Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 16, 2024 - Sebastian Gorka

02:52:31

Grant Stinchfield LIVE: Second Amendment Friday with Grant Stinchfield, Prosecutorial Betrayal

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	♪♪ ♪♪
	♪♪ ♪♪
	you you
	you you
	This is America first with Sebastian Gorka I'm very proud and excited to introduce our guest host for today, Grant Stinchfield.
	Well, thank you so much, Dr. G. It's so great sitting in his chair today.
	A good friend of mine, Dr. G, is and I'm always honored when he asks me to sit in for him.
	Happy Friday to all of you.
	I got some bad news to report.
	Man, oh man, isn't it like we report bad news every day?
	People say I get so depressed listening to all of us talk about this.
	Well, it's depressing!
	But we're going to try to make it a little fun today after we get over all the hullabaloo that really actually makes you want to Well, first it makes you want to cry, but then you get mad and then you say, you know what, we're going to fight, fight, fight, as President Trump says, so that's what we're going to do today.
	I want to call attention to career politicians.
	I want to call attention to the deep state.
	I want to call attention to bureaucrats that put self-interest over the public's interest every day of the week.
	And I'm going to use as an example for just how bad it is out there, how few politicians really represent you and fight for you, where they spend more time fighting for themselves and power.
	I'm going to use an example out of Los Angeles.
	We all know George Gascón, the Soros-inspired, Soros-funded prosecutor who doesn't do any prosecuting in Los Angeles.
	George Soros Uh, installed George Gascogne.
	And George Gascogne is a guy who literally lets criminals out of jail.
	He doesn't prosecute crime.
	He's more concerned about victims' feelings than he is about the justice that should be served against perpetrators, criminals, thugs, and bruisers.
	So there's a guy running against him for district attorney.
	Remember, San Francisco threw out their radical district attorney.
	I was shocked when this happened.
	L.A.
	had a chance, still has a chance, because the bottom line, folks, is Mickey Mouse, just down the road in Disneyland, would be a better prosecutor than George Gasco.
	But there's a guy by the name of Nathan Hockman.
	He's running for prosecutor, L.A., district attorney.
	He had the support of many conservatives, Republicans.
	He wasn't the best conservative, but he was a California guy who says he's going to prosecute crime and he vowed to be independent.
	Now this, folks, I'm going to tell you where the warning signs are.
	He ran as a Republican for attorney general in California.
	He lost.
	Then he decides to run for district attorney as an independent.
	And he vowed to me and my co-host, Jen Horne, out in LA on AM 870.
	Hi to all you folks out there.
	He vowed to us that he was going to remain non-partisan and independent.
	He was going to solely focus on prosecuting criminals.
	So you know what we said?
	Fine.
	That's a lot better than George Gascogne.
	Think about all the cities across America.
	You may live in one.
	Detroit, New York.
	Look at what the prosecutor, the DA in New York did to President Trump.
	St.
	Louis, Chicago.
	These are awful, awful prosecutors.
	They all need to go.
	So we said, fine.
	All right, we'll trust you on this and get behind you.
	So we did.
	And now he's got this election coming up.
	And lo and behold, you will not believe what the man did.
	He went and endorsed Kamala Harris.
	Kamala Harris, the defund the police candidate, the prosecutor who put black men in prison for low-level marijuana offenses, the vice president, then senator, who called police officers the KKK.
	And now this so-called prosecutor, a wannabe prosecutor, endorses Kamala Harris?
	This is him on the local news station.
	This is Cut16 talking about why he's endorsing Kamala Harris.
	And now I'm an independent running for a non-partisan position where party affiliation won't even be on the ballot.
	And so if I had to choose in this race between a former prosecutor and a convicted felon, I'm going to choose the former prosecutor because that's the job I'm seeking.
	A felon versus a prosecutor?
	If you want to be any kind of a district attorney, you're going to call President Trump a convicted felon?
	Sure, maybe the court convicted him, but it was a sham kangaroo court.
	No prosecutor in his right mind would have brought this case against President Trump, and the only time you could win a case like that is in a city like New York, or guess what, folks?
	L.A.
	Now, the problem with what Nathan Hockman did, it's not about Nathan Hockman.
	He's just a small fish in a very big pond of slimy politicians.
	But he lied to us.
	He lied to me.
	He lied to all of you.
	He lied to the listeners, to the people watching.
	We had him on stage at a town hall that Salem put on, and he lied to people saying he was going to stay out of it.
	And then he says, you know what, I'm going to endorse Kamala Harris.
	Now, if you ran as a Republican, do you think there's any way you can get to the point of Endorsing Kamala Harris, if you were even a hint of a Republican, I don't even think Mitt Romney would endorse Kamala Harris.
	Now, Adam Kinzinger did, right?
	So I put these two cats in the exact same ballpark.
	So, I believe Nathan Hochman did this because he sees a Democrat city of L.A., county of L.A., and he thought he'd get votes to do with this.
	But when do you put Your quest for power aside over what's right, what your moral values are, what is the ethical thing to do when you tell somebody one thing that you're going to do another just so you can get elected, to me it's sickening.
	So I want to play the clip to his credit.
	He came on our radio show this morning with Jen Horn and I. I was amazed that he did.
	Well I asked him about this President Trump stuff and would he prosecute the same case in L.A.
	under the same circumstances?
	Listen to this interaction and you make the judge about what kind of guy this guy is, this once Republican.
	It's not like I went from being a Republican to a Democrat, I just adopted a different party.
	I wanted to communicate an absolutely clear message that I will be independent.
	No other candidate, by the way, is independent.
	In fact, almost all other than one are Democrats, including George Gascon.
	You need to believe that someone is in there.
	It starts with them, that they're going to be independent, and I figured that there was no better way to communicate that to voters than starting with my own party registration.
	I don't care about your party registration.
	I care that you told me you were going to remain independent and you come out with a full-fledged endorsement of Kamala Harris.
	Now listen to this interaction about prosecuting President Trump.
	Cut 19 on this one.
	This is where he will not answer the question.
	You called President Trump a felon and you couldn't endorse him because of that.
	You're going to prosecute records-keeping cases?
	You're a prosecutor?
	You want to be a prosecutor in L.A.
	County?
	You think that case was a legit case?
	Well, again, what I would prosecute are crimes being committed in the L.A.
	County.
	Would you prosecute the case?
	Would you have done what they did in New York to President Trump here in Los Angeles?
	As you know, Grant, there are two questions dealing with President Trump's case.
	One is a should and one is a could.
	In other words, if you do prosecute the case, can you?
	Do you have the evidence to convict him?
	And then there's a should question.
	Now I would certainly evaluate that should question very carefully to see if it meets the criteria of the LA County District Attorney's Office.
	You know this case inside out, the entire country does.
	Would you have prosecuted President Trump under the circumstances he was prosecuted in New York?
	Well again, the short answer is that I would take a very, very hard look, more than Alvin Bragg did, to actually look at that case.
	See if it meets the criteria and then make a decision at that point.
	So you're not giving me a yes or no?
	You might prosecute President Trump under those same situations if that happened in L.A.?
	This is unbelievable.
	Well, again, I don't have all the inside information.
	Yes, you do.
	We all watch this, Nathan.
	I want to make it clear on the methodology.
	Played out over the airwaves, non-stop, 24-7.
	Everybody had all the information.
	Everybody knows it's bogus and he wouldn't answer the question.
	Because now he's sacrificing.
	Maybe he's not sacrificing.
	Maybe he went and ran as a Republican because he thought he could win.
	I don't know how you think he could win in California as a Republican.
	It's impossible.
	I've been doing radio out there for three years.
	I wish it was possible.
	It's not.
	Not on a statewide race.
	This is what's wrong with American politics today.
	There are too many people like Nathan Hockman in the game that don't care about you, folks.
	They don't care!
	833-33-GORKA.
	833-33-GORKA.
	Feel free to weigh in on this.
	And then, uh, compare a Tories family.
	The gentleman who was killed at Trump's rally speaks out next.
	This is a story of a man who was killed at a Trump rally.
	He was a man who was killed at a Trump rally.
	This is a story of a man who was killed at a Trump rally.
	Alright folks, so I think when you talk about what's wrong with government today, you see what I'm talking about by politicians who are simply out for themselves, right?
	It's disgusting to watch.
	Then you see an overreaching government that has become so tyrannical, and really, it's not just Democrats that are responsible for this.
	There are Republicans that are clearly responsible for this as well.
	But overwhelmingly, Democrats want to increase the size of government.
	They want to increase the amount of control over you.
	All you have to do is look at Kamala Harris and Tim Walzer, vice presidential pick, to figure this out.
	This has been where the real wake-up call happened, I think, was all the way back in 2010-2011 with the Tea Party movement.
	After that, there were a lot of people that came out, and God bless every single one of them, that started spreading the message that they were leaving the Democrat Party.
	One of them is a gentleman you probably know, Brandon Strzoka.
	Since then, he has founded the walk-away campaign movement.
	He's been persecuted when it comes to January 6th.
	He's been vilified all over the place for speaking out.
	This is what I mean by people who make great sacrifices in order to spread the word that we need spread, which is let's get our country back in order.
	Well, I was perusing Twitter and I saw that Brandon had released a new video.
	He got a lot of publicity six years ago when he released his original walk-away video about why he was leaving the Democrat Party.
	He's got a new one on Twitter.
	I shared it.
	You can find it on my Twitter feed, Stinchfield1770.
	We do not have the clip.
	And it reminded me, it reminded me of my old NRA videos.
	I don't know if any of you remember these.
	When the NRA did it right.
	Black background, all the craziness, and Zuni's explaining it.
	It's great.
	So I figured I'd have Brandon Straka on.
	And Brandon, welcome to the program, my friend.
	Hey, great to be here.
	Thank you.
	Alright, so why did you feel the need to do the sequel to the original walk-away video six years ago?
	Well, it's been something that was a long time in the making.
	I mean, I put the first video out six years ago and people always sort of ask me, you know, will you follow up and kind of remake or retell why you feel the way that you feel in the first place.
	My life got taken in a lot of chaotic directions in the last three years, mostly because of what I faced with the federal government and what I went through with January 6th, and it just sort of never felt like the right time.
	But finally, about two or three months ago, I thought to myself, OK, I really need to sit down and get this done.
	And so what I did was I sat down and I thought to myself, What are all the things I can think of that have the ways in which the left and the Democrats have further eroded and destroyed our culture, our country, our policies, our values, our country as a whole in the last six years since I made the first video.
	And so I just started making a long list of all the things I could think of that had happened in the last six years.
	And then I kind of put it together in a cohesive script and shot what I'm calling the sequel to my original walkway video.
	Everything in the last six years since that first video that the Democrats have done to further destroy our country.
	All right, so I would urge everyone to go look at it, because it does go through, call it a timeline, call it a rundown, whatever you want to call it, of just Democrat wild craziness, okay?
	And it is a very powerful video.
	But it's interesting you get to this point, because when you founded the walkaway movement, obviously you got pushback, but it's okay, that's good pushback, right?
	Like, they're mad at you for leaving the Democrat party, and people are welcoming you in, and there's some controversy surrounding it, and that all comes with the territory.
	But January 6th, and I don't mean to put words in your mouth, Brandon, but that had to have changed everything.
	That changed the dynamic, did it not?
	Oh, it changed everything.
	I mean, it changed me as a human being.
	Like, it changed everything because you're absolutely right.
	Up until January 6th, any of the negative attention that I received or, you know, the attacks, the name calling, the acts of sabotage, whatever, to a certain degree, it all felt like a game.
	And it all kind of felt to me like, okay, well, I must be sort of over the target if these people are, if I'm making them this angry and they're trying to shut me down and they're trying to shut me up and all these different things.
	It was like overnight after January 6th happened, nothing felt like a game anymore.
	So, and not only did it feel like a game, but it was really obvious to me, these people don't care if I go to prison for the rest of my life.
	They don't care if I kill myself.
	They don't care if somebody else kills me.
	So I mean this isn't just like, you know, we're playing a game of political chess.
	This is like, they dead serious want you out of the way no matter what it takes.
	Whether it's your death, whether it's your imprisonment, whether it's your complete and total destruction and annihilation, they don't care.
	And so it became really clear to me, this isn't a game, this is life or death.
	I'm glad you brought up the idea of it being a game because there were moments in my career where I felt that way as well.
	Even when I was at the National Rifle Association, there was a symbiotic, this is a little secret for everybody out there.
	There was a symbiotic relationship between the New York Times and the National Rifle Association and the Washington Post and the National, that we would feed off each other.
	They were happy when we were going after them.
	We were happy when they were coming after us.
	It riles everybody up and it's this, it's this gladiator battle.
	That was definitely serious and meant something, but we knew it's business, part of it, and it builds the momentum.
	But the moment they want to put you in jail, the moment they want to put you in handcuffs for taking an unorganized tour around the Capitol or anything else, this is far different than what any Republicans have ever done.
	The only people Republicans want to put in jail are real criminals, not persecuted grandmas and founders of the walk-away campaign, Brandon.
	Yeah.
	Well, let me tell you, I actually have a great little anecdote about that because I'm not going to name his name, but there's a reporter who works for a far left rag.
	And this reporter is definitely known for being, you know, very much a leftist, progressive reporter.
	I mean, you know, and he antagonizes conservatives and that's what he does.
	But I will tell you, And he's come after me numerous times, and he's come after WalkAway numerous times, but he didn't say a single word about January 6th, what happened to me.
	And I actually called him on the phone a few weeks ago, and I just said, hey, I gotta ask, when the entire world was piling on and kicking the hell out of me, you didn't say a word.
	Why?
	And he was just kind of like, you know, I just kind of felt like I just had better things to talk about.
	And I thought to myself, That is an example of somebody who was kind of playing that antagonistic game.
	Today probably has boundaries and probably has a conscience.
	Whereas so many people on the left at this point, they've checked their conscience at the door.
	And it's just about complete and total destruction at this point.
	Yeah.
	And now it really is about saving a country.
	If we ever thought we were playing a game, no longer.
	And so how's real quick if you can, 30 seconds or so, walk away campaign.
	How is that going?
	Where can people find you?
	Yeah, it's great.
	And I want to encourage anybody to watch and share my new video.
	Please share, share, share.
	We're always up against suppression and shadow banning, so please share the hell out of it.
	The other thing is that we're running a huge contest right now for the best walkaway video.
	Between now and November 1st, we're giving away $10,000 for the person with the best walkaway video.
	So for anyone who has a walkaway story, if you have a walkaway story, go to walkawaychallenge.com.
	Walkawaychallenge.com.
	Fill out your submission form, read the rules, and enter the contest.
	But let's get these walk-away videos going again.
	Let's start spreading the message.
	Let's get everyone to walk away from the Democratic Party before November.
	walkawaychallenge.com WalkAwayChallenge.com, you know I love what you're doing, Brandon Strock.
	I appreciate you coming on the program today.
	Thank you, and I urge everyone to go check that video out and share it, as he said.
	And the WalkAway videos, man, that's a way to spread the message.
	You always ask, what can you do to help?
	Do something like that, all right?
	You know how you speak up and you take heat for it?
	Do you know who Kirk Herbstreit is?
	He's one of the biggest announcers on ESPN.
	He did something very, very bold.
	We'll talk about that when America First continues.
	I'm Grant Stinchfield, in for Sebastian Gorka.
	This is a story about a man who was a soldier.
	He was a soldier.
	In memory of Sebastian Gorka.
	This is a story about a man who was a soldier.
	I'm Sebastian Gorka.
	This is America First.
	Let's get back to the show with Grant Stinchfield.
	Welcome, folks.
	It is great to be along with you today.
	I am in for Sebastian Gorka.
	One of the things that has boggled my mind is just how radical the left has become.
	I mean, you know, we talk about this now for years.
	I guess since the Obama administration, it's been on a rocket ship ride to radicalism.
	And over the last three and a half years, we've seen it just absolutely explode under the Biden administration.
	Kamala Harris is a big part of that.
	There are things that are so radical that I think everyday citizens realize this isn't what we want to be a part of.
	Women in women's sports and men playing in women's sports is one of those very radical ideas.
	I mean, the Democrats were supposed to be the party of feminism, right?
	Which they weren't.
	They hijacked that.
	I always said I was a feminist.
	I want women to have just as much equal rights as anybody else has.
	I want everybody to have equal opportunity.
	What I don't want is equal outcomes.
	Equal outcomes makes no sense.
	That's equity, folks.
	That's the difference between equality and equity.
	Equality is equal opportunity for everyone.
	Equity is equal outcomes.
	Equal outcomes mean you bring everybody down to the lowest common denominator.
	Well, I guess an equal outcome if you're a transgender individual and you want to play in a female sport even though you're a dude with a huge advantage, the left says fine.
	But what happened to women's rights in all of that?
	So anybody who speaks out against this in the leftist world is persecuted.
	But I really don't get it because even my sister who is a, she's a leftist, went to Wellesley, she's a Hillary Clinton person, she's got three daughters.
	Her daughters run track, play field hockey, and I talk to them, they're between junior high and high school.
	They don't want to play against men.
	And I can see the conservatism coming out in them, by the way, much to the dismay of their mother.
	But they don't want to play against women.
	And I think my sister, who's a, I would call a leftist.
	She doesn't want men playing against women because she has three daughters and she knows it would be unfair.
	She doesn't want them taking spots from people, taking scholarships from people, or injuring them or killing them.
	So Kirk Herbstreit comes out.
	He's maybe one of the biggest voices on ESPN today.
	And he says it's wrong.
	He said men shouldn't be playing in women's sports.
	He doubles down on it.
	This is a clip of him.
	Um, this is a clip of him on outkick.
	I believe the podcast, uh, talking about, um, why he's doubling down on this whole thing.
	And, uh, this is cut 15 roll it.
	I've been biting my tongue on a lot of topics for three years.
	And so I happened to see somebody.
	say what he said. I think he said, should, should men be able to play in women's sports?
	And I just was like, I'm just going to give a quick answer.
	You know, ridiculous question.
	Of course not. You had to know that when you put that tweet out, there was going to be a reaction.
	Come on. You had to know. I didn't give it though. Like I'm done giving any at all about any of it.
	You know what? Honestly, we need people in positions of power with powerful voices
	in call it Hollywood entertainment, news media. I'll throw ESPN into that bunch.
	To say, you know what, I don't give a you-know-what anymore.
	I'm talking about what I believe in.
	Now, I'm surprised ESPN hasn't fired him.
	They fired this woman, Sam Ponder.
	Sam Ponder is a, she's been around, I believe, like sideline reporter stuff, doing some little in-studio things, and she wasn't a huge name, but they fired her.
	She had spoken out against women in sports.
	And they let her go.
	Would they fire Kirk Herbstreet?
	I don't know.
	Maybe.
	I don't think anybody, after Tucker Carlson got let go from Fox News, I don't know if anybody is too big to be fired.
	Just not in this day and age.
	There's too many people willing to do the things like I do, Dr. Gorka does, Kirk Herbstreet does, depending on what section you're in.
	A lot of people don't want these jobs.
	So I'm surprised Kirk Herbstreit is still there because ESPN has gone off the woke deep end.
	Now, what's the play here?
	Why?
	Why do they want men in women's sports?
	Why do they want transgender mania when it's only a small fraction of society?
	I think it's to break down the family unit.
	It's to blur the roles.
	between men and women.
	It's to take men out of society.
	And when you take men out of society, folks, do you know what happens?
	Society collapses.
	All you have to do is go back to ancient Rome, ancient Greece.
	Watch the progression of statues from Greek gods to these little fairy-like twig men.
	And then boom, Greece collapses.
	This is what they want.
	They want strong men, alpha males out of business.
	Toxic masculinity, they call it.
	There's nothing toxic about it.
	Keeps America safe.
	Keeps the world safe.
	God bless toxic masculinity.
	Just be nice about it.
	All right.
	833-33-GORKA.
	833-33-GORKA.
	Kamilah Harris's price controls plan is really taking hits.
	We'll talk a little bit about that next.
	You You
	A America First.
	Can you believe it?
	They are saying that they don't agree with America First.
	How do you say that?
	Magnificent.
	Well, I'll tell you what, I agree with America First.
	What other country would you put first when you live in America?
	Well, if you're the Democrats, I bet they have a whole host of other countries.
	They're globalists.
	I'm Grant Stinchfield, in for Sebastian Gorka.
	It is great to be along with you this afternoon.
	So folks, When you look at what's going on across the country and you look at Kamala Harris now making her way as the new change agent that she's going to be a new and fresh shiny object to take America in the right direction.
	All you have to do is look at her policies.
	In fact, she finally comes out.
	And announces one of her newest policies to help get the economy back on track.
	An economy that she and Joe Biden crushed, by the way.
	Commonomics did not work.
	Bidenomics did not work.
	So her great idea is to come out and say, we're going to institute price controls.
	Because that worked for Venezuela.
	That worked for Cuba.
	Even the Washington Post had an editorial today.
	Don't get mad at your opponent for calling you a commie when you offer up price controls.
	That and the Washington Post!
	So you'll see even some Democrat institutions like the Washington Post realize price controls do not work.
	They are a bad, bad, bad idea.
	I want to play you a cut from CNN.
	This is Abby Phillip.
	She's claiming that the price gouging sounds like a ploy.
	Let's listen to it.
	Cut three.
	One of the things that we learned about her policy that she's going to roll out is a ban, support for a ban on price gouging.
	Now, I think reasonable people would ask, what does that mean?
	What does that really mean?
	And how is the government going to be involved in it?
	Here's Noah Rothman in the National Review.
	He describes this policy as a rank pander to the economically illiterate.
	And despite the presence of many who fit that description in Congress, They understand that allowing the executive branch to
	functionally set prices is a brain-dead idea that would only hurt consumers in the long run.
	I mean, is this just a ploy?
	Because it sounds kind of like it.
	It's a ploy to pander to idiots.
	Because idiots will blame big corporations on gouging consumers.
	With no regard for the price of oil that has been through the roof now, and just to move goods and services around, costs three times what it did under President Trump.
	You think about interest rates if you're taking loans for your business, or you're taking loans out to pay for inventory.
	Interest rates, that's up.
	You think about the amount of money that has been infused into the economy now with all of these giveaways by the government.
	So you got so many dollars now chasing all this good, prices go up.
	Dollar's been devalued.
	So you spend more dollars.
	They don't understand this.
	It's easy for them to say, all right, the big corporation, they're the problem.
	A grocery store operates, I read one article that a grocery store operates on a 1% margin.
	I can't believe that would be true.
	There's not enough room in there for things to go wrong.
	But I do know that grocery stores operate on very, very thin margins, and it is a play on volume.
	When you own a grocery store.
	So what are you going to do?
	You're going to go into a local town and you're going to say, Hey, uh, the shop, right?
	You guys have to cut your prices on rice, crispy treats.
	How are you going to do that?
	And, and the FTC is going to get involved.
	So now we got another government agency coming into your business to tell you you're charging too much.
	If you're charging too much, people are not going to buy it.
	It's that simple.
	Okay, it's not price gouging because you could go to the next grocery store and people do.
	You ever been to Central Market?
	Central Market is very, very expensive.
	You ever been to the local, I mentioned, a ShopRite or a Trader Joe's?
	Not as expensive.
	If you're shopping on price, you'll just go someplace else.
	But the Democrats either don't understand this or there's something else at play, which would be taking over all of these things.
	And I think that's what they ultimately want.
	They want to put all these businesses out of business.
	So you have to have government-sponsored bread.
	You have to have government-sponsored farming.
	Maybe you have to give subsidies to these companies.
	You give subsidies to the companies.
	Think about that.
	Well, federal government, I can't afford to pay for the oil you want me to sell.
	For my oil changes and they say, well, we'll just subsidize the cost and we'll, we'll, we'll, we'll make, well, who's going to pay for that?
	Ultimately the taxpayer again.
	This is a recipe for collapsing economies.
	That's why president Trump says the economy will collapse if, uh, if she gets in to office, that's cut 12, roll it, we'll listen to it.
	We're gonna have a crash, and we're gonna have a crash like a 1929 crash if she gets in.
	You saw a gentleman yesterday who got up, one of the top analysts in the world, frankly, and said that if Trump isn't elected, he predicts, and he's predicting you have a stock market crash like 1929.
	Well, why wouldn't it crash?
	Every single business would not be able to function under their Doing away with free markets, which is what America was built on.
	Let's go out to Orlando.
	David, line one, let's say you.
	Hi, how are you?
	And thank you for having me on the show regards to Dr. Gorka.
	Prices are not only driven by the private sector, but government set prices.
	And if I were to give President Trump a piece of advice, I'd have him come out and say, I'm going to freeze government fees and taxes because parking tickets, tolls.
	Drivers license, renewals, property taxes, any, I would have them freeze every federal fee charged to citizens of the United States.
	In any state or municipality that receives any federal funding, they are not allowed to increase any of their fees, and maybe they should roll back some of their fees, and that would cut inflation.
	You know, that's an interesting idea, and I appreciate the phone call, David.
	So, obviously, as president, you don't have control over what Texas charges for driver's licenses.
	But what you do have control of is the purse strings.
	And so, the purse strings here, you can hold back money and say, we're not going to give you money.
	To your state, unless you do these things.
	The federal government does that all the time.
	It's not a bad idea.
	And when you think about, there's the biggest scam.
	Your local city says, we're cutting property taxes.
	Yeah, they cut property taxes.
	But meanwhile, Biden's real estate has gone through the roof.
	So now they valued your house higher than ever before.
	They say they cut your property taxes by a new fraction.
	But meanwhile, now you're paying more on a house that's worth more.
	This is how they get it, all the time from you.
	It'd be a great idea for President Trump to look at that.
	I'm open to those ideas.
	How can you put the squeeze to some of these overreaching state governments?
	Alright, 833-33-GORKA.
	833-33-GORKA.
	More on the price gouging plan, more from President Trump when we return.
	Thanks for watching!
	More on the price gouging plan, more from President Trump when we return.
	And Kamala are here today to make a major announcement on her efforts to lower...
	More on the price gouging plan, more from President Trump when we return.
	you you
	Oh, there he is.
	Here's my guy.
	Good job.
	How's your new show going?
	Good?
	Very well, thank you.
	I heard good.
	Well, I heard great, in fact.
	Making radio great again, Dr. Sebastian Gorka is.
	It's great to be sitting in for him.
	I am Grant Stinchfield.
	I saw an interesting story on The Gateway Pundit, my friends over there.
	My podcast often airs at The Gateway Pundit, and it's worth checking out this website.
	It was a piece on Ana Paulina Luna.
	This is the congresswoman from Florida who's a great conservative.
	I mean, fabulous mind, fabulous thinker.
	She'd been coming on my shows since Newsmax and Real America's Voice and all those for a really long time, long before she was a member of Congress.
	Well, I don't know if you remember ways back, she put out a video of her in a Make America Great Again swimsuit.
	And it is no secret that Ana Paulina Luna is a very good-looking woman.
	There's no secret about that.
	Well, what do you think the left did when they see a very good-looking woman in a swimsuit?
	They get triggered.
	Well, for whatever reason, this video has surfaced back up again.
	And now it's making the rounds.
	And the liberals are outraged.
	She should be in a hooter.
	She shouldn't be in Congress.
	This is disgusting.
	And I'm thinking to myself, do they not have better things to worry about?
	For the most part, it was a tasteful swing suit.
	Now she does a little pirouette and shows off some parts of her body, but look, she's getting clicks and she was running for Congress and I figured she'd probably use that as a ploy to get some votes and it probably worked.
	Now, they are freaked about this.
	I'm going to read you some of the tweets that were out there.
	Ew, she looks disgusting.
	A stripper looks better than her.
	She's a member of Congress, not a streetwalker.
	They're worried my community is grooming children, another one writes.
	Interesting the only thing she's got for her is a bathing suit and showing her butt off, but they use the A word, on camera.
	Anna Paulina Luna, though, having a great sense of humor about all of this, came back with a fabulous response.
	I'm confirming that I have indeed worn swimsuits and you can tell I am biologically a woman.
	She goes on to write on Twitter, I have a confession to make since the TikTok Democrats are on to me.
	I wear bikinis to the beach and mineral sunscreen.
	That's what you need to do.
	Instead of getting outraged at the hate, you need to come back at them hard.
	But I thought, again, the Democrats, you talk about women in sports.
	And playing against men, that they're all for that, and they're all for women's rights, but men can play, so that kind of goes for not women's rights.
	Then I thought you're supposed to be able to make your own choices.
	If you want to be in a bathing suit, then why can't you be in a bathing suit?
	What's the difference?
	Will they come out screaming and yelling about that?
	I promise you, well, I shouldn't say it, but I will, if AOC Put some pictures of her in her bathing suit, I'd applaud her!
	AIOC's a good looking woman, that's all she's got going for her.
	Box of rocks in her brain.
	Radical.
	Maybe she ought to try bathing suits instead.
	Or go back to bartending, I'm sure she'd do a better job than that, than working in Congress.
	Alright folks, we are back in a flash.
	We're going to talk about the Reagan movie being censored as well.
	Stick with me as America First continues.
	This is America First.
	Let me tell you what our Project 22 is.
	2025 is. Beat the hell out of them. I mean it.
	I mean it.
	Thank you.
	you you
	This is America First with Sebastian Gorka.
	I'm very proud and excited to introduce our guest host for today, Grant Stinchfield.
	Thank you so much, Dr. G. Great to be in the chair for you on this Friday afternoon.
	All right, so Kamala Harris taking a lot of heat for her price gouging plan.
	This is her big economic policy.
	Go after the corporations that are charging you too much money.
	Now, I would offer up that the pharmaceutical companies may fall into this category, but do you know how much it costs for research and development and what the FDA puts on the pharmaceutical companies?
	There is a component of that, that it is very expensive to produce drugs because of all the rigorous testing that goes on and the mandates from the government that it is expensive to produce drugs.
	So what does the pharmaceutical companies do?
	They fall into the trap of, okay, you know how we're going to get rich?
	We're going to offer you a bogus vaccine.
	The government's going to mandate that hospitals have to buy it.
	The government will pay for it.
	And then we'll make billions of dollars and make up for all the other stuff that we can't charge you a fair price on.
	I really do believe that's what happened.
	The vaccine was literally just a tool To scam everybody, the federal government, taxpayers, out of money to buy all of these vaccines.
	And now monkey pox vaccines are coming.
	We got a pharmacy company over in Europe says they're ready to offer up hundreds of thousands of these vaccinations for monkey pox.
	That only affects gay people, by the way.
	And when it happens, it's only a rash.
	But that's where we are.
	So this idea that price gouging is the real problem when literally everything that Joe Biden and Kamala has done has been to hurt business is why President Trump goes after Kamala Harris on this and other things.
	The media then attacks President Trump for attacking Kamala.
	Kamala, however you say.
	So this is President Trump talking about that Cut 11.
	As far as the personal attacks, because of what she's done to the country.
	I'm very angry at her that she'd weaponized the justice system against me and other people.
	Very angry at her.
	I think I'm entitled to personal attacks.
	I don't have a lot of respect for her.
	I don't have a lot of respect for her intelligence.
	And I think she'll be a terrible president.
	And I think it's very important that we win.
	It's the most important election of our lifetimes and it is crazy we say that every every every election but every election gets worse and worse and worse.
	So she isn't smart, you know that, because she can't get through a sentence.
	She can't think on her feet.
	Everything's scripted now.
	She still hasn't done a news conference or a sit-down interview.
	No indications that she's going to.
	And how does President Trump actually hold it back?
	You know, so many of you, as I mentioned the other day, are angry that President Trump lashes out at times.
	I don't understand how he's held it back as much as he had.
	When you look at what is happening to him, he may get sentenced in September and he may get prison time.
	Folks, what's going to happen if they put President Trump in prison?
	I'm curious as to your thoughts.
	833-33-GORKA.
	833-334.
	I need my glasses to read that.
	833-334-6752.
	Alright?
	That's 833-33-GORKA.
	Do you think they'll put him in prison?
	I need my glasses to read that.
	833-334-6752.
	All right?
	That's 833-333-GORKA.
	Do you think they'll put him in prison?
	What happens if he's put in prison?
	I actually believe he may have reached a ceiling in how far his poll numbers can go.
	Meaning, we saw his poll numbers go up when he got arrested.
	We saw his poll numbers go up when he got convicted.
	But then we didn't really see poll numbers move when he got shot nearly in the head.
	Why?
	I think his poll had reached the ceiling to the point where there's no more people left that are absolutely on the fence or willing to even look at him.
	But here's what going to prison would do.
	I think it would make any of you who's on the fence about going to vote, or maybe they're just lazy, they sit on the couch, they never really get there, they talk about politics all the time.
	I know that you have friends like this.
	They talk about politics.
	But then they don't vote.
	Do you know when I ran for Congress, they have early voting in Texas all the way back in 2011 when I ran in the primary for the 2012 race.
	Two weeks of early voting, basically.
	I can get who voted every night.
	Now I don't know how they voted, but I can see who voted.
	So that's how you run a campaign.
	You say, OK, well, I know this is a supporter.
	They haven't gone to the polls.
	I've got to get a caller, somebody working, a volunteer, maybe even me.
	Call them up.
	Get them to the polls.
	Get them to the polls.
	Do you know I had friends of mine at my golf club that I would say, hey, I need you to vote for me.
	Oh, yeah, I already voted.
	I got you covered.
	Unbeknownst to them, I could see that they didn't vote.
	And back then, I was a little bit more on my best behavior than I am now.
	I didn't call any of them out.
	I would just call, like, hey, you voted, right?
	You voted?
	Oh, yeah, yeah.
	And they didn't.
	So, I know these people exist.
	You gotta get those people to the polls.
	Today, after doing what I've been doing now for, I mean, I can't believe it's 12, 13 years in the conservative circles, 20, 30 years in media, but 13 years in conservative circles.
	I would call their asses out quicker than lickety split now.
	If you told me you voted and you didn't, I would call you out right away.
	So, President Trump has a right, back to the original point, to criticize Kamala Harris because the policies are awful.
	Awful.
	Let's go to line four.
	Tom in Atlanta, a very important city for President Trump.
	What say you, Tom?
	Hey, Grant.
	Always great to hear your voice.
	Appreciate all you do.
	Thank you, buddy.
	I appreciate that.
	I really do.
	Now if I can sneak in a couple of... Because while I was on hold, I heard this clip from Biden going, you know what we're going to do with our Project 25?
	We're going to beat the hell out of them.
	And I'm so glad he's going to go after Hamas right now and help those Israelis beat the hell out of Hamas.
	I was just thrilled to hear that clip.
	Ha ha, fun on Friday.
	Yeah, and I don't think that's happening anytime soon.
	I have that clip.
	I'll play it for you guys in just a minute.
	You probably heard us going through some of the clips, but Kamala Harris is a big problem, obviously, and I appreciate the phone call, Tom, as always.
	Thank you.
	All right, so the question was, will they sentence President Trump to prison?
	President Trump asked the judge to recuse himself.
	We know that his daughter made millions of dollars off of these cases against President Trump.
	She's a Democrat fundraiser.
	I mean, it's the most obscene abuse of power that I've ever seen.
	And the judge says no, he's not going to recuse himself.
	Line one, Elaine, also in Georgia.
	I'm so glad so many people in Georgia are listening to this program.
	Elaine, what do you got?
	Hello, Grant.
	Hi, Elaine.
	Well, I think that, yes, the worst abuse of power that you've ever seen, and I'm 82 years old, I agree with you.
	What I think will happen if they put him in jail or say that they're going to put Trump in jail, nothing for a few days until it starts to build up, and then I think There will be a riot, and I hate to say it, but I think there will be.
	Oh boy.
	You know, there's a lot of people that believe that.
	That could happen.
	Now, I will say this, Elaine, before I let you go.
	I don't want to let you go yet.
	Republicans have been really good about not rioting, and I don't want anyone to point to January 6th.
	There was one area of January 6th that got a little rough.
	It was the West Terrace.
	By and large, the tens of thousands of individuals there were well-behaved, overwhelmingly.
	Republicans do not have a problem with rioting.
	So, Elaine, why do you think this would be different?
	Why do you think you're afraid they would take to the streets and cause trouble?
	Well, I don't know about so much causing trouble.
	I hope it would be a peaceful demonstration.
	However, I think enough is enough, Grant.
	We've had it.
	The abuse of power, the weaponization of the Justice Department, and just the double standard.
	It's just too much.
	Well, Elaine, I think there's a lot of people out there like you.
	Let's hope that motivates them to get to the polls.
	Thank you so much for listening, and thank you so much for the call.
	We appreciate you.
	I think Elaine is right because when I go around and I speak to all of these groups and I talk to people, people are literally at the end of their rope.
	People are afraid.
	You know, we played that clip of the woman yesterday crying because prices were so bad, but there are other people that are literally afraid for their businesses.
	You've got IRS agents now.
	You know that these enforcement letters have gone out.
	Tens of thousands of them, and they're just hoping you're going to pay.
	I mean, the IRS is really an agency.
	It's the only agency I know where you're guilty until you prove your innocence, right?
	It's the exact opposite of how it's supposed to be.
	They'll seize your bank account and money, and then you prove why it's yours and not theirs.
	That's wrong.
	So it's no coincidence that the Democrats weaponized the IRS agents against American citizens.
	So they're not going to sic the Justice Department on us like President Trump did, unless you're a J6er, because they can't go after every single person.
	But how do you throw a wide net over American conservatives?
	You use the IRS.
	Right?
	You can't build a big criminal case against everyday citizens.
	I mean, you might try, but you can't do that on a large-scale base.
	That's how you go after the most powerful voices.
	The Steve Bannons.
	The President Trumps.
	You go after those guys with the criminal cases.
	God forbid they come after me or somebody else and concoct all kinds of nonsense.
	You just don't know.
	But they'll use the IRS to go after all of you.
	And that's what President Trump means when he says he's standing in the gap between good and evil, standing there to protect us from them.
	And thankfully, he's doing a great job of that.
	Hey, Lauren Boebert, the Congresswoman from Colorado, is up next.
	We'll talk to her as America First continues here on the Salem Radio Network.
	You You
	You I'm Sebastian Gawker.
	This is America First.
	Let's get back to the show with Grant Stinchfield.
	Thanks so much, Dr. G. It's great to be along with all of you this afternoon as we head on into the weekend.
	So the question I asked you is, do you think that they will put President Trump in prison?
	Will this judge who refuses to recuse himself, that oversaw this sham trial in New York, will they put him in prison?
	They may put him under house arrest.
	Maybe that's the odds-on favorite.
	Boy, what an election engineering move that would be.
	But putting him behind bars, actually behind bars, is not out of the realm of possibility from these lunatics.
	A3333 Gorka, I'd love to hear what you think.
	Someone else I'd love to hear what they think is a great friend of mine, a great friend of this program at Real America's Voice Show.
	She's running for Congress out in Colorado.
	She's doing a great job already as a member of Congress, just now in a new district.
	I'm talking about Lauren Boebert.
	Congresswoman, it's great to have you on the show.
	Thanks for coming on.
	Grant, it is wonderful to join you today and I'm glad you are asking the questions you're asking because this is something that we cannot be apathetic about and that we have to continue to keep in our regular discussions because the Democrats will stop at nothing.
	What do you think they're going to do?
	Well, you know, every time I think I know what they're going to do, they do something even worse.
	So to speculate is near impossible with them because there is no rest for the wicked.
	And this is a battle between good and evil, between truth and deceit and lies.
	And I do not think that putting President Trump behind bars is something that they are ruling out.
	They would love to see him behind bars.
	And Grant, you have been there every step of the way throughout President Trump's very
	first candidacy until today, and they have lied about him.
	They have tried to financially ruin him.
	They have committed character assassination on him.
	They have impeached him twice.
	They have interfered and stolen an election against him.
	And they have even tried to kill him.
	So I don't think jailing him is out of the realm of possibilities for them.
	Is there going to be a house arrest?
	I don't know.
	What does that look like?
	Is he really going to be stuck in Mar-a-Lago?
	Honestly, that's where he probably should be and could be.
	But he loves America too much to just sit home and live a luxurious billionaire life.
	He's out every day, literally risking his life to fight for our Constitution, for our
	American dream, and to get our country back to where it was and even greater than it was
	under his first administration.
	And with all of the political persecution going on, all the use of lawfare, I really believe President Trump's the only guy for this job right now.
	He's the right man for the job because of everything that's happened against him to try to get our country back on track.
	One of the issues that the Democrats have used, one of the ploys, schemes, is this open borders nonsense.
	And so we know we've been flooded with millions and millions of illegals, that we know many of them vote.
	I know for a fact That many of them vote.
	You have been a very strong voice, you and Chip Roy and other conservatives, Matt Gaetz, on this SAVE Act, meaning only American citizens should be voting.
	We have no chance of getting that in time for this election, even no matter how hard you're fighting for it.
	Well, I know that President Trump is ready for a shutdown over this issue.
	I don't think anyone loves the idea of a continued resolution and continuing the funding that many of us voted against just last year.
	However, we are against another omnibus spending bill that's going to spend even more money than what was approved last year.
	So if we could get a continuing resolution of Congress with the SAVE Act attached to
	it that says you have to be a United States citizen to vote in United States elections,
	you have to provide voter I.D. to vote in our elections, and so many other safeguards
	that are included in that, then I think that this is a fight worth fighting to the shutdown.
	And if Democrats want to shut down our federal government because they want a brand new forever
	voting block that they've been recruiting for at least, you could say, three and a half
	years, really, I think it goes beyond that.
	But especially with the more than 12 million illegals who've come in under the Biden administration,
	then the shutdown would be on them.
	We are simply saying we want free and fair elections that are American elections with
	only American citizens voting in them.
	And I think that this is something worth holding federal funding for.
	You know, it's interesting.
	I was talking to a very dear friend and a very familiar name to you.
	Louie Gomer was in Washington, D.C.
	a couple of weeks ago, and he was telling me stories about Justice Scalia and how Senator Mike Lee, man, this is getting a lot of third-hand and fourth-hand information here, but Senator Mike Lee supposedly went to Justice Scalia and was, you know, kind of complaining about some of the regulatory agencies and what they were doing within the federal government, how they were abusing the separation of powers and making law when they can't and what lawsuits can I bring, and the justice responded, I'm tired of you guys bringing me your lawsuits.
	You are the most powerful branch.
	of the government.
	If you don't like what these agencies are doing, don't fund them.
	And that's what we've been screaming all along.
	Why are we going to fund agencies that aren't securing our border?
	Why are we going to fund a Department of Education that is indoctrinating our children?
	Why are we going to fund a Department of Energy that is more beholden to China than American energy development and prosperity and security and dominance?
	And the list goes on and on.
	And so this is just another small portion of, hey, no, we're gonna put our foot down.
	We want fair elections that are secure, and we're gonna attach the SAVE Act to your funding.
	And if you don't like it, then you don't get your money.
	All right, so of course we need a Speaker of the House that's going to be willing to do that.
	I still have my concerns about Speaker Johnson, and just a quick note on Louie Gohmert.
	He's just down the road from me.
	I'm in Dallas, he's out in East Texas, and he's going to be with us at Salem Media's Town Hall, Universal, Hilton, on September 15th.
	We invited him out to California to do a radio event out there, so he's always a great guy.
	So if it comes from his mouth, Lauren Boebert, I'm telling you, it's good as gold.
	It really is.
	I want to remark just a second on the speaker.
	So I'm actually at an event.
	The speaker was just here in Colorado helping our Republican candidate in the 8th District, Dave Evans, helping Jeff Hurd in my current and soon-to-be old district.
	And then he came and spoke to some folks here in Douglas County with me.
	And at the table, he leaned over to me and he said, When you talk to President Trump, please let him know that I want the SAVE Act attached to a CR and willing to fight for this.
	And I said, I think he knows that, but I'm happy to communicate that message.
	So I do know that the Speaker is wanting the SAVE Act connected to spending.
	You know, when you think about it, it's the most important act, I think, maybe, that we've ever had, because I'm amazed.
	Most people don't know.
	You register to vote, but you forget that I never showed an ID, I never showed a passport, I never showed a social security.
	Nothing.
	And so, you know, you talk about safe, secure elections.
	The only reason you wouldn't want a safe and secure election is if you're trying to cheat.
	Lauren Bobert, real quick, in just 15 seconds, where can people find you, help your campaign, and all of that?
	Yes, so laurenforfreedom.com is my website.
	You can also text the word FREEDOM to 880306 and this will keep you connected to my campaign.
	I am now the most senior member in the Colorado delegation.
	Well, we love having you on the program.
	As always, thank you for spending time with us.
	You keep fighting, and we'll talk again for sure.
	What about this idea of President Trump in prison?
	I want to hear from you.
	Let me know.
	know I'm Grant Stinchfield.
	.
	News and talk radio is still really popular, even in the internet age.
	What you are about to hear them say is mind-boggling.
	Here's looking at you, Snowflake.
	America first.
	I even have a job?
	That's Brian Stelter, I think.
	Oh my god, the little cue ball.
	I can't really make fun of people's hair, though.
	Look at this.
	I don't have much myself.
	For those of you watching on the Rumble channel, hello to you.
	I'm Grant Stinchfield.
	A big thank you to Dr. Sebastian Gorka for letting me sit in his chair this afternoon.
	I am eagerly awaiting the release of the new movie, Reagan, starring Dennis Quaid.
	Now, Dennis Quaid has been slowly, I think, Revealing himself as maybe a conservative.
	I know he did a documentary on grid down, power up and the threat that our electricity grids across this country face because they are just not in good shape.
	Dennis Quaid did that and he's starting to show signs of this.
	Well, Reagan is set to come out, I believe it's September 30th.
	I believe, I'm not sure, but I think it is.
	Just in time for the election.
	Now think about a movie, Reagan.
	This is supposed to be a very positive Reagan movie, a view of his presidency.
	I don't know what could be negative because the guy was a hero to me and most conservatives.
	So the timing of this is perfect because I think there will be moviegoers that go see this movie and we'll see, boy, this is what a president is.
	This is how you make America great again.
	And remember, President Trump's the one who coined the phrase, make America great again.
	A lot of people don't know that.
	But that's the guy who came up with it.
	So...
	President Trump, very Reagan-esque when it comes to policies, strength, especially with our enemies by the way, resolve, unpredictableness, and just all around lovers of America.
	And I do believe Reagan and Trump both love this country.
	So this movie is set to sway hearts and minds.
	Maybe only a few, but a few is all we need in these swing states.
	Doesn't take very many.
	So what do you think happens when social media companies start to see what this movie is about?
	Here's a 15 second trailer.
	Roll that.
	Welcome to your life.
	There's nothing a retired governor can do.
	But a president, now he can do a thing or two.
	Everybody wants to rule the world.
	All right, so a president, he can do a thing or two, and Lord knows Ronald Reagan did a thing or two.
	So they see this trailer, and social media companies, Facebook in particular, says, we can't get this out there.
	We're gonna start censoring this movie.
	This is what I believe happened.
	The people behind the movie Reagan, and I know them, Wanted to advertise on Facebook.
	And guess what happens?
	Facebook shuts down the Reagan movie page.
	Shuts it down!
	They flag the advertisements as, I guess, political speech and says, you can't advertise these.
	You can't advertise the movie.
	Now, they didn't do this for movies about Lyndon Johnson.
	They didn't do this for movies about Barack Obama.
	But they do it about a movie about Ronald Reagan, you know, that's out just two months before the election.
	So they censor the movie Reagan.
	Folks, this is still going on.
	These social media companies better tread very, very lightly because I now believe, I have for a while, I don't say now believe, I have for a while, that they are breaking the law when it comes to this.
	Censoring one group over another.
	They have certain protections and yet they've decided because of those protections, they're going to get in the game of deciding what people see and what people don't see.
	If that's the case, then they ought to lose the liability protections that they have.
	Now, does anything happen to Facebook?
	No.
	Facebook gets caught in the act with this, and then comes out and says, oh, you know what?
	It was just a mistake.
	We're sorry.
	I am tired of social media companies claiming it was a mistake.
	I am tired of leftists claiming something was a mistake.
	When individuals are persecuted, conservatives are persecuted.
	It's not a mistake.
	There are no mistakes in politics.
	And there is so much attention around this game on social media that you better believe the social media companies, every single move they make is played out here.
	This is Dennis Quaid, by the way, the star of the movie, talking about this.
	Well, I am baffled by it, to tell you the truth, because it was banned and they haven't even seen the film.
	So, it seems like they don't want other people to see the film either, I guess.
	But, you know, we'll set up a screening for them any time and see for themselves.
	This is how you know a guy who's just coming over.
	It seems like they don't want people to see.
	It doesn't seem like anything.
	They don't want people to see your movie, Dennis Quaid.
	They don't want people loving America.
	They don't want people being inspired by Ronald Reagan to go vote for Donald Trump.
	That, I promise you.
	833-33-GORKA.
	833-33-GORKA.
	That's the number to weigh in.
	I'm Grant Stinchfield.
	Thank you.
	you Can't handle the truth?
	Is reality just too much?
	There's always NPR.
	I hear they have tote bags.
	This is America First with Sebastian Gorka.
	Well, I'm Grant Stinchfield sitting in for Dr. G this afternoon.
	It's great to be with you.
	I always have said Republicans don't have a sense of humor.
	I wish Republicans did a better job about lightening up a little bit and having some fun.
	I always try to have fun on my podcast, this radio show, a radio show out in Los Angeles on AMA at 70, the Real American's Voice show.
	You gotta have a little fun, right?
	But I'm more and more watching liberals don't know how to have fun anymore.
	Liberals can't take a joke.
	And maybe it's just because everybody's so on edge with where they think the country's going, and they're afraid of us, we're afraid of them, and everybody's freaking out, and nobody can smile anymore.
	It really is quite depressing, if you think about it.
	Nobody smiles.
	Well, I smiled at this, and I hope you do too, because the CNN reporter was not smiling.
	Let me just set this up by saying this.
	There's black folks who own a Trump merch store.
	They're black.
	The owners of the Trump merch store are black, okay?
	They sell a white privilege card.
	Now, to me, that's funny.
	I wish I had white privilege.
	I don't anymore, and I could tell you many examples of why, in media, white privilege is most certainly gone, all right?
	And I'll tell you personal stories about that.
	But I think it's hilarious.
	The reporter gets upset that she claims people are using the white privilege card to get out of a ticket.
	Now, what do you think would happen if I handed a cop my white privilege card?
	I mean, they might let you out of the ticket only because they think it's so funny.
	And cops are human too, by the way, folks.
	I hate to break the news to you.
	You turn on the dome light, you roll down the window, you put your hands on the steering wheel, and you say hello to them with a smile, they may let you out of the ticket.
	You hand them a white privilege card, they may laugh at that too, okay?
	Especially if it's a black cop.
	I bet you they think it's even hilarious, but... CNN reporters have no sense of humor.
	Roll this clip.
	This is a white privilege card.
	And this is just a play.
	It just says this card trumps everything and it gives a barrier.
	Happiness and success because of the color of the skin.
	And who buys that?
	White people.
	Okay.
	It's funny.
	And then when you give it to a state trooper, they'll let you go and write you a ticket.
	You think so?
	I've experienced it.
	Wait, really?
	And he said, OK, he laughed at it and gave it back to me and did not write me a ticket.
	This actually happened at least once elsewhere.
	In 2022, a woman claimed Alaska police let her go without a ticket when she flashed a white privilege card instead of a driver's license.
	It's humorous to us.
	You know, it really is.
	It's humorous to the to the average American out here.
	You know, he was a Republican, too.
	God bless that couple.
	It's humorous to me too.
	I want to carry around a white privilege card.
	And you know what?
	If you have a card that says, uh, you're a brother to card, I'll carry one of those also.
	All right.
	Cause I think it's funny.
	That CNN reporter just showed to me how dopey these reporters are.
	Folks, I worked in mainstream media for 20 years, in mainstream television, mostly for NBC, mostly at a local news level.
	Let me tell you something about reporters.
	They all take their jobs way too seriously.
	They think they're doing the most important work in the world.
	Now, being a good reporter is an important job because it gets you the news.
	Doing it right is a dying breed.
	That doesn't exist anymore.
	But it's an important job.
	But we're not operating on children.
	It's not brain surgery.
	They take their jobs so seriously.
	They have no idea, most reporters, what the real world is like.
	What it is like to make payroll.
	When I left the NBC system, I bought an oil change business.
	It was a real estate play.
	I liquidated my 401k.
	Much to this may, I got hit with a tax bill.
	Back then, I never would have imagined because I was unprepared for taking the risk of liquidating my 401k to buy this oil change business.
	Anyway, that story worked out great.
	I went on to buy other businesses, trucking companies, and all those things.
	I grew up in a family, I don't want to call them entrepreneurs, but construction industry in New York City and business-minded.
	Grandfather, great-grandfather, father.
	Proud of all these people.
	These reporters have no idea what it is like to run a business.
	No idea what the stresses and pressures are of making payroll.
	No idea of what it's like when a client doesn't pay you and you're relying on that money to pay your bills.
	Okay?
	Now, there's some great benefits to owning a business.
	You're your own boss, and when things are going well, you're on top of the world.
	I'd also argue, in many cases, you work harder owning your own business than you do as an employee.
	Reporters don't understand any of this.
	So this idiot reporter... This really happened, and the graphic pulls out.
	Alaska State Trooper.
	I mean, come on!
	You know how many times I've tried to get out of a ticket?
	A lot.
	Too many times to count.
	And you know what?
	I get out of them all the time.
	I hate to break the news to all you liberals out there.
	And you know how I get out of it?
	Exactly what I told you.
	Folks, you want a trick to get out of a ticket?
	You make the cop feel totally at ease.
	You turn that dome light on, you roll down the windows, you put your hands on the steering wheel, and you smile at them when they come in.
	How fast were you going?
	And then I always lay it on him.
	I don't know if it's worth anything, but you use it for what you want.
	But you know, I'm a big pro cop guy.
	I got some media outlets I'm on, and I'm always trying to defend you guys.
	If it means anything to you, take it for what it's worth.
	If not, bring me the ticket.
	Do you know nine times out of 10 that works?
	And people get mad at me for that, not mad at me for it.
	I don't care.
	I got a lead foot, baby.
	All right?
	And I love to drive my car fast.
	Not dangerously, but fast.
	Montana actually has the best rule when it comes to speed limit.
	Montana is reasonable and prudent, okay?
	So if you're driving a Porsche 911, reasonable and prudent could be 100 miles an hour on a straight highway.
	If you're driving a 1957 Ford Chevy pickup, 100 miles an hour is not reasonable and prudent.
	I like that.
	You know what that says?
	Freedom.
	Freedom to make your own decisions about these kinds of things.
	So, when I tell you white privilege is gone in America, I believe that in this day and age, with diversity, equity and inclusion, That people of color have a leg up.
	This has been going on in media for a long time.
	When I was working in Hartford, Connecticut, this is going back to, I don't know, 1998, 99.
	I'm signing my contract, and I want to keep some certain things in it.
	I said, otherwise I'm going to leave.
	He says, go ahead and leave, my general manager.
	He says, you know what, Grant?
	If you were black, you'd be the White House correspondent for NBC News.
	But you're not black.
	You're white.
	So you're staying in Hartford.
	Sign on the dotted line.
	You know what I said to him?
	I want your wife's cell phone number.
	I want to tell her what a jerk you are and how you squash a young man's dreams.
	We worked out the contract.
	Let's just say it like that.
	All right, folks.
	Is white privilege real?
	You can weigh in on that.
	833-334-6752.
	833-33-GORKA.
	833-334-6752, 833-33-GORKA, Back in a Flash.
	Thanks for watching!
	I'm Sebastian Gawker.
	This is America First.
	Let's get back to the show with Grant Stinchfield.
	All right, thank you, Dr. G. I'm going to give you another example of why white privilege is not real.
	You know, everybody wants to complain about racial profiling.
	I'm a big believer in racial profiling, okay?
	If you don't belong someplace, I'm a big believer in what I call the stop and talk, not the stop and frisk.
	And it has nothing to do with whether you're black or white.
	It has to do with police being proactive about what they're doing.
	It's not an infringement of rights for a cop to talk to you.
	All right, I'm going to give you an example of this.
	When I own my oil change business, one of my employees, black, says, boss, can you drive me home?
	I said, absolutely.
	He lives in the hood, Pleasant Grove in Dallas, Texas.
	I am in a pearl white Escalade at the time.
	It was a beautiful car, the original look and style Escalades.
	I'm driving him into the hood.
	It's around 530 at night.
	And I come up to a stop sign.
	I make a turn and what happens?
	I get lit up from behind.
	Why is a cop pulling me over?
	I'm not doing anything.
	Well, I start to think about it.
	Oh, I know why I'm getting pulled over.
	I'm in a pearl white Escalade.
	A white guy with a black guy sitting next to me and we're rolling through the hood together.
	There's only one reason.
	Why I would be there, and that is to buy drugs.
	And if the mothers and fathers and grandmothers and grandfathers are tired of drugs being sold in their community, and tired of white yuppies coming into the hood to buy their drugs, what do cops have to do?
	Stop and talk.
	So Dallas police light me up, I pull over.
	Same thing I told you, roll down the window, hands on the steering wheel, what's going on?
	He says, you rolled a stop sign.
	I said, officer, I don't think I did.
	But, you know, if you say so.
	What's going on here?
	I said, oh, this is my employee.
	I'm driving him back from work.
	And he's got his quick car uniform on.
	Oh, OK.
	All right.
	He looks at us.
	All right.
	Go ahead.
	Take it as a warning on your way.
	I got racial profiled!
	A white guy in a black neighborhood.
	Now wait a second, I'm supposed to complain about this because the black guys in the white neighborhoods get upset for racial profiling there, when maybe if you're driving through a multi-million dollar neighborhood in a beat-up Chevy Caprice from 12 years ago, and it's 2 o'clock in the morning, maybe the cop needs to talk to you.
	White or black, by the way, okay?
	Nothing to do with the color of your skin has to actually do with your car.
	And I think that had to do with me, too, driving the Escalade in the hood.
	So, I'm okay with it.
	I want everybody safe and I don't want rights infringed.
	Nobody's rights should be infringed.
	Certainly not for the color of your skin.
	But if cops are going to be proactive, they've got to talk to people.
	They've got to be out there.
	But the reality is nowadays in big cities, cops can't be proactive.
	They're call takers going from one call to the next.
	They can't go find crime, fight crime.
	They respond to crime.
	And that's really the shame of it.
	All right, folks.
	Up the next hour, you know, I got a buddy of mine who's coming on this program.
	I love this guy.
	Congressman Matt Rosendale from Montana.
	I was just talking about Montana.
	Maybe I'll ask him if reasonable and prudent is still the way of the land in Montana.
	But this guy's great.
	We're going to talk to him next hour.
	Stick with me as America First continues here on the Salem Radio Network.
	I'm Grant Stinchfield.
	Stinchfield, 1776.
	Give me a follow everywhere.
	Thanks for watching!
	Subscribe to our channel for more videos!
	Thanks for watching!
	you you
	this is America first with Sebastian Gorka I'm very proud and excited to introduce our guest host for today, Grant Stinchfield.
	Well, thank you so much, Dr. Gorka.
	It is great to be sitting in your chair this afternoon.
	I have a story that I'm really, really bothered by.
	There's a group of people that I despise.
	Slimy politicians.
	Swarmy.
	That's a word, right?
	Swarmy politicians.
	People you can't trust.
	They'll tell you one thing, they'll do another.
	They don't stay true to their convictions.
	A great example of a guy that I have more respect for than many Republicans is a guy like Bernie Sanders, okay?
	I know that probably shocks you to hear me say this, but Bernie Sanders, probably more than any other member of Congress, believes in what he's saying.
	Now, it's nonsense what he's saying.
	He's a communist.
	He's a socialist.
	He believes in bringing down America.
	But I think the man actually believes it.
	Okay?
	Fine.
	That's what America is about.
	But when you show me a politician that's gonna Flow with the wind.
	That's an amoeba-like creature that just molds and melds to whatever the public thinks is popular at the time.
	That disgusts me.
	Because I'm a principled guy.
	What you hear on this radio program, on my TV show, is the same thing you'd hear from me if I'm sitting at the bar with a buddy of mine.
	The same thing.
	So when I tell you That principle is everything.
	Boldness is everything.
	Be true to your values.
	I don't want anybody in politics that's not.
	And if that means that the seat is not right for you, look, I can't run for Congress in a seat in some squishy district in California where you got people that are just afraid to even look at their own shadow, much less say they're voting for President Trump.
	I would never win in a district like that.
	And I'm certainly not changing my views just to win a seat in Congress.
	This brings me to a man by the name of Nathan Hockman.
	He ran for Attorney General as a Republican in California.
	Then he switches to an Independent.
	Now, anybody that switches from a Republican to an Independent, I've already... I never see anybody switch from a Republican to anything else.
	I always see people switching from Democrat to Republican, and they denounce the Democrat Party, and they... He switches from Republican to Independent.
	He doesn't denounce Republicans.
	He just switches to Independent.
	He says, I'm going to run for District Attorney against George Gascogne.
	Okay?
	George Gascon is the Soros-inspired, Soros-funded prosecutor in Los Angeles County that's literally letting criminals go, not prosecuting crime, refusing to let police go after criminals.
	L.A.
	County is a disaster zone because of George Gascon.
	Won't even prosecute the smash-and-grab robberies.
	So, Nathan Hockman is going to run against him, and he is.
	Well, he tells us on the morning answer out there on AM870 that he's going to remain independent, that he's not going to take a stand in any politics because being a prosecutor is an independent job.
	All you have to do is go after criminals.
	And then he says this on the local news this week.
	Listen to this from the guy that recruited the help of people like me and my co-host Jen Horn and so many Republicans in Southern California.
	Fine, you're an independent.
	You're better than George Gascoigne.
	We will help you.
	And then he goes and does this.
	Listen.
	Oh, excuse me.
	Yeah, that that is, uh, uh, uh, uh, no, no, no.
	Uh, um, 18.
	Yes. 18.
	I was asked the question, and I don't volunteer the question.
	If I'm asked the question, I answer the question, because I'm not going to run away from the question.
	I was asked the question a number of months ago, who do you support for president?
	And I said, and this is back in April, May, look, I haven't voted for Donald Trump in 2016, 2020,
	or didn't intend to vote for him in 24, intend to vote for the Biden-Harris ticket.
	But you offered an endorsement on Channel 11.
	You offered an endorsement.
	That's different than telling people who you vote for.
	Again, I don't care who you vote for.
	They asked, are you endorsing someone for president?
	And you said yes.
	What I said a number of months ago is I said I was going to vote in support the Biden-Harris ticket.
	And I said it because I was asked the question directly.
	I got asked the question on Fox 11 as well.
	You know, this is a situation where I was coming on to talk about the protesters who had blocked the 405 freeway.
	I was coming on to talk about what was going to happen to the guys who stole Johnny Walker's catalytic converter and shot him.
	All right, enough of him.
	I can't take it.
	I ran there.
	That's my fault for the guys behind the glass.
	I take full responsibility.
	That was the wrong clip.
	I wanted to run the clip that he endorses Kamala Harris.
	This is what you have to hear, and listen to the way he does it.
	This is a guy who endorses Kamala Harris, a prosecutor, so-called, who put young black men away for low-level marijuana offenses.
	Now decides police are the enemy.
	She calls police the KKK.
	She pushes the defund the police movement.
	She helps raise money for the Minnesota Fund that lets convicted felons out of prison.
	Black Lives Matter rioters and goons out of prison.
	And now you're going to be a prosecutor and endorse Kamala Harris?
	This is cut 16.
	And now I'm an independent running for a non-partisan position where party affiliation won't even be on the ballot.
	And so if I had to choose in this race between a former prosecutor and a convicted felon, I'm going to choose the former prosecutor because that's the job I'm seeking.
	How dare you?
	You told us you'd be independent.
	Then he brings up this idea that he told us he was going to vote for Biden.
	I don't remember that.
	He may have said it.
	I don't remember that.
	But I remember him talking about independence of the office.
	What's his game here?
	He wants to be elected in L.A.
	County so badly that he's going to turn his back on every value, if he actually had those values, to vote for Kamala Harris.
	Nobody that was once a Republican can bring themselves to vote for Kamala Harris.
	That just makes no sense, especially with her history of attacks on law enforcement.
	So you notice she said, President Trump.
	was a convicted felon.
	Give me a break.
	You're going to be a prosecutor in LA County and you're going to tell me that they convicted President Trump in a legitimate fashion in a kangaroo court with a kangaroo jury and a kangaroo judge that had it out for President Trump.
	So I asked him, Would he vote for, would he try to prosecute President Trump?
	This is cut 19, if the same situation happened here in L.A.
	You called President Trump a felon and you couldn't endorse him because of that.
	You're going to prosecute records keeping cases?
	You're a prosecutor.
	You want to be a prosecutor in L.A.
	County?
	You think that case was a legit case?
	Well, again, what I would prosecute are crimes being committed in the L.A.
	government.
	Would you prosecute the case?
	Would you have done what they did in New York to President Trump here in Los Angeles?
	As you know, Grant, there are two questions dealing with President Trump's case.
	One is a should and one is a could.
	In other words, if you do prosecute the case, can you?
	Do you have the evidence to convict him?
	And then there's a should question.
	Now, I would certainly evaluate that should question very carefully.
	to see if it meets the criteria the other county...
	You know this case inside out, the entire country does.
	Would you have prosecuted President Trump under the circumstances he was prosecuted in New York?
	Well again, I would...
	The short answer is that I would take a very, very hard look,
	more than Alvin Bragg did, to actually look at that case, see if it meets the criteria, and then make a decision at
	that point.
	So you're not giving me a yes or no?
	You might prosecute President Trump under those same situations if that happened in L.A.?
	This is unbelievable.
	Well, again, I don't have all the inside information.
	Yes, you do.
	We all watch this, Nathan.
	I want to make it clear on the methodology.
	No.
	Come on, man is right.
	Don't have all the information.
	The entire nation watched this case unfold.
	It's a disgrace.
	And so now he's asking conservatives to vote for him.
	When you say you're going to vote for Kamala Harris, why don't you just stay out of it?
	And you would have had support from everybody.
	Let's go out to line one, Nancy in California.
	What say you, Nancy?
	Thank you so much for taking my call.
	That's great.
	Before I make my point to my experience with Hoffman, I just wanted to ask you, do you think Hoffman's going to show up to the answer event in September at the Universal Hilton now that he's done what he's done?
	You know, there's some real inside discussions about that.
	Let's just put it that way.
	I'm not in a position to say what happens either way, but as anybody out there could imagine, there are some real serious discussions about that.
	I mean, if it was up to me, I'd disinvite the guy, but it's not up to me.
	So we shall see.
	And then there's an argument to say, hey, I want him on the stage.
	Let's ask him these questions again.
	This is the same event where Louie Gohmert is going to be in September.
	September 15th in LA.
	It's going to be a great event.
	So I don't know.
	Real quick though because we don't have much time left in this break and as you know on this show it's hard outs for the commercials.
	So what do you say about Hockman?
	Yeah, okay, so I won't mention the two events where he lied and said he wasn't going to.
	I won't go into that because I don't have too much time.
	I'll keep it real brief.
	What he did was a huge betrayal to both Steve Cooley and Jackie Lacey.
	And I want to know if we can organize, especially you and Ms.
	Horne, if we could do, if we could still do this in California, do a write-in campaign either for Judge Milton or Jackie Lacey or Steve Cooley.
	And see if we can at least, you know, because there's no way in God's green earth I'm going to vote for him now.
	He personally told me in Westwood at a Republican event that he wasn't going to vote for Trump or Biden.
	So, I'll tell you what, thank you for the call.
	I'm told that write-in candidates are not allowed under the rules of this election.
	Jonathan Hatami is the one who came in third.
	He would have been a great pick for this.
	So, I don't think you can do a write-in.
	But this is what you see about politicians who will do anything to get elected.
	Very sad.
	Alright, my friend, Congressman Matt Rosendale from Montana, up next.
	strong conservative stick with me.
	I'm going to be using a stick with me.
	They represent you nearly just as much as a congressman in another state, because ultimately these votes, you need all of them together.
	So don't think just because somebody's from another state it doesn't matter.
	It most certainly does, which is why you should help out many of these members of Congress that are running in tough races in other states.
	They're working for you, too.
	Okay.
	One of these great members of Congress who's a great conservative, one of the very few great conservatives, is a good friend of mine.
	His name is Matt Rosendale.
	He represents Montana out there.
	And I want to welcome him to the program.
	Congressman, it's great to have you on this radio program.
	Grant, it's always good to be with you, buddy.
	I'm blushing.
	I'm blushing.
	You're too kind.
	Well, you know I'm a big fan of yours because you tell it like it is.
	Nobody else does.
	I was looking at your Twitter feed and I saw you and I, we think alike.
	You're on the same topics I'm on.
	This Afghanistan withdrawal, we came up on the three year anniversary of this.
	The Taliban holds a parade with American equipment.
	This is on Kamala Harris and Joe Biden.
	What goes through your mind when you see this?
	It just is a reflection of what happens when you have weak leadership in Washington, D.C., in the White House, and the chaos that ensues around the world.
	And here's what really breaks my heart.
	That our intelligence community, okay, the intelligence community told us for not just weeks, not just months, but for years, everything's okay.
	Once we pull out the Afghanis, you know, we've trained them, we've armed them, they're going to be able to hold their own country and maintain it and keep the Taliban from coming back again.
	The cavemen came out of the caves 72 hours after we were gone and took the country back.
	That's where our intelligence community failed us just dramatically.
	But go back even a little bit further, and people don't even talk about this anymore, Grant, and this is what really, really hurts me.
	What about Benghazi?
	What about when Christopher Stevens was, you know, Killed in Benghazi, September 11th of 2012, the ambassador.
	What about when Hillary Clinton was the Secretary of State and they were requesting additional support back then for that embassy?
	Nobody even talks about that anymore.
	And that really was what I consider the turning point where people started recognizing and admitting That the Clintons were a corrupt bunch, that Hillary Clinton was a terrible, terrible elected official serving only her own interests, and there was a lot of people that got hurt and died as a direct result of that.
	And then we fast forward, and we watch the perpetuation of this weak leadership, and we see Joe Biden being led around by, you know, I truly believe, Barack Obama, and he goes and withdraws, and it's a catastrophe.
	Yeah.
	You know, it's interesting.
	We're talking with Matt Rosendale, congressman from Montana, Republican, of course.
	You bring up Benghazi.
	One of the few people that I feel blessed to know, or the group of people I feel blessed to know, I've gotten to be friends with those Benghazi guys, the badasses, as I call them, the heroes.
	And they still are very upset that no one has really paid a price for that.
	And then I think as I'm listening to you talk, and you say they asked for help, they asked for more, for more assets, and they didn't get it.
	Guess who else asked for more assets?
	The Secret Service when they were protecting President Trump.
	His detail asked for more and he didn't get it.
	I can't help but think of the similarities here, Congressman.
	Grant, there's nobody that can go out to that site in Butler, Pennsylvania and look around that has any kind of experience with security whatsoever or just simply with shooting a firearm.
	And would not be able to say, hey, we've got the former president here.
	He's going to be speaking.
	Maybe we should have that rooftop covered.
	I mean, I stood on the stage with President Trump four separate times.
	Now, I didn't feel fearful in my life because I was here in the state of Montana, and the only people that were carrying guns around there were either Secret Service or some of my supporters that just regularly carry their firearms, and they were directed away from the event because they weren't allowed to come in.
	They're used to it now, but when you go out to another place, a strange place, and you've got rooftops, that are elevated and were not covered.
	Eli Crane, you know Eli as well, representative out of Arizona, another, another great, great
	representative.
	He was a Navy SEAL.
	He's one of the solid Navy SEALs that we do have up there that I can count on his vote.
	He's like, there's a water tower right there.
	Why wasn't someone stationed up there?
	And there are so many questions.
	Why was it that after this man was detected, there wasn't a swarm of Secret Service agents down on top of him?
	Why was the president even allowed to go out on the stage when they already knew this guy was in the vicinity?
	There's just a lot of unanswered questions.
	I hate to even ask you this question, but do you think there was anything nefarious at play on behalf of our government?
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	The shame of it is there are so many people that have lost confidence in our government grant.
	That question is being posed.
	You know, 20 years ago, nobody would have posed that question.
	They would have just said somebody was negligent and, you know, some people need to be fired and be held accountable.
	Let's figure out what was going on.
	But unfortunately, we've seen a Department of Justice that has used lawfare to pursue the president to try and keep him from obtaining office again.
	We've seen them go after The Jan 6th protesters, we've seen them right here in Montana, in Great Falls, Montana.
	20 armed IRS agents with full body armor raid a man's shooting range and his firearms store because of an IRS violation.
	Really?
	You've got to go in there and put 20 armed agents with, and I don't mean just with like nine millimeters,
	I'm talking about AR-15s came in, shut his store down for the day
	to make sure they intimidated not just him, but everyone else in the community
	that typically goes to that store.
	And so I will tell you, when those kinds of actions take place,
	me, I make it a point to go to that store once a month to go in there and either use the firing range,
	Buy some ammunition or buy yet another firearm.
	That's how you support your fellow Americans, which is why I love having you on.
	We're talking with Congressman Matt Rosendale out in Montana.
	Congressman, before I let you go, I have to ask you one question.
	So I used to work in Montana, Missoula, Montana, Calispell, my first job in TV.
	They had passed a law that the speed limit was reasonable and prudent.
	And so they threw away the speed limit.
	I remember the best line I ever had was that you're now allowed to travel like a bat out of hell.
	And is it still is it still reasonable and prudent or do they put back in speed limits?
	No, they put speed limits back in, unfortunately.
	You know, I always thought that was a great, that was the true personal responsibility law.
	If you had a good vehicle, you know, a safe vehicle, good tires, brakes, the weather was clear and You were an experienced driver.
	Like, I used to race cars, okay?
	I can drive over 100 miles an hour and make sure that I have good, safe equipment and be safe out on some of these open roads, but... It was... Yeah, no longer.
	It was a great... I figured as much.
	Of course, times change, but Congressman Matt Rosedale, you are an absolute hero and a patriot, and we appreciate you coming on.
	Thank you so much, sir.
	Love to give the sitch with the stinch.
	Oh yeah.
	Well, we love having you on and we love when you do it, my friend.
	Thank you so much.
	All right, folks.
	You know, we mentioned the Secret Service.
	What if I told you a Secret Service agent was now breastfeeding on the job?
	Breastfeeding!
	That's next.
	you you
	you this is America first with Sebastian Gorka
	I'm very proud and excited to introduce our guest host for today, Grant Stinchfield.
	Thanks so much, Dr. Gorka.
	So, today is Friday.
	You remember when Rush used to do Open Line Friday?
	We should have just done the whole show Open Line Friday.
	The secret of Open Line Friday, I'm not going to besmirch the great Rush Limbaugh, because he was absolutely fabulous.
	But it's a very lazy way to do radio, if you just all you do is take phone calls.
	And there are hosts out there that just take phone call to phone call to phone call.
	You don't have to really do a lot of work, you just respond.
	But since it's Friday, and even if it's off-topic, we got a caller that's very upset, so we figure I'll take her, alright?
	In the memory of the great El Rushbo.
	Wendy in L.A., what do you want to tell me?
	Well, first of all, it's wonderful to hear you on Dr. Gordon's show.
	I love you in Los Angeles, so thank you for being there today.
	Thank you, Wendy.
	Thank you.
	Well, what I wanted to say is I wish the President Trump would just keep it simple.
	I'm getting worried, too.
	This man had it in the bag.
	We were winning this thing.
	And then it seems to me we've been thrown off by what the Democrats have done, which is unbelievable.
	But if you can think it, they'll do it.
	And now I just wish that he'd be listening to you or to Mark Levin or anyone.
	I don't know if he listens to anybody.
	You've got to keep it simple.
	You know, it's basically why is she lying to the American public?
	Why is she switching on all of her positions?
	And yes, I think if they have their way, they'd love to put him in jail.
	I mean, that's I can't I'm with the woman who said, if you can think it, they'll do it.
	Well, you are right, and she was right as well when it comes to that, and I appreciate the kind words.
	So let me respond to you here, and I appreciate the phone call, Wendy.
	Thank you, and I appreciate you tuning into our show out in Los Angeles.
	Everybody can, by the way.
	AM 870.
	Just go to the app.
	We got an app.
	You type it in there, or any of the places you listen to.
	I think you can even say, hey, Alexa, tune in AM 870.
	I probably just set off Alexas all over the place.
	So listen, folks.
	Keeping it simple is the best way to win this campaign, and Wendy was correct in that President Trump needs to frame Kamala Harris as one, a failure, and two, a liar.
	She is not who she says she is.
	I don't mind that he calls her an idiot and she's dumb and she's not very smart, but that doesn't need to be the main focus of the campaign.
	You're not going to stop President Trump from talking like that, alright?
	So anybody who thinks that somebody came to me and they said, Grant, I know you know President Trump.
	Can't you just sit down with President Trump and tell him not to?
	Sit down with President Trump?
	No, I can't do that, and I would never try to do that or want to do that.
	Let President Trump be President Trump.
	And Corey Lewandowski, who's coming in now to help the campaign out, I think this may
	be part of the method where you let President Trump be President Trump, but you might polish
	it up a little bit.
	President Trump knows what he's doing, folks.
	This is one of the most successful presidents of all time.
	I believe the only reason he lost is because it was stolen from him.
	Now, it's gotten so bad that I do believe that minorities have come over to President
	Trump where we didn't have them before.
	The Hispanic numbers have not moved even with the institution of Kamala Harris now taking the slot from Joe Biden.
	The Hispanic numbers are still strong with President Trump.
	Black men, still strong with President Trump.
	So, I still feel good.
	Yes, I'm concerned.
	Yes, she can win.
	Don't take anything for granted.
	But the press is very, very powerful.
	And I understand why people would feel rattled.
	Now, we had it in the bag because it was Joe Biden.
	And Joe Biden was so bad, even the press couldn't defend him anymore.
	You can't defend the debate performance.
	You can't defend when he's literally slurring and stammering and stuttering and botching.
	Every speech that he gives, every other line was botched.
	The media cannot defend that.
	So I'm with Wendy that take a deep breath and things are going to be okay.
	Now, I told you about, um, uh, well, you know what?
	I'll take another phone call on this.
	Go to line one.
	Kim in Hollywood.
	Kim, what do you say?
	Hi, this is so confusing to me.
	How could it be that all, like, it seems like the entire sea of so-called journalists are all reporting supposedly the same thing.
	They use the same words, so you know they're being fed or controlled by their management.
	But, I mean, how is it that they're all coordinated like that?
	All right, so I'm going to answer your question and hopefully have enough time before break.
	Thank you for the call.
	So as someone who worked in mainstream media, I can tell you this.
	It's not that there's a conference call.
	People know what they're supposed to say.
	And as liberals took over management positions inside the mainstream media, they started to hire other liberals.
	Anybody that was a conservative was cut out.
	You didn't have a spot in the mainstream media anymore.
	So diversity in a newsroom needed to be from political thought.
	You can be unbiased but still have a political leaning.
	It doesn't mean you're not human.
	You just have to remove that from your reporting.
	That's gone.
	The leaders of these newsrooms wanted that gone.
	And they did.
	And they moved it out.
	So, they know what they have to say.
	They know what they have to do.
	It's like a super PAC that's working on behalf of the Trump campaign.
	They're not allowed to talk, but the people in control know what needs to be done.
	Alright, I'm Grant Stinchfield.
	Stinchfield 1776.
	Feel free to weigh in on this 833-33-GORKA.
	That's the number.
	We're back in a flash.
	Thanks for watching.
	I'm your host, Steve.
	I'll see you next time.
	Bye-bye.
	Bye.
	Bastion Gawker.
	This is America First.
	Let's get back to the show with Grant Stinchfield.
	Thank you so much, Dr. G. I've got a little bit of breaking news here, thanks to the Accountability Project.
	The House Oversight Committee is now launching an investigation into none other than Vice Presidential pick Tim Walz.
	Now, you might think, oh boy, this is weaponization of government, investigating a political foe.
	No.
	These are legitimate concerns.
	Walz's own admission and his ties to China are very concerning.
	I don't think Tim Walz would get a security clearance.
	He was going to be hired to work inside the government with 30 trips to China.
	He claims he got married on the anniversary of Tiananmen Square, claims he was there during that time when it looks like he wasn't.
	But this is a guy we know lies about things.
	He also admitted that when he was staying in China for long periods of time, he was given gifts, lots of gifts.
	They said they were so nice to him.
	Well, either he's too dumb to realize it, or he knew and is just trying to play it down, that the Chinese Communist Party would do this to foreigners.
	They lavish you with gifts to suck you in and then ultimately get you to work for them.
	There is ties that have been found between Tim Walz and Chinese secret police stations here in the United States.
	Now is this a man you want as vice president?
	And again, this election is not about vice presidents.
	This election will not come down to Tim Walz vs. J.D.
	Vance.
	It will come down to Donald Trump vs. Kamala Harris.
	What direction do you want the country to go?
	And if you don't know by now, folks, get out of the way, please.
	Or grow a set of brains.
	This idea that people are moderates and independent and I don't choose a side.
	How do you not choose a side in this day and age with how radical they are and how conservative we are, you can't choose a side?
	You don't know where you stand?
	You either stand on the side of freedom and liberty that you're in a position to make a decision for yourself over government making that decision, or you're not.
	But these people that are undecided, to me, I think you have a real problem with making a decision.
	I would hate to go to dinner with you.
	I bet you're one of those people that can't decide on the menu.
	I don't know what to eat.
	What should I eat, honey?
	Honey, will you tell me what to eat?
	Just pick something, please.
	But this is America now.
	People want to be told what to do.
	Blind liberal zombies want to be told what to do.
	And the undecided, okay?
	There's two things at play here.
	The truly undecided have to be liberals.
	They have to be.
	Because you wouldn't be undecided if you had any conservative leanings.
	The people that say, oh, I'm a moderate.
	Well, those people, I think, are voting for Trump.
	They just don't want to admit it.
	There's a difference between the undecided and the so-called moderate.
	The moderate just doesn't want to admit that he's a conservative, especially in California, where I do radio there.
	So, this is an issue with Tim Walz in China, though.
	And it goes to show you the decision-making capabilities of Kamala Harris to pick a guy like this.
	Did she vet him?
	Or did she not care?
	The AWOL stuff, well he wasn't really AWOL, but cut and running from his unit two months before they get deployed, claiming he's a command sergeant major, claiming he was in battle.
	That's stolen valor.
	Opening fire with the paintball guns the National Guard did on people defying his tyrannical curfew.
	This is who Kamala Harris picks.
	So again, this is your choice.
	We'll get to see inside the soul of the Democrat Party when we see what happens to President Trump when he's sentenced.
	Will they sentence him to prison?
	Will they put him behind bars?
	My gut feeling tells me they will not put him behind bars.
	I know it goes against what we would normally think.
	I know that it would be easier for me to be very sensationalistic and tell you as conservative viewers they're going to put him in jail.
	There is a chance they do that.
	For some reason my gut feeling tells me they're not going to do it.
	Those of you who listen to me in the morning know that I say I'm right 95% of the time.
	We have run the numbers and I'm right 95% of the time, much to the dismay of my very special lady friend.
	She hates that I'm right so often.
	She probably hates that I say that.
	But I am.
	This could be a time when I'm wrong, but I don't think it is.
	I think house arrest could also be a possibility.
	If that happens, that's also.
	Not good for President Trump in the middle of campaign season.
	All right, let's go out to Eric in San Jose.
	What say you, Eric?
	Hi, thanks for having me.
	I just want to say that I think the media, the conservative media, needs to spend a little bit more time on a bullet-by-bullet approach of exactly how these charges are unconstitutional, because the liberal media and the leftist media are spending time throwing curveballs about stupid things that the conservative media is paying
	attention to, and you know as well as I do about weirdness and stuff and how much time's been spent on it.
	If we just focus on the bullet by bullet about exactly why these charges are unconstitutional for the uninformed voter,
	I think we'll make progress.
	I have one more point, is it okay?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah, go for it.
	If I had my wish, when you get to the poll, every voter would have to press a button and a great kazoo from the
	Flintstones would pop up and say, Hello, Dum Dum, and then educate you on exactly what the
	facts are.
	Because that's what's needed.
	People really need to have more information.
	And instead of that all of the media is trying to trick them into these
	curveballs and having the conservative media spend time deflecting them about weirdness and stupidity.
	We need to focus on the uninformed voter who actually does not know about why police charges,
	the statute of limitations, out of the bag, misinformation, you know, all of it expired
	and that it was out of jurisdiction.
	All those things need to be known to the voters so that they can actually have some sense of
	recency before they go to the polls. I agree with you and I appreciate the phone call and
	Thank you.
	Here's the thing that's almost depressing for me.
	Today I will have done 8 hours of content.
	I'm not complaining.
	I love my job.
	It's the greatest job in the world and filling in for Dr. G is awesome.
	Every day I dedicate my life, three hours of radio, an hour podcast, an hour TV show, to making sure people get exactly what he talked about, bullet by bullet points, about why it's unconstitutional, why statute of limitations was up, why you can't charge a records keeping case the way they did it, and stacking the deck when it comes to charge stacking, all these things.
	And then for someone to say, oh, well, we need to do this more.
	Like, we're doing it.
	The problem is, and I love conservative media, But we're not CNN.
	So we don't have moderates, so-called moderates, listening to us.
	We don't have a lot of liberals listening.
	We have some haters.
	They make a big portion of the audience.
	They love to hate us.
	This is why I tell every single one of my conservative friends, you've got to go on MSNBC.
	You've got to go on CNN.
	Now, I would do that in a heartbeat.
	CNN, MSNBC, if you're listening, invite me on.
	They don't invite me on.
	They don't want me.
	Because they know I'll smoke them.
	All right, coming up next, folks, we're going to talk about mispronouncing Kamala's name.
	And a very unexpected person did it.
	Apparently he's a racist, but they don't call him out.
	What do you hear this next?
	you you
	I'm Sebastian Gorka.
	This is America First.
	Let's get back to the show with Grant Stinchfield.
	Thanks, Dr. G. It's been an absolute pleasure sitting in for you the last couple of days.
	I love all of your listeners, and some of them overlap with our friends over and out at AM 870.
	Don't forget my Real America's Voice show coming up at the top of the next hour on Real America's Voice.
	You can catch that there.
	We so appreciate that.
	How do you say Kamala Harris?
	Is it Kamala?
	Kamala?
	What is it?
	I think it's Kamala.
	But if you mispronounce it, I don't think it means you're racist.
	I think it just means it's a hard name to figure out because everybody says it differently.
	So when Nancy Mace says it wrong, CNN panel explodes on her for saying it wrong.
	Listen to this.
	Uh, Donald Trump is in a very vulnerable position.
	Well, talk about rerun Kamala's... Kamala's, uh... You had it right!
	You almost got it!
	You almost did it!
	I will say Kamala's name any way that I want to.
	No.
	But Kamala... But you mispronounced her, and you also misjudged her.
	I just did.
	I just did, and I'll do it again.
	You're purposely mispronouncing her name.
	Kamala's... That's why we're doing GoToEndMalaysers, man.
	And if Joe Biden's policies... One at a time, guys.
	If I purposely mispronounced your name, that would not be appropriate.
	Kamala's policies are Joe Biden's policies.
	She owns it 33 times.
	You're normalizing that kind of viciousness, man.
	Do you think, folks, That she mispronounced that on purpose?
	No.
	Kamala, Kamala, who the hell knows how to pronounce it?
	I know one guy who has no idea how to pronounce it.
	They don't call him a racist.
	Do you recognize this voice?
	Kamala, I'm here today to make a major announcement on the reference to Laura.
	That's Joe Biden.
	Kamala, he said.
	That was this week, by the way.
	Not when he was introducing her as his running mate.
	That was...
	This week, Kamala, he said it.
	One more time, guys.
	Kamala, I'm here today to make a major announcement on our efforts to lower... I think you'll love it.
	This is where I'm telling you.
	The media makes up these accusations that if you mispronounce Kamala Harris' name, that you're a racist.
	Well, I'm going to tell you something.
	I am not a racist.
	And if I want to say Kamala Harris or Kamala Harris, or what is the other one I got?
	I got Kamila Harris.
	What if I said that?
	I want to go on a CNN panel.
	I told you CNN and MSNBC won't have me on.
	Please, I'm begging you.
	I want to come on.
	And I'm going to call her Kamila.
	Or I may call her Kabbalah Harris.
	Can I do that?
	How would they feel about that?
	Chameleon Harris.
	The Chameleon?
	Hyden Harris?
	All of those things are worth calling her.
	Oh, you can't make this stuff up.
	Alright, folks.
	It's been an absolute pleasure.
	Here's what I want you to do this weekend.
	I want you to think about what you can do to help President Trump win and any congressional or senate candidates in your state or beyond.
	Think about what you can do.
	Little steps.
	There's plenty of them out there.
	Think about it because the fight is now, man.
	It is so important.
	And so, here's another thing you can do.
	Peruse my website.
	GrantStinchfield.com.
	GrantStinchfield.com.
	All the podcasts are up there.
	If you like what you saw today, I've got a podcast, The Real America's Voice Show, and of course, AM870.
	You can catch us all there, all day long.
	I so appreciate you.
	Stinchfield's Army Rolls.
	Thank you, Dr. Gorka, for letting me fill in, and a big thanks to the crew behind the glass.
	See you soon, folks.

▲