700,000 plus on GoFundMe, which is a compromised money laundering tool as far as I'm concerned, have been banned from GoFundMe as an OG company.
		For a long time.
		So you have to wonder, you know, did Maurice make any money?
		Did Chris Martin, the boy that took the 20, make any money?
		No. But yet others, you know, also let's say Judea, the nine-year-old, Darnella says that she wanted to shield her from the, quote, horrific torture, but you could see them on the scene saying, Laughing, smirking does not look like a horrific torture as someone's life is being snuffed out.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Well, that again sort of points to the other thing that stood out to me above all else was how casual this was, how routine this was, how utterly ordinary this entire event was until it becomes something life-changing.
		And I jotted down a couple times because it's almost every single person that's involved Treat this like they've done this every day.
		In fact, there's one point where the cop says, he's talking to the EMS, I think, and they're like, yeah, we had basically the same thing happen yesterday.
		Like, the same thing, basically.
		The day before. The fire truck person, when they pull up, they go, what's going on?
		More drama at Cup Foods?
		I mean, this was... Clearly a place where the cops were called out almost every day.
		I mean, it was routine and ordinary to them.
		So you almost understand why, you know, they didn't take it as seriously when the guy that they're holding down is like saying he can't breathe because every single day they have to deal with somebody like ODing on drugs and going crazy.
		And they go, look, we call the ambulance.
		We get it here. Even the ambulance is like loaded up and go around the corner because they know it can get out of hand fast.
		I mean, it's so ordinary.
		It was such a... Weird insight into emergency services in America that have to deal with this on a daily basis.
unidentified		Well, I had a screening on Sunday and there was an ER nurse and she pointed out a whole bunch of things that they don't usually do.
		And I show what happens inside of the ambulance.
		But to tell your audience that the reason why there's a milestone camera across the street is because of the shenanigans that have occurred over 30 years ago.
		At Cup Foods. This is not their first rodeo, and that's blood gang territory.
		So you have to wonder, like I also point out, I didn't know Derek Chauvin's nickname was the Warlord of Precinct 3, which is also very interesting.
		And he worked at other clubs with alleged ties to the Mexican cartel.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		And that's another big aspect of this story is Mexican cartels and the fentanyl, the fake money, where that's coming from.
unidentified		And that's in my book.
		I focus on that in my book.
		I couldn't smush all this.
		It's very complex. It's intense.
		It's an intense film.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, it is a very intense film.
		I'll tell you, it's hard to watch.
		I mean, that in and of itself is kind of a good reason to revisit this because you get desensitized at a certain point, but then seeing it again in the timeline with the context, I mean, your movie's really unblinking, right?
		We don't cut away from anything.
		You sit there and you watch it, and him and the ambulance.
		I mean, it's hard to watch.
		And you sort of get why it looked so brutal, but it gives you the context that shows why the cops seem so cavalier about this.
		It's because it was routine to them.
		It seemed totally normal. They had no idea that this would become what it became.
		So that alone is so interesting, watching this event unfold, knowing what it becomes, and knowing the people involved are treating it like just another Wednesday.
		Totally fascinating. And so you have a new book coming out.
		We only have about a minute left. Yes.
		And so this movie will be a companion to it, but this movie really focuses on just that about hour and 30 minutes that took place.
unidentified		Yeah, and I want to make a shout-out to Sean Hibbler, I think he's been with Alex Jones and I wouldn't have been able to realize my vision without him because he knows the story and is very gifted and open-minded.
		There were other editors that called me a white supremacist or unethical.
		For reals. And yes, this is to go with a book that is not out yet.
		It'll be published by Logosophia.
		You can get a pre-order on MiriamHinane.com under the George Floyd tab.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Well, I just want to thank you so much for coming on.
		Congratulations on the movie again.
		Thank you, Harry. Folks, the movie's called The Real Timeline.
		It's on My Movies Plus.
		Search The Real Timeline.
		Miriam Hanane, thank you so much for being on with us today.
unidentified		Thank you. Thank you.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Have a good day. All right. Thank you, you too.
		We'll be back, folks, on the other side.
		I think I'll open up a phone line.
		Stay with us. Don't go anywhere.
		Very interesting stuff, folks.
		We're living through a time when world-changing events are caught live on video, and that's something else.
		Let's talk about conspiracy theories, shall we?
		I don't know if you have realized this yet, but they're not theories.
		They're just noticing what's happening.
		They're just pointing out what's going on and they're called conspiracy theories.
		Rolling Stone lists the paranoia conspiracies the House GOP will investigate with their new majority.
		Among them, according to Kara Vogt, the lab leak hypothesis.
		That's a conspiracy theory, apparently, despite the fact that It's true and also acknowledged by everybody, including Anthony Fauci himself, who at this point has also acknowledged that it's a distinct possibility that it happened.
		But they don't want it to be true.
		That's why it's a conspiracy theory.
		Social media speech suppression, also not a theory.
		And Hunter Biden's laptop, again, not a theory.
		So what are they talking about?
		What are they talking about? Well, the point of this is obviously that the GOP is addressing very real and very concerning events that affect the American people.
		And the Rolling Stones are very angry about that.
		They say how Republicans have put disinformation and falsehoods at the center of their governing agenda.
		They say that they've launched their control of the House of Representatives with a sprawling, paranoid new initiative, the Select Committee on Weaponization of Government, an interrogation of alleged efforts to silence and punish conservatives across federal agencies.
		Which is hilarious because, again, it's like these people.
		I mean, it doesn't even matter.
		To argue with these people is a pointless act.
		It doesn't matter.
		And it's hard to even, like, express how dishonest these people are.
		They know these things are happening, but they call them alleged.
		We know they know they're happening because they celebrate them happening.
		You say the FBI is doing this, you know, the disinformation board, they write articles about what a good thing that is.
		Knowing full well the disinformation board is there to censor conservatives.
		They're in favor of that.
		Then the Republicans react to it.
		They act like they don't know what's happening or that it's not happening.
		So it's just...
		These people are despicable.
		They're dishonest. It goes beyond description.
		It goes beyond logic or reason.
		It goes beyond argumentation.
		It's just dealing with a persistent, perpetual, congenital liar.
		And the only thing to do with those people...
		Is to stop listening to them or shut them up.
		That's it. That's all it takes.
		That's all we need. And...
		Like, obviously this is going on.
		Obviously they're trying to crush conservative voices.
		But there's more than that.
		We're losing free speech as a principle or a concept.
		Not just as a law. We're losing it as a value that Americans hold.
		We're losing it as a concept that not just the government has to abide by...
		But that the American people also recognize the value of and uphold in their own regard.
		That's going away now.
		That's going away now. And again, it's being...
		The destruction of this right and this principle and this founding...
		Aspect of our entire civilization is going away predicated on hate speech, anti-Semitism, racism, etc., etc.
		And so in order to combat the scourge of people not liking other people, in order to combat the scourge of people criticizing the state of Israel...
		Or people noticing FBI statistics when organized by race.
		To stop that scourge that they think is going to destroy the world, they are destroying the most fundamental and foundational principles that give us the freedom that they think they're upholding.
		It's so ridiculous and backwards.
		This is the story.
		I covered it yesterday. This one's more extensive.
		It's from the justicereport.news.
		White man arrested, harassed, red-flagged, and charged with felony over swastika sticker found at Albany University.
		Again, I'm not a Nazi.
	I don't like the swastika.
	I wouldn't go around and put a swastika up.
	I don't like the Nazis.
	I don't like what they represent or the symbol that they use to identify themselves because they were a totalitarian, authoritarian system.
	Group of control freaks that took over a country and then demanded everybody bend their will to the desires of their leadership and eliminated, destroyed, or did all they could to prevent from succeeding anybody who stood against them.
	That's the world we're entering into.
	We are entering into a world that won't have any swastikas allowed, but all of the things that the swastika represents will be here.
	All of the restrictions, all of the totalitarianism, all of the oppression from the government or from...
	Private groups or the combination of them, which is fascism.
	That's what we're entering into.
	So we won't have the swastika symbol, but we'll have all of the things that that symbol represents, minus the anti-Semitism, I guess.
	It'll be phylo-Semitic, but it will be all of the same things.
	So again, this person was a college student in Albany University.
	He put less than a dozen stickers up.
	Some that were pro-white, some that were anti-Zionist, others that were explicitly Nazi.
	Not my favorite thing, but you know, I think we can deal with it.
	I think we can handle it. I think we can deal with this, you guys.
	I think if we see a symbol that we don't like, we can just ignore it.
	I think if we see a sticker with an offensive thing, we can just take it down or not care.
	Because again, it just matters who's in charge or who's not.
	The symbols that they choose to deem as being hateful and therefore beyond free speech, absurd.
	It's an absurd thing, but it's totally arbitrary what they choose.
	You could just as legitimately ban the rainbow flag and the black fist, the power fist, or whatever they call it.
	If you're offended by that symbol, why not make that illegal?
	Why not charge anybody who posts a sticker of the Black Lives Matter flag?
	Why not throw them in prison?
	There's no difference except the people in charge don't want to make that a hate symbol.
	That's the only reason. They do want to make the swastika and a burning cross a hate symbol, but not the other stuff.
	But it's totally arbitrary.
	It doesn't matter. Again, I would prefer to have swastika stickers up Than I would to be dragged away by the police for putting a swastika sticker up.
	Do you get what I'm saying? To oppose Nazis is to oppose the thing that they represent.
	The totalitarianism, the hatred, all that.
	Not the symbol. The symbol doesn't hurt anybody.
	But they say, but he's been red flagged.
	After a heavy handed investigation.
	So a couple stickers go up that scare people.
	So then you have multiple police agencies, including the University Police Department, the Albany County Crime Analysis Center, the New York State Police.
	Only when all these people got involved did the system finally arrest and detain 23-year-old Alexander Wolcott for his alleged involvement.
	He's since been charged with aggravated harassment in the first degree, a Class E felony charge that would see him receive up to five years in prison, as well as being issued a New York State Extreme Risk Protection Order.
unidentified		here.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		For putting up a couple stickers, folks.
		Again, does that mean I love the swastika?
		No, it means I love free speech.
		It means we are adults and we're Americans and we can handle when people have opinions that we find distasteful.
		That's what it means to be an American.
		What it means to be an American is to stand up against the idea that somebody's going to be sent to prison for five years having never done anything wrong and their only crime having been to put up a sticker on With a symbol that the authorities don't like on it.
		What it means to be an American is to understand the threat of the censorship being significantly worse than whatever that symbol could represent.
		And why not ban the hammer and sickle?
		Killed way more people than the swask ever did.
		Why not ban the black fist, right?
		Been responsible for way more deaths than the KKK could have ever dreamed of.
		That black fist has killed more black people in the last year than the KKK did in its entire existence.
		The rainbow flag. Why not ban that as well?
		It's all arbitrary.
		And we'll return to this on the other side, because I want to keep getting into this.
		Reading this article, it is actually horrifying what they're getting away with.
		And you can think that they won't come for you next.
		Remember how that worked out with the Nazis last time?
		Remember how that worked out? Well, they're just going after the Nazis.
		They're just going after the people who put up swastikas, and I would never do that.
		Yeah, but where's the line?
		But where do they draw the line?
		I don't think they draw it anywhere.
		So you're next. Stand up for the distasteful people now, or you're next.
		Again, folks, it's the same thing over and over.
		Just slowly but surely ratcheting away our First Amendment.
		And they'll do it with the people that you don't want to argue on behalf of.
		People that you don't want to stand up for.
		It's how they do it. It's why they destroy Alex Jones' reputation and then make him first on the chopping block.
		Well, that's Alex Jones.
		It's fine. We can let it happen to him.
		And it happens to you.
		Like, it's really not that complicated.
		I'll show how this works in just a second.
		But again, it's like they're slowing down or even...
		No, they're just speeding up.
		The latest from New York Post, Democrats' latest attempt to use, quote, white supremacy to crush their opposition.
		Politicians of old wanted to persuade the public by capturing hearts and minds, but today's politicians find more value in capturing our tongues.
		They want all Americans to take the most paranoid position on how dangerous our majority white nation is for nonwhite citizens, while also bringing in millions of nonwhite citizens.
		I mean, that's fine.
		This is about Representative Sheila Jackson Lee's new bill, the Leading Against White Supremacy Act, to prevent and prosecute white supremacy-inspired hate crime and conspiracy to commit white supremacy-inspired hate crime.
		The addition of conspiracy means that people who use supposed hate speech online could face criminal charges under the legislation even if no one takes action based on their speech.
		So again, in other words, if you post something about a group of people that's negative, you can be charged.
		That's the end of the First Amendment.
		That's it. It's over.
		And, you know, I don't have to try to put myself in these people's positions.
		I see symbols that I hate every single day, all of the time, in media, on the news, on the internet, in real life, in stickers, all the time, constantly.
		Hammer and Sickle, the Black Live Pride Fist, whatever that is.
		It's just endless, right?
		I would never want those symbols to be banned outright.
		Although now, I guess, you know, I guess that's the world we're entering into.
		It would be kind of stupid of us if we had power to not do what they're doing to us.
		But regardless, my principles, my American intuition, my love of free speech for everyone means that I got to deal with symbols I don't like sometimes.
		That's just the way it is. I understand that very minor inconvenience is worth the existence of free speech.
		Okay? They don't think that way.
		They don't believe that. These...
		The discomfort of knowing people disagree with you or maybe don't like your race of people, it's unacceptable to them.
		So one of these stickers that this guy put up, he put up like less than 12 stickers.
		One of the stickers found by a dormitory RA contained a swastika, a violation of New York state law that prohibits public display of nooses, swastikas, or the burning of a cross under threat of strict penalties.
		Local law enforcement quickly launched a dragnet of epic proportions.
		Even the governor herself took to Twitter to decry her outrage over the incident days before a tightening gubernatorial election.
		Again, you don't like the swastika?
		Great. Sound off about it.
		That's it. That's all you can do.
	But the investigation, it's a little bit overblown, in my personal opinion, especially when you have multiple police agencies dedicating time and money at a time when New York is experiencing a massive rise in violent crime where people are being assaulted and murdered on the streets to outrageous extents.
	That's the one they're focusing on. They're focusing on the The cross with the crooked parts.
	That's the big threat here.
	And again, why these symbols?
	Well, because it's white supremacy, obviously.
	But is there any more legitimacy to our government banning the swastika than the Nazis had to ban the Star of David?
	Or ban the menorah?
	They had just as good of reasons as you do.
	They could explain their position in your words.
	And it's the same. So are you against Nazism?
	Or are you just against, like, Germany doing it, right?
	Because you are Nazis. You are engaged in Nazi-like behavior.
	The censorship, the, you know, arbitrary application of, you know, political punishment or persecution.
	You are Nazis. So you are who we're against.
	Sort of ironic. I got to defend a Nazi against the Nazis.
	But okay, that's what I got to do.
	So he's got an extreme risk protective order on him.
	And again, it would be one thing if it was like, well, you know, we charged him with vandalism or graffiti because he put a sticker up.
	And it's like, well, all right.
	Yeah, I guess. You know, everybody puts stickers up and you only punish the one guy that put up the sticker you don't like.
	Yeah, it's fine.
	Fine. You know, that would be fine.
	That's not what's happening here.
	That's not what's happening here. Because that would be appropriate.
	That would be, I guess, legitimate, right?
	If you have, you know, anti-graffiti laws and you only apply them to people who put graffiti you don't like, it's not exactly fair, but that would be fine.
	Because that would at least be somewhat equal, right?
	You put a sticker, you get a punishment for putting a sticker.
	This guy's being punished as if he is a terrorist for putting up a sticker.
	That's the crazy part.
	In layman's terms, he's been red flagged.
	Because of this, the state has effectively declared him mentally unwell, confiscating his firearms, all because the system, after merely finding a swastika on public property, determined their suspect is somehow, quote, likely to engage in conduct that would result in serious harm to self or others, as defined in the mental hygiene law.
	Again, there's no evidence of this.
	He put up a sticker. It's scary to me that our government will charge you with red flag you and basically claim you are mentally unwell and a lunatic for putting up a swastika sticker.
	That's absurd. That is insane.
	One attorney says of this protective order, you have people who are essentially not medical professionals expressing medical opinions that result in the deprivation of rights.
	And you have a procedure that essentially allows somebody to lose their rights without ever having gone in front of a judge.
	They actually interviewed Alex at Justicereport.news.
	And Alex says, quote, they arrest me for a broken taillight an hour and a half away from the campus in question, said Alex, a man who was in high spirits with a calm demeanor considering the injustice he now faces.
	Two SUNY University police and undercover vehicles and two New York state counterterrorism investigative units pulled up.
	I was arrested for aggravated harassment.
	They claimed I had photos on my phone of, quote, a weapon holding a weapon, photos of Hitler and other anti-Semitic memes, screenshots of memes and photos of Hitler and 420 relating to Hitler's birthday.
	That was their probable cause for taking away my firearms.
	There was never any target, no menacing whatsoever.
	I think that's important.
	I think it's important to know if we now live in a country where memes we might have on our phone about Nazis will get us arrested.
	That's not a world I want to live in.
	I guarantee you there's memes on my phone that would fall under that category.
	I'm not a Nazi, but I do like memes.
	He says I was arraigned and had my preliminary hearing two days after.
	A week or two after I was arrested, the local sheriff stopped by where I was staying at the time and knocked on the door.
	This was them taking away the firearms, basically saying you can either give us the firearms or we can go in and tear your house up and get them myself.
	My lawyer said he's never seen anything like that.
	The only time he's ever seen anything like that is when somebody is hospitalized in an insane asylum against their will because they're off their medication, explained Alex.
	After that, however, the police offered him a cruel ultimatum.
	Give us the guns or we'll do whatever it takes to find them ourselves.
	So again, this is insane.
	This person never hurt anybody.
	He never threatened anybody.
	Put up a swastika.
	I get it.
	You don't like the swastika.
	I get that.
	I get you're very scared of the swastika.
	That does not give you the right to eliminate the First Amendment in this country.
	It does not give you the right to eliminate the Fifth Amendment in this country.
	It does not give you the right to deny somebody legal process or the ability to speak out for themselves.
	Remember this happened last year.
	I talked about it then.
	The woman wearing a swastika on her shirt that was assaulted by men who were ripping her shirt off and assaulting her in the street.
	And the media goes out and is like, good, she deserves it.
	It's like, again, I'm less offended by the symbol of the Nazis than I am of the Nazi behavior you're engaged in, you psychopaths.
	And this is where it goes, right?
	From thetimesofisrael.com.
	U.S. Group dispatches mobile anti-Semite billboards to the homes of anti-Israel students.
	These people aren't Nazis. These people weren't drawing swastikas.
	They just criticized a nation state.
	They criticized a country on the other side of the world.
	And then you have private groups sending billboards across the country to park outside of their house, identifying them by name and address with the word anti-Semite.
	Is that okay?
	My Jews out there, you okay with people doing this in your name because somebody criticized another country?
	They're in your name going out and parking a billboard truck outside of their house saying target this person?
	They're a wrong thinker?
	Again, they didn't do the swastika.
	I don't get how this is illegal.
	But yeah, dispatch mobile billboards to the home of anti-Israel Berkeley law students accusing them of anti-Semitism.
	The provocative campaign is the latest sally in a high-profile dispute over anti-Zionism.
	They truck-mounted billboards, visited the two students at their neighborhood in Texas when they were home during the university winter break.
	Yeah, we're losing the First Amendment, folks.
	And it'll be the anti-Semites.
	First they came for the anti-Semites, folks.
	Then they came for me. You need to defend your civilization against the onslaught of this cancer of progressivism, liberalism, and globalist brainwashing.
	This is a life-or-death situation.
	No messing around.

▲