All Episodes
Feb. 15, 2022 - American Journal - Harrison Smith
02:13:03
The American Journal: Trudeau Declares National Emergency – Seizes Bank Accounts of Critics - FULL SHOW 02-15-22
Participants
Main voices
h
harrison smith
01:20:14
Appearances
a
alex jones
01:26
j
jon bowne
03:36
j
justin trudeau
01:52
Clips
c
chrystia freeland
00:45
j
joe biden
00:14
n
nancy pelosi
00:26
s
syrian girl
00:33
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
harrison smith
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the final battle of humanity.
Welcome to the crossing of the Rubicon.
Yes, folks, it's down to the final hour here.
We're reaching the finish line.
The actions of the elites and the people in response over the next couple weeks will decide the fate of not just Canada, but humanity itself.
And it's Rather exciting to see.
We'll, of course, be covering it all.
We'll be welcoming Ian Miller, author of Unmasked, The Global Failure of COVID Mask Mandates, in the third hour.
Plenty of videos to show you.
Canada will be the top story, of course, and we'll be taking your phone calls throughout the show as well.
Well, but let's begin, as we always do, their daily dispatch.
All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Tuesday, the 15th of February 2022.
Trudeau to invoke never used emergency powers, the Emergencies Act, to crack down on Freedom Convoy protesters.
ah yes like father like son taking after his father fidel castro and declaring himself unilaterally dictator over the country that he was elected to lead really uh incredible stuff of course he wasn't really elected he was elected with about 21 of the vote so here you have a guy with less than a quarter of the votes uh popular votes in canada and declaring martial law over the canada trucker strike of course this will be our major topic
we'll discuss how this differentiates from the way they've treated other actual violent protests in the past we'll be talking about the connection to his deputy prime minister and the world economic forum and how all of this plays into the global corporate control grid attempting to be erected around us as we speak I think.
It's actually never been used before the Emergencies Act, but that's just because it's an upgrade to the War Powers Act or War Measures Act in Canada, which has been invoked before, famously in World War II with the internment of Japanese Canadians during that conflict.
Are we going to see more internment camps?
Wait to see. Stay tuned, folks.
Meanwhile, worst mega drought in 1,200 years caused by climate change, this according to a study, MSN.com, has the story.
The mega drought that has been plaguing the southwestern United States for at least two decades is causing the region to experience the driest conditions in 1,200 years, according to new research.
It means it's the driest since AD 800.
Begging the question, what happened back then?
I mean, what happened back then?
I mean, why was it so dry back then if now it's dry because of human-caused climate change?
What was causing it back then?
It'd be one thing if it was like the driest ever, but it's been this dry before, and now it's becoming this dry again.
What happened back then?
I guess the scientist should answer that question before we impose ridiculous tyrannical orders telling you not to drive a car or eat meat based on human climate change when apparently the climate just changes.
That's just a thing that happens apparently.
Incredible, incredible scientific revelations being made live on American Journal.
Meanwhile, the Louisville mayoral candidate was targeted in a shooting and attempted assassination against Craig Greenberg, a Democratic mayoral candidate for Louisville, Kentucky, said he's shaken but safe after an alleged gunman came into his campaign headquarters Monday morning and shot at him.
Pretty horrifying stuff, but they have a suspect.
They have the guy that did it.
Of course, you aren't hearing about this, strangely.
ADL doesn't seem interested.
The Democratic Party isn't sounding all the alarm bells about this being domestic terror.
You have a Jewish mayoral candidate being attempted assassination.
The ADL has nothing to say about it.
What would cause this?
obviously it's because the suspect is a radical black nationalist and that's okay and good and we can't we can't demonize that guy or that group so we'll just brush this under the rug and just let you know a jewish person be attempted assassination and not cause a big fuss about it you know because otherwise you're demonizing black it's all very confusing folks but just know yeah they'll let you die if uh combating it interferes with their overall plans
We'll get back to the Daily Dispatch on the other side.
What do you think about that? Stay tuned.
That's right, ladies and gentlemen.
Last time the Southwest United States was this dry, the oldest inn in the UK, Ye Olde Fighting Cox, was founded.
What a change.
What a change in the last 1,200 years.
Incredible. It's the Neolithic period.
Neo is Greek for new.
Lithic is Latin for monster trucks.
And that explains why the atmosphere changed so much and was so dry in the 1200s.
Meanwhile, back to our Daily Dispatch here.
Ukraine and West have stopped Russian escalation.
This is according to Kiev. Ukraine said Tuesday...
I'm sorry.
They're taking credit for this.
It's like... Oh boy.
Ukraine said Tuesday that its joint diplomatic effort with Western allies have managed to avert a feared Russian invasion.
No, they did it, guys.
They said we and our allies have managed to prevent Russia from any further escalation.
It's already the middle of February and you see our diplomacy is continuing to work.
unidentified
It's just amazing. It really is incredible what they think they get away with.
harrison smith
They're like, Russia's about to attack.
Russia's like, no, we're not.
Russia's about to attack. And Ukraine's like, no, they're not.
Russia's about to attack. And everybody's like, no, they're really not.
Then they're like, whew, Russia's not attacking anymore, guys.
We did it. We did it.
It was us. We stopped Russia from attacking.
Oh, wow. Good job, you guys.
Good job. You did it.
You stopped Russia from attacking.
You stopped them from doing the thing they weren't going to do anyway and that you were the only one saying they were going to do.
It's amazing. The adults are back in charge, folks.
The adults are back in charge.
Meanwhile, wholesale prices continued or likely surged again in January as inflation accelerates.
So it's like inflation went from non-existent and the Fed saying we want to create inflation, we think that's the best course of action now, to inflation, it's mild and temporary and nothing to worry about.
It's transitory, right?
And moved on to, well, maybe it's not as transitory.
Okay, maybe it's permanent.
Okay, now it's accelerating, okay?
So we've gone from non-existent to fabricated by the Fed to don't worry about it, ignore it, we're not going to do anything to stop it, to...
Okay, it's here now, but it'll be gone soon.
Okay, it's here now to stay.
Okay, now it's here to stay, and it's accelerating and getting worse.
So, thank you adults in the room.
Thank you for manufacturing war with Russia over Ukraine.
Thank you for... Exposing yourselves as the corrupt tyrant you are when it comes to Russiagate and the continued fallout of the Spygate scandal that threatened to derail the Trump campaign and Trump presidency.
But instead, what it's done is completely exposed the powers that be.
In case it's not perfectly clear already, the Western world is currently under an occupation.
It's a little bit troubling.
It's a little bit concerning. But it's not new.
It's been this way for quite a while, actually.
Slowly but surely, they've built up their power.
They've consolidated their networks.
They've expanded their tentacles of control.
And now they feel like they have...
Done enough. They've done enough legwork.
They've laid enough ground out.
Now it's time to slam the door of the cell shut and lock it and throw away the key as they attempt to fully mobilize their global takeover campaign.
That's what's happening in Canada right now.
That's what Justin Trudeau represents.
Meanwhile, the premiers of Alberta, Ontario...
Every other Canadian province has come out against the War Powers Act that Justin Trudeau has invoked.
They want nothing to do with it.
They don't think it's necessary or wise or advised or in line with the liberal ideas that Justin Trudeau is supposedly representative of.
But it doesn't matter what they think.
It doesn't matter what the Canadian people want.
It doesn't matter what the other politicians in Canada want.
Justin Trudeau has a different power he answers to.
See, this is why the Great Reset is kind of an appropriate name.
Because they're resetting.
And it's not a reset as to, like, back to right before COVID. It's not a reset...
You know, in a small scale, it's a reset back to 1775, right?
It's a reset back to a time when the powers that ruled a land had no obligation whatsoever to actually serve the people that they lorded over.
That's what the reset is.
So Justin Trudeau right now doesn't represent the Canadian people.
He definitely is at odds with the other Canadian politicians, especially the local ones.
The more local you go, the more viscerally they...
Disagree with Justin Trudeau.
But that doesn't matter because he serves a greater power.
He serves the unelected, Dr.
Evil, supervillain scumbag, Klaus Schwab, the World Economic Forum, and the bankers that pull his strings.
That's who he's serving.
He's a good little soldier.
He's willing to sacrifice himself and his heritage and his legacy at their altar.
This is what they're telling him, right?
They're like, look, this is too important.
This is too important in our worldwide scheme.
Do you realize how long we've laid the groundwork for this?
Do you realize how much has been put in to this effort?
And if you just roll over to these truckers right now, all of that will be wasted.
You can't do that to us, okay?
So you're going to have to double down.
You're going to have to become a tyrant.
You're going to have to threaten total destruction of your own people.
Over measures that we now, it's not even debatable.
Every measure they're imposing has been completely ineffective, utterly useless.
Lockdowns, masks, vaccine mandates.
Not a single one has had a measurable positive impact on cases of COVID, the destruction of COVID, the spread of the disease.
Absolutely none at all.
So again, none of this is...
They're not even trying to predicate it on the science anymore.
It's a simple power struggle.
That's what's going on here.
And we're going to listen to all sorts of people from Canada today.
Let's begin with our good friend Alex Cargill.
Clip number four.
Building, rebuilding a culture where they can care again.
Here's Alex Cargill responding to the announcement by Justin Trudeau.
unidentified
...right under the eye of Sauron, as usual, in our bubble of jubilation, right in the heart of evil, where these politicians have ruled your life and they want to drop that draconian communist system of digital ID on all of us.
We can't fix all the world's problems, but we can start building a culture where we care again.
Where Canada is brave and we're standing up to tyranny.
Where the cops have been challenged and they've largely landed on our side and they support us.
Sure there are still some scared people out there that watch a little too much CTV news but largely everyone's coming back to the light and they're realizing that of all the measures tried it had a 0.2% effect on the death rate and the jig is up guys.
The experiment has failed.
With a failed experiment, mandating it becomes not just ridiculous, it becomes insane.
We're no longer living in an insane world, and if you think threatening to remove the insurance of anyone that provides material support, you won't get a license from us.
Any power that we have as a federal government will be dedicated to making your life horrible, as we pretend that you've made the lives of Ottawa citizens horrible, because we have Mayor Watson, who's a lame duck mayor, who wants a federal appointment from Trudeau.
He's hystericalized the population with lies about us, guys.
That's fine. Not many of them believe it, but the ones that do are very loud, and they're the ones that are going to get coverage.
That's called a proportional psyop.
That means that this large percentage of people who are very peaceful are being misrepresented by literal false flags where they just hop out of a car, they do a Nazi salute, hop back in, they run that on the news, and that's all they have.
That's all they have.
The cops know they're landing on our side and the right side of history.
No one's going to do a crackdown on their own parents, on their own veterans who have removed the fences at the war memorial.
They're okay with it. The diesel's coming through.
They are not listening to these dictates.
All the scare tactics are for you.
They're a deterrent for you.
And you're saying, oh, I'll come down on the weekend, man!
I'll come down on the weekend and be a fucking liability, carrying around open beer cans and getting drunk as shit, celebrating like we want anything.
How about you come down on a Wednesday?
Stay as long as possible.
Behave yourself. Help the truckers out.
These truckers have given a lot.
They're a dedicated bunch. They've got leadership that has talked to Mayor Watson and engaged in talks with him.
I hope they throw it back in his face and say, you called us occupiers.
You think we're talking to you? No.
This is between us and our government, not the municipal.
You can convince your citizens that we're evil, but we know we're not.
harrison smith
Brilliant as ever by Alex Cargill.
Follow him at TransSplendor on Twitter if you want to keep up to date with what's going on there on the ground in Ottawa.
We'll get back to this on the other side.
Ezra Levant, some very interesting things to say about this.
We'll be playing you the clips of Justin Trudeau and his deputy prime minister announcing total tyrannical crackdown on the people of Canada based on a totally peaceful protest.
It's outrageous. Well folks, the die is cast.
Justin Trudeau has crossed the Rubicon.
He has declared war against his own people.
Now as I understand it, this still has to go to Parliament to be approved.
But since when has the globalist super state adhered to nationalist laws?
If they were actually going by the law, this never would have been declared.
So I think we're beyond the realm of You know, legal restrictions on the government.
No, the government's there to legally restrict you however and whenever they so please.
Now, I've got some videos of Canadians and people around the world reacting to this, but I think let's just lay down what exactly is happening right now.
Let's go to clip number 12 here.
This is Trudeau giving himself emergency powers to stop the trucker's protest, calling the action reasonable and proportionate.
justin trudeau
To continue building on these efforts, the federal government is ready to use more tools at its disposal to get the situation fully under control.
After discussing with cabinet and caucus, after consultation with premiers from all provinces and territories, after speaking with opposition leaders, the federal government has invoked the emergencies act to supplement provincial and territorial capacity to address the blockades and occupations.
I want to be very clear.
The scope of these measures will be time-limited, geographically targeted, as well as reasonable and proportionate to the threats they are meant to address.
The Emergencies Act will be used to strengthen and support law enforcement agencies at all levels across the country.
This is about keeping Canadians safe, protecting people's jobs, and restoring confidence in our institutions.
harrison smith
I don't know.
Are liberals children?
Are they children? Can they not think for themselves?
If somebody just speaks in an authoritative and calming tone, is that enough?
Like, is that really enough, or can you see through the just obvious display of falsehood?
Like, if I just got up here and was like, in order to maintain order and for the safety of all Americans, we do have to lay your child down for eternity.
And it will be hard, but it's what we need to do, and we will not allow it.
Your child to be victimized by it.
It's like, wait, you're saying you're going to kill my kid?
Like, you have to see through this crap.
You have to be able to see through the soft language, the bullcrap bureaucratic doublespeak as they impose martial law on the country of Canada in response to utterly and totally peaceful protest with very explicit and simple demands for basic human rights.
They are declaring you a terrorist for standing up against it.
Of course they're going to couch it in fanciful words.
Of course they're going to lie about it.
Of course they're going to try to justify this in the eyes of the media, and they've got the media on their side to back them up on it.
But the measures that they're taking are unprecedented and incredible.
Let's go now to clip number eight here.
This is the Deputy Prime Minister saying that under the Emergency Act, banks can immediately freeze or suspend bank accounts.
chrystia freeland
Let's watch. with anyone involved in the illegal blockades and report to the RCMP or CSIS. As of today, a bank or other financial service provider will be able to immediately freeze or suspend an account without a court order.
In doing so, they will be protected against civil liability for actions taken in good faith.
Federal government institutions will have a new broad authority to share relevant information with banks and other financial service providers to ensure...
harrison smith
So what all of these governments are doing now, in line with the Great Reset, is outsourcing their tyranny.
They don't have the legal power or the popular will to impose this stuff militarily.
And so they're going to use the banks to do it.
They're outsourcing their tyranny.
And they're doing it across the board.
They're doing it in America and Canada.
But here's some responses to this.
Gathered some tweets here.
I think they make a couple good points.
Now, as to what she just said, that the bank, the government can unilaterally, and she made it explicit, without a court order.
Meaning this doesn't have to go through a judge.
This doesn't have to go through a jury.
This doesn't have to be approved by anybody who was elected.
This is unelected bureaucrats and financial powers debanking Canadian citizens for simply supporting a peaceful protest.
So let's get into some of these responses.
Ezra Levant says this.
Clearly unconstitutional. No other crime, not even murder, causes you to lose your ability to earn a living.
Protesting against a failed government is not a crime.
Yeah, absolutely right.
You can kill, you can rape, you can keep somebody as a kidnapped victim in your basement for 20 years.
You can still have a bank account.
Because we understand that there's limits to...
The justice system. There are things that are beyond justice.
And this is one of them. So, if you're a rapist or a murderer, you still get your bank account.
You can still operate. I mean, if you're a terrorist, the Trudeau government will give you a million dollars.
They've done it before. But if you peacefully protest, if you park somewhere that they don't approve of, you'll lose your livelihood, you'll lose your insurance, you'll be thrown in jail for a year and fined $100,000, and they'll take your driver's license and your government ID. Maybe they'll deny you health care.
It's really incredible. Now, a woman on Twitter, Sherry Voluntary, says this.
My ex has a childhood friend in Ottawa Police Department.
When he asked him about his views on the trucker situation, he said, quote, none of us want to be policing this.
It's making me sick. And yet he continues to do it.
I guess he thinks wishing it were different makes him a good guy.
You know what we need to do is find the Infowars report from...
Hurricane Katrina, when it was exactly the same thing, and you had National Guard members going door-to-door, confiscating guns, and they interview the National Guard people, and they're like, yeah, this is really bad.
This seems tyrannical.
I really don't agree with what I'm doing.
They walk up, knock on the door, give me your gun, sir.
Like, they're the ones doing it.
The police are the ones doing it.
Just following orders is not an excuse.
I thought we established this a little while ago.
You are now complicit in the tyranny.
You're complicit in the takeover.
You are just as guilty as the people giving you the orders, if not more so.
Because they can give orders all they want if there's nobody there to follow them.
They have no power.
You are the ones that are giving them the power they're using To tyrannize Canadian citizens.
Viva Frye says this.
Don't worry. Justin Trudeau isn't calling in the military.
He's just authorizing banks to utilaterally freeze your accounts on the basis of suspicion alone.
No court order required with legal immunity.
I hope everyone realizes how much more dangerous this is than the military.
But see, there's a reason for this.
And it's pointed out by VocalDistance on Twitter.
This is the real danger of the administrative state.
Arresting you requires actual police officers to go out and physically do the act of arresting you.
The bureaucratic state, however, can freeze your bank account, revoke your license, and shut down your life with the push of a button.
And they can destroy your life even further by enlisting the cooperation of the mainstream media to slander and demonize you in the public view as well.
Matt Brevner on Twitter says the War Measures Act was used to put my Japanese-Canadian grandparents into concentration camps.
May be coming. And of course, extremely important, pay attention, not one Western leader has condemned the actions of Trudeau.
Alright, welcome back folks.
Got some more videos to show you here.
Let's go back to... Let's just go to clip number 11 here.
This is Trudeau invoking the Emergencies Act, but there's something I noticed as I was watching this, and it's the little gremlin creature to Trudeau's right, so it'll be on the left side of the screen, and she's just sort of twitching.
It's very weird. Let's watch.
justin trudeau
The federal government It's weird, right?
harrison smith
Everybody else standing around perfectly normal.
She's just like twitching back and forth.
Her head is like ripping back and forth.
Well, luckily somebody else noticed this and captured even more strange behavior from this woman.
Let's go now to that video.
The Freakland video that you just pulled him?
unidentified
We've been reporting all day that he will, and his parents will go to the emergency measures.
harrison smith
Like, why does she look like she's having an anxiety attack?
Minister's liberty.
Is she on drugs?
What is she doing?
What is happening here? Does she understand maybe that what she is about to do is in complete violation of everything that her country supposedly stands for?
Is she just nervous?
What's happening? Why is she so twitchy?
Why is she so unsettled?
It's weird, right?
So who is this woman?
Well, her name is Chrystia Friedland.
And you know, one of the people that I've been following on this is a woman named Rupa Sabramanya.
And she's a Canadian journalist who's a liberal, but she would go around the trucker convoy and actually tell the truth about it and say what she was actually saying on the ground.
Well, here she's written a story on February 2nd of last year saying, Christia Friedland's side gig with the WEF is endangering Canadian democracy.
There's no need to invent conspiracy theories.
The attempt by global elites to subvert local democracy is full-on and in plain view.
And Chrystia Freeland is a primary mover in this World Economic Forum.
She is a major figure in the World Economic Forum.
It says in her book, Freeland notes that an invitation to Davos marks an aspiring plutocrat's arrival on the international scene.
It's like, yeah, you're admitting something maybe you shouldn't be admitting.
Of course, this was last year.
I mean, this has been known about for a while.
Here, the NCIO.ca MP Christia Friedland continues to violate the law, pointing out that her position as board member, or rather a member of the Board of Trustees in the World Economic Forum, represents a conflict of interest that is forbidden by the Canadian law.
An apparent conflict of interest exists when there is a reasonable apprehension which reasonably well-informed persons could properly have that a conflict of interest exists.
Prohibitive activities, no reporting public office holder, including Chrystia Freeland, shall, except as required in the exercise of his or her official powers, duties and functions, continue as or become a director or officer in a corporation or organization.
Christia Freeland is in a conflict of interest.
While serving as a member of the Parliament of Canada, Christia Freeland became and continues to be an active member of the Board of Trustees for the World Economic Forum.
So, of course, she also serves this other power.
Justin Trudeau, of course, was one of the young leaders that Klaus Schwab brags about having control of, having this man in his pocket.
Of course, his deputy prime minister is also in his pocket, and she's the one that makes this announcement.
She is a board of trustees member at the World Economic Forum, but this is just the latest in a long line of...
Alliances or loyalties to foreign and international powers.
She's a Rhodes Scholar, which means she was indoctrinated from the very beginning to be a member of the uber elite controllers of the world.
She was a, immediately, as soon as she graduated college, had a gig at Reuters and Financial Times.
She spent time in America as a journalist for quite a while.
And now she's the Deputy Prime Minister of Canada and has just announced that she's working in cooperation with banks to shut down bank accounts of anybody who opposes that government without so much as a checkmark by a judge.
No oversight. No checks and balances.
No ability to attempt to defend yourself from the accusations made against you.
Simple unilateral dictatorial financial tyranny.
Plain and simple. Just absolute pure despotism.
And of course, pointed out that tweet that said, you know, not a single Western leader has condemned the actions of Trudeau, which is interesting because they're very, very fast to condemn this type of action amongst anybody else.
So what's going on here?
What's going on here is that the elite and the establishment, the globalist superstructure, does not care if your country is Democrat.
It doesn't care if your country is a republic.
It doesn't care if your country is authoritarian and communistic.
They love China.
China will disappear your ass for saying the wrong thing.
They'll put you in a cell underground.
You've seen the videos.
It's horrific the way they act.
Nothing but nice things to say about China.
They love it, in fact.
But Russia, well, Russia is also somewhat authoritarian, and we have to sacrifice our fortune, our blood, our lives to defend Ukraine from that tyranny, right?
unidentified
Thank you.
harrison smith
So what's the deciding factor?
It's obviously not authoritarianism.
It's obviously not despotism.
They don't really care about democracy.
They'll crush democracy if it goes against their will.
And that's sort of the point, right?
You can be—if the democratic process— Is allowing you through manipulation of the media, falsified election results, to continue to exploit the people of the country, then your democracy is fine.
Don't worry about it. If your authoritarian government is serving the interest of the banking elite, then go ahead.
Crush your people. Destroy free speech.
Invade other countries. It's fine with them because they're getting their peace and you're working with them to exploit your people at the benefit of The globalists.
See, Russia doesn't want to exploit its people, so they're bad.
And they can claim that they're authoritarian, which is why they want to go after them.
But it doesn't really matter. What matters to them is whether they can exploit the people of the country without the people pushing back in any real sense.
And this is absurdly true.
In fact, let's now go to clip number 10 here.
This was... Trudeau, when he was asked what country he admires, let's watch.
unidentified
With Sun TV watching for any slip, he was asked which country he most admired and referred to China.
justin trudeau
There's a level of admiration I actually have for China.
because their basic dictatorship is allowing them to actually turn their economy around on a dime and say we need to go green as fast as we need to start investing in solar.
I mean, there is a flexibility that I know Stephen Harper must dream about of having a dictatorship that he could do everything he wanted.
But I find quite interesting.
harrison smith
I mean, what more is there to say?
What more is there to say?
Don't worry.
I have plenty more to say.
Here's what Justin Trudeau said two years ago, almost exactly two years ago.
This was February 17th, 2020, when you had a series of protests going on in Canada, somewhat similar to the trucker protests in the sense that they were blockading roads and blockading train tracks and actually causing major damage.
They derailed trains.
They caused major accidents.
People died because of these protests.
What was Justin Trudeau's response then?
It was this, quote, And he puts out this statement, So, again, very similar, right?
Blockades. Using blockades as a protesting method.
Now, of course, there's a couple differences.
One, these people were actually violent.
They derailed trains.
They caused major issues.
Also, the... We demand that native tribes just get more money.
And, you know, when it's these demands, Justice Joe is very serious about very carefully listening and working with these people and having a dialogue.
When it's truckers saying, please, can we just work for, like, can we be free?
He shuts them down. All right, folks, let's try to put what's happening in Canada into perspective.
Let's compare it with a somewhat similar protest that occurred exactly two years ago under exactly the same...
Government? Let's see how they responded to that.
But first, let's see how the media responded to what went on.
Global News asks, February 27th, 2020, just almost exactly two years ago, do Tyendignaga Mohawk protests amount to terrorism?
Experts say no.
Oh, well, the experts, they say no, so I guess it's fine.
The actions of protesters who set fire under a moving CN rail train in Mohawk territory were quickly condemned by the Trudeau government as reckless and unsafe, but resulted in no arrest.
No arrest at all. A video posted to social media Wednesday by Real People's Media showed several masked protesters setting wooden skids on fire by the tracks of a CN rail line near Belfair, Ontario, as a train passed by.
Mohawk warriors here are adamant no train shall pass, said an unidentified man in the video.
Okay, not terrorism.
Totally peaceful. A good thing, according to the Trudeau government.
As National Post reports, fires lit, pallets thrown during Ontario rail protest as Lee Galt warns of AK-47s in Kahnawaka.
In the Kahnawaka-Mohawk territory, South Montreal, protesters warned that any police efforts to remove the site would be seen as a provocation.
Oh yes, the protesters are warning the police and the police are very scared to go up against them.
Freight train carrying wood pellet derails in northwest British Columbia.
The movement to end Canada.
This is how it was reported in Washington Post, saying, since much of the moral indignation fueling the Canadian indigenous rights movement is rooted in opposition to an enormous historical fact, the conquest of North America by non-indigenous people, it's easy for them to reach an equally enormous conclusion.
The land should be given back.
So what they're protesting was the conquering of their country 200 years ago.
What they're protesting was industries drilling for oil on sacred land.
It was very concerning to them, and their demands were things like, we no longer want to be Canadian.
We want the Canadian government to be taken down.
We don't want to be patrolled or subject to Canadian laws.
We don't want the RCMP to have access to our territorial lands.
Totally reasonable, right?
And they wanted to achieve this by lighting trains on fire and derailing them and causing actual violence and arming themselves and threatening police that if they come towards them, they'll be met with violence.
And all of that was good, according to Justin Trudeau, as his response to this was to meet with these people and discuss very calmly how they can come to a resolution.
And this is even getting into the later protests where the Trudeau government was funding the falsified scientific research to fabricate a lie about mass graves outside of churches that led to a series of church burnings and the destruction of some of Canada's oldest and most revered statues.
That was all fine.
Again, that was all good.
That was all perfect and wonderful and decent and not a problem at all.
Now, of course, you have truckers honking their horn and you have to basically make yourself a despot and dictator and crush them.
So, again, this is from February 17, 2020.
Today, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau convened the Incident Response Group to discuss the government of Canada's engagement to resolve infrastructure disruptions caused by blockades across Canada as soon as possible.
The Prime Minister, the Deputy Prime Minister and ministers all agreed on the importance of freedom of expression as a democratic right.
And they discussed the need to approach this urgent situation in a way that builds trust and respect towards an immediate resolution with all parties.
unidentified
Thank you.
harrison smith
A little different. A little bit different.
Things change over two years, don't they?
The Prime Minister re-emphasized the urgency of the situation and the need for ministers to continue to be engaged at all levels to resolve this quickly and minimize the very real impact on Canadians.
All participants committed to continue to cooperate closely and be fully engaged.
The Prime Minister stressed the importance of resolving the situation in a peaceful manner with continued dialogue to address underlying issues in the spirit of reconciliation.
The Prime Minister and ministers remain actively involved on this issue by continuing to reach out to the premiers and indigenous leaders to bring the situation to a resolution as soon as possible.
Yes, can we kiss your feet?
Can we bow before you?
Would you want to make any other demands?
Just the more violent you are, the more we want to help you and understand you and listen to you.
Oh, what's that? Oh, truckers?
Well, truckers are white.
No, no, no. Crush them.
No, no. Destroy their livelihood.
Oh, the police won't do it because they recognize this is clearly a peaceful protest and what you're asking them to do is the equivalent of 1989 Tiananmen Square in China?
Well, just get the banks to do it then.
Just get the big tech companies to do it.
Just get the media to encourage it and get the crowdfunding...
Organizations to impose this rule for you.
They're all in it with you.
They're all in your cabal.
The police on the ground, not so much.
So, you know, you're not going to be able to rely on them.
The Canadian military, they probably won't shoot on their own people.
So go ahead and outsource your tyranny to the banks, outsource your tyranny to the corporations, and that way, you know, the people that want to fight back or...
Get involved in some way.
They're just cut off at the knees and there's nothing they can do because what they're up against is a giant, faceless, unified, monolithic bureaucracy that's intent on crushing them from every angle.
It's absolutely outrageous.
And of course, not everybody's going along with this.
In fact, the Quebec MP slammed Trudeau's use of the Emergency Act Against Freedom Protest, and he was joined by the premiers of Alberta and Manitoba and Ontario and basically every other major state in Canada because this is clearly and he was joined by the premiers of Alberta and Manitoba and Ontario and basically every other major state in Canada But it doesn't matter because they're not the ones that Trudeau is answering to.
He's answering to higher powers, namely Klaus Schwab and his cabal of parasites.
Let's go now to clip number nine.
Here's the Quebec MP and what he thinks about Trudeau's emergency act.
unidentified
Let's understand clearly that Quebec, Quebec government and us do not want this law to be implemented on the territory of Quebec.
It is not legitimate and it is useless.
So we don't want it.
And we don't want the extent of the powers that the federal government could give itself to go as far as eventually Using the army.
Obviously not in Quebec, but I believe nowhere.
But this is a decision which is, or a position which seems to be the decision of the government of Quebec as well as ours.
Just as a follow-up there, sir, what has been happening in Ottawa has spilled across bridges into Gatineau, into Chelsea, into Massa-en-Angers.
This whole region has been affected, and that includes parts that are in Quebec.
Should there not be some...
There is no civil disorder in Quebec now which is not well contained by civil authorities and police.
harrison smith
I thought that part was pretty amazing.
Because it really illustrates what's actually going on here.
Here you have a politician saying this is unnecessary.
It's not needed.
This isn't going to help anything.
It's not the correct approach to take.
And then the media is questioning him on that.
The media is actually begging for the tyranny.
And this is the thing.
They have captured all of these industries.
Banking. Journalism.
Like the mainstream media, they're all in it together.
Like it's this massive superstructure versus the people.
And so, of course, it's not just the authorities that have been elected like Trudeau or Chrystia Freeland.
It's also the corporations like the banks and the media, obviously.
But it's also criminal elements like hackers.
We're hacking that hacked into Gibson go and publish the list of people who donated in complete cooperation with the authorities that be so this is the world that we're setting up the governments are completely lawless and acting with absolute abandon and disregard for the rule of law as they impose outrageous restrictions based on nothing by the way remember the lockdowns the masks the vaccine all of this has been proven incontrovertibly to be both ineffective and hugely damaging in fact So this is the thing they're pushing.
This is the thing that they are willing to sacrifice their literal republic over.
There's no basis in science.
There's no basis in anything, really.
It's a pure and simple power move.
And they're working quite openly with criminal elements who are hacking, who are no doubt funded.
By the same organizations, right?
I'm sure there's some NGO that's like hacking for democracy.
And they have some, you know, they probably, Klaus Schwab, I mean, or George Soros, who cares?
Like $250,000?
Yeah, go hire five hackers and they'll spend all day every day trying to infiltrate and expose their political enemies.
And of course, Occupy Democrats are in on this.
Their Twitter celebrated this and published the list.
A lot of Democrat journalists and politicians here in America are celebrating this.
Actual rule of law in a world of some sort of sense, authorities would be tracking down the people who hacked this and released it because it's obvious that this is a political maneuver, but it's so beyond anything now.
So there is no difference now between the criminals and the politicians.
They're one and the same. They're working hand in hand.
And it's this massive overarching superstructure versus a couple hundred truckers and less than 100,000 financial supporters.
And they're losing. Imagine being that weak.
jon bowne
We'll be right back. The 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing will one day be written in the history books as they parade celebrating the point at which the United States lost its ability to perceive reality and embrace the impending doom brought on by the selling out of its most powerful assets by a self-serving treasonous elite class of baby boomer,
politicians, and economic prostitutes.
nancy pelosi
I would say to our athletes, you're there to compete.
Do not risk incurring the anger of the Chinese government because they are ruthless.
I know there is a temptation on the part of some to speak out while they are there.
I respect that.
But I also worry about what the Chinese government might do.
To their reputations, to their families.
unidentified
And nobody cares about what's happening to the leakers, okay?
You bring it up because you really care.
And I think that's nice that you care.
The rest of us don't care.
harrison smith
I'm just telling you a very hard...
unidentified
Wait, you're saying you personally don't care?
joe biden
I'm telling you a very hard, ugly truth, okay?
harrison smith
Of all the things that I care about, yes, it is below my line.
jon bowne
The irony of statements like these is that the very CCP tyranny they either ignore or bow down to is already in the United States, as those rightfully exercising their First Amendment still await the communist-style circus of the January 6th committee.
unidentified
You can't lock up a whole group of people and somehow identify them as terrorists in advance.
A terror event on your own people to prevent terrorism, just, that doesn't make sense.
joe biden
And we won't ignore what our intelligence agencies have determined to be the most lethal terrorist threat to the homeland today.
White supremacy is terrorism.
jon bowne
If you aren't up to speed, China's policy of mass genocide is skyrocketing.
After killing a reported 1.2 million Tibetans...
unidentified
The Chinese army continued its progress towards Lhasa in a peaceful march that the Chinese news broadcast to their people.
It was with more curiosity than animosity that the Tibetan population, isolated from the world for centuries, watched the arrival of these strange invaders posing as liberators.
jon bowne
And imprisoning two million Uyghurs in the largest network of forced labor detention camps on the face of the earth, These satellite images show the site where Tersenai says she was held, sharing a cell with 13 other women with a bucket for a toilet.
unidentified
And she's haunted by one image, masked men coming down a camp corridor like this one after midnight.
They were three men.
Not one, but three.
They did whatever evil their mind could think of, and they didn't spare any part of my body, biting it to the extent that it was disgusting to look at.
jon bowne
And imprisoning 5,000 Christians, including 1,000 Christian leaders, not to mention a myriad of horrific human rights abuses against the Chinese people, including forced abortion sterilization and organ extractions.
unidentified
For over a decade, the People's Republic of China...
has stood publicly accused of acts of cruelty and wickedness that match the cruelty and wickedness of medieval torturers and executioners.
It stated with certainty that in China, forced organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience has been practiced for a substantial period of time.
The report underscored that there were extraordinarily short waiting times for organs to be available for transplantation, and numerous websites advertised hearts, lungs and kidneys for sale, suggesting an on-demand industry.
jon bowne
The Olympics themselves have been a historic ratings disaster, but NBC keeps on pushing their departure from compassion, common sense, and moral courage into the homes of any American gullible enough to sit transfixed by the brutal spectacle that is less than a decade away from having a hand in toppling Western civilization under the New World Order plan known as Agenda 2030.
John Bound reporting.
harrison smith
Latest incredible video from John Bowne.
The Genocide Olympics are coming to the USA. Find and share that at band.video.
Stay tuned, folks. Second Hour of American Journal will open up the phone lines.
Take your calls. Welcome back, folks.
Second Hour of the American Journal has begun.
I'm going to go ahead and open up the phone lines right now.
And I'm going to ask that if you have been on American Journal, if you've called in and gotten on the air in the last month, Hang out for a sec.
Just chill for a second. We're going to try to let some new callers call in because there's a couple people that are really, really good at calling in and they take up all the top spots right away.
We love hearing from them, but I want to give a chance to the people that don't have an opportunity to call in every time.
So give us a call. The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539.
That's 1-877-789-2539.
Taking new callers only.
And if you've never called before, if you've called and haven't been able to get on and have been stuck on hold, Call in now and we'll go to you as soon as possible.
We'll try to get as many people on as humanly possible in this second hour as we continue to talk about the trucker convoy, the complete tyrannical despotism of the Trudeau government, and the cooperation by the corporate globalist superstructure.
Let's talk about some of the reactions to exactly what's going on here.
Let's go first to clip number one.
There's a man saying that 2022 is going to be the most significant year in world history to date as globalist plans are executed in lockstep.
Good use of words. Let's go to clip number one.
unidentified
I have said several times that I believe 2022 will be the most significant year in human history.
There's always been trouble in the world.
There's always been dictators.
There's always been genocides.
There has always been wars, famines, economic collapses.
This is nothing new. However, this is the first time in history that all these events will be culminating globally.
In one year, building up from the last two years.
Today, Justin Trudeau is likely to invoke martial law or emergency acts within Canada, giving him unlimited scope to deal with what he believes is a problem, a problem of unpatriotic extremists who have invaded Ottawa.
In reality, they're just normal working men and women and their children.
Who want to have their freedoms reinstate it.
Away from that evil, twisted psychopath Justin Trudeau.
He may well invoke these powers.
It's likely that he will.
He's like a little boy. A little boy throwing a tantrum.
When he addresses the crowds, it's like someone condescendingly reading its story to a group of five-year-old children.
Trudeau is full of arrogance.
Trudeau is full of pride.
Trudeau will be taken down.
It doesn't matter if he's replaced.
He will go. But in the meantime, while he's still in power, if he evokes this, that is not necessarily the issue.
The issue is how it is responded to.
Do the military fall in line?
Do the police enforce this?
Do the people of Canada back this despot?
Or do they unite and overthrow him and overturn him?
That will be the key turning point.
Not the invocation of the Emergency Act, but how it is responded to by those in authority, by the people that are also in government, and by the Canadian people.
I don't know if you have faith or not, but if you do, say some prayers for Canada, because Canada needs them, and so does the rest of the world, depending on what goes down in Ottawa and further afield.
Keep your eyes on the ball.
harrison smith
100% absolutely accurate.
2022 will be the year that we decide whether we give up and surrender to this globalist takeover or whether we fight back and truly take the measures necessary to rid ourselves of this corruption.
And here's the thing.
This sort of in a way goes back to just the schoolyard rules.
Just remember that they started it, right?
They are the ones that started this conflict.
They are the ones that decided to start using their political power for their own political aims at complete odds with the responsibilities and obligations that these powers are predicated on.
They're cheaters, basically. It's simply cheating, right?
And you can picture this like a board game.
Now in games, cheating sort of ruins all the fun.
In real life, this level of cheating is an existential crisis, right?
But here's the problem. If one person's cheating, the other person kind of has to cheat, right?
Think about this. Could you ever win Monopoly if the person that you're playing against just helps themselves to money out of the bank whenever they please?
Of course not. Why would you keep playing?
You could never win. The only option you have is to try to also cheat to try to even the playing field.
So this is sort of where we are now.
And I was thinking about this because if Black Lives Matter, if the 2020 protest had acted the way that the trucker convoys protesting, nobody would have cared.
Conservatives would not have cared.
And maybe this was our mistake, right?
All through 2020, when you had these rioters burning down buildings and shooting people in the face, jumping out from behind walls and knocking people over the head with bricks.
We were outraged to that.
We were like, you have to stop that.
You have to stop the violence.
You have to stop the extremism.
You have to stop the destruction that they're causing.
And of course, this was for sure. They're like, you want to stop peaceful protests.
Like, no, that's fine. Go out and peacefully protest all you want.
You're dumb and you have no goals or aims that you're actually advocating for.
So go out and waste your time.
It doesn't matter to us. Maybe that was our mistake.
Maybe we should have treated it like they're treating the trucker protest.
And this is the insane dichotomy that we're faced with.
On one side, you have actual violence being perpetrated, and they're treated with utter respect, and they're kowtowed to, and they're told how good and righteous they are, and any laws that they demand are absolutely changed immediately.
Meanwhile, peaceful protesters get the book thrown at them and their life destroyed.
See, they're the ones that started using official power for political gain.
They're the ones that will lie and lie and lie about peaceful protests and then stick the military on them.
They are the cheater. And it's creating a landscape where you have to cheat to play.
It's creating a feedback loop, a downward spiral towards utter destruction because the only option, like, how are you going to play fair with these people?
And so... All this is to say that there is a way to get back to some semblance of normalcy.
There is a way. The only possible way is to totally eradicate and purge these people from power.
It's the only possible option.
You have to get back to a position where people in power respect and understand the obligations that they have to the people that they're serving.
Not ruling over, but serving.
And they respect that, and they engage in that, and they don't bend the law to their will whenever it's convenient to them and just throw the whole thing away.
Because otherwise, we're just going to be stuck in this feedback loop.
It's going to be like, well, if they're going to do it to us, then we have to do it to them.
And they're going to be like, well, if they're doing that to us, then we have to be even worse to them, right?
It's like the cheating feedback loop.
Well, if he's taking the money from the banker, then I have to take money from the banker.
Now we're both taking money from the banker.
Now we're taking money from each other.
Now the whole game is pointless and useless, and the rules are destroyed.
Because they started it. They started this feedback loop.
They began it. The only way to stop this feedback loop is to take all of these people, remove them from power, punish them to the fullest extent of the law, to the extent that anybody coming after them will go, oh, I better not try to bend the rules.
I better not try to cheat here because the last guy that did that, we know what happened to him, right?
It's the only possible way, because otherwise we're stuck in this feedback loop of violence and violence and despotism versus despotism.
If we just had the simple rule of law, none of this would be an issue.
None of this would be a problem. We've got on one side they refuse to force the law against sexual criminals while using the power of the law to crush peaceful protesters.
So it's like, I guess our response should have been, like, looking back, it's like, well, in 2020, you know, we should have just shut down the whole – anybody involved in the peaceful protest, we should have just crushed, right?
We should have just sent them to jail and closed their bank accounts and, you know, published their names and encouraged violence against them.
Like, is that what we should have done?
Is that the correct response?
Obviously not, but is your only other response to lose?
Is your only other response just to surrender and give up and say, well, they can cheat all they want, but I refuse to.
I will stick to the rules as they're being shredded in front of you and nobody else is playing by them?
That's stupid. That's suicide.
But it's also national suicide to go along with this scheme.
So the only possible way we get back to normalcy is everybody involved in this, from Justin Trudeau to his deputy minister to the police on the ground enforcing these rules, be utterly eliminated from public life and from public power and from their positions.
We get back to some normalcy.
All right, folks, welcome back. We'll go to your phone calls momentarily.
Here's a very short clip of some other Canadian reactions to Justin Trudeau's measures that he's taken.
Let's go now to clip number five.
unidentified
Well, guys, it's getting worse down here.
Somebody bought Connect Four.
This is big time.
We need help! Help!
Look at you, Justin.
joe biden
Look what you did to your country.
unidentified
You brought us all back together, you f***ing idiot.
Freedom! A little white pill there for you here.
harrison smith
This is the amazing thing, right?
The ideal thing is that this move by Justin Trudeau exposes in stark contrast the lies and The dissimulations of the powers that be versus the goodness and purity of the people beneath them.
Hopefully it coalesced those people into an understanding that they are at war for their very lives right now against people who deign to rule over them.
With that, we go back out now to the phone calls.
Mike is called in from the Communist Republic of Canada.
I'm very sorry, comrade.
Hopefully your bank account's okay.
Thanks for calling in, Mike. You're on the air.
unidentified
Mike, my bank account is that...
Sorry, bad attempt at a Russian accent.
Greetings, comrade. Greetings, Mike.
Thank you for taking my call.
Good day to you. And I'm not turning into East India now.
Thanks for taking my call, man.
Yeah, it's been a heck of a few weeks for Canada, right?
harrison smith
A little nutty. Yeah, a little crazy what's been going on.
If only somebody had warned us about this.
Only somebody had warned about the technocratic takeover of the world through their puppets, through the World Economic Forum, predicating it all on medical tyranny.
If only somebody had been able to see that beforehand.
But I'm sorry, Mike. Yes, it's horrible what's been happening over the last several weeks.
unidentified
Well, it's a brave new world, and the year is 1984 and 2022.
What I would like to expand on is false flags passed and false flags about to come up.
So there were several people arrested at the Coutts, Sweetgrass, Alberta, Montana border that were made on Sunday night.
And it was based on the allegation of threats made to the RCMP. RCMP raided several homes, several trailers, found some firearms, arrested 13 people.
And no, like once the RCMP just alleges a threat, it only has to be backed up in court.
So literally this could take years.
So all those illegal searches and seizures could just be like, well, we heard somebody told Sally and Sally told Billy and Billy heard it through his other buddy.
All this kind of hearsay, right?
So all those guns also could have been ones that are left over from the legal search and seizure from High River, Alberta, and the floods of 2013.
I know because I lived there and I went through all that crap.
Yeah, so on Saturday night, There were several pieces of equipment, large equipment, that were parked on private property near Cootes and were sabotaged by the RCMP. Lines were cut.
They disabled the battery system, cut lines.
They spray foamed in all the oil return lines and stuff.
It's on Rebel News if you want it.
harrison smith
Yeah, I've actually got the article right here.
Police sabotage heavy equipment at Coutts.
Police confirmed that they were behind the damage caused to vehicles on private land in Coutts, Alberta.
So yeah, when you're talking about the RCMP violating the law in order to perpetrate a false flag, like, they've already admitted to doing this.
They've already admitted to...
I'm sabotaging private equipment on private land.
What else would they do?
What other laws would they be willing to break in their attempt to shut this down?
No, you're exactly right. I want to go to some other callers here, so finish up for me, Mike, if you will, please.
unidentified
Well, Mr. Smith, I'd like to bring to your attention the theft of 2,000 firearms missing from a vehicle in Peterborough, Ontario.
No make-model vehicle type, color vehicle.
License plate. Nothing.
No description. 2,000 guns have gone missing.
Where are they from? Were they from a manufacturer?
Were they from a distributor? Where are they coming from?
Where are they going to? Nothing was given.
And, wow, wouldn't you just think that that would be interesting to plant some guns in tobacco, some trucks, and call this peaceful protesters and break up the hockey games in the bouncy castle?
harrison smith
Yeah.
unidentified
To say, "Ooh, we found a bunch of guns.
These people were planning to do an insurrection." Wouldn't that just be very, very convenient?
harrison smith
Yeah, look, I mean, the thing is, they're already doing this, right?
When they come out and call peaceful protesters Nazis, With no evidence, except for, like, one picture of a Canadian flag with a swastika drawn on it saying Trudeau is a Nazi.
Like, if they're willing to smear you as a Nazi, if they're willing to smear you as a racist, if they're willing to lie about you and call you violent when you haven't done anything, you think they're going to stop...
Like at that, you think once those lies are exposed, they're just going to go, okay, you got us.
All right, these guys were good and peaceful.
No, this is not out of the realm of possibility.
In fact, it's very squarely in the playbook.
False flag attacks, false flag violence.
That's why the most important act of resistance now, and I've heard rumors that this is the tactic that the truckers and the protests will be using, is a sit-in.
You sit down.
You link arms.
You refuse to let go.
And if they want to commit violence against you, the impetus is entirely on them.
You give them no justification for it whatsoever.
And you hope to God that there's enough free-thinking individuals in this world to see what's going on and to see the way that violence is being perpetrated on peaceful people and illustrates finally once and for all what the real sides are, who's good and who's bad.
I mean, that's the only option we have at this point because they are desperate, desperate for some sort of justification to enact extreme violence opportunities.
You're on the air. Hey, I just basically want to make a statement.
unidentified
I think a lot of people need to do some waking up.
I think we're beyond the point of all the peacefulness and the talking.
I know Infowars has to be careful so that they ain't pointed out as a leader or an antagonist of anything that might happen.
The fact of the matter is that they've already been violent with us.
They've been viciously violent with us.
And I'm not just talking about the American people.
I'm talking about humanity.
And this ain't just the Canadian government.
This ain't the American government.
This ain't the government of Europe.
This is all one entity that has come together and combined against us.
And if people Quit worrying about the little stuff.
Oh, 2,000 guns here or this and that.
Quit worrying about that.
There's a much bigger picture in the storm that you need to be looking at.
Don't just look at the lightning.
Look at the whole storm.
harrison smith
You also got to look at the fact, I mean, now Europe is somewhat withdrawing some of their measures.
But, you know, for the last two years, there have been city paralyzing protests in cities all throughout Europe continuously.
Yeah, no, just nothing.
They just don't care, right? Because you can't talk to these people.
They're tyrants. They don't care what you say.
The democracy is an illusion, and they're wielding power over an unwilling population.
Robert, can you answer a question for me?
What is the answer to 1984?
What's that? What's the answer to 1984?
unidentified
I'm not sure. I'm not sure.
harrison smith
1776, Robert. The answer to 1984 is 1776.
I think that's my position on what's going on here.
You can vote your way into communism, but you've got to fight your way out of it.
Canada sells guns, right? All right, folks, we're halfway through the show today, and I haven't plugged once.
It's kind of stupid of me, but at the same time, isn't every one of these stories, in a way, a plug for Infowars?
Isn't every one of these stories a nail in the globalist's coffin and a light shined on the shadows in which the globalists work?
And that's the thing. Take any one of these, you know, I was talking about the constellation of truth, right?
Like, take any one of these data points as a star in the sky, and it doesn't make any sense, right?
Why Justin Trudeau would act this viscerally against the trucker convoy protest when previous protests he was more than willing to be conciliatory and reasonable?
So this doesn't make any sense.
Why would they push so hard on these mandates when now it's known that the vaccine isn't effective against Omicron and has also devastating side effects and the lockdowns never worked and caused massive side effects that we were informed about?
When I say we, I mean you, of course.
Why would they do any of this?
It doesn't make any sense. You look at each little data point and you go, well, this doesn't make any sense.
What is the logic that they're using?
Until you zoom out, until you pull back, and you see that all of these data points build a giant constellation of a global technocratic takeover who launched coronavirus as a pseudo-military campaign of desolation.
That's the only way any of this makes sense.
The only way Justin Trudeau's actions make sense is if you understand that he's not even serving himself.
He's not serving the Canadian people, certainly.
The thing he's serving is the global superstructure that he is employed by.
That's his master. That's who he's serving.
And when you understand that, all of his actions make perfect sense.
They're all perfectly reasonable actions, if that's your goal.
That's the only way it makes sense.
And the most effective, most powerful, most correct, most steadfast outlet telling you this for the last several decades has been Infowars.
So this is it.
This is the fight we've been warning you about.
This is the fight we've been telling you was coming.
These are the plans that we've tried to sound the alarm on, most loudly so over the last two years.
I mean, there can't be any confusion now.
Infowars has been right the entire time.
Alex Jones has been right the entire time.
That's the reason they wanted to destroy us.
That's the reason they still continue to try to destroy us.
And it'd be a major feather in their cap and a major battlefield victory should the ship of Infowars go down beneath the waves.
So help us stay afloat.
Help us continue to fight this.
You know, I said this yesterday on Twitter, right?
It's actually mind-blowing that InfoWars was right about absolutely everything.
Like, sometimes you think, like, okay, here's a worst-case scenario.
And it'd be, you know, a shame if it got to this, but, you know, here's what potentially could happen.
And it's like all of these potentialities, all of these worst-case scenarios, all of these far-flung predictions have all come to fruition.
Every single one of them has come true.
Because these people that are in power, the globalists, the World Economic Forum, the Davos elite, the Bilderberg groups, are all working completely in concert with a well-published and readily apparent agenda of total world domination.
And we've been right about this the entire time, and now it's all coming to fruition.
And boy, there's almost nothing more frustrating than people being like, yeah, but...
Yeah, but Alex Jones was wrong about this thing 20 years ago.
It's like, was he though?
Yeah, was he really though?
If you really look, was he really wrong?
I don't actually think he was.
Or it's like, well, yeah, but this other guy is also right.
It's like, okay, great, great.
And where is he?
And who is he?
And what effect has he had?
Like, you could disagree with Alex Jones, but you're just wrong.
Like, that's just how it is.
And you can say, like, well, somebody else could have done it better.
Like, yeah, maybe. Okay, so in your fantasy, Alex Jones is second best.
But this is reality, where InfoWars is the primary target.
InfoWars has been the carrier of the torch for so long.
InfoWars has been the light, you know, the torch shining the light on the shadow creatures.
So yeah, there are other people doing this.
Yeah, great. Good.
Fine. But InfoWars is the battleship.
InfoWars is the headquarters.
InfoWars is the main font of all of this.
And so I hope that you can support us because all we can do is just try our best to tell you the truth.
If you want somebody here to do that for you, you've got three days left.
Take advantage of the storable food sale.
25% off. Massive, massive discounts.
There's no reason not to have storable food.
There's absolutely no reason.
It's an amazing way to support us, and it's a jaw-dropping sale.
25% off. Storable food.
Running out in mere days.
So go now to take advantage of the sale before we sell out or before the sale ends.
Infowarsstore.com. It's good for you.
It's good for us. 360 win.
And it empowers the greatest weapons system aimed at the globalists in the information war that the world has ever seen.
With that, we go back out to the phone calls.
We've got Jared from Pennsylvania.
Thanks for calling in, Jared. You're on the air.
unidentified
What's going on, man? How are you?
I am alive, I think.
Good. So, a couple things.
One is, I'm out here in Pennsylvania, and I look over at my girl's phone, and they're still recruiting for Patriot Front.
And several others.
And this is the newspaper it came out of.
Eventually, you look down, Comcast, NBC, Universal.
And apparently, this is Facebook, you know, so they're actively trying to get people with 75% or more European lineage.
Crazy. But the other thing I wanted to mention was the hemorrhagic fever virus that People keep names out in China.
I started looking into it and apparently Johnson& Johnson, which has like one of the only cures for one of these viruses, stopped making the COVID-19 vaccine not too long ago over there in the Netherlands and switched to something else.
Which is funny because the FDA approved in 2019 emergency use only One of these drugs to treat a hemorrhagic fever virus.
I don't know.
harrison smith
Yeah, it is suspicious that famous whistleblower, Chinese whistleblower, is the one saying that there's a hemorrhagic fever outbreak.
And yeah, you're right about J&J pausing their production of COVID vaccine.
And they did. They turned it towards something else.
I can't quite recall what it is right now.
But yeah, I mean... Their entire narrative is collapsing.
But the one thing we know about the globalists, they don't just give up.
They don't just roll back.
You can't just keep complying with them and eventually they go, okay, that's enough control for us.
Thank you. We're full. That's never going to happen.
They're going to double down on whatever they're doing.
It's entirely, again, within the realm of possibility that they release yet another plague on planet Earth just to double down on the advances they've made over the last two years.
Nothing is out of the realm of possibility.
These people Thanks for the call, Jared.
I'm sorry. I want to go to Biff in Florida.
I want to talk about voter fraud.
Thanks for calling in. Biff, you're on the air.
unidentified
Hey, Harrison. Great to talk to you.
harrison smith
Big fan. Thanks for calling in.
unidentified
Yeah, so I think voter fraud is a really, really big issue that's kind of been overshadowed recently.
And, I mean, like, if we don't stop voter fraud, like...
harrison smith
What's the point of anything else?
What's the point of anything else if we don't stop voter fraud?
I agree. Yeah.
unidentified
It could be the best debate.
You, like, destroy voting debates, but then, like, okay, every issue's right, but you're not in office because there is voter fraud, so let's stop voter fraud.
harrison smith
Yeah. Yeah, wouldn't that be something?
I mean, it's not just voter fraud.
Immigration is something that's been tossed to the side.
The fentanyl death rates is something that's been tossed to the side.
Collapsing fertility has been tossed off to the side.
Hey, we haven't talked once about the Russiagate revelations that just came out yesterday, that by the way, not a single other mainstream media outlet has reported on in the slightest.
I'll show you that on the other side.
But so many things are going wrong right now.
So many things require concerted effort to combat.
And that's why we need a blank slate.
I mean, we need to punish all of these people, every one of their contributors to this corruption.
And this is the thing. Somebody was like...
This is, you know, I really respected that Trump didn't declare a state of emergency like Trudeau did.
And it's like, yeah, but Trudeau is declaring a state of emergency on a bunch of truckers playing Connect Four and having a carnival.
Trump was faced with a FBI colluding with domestic terrorists to burn down American cities and steal the election.
Actually an emergency. All right, welcome back, folks.
We go directly out to your phone calls.
And once again, try to get to everybody on hold here.
Daniel in Las Vegas.
Thanks for calling in, Daniel.
You're on the air. How's it going, Harrison?
Good, thanks. Excellent.
unidentified
So, yeah, what I wanted to talk about is sort of a demographic thing.
I think when I have a, you know, sort of political conversation with, I don't know, whether it's the average client or even friends and family, it seems like it's easy to typically look at people as like this 50% of us, you know, are kind of on our side and 50% are against freedom and all for this tyranny and everything that's been happening in the last few years.
My position is that I don't think that's the reality of the demographic.
I think there's a lot of people that are, you know, kind of considered the opposition that are more so actually, you know, loving, caring people that are just, for whatever reason, maybe they haven't heard the right information or they're in the wrong group of people.
So rather than ruling those people out as kind of dumb or a lost cause, I think we need to take a completely different approach and different tactic to it.
Yeah, my idea is basically to convert this category of people to the side of what I call freedom side is basically exactly what you guys are doing, education and information, but in a different way or an additional layer to what you guys are doing.
Definitely implementing some better visuals in a historical timeline just to quickly get people up to date on what's happened.
I think So many people, myself included, up until all of a sudden it started mattering during the lockdowns and things, really had no reason to pay attention to this corruption and everything that's going on, you know, in the world.
And then all of a sudden it's right in your faces.
We're losing our jobs and everything that's happening.
So now more than ever, I think if someone were to create a very easy visual, a timeline that you can go reference anytime and you can share with your friends a specific timeline There's a point in history that they need to go watch, and then within that point that they click on, maybe there's a few different layers of content, a link to any of the past content you guys have put out referencing those topics.
Sometimes you're at work and you don't have time or the ability to do a visual, so you can just do audio.
Having a specific way to target these people in this category...
harrison smith
Well, yeah, I'll tell you...
I don't know if I'm making... Yeah, yeah, it makes sense.
I mean, Endgame is the documentary that predicted all of this 20 years ago.
It's all come true exactly as you said, and that gives all of the history as well.
And that's the thing, is that you have to let people know this isn't something new.
This is something that's been in the work for decades, and I think you're right.
Unfortunately, you know, we interviewed a guy one time, and he had this great quote, and I'm going to butcher it here, but he was like, you know...
If somebody doesn't know something and they're wrong about something, well, that's ignorance.
They haven't been informed yet.
And so you can inform them and you can tell them.
But then, you know, they still are kind of confused.
All right, they're still loaded.
So you tell them again and you really try to explain it to them.
You really try to let them know and you show them the proof.
And it's there.
The evidence is for their own eyes.
If they still reject it, that's something else.
That's stupidity.
That's willful ignorance.
And you really can't do anything to fight back against that.
They want to be stupid.
They want to be wrong.
They want to ignore the facts.
And at that point, they're a lost cause.
I'm a little more black-pilled than you, I think.
I think probably 50% of America just has literally no idea what's going on.
Their entire mindset is like, if you comply, everything's good.
That's literally how they think.
They're just like, well, I complied and everything's good, so everything's good.
It's just like, yeah, okay. And they're not going to notice.
In some cases, they're not going to notice even if you do kill their child, right?
Like, there are people who, like, inject their child with a vaccine, their child dies, and then they post on Facebook and Twitter, my kid died from the vaccine, it's important your kids go get vaccine.
Like, I'm not even worried about reaching out to those people.
They're dead. They're suicide victims.
They are members of a cult that need to be dealt with, but they're incapable of being convinced.
And that's just the reality. So there's a lot of people that are slightly open to it that you can appeal to and try to explain to.
But I mean, it's up to you, I guess.
I mean, if you want to make that thing, I'll be happy to spread it.
But it's up to every single one of you to have these conversations with people.
And that's the only way I've ever been able to get through to people that aren't already intellectually curious and, you know, searching out things on their own.
Like, they just believe the mainstream.
The only way I've been able to convince anybody is by, like, literally sitting for an hour and a half and describing everything and answering their questions.
And eventually by the end, they're like, wow, gosh, you're right.
This is kind of crazy. Like, so that's got to be you.
I can't do that to everybody.
You know, it's like you have to do it.
And just as one person, you can then convince 10 different people.
It's going to take you 10 hours to do it.
But that's 10 people who can then convince 10 other people.
That's the way to do it. You've got to be spreading the links, finding the stories, compiling for yourself this information, and doing it yourself.
We get a lot of callers with advice for what to do.
This is where you come in.
You have to do this.
We'll spread it. We'll help you however we possibly can.
These are things that the InfoWarriors need to get involved in.
And heck, if you want to just go to InfoWars store and support us that way, that's great.
But really, it's almost even more powerful if you create PDFs, if you create skits, if you create things for people to print out.
We will help you spread it.
That's what InfoWars is for, an outlet.
But we can't be the singular font of all these things.
But thank you for the call, Daniel.
I appreciate it. Let's go now to Josh in Ontario.
Thanks for calling in, Josh. You're on the air.
unidentified
Hey, how's it going, Harrison?
Good, thank you. All right, I got a fun little idea for you.
I think you may want to put a little hat on for it and be a co-founder.
Okay. I'm calling it the Play Store Convoy.
harrison smith
What is that? Oh, about Google?
unidentified
You go into your Play Store because nobody uses Apple because of the Uyghurs.
But you find your three tops.
For me and Canada, it'd be Global News, BBC, and Facebook.
You give them a one star.
You do your little rant that you have to do.
And at the end, you put honk, honk.
harrison smith
You see, that's the thing.
Like... I mean, I think that's good.
I mean, there's a million different ways to fight back on the technocratic side.
And yeah, you've got to be doing all of them and fighting back.
Again, I'd love if we didn't have to do any of this.
It would be great, wouldn't it, if we could just relax?
unidentified
It would be great, but I do have to go with Mike and say it's very Canadian of him that he went with a Russian accent.
Versus Chinese, because, you know, in Canada, we don't bash the Asians at all.
harrison smith
Oh, no. No, absolutely not.
No, you're surrendering to them, in fact.
Well, thanks so much for the call, Josh.
I want to go to one more call, at least.
Let's go to Jeff in Ohio.
Thanks for calling in. Jeff, you are on the air.
unidentified
Hey, Harrison. Thanks for taking the call.
Loving all the points you're making, and I'm with you on the black pill.
Locally, though, there's a movement afoot called...
It's about going after the security bonds for all elected and appointed officials, whether it's down your city, county, state, everybody that's elected has essentially an insurance policy for their liability.
And whether it's a government bond or private insurance, you can ask for that policy number through a Freedom of Information request, and then you can stand in front of that elected body and tell them that you're going to file a claim against their Right.
harrison smith
Yeah, we've actually covered this.
We showed a video explaining exactly how to do this.
It's on band.video, but you can go to bondsforthewin.com.
Bondsforthewin.com. It's a very interesting sort of guerrilla tactic that people are using to hold their local and governmental leaders to account.
So yes, brilliant idea.
Bondsforthewin is the website, and you can find our video on it on band.video under the American Journal tab.
Just search bonds, and I think it should come up.
Thank you so much for the call, Jeff.
Let's go now to Josh in Arizona.
He wants to talk about Putin removing his troops.
Yes, Putin is withdrawing several thousand troops.
What's your comment on this, Josh?
You're on the air. Hey, Harrison.
unidentified
How's it going? Good. Hey, man.
I just wanted to give you guys a shout-out for your guys' X3, the deep crystal iodine.
That's pretty good stuff, man.
harrison smith
Yeah, thank you. I agree. Definitely.
unidentified
Yeah, I just seen the article posted on to Getter about that.
I just wanted to say that, man, that's gigantic news.
harrison smith
That's massive. Yeah, that he's not bowling shoes.
I mean, it's kind of confusing, though.
Literally, this morning, I'm going through headlines.
I don't even know if I have them printed out, but it's like, CNN is like, 1 a.m.
tonight, the attack begins.
And then, like, the next line down is like, Putin withdraws troops as he retreats from the Ukraine border.
So it's totally up in the air at this point.
De-escalation. Russia pulls troops.
Moscow ready for talks. That's what they say.
But, of course, we were told with very good authority that tomorrow was the day they were attacking.
So put it on your calendars, folks.
We have a time now between 1 a.m.
and 3 a.m. They'll be attacking, but also they're withdrawing troops, so they don't know what they're talking about, and it's all made up nonsense.
But, yeah, thanks for that, Josh.
Let's go quickly to Bear in Denver.
Bear, we got less than one minute, but state your point.
unidentified
You're on the air. Hey, yeah, it sucks that we don't have much time, but that's cool.
So I just wanted to say about, people always ask me, oh, why would the elites want to kill off all the people who are complying?
Because I totally believe in the Georgia Guidestones and that they're trying to wipe out a large portion of the population.
And, you know, why would they kill off the ones who are complying?
Well, it just makes sense that if you kill off all the ones who are resisting, the ones who are complying are going to take note and you're going to have to fight them too.
Whereas if you kill off all the ones who are complying, you only have left the ones who are going to resist anyways.
harrison smith
Yeah, look, it's, you're right.
You're exactly right. But, you know, it's like asking, you know, why did Jim Jones kill all of his followers?
because they're in a death cult.
That's why.
Bye.
jon bowne
Neil Young is a tool of the cult of the left.
What kind of an a***** writes a song called Keep On Rockin' in the Free World and proceeds to become the loathsome antithesis of the song?
unidentified
Comfortably numb is uncomfortably dumb.
Neil Young's the poster child for that.
I mean, rocking in the free world, but he wants to censor people?
Hey, Neil, choose one.
harrison smith
You can't do both, you dirtbag!
jon bowne
But there is more to Neil Young's sociopathic behavior deeming Joe Rogan's exploration of COVID vaccine truth as misinformation than meets the eye.
unidentified
This is about political warfare and information warfare, full stop.
And all of this chatter That many have bought into that this is about culture wars or it's about vaccines.
No, it's not. It's about power and money.
You know, it's about Spotify's market cap dropping.
So fascinating point is that the major owner of Spotify, the top owner of Spotify is also the top owner of Moderna.
Richer and more powerful than ever, underpinned by its influence networks, the pharmaceutical industry stands unchallenged in its ability to dictate government health policies.
jon bowne
Neil Young sold 50% of his publishing to Hypnosis Songs Fund, worth a reported $150 million.
Hypnosis merged with Blackstone, an investment management fund with $600 billion in assets.
Blackstone is taking a big gamble on RNA technology and life sciences, rivaling Pfizer and Moderna.
In a word, Neil Young is a sellout who is now imploring the employees at Spotify to quit over Joe Rogan's successful platform combating New World Order propaganda.
unidentified
In a blog post, he calls out the CEO saying, quote, to the workers at Spotify, I say, Daniel Eck is your big problem, not Joe Rogan.
Eck pulls the strings. Get out of that place before it eats up your soul.
jon bowne
A self-serving ploy that ultimately satiates Young's legendary massive ego.
unidentified
Well, I admit I'm out of ideas for what to do about Joe Rogan.
jon bowne
But Young is merely a pawn for a Goliath woke industrial complex.
unidentified
He is what I call the king of the woke industrial complex.
As you said, he is the CEO of the world's largest asset manager.
And what they do is they cause companies to bend the knee to woke orthodoxy because BlackRock says that we won't invest in your company unless you abide by these progressive standards.
Or we'll dock the pay of a CEO or fire a CEO who refuses to bend the knee to woke orthodoxy.
But here's the rub, Tucker.
It is not their money.
That $10 trillion doesn't belong to BlackRock.
Say what you will about George Soros.
At least it's his money.
In this case, it is money that belongs to you, to everyday Americans in this country whose blood would boil if they actually knew the way their own money was being used to force a progressive social orthodoxy back onto them.
That is the defining scam of our time.
And I think it's high time that everyday Americans wake up to learning how their own money is being used as a weapon to advance values that they would find repugnant if they actually knew what was going on.
jon bowne
David Crosby once described Neil Young as probably the most self-centered, self-obsessed, selfish person I know.
And as more boomer rock stars sell out to the New World Order, Will any of them actually take the time to listen to the crucial, documented, urgent warnings from experts before they decide to dismiss this information as misinformation?
syrian girl
But the fact that Fauci was one of the leading scientists when it comes to AIDS, the links between this HIV This 19-length sequence of RNA in coronavirus matches a patent that Moderna had since 2018.
For a HIV vaccine, that just can't be a coincidence.
It's impossible. Like, it's scientifically impossible.
alex jones
And it's not a coincidence that he ran the program of gain-of-function and that he lied about it.
And he's a depopulationist.
I mean, he's caught red-handed.
jon bowne
This is insane. John Bowne reporting.
harrison smith
It's all tied in together, folks.
There's nothing separate from this struggle.
Go to InfoWarsStore.com right now if you want your last chance to take advantage of the storable food at 25% off.
Unprecedented sale. It keeps us on the air.
It keeps us actually broadcasting.
And it may very well keep you alive should the worst come to the worst.
Be prepared. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is the American Journal Third Hour Has Begun.
My guest is named Ian Miller.
He's the author of a book called Unmasked, The Global Failure of COVID Mask Mandates.
His background in data management and analysis made him well-suited to compile a book that perfectly illustrates the frustrating saga of months and months of unconstitutional, pointless mask mandates in America and around the world.
Ian provides an invaluable interpretation of multiple streams of data along with visual aids and database collections throughout his work.
You can find the work. Again, it's called Unmasked, the Global Failure of COVID Mask Mandates.
It's available online at Amazon.com.
His Twitter is at IanMSC, and that's also the name of his substack.
That's IanMSC.
Thanks so much for coming on with us, Ian.
Thanks for having me. Well, I'm excited to talk to you about this because your book seems to have come out at exactly the right time as all of these narratives, all of the restrictions, all of the mandates are all collapsing.
And of course you can focus on lockdown or vaccine.
Why did you focus on the mask in particular?
unidentified
Well, I think the mask mandates, to me, especially early on, were kind of the whole pandemic.
It was this visual sign that we were in a pandemic.
Everybody was supposed to be afraid and panicked all the time and very concerned.
And I think it was also an indicator that Without any evidence, the government could kind of tell you what to do and force you to wear something without really backing up the reasons why.
So it became kind of a crusade for me to try to destroy the arguments behind it.
And also because when you think about it, if you try to accept that mask mandates work or the mask work, how long does this go?
Because COVID is never going away.
Respiratory viruses are never going away.
So are you just supposed to be wearing masks forever?
And so that was kind of the idea to try to argue against that underlying assumption that masks work.
harrison smith
That's such a good point because the vaccine, the lockdown, we were sort of suspicious of all of these measures since the beginning.
And just from simple logic, you can kind of go, well, it doesn't seem like the lockdown will be that effective and it may be damaging.
But it was still somewhat at least up in the air.
You could still make an argument for the other side because there wasn't the data there.
But the masks from the very beginning have been...
Totally not based on science, totally baseless.
All of the published work before that showed that the masks were ineffective, and yet people fell for this.
Why do you think people did fall for this?
I mean, do you get into this in your book, sort of the psychology behind it?
unidentified
I don't as much, and that's something I would like to cover more of.
But I think it is really—it was a lot of this fear.
People were afraid, especially early on.
They didn't know what COVID was about.
I remember the World Health Organization was saying that something like 3.5 percent of people that got COVID were going to die.
Obviously that it was hopelessly incorrect and wildly off.
So I think early on, you saw these videos from China of people falling down dead in the streets and everybody was just kind of like, what is this going to be?
And so there was this thought of like, well, if we do something that we think might protect ourselves, we can avoid getting COVID. Obviously that has proven completely inaccurate, but At the time, I think people were just kind of afraid.
And also, there's this very powerful, like, societal compliance thing where, you know, you go out to the market, you go to a store, once things kind of reopen, and you see everybody wearing a mask, and you don't want to be the only person there and cause a scene and have conflict and get yelled at because you're not doing what everybody else is doing.
Yeah, so I think it was just kind of a combination of this desire to protect yourself and to go along with the herd, I guess.
harrison smith
Yeah, and even, you know, most recently, I can't remember who it was exactly, but, you know, somebody officially was like, you know, now masks are basically safety blankets, and that's really what they are, right?
They make you feel protected, but you're not.
I remember almost having to, like, consciously convince myself of this, right?
Because when you're, if you wear a mask, you at least feel like you're doing something, and you're not wearing a mask, you're like, oh gosh, am I, is this wrong?
Am I unprotected right now?
And you sort of have to go, no, no. I know the facts.
I have to override my own fear.
I know that even if I was wearing a mask, it would give me no protection.
And yet, I guess people just didn't have that information to go on, which is strange because the data was always there, wasn't it?
unidentified
Yeah, and that is one of the things I really cover in the book, especially early on, is to point out that all of the evidence pre-pandemic, pre-COVID, said that masks would not work in the general population.
And in fact, that was kind of one of the things when I was doing the research for it that jumped out at me was, In late March, Dr.
Fauci was sent an email from one of the employees at NIH saying, you know, we reviewed all the randomized controlled trials on masking and it showed that there was no benefit.
This is, I think, was March 31st.
And just literally three or four days later, the CDC and Dr.
Fauci come out and say everybody should wear a mask.
So, you know, it's obviously not possible for the science, as they call it, the science to have changed in three or four days from March 31st to April 4th.
So, you know, clearly it was not based off of any new data.
It was not based off any new evidence.
And so that was the idea is to show, you know, we knew this wouldn't work before COVID. And then afterwards, here were the results and showing all the different areas with the mandates and saying, well, it didn't work just like we always would have expected it not to work.
harrison smith
Yeah, and that's the craziest part.
And of course, I say that in my skit, right?
Where it's like, no, no, we know masks don't work, but also they're mandatory.
I mean, that's really how it felt.
You know, for people that were actually paying attention, it just made no sense.
And, you know, I remember making this argument with people going, it's a symbol.
It's symbolic. You know, if they were to mandate masks, A certain level of masks, if they were to mandate effective masks, which would require a gas mask-style protection, then maybe you could make the argument that this is for your safety.
But the fact that I could wear a handkerchief, I could wear a bandana, I could wear a used mask that I've been wearing for an entire week, and it counts because it's not about actually protecting you, it's about wearing the symbol on your face that tells people, I am compliant, I am a slave. Like, it...
It was purely symbolic as far as I could tell.
What's your feeling on sort of the symbolism of this?
unidentified
I agree. I think it is very much symbolic.
I think it became kind of this token that you were doing the right thing, that you were a good person.
And that's also a very powerful urge for people.
I think a lot of people want to feel like they're a good person and want to feel like they're helping and contributing.
So once that became a kind of message from the CDC and Fauci that this wasn't just about protecting you, it was about protecting others.
It also gave other people a license to enforce it themselves, where it's like, well, you're not protecting me.
You're a bad person.
I mean, I personally was in Los Angeles, and you'd walk around outside in 2020, and people would be yelling at you for not wearing a mask outside, which, I mean, even if they were outside, it couldn't be more useless there.
And yeah, I completely agree about the quality, too, where everybody just said, the Surgeon General was saying, you can fold up a T-shirt and cover your face with a T-shirt, and that would be effective.
It's completely absurd. And, you know, the only way that you were ever going to get this to work was something like N95s that are fit tested and worn consistently and disposed of after every use.
And obviously that was never going to happen.
So a lot of this is just symbolic.
It's been symbolic from the beginning.
I think a lot of experts kind of deep down knew it and were too afraid to say something and come out and say this isn't really going to accomplish very much.
harrison smith
Well, because you saw what happened if they did that, right?
They'd be disbarred.
They'd be eliminated from...
I mean, the images that we're showing are just...
We've truly been indoctrinated into a status of complete insanity on a social level.
For our radio listeners, we were just watching a kid swim around with a mask on.
I mean, it's wild and ridiculous.
And the strange thing to me is that I would have these arguments with people...
And of course, I've been proven right, just like you've been proven right, if you're arguing this from the beginning.
And I want to get in maybe in the next segment into how you got into this field and your background and what led you to this.
But the most frustrating thing to me is now people, they see it on CNN, and the same people I was arguing with saying, hey, these masks aren't effective.
If they were, you'd have to have this.
Now they're coming to me and going, hey, do you know the N95 mask is the only one that's effective?
And it's like... Do you not remember two years ago when I told you this?
I mean, have you experienced this frustration of now that the truth is coming out, people act like you didn't know it the whole time, just like they didn't know it the whole time?
unidentified
Yeah, there was a Washington Post article that just got published that was like, well, mass mandates didn't work this whole time, so let's focus on other stuff.
And that was just kind of like I mean, on one hand, it was a little validating that, you know, I wrote a whole book about this.
I've been tracking this for nearly two years that, oh, finally they're waking up to it.
But on the other hand, it's very frustrating that, you know, this evidence isn't new.
It's not like we just figured out that mask mandates don't work.
It's been like this this whole time.
And, you know, where were you guys?
And what were you looking at that made you think that it would work?
And, yeah, on CNN, as you mentioned, Leanna Nguyen comes on and calls it a facial decoration, the Clothmaster facial decoration.
So, this whole time, everybody's just been wearing a facial decoration, and we've been enforcing this and yelling at people about it.
So, yeah, it's frustrating, but better late than never, I guess.
harrison smith
Yeah, I guess so.
I guess. But it's so frustrating because you want to just scream to people, you were lied to!
Why do you keep trusting these people?
We'll get more into it and the background and some of the numbers as well with Ian Miller on the other side.
Stay tuned, folks. Welcome back, folks.
You know, there's a... That turns out not to be true.
It's that old cliche that said the internet is forever.
If it was on the internet, it'd be there forever.
Well, people are realizing that the internet not only will not be there forever, but they're pretty good at eliminating things from the internet that they don't want to spread.
So I think there's a revolution or sort of a renaissance going on of the physical.
People want books. They want DVDs.
They want something that can't be deleted by somebody in L.A. whenever they feel like it, right?
Or San Francisco or Silicon Valley or wherever.
And so I know I've been a part of this.
Throughout COVID, I have found that the books that people are publishing about it are such valuable tomes of information.
So much stuff is flying at us all the time.
It can seem just like temporary, and it's in one ear and out the other.
But when you have the book, it's like a magical artifact that lays it all out perfectly, and it can't be taken from you.
You can use it to convince people.
And I think it's amazing. Some of the best books I've ever read have come out about the pandemic and really exposed so much stuff.
And my guest is an author of one of these books, Unmasked, The Global Failure of COVID Mask Mandates.
It's available on Amazon.com by Ian Miller.
What encouraged you to write a book?
Was it about just getting it all in one place?
Was it about the most effective way to spread the information?
You could have made a documentary.
You could have just made a podcast or a blog or whatever.
Why do you think having a physical book is so important?
unidentified
Well, a lot of what you just said, I think one of the biggest things is, you know, it's one thing to send somebody to a Twitter page or to a sub stack and you have to scroll through thousands of tweets or, you know, read a ton of articles, but it's one thing to hand somebody a book and just say, hey, look, take a look at this.
And I think it's a very easy way to reach people that are not necessarily on Twitter or social media.
You know, somebody can stumble upon it on Amazon or Barnes& Noble or wherever it is and find it and hopefully learn and enjoy it.
The idea behind it was also that, you know, the medium has been very visual.
All the stuff I've been doing is kind of creating these charts and graphs and with these annotations.
And so that it works well kind of to in a book format to lay it out.
And there's this I think there's a story there as well.
And it's longer than just a couple of tweets or a sub stack post that has, you know, 1700 words.
It's there's a much longer story to tell.
I think so. And really, the best way to do that, in my opinion, was to do a book.
harrison smith
Yeah, no, you're so right because so often I know something's true and I'll say something and they'll go, well, where'd you get that?
And I go, oh God, okay, I gotta search Twitter now.
I gotta try to find it. I gotta scroll through 10,000 bookmarks.
It's impossible. Whereas a book, you just go, oh, page 88.
It's right there. There's a chart you can look at.
I mean, it's very... So what is some of the information people can expect to find in your book?
Like what do you lay out with the charts and the graphs and everything?
What's some of the stuff that you discovered as you poured through the data?
unidentified
Well, one of the most important things, I think, is comparing states that had mask mandates and those that didn't.
So we can compare neighboring states, Idaho and Montana, for example, that Montana had a mask mandate for a time, and Idaho didn't.
So they're right next to each other, and you can see, okay, well, this state did a mask mandate, this one didn't, which had the better results.
And I put the labels on there, but kind of the point is to show that if you remove the labels, you wouldn't be able to tell.
And if you can't tell, you know, It's pretty clear the mask mandates aren't really having that much of an impact.
And it's also important to—I lay out, especially in the early chapters, here's what they said masks were going to do.
They said they were going to reduce infections by 80 percent.
And they were—you know, if 80 percent of people wore masks, that infections would drop.
So, you know, I showed some compliance numbers from survey data across the country showing that we exceeded 80 percent.
And, of course, the numbers did not drop.
Also, I go back and kind of point out all these times when experts or media members would credit masks for doing something in a country or a state.
And then sure enough, a couple weeks later, cases would go up and break all the records.
This is like Israel and India, this happened, for example.
So it's tried to kind of come at it from a couple different angles and show all these expectations were wrong and the mandates really didn't have much of an effect.
harrison smith
Yeah, it's kind of nice. It's almost like an informal scientific study.
You have a control group and you have the object group.
And they aren't really doing this, right?
right?
They don't really want to know how effective the masks are because if it's revealed, you know, if they were to hold scientific studies that really like you did and actually go through the data and see whether it's effective or not, it'd be obvious that it's not effective and their whole mandate would collapse.
So they've avoided doing this research despite the fact that the evidence and the data is all there, right?
And yet they, and yet, do you know anybody in the mainstream media or mainstream scientific realm that's actually delved into this and looked into this and spoken out about this because there's got, I mean, this is the craziest thing.
There's got to be 10 million people around the world that knew from the very beginning what was happening was BS, and yet they never spoke up, they never talked about it, they never did the research.
I mean, what has this been like for you to watch the last two years go by without anybody with knowledge standing up against the obvious falsehoods being put forward by the media?
unidentified
Yeah, for sure. That's one of the things that I've referenced on Twitter a lot.
I'm just one guy doing this.
Anybody could be doing this.
And the fact that these organizations that have a lot more resources and time and Groups of people dedicated to doing this haven't been is incredibly frustrating.
You know, you watch CNN, for example.
They just put up a counter on the side of the screen saying 100,000 people have tested positive today.
Well, you know, that doesn't help.
And so the goal is to try to show, okay, well, we did this, and then 100,000 people tested positive.
So what would you have expected to happen?
And, you know, it is frustrating.
I think one of the biggest things I wanted to cover as well was The CDC kind of did try to say masks work.
It wasn't so much a study.
It was one of their kind of MMWR releases.
But they do a couple from Kansas and Arizona where they say masks reduced infections in Kansas and reduced infections in Arizona.
But when you go through and look at the methodology and the time periods they used, they're severely flawed where the data doesn't really hold up and they kind of hide some stuff to make it appear that masks work when it's pretty obvious they didn't.
Like you mentioned, a control group.
In Arizona, they had a control group.
They had counties that didn't mandate masks.
But they only used the counties that did mandate masks and said it reduced infections by 75%.
Can't do that if the counties that didn't have the mandate have the same results, which is exactly what happened.
So I show that in the book, like here's the counties with and without mask mandates.
So yeah, when they've even tried to justify it, it's been really flawed.
And so that was also part of the goal is to kind of debunk the research that they did do.
harrison smith
Right, and it's been somewhat sporadic.
Any actual information they come out with, they're much more dogmatic than our side, I would say.
And I do, so were you inspired by like the freedom you were outraged by?
Like what was the impetus to go, okay, I'm really doing, I mean, writing a book, that's a lot of work.
So like what really made you decide to take that plunge and dedicate yourself to this?
unidentified
Yeah, living in California, obviously there are a few places that have been worse about COVID policy than California.
Late last year, California closed restaurants again in December of 2020, and then the LA Times said that it worked, except the cases in Arizona, which didn't close restaurants, dropped at the exact same time, and Arizona actually did better in that winter wave.
Kind of like early 2021, I was just like, I'm fed up with this.
We got to do something. And it kind of led me down this path, right?
Well, what can I do that would have potentially the most impact?
And yeah, in wanting freedom and promoting freedom and it just the idea that the government could tell you to do something like this that without any evidence and then when they tried to justify it would do such a terrible job of it.
And it's so obvious.
And that was what made me so angry.
It's so obvious. As soon as you see the data, it's so obvious it doesn't work and that nobody else was doing it.
It has to end.
It can't be something that we pretend works forever, because as we see, we're almost two years into this now, and Los Angeles is still mandating masks.
California's lifting it today, but Los Angeles is still going, and they don't know when it's going to be lifted.
Schools are still masked in a lot of states, and so that was the idea.
It's really like we have to destroy the underlying arguments behind masks, because otherwise it'll just come back forever.
harrison smith
Right, and we can actually provide the data because they're basically just going off moral superiority.
They're just saying, because we told you so, you have to.
And I'm glad you brought up California because that's what we're going to get into next.
The Super Bowl followed by children being masked in schools.
None of this makes any sense.
If it's not about having power over you, then I don't know what it's about because it certainly isn't about health.
More on the other side. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
The book is called Unmasked, The Global Failure of COVID Mask Mandates.
The author is Ian Miller, and he is my guest.
You can also find him on Twitter at IanMSC, as in...
Mike Signal Charlie MSC. And that's also the name on Substack, Ian MSC, where you can find some updates as he continues his research and continues to take a battering ram to the total falsehood of mask mandates and their effectiveness and that they stop spreading COVID. There's so many different angles to take on this, but you're from California, and California seems to be the mecca of these mandates.
And Of the negative consequences from them.
National Review has a story.
Maskless Super Bowl marks our return to normalcy, which it would if, you know, we had some semblance of sanity in our leadership.
But unfortunately, the headline today, California is keeping its school masking requirements for now.
So, if you're at the Super Bowl, if you paid $5,000 for a ticket, no mask, no worries, don't even try.
But the school children must remain muzzled.
I mean, this is...
How do people not wake up to this, man?
What are they thinking?
I don't even know.
unidentified
Yeah, it's really frustrating.
And one of the great things about the Super Bowl is that LA County Public Health basically came out and said, oh no, this is going to be enforced.
Like, we're going to make sure everybody's wearing masks.
You know, obviously they spent a ton of money.
They were going to distribute KN95 masks to everybody that walked in the stadium.
And clearly everybody that got one wore one during the entire game, only moving it down to take a sip of water or to hold your breath like Eric Garcetti did.
Yeah, exactly. Yeah.
And what's really funny is, you know, at the Super Bowl, it's very clear nobody was wearing them.
But L.A. County, just before mid-December, collected data from 1,200 businesses or something like that and said that 95 percent of people were wearing masks indoors.
And then the numbers jumped up 20 or 25 times higher within a matter of weeks than they were before that.
So here L.A. County was saying everybody was wearing masks inside, and then it didn't matter.
It completely failed over the winter.
We see all these images, everybody sees it, and then they keep the school mask mandate, which shows you it's just But basically, it's bowing down to the teachers unions, because a lot of other states have pulled back on it.
It's clear that they don't really believe it matters very much.
Otherwise, they would actually be policing everybody wearing masks at the stadium.
But they keep it in schools as a concession to the teachers unions, despite all the demonstrable harms to kids, and the fact that it really doesn't make much of an impact even in schools.
You know, I compared states that had forced masking policies to those that were mask-optional recently, and the numbers were actually worse in the states that had Right.
harrison smith
And that's not a small point.
I mean, I know it's almost a cliché at this point just to point out hypocrisy, but Eric Garcetti, mayor of L.A., or Gavin Newsom, the California governor, you know, it's not just like, oh, he's a hypocrite, and so we're going to morally shame him.
It's like you have to understand.
These people do not believe what they're pushing.
They can get up and they can sound very sincere as they demand, you know, as they mandate something of you, as they force you to do something, but they don't believe it themselves.
They aren't doing it themselves.
They know the science doesn't back them up.
I mean, this isn't just a small thing.
This isn't just, oh, I'm...
Because, you know... I'm still giving you good advice.
I'm still like, I still want you...
I want something good for you, even if I don't stick to it myself.
That's not what's going on here.
These people know it's not good, the masks.
They know they're not effective. And yet, they're using their political power to enforce it on the people below them and exempt themselves from it.
I mean, this isn't just a small thing, is it?
This is a major issue in this country right now and in the lack of actual, you know, scientific backing to these things they're mandating.
It's all political, isn't it?
unidentified
It is definitely all political.
And you see that when I think there was a fundraiser last year where Nancy Pelosi was up in the Bay Area and there's a picture of all the wealthy people sitting at the table at the fundraiser and the people that were serving them food are all wearing masks.
And we've seen this constantly over and over again where, yeah, they exempt themselves from their own rules.
But they are, you know, we'll go out there and say that we have to, everybody should wear a mask.
It's the kind thing to do. And if you're not wearing a mask, you're the problem.
And then you see these photographs of them all not wearing masks.
And like you said, that tells you they don't actually take this that seriously.
They don't think that it really matters very much.
They just want everybody else to comply.
And I think part of it is a lever of control where they can say, we can make you do this.
And, you know, and California is another, I keep bringing it up, but they're in basically a permanent state of emergency right now where You know, we hosted the Super Bowl with 75,000 people and all these parties and events throughout the whole weekend.
And then the legislature votes to extend the state of emergency again.
And you just go How does anybody take you people seriously anymore when it's clear that none of these politicians are following it, the celebrities that do advertising campaigns to wear a mask and everything, they're not following it.
And then you're declaring an indefinite state of emergency, essentially, after hosting the biggest event in the world.
It's just completely absurd and very—I think they realize that it shows that they can make you do things, no matter how little evidence there is to do it.
And I think they're enjoying that.
Exactly. That's the fundraiser with the wealthy people and being served by those in masks.
It's incredible they've been able to get away with this kind of theater for so long.
harrison smith
Yeah, I mean, even at the Super Bowl, there were images, or I guess during the halftime show, the children orchestra in the back were wearing masks, but the singers and the adults were not wearing masks.
I mean, it's so obvious this is happening.
And, you know, these big events are sort of like they highlight the hypocrisy or they highlight the double standard, but it's happening at a smaller level a million times a day, right?
The Oscars, they're also exempting from mask mandates and vaccine mandates, right?
They're sort of flexing the fact.
They're going, we're imposing this on everybody.
And they go, oh, even the Oscars?
Well, no, not them. They're important.
Well, even the Super Bowl? Well, no, of course not the Super Bowl.
How could we, you know, mandate that?
And it's the same thing they did in the industrial, you know...
In the beginning of the pandemic, the lockdowns, if you're a restaurant, you've got a lockdown, but, you know, the film industry is pretty important, so they can continue to operate, but your restaurant can't.
So, again, it's not just about, like, the people at the Super Bowl being hypocrites.
It's a symbol of the hypocrisy across the board, isn't it?
unidentified
Absolutely. And it's very consistent that all of these politicians have kind of picked and choose winners over the pandemic where, you know, Walmart could stay open, Target could stay open, but a local hardware store, you know, that was dangerous.
That was going to spread COVID. It's a very...
It's a dangerous precedent to set that the government can pick and choose which businesses it wants to promote and stay open.
Yeah, exactly.
You see the Met Gala where these events are held without masks for the celebrities, but the people standing in the corner, they have to help them.
It's kind of like subjugating people and putting them into a second class.
It's very dehumanizing to do this.
Of course, they just keep getting away with it because I think in large part the media has been very complicit.
Mainstream media, CNN, MSNBC, New York Times, etc., You know, I think these people are very sensitive to political pressure from the media and criticism from the media.
And there hasn't been that criticism.
A lot of the media supported these measures.
They promoted them. They've accepted that they work without any criticism or pushback.
And instead of kind of being that for the state to criticize the politicians, which is what they're supposed to do, is fight against authority, they've supported it.
And so these politicians and celebrities kind of felt emboldened, I think, by the lack of criticism from the kind of allies in the media.
harrison smith
Right. I mean, I think they're in on it.
It's not even like they're not being criticized.
They're being actively pumped up, right?
They're being actively supported in this hypocrisy, and it's absolutely ridiculous.
You know, while we're sort of on the topic of the Super Bowl and the kids in L.A., I never realized this until yesterday when Candace Owens tweeted this out.
She said, I was today years old when I learned the United States is the only country that's force-masking small children.
I didn't realize this.
In Australia, the age of masking is 12 and older, and in totalitarian Canada, it's six years old and over.
America's the only nation that's putting masks on toddlers.
I mean, this is...
I had no idea about that.
Were you aware of this?
unidentified
Yeah, actually, we are one of the few countries that mask kids as young as two years old.
I think in the U.K., I think it was either six or 12 as well.
And the World Health Organization guidance was six or younger.
I don't know what happened.
I don't know how the CDC got to two and made that policy.
You go everywhere. You go to a theme park these days, and anybody over two years old has to wear a mask.
Again, where is the science of the data or the evidence suggesting that two-year-olds are going to benefit from this?
There's loss of learning.
They need to see people's faces and communicate and grow.
harrison smith
That's the whole other topic, right?
Not only do masks not work, the damage that they do really compounds the problem.
We'll get into that on the other side.
It's Ian Miller. The book is Unmasked, The Global Failure of COVID Mask Mandate.
It's available now on Amazon.
Stay tuned. We'll finish up on the other side.
All right, welcome back. Ladies and gentlemen, this is the American Journal.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
Share these links at band.video and infowars.com.
And folks, go to infowarsstore.com to support us.
Right now, there's a 25% sale on storable food, which is the biggest sale we've ever been able to offer.
On this incredible product, and that sale is ending very soon.
So if you want to take advantage of this and stock up and be prepared for whatever life throws at you, go to Infowarsstore.com right now.
Stock up on the Infowars Life Select strollable food at 25% off.
Again, massive sales, and there is no reason not to do this.
Even if you don't eat it for an emergency, it's still delicious food that's ready to eat.
So it's a win-win situation.
Really, it's a win-win-win-win-win-win situation because not only are you getting the food that you need, you're also supporting the InfoWar and everything that we do here, including getting our incredible guests.
My guest now is Ian Miller.
He's the author of Unmasked, The Global Failure of COVID Mask Mandates.
And that second part of the title is pretty important.
Because I searched, I was just searching, and I searched an unmasked book, and unfortunately, Andy Ngo also has a book called Unmasked.
In 2019, I did a year in review that I called 2019 the year the mask came off.
It's a theme, isn't it?
This term unmasked.
So make sure you have that second part of the title, The Global Failure of COVID Mask Mandates.
That's Unmasked by Ian Miller, and it's available right now on Amazon.com.
His Twitter is IanMSC, and that's the same on Substack, IanMSC.
So, my gosh, there's still so much to talk about, and especially the damage that masks are doing to children.
It was another one of these things that they just happened to forget that they already did a bunch of research about this prior to COVID, and you used to have articles and studies published by major...
Scientific outlets and people who cared for children saying children need to be able to see faces.
They need to be able to see mouths make noises so they can mimic that and do that.
And everybody knew this. Nobody understood this until COVID. And suddenly everybody forgot that children should not be muzzled, that children need to have their faces uncovered and be able to see the uncovered faces of adults.
This was just another thing they forgot, didn't they?
And our children have to suffer for it.
unidentified
Yeah, and it's really indefensible because, like you said, there was a lot of research on this that the children need to see faces in order to have good, proper learning development.
There was just a study done that showed a 23% drop in early learning scores among children, and those numbers are very consistent for years, and then all of a sudden, 2020, 2021, it drops 23%.
That's a big drop. And, you know, it's attributable almost exclusively, I'm sure, to mask wearing because of, yeah, like you say, you need to see facial expressions.
That's how you learn and grow as a person.
It's really unconscionable that we've done this to protect adults' fear.
And also, especially as the evidence has accumulated more and more, that it's been completely useless.
And to keep that going in schools is really completely indefensible and damaging.
And I really... One of the things that I hope is that as we move further away from the kind of initial the science that more people are willing to speak out about this and those with a lot of scientific credentials to say Actually, we did a lot more harm than we did good, especially with kids. And, again, the data shows that it hasn't really made much of a difference.
In Florida, when they had counties that had mask mandates in schools and those that didn't, the numbers were identical.
There was no difference. So not only are we not getting a benefit, we're only getting harms.
Everything's a tradeoff. So school masking, there's no benefit.
harrison smith
All you're getting are harms. So let me play devil's advocate here for a little bit or just pose a question that I know a lot of people who are pro-masking are probably wondering.
Why don't masks work?
I mean, it seems like it should work, right?
If you're expelling germs and you have something there to block it.
I mean, a filter, like we know how filters work.
It seems like masks should work.
It feels like they work.
unidentified
Why don't they? Yeah, and I go into that briefly in the book.
One of the things that the CDC was trying to say and all these other organizations were saying was that it would block a droplet.
But droplets are not the main route of transmission.
It's aerosols, which are much smaller than droplets.
And that became kind of a widely accepted thing in early 2021, and scientists realized this is mostly by aerosol transmission.
So droplets, that was the whole six feet of social distancing, was that it comes out and drops to the ground within six feet.
Aerosols hang in the air. So you can think of it as like smoke.
It doesn't just fall to the ground.
It hangs in the air. So aerosols just go right through masks.
And it doesn't, like you're seeing right now on the screen, that's exactly what happens.
The breath just goes right through the mask.
It goes up into the air, hangs in the air.
Anybody that's in that area can be infected if they're susceptible.
So, yeah, in theory, it should work.
But in practice, what they're trying to what they're trying to do is something that masks can't do.
It can't block aerosols.
And that was widely accepted science.
And that's again, I bring that up in the book where the UK in 2011 and again recently when they reviewed the evidence said masks don't stop aerosols.
Well, that's what COVID is.
That's how it's transmitted. So, you know, essentially you're trying to stop something that can't be stopped.
And the only way in theory that you could is with these respirators that have to be fit tested.
So obviously no one's doing that.
harrison smith
Right. And the image that I'd always hear was like, it's like trying to stop a mosquito with a chain link fence.
And that sort of gives you a good image as to the size of the particle versus the mesh of the mask.
Is that an accurate portrayal?
unidentified
Yeah, I mean, maybe not exactly perfect scientifically, but that sums it up pretty much perfectly.
You're trying to block something that's much smaller than the filter and the mask can catch.
And there's this misconception, and I go into that in the book as well, the misconception that surgeons wear masks to stop the flu.
One of the things that nobody ever talks about is, well, it's just surgeons, not doctors.
in 2019, you went to go see an ear note and throat specialist.
They weren't wearing a mask.
Surgeons wear masks in theory to stop bacteria, which is much larger than aerosols, from dropping into an open wound during surgery.
But there's a lot of evidence that doesn't actually work that well to do that either.
But in theory, that's why they're doing it, not to prevent the spread of respiratory viruses.
So that's another misconception that's like, well, if doctors wear masks, it must work.
But it's just surgeons, and it's just for that specific purpose.
And there's a lot of research showing it doesn't actually do very well with that purpose either.
harrison smith
Right.
It's so ridiculous.
And again, I sort of want to play devil's advocate here just because I know that we're, in some ways, we're preaching to the choir here because Info Warriors have been up on this And I think it's great. You know, your book, again, the power of books codifies it, right?
It's there. It's a record.
You can you can access it.
You can reference it. You can share it with people.
You have it there laying out the whole argument there in your hands.
And it's not this sort of temporary conversation.
It's a fluid thing. It's solid.
It's there, and you can have it. So extremely valuable.
But what do you say to people who aren't aware of this sort of stuff?
What's your elevator pitch against masks?
If somebody's wearing a mask and they go, you aren't wearing a mask?
Why not? Do you think you could convince them very quickly as to the falseness of this?
Or does it take getting into the data and going through the charts and really understanding things?
What would you say to somebody if you had to convince them to stop wearing a mask in two minutes?
What would you say to them?
unidentified
That's a great question, actually.
That's a really good question. I don't know that it would be possible.
I mean, obviously, if you're so dedicated to it that at this point you still believe in it, it's going to be hard to convince you otherwise.
But I would say that the best evidence in, like, a short format would be to say, you know, We've seen the difference in places like Los Angeles that have had mask mandates for so long.
Numbers are some of the worst numbers anywhere on Earth.
And then we see Sweden, where hardly anybody is wearing masks, and their numbers are significantly better.
Obviously, Los Angeles and Sweden are not exactly the same, but if masks were so important, if it was the most important thing to do, How could that be possible?
And that's kind of the question.
I try to turn it around on them.
How could this be possible if masks were so important to wear to stop the spread of COVID? And also, I would say, why are all the scientific studies that were done on masking showing that it didn't work?
There hasn't been a single new randomized controlled trial, a gold standard trial, during COVID that has suggested that masks have a positive benefit.
Why hasn't that happened?
We've had two years to do this.
I'm sure tons of money would be going into looking into this to make sure it works.
Why hasn't that happened?
And just, you know, for fun, one of the things I bring up as hypothetical is if masks work this whole time, if this is just scientifically proven, we've all known this forever, you know, how many tens of millions of people have died in the last hundred years from respiratory viruses because scientists and doctors and public health officials didn't recommend mask wearing every flu season?
Why did that happen? So that's kind of what I would try.
I don't know. It's really hard with a lot of people.
A lot of people have just kind of I've gone into this, have bought into it completely, so tough to get them out of it.
harrison smith
Well, and I think part of that is probably just because they can't conceive of the fact that the media who's been saying to wear a mask and the politicians and the science...
Like, there's no way they could all be wrong, right?
Like, it's you versus all of them.
They gotta be right, right?
But they do that by manipulating the data, and they do that by not even referencing the data.
So I guess data is the thing that can break through to them, hopefully.
If there's any chance at all, I guess it would be data that they have to actually think for themselves for once, and maybe that's the issue, is they're used to being told how to think.
Well, I want to thank you so much for coming on.
Again, it's Ian Miller. His book is called Unmasked, The Global Failure of COVID Mask Mandates.
It is chock full of incredible information and charts and graphs and all of the evidence you need to hopefully get through to your masked friends and let them know that they've been lied to, they are being made a fool of, and they can free themselves if only they were to have some confidence in the real science and not the fear mongering of the mainstream media.
His Twitter is IanMSC, same name on Substack, IanMSC, where he continues to do research and uncover the falsehoods behind the mask mandates and all of the COVID misinformation.
Thanks so much for coming on, sir.
unidentified
Oh, thank you very much for having me.
harrison smith
Appreciate it. Well, thank you very much, and hopefully we'll get through this.
Hopefully we'll be unmasked fully, maybe by the end of the year.
You know, who knows? It was supposed to be two weeks, wasn't it?
Absolutely incredible. So there he is, Ian Miller, unmasked.
The global failure of COVID mask mandates.
Folks, again, I want to remind you, 25% off, storeable food.
Biggest sale we've ever had.
It's ending in just a few days, so go now.
Infowarsstore.com. Make sure to get your supplies.
The Alex Jones show begins in one minute. - Something very rare is going on.
alex jones
And it ends in just three days as of the time I'm taping this announcement on Thursday afternoon.
Coming up this Monday, the biggest sale in four years of high-quality storable foods at preparewithalex.com will end.
That's 25% off already the lowest prices you're going to find on high-quality storable food at infowarsstore.com.
Again, you can go to preparewithalex.com or infoworkstore.com and it takes you to the same place.
50% off as well on super high quality products like X3, the deep earth crystal iodine.
That sale is going on as well.
It doesn't end on Monday.
It'll end in a few weeks and we're almost sold out of the product.
Everybody needs to have storeable food and be prepared.
So become self-sufficient now with the best high-quality food at the lowest prices at InfoWarsStore.com.
unidentified
Inside you, like me, a fire is burning.
Something needs to change.
I just want to reach out and give a recommendation to Reset Wars.
It's really powerful. Reset Wars was absolutely amazing and eye-opening and revolutionary.
If you want to change your life for the better, I highly recommend this to Alex.
Thank you very much for putting the course together.
I found it to be awesome.
It was worth it to me.
You have taken ancient wisdom and ancient knowledge.
And crystallized it with scientific facts.
alex jones
This isn't about Alex Jones.
So what you're about to see is a lengthy, powerful, well-documented spectrum of information and experiences and understanding that the power structure is censoring and is deathly afraid of.
unidentified
To think the way we were intended to think by God.
alex jones
That's what this series is about.
unidentified
Reset Wars has been a great tool during this time of uncertainty and it has rejuvenated my hope.
It's been helping me a lot with a lot that's going on in my life.
Everybody needs to purchase this product and watch it and then share the information far and wide.
There is an awakening. Join in to help yourself and others to wake up.
Reset Wars has been a great tool in both recapping what I've come to already know And also learn new material.
I'm not disappointed. I plan on sharing it with as many people as possible.
I hear you coming more and more with that and I feel it more and more.
It's moving me. We need to have courage and focus in order to accomplish that mission and I felt like I got a lot of that from Reset Wars as well.
The confidence and hope gained from Reset Wars is priceless.
alex jones
This isn't magic.
This is the real code of the universe or what Max Planck 120 plus years ago called The Matrix.
Export Selection