Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
you're tuned in to the American Journal with your host Harrison Smith Watch it live right now at band.video. | |
| Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to The American Journal. | ||
| Sort of scrambling behind the scenes here. | ||
| I got totally distracted this morning by the latest Project Veritas release. | ||
| I'm saying they're transfixed to it, watching it, and then I realize, oh, the show starts in about two minutes. | ||
| I better go. So we're going to show you that full video here in just a minute, an absolute bombshell from Project Veritas. | ||
| We've got a lot more to come today, more videos than I can possibly play, but I'll try to play a lot. | ||
| Your calls, of course. John Murawski will be joining us in the third hour. | ||
| Very exciting show we have for you. | ||
| We'll open up the fun lines just a little bit, but let's begin as we always do with our daily dispatch. | ||
| All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Wednesday, the 16th of February, 2022. | ||
| From Indy100.com, how's this for a headline? | ||
| The moon should be privatized to help wipe out poverty on Earth, economists say. | ||
| Oh, well the economists, huh? | ||
| The economists say this, do they? | ||
| Privatizing the moon is the next bright idea to help wipe out poverty on Earth. | ||
| Some sort of demon whispered in the ear of economists. | ||
| According to a strange report by neoliberal think tank the Adam Smith Institute, the satellite should be divided into parcels of land and assigned to different countries to rent out to businesses, boosting the economy. | ||
| The economists also reckon this would boost space tourism, exploration, and discovery. | ||
| Yeah, maybe. Yeah, I guess. | ||
| Wouldn't it be great, the moon with a big Coca-Cola sign on it? | ||
| Maybe just every time you look up at the mysterious wonder of the celestial bodies, you'll see a big Nike swoosh on the moon. | ||
| Maybe that's a good idea. | ||
| You gotta love it, don't you folks? | ||
| If you thought globalism was bad, they're not sticking to one planetary body. | ||
| No, it's really more of a universalism, I think. | ||
| Yeah, there you go. Can we just give the moon to Black Lives Matter? | ||
| Maybe that... Reparations. | ||
| You get the moon. You can have it. | ||
| Moving on here. | ||
| Eric Adams blames white media for negative media coverage of bail reforms and NYC crime surge. | ||
| Under fire, Eric Adams, the new mayor of NYC, plays the race card. | ||
| He suggests white reporters are racist in covering bail reforms and surging crime and threatens to stop talking to the press. | ||
| Ironically... I'm kind of fulfilling another stereotype in this. | ||
| It's just a little weird. | ||
| A little strange. | ||
| It's just... Really despicable and humiliating. | ||
| I think it's humiliating for this guy. | ||
| I feel embarrassed for him, right? | ||
| Just like exploding crime. | ||
| It's getting to the point where I'm not sure if I'm reading the same reports about the same crimes or if these are new crimes. | ||
| It's like every day it's like, woman stabbed 40 times in New York apartment building. | ||
| And it's like, wait, is this the same woman that had her throat slashed by the homeless person or is this another one? | ||
| It's so rapid. | ||
| They're sort of It's a cavalcade of crime going on in New York City as the crime rate explodes. | ||
| It's up 46% this year, I think, either 41% or 46% year-to-date over last year, which itself was a record-setting year in crime. | ||
| But if you report on that, you're racist. | ||
| So let the collapse happen. | ||
| Do not pay attention. | ||
| If you pay attention to what's happening, that means you're a racist. | ||
| Be a good American, bury your head in the sand, and allow your entire country to collapse into chaos and crime. | ||
| Meanwhile, Prince Andrew settles out of court, agrees to an undisclosed sum payment to Virginia Giuffre. | ||
| So he is avoiding a trial. | ||
| The rumor is that it's about $16 million, which is quite a bit of money, but sort of chump change for the royal family. | ||
| I assumed it was going to be billions of dollars because what wouldn't this guy pay to not have this exposed in public court? | ||
| But, you know, maybe they got this low number because when they presented it, They also showed Virginia the video of Jeffrey Epstein being murdered. | ||
| You know, that can be really a convincing type of encouragement there. | ||
| Joking, of course. | ||
| Of course, Jeffrey Epstein killed himself. | ||
| And you're probably racist if you question that too. | ||
| Meanwhile, multiple Canadian premiers opposed Trudeau invoking the Emergencies Act. | ||
| And yeah, basically Trudeau is absolutely collapsing as everybody's rising up against him and pointing out what an obvious tyrannical despot You're listening to the American Journal with your host, | ||
|
unidentified
|
Harrison Smith. | |
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Bright and early here at American Journal. | ||
| I was up a little bit late going on the kill stream with friend of the show, Ethan Ralph. | ||
| It was very fun. It was very fun. | ||
| And I'm going to be debating a guy named Destiny. | ||
| That's right. That's right, a guy. | ||
| A guy named Destiny. | ||
| I'll be debating him on April 2nd. | ||
| I just thought it was hilarious because I was talking to my friend John about this. | ||
| I go, yeah, I'm going to debate a guy named Destiny. | ||
| The topic is nationalism versus globalism. | ||
| My friend John was like, I don't understand. | ||
| What do you mean? I'm like, yeah, the debate is going to be nationalism versus globalism. | ||
| And he's like, wait, this guy's a globalist? | ||
| Like, wait, what? | ||
| Wait, people actually knowingly support this ideology? | ||
| It's like, yeah, I guess so. | ||
| I guess they do. | ||
| But it's amazing. | ||
| I'm scared. | ||
| I'm scared. What if he convinces me? | ||
| What if he convinces me in this debate that I'm wrong and that really, you know, we should just surrender our national sovereignty and any sort of governmental oversight we have to some sort of unelected corporate cabal? | ||
| You know, what if I'm convinced of that? | ||
| What if there are good arguments to be made? | ||
| There aren't, of course. It's an insane ideology of suicide and death. | ||
| And so that should be fun. | ||
| That'll happen in April. | ||
| I have a lot of videos to show you, good lord. | ||
| Trucker convoy, vaccine collapse, multiple, like, it's an everyday occurrence now that somebody collapses on camera. | ||
| Think about this. It's not just like famous people collapsing or just people collapsing and it gets reported about. | ||
| These things are happening on camera, right? | ||
| What percentage of people's lives do they spend in front of a camera? | ||
| Even myself, it's three hours a day, plus commercial breaks. | ||
| It's a pretty small amount. | ||
| So just think about the likelihood that this would be the time that they collapse. | ||
| Yeah, it's happening over and over. | ||
| So we'll show you those videos as well. | ||
| Yeah, quite a few videos to go to. | ||
| But I've got to go to the latest from Project Veritas because it is... | ||
| It's not even a bombshell. | ||
| It's a carpet bombing. | ||
| It is bombshell after bombshell. | ||
| And they've done this over and over. | ||
| Like, they come out with these videos undercover exposing people really telling the truth behind the scenes when they don't think they're being recorded. | ||
| And every time, it's jaw-dropping. | ||
| And this one is no exception. | ||
| It's a FDA member who oversees the vaccine approval. | ||
| And he just spills the beans on absolutely everything. | ||
| And the funny thing about this, Project Veritas, is that the woman isn't even, like, pretending to play along. | ||
| Usually they get a pretty woman to go and seduce a guy and drinks with him. | ||
| And the woman the whole time is like, oh, really? | ||
| Oh, no way. That's so cool. | ||
| And just, like, encouraging the guy to talk. | ||
| This woman is so outraged by what the guy is saying. | ||
| She's not even playing along. | ||
| She's just like, and you're doing this to toddlers? | ||
| You're going to inject toddlers? | ||
| Well, yeah. Yeah, toddlers. | ||
| It's amazing, right? So let's just go to this and watch it. | ||
| And I'm just going to sit back and take notes along with you. | ||
| It's the latest from Project Veritas. | ||
| Already deleted on Twitter. | ||
| Impossible to find. But here it is. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Biden wants to inoculate as many people as possible. | |
| So you're going to have to get an annual shot. | ||
| We haven't formally announced yet. | ||
| The drug companies, the food companies, the vaccine companies. | ||
| They pay us hundreds of millions of dollars a year to hire and keep the reviewers to approve their products. | ||
| If they can get every person required at an annual vaccine, that is a recurring return of money going into their company. | ||
| I mean, just from everything I've heard, they're not going to not approve this. | ||
| Meet Christopher Cole, an executive officer at the FDA with over 20 years experience who claims to be directly involved in the approval process of the various COVID vaccines. | ||
| What you're about to witness Raises some alarming concerns from the government's desire to mandate an annual vaccine for everyone, including young children, to the billions of dollars that exchange hands between our government and Big Pharma to railroad the approval process. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm a manager for the Food and Drug Administration. | |
| My agency oversees vaccines. | ||
| Vaccine approvals and devices for vaccines. | ||
| My office clears all the emergency approvals. | ||
| Since COVID is under an emergency order, we expedite the approval of any emergency. | ||
| I've been there for like 22 years. | ||
| Biden wants to conagulate as many people as possible. | ||
| So, you have to get an annual shot. | ||
| I mean, it hasn't been formally announced yet, because they don't want to, like, rile everyone out. | ||
| Is it going to be formally announced? | ||
| Yeah, yeah, at some point. | ||
| I mean, it's going to be, and some of it's been talked about publicly, but it has been talked about on... | ||
| Like CNN or Fox or MSNBC or anything. | ||
| So yeah, you'll have to get an annual. | ||
| I think what's going to happen is this could be a gradual thing. | ||
| School's going to mandate it. | ||
| Why do they need the third one? | ||
| Well, the same reason that you or I would use a thermo, because the vaccine, it wanes. | ||
| Your ability to fight it, it wanes. | ||
| So the three will bolster your system. | ||
| And then there will be an annual, eventually an annual, just like the flu shot. | ||
| For the toddlers? | ||
| Well, for everyone. | ||
| Okay, so the toddlers too then? | ||
| We'll have to get it annually. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| I mean, that's in the future. | ||
| We're not sure that might involve more studies. | ||
| The FDA was scheduled to meet this week to discuss approval of the Pfizer vaccine for children as young as six months old. | ||
| They were hoping to have the new vaccine available by the end of the month, but the meeting was unexpectedly canceled, citing the need for more testing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You guys have been in the news a lot the last couple days. | |
| Yeah, we're looking at trying to prove... | ||
| I don't completely agree with their... | ||
| the process. | ||
| They're looking at trying to inoculate kids under five years old, between six months and five years old. | ||
| What do you mean you don't agree with the process? | ||
| Well, I mean, they don't have all the... | ||
| all the tests aren't there. Despite Cole's concerns regarding the possible dangers of vaccinating young children, it seems the FDA is still willing to go through with this approval. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's an EUA for all age groups, all designations, and then you have to get approved by specific age groups based on the study. | |
| Do you think it's really an emergency for the toddlers? | ||
| Well, they're all approved under an emergency, just because it's not as impactful as some of the other approvals, emergency approvals, but they're all being approved under that standard. | ||
| The efficacy data doesn't have to be as high. | ||
| The standard is on emergency use authorizations is that it does more benefit than harm. | ||
| So how do you know it's already getting approved? | ||
| Well, they're not going to... | ||
| I mean, just from everything I've heard, they're not going to not approve this. | ||
| I thought their cases weren't that high for six-month to four-year-olds. | ||
| They're not, but because it's related to COVID, it's under that approval process. | ||
| So how many babies... | ||
| Did they have to jab, basically, for the trial? | ||
| I don't know how many people they did. | ||
| There's always a chance of long-term effects, especially with someone younger. | ||
| Cole seems certain the federal government will require annual COVID vaccines, including young children, even though the efficacy, adverse reactions and long term effects are still unknown. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's hard to find pregnant women for these studies and a significant number in order to be statistically accurate. | |
| They haven't tested enough on pregnancy, on vaccines and everything, and women because they have different systems than men. | ||
| They haven't tested enough? | ||
| Well, they have, but they haven't done enough prior. | ||
| Now they've also been very good at promoting that, but that was an issue for a period of time. | ||
| Well, I feel like that's still an issue. | ||
| It is still an issue. We still haven't gotten there. | ||
| I read, like, a couple articles about it, and everything I saw was that the first two shots weren't effective. | ||
| There has been, yes, it has not been as effective as they're expecting. | ||
| I agree. | ||
| Here's a statement. | ||
| The person purportedly in the video does not work on vaccine matters and does not represent the views of the FDA. | ||
| And if all that doesn't raise some eyebrows, just wait until you see what he says in part two about the billions of dollars exchanging hands between our government and Big Pharma and what really goes on behind the scenes during the approval process. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There's almost a billion dollars a year going into FDA's budget from the people we regulate. | |
| If they can get every person required at an annual vaccine, that is a recurring return of money going into their company. | ||
| Folks, if you can watch that video and not understand that the decisions being made for our health, the decisions being made to mandate and control you are being made strictly out of greed and power-hungry psychopathy. | ||
| It has nothing to do with your health. | ||
| And behind the scenes, they admit it, and they know it, and they laugh about it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's despicable. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | |
| You know, I was just thinking about the video that we just saw, like really bombshell stuff from Project Veritas, and the fact that it has been deleted off Twitter. | ||
| It has been totally destroyed off of Twitter immediately, right? | ||
| Rapidly, just without any hesitation, it got taken down. | ||
| And I was thinking, what? What could they even claim was the reason they were taking this down? | ||
| Hashtag expose FDA. And I was thinking, one of the claims that they make is they'll claim that something is hacked material, kind of like the Hunter Biden laptop. | ||
| And remember, if we go to a story that actually took place at the time from CNBC, FEC says Twitter acted lawfully in restricting the New York Post article on Hunter Biden. | ||
| And they say Twitter said at the time it decided to block links to the story based on its, quote, hacked material policy. | ||
| That prohibited the use of our services to directly distribute content obtained through hacking that contained private information and may put people in physical harm or danger or contain trade secrets. | ||
| But of course the Hunter Biden laptop was not hacked. | ||
| It's not a hack at all. | ||
| So this shouldn't have applied to it, but it never has to, right? | ||
| They just delete things that are politically uncomfortable and then they slap whatever label they need to on it in order to justify it retroactively. | ||
| But then that made me start thinking about the fact that the Ottawa trucker convoy was hacked. | ||
| The Give, Send, Go material was actually hacked. | ||
| A bunch of private people had their private information hacked and published. | ||
| And it's all over Twitter. | ||
| It's absolutely everywhere. Occupy Democrats has posted. | ||
| Other people have posted. | ||
| The New York Times has an article with all the leaked data in it that's posted on Twitter. | ||
| It's just... Again, it's not just about pointing at these people and saying they're hypocrites. | ||
| It's about understanding the weapons that they use, the methods that they use, and hopefully exposing to people that when they're lying about this stuff, there's a reason. | ||
| It's because they don't have a legitimate reason to take it down. | ||
| They don't have a legitimate concern for safety or hacking or anything of the sort. | ||
| They're just labels that they're throwing on it to destroy their political enemies, and it's really as simple as that. | ||
| So Twitter has removed the FDA. Undercover footage. | ||
| Why? No reason. | ||
| They don't want it exposed. | ||
| They don't want it exposed that the FDA, behind the scenes, when they think they're alone, when they think they're not being listened to, are quite open about the fact that they're mandating inoculations for children that don't have enough data. | ||
| And that they're using the emergency use authorization to circumvent normal laws requiring data and information and testing procedures. | ||
| Like, you don't need any of that if it's under the emergency use. | ||
| So even if it's improper, it's kind of similar, isn't it? | ||
| There's another sort of thread through it, right? | ||
| It's these labels they use. | ||
| Whatever label justifies their corruption. | ||
| So in this case, with Twitter, if they need to put a label of hacking on something to destroy it, that's fine. | ||
| The FDA, if you want to put an EUA label on something, then you can just circumvent everything by saying, oh, it's an emergency. | ||
| Oh, I put the emergency label on it, so now I get to flout the law and completely ignore safety precautions. | ||
| It's absolutely incredible and just fantastic work, once again, by Project Veritas. | ||
| But we've got so much more to talk about and get into. | ||
| Let's start today with the Trucker Convoy, since it continues to be one of the most important stories in the history of the world, strangely enough. | ||
| But that's not a joke. | ||
| I mean, we're on the cusp of total despotism in a worldwide globalist control grid, and the most powerful force against this so far has been the Canadian truckers. | ||
| And I have some videos here to show you. | ||
| Where to begin? | ||
| Because there are some very good ones. | ||
| First, let's talk about what brought this about. | ||
| We'll go to clip number 10 here. | ||
| Because what you need to understand is the globalist cabal is a mafia. | ||
| And it operates like a mafia. | ||
| And so what does that mean? That means that if you have a union and the head of that union is in the mafia, it means their loyalty is not to the union. | ||
| The union to them is a tool to be used to We're good to go. | ||
| But in reality, their concern is not for the union members. | ||
| Their concern is not for the people working beneath them. | ||
| Their concern and their loyalty is strictly to those who pull their strings, those who they have a real loyalty to. | ||
| And so this is Klaus Schwab admitting to this. | ||
| This is a video I believe from 2016. | ||
| Where he's talking specifically to Justin Trudeau and thanking Justin Trudeau and the other Canadians involved in the World Economic Forum, including the Deputy Prime Minister who we saw yesterday make the claim about the, or basically announce the confiscation of people's money for daring to donate to this peaceful protest. | ||
| And he's thanking them for their loyalty. | ||
| They're some of the most loyal people. | ||
| That's the exact word he uses. | ||
| Pay attention to this. It's clip number 10, Klaus Schwab. | ||
| Prime Minister, good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, friends. | ||
| As you know, the theme of this annual meeting is mastering the fourth industrial revolution. | ||
| I couldn't imagine anybody who could represent more The world which will come out of this fourth industrial revolution. | ||
| It certainly will be a world, hopefully, not certainly, hopefully, if we take the right decisions. | ||
| Where is James Bond when you need him? | ||
| It will be a diverse world, characterized by plurality, It will be a world which will combine significant investments into the future, into our soft and hard infrastructure, with fostering entrepreneurial activity, at the same time social responsibility. | ||
| It will be a young world. | ||
| It will be a digital world. | ||
| Now, who could represent Such a world better than you, Prime Minister. | ||
| We are very glad that at the beginning of this meeting you are talking to us to represent also a new, open Canada. | ||
| I want to use this opportunity also to thank our Canadian constituency, which always has been a very loyal and very much engaged constituency here at the Forum. | ||
| But now, I think, with you, together with our constituents, Prime Minister, we can make sure that in the future, We strengthen the cooperation even more with your country. | ||
| Prime Minister, we are very much looking forward to listen to you. | ||
| And actually, the discussion will be moderated by my friend, Fareed. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So we will have some exciting- I don't know how they're doing this. | |
| He's literally a super villain. | ||
| It's so ridiculous. One theme that I've been noticing, if you want to capture the spirit of the socialist, the spirit of the scumbag, the dependent, the good little teacher's pet, you want to picture like Randall from Recess, right? | ||
| You just want to picture the most skeeving, conniving This slimy little dirtbag who really gets his own self-fulfillment by tattling on other people doing cool stuff. | ||
| And it's the image that you get, right? | ||
| Justin Trudeau sitting up very, like, proper, like, he's got to stick up his butt, like, smiling, and Klaus Schwab like, you are a good little dog. | ||
| You're being a very good little boy, and you're the handsomest boy in town, and don't you know how you're the perfect representative for our beautiful new world? | ||
| You couldn't be better than you. | ||
| It's just, you know, like, he's right. | ||
| I'm so good and wonderful. | ||
| Just like, ooh, just fellating the devil is what they're doing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're tuned in to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| If you've ever watched this show and wondered how I do it, how I... Do a podcast at 10 o'clock at night, only to wake up at 4 in the morning to do this show. | ||
| Is it because I'm fired with the invigorating light of human freedom? | ||
| Of course it is. That should go without saying. | ||
| Is it because it's my job and I have to? | ||
| Obviously, it's an obligation I've taken on. | ||
| And I can't let you find people down or leave the crew hanging. | ||
| But really, the secret is not so secret. | ||
| It's a little secret ingredient I like to call Brain Force Plus. | ||
| That's right, folks. Brain Force Plus. | ||
| It's an incredible supplement from Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| It's the answer. And it's one of our highest rated and best-selling Infowars Life formulas ever. | ||
| And there's a very good reason for that. | ||
| People try it. They love it. | ||
| And they come back and buy it more. | ||
| It puts you in the zone. It gives you really an incredible boost throughout the entire day. | ||
| It's Brain Force Plus. It's 40% off right now at Infowarsstore. | ||
| And if you haven't tried it... Challenge you. | ||
| Try it. Give your brain a boost. | ||
| You'll love it, and it's a 360 win no matter how you look at it. | ||
| 40% off right now, and you know the iconic Brain Force Plus. | ||
| And with that, we go back to the Trucker Convoy there in Canada. | ||
| Some very interesting updates to it. | ||
| Trudeau is not having quite of an easy time as he expected. | ||
| As Rebel News reports, multiple Canadian premiers oppose Trudeau invoking emergency act. | ||
| Starting with Scott Moe, provincial premiers have begun speaking out against the federal government's potential plan to invoke emergencies act in response to the Freedom Convoy protest. | ||
| Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe has done that. | ||
| But then you also had progressive conservative premier Heather Stephenson announcing loosening of restrictions in Manitoba. | ||
| And now you also have Quebec premier Francois Legault also taking a strong stance against this. | ||
| Other premieres are rumored to follow suit, which is interesting. | ||
| Again, a huge point. | ||
| Somebody pointed this out on Twitter, but it bears repeating. | ||
| No Western leader has condemned Trudeau for this. | ||
| Not a single Western leader, not the president of Mexico, not the president of the United States, not France or Germany or the Netherlands or England has said, hey, maybe confiscating the bank accounts of peaceful protesters is beyond the pale. | ||
| They don't care. They do not care. | ||
| And they're in favor of this. | ||
| And they're all keeping an eye on Justin Trudeau to see how to do it themselves in the future. | ||
| It's kind of a scary thing. | ||
| Yesterday I was like, oh, crap, I need to get all my money out of the bank account. | ||
| Who knows? | ||
| Tomorrow Joe Biden could issue something very similar, right, encouraged by the response of Justin Trudeau. | ||
| So it's all important that we shut this down right now and make an example to the rest of the complicit Western leaders that if you try this, it will be your own destruction that occurs, not the destruction of your enemies. | ||
| That has to be paramount in this conflict. | ||
| Of course, other little hiccups going on. | ||
| Ottawa police chief resigns amid Freedom Convoy protest. | ||
| Police chief Peter Slowly resigned on Tuesday, according to Canadian outlet CBC. CBC sources say Peter Slowly has resigned and will publicly announce he's stepping aside after the Ottawa Police Services board meeting today. | ||
| He's been criticized over his handling of the truck convoy protest that's caused major disruptions. | ||
| His resignation comes. As sources tell CBC News, he's been accused of bullying and volatile behavior and has damaged relations with senior leadership and compromised the force's ability to cope with the truck protest. | ||
| You can basically copy and paste this statement onto every single leftist liberal leader. | ||
| Every single one of them is a bully. | ||
| Every single one of them is just vicious and hateful behind the scenes. | ||
| All of these stories always come out where it's just like, yeah, behind the scenes, they're bullied. | ||
| They snap at you and they call you names and they humiliate you and they drive you to tears and they demand that you're loyal. | ||
| This is just the personality we're dealing with. | ||
| It's just the mindset of the... | ||
| It's bullies and snitches is what it is. | ||
| This is the socialist scheme. | ||
| It's bullies who beat the crap out of you and then lie about it to the teacher. | ||
| And then it's the snitches who snitch on you for trying to get back to the bully. | ||
| It's just... They're worshippers of authoritarianism, and whether that's themselves or they get to attach themselves like a leech onto some larger, more powerful construct, whatever they need to do to aggrandize themselves and humiliate others and draw strength from that, that's what they want. InfoWars has the article, Trudeau admits real purpose of emergency powers is so Canadians learn the consequences of breaking the law. | ||
| Which is interesting because, I remind you again, a map of 68 churches has been published. | ||
| The 68 churches that were vandalized or burned since the residential schools announcement. | ||
| That was back in August of 2021. | ||
| I remember it being that high of a number, but then I was second-guessing myself. | ||
| So recently I've been saying dozens. | ||
| There was some official thing that was like over a dozen churches. | ||
| But no, it was 68. | ||
| 68 churches vandalized and burned down or desecrated in just a couple months because of the scientific study that the Trudeau government itself funded. | ||
| And then they encouraged all this. | ||
| Gibson Go website is also back online after legal leftist hack. | ||
| They issued a statement saying, we are in a battle, absolutely we are, against criminals from the government to the shadows and everywhere in between. | ||
| Gibson Go puts out this announcement. | ||
| But really, the... No, it's nothing even close to journalism. | ||
| And of course... Justin Trudeau is getting an earful of this from his own parliament. | ||
| Here's Candace Bergen's MP having a little back and forth with old dictator wannabe Justin Trudeau. | ||
| Remember, the parliament has to still approve this measure, and it doesn't look like they're going to as Justin Trudeau has absolutely no support in this. | ||
| Let's watch Candace Bergen's face-off with Justin Trudeau in the parliament in Canada. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Can the Prime Minister invoke the Emergencies Act? | |
| Twenty-four hours in and there are more questions than answers. | ||
| Questions about whether this is justified, questions around if the criteria is met, questions around what this means to Canadians' rights and freedoms. | ||
| Parliamentary approval is required in order for the Prime Minister to use this unprecedented sledgehammer. | ||
| So, can the Prime Minister tell us When will Parliament be debating this? | ||
| Will it be coming to us on Friday? | ||
| And does he expect that we will look at it Friday but then rise, take a week off, and not actually deal with this until March? | ||
| The Right Honourable Prime Minister. | ||
| After discussions with Cabinet and caucus, after consultations with the Premiers of all provinces and territories, after conversation with opposition leaders, we decided to invoke the Emergencies Act to supplement provincial and territorial capacity to address the blockades and occupations. | ||
| I want to be very clear, Mr. | ||
| Speaker, the scope of these measures are time-limited and geographically targeted. | ||
| They are reasonable and proportionate to the threats they're meant to address, and they are fully to be compliant with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms to reassure all Canadians that this is the right thing to move forward. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Honourable Leader of the Opposition. | |
| I had a very simple question to the Prime Minister he was not able to answer. | ||
| It would appear this could be more political drama for the Prime Minister. | ||
| He name calls people that he disagrees with, he wedges, he divides, he stigmatizes. | ||
| Yet in spite of all of his failure, Coutts' border has cleared. | ||
| Windsor has opened up. | ||
| Provinces and police are doing their jobs and blockades are starting to come down. | ||
| But the Prime Minister thinks that now is the time to use this extreme measure and invoke the Emergencies Act. | ||
| Isn't it true that the Prime Minister's actions could serve to actually make things worse and not make things better? | ||
| Mr. Speaker, this is about keeping Canadians safe, protecting their communities and neighbourhoods, and ensuring jobs and our economy. | ||
| You know, the MPC meme, like all these memes are just, they're coming to life before our very eyes. | ||
| And again, I'm adding a third. | ||
| It's the snitch, I guess it's sort of the snitch slash teacher pet. | ||
| That's the, right? | ||
| You get the teacher's pet vibe from Justin Trudeau. | ||
| And it's just this, everything we're doing is for the health and safety of all Canadians. | ||
| And there's like, why are you stealing the bank accounts of peaceful protesters? | ||
| Everything we're doing is for the health and safety of all Canadians. | ||
| It's like, just give us a robot. | ||
| Just give us like a tape recorder with that statement and we'll just hit play. | ||
| And you can just terrorize and tyrannize and be a complete despot and just run roughshod over every human rights that your citizens constitutionally enjoy. | ||
| But as long as you repeat this self-serving, you know, bureaucratic doublespeak, then I guess there's nothing we can do. | ||
| That's what they think. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| A journalist was asking some of the Freedom Convoy truckers what they thought about the emergency act and whether they were worried about it. | ||
| Let's go down to clip number seven. | ||
| Here's what one of those truckers has to say about Justin Trudeau threatening to close his bank account. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Alright, so what are your thoughts on Trudeau invoking the Emergencies Act? | |
| Absolutely ridiculous. | ||
| To put something like that on a peaceful protest is just insane. | ||
| Are you concerned at all about your bank account? | ||
| No. There's nothing in it anyway. | ||
| So if he wants to go in there and put some money in for me, that'd be fantastic. | ||
| Sure. How long do you plan on staying in Ottawa? | ||
| As long as it takes to get this stuff straightened up. | ||
| Absolutely. I'm not moving. | ||
| I'm not moving. Do you think the protest is having an impact? | ||
| A huge impact. Absolutely. | ||
| It's bringing people together in huge amounts. | ||
| Funny? Yeah, I mean, it's pretty funny, right? | ||
| Empty bank account. And this is what you need to understand, though. | ||
| These people are hardworking Canadians who have seen their lives destroyed over the last two years, seen their country destroyed over the last couple decades, but it's accelerated pretty extensively in the last two years. | ||
| And they find themselves... | ||
| Like, they have nothing to lose. | ||
| That's the problem. You've made a class of incredibly dangerous people with nothing to lose because you have robbed them of their job, you've robbed them of their dignity, you've robbed them of everything, and now you're demanding that they grovel at your feet and beg you for forgiveness for daring to try to stand up for themselves. | ||
| It's outrageous. And so keep that man in mind. | ||
| As we go to this next clip, this clip I just pulled in, guys, because it's back in the parliamentary combat. | ||
| And just listen to the hatred, the disrespect, the vile lies they tell about the truckers. | ||
| It's like they're attempting to demonize them, but I don't even think it's conscious. | ||
| I think they just despise these people and just verbally, mentally, spiritually spit on them. | ||
| In their mind. And just watch this and just listen to the level of hatred, disrespect, dissimulation. | ||
| It's the condescension, I guess you could say. | ||
| They despise these people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. The invocation of the Emergencies Act for the first time in Canadian history is a damning indictment on the failure of this Prime Minister to address the situation. | |
| The Prime Minister once said, I quote, when a government asks its citizens to give up even a small portion of their liberty, it is not simply enough to say, trust us. | ||
| That trust must be earned, it must be checked, and it must be renewed. | ||
| These are his words. | ||
| Canadians do not trust this Prime Minister. | ||
| When will he stop undermining Canadians' rights and start renewing Canadians' trust? | ||
| The Honourable Minister of Public Safety. | ||
| Mr. Speaker, Canadians can trust that this government will always follow the science and the best evidence to get us out of this pandemic. | ||
| And that includes getting vaccinated, Mr. | ||
| Speaker. And contrary to what my colleague says, this is an illegal blockade. | ||
| This illegal blockade is not about the vaccines or the mandates. | ||
| It's about a very small, organized group who are trying to upend our way of life, Mr. | ||
| Speaker. Now, we've made progress. | ||
| We've seen the Ambassador Bridge reopen. | ||
| We've seen Cootes reopen. | ||
| We've seen Surrey reopen. | ||
| And, Mr. Speaker, yesterday, yes, we invoked the Emergencies Act so that we can secure that progress and give law enforcement all the tools they need. | ||
| Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The Honourable Member for Sturgeon River Parkland. | ||
| Well, we'll see if the Prime Minister answers this one. | ||
| Every opportunity... | ||
| In Ottawa and around Canada, he has chosen to hide, to confront, and to escalate. | ||
| His divisive conduct has been a lesson in abject failure. | ||
| Blockades should come down. | ||
| They are already coming down across this country. | ||
| But now the Prime Minister has invoked the Emergencies Act to punish Canadians who, in his words, hold unacceptable views. | ||
| Why is the Prime Minister punishing Canadians for their political views? | ||
| The Honourable Government House Leader. | ||
| A long ago that the former Conservative leader, now the member for Regina Capel with the Conservative Party, said the following. | ||
| These protesters, these activists, may have the luxury of spending days at a time at a blockade, but they need to check their privilege. | ||
| They need to check their privilege and let the people whose jobs depend on the railway system and small business and farmers do their jobs. | ||
| And what have they said now, in this context from the beginning, as swastikas flew, as Confederate flags, They went out and they gave coffee. | ||
| They took pictures. | ||
| They have absolutely the opposite of responsible leadership. | ||
| Instead of de-escalating, they escalated at every turn. | ||
| It's just absolutely insane. | ||
| They say they're following the science. | ||
| The science says explicitly the vaccines do not work at this point and cause major damage. | ||
| I mean, the science. | ||
| They follow the science. And then they have the Temerity. | ||
| And, you know, he basically was insinuating these people were racist, right? | ||
| He says this isn't about vaccine mandates. | ||
| These protests are not about vaccine mandates, despite the fact that that's the only thing this has ever been about. | ||
| And it's amazing when, again, you can contrast this to the way that leftist protesters are treated because he actually said these protests are about upending our way of life. | ||
| So I guess their way of life is subjugation and mandates and unwilling medical procedures. | ||
| Is that the way of life they're upending? | ||
| Because the leftist protests are quite openly saying, we want to destroy the nuclear family and end Western civilization as we know it. | ||
| They're the ones actually advocating for upending and destroying your way of life. | ||
| It couldn't be farther from the truth when it comes to the truckers. | ||
| And then they say, oh, the luxury. | ||
| These people have the luxury and they need to check their privilege, right? | ||
| Of course, just take a look at the first video that we played of a guy going, look, I don't have any money in my bank account, and they're taking my job away, so I have nothing to do but stay here. | ||
| And then I want to go to this tweet by our good friend Alex Cargill at TransSplender on Twitter. | ||
| He says, my job was taken on July 31st, 2021, because of course he refused to get the The jab. | ||
| He said, all of yours will be if we fail. | ||
| No jobs without failed experimental jabs. | ||
| I live in a van in various underground parking lots living off the kindness of the movement for food and showers. | ||
| Thirteen bucks a day. | ||
| Help is a veil to all, but we need everyone. | ||
| And he has a list of things. | ||
| So, these people are destitute. | ||
| These people are homeless. These people have had their lives absolutely and literally destroyed. | ||
| Buy these mandates, and then they're being told to check their privilege because they have the luxury of spending all day protesting against these ridiculous mandates. | ||
| It's outrageous, but also a change is definitely happening. | ||
| And I want to show you a video now, which is just baffling, because yesterday, or maybe the day before, we played a video of Doug Ford, Premier of Ontario, threatening very severe consequences for the truckers if they don't stop blockading. | ||
| But then yesterday, he made this speech and this comment that lays out, it's just... | ||
| It's a revelation just hearing a politician speak like a living human being and completely destroying the entire argument that the government is making here. | ||
| Doug Ford completely blowing up Justin Trudeau's House of Cards. | ||
| Clip number five. Let's go. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know, you can go to Costco, you can go to Walmart, you can go shopping. | |
| You know, you don't know if the person has a shot beside you or not. | ||
| But we also know that it doesn't matter if you have one shot or ten shots, you can catch COVID. See, the Prime Minister has triple shots, and I know hundreds of people with three shots that caught COVID. We just have to be careful. | ||
| We've got to always make sure we wash our hands and move forward. | ||
| Colin, we can't stay in this position forever. | ||
| We've got to learn to live with this and get on with our lives. | ||
| I bet if I asked every single person in this room, do you want these damn masks or do you want them off? | ||
| They want them off. They want to get back to normal. | ||
| They want to be able to go for dinner with their families. | ||
| And there's every single person, including myself, knows people that are unvaccinated. | ||
| You know, sure, there's the rebel rousers, and then there's just hardworking people that just don't believe in it. | ||
| And that's their choice. | ||
| This is about, again, that democracy and freedoms and liberties. | ||
| And I hate, as a government, telling anyone what to do. | ||
| We just got to get moving forward and get out of this and protect the jobs. | ||
| You know, I think a lot of people, Colin, probably yourself too, everyone's done with us. | ||
| Like, we are done with it. | ||
| Let's start moving on and cautiously. | ||
| We've followed the rules, all of us, like 90% of us, for over two years. | ||
| The world's done with it. | ||
| So let's just move forward. | ||
| Yeah, that's it, folks. | ||
| That is a politician actually showing a human spirit, actually speaking... | ||
| His own thoughts in a way that are natural and obviously true. | ||
| It's amazing. It's a revelation. | ||
| It's a miracle, folks. | ||
| It's a miracle to see a politician show a little bit of heart. | ||
| Unbelievable stuff. | ||
| And it's truly wild. | ||
| And something is happening here. | ||
| And we're really breaking through. | ||
| And it may all come crashing down should the Canadian truckers stay strong and the Canadians understand the threat that they're under and push back against their tyrannical Prime Minister and his cronies in the World Economic Forum. | ||
| Folks, I do want to remind you, we have the Globalist Destabilization Emergency Sale, 25% off all storable foods right now, and that is ending in two days. | ||
| So you've got just a few days left to get your storable food. | ||
| Don't put it off any longer. | ||
| You need it. You need to get it before you need to eat it, right? | ||
| So get something that will save your life and support the Infowar and keep you prepared and secure no matter what happens in the future, whether it's a major natural disaster or whether you hire socialists to run your city, you're always in danger of starvation. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're tuned in to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| That's why individual rights and freedoms are so important, right? | ||
| Because it's you as a person. | ||
| You as an individual. | ||
| Not you as a family. Not you as a group. | ||
| Okay? Not you as part of some other organization. | ||
| Not you as part of the province. | ||
| It's you as an individual Canadian. | ||
| Possess these rights. | ||
| That's what's important. | ||
| After discussing with cabinet and caucus, after consultation with premiers from all provinces and territories, after speaking with opposition leaders, the federal government has invoked the Emergencies Act to supplement provincial and territorial capacity to address the blockades and occupations. | ||
| Justin Trudeau has enacted the Emergency Powers Act against all who protest his dictates. | ||
| Including seizing people's bank accounts. | ||
| Trudeau won't allow these Canadian citizens to have a life in their own country, nor will he allow them to leave. | ||
| These are Canadian families celebrating together peacefully as they honorably protest their government. | ||
| It is now evident that Trudeau is capable of anything. | ||
| Last Sunday at around 3 a.m., more than 2,000 firearms were stolen from a shipping lot in Peterborough, Ontario. | ||
| A former sniper for the RCMP has announced that multiple sources have warned that Trudeau's government could be planting weapons in Ottawa to deceptively frame the Freedom Convoy as violent and use it as a false pretext for violently ending the historic peaceful protest. | ||
| While the truckers keep saying that their movement is a movement of the people and is non-political, certain suspicious individuals have stepped into leadership roles. | ||
| B.J. Dichter, a politician and co-founder of LGBTory, and Tamara Leach of Wexit, who is funded by a sitting member of the Globalists Atlantic Council, are the ones who set up and manage the GoFundMe page for the Freedom Convoy. | ||
| And former liberal staffer for the Minister of Public Safety, Dagny Pollack, has recently been made part of the communications team. | ||
| And people involved claim it's all a deceptive story. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Most people don't seem to know where these people came from, how they got involved, how they ended up controlling all of the money, why they're doing all of the speaking. | |
| These are political. These people aren't even truckers. | ||
| B.J. Dicker's not a trucker. | ||
| This Dagny, that was Mendo, or Marco Mendocino's campaign manager, who's a sitting liberal politician right now, who called everyone terrorists the other day. | ||
| And conveniently, these people seem to be... | ||
| Holding a lot of keys, somehow. | ||
| If they have this media story, which is what it is, it's a story, the truckers have not agreed to this, nobody's going anywhere, nobody wants to go anywhere. | ||
| That they've agreed to move or leave or something, the media will run with that, and then the government will use that as like, oh, well, look, see, you know, they said they would, you know, do one thing, and then they didn't, and they're, you know, negotiating in bad faith and this kind of stuff. | ||
| It's a setup. | ||
| Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese. | ||
| Incredible stuff from Greg Reese. | ||
| But I want to look at this. | ||
| This is DefiantLz on Twitter. | ||
| DefiantLz simply took screenshots of leftists and posted their own words without elaboration or mocking or anything. | ||
| But they've been deleted. | ||
| And their final tweet, apparently, there's debate. | ||
| There may have been one about Hillary Clinton. | ||
| But this may have been the final tweet that actually got them axed off the platform. | ||
| It is comparing Justin Trudeau's statement from 2012 when he said, when a government starts trying to cancel dissent or avoid dissent is when it's rapidly losing its moral authority to govern. | ||
| He's quoting Harper in 2005. | ||
| Comparing that to yesterday's, So thank you to our big tech overlords for making sure that there aren't any dissident terrorists out there pointing out how our leaders are complete and shameless hypocrites who change their most core ideology and belief at the gust of a wind because really whatever they believe is whatever gives them power. | ||
| So there you go. Define Els. | ||
| Another victim of the Canadian trucker convoy tyranny. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Into the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| Oh, my God. I have so many videos to show you, folks. Welcome back to the American Journal. Second hour has begun. Oh. | ||
| We just have so much to talk about. | ||
| I just I don't even know where to begin. | ||
| I guess we'll get into Biden. | ||
| Joe Biden gave a speech yesterday talking about Ukraine and Russia. | ||
| And it's very interesting. | ||
| Points of that speech I'll lay out here. | ||
| First, we'll do just one of the strangest, most off-putting things I've ever seen in my life. | ||
| Clip number one here. Biden bragging about putting a dead dog on a woman's doorstep. | ||
| Again, these people, they're just sick, man. | ||
| There's just something wrong with these people. | ||
| And listen to the crowd laugh and crack up, and we'll get into what he's really saying here on the other side. | ||
| Let's watch. I got a call one night. | ||
| A woman said to me, obviously not to the same persuasion as I was politically, called me and said, there's a dead dog on my lawn. | ||
| And I said, yes, ma'am. | ||
| I said, have you called the county? | ||
| She said, yes, they're not here. | ||
| And I said, well, I'll get them in the morning. | ||
| She said, I want it removed now. | ||
| I pay your salary. | ||
| So I went over. I picked it up. | ||
| She said, I want it out of my front yard. | ||
| I put it on her doorstep. | ||
| Like just weird, right? | ||
| But again, you know, it's sort of this like, you know, the Karen meme, right? | ||
| That's like, oh, this crazy woman, right? | ||
| Why do you pay taxes? | ||
| They take half of our money. | ||
| Everything you buy has been taxed from the moment it was produced, to the seeds that were bought, to the moment it's produced, to shipping it down the road, to repackaging it, to when it's sold to the grocery store, when it's sold, it's been taxed over and over and over again. | ||
| So much of our money is just sucked up like a vacuum into the government. | ||
| You would think maybe dealing with dog carcasses left on your front yard was Would be maybe something the government could do. | ||
| You know, maybe like hazardous waste, animal control, just like health dangers, just being out in the open, like kids running around. | ||
| You've got a dead dog carcass on the ground. | ||
| It's like, yeah, you should probably be pissed if your government is not picking up the dead dog carcass. | ||
| Like, I know in third world countries, you might just have like flies swarming some dead carcass in the middle of the road. | ||
| Nobody cares. Like, this is America. | ||
| You're not supposed to have dead animal carcasses lying on the road or on the front yards of people. | ||
| And then to act like this woman is somehow like feels like she deserves something. | ||
| Like he's treating her like she's some person that's mad because her ice water had two ice cubes instead of three and is throwing it at the waiter. | ||
| Like this is not an extreme thing. | ||
| This is not like... Some sort of unreasonable demand. | ||
| She's like, there's a dog carcass on my front yard. | ||
| It's rotting there. | ||
| It's totally a health and safety hazard. | ||
| Again, kids running around, all this sort of stuff. | ||
| And the city's not picking it up. | ||
| I pay your salary. | ||
| You take all of my money, and then you're leaving a dead dog carcass on my lawn. | ||
| And his response is to go put it on her doorstep? | ||
| I'm sure this story's not true. | ||
| Although, I mean, who knows? | ||
| Joe Biden is the type of creep to just, like, walk up and just, like, barehanded grab a dog carcass and just, like, move it around. | ||
| Like, I'm sure he would do that type of thing. | ||
| Yeah, he'd probably grab it by the snout. | ||
| It's probably his dog. He probably killed it. | ||
| Probably, you know, one of his dogs that bit somebody and he just drove out on the highway and left him on the side of the road because that's the type of dog owner he is. | ||
| But again, it's just this spirit, right? | ||
| It's a woman who just wants a modicum of respect from her government, who just wants the most basic things to be done and just can't get it done. | ||
| They're spending millions of dollars settling illegal immigrants in four-star hotels. | ||
| But just a decent, tax-paying American... | ||
| Doesn't want a dog carcass on her front lawn. | ||
| And so I'm like, geez, spoiled much? | ||
| Like, aren't you a little bit conceited and feel like the world owes you something? | ||
| It's just like, it's just the bare minimum. | ||
| It's just the bare minimum. And then it's Joe Biden like, so I just humiliated and abused her. | ||
| And so I'm like, yeah, yeah, humiliate and abuse the woman who thinks she deserves just a modicum of respect. | ||
| And just a, just a semblance, an iota, an ounce of decency from her government. | ||
| And it doesn't exist anymore. | ||
| No, no. | ||
| They'll, you know, if you're, if you're a criminal, they'll roll out the red carpet. | ||
| If you're an illegal alien, if you're an Afghan refugee raping two-year-olds, you'll get the full five-star treatment. | ||
| But if you're just a regular American demanding just the most basic services from your government, you're up a creek and no one's going to help you and they're going to mock you and laugh at you and maybe put a dead dog on your doorstep. | ||
| He's the president of the United States, folks. | ||
| It's insane. | ||
| But of course, the topic of the of the speech there was supposed to be about Ukraine. | ||
| And here's a very, very interesting clip. | ||
| Again, thank you to my friend John for pointing this out to me. | ||
| So I wouldn't about to sit there and watch Joe Biden bumble for 30 minutes. | ||
| But here's a 20 second clip that should send shivers down the spine of anybody that's been paying attention. | ||
| Clip number two here as Biden talks about the conflict with Ukraine. | ||
| Today's the day, remember. It's today, isn't it? | ||
| The 16th Wednesday. They should be invading today. | ||
| Oh, it's so exciting. | ||
| Let's hear Biden perhaps hint at what is to come. | ||
| Russia attacks the United States or our allies through asymmetric means like disruptive cyber attacks against our companies or critical infrastructure. | ||
| We are prepared to respond. | ||
| We're moving in lockstep with our NATO allies and partners to deepen our collective defense against threats in cyberspace. | ||
| You know, maybe it's just coincidence. | ||
| Maybe it's just a wild coincidence. | ||
| Maybe they're not very careful about the words they choose when writing presidential addresses. | ||
| Maybe they don't know the context. | ||
| That this is seen in, in the eyes of the conspiracy theorists over here, or maybe they know exactly what they're doing, and maybe what they're doing is giving you little hints as to what's to come. | ||
| So just on the surface level, what Joe Biden said there is terrifying, because what he said is that we will respond militarily, and this is the same thing Hillary Clinton said, we will respond militarily to cyber attacks. | ||
| What we know, 100% from WikiLeaks, came out in 2016, is that the CIA and the deep state and the NSA have really... | ||
| There's unbreakable ways to make cyber attacks look like they're originating from other countries. | ||
| What's the term they use? | ||
| There's a specific term they use that means it's basically a cyber false flag. | ||
| You make the internet traffic, you route it through Russia, and so when you're attacking an American country, it looks like it's coming from Russia, and they have this tool. | ||
| The CIA has this tool and they're perfectly willing to use it. | ||
| So, I mean, we're getting into the realm where false flags are just a matter of will for the powers that be. | ||
| They can just choose. | ||
| They can just say, yeah, you've already figured it out, right? | ||
| Lockstep, step B, right? | ||
| Plan B. And now we're moving into hack attack. | ||
| Moving into hack attack where the cyber polygon and the cyber attack summit by the World Economic Forum, like they're getting all of their pieces in order. | ||
| They're getting all of their little constituents in line. | ||
| Constituents, as Klaus Schwab says, to pull off this false flag. | ||
| So what they've just set up, and that's sentenced by Joe Biden, is... | ||
| The ability, because you know it won't be questioned, you know the media won't research it, they won't double, you know, they won't second guess this. | ||
| They're really, except for WikiLeaks, which they've done a pretty good job of destroying, there's not a lot of ways to actually figure out for sure, okay, if this cyber attack came from inside the country, outside the country, we don't really know. | ||
| So the government has set it up where they can attack an American company with a cyber attack, make it look like it's Russia, and without wasting any money or... | ||
| Time or lives or anything, they can perform a false flag attack that gives them, as they've just laid out, the justification to go to physical war with Russia. | ||
| So that may very well be coming, and call me a conspiracy theorist, I don't think it's a coincidence that when he, in the sentence where he says cyber attacks will be met with military force, that NATO is working in lockstep together to do this. | ||
| They're rubbing it in your faces. | ||
| This is all part of the plan. | ||
| We can very soon expect a false flag cyber attack in the most pure sense of the term, false flag, as in an attack under another nation's colors to blame that nation and then justify a physical attack on them. | ||
| It's a little bit harder to do a physical false flag. | ||
| You actually have to have people there. | ||
| You might have to injure some people. | ||
| There could be people on the ground that can figure it out. | ||
| Cyber attacks, you just give an order to the computer fellows down at the Pentagon. | ||
| They click a couple buttons. | ||
| An industry goes down. | ||
| Now you've got your war with Russia that you've been aggravating for this entire time. | ||
| Of course, we're still seeing headlines. | ||
| Like, just go to Google News today. | ||
| Top story is, like, Ukraine. | ||
| War in Ukraine. BBC says war imminent. | ||
| US says war imminent. | ||
| Russia withdrawing troops. | ||
| Russia moving away from border. | ||
| Wait, what is going on? Wait, they're moving away from the border? | ||
| And that means that they're gonna attack? | ||
| No, it's all nonsense. | ||
| And Putin, to me, just looks like the guy laughing as he just like is just messing with everybody. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen, to the American Journal of the United States. | ||
| I want to take a brief moment to thank our listeners for supporting us at Infowarsstore.com and to remind you that when you visit the Infowarsstore, you can find the Infowars Life Whole Food Multivitamin at 40% off right now, as well as the Infowars Life Vitamin C plus Zinc at 40% off. | ||
| These products are limited, though, but a lot of our products sell out pretty quickly. | ||
| And we get a lot of angry comments. | ||
| When are you getting X2 back? | ||
| When are you getting Whole Food Multivitamin back? | ||
| Well, folks, you don't have to worry about it at all when you subscribe to AutoShip. | ||
| Because when you subscribe to AutoShip, not only do you save even more at checkout, but we reserve products for you so you never run out and always get them at the lowest price offered on the site. | ||
| So it's a win-win situation. | ||
| Sign up for AutoShip. Take advantage of the sales. | ||
| Whole Food Multivitamin and Vitamin C plus Zinc. | ||
| Are both really amazing supplements that will help you every day, and they're on sale for 40% off right now at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| All right, more videos now since we have so very many more. | ||
| Of course, yesterday was a—I guess the word bombshell is used too much, but this is a war. | ||
| It's an information war, and these are munitions being fired now. | ||
| At the enemy, the latest major bombshell was the Durham report exposing even, you know, in more detail the spider web of corruption, manipulation, and illusion that the Hillary Clinton cabal was working on in 2016. | ||
| I want to play this clip now. | ||
| Clip number four. The MSM pointing out that there was no collusion ever and they're very sure about this. | ||
| They all are because they all say exactly the same thing in exactly the same way at exactly the same time. | ||
| That's how you know it's true. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. It's completely wrong. | |
| It did not happen. | ||
| There was no spying. | ||
| It's Pizzagate. The conspiracy gene is no more accurate than Pizzagate. | ||
| No one was spying on the president through the microwave. | ||
| No one spied on the Trump campaign. | ||
| There was no spying. | ||
| There was no spying. | ||
| No spying. There was no spying. | ||
| There was no spying. | ||
| There was no spying. There was no spying. There was no spying. There was no spying. There was no spying. | ||
| There was no spying. | ||
| There was no spying, of course. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There was no spying. There was no spying. | |
| On the Trump campaign. On the Trump campaign. | ||
| It's been a year and a half. There was no spying on the Trump campaign. | ||
| Of this crap. No spying on the Trump campaign. | ||
| Which is a conspiracy theory. | ||
| No spying on the Trump campaign. | ||
| Facts matter. And, oh, by the way, no. | ||
| There was no. There was no. | ||
| No. No spying on the Trump campaign. | ||
| Yeah, that was that. | ||
| MRC Newsbusters came up with that compilation. | ||
| Brilliant stuff. Because there actually was spying and there was actually multiple layers of spying. | ||
| First, they spied on Trump to try to find information to justify the Pfizer warrant that the government then used to spy on Donald Trump. | ||
| So, you had... Multiple groups of people spying on Trump all at exactly the same time and using each other to justify this. | ||
| And it might make you wonder, if you're still a brainwashed moron, why the media would not cover this honestly. | ||
| Don't they care about the American people? | ||
| Aren't they our stalwart defenders of the First Amendment and they stand up against corruption in the government? | ||
| Of course not. Stop being naive. | ||
| But I want to go to an interview here. | ||
| It was on OAN. It's a man named Lee Smith. | ||
| Explaining why the media seems to have gotten this all so wrong in such a monolithic way. | ||
| They all had exactly the same wrong talking points at exactly the same time. | ||
| It's just, it's a phenomenon, isn't it? | ||
| What do you think's behind it? Well, let's listen to Lee Smith on OAN, clip number 11. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Of course, the media, instead of actually looking into the allegation, they just freaked out that he actually tweeted that. | |
| And that's the way they're treating this now. | ||
| Of course, they were silent since Friday's filing. | ||
| Now, some of the shows... | ||
| Go ahead. They didn't freak out. | ||
| I mean, these people have been part of the shot from the beginning. | ||
| So the idea, look, the guy that you had in the run up here, Evan Perez, right? | ||
| He's close friends. | ||
| He worked with all these guys from Fusion GPS. And these were the guys that broke the existence of the dossier. | ||
| CNN. It was Evan Perez, Jim Sciuto, Jake Tapper, and Carl Bernstein, right? | ||
| They're the ones who broke the story. | ||
| Evan Perez knows all these boys at Fusion GPS. These guys have been part of the shot from the beginning. | ||
| So when they're ignoring this stuff, they're not saying, oh, not a big deal here. | ||
| They're not covering For Clinton, they're covering for themselves. | ||
| It's their role. | ||
| The media is the essential platform. | ||
| Again, this is so important for people to understand this. | ||
| We're not talking about a partisan press. | ||
| We're not talking about what happened 50 years ago. | ||
| We're not talking about a New York Times that doesn't endorse presidential candidates for president. | ||
| We're talking about a platform for an information operation. | ||
| There's no such thing as the left, right? | ||
| The left would never partner with the FBI and the CIA, but that's what we have here. | ||
| It's an intelligence front. | ||
| That's all it is. | ||
| When CNN gets on there and they start talking about these guys, that's what it is. | ||
| They're part of the operation. | ||
| That's why they bring all these people on CNN MSNBC and why they give them contracts, John Brennan, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, all of them. | ||
| It's an operation. | ||
| That's the key to remember. | ||
| So while it's important to point out how the press is not covering it, it's important to understand who the press is and what their real role is. | ||
| They're not just corrupt. Yeah, they're not just corrupt. | ||
| They're actually part of it. | ||
| They're actually the bad guys. | ||
| They're actually the outlet of the spy agency. | ||
| And it's been this way since the 1950s, folks. | ||
| Operation Mockingbird was uncovered. | ||
| And as early as the 1950s, the head of the CIA said, yeah, we've got somebody in every major newsroom in America. | ||
| You think it's gotten worse or better since then? | ||
| I mean, these people are... | ||
| They're trained, right? | ||
| They're trained to such an extent that they don't need orders anymore. | ||
| They don't need to be instructed how to cover each and every story. | ||
| They know through osmosis exactly how it should be covered and exactly how they should present things. | ||
| And they all do it in lockstep, in complete cooperation with one another, in an overwhelming sense that gives the illusion to the American people That it must be true because otherwise why would all of these places be saying it exactly like this? | ||
| It's because they're all coordinated from the same central location. | ||
| It's because they all get the same talking points delivered at four in the morning every day. | ||
| They're little producer meetings that they hold where the people in charge, like the corrupt, lascivious... | ||
| Dirtbags like Jeff Zucker, they're the ones that get to decide how everything is covered and how everything will be presented. | ||
| And if you go against it, if you go against that grain, they aren't going to tell you how to cover things. | ||
| They just get rid of you. You're just gone. | ||
| So it's up to you to police yourself. | ||
| It's up to you to stick to the talking points as given to you by your bettors in the United States government and repeat it ad nauseum with absolutely no personal research or anything of the sort. | ||
| And of course we saw this when Jen Psaki got so mad that Fox News was talking about the massive exploding crime rate and the unprecedented number of murders happening this year. | ||
| And she was very mad because unlike the other – Fox News was talking about something that is concerning the American people and actually affecting our lives and actually a direct consequence of the Democratic Party policy that is destroying our entire nation. | ||
| And she was very mad that they were talking about that because she would rather Fox News be like, MSNBC and CNN and CNBC and whatever other outlet she said, which were all parroting her talking points live, and she looks up and goes, look, see, they're all saying what we told them to say, except for Fox News, and that's bad. | ||
| Like, they aren't even hiding it anymore. | ||
| They're just, they are the outlets for the government. | ||
| So, you know, at least in Soviet Russia, Pravda, everybody understood this is the state apparatus, and it's lying to us for the benefit of the state, so we don't have to necessarily believe it. | ||
| So now they have Pravda in form and function works exactly the same, except the people have the illusion that they're independent, which is even more dangerous. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| In the third hour, I'll be joined by John Murawski. | ||
| I didn't want to say Murkowski. | ||
| There's no K there. John Murawski about critical race theory, another major and important topic that you really need to cover more of. | ||
| You know, it's just... Every day. | ||
| Every day there's more insanity to report than we could possibly cover in a single broadcast, but we'll do our best by going back out to these videos. | ||
| I'm going to go to clip number eight here now. | ||
| I only watched the first couple seconds of this, but I thought it was really pretty amazing. | ||
| I figured I would just react to it live on air. | ||
| I should have gotten some of the numbers, but the good news is, you know, I don't really need the numbers because the numbers themselves are beyond human comprehension. | ||
| When we're talking about trillions of dollars, when we're talking about, you know, over half of the dollars ever printed being print since 2020, the numbers are sort of inconsequential since they are so astronomical as to beyond the kin of the human mind. | ||
| So... It's insane the way that the Fed has been acting. | ||
| And of course, I cannot repeat more enough that the Fed has done this on purpose. | ||
| This was their plan. They announced in October 2020, we are going to start processes to create inflation. | ||
| They were... Doing everything they could to create inflation, and they have been wildly successful in this, and that's why your money is worth 7.5% less now. | ||
| So unless you got an 8% raise last year, you are now making less money. | ||
| They have given you a pay cut. | ||
| Just know, again, I can't remember the exact calculations, but if you're losing 7% of your money every year, half of your money is gone in like four years or something because it compounds, right? | ||
| The more you lose, the more you lose. | ||
| So it's just incredible. | ||
| And there was a video that I showed a little while ago on the show where it was the head of the Fed talking about the strength of the American dollar. | ||
| And he was being asked, is the American dollar strong or what about in terms of other currency? | ||
| And he used a phrase just sort of offhand, but I think it really illustrated the absurdity, the illusion that we live under. | ||
| He said the good news is the dollar is still strong. | ||
| There's a lot of demand for our paper internationally. | ||
| Think about that. | ||
| You go, well, this guy is not a paper manufacturer, right? | ||
| That type of statement makes sense if you bring in pulp and then create fine, high-quality stationery and then send it out. | ||
| You say, yes, there's a lot of demand for our paper and that's why we're successful. | ||
| But when he says it, it's like sort of peeking behind the curtain and going, oh yeah, this is just paper. | ||
| So he literally says there's a lot of demand for our paper out there. | ||
| A lot of demand for our illusion out there. | ||
| A lot of demand for our worthless tickets, our notes that symbolize nothing, that come from nothing. | ||
| There's a lot of demand for that, luckily. | ||
| And it just makes no sense. | ||
| Just like, it's an illusion. | ||
| Demand for our paper. | ||
| Really... Again, just to remind you that, like, no, this really is backed by nothing. | ||
| It's not gold. It's not even Bitcoin. | ||
| Like, at least Bitcoin has some sort of claim to, like, it's worth something. | ||
| It's worth computer processing time or whatever it is. | ||
| But cash is worth nothing. | ||
| They are fabricating it from thin air. | ||
| But luckily, there's a lot of demand for this illusion. | ||
| There's a lot of demand for this, you know, projection, this... | ||
| Hologram that they're putting forward. | ||
| There's no substance behind it. | ||
| So here's Jon Stewart, seemingly at the age of, you know, whatever, 80, however old he is, finally for the first time, actually asking questions about this whole, you know, monetary system we're a part of. | ||
| Eh, maybe time to get around to that, John. | ||
| Let's look. Click it, clip eight. | ||
| How much currency that has been sort of created out of thin air has been added into this economy through the Fed? | ||
| What would you put as a figure? | ||
| Would it be six trillion? | ||
| Is that too much? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It would be $6 trillion in terms of deposits with the banks and currency, be $6 to $7 trillion. | |
| Okay. That they're just injecting into it sort of out of nothing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Out of nothing. The Central Bank of the United States is the only institution on Earth that can create dollars and pay for assets out of nothing. | |
| It's alchemy. They're Rumpelstiltskin. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well... Yes. | |
| In that sense, yes. | ||
| And it's just another form of government debt. | ||
| Am I making sense? | ||
| You know, it makes sense in the make-believe world of conjuring. | ||
| Like, there is a certain part of this that all feels like a mirage to some extent. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, it's a fiduciary system. | |
| It's all faith-based. | ||
| Oh my lord! | ||
| Yes, you've got to have confidence in that currency, in that dollar, because there's nothing backing, there's no gold backing. | ||
| So in some ways, it's a mass delusion. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, that's a harsh word, but so long as you have faith, yeah. | |
| So there's Jon Stewart learning something we all should have learned in elementary school. | ||
| This isn't new. They didn't just decide to start doing this. | ||
| This is what fiat currency is. | ||
| So congratulations on Jon Stewart for being 50, 60 years too late on this revelation. | ||
| But that was former Federal Reserve President Thomas Honig really saying the quiet part out loud. | ||
| Saying the quiet part out loud and shocking Jon Stewart for some reason. | ||
| As if he didn't know that this was how it worked. | ||
| And this is the issue. And it's why... | ||
| So many people woke up to the libertarian concept in the first place when you realize just how fake all of this is and how – I mean from the wars to the media corruption to the big pharma collusion to the – You know, a degradation of just everything from football to movies to media. | ||
| Like, it all goes back to the central banks. | ||
| It all goes back to BlackRock and Vanguard and Goldman Sachs and the Federal Reserve, which is exactly like BlackRock and Goldman Sachs, a privately held organization that is not under federal control. | ||
| So these are private banks. | ||
| And again, it really makes you realize why things like socialism and communism are popular to people because... | ||
| There's not a lot of... | ||
| There's not a lot of hope in this system anymore. | ||
| And when you realize how absurd it is, it makes you want to just go, okay, the whole thing should be blown up. | ||
| The whole thing should be destroyed. | ||
| Now the problem is not that... | ||
| It's not capitalism, right? | ||
| Because this is not capitalism. | ||
| But it's understandable why people would want to just burn the whole system down when you realize that you can work... | ||
| Your fingers to the bone day and night, 12 hours a day for seven days a week. | ||
| And you can, you know, if you're not skilled or even if you are skilled, you can maybe stack up a little bit of money. | ||
| You know, maybe you can keep a comfortable life for yourself. | ||
| But meanwhile, the people at the top who already have everything are just with the flick of a wrist or the signing of a pin or a click on a keyboard are summoning into being billions and trillions of dollars. | ||
| So you have to work Your fingers to the bone. | ||
| You have to scrimp and save and suffer to just get a little piece of the pie. | ||
| Meanwhile, they just create from thin air fortunes of unimaginable grandeur. | ||
| It's insane. It's especially insane in the sense that the people that are working their fingers to the bone are still being taxed to an absurd degree by the government because the government... | ||
| Is equally involved in this, and to an even worse extent, where they sign a paper or wave a wand, and they accrue, they take for themselves, they usurp, whatever, $50 billion. | ||
| I want, you know, this project here in Ohio, $50 billion. | ||
| With a stroke of my pen, I have that $50 billion now, and I've just taken it from your pockets. | ||
| I've taken it from the pockets of the taxpayers and the bank accounts of the taxpayers. | ||
| There's nothing they can do to stop it. | ||
| I've done nothing to earn it. | ||
| But it's mine now, and I have it. | ||
| The problem is not capitalism. | ||
| The problem is centralization. | ||
| The problem is fiat currency. | ||
| The problem is the Fed and all of their tentacles in every industry in America. | ||
| The problem started in 1913 on Jekyll Island with creation of the Fed and accelerated exponentially in 1971 with the abandonment of the gold standard. | ||
| These are the things that were done Ostensibly to help fight poverty, to help bring about inclusion and help to fight income inequality. | ||
| What it really did was solidify and codify an industry of mass manipulation, an industry of mass formation psychosis that has taken over the entire world, works only for itself, and is predicated on nothing more than a confidence and is predicated on nothing more than a confidence game and a baseless illusion. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | |
| We are actually getting connected right now with Tyler Nixon. | ||
| We're going to talk about the Durham probe and what we learned from it and how deep the rabbit hole goes in that particular regard. | ||
| So we'll be having him on in just a second. | ||
| In the third hour, we'll be joined by John Murawski to talk about critical race theory. | ||
| The racist ideology that is now worming its way through our education system. | ||
| Let me take a moment now to remind you that the globalist destabilization emergency sale is on at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| It's 25% off all of our storable foods. | ||
| Again, you know, the number of reasons why this should be on the top of your list, the number of reasons why you should not hesitate. | ||
| To take advantage of this deal is almost innumerable. | ||
| I mean, the food is legitimately delicious. | ||
| I don't have to tell you that, right? | ||
| Like, if it wasn't good, I've eaten it. | ||
| I've tried it. We did a blind taste test. | ||
| And, you know, we compared the blue box mac and cheese to the mac and cheese to be found in the Infowars Life Select storable food. | ||
| And it was so good. | ||
| And it does... Maybe it requires water, but I don't even know if it requires that. | ||
| Some require... Actually, I don't know if any of it's dehydrated. | ||
| Everything I've had is you can just eat right out of the container, and it's delicious. | ||
| It's incredibly good. | ||
| Now, if it wasn't good, I wouldn't tell you that it was good. | ||
| I would tell you, well... | ||
| Okay, so all of it needs hot water, they're telling me. | ||
| Yeah, that makes sense. I thought it was... | ||
| Anyway, it was delicious. | ||
| Make sure you have your water filters as well. | ||
| You're going to want to be prepared regardless of what happens. | ||
| If it was just whatever would keep you alive, I would tell you that. | ||
| But it actually tastes really good, which means that even if nothing ever happens, even if 10 years from now nothing has occurred, you have a box full of perfectly good food, perfectly preserved and stored food that you can eat just for dinner, late night snack, or breakfast even. | ||
| It's just very good food. | ||
| And it's almost like if you just were to go grocery shopping and get this amount of food anyway... | ||
| It would be more expensive than this bucket. | ||
| I wonder if we could do that, like a challenge. | ||
| It's like just surviving off InfoWars Life select food and see how much money you could save. | ||
| Because I spend a lot of money at restaurants and stuff. | ||
| And it's way more expensive than storable food. | ||
| So it's just like, the food is fantastic. | ||
| It tastes delicious. | ||
| It's so good. If you don't ever use it for an emergency, then that's fine. | ||
| But if... There is an emergency and it can be anything. | ||
| It can be an unexpected freeze. | ||
| It could be a flood. It can be a power outage. | ||
| It could be a sun spot like the one that knocked out dozens of satellites. | ||
| The next one might be a little stronger and it might wipe out electricity and you might find that stores are no longer able to open and trucks are no longer able to run and you're going to be looking for food. | ||
| And if you don't have a food storage system in place already, it's going to be too late. | ||
| It's going to be a time where you're looking around and going, gosh, I really should have bought that food. | ||
| You know, I didn't think this time would come, but here it is, and I'm really hungry, and I have nothing to eat. | ||
| Like, that is not out of their own possibility. | ||
| I was in that situation last year, and luckily I had storable food. | ||
| So make sure you are not caught unprepared. | ||
| Once you need it, it's too late to get it, so get it now. | ||
| InfoWars Life Select Storable Food, 25% off, biggest sale we've ever had. | ||
| You need it. It'll save your life, and it'll keep us on air. | ||
| Do your part. InfoWars Live Select, now on sale, 25% off. | ||
| With that, I welcome Tyler Nixon, who we all know very well as a major and important enemy of the cabal, of the deep state, of the nefarious network of slimy creatures that run our country. | ||
| And Tyler, you know, nobody's covered the Durham probe. | ||
| In fact, we have this graphic. | ||
| Produced by Fox News yesterday. | ||
| ABC, zero seconds. | ||
| NBC, zero seconds. | ||
| CBS, zero seconds. | ||
| CNN, the outlier here, spent a solid two and a half minutes on the subject. | ||
| MSNBC, zero segments. | ||
| Tyler, am I wrong, or are they missing one of the biggest stories ever in American politics right now? | ||
| Oh, I mean, they're not missing it. | ||
| They're part of it. Right. | ||
| It's the problem. It's good to be with you, Harrison, as always. | ||
| It's good to be back on InfoWars in this amazing, exciting, interesting time that we live in. | ||
| I'm sorry, I can't let an opportunity go without bashing and talking about this supercilious twit. | ||
| In Canada, Justin Trudeau. | ||
| I mean, Pierre Trudeau was no he-man, but my God, the man, if he was alive today, would be spinning in his grave. | ||
| And is he alive? | ||
| I don't know. Is Pierre Trudeau still alive? | ||
| Is Pierre Trudeau really Justin Trudeau's father? | ||
| That's another question. Oh, yeah, that's right. | ||
| I forgot. No, no. Well, Fidel then is spinning in his grave, I guess, right? | ||
| No, Fidel is looking down with a tear of joy, seeing his son follow in his footsteps, I think. | ||
| Well, here's the thing. | ||
| Here's the thing. Here's why I have hope for the future and I have hope for the present. | ||
| You look at the past, at the strongmen, the dictators, who actually were able to dominate and to tyrannize large swaths of humanity. | ||
| These were hard men. | ||
| These were men who were generally raised You know, they came usually from dirt poverty. | ||
| You look at Stalin, Mao. | ||
| Hitler wasn't necessarily impoverished, but, I mean, he was gassed in World War I. I mean, he definitely, you know, had been through hellish conditions. | ||
| He was not a pampered little, you know, privileged whatever. | ||
| He wasn't the son of the prime minister. | ||
| Yeah, none of them were. I mean, you look at the men who were the hard, you know, really brutal dictators who could get away with it because they carried some level of credibility. | ||
| I've always wondered through the years when I looked at the generations past and you look at these guys who brokered World War II, the old wise men in art on the Anglo side, And, you know, of course, you know, the dictators on the other side. | ||
| And these were whatever you thought. | ||
| They had gravity. They had gravitas. | ||
| And I thought, well, who do I look around today that I could, like, see as a credible tyrant, you know, credible someone who could really dominate other people? | ||
| And frankly, I just didn't – I haven't seen anybody yet. | ||
| And now finally I guess my question is answered. | ||
| This is it. The pampered, primped, withy, wafty sort of, you know, just like little Lord Fauntleroy come to life. | ||
| In this Justin Trudeau, I mean, this man is a disgrace to everything, just Western civilization generally. | ||
| I mean, he is the product, you want to talk about the product of privilege. | ||
| This is why the offspring, frankly, of career politicians, of slick career politicians should never, they should be banned by just default from ever seeking office because they're so insulated. | ||
| And so they have such a sense of entitlement, as Trudeau clearly shows, that they're capable of trying anything. | ||
| Of course, you know, who would follow this man into combat? | ||
| Who would follow this man into the bathroom or anywhere, for God's sake? | ||
| You know, whatever have you. | ||
| It's worse, isn't it? | ||
| I would prefer to be against a strongman ruler. | ||
| I would prefer somebody who just tells me straight up, I'm a tyrant, I'm a dictator, I'm going to step on your throat. | ||
| Then it's like, okay, now I know where we stand. | ||
| Now I can fight you with the full knowledge of just how evil you are, and you know how... | ||
| How despicable you're being. | ||
| We understand each other and we can have mutual combat on that footing. | ||
| But this, the smiling, preening, very nicely, you know, the rhetorical tricks that they use, it's so much worse. | ||
| It's so much more aggravating to me. | ||
| It's like I'd rather be... | ||
| Elevator music type. | ||
| Exactly. It's like this, like, very trying to make it sound as though it's, oh, this is just very reasonable. | ||
| And I'm just doing things according to the plan, according to, you know, everything is in order. | ||
| And, I mean, the man is completely off the rails. | ||
| I mean, he's so removed from reality. | ||
| I'm sure as he grew up, you know, again, the child of privilege or whatever have you. | ||
| And then he's, you know, obviously been indoctrinated by Schwab. | ||
| And that ilk. | ||
| So he's, you know, like triple delusion now under the spell of this Bond villain monster. | ||
| And it's just laughable to me that he thinks that like truckers and the people who live in Canada where, I mean, it's cold up there, man, and it is a hard life for a lot of people, regardless of where you live. | ||
| And, you know, the conditions recently in the last couple of years, this man hasn't felt none of the pain that he's inflicted in any way whatsoever. | ||
| And here's the thing. Here's where the second thing, in addition to having weak strongmen, I guess you could say, or sort of wifty like, you know, like Trudeau, this is the best you can come up with, or the AOCs of the world, or frankly, you know, this is your future dictators. | ||
| It's like, honey, you know, please just get a grip. | ||
| Nobody's following you. Nobody's listening to you. | ||
| And you only have 20%, if you're lucky, of the population that's enough brainwash. | ||
| Now, that's not to say behind these people, Aren't, you know, thugs basically in the intelligence community as we see in our own country. | ||
| And frankly, I guess we'll see where the police come out, where the RCMP up in Canada and then our, you know, I think ultimately, listen, Excuse me, Justin Trudeau may be able to live in his little escape pod, his little removed reality. | ||
| But people in the police, they have to live amongst the population. | ||
| So, you know, it's not exactly easy to live amongst people you're tyrannizing when they're this united. | ||
| And I never would have thought it was the Canadians would be the ones to rise up. | ||
| I mean, they're so sort of mild-mannered and they are part of the British Crown, obviously. | ||
| And they have a parliamentary system. | ||
| It's, you know, it's very much about sort of consensus and so forth. | ||
| And there's not a lot of adversarial, you know, as we have here in the United States, certainly. | ||
| And I wouldn't have thought that it would have been they who would rise up as they have in this spectacular, you know, standoff, final confrontation, I guess, to just really kick off the re-revolution or the... | ||
| Yeah, thank you. I appreciate the patriotic music. | ||
| The reset, yeah. | ||
| Yeah, and here's the thing is, yeah, the reawakening, I guess. | ||
| And here's the other thing is, look, in times of stress, in times of economic strife and where you have had situations like we have today, people have sought the government to be more aggressive and more involved. | ||
| That's right. Stay there, Tyler. | ||
| We'll be right back. Yep, sure. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're tuned in to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Welcome back. Ladies and gentlemen, third hour has begun. | ||
| We'll be welcoming John Murawski in just a moment to be talking about critical race theory. | ||
| But I wanted to give Tyler Nixon a chance to finish your thought here about pampered puppet tyrant Justin Trudeau. | ||
| Final words, Tyler? | ||
| Well, I was going to say, I think usually in the past when you've had economic stress and things like a pandemic, people looked to the government and wanted more robust government intervention. | ||
| Now I think we're seeing, and this is why I feel hopeful about the future, a unique situation in which people want freedom in this situation. | ||
| They're not seeking the paternalistic, you know, the uncle sugar to take care of things. | ||
| And that's unique. | ||
| And I mean, in modern history, frankly, it's always been the opposite. | ||
| So that and the fact that I said, like I said, we have these poofs thinking that they're going to rule on high just because they can do it from behind a keyboard or from behind a television camera. | ||
| They better think again. | ||
| Yeah, you've got this like despicable, oily, vampire, tentacle, squid monster behind them with a little finger puppet of the nice looking pampered Justin Trudeau to make it seem like it's nice and loving. | ||
| And really what they represent is sick and despicable. | ||
| I could not agree more, sir. | ||
| How can people find you on Twitter? | ||
| What's your Twitter account? It's a real Tyler Nixon. | ||
| I would love to discuss the Durham account. | ||
| I'm telling you, this is just explosive stuff, and I wish we could have had more time to talk about it. | ||
| Yeah, it's absolutely huge. | ||
| I know you have so much fantastic knowledge, like insider knowledge about that sort of stuff. | ||
| We'll have to have you on maybe the next couple days because, yeah, just digging through this Durham, I mean, it's like, it's... | ||
| It's a goldmine of crap, right? | ||
| It's a goldmine of horror down there. | ||
| So we'll have to have you back on again very soon. | ||
| Thank you so much. Above all, vindication for our friend Roger Stone, for sure. | ||
| Absolutely, 100%. | ||
| And some people need to get the Roger Stone treatment. | ||
| They need to have their doors kicked in with the CNN live out front. | ||
| And then they need to be sent to prison, except without the pardon later on. | ||
| Thanks so much for coming on, Tyler. | ||
| We really appreciate it. Thanks, Harrison. | ||
| Good to be with you. Thank you. | ||
| That's Tyler Nixon, everybody. | ||
| I want to play very quickly a couple clips that I just, I gotta play because they're all so insane. | ||
| You've seen this one before, but it, you know, bears repeating here. | ||
| You're messing up that saying. Let's go to clip 17. | ||
| This is Heather McDonald, a stand-up comedian collapsing after promoting Getting the Vax. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't mean to brag, I don't care, but I want you to know, double vaxxed, booster, flu shot, and I'm going to be honest, I have the shingle shot too. | |
| And I still get my period. | ||
| What? Yes! Traveled, went to Mexico twice, did shows, meet and greets, never got COVID. Clearly, Jesus loves me the most. | ||
| Seriously. So nice. | ||
| So nice. Not sad. | ||
| She actually cracked her skull open there. | ||
| But of course, pushing the vax, celebrating the vax, bragging about the vax, blaspheming against Jesus, and then collapsing. | ||
| Something very similar happened yesterday. | ||
| Clip 16 here. German politician pushing the vaccine when she faints live on air. | ||
| Let's watch. Yes, so you're saying we need to only activate mandatory vaccinations as soon as it will be vital? | ||
| Won't it be much too late then? | ||
|
unidentified
|
We need to Yeah. | |
| Oh. Creepy, right? | ||
| Cameron says, are you okay? | ||
| Anchor, I think we should stop here. | ||
| At this point, we'll continue with a different topic. | ||
| As you can see, our colleague is not feeling well. | ||
| This is a weird... | ||
| I mean, I've seen people pass out before. | ||
| That was weird. That was very weird. | ||
| This, like, eyes rolling and just like... | ||
| Like, usually it's just sort of like... | ||
| You know? In fact, it's sometimes usually like this. | ||
| Here's another one. Again, from yesterday. | ||
| So again, all of these are from the last couple days. | ||
| All of these are live on air. | ||
| How... You know, what are the odds of this? | ||
| How much is this happening behind the scenes that we don't see? | ||
| Clip 18. We have a problem. | ||
| Have you ever seen this? | ||
| In your entire life, have you ever seen videos of people collapsing while on air? | ||
| Why are we seeing this every day now? | ||
| Every day we're getting a new video of people collapsing live on air in front of the camera, usually while they're promoting the vaccine. | ||
| Coincidence? Yeah, right. | ||
| It's poison, folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Very glad that you're here with us on American Journal, InfoWars.com, band.video. | ||
| Guys, are we connected with John? We're about to be. | ||
| All right, we're about to be connected with John Murawski. | ||
| He's reporting on the intersection of culture and ideas for Real Clear Investigations. | ||
| And of course, one of the major cultural conflicts going on right now is over critical race theory. | ||
| See, the leftists say that they're not teaching critical race theory in schools, but if you try to ban it, then you're a racist and a hateful, and what you're doing is against the First Amendment, which is kind of weird. | ||
| It kind of doesn't make a lot of sense, actually, if you really think about it at all. | ||
| But then again, none of this does. | ||
| None of this makes any sense. | ||
| And it's not a small thing, right? | ||
| They want to treat this like, ah, first of all, it's not even being taught, right? | ||
| Of course it's being taught. It's not just being taught. | ||
| Like, it's not being taught as a class, right? | ||
| You don't have fifth graders going to PE and music and math and CRT. That's not happening. | ||
| Instead, what's happening is when they go to music, they learn music through a CRT lens. | ||
| When they go to math, they learn math through a CRT lens. | ||
| When they go to reading, Or PE, they're learning it through a CRT lens. | ||
| So it's not that it's being taught as a class, it's that it has infiltrated and usurped so much of the educational system in this country that And again, even if that was the case, even if it was just there, even if it was just this idea, this poisonous idea being pumped into the minds of children, that'd be bad enough, right? | ||
| But what it represents is one of the most visible and objectionable outbreaks of a civilization-wide phenomenon of race now being pumped into absolutely everything, including healthcare, including to the point that Pretty liberal leftist magazines are going, this is not good. This is dangerous and weird and bad. | ||
| It's not theoretical. | ||
| It's not academic. It's life and death in many situations. | ||
| How many times have we covered stories? | ||
| There was one last month where a juror had to come out and they have this time. | ||
| It's like when you're at a wedding and they say, does anybody have any objections to this union? | ||
| It's a formality, right? | ||
| Nobody actually objects. | ||
| It'd be rude. So you don't do that, right? | ||
| In the same way, They have this possibility to object to what's going on. | ||
| I completely lost my train of thought here. | ||
| I forgot what I was saying. | ||
| But this is the Atlantic. | ||
| Which one's the Atlantic? This is the Revolver. | ||
| Our country's new race-based healthcare system is a hate crime against white people. | ||
| Race-based rationing is real and dangerous, according to the Atlantic. | ||
| The stock market has plummeted, erasing hundreds of billion dollars in household wealth in the span of weeks. | ||
| But essentially they're talking about how, I mean, healthcare now is starting to be affected by race. | ||
| And whether you get healthcare or not is dependent on race. | ||
| Which is insane. | ||
| Which is an absolutely mind-bogglingly insane thing to be taking place. | ||
| Because again, it's not academic. | ||
| It's not theoretical. | ||
| It's not philosophical. | ||
| It's real. And you may very well be denied medicine like I was because of your race and because it was based on your race. | ||
| And you're the wrong race, so you don't get the medicine that you need to survive, you know? | ||
| So it's happening in medicine, but it's happening in a number of other places as well. | ||
| In fact, I have a... | ||
| Here's a story from the Austin Monitor here, a local story. | ||
| City anticipates legal challenges to race-based grants, including Live Music Fund. | ||
| So they now have... | ||
| Tax dollars being awarded through grants where people are graded by a matrix, a scoring matrix, part of which and one of the largest parts of which is race. | ||
| And it's the same way that they do this with medicine, right? | ||
| If you look at Utah's scoring procedures, they give numbers of points depending on the condition of the patient and aspects of the patient's identity. | ||
| And if you are over a certain threshold, then you receive the medicine. | ||
| But if you don't reach that threshold, then you don't get the medicine. | ||
| And the numbers are just absurd. | ||
| If you're obese, it's one point, right? | ||
| And we know that being obese is one of the most dangerous contributing factors to serious COVID or death from COVID or death from any illness for that matter. | ||
| But obesity, hugely important. | ||
| When it comes to determining the outcome of a person with an illness. | ||
| If you're over 80 or over 60, that's worth two points, right? | ||
| Obesity, one point. If you're elderly, it's two points. | ||
| If you have some sort of contributing permanent illness, that might be another two points, right? | ||
| But being black gives you seven points. | ||
| Seven points, right? | ||
| So that means that you could have an obese... | ||
| Elderly, chronically ill, invalid, but if they're white, they score less than a 20-year-old black basketball player who's perfectly fit and has no conditions, right? | ||
| So race overwhelms all of those other conditions. | ||
| And what they're predicating this on is the overall social medical outcomes of these groups. | ||
| So it has nothing to do with COVID. In fact, if you were just to go with COVID, white people have worse outcomes. | ||
| That's not what this is about. It's not about trying to, you know, what they'll frame it in as, well, we only have so much medicine and we need to ration it, you know, so we have to determine how to, you know, who needs it most. | ||
| But that has nothing to do with it. | ||
| They're basing that on society-wide trends, meaning that overall, in general, the black population has worse health outcomes than the white population. | ||
| And so they're using that to justify denying white people medicine and giving it to black people and letting white people die. | ||
| It's so ridiculous and absurd, and yet they're going along with this. | ||
| People are going to die because of this. | ||
| People are already being denied medicine because of this, but it doesn't stop there. | ||
| They're using the exact same scoring matrix philosophy to dole out money. | ||
| And we've, again, covered it here. | ||
| I mean, we just need to have a recurring segment that's just like black privilege in America, where it's just like, a new policy gives free money to black women. | ||
| It's like, that's cool, and it's my money? | ||
| Oh, okay. Neat. | ||
| Glad you're doing that. Amazing. | ||
| And here again, our money being taken from us, given to the live music fund run by the city, and the city is saying that this money needs to go explicitly and exclusively to non-white people. | ||
| EDD Chief Silnovia Holt-Rab said concerns about race-based scoring metrics caused the department to reconfigure how it awarded grants under the recent Music Disaster Relief Fund, with scoring based on income, geography, and displacement appearing to achieve the same ends as questions based on race. | ||
| She said in a complete analysis of how the program performed will be ready next month. | ||
| So they have a scoring system where, once again, they are grading whether you deserve help from your government, and it's based on race. | ||
| It's just awful. | ||
| It's just so terrible, you know? | ||
| This white privilege of being denied medicine and having your money taken and, you know, given to people of other races because of that, you know, because they're a different race. | ||
| And that's what they're deciding it on. | ||
| And it's absolutely insane. And of course it's happening in... | ||
| Oh yeah, that's what I was going to say. | ||
| Yes, I remembered. Okay, so the wedding thing, right? | ||
| Objection, right? So at the end of trials, when the jury is presenting their decision, guilty or not guilty, they ask the jury, is this your decision? | ||
| It's a formality. It's like, you're supposed to say yes because you've all decided this. | ||
| And I think it was in Mississippi or Alabama, and this one woman, when they ask, is this your decision? | ||
| She goes, honestly, no. Honestly, no, it's not. | ||
| It's not. Because he was a murderer, a guy that was a murderer. | ||
| He killed a woman. And the jury decided that because he was black, they were not going to charge him with first-degree murder. | ||
| Because of his race, they lowered his... | ||
| Guilty verdict to one of negligent manslaughter or something. | ||
| They went easy on him because of his race. | ||
| And they got everybody in the jury to go along with this. | ||
| And it was this one brave juror standing up and going, this is wrong. | ||
| This is a race-based decision that's being made here. | ||
| And she objected to it and exposed what was happening behind the scenes. | ||
| That took a lot of guts, right? | ||
| That took a lot. Her life has probably been destroyed by this point. | ||
| She's called a racist and all this other stuff for just pointing out that And we don't even know the race of the other jurors, right? | ||
| This isn't necessarily like black men and women going, we refuse to punish black. | ||
| It's probably white liberals going, oh, but he's black. | ||
| Oh, we can't hold him to account for his own actions because he's just a poor little black man that is not responsible for his own actions. | ||
| Of course he is. He's an adult. | ||
| He's a grown man, and he murdered a woman, and he has to be put away. | ||
| That is what justice demands. | ||
| But they are willing to override that. | ||
| They're willing to discount that. They're willing to ignore justice. | ||
| The operation of America itself when they think they can somehow benefit racially by it. | ||
| It's despicable. It's wrong. | ||
| So critical race theory is not just about the education. | ||
| It's not just about the school. It's about this cancer seeping its way into our very bones and destroying the actual equity that we have in this country under the law. | ||
| We're having a little bit of technical difficulties, but we will be having on John Murawski in just a moment. | ||
| We'll be on next segment, and it gives me a little bit of time to cover some of these other stories that I wanted to get to and show you some of these other videos. | ||
| In fact, I want to go to a video now, clip number nine. | ||
| This, well, this video will infuriate you. | ||
| Hopefully. It infuriated me, that's for sure. | ||
| And we'll play it here. | ||
| We'll play it and then I'll talk about it afterwards. | ||
| It's a man who was kicked off of a flight because he had Let's Go Brandon written on his mask. | ||
| And he's told this is an FDA regulation, which it's not. | ||
| It's not a law. It's not an FDA regulation. | ||
| Let's Go Brandon is not offensive or, you know, untoward. | ||
| It's not pornography or a curse word, something you could actually be like, you can't, you know, our business prohibits this. | ||
| This is a simple, innocent, pretty much innocuous statement of political alliance. | ||
| And so what they're telling you is if you have... | ||
| A political statement that our establishment disagrees with will kick you off the plane. | ||
| We sold you a ticket. | ||
| Now we're going to take your money. We're going to kick you off the plane for having Let's Go Brandon written on the mask. | ||
| Here's this conflict. You can't have Let's Go Brandon on your mask or you will be removed. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So I'm going to ask you to put a different mask on or I'm going to ask you to put a different mask on. | |
| So is that a violation of our rights? | ||
| This is an FAA regulation and I'm asking you to leave. | ||
| So I'm going to ask you to change your mask. | ||
| Could you please put the phone down? I'll give you permission to film it and put the phone down. | ||
| Okay, I'm going to have you to leave the aircraft, please. | ||
| I'm going to have you leave the aircraft. | ||
| Sorry, I'm just asking you. | ||
| I'm going to have you leave the aircraft now. | ||
| Do you have any bags in the overhead bin? | ||
| Can you get this down please? | ||
| Sir, can you get your bag down? | ||
| If you could please just get your bag down. | ||
| I do not give you permission to film it. | ||
| Please turn your camera off. | ||
| No, please turn the camera off. | ||
| Okay, can you get your bag please? | ||
| I'm going to ask you to get your bag. | ||
| That's fine. What to say about this? | ||
| There he is getting kicked off of an airplane for having the words, let's go Brandon on his mask, getting kicked off of an airline for his political opinion, essentially. | ||
| Which, it's like, okay, on one hand, you have the petty tyrant of the stewardess, right? | ||
| Just any sort of, any hint at power over somebody else and they just start salivating. | ||
| They just like, they're just desperate to exercise it. | ||
| Like this is her own accord. This is not a rule. | ||
| It's not a law. It's nothing, right? | ||
| Does she have the power to do this? | ||
| No, of course not. Of course not. | ||
| But she does if you obey her, right? | ||
| But she's not the one that pisses me off. | ||
| She is, let's be honest. She's an annoying control freak, Karen. | ||
| So, screw her. | ||
| But what about everybody else in the plane? | ||
| Did you hear what the guy holding the phone said? | ||
| He said, this guy's being a jerk. | ||
| Now is not the time. | ||
| So it's just like, what is going on in these people's minds? | ||
| Like, what do they think is happening? | ||
| What do they see around them in the world? | ||
| Because this is a guy, sitting by himself, not doing anything. | ||
| He's got a political slogan on his mask, as many people do. | ||
| He isn't causing trouble. | ||
| He isn't the one delaying them. | ||
| He isn't the one confronting anybody else. | ||
| He is the one being imposed upon. | ||
| He is the one being confronted. | ||
| He is the one being told that he must do something or he must leave the plane. | ||
| And they're mad at him for not complying. | ||
| They're mad at him and they're saying, this guy's being a jerk. | ||
| Now is not the time. He is not the one who did anything. | ||
| This is why, this is the teacher's pet snitch mentality, right? | ||
| This is Randall from Recess, seeing all the cool kids, seeing TJ and Smelly just like doing something on their own, and just like running back like a little weasel bug to go tattle to the authorities, and then like hiding behind the skirts of the principal, laughing and celebrating that the authority has taken his side and is punishing his enemies for misbehaving. | ||
| Even though the misbehavior, it's not misbehavior. | ||
| It's just a political slogan. | ||
| Doesn't bother anybody. So... | ||
| The lady is annoying as hell. | ||
| She pissed me off. More so, the people around them either quietly pretending like this isn't happening and ignoring it or actually blaming the guy for being the one being treated this way. | ||
| They pissed me off even more, but kind of most of all is the guy. | ||
| The guy wearing the Let's Go Brandon mask. | ||
| Folks, what is wrong with you? | ||
| Why did he stand up? | ||
| Why did he leave the plane? | ||
| He is not in the wrong in this situation. | ||
| He is absolutely in the right. | ||
| So why did he go along with him? | ||
| Why did he capitulate? | ||
| You know what happened? Like, if that was me, and they came up and said, sir, you have to change your mask, I'd say, why? | ||
| Because, you know, if it's like, well, that mask is against regulations, like, okay, then there's at least an argument to be made, and it's like, oh, this paper is not the right type of paper or whatever, but like, that's not the rule, right? | ||
| It's because of the slogan. So you say, why? | ||
| And if they say, because of the slogan, you just close your mouth, you stare them in the eye, And you wait them out. | ||
| Just quietly. Sir, you have to get off the plane. | ||
| Like, I'm just not going to. | ||
| I'm not going to fight you. If you want to try to physically remove me, have fun. | ||
| Like, you are in the right. | ||
| You're the correct one. You're the one being imposed upon. | ||
| You're the one being confronted and annoyed and aggravated and, you know, having somebody impose upon you some sort of restriction. | ||
| You do not need to go along with them. | ||
| You do not need to comply with them. | ||
| What they're trying to enforce is not a rule, and it's not a law, and it's not a stricture, and it's not from the FAA. Those are all lies. | ||
| So you can ignore them. | ||
| Like, I don't get it. | ||
| Yeah. Do what this guy does. | ||
| Do what Artur Pawlowski does. | ||
| He didn't do anything wrong, but they're arresting him. | ||
| So he says, you know what? | ||
| If you're gonna act like Nazis, then act like Nazis. | ||
| He says, I don't comply with Nazis. | ||
| He's my hero, right? | ||
| These jackbooted thugs are coming to arrest him. | ||
| They're like, just stand up, man. | ||
| Just come with, just contribute, just help us, you know, make it easier for us to enslave and abuse you. | ||
| Won't you make it easier for us to enslave and abuse you? | ||
| And he just goes, I don't comply with Nazis. | ||
| I don't comply with Nazis. | ||
| You want to treat me like a Nazi? | ||
| Then treat me like a Nazi. | ||
| Pick me up. And he forces them to do it. | ||
| That's the way to do it. | ||
| If they're going to try to kick you off a plane because they don't like the words that are written on your mask... | ||
| Now, meanwhile, right, there's probably, you know, who knows? | ||
| There's people with just like... You know, they let anybody on a plane now. | ||
| It doesn't matter, right? | ||
| Shirts and hats just would have fined the hell out of me, right? | ||
| But it's free country, right? | ||
| So if they come up to you and try to enforce something that is not a rule and is not a law and they have no authority to do so, the only way they succeed in this is with your complicity. | ||
| The only way they succeed in that is... | ||
| By you going along with them and surrendering the power to them. | ||
| She didn't take that power. | ||
| He gave it to her. He presented it to her. | ||
| Right? And all it does is reinforce this schoolmarm, substitute teacher attitude of just like, Sir, get your bag and get off the plane, please. | ||
| And everybody around him is like, Why is this guy being so annoying? | ||
| No, you sit there. Make the plane take two hours. | ||
| I mean, make them arrest you. | ||
| Whatever you have to do, because you're in the right, and you can sue the hell out of them afterwards, and you can let everybody know in the plane, this is your fault, not mine. | ||
| I'm going to sit here until you drag me off. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal. | ||
| Very happy to have my guest on, John Murawski. | ||
| He reports on the intersection of culture and ideas for RealClear investigations. | ||
| He previously covered artificial intelligence for the Wall Street Journal and spent 15 years as a reporter for the News and Observer in Raleigh, North Carolina, writing about healthcare, energy, and business. | ||
| At RealClear, John reports on how esoteric academic theories on race and gender have been shaping many areas of public life. | ||
| From K-12 school curricula to workplace policies to the practice of medicine. | ||
| And we're all well-versed on that, but very excited to hear the results of the investigations he's done. | ||
| You can find the website at realclearinvestigations.com. | ||
| That's realclearinvestigations.com. | ||
| And his Twitter is at John Murawski. | ||
| That's M-U-R-A-W-S-K-I. Thank you so much for coming on with us, John. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks for having me on. | |
| Well, absolutely. I think what you're covering is one of the most important and insidious things going on in the country right now. | ||
| You have this article from December that made a very big splash. | ||
| No critical race theory in schools. | ||
| Here's the abundance evidence saying otherwise. | ||
| So we know that leftists, when talking about CRT, critical race theory, they say it doesn't exist. | ||
| What goes through your mind when you hear them say that it's not being taught in schools? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What goes through my mind is that most journalists Rely on experts to tell you, to tell them what's real and what's not real. | |
| And when experts are telling them the critical race theory isn't being taught, the experts have a specific agenda. | ||
| The journalists are just going, just relying on the experts. | ||
| And these are the experts that, you know, they have, unless they're going to take a lot of time to look into it on their own, they're just going to rely on experts and they're basically completely dependent on experts to tell them what is real. | ||
| So the experts in this case are people who are ideologues and involved in political advocacy and they have an interest in downplaying or denying critical race theory because we're talking about the eve of an election where critical race theory can throw an election, especially when elections are very close. | ||
| We actually saw this happen in Virginia. | ||
| So critical race theory actually probably made it determine the outcome of an election And so there's just an interest in downplaying its effect, especially when people are very committed to implementing critical race theory, because they believe that critical race theory isn't just a theory, but to them it's actually, in quotes, the truth. | ||
| So to eliminate critical race theory from the curriculum is essentially not allowing, is to disallow teachers from teaching the truth to K-12 students. | ||
| So that's what it really comes down to. | ||
| They don't even think it's a theory. | ||
| They think it's as true as scientifically verifiable research. | ||
| Right, and part of it I think is just sort of a linguistic rhetorical trick, right? | ||
| Because sure, it's true that third graders are not going to critical race theory class, right? | ||
| It's not being taught as a standalone course being taught. | ||
| But what's happened is that the tenets of critical race theory and the ideas underlying critical race theory have wormed their way into just about every subject in elementary school. | ||
| So the ideas of critical race theory are being taught, but they're able to say that it's not because they aren't calling it critical race theory when they're teaching it. | ||
| Is that accurate? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, that's accurate, but in fact, critical race theory is taught as a subject in high school classes, in ethnic studies courses in California, where kids are actually introduced to a subject called critical race theory. | |
| And, you know, students, and according to, for example, a course description from a public high school in California, students must be able to identify the core tenets of critical race theory. | ||
| Students are required to identify the key scholars who are instrumental in the development of critical race theory. | ||
| Students can then explain those tenets and then apply them. | ||
| They can actually be given a text and use critical race theory to interpret this text. | ||
| So in some cases, it is like law school, except in law school you might have A unit that might be a few weeks on critical race theory, or you might have an entire course, which is all semester, whereas here it's shorter and it's more compressed, but it's really the same thing at this point. | ||
| And in other In other classes, they're not told it's critical race theory. | ||
| They're just told we're going to learn about systemic racism, white privilege, intersectionality, implicit bias, microaggressions, the critique of whiteness, the critique of meritocracy, the critique of individualism, the critique of equality theory, the critique of colorblindness. | ||
| This is all straight out of critical race theory. | ||
| It's everything but critical race theory in name. | ||
| They're not told it's called a theory. | ||
| They're just told we're going to Use these, you know, intellectual or philosophical tools to help us understand the world as it exists. | ||
| So it exists. And also, It also exists in the sense that staff and teachers are given training in critical race theory, and they're introduced to the core concepts as well. | ||
| So it exists in the classroom. | ||
| It also exists at the administrative level to help administrators understand why there's a disparity of performance and outcomes for students of color and for the white students. | ||
| Why are students of color getting worse grades? | ||
| Why are students of color not doing as well on standardized testing? | ||
| And why is there a higher level of disciplinary infractions or disciplinary actions against students of color? | ||
| And they use critical race theory to explain that, and critical race theory points to only one explanation, and that explanation is systemic racism. | ||
| That's the only allowable explanation. | ||
| So, the answer is already predetermined. | ||
| It's systemic racism. And so critical race theory comes with an answer, like an answer key. | ||
| And your answer to everything will be systemic racism. | ||
| And so, I don't mean to simplify it that much, but that is essentially the way it works. | ||
| The one thing about critical race theory, I think, that's missed in these debates is that critical race theory is... | ||
| Because when I'm presenting it, it sounds almost ridiculous. | ||
| But when you listen to a critical race theorist or a fellow traveler present this information, it can be very compelling because you are drawn into a universe with its own terminology and its own and very specific emotional associations with words. | ||
| And you're drawn into this narrative. | ||
| And it's hard to step outside of the narrative, especially if a lot of this information is new to you. | ||
| If you're learning about historic racism, redlining, various practices historically that are presented as affirmative action for white people, you've never known about any of this. | ||
| You tend to be deferential to the teacher who's presenting this information. | ||
| It's convenient. It's a panacea, right? | ||
| Because, like you said, they already have a predetermined outcome to these discussions. | ||
| It doesn't matter what the problem is or what might actually be the underlying causes of differences that are seen. | ||
| They have already determined it's going to be racism. | ||
| So it's like anything you throw at them, they can just sort of twist it back towards that being the source of it is racism, societal racism. | ||
| So it's sort of a panacea for any issue you want to bring up. | ||
| They think they have the answer. | ||
| It's a religion in that sense. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So my advice would be people should be very wary of any philosophy or ideology or methodology that has a univariate explanation for multivariate phenomena, meaning a single explanation for complex phenomena. | |
| So that should be your first sign that something is that you should just be a little skeptical when you're given a single explanation for something that is very complex and you could easily come up with alternative explanations. | ||
| And the second point is that you should also be skeptical or wary of any philosophy, methodology or ideology that treats critique or dissent as proof of the ideology. | ||
| So in critical race theory, often what happens, either in critical race theory or its derived applications, like Like diversity, equity, and inclusion training, often what happens is that anybody who disagrees becomes part of the problem. | ||
| Right. It becomes proof. | ||
| They go, see, we're right. | ||
| See the way that they're resisting us? | ||
| That proves that we're correct. My God. | ||
| Okay, you understand this so well. | ||
| I'm very excited to continue to talk to you again. | ||
| It's John Murawski on RealClearInvestigations.com. | ||
| And, man, this is a sick story. | ||
| I don't know. Ideological cancer wearing its way. | ||
| We'll talk about the various industries it's infecting on the other side. | ||
| Stay tuned. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| My guest is John Murawski. | ||
| He's the investigator and journalist at RealClearInvestigations.com. | ||
| Story from December. | ||
| No critical race theory in school. Here's the abundant evidence pointing otherwise is a true deep dive into the rabbit hole of critical race theory and the way that it has made its way into so much of our curricula. | ||
| But I want to let you finish. We got cut off by the commercial break there. | ||
| You were talking about how critical race theory uses critiques of their theories as proof that their theories are correct, which is another reason to be suspicious of them. | ||
| I want you to finish up that thought, please, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
One of the sort of offshoots of critical race theory is called whiteness studies. | |
| So whiteness studies first was kind of a subset of critical race theory, and then it kind of broke off into its own discipline. | ||
| So Robin DiAngelo, the author of White Fragility, she specializes in whiteness studies, and she was an academic, and she was actually published in this field. | ||
| And in this field, one of the definitions of whiteness One of the characteristics of whiteness is the denial of privilege, the denial that people who are white and male are privileged, and the myth that they have earned everything they have through individual effort and meritocracy, and that it has nothing to do with privilege or the 400 years of oppression of people of color that gave them advantages in society. | ||
| So denial then, now there's some truth to that. | ||
| People generally are sort of oblivious to privileges that they have. | ||
| That's not really a special insight. | ||
| That's kind of almost a platitude, you know, a truism. | ||
| Right. It's also not based on race, right? | ||
| Privileged, you know, black people that have grown up as millionaires don't recognize their privilege as well. | ||
| Not necessarily a race-based thing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. Sorry. Exactly. | |
| Whiteness studies and critical race theory takes universal privilege. | ||
| Human attributes and universal human traits. | ||
| And when they're negative, they tend to associate them with white people. | ||
| And when they're positive, they tend to associate them with people of color. | ||
| And this is why people, I won't say who they are, but tend to see critical race theory as a racist enterprise because it is so negative about white people and so one-dimensionally positive about people of color, which seems to sort of contradict the very concept of what it which seems to sort of contradict the very concept of what it is to be prejudiced, bigoted, | ||
| So, you know, getting back to critical race theory in schools, it is surprising that even the media repeats to Kinnard that it's not taught in schools because Education Week, which is a trade journal, did a survey in July. | ||
| And 8% of K-12 teachers said they taught or have discussed critical race theory with their students. | ||
| And in urban schools, it was 20% of teachers. | ||
| And you have to remember that most students go to urban, many students go to urban schools. | ||
| I don't know if it's most, but, you know, urban schools represent a significant percentage of the public school system. | ||
| And in those schools, it's 20 percent of schools. | ||
| And another group, the Association of American Educators, also in July found that 4.1 percent of teachers said they were actually required to teach critical race theory. | ||
| And 11 percent of them said that teaching critical race theory should be mandatory. | ||
| And those numbers are not going to diminish. | ||
| Those numbers are going to increase because California and other states are adopting ethnic studies and critical race theory is a core component of ethnic studies. | ||
| So in the year 2025-26, in California high schools, you're going to be required to have an ethnic studies course to graduate, to take an ethnic studies course to graduate from high school. | ||
| And critical race theory is a core component of ethnic studies. | ||
| So, you know, pretty much the entire high school population in California is going to be exposed to critical race theory one way or another, starting in the year 2025-2026. | ||
| And that's, you know, something like 1.7 million students. | ||
| And other states are also applying, adopting critical race theory, either generally as an elective, but the courses are becoming more available. | ||
| Critical race theory is being snuck in through ethnic studies. | ||
| Now, personally, I have no problem with students learning about critical race theory. | ||
| In fact, what I'm doing right now is I'm teaching people about, you and I are both teaching people about critical race theory. | ||
| The problem becomes when you're required to adopt critical race theory as a truth, as the truth, and you are essentially coerced into espousing critical race theory in order to get it past a class. | ||
| This is when it becomes troubling. | ||
| You're really not allowed to dissent. | ||
| So it's almost like a catechism in a Catholic Sunday school or any religious school where you're mandated to accept the theory as truth, and there's no room for dissent. | ||
| And there's a strong pressure on you applied by teachers and authority figures. | ||
| This is what – when it becomes problematic, and this is when people start pushing back. | ||
| If you could take critical race theory and then debate it and cite Coleman Hughes, John McWhorter, Glenn Lowry, any number of people who have disputed critical race theory as part of your in-class discussion or in a paper, I don't think there'd be any problem with it. | ||
| with it it'll be like a shakespeare class right well or you know or uh or thomas thomas soul which i think he you know he did most of his work long before anybody had ever heard of critical race theory but he presents very important arguments against the concept that it's somehow racism that's causing the you know the shortfalls when he shows study after study showing that it's about time spent studying and home atmosphere you know home uh uh how they're treated and whether they It's a number of other things. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Shelby Steele is another one. | |
| What happens is that critical race theory is taught like chemistry. | ||
| It's taught as if it were science. | ||
| And the discipline uses a lot of scientific terminology that gives it this veneer of scientific precision and certitude. | ||
| But in fact, critical race theory is more like the theories of Karl Marx or the theories of Sigmund Freud or the theories of Aristotle. | ||
| Right. It almost seems religious in nature. | ||
| Now, we're running out of time here. | ||
| We're going to have to have you back on to have a longer segment because I love talking to you about this and you're so well-versed in it. | ||
| But beyond education, we see that this is now being used. | ||
| I just covered a story in Austin announced they were doing race-based grants for live music performances. | ||
| The city is giving it out based on race and they have a scoring matrix that, you know... | ||
| Basically, if you are not white, then you automatically get it. | ||
| And if you're white, you have to qualify for a bunch of other stuff. | ||
| We've seen how medicine is now going race-based. | ||
| So this goes beyond education, doesn't it? | ||
| And it's making its way into real life and death situations, including the legal field and the medical field. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Can you talk on that a little bit? Yeah, if you want to boil down what critical race theory is about, it's about equity versus equality. | |
| Equity is about achieving equal outcomes between the races. | ||
| Equality is about giving everyone equal opportunity and basically measuring everybody by the same standard. | ||
| In equality, you would accept students at a university in a pure system of equality based on their SAT scores, let's say, or their grades, Whereas in an equity system, you would make adjustments based on the hardships that they have encountered. | ||
| So an SAT score of 1,000 might actually be more rate higher than an SAT score of 1,400 because you had to face all these obstacles. | ||
| However, when you measure the obstacles, you're not talking to the individual student and you're not asking them what are their personal obstacles. | ||
| What you're really doing is you're putting them in a category, and if they're a category of Right. | ||
| systemic racism and oppression based on their skin color without regard for their individual experiences. | ||
| So it's strictly based on group membership. | ||
| And this is judging people by group membership, putting the group membership factor above their individual characteristics is where critical race theory clashes violently with the established norms of this country, which are equal treatment and colorblindness. | ||
| Colorblindness is a really dirty word in critical race theory because colorblindness is seen as a tool for oppressing black people by standards that appear to be neutral but produce unequal outcomes. | ||
| So in critical race theory, what they focus on is outcomes. | ||
| And in our society, we do have We're good to go. | ||
| They have much worse health when it comes to chronic conditions like diabetes or heart disease or hypertension. | ||
| And if you want to solve these problems, which I do and I assume you do too, we don't want to see our fellow Americans suffer, then you have to actually find out what's causing them and they completely... | ||
| Ignore that. They make that impossible by saying it's just racism. | ||
| That's the only thing it can possibly be. | ||
| And so that's what we're going to solve, making all the problems in many cases worse and certainly not solving them by getting to the root. | ||
| My gosh, I wish we had more time with you. | ||
| We're going to have to get you on again soon, maybe next week sometime, to do a full hour because you obviously so well understand critical race theory and present such powerful arguments against it. | ||
| We're going to have to get you back on again very soon. | ||
| You can find his work at RealClearInvestigations.com on Twitter at John Murawski. | ||
| Thank you so much for coming on, sir. | ||
| Really enlightening. Thanks for having me on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'll be glad to be on your show anytime. | |
| Well, let's do it again because, yeah, critical race theory, again, it's worming its way into every aspect of every institution that we have. | ||
| It's no longer an academic idea. | ||
| It's not a philosophy. It's not an ideology. | ||
| It's actually being used to determine where money goes, where healthcare goes and whether people are punished for breaking the law. | ||
| It's the destruction of our country if we allow it to continue. | ||
| Folks, stay tuned. The Alex Jones Show begins in one minute. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Don't go anywhere. With the world awakening, I think it's important that we rise over momentum right now, take advantage of this moment, and I have always an idea that's something everybody can do, that every listener can do. | |
| I think it'd be powerful and effective for us to, you know, hang banners over highways. | ||
| Imagine a giant banner in Houston or LA or Atlanta that says, our experience is right, Infowars.com, or we stand with the truckers, arrest spouts. | ||
| Brother, I'm so glad you called to elaborate on this. | ||
| Yes, now is the time in your small town or your big city to write something on the bathroom wall, or to put a sign up on your barn, or to put a sticker on your car, or banner hangs over highways, and it will be a chain reaction. | ||
| Beautifully said. What do you recommend people say on these banner hangs? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I have a few ideas. First of all, Alex Jones is very cool. | |
| No, I agree. | ||
| Arrest Fauci, arrest Bill Gates. | ||
| The COVID vax is poison. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Beautiful. Yeah. And also, I think it might be a good idea. | |
| I volunteered with Ron Paul in 2008. | ||
| It was really effective. But, you know, we used Slim Jim Flyers. | ||
| We did banner hands. | ||
| Maybe on InfoWars, you could have printable PDFs. | ||
| We could print it out. Pick these things in a Walmart parking lot in every car in the parking lot. | ||
| There's ways that we could all be involved and we could all be affected. | ||
| So that's what I'm calling about. | ||
| God bless you, Chris, in Atlanta. | ||
| I really, really appreciate you calling us today. | ||
| Thank you so much. You're looking at Infowars' newest designer t-shirt. | ||
| It's the presidential emoji shirt. | ||
| And it's got all 46 presidents going back to the founding of this nation with George Washington. | ||
| And it ends up with Obama, Trump, and Biden. | ||
| And of course, Biden is a clown. | ||
| Trump's wearing the sunglasses and we know that Barack Obama is not a good friend of America. | ||
| This shirt is very thought-provoking. | ||
| It'll cause a lot of conversations and it's a great way to wake people up. | ||
| It also makes a great gift. | ||
| You're not just giving someone the gift of a fun t-shirt when you give them this. | ||
| We're also funding the Information War. | ||
| And there are dozens and dozens and dozens of new t-shirts that we've designed in the last six months that are now available at infowarstore.com. | ||
| And when you purchase the shirt, you're giving yourself the gift of waking up the world and living in a free society. | ||
| So get one for yourself and give one as a gift. | ||
| All of it is a 360 win and it keeps us on the air. | ||
| All the Democrats and the Deep State and the Davos Group and Klaus Schwab and the Globalists are fighting around the clock to shut us down because they can't succeed if we stay on the air. | ||
| And of course we have a whole line of amazing 1776 shirts in short sleeve and long sleeve. | ||
| And then of course there's one of my favorites, the Vaccine Passport t-shirt. | ||
| This lets the globalists know you're not signing onto their mark of the beast, and you're fully aware of what they're doing, and you're educating other sheeple at the same time while funding the Infowar. | ||
| A true 360 win. | ||
| Get yours now with hundreds of other amazing t-shirts to choose from at InfowarStore.com. | ||
| All of this art is original and is incredibly thought-provoking like this one. | ||
| You've got one mouse asking the other mouse, are you going to take the vaccine? | ||
| He says, no way! They haven't even finished the human trials yet. | ||
| These are the type of shirts you'll find exclusively at InfoWarStore.com. | ||
| Again, hundreds and hundreds of shirts to choose from. | ||
| Dozens and dozens of new shirts that we just produced in the last few months and it funds the InfoWar and it spreads the word like this one, which is mainly for Texans but other folks might want one, most likely to secede. | ||
| It's all available at InfoWarStore.com and it keeps us on air and it exercises free speech in the public, something the left doesn't want. | ||
| So again, thanks for keeping us on the air. | ||
| And thanks for shopping at InfoWareStore.com. | ||
| I want to salute and thank you all for your support. | ||
| I want to encourage you to go and get these t-shirts and other pieces of apparel and wear them openly, loudly, and proudly. | ||
| And let the leftists know they're never going to silence us. | ||
| They're never going to break our will. |
Export Selection