All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 3, 2023 - Sebastian Gorka
02:51:58
Sebastian Gorka LIVE: Cease Fire THIS!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
the the
the thank you for joining us on america first with today's very
special guest host
Cleveland's own Bob France.
Peace.
Thank you, Dr. G. What an amazing week it has been.
I've been listening to Dr. G. every day.
I have been talking about this extraordinary situation in the Middle East every day, but not just because of how it affects the Middle East and our friends and our allies in Israel, but how it affects us here in the United States.
And today, if you're wondering how and why and what the focus will be today, If you're watching right now on SebGorka.com or on the Salem News Channel or on Rumble or anywhere else that you're watching, you see my background, right?
That is what we're going to be talking about in large part today, not again just because of the ramifications that it has on what goes on in Israel, but on the ramifications it is going to have on you, our security in the homeland, and our way of life.
So welcome to America First.
I am Bob France.
I'm live in Cleveland, Ohio.
Follow me on social media so that we can engage with one another when I'm not privileged enough to be hosting America First.
I'm on Twitter at France Rantz.
F-R-A-N-T-Z-R-A-N-T-Z.
I'm on Truth Social at Always Right WHK.
That's my home base here.
The ReliefFactor.com studios of WHK Radio AM 1420 The Answer.
I'm on Rumble and on Facebook and on Instagram as Always Right Radio.
Always Right Radio.
Just one wording.
You can take that however you wish because I mean it both ways.
So, we've got a very important show lined up.
It's Second Amendment Friday, as you know, so we're going to talk to John Arlott Jr.
a little bit later on.
We're hoping to be able to talk with Riley Gaines, warrior for free speech and for biology, defending women against the intrusion of their spaces, their places, their competition, and so forth, by confused men.
We're going to talk with her about that, and of course, we are going to talk with you.
Oh, I almost forgot.
Senator J.D.
Vance, senator from Ohio, is striking.
I'm Ohio.
He's striking every single cord in the United States Senate perfectly, as far as I'm concerned.
He is doing a phenomenal job.
It's the reason why he was indeed the winner of the very hotly contested Republican primary, and he beat Tim, why can't I remember Tim's name?
I wanted to say Sherrod Brown, the current Senator, Democrat Senator.
Tim Ryan.
J.D.
Vance is killing it.
He's doing a phenomenal job in the Senate.
He's got a great message.
We're going to talk to him.
That's not until hour number three, though.
So between now and then, we can hear from you at 833-33-GORKA.
833-334-6752.
I want to talk for just a second, if I may.
I want to talk a little bit about the ceasefire.
The first senator, the first United States senator to call for a ceasefire.
We have heard the Hamas squad, sometimes called the Hamas caucus, led by Rashida Sharia Tlaib in the House And then of course with Ilhan Omar, and there's Jayapal, and there's so many others.
Members of that all, you know, Palestinian-supporting and terrorist-supporting caucus.
We've heard them on the House side.
We have not yet heard.
They're screaming for a ceasefire.
They're demanding a ceasefire.
They are pushing and propagating all of the propaganda.
Of Hamas, about what's going on, and about who's dying, and who's being affected by the Israel self-defense exercises that they are carrying out in Gaza.
And I want to emphasize it that way, and I want to make sure it's very clear that way.
What Israel is doing is not inoffensive.
What Israel is doing is they invade Gaza.
What they are doing are self-defensive exercises.
Not offensive!
Very important to know that.
Certainly not collective punishment, certainly not genocide, nor any of the other things that the Palestinian propaganda arms try to push.
And they have a number of wonderfully supportive people in the United States Congress on the House side, and now on the Senate side, Dick Durbin is calling for a ceasefire.
Joe Biden?
What about our Commander-in-Chief?
What about the supposed staunch ally of Israel that's putting his own re-election chances at risk, we're told?
Because he's daring to show some support for Israel, which may cost him all of Rashida Tlaib's voters in Dearborn, Michigan, putting the essential swing state of Michigan in play for Donald J. Trump or whomever, and it's going to be, but whomever is going to be the Republican candidate?
How supportive of Israel can he be when he is calling for a pause?
Or a series of pauses so that they can effectively get some of the hostages and some of the Americans out of Gaza and into Egypt.
Let's give them a pause, give them some room.
Let's take a little time-out from the bombing and time-outs from the extraction of Hamas from the holes and from under the rocks where they live.
Let's take a pause there.
A pause is akin to a ceasefire, at least a temporary ceasefire.
So I'm going to talk about ceasefires, and I'm going to talk about what that looks like, and I'm going to talk about what that means.
I'm going to use a bit of a metaphor here.
I tweeted, if you follow me on Twitter, at France Rance, and I tagged in Dr. G. Seb Gorka, that I can beat Mike Tyson in a boxing match.
I'm 55 years old.
I've never been in a professional boxing match in my life, and Mike Tyson, even though he's in his 50s, is still a fearsome, fearsome, very, very destructive man.
I can beat him in a boxing match.
You want to know how?
Here's how.
I can beat Mike Tyson as long as I follow Hamas and Democrat rules.
Right?
And here's how it works.
Before the bell to start round one begins, I go over to the corner where Mike Tyson is chilling, and I punch him in the face as hard as I can.
You know, catching him off guard.
And then as he stands up and draws his fist back to destroy my world, I say, Cease fire!
Cease fire!
Hold on, we got a cease fire.
He has to stop.
He has to stop.
Mike Tyson is Israel.
I'm Hamas.
And I call a ceasefire, and so he can't do anything, and he goes back and sits back down again.
And just when he is unsuspecting, once again, I come over to him and I punch him in the face as hard as I can.
And as soon as he is ready to kill me, ceasefire!
I call ceasefire!
You can't hit me!
You can't hit me!
No, no, no, we're in the middle of a ceasefire here.
And I can repeat that again and again and again and again, until Mike Tyson eventually does one of two things.
Either quits making me the winner, or he says, to hell with your ceasefire, France!
And he comes over there and beats me into my grave.
Those are the only two outcomes.
That is what the ceasefire looks like.
Hamas unsuspectingly goes in and attacks and kills 1,400 Jews in the most horrific, just sadistic manner possible.
Capturing 200 plus of them, murdering 1,400 of them, wounding over 4,000 of them in the most barbaric, sadistic, medieval style possible.
And just when Israel is starting to fight ceasefire, Ceasefire?
Nope.
Nope.
Put those down.
You put those bombs down.
You stop this incursion right now.
We're calling for peace.
And if Israel does what they want them to do, which is to agree to the ceasefire and not punch me back in the face, going back to my metaphor, what do you think is going to happen?
You damn well better believe it.
They're going to once again come back and hit Israel again.
How do we know that Hamas would never honor such a ceasefire?
How do we know this?
We know this not because, well, we just don't trust them because they're, you know, a bunch of Arab Muslims and they're sadistic barbarians and things that they proved they were the first time.
No, it's not just a matter of probably because we've seen what they're all about.
It's guaranteed because they have told us so.
Does Tony Blinken know that?
Does Joe Biden know that?
I promise you nobody else in America knows that because the American media has yawned at it.
It's crickets.
Hamas says we will never cease fire.
We will never stop.
We will come back again and again and we'll do it again and again.
I can beat Mike Tyson, as long as he fights with ceasefire rules.
We got a lot to talk about together, you and I. Bob Franson for Dr. G. Stay here.
♪♪ ♪♪
♪♪ I
I'm Seb Gawker.
Now let's get back to the show with Bob France.
All right, thank you, Dr. G.
20 minutes past the hour.
I'm Bob Franson for Dr. G at the ReliefFactor.com studios here in Cleveland, Ohio.
Phone number is 833-33-GORKA, 833-334-6752.
We welcome you.
We're going to talk to Riley Gaines, we did confirm.
We're going to talk to her after the bottom of this coming hour, but we've got plenty of time for you.
I want you to listen to a little bit of the insanity from the American left.
First of all, You did not know, I promise you, you did not know that Hamas has already said nix to any kind of a ceasefire.
You didn't know that.
Because the media won't tell you that.
That, to me, is as much of a big story as anything the media does cover, is the fact that they won't cover that.
They will not tell you about the reality of what Hamas has said.
I want to read a quote for you before we listen to this clip.
I want to read a quote for you from one of the leaders of Hamas.
Hamas said, and I quote, and they have avowed, Hamas, to repeat their attacks on Israel, quote, again and again and again.
This is what they have said, okay?
Hamas officials say now, let me give you the name of the official, Ghazi Hamad, he's a member of the decision-making Politburo, and he warned that Gaza leadership will indeed replicate the coordinated October 7th attacks.
That took 1,400 lives, 240-plus hostages, and wounded 4,000 more.
And I quote, the Al-Aqsa flood is just the first time, and there will be a second, a third, and a fourth, because we have the determination, the resolve, and the capabilities to fight.
He said they are willing to pay a price, which means the death of the Palestinian people that we are told here in the United States is of paramount importance.
How can the Israelis possibly kill Hamas without killing these innocent Palestinians?
Hamas is announcing they intend to have Palestinians killed, and I quote, We are called a nation of martyrs and are proud to sacrifice martyrs.
Israel is a country that has no place on our land.
We must remove that country because it constitutes a security, military and political catastrophe to the Arab and Islamic nations.
We are not ashamed to say this with full force.
We must teach Israel a lesson and we will do this again and again.
The existence of Israel, he went on to say, is what causes all that pain, blood and tears.
It is Israel, not us.
We are the victims of the oppression.
We are the victims of the occupation.
Therefore, nobody should blame us for the things we do.
On October 7th, October 10th, October 1 millionth, everything we do is justified.
End quote.
Hamas has told the world there will be no ceasefire, there will be no peace, because we will never allow there to be peace.
We will continue to attack Israel on October 7th, on October 10th, on October 1 millionth.
We will do it forever.
How can anybody with two ears, a functioning cerebral cortex, an ounce of common sense, an ounce of compassion for the victims of brutality, how can they possibly say, yeah, Israel, you should definitely agree to a ceasefire?
You should definitely not go and carry out these, what are we calling them?
Self-defensive exercises in Gaza.
We should not do that to these people who say they will never stop trying to kill you all.
Mark Lamont Hill is an academic, and a professor, and a left-wing commentator, and apparently a comedian, because what he has to say here is simply hilarious.
Cut one.
The truth is that history didn't start on October 7th.
As much as the news media wants you to think that history started on October 7th, the Palestinian people have been catching hell for over 100 years.
For a hundred years, there's been a settler colonial project.
For 75 years, there's been ethnic cleansing.
We gotta tell the truth about that.
Tonight, we demand a ceasefire.
Tonight, we demand the full surrender of Israel.
That's what ceasefire stands for.
Do you understand that?
Full surrender of Israel.
We demand a ceasefire, which means we demand that Israel stop fighting back, so that we, and he puts himself there with the Palestinians, we the oppressed, we the occupied, we can continue to attack them without repercussions.
Because the history didn't start on October 7th.
I want you to consider the mindset of these people.
I want you to think about the insanity that must pervade their brains to think that they can tell Israel, ceasefire, stop fighting back until they hit you again.
And then ceasefire.
It's the same thing I described in my metaphor.
I can win a fight against the baddest man on the planet.
If I get to punch him when he's not looking, and then when he goes to kill me, we call ceasefire.
Because Hamas hits Israel when they're not looking, and then they say ceasefire.
Until it's time for them to hit them when they're not looking again, and again, and again.
Which is why this is what makes the American regime, the Biden regime's attitude toward this so extraordinarily dangerous.
They want the two-state solution to exist.
They want the two-state solution to be real.
The reality is, such a solution will never be a solution.
It cannot exist, because Hamas and Hezbollah and radical Arab Muslims in Gaza will never allow it to exist.
Tony Blinken is the Secretary of State.
He should know these things.
He's in a position where he better know these things.
He does not cut four.
Finally, and importantly, Even as we work toward progress on each of these urgent needs, we're focused on setting the conditions for a durable and sustainable peace and security.
The United States continues to believe that the best viable path, indeed the only path, is through a two-state solution.
That's the only guarantor of a secure Jewish and democratic Israel.
The only guarantor of Palestinians realizing their legitimate right to live in a state of their own, Enjoy equal measures of security, freedom, opportunity, and dignity.
The only way to end a cycle of violence once and for all.
So that is the position of the State Department of the United States of America in the Biden regime.
Tony Blinken says the only way to guarantee A safe and secure Israel is to allow the people that have just pledged to continue attacking Israel to have their own state.
Did you catch that?
Tony Blinken says that allowing Hamas to continue to exist in a Palestinian state, even though there are no Palestinians, because there is no Palestine, Because there has not been a Palestine.
Allowing the Palestinians to live in their own state with Hamas as their governing terrorist body is the best way to secure peace in the region, even though that governing terrorist body has pledged we will never stop attacking Israel.
Somebody make that make sense to me.
Somebody on the American left.
Somebody who is a supporter of the Biden regime.
Somebody who's sitting out there now screaming, shut up, we want a ceasefire.
Tell me how that ceasefire looks.
Tell me how that ceasefire works.
Tell me how Israel survives such a ceasefire.
I'm Bob Francin for Dr. G, stay here on America First.
♪♪♪♪♪ ♪♪♪♪♪
♪♪♪♪♪ I'm Seb Gawker.
Now let's get back to the show with Bob Franz.
Oh, and I love that theme song, and it applies so very, very well, so perfectly to our guest now, as we welcome back to America First, Riley Gaines.
She is a Wonder Woman, and she is battling on behalf of all women, trying to protect their spaces, trying to protect their competitions, and protect their dignity, and quite frankly, to protect their biology.
Riley Gaines, All-American swimmer, and now All-American advocate for women.
Welcome back to America First.
Riley, how are you?
Well, I'm doing great, Bob.
Thank you so much for having me on.
It's so good to have you.
I just loved 1010.
On October 10th, when I saw your messaging on that, and I just, I did it on every show that I host, radio and television, and I talked about it.
Nobody got it!
Nobody got it.
I said, Roman numerals, what is, what are 1010 and Roman numerals?
And I told my co-hosts and had no idea, and I had to explain it to them.
And that is just so brilliant.
That was a wonderful, Way to advance the cause, right?
I mean, look, you know, XX, which of course is the Roman numeral, that is the chromosome, it is such great messaging, and how was that received?
What kind of feedback did you get?
I will tell you, we had such great reception on that day.
The month when we saw So many men by organizations and companies and academia and even within our federal government who are nominating these men as, you know, they were honoring them as these trailblazing women.
We saw Mr. Rachel Levine.
He was awarded USA Today's Women of Courage Award.
We saw ESPN nominate and honor Leah Thomas during Women's History Month.
We saw Hershey's did the same thing with a man named Faye Johnson.
And so I'm watching this and I just began to feel frustrated because one, we don't see women being honored in the place of men.
It's only women who are being disproportionately affected here.
And so I thought, you know, how can we get back to honoring real women?
And that's when I thought of October 10th, which of course was denoted as Real Women's Day.
But Representative Lisa McClain read it into the congressional record and created a bill honoring October 10th as Real Women's Day from this day forward.
Lots of really good things were done that day.
I went to Penn State to speak where the reception might not have been as great as I'm letting on here.
Multiple students were arrested and things like that, but really good stuff.
Well, it is great stuff, and I'm so glad to hear that.
Now we just need to make it a month.
I mean, if they can get an entire month to celebrate men invading women's spaces and invading their personalities and so forth, we ought to be able to get a month for Raleigh Gaines and for Women's Month.
So, Riley, let's talk about, you went to Penn State and you've got an event that you're going to tonight at UC Davis, which should be a pretty simple thing for you to do, to be able to plan out for people to get tickets to come and see, but unfortunately tickets are hard to come by to go see you at UC Davis tonight.
Can you tell us why?
What happened?
Of course I can.
So we're using the platform called Eventbrite to administer these free tickets.
I got an email maybe two weeks ago from Eventbrite, and they said my event, the event that was called Protecting Women's Sports, violated their hateful content policy, and that it was discriminatory.
And I was so baffled by this, because again, message, it's a very much pro-woman message, as you could even see by the headline, Protecting Women's Sports.
And so I started to do some research into the whole Eventbrite thing.
Of course, all of the LGBTQ groups and their events remained on the site.
But so did pro-Hamas groups, to which they called pro-Palestinian resistance fighters.
But all those groups remained.
And so there was some public calling out of CEO and Chairman Kevin Hart To which he very quickly defended being pro-Hamas and said that was an egregious representation of him, but never once defended being anti-woman.
My event is still off, so we have switched to another platform, which still has the governor of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, he's announced he won't be using Obamacare anymore, and a slew of other people.
There was a lot of outrage there by parents.
You know, by, I mean, I would just say concerned civilians, people who have daughters, people who have women in their life that they love who were appalled by Eventbrite's behavior.
So Raleigh, did Eventbrite explain exactly what was hateful about the term protecting women's sports?
Because to my understanding, it doesn't get followed by while killing and crushing and attacking men's sports.
It's just protecting women's sports, right?
Did they explain how that's hate-filled?
No, they didn't.
They said it was just discriminatory towards the portion of their policy that pertains to gender identity.
But nowhere, I started looking into what groups are protected under their policy, and of course it's the disabled, it's veterans, it's, you know, they protect ageism, the list goes on, but nowhere in there Do they not discriminate against sex?
Protecting women's sports is hateful, but pro-Hamas is not hateful.
We're going to continue with Riley Gaines right after this.
Bob Frantz in for Dr. G here on America First.
This is a test.
you you
you I'm SabGurka.
Now let's get back to the show with Bob France.
All right.
Thanks, Dr. G. Seventeen minutes before the top of the hour.
Yeah, try that at a small college.
That's what Riley Gaines is going to do tonight at UC Davis.
It's her latest appearance.
On behalf of women and protecting women's sports, Riley Gaines also now is running the Riley Gaines Center at the Leadership Institute, which continues to advocate for women, women's spaces, and women's sports.
And Riley, so Eventbrite, as we covered, did not want to ticket your event, saying that you violated their rules against hate speech or hate messaging or what have you.
They were going to, until the last minute, continue to ticket a pro-Hamas event.
Let's go back to last week, on the 26th, when you had another event.
At Harvard.
Harvard, of course, has been one of the most shrill and loud voices in support of pro-Hamas and pro-Palestinian events, but apparently not so much at pro-women's protecting women's sports events.
What happened there?
So, as you can imagine, like a lot of these institutions of higher education, like Harvard, like a lot of the other Ivy Leagues, they've totally gone south in terms of protecting our freedoms, especially the freedom of speech.
Um, I was able to speak there, uh, but outside of my speech, they hosted a big trans party is what they called it.
Um, as you can imagine, there were people of, uh, it was incredibly disorienting, right?
There's men who are wearing dresses with beards and women who are dressed up as boys all together eating pizza and cupcakes, which just That part sounds a little fun, I guess.
But I was able to deliver my speech, and you know what?
For the most part, actually, I would say it was incredibly well received, even by people who maybe, you know, didn't disagree with me, or didn't agree with me coming into it, but came with an open mind.
They left agreeing with me, and that's what it's about, you know?
That is fantastic and I'm glad to hear that.
I'm just trying to picture the clown show that you just described though and I just, I can't help but wonder whenever we look at some of the things you do, the places you go, the people you see, and we see videos of these things, how will history record this moment in time?
I cannot believe this is going to continue throughout the future.
Of course.
This has no sustainability.
Because you're right.
return common sense and reason and reasonability returns and I just wonder
50 years from now, 100 years from now, when people write back to this early part of
this century, the insanity that came about when men thought they were women
and women thought that they were men. You ever think about stuff like that in the
context of where we are? Of course. This has no sustainability because you're
right. We're denying truth and truth will always prevail.
It's how I keep myself grounded to be honest because knowing that on my side we do
have we have public opinion first and foremost.
We have the biblical view of we already know who wins.
We have science, we have logic, we have reasoning, we have common sense.
It is bound to restore, but in the meantime, you know, asking ourselves the question of how will we look back on this, this blip of history?
I can tell you exactly how we'll look back on it, because I've read the book 1984.
That's what we're going through, in terms of denying this truth that's essentially, it's the same as basically saying 2 plus 2 is 5.
That's what it is to deny man and woman.
So we'll look back on this as if, and wonder, how did we get here?
Yet, right now we're actively living through it.
Yeah, well, you know, the only problem I have with that theory is that I remember the end of 1984 and history went on the way the party decided it went on.
We don't know when they actually and if they ever got back to the reality of what it was like to exist before history was revised and people were made into un-persons and so forth.
So we're going to hope that eventually we do get out of this and can look back at this and realize what it was, which was kind of like in 1984.
When you said a moment ago, Riley, Uh, institutions of higher learning, referencing the Harvard thing.
It just occurred to me that I don't know if I've ever heard you address this.
What about your institution of higher learning?
What about your alma mater?
How does Kentucky treat you, treat this, and how are they in terms of the, um, you know, what we see in campuses all over the country with, you know, pro-Hamas and things like that going on?
What's happening at UK?
So I will say, well, before I spoke out, I called my athletic director because I love my athletic director.
He's been the AD at Kentucky for 20 plus years.
He's an incredible Christian man.
We had a great relationship.
And so I called him before I spoke out and I asked him, you know, Mitch, how are you?
How do you feel if I take a stand and say that this is wrong and harmful to women?
And I will never forget what he said, because he said, Riley, I love you.
You know, I support you.
Speak your heart, stay true to your convictions, and don't worry about painting the university in a bad light.
And that gave me so much encouragement.
That gave me the support to take a stand.
And I think that goes to show why so many people are scared, because they don't have that.
I had incredible support from my coaches.
Not as much from the academia side of things, but among the athletic department, you know, people who knew me, who knew my heart, my heart of service, how I was dedicated in academics, as well as my athletic achievement.
All these people knew there's no hatred at my heart.
And they supported me.
And that made a huge difference in my confidence and my leadership and my security to take a stand.
And that's not being seen anywhere else across the nation.
How would it go, Riley, if you did one of your presentations like you're doing tonight at UC Davis, and you did at Harvard, you did at Penn State, and San Francisco State, and so forth, if you're invited to come back to the alma mater and give one of these presentations, do you think you would meet any resistance?
Would there still be trans parties and you hateful blah blah blah going on there, or do you think you'd be welcome back with open arms as the daughter of, you know, UK?
I would say for the most part I'd be welcome with open arms, but That being said, there's pockets of crazy everywhere, and Kentucky is not immune to that.
Even, you know, these Christian universities.
I live in Nashville, where we have Lipscomb and Belmont, which are Christian universities, private colleges that have gone super crazy and woke, for lack of a better word, as well.
So, crazy is everywhere, but I think for the most part, I would be extremely well-received and welcomed in Kentucky.
I'm so glad to hear that.
I'm so glad to hear that.
And I would expect you would too.
But you're right, crazy is everywhere.
One of the things you're trying to do is undo the crazy.
Tell me what else you're doing with the Riley Gaines Center at the Leadership Institute.
Yeah, so this has been a really fun and eye-opening project because I We get messages daily, right, from parents, from coaches, from female athletes who have been affected by this movement but don't know what to do.
And so the center is a way to help those people.
It's a training program to provide resources and support and encouragement, communication tools, different things to these people, you know, whether it's even, you know, school board leaders, community leaders, national leaders, campus leaders, team leaders, to create leaders.
And so we've Had a lot of good progress there thus far and will only continue in the future.
It takes a leader to train a leader, to coach a leader, to make them become leaders.
You are exactly that.
Riley Gaines, thank you for coming back on America First.
Pleasure to talk with you.
Keep up the phenomenal work.
Of course.
Thank you, Bob.
You got it.
It's nine minutes now before the top of the hour.
We'll take a short time out and come right back on America First.
God Bless, Bye, Bye.
you you
you Is the United States becoming a police state?
Dinesh D'Souza's new movie, Police State, answers that question.
It's his timeliest and most eye-opening film yet.
Watch it today at SalemNow.com.
That is great advice indeed.
Dinesh D'Souza is an amazing filmmaker and an amazing truth teller.
Police State is going to be phenomenal.
I interviewed Dinesh just a couple of weeks ago about this.
I cannot wait to see the film myself.
Make sure we all watch Police State.
Five minutes before the top, Bob France in for Dr. G on America First.
I want to go right to the phones now.
Thanks to Riley Gaines for her time.
833-33-GORKA.
I want to go to Line 3 from Alex in Brooklyn.
Welcome to America First.
Alex, you're on the air.
Go ahead.
Yeah, hi.
Thanks for taking the call, and it's absolutely crazy that, you know, Riley Gaines is going through this with that website that's refusing to have her event up.
But Hamas, you know, pro-Hamas protests they're willing to have up, and that's because they're afraid of the wokesters, and the pro-Hamas people are part of the woke movement, and it's so insane, and I think it's because they're such bitter people.
And they're trying to offend people, these wokesters.
You know, if they would come out pro-Israel, no one would give a damn about it, really.
Because it's the right side of the issue, coming, you know, out against Hamas.
And nobody would be offended if you stand against Hamas, because they're terrorists, but you come out against Israel and pro-Hamas, and that offends people, and that, you know, spreads your bitterness to other people as well.
But I think that About a ceasefire, even if Hamas, which they're clearly saying they're not willing to have a ceasefire with Israel, even if they were open for that, Israel cannot say we're going to do a ceasefire now.
Not just after they did this, because it's not like they're not going to do it again.
They're going to do it again, and if Israel does a ceasefire without wiping out Hamas, this is going to repeat itself and the Israelis need to regain control of Gaza.
I think the biggest mistake that the Israelis have made during the time of their government Was that they gave Gaza to the Palestinians, because what happened then was that Hamas was able to build itself up in that big terrorist organization and brainwash little children, get money from Iran and run the government over there, and force the kids into being indoctrinated with their crazy beliefs of, you know, killing Jews and Americans and following through with these terrorist attacks.
And so all these people that are saying, make a ceasefire, and also a lot of them are saying, we need a two-state solution.
No, you have a two-state solution.
You're going to have another terrorist organization building itself up in a way bigger way with the two states because they'll have all these Arabs that are living in Israel now being under them as well.
And so Israel needs to regain control and not give in here and completely wipe out Hamas is what I see it as.
And we've got a president that you mentioned you need an ounce of common sense and an ounce of compassion.
Joe Biden doesn't have an ounce of compassion.
He has a million ounces of corruption, despicability.
Alex, I need to jump in right now, my friend.
I need to jump in here, but I'm going to tell you something.
I could just let you go.
need a ceasefire. He went off the teleprompter said oh yeah we need a
ceasefire because he doesn't give a damn. Alex I need to jump in right now my
friend I need to jump in here but I'm gonna tell you something I could just
let you go I could let you just I take the rest of the show off you're nailing
every single point You're striking every note perfectly.
I could not agree with you more.
It's a great phone call.
Thank you for making it.
I'm Bob France in for Dr. G.
Hour Two of America First is coming up.
Thanks for watching.
Subscribe to our channel for more videos.
See you in the next video.
It is going to pass.
I don't think it's carved in stone yet.
I'm seeing some signs of momentum.
I'm Seb Gawker.
Now let's get back to the show with Bob France.
And hour number two is underway of America First.
Thanks for being with us on this Friday.
It's the third afternoon of the 11th month of the year of our Lord 2023.
Kind of got into that habit a long time ago with my morning show, just telling everybody what the day was, just so that I can say, in the year of our Lord 2023.
You know why that matters to me as we come to you live here in the ReliefFactor.com studios in Cleveland, Ohio?
My home base, if you're interested in listening, is WHKRadio online at WHKRadio.com.
Nine to noon weekdays is my normal time slot here when I'm not sitting in for Dr. G.
You can follow me on Twitter at France Rantz, F-R-A-N-T-Z, R-A-N-T-Z, on Truth Social and on Instagram and on Facebook at Always Right Radio, Always Right Radio, and on Rumble there as well.
You know the reason I started doing that?
I'm bringing this up again because I was doing a story in an interview this morning with Rabbi Michael Barkley.
He's from California.
And he wrote a piece that really buttressed a point that I made the other day on the Dennis
Prager Show, which is talking about the existence of Palestinians and the existence of Palestine
and the fact that quite simply there is none of either.
There is no existence of them because there never was a Palestine, which was an established
territory and the people being born to it, Palestinian and so on and so forth.
It was a really, really important history lesson.
But at any rate, it started talking about the history of the land that is Israel and
how it literally became Israel at the very beginning of the first populations there,
starting back about 3200 BC.
I'm sorry, 3200 years ago, about 1200 B.C.
And so in the article, they did the more commonly accepted now, B.C.E., which is before Common Era, and then now C.E., which is Common Era, when we all know that time started being marked By the birth of Christ.
That's what calendars have been, literally, since the beginning of time, or since the beginning of calendars.
We mark everything by BC, before Christ, and AD, which many people do not know.
And I've been doing this for 25 years on the radio.
I try to tell people, A.D.
does not mean after death, because that would mean there would be a 33 year period from Jesus' birth to His death where there was no time.
A.D.
doesn't stand for after death.
A.D.
stands for Anno Domini, which is Latin for, in the year of our Lord.
Anno Domini.
So when I tell everybody this is year of our Lord 2023, it's rejecting the B.C.E.
and C.E.
nonsense, and it's reminding everybody how we really mark time as a people.
Alright, 833-33-GORKA, 833-334-6752 is the number.
I want to play something for you as we continue.
And if you're watching on the Rumble or any of the video streams or on Salem News Channel or anywhere else right now, you'll see my background.
It's an American flag waving next to an Israeli flag because that is exactly what this country should be presenting.
A unified front with the people of Israel for all of the right reasons.
There is no moral equivalency between Israel and the quote-unquote Palestinian people who elected Hamas, a terrorist organization, to lead them in the Gaza Strip, and to carry out the ongoing belief that from the river to the sea, Palestine shall be free, and that means the elimination and the extermination of Jews and of Israel.
So I want to talk about this for a moment here.
And I'm going to talk about how important it is for us to make sure we recognize the importance of supporting one nation with our philanthropic aid, while saying about enough is enough about another.
Yesterday, the House of Representatives passed a stand-alone bill.
$14.3 billion in aid to Israel.
Not to Gaza, nor to Gazans.
And it's not because people are completely indifferent to the suffering of some of those quote-unquote Palestinians or the Gazans.
It's just a matter of, we all know what Hamas does.
Hamas takes everything of value and they hoard it for themselves and they starve their people out.
And they don't care if their people die.
In fact, they much prefer it.
Because, as the leader of Hamas said, we need the blood to be spilled of men, women, and children, so that we can revolutionize, or I'm sorry, so that we can lift up our revolutionary spirit.
Which means, so that we will generate more anger and hatred toward Israel if our civilians die.
So this is just the reality of the situation.
So we're giving money to Israel, but not to Gaza.
Or at least that's the plan of the House vote yesterday.
Along with that is a rejection, because they did it as a stand-alone bill, a rejection of the $60 billion aid package requested by Joe Biden and by Volodymyr Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, for the Ukrainians.
And it's not as though we're indifferent to their plight either, but we have already chipped in.
We've already filled their kettle to the tune of $120 billion American taxpayer dollars.
We have filled the kettle the best we can.
It is now up to their European allies and neighbors to take care of them if they want to continue their push back against Vladimir Putin.
That's not to say we don't support them in spirit, but there is only so much we can do to support them financially.
Now, why am I bringing this up now?
Here's why I'm bringing this up now, because despite Despite the fact that the stand-alone bill passed in the House yesterday, and I'm not sure if it'll pass through the Senate, our new Speaker of the House, a man that I'm very glad is the Speaker, I did not support the method for getting Kevin McCarthy out and handing the gavel to someone like Mike Johnson, but I am pleased with the outcome.
But our new speaker, Mike Johnson, who made it his point to make sure that there was a separate vote on funding for Israel versus funding for Ukraine, is allowing a link to be made between funding Ukraine and defending our own country.
What?
I'll let the speaker himself explain.
Cut eight.
Ukraine will come in short order.
It will come next, and you've heard me say that we want to pair border security with Ukraine because I think we could get bipartisan agreement on both of those matters.
Look, the American people feel very strongly about this, and I do as well, and I can tell you House Republicans do.
We have obligations and we have things that we And I think our speaker is dead wrong.
But we have to take care of our own house first and as long as the border is wide open
we're opening ourselves up for great threat and Again, it's just a matter of principle that we we're gonna
take care of a border in Ukraine We need to take care of America's border as well. And I
think there's bipartisan support for that idea And I think our speaker is dead wrong
What he just acceded to and what Joe Biden is pushing forth is bribery
Understand that?
What our speaker agreed to here by saying we will link aid for the Ukrainians for their $60 billion to supporting some asylum changes and for some security upgrades at our southern border.
What that means is, and here's how I tweeted it earlier today.
So this quarterwit, meaning Joe Biden, will only think about partially securing our southern border if we pay a $60 billion bribe to Zelensky.
How can that be okay with any conservative American?
How can that be okay with our Speaker Mike Johnson?
How can that possibly be?
We don't secure America only if we pay a ransom to another country.
One that we've already paid $120 billion to.
We don't do it that way.
We can't do it that way.
We secure America first because America must come first.
That was the message of former President Trump.
It is the message of Dr. G in the name of this show.
America must come first, not only if we give another $60 billion to another country that is not even a NATO ally.
That may not even be a functioning democracy.
That may be corrupt, considering all of the strange entanglements of their energy oligarchs, the current president who was the former vice president, the cocaine-addled son, the board at Burisma, the getting the prosecutor fired, the whole nine yards.
It stinks to high heaven.
And now, Joe Biden has convinced enough Republicans, and apparently the Speaker of the House, to go along with linking Aiding Ukraine further with $60 billion more that our $33 trillion in-debt nation cannot afford to do in order to secure our funding.
Our border, I should say.
Secure the funding for our border and secure some policy shifts for our border as well.
So I've got a big problem with that.
Joe Biden, for the sake of being clear and being fair, Is willing to do some things here that do need to be done.
For example, according to reports from the Daily Caller and others, the White House introduction of that funding package for 60 billion dollars for Ukraine would lead to a shift or sort of a change in the asylum policies of the regime that we have right now.
It is supposedly a huge substantive risk, a political one.
What it would involve is slight changes to what could be used for quote, persecution, the language and the definition of persecution for those seeking asylum here.
It would narrow that.
Which would make far fewer people eligible to request asylum here, which would give us a little bit of relief at the border.
But only will he do that if we send another $60 billion in bribe money to Zelensky.
Is anybody okay with that?
I'm not okay with that.
I'm Bob Frantz, in for Dr. Gorka.
Stay here on America First.
www.americanfirst.org www.americanfirst.org
I'm Seb Gawker.
Now let's get back to the show with Bob France.
It is always good to sit in for Dr. G on a Friday, a Second Amendment Friday, and so glad to tell you.
We thank God every day that America is the freest nation on earth, and we remain that way because of the right to keep and bear arms, and no other company in America personifies that more.
than car firearms group.
Their story, the American dream, their products, absolutely second to none.
Car Firearms Group, your source for high quality firearms.
Visit them at www.kahr.com.
We carry car every day at America First, and so should you.
We're going to talk to John Lott, Jr.
John Lott, Jr., that'll be in about 20 minutes from now, about Second Amendment issues that matter to you.
And to all of us, quite frankly.
All right.
833-33-GORKA is the number.
833-334-6752.
We're going to go back to the phones now on this Free For All Friday.
Anything you want to hit, including the bribery push that Biden is making in order to fund Ukraine, I'll give you a little bit of a break at the border.
In other words, if you don't give me the funding for Ukraine, then I just let more Hamas and Hezbollah and terrorists, people on the terror watch list, gang members, cartel members, Sex traffickers, we just let them all continue to come across the border.
9 million since Biden took office and counting.
You want a break from that?
You want to get a little bit of a slower flow across that border?
Give me 60 billion for Zelensky.
I failed to see it any other way and I don't know how anybody else can either.
Let's go to Arizona.
Line 2, Dave, you're on America First.
I'm Bob Franson for Dr. G. Fire away.
Thanks so much, Mr. Frantz.
I'll let the fact that you're a flatlander slide, so I appreciate you hosting the show today, my friend.
I am indeed.
I'm a Penn State guy, so.
But again, I won't hold that against you.
Thank you.
My question is this.
I see, you know, broadcast today a couple news stories which are great for low-information voters, consumers of electronic media like Fox News, FAUX News.
You know that Speaker Johnson is going to give all the tapes to Blaze.
We heard that 10 months ago.
Actions, not words.
And then the other thing is Comer.
Comer says, oh, definitely there's going to be indictments of Biden.
Well, what are you waiting for?
We don't need to prove every single instance of bribery.
Prove one.
One is enough.
Let's move on.
They've got multiple checks.
And I'm just shocked.
I don't know how much longer we, the people, can sit around with a Biden puppet regime Laughs in our face overtly because we don't do anything.
We don't hold these people accountable.
And we, the people, we have all the power.
Is that correct, sir?
That's the way it's supposed to be, yes.
It's supposed to be our power and they serve at our pleasure.
But you're right, it doesn't seem that way sometimes with this particular regime, now does it?
It does not, sir.
I know that my representative, he gets the equation.
I call him almost every day.
Dr. Paul Gosar in CD9 out here in Arizona.
And you know Arizona's the capital of corruption in the world.
Next to Ukraine, maybe.
We could probably get them running the way we administer our voting process.
Katie Hobbs or Zelensky.
Katie Hobbs or Zelensky.
Boy, I don't know.
That's a tough one.
That's a toss-up, maybe.
They're both good actors, aren't they, sir?
Very well said.
Yes, they are.
And I think corruption applies to both of them, quite frankly.
Yes, sir.
I appreciate you, sir.
Have a great day, my friend.
Thank you.
I appreciate the call.
His large point there, and God bless you, too.
Thank you, and have a good weekend.
How many more lies can we take from this country and from this regime?
I don't know.
It's not just the lies.
And I concur with you about Comer and what he said.
We have one check.
That should be enough, as he pointed out.
That should be enough to impeach.
It probably will not be.
Now, the impeachment inquiry that was started when Kevin McCarthy was the Speaker does not end.
I talked to Jim Jordan on this program just this past Monday.
Rather, on my program in Cleveland, Ohio.
And I talked to Jim Jordan, who could have been and should have been the Speaker, had it not been for the knifing that he took from some individuals who will remain unnamed at the moment.
But we talked about this and he said, absolutely the impeachment inquiry stays.
The investigations that are being done into the Biden regime and into the first family of crime, both in the oversight and in the judiciary, they will continue.
They do have the one check and it was spelled out very, very well.
I thought James Carmer did a phenomenal job talking about the $500,000 that was given to a Biden.
$40,000 that was given to a Biden then that $400,000 of that was paid to another Biden and then
$40,000 or Everybody stay with me now from the laptop from hell
10% for the big guy, $40,000 written directly, and all this originating in a Chinese account, written directly to Joe Biden.
So 10% for the big guy has been proven.
Should that be enough to impeach and to actually bring about articles of impeachment, not just an impeachment inquiry?
Perhaps.
But I trust Jim Jordan and I trust James Comer to get to the goods on all of it to the point where it cannot be in doubt.
You can't go into any impeachment type of hearings without knowing everything.
Otherwise, and even if you do know, you know that the Senate is never going to convict, just like the Republican-controlled Senate was never going to convict Trump.
But all of the dirt must come out if you want to truly bring down that House of Cards.
So thank you, my friend.
Let's go to Philadelphia.
Nancy, welcome to America First.
Bob France in for Dr. G. Go ahead.
Hi, Bob.
For more than two years, I've been hearing Biden insist that we're going to support the war in Ukraine for as long as it takes, and now clearly for an unlimited billions of dollars of our tax money.
But I'm wondering why I haven't heard Biden calling for a pause or a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine against Russia so that the citizens of Russia can be provided humanitarian aid.
Wow.
Nancy, that's a brilliant point.
An absolutely brilliant point nobody that I have heard is made.
That's exactly if he's being consistent in the way he is applying things in the Middle East.
He should do the same exact thing and call for a ceasefire.
Tell Tell Zelensky not to defend his people anymore.
Tell the war machine to take some time out, because if you continue to fight back against the Russians, you might put some innocent civilians in danger.
You should definitely allow the Russians to clear their people out in order to give them an ability to avoid collateral damage.
That's brilliant!
That's a great point.
Why has that not yet been brought up to Joe Biden himself?
That's that's exactly what needs to be said.
Your clarity and your wisdom are off the charts.
Well done, Nancy.
Thank you.
Thank you for the call.
God bless you.
Let's go to how about Ken in Chicago, Illinois.
Ken, welcome to America First.
I'm Bob France.
Go ahead.
Hey, Bob, how are you?
So I'm not a regular listener, but I've been listening to your kind of rhetoric about Ukraine, and I have to say I agree with pretty much everything you've said.
And as far as the bills go, in my view, they should be separately approved, you know, for Israel, the border, Ukraine.
But here is my question to you.
It seems like a lot of people are talking about Ukraine in this way in the recent weeks.
But the border problem, that's not a problem from the last, you know, four weeks or eight weeks.
I mean, that's been a problem for a long time.
So why did we approve anything to begin with 18 months ago?
Why did we give 120 billion?
And I wasn't hearing that on Well, the original argument, and I helped make it on conservative talk radio back then, and it's a very fair point that you're making up.
Thank you for the phone call from Chicago, Ken.
I'll talk more about it after the break, but yes, it is a very good point.
The original point wasn't about protecting their border, it was about stopping Putin
from beginning another Hitlerian march through Europe, or a Stalinistic rebuilding of the
Soviet bloc.
That was the original argument, not about defending any one nation's border.
More coming up on America First.
Thanks for watching.
And as always, thanks for watching.
I I'm Seb Gorka.
Now let's get back to the show with Bob France.
And welcome to another Second Amendment Friday.
The greatness of America is at its core our freedom.
No other country is as free, and we remain free due to our right to keep and bear arms.
No other company in America personifies that right more than Carr Firearms Group.
Their story is the American dream, and their products are absolutely second to none.
Carr Firearms Group is your source for high-quality firearms.
Visit them at www.kahr.com.
Carr Firearms.
We're going to go right back to the phones in a second.
I want you to hear one more clip from the regime.
This one, John Kirby, one of the National Security Advisors, Admiral John Kirby, was taking questions yesterday from Peter Doocy from Fox News.
Taking questions from the assembled media, but specifically bragging about the job that Cutter did in helping to negotiate the release of some American hostages, the same hostages that Cutter Helped apprehend by their support for the same terror groups that are supported by Iran.
You know, Qatar is the second largest state sponsor of terror in the world, right after Iran.
Why is Joe Biden kissing Qatar's rear end for something they helped engineer?
That was the question Peter Doocy had.
Listen to the answer from John Kirby in Cut 5.
John, so talking about getting Americans out of Gaza, President Biden said, I want to thank our partners in the region and particularly Qatar.
The leader of Hamas lives in Qatar.
So why is President Biden thanking them for anything?
Oh, geez, Peter.
Let's take a step back here.
Look at this.
Qatar was- They are a terrorist group that killed Americans and kidnapped Americans within the last month.
Peter, Qatar has been helpful.
in getting those Americans out.
I'm sure you would agree with me and everybody at your network would agree that getting American hostages out is a good thing.
And Qatar was a key player in that regard.
Qatar has lines of communication with Hamas that almost nobody else has.
Now I'm not saying that we support Hamas.
Of course we don't.
They're a terrorist organization.
And Israel has an absolute right to go after them.
But Qatar has lines of communication that not everybody else has.
And it would be irresponsible.
In fact, I would expect that you and everybody else in here would be going after me if we weren't doing everything we could and having every possible conversation we can have to get Americans that are held hostage back home with their families.
If we weren't doing that, it would be diplomatic malpractice.
It's unfathomable, the gaslighting that this regime does to the American people.
As Peter Doocy just said, the head of Hamas lives in Qatar.
Kirby responds by saying, Qatar has a great line of communication with Hamas.
That's because they are supporting Hamas.
That means Qatar helped Hamas kidnap Americans, along with 240 or so Israelis.
Kidnapping Americans in the middle of that barbaric, sadistic, medieval assault on civilians throughout Israel.
Qatar helped sponsor the Hamas invasion and attack.
Then, quote-unquote, brokers the release of some Americans, and Joe Biden is falling all over them with sloppy hugs of gratitude and sloppy kisses of, well, thank you for helping us get our people out.
I mean, there was a situation in Cleveland, Ohio, about 10 years ago.
Maybe you've heard of it.
It's been on a few news stories, in which three young women were all kidnapped And we're missing for years, all at different times, by a sick lunatic named Ariel Castro and held in Cleveland, Ohio.
One of them was named Michelle Barry, one of them was named, I'm sorry, Amanda Barry, beg your pardon, Michelle Knight, and Gina DeJesus.
You probably have seen something about this because they were found They were rescued after 10 years of captivity by a neighbor who heard one of them trying to push their way out of the door when the kidnapper was not home.
When they were freed and Ariel Castro was caught, nobody gave him a big hug and said thank you for stepping away and letting them get out.
You don't thank kidnappers who eventually release their victims!
You beat them to within an inch of their lives and you throw them in prison for the rest of their lives.
That's what you should do.
Joe Biden, Tony Blinken, they're thanking Cutter for releasing hostages that Cutter helped take.
That's how pathetic and weak this administration looks to the rest of the world.
It's why the rest of the world is so willing to screw with America, to attack her allies, To take hostage our citizens.
That's exactly why.
Because this is the weakness projected to the rest of the world by the Biden regime.
Oh, thank you hostage takers for finally releasing the hostages.
Unbelievable.
John Arlott will join us next on Second Amendment Friday.
Thank you.
you You know, here at America First, we thank God every day that America is the freest nation on earth, and we remain free because of the right to keep and bear arms.
No other company in America personifies that right more than Carr Firearms Group.
Led by our good friend Justin Moon, Carr stands strong and unashamed in their support for the right to keep and bear arms, any and all arms, that the people might need to stand against tyranny.
Americans can be sure that no matter what happens, Carr Firearms Group will be at the front lines fighting for Americans' Second Amendment rights.
Their story is the American Dream.
Their products are absolutely second to none.
Carr Firearms Group, your source for high-quality firearms.
Visit them!
At www.KAHR.com.
We carry CAR every day at America First, so should you.
Portions of America First are brought to you in part by CAR Firearms.
Let's welcome back to the program now on Second Amendment Friday.
That's why I love sitting in for Dr. G on Fridays, because I get to talk to John R. Lott, Jr.
John, good to talk to you.
How are you?
Good, sir.
Doing great.
Glad you're there.
Thanks for having me on.
It's good to be here.
Whenever Seb has to stay away, or step away I should say, I'm so glad to sit in, especially when we can talk about our Second Amendment rights.
John, there's a big story coming up.
You may not recall this bit, but two weeks ago, the last time I was in on a Friday for Dr. G, you and I started to talk about your article in The Federalist.
And now that we are just a few days away from November 7th, this coming Tuesday, a very important Supreme Court case that you wrote about is nearly upon us.
Give us the background here.
Tell us what this case is all about, the Rahimi case.
Right.
Well, it deals with the issue of what standards courts have to follow to take away a person's guns.
So, you know, you might think you can take away a person's guns after a criminal conviction, and that's true.
But the question is, can you take them after civil cases?
And there's a big difference between criminal and civil cases.
In criminal cases, you have beyond a reasonable doubt.
So you're like 92% certain that the person really is guilty.
In a civil case, the standard is a preponderance of the evidence.
So you're like 50.1% versus 49.9% Certain that the person did something.
Essentially, it's a coin flip could determine whether or not a person can lose their guns.
And there are other protections in criminal cases.
So if you can't afford a lawyer, one is provided for you in a criminal case.
In a civil case, no lawyer is provided for you.
If you can't afford one, you know, tough luck.
And also, you have this issue, you may not even be a hearing,
that determines whether or not you're gonna lose your rights or not.
And the case on Tuesday is gonna be a difficult case, mainly because of the optics,
as opposed to kind of the standards that's there.
And the reason is, is because it's named after the defendant there, Rahimi, who's a bad guy.
The guy is a drug dealer.
The guy has committed many, many felonies, including felonies with guns.
In 2020, he had, because of a civil case, where he didn't have a lawyer representing him,
he lost his right to be able to go and own guns.
And the Biden administration is pushing this case, I think, largely because of the optics that are there.
They hope that the justices there will say, you know, this guy is a bad guy and he shouldn't
have guns, which I agree, but he shouldn't have had guns because he should have been
prosecuted for the violent crimes that he had done beforehand, and they didn't prosecute
him for those.
And so, you know, the question is, are they going to set a standard that's going to make
it easy to take away people's guns or not?
Even in civil cases, not necessarily in criminal cases.
That's a staggering thing.
This won't affect any criminal cases.
The only thing that this case deals with is the standard that's used in a civil case.
And this has the possibility of really undoing a lot of the good recent precedents we've had with regard to Bruin.
So, for example, the Bruin case that the Supreme Court dealt with last year was written by Clarence Thomas.
And Thomas wanted to get away from what they call these balancing tests that courts have had, where they go, And, you know, judges like power.
And so, when I taught in law schools, one of the things I would always point to is, you look at the First Amendment, where it says, Congress shall pass no law.
That seems pretty clear, you know, in plain English, no law.
But the way the courts have liked to interpret it is, Congress shall pass no law unless they have a good reason.
And we, the judges, get to determine whether or not it's a good reason, because Judges like power, and so they don't like bright lines.
And so, you know, you jokingly ask students and stuff, what would they have had to write if they really meant no law?
Would they have to write, Congress will never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever pass a law like that?
And Thomas, I think if he could deal with writing a case dealing with the First Amendment, he would make a similar thing that he did with regard to the Bruin decision, where it says you read it, And you go and look to see what laws were in effect at that time.
The problem is, is that while you had four votes, including Thomas on that, you had two other votes with Kavanaugh and Roberts, which pretty much indicated they wanted to go and look at each law as it came along rather than setting some type of precedent.
And so the Biden administration is pushing this case with the hopes that they can peel off Kavanaugh and Roberts again.
on this and get them to agree that they should take these laws on a case-by-case basis rather
than having some type of underlying principle there.
is our guest, and Dr. Arlott, that took up most of our time, but in the one minute we have left, it's okay.
I just want to hit red flag laws because of what happened in Maine, and the shooter up there spent two weeks in a mental health facility this past summer, which has led to renewed screams, not cries, but screams for red flag laws.
If somebody has a mental condition, they have to be stripped of their guns, or they're not allowed to buy guns, regardless of what that mental condition may be.
to the hospital. He was in the hospital for two weeks. He was
in the hospital for two weeks.
We'll give you 40 seconds on that. Right? Well, you know one
thing that everybody is ignoring in the media is that
the attack at the bowling alley was another gun free zone. It
had a sign there warning people not to carry. You know, uh, and
the person was in for two weeks. But what people are also
ignoring is that. If the mental health care experts at the
hospital thought he was a Apparently, they didn't think he was a danger to himself or others, which
Red flag laws, you could temporarily take away a person's guns for a couple weeks or a month without a hearing or without any evidence provided other than just a pure written statement.
John Arlott is the president of the Crime Prevention Research Center.
Always great knowledge on Second Amendment Friday.
Thank you, John Lapp.
Thank you.
You You
Is the United States becoming a police state?
Dinesh D'Souza's new movie, Police State, answers that question.
It's his timeliest and most eye-opening film yet.
Watch it today at SalemNow.com.
Now, that's going to be a must-see.
There's no question about it.
Pretty much everything from Dinesh is phenomenal, but this is so perfectly timely and so important right now with so many American citizens being targeted by the weaponized government.
Police State is right.
So I cannot wait for that one.
Let's go to the phones.
Bob France once again in for Dr. Gorka on America First.
833-33-GORKA is the number to call.
We have Senator J.D.
Vance, who is going to be joining us after the top of the hour, by the way.
You're going to want to hear this conversation.
But first, let's have a conversation with Brent in Los Angeles.
Hello, Brent.
Welcome to the show.
Hello, Bob.
Wonderful talking with you again.
Yes, sir.
As a Jew, I wanted to tell the devil's democracy of Blinken, Biden, and Obama that there could be a complete ceasefire and humanitarian halt to Gaza belligerency the moment a total and unconditional Palestinian surrender is extended.
Just as when America's godly general, Ulysses S. Grant, and the devil's first Democrat general, Robert E. Lee, ended war in one hour at Appomattox.
Well, you are a thousand percent right, Brent.
I've said this myself on my program here in Cleveland, and I'll say it now to the millions of people listening on Dr. Gorka's network.
If Hamas is truly concerned about Gaza civilians, Palestinian civilians dying in Israeli self-defensive operations being conducted in Gaza, they can stop them in two seconds.
One, release every single hostage they are holding and two, Surrender.
Turn yourselves in.
All of those that committed those horrific, barbaric crimes against the civilians in Israel on October 7th, turn them into IDF forces, let them face justice in Israeli courtrooms, and the whole thing can be called off.
But until they do that, until they release every hostage, and until they surrender every single one of their barbaric, sadistic, savage animals that carried out those awful, awful attacks, then there will be no ceasefire.
That's the only thing they will understand.
No, you know they're not going to do that, and I know they're not going to do that.
And we also know they will never honor any brokered ceasefire by the United Nations or anybody else in the world, in the Middle East or anywhere else.
They will not honor a ceasefire talking about Hamas.
They've already declared so.
So as such, it's business as usual.
Let's get it on.
Let's get going.
No quarter shall be given.
Let the Israeli forces do what needs to be done to end the Hamas threat and protect themselves against future attacks.
God bless you, Bob.
God bless you for that point.
I'm glad you made it because you got me fired up about that again.
Thank you, Brent, for the call.
Listen, I want to be as clear and unequivocal.
Joe Biden, we unequivocally support Israel.
My rear end, you do.
This is unequivocal support.
Israel shall not stop bombing, shelling, Starving, cutting off aid, I don't care what you have to do until Hamas decides that the lives of their own people matter.
If Hamas believed their own lives mattered, they would release the hostages and surrender.
That's it.
Until they do, it is, like I said before, it is game on.
Hour number three of America First is coming up.
You're going to hear from Senator J.D.
Vance about this and much, much more right here on America First.
Thank you.
We're four days away now from November 7th.
Issue one is a...
...
you you
I'm Seb Gawker.
Now let's get back to the show with Bob France.
Alright, Dr. G, thank you.
Hour 3 is underway and I am indeed in the ReliefFactor.com studios in Cleveland, Ohio.
And here in Ohio we have a huge couple of monumental constitutional amendments to decide on next week.
And joining us now to discuss those issues and much more is U.S.
Senator J.D.
Vance from Ohio.
Senator Vance, We're four days away now from November 7th.
Issue one is, according to polling, going to win.
It is going to pass.
I don't think it's carved in stone yet.
I'm seeing some signs of momentum on the no one issue on issue one sign, but where are you, or aside I should say, where are you on this four days out and what last minute appeal can you give to those who are maybe undecided?
Yeah, so look, I don't think this is carved in stone at all.
We were always going to have an uphill climb, and I think we have a real shot here.
I think there are signs of momentum.
I've seen some polling that suggests that things are closing pretty tightly.
And importantly, that Issue 1, yes, has not hit that 50% threshold, which means there's a lot of undecided voters out there.
So I do think that we have a chance.
Get out there and vote.
This is not a foregone conclusion.
If you believe that it is, that's how we ultimately lose.
Here's my basic pitch.
Look, first of all, if you're pro-life like I am, you want to save as many babies as possible, clearly you should vote no on Issue 1.
That's easy.
But I think even if you're pro-choice, even if you think that there should be some ability to have an abortion in the state of Ohio, I think there are a few different reasons why Issue 1 is a huge, huge mistake.
Number one, Let's say, God forbid, you have a 15-year-old girl who has an unplanned pregnancy.
We want their mom to be in the room with them when they have to make this decision.
We want parents to have the ability to be notified to have some role in the healthcare decisions of their kid.
Issue 1 takes that away from people.
That's why you should be a no on Issue 1.
Number two, let's say you're pro-choice, but you think there should be some limits.
You shouldn't be able to abort a baby at 30 weeks.
You shouldn't be able to abort a baby after the baby can feel pain.
Maybe you think there should be some exceptions in cases of life of the mother or rape, but you don't want taxpayer-funded abortion up to the moment of birth.
Issue one takes that away from people.
It enshrines taxpayer-funded abortion really up to the moment of birth into the Ohio Constitution.
I really think, even if you are pro-choice, most people I know who are pro-choice, they want some limits on abortion.
They want some ability for the legislature to be able to make it a requirement that parents are involved in the healthcare decisions of their kids.
Issue 1 takes all of that away, which is why I encourage even people who don't see eye-to-eye with me on the abortion issue, I think you should still be know on Issue 1.
You know, the world isn't actually lived on Twitter.
Many people think it is, or X. And I go by that for just kind of get a pulse of Ohioans right now.
And the yes on issue one side just continues to call people like you, people like me, liars.
They're saying that there's nothing in that bill, in that constitutional amendment, in that language that says you can abort up to the moment of birth.
Partial birth abortions are illegal anyway, a federal ban on those things.
And there's nothing that says parents don't have a say.
And if you look at just the lines of the legislation or the amendment, they're right.
But what you have to do is read between those lines.
It's not what it says, what is not said.
When it doesn't say woman, which is defined as an adult female, and it says individual,
that means it can be applied to minors.
When it, you know, same thing with the parental rights, same thing with the transing situation.
If you read reproductive rights as being every step of the reproductive rights thing,
When you transition and take puberty blockers, you are essentially making yourself sterilized.
You're going to be infertile.
That's a reproductive decision and individuals can make that decision.
So how do you respond to those who are saying you're lying because it doesn't say specifically in the amendment language that parents can't have a say and that this applies to gender transitioning and so on and so forth?
Well, let me say a few things.
First of all, the amendment talks about viability as being the threshold.
Nobody really knows what viability means.
That is not an easily defined term.
You could easily have a court define that up to the moment of birth, which is why I say that I think issue one will enshrine abortion up to the moment of birth.
Well, just quickly on that, it goes past that though because it says even after the point of viability, an abortion may be granted if, in the opinion of the provider, which is the abortionist, that the mother needs it for her health, and that can mean emotional health, Psychological health, financial health, etc.
That's exactly right, Bob.
So this gets into another issue.
When people talk about the health of the mother, I think what most normal people think, understandably so, is you have a situation where, God forbid, the baby is just not viable and we don't want to force a woman to carry a baby to term that's already, you know, again, God forbid, already not living inside of her.
That's what most people think and absolutely that is a reasonable position to have.
What this amendment will do in practice When it's interpreted, especially by, you know, very, very liberal courts, in practice, it will say that if you would face emotional distress by delivering a 36-week-old baby, then you can have an abortion.
Well, look, emotional distress is in the eye of the beholder.
And when the eye of the beholder is the abortionist's eye, then you are effectively throwing open the gates to no limits on abortion under any circumstance.
Here's the final point I make about this.
This abortion amendment is framed by its advocates.
Again, we want to be no on issue one, but it's framed by the Yes Campaign as giving people the right to make decisions about abortion.
But in reality, what it will do is it will enshrine an incredibly broad and incredibly poorly defined amendment into the Ohio Constitution, then the courts get
to make these decisions about what issue one really means. We know in the past they interpret
this stuff broadly, but that's not giving people the power. That's giving judges the power to
decree radical abortion policies for the entire state of Ohio. It's a bad deal for the state, and if
you don't like what Ohio is doing on abortion, we should elect new legislatures. Write to
your state senator, to your state representative, and say, we would like a change.
I think putting this in the Ohio Constitution, taking it out of the hands of the state legislature, really putting it into the hands of some radical judges, it's a bad deal for the state of Ohio and goes way, way too far.
The other thing I'll ask you about this is the Yes on Issue 1 ads that continue to run.
They continue to be completely dishonest, not even deceptive, just straight-up lying, saying that you have to vote Yes on Issue 1 to stop Ohio's extremely restrictive abortion ban.
That if you get pregnant and you need care for a miscarriage or ectopic or anything else, you can't get it.
You have to have the baby.
If you get pregnant and you're raped, if you're a rape victim, You can't get rid of the baby.
You have to carry your baby to term because of Ohio's restrictive abortion ban.
There is no abortion ban in place right now.
The one that was passed and signed into law, which is the heartbeat law, is currently in court.
We have no idea whether it's going to be allowed to be in or not, and yet they're telling us that it exists.
And they're also suggesting that if you're raped, you can't have an abortion under any circumstances, even if the heartbeat law does exist.
If the court says it can exist, you have six weeks, and I would imagine that anybody Minor or otherwise who suffers a rape that at some point in six weeks would take a pregnancy test and find out if they were indeed impregnated by the act and therefore still be able to act accordingly under that law.
So the ban is not what they say it is.
No, that's exactly right, Bob.
There's a ton of dishonesty here, and they're trying to sell this thing as effectively what you said.
Their argument is, if you're an 11-year-old girl, and God forbid you're raped, you have to carry the baby to term under Ohio's law.
That is not Ohio's law.
Even if the courts uphold the current statutory provisions in Ohio, that is not the law in the state of Ohio.
The case that everybody talks about, and this came up during our Senate campaign, of this terrible situation of a 10-year-old girl who was raped and became pregnant.
What nobody mentions, who's sort of using this as the perfect test case for the pro-choice side, what nobody mentions is that number one, she was raped by an illegal alien.
A person who never should have been in this country in the first place.
That's huge.
Number two, they were trying to procure an abortion arguably to cover up the crime.
You had a little girl who was being preyed on by an illegal alien.
They were procuring an abortion in another state.
The problem here is that you have an illegal alien raping a 10-year-old girl and trying to procure an abortion.
Why weren't law enforcement officials notified the day after this happened?
That is the problem here, is a little girl who is preyed upon.
The fact that they're using her case to try to advance abortion up to the moment of birth is really sick stuff.
It really is.
And we didn't even address the issue of pain capability at 15 weeks, which again, I cannot imagine the giddiness and the excitement of people to say, yes, we made it legal to kill babies after they can feel themselves being dismembered and the things that go on.
And I'm sorry for being graphic, but we have to face what it is.
But this is a really important point here.
If you take the Ohioans, the Americans who describe themselves as pro-choice, they believe in a right to an abortion, I'm pro-life, we can have that moral disagreement.
Even the people who describe themselves as pro-choice, they don't want to have abortions after the baby can feel pain.
They don't want partial birth abortion.
They don't think that you should be able to walk into a doctor's office 35 weeks pregnant and claim emotional distress and then abort your baby.
Now the other argument these guys make is this never happens, right?
Nobody ever walks into a doctor's office 35 weeks pregnant and wants to abort a healthy baby.
And God, I wish that was true.
But it's not, Bob.
We know, there's data out there from the Guttmacher Institute, which by the way is a pro-abortion organization, there are 8,000 Purely elective abortions, late-term abortions that happen in this country every single year.
That is post-viability.
That is no reason to abort the baby other than the mom or the dad want to.
That is not humane health care.
That is not pro-choice.
That's not even, remember Bill Clinton used to say safe, legal, and rare.
That is radical pro-abortion policy and these guys are trying to write it into the Ohio Constitution.
Vote no on issue one to prevent them from doing it.
Perfectly well stated.
And we have more coming up with Senator J.D.
Vance right after this on America First.
you you
Senator Jenny Valdez, thank you.
Vance is our guest.
I was prepping for the conversation today and last night I was looking up an issue on Article 2.
I was looking up an issue on Article 2.
It's crazy to me that these people are already waffling.
I'm Seb Gawker.
Now let's get back to the show with Bob France.
Yeah, let's do that, Dr. G.
20 minutes after the hour, we're right back here on America First.
Issue 2, while Vance remains silent.
And I have not, I didn't find anything to disprove that.
Have you spoken out about Issue 2 and where you sit on that?
So I have.
I'm a no on Issue 2, just to be clear.
Good.
And I mean, what's weird about that article is I've given a few interviews where they ask me about Issue 2, and I always say I'm no on Issue 2, and maybe they just haven't published the interviews.
You know, you never know.
You give an interview and you never know what actually goes to press.
Here's my argument against this issue, too.
Look, I'm sort of one of these guys.
I'm 39 years old.
If you're caught with a joint, I don't think you should be thrown in prison for it, even though I think, you know, I strongly discourage my friends and family to smoke marijuana, okay?
I think that its side effects are much more significant than people let on, but, like, whatever.
If you're caught with a joint, you should not get thrown in prison, of course.
Here's what I also think.
I'd like to be able to take my kid out to dinner in Cleveland or Cincinnati or Columbus and not just be overwhelmed with the smell of weed when you walk down the street, okay?
You go to the places that have recreational marijuana, Denver, Colorado, San Francisco, California, and it becomes like an open-air drug market.
There are no limits.
There are no exceptions.
Do whatever you want to do in the safety of your home.
It's in your face everywhere.
That's why I'm a no on issue too.
I want people to not bring this everywhere that kids walk around, play.
I want to be able to go to my job.
I want to be able to do normal things without being slammed in the face with the smell of weed.
And the availability of it is going to be more than ever before, because at least now there's a chance that if I buy drugs, I'm going to get caught and I'm going to be in trouble.
You legalize it, they're going to get it, not from the dispensaries and pay the hiked tax price.
They're going to get it from dealers and there's going to be even more of those undercutting the cost of the dispensary.
So it's just going to put more weed in more hands and make it easier for people to access, including kids.
I would hope that people would be concerned about that.
I would hope so, too, Bob.
I mean, we've run this experiment a number of times.
We have recreational marijuana in a number of states.
What do you see?
You see traffic incidents go up, traffic fatalities go up, increased usage, especially among young kids.
That's not a good thing for the state of Ohio.
Glad to hear that you're a no-one, too, like I said, because not enough people are getting that message.
So no on Issue 1, no on Issue 2.
Let's talk about Senate business now.
You are also no on economic aid to Gaza.
You had a pretty good showdown there with Margaret Brennan I think on CBS and she was telling you, but what about all of the Palestinian children?
Tell us why you don't want aid to go to the Gaza Strip.
Well, I'll tell you what I told her, Bob.
If I could wave a magic wand and give food medicine to Palestinian children, I would.
Of course, there are a lot of innocent Palestinian kids who are getting caught up in this, but we know on the ground that when we deliver aid to Gaza, Hamas ends up taking it.
They are the governing force in the Gaza Territory.
They control everything.
They control the logistics.
They control the military, the way that equipment moves.
I don't want to send food and medicine to Palestinian children that ends up just further fueling the war effort against Israel, right?
Are we going to fund both sides of this conflict?
We're going to support the Hamas fighters and we're going to support the Israelis?
That seems like a very, very stupid idea for the American taxpayer.
By the way, as a pro-Israel guy, a very, very bad deal for the Israeli allies.
So this is a really terrible idea.
I think that we need to be careful about how we support our friends in Israel, of course, but we need to do it, in my view.
We need to make sure it actually happens, and we need to not support this war in a way that just sends resources to Hamas.
Yeah, and Hamas, you know, it's been reported even by the New York Times that Hamas has stockpiled food and water and all kinds of necessities that the Palestinian people or the Gazan people could use, and they store it in underground tunnels for their own use, and they starve out their own people.
And that's because they have literally said, you know, the leader of Hamas has said, we need the blood of men, women and children in Gaza to be spilled so that we can, what was it, advance and revive our revolutionary spirit against Israel.
Yeah.
This is the explicit strategy.
It is to put men, women and children, innocents, in the face of the war effort.
And when they inevitably get killed and injured to use them as propaganda, both for their own war and their own population, but also for European allies of Israel, for American allies of Israel.
They're trying to break the resolve here.
And look, I think we have got to give some flexibility to our Israeli friends here.
They've been dealing with this problem much longer than we have.
The war is not even two weeks old.
They've already made significant progress actually.
They've cut North Gaza and South Gaza in half.
And North Gaza, of course, is sort of the basis of Hamas.
So we ought to let them try to root out this terrorist organization, support them as they do it, obviously offer intelligence support and counsel when we think that they're doing the right thing or the wrong thing.
But we've got to give these guys some flexibility to accomplish their effort here.
So no Gazan aid, because Hamas is going to take it.
I am with you.
$14.3 billion in Israeli aid.
At least that's what was passed by the House yesterday.
Will it get through the Senate?
And I want you to answer this too, because you, like many others, including myself, are done sending money to Ukraine.
They're going to say, why Israel, not Ukraine?
Where do you come down?
Well, first of all, I've made this point before.
Israel is a totally separate country from Ukraine.
It has an achievable objective.
It's one of our most important allies.
And it's asking for much, much less money than Ukraine, which has already received $120 billion and is now asking for $60 billion on top of it.
So these are fundamentally different issues and I think at the very least we should be debating them separately.
Now, I would support and I plan to vote for the $14 billion aid package to Israel.
We have to remember here that what Speaker Johnson did was actually very smart.
He actually paid the bills for once, right?
He passed $14 billion of aid to Israel, but he paid for it by cutting $14 billion out of the IRS budget.
I think that's a good deal for America and of course a good deal for allies.
You asked the question, will it pass in the Senate?
It's a very tough question to answer, Bob, because unfortunately we have way too many establishment Republicans who would like to tie Israel to Ukraine because they realize that it gives political cover for a very unpopular Ukraine policy.
And I don't get it, man, but a lot of these guys are obsessed with sending $60 billion
to Ukraine, and I think they're willing to hold up $14 billion of aid to Israel as hostage.
They're literally willing to take the Israeli support hostage for $60 billion in Ukraine.
I think we have to push back against it.
I think this is going to be the fight in Washington over the next two weeks.
We should not be holding Ukraine, excuse me, we should not be holding Israel hostage to
$60 billion for Ukraine.
Whatever you believe on the Israel question, they're separate issues and we should not
be combining them into this massive spinning packet.
Speaking of the Senate, the first senator to my understanding has indeed now called
for a ceasefire.
Senator Dick Durbin said we need to have a ceasefire and Joe Biden, as of yesterday, has warned that Israel's support might be eroding.
Hurry up and get on with it and get it done because support is eroding in the rest of the world for them.
So he tries to say, does Joe Biden, that our support for Israel is unequivocal and then he equivocates like you couldn't even believe.
Your thoughts on both the ceasefire call from Durbin and whether that will add names to it.
Yeah, and I've already seen some Democratic senators join in with Senator Durbin.
Look, this is a very dangerous time for the people of Israel, and we have to be honest about this.
And I guess my pitch is, number one, on the actual substance of the policy, it is ridiculous to expect people who lost 1,400 of their own citizens just two weeks ago, who are a week and a half into a ground incursion to Gaza, to already be calling for a ceasefire.
They have an objective.
When you have friends, you trust your friends, we should let them accomplish that objective.
That's on the policy.
We are 10 days into it, Bob.
It's crazy to me that these people are already waffling.
It is indeed great stuff from Senator J.D.
Vance, and guess what?
We're not done.
We have more with the Senator coming right up on America First.
I'm Bob France, in for Dr. G. It's so good to have you here as a part of the program, and I've got more questions for Senator Vance.
He's doing a phenomenal, phenomenal job in the Senate thus far.
We've got some big issues in Ohio, as we talked about in the first part of this conversation.
And we're going to talk a little bit with you about those two at 833-33-GORKA, 833-334-6752.
We want to hear from you, but I've got one more segment with Senator J.D.
Vance when we continue right here on America First.
Thanks for watching.
We'll see you next time.
You You
Thanks, Bob You
You You
you you
Thanks Bob.
No on Issue 1.
and on issue two.
I'm going to go ahead and get started.
I'm going to start with the first question.
All right, Dr. G, thank you so very much.
33 minutes past the hour, 27 minutes left in the hour.
I do want to hear from you in this final half hour of America First on this Friday, but, and that means you have to dial 833-33-GORKA, but we still have a few more questions, so let's continue our conversation now with U.S.
Senator J.D.
Vance talking about calls for a ceasefire in the war between Israel and Hamas.
Senator Vance, Senator Vance, a ceasefire indicates that both sides agree to stop firing.
I cannot believe that Senator Durbin made that call and so many others on the House side, what we call the Hamas squad or the Hamas caucus.
It's much bigger than the actual quote unquote squad.
They don't seem to understand that Hamas has not agreed to a ceasefire.
As a matter of fact, Hamas has said no ceasefire.
Gazi Hamad, member of the Hamas Politburo, October 24th, so it's a week ago, we must teach Israel a lesson, and we will do this again and again.
The October 7th operation to slaughter defenseless Israelis is, quote, just the first time.
There will be a second, a third, and a fourth.
That's what a ceasefire means to Hamas.
When Israel lays down their weapons, we plan the next October 7th, and the one after that, and the one after that.
How can anybody ignore those statements from Hamas that, no, we're not going to agree to a ceasefire?
And by the way, maybe they're sending people over across the southern border to do the same thing here, right?
This is really a worldwide phenomenon here.
We're seeing the rise of Islamic terrorism for the first time in 20 years.
Thank you for calling it that.
Most people are taking the Islamic part of this out of the equation.
They're seeing it as a territorial dispute, not a religious ideological dispute.
It is absolutely not.
And look, you raise the perfect question.
If Israel agrees to a ceasefire tomorrow, what happens?
Do we think, like, peace breaks out?
We're singing Kumbaya and throwing out white doves everywhere?
No.
Hamas is going to attack Israel a week later, two weeks later.
You cannot possibly expect the Israelis to lay down their arms ten days into this process when Hamas is still saying they want to kill their civilians.
Here's another thing, Bob.
Like, I harp on this a lot.
Statesmanship.
Statesmanship is recognizing where your allies and where your own population actually is.
Joe Biden cannot possibly expect the Israeli government to lay down their arms 10 days into this, given what just happened to them.
If your advice to your allies is not rooted in political reality, set to the side that it's stupid advice, why is he even giving the advice when the entire country of Israel is unified behind rooting out Hamas?
He needs to let our friends actually take care of business.
You used the word maybe a few minutes ago talking about it's going to happen here in the United States as well because of the southern border.
I think there's no maybe about it.
We got a report from the San Diego Customs and Border Patrol front that said absolutely Hamas and Hezbollah, specifically, not just saying Arabs who may be, but Hamas and Hezbollah fighters are absolutely coming across that border.
We know this for a fact.
Now the question is exactly when are they going to strike, not if.
Almost all of the intelligence agencies agree on this, yet the president and his party continue the open-door asylum catch-and-release policy.
Is it going to take an explosion in a Capitol building or something on the scale of or slightly less than 9-11 for them to realize this?
Bob, it is the craziest thing.
I try to understand, I really try to understand where the other side is coming from.
I don't assume that I know everything.
The Biden border invasion is the worst set of policies I have ever seen from an administration.
He is actively inviting lawlessness, drugs, terrorism, sex trafficking into the country, and they're not doing anything about it.
This is not rocket science. Okay, some problems are hard, right? This is not rocket science.
You need to put people at the border who tell the guys who are trying to cross illegally,
go back and go through the proper channels. And they are not willing to do that. They are
inviting people. They're actually fighting. We sent a letter to the CFPB about this yesterday,
I believe, Bob. They are fighting banks from who don't want to lend to illegal aliens.
They're actually trying to prevent banks from not lending to illegal aliens. This is crazy.
It's not even worth facilitating the invasion. We're not going to tell American financial
institutions they have to lend money to these guys after they break America's laws. It's insane. And
yes, Bob, I fear we're not going to get pushback until either we get a new president, which we get
an opportunity to do that in about a year, or...
Or until some very significant tragedy happens in our country.
God forbid.
I hope it doesn't happen.
But we are in a very tough spot.
Well, Senator Vance, I know you are one of the very few who are speaking out about that in the issue of banks lending to illegals.
I'm so glad that you are doing that.
I'm glad you're doing so many of the things you are doing.
We didn't get a chance to get into the no mask mandates in the transportation bill.
That's a great amendment, too.
You're doing great work, Senator Vance.
Thanks, Bob.
No on Issue 1.
And on Issue 2.
That's exactly right.
No one issues 1 and 2?
Listen, Senator Vance, I said it before, I think he's hitting all the marks since he replaced Rob Portman.
I think we have a significant upgrade there.
But the first two issues we talked about, in case you were not listening to it or missed it, the first two issues are issues 1 and 2 in Ohio.
And lest you think that these things don't matter in the rest of the country.
I think you're mistaken.
Ohio, where we reside, where I am, where Senator Vance represents, is in the heartland.
It's a red state in the heartland.
If it becomes the most extreme abortion law state in America, the dominoes will start to fall.
Because this amendment that's coming, that we're going to vote on on Tuesday here in this state, will be far more extreme than anything in California, New York, or anywhere else.
It's that radical.
We've got more time for you coming up.
833-333-GORKA.
I'm Bob France in for Dr. G. Let's hear from you on America First.
America First.
Now let's get back to the show with Bob France.
All right, Dr. G, let's do that.
It's 17 minutes before the top of the hour in the end of this Second Amendment Friday.
Bob Frantz in for Dr. G. Thanks again to Senator J.D.
Vance.
We had a great conversation with him earlier.
Also, Riley Gaines.
You can also, of course, catch all of these interviews on subgorka.com and on the Salem News Channel and so forth.
We had great conversations.
John R. Law, Jr.
joined us.
We're going to talk now about one of our Salem colleagues.
And that's, of course, the great Dennis Prager, who has brought us PragerU, which is just a phenomenal source of information.
And it's just so fantastic that it is so available to pretty much everybody of all ages.
The PragerU five minute videos that are animated, so educational for younger people trying to figure out what's going on.
Dennis's fireside chats are tremendous.
Well yesterday PragerU did a one day Twitter takeover to present a 21 minute documentary
called D-Trans.
It's a documentary explaining the terrible cost of the transgender movement for those
who went through it, who were indoctrinated, who were fooled, who were tricked, who were
pushed into something almost against their will.
How are you?
some of the cases when you listen to their stories now. It was a remarkable
Good.
event that PragerU put up there. It's still available right now. It's a 21
minute video. I cannot recommend highly enough. And covering that for Breitbart
News is reporter Alana Mastrangelo who joins us now on America First with Dr. G.
Alana, good to talk to you. How are you? Good. How are you?
Doing very well.
You are a PragerU veteran.
You have done some videos for PragerU before.
You work for Breitbart now, so I'm really glad to kind of get you on.
You can lend some perspective to the importance of Breitbart.
This was a pretty amazing 21-minute documentary yesterday.
Do you want to give people like the thumbnail sketch here that you wrote about?
Yeah, this docu-series is very shocking and heartbreaking and I really do encourage your
listeners to watch it.
The one thing that really stood out, oh sorry.
No, that's okay, we had a little pause there, I thought you had stopped speaking, go right
ahead.
Oh, sorry.
No, I was just going to say the one thing that really stood out is that these are young
people who at the end of the day, they're just struggling to find themselves and their
place in the world.
And as many people know, that's not a new struggle at all.
You know, adolescence is a complex time when young people are exploring their identities, and this is a very familiar concept to a lot of people.
When I was a kid, I didn't fit in with the girls, you know, in high school.
Like, I had a punk rock phase in my early teens.
So kids, they explore their identity, but by and large, they eventually come around in adulthood.
And we see now that with the rise of social media and trans activists, they're encouraging that these kids that are just simply going through a very normal thing, struggling with identity as a young person, very normal concepts, They're encouraging these kids to participate in self-destructive behavior.
And one thing that the docuseries really highlighted was how social media, which is relatively, it's a newer thing.
I mean, when I was a kid, I mean, I think it's my generation that invented Facebook, you know, that started with all this social media stuff.
So it wasn't popular when I was a kid.
We were on AOL instant messaging, and there was not this thing that you have going on now.
This generation now is really the first one that's dealing with social media and what kind of content is online.
And this social media is really the lure that gets these kids into this frame of mind.
And you've got with the rise of TikTok, you have this very popular social media platform that is owned by China, a hostile foreign nation.
So there's a lot at play here.
You are spot on about that.
This is the generation, or excuse me, this is the worst thing in the world for this young generation.
This proliferation of more and more online platforms filled with influencers who want to take, and I think the key word, Alana, that you used there was phase.
You talked about going through your punk rock phase.
Kids go through phases.
They go through, this is what I want to be when I grow up.
This is what I want to be.
This is who I think I am now.
And there are always phases until eventually maturity happens.
Puberty happens and then maturity follows.
And then most of those things, 99% of the time, kind of fade away and you kind of evolve into your normal self and what you are.
But the online influencers, Alana, are convincing these kids
that whatever moment, whatever you feel like in the moment, you should pursue and grab onto and make that your future.
And sadly, when it comes to transing, with the starting of things like puberty blockers
and then moving on to the cross-sex hormones, you can't go back after that.
You can't come back from that phase, which is what these detransitioners
that we're talking about right now, that's the message that they're all sharing
on this, in this docu-series.
Yeah, that's another thing that was talked about.
It's kind of this permanent destruction.
There are things that happen that they, you know, they're unable to get back when they eventually go and decide to treat the transition to, you know, back to how they started.
And another shocking thing that they actually mentioned in the docu-series is how quickly behavioral health clinics approve this stuff.
I mean, they were talking about how double mastectomies, for example, for teenage girls,
went up 13 fold between 2013 and 2020.
And then it went up 500% between 2016 and 2019 alone.
So this stuff, as soon as these behavioral health clinics approve this stuff very quickly for kids
that are just going through a phase or questioning identity, a normal thing,
they approve this stuff, and then you see how many kids take advantage of this
and complete this very destructive change.
And it's just crazy how adults in clinics are also playing a part in this
and approving it so quickly and approving it at all, really, and having this even become a thing.
Right.
I think that's very well said.
We're talking with Alana Mastrangelo.
She is a reporter and a phenomenal one with Breitbart.
She also does some PragerU videos and presentations from time to time, and she's covering PragerU's D-Trans docuseries that aired yesterday, the 21-minute documentary that aired yesterday on Twitter, and it's available now at PragerU.
Alana, going back to the issue, again, of these influencers, these kids are Yeah, adults really do need to take a stand here because at the end of the day, I mean, the adults are in, they're in charge.
How could you let me do this?
Where were you when I needed you to bring me out of whatever weird phase I was in,
or at least stop me from doing drastic things?
They are always going to have that regret, and it's gonna be the fault of the adults in their lives.
Yeah, adults really do need to take a stand here, because at the end of the day,
I mean, the adults are in, they're in charge.
You know, these are young kids that we're talking about.
And I think that a lot of people, I mean, you see just with something as simple
Rowling, the author of the Harry Potter franchise.
Something as simple as her saying that only women can menstruate, and now she's under attack by a trans activist for years, which is just an ongoing thing now, and she's vilified.
The adults have left the room!
The adults have left the room, and the kids are being now influenced by these online celebrity influencers instead of from their parents.
Alana Mastrangelo, thank you for coming on from Breitbart News.
Terrific conversation.
and we'll be back on America First.
Thanks for watching.
And I'll see you next time.
Bye.
Now let's get back to the show with Bob France.
Yeah, Dr. G, thank you so very much.
It's been a pleasure sitting in for you once again, especially on a Second Amendment Friday.
By the way, I'm going to take another call or two here before we're done.
833-33-GORKA.
I made something up today.
When I was starting my show in Cleveland, Ohio, I walked into another studio, another radio studio, one of our Salem partners and the two co-hosts there, and I gave them fist bumps.
And I said, Happy Fist Bump Friday.
I made up something called Fist Bump Friday.
I'm saying that because I want it to be a thing.
It's just, I got up, I realized it was Friday, and I was in a good mood because it's Friday, it's the start of the weekend.
And I said, I just kind of said, Fist Bump Friday, and they did it, they loved it, and I said, you know, we just made something.
Somebody created Taco Tuesday somewhere a long time ago.
I don't know who did it.
But Taco Tuesday is a thing.
I want Fist Bump Friday to be a thing.
So what I did all day long, the rest of the day, everybody I came in contact with, I put
a fist out and I said, it's Fist Bump Friday.
And not one person, I'm talking total strangers, I stopped at a Sheetz, I got some gas, I went
inside, got a sandwich, I went up to strangers, I said, it's Fist Bump Friday.
Not one person refused to give me a fist bump.
And they said they would pass it on.
So I put it on my social media.
Do Fist Bump Friday.
Make it a thing.
It's a good way just to kind of ease the tension a little bit.
Dial back some of the stress that we're all under right now.
It's the start of the weekend.
You should be in a good mood.
You should be willing to fist bump the guy next to you.
The guy in the cubicle next to you.
The guy in the line in front of you.
The guy, you know, wherever it is that you come into contact.
Just put your knuckles out and say, hey, it's Fist Bump Friday and let's see that spread.
I talk about enough negativity every day on the radio at this world that we're in.
For God's sake, let's do something to spread a little bit of positive fist-bump Friday cheer.
Can we do that, please?
I want it to be a thing.
And I want you to have been there when it was invented, on November 3rd, 2023.
Let's talk to Chris in California.
Chris, welcome to America First.
Fire away.
Hello.
Hello, Chris.
I don't think we should give Israel any money.
I don't think we should give Palestine any money.
I think they should give the money back to the Americans that are being... Well, I'll meet you halfway.
We can't give Palestine any money because there is no Palestine.
That does not exist.
But tell me why you don't think we should give Israel money.
No, I don't think... I think we've done enough for Israel.
Let them fight their own battles.
We don't need to help them.
They got state-of-the-art Armories, they have the dome, everything.
But they don't have those things if it isn't for their partners and allies like the United States.
And here's the problem with what you're saying, Chris, and I respect your opinion.
I thank you for the phone call.
You'll be our last call of the day.
But here's the problem.
When we, quote, leave Israel to fight their own battles, Israel will get wiped out.
They are surrounded by enemies on all sides.
All sides.
Arab Muslims in all from the north, in Lebanon, to their northeast in Syria, to the south in Egypt, to obviously Jordan.
Listen, they're surrounded by enemies who want to wipe them out.
Not to mention Iran, just a couple of states away.
If we don't support them, they will get wiped out.
And that's why it is so important.
They're the only functioning democracy in the Middle East.
We have a benefit by having them be strong as well.
That is it.
That's all we're going to do for you today.
Thank you to the team, to Jeff, and to John, and to Guy, and to Alex, and Eric is in there today.
But thanks to everybody, and thanks to you for listening.
I'm Bob France.
Love to talk to you on America First.
▲
Export Selection