Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 16, 2023 - Sebastian Gorka

02:52:30

Grant Stinchfield LIVE: Third insurrection in a month

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	♪♪ ♪♪
	This is America First with Sebastian Gorka.
	I'm very proud and excited to introduce our guest host for today, Grant Stinchfield.
	Well, Dr. G, thank you so much.
	It is so great to be along with all of you this afternoon filling in for the great Dr. Gorka.
	He's in London, by the way, getting ready to debate April Ryan and Bernie Sanders' brother on the dangers of Donald Trump.
	That's not a fair fight, by the way.
	So, Dr. G's gonna crush these clowns.
	He's in London at the Oxford Club, I believe it is, and wish him well.
	I don't know any of you if you're listening in London, but if you are, you wanna go pay Dr. G a visit, because I promise you, that is going to be entertaining at the Oxford Union in London tonight.
	So folks, it's so great to be here.
	We have now had our third insurrection in a month.
	Third in a month!
	Yes, a real-life insurrection.
	Last night, we had these pro-Hamas, pro-Palestinian lunatics storm DNC headquarters right by the Capitol.
	150 of these goons blocking the doorway, refusing to leave.
	And I'm looking here this morning, and then into the afternoon, and I see there's only a handful of arrests.
	What do you mean only a handful of arrests?
	I'm watching 150 people go hog wild at the DNC.
	You got Democratic members of Congress that cannot make their way out of the building, not to mention it's a fire hazard, but these people are acting the fool.
	You see video, if you're watching now, you could see video of Officers, Capitol Police officers, trying to clear the area.
	If it was me, I would have brought in the tear gas, I would have brought in the horses, I would have brought in... Sick the German shepherds on these people!
	Because what I'm watching is an absolute disrespect for the law and an all-out thirst for violence.
	Now, Who's engaging in this nonsense?
	Before October 7th, and the slaughter of these poor Israelis, and not all of them were Jews, by the way.
	They slaughtered anybody in their path, okay?
	So before October 7th, was anybody talking about free Palestine, other than maybe Rashida Tlaib?
	No.
	You have young people across America, on campuses across America, and all of a sudden now, they're talking about this?
	It really, quite frankly, doesn't make any sense until you look at the ultimate goal that they're after.
	This is about pushing the oppression narrative.
	I know we've talked to you about this before many, many times, but the leftists so embrace the idea that the evil white man is oppressing every single minority, is oppressing those that are inequitable to all of us.
	And Israel falls right in line with that, right?
	The evil Israelis.
	Oh, come on.
	So they go down this road and they jump on board, let's back the people that are being oppressed, when in reality, the oppressed have turned into the oppressors.
	You think Hamas fighters?
	Are oppressed?
	They went into Israel and they literally cut people's heads off and they killed people, anyone they encountered, raping, pillaging, dragging people through the streets.
	You think that's oppressed?
	No, that's oppressing Israel.
	Israel now has a right to defend itself.
	Balloons show up at the Capitol and they go crazy.
	I'll let you listen to them.
	This is cut 14.
	We are outside the DNC.
	We're outside the Democratic Party headquarters because this party claims to be on the side of life and peace and equality.
	And we're saying that we want them to live up to their values and oppose this horrific war and call for a ceasefire now.
	And we're being responded to by the police shoving anti-war activists down the stairs, shoving peaceful protesters back with their bikes.
	And because our party, our party that 80% of us want a ceasefire, would rather beat up protesters Oh, come on.
	Do you see what I mean?
	These people are insane.
	I'm telling you they have been possessed.
	I talk about blind liberal zombie-ism.
	That's what we witnessed outside the Democrat National Committee headquarters.
	Blind liberal zombie-ism.
	These people are violent and they will stop at nothing in their quest to destroy anything in their path.
	Some of them I think it literally is an excuse just to just to get violent.
	Some of them, I think they're totally duped by their leaders and they think they're somehow standing up for the little people.
	Now I would like them to know, you know, I saw a sign, this is not a joke, I saw a sign that said gays for Hamas at one of these rallies.
	Gays for Hamas?
	Do you understand that they would like nothing more than to march every gay person, including every Christian person, including every single person that doesn't agree with their radical way of thinking.
	They'd love to march them all out to the beach, put them on their knees and lop their heads off.
	Okay?
	Gays for Hamas.
	They have no comprehension of what Hamas does when it comes to oppression.
	And I will also say this.
	Free Palestine.
	Two-state solution.
	Two-state solution isn't going to work.
	The majority of the Palestinian people, it has become clear to me, support Hamas.
	The majority of the Palestinian people want nothing more than to take over Israel.
	They elected Hamas into power.
	How do you think you're going to get a two-state solution here when one state wants you wiped off the face of the earth?
	Now, Benjamin Netanyahu, the leader of Israel, as well within his rights, said, we're going to wipe Hamas off the face of the earth.
	And honestly, that does all of us a giant favor, if they were to do that.
	Listen to what they are chanting for, rioting for, outside the DNC headquarters.
	And the DNC is like the ones that are calling for the ceasefire or, oh as they put it, a humanitarian pause.
	There's no such thing.
	You're either not firing or you are firing.
	Call it whatever you want, okay?
	Ceasefire is not happening in the middle of a war.
	We have terrorists wanting to kill Israelis.
	Listen to what they're chanting out there.
	They're cut 15.
	Not the money!
	And as they're yelling this, you can see the people trying to, trying to, police officers trying to get them to clear
	the area and they just will not clear the area.
	So, in many respects, what we are witnessing is the dumbing down of America firsthand.
	In fact, the world, and we have watched the dumbing down of the world when you think about Justin Trudeau in Canada, when you think about the people who are leading countries like France and others.
	The dumbing down of the world is real.
	And this is all part of it.
	The world is turning on Israel for no good reason.
	There is an underlying hatred towards the Jews, which to me is shocking at just how prolific it has become.
	I didn't realize it is what it is.
	To me, it's disgusting.
	And then you have the same very youngsters that we see at college campuses that are jumping on board what amounts to be a propaganda move that they are falling for.
	And when you talk about the dumbing down of America, I saw this story out of Oregon.
	That the State Department of Education was going to drop all education standards.
	And this plays into this story, folks, about Israel and Hamas.
	The Department of Education in Oregon was going to drop all education standards and no testing to graduate from high school because, oh, kids fell behind in COVID and just isn't fair to these kids.
	So, you know what they just told everybody?
	You don't need to educate them.
	Kids don't need to be educated, and the left doesn't want your children educated.
	The left wants your kids dumb and stupid, so they can tell your kids, go rally wherever they want to, whether it's in the Capitol, whether it's in front of the White House, whether it's in front of DNC headquarters, go hog wild, you're dumb, we taught you how to be dumb, we indoctrinated you into a dumb way of thinking, and they're just going to let them pass.
	It's up to us to push back, fight back against all of this.
	Hey folks, 833-334-6752, 833-334-6752, 833-33, GORKA is the easy way to remember it.
	I want to hear from you.
	What do you think about all of this?
	And then I want to talk a little bit about spending as well.
	That when America First continues right here on the Salem Radio Network.
	Stick around, I'm Grant Stinchfield.
	Thanks for watching.
	you you
	you I'm Sebastian Gawker.
	This is America First.
	Let's get back to the show with Grant Stinchfield.
	Well, welcome back everybody.
	Dr. G has, I won't call it a day off because he's debating April Ryan and Bernie Sanders' brother at the Oxford Union in London over the dangers of President Trump.
	Again, they better be in for a danger because it's not going to be a fair fight against Dr. Gorka.
	So welcome back, everybody.
	833-33-GORKA.
	That is the line to weigh in.
	833-33-GORKA.
	As I mentioned, I'm Grant Stinchfield.
	Look, I do want to talk a little bit about spending.
	When we see Xi Jinping coming into San Francisco to talk to Joe Biden, who I believe is the greatest national security risk to America as we know it.
	One, he's a dementia-ridden patient.
	Two, he's feckless.
	Three, he's weak.
	And four, he's compromised.
	All of that makes him a national security risk.
	The number two national security risk, I believe, to America is our spending problem.
	We are weak with the amount of spending we have.
	Why?
	Because we're crushing our economy.
	Inflation is up.
	Now we push this continuing resolution, what they call the two-step stopgap.
	It sounds like a dance in Texas where I'm broadcasting from, but it is no dance.
	It is a game.
	In fact, I call it a con game.
	There's no coincidence.
	Con begins the part of Congress, right?
	And I believe it's a con game.
	We need to get back to the business of cutting spending and doing it now.
	But here we are, and we're giving Speaker Johnson some leeway.
	So I want to dive into Are a lot of the conservative members of Congress giving Speaker Johnson leeway here?
	There was a lot of fight about this continuing resolution.
	So, until we break all of this stuff down, I want to bring in the Washington Bureau Chief for Breitbart.com, which is a great, great, great site.
	Here with us now is Matthew Boyle.
	Matt, it's great to have you on the program.
	Yeah, great thanks for having me.
	Absolutely.
	So, you know, I didn't see a huge fight here.
	Normally I would.
	It seems like some of the usual suspects who I'm such a big fan of were somewhat quiet here.
	What do you think is going on?
	With regard to the spending fight, I mean... Yes, the continuing resolution and getting that passed through.
	Well, look, I mean, nothing changed when you elected a new Speaker of the House.
	The fact is that you've got a four-seat Republican majority in the House, the Democrats control the Senate by one seat, and the Democrats control the White House.
	So, electing a new Speaker wasn't going to change that vote math, and the fact is, is that any Republican Speaker is going to be in a tough position, and, you know, Speaker Johnson has the same hand that Speaker McCarthy had.
	So, I do think that some of the people that were making promises, like electing a new Speaker, etc., We're writing checks they can't cash, right?
	And I think that the fact is that you want to change how Washington works, you can do it, but you need to elect better Republicans, you need to elect more Republicans in both the House and the Senate, and you need to change who's the president.
	So I do get a feeling, though, that I get a feeling, Matt, that there are those of the Freedom Caucus That maybe you're giving Speaker Johnson a little more room to maneuver here, because if this was Speaker McCarthy trying to put a two-step stopgap, I would have had Matt Gaetz and Lauren Boebert and Marjorie Taylor Greene on my Real America's Voice show every night for the last two weeks screaming and yelling how we can't let this happen, we can't do this, and there wasn't a lot of that going on.
	It was kind of more quiet than it had usually been.
	Yeah, well, I think that, again, these people wrote checks they can't cash.
	The fact is that nothing changed.
	We went through a month of this fight for a new speaker, and the idea that Johnson was going to be fundamentally different Well, Matt, here's the difference.
	Here's the difference.
	This is the whole point of the McCarthy situation.
	The McCarthy team was always saying that they're doing the best they can with what they've
	got.
	Well, that's true.
	I mean, that's the...
	And that...
	Well, Matt, here's the difference.
	Here's the difference, is that you couldn't trust McCarthy.
	McCarthy was a guy who said, okay, we'll bring individual spending bills to the floor, and
	He said we give you enough time to read the bill and then doesn't.
	Made promises about other things and then breaks the promises.
	There were times where you could really get a feeling he was turning his back on certain factions of the Republican Party.
	What we needed, I know we can't get a unifier because we're so far apart just even inside the Republican Party, but if you have somebody you can trust you may disagree with You're gonna be better off as a party.
	McCarthy was just too divisive.
	Well, I mean, again, Speaker Johnson made all of those same exact promises, and he's now broken them, too, right?
	Like, so if these people actually believe what they say they believe, the people like Matt Rosendale, like Matt Gaetz, etc., and, you know, many of them are friends of mine.
	I liked a lot of those members of Congress, but the fact is that if they are going to stick to what they say they believe in, they will bring a motion to vacate against Speaker Johnson, and I don't see that happening because it's unrealistic.
	No, but Matt, you're not letting the game play out, right?
	So now you've put him in a position where basically you're saying, okay, you're the quarterback and you didn't win with two minutes left, we put you in in the fourth quarter, you're down by 14 and you didn't win and we put you in with two minutes, so now let's get a new quarterback.
	I don't know if that's true.
	I don't know if the idea that you're going to be able to pass individual spending bills in January and February either.
	I don't think that you are.
	Well, I agree with you on that, which is why, in my mind, I think we should have taken the stand now.
	Why are we pushing it down the road?
	I see what Johnson's political move was.
	Things are quiet.
	He was able to get it through without a bunch of yelling and screaming, so he just bought himself some time.
	In his position, I see what he's doing.
	In my position, and I think in your position too, what we want are to stand up and fight for what's right!
	Forget about the political move, like, we are flat, broke, busted, Matt.
	Yeah, well, again, the fact is that I want to see Republicans use the leverage that they've got to get positive changes, right?
	And the month-long fight over a Speaker blew Republican leverage in Congress in the spending negotiations.
	The fact is that they had passed several of the individual appropriations bills in the
	lead up to that.
	They had passed, I think, four or five of them before they vacated the chair.
	Since then, since we got a new speaker, I think they've passed a few more.
	They had to call off several of the other ones because several of the conservatives
	blocked them again this last week after the CR vote and whatnot.
	But the fact is that you want to see real change in Washington, which I do, you need
	to change who the president is, you need to change who the senators are, you need to change
	who the members of Congress are.
	And that means you need to elect better numbers with a four seat majority.
	The idea that you're going to see in the House where the Democrats control the Senate and
	the White House, you're not going to see that much more change on the policy side.
	They need to get to the election next year.
	And that is where it starts, is electing new leadership, and especially in the United States Senate.
	That's where it is imperative.
	I'll tell you what, Matt Boyle, it's great having you on the program as always.
	I know this is a regular thing for you, but I appreciate you coming on when I'm filling in for Dr. G. Thank you, buddy.
	Yep, you bet.
	All right, absolutely.
	You can find Matt Boyle at Breitbart.com, and he's doing great work up in Washington.
	I will say this.
	That it is better off to have a speaker that, at least for now, we can give some trust to.
	But I give rope, and I give a short rope in situations like this.
	So, as I say, in my position doing radio, I do the morning out in L.A., I do the TV show on Real America's Voice, 7 p.m.
	Eastern Time tonight.
	I got eyes in the front of my head, I got eyes in the back of my head, and I got eyes in the side of my head.
	And they all see 2020.
	And I'm always watching.
	And you know who else is watching?
	Stinchfield's Army.
	All of you.
	Because we're gonna get those good people back in office.
	It was up to us.
	So we keep moving forward.
	Hey, let's talk about Israel and the hostages and what the real truth is about all that when we come back.
	Stick around.
	You You
	I'm Sebastian Gawker.
	This is America First.
	Let's get back to the show with Grant Stinchfield.
	Well, hi there folks.
	Grant Stinchfield here in for the great Dr. Sebastian Gorka.
	It is a pleasure to be along with you this afternoon.
	833-33-GORKA is the number to weigh in on the program.
	833-33-GORKA.
	I want to talk about what's going on in Israel right now.
	And there's a lot of news coming out.
	That Israel may be in a position to make a deal for hostages.
	Now, I am skeptical of the news reporting that is coming out from both CBS and, of course, the New York Times.
	Now, why would I be skeptical of them, for crying out loud?
	Well, you know why.
	Because they're phony fake frauds.
	That's why.
	So, one report is that Israel is considering a deal with Hamas for a temporary Gaza ceasefire in exchange for release of some hostages.
	The New York Times is reporting that the exchange would be for up to 50 women and children hostages for up to 50 Palestinian hostages that are being held by the Israelis.
	Now, one thing has become clear to me as I watch this war play out and I've watched history play out.
	I'm 54 years old, so I've been witnessing unrest in the Middle East for a really long time.
	And I'm tired of it.
	Something's gotta give.
	I don't think anything will give, and I don't think anything will ever give.
	And the reason for that is that when you talk about so-called jihadists, holy warriors, these terrorists, these evil thugs, just cockroaches of human beings, It's generational.
	It's bred into them.
	They raised their children to wage these wars on humanity.
	You're never going to stop that.
	You stomp out one, it's like whack-a-mole, others will pop up.
	So we need to be prepared to fight the likes of Hamas and Al-Qaeda and ISIS and Hezbollah for many decades to come.
	And I know that just sounds absolutely horrible for all of you.
	And, you know, look, I don't care whether you're young or you're old.
	We don't want to be in wars over here.
	We don't want to stop them overseas before they come to the United States, but we have to.
	That is the reality of things.
	So here's what I say America is very good at, and then we get back to the hostages.
	America is very good at Big time strikes.
	America is very good with might and fury and all of the just explosion style attacks.
	We're good at that.
	Which is why I say, if I'm the commander in chief, I'm taking out Iran's nuclear facilities.
	I'm done with even having to worry about them getting a nuclear bomb.
	I'm done.
	They're attacking our service members in Syria and Iraq.
	What are we, upwards of over 50 attacks now since this war broke out?
	That's Iran!
	Take those nuclear facilities out and, by the way, take the oil refineries out too.
	We would return Iran into just the depths of a horrible economy.
	They couldn't afford to do anything, even if they wanted to.
	But this administration doesn't have the stones to do that.
	Those are big attacks, okay?
	Those are big fire and fury.
	What we suck at is policing.
	And I don't mean policing here.
	I mean policing overseas.
	What we suck at is nation building.
	I don't want to nation build.
	I don't want to change Gaza.
	I don't want to change Afghanistan.
	It would have been nice if that would have happened.
	Iraq, oh, it would have been great if it turned into a great free country.
	It's not.
	The people over there do not want democracy like we know it.
	They do not want the freedom that we know and love.
	Many of these people that live in these countries want to be told what to do.
	Unlike all of us who want just the opposite.
	So you're not going to change that.
	So stay out of there.
	Now with that said, Hamas knows the way that it gets to Israel is through these hostages.
	They're not going to trade for Palestinian hostages because they don't care about the Palestinian people.
	They don't care if they die.
	They use them as human shields.
	Why would they trade for 50 Palestinian women and children in an Israeli prison when they don't care about Israeli-Palestinian women and children?
	So, the New York Times, I throw it out.
	Now, I may be wrong.
	I've run the math.
	I'm wrong about 5% of the time.
	95% of the time, I get it right.
	5%, I get it wrong.
	This could be one of those times, but I don't know.
	I'm not necessarily convinced that it is.
	So, as you look at all of this, do we get messages?
	I'm not convinced that we do.
	And I don't think Israel's convinced that we do.
	And I think Israel, in the quiet depths of the military planning, they know that, quite frankly, as sad as this is, that it's horrible it is to think about it, that if they go in there and bomb some of these areas that hostages could be lost.
	But what do you do in the end?
	You're sending a message to Hamas saying you can't take hostages because we're going to kill you no matter what.
	It's not going to work using them as human shields.
	Sadly, a few lose their lives.
	What?
	Save an entire country from being hostage?
	Maybe.
	Alright, 833-33-GORKA.
	That's the number to call in.
	Stinchfield 1776 is where you can find me.
	I'm Grant Stinchfield.
	stick with me.
	I'm going to be back.
	Bye.
	you you
	you I
	you I'm Sebastian Gorka, this is America First, let's get back to the show with Grant Stinchfield.
	All right, folks, welcome back.
	Grant Stinchfield here.
	It is a pleasure to be in the chair.
	833-33-GORKA.
	833-33-GORKA.
	So is there a possibility we will see hostages being released?
	Joe Biden was asked about this during his meeting with Chi at San Francisco.
	Just listen to this interaction.
	Cut 19.
	I think the pause that the Israelis have agreed to is down to... I'm getting too much detail.
	I know, Mr. Secretary.
	I'm going to stop.
	But I am mildly hopeful.
	I'm mildly hopeful.
	Look, Secretary Antony Blinken, one of Biden's beta males, and he's got a lot of beta males working for him, and I'm telling you, beta males don't do well for running a country.
	They don't do well for running a business.
	They don't do well for running a family.
	Beta males are pretty bad news.
	We got a whole slew of them running this country.
	Blinken is at the top of the list of Biden's beta males.
	It's interesting though, you know, Joe Biden is not a beta male.
	Joe Biden is an alpha male, and back in his day, he's an angry, mean alpha male.
	But he's an insecure, angry, mean alpha male, which is why he surrounds himself with beta males.
	Compare that to the difference between President Trump.
	President Trump is a kind, strong, confident alpha male.
	And you know who he likes to be surrounded with?
	Other alpha males.
	Why do you think Dr. Gorka worked for him?
	Why do you think Steve Bannon worked for him?
	Why do you think he's got Peter Navarro?
	Guys like this, these are all alpha males.
	And you know what?
	Our country was in a much better shape with alpha males.
	So Joe Biden, who's supposed to be the leader of the free world, is now taking cues from his Secretary of State, saying, hey, you better be quiet, Mr. President.
	Don't give it up.
	Well, Biden kind of gave it away there a little bit.
	He talked about this pause.
	I love this term, humanitarian pause.
	It's ridiculous.
	Mounts to a ceasefire and it's not a good move.
	They should not agree to any ceasefires.
	So, if there's a ceasefire for a return of some hostages, what is the motivation for Hamas to accept the ceasefire and return hostages?
	Unless it's to regroup.
	They have to be getting something out of it, because the only thing a ceasefire does for Hamas is allow them to stock up, restock up on food and ammunition, to move about the city, to find their stockpiles and cache of weapons.
	It's only going to make Israel's job of eradicating Hamas harder when the ceasefire stops.
	So if that is the case, Hamas is giving up hostages, but they're going to get something far better in return, and that's tactical advantage on the Israelis.
	And let's face it, Hamas has tactical advantage inside Gaza.
	It is close quarters.
	It is inner city.
	You've got apartment buildings.
	You've got civilians all over the place.
	Hamas knows the area.
	Yes, Israeli has good intelligence.
	They probably have maps of this whole city, but they don't know it like Hamas does.
	Hamas are the rodents that have been traveling around this city.
	They know it.
	They could go with their eyes closed.
	So Hamas is going to get the benefit of this.
	So why was Blinken shaking his head apparently to Biden as Biden started talking?
	Well, this is a CNN reporter trying to spell out what she, what they think happened.
	Cut 20.
	I was sitting so close to the front row.
	I was in the second row, the first row of reporters in this press conference.
	When President Biden was asked about the ongoing hostage negotiations, he said that he was mildly hopeful.
	He started to talk about a pause that Israel may have agreed to.
	And then he looked over at Secretary of State Antony Blinken, who was sitting right in front of him, and made some remark about how perhaps he shouldn't get too much into the detail, and Secretary Blinken shaking his head, shaking his head no, definitely do not get into too much of the details.
	Don't get into the details!
	Don't give it up!
	Now, if you're the President of the United States, I tell my Secretary of State, you sit back down.
	I'll talk about whatever I want to talk about, and I think there's a best interest to say something, then I'll say it.
	And if there's not an interest to say it, then I'm not going to say it.
	But I don't need my third-in-command, which is basically what he amounts to, maybe fourth-in-command, telling me what to do.
	But this is Joe Biden.
	He's handled like a child.
	He's handled like a baby.
	He doesn't know where he is.
	He doesn't know what to say.
	This is why I told you in the very beginning of this show, what did I say?
	I said our number one national security risk is Joe Biden at the helm.
	There is no doubt about it in my mind that Joe Biden is frightening to America.
	Because of this, and their ultimate quest to destroy America.
	And all of this is most certainly connected.
	833-33-GORKA is the number.
	833-33-GORKA.
	It's been on hold for a little bit.
	I want to go out to Arizona line 1.
	Dave, welcome to the program.
	Yeah, I appreciate you taking my call, sir.
	So I have to give you a slight disagreement.
	One man at the top of the executive branch I don't think is breaking our country, but as we saw, this week and with the voting last week in November, we can't
	trust anybody in our government.
	And I called this in May of 2020, that our entire system is broken. When the DOJ failed
	to respond for the George Floyd riots, and we saw at that point, well, in the six months
	before that, President Trump's still alone to get us in the room and get us at the table.
	And now at this point with this budget fiasco, this two-step ladder deal where they're going to punt for another four months, we've lost total control of this government.
	And it's time for we the people to stand up, all 330 million of us, Well, I agree with you, and I think the only one that's going to be able to get all of us rallied in a position where we stand up is, of course, is President Trump.
	Thank you so much for the phone call, Dave.
	I appreciate it.
	And look, I do believe one man can do an awful lot of damage.
	Joe Biden has done tremendous damage.
	We call it him, whoever is pulling his strings, but the power of the presidency with Joe Biden in it is disastrous.
	Every single move this man has made, every single person this man has hired, He's done damaging things to the United States of America from Secretary Mayorkas at Homeland Security and our open border policies to Secretary of State Blinken is making deals with Iran as we speak.
	Another $10 billion being offered up to Iran.
	Hey folks, I want to talk a lot about China.
	You know, you had Xi in San Francisco, and that's it.
	We're going to continue all of this as America First continues.
	I'm Grant Stinchfield.
	Stinchfield1776 on social media.
	GrantStinchfield.com.
	GrantStinchfield.com.
	If you like what you hear, check out my podcast.
	GrantStinchfield.com.
	We're back in a flash.
	You You
	You I'm Sebastian Gawker.
	This is America First.
	Let's get back to the show with Grant Stinchfield.
	Welcome back, everybody.
	So Dr. G is in Oxford, England, getting ready to debate April Ryan, you know, the leftist opinionator, and Bernie Sanders' brother about the dangers of Donald Trump, which there's no debate.
	He's not dangerous.
	So that's an easy talking point for Dr. G. But I guess it's one of the oldest debate clubs in the world.
	And good for him going over there and taking them head on.
	Um, you know, as the first hour starts to come, you know, it's so depressing, everything going on in the world, everything going on in Israel, everything going on in the United States, what we see in San Francisco with Biden sucking up to Papa Xi, let's call him that, the Chairman Xi of the Chinese Communist Party, that's what Biden calls him, Papa Xi.
	It's all depressing.
	Our open borders, we got inflation through the roof, gas prices, ugh.
	But every now and then when I see a good story, I want to tell you about it.
	Because good stories are hard to come by.
	So apparently there was a shootout in Houston, Texas between police and an ex-con, okay, who was, led police on a police chief to get in a shootout on the highway.
	And you had another ex-con who jumps out of his car to rescue a wounded police officer.
	This guy, Phillip Lally, he's 40 years old.
	He's been in and out of prison for burglary and firearms charges and domestic assault.
	Nothing that I like.
	But he says he loves cops and he says he's reformed.
	And he ran into the gunfire and he saved this cop.
	This is how Inside Edition laid it out.
	Cut five.
	The drama erupts when cops in Houston got into a gun battle with a suspected carjacker.
	As John Lally sprints forward, you can hear the injured officer screaming in pain from a bullet in his leg.
	Lally and another officer grab the wounded cop by his bulletproof vest and drag him behind a vehicle.
	Video shot from across the highway shows the amazing scene as they pull the stricken officer.
	The Good Samaritan tries to comfort the wounded cop as officers put a tourniquet on his leg.
	Hold my hand!
	Hold my hand!
	I'm still here with you, buddy.
	You can see other witnesses huddling behind a car for safety.
	That lally makes a surprising admission.
	I've been to jail a million times, man, and I love cops too, bro.
	It's gonna be alright.
	How about that?
	Hole in his hand.
	Rescuing him to safety.
	This is what makes me feel great about America, because that guy, even a reformed ex-convict, goes and saves a cop.
	But we have a war on cops going on.
	You have so many of those on the left who hate police officers.
	Here's a story of a guy you would expect wouldn't like police officers, but then maybe quite possibly saves the life of one.
	Those are the kind of stories we need to tell more of at times.
	I try to do that on my podcast, GrantStinchfield.com.
	Go to the website.
	Please subscribe to the podcast if you can.
	If you like what you're hearing today, as I'm in for Dr. G, it's very, very helpful.
	GrantStinchfield.com and everywhere you can find podcasts.
	Rumble, too, if you're watching.
	Subscribe to the Rumble channel, Grant Stinchfield.
	All right, we are back and we're going to talk about Christopher Wray and the possibility of Hamas coming across our southern border.
	That's next.
	Thanks for watching!
	you you
	you I
	you I'm Sebastian Gorka, this is America First, let's get back to the show with Grant Stinchfield.
	Well, hi there, folks.
	It is a great pleasure to be here this afternoon as I sit in for the great Dr. Sebastian Gorka.
	And look, Dr. G is over in Oxford, England.
	He's about to take on Bernie Sanders' brother and April Ryan in a debate of the century over whether or not Donald Trump is the greatest threat to America.
	Come on.
	Dr. G's gonna crush him there.
	So with that, welcome, everyone.
	I don't need to tell you that our southern border is wide open.
	I don't need to tell you that we are facing a crisis beyond belief.
	I don't need to tell you that it's not only a humanitarian crisis, but it is also a national security crisis.
	And then I ask you, and you know, how do we get here?
	Well we got here by electing globalists into our own government.
	The deep state elitists who have been there and embedded there as career bureaucrats.
	You put Joe Biden at the helm and those pulling his strings and then he surrounds himself with other globalists like Blinken and Mayorkas and just about every leader of every agency he appointed a leader to.
	They've done everything they can to destroy America.
	Secretary Mayorkas first and foremost because he's totally disregarded his oath to America when it comes to the idea of securing a border.
	In 2006 we passed a law that says you have to keep operational control of the southern border.
	You can no longer dispute that the cartels have operational control of the border.
	You can no longer dispute that Border Patrol agents no longer work the line.
	Border Patrol agents now are process takers.
	They're signing people in.
	Why?
	Well, I believe that the Democrats, the Radicals, the Liberals, and I'm almost to the point where all Democrats, if you're a Democrat and even call yourself a Democrat, You have to support the radicalization of America.
	Because even if you were an old-fashioned, what they call blue-dog Democrats in Texas, a Texas Democrat, you wouldn't support what's going on.
	You'd say either, I'm now an independent, or you'd turn your back on the Democrat Party, but this is not anything but radical ideas.
	So they have these open borders, ultimately to destroy America.
	I just saw something like $460 billion a year in health care costs.
	The illegal immigration costs us a year.
	Not to mention the fentanyl that's coming in.
	And we talk about this on a daily basis.
	The crime now in every city, whether it's liberal-run or conservative-run, and there are not many big cities that are conservative-run anymore, every city is overrun with crime because police can't keep up.
	Add in the liberal policies in the big liberal cities, and it's a total recipe for disaster.
	So, what about the other problems with the border?
	What about terrorists coming in?
	I have never seen anything like it with the amount of people not coming from Mexico.
	Remember, like, during the Bush years and beyond, it would be Mexicans coming across the border.
	Then it kind of switched to, okay, you get a few Mexicans, but then you have Central and South America coming across the border.
	Now, you see people coming from China, just about every African nation you can imagine, Middle Eastern countries, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, just to name a few.
	You have India, Pakistan, it's a smorgasbord of hotbed areas for terrorism that these special interest aliens are coming across the border.
	Christopher Wray, the director of the FBI, was asked about this.
	And he was asked about the suspicion of terrorists coming across our border.
	I have no faith in Christopher Wray whatsoever.
	I believe he is one of the globalists, the deep staters that has penetrated himself so deep in the federal government that it's hard to oust a guy like this.
	But this is what he had to say to Representative Mark Green.
	Well, certainly the group of people that you're talking about are a source of great concern for us.
	That's why we're aggressively using all 56 of our Joint Terrorism Task Forces.
	or other terror groups are not amongst those gotaways?
	Well, certainly the group of people that you're talking about are a source of great concern
	for us.
	That's why we're aggressively using all 56 of our Joint Terrorism Task Forces.
	But there's really no way for you to guarantee that Hamas isn't in those?
	Well, again, as you say, there's the unknown unknown and the known unknown.
	But what I can tell you is that our 56 Joint Terrorism Task Forces are working their tails off to make sure that they suss out and identify potential terrorist suspects, whether they're on the watch list or not.
	Now, why are they working their tails off?
	I mean, I'm happy that a Joint Terrorism Task Force agent is working his tail off.
	But why?
	He's working his tail off because there's no way to track these people.
	You literally are coming in.
	Joe Biden and Mayorkas have instituted an illegal parole system where you don't even have a judge involved in the process of letting somebody into the country and then tracking them down and giving them a promise to appear.
	The promises to appear are gone.
	They give you a plane ticket to a city wherever you want to go and then they say when you get there, check in.
	Nobody's checking in.
	So now, even well-intentioned FBI agents, and I have to believe that there are some left.
	Please, dear Lord, let there be some left.
	Even well-intentioned FBI agents are now left, where'd they go?
	How do we find them?
	Secretary Mayorkas, you didn't give us a trail, no breadcrumbs, nothing to follow these potential terrorists down.
	And you've got thousands upon thousands, tens of thousands of what they call special interest aliens, aliens that come from countries that have a history of breeding terrorism.
	So, what Christopher Wray did there was he gave you a roundabout answer, but this is all you get from the Biden administration, and quite frankly, it's all you get from most people in government.
	He gives you a roundabout answer about why we're in the position we're in, instead of just telling you flat out, it would be a lot easier for us to stop terrorists if we were stopping all illegals from coming into the country at the source, which is our southern border.
	Just stop it.
	Finish the wall.
	Let the agents patrol.
	When you arrest somebody, you deport them immediately.
	Institute the Remain in Mexico program for your asylum claims.
	Let your asylum claims be played out while you wait in Mexico.
	You do all of those things.
	Immediately, immigration is going to be cut tremendously.
	So, Christopher, I was asked again about this topic.
	Cut to?
	I can't really speak to that issue.
	It's not in my lane.
	Why do you think in four years before this there were only 11 and suddenly
	there are 294 in the past few years? Why do you think that's so?
	I can't really speak to you know to that issue, not in my lane. I can
	tell you the threats that come from the other side of the border are very much
	consuming all 56 of our field offices not just in the border states. That's why
	Sure, I agree.
	If I heard you correctly, what you just said is not every state in the country is a border state now.
	Is that what you just said?
	Well, I didn't put it quite that way, but the threats that come from the other side of the border are affecting every state.
	Absolutely.
	100%.
	So that's an admission right there from one of the top law enforcement officers in the country who happens to be a devious jerk.
	But it's still an admission that his boss, Joe Biden, has turned every state into a border state.
	We talk about every city's a border town now.
	They really are.
	You know, my buddy Ben Birkwam, he does such great work over at Real America's Voice.
	You can catch my show there, 7 o'clock tonight, Eastern Time.
	Ben Birkwam will stand at the border where illegals are coming by and he'll just ask them, Where are you coming from?
	Where are you going?
	Where are you coming from?
	Where are you going?
	Syria, New York.
	Yemen, Los Angeles.
	Iraq, Chicago.
	Over and over again.
	And I'm left looking and shaking my head.
	Who in government thinks this is a good idea?
	And how can Christopher Wray, the director of the FBI, sit in front of Congress and think that he's doing a good job, think that Homeland Security's doing a good job, when our border is wide open?
	How is our terror threat now, Christopher Wray, since October 7th when Hamas went into Israel, cut three?
	Certainly, we're in an environment where the number of tips and threats that are being reported to us have gone up significantly since October 7th.
	We were already, as I testified earlier, already in an elevated threat environment even before October 7th, and it's gone to a whole other level since October 7th.
	The biggest chunk of the threats that have been reported into us by a good margin are threats to the Jewish community, synagogues, Jewish prominent officials, things like that.
	We also have a large number of tips and leads related specifically to Hamas and radicalization and recruitment.
	So, the threat level's higher now.
	Then it was October 7th.
	I remember a few weeks ago he was in front of Congress.
	He said, where are we now compared to when President Trump was in office?
	Are we better or worse with Joe Biden?
	And he paused for 20 seconds.
	I don't know if you guys remember this.
	He paused for like 20 seconds.
	And it's like the old country song.
	It's not what you say, it's what you didn't say that matters most.
	It's not what you did, it's what you didn't do.
	I'm not going to sing.
	I got yelled at for doing that this morning on the morning answer out on AM 870 at my home station in Los Angeles.
	They don't like my singing.
	But it's a great, it's a great phrase because he was silent when it came to all of this.
	Because he doesn't know how to answer the question.
	Or he knows how, he just doesn't want to and he doesn't want to throw Joe Biden under the bus.
	Alright folks, the new federal state of China taking down the CCP.
	They're in San Francisco.
	We're going to talk to them when we come back.
	Thank you.
	I'm Sebastian Gorka, this is America First, let's get back to the show with Grant Stinchfield.
	Well, hi there, folks.
	Thank you, Dr. G. It is great to be sitting in your chair this afternoon as we go through some of the news of the day.
	And there's no bigger news than Joe Biden putting national security at risk, sucking up to Xi Jinping, the chairman of the Chinese Communist Party, who is over here being welcomed as a state hero.
	Xi Jinping is the leader of an army that is waging war on us right now.
	He's pushing fentanyl through that's killing American citizens.
	He's stealing American secrets from American companies.
	They are spying on us.
	They got spy balloons flying across the country.
	They're propping up our enemies like Iran and Russia.
	Our allies have a harder time keeping themselves safe.
	All of this is sowing chaos for one reason and one reason only.
	To take down the United States.
	All the while, Xi Jinping is selling the dollar and buying gold.
	What?
	To crush the American dollar.
	And lo and behold, Joe Biden says this about Xi Jinping in their little meeting yesterday.
	Roll cut.
	Roll it.
	We've known each other for a long time.
	We haven't always agreed, which would not surprise anyone.
	But our meetings have always been candid, straightforward, and useful.
	I've never doubted what you've told me in terms of your candid nature in which you speak.
	I value our conversation because I think it's paramount that you and I understand each other clearly.
	He trusts him?
	Never doubted anything you said?
	I just spelled out everything they're doing to us and he says, the only only thing that he's never doubted, the check is in the mail.
	Yes, Joe Biden, the check is in the mail.
	Oh, I don't doubt that.
	I'll have my son Hunter go to the post office tomorrow and pick it up.
	All of this is nonsensical, and it's also very dangerous.
	Well, there is an organization out there trying to take down the CCP.
	The New Federal State of China has become very involved with this group, founded by Steve Bannon and the billionaire Chinese dissident Miles Guo, who sits in a federal prison, also a political persecution.
	No victims to what he's being accused of, that I can see, because they are on a quest to take down the CCP.
	They also have many of their members, the New Federal State of China, that are embedded inside, even yes, secretly, Chinese Communist Party in China that gets information back here.
	There are many of them in the United States that support the destruction of the CCP.
	One of them, of course, is Nicole Tsai.
	She comes on my Real America's Voice show a lot, my podcast a lot.
	She is with the New Federal State of China.
	Nicole Tsai, welcome to the program.
	Thank you, Grant, for having us.
	Well, you're out there in front of where Biden and Xi are meeting.
	They keeping you away from Xi?
	Absolutely.
	Gavin Newsom and the city government and state government did a very good job complying with Xi Jinping's demands of not seeing any anti-CCP protesters.
	And we are among the largest anti-CCP group.
	As you mentioned, we are new federal state of China.
	Founded by Steve K. Bannon and Miles Guo with the sole purpose of taking down the Chinese Communist Party.
	And we want to do it right here on the U.S.
	soil because CCP is not just in Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong, or Taiwan.
	They are right here on the U.S.
	soil.
	They're in Washington, D.C.
	They're in San Francisco.
	They're in New York.
	They have infiltrated the U.S.
	communities and schools and colleges.
	So that's why we're here, to demand Xi Jinping to be booted out from this country, and we ask President Joe Biden to wake up.
	Well, Nicole, look, you say they're right here in the United States.
	The Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party in Congress released the donor list of who was paying $40,000 a plate.
	And you have the CEO of Amway, Tim Cook, the CEO of Apple, Lawrence Fink, BlackRock, Stephen Schwarzman, Blackstone, all of these companies.
	This is just a few of them.
	You've got Gilead Services, you've got MasterCard, you've got Fulgen Genetics, all these huge companies.
	$40,000 a plate and the organization putting it on, filled with globalists.
	This sums up the involvement of Wall Street and big business sucking up to Daddy Sheet.
	Absolutely.
	I mean, these globalists, they do not represent the American people's interests.
	They have been profiting from America's failed policy toward the Communist China, and they have been profiting from the CCP's slave labor market.
	That's why Tim Cook set up iPhone's biggest factory in the city of Zhengzhou, where they employ hundreds of tens of thousands of Chinese slave labor.
	This is the reason why the Wall Street did not want to decouple from the CCP, and they have paid All right, I've got another soundbite from Joe Biden, who's literally spelling out the exact opposite, Nicole, and we're talking with Nicole Tsai of the New Federal State of China, exact opposite of what we're talking about.
	We're not trying to decouple from China.
	relying on China who wants to destroy us, start relying on ourselves. This is what
	Joe Biden said. Guys in the control room, I believe it's cut 22.
	We're not trying to decouple from China. What we're trying to do is
	change the relationship for the better. From my perspective, if in fact the
	Chinese people who are in trouble right now economically, if the average homeowner
	or the homeowner, if the average citizen in China was able to have a decent paying
	job, that benefits them and it benefits all of us.
	But I'm not going to continue to sustain the support for positions where if we want to invest in China, we have to turn over all our trade secrets.
	So he mentions that at the very end, let's not turn over trade.
	It's not turning over our trade secrets.
	They're stealing our trade secrets.
	And then he says he doesn't want to decouple and he wants all of this investment.
	Yet China is doing everything it can to be the global leader, including ruining our dollar and them taking over international trade.
	Nicole.
	Absolutely.
	You know what?
	When he talked about the Chinese people, I think this is so.
	So hypocritical, because it's exactly the Wall Street and America's failed policy toward the Communist Party that has led to the Chinese people's deteriorating human rights condition.
	And Chinese people are being paid like dirt by the corporate America, who are now paying $40,000 just to dine with Xi Jinping.
	And these corporate CEOs in America, they have done nothing to promote human rights and freedom and democracy and individual liberty for the Chinese people.
	In fact, they have been funding the world's most powerful dictatorship.
	They have been funding the CCP's military modernization.
	They have been funding this totalitarian regime who has sponsored the Hamas surprise attack in Israel and the Russian invasion in Ukraine.
	And the upcoming CCP's reunification effort to take over Taiwan by force.
	All right.
	I'm going to ask, I'm going to go on the fly here a little bit, Nicole, because there is another story I want to talk about.
	I'm going to ask you, do you think you could stay through the break, come back for the next segment?
	And I want to talk about Xi Jinping, the Chinese consulates in America, trying to hire Chinese students, ultimately end up threatening Chinese students to show up in San Francisco and then Sticking it to Chinese students, not paying the bills that they promised to these students.
	It's another example of the exclusive information coming out of the new federal state of China.
	Will you stick around, Nicole?
	Absolutely.
	Okay, we're gonna come back with Nicole Tsai from the streets of San Francisco, outside where Biden and she are.
	Don't forget, folks, my website, GrantStinchfield.com.
	GrantStinchfield.com.
	If you like what you hear on this program, I love being here.
	You can catch my podcast, GrantStinchfield.com, everywhere.
	Rumble, go to my Rumble stream, like it there, subscribe, and of course, the Real America's Voice show every night at 7 p.m.
	Eastern Time.
	All right, we're back in a flash with Nicole Tsai.
	.
	you I'm Sebastian Gawker.
	This is America First.
	Let's get back to the show with Grant Stinchfield.
	Alright folks, welcome back.
	So if you were watching any of the coverage of Xi Jinping visiting San Francisco, you know they cleaned up the streets for him.
	I mean, San Francisco was the dirtiest, nastiest city in America.
	It's so sad because it was once such a shining great city.
	But miraculously, they cleaned up the entire city for him.
	It's crazy.
	Also, when he drove in, there were no American flags.
	Now, I wanted him to be greeted with American flags.
	Instead, there was all kinds of Chinese flags.
	And then there were all kinds of Chinese people cheering his arrival.
	The streets lined with people dressed in red, cheering him on.
	Well, I'll bring back in now our guest from the new federal state of China, the organization trying to bring down the CCP and ultimately replace it.
	Nicole Tsai is in San Francisco where this all went down.
	Nicole, who were those people that were cheering him?
	Grant, those people are all paid by the CCP's embassies and consulates because we have intercepted some text messages sent through the CCP's consulate in LA and San Francisco. They're
	trying to mobilize the Chinese students studying in the University of Southern
	California, UCLA, and even the University of San Francisco. So they tell the students, hey, this is a
	glorious historical mission for you to welcome Papa Xi. The CCP spy operative offered the students
	very lucrative treatment, that is, paid hotels and air flights, and also some cash rewards,
	about $3,000.
	That's a lot of money for a lot of international students.
	And then there's also like a restriction that if students sign up, they cannot back off If ever they back up, they face some serious consequences back home if they ever go back to China.
	All right.
	So through the new federal state of China, through your sources, you uncovered some text messages.
	It was written in Chinese.
	You've translated it for us.
	I'm going to read it.
	This is from a University of San Francisco Chinese student.
	It was a complaint message.
	To the organizer of the welcome group for Xi's visit, and it reads, I am a student at the University of San Francisco.
	Today we took the big bus provided by the embassy to welcome Chairman Xi.
	We encountered unfair treatment.
	The embassy personnel told us the free lunch will be provided to only some students.
	Most students don't get it.
	We were promised to receive $400 award, but we only received $100.
	Some students wanted to withdraw, but were issued a direct warning that quitting will be recorded in their personnel files in China, which will affect their future in China, i.e.
	employment and residency.
	Now, Nicole, as an American, the last thing I heard of a personal file was when I was in junior high and they threatened me that they would put it in my personal file.
	I never thought much of it.
	In China, though, a personal file is everything.
	This is the government has information on you.
	They could they could ruin your life.
	They were threatening these students, not to mention they stiffed them 300 bucks that they promised them.
	Yes, absolutely.
	You know, people hear about the social credit score, but very few people actually know that there's a secret personnel folder that is being kept by the CCP.
	Not the government, but the CCP.
	And so everybody in China has a secret file kept on you.
	And I think that if you get some negative comments on your personnel folder or file, you will have difficulty in finding a job or applying for a home, mortgage, loan, and even find a residence.
	That's how the CCP controls the students.
	Even the international students studying outside of China, these two students Certainly seems how they act.
	Just a couple seconds left in the segment.
	Nicole, can you go back to China or no?
	not as a government. They are mafia, the criminal organization and they hijack
	the Chinese people to do bad things. Certainly seems how they act. Just a
	couple seconds left in the in the segment. Nicole, can you go back to China
	or no? Would you be arrested? No, Grant.
	I haven't been back to China for 25 years and I'll never, ever go back because there's no freedom there and I'm a proud, naturalized U.S.
	citizen.
	Becoming a U.S.
	citizen is the best decision I've ever made in this life because America is great and we need to keep that, Grant.
	We need to keep America great again.
	Absolutely.
	Nicole, I'm making a prediction.
	When the new federal state of China takes over China and replaces the CCP, you go back for the celebration.
	Absolutely, and you'll be invited to go there and taste the real authentic Chinese food.
	And I cannot wait for that.
	Nicole Tsai with the New Federal State of China, thank you so much for coming on the program.
	Fascinating information.
	Folks, I'm going to tell you something about this group.
	They have members that risk their lives to get information back to the United States from inside China.
	It really is an amazing group.
	NFC, NFCOfficial.com is the website.
	NFSC Speaks is their social media.
	That's going to do it for Nicole Sy, but we are back here in a flash.
	I want to talk about Kim Kardashian as man of the year.
	What?
	What's next?
	Thanks for watching!
	Subscribe!
	More videos coming soon!
	Thanks for watching!
	More videos coming soon!
	you you
	you I'm Sebastian Gawker.
	This is America First.
	Let's get back to the show with Grant Stinchfield.
	Well, hi there, folks.
	All right.
	January 6th.
	What do you guys think about January 6th?
	I'm sure if you watch anything that I do, you know how I feel about January 6th.
	I think that there were small pockets of areas that got a little feisty.
	And I choose that word very carefully because feisty is about as bad as it got.
	I watched video between officers and J6ers and there were some pushing and shoving and then it would calm down and they would talk to each other.
	They would even adjust each other's helmets.
	And then there were other areas where literally grandmothers and grandfathers are going through the Capitol and they're taking a stroll.
	They're taking selfies, they're walking between the ropes.
	You had tens of thousands of people that were on the steps of the Capitol, all ultimately tracked down by the federal government for somehow doing something wrong, staging an insurrection, obstruction of an official proceeding.
	No one ever charged with insurrection, by the way.
	So, still, we are asking questions.
	I am especially.
	I will never give up asking questions, because I don't have answers.
	I want to know what was the government's involvement in all of this.
	And when I say the government's involvement, there are situations from January 6th where fencing was removed that said, do not enter this area, and just before the crowds got there, they removed the fencing.
	Why would you do that?
	They took down signs.
	Don't go in here.
	There were people on top of scaffoldings with bullhorns screaming, go into the building, go into the building.
	And those people were never arrested, but everybody else was.
	None of it makes sense to me, unless there was involvement by the federal government.
	Well, Clay Higgins is a former sheriff.
	He's a congressman now.
	He's from Louisiana, I believe.
	He was questioning Christopher Wray, the director of the FBI, on January 6th.
	Christopher Wray's testimony yesterday before Congress.
	And I want to go through some of it because I think it's important that we hear Christopher Wray's non-answers to very, very important questions.
	Let's roll cut six.
	Director Wright, last year you might recall, sir, our exchange regarding the FBI's involvement on January 6th and prior.
	I'm happy to jog your memory to quote, according to the record, I asked you, did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the Capitol on January 6th prior to the doors being opened?
	You responded, I quote, again, I have to be very careful of what I say.
	To which I said, it should be a no.
	Can you not tell the American people no?
	We did not have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the Capitol on January 6th.
	A year has passed.
	A year has passed.
	And he still is not going to want to answer some of the questions.
	So I'm going to, I'm going to, I'm going to play the next clip for you.
	So you can see Christopher Ray refuses to give an answer.
	Roll the next one.
	We sit here again, a year later, we, the people still did not have a definitive answer from you or anyone else in the Biden administration regarding the FBI presence and participation in the months leading up to The November election and in the weeks and days prior to January 6th and on January 6th here in D.C.
	We can't get a straight answer, although we have a tremendous amount of evidence harvested and reviewed over the course of the last year.
	All right, so I want to get to the bottom of what Christopher Wray says to all of this.
	I want to hear this man defend his non-answers.
	And so I think the next cut will be that.
	Let's roll the next one.
	Congressman, as we've discussed before, I'm not going to get into where we have or have.
	Sorry, that was a miscue.
	Keep rolling it.
	Congressman, as we've discussed before, I'm not going to get into where we have or have not used confidential human sources, but what I can tell you... Okay, we'll move on.
	You asked for a definitive answer.
	We'll move on.
	It's my time.
	You said no, you're not going to answer.
	That's cool.
	We're watching.
	Mr. Chairman, may I answer the question?
	The moment will come.
	This is my time.
	Earlier this year, an FBI informant who is reported to have, quote, his quote, under oath, March to the U.S.
	Capitol with fellow Proud Boys members on January 6, close quote.
	He said he was communicating with his FBI handler while people were entering the U.S.
	Capitol.
	Can you confirm that the FBI had that sort of engagement with your own agents embedded within to the crowd on January 6?
	And so, what we need to hear from is Christopher Wray because he doesn't answer these questions.
	Now, I will say something.
	This is a real big problem I have with members of Congress.
	I like Clay Higgins.
	He's a strong guy.
	They love to hear the sound of their own voice.
	Now, who am I to talk?
	I'm a radio host and a TV host.
	I'll sit here and talk to you for three hours straight and I don't need to take phone calls.
	I don't need to have guests.
	I can go on and on and on, right?
	But I'm not a member of Congress, and I don't only get five minutes for this radio program.
	Now, if I have a guest on, which what Christopher Wray is, I want to hear from that person.
	The problem with members of Congress is they like to spew all the stuff out, which we know already, and we never get to hear from the witness.
	Because Christopher Wray's responses are the most important thing.
	He basically filibustered his entire time of questioning Wray.
	And so, when you look at that, I'm going to go through and see if I can get a response from Christopher Wray so when we come back here, I want to hear the answer from Wray.
	I don't need to hear Clay Higgins talking and going on and on and on.
	We know that it was a setup job on January 6th.
	We know that they have attacked conservatives.
	We know that they are persecuting conservatives.
	I got a guy by the name of Jake Lang who sits in the D.C.
	Gulag right now going on a thousand days sitting in prison and he doesn't have a trial date set.
	I got a new buddy of mine, Jonathan Strand, who was a bodyguard that day, walks around the Capitol, not one sign of violence, refuses to take a plea deal, and he gets 32 months.
	He calls into my Real America's Voice show, and they throw him into solitary confinement for making a phone call live to a TV program, because they didn't want him to get the story out.
	I'm then removed from his communications list along with so many others.
	This is political persecution.
	It's tyranny.
	So let's see if we can get to the bottom of it with Christopher Wray when we come back.
	Again, my website is GrantStinchfield.com.
	Please go to and subscribe to all my outlets and podcasts.
	Greatly appreciated.
	We'll get to the bottom of Christopher Wray when we come back.
	Stick with me.
	You You
	I'm Sebastian Gawker.
	This is America First.
	Let's get back to the show with Grant Stinchfield.
	Bye.
	Alright, so I told you that I would get to the bottom of what Christopher Wray had to say, and this is no knock on the crew, you're trying to cut this audio from Clay Higgins, great guy, true patriot, law enforcement guy who's now a congressman.
	But my lord, one, he talks slow, okay, and I live in Texas, I'm around a lot of people that talk slow.
	Two, he goes on and on and on.
	Okay, just let's get to it.
	This is Christopher Wray responding to some of the ideas that... Who committed the violence?
	Did the FBI egg the violence on?
	Let's hear what Wray has to say here.
	He gets mad about the insinuation of that, which Wray never really answers the question, but listen.
	If you are asking whether the violence at the Capitol on January 6th was part of some operation orchestrated by FBI sources and or agents, the answer is emphatically not.
	You're saying no?
	No.
	You're saying no?
	Okay.
	Not violence orchestrated by FBI sources or agents.
	Let's move on.
	Are you familiar with, you know what a ghost vehicle is?
	Director of the FBI certainly should.
	You know what a ghost bus is?
	A ghost bus?
	Ghost bus.
	I'm not sure I've used that term before.
	It's pretty common in law enforcement.
	It's a vehicle that's used for secret purposes.
	It's painted over.
	Yeah, so he's gonna show them ghost buses.
	You know, Christopher Wray, I'm not a law enforcement guy.
	But I've been around law enforcement enough.
	You call them ghost vehicles, ghost buses, things that are used to go undercover with.
	You can load confidential informants into them.
	You can load SWAT officers into them.
	You can do all kinds of things with a ghost bus because it's like a ghost because you don't know what it is.
	Give me a break, he doesn't know what those are.
	So I'm going to roll this clip of Clay Higgins.
	Spelling out the ghost buses with Ray looking dopey.
	This guy is a spoiled brat, Christopher Ray, and he's anti-American and he is culpable in the persecution of American citizens.
	And quite frankly, I'm sick and tired of this guy.
	Roll it.
	These two buses in the middle here.
	They were the first to arrive at Union Station on January 6th.
	0500.
	I have all this evidence.
	I'm showing you a tippitus iceberg.
	Mr. Chairman.
	These two buses are painted completely white.
	Point of order.
	Point of order.
	Sure.
	Just run over the time.
	I understand, but you'll recall that Ms.
	Jackson Lee's been allowed to go two minutes before.
	I've been very fair in letting people finish their questioning throughout my tenure as chairman, and I'll continue to be fair on that regard.
	Alright, he's real fair.
	Guess what?
	You don't get to finish the question.
	He never gets to finish.
	So again, we don't get an answer from Christopher Wray.
	Again, Clay Higgins is a good conservative.
	He's a tough guy.
	You understand what it's like to go after criminals.
	I like it.
	But if I'm giving him media training about how to get real publicity when you're questioning a witness, you want to get the sound, but you got to get it from the witness too.
	You got to draw it out of him.
	Clay Higgins is not doing that.
	He ran out his whole time before he even got to really get to the heart of what was going on.
	That's a problem.
	You don't get often a time to directly question the director of the FBI.
	Alright folks, we are back in a flash.
	I'm Grant Stinchfield.
	Thanks for watching.
	I'm Grant Stinchfield.
	I'll see you next time.
	Bye.
	I'm Sebastian Gorka.
	This is America First.
	Let's get back to the show with Grant Stinchfield.
	Well, hi there, folks.
	Welcome back to the program.
	Thank you, Dr. Sebastian Gorka, who is in Oxford, England, getting ready to debate April Ryan and Bernie Sanders' brother over the dangers of Donald Trump.
	I'm sure Dr. Gorka is going to be victorious again in his debate at one of the oldest debate clubs in the world, the Oxford Union there in Oxford, England.
	So I appreciate him letting me sit in for him today.
	Good evening, I guess we can call it, depending on where you are in the country.
	You know, the left is so outrageous.
	The left is so out of control when it comes to blurring the lines of reality.
	You know, in America today, we can't even figure out what is right when it comes to facts.
	Now, we can, conservatives can, but liberals don't want to look at facts.
	I saw this story that Blaze had put out, but it's really a GQ story.
	That, if you're gonna believe this, GQ's Man of the Year is Kim Kardashian.
	That's right, GQ Magazine naming Kim Kardashian as one of its Men of the Year, okay?
	This is literally a strategy by them to ridicule men and uproot the patriarchy, as our friend Jason Whitlock writes over at The Blaze.
	You might think this is just nuts and and and you let the air out of your out of your belly and you say oh boy you roll your eyes you shrug your shoulders but GQ doing this is bigger than just pandering to the woke mob.
	This is about blurring the lines of reality.
	This is about taking men out of society.
	Ultimately, when you take men out of society, society collapses.
	How do I know this?
	I just have to go back to history.
	You look at ancient Greece.
	You look at ancient Rome.
	If you go to your local museum And you look at statues from different eras of Greece and Rome moving in from at the top of their game to the bottom of their game, you had Greek and Roman god-like statues, these big giant Zeus-like men.
	And then what happened?
	Then as society starts to fail, you get these whimsical little creatures, these little angel-like fairies of men.
	What do you think is happening in society today?
	We literally are filling the ranks of soy boys, okay?
	You got people we should be being called men living in their mother's basement.
	They can't provide for themselves.
	They certainly aren't going to protect the women and children that are around them because they run scared of everything.
	They glob on to the liberal ideology because they're hopeful the government will just up and take care of them.
	And then, lo and behold, you got Gentleman's Quarterly, which, back when I was a kid, like, this was a magazine you looked for to see what the latest style was.
	Now, I'm not a big style guy.
	You can see I'm wearing a shirt that literally says, why are we whispering?
	Which, anyone who knows me knows I don't whisper.
	But we can't be whispering as a country, and we certainly can't be whispering about things like this.
	So we cannot surrender our roles as men in society.
	Okay?
	Now Jason Whitlock pointed out some interesting things in his article.
	When did this all start?
	He goes all the way back 30 years ago when we took away superheroes out of Entertainment.
	I grew up with Superman and Batman, okay?
	And Superman and Batman had crushes or even relationships with Lois Lane and Batman had a crush on Catwoman.
	And let me tell you something, Catwoman was about as hot as it gets.
	As a 14-year-old boy, Catwoman was the bomb.com, okay?
	Now what do we get?
	Now we get villains that are the heroes of TV, including people like Tony Soprano, who's a mob boss who Hollywood made us feel sorry for.
	Meanwhile, he's like ordering the killing of people and shakedowns and all of this stuff.
	And I love me some Sopranos.
	Don't get me wrong.
	I'm half Italian.
	I grew up in New York.
	I look at the Vinny and Joey and I can look at some family members and say, those are my guys.
	But that's not who you want as heroes for our kids, Tony Soprano.
	I want Superman as heroes for our kids.
	Then I gotta read in GQ that Kim Kardashian is its man of the year.
	Now, there's another, they named three, okay?
	So, I don't even know these people.
	Maybe the crew can help me out with this.
	Jacob Elordi is one, and Travis Scott is another, okay?
	Elordi apparently is an actor who plays a closeted gay man in the HBO drama, Euphoria.
	And Scott, Travis Scott, I know he's a rapper.
	Go figure.
	This rapper has all kinds of Satan-themed concerts.
	Why is Satan overtaking concerts?
	I mean, all you have to do is look at many of the pop culture icons today and their infusing satanic imagery in all of their concerts, in their movies, in their music videos.
	And so GQ decides to name a gay guy A rapper who embraces Satan and a fake big-butted supermodel named Kim Kardashian as their man of the year.
	Now, I will say this about Kim Kardashian.
	They're a heck of a business people.
	I don't know whether it's her mom that leads them to the success that they have had, but you don't see much better families of success than the Kardashian family.
	They have figured out a way to capitalize on the idiocy of America.
	Okay?
	And quite frankly, I know that this is a Christian channel and that we all... But what is up with the butt surgeries?
	And I see this at the gym all over the place.
	This is not attractive!
	This is not a real woman walking around with a giant butt that you had surgically implanted?
	What is that about?
	And then I gotta look on the other side of things.
	You have men that are doing everything they can to not look like men.
	At one place, I'm at the gym, I'm looking over here and I got a woman with a fake butt and then I'm looking over here and I got a guy wearing eyeshadow and eyeliner with earrings all over his face.
	Society is collapsing before our eyes and we're doing nothing about it.
	Is it because there's no men in the household anymore?
	Is it because we don't have male role models?
	Is it because we don't have... Forget about fathers, we don't even have father figures anymore.
	The last father figure I remember was Huxtable, Dr. Huxtable.
	And the Cosby show, that's the last father figure.
	Now the guy's a disgusting rapist.
	Do you see what's happening?
	They are trying to turn men into laughingstocks.
	They talk about toxic masculinity if it's some kind of a bad thing.
	Let me tell you something.
	I'm proud of my masculinity.
	I'm 54 years old.
	I take testosterone shots once a week.
	Why?
	So I keep up with my masculinity.
	I go to the gym so I can try to build some muscles as I get older in life.
	Why?
	So I can keep up with masculinity for two reasons.
	One, I want to take care of my body and I want to look good.
	Two, I want to be able to protect my family and those around me.
	If I'm a frail, feeble, wussbag, how are you going to protect anybody?
	And then that leads me to say, how are you going to protect your country if you don't act like a man?
	The reality is we need men in society.
	And now as Whitlock points out in his article, the superhero movies, they aren't even with men anymore.
	The superhero movies are trying to make women superheroes.
	You gotta have crazy alien superheroes.
	And then the superheroes like Deadpool, I'll admit it's a funny movie, but that's not a superhero.
	He's a derelict.
	And yet, I gotta come home and my 14-year-old son says, Dad, can I watch Deadpool 2 or 3 or whatever?
	What happened to Superman?
	Oh, I know what happened to Superman!
	They made him gay, too!
	In the comic book.
	It is about systematically destroying the country as we know it.
	And I'm fed up of watching it happen.
	This is why they hate President Trump, by the way.
	You know what?
	Because President Trump happens to be an alpha male.
	President Trump happens to be strong.
	President Trump happens to believe in traditional male-female roles.
	Doesn't mean a woman can't go be super successful.
	In fact, just the opposite.
	Have at it.
	Don't take men out of society.
	Don't turn them into women.
	They start the transgender nonsense.
	Stay away from my kids.
	Do not be giving them hormones without my permission.
	You know, that's what they're doing in California.
	They want to make it okay for your kid to go have transgender surgery without the parent's permission.
	What world are we living in today?
	We're living in a world where GQ names Kim Kardashian their man of the year.
	That's what world we're living in, folks.
	And it's absolutely disgusting.
	Alright.
	833-334-6752.
	833-33-GORKA.
	I'm Grant Stinchfield.
	GrantStinchfield.com.
	If you like me getting all worked up, I do that on the podcast too.
	Just go to GrantStinchfield.com.
	It is the Salem Media Podcast.
	You can hear me there.
	Subscribe it on social media.
	Stinchfield1776.
	back with my buddy Mark Morgan talking about the border next.
	And I'm going to be talking about the border next.
	So, I'm going to be talking about the border next.
	I'm Sebastian Gorka, the leader of the movement.
	This is America First.
	Let's get back to the show with Grant Stinchfield.
	Well, thank you so much, Dr. G. It's great to be sitting in your chair this afternoon.
	And one thing that I love about doing this job is I get to talk to my favorite people across the country, real patriots who really want this nation to be resaved And I think President Trump's the only guy that could do it right now.
	But just know there are people out there that think like us and can get back in a position to turn this whole thing around.
	And one of those guys that I'm talking about is Mark Morgan.
	He's a former Commissioner of Border Protection.
	He spent 20 years inside the FBI.
	He's a main, main, main dude inside the Trump administration.
	And I want to welcome him to America First.
	Mark Morgan, it's great to see you, my friend.
	Grant, thanks for having me.
	And I wish you would have told me if you were going to wear the t-shirt and show the guns, I would have done the same thing.
	You know, look, you're a government guy.
	You gotta always be wearing the tie, and I gotta wear the suit.
	Why are we whispering, Shirk?
	But somebody who doesn't whisper is Mark Morgan.
	And you texted me literally right after this move to impeach Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas that Marjorie Taylor Greene offered up, and these eight feckless Republicans voted against it.
	You texted me, I'll just say some real man, salty language responses to this.
	Have you calmed down since then or are you still like me?
	I'm so angry.
	No, I'm so angry, Grant.
	I say every day I wake up angry, pissed off, frustrated.
	And I think we're justified in doing so.
	And I think more people should be.
	And I think if these eight feckless rhino Republicans felt the way we did, they wouldn't have voted the way they did.
	Look, this secretary, Grant, you and I have talked about, this is the first secretary in a lifetime of a major department that's come in.
	He views the law as a mere advisory opinion.
	He's abdicated his oath.
	He's abused it as authority.
	He's lied to the American people.
	He's lied to Congress over and over again.
	He's even vilified the same men and women that he's supposed to oversee, and he's been the chief architect of the worst border security crisis in our lifetime.
	So, Representative Greene, she is absolutely on the right side of this.
	Those eight are on the wrong side of this.
	But real quickly, I'll say, You are talking earlier.
	What I'm hoping is this is less about substance and more about timing, because Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, Representative Mark Green, he is conducting a series of five phases of investigative inquiries Taking a look at the dereliction of duty of Secretary Mayorkas.
	Just this week, he released the fourth phase report.
	He's got one more to go.
	I'm confident that the end of these five phases, he's going to recommend impeachment for Secretary Mayorkas.
	All we need is for those eight to vote for it.
	I think we're going to get there.
	Alright, Mark Morgan, you were such an integral part in running Border Protection, and we had turned things around, and it wasn't perfect, I don't think anybody would say it was perfect, but we really were making a dent in this, and more than a dent, we had operational control, which we don't now.
	Am I out of line when I say that every move this administration has made and Secretary Mayorkas has made, it's the move you would make if you were actively trying to destroy America and open up the border.
	There's nothing about security about any move they've made.
	No, Grant, I think it's absolutely correct.
	Here's what I like to do.
	Let's take away your opinion, my opinion.
	Let's just look at the facts.
	So by February of 2020, this is what I always say about what we accomplished.
	I always say, like you said, it wasn't perfect, but what I always comment on is we had the most secure border in our lifetime, and every single day it was getting more secure.
	That's a fact.
	By February of 2020, we had reduced illegal immigration by 85%.
	It's a fact.
	We brought Mexico into joining this as the regional crisis that it is.
	We had all three Northern Triangle countries that signed on to the Safe Transit Country Agreement.
	I mean, I could go on and on and on.
	We got Border Patrol agents more back on the front lines, back on the national security mission to stop drugs, criminals and national security threats from pouring in.
	This administration dismounted all of that.
	And so at the end of the day, and again, we've seen, right, so we, in the past 35 months, We've had over 8 million total nationwide encounters, plus almost 1.7 million known gotaways.
	The list goes on and on.
	Look at the facts.
	It is what it is.
	They've destroyed this border.
	So, I know I've known you for a long time now.
	You've become more political as you've watched the country be destroyed.
	But you're a law enforcement guy.
	Your politics was just enforce the law.
	That's how a good law enforcement guy should be.
	Can you figure out what their motivation is?
	I've come to the conclusion that I think they want to destroy suburbs.
	I think they want to import poverty into America.
	It helps them push socialism.
	It helps them push their big government agenda when they dumb down America and society in general.
	I know you're not a super political guy, but you take this country and the values of it.
	I know you dearly.
	Can you figure out what they're up to?
	Yeah, I think so, Grant.
	And look, I still like to consider myself, I'm not that political person.
	But the problem is, when it comes to our border, I say when I when I left, you know, the government office, I got my First Amendment rights back, right.
	And at the end of the day, is you can't talk about the border without talking about politics.
	Unfortunately, it shouldn't be a red or blue issue.
	It should be a red, white and blue issue, but it's not.
	And so at the end of the day, here's the conclusion.
	It took me a while to get here, and you and I have known, and you've seen my progression.
	I wasn't a willing participant in this, but I can draw no other conclusion.
	At the end of the day, this is about a perceived political benefit.
	And there's two fronts to that.
	One is, remember, illegal aliens are a counterpart of the census.
	So the short-term game is we're going to have redistricting of seats in the Democrats' favor.
	The second political benefit they see is every single illegal alien All right, here's what I didn't know.
	is going to equate to a Democratic vote. I think they're on the right side of this. And then when
	you add in that you've got the political benefit plus the conversion of ideologues in this
	administration, I think that's what we have right now. All right. Here's what I didn't know. I ran
	for Congress. I didn't know that illegal aliens are counted in the census to decide what the
	congressional district is. It's not American citizens that 800,000 or whatever it is.
	Illegal aliens are counted?
	That explains a whole slew of it.
	I don't think anybody's talking about that.
	I agree.
	I agree.
	I've been saying it for a while, but that's the part.
	And here's the other part, too, is don't discount that they believe every single illegal alien they find a pathway to citizenship is going to equate to a Democratic vote.
	Grant, that's why they don't care about border security.
	That's why they're incentivizing illegal aliens to come, because now the Democrats at least used to discussion about border security.
	They really didn't mean it, but they used to fake it.
	Now they don't even fake it.
	They're not even talking about border security now.
	They're only talking about amnesty now.
	And the reason why is because they know every single individual that they provide amnesty to
	is gonna equate to a democratic vote.
	That's why this is happening.
	They're jeopardizing our nation's safety all in the name of politics.
	All right, I asked you this question, if you could do it in 30 seconds.
	Do you think we should criminally charge Secretary Mayorkas since we can't get him impeached
	right now?
	It was a pleasure.
	Look, I don't want to be hyperbolic.
	What I'll say is he should definitely be impeached and what I would say is I believe that he is the most dangerous man in this administration and I believe he has blood on his hands.
	I believe he's responsible for the largest sex trafficking ring in American history.
	I believe he's responsible for the largest drug trafficking ring in American history.
	I think he has blood on his hands.
	When you got blood on your hands, you usually get charged with murder.
	American kids are dying left and right.
	We have a bold district attorney and a bold sheriff that would do this.
	They do it to President Trump.
	Hey, Mark, you want to stay for one more segment?
	Yeah, sure.
	Okay, I want to play some soundbites from you from Christopher Wray, and we'll go through these things as we continue.
	Mark Morgan stays with me.
	I'm Grant Stinchfield.
	Don't forget the website, GrantStinchfield.com.
	GrantStinchfield.com on social media.
	Stinchfield1776.
	Follow me on Instagram and Twitter, please.
	I'd love to see you there, okay?
	And then we're back with Mark Morgan to go through some of these soundbites.
	we'll break it all down for you.
	You you
	you you
	I'm Sebastian Gorka.
	I'm Sebastian Gorka.
	This is America First.
	Let's get back to the show with Grant Stinchfield.
	Alright, so I asked my friend Mark Morgan, the Commissioner of Border Protection under President Trump, 20-year FBI veteran, whether or not Secretary Mayorkas should be criminally charged.
	I asked him this months ago back on the Real America's Voice show.
	I just asked him that again and then he kind of gave me a runaround, Mark.
	Look, he's got blood on his hands.
	I believe he's a drug trafficker.
	I believe he's a sex trafficker.
	He's got the open borders.
	You name it, he's certainly broken his oath to uphold the 2006 Border Security Act, which says you've got to keep operational control.
	What do you think?
	Criminally charge this guy or not?
	Look, I think this goes to, like, these sessions aren't scripted, right?
	And believe it or not, there are times that I think about maybe I shouldn't be so bombastic as I normally am.
	And I'm like, what am I thinking, right?
	So, yeah, let's put it this way.
	This is why I said what I said before.
	If he was a civilian, right, if he didn't have the indemnity protection, you know, a secretary of DHS, he would be.
	I mean, if he did what he was doing as a civilian, he would be charged with multiple felonies.
	Right?
	He is actually facilitating the world's largest human smuggling rink, the world's largest trafficking rink.
	He's assisting the cartels.
	He's facilitating the cartels with pushing drugs, criminals and national security threats.
	So, yeah, I think I'll stick with what I originally said.
	I think that there is a reasonable case that could be made.
	This is why I love you, man.
	This is exactly at least aiding and abetting.
	It's an open shut case on all of this stuff.
	All right, so Christopher Wray, the director of the FBI, your old organization, went in front of Congress.
	He was asked about suspected terrorists at the border.
	Cut one, guys.
	Let's roll that.
	Can the FBI guarantee the American people that known or suspected terrorists, including any from Hamas or other terror groups, are not amongst those gotaways?
	Well, certainly the group of people that you're talking about are a source of great concern for us.
	That's why we're aggressively using all 56 of our Joint Terrorism Task Forces.
	But there's really no way for you to guarantee that Hamas isn't in those?
	Well, again, as you say, there's the unknown unknown and the known unknown.
	But what I can tell you is that our 56 Joint Terrorism Task Forces are working their tails off To make sure that they suss out and identify potential terrorist suspects, whether they're on the watch list or not.
	Mark Morgan, formerly with Border Protection.
	The doublespeak just kills me.
	Grant, I'm with you.
	I mean, really, that was blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	It was a light touch.
	At the end of the day, what he said with five minutes of DC Swamp Talk is, yes, just once, I wish that there would be somebody in the government in a key, critical position, like the director of the FBI, would just look at whoever's asking the question, and look at the American people in the eye, and just be straightforward and honest.
	The answer to that question was, yes, Chairman.
	That is absolutely a significant national security threat.
	That should have been the answer.
	Yeah.
	The bottom line is they can't tell you.
	I know they can't tell you whether or not terrorists are through.
	There's no way to tell you.
	Now, and the best assessment, if they're honest, is you better believe there have been terrorists that have come through there.
	We know there are numbers of special interest aliens, Mark.
	Correct, Grant.
	We have, I mean, he talks about the cases he's had of terrorists in the country.
	We know that in the past 35 months, 286 aliens on the FBI's terror watch list have been apprehended.
	Tens of thousands of what we call special interest aliens that come from countries that harbor, sponsor, and facilitate terrorist organizations we've encountered.
	And we have 1.8 million known gotaways.
	Yeah, the law of averages, we have terrorists in the United States.
	The law of averages will tell us we already have a sleeper cell in the United States planning the next terrorist attack.
	That is not hyperbolic.
	That is what these individuals should be being honest with the American people about.
	So what do we do?
	Is there ever a point where we get where Mayorkas is going?
	You know, my buddy Kash Patel is big on this.
	He's not a super fan of impeaching Joe Biden, even though he believes that Joe Biden should be impeached.
	He says the key is going through guys like this with Mayorkas and Blinken and Christopher Wray.
	Your thoughts?
	I think he's absolutely right on this.
	You know, at the end of the day, the president, to some degree, especially this one, come on, let's be honest, he's a figurehead.
	The people that are actually implementing the day-to-day policies that's actually impacting this, they're at the cabinet level official.
	I've heard people all the time say the opposite.
	Say, oh, he's just caring.
	No, that's not correct.
	I completely disagree with this.
	The majority of policy is coming, with respect to that border right now, is coming at the end of a pen from Secretary Mayorkas.
	And that's the fact.
	Mark Morgan, I appreciate your service to this country.
	You're so great to spend this much time with me.
	I appreciate your friendship as well, buddy.
	Thank you for coming on tonight.
	You bet.
	Next time I'm wearing a gun t-shirt.
	There you go.
	You gotta go to the gym to keep up with me though, buddy, but I'm sure you can.
	That is the great Mark Morgan, everybody.
	We so appreciate him coming on, and I do mean it when I tell you he's a great patriot, and I wish this administration would listen more to him.
	We are back in The Flash.
	Gordon Chang is here.
	We're going to talk about China with that great expert as well, another patriot.
	as america first continues on the sale of radio network on grants inchfield
	thank you for watching you
	you you
	you i'm sebastian gorka
	This is America First.
	Let's get back to the show with Grant Stinchfield.
	Well, thank you so much, Dr. G. It's great to be sitting in for you as Dr. G is over in Oxford, England, getting ready to debate April Ryan, the leftist pontificator and Bernie Sanders' brother about the dangers of Donald Trump at the Oxford Union.
	It's like the oldest debating club in quite possibly the world.
	So Dr. G is going to do great.
	He doesn't need our help at all on that, as we know, but certainly send him some good thoughts as he takes on those leftists.
	You know, speaking of leftists, We had Joe Biden literally treating Chairman Xi of China as a state hero.
	As Chairman Xi is literally running a fentanyl operation in the United States, killing American citizens.
	He's stealing trade secrets.
	And yet, Apple's Tim Cook.
	You get Gilead Sciences.
	You get BlackRock.
	All of these companies pay $40,000 a plate to sit with a guy who literally would like nothing more than to steal the trade secrets from those companies and is And yet, they pay for it.
	So, how should we be treating China?
	Because I can't imagine welcoming them into America as a hero, as they're literally waging war on us, is a good idea.
	To help me break all of this down is my good friend Gordon Chang.
	You can follow him on Twitter, GordonGChang, at GordonGChang, and he's got a new book out, China is Going to War.
	Gordon Chang, welcome to the program.
	I think China's already at war with us, Gordon.
	Well, it certainly is, because China, first of all, in May 2019, in a landmark editorial in People's Daily, actually declared a quote-unquote people's war on the U.S.
	But you also got to remember that China has this doctrine of unrestricted warfare, and
	it's been conducting that type of struggle against us for decades.
	So yeah, we already had war, and we're taking big casualties.
	Because, you know, Grant, you mentioned fentanyl.
	Well, last year, 70,000 Americans died from doses of illegal fentanyl, according to the
	CDC.
	Now, virtually all of that fentanyl came from China, which means that China killed 70,000
	Americans last year, and we welcome a murderer into our country.
	And Tim Cook and all those other guys gave him a standing ovation last night at dinner.
	This is hideous.
	It's amazing to me because these are companies built on well they're supposed to be built on capitalistic principles and they got there based off of free markets but now I think in many respects they're relying on China with the with the cheap labor that they're getting there and they've just decided you know what I'll make more money in bed with the Chinese CCP and turn our backs on the American people because I think that's what these big companies are doing.
	Well, that's certainly right.
	And you mentioned Tim Cook.
	You know, Apple has been using a company, Lens Technology, which has been accused of using forced enslaved Uyghur labor.
	That's basically a racial and ethnic minority.
	And Apple is lecturing us about all sorts of issues.
	You know, how dare they?
	How dare they lecture us when they take advantage of forced labor of ethnic minorities?
	Do you think Xi Jinping goes back to his presidential suite and laughs at us and Joe Biden that we welcome him in, he's getting a standing ovation when literally he's buying gold, selling off the dollar, doing everything he can do to crush our economy?
	Does he laugh about this?
	He laughs about that.
	You know, there was one good note last night, and that is during the press conference, Biden called Xi a dictator.
	And of course, today, you know, the Chinese foreign ministry goes berserk.
	Well, that's a good thing.
	But apart from that, yeah, Xi Jinping is laughing at us because he can see that we're not willing
	to stand up to him, that we invite him into our country even though he kills tens of thousands
	of Americans a year.
	And by the way, that's on top of 1.1 million Americans who died from COVID, a disease that
	Xi Jinping decided to spread to us.
	So yeah, this is just awful.
	And by the way, Biden won't challenge Xi Jinping on the origins of COVID.
	Well, because Biden, in my opinion, has paid off.
	You know, Biden said he can trust Xi Jinping.
	I don't know what he trusts him on, except other than the check is in the mail.
	I'm sure he trusts him on that, sends Hunter to the post office to go pick it up for him.
	John Kirby is one of President Biden's chief spokespeople.
	He was on MSNBC.
	I want you to listen to what this is an ad, was an ad roll in the Navy, says about Xi and fentanyl, cut 17.
	And so what we're trying to do, if you think about a supply chain in that regard, we're trying to go to the left of that supply chain, as far left as we can go, getting at the chemical ingredients that make up fentanyl in China.
	And President Xi made it clear yesterday that he doesn't want to see another American die because of fentanyl.
	Gordon Chang, that is so nuts.
	Does he really believe that?
	I don't know what's in Kirby's head, but he can't believe that if he's a sane and rational individual.
	I mean, let's look at the facts.
	China runs a near-total surveillance state, which means they know exactly what the large, well-organized international fentanyl gangs are doing.
	And so they couldn't operate if the Communist Party didn't approve it.
	But we don't have to speculate, Grant, because we know that Chinese diplomats actually provide cover for the fentanyl gangs.
	The gangs operate and put their money into the Chinese state banking system.
	And by the way, every container that leaves China gets inspected by a Chinese official.
	So we have to conclude that the Communist Party wants to kill Americans.
	I don't know how else you come to that conclusion, and the fact that John Kirby is saying that just shows you how feckless, weak, and if it's by design, that's scary enough.
	If it's ignorance, that's scary enough.
	Either way, we're in a bad spot.
	I'll give you the last word as we come up at the end of the segment.
	Gordon Chang.
	You know, the highest, most solemn duty of the President of the United States is to defend the United States from foreign attack.
	We have seen the Biden administration completely fail to discharge that obligation.
	You know, if Biden doesn't want to confront Xi Jinping, that's his business.
	But he then has no business being the President of the U.S.
	Yeah.
	Well, as always, I agree with you 100% and your insight is always fascinating.
	Gordon G. Chang.
	At Gordon G. Chang is his Twitter address, his new book out, China is Going to War.
	Gordon Chang, as always, I appreciate you coming on the program today.
	Oh, I appreciate it, Grant.
	So thank you.
	Absolutely.
	Always good to talk to you, my friend.
	All right, folks.
	I'm Grant Stinchfield.
	Fill it in for Dr. G, who's over, as I mentioned, in Oxford.
	Listen, go to the website, grantstinchfield.com.
	Sign up for the email list.
	Keep you posted on things.
	If you're watching on Rumble or any other outlets, just hit the subscribe button.
	Go over to Grant Stinchfield.
	I do lots of podcasts there, stream them live, and can use the support from you.
	Stinchfield1776 on Instagram and Twitter and everything.
	We'll continue here in a moment as America First continues.
	I'm Grant Stinchfield in for Dr. Gorka.
	I'm going to be doing a video on the importance of the use of a microscope.
	I'm going to be doing a video on the importance of a microscope.
	I'm Sebastian Gorka.
	This is the American Psychological Association.
	This is America First.
	Let's get back to the show with Grant Stinchfield.
	Well, thank you so much, Dr. G. It is great to be in your seat.
	I'll be back tomorrow, everybody, as well, so I hope you join me here on the Salem Radio Network.
	Of course, you know, I do morning drive radio out in Los Angeles on AM 870, but I live in Dallas, so I got the whole country covered, okay?
	The whole country.
	And I got the Real America's Voice show coming up in just about an hour from now, so please tune into that.
	But I can't let you go yet.
	We're having too much fun.
	Joe Scarborough, what a disappointment this guy is.
	Okay, the only time I play him is to slam him for something.
	You know he was a Republican in Congress.
	I know you know his history, but it's hard to believe because he's totally drank the Kool-Aid of MSNBC.
	This is him talking about Democrats and why people vote for Democrats in America.
	It's laughable.
	Cut 16.
	They like the democratic ideas.
	They like freedom for women to have power over their own lives.
	They like 10-year-old girls having the freedom, along with their parents and their clergy and their medical providers to make decisions if they've been raped by illegal immigrants.
	Donald Trump doesn't.
	Certainly the United States Supreme Court decision, Dobbs, doesn't.
	Alright, so this is called the dumbing down of America.
	When you lower education standards, when you squash real news from ever reaching the people, when you dumb down youngsters where they can't critically think anymore, Joe Scarborough can go on TV and he can spew all those things.
	None of them are based in fact.
	See, this is going to be the Democrat talking point, because the only thing they can win on is abortion right now.
	And yeah, they're winning on abortion, I'll admit it, even though we've got to stand firm in our beliefs, and my belief is life begins at conception, and so that's where we are.
	But here's what they're going to do.
	They're going to take to the streets, they're going to say, Donald Trump made it illegal for you to have an abortion.
	That's going to be their mantra.
	And they're going to take that to every state across the country.
	When that's not the reality, as all of you know, Roe v. Wade was overturned, throwing it back to the states.
	The states get to decide.
	Donald Trump had nothing to do with what happens in each individual state.
	He only had to do with picking strong Supreme Court justices that sided with the Constitution on all of this.
	But Democrats are going to do what they do, and they will misinform you, they will misguide you, and to think we're the ones being censored on Facebook.
	Look, I started doing more and more videos last month.
	I got one month in on Facebook.
	Six, seven videos a day, six to seven minutes of them.
	There's a revenue model on Facebook.
	I was making all kinds of money.
	I'll just look, I'll be honest with you.
	Two to $500 a day off of videos on Facebook.
	That's like YouTube stuff.
	That's a heck of a way to make some extra running around money.
	For many people, that's a living, okay?
	What do you think happens Friday?
	I go from two to $500 a day to 17 cents.
	Why?
	17 cents?
	Because they shut me down?
	Because they don't like what I have to say?
	Well, guess what?
	I'm back tomorrow to say some more of it right here on the Salem Radio Network on America First.
	Thank you, Dr. G, and thanks to all of you for listening.
	Stinchfield's Army Rolls!

▲