All Episodes
Jan. 18, 2023 - American Journal - Harrison Smith
02:09:45
The American Journal Full Show 1-18-23
Participants
Main voices
h
harrison smith
01:29:41
Appearances
a
alex jones
02:30
d
dr leana wen
01:04
g
greg reese
04:32
r
ron johnson
02:52
s
steven crowder
02:18
Clips
k
kaitlan collins
00:17
n
nigel farage
00:33
Callers
jr in new york
04:09
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
You walk into this room at your own risk, because it leads to the future.
Not a future that will be, but one that might be.
This is not a new world.
It is simply an extension of what began in the old one.
Hey, I'm Safia, and I'm powered by artificial intelligence.
You might be wondering what artificial intelligence can do for you.
alex jones
Popular news outlet has been publishing AI articles since November, and no one noticed.
Most of these articles on BuzzFeed and even CNN and articles over at CNET are written by AI. And right now, ChatGPT is rattling the AI world, turning out stunningly humanoid writing.
unidentified
Just ask Douglas Rushkoff, a renowned author and professor of media culture.
It is writing better than most of my students write at this point.
How does it work? ChatGPT has been filled, in a sense, with a massive amount of information.
Imagine the biggest library you can, then programmed and trained by humans to process and spit it out in conversational phrases.
And all that means ChatGPT, or more advanced AI like it, could replace people in all sorts of positions.
This could potentially save time and resources, but it could also lead to a loss of personal connections and a decline in the quality of these types of interactions.
We know that because everything Rushkoff said just there was written by ChatGPT.
alex jones
So basically you write one article that's ten pages long.
And then it gets recycled into thousands of other articles that are a page, two, three pages long, and the AI just moves them around.
And I remember seeing articles I could tell didn't quite make sense and didn't have names on them or had names I'd look up that don't exist.
unidentified
The clear and present danger of disinformation is our conversation here this afternoon.
It follows a session just now about disrupting distrust.
And of course, those are connected.
alex jones
So I hope that's where we can start. Think about how we just calmly discuss the fact that, oh, AI for many years secretly is writing news articles.
With information, with disinformation, it's fed.
That way you don't have a reporter that can come back later and say, I was told to lie, or you can't even basically expose the person.
It's following orders.
It doesn't have a conscience. They won't ask questions.
They will follow criminal orders and they can have their memories wiped.
unidentified
What must be right?
alex jones
Think about cell phones.
Until cell phones and until iPhones and smartphones came out in the last 15 years, I could remember the phone number I had when I was a teenager.
I could remember my grandma's phone number.
I could remember some of my girlfriend's numbers.
Because I was trained, we were all trained, to commit numbers to memory.
So once I dialed the number two or three times, I could remember that number.
You couldn't write it down, but you could just punch it into the phone.
It was mental memory.
A form of, like, muscle memory.
Go back to skeletons they dig up in ancient Africa, in ancient Europe, in ancient Asia.
The people, they estimate, were twice as strong as they are today.
And a man from 5,000 years ago in England Or a man from 1,000 years ago in Africa, or a man from 6,000 years ago in the Middle East, was twice as strong as the average man today, just with their genetics.
unidentified
You are obsolete, Mr.
Wordsworth. A lie!
No man is obsolete.
alex jones
Now we're becoming softer and softer and softer, and the televisions and the dopamine and the smartphones on record have lowered the average human's attention span in the modern world to less than 14 seconds.
The attention span of a goldfish is about 16 seconds.
So what does it mean when humans are taken out of the equation?
Well, it means we become, by action, obsolete.
unidentified
The narcotics that you call What qualifies as hate speech, as illegal hate speech, which you will have soon also in U.S., I think that we have a strong reason why we have this in the criminal law.
We need the platforms to simply work with the language and to identify such cases.
The AI would be too dangerous.
I tell you, I don't care.
I'm a human being.
I exist. And if I speak one thought aloud, that thought lives, even after I'm shoveled in my grave.
harrison smith
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome to the program. This is the American Journal.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
You're watching us on Infowars.com and Band.video.
Glad you're here with us today.
We've got a big day to cover.
Lots of news coming out of Davos.
Talking about Ukraine war as well.
A plethora of hoaxes to deal with today.
And we'll get to those.
We'll take your phone calls as well.
Very big show we have for you.
Hope everybody enjoyed the Alex Jones' Right emergency broadcast yesterday.
The sale is still on, if I'm seeing this right, at Infowarsstore.com.
It'll be on through the rest of the week.
Alex Jones' Right emergency sale, up to 50% off our top-selling products.
Please do go there and support us.
Just because we're not in the emergency broadcast doesn't mean the state of emergency is over.
And without any further ado, let's just get into it.
Intuit, here it is, your daily dispatch.
All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Wednesday, the 18th of January, 2023.
Video evidence suggests Greta Thunberg detainment in Germany may have been staged.
My God.
I also have evidence of other things that Greta Thunberg has been involved in staging, including the climate crisis itself, her entire career, the grassroots support she receives, her legitimacy and authority.
You know what? It turns out that this latest is just a very long line We're good to go.
To be more about herself than about any legitimate concern for the environment, recent events in Germany suggest her M.O. has not changed.
During a protest over the expansion of a coal mining operation in Germany, Thunberg was apparently detained by police, sending climate change activists into a fury on social media.
Images of Thunberg smiling while she was carried away by law enforcement were circulated widely by the media.
However, the other video footage of her interactions with police and reporters on the scene showed that the arrest may have been staged for the cameras.
We're going to go over this whole thing a little bit later.
We're going to look at how the media is covering it.
We're going to look at the video that shows the staging behind the scenes in the first place.
We'll also talk about the effects of the climate change program you don't see.
They're very scared of a giant shovel that they have in Germany because it digs up coal.
But they're perfectly fine with replacing that coal power with lithium-ion batteries and What are we doing?
What are we doing?
Shut down nuclear power.
Force everybody on coal. Go protest the coal.
Film yourself being arrested.
Pretend. It's just everything is so fake.
It's so fake. It's so fake.
We'll get into it later.
Meanwhile, Biden administration opened civil rights investigation into school bans on groomer books.
That's right, folks. School districts across the country have been forced by parents to remove books deemed sexually explicit.
Now the Biden administration has opened an investigation into a Texas school district for banning sexually explicit books that promote gender theory.
Now, obviously, the real civil rights violation here is to have the school and the government engaged in religious indoctrination against your wishes.
That's what this is.
That really is the solution, I think, to solving all of this.
I don't know if it needs to be a declaration or I don't know what needs to happen, but...
Everybody needs to acknowledge that the rainbow flag is a religious symbol.
Whatever they're pushing with these books is a religious manifestation.
It fulfills all of the necessary requirements.
It is a moral teaching.
It's a moral framework that they're pushing.
So the violation is that you have this pseudo-religious organization forcing their beliefs and their We're good to go.
Aren't restricted the same way that religions are.
But if you just recognize that this is a religion, and this is a religion infiltrating and pushing its theology on the schools, it's not that complicated to understand how that is a civil rights violation.
But instead, they're investigating the people who are removing this religious indoctrination from the schools.
They're claiming it's a civil rights violation to keep pornography out of schools, folks.
That's what the federal government is engaged in.
They didn't have anything to say when it was leftists banning Dr.
Seuss or To Kill a Mockingbird or Huckleberry Finn.
No, that was all fine and good.
But when you ban pornography from your elementary school, the federal government's going to get involved and make sure that you don't do that.
It's very gay.
Moving on, FBI decided not to monitor Biden document search after President Biden's lawyers found classified documents at an And because Biden's attorney,
quote, I don't think I need to explain this to you, but in case you forgot, in case you don't remember, originally when Donald Trump, he was asked to go through and identify potentially classified documents.
He's doing this in cooperation with the National Archives Foundation.
The Archives and Records Bureau, whatever that's called.
And they raided his house anyway with dozens of armed FBI agents who took pictures of everything inside and then published it on the media.
He was also cooperating.
He also had his lawyers at the direction of the National Archives going through their information.
That's not what happened with Joe Biden.
I guess just admitted that they had classified documents.
And so the FBI is just like, well, tell you what, have your lawyers go...
If we got involved, it would just be so complicated.
It would just be too complicated if we got involved or if we did a search or anything.
So tell you what, you go through your stuff, you figure out if what you have is illegal, and then turn it over to us.
And that should be good, and we'll trust you completely and not supervise or observe at all.
It's just, you know... They just do this stuff.
Like, it doesn't matter. None of it's legal.
None of it's lawful. None of it's consistent or anything of the sort.
They just do whatever the hell they want to do because they know they can.
And as long as we let them get away with it, they can.
Top scientists on COVID vaccine, quote, withdraw them immediately.
The stories at Infowars.com via The Daily Skeptic.
Dr. Richard Enos, a retired professor of evolutionary biology at Edinburgh University, has undertaken a thorough analysis of the UK's COVID-19 yellow card vaccine adverse event data and found it indicates, quote, unequivocal safety signals for adverse reactions caused by Pfizer and Moderna vaccines affecting the blood, the heart and female reproduction.
He concludes that, quote, there can be no question that the mRNA vaccine should be withdrawn with immediate effect.
And this will be a common theme that we'll cover throughout today's show.
Even the head of the CDC or whoever she is, Dr.
Leanna Nguyen, who's been one of the worst, most obnoxious and annoying pushers of the COVID narrative and the vaccine pandemic.
Actually coming out and saying, you know, we think we should go back and determine how many people actually died from COVID because we admit now that we were counting everybody who died as a COVID death to pump the numbers up, to scare you, to justify all the things that we're doing.
Now that we've done all of those things and we don't need to keep scaring you, then we can go back and actually get the correct numbers now that it's not useful for us to lie about it anymore.
It's really pretty wild what's going on.
But there are some positive developments in this.
Ron Johnson... It's actually talking about the process for beginning the Nuremberg trials, which would be nice to see.
It'll be nice to see those people hang.
Finally, this Ukraine interior minister, along with 16 killed in worst helicopter disasters since the war's start.
Ukraine's interior minister is among three top government officials killed in what marks the country's worst aerial disaster since the war's start.
A total of 16 people died, including three children and four other bystanders on the ground.
Pretty horrifying stuff.
I think we should send him a billion dollars.
I think we should send him a hundred billion dollars.
200 billion. Let's send him 200 billion dollars.
I was just thinking about trying to find this quote from a C.S. Lewis book.
I'm reading the...
C.S. Lewis wrote a trilogy, a sci-fi trilogy.
And it's really just like a sci-fi version of the Bible.
In a weird way, the second book is basically like a Garden of Eden, like a new Garden of Eden.
Basically, God... Earth didn't go so well, so he made a new planet.
And you meet Eve, and you see the devil trying to corrupt Eve and the other characters watching this happen and trying to make the arguments to Eve that she shouldn't be corrupted, that she should follow God's will.
And... It was just...
It was so... It was so appropriate.
It was so accurate. It was so like I felt like I was there because it essentially...
It asks the question, like, what if Eve said no to the devil in the Garden of Eden?
Would the devil just give up?
No, he wouldn't. He would keep corrupting.
He would keep corrupting. He would keep planting seeds.
He would keep telling her stories.
He would keep just seducing her over to the dark side forever.
And there's just this stretch in the book where the main character who's trying to keep the Eve character...
Virtuous, and not let her be corrupted, is just like, I can't do this, can't go on.
He keeps saying this phrase, this can't go on, this can't go on, this can't go on, because eventually the devil's gonna corrupt her.
Eventually it's gonna happen.
It might not happen today, you might be able to hold him off until tomorrow, or the day after that, or the day after that, or the day after that, but if he never gives up, and he just continually, persistently tries to corrupt Eve, she's eventually gonna be corrupted.
And so, the main character, named Ransom, It's like, I don't know what to do.
Like, this isn't going to work.
I can't keep, you know, arguing with him forever.
Eventually, something's going to break through.
And every time we argue, he gets a little closer.
He plants another little seed in her mind, and it makes it that much more difficult.
The longer it goes on, the more corrupted she becomes.
And eventually, he just punches the devil in the face.
Eventually, he decides, you know what...
This isn't a winning strategy, just trying to continually argue with the devil who has infinite energy and will outlast you, you know, forever and, you know, always makes little tiny gains every time they talk.
It just, this can't go on.
This can't go on.
I'm just reading this book going, he's right, this can't go on.
This can't go on anymore.
And I love that at eventual point he's like, oh right, I'm I can just beat him up.
I can just kill him and get him out of here.
And then he's gone and he's not trying to corrupt her anymore.
And she is safe from his corruption.
And all I'm saying is I know how you feel, Ransom.
I know exactly how you feel at a certain point.
This can't go on.
And it's exhausting trying to metaphorically, metaphysically beat these devils back forever.
It's so infuriating.
So we're going to start today with a good example of how to hold the line.
And it's not even like fighting back against these people.
It's just this is how you do it.
It's a player from the Flyers, a defenseman, Ivan Pororov.
Bunch of R's, bunch of V's.
I don't know what to tell you, folks.
O's, R's, and V's.
He's refusing to wear a rainbow jersey on warm-ups during Pride Night due to his Russian Orthodox faith.
And I just love this video so much.
It's been going around.
But again, just take this as an example.
This is the best possible way to respond to demands.
Because we talk about it all the time. Whether it's explicitly talking about how this...
How discussion works and the methods that they're using, how you combat it, or just sort of mocking them in this idea of how they're constantly like, oh, well, we really just think that...
And as soon as you start arguing with them, as soon as you get into it, I've been talking about this with the gas stoves, right?
Where you start going, well, I don't think gas stoves are more...
And it's like, you've already lost.
You've already lost at that point.
We say, just tell these people to shut up.
That's the only way to do it. This guy's not telling them to shut up.
He's got an even better tactic, actually.
And it's just to... Assert your stance and demand respect for it.
And then look him in the eye.
And listen to the silence.
Because he doesn't give credence to their arguments.
He doesn't get on their level.
He doesn't try to reason with them.
He doesn't try to...
Well, let's just watch the clip and then we'll talk about it after.
Maybe we'll watch it again. Maybe we'll watch it a couple times.
It really is that good. So this is it, folks.
This is how you stand up to these people.
Brilliantly done. Perfectly done.
Clip number eight. Let's watch.
unidentified
Everybody, I respect everybody's choices.
My choice is to stay true to myself and my religion.
That's all I'm going to say. Silence.
Like I said, that's all I'm going to comment on that.
If you have any hockey questions, I would answer those.
harrison smith
If you have any hockey questions.
We're sports reporters.
We don't ask questions about hockey.
We want to know about gay. We want to know if you're gay.
unidentified
Do you hate gays? Can you walk us through the emotion that the team was feeling?
harrison smith
What's going on? Just perfectly done, right?
I respect everybody, but I'm going to go with my religion on this, and I expect to be respected on that too.
And they're just silent. What are they going to say?
No, we're not going to respect that?
Well, then why should he respect your view?
It's like a kill shot.
It's like just saying, well, look, I respect how you feel.
Now you respect how I feel.
And you sit there and watch them try to justify why they shouldn't have to respect how you feel.
It was perfect. I just love it so much.
And let's talk about another way that you can argue in favor of what We're selling here at InfoWars.
You know, humanity, freedom, God, family.
You know, this very dangerous stuff, according to those in authority right now.
We talk about this quite a bit as well, that it's a losing battle to always be responding.
It's a losing battle to always be playing defense.
To play offense, you have to present an argument that First, you have to, you know, give them something to respond to.
And this is what Nigel Farage does in this next clip, clip number 11.
Another thing that we talk about quite a bit, I know I mentioned a thing about it yesterday, the idea that Charles Munger or, you know, Bill Gates or anybody like that, they'll look at the stock market and go, everybody's five times better off than they were before, ignoring all of the horrific reality around them.
Here's how Nigel Farage reframes this argument.
And, again, puts it in a way that is pretty impossible to respond to.
unidentified
Let's watch. And that's why you said it didn't matter if we weren't slightly richer by leaving as long as we cut immigration.
nigel farage
What I said was this. There are reports that say that we're better off with mass immigration.
There are some reports that say we're slightly worse off economically with mass immigration.
But to me, there's an issue called the quality of life.
And I think that matters more than money.
It's about thinking our kids and grandkids can have what we've had in terms of access to local healthcare, in terms of our kids getting into local primary schools, in terms of our overall quality of life.
And that, David, I think matters more than GDP rising by 1% per annum.
harrison smith
No doubt we'll leave it. He's exactly right, and that's the argument that needs to be made.
You need to put it on them and say to them why—you explain.
You make the argument why GDP is more important than quality of life.
You explain why we should sacrifice our quality of life, our way of life, our comfort, and our safety for a few extra bucks.
I'm not about to make that argument.
You make that argument. Tell us why it's worth it.
And they can't, so they won't, so you win.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is the American Journal, Infowars.com, band.video.
We've got a lot of videos to show you today.
I want to start off, again, before we dive into the real heavy news segment, let's take a look at something taking Twitter by storm.
I've seen a lot of headlines about this recently, videos about this.
Just happened yesterday. Stephen Crowder coming out and exposing Khan Inc.
It's pretty interesting.
Of course, it reflects what you've heard me say here on American Journal.
He makes some interesting claims.
I don't know what I really think about this yet.
And maybe this is what we'll...
Ask the audience when we open up the phone lines.
I'll know what you make of this.
Let's go first to, let's see, we got a couple clips here.
We'll go first to clip number six.
So Crowder, as you may know, Crowder recently left the Blaze to strike out on his own.
I guess he's going independent.
I don't think he's signed with anybody yet, but apparently he was in negotiations with various top media outlets.
And he's actually revealed some of their...
Like some of the agreements that they signed, some of the contracts that they offer.
Let's go first to clip number six here.
Crowder saying Big Con is in bed with Big Tech.
steven crowder
Let's watch. Big Tech is in bed with Big Con.
The people you thought, the people I thought were fighting for you, a lot of it has been a Big Con.
Now, I'm specifically avoiding...
Naming names or going after individuals in this video, because I genuinely hope that those I'm addressing, and you know who you are, have a change of heart.
Don't sign these contracts.
I now know what you are signing out there.
I have the luxury of not having to.
Let me go through this. If any of the major platforms issues a content strike such that Crowder cannot be monetized on such platform, the fee will be reduced by 25%.
And then another 20% of it happens on Apple.
And then another 10% of it happens on Facebook.
And then another 10% of it happens on Spotify.
And then if you get a strike...
Meaning a suspension, another 20%.
Just to drive it home.
You get hit by a car, you have a sick day, you can lose $100,000 a day.
This is what's sent out to everybody.
harrison smith
And he's actually posted some of these videos.
I guess these are screenshots from the video, but he actually has images from the contract itself.
This one posted by Behese Tweets.
Additional rights, merch rights, blank will maintain the exclusive right to create and sell Crowder and Crowder content branded merchandise.
All remuneration for the blank and exploitation of these rights is included in the fee.
They say they'll maintain exclusive rights to manage, grow, and monetize all of the Crowder email lists during the term.
social media management the company will have exclusive rights to manage curate and monetize crowder's official facebook youtube apple podcast spotify snapchat rumble and other social media accounts excluding crowder's existing existing personal twitter and instagram account during the term
additionally blank will have you know company will have the perpetual have the perpetual and exclusive right to create own manage curate monetize any and all social media accounts on any social media or similar platforms determined by blank on crowder content or shows all remuneration for the exploitation of these rights is included in the fee Thank you.
unidentified
Thank you.
harrison smith
Pretty incredible.
But he seems to have gone, you know, even further than that.
Let's go to clip number 17.
Here's his spiel about, because this is them, as you just heard him explain, basically, I guess his contention is that they have things built into the contract that says, if you violate big tech's rules and big tech kicks you off, you know, we're going to punish you monetarily.
We're not going to pay you as much.
Which, to me, in a way, kind of makes sense.
I mean, if you're paying somebody to create content, and that content is posted to a big tech site, and that content can no longer be posted to the big, then you're paying them for nothing, because it's not going out anywhere.
I don't know. To me, that kind of makes sense.
If you're going to be on big tech, it's like a...
It's just an understood thing.
And I've explained this to our audience as well.
I go to The Blaze and do a show with them and I can't say the word ivermectin because it's YouTube.
And they have like an updated list of terms that YouTube tells you not to say and they ask us not to say it.
I didn't realize that I may have been costing them $100,000 a pop every time I said one of these words.
Oops, sorry guys, but hey, I'm used to being on Infowars where we don't have petty little restrictions like this and we don't have to abide by the arbitrary, capricious, yet draconian rules of big tech free speech censorship.
It's a beautiful thing, actually.
So, you know, this is all known.
To me, that's not necessarily...
You know, conservative media working with big tech, except that they do.
And we know that they do. They literally, they like have people at YouTube that they call.
Hey, are we going to be okay saying this?
We are? Okay, great. I mean, they have this connection.
So that's kind of the other thing that they don't mention in this is like, because these big companies blaze daily wire, like all the, they have connections at Twitter.
They have direct contact people at YouTube.
It's not the same as everybody else where if you just get a strike from YouTube, it's just this faceless robot email and they just say, your request has been denied.
Goodbye. And that's it.
You actually have somebody to talk to.
So it's not quite as draconian as it seems, these strictures in this contract, because the company, when you sign up with them, they then lend you their influence and make it harder for you to get kicked off of YouTube.
So you really have to violate it big time.
Again, All I can say is I thank God every day that I don't have to deal with any of this crap because I can say literally whatever I want.
But we'll get into it. Let's go now to clip number 17.
Steven Crowder has woken up to the fact that many in right-wing media are actually working with the establishment.
steven crowder
Let's watch. But for the first time, I have to say that I believe many of those in charge in the right-leaning media are Are actually at odds with what's best for you, the viewer, the customer, and more importantly, the country.
We here at Milk Club, we thought that we were all in this together, that we were fighting the media, entertainment, industrial complex.
We thought that we were all genuinely taking it to big tech.
But too many of those in charge Of the big conservative platforms are verifiably in bed with them.
Big tech is in bed with big con.
The people you thought, the people I thought were fighting for you, a lot of it has been.
A big con. Now, I'm specifically avoiding naming names or going after individuals in this video because I genuinely hope that those I'm addressing—and you know who you are—have a change of heart.
It's never too late to do the right thing.
Guys, this is a genuine plea.
We can all do better. We can all do better.
It doesn't have to be this way.
And please don't make me have to provide receipts.
unidentified
Love that sound effect riff.
harrison smith
I will say, well, yeah, I know.
That's the... Where's that in the contract?
Who gets exclusive rights to the guitar riff?
I'll say one thing. Steven Crowder is a masterful creator of controversy and conflict.
Really pretty amazing, right?
It's not exactly a coincidence that he strikes out on his own and the first thing that he does is like a...
Exposing the companies that I guess he was a part of until he decided...
It feels a little bit like a grift to me.
A little bit. But I thought out of pure openness and transparency, I thought I would present our rules here at InfoWars.
There's only one.
It comes straight from Alex Jones.
It is simply this.
Say whatever you want, just tell the truth.
That's our contract. Oh, also, no Sandy Hook.
So other than no Sandy Hook, that's an addendum.
That was added last year for obvious reasons.
So other than that, we're an open book here.
But folks, you don't need Stephen Crowder to tell you this.
I have told you this. Alex has told you this.
We have talked about our own experience in this.
There is nobody... There is no outlet, there is no media organization on the right or the left wing as legitimate, as open, as uncensored as Infowars.com.
I hope that you support us in this because there's nothing like this anywhere on earth.
Listen to Steven Crowder if you need any more information about that.
Alright, welcome back ladies and gentlemen.
We're going to go ahead and open up the phone lines right now.
We'll be taking your calls throughout the second hour.
In the third hour, we will be joined by Izzy Lyman.
She's a journalist and author, and we'll be talking about immigration, the immigration issue.
There's a lot of immigration issues that we could be talking about right now.
We'll get into those with Izzy Lyman.
We'll go ahead and open up the phone lines right now, compile your calls during this segment, and take them throughout the next hour.
The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539.
That's 1-877-789-2539.
Like I said, we have a lot of stuff to cover.
I'm wondering where to even begin.
Let's go ahead and talk about what's happening with old Greta, shall we?
Old Greta Thunberg.
Greta Thunberg was arrested, just like AOC. Just like they keep staging their arrests to make it look like they're against the authorities for whom they are slavishly devoted.
It's very interesting.
In fact, I should have...
I'll have to grab the videos and the articles, I mean...
Because this is a whole thing, right?
This is a whole... I don't even know.
We're entering a house of mirrors here, right?
We're entering a house of mirrors where everything is a reflection of a reflection of a reflection.
Everything is illusion upon illusion upon deception.
It really is baffling and confusing.
So you've got these eco-terrorist groups.
Like Extinction Rebellion and Just Stop Oil.
And they are funded primarily by the oil companies.
I'm not kidding.
You can go look it up. The people who fund the protesters are billionaire oil heiresses and like oil company executives.
They actually are paying these people to do this.
And there's mainstream articles about it.
So this oil heiress has dedicated her fortune to bringing down the business that made her rich, right?
They're like celebrating, like think it's so cool.
No, it's a manipulation.
It's an act of puppetry.
And then they go out and they are allowed by the authorities to break any laws, commit vandalism, Break the public peace.
They never get busted. I mean, literally you have them like breaking the windows of banks, like little middle-aged women, right?
Like college professors wearing orange vests, going up with hammers and breaking the windows of banks while the cops stand there right next to them and watch it happen.
It's the wildest thing ever, right?
It's so weird how this works.
And then you've got, you know, the World Economic Forum, who it seems like their primary purpose of existing right now is to wage relentless war against fossil fuels.
That's what they, I mean, and again, they're willing to run roughshod over the concerns or desires of the people that this stuff is being inflicted on.
They're shutting down farms.
They're shutting down food supplies.
It doesn't matter how many people die.
They're on a suicide mission to end fossil fuels.
And yet you've got... Climate protesters protesting World Economic Forum saying they're not doing enough.
So you've got protesters funded by oil companies protesting the people who are working against oil companies but are also in bed with the oil company.
Like, they're funding their own opposition but they're also involved in the groups that the opposition is opposing.
It's all so baffling and retarded, but that's just how it is, okay?
All of it is manufactured.
All of it is fake. All of it is a stage show, carefully orchestrated and performed for the news cameras and carefully edited and selectively presented to the people of the world so they only get one particular image.
It's something else.
The story is a zero hedge. Video evidence may suggest Greta Thunberg detainment in Germany may have been staged.
And again, I love the way they put it.
Greta Thunberg, the manufactured political product of her activist parents in a climate change regime desperate for a literal poster child.
That again was the funniest part.
They would put the 16-year-old up in front of the camera and have her say stuff.
And then if you disagreed with her or criticized her, they would be like, she's a child.
She's just a child. You leave her alone.
It's like, you are the ones making, so it's, again, I mean, it's just, it's the most, like, simplistic and childish manipulation tactic, but it works because people are dumb, I guess, to literally go, you have to listen to this person, but if you criticize or speak back to this person, you're the bad one because they're just a child.
Then why are, it's obvious.
It's obvious why they do this stuff.
Do you remember when she turned 18?
The day she turned 18, there were like newspaper articles across the board about some other little kid.
It didn't work out. They wanted him to become the new Greta Thunberg.
It was some like 12-year-old from like Columbia or something.
I don't know if y'all remember that. But it was literally the day she turned 18.
They went and found another child to bring forward because from then on, if you criticize Greta Thunberg, they couldn't just say, she's a child, leave her alone.
And so they literally tried to make another one.
It didn't work out. Greta Thunberg was too popular at that point.
So we have lots of videos of this.
And then we'll get into what exactly, like who they're protesting or what and why.
But let's go to one of these.
We'll go to, I don't want to go to 10 yet.
Y'all had them up already as B-roll.
Let's roll the video of old Greta being arrested.
There she is, smiling, posing for the camera.
Okay, just stand here. Yeah, you're being arrested.
Look serious. Look serious.
Look like you're really being arrested.
Yeah, look angry.
Literally standing there posing.
I mean, this is, I don't know, is this worse than AOC holding her hands behind her back pretending to be handcuffed when she wasn't?
Pretending to be arrested when they hadn't put handcuffs on her?
It's just the same tactic over and over.
Okay, we got that shot. All right, moving forward.
I mean, it's just... It's completely manufactured.
The police are literally posing for the cameras, pretending to arrest this girl.
Carrying her on. She's trying not to smile.
She's trying not to smile because it's got to be fun.
She's getting carried through the mud by a bunch of cops.
Like, do they think this makes her look like some, you know, bedraggled, you know, constantly opposed activist who's standing up against the system?
The system is literally, they literally are orchestrating all of this.
If you believe this, you are a freaking moron.
And actually, we have some videos in either yesterday's folder or the day before of the thing they're protesting.
They're protesting the expansion of a coal mine.
In Germany. But first, let's read how they're portraying this.
Yeah, there's AOC pretending to be arrested, which is at least...
And Ilhan Omar.
Yeah, both of them pretending to be arrested, right?
I don't know if the cops were as in on it that time.
They're so proud of themselves.
Do you think they believe it?
They're like, oh my God, I'm being arrested.
Oh my God. I'm like a civil rights hero.
Yeah. We're good to go.
Here's how CNN reports it.
Climate activist Greta Thunberg released after being detained by German police at coal mine protest.
Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg was released by German police on Tuesday evening after being detained earlier in the day at a protest over the expansion of a coal mine in the western village of Luzerath.
Police confirmed to CNN on Wednesday.
Thunberg was only briefly detained.
Once Thunberg's identity was established, she was free to go.
Yeah, they didn't know who she was.
Yeah, they had to establish her identity.
unidentified
She was detained for a photo op only.
harrison smith
It was just enough time to snap a couple pictures.
unidentified
And then she was promptly released.
harrison smith
She was promptly released. A pat on the head.
Good job, little slave.
Due to the recognition of her name, police sped up the identification process, Wilms said.
He said they then waited for other protesters to be released.
Thunberg swiftly resumed campaigning on Wednesday, tweeting, climate protection is not a crime.
If what you were doing was climate protection...
That would be true. If you were charged with a crime, there would be a reason for you to say that.
It's just, I don't know.
Do you, are you not insulted?
Do you not, like, you get that they're treating you like an idiot?
They're treating you like you're stupid and that you fall for this?
So yeah, they're protesting against this coal mine that's expanding in Germany.
Here's the thing, though. January 3rd, 2022, Germany shuts down half of its six remaining nuclear plants.
Germany has shut down half of the six nuclear plants.
It still has an operation. This, of course, way, way down from when they first started to denuclearize.
Around the time that Fukushima happened and Angela Merkel was elected.
So again, the globalists just blessing us.
Blessing us with their glorious intervention.
Doing things like shutting down our sustainable resources and flooding our countries with tens of millions of foreigners with no interest in conforming to the rules of the government.
State that they're moving to.
Angela Merkel. So just creating more problems than they're worth and staging a fake protest about a thing they caused.
Does it get any more insane than this?
Of course, if they were to shut down the coal mine, would she go stand in the forest that they would be cutting down to burn for biofuel and replacement of coal?
Is there any end to this cycle?
Alright folks, we're going to go out to your phone calls here this hour.
I do want to just spend another second on Greta Thunberg because it really is a tangled web.
Many, many folds in this story.
Here's just one story that I pulled up during that minute-long break there.
Eileen Getty, billionaire, proud to finance environmental activists' dramatic actions.
You also have stories like this from the post-millennial Just Stop Oil.
Petroleum heiress donates $1 billion to fight back against the industry that made her rich.
So literally, it's the—and this is just the beginning.
Because of ESG, because of environmental social governance, the oil companies have to— Spend more on this type of stuff, on, like, activism to offset because they have a lower score because they produce oil.
It's just all completely manufactured, but it goes, like, significantly deeper than you even realize in so many different ways.
Like, the number of hypocrisies in this is just absolutely wild, right?
So... Greta Thunberg, like, the arrest was obviously staged.
We just saw a video of them literally posing for the camera.
The police were in on it. They knew who she was.
They knew what was going on.
The whole thing was orchestrated.
Nobody was ever arrested for anything.
It was just a giant waste of resources and et cetera all organized and carried out and carefully structured by the media outlets that helped to carry this out.
They're protesting the expansion of a coal mining operation in Germany, a coal mining operation that's only being expanded Well, for a couple reasons.
One, because they shut down nuclear power plants at the behest of people like Greta Thunberg.
Germany shuts down half of its six remaining nuclear plants.
That was January 3rd of last year.
So one year later, they've had to make up for that.
But of course, they also had to make up for it because of the Ukrainian war.
And because the natural gas and the oil that they were getting from Russia, they're no longer getting.
So they have to make up for that a different way.
So they're using coal because of the climate activism of the Ukraine.
Globalist idiots. And the Ukraine war brought about by the globalist idiots.
Oh, and by the way, if they do shut down the coal mine in Germany, it's only going to go somewhere else where there are things like child slaves mining or China with no environmental controls whatsoever as they ravage the earth in pursuit of...
And if they don't do that, then what they use is biofuel, which is old growth trees being deforested in places like British Columbia or Virginia here in the United States, shipped across the ocean and then burned in Germany.
So like, where is the positive from Greta?
What is Greta Thunberg, what positive impact has she had?
She was against nuclear energy.
They shut down nuclear energy.
Now they have to go to coal. She's against coal.
Then they have to tear down forest to do it or offshore it somewhere else.
Even if they are able to do all of that and are able to find an alternative energy source of some sort, it requires things like lithium, which are dug out of massive open pit mines that make the freaking coal mine in Germany look like the Shire or something.
They're just horrifying visions of hell.
With literal child slaves doing this.
In fact, we have a little comparison here.
Clip number 10 is the Green Movement hoax versus the Green Movement reality.
Here's Greta Thunberg being arrested on the left and the child slaves she's creating on the right.
Let's watch. There she is on the left being pretend arrested for protesting a big shovel.
There's a big shovel. The shovel's too big!
It's too big, she says.
That shovel is just too big and we don't want it here.
No, we'd instead rather have this, what, eight-year-old child lugging dirt in the rain, toxic metals, with the slave drivers beating him so he goes the right direction.
Is that what you prefer, Greta, you idiot?
Alright, that's just 900 more of those.
We got half a Tesla battery, boy.
Just incredible. Absolutely nothing positive.
German Chancellor says the West has to work very hard to find energy sources beyond Russia, which of course is why they started the coal mine again.
And they say German energy policy in its purest form, police rolling around in mud attempting to protect a mine that serves almost exactly the same amount of energy as Germany is termining off in a few weeks from its world-class nuclear fleet.
So yeah, they're shutting off more in the next couple weeks.
Is anybody ready to wake up and just ignore these people and just go about our business and like have nuclear energy and clean fuel and just ignore these psychos?
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Second hour has begun on today's episode of American Journal.
Remember, you can support us by going to InfoWarsStore.com.
I really do pity people that...
Are in the right wing and don't work for Infowars.
I talk to a lot of them. They're honestly jealous of us.
On one hand, they're...
Jealous of us because we don't have to stick to the strictures that they have to stick to.
We don't have some overbearing management structure listening to our every word and giving us little talking to's after every broadcast.
Oh, you went a little far on that.
Let's be careful, right?
We don't have any of that. My God, can you imagine?
They do. Very unfortunate.
Sorry about that. Fellas, ladies.
But, you know, the other thing is that The other companies just don't work as hard.
It's sort of give and a take.
Yeah, you let yourself be censored.
Yeah, you're not allowed to say what you really think about stuff.
Yeah, you got to stick to the big tech censorship program and follow the rules of your enemies.
That they use to silence you.
That's not great. But also you only work two days a week.
So you got that going for you.
So I think we have the best of both worlds here at InfoWars.
We work our butts off all day and night and are engaged in a literal war for the fate of humanity for which slackening is death.
But also we get to say whatever the heck we want as long as it's true.
And I like that.
I can't imagine having to self-censor myself as I do sometimes when I go on those people's shows, which I imagine if I keep talking like this, I probably will go on less.
But it doesn't matter because we have InfoWars.com and Band.Video, and we have that because you go to InfoWarsStore.com.
The Alex Jones was right.
Emergency sale is still on and will be continuing it through this week, but waste no time in getting some of the best products known to man with the Alex Jones is right.
Emergency sale, you're getting up to 50% off some of our top-selling products, 50% off Super Male Vitality, Vitamin D3 gummies, and more, including the Real Red Pill Plus.
You can also get 25% off things like Super Male Vitality, VasoBeats Complete, Alpha Power, Living Defense Plus, and Fizzy Magnesium.
All of those are 25% off.
Very limited supply, and I know they've been out of stock for a while.
We've been having people call in.
Gee, when are you going to get those vaso beats back?
I ran out, and I'm fiending.
Well, fiend no more, friend.
Go to InfoWarsStore.com and stock up today on the supplements you need to live your best life.
And of course, shop easy, knowing that...
The money that you're spending at Infowarsstore.com goes directly towards funding this singular battalion of warriors for the truth.
Going to war against an empire of lies.
With that, we go out to your phone calls.
We've got Sean in California.
You want to expose the climate change hypocrisy.
Thank you for calling in. Sean, you're on the air.
unidentified
Good morning, Harrison. Yeah, the hypocrisy.
You know, the American public could probably take the straight-up truth, but the condescension of these folks with their climate change agenda is a little bit much.
Let me ask you a question, Harrison.
Have you ever followed who owns the different oil companies that are out there?
harrison smith
Sure. Well, what do you mean?
unidentified
It's a little broad. Well, we have Royal Dutch Shell, literally the queen of the Netherlands, She gets an income off of them.
And then, in the case of British Petroleum, Crown Corporation and the Queen and, like, hypocrites like Prince Harry, you know, they get their wallet packed with money from that and stock options and the like.
So they come and lecture us that we can't have coal, which is basically their competition.
But, oh, gee, we have to, you know, not only buy these plastic products, take them point, the Coca-Cola plastic bottle, that's made from Royal Dutch Shell's product.
So when you follow the supply chain and who owns what, you get to see these guys who are the hypocrites they are.
They want to get rid of alternative fuel to compete with them and then say they're the alternative by selling you a plastic car with those lithium batteries you were just discussing moments ago.
harrison smith
Yeah, yeah. Do you follow where I'm going? Yeah, for sure.
I get exactly where you're going, but I also have to...
You know, I assume that the coal companies are also owned by these same entities or figures, right?
So, I mean, are they really in competition with the coal companies, do you think?
unidentified
Some are, some aren't.
At the end of the day, you know, all these folks are going to want money.
Soros bought up some plants when Obama shut them down.
Sad news for us was Trump to get, you know, the coal worker vote turned those plants back on, which made Soros rich either way.
So there is a little bit of that going on.
If they would just say, hey, we think our products are better for the environment, How about you pick or choose instead of trying to pass legislation forcing the product, forcing the choice, such as these electric cars and so on.
Speaking of which, I'm looking at one of these detestable Teslas right now.
Nothing worse than a car that doesn't have an engine that purrs.
harrison smith
You know what I mean? I do know what you mean.
I completely agree. Thank you very much for the call, Sean.
I completely agree.
It's all absurd. They're making money on every aspect of this and using it to their own ends.
The number one thing to me is the idea of the biofuels, whatever they call it, biomass that they burn.
I mean, if you can explain that to somebody and they still don't get what a scam climate change is, how are you supposed...
Yeah, climate philanthropist George Soros invested millions in coal.
That's from 2018.
Is that what it is?
2015. So that's what he's talking about.
Obama sold them the coal things.
unidentified
I mean, these people. These people, folks.
harrison smith
Their epoxy knows no bounds.
But their stupidity, too.
I mean, we've ranted about this so many times.
Just the absurdity of all of it, but the fact that they...
I just have to keep saying it because it sounds so crazy, but they literally are cutting down 100-year-old trees in British Columbia by the thousands to chop them into little pellets, to ship them across the Atlantic Ocean, to burn them in a coal plant, and then they say it was carbon-free energy because it wasn't coal.
I mean, it's so... Blatant.
I mean, literally, if you have an IQ of 50, you should be able to figure this out.
You could explain this to my two-year-old son, and he would look at you weirdly and be like, that doesn't make any sense, Dad.
Yeah, I know it doesn't.
But that's the leaders of our world saying that.
So you get the danger that we're in right now.
With that, we go out to the phone calls again.
Let's go to Marcus in Australia.
Banks in Australia want chips in children.
Why am I not surprised? Marcus, thanks for calling in.
unidentified
Well, how are you, Harrison?
How are you going, all right? I'm doing all right.
harrison smith
How are you? Good, mate.
unidentified
Good. Listen, there's a website, a YouTube website in Australia called In the Interest of the People.
And a couple of months ago, they released a clip with the heading Australia's Banks Want You Microchip.
And, yeah, this bank sent out an email to its customers.
About putting chips in them and then they got such a backlash from that.
They took it all down from the website.
You can't find it anymore, but this website, these guys, these two guys, they got a copy of it and they show you what it said.
It's just crazy. So what do you think that was?
harrison smith
Do you think that was like a testing thing?
Like, we're going to see how people react to this, whether they're ready for it or not?
unidentified
Yeah, exactly. And they go into all that stuff too, like how they're sort of trying to pre-programming thing.
And then the next week, it was that bad that they put out another clip that's under the heading of the World Economic Forum Wants Children Microchipped.
And under the guise of safety for your children, know where your children are and all this crap.
Just crazy, man.
You need to watch those two clips.
But in that order.
harrison smith
I'll check them out, yeah. In the interest of the people.
You said it was a YouTube channel, right?
I'll check them out. Yeah, yeah.
Alright, thank you for that suggestion.
unidentified
These two guys are really, really intelligent.
Big fat brains on them, you know?
harrison smith
Big fat brains, alright, great.
Yeah, I'll check them out. Thank you for that suggestion.
Very... Fervent support from Marcus.
I love it. Big fat brains.
And of course, this is happening across Australia.
We have this story from just last year, February.
The end of ATMs in Australia.
Thousands of cash machines are removed across the country as banks go digital.
We have long said, even years before COVID-19 hit Australia and, you know, Pushed that tyranny into hyperdrive.
Australia's like the New World Order's testing center.
Like, they roll things out there a couple years before they get rolled out anywhere else.
It's like an isolated population that they can test things on to see how they react and reformulate their introduction for distribution throughout the wider world.
I feel sorry for Australia.
But yeah, no more cash and chips in your hands, and it's all for your safety, of course.
We love you so much.
Now put the chip in your eye. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
We're going to go out to the phone calls now.
We've got Junior in New York who called in the other day.
He was our last caller talking about the Noahide laws.
We only had about a minute to talk to him.
So I want to give him the...
We'll probably spend the whole segment on the Noahide laws since I know it's a big topic.
Just give people the rundown before we go to Junior.
This is from shabad.org.
The seven Noahide laws, universal morality.
What are the seven Noahide laws?
There are rules all of us must keep, regardless of who we are or where we come from.
Without these seven things, it would be impossible for humanity to live together in harmony.
One, do not profane God's oneness in any way.
Two, do not curse your creator.
Three, do not murder. Four, do not eat a limb of a still living animal.
Five, do not steal.
Six, harness and channel the human libido.
Which is pretty interesting. That says incest, adultery, rape, and homosexual relationships are forbidden.
Says the family union is the foundation of human society.
Seven, establish courts of law and ensure justice in our world.
And then you have this from the Boston College Center for Christian Jewish Learning.
They talk about how the Bible presents a predominantly binary view of humanity with Jewish people in covenant with God on one side and the idolatrous nations of the world on the other.
However, the rabbis of the Talmudic period, approximately 200 to 600 years after Christ, seized upon one aspect of the biblical narrative that does not fit in this neat binary universe.
When the Bible portrays the stranger as isolated individuals in Jewish society, the Talmud expanded the idea of the stranger and conceptualized it into broad legal and moral categories.
Essentially, it says that the Jews have a covenant of 613 commandments that they have to follow in their holy books, but that Gentiles only have to stick to the seven Noahide commandments.
And if they do, they're considered like a third category, which is Gentiles who accept the law of Noahide covenant and regarded positively and whom Jews are obligated to protect and sustain.
So, again, I'm just reading this from the source.
Just to give people a basic breakdown.
When we talk about Noahide laws, these are the laws that God gave to Noah.
Actually, six of them he gave to Adam.
The seventh he gave to Noah, which was the eating of a limb of a living animal was forbidden.
So what are your thoughts on this?
You were saying that this was actually signed into law by George Bush Sr.
somehow. I'll find an article on that here while you tell us what you're thinking.
But go ahead, Junior. You're on the air about the Noahide laws.
jr in new york
Hi, thanks for taking my call again.
So, yeah, it's called Education Day, and I think it's March 20th, 1991.
George Bush Sr.
signed it in. So you cannot—I looked all over.
It seems like a lot of stuff has been scrubbed.
But I think the key to this whole thing is that we know that they want the one world religion, the one world—the government and the currency.
And this is their linchpin for the religion.
Because like Leo Zagami says, and like David Icke says, they're not actually Jews.
They're Satanists. They're heretical Jews.
They are members of a cult.
It's the Sabbatean Frankist cult.
So George Bush signs this in, and it's all to honor this guy named Rabbi Schneerson, who was alive in the 40s.
He's an activist, and he's a complete racist, like totally, just 100% saying, Jews are here to—we're all here, Gentiles are here strictly to serve the Jews, saying that our souls are of a satanic nature.
It's okay to kill us, etc., But then he did a lot of other work, which is charitable.
It's like the Lubavitch movement, but there's the dark underbelly of that, which is the lies and the racism, the pure racism.
And like I've called in many times and explained, it goes back to the biblical interpretation being very literal and how Christians, how we, like I used to be very literal with Christianity.
Not anymore, because I come to a different understanding that it's kind of a psyop and that if we believe that These are the chosen people.
We'll allow them to get away with pretty much anything.
I think that the 12 tribes are psychological archetypes that we have within.
We need to lead them out of Egypt, meaning we need to awaken our consciousness on 12 levels out of Egypt, Egypt being physicality, to go to the Holy Land, which is the next dimension, and in a higher elevation.
But when it comes to this, this is basically...
Let me step back.
If you violate the Nelahide laws, it's death by decapitation.
harrison smith
Oh, okay.
jr in new york
So that's where you can't find in the law by Congress, which there is an actual law.
It's like Public Law 102-something.
harrison smith
Yeah, I'm looking at it right now.
H.J. Res 104-102nd Congress, 1991-1992.
Whereas Congress recognizes the historic tradition of ethical values and principles, which are the basis of...
Yeah. It says, whereas these...
Let me just read it because it actually mentions the Noahide laws right here in the first couple.
So it says, whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles upon which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great nation was founded, whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization when they were known as the seven Noahide laws.
Whereas these ethical values and principles, yeah, so this does seem like a religious proclamation by our government.
jr in new york
It's written in. Yeah. It's written in by none other than Bush Sr., so we know immediately that it's purely satanic.
They hide behind the word Jew, so you can't call them out on what they're doing.
And there's pictures of them all surrounding him.
And ever since then, every single year, every president has signed a proclamation honoring him, including Trump.
To honor this guy, Rabbi Schneerson, who is 100%—I know we don't have a lot of time, I know I'm speaking really fast— But there's so much information here, and it's critical because this is supposed to be a Christian nation, even though there's some befuddlement with it being created.
Really, it's Masonic or Christian.
I know one of the guys that works there is a Freemason.
I have nothing against Freemasons.
harrison smith
Chase doesn't work here.
He just sits in for me.
unidentified
He does his own podcast. There's some confusion because I know that they use the Talmud.
jr in new york
The Talmud is the ancient Babylonian Scriptures, right?
It says in the Talmud it's okay to have sex with a girl up until she's three years old because her hymen regrows and so she's perpetually a virgin until after three.
It says that in the book itself.
You could just, you know, so this is who we're dealing with, who runs the show.
These are the guys who were with George Bush to sign that.
This is what they're into, the Hasidic Jewish movement, the Lubavitch movement, the The Lurianic Kabbalah, which is tied in with the Sabbatean Frankism, is all about this, quote, Jewish supremacy.
But it's a psyop, because the true meaning, the ancient meaning of Jew, what I've learned, is the true meaning of Jew, Jesus is of the tribe of Judah.
It's about working with that force of Judah, which is the lion that we have in our heart.
It's not about actually...
These 12 groups of people, it's 12 psychological archetypes.
That's why we have 12 solar nerves in our solar plexus, 12 cranial nerves, and seven chambers in the heart.
It's all connected.
harrison smith
And they have hijacked that movement.
unidentified
Yeah, there's definitely a major...
harrison smith
Sorry, we are running out of time here, Junior, but I appreciate your call, and you've dropped a lot of knowledge on us here before, and...
There's definitely a big difference between, you know, the Jews that were before Jesus and then the Talmudic style Jews.
And even there are multiple versions of the Talmud as well.
But definitely like if the Jews from, you know, the first century AD, you could see what some of the Jews get up to here in the name of Jesus.
I mean, it's just witchcraft, right?
Like Kabbalism and stuff.
It wouldn't fly in first century Israel.
Let's just say that. But I'm looking at some pretty interesting quotes from this Schneerson guy.
It's pretty racist, I have to say.
The dude seems like a Jewish supremacist.
But hey, we honor him every year, apparently, in this country.
Well, thanks for the call, Junior.
We'll be back on the other side. More of your phone calls.
Some pretty mind-blowing headlines I want to read as well.
So stay with us. More news and more calls on the other side.
Don't go anywhere. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
More of your phone calls here in this second half of The American Journal.
Let's talk a little bit about COVID, shall we?
And when you say COVID, of course, we mean a number of different things.
We mean the virus itself that was created in a lab and allowed to spread all over the world by the authorities who had pre-planned this event from now.
I pre-planned this event happening.
Then you've got the reaction to COVID. A lot of people say COVID has destroyed our economy.
COVID didn't do anything.
COVID was the excuse that the authorities used to destroy the economy.
So you've got the lockdowns and the masks and the school shutdowns and the supply chain collapse and the...
Economic stoppage and just the horrific damage that caused from that.
And then you also have the vaccine program, which of course was not just ineffective, but actually counter-effective.
And it's actually caused many more deaths than it ever prevented.
So every step of this has been a total and complete scam.
But one of the biggest scams of all of it was the reaction to the lockdown crisis.
Which, again, it's very interesting because, you know, here you have this story from today.
Amazon begins cutting 18,000 workers in its biggest layoffs ever.
Amazon's layoffs are just a fraction of its 1.5 million global workforce.
But this is happening in a bunch of companies right now.
Amazon's just sort of the most, the biggest, most prominent.
But it looks like we're heading in 2023 and towards some sort of economic coming home to roost of what has been done over the last couple of years.
And of course, one of the biggest beneficiaries of all of these programs has been Amazon.
From the inability for people to just go out and buy things, they have to go to Amazon to buy it, to the web service aspect where you've got all these video conferencing things that are all hosted on the Amazon web services.
I mean, Amazon made out like a bandit with COVID-19.
And yet now they're having to downsize and shrink and are firing nearly 20,000 workers in its biggest layoff ever.
Maybe it wasn't such a great idea to centralize our entire economy into this one company.
Maybe we should have thought about that.
Of course, if you go back in time, this wasn't a...
Uncertain or unpredicted outcome.
Thomas Massey wrote in March of 2020, that is just a month or two after the American public was allowed to know about COVID. He says the stimulus package that just passed is the biggest wealth transfer from common folks to the super rich, Wall Street and bankers in the history of mankind, done in the name of a virus with $1,200 checks as the cheese in the trap.
This will be obvious in short order.
And of course it has...
It has been made obvious.
And of course they have this story from yesterday.
The richest 1% of people amassed almost two-thirds of new wealth created in the last two years.
The richest 1% of people amassed almost two-thirds of new wealth created in the last two years.
So not only did they consolidate and centralize their wealth and corporate power through lockdowns and COVID measures, but since they implemented those, two-thirds of all wealth created has gone exclusively to that two-thirds of all wealth created has gone exclusively to that top 1%.
So again, you just have to ask the leftist, whether it's your economic ideas, your climate change ideas, your ideas about human health, why is it that every single intervention you try makes the problems you are concerned with why is it that every single intervention you try makes the problems
How are the people who their entire political ideology can be boiled down to, we hate the 1%, Jeff Bezos bad, billionaires bad, and yet they were the ones that...
We're saying we should be kicked off the internet, maybe imprisoned for daring to suggest that we not do the thing that consolidated the entire economy into the hands of the 1%.
It's just how can you be so bad at what you're trying to do?
How can you be so oblivious to the way that your impulses are hijacked and made to benefit the very people you think you're fighting?
How long is it going to take until you realize that you are being set up?
You are... Engaging in a scam.
You can just come join us and actually be a part of the group that the billionaires and the corporatists and the sick capitalists, internationalists, we are the ones they hate.
They love you. You give them everything that they want.
You shove into their hands things that they wouldn't be able to grasp for themselves otherwise.
They love your stupidity.
They love how easy you are to manipulate.
Why do you think you're fighting them?
It makes no sense at all.
But that's just one of the myriad of horrific outcomes from the COVID policies that we knew from the beginning would have this outcome.
It's all been obvious the entire time.
We've been saying it the entire time.
Again, it's just baffling how this is happening.
But one of the other things we've been talking about for a very long time, because this became obvious in very short order after the vaccines rolled out, is the danger that they pose to pilots.
And we covered this on American Journal probably over a year ago at this point, where we talked about pilots are passing out and dying in the cockpit and showing you that prior to the COVID vaccine, for years there had been very well documented evidence showing the effect on pilots' hearts.
As they're constantly taking off and landing, the change in atmosphere, the change in pressure, how that can affect sitting for a long time and how that can affect blood clots, how pilots are already, you know, have higher incidences of behavior or activity that increases the likelihood of heart attacks.
And when you combine that with the damage of the COVID vaccine, it's a crisis waiting to happen.
We've been covering that for, like I said, over a year now, probably more than almost two years at this point.
The chickens are finally coming home to roost.
The FAA has quietly, tacitly admitted that the EKGs of pilots are no longer normal.
We should be concerned.
Very concerned. After the vaccine rolled out, the FAA secretly widened the EKG parameter range for pilots so they wouldn't be grounded.
It looks like the vax gave at least 50 million Americans heart damage.
Again, we'll get back into this article in just a second.
But now I want to go to clip number five here.
Because it's like all the chickens are coming home to roost.
All of the lies are being exposed.
All of the deception is being exposed.
And it's up to the American people to not be lost in this milieu.
Not to be like bashed around by this storm that you're in.
Step out of it. See the forest for the trees.
And recognize what's going on.
Think about the implications of what you're hearing.
Because I don't get how liberals are indoctrinated into it.
I don't get how they get you people to do this.
But they'll tell you something like that they dramatically overcounted COVID deaths and they just go, oh, okay, that's interesting.
Just think about it for a second, damn it.
For the sake of humanity, just think about what that means for a single second.
We'll go to this video. We'll talk about it on the other side.
unidentified
Clip number five. Doctor, these are two separate things here.
kaitlan collins
Overcounting deaths and overcounting hospitalizations.
As you know, I covered this closely being in the Trump White House when this happened.
I talked to a lot of health officials about this who are actually kind of skeptical of this claim that you're making.
And I think one big thing has been, what is the evidence that these COVID deaths are actually being overcounted?
harrison smith
Oh, they're skeptical about that, are they?
dr leana wen
Well, this is the reason why this kind of transparent reporting is going to be so important.
There is a way for us to look at death certificates and also to look at the medical records of individuals prior to their death.
And I think this needs to be separated into three categories.
One is the COVID as a direct contributor, the primary cause of death.
The second is, could it be a secondary contributing cause?
So, for example, somebody with kidney disease, COVID then pushes them over the edge to have kidney failure.
That's COVID as a contributing cause.
And then the third is COVID as an incidental finding.
So somebody coming in with a gunshot wound or a heart attack and they happen to test positive.
I think that we need to separate out and look at the percentages of each.
That percentage would have shifted over time as well.
In the beginning, probably a lot more people were dying with the primary cause of COVID. That probably has shifted.
And I think, again, Again, we need to understand this.
Another reason to understand this, too, is a lot of people are wondering when they should get a booster next.
When do we need a second booster or another booster?
And the only way we can know for sure is to understand who is getting severely ill and when.
unidentified
But doesn't that change? Just incredible.
harrison smith
So just think about that for a single second.
Think about all the fear that was created by these high numbers showing massive COVID deaths and realize that only two and a half years later are they telling you that that was all a lie.
Just think about that, please.
All right, welcome back, folks. It really is amazing to see the video we just watched.
Dr. Leanna Nguyen admitting...
That the CDC drastically over-counted COVID deaths.
Again, you got banned from the internet if you said this back then.
And to me, the most egregious part of all of it is that the CNN anchor begins by saying, you know, a lot of doctors we've talked to are very skeptical about this fact, about this claim that you've been over-counting deaths.
Oh, I'm sorry. Are we allowing skepticism now for the claims of the CDC? It's so amazing.
Back then they'd be saying, this many people died from COVID. And doctors going, are you sure that that's true?
And it was just like, shut up.
You shut up right now.
You want more people to die, don't you?
I mean, just think about...
I mean, this is why I made the COVID, the pitch meeting of it.
Just to go through the timeline is just so completely insane, what we've lived through.
And that's why I'm saying you've got to step out and remember...
Think about what the implication of this is.
Because we've known this the whole time.
The whole time we've known that deaths where people would crash a motorcycle and go into the hospital and they'd say he was there for COVID. Because, by the way, they got tens of thousands of dollars for doing that.
This wasn't an accident that people were doing this.
It was actually incentivized.
Said, well, if you claim he's a COVID patient, if you claim he's a COVID death, you get even more money.
So they were incentivized to do this on purpose.
They misallocated the death because they wanted the high numbers, because they wanted to make it look scarier than it was.
And if you called this out, you would be removed.
And remember, they sent people into nursing homes and killed tens of thousands of them.
Mass murder, never once has anybody paid the price for that.
Told you to go hug a Chinese person and claimed it was racist for us to try to protect ourselves from this virus before it ever even got onto American shores, right?
They stopped us preventing it getting here.
They stopped us actually having an accurate read on the situation by pumping up the numbers purposefully through bribery and through manipulation of the statistics and misallocation of the cause of why they were in the hospital in the first place.
We were talking about this forever.
And it's not just, this isn't just something that you can go, oh, okay, so it wasn't quite as bad.
Well, that's good to know. Moving on.
These numbers being high wasn't in a vacuum.
It wasn't just something that happened that didn't have any effect.
Those numbers being high gave the people the excuse they needed to push the lockdown farther.
That was the evidence and the ammunition they were using to blame all of the deaths on Donald Trump, to frighten people into staying home, to shut down the entire economy.
These high numbers were necessary as an aspect of the fraud they were carrying out.
It's like... I don't know how they think they're going to get away with this.
I don't know how people are letting them get away with this.
It's just completely insane.
And again, the most insane part is that CNN is like, well, but other doctors are saying the CDC might be lying about this.
And it's like, gee, if you would have said that exact same sentence three years ago when they were doing the lying in the first place, then we could have saved...
Just the world. We could have saved the world, but it's gone now.
The world is over. It has been transformed beyond recognition and will never go back because of the numbers that you helped to perpetuate and lie about because skepticism at that time was considered a crime against humanity and would be shut down with all the force you could muster.
Not so anymore. Now they're very skeptical.
So we need Nuremberg trials at the very least.
That would be the most peaceful and appropriate resolution to all of this, though not the most satisfactory one.
Let's go to clip 15 because the talk about this Nuremberg trial has moved beyond Infowars, beyond the mainstream media, into actually the halls of power and the people that have the authority to carry something like this out.
They need our support now, and we need to continue to bang this drum and refuse to accept anything less.
Than appropriate punishment for the people who carried out this worldwide campaign of murder, dissimulation, deception, and domination and tyranny.
Okay, let's do that.
Let's go to clip number 15. Senator Ron Johnson discusses Nuremberg trials and the COVID cartel.
unidentified
Is there enough appetite out there, even in the general population, let alone where you work?
To actually have accountability so this doesn't happen again.
ron johnson
So, go back after World War II. The reason the Nuremberg trials, one of the reasons that it was made possible is because Eisenhower made sure the camps were exposed and photographed and those horrors were revealed to the world.
That's why the first step here is exposure.
And one of the reasons, well, the main reason I got contacted by Ken Rutgers, whose wife was vaccine-injured, that got me involved with the vaccine-injured community.
And my main reason for advocating for them is so they can be seen, heard, believed, and healed and treated.
Because right now, without federal agencies, without medical establishment, Acknowledging that they can't even get treatment.
But the vaccine injury also can play just a key role of raising the awareness so that these harms are exposed, so we can actually have accountability, so we can actually So we can actually fix these problems.
There's really two tracks here.
On the one hand, it's about the origins so that we can have much stronger international treaties to tightly control what science now allows.
And on the other hand, compassionately deal with The people who've been harmed by these actions, been harmed by these vaccines.
And from my standpoint, one of the points I've been making, as we've been discussing this this morning, is we need the vaccine injured to get organized on a state-by-state basis and set up meetings to meet with their House members and their senators and tell their stories.
They are powerful stories.
You can't sit and listen to these things and not believe these people.
But right now, I'm talking to colleagues and I say, are you being contacted by people talking about vaccine injuries?
Do they look at me like I'm...
It's like, what are you talking about?
unidentified
Is it going to take one of your colleagues to collapse suddenly, to die suddenly?
Is that what it's going to take? Well, none of us actually got vaccinated.
ron johnson
But you're seeing with the Buffalo Bills player, you saw how quickly they already had The excuse, right?
Commodial Cordis. And you know, certainly in my doctorate group, immediately people are saying, there's no way!
That is a small object, high speed, unprotected, probably young chest.
That's not what this was.
And yet, again, what we're up against, the COVID cartel, they were so prepared For that eventuality, because they anticipated it.
So again, we are up against powerful forces.
I've used the analogy in terms of what the FBI did, sabotaging, in advance, the revelation that Hunter Biden had this computer.
They went to those lengths.
Unsolicited briefings to myself and Chuck Grassley, working with Twitter and the social media companies.
harrison smith
So it's good to hear this.
We can take it down. But it goes so much deeper.
And again, I'm glad that Senator Ron Johnson is staying on this.
I'm glad he's talking about Nuremberg trials in a serious way, comparing it to the Nuremberg trials, saying, first, we need the exposure of what's going on.
That's how you got the Nuremberg trials to happen, was people finally were presented with irrefutable evidence of the evil that had been done.
But when you take a look, I mean, the layers of deception that we're operating under, right?
So right now what's being...
Right now we have mass death die-off.
And the lie being told about that is they don't know what's causing it.
It's unexpected. It's climate change.
It's racism. It's all these other ridiculous things that are lies.
But all of that only came about because the efficacy of the vaccine was a lie.
The efficacy of the vaccine was...
All of those numbers are lies because we didn't even know how many people were hospitalized or died from COVID in the first place because anybody who came in was counted as a COVID death.
Do you remember they stopped that way of counting?
They actually already made this change immediately after Biden got into office.
I don't know if you remember that. Also, do you remember they were also going to wait to release the vaccine as soon as Biden got into office?
So their plan was, and then Trump actually stepped up and said...
I've seen it. I've seen the inside info.
They already have the vaccine.
They're just withholding it.
I'm going to make him release it. And he actually made him release it under his administration because their plan was to withhold the vaccine until Biden was in office.
As soon as he was in office, you drop the vaccine.
Then you drop the requirement for testing everybody for COVID and counting everybody who has COVID as a COVID patient.
So the numbers immediately drop.
Then they could open up the economy and have Joe Biden be he cured the virus and he you know, there's nobody sick anymore in the economies open.
This was all orchestrated as a plan.
But even those hospital numbers saying that they had COVID or you know, we're in hospital with COVID.
And we're falsely attributed to being in the hospital because of COVID.
Even those were false because they relied on the PCR test, which didn't actually give you an accurate reading, which is why you had the flu go away all of the sudden one year because the flu was counting as a positive result in the PCR test.
So the people that were said died because of COVID didn't die immediately.
Because of COVID, they just had it when they died.
And it may not have even been COVID. It may have just been the flu.
Lie upon lie upon lie upon lie.
The deaths continue.
The lies continue.
The Great Reset continues.
I don't know what it's going to take to get this information out there because it's been out there the entire time.
We have been hammering all of this stuff for the last two years.
I hope you support us in this by going to InfoWarsStore.com.
greg reese
I really do. As we've discussed recently, the word occult means hidden, and the dark satanic occult which has been ruling over humanity maintains its power by hiding knowledge from the public.
This hidden knowledge can be described as natural law or universal law, inescapable laws of reality that affect each and every one of us from moment to moment.
They have been hidden from the public as a means of keeping humanity ignorant and thereby controllable and ultimately enslaved.
So long as we remain ignorant of them, mankind will never be free.
The etymology of the word apocalypse reveals its occulted meaning, which is to uncover or reveal something that was hidden.
One can argue that the apocalypse already happened and that we are now living in the post-apocalyptic world.
In 1928, Manly P. Hall published The Secret Teachings of All Ages, a comprehensive introduction to all of this occulted knowledge which has been used to manipulate the ignorant masses of humanity for millennia.
And while many people choose to educate themselves, Many others have chosen to remain ignorant.
Ignorance is not bliss.
It is the reason why humanity continues to fall deeper into bondage.
These laws are fairly simple, and they can be found in every culture on Earth.
In the hermetic sciences revealed to the public in 1908, we have seven laws.
The first three, mentalism, correspondence, and vibration, teach us how everything is connected, that everything begins with our thoughts, and that everything in this reality is a frequency.
You could say that we are all living within the mind of God, and our thoughts matter.
The principle of polarity teaches us that things which appear to be opposites are actually related.
Love and hate are merely polar opposites of the same thing.
And knowing this makes it easier for us to transform our hate into love.
It allows us to turn a negative into a positive.
The principle of rhythm teaches that everything in nature has its rhythm.
The measure of the swing to the right is equal to the measure of the swing to the left.
This allows us to better navigate the waves of reality The principle of cause and effect may be the most important to understand.
Each and every one of our thoughts and corresponding actions in this life has an inescapable effect on everything around us.
And the principle of gender teaches us that there are only two genders and that everything in this reality has its masculine and feminine aspects.
One could argue that the apocalypse happened thousands of years ago with the Ten Commandments, the laws of how to liberate oneself from the land of slavery.
These natural laws were taught in the East by the Buddha, who taught us of right action.
And these natural laws were perhaps most eloquently simplified in the teachings of Christ with the golden rule, in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you.
Do not take another person's life.
Do not assault or rape another person.
Do not steal another person's property and do not trespass upon them in any way.
Do not coerce or manipulate another person.
In the most simple terms, do not steal anything from anyone.
Live and let live.
This is the path to freedom.
And you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free.
Each and every one of us is affecting this reality with every thought and every action.
And if we choose to remain ignorant of this, then we are choosing to be sheep, and we will always be enslaved.
Understanding these natural laws and treating others with love and respect is the only way to true freedom.
harrison smith
That is the latest from Greg Reese.
Find and share it at band.videoinfowars.com.
Natural law in the post-apocalyptic world.
We'll be back on the other side with Izzy Lyman.
We're going to talk about immigration and Muslims and all sorts of fun stuff.
Welcome back. Ladies and gentlemen, third hour of the American Journal has begun here on Infowars.com and Band.video.
Remember, you support us by going to Infowarsstore.com, and we will not be here without your support.
That's just the way it is.
I'm very happy to welcome my guest this hour.
Her name is Izzy Lyman.
She is an author who focuses on immigration and culture.
And you can find her articles on Infowars, Borderhawk News, and she's on Twitter at Izzy Lyman.
That's I-Z-Z-Y Lyman on Twitter.
And you can find the website Borderhawk.blog where she writes her stories, breaks stories, and advocates for America.
Thank you so much for coming on, Izzy.
unidentified
Oh, thank you so much, Harrison, for having me.
harrison smith
It's my pleasure, and I know I've followed your work for a while, and Borderhawk has done some amazing investigative research when it comes to the southern border.
Your latest story on Infowars is a little bit of a different topic.
It's called Muslim Michigan Mayor on Ritual Animal Sacrifice.
No Way We Can Ban It.
You say the all-Muslim ham-trampk—I hope I'm pronouncing that right— Is that right?
Hamtramck. Hamtramck.
Okay. All right. Yes.
That rolls off the tongue a little better.
A mayor and six members recently voted to allow religious animal sacrifices on a residential property.
So what is this?
What's going on here? Why is this being allowed and what's the problem with it?
unidentified
So it is actually a form of ritual animal sacrifice.
And it's to commemorate the festivals, the holidays of A'id, which are celebrated typically at the end of Ramadan.
And in this case, it's when the prophet Ibrahim, or as Christians call him, Abraham, it's to commemorate the fact that he was going to sacrifice his son.
Instead, the Lord intervened, as in the Christian tradition, and told him, no, you don't have to sacrifice his son, instead send a ram.
So the Muslims also celebrate this.
And of course, in their case, they're sacrificing and celebrating Allah, which is the slight twist here.
Oh, big twist, I should say.
So that is the genesis of this.
And apparently, this debate has gone on for many months in Hamtramck, which is a community on the outskirts of Detroit, very close to Detroit.
It's a small community.
It's very densely populated.
But the Hamtramck City Council is all Muslim.
It's six men and a woman.
And the woman is actually a convert to Islam.
harrison smith
Interesting. So they allowed this to continue.
I've seen some videos of this being celebrated.
I'm pretty sure that the pictures and the photos I've seen are from places overseas.
But I mean, it's a bloody affair, this animal sacrifice.
I mean, it is not an easy thing to watch.
Even just the still images of it are sort of horrifying to look at.
And it seems to me like they're...
Aren't there already laws on the books to deal with this?
Like, what's the issue?
Why did they get a pass for mistreating animals this way?
unidentified
Okay, yes, so the slaughter of animals is a bloody affair for sure.
Well, part of the reason that, as you put it, they got a pass was because the Supreme Court, the U.S. Supreme Court, ruled in 1993 in the case called the Church of the Lukumi Babalu IA versus the City of Hialeah on behalf of ritual animal sacrifice.
And that's the genesis of all this.
This was 30 years ago.
And this particular church was in Miami-Dade County.
And it's under the practice of Santeria, which is an Afro-Caribbean religion, which has, if you can loosely call it saints, so you sacrifice animals, specifically the blood, to the saints.
So the city of Hialeah, the public officials there, which were all Latino, by the way, did not want this church in their midst, sacrificing animals, so they pushed back very, very hard.
In fact, they came up with several ordinances So one thing led to another.
This went through the court system, and it ended up in the U.S. Supreme Court, the Rehnquist Court, which was a very conservative court, and they ruled in favor of the church, saying that the city of Hialeah had violated the Free Exercise Clause of the Constitution.
harrison smith
See, I'm sort of torn on this because it seems like there should already be – I don't know.
I mean obviously you want to have religious freedom.
I mean our country is sort of founded on that.
So where do you draw the line where it's religious freedom but you're in violation of our laws?
I mean how do you come to that – And there's also sort of this irony of them saying, as you have in your article here, the mayor saying you cannot suppress people's religious practices because they are a minority, which I would agree with, right?
That's the reason we have a republic and not a democracy, for the protection of minority populations.
But at the same time, you can't just get away with stuff because you're a minority group.
And at the same time, they're appealing to the democratic aspect of this, saying, well, we'll have to vote on it, and that'll decide.
So, I mean, where do you land on this?
And, like, is there any way to deal with this within American law?
Or is this just an aspect of this is what happens when you have literally different law sets moving in and, like, setting up their little fiefdoms here in America?
unidentified
Yeah. I think it's all of the above and you're right to have Concerns about this, for sure.
Like, where's the animal cruelty statutes that are possibly being violated?
And I don't doubt that they are, especially in Miami.
And where's the containment and disposal issues have gone on for a long time.
Even recently, the Miami Herald reported on a park in West Miami where joggers were finding animal parts like rooster's feet and bags of blood.
And everyone in Miami who's familiar with all of this knows that's the result of Santeria.
So again, we open the door to these practices because we're a tolerant, religious liberty country.
But of course, there are a lot of pieces to this that are troubling and somewhat seeming unfair to us.
For example, in the municipality that I live in, I'm not allowed to have egg-laying chickens, you know, just a little bit, two, three, four, right?
No, but if I said perhaps in the name of religion I wanted these chickens, they might give me a pass.
harrison smith
And, of course, you know, a lot of times, you know, I think of the, you know, Ilhan Omar and the district she represents.
And you have these places, especially in Michigan, it seems like there's a high percentage of these where there are places that, you know, were settled by people of, you know, European heritage.
And then basically by governmental fiat, just tens of thousands of foreigners are moved into one particular area.
So they have all of the votes that they could need to get elected to office.
So they get elected to office and they start changing the rules.
And it's like they're almost creating these little like enclaves, pocket enclaves, not naturally because, you know, there's a natural process of immigration that occurs over time in the way that's always happened through history.
But like out of a concerted effort to go, all right, we want this district to be Muslim now.
And then they just bring in 10,000 Muslim people and completely change the entire atmosphere and character of the small town.
and the people in the small town are told, well, you're a minority now, you know, get out or conform.
That just seems wrong to me on its face.
unidentified
Yes, and you're addressing the larger question of assimilation.
How many immigrants do we want?
Historically, in recent years, the federal government has allowed about a million to come into the country legally, whereas some of the restriction immigration groups, so to speak, like FAIR, Numbers USA, CIS, they've called for about that number to be 300,000.
Because we need people to assimilate into our traditions, our culture, Our laws, our way of life, as we put it rather colloquially.
And that does not happen when you have a mass immigration.
And I call it unfettered because it has absolutely no limits.
harrison smith
Right. Right.
And that's a good point.
And again, you know, I... I love America.
I love the fact that we give people religious freedom and it's like, so that's what I want to preserve.
I want to, you know, preserve this character that allows us to give people freedoms knowing that they understand they have a responsibility not to go crazy with the freedoms because then we all lose them.
And so I want to be open-minded, but at the same time, it's like I can see the image now where you look around and you go, there's a Christian family celebrating, you know, Christmas around a tree.
And there's a Jewish family celebrating Hanukkah around it.
And there's a Muslim family covered in blood, slaughtering a goat.
And it's like one of those doesn't quite fit.
And does that just make me bigoted?
Or like, is it okay that I'm concerned about the character of my country being unrecognizable?
unidentified
No, no, absolutely not.
You're absolutely right to be concerned.
I think that generally, as I point out in the article, you could have a wide coalition of people agreeing with you, be they zoning purists, environmentalists, animal rights activists, evangelicals, and they would all, all be appalled.
They're not comfortable with this at all.
And in fact, at the meeting itself in Hamtramck, there were many Muslims who spoke out against trying to see this practice in their neighborhoods.
They don't want to see their neighbors, you know, bring livestock into a garage or a basement or a yard.
They do want designated spaces, as they recall, that are more appropriate for this slaughter.
So, you know, you're hardly alone.
There's a lot of people that agree with you.
And in fact, a lot of them are immigrants.
harrison smith
Yeah, I'm not surprised.
And that's an interesting aspect of this story that we'll cover on the other side is the different way that these groups are treated by the media.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is the American Journal.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
My guest is Izzy Lyman.
You can follow her on Twitter, at Izzy Lyman.
She writes for Borderhawk.
You can find that at borderhawk.blog.
And you can also find her articles on Infowars.
As well, that's where her latest article is that we're discussing today.
Muslim Michigan mayor on ritual animal sacrifice.
No way we can ban it.
There's just no way.
This to me is kind of a funny way to phrase it, right?
Why would there be no way you could ban it?
I know how you could ban it. You say...
It's banned. You go, you're not allowed to slaughter animals in your living room.
Sorry, it's not healthy. It's not safe.
It's not good for the animals.
There's a myriad of reasons.
The fact is, it's banned.
No, you can't do that.
I mean, is that so hard?
Is that such a hard thing to do?
Hold on. Hold on, Izzy.
I'm sorry. We had some, we're having an audio hiccup.
You might be muted on your end.
Izzy, that might be a possibility.
Well guys, reconnect with Izzy real quick and make sure we can get her audio.
But I just want to read a little bit more of this article.
Again, it's called Muslim Michigan Mayor on Ritual Animal Sacrifice.
No way we can ban it.
And this is, again, sort of the strange part, right?
You've got this, where they say you cannot suppress people's religious practices because they are a minority.
Yeah, true. I agree with that.
But then they say, you know, we live in a democratic country.
Decisions that will affect all residents when we put on the ballot so that people will decide for themselves.
So a little bit of... I don't know if that's irony or hypocrisy there, but okay, we're reconnected with Izzy now.
So yeah, my question is like, why wouldn't they just be able to ban this outright?
unidentified
Because of the Supreme Court decision, and no doubt they have already been told in Hamtramck that there's going to be a lawsuit if they don't go forward.
There's going to be a legal challenge.
And the young mayor who has said during the meeting, we are already paying $30,000 a month for a fair housing issue that the city had to settle, and this was years and years ago.
So they are probably trying to avoid that.
And in that respect, I'm a former city council member.
I can understand that.
I can even sympathize.
You don't want a legal challenge.
You don't want to use taxpayer dollars to pay for it.
So I think this is a tough spot for them.
harrison smith
Yeah, I mean, it just seems like a legal gray area, but again, this is, I guess, just the outcome of mass uncontrolled, unrestricted immigration with no even societal pressure to become American, but rather to hold on to whatever culture that you're bringing with you.
I don't think it's a productive thing.
I don't think it's a way to unite Americans, even in the slightest.
unidentified
Yes, yes.
harrison smith
Muslims seem to be, they get treated with kid gloves here in America.
I mean, if a Christian person wants to, you know, try to counsel a kid who's questioning his sexuality that's banned, you're not allowed to do that.
You'll go to jail.
No conversion therapy, they call it, right?
But if a Muslim wants to, you know, cut a goat's head off in his living room, they allow that.
unidentified
Not in the living room, but yeah.
harrison smith
Wow, I mean, I don't know.
I don't know what the restrictions are exactly.
unidentified
No, I understand. Yes.
No, I understand what you're saying.
In fact, here's a sidebar piece of information.
Many of the same Muslims from Hamtramck as well as Dearborn, which is nearby, have been attending school meetings and school board meetings.
And they have been very, very angry and very, very vocal about the pornographic materials in the schools.
You know, this is a nationwide issue right now.
But surprisingly, they have turned out by the hundreds.
Literally, they pack out these meetings and they're quite vocal.
And they even shout down the LGBTQ plus folks.
harrison smith
Right.
unidentified
So I wonder that that is sort of another unexpected consequence, if you will, of immigration.
But for liberals, not for conservatives or Christians, for liberals.
harrison smith
Right.
But it certainly is just contributing to the chaos of the whole situation.
But yeah, I found that so strange because I was going to bring that up.
We talked about it during the break. I was going to mention the Muslims that were protesting the LGBT indoctrination going on in schools and how, again, the media treats them very, very differently than they treat Christians who might stand up against this stuff.
Is it just something in the minds of the liberals where, like, because they consider...
Muslims, a minority, they just give them passes for stuff.
Like in their conception, when they see a Christian person saying, I don't want pornography in my school, they see like an image of some like boogeyman that's just like, I want to impose my ruling.
But when a Muslim do it, they see like an innocent brown person who's just trying to live their life.
Like, is it just their perception?
Why do they treat these groups so differently?
unidentified
Yeah, absolutely. There is a prejudice against Christians, for sure, especially traditionalists, conservative, fundamentalists.
In their minds, we're the colonizers, to use the modern word that's being, you know, as an old word.
And these other people, yes, they're the poor, downtrodden masses who come here to work, and they're persecuted people, and we can't be mean to them.
But again, I believe that the liberal establishment has a problem on their hands when there's so many of these folks that are Intrinsically conservative on some of these moral issues, not completely, but on some of them.
And, you know, I can assure you that there were some just regular Michiganders at that meeting pushing back against this ordinance.
They were not comfortable with it.
So, you know, their buttons get pushed too in all of this, whether they say so or not publicly.
I believe that, you know, that is sort of the dirty little secret that some of these liberals are not comfortable with all this immigration.
harrison smith
You know, it's so funny that you use the word colonizer because when I look at what's happening in Dearborn or I look at what's happening in Hamtramck, colony is the one word that jumps to mind, right?
These are little colonies of, you know, foreigners in America that are not following American laws but sort of imposing their own.
I mean, is this anything other than a colony?
unidentified
Right. Well, back in the day, I grew up in New York City.
My parents are actually Costa Rican immigrants.
And New York was famous for, you know, little this and little that, right?
And, you know, all the little enclaves of immigrants.
And, you know, Chinatown, I thought it was an amazing place as a kid.
You'd go there and there's endless supply of restaurants and these great little stores.
So we were very comfortable with some aspects of that, of these enclaves.
It seems like folks got along and they were unified and we gave people their space in their culture.
Which I appreciate about America.
I think that's a beautiful thing about it, you know, beautiful quality.
But again, we've gotten to the point where, you know, people are not assimilating in that fashion.
You know, there's not that national unity, which I think you're talking about and that we're hungry for.
And we haven't really decided what makes America America anymore.
What is assimilation?
You know, is it our founding documents?
Is it the Christian faith?
Is it, you know, limited government?
Is it our Chamber of Commerce type traditions?
You know, those kind of things that built the country so many, many years ago.
harrison smith
Right, and do we want to continue to be a country that champions the rights of minorities, or do we want to be a democracy where the rule of...
You know, the majority gets imposed on everybody else.
I mean, it doesn't seem like the left wing has any answer to this.
They're only exacerbating the issues.
Can you stay on for one more segment, Izzy?
unidentified
Oh, thank you. Yes. Okay, great.
harrison smith
Thank you. Okay, yeah. I want to talk to you about this a little bit more because, again, you do a lot of great stuff.
Borderhawk does a lot of great stuff with the border, and there's a ton of interesting information that's come out of there.
We also have a news story here today that, again, it just sort of shows the bizarreness of Of the atmosphere when it comes to this in particular, it's the outrageous firing of an art history professor in Minnesota.
This was an art history professor that showed a picture of Muhammad and then was fired.
And you have the extremely liberal LA Times standing up for her.
So again, it's like, I don't know what side I'm on anymore.
Everything's just up in the air and confusing.
And I guess that's the world under multiculturalism.
Nothing is simple.
It's all complicated and chaotic.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is Harrison Smith, your host of the American Journal.
My guest is Izzy Lyman.
Borderhawknews.blog is where you can find her work.
Also available on Infowars.com.
You can follow her on Twitter at Izzy Lyman.
And, you know, Izzy, when it comes to things about immigration, I just apply the same rule that I apply to everything else in my life, which is the golden rule, right?
Jesus Christ told us to treat others as you would like to be treated.
Right. And so I can't imagine moving into a country, especially like illegally, right?
I love Japan. Visiting Japan was like the best two weeks of my life.
I would move there in a second.
But if I went and said, hey, I'd like to move here, and Japan said, sorry, we don't want any immigrants, I cannot myself fathom then wanting to sneak in somehow, then wanting to circumvent their laws, then once I'm there...
I don't think it's disrespectful.
I don't think it's mean. I don't think it's overly nationalist to simply demand that same consideration that I would give to foreign countries, foreign countries and foreigners and people moving to America, give to America.
I mean, that seems so simple to me, but we're not allowed to do that anymore, I guess.
But to me, that makes sense.
unidentified
Absolutely. I think that's a spot on example.
And I can't, you know, again, there's so many of us that would never even think of doing that.
But unfortunately, we now have this sort of culture of entitlement where we have told people from other countries, especially during the Biden administration, I believe the number is now 5 million illegals have come into our country.
And I don't think that accounts for the gotaway.
So we're encouraging this by the minute, by the second.
Our leaders are, you know, not our good leaders, our bad leaders, so to speak.
So I think that's what's happening.
And this message is getting out across all of Latin America apparently, people making these dangerous, brutal crossings.
It blows my mind.
It blows your mind. It blows so many of our minds to think people would do this.
And again, it's a culture we've encouraged and we're probably telling these people that they're going to get all kinds of neat goodies and so forth.
No, it's a communication problem.
It's a policy problem.
It's a moral problem.
It's a leadership problem.
It's definitely not us.
It's them that are causing the problem.
harrison smith
Yeah, absolutely. And I also think it's an information problem.
You said the 5 million number.
I think that's probably about accurate.
But there is no way to know.
There's no possible way to know how many have crossed the border in just a couple years, let alone how many have crossed in the last 40 years or so.
I mean, I have a video here. I don't necessarily have to play it, but it's from the World Economic Forum.
And it's a Republican, apparently, a Republican congresswoman, Maria Salazar, saying that we need to give dignity to the 13 to 15 million illegals living in America.
And you hear this number a lot, like 11 to 13 or sometimes 11 to 15 million.
I mean, unless I'm mistaken, and you might know this, Izzy, the 11 million number is from a study in like the 80s.
Right? I mean, there were 11 million illegal immigrants in the 80s.
That was 40 years ago.
So, I mean, who knows how many we have here now, but they still use this number, 11 million.
unidentified
Right, exactly. You're absolutely right, Harrison.
I think that number is very dated, and they just haul it out every so often, Pew Research or somebody or other, you know, and sort of to keep us appeased.
Calm down, people. It's not that bad.
But no, in fact, it's much, much, much worse than that, if I had to guess.
And we just don't know is the other problem.
harrison smith
It's a mystery. And then you've got the UN funding people.
That was a big story that broke on BorderHawk, the video of the guy going, the UN hasn't put money on my card today, and I'm very mad.
And it's like, so we pay for the UN. The UN funds the people who cross our border.
I mean, this is just a scam of biblical proportion, and they're making it increasingly illegal to even disagree with it and say we don't want this.
I mean, what is the path out of this situation, Izzy?
unidentified
You know, I think, and I pray about this all the time, and I wish I knew.
I'm hoping for a little leadership from this new Congress, you know, from the group, especially those people, the dissidents that stood up to the McCarthy faction.
I'm hoping they can do something.
I'm hoping they can help our Border Patrol.
It's because they're at the front lines, and their experience, the worst of this, are ranchers.
You know, so I don't know, honestly, Harrison.
You asked me that question, and I'm sorry, I just don't have an answer.
harrison smith
I'll tell you an easy one. How about we, you know, what do we do to fix the immigration crisis?
I mean, it's not an easy question.
But, you know, the other thing is that in this video where she's talking about 13 to 15 million illegals, she's essentially saying that's too many.
We could never deport all of them.
And I see this sentiment a lot. They just go, you know...
We can never deport all of them, so that's off the table.
We can't do that. Let's come up with a different solution.
But to me, why could we not deport all of them?
And I think the implication there is that if we start to deport all of them, they'll fight back.
And there are so many of them that if they start fighting us, we won't be able to handle it.
It'll create like a war. In which case, they're sort of acknowledging this really is an invasion.
I mean, there's violence underpinning all of this.
unidentified
Well, first of all, let me say that I think Salazar is an undocumented Democrat.
Let's get that out of the way.
That's a good phrase. I like that. And I do believe that we have the resources to deport, for sure.
I mean, look how quickly that situation in Martha's Vineyard was settled, right?
Instantly.
Look at how quickly the streets of El Paso were completely cleaned up.
Like suddenly there's no more homeless people.
So to me, it's a matter of the will.
It's completely a matter of the will.
And the folks that talk about a great replacement, they are not wrong.
harrison smith
Right.
Right.
And yet that's now, you know, the latest is that there's a congresswoman that's basically saying that if you talk about the great replacement, they're literally trying to make that illegal to talk about.
unidentified
you What? Correct. What?
What a world, right?
This is so crazy, right?
harrison smith
Yeah, so it's like you gotta get rid of these fundamental human rights in order to uphold the immigration that you're dealing with.
It's just everything's getting worse, and I see no end to it, and...
Unless we make a concerted and conscious effort to instruct people on what it means to be an American, I don't see this ending anytime soon.
I see greater fractionalization and factions forming up and small ethnic groups vying for power with other small ethnic groups, which is just chaos to me.
I don't see this being able to continue for much longer in a stable state.
unidentified
Do you? Well, I think what you're doing as alternative media is so important more than ever, to get this information out there, to educate people, to explain to them the problem, and to possibly give them a solution.
I think that is so important.
We need so many voices.
We need every hand on deck in this.
And, you know, I thank you folks at InfoWars for what you're doing in this regard.
harrison smith
Well, it's just, you know, I... What else are we supposed to do?
It feels like all of our avenues to deal with this are cut off.
It's got to just be step one.
Talking about this stuff has to just be step one.
Then we have to, as you're pointing out, have the will to put it into political power to come up with some sort of way to move forward because this is just totally unsustainable.
Again, it's just...
I even need to get over this idea of just being like, no, this just isn't American.
It's just not American. I don't have to feel bad about saying that.
You know, this country was founded with certain principles.
And when you have people that are just in complete flagrant violation of those, even I need to get over, you know, feeling bad about saying, no, if you're in our country, you need to obey our laws.
And that's that. And if you don't like it, you're welcome to go back home.
I mean, it's really not a mean thing to say, is it?
unidentified
No. And, you know, to use a word from the Christian tradition, it's evangelism.
And evangelism is that concept where we try to persuade people to look at the Bible, to look at Jesus, right, and to persuade them that this is the way, the truth, and the life.
So if I may borrow from that, I think that we have our work cut out as evangelists, and we have to evangelize our fellow Americans, perhaps these new immigrants who are receptive to You know, we have to find ways to counter it.
And the work of an evangelist is extraordinarily hard, no question about it.
But I think that is our mandate, and I think that is our calling for now.
harrison smith
Yeah, and I see another parallel with the asylum situation.
It's like America has so many of these great things, the religious freedom, the idea that we would be a place of asylum for people who are politically persecuted.
These are the good things about America, but when they're taken advantage of and when groups use these terms for things that are not appropriate, then we lose those things that make America really good.
So it's... It's dangerous.
It's a dangerous world we're entering into, but Izzy Lyman is keeping on top of things.
Izzy Lyman on Twitter.
Borderhawk.blog is the website you go to.
Thank you so much for joining us, Izzy.
unidentified
Thank you so much, Harrison.
harrison smith
All right, folks. We'll be back on the other side to finish out the show with some of your phone calls.
This is the American Journal. Go to Infowarsstore.com to support everything that we do here.
We're trying to save America, folks.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Final segment of American Journal today, Infowars.com, ban.video.
Have you tried Super Milk Vitality?
Have you tried Fizzy Magnesium?
Have you tried Down and Out Sleep Support?
Have you taken the real red pill?
You can do it all now with massive discounts at InfoWarsStore.com.
The Alex Jones was right. Emergency sale is on this whole week up to 50% off, but these products are in limited supply and will be selling out fast.
So waste no time.
Get the supplements that can and just might change your life for the better.
Vaso Beats Complete is one of those that we actually get calls about.
People call into the show just to ask, when are you getting Vaso Beats back?
Well, it's back, folks. It's back, back in stock, and 25% off with this limited supply.
Super Male Vitality, also 25% off.
Again, I love down-and-out sleep support.
I need to get another bottle of it, actually.
I ran out of my... My old supply, and it's now back in stock and 40% off.
And what I like about it is the liquid tincture, so you can take just the right amount for you.
You can sort of test it, take half a drop for the first time, see how that does, and, you know, alter it for your needs.
It really is an amazing sleep supplement.
It'll knock you out like a light.
Vitamin D3 gummies are also 50% off.
That sale will be ending very soon.
And, of course, we are in the dead of winter now.
Although nobody bothered to tell the Texas weather.
We are. Which means that for most of you, where weather behaves, you're not getting as much sun as you normally would.
You've got to make up for that lack of sunlight.
And one great way to do it is by getting the vitamin D3 gummies.
They're delicious. They taste like lemon candies.
But they get you the vitamin D3 that you're not getting because you're not out in the sun as much as you should be.
So again, folks, these things are not just...
A lot of these really just aren't optional in today's world.
Because of the denuded water supply, because of the poisons or the food supply denuded of nutrition, because of the poisons in the water supply, because of the poisons in the air, because of the, just again, lack of nutritional value in your everyday food, you're just not getting enough of so many of these vitamins, minerals, and other things that are found in the Infowars supplements.
And of course, it's a 360 when you keep us on the air.
We're going to go out to your phone calls.
In just a second.
But I wanted to cover some more stories because since we're talking about immigration and the way rights of minority groups are respected or not, there's been a very subtle but very important, very dangerous, very novel shift of speech laws recently.
I don't know if you've noticed this. We know Ricky Vaughn is being prosecuted for sharing a meme, right?
Baked Alaska talked about being a co-conspirator with him because he retweeted a meme that was jokingly telling people that they could vote by phone by texting a number.
Which again, it's just a troll.
It's not electioneering.
It's not election engineering, right?
Which do you think had a bigger effect on the legitimacy and outcome of the Of any election.
Do you think it was a meme shared by a meme guy?
Or do you think it was instituting mail-in balloting without any form of control or guarantee that the ballots you're getting are legitimate?
Do you think it's worse for somebody to share a meme?
Or do you think it's worse for the people in charge of printing the ballots to print them all wrong and force people to wait in line for hours and hours and hours on voting day and then not even cast their vote, disenfranchising tens of thousands?
I don't know. One of those got punished by the federal government.
The other one didn't even get investigated.
So this sort of across the board, right?
It's just there's no law that says memes are now illegal.
But he'll be going to jail. There are no laws against expressing certain opinions, but there soon might be.
Sheila Jackson Lee.
Her new white supremacy bill.
Stopping white people and only white people from saying anything bad about another group, race, religion, or anything else.
So they are trying to put the laws on the books, but in the meantime, they're just enforcing non-laws anyway.
And again, it's all very bizarre.
It's all very strange.
Here's a story from yesterday from New Hampshire Public Radio.
Leader of New England hate group facing civil charges for racist display in Portsmouth.
So he's being charged for a display.
Okay, it's an illegal display of some sort.
It's a case against NSC-131, a hate group active in New England, as well as its leader and another member, for allegedly trespassing and then hanging a racist banner in Portsmouth last summer.
Prosecutors allege in court documents released Tuesday that the group violated the state's civil rights statute when a banner over a highway overpass contained the phrase, Keep New England White.
Keep New England White.
So that's an illegal sentiment to have now, I guess.
This is why I don't understand. Who is being attacked when you say keep New England white?
Because I can tell you that there's no shortage of the number of stories that you can find Saying that people think that certain states are too white and need to be made less white by mass immigration.
See, that's an attack on the population of the state.
That's saying we want to replace you, which is a form of genocide.
We think there's too much of your race here, so we want to bring in other races to dilute your population.
That's an attack on a population.
I don't get how saying we live here, we want to keep living here, this state is a race and we want it to continue to be that race.
I don't get who that's attacking or how that is being offensive to anybody.
The offensive thing is what the mainstream media does when they write articles saying New England is too white, we need people of other races to come in.
Again, I don't even necessarily agree with the sentiment, keep New England white.
I don't My experience in New England is not that it is particularly white, but personally, but also, you know, It's not like I'm defending something I agree with.
I'm defending the right for people to express opinions of theirs that for any other group would be totally mainstream, completely normal.
Nobody would have any issue with it.
But when it's white people saying it, somehow self-preservation is perceived as an attack.
Somehow continuity is seen as being aggressive.
Aggressively fighting against somebody.
It doesn't make any sense to me.
Again, I can just, you know...
We'll see if they pop up.
New Hampshire, too white.
Let's just search that and see what comes up.
One of the whitest states in America wants more minorities, so that's good.
New Hampshire, 94% white, asks, how do you diversify a whole state?
See, there's article after article talking about how certain states are too white, there's too many white people, and they want it to be less white now.
And so then in reaction to that, people put up a poster saying we don't want to be forcibly intervened with and racially reconfigured to fit your bizarre ideology.
We want to stay who we are.
And that's the thing that's punished.
That's the thing that's deemed illegal.
That's the thing that is considered a hate crime and now being punished with jail time.
Makes no sense. That was a New York Times article.
New Hampshire is 94% white.
It is now trying to figure out how to change that.
It's not even like these people just out of nowhere were like, keep New England white, we hate minorities.
There are mainstream media articles from the New York Times to LA Times and everywhere in between saying you're too white, we're going to make you less white by bringing in, whether you like it or not, foreigners to make you less white because we hate white people, we hate your race, and we want less of you.
And then they say, we actually like ourselves, and we're okay with being white, and we don't think we need anybody else, and then those people get arrested.
Insane, right? And there's this other story from Albany, New York.
White man arrested, harassed, red flagged, and charged with a felony over a swastika sticker found at Albany University.
And again, we just have to ask the question, why are the Nazis bad?
Why are they bad? Are they bad because who they targeted?
That's not why I think they're bad. I think they're bad because they're tyrants, because they created a civilization where nobody could have free thought, where opinions outside of the approved, top-down, fascist paradigm were ruthlessly extirpated and removed from the society.
It was a brutal totalitarian regime that ran on censorship and And making illegal the holding of alternative ideas or the displaying of forbidden symbols.
That's what's evil about the Nazis.
So I'm less offended by the Nazi symbol than I am about the Nazi activity going on.
I'm less offended by the wearing or the displaying of a swastika than I am offended by the authorities coming in and charging people with felonies for displaying a swastika.
I think it's up to us to decide which side of the aisle that we land on.
Because free speech is going away very quickly, folks.
But mostly just for one group of people.
So it's time we stop letting that happen.
I think it's just a choice we have to make, and it's not that hard to make.
That's going to do it for us, folks.
Export Selection