Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Brianna Morello tells you the truth about what's happening next on Good Morning Infowars. | |
| Good morning Infowars. | ||
| Happy Saturday everyone. | ||
| Thanks for jumping on with us. | ||
| Of course, a lot to dive into. | ||
| A lot of headlines we're following. | ||
| We've got a jam pack show for you coming your way in just a few moments. | ||
| But let's dive into what we've got our eye on. | ||
| The Office of Special Counsel is investigating Jack Smith for possible violations to the Hatch Act. | ||
| Now, if you recall, the Hatch Act is the law that limits political activities by.. | ||
| government employees. | ||
| Now, if you also recall, Jack Smith is the hack who went after President Donald Trump by leading two criminal investigations into Joe Biden's political opposition. | ||
| He was the lead prosecutor in the classified documents case as well as the January 6 case against President Trump. | ||
| Now both cases were dismissed, but it's refreshing to see that we're at least starting off by going after Smith. | ||
| Now let's turn to Secret Service because that's where a former Secret Service director, Kimberly Chetley, has just had her security clearance revoked and she will not have it renewed. | ||
| That's according again to another report. | ||
| The General Account Office report requested that Senator Chuck Grassley and others release the Butler assassination anniversary, which revealed a lot of the key details in all of this and how top secret service officials really missed on letting federal and local officials know about the Iranian threat. | ||
| Now, as many of you guys know, there was an Iranian threat on President Trump's life that was issued ten days prior to that Butler rally, and they never told local and federal law enforcement agents about that. | ||
| And obviously, that is the reason why the director is no longer in her position. | ||
| We'll be talking about the assassination attempt on President Trump's life, both of them later in the show with Ken Silva in just a few moments. | ||
| Now let's turn to AG Pam Bonnie because she's now instructing investigators to look into a potential election fraud going on all over the country, but specifically non US citizens voting in federal elections. | ||
| The Probe Alliance with President Donald Trump's look at enforcing federal election laws. | ||
| The DOJ's Civil Rights Division is primarily leading these investigations. | ||
| And they just want to make sure that everyone on the voter lists is an American citizen. | ||
| That's a good place to start. | ||
| Little delayed, but we're optimistic. | ||
| that they'll continue to push for election integrity. | ||
| Now let's turn to Washington State because you might have missed this criminal trial. | ||
| It just concluded and the results of it are absolutely shocking. | ||
| A Muslim couple who allegedly was looking to kill one of their daughters in an honor killing, well, they were just found not guilty by a grand jury. | ||
| They were accused of attempting to strangle their teenage daughter in the honor killing in front of her high school. | ||
| This happened last year. | ||
| You probably recall this shocking video. | ||
| Well, they were just found not guilty of attempted murder. | ||
| Now, it's important to note the reason why they were found not guilty of attempted murder. | ||
| The judge wouldn't allow the terms arranged marriage or honor killing to be used during their criminal trial. | ||
| The incident occurred last fall. | ||
| Allegedly the 17-year-old girl she refused to marry an older man in Iraq and that's what triggered her parents allegedly now after three days of jury deliberation they came back with that non guilty agreement on the attempted murder. | ||
| They were found guilty on other charges, but the most severe charge, not guilty. | ||
| The viral video showed the daughter collapsing on the pavement with prosecutors stating that her father continued to strangle her unconscious body for nearly twenty seconds. | ||
| That's according to several reports. | ||
| And the father refused to release the daughter even after her body became limp. | ||
| Now let's turn to Minnesota because as you and I both know, there is a huge problem with Somalis in Minnesota. | ||
| And we have another Somali man who is a problem. | ||
| He was just recently convicted of raping a twelve year old girl after abducting her from her backyard. | ||
| Now please bear with me while we do this pronuncer. | ||
| It is K. Leen Lee indeed. | ||
| I can't even pronounce this, but the suspect in all this case has been sentenced to twelve years in prison for the heinous crime. | ||
| The worst part about it, though, a Minnesota Islamic Center actually wrote a gushing letter in support of the Somali man saying that it wasn't really his fault. | ||
| Now, obviously, folks, that excuse doesn't fly. | ||
| The victim's brother actually intercepted with the father and ended up getting the suspect to come down to their house where he was later arrested and now he'll be spending twelve years in federal prison. | ||
| We have a lot going on later on the show, folks. | ||
| A lot of great guests lined up for you. | ||
| We'll dive into that in just a few moments. | ||
| Oh man, guys. | ||
| When we talk about uncensored truth, we mean it on this show because the corporate media is not going to tell you about those two assassination attempts against President Donald Trump, but we will on this show. | ||
| Thank you for joining me. | ||
| Now, folks, we have to talk about what happened, obviously, because the mainstream media, like I said, is trying to avoid it. | ||
| But Judge Eileen Cannon just said something in court that's very shocking.. | ||
| She's allowing the DOJ to keep evidence in the alleged would be assassination attempt on President Trump's life regarding the Ryan Roth case. | ||
| She's allowing to keep it secret on the grounds that it discloses so called secret and damaging information that could actually be a national security threat. | ||
| Now, what exactly is going on here? | ||
| Well, Ken Selva is the man who is following all this over at Headline USA, and he's going to break down this latest shocking report that he just dropped. | ||
| Ken, thanks for joining the program. | ||
| You know, I find it very, very shocking that Judge Cannon is allowing the DOJ to keep certain elements of this case secret. | ||
| What's going on here? | ||
| Oh, yeah., indeed, it's a very troubling development. | ||
| And first of all, thank you for having me on because this is really an important issue. | ||
| So Judge Cannon made her ruling pursuant to a law called the Classified Information Procedures Act, which was passed in the 1980s and was initially designed to kind of protect like FISA intercepts. | ||
| So if the NSA is spying on a terrorist overseas and they eventually arrest that guy, they can keep the intelligence information separate from the actual criminal case that they built against the terrorist. | ||
| However, in the advent of social media, instant text messages, apps like Signal and WhatsApp. | ||
| The FBI has frankly bastardized this law to protect all text messages between undercover informants and their targets, which we know they make dozens of these cases every month. | ||
| Whether that was the case in the Ruth case, was he talking to an undercover informant or agent? | ||
| We don't know, but we know a long list of cases where this has been the case. | ||
| The most notorious one was the Pulse nightclub shooting in 2017. | ||
| It later broke that the shooter's father was an FBI informant. | ||
| Well, that was something that was in the FBI. | ||
| That was something that was initially hidden under this Classified Information Procedures Act. | ||
| Perhaps an even more egregious case was the 2015 shooting in Garland, Texas, where it was later review revealed that one of the shooters was in touch with an undercover FBI agent who quote, told him to go tear up Garland. | ||
| This was like a huge scandal where the FBI was directly provoking terrorism. | ||
| And this was all hidden under the same law, the Classified Information Procedures Act. | ||
| The last example is another Trump assassination case where a supposed Iranian assassination plot was takening place last year. | ||
| Two of the so-called hitmen that were targeting Trump were, again, undercover FBI agents. | ||
| And we don't know all these recordings or what they told their target, again, because of this same law. | ||
| So it's really it seems totally unconstitutional, outdated, it needs to be updated for transparency. | ||
| And we need to know why was there classified information in Ruth's case and was he talking to feds? | ||
| Yeah, and I think that's really important. | ||
| And the President and Trump's administration continues to say that they are the most transparent of them all, but this is his own DOJ doing this and pushing for this. | ||
| And so I would like to see that change because these are the things that the American people need to know. | ||
| And I think it's very important that we do. | ||
| I also want to turn to something else before we go because I think this one's really important. | ||
| You did an incredible report just a few days ago in regard to Thomas Crooks. | ||
| Now that is the deceased Trump assassination attempt, the individual who was the suspect who is now deceased, I refer to that. | ||
| But ultimately, we're talking now about the medical examiner issue here. | ||
| There was a piece of his toxology report that was omitted. | ||
| And you guys got your hands on this over on headlineusa dot com. | ||
| So tell us a little bit about that. | ||
| Yeah, that's correct. | ||
| We were the ones that published the autopsy and toxicology exams last October. | ||
| It was like a three month legal fight just to get these documents. | ||
| When I first obtained them, I just kind of threw them out online and said, you know, hey, this is the evidence. | ||
| People want to know more about Thomas Crooks. | ||
| This is what's in the reports. | ||
| I didn't even notice some of these strange anomalies until about a week ago. | ||
| And what I'm referring to is specifically in his toxicology report, which I've got in front of me. | ||
| There are eight specimens listed that were taken from the shooter, Thomas Crooks. | ||
| We have four vials of heart blood. | ||
| They took some urine, some eye fluid, some bile and a little bit of eye fluid. | ||
| And an envelope of his hair. | ||
| Now, when you look at the findings under the specimens, it lists one, two, four, five, and six. | ||
| So they're not listing three of the specimens. | ||
| They're not listing one of the bile of blood. | ||
| They're not listing the bile. | ||
| And I believe it might be the i fluid as the other missing specimen. | ||
| And if you do a little bit of googling and research, bile and hair specifically would indicate whether the shooter was on some kind of psychotropic drugs or other mind altering substances. | ||
| So whether the medical examiner tested for these substances and didn't include them in his report or he didn't test them at all. | ||
| Either way, for me, this is a huge scandal. | ||
| I mean, it was revealed last year that they didn't test for psychotropics. | ||
| That was a big deal. | ||
| But at the time, I was told, well, it was clear that he was shot through the neck. | ||
| So they're not going to go above and beyond. | ||
| But now when you look at the report, it's like they purposely left certain items off. | ||
| And yeah, I think Congress needs to do something. | ||
| This seems like a real scandal to me. | ||
| Yeah, no, it does seem like a real scandal and they do need to do something about this. | ||
| You know, we need transparency. | ||
| People continue to call us conspiracy theorists for not believing what we're beingre being told, but they need to show the evidence. | ||
| We know we can't trust our governments, both federal and local. | ||
| And so we ask for the most basic pieces of information and we really hope that they do that. | ||
| Ken, I want to thank you for joining me. | ||
| Of course, you're doing incredible work over at headlineusa.com. | ||
| Make sure to check it out. | ||
| Give him a follow on X as well. | ||
| I'm telling you, he's ahead of everyone else. | ||
| There's a lot of stories that people won't cover. | ||
| He covers it. | ||
| So make sure you give him a follow on X. And I wanted to turn to Brazil because, folks, President Trump is really going aggressively hard right now over the dictators in Brazil. | ||
| I'm saying dictators plural because they have a president who's currently sitting and pretending to be president, but they also have a corrupt Supreme Court. | ||
| Now, as many of you guys know, there's been a war against censorship and it's been outrageous to watch over the last few years. | ||
| The former president Bolsonaro is being targeted because they don't like what he's done. | ||
| He is pretty much the Brazilian version of President Donald Trump. | ||
| And so when we talk about law fair, that's exactly what they're looking to do against him. | ||
| They're looking to target him, they want to throw him in prison and his whole family. | ||
| They've all been the victims of law fair. | ||
| Well, the White House is pushing back and they just recently announced fifty percent tariffs and sanctions overseeing what investigation against Bolsonaro for those who are participating in the investigation against Bolsonaro will be sanctioned. | ||
| And then it's very important because it's not just President Trump who is looking to push back on all this. | ||
| Thankfully, we have brave members over at the European Parliament who are looking to push back, sixteen of them sending a letter saying that they also want the EU to look into possibly sanctioning the Brazilian Supreme Court justice Alexandro Di Maioris and his close allies for what they've done to the Bolsonaro family. | ||
| Now, this is again very important that we even talk about this because this is the war that's going on right now in Brazil. | ||
| It's a censorship war. | ||
| They've sent dozens of letters to social media companies trying to get these critics of theirs censored so you don't know the truth. | ||
| But it's refreshing to see that the EU is looking to push back. | ||
| Joining me now to discuss is Dominic Tarzinski. | ||
| He is an EU Parliament member and he's with us now. | ||
| Dominic, thank you. | ||
| Thank you for having me. | ||
| Yes, I can hear you. | ||
| Good morning. | ||
| Thank you for joining us. | ||
| I wanted to thank you guys for putting together this list because this list is very, very important. | ||
| This letter specifically in regards to how we should be able to push back. | ||
| We've got about one minute. | ||
| I'm going to hold you on after the commercial break, but give us a brief summary of what you guys are looking to do at the EU to hold Brazil accountable. | ||
| Very straight. | ||
| We want Moraes to be sanctioned, The same way as US sanctioned him. | ||
| I used to live under communism. | ||
| I know what communism is and what they are doing now to Bolsonaro family is a pure communism. | ||
| We're going to fight it. | ||
| We're going to fight it in the European Parliament, but also here in Poland. | ||
| I'm in the Polish Parliament now, in the gardens of the Polish Parliament. | ||
| I'm having a meeting just after our conversation with the Polish MPs. | ||
| So we're going to act. | ||
| We're going to react. | ||
| This is communism. | ||
| This is terror. | ||
| This is political terror. | ||
| And we have to react. | ||
| This is not about Brazil only. | ||
| This is about the whole conservative movement around the world. | ||
| Dominic, stay with me because I want to bring you back on because there's a lot more I want to to talk about with you right after this commercial break. | ||
| So stay right there. | ||
| There's a lot to go through. | ||
| We were just talking with Dominic Tarzansky and he's still with us. | ||
| In regards to Brazil, now obviously the Bolsonaro family has been targeted by their corrupt Supreme Court judge. | ||
| No surprise there. | ||
| We talk about that one quite often. | ||
| But the reality of it is this is a global issue as Dominic was just saying, and it just doesn't have to do with Brazil. | ||
| So Dominic, thank you for staying with us throughout the break. | ||
| We appreciate that. | ||
| You are a member of the EU Parliament. | ||
| So it's good to hear your perspective on all this. | ||
| You're saying that this is not just about Bolsonaro itself. | ||
| This is a global issue. | ||
| Tell us a little bit about what you mean by that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It is. | |
| It is. | ||
| It is much more important than I'm saying. | ||
| I mean, obviously Brazil is important, Bolsonaro family is important, but since Donald Trump won the election, the leftists around the world went crazy. | ||
| They know that they are losing power around the world. | ||
| And I can see the reactions in the European Union. | ||
| I can see how they react on every election in a member state's country. | ||
| So I know that if we won't stop them in Brazil, this cancer of communism will spread around the world. | ||
| Because as I said before, to me, the way they behave, the way they treat Bolsonaro family is just a communism.. | ||
| I know how the communists fight against the political opponents. | ||
| They freeze your bank account. | ||
| They want to jail you. | ||
| It's the same thing. | ||
| It happens in the US. | ||
| Look, look, they tried to get rid of Trump. | ||
| They tried to get rid of him. | ||
| They tried to get him out of the ballot. | ||
| Then Jay Sixers, it's the same thing. | ||
| They jailed people. | ||
| So as I see our war, because it is actual political war, it's a global war against leftism. | ||
| And we have to stick together. | ||
| That's why, thank you, Brianna. | ||
| Thank you for covering it. | ||
| Because this is actually a war. | ||
| When someone is trying to jail you, if they are trying to get rid of the freedom of speech, when they paid a visit to President Bolsonaro while he was in the hospital after very serious time in the hospital, that was unhuman. | ||
| That was the way the communists behaved. | ||
| So they want to get rid of Brazil. | ||
| They know they know exactly what is going to happen after the elections. | ||
| They know that Bolsonaro is going to win. | ||
| They know that this is going to be a huge support for conservative movement around the world. | ||
| That is why after election in Poland, presidential election, we won. | ||
| We've got a conservative president. | ||
| We are going to fight step by step for other countries to bring back a sense, to bring back common sense, to bring back normality. | ||
| And Brazil is very important at the moment. | ||
| Yeah, it is very important. | ||
| And when we talk about that too, you know, I saw as your election was getting very, very close, our Barack Obama and John Kerry tried their very best to weigh in on your elections just days before. | ||
| So I'm glad it worked out in the conservative favor. | ||
| This is why we have to react. | ||
| This is why we have to be active. | ||
| This is what we heard from Alex Jones just a couple of minutes ago. | ||
| He says be active, be very much active. | ||
| So again, thank you for covering it. | ||
| Thank you to you, to Infowars, for covering it. | ||
| It's very important. | ||
| I mean, not many journalists are interested to say what's going on in Brazil. | ||
| And this is again, this is a communism. | ||
| They want to jail them. | ||
| They want to get rid of them. | ||
| They are trying to stop them from running. | ||
| As you know, Eduardo Bolsonaro is in the US now. | ||
| His passport was seized and this is going on. | ||
| And there's this communism. | ||
| We have to fight them. | ||
| So I'm going to use every, every tool to fight for freedom, to fight for freedom of speech, to fight for the conservatism, for common sense. | ||
| Yeah, and we all need to stick together in this fight. | ||
| Dominic Tarzansky, thank you for joining us. | ||
| We appreciate you very much. | ||
| As always, our friend over in Poland, we greatly appreciate it. | ||
| Folks, it's a long battle and we need to be able to fight it. | ||
| I mean, here in the United States, we constantly are telling you guys all at home about this one world order. | ||
| And unfortunately, I'm starting to get a little down. | ||
| I don't know if our current officials understand what we're really up against. | ||
| And we've got some brave individuals though. | ||
| They're watchdog groups and they're trying their best to hold government officials accountable. | ||
| It doesn't matter what administration it is, they're doing their part. | ||
| The great folks over the oversight project are doing just that. | ||
| They just recently tried to refer Christopher Wray, the former FBI director, to the DOJ over claims that he misled lawmakers regarding that Catholic memo. | ||
| Now you guys know Kyle Sarah from the FBI whistleblower brought this to our attention when he exposed the corruption, of course. | ||
| And Christopher Wray may have lied under oath. | ||
| That's still up for debate, but that's the reason why you need an investigation. | ||
| I don't even know if it's up for debate anymore. | ||
| I just think we all kind of know it by now. | ||
| But interesting enough, folks, we are trying our very best to get accountability. | ||
| And the people over at the Oversight Project are doing just that as well. | ||
| Joining me now to discuss is the president of the Oversight Project, Mike Hal joins the program. | ||
| He's going to detail what this all means. | ||
| Mike, I want to thank you for joining us because we are sitting here and we're wondering, well, when the DOJ is going to react? | ||
| When are they going to start moving? | ||
| I mean, I haven't heard any whispers about any grand jury in DC, so I'm getting a little nervous. | ||
| Maybe there are grand jury going on outside of DC area, but normally you'd hear something. | ||
| But it looks like your group is moving forward and trying to make sure that Christopher Wray is held a cannibal and exposed the fact that he lied under oath. | ||
| So tell us a little about this latest news.? | ||
| Yes, so we referred Christopher Wray for investigation and potential prosecution because he deserves it. | ||
| And he broke the law when he led Congress about two major things. | ||
| One of them being the existence of a massive Chinese plot with twenty thousand fake IDs in advance of the 2020 election to help Joe Biden. | ||
| He knew about it. | ||
| It's very clear in the record. | ||
| And when asked by Congress, he said there were no major threats. | ||
| It's kind of pretty simple. | ||
| And then with the Catholic memo that has been discussed so much, Grassley said he lied about it. | ||
| Cash Patel, the director of the FBI, said he lied about it. | ||
| And so we're sitting here saying, okay, it's great that, you know, national leaders and people of authority are say are saying he lied to Congress about it. | ||
| Here's the criminal referral. | ||
| We're trying to jog the system. | ||
| It's like the meme with the person with the stick saying do something. | ||
| And so we're trying to get things into the system that actually can move towards accountability and prosecution. | ||
| Yeah, Mike, why is it that there's nothing really? | ||
| I mean, we don't really see much going on. | ||
| We see our officials, individuals like FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino and Cash Patel telling us just to wait that there's things going on behind the scenes. | ||
| But I mean, when the previous administration was at power, you know, Merrick Garland had over 400 J6 arrests under his belt. | ||
| And so we saw the results of that, but we're not really seeing anything here. | ||
| What do you think is leading to all that? | ||
| Like, do you really think that there's something happening behind the scenes? | ||
| No, no, I don't. | ||
| And if there were, we would know about it. | ||
| And I don't think it would be through intimations and like goofy tweets from the FBI about knowing something but not being able to tell us, like seems to be the pattern. | ||
| It would be from the left leaking it. | ||
| If a grand jury was convened or any movement was taken, there would be a full on onslaught press about President Trump weaponizing the Department of Justice and so forth. | ||
| And so rest assured, if something was happening, we would know because it would be weaponized back against the Trump administration. | ||
| I think ultimately what's happening is they're hoping that just disclosure and shining object transparency along the way., will satisfy people's need for accountability. | ||
| I think that's a fundamental mistake. | ||
| Why are they doing that? | ||
| I think it's because it's really hard to bring accountability. | ||
| You need full political control of the Department of Justice, and I think other priorities get in the way. | ||
| And I don't think that this is a DOJ that really has prioritized accountability. | ||
| I think they want to head not to it, use it rhetorically on Fox News and such, but clearly it's not where the muscle movement is going. | ||
| And I think that's going to be a huge political failure if it doesn't change. | ||
| Yeah, Mike, and we're hoping for change and we're hoping that public pressure kind of inspires that change. | ||
| We saw it with the Epstein document dump that never really came. | ||
| And now we're seeing a little bit of movement on that. | ||
| So I think public pressure works. | ||
| So thank you for all the great work you guys are doing over the oversight project. | ||
| We greatly appreciate it because you guys are creating the pressure that we need to get things done. | ||
| Mike, thanks for joining the program today. | ||
| We have another breaking story coming up in just a few moments, so stay with us. | ||
| There are so many mainstream media outlets that won't even cover stories that we're about to cover because they're too afraid. | ||
| They're too afraid, but we are fearless on Good Morning Info Wars. | ||
| Good morning, everyone. | ||
| Thanks for jumping on with me. | ||
| I've got an exclusive story that I broke to you on the independent newsroom dot com just a few days ago. | ||
| US Air Marshals who are being flown on those deportation flights are being told by their supervisors. | ||
| They're also being forced to do hair lice checks and to hand out juice box to the deported. | ||
| Now I asked DHS about these accusations, specifically about the email that I received that specifically had the director of the Air Marshals telling these individuals to go on these flights unarmed. | ||
| And DHS did not respond to my request for comment. | ||
| But someone who will respond to my request for comment is Sonia Lebasco. | ||
| She is a director of Air Marshall National Council. | ||
| She is also a retired supervisor over at the Federal Air Marshall and she joins us now to discuss Sonia, I can't believe it, but they're asking your air marshals to fly on these dangerous deportation flights unarmed. | ||
| And they're also telling them to check for head lights. | ||
| What the heck is going on here? | ||
| I mean, Brianna, is this the dumbest thing you've ever heard in your life? | ||
| You're going to remove your elite workforce, number one, from carrying guns on a commercial aircraft to protect American citizens. | ||
| Number two, you're going to disarm them and have them on the tarmac doing lives checks, lives checks for God's sake. | ||
| Don't they have a contractor there that they're paying like a billion dollars to be able to do that? | ||
| billions to be doing these things. | ||
| Why, once again, are we revisiting the situation where the air marshals are not being used to stop another 911? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And it's frustrating because I reached out to DHS for comment on this and they didn't really want to say much. | ||
| But, you know, other individuals have assured me that they do take security seriously and they wouldn't disclose information like that to me as a journalist. | ||
| But the email itself that the director of the air marshals sent out in regards to all this, telling these air marshals that they have to fly on these planes without their firearms. | ||
| I mean, they're going to third world countries that are run by the cartels. | ||
| What kind of dangers await them when those doors open? | ||
| Well, there's a lot, Brianna. | ||
| And another thing that the agency won't tell you is they cut all their communications off. | ||
| So when they're flying into another country, they disable their mobile phones. | ||
| So they don't even have a way to communicate with anyone if anything goes wrong while they're in some of these violent third world countries. | ||
| The other big problem that I'm having with this whole thing, number one, you're unarming the air marshals. | ||
| But number two, you're using them as a contract security guard where you're already paying a billion dollars to Geo Group to provide these functions while they've decided to supplement the air marshals again. | ||
| You know, we went through this in the last administration removing the air marshals from the border. | ||
| It is wrong. | ||
| Anyone that thinks taking the Air Marshals out of the air, not protecting the American people, their decision is stupid. | ||
| It's stupid and it's wrong. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And Sonya, you've been on the ball with all this. | ||
| And I wanted to, before we wrap, I wanted to thank you for your hard work because for many of our audience members, you probably don't realize, but Sonya has been the voice, the main person trying to end the TSA terror watch list known as the Quiet Skies program. | ||
| If you at home had a four, like the little four S's in the corner of your boarding pass, Sonya was actively looking to get that shut down. | ||
| She's done incredible work. | ||
| And just recently, the Trump administration shut that down. | ||
| So Sonya, as we wrap up., we have about 15 seconds, but I want to thank you for all your hard work to make sure that got shut down because you and I worked together on exposing the fact that Tulsi Gabbard was on that list. | ||
| And now we have you to think. | ||
| So thank you so much for your hard work. | ||
| And we couldn't have done it without you, Brianna. | ||
| Keep fighting. | ||
| Sonya, I love to work up next to you, lady. | ||
| You are a powerhouse. | ||
| So thank you so much. | ||
| Sonya Lebasco, everyone. | ||
| She is really, I mean, I mean it. | ||
| I'm not even trying to fluff her up because she's a friend of mine. | ||
| She is the person who is behind all that. | ||
| I know many of you guys who were on the J six terror watch list that they had created were probably victims of the Biden regime adding you to that watch list. | ||
| But again, folks, that is the woman who got it shut down, the Trump administration just announcing that that was no longer. | ||
| So we're very thankful for that. | ||
| Let's turn to Russia Gate because it's a story we've been telling you, I've been telling you, and For Wars has been telling you about it for years now. | ||
| But all of a sudden, everyone's starting to talk about it like it's something new. | ||
| DNI's Tulsi Gabbard has been releasing tons of documents. | ||
| And well, there's a lot going on with that. | ||
| Joining me to discuss is Steve Dace. | ||
| He is one of the great hosts over at the Blaze TV. | ||
| And he's with us now because, Steve, I mean, I'm sitting here watching everyone as they're reacting to what's coming out. | ||
| And they're all acting like it's breaking news. | ||
| But we've known about exactly what was happening behind the scenes during the Obama years and what Hillary Clinton was doing, but we're now seeing some documents in regards to all of this. | ||
| So do you think this is overhyped or do you think the attention it's getting now is warranted? | ||
| I think the attention it is getting now is warranted, but we're about to find out whether it's overhyped. | ||
| There was a saying, Brianna, when we were kids, picture it didn't happen, right? | ||
| Okay. | ||
| I'm at this stage now, arrests or it didn't happen. | ||
| Arrests or it doesn't matter. | ||
| And behind any human enterprise is what's called a social compact, whether that's a marria marriage, whether that's a business, whether that's a country. | ||
| You know, there's a reason why our constitution begins with the words we the people, because the people existed before the constitution. | ||
| The constitution was made for the people, not the people for the constitution. | ||
| And there were, there was a pre existing ethos, a social compact. | ||
| We hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created equal, endowed by their creator, certainly in labor rights, right? | ||
| Well, after that battle was won over that mission statement, the constitution comes along and says, in light of this social compact, here's how we will live together and govern ourselves. | ||
| What has happened in our political duopoly is one side has shredded that social compact. | ||
| It's a little bit like a marriage where one of the spouses has just decided to openly cheat. | ||
| on the other, even in broad daylight, even in their own master bedroom. | ||
| And the other spouse is just still continuing on, following the uptime codicle of the spirit of every stipulation of the marriage covenant while it has been completely defecated on by the other party. | ||
| And so we cannot have a situation where one side gets to shoot our candidates, gets to try to put our candidates in prison over undisclosed campaign, or hush money bribes from twenty years ago of meager amounts in the grand scheme of things, but prison for ninety three years for such things where we can just take your people and if they pray the things we don't like, say the things that we don't like, you know, just essentially arrest them and put them in prison. | ||
| We cannot have one side do that, orchestrate an entire treasure-like plot in order to stillborn a presidency with a fake impeachment that was completely colluded upon. | ||
| The only collusion was between the media industrial complex and the intelligence community and the Democratic Party. | ||
| You can't have that and then expose that and then let people see that and then do nothing. | ||
| You just can't. | ||
| You know, and I think the culture is a powder keg. | ||
| And a lot of times, you know, people went about their business as well until the shots were fired at Fort Sumter. | ||
| You know, a lot of times you don't see the signs of the times until they that are happening underneath you. | ||
| And this idea that the side of the country that owns 300 million guns, Brianna, is just going to sit here for an indefinite period of time because the NFL is so much fun and Marvel movies are just that cool. | ||
| And they're just going to say, you know what, you go ahead, you trans our kids. | ||
| No, I mean, doctors, no one goes to jail. | ||
| You shoot our candidates, you commit treason, no one gets, no one goes to jail. | ||
| You lie to us, you steal from us, no one goes to jail. | ||
| That's just not how human nature works. | ||
| And so we have a very limited window. | ||
| I'm a grandpa now. | ||
| I'm sending my adult children off into the world. | ||
| And so I'm thinking a lot about the future just beyond the next election cycle. | ||
| And this idea, you know, is that you're a great man. | ||
| I know this audience is aware, but I don't know how many people in the Normie community truly understand how angry the young men of the right really are. | ||
| Well, I'm raising one of them. | ||
| One of them is about to leave my home, so I see it firsthand. | ||
| The anger of when my son comes to me and says, Wait a minute, I'm going to make $35,000 a year not to live in an apartment in a slum in Des Moines, Iowa, where I live. | ||
| Yeah, pretty much. | ||
| The anger is palpable. | ||
| They want accountability and they want people who did this to their way of life, who are also very involved in the plot that you're talking about, they want them to pay a penalty. | ||
| And so enough rally chants, enough talking points, enough engagement farming off of this stuff. | ||
| It's time for consequences. | ||
| Otherwise, what is the point of all this? | ||
| Yeah, and Steve, I think so many Americans have the same question. | ||
| We've got about twenty seconds. | ||
| Do you think Pambani is going to do anything in regards to prosecuting these individuals? | ||
| No, and I think she'll have to be replaced. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, I think we're getting close to that point at this point because she should have had a plan laid out before taking on this position, and it doesn't look to be that way. | ||
| Steve, thank you for jumping on with us. | ||
| Of course, it's always a pleasure to talk with you. | ||
| Folks, the whole Russia Gate situation just really infuriates me because we're watching President Trump as he continues to push out there all these truth social posts calling for the arrest of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and yet we don't hear anything from our DOJ, our Pam Bondi. | ||
| It's time to really consider possibly replacing her. | ||
| We'll be back with more. | ||
| Biometric data. | ||
| Our federal government loves to grab onto your privacy information regarding that. | ||
| And it's deeply concerning. | ||
| I've been covering it for years now on how our federal government is taking your biometrics and potentially using it and just distributing it to private companies and other nations. | ||
| So I was extremely alarmed to receive an email from DHS this week in which they detailed how the United States and Chile have signed a new letter of intent to share biometric identification transnational migration alert program information. | ||
| And I had a lot of questions regarding this. | ||
| So what does it mean? | ||
| Well, biometrics, we all know what that is, your face, your fingerprints. | ||
| That is now being shared between both countries. | ||
| Now, it doesn't specifically say whether that means Americans' information is going to be sent to Chile and their government so that they have our biometrics. | ||
| Again, folks, biometric data is something that should not be shared with other countries, but they do cite security reasons and they say that's the reason why they're doing this, that this is going to help them catch very violent criminals who are looking to make their way to the United States and that this is a security issue. | ||
| Again, I don't know. | ||
| I don't know what's going on with this. | ||
| I don't know if your data is being given to Chile. | ||
| I've asked the HS twice. | ||
| for comment on this, and for years now they have not responded about that specific program itself. | ||
| But again, just this week twice didn't respond to me. | ||
| It's very frustrating because biometrics, this is your information. | ||
| It should not be given to any countries, and we should be able to know where your biometric data is going. | ||
| And I tell you all the time, guys, when you go through TSA, when they sit there and they tell you to take a quick photo so you can just go through the TSA line very quickly, I tell you all to reject it. | ||
| And it's because of my exclusive report I broke to you also last year in regard to TSA. | ||
| TSA tells you that they delete the image after they capture your biometrics, but in all reality, I got DHS told me last year that they submit a limited amount of those biometric data photos to DHS and then they delete it. | ||
| So is DHS creating a database? | ||
| Well, we still don't know. | ||
| I've got tons of FOIA requests in on that, and I look forward to breaking that down for you soon. | ||
| But when it comes to our governments and whether you can actually trust them with your data, it's very likely that shouldn't be the case. | ||
| You shouldn't trust them at all. | ||
| And I recently posted, of course, the news regarding the US Chile deal, and I was alarmed to learn that this wasn't just exclusively regarding the migration program they've set up. | ||
| Sarah Adams commented on my tweet, and as many of you guys know, she's the former counter terrorism analyst, and she alerted me that this actually happened in Afghanistan as well. | ||
| And she joins the show now to discuss. | ||
| Sarah, I'm excited to have you on the program today because you commented on my post, and it was extremely alarming to hear that the biometric information of people who were helping us in Afghanistan was left behind, if I've got that correct, and it really exposed a lot of these individuals to the Taliban. | ||
| So break down this because so many people didn't even know that this took place in the first place. | ||
| Yeah, just to be simple, maybe back in like 2007 the US Army made a consolidated database of Afghanistan biometrics. | ||
| It's not just travel data like with visas that's in there. | ||
| It also has if you received a paycheck from the government, your biometrics are in there. | ||
| If you were pulled over for speeding ticket or had criminal records, that's in there. | ||
| So it's a very massive database. | ||
| And when we pulled out of Afghanistan, we left it for the Taliban, and the Taliban have been using that to check the identity of people. | ||
| And then, of course, if they had served with us, they're capturing them, detaining them, torturing them and killing a number of them. | ||
| This week in Kabul, there was a huge surge where they killed a bunch of foremer Afghan army members they called into the Kabul office. | ||
| And once they did biometrics, they were murdered for serving with the US government. | ||
| It's very horrible. | ||
| Yeah, it is horrible because a lot of these people did help us. | ||
| And I know for our audience, you know, we talked about it also how a lot of these individuals were looking to flee Afghanistan before the Taliban officially took over under the Biden administration, a lot of them we didn't save, we left them behind. | ||
| And we also took in individuals that we didn't vet properly into the United States and into other countries. | ||
| And now we're seeing countries like Saudi Arabia, who are potentially working on agreements to bring these individuals back to Afghanistan. | ||
| President Trump saying that he's going to your reaction to the potential dangers that are at risk of individuals who helped us out during our war in Afghanistan now being handed back over to the Taliban? | ||
| Yeah, it's really a mixed bag, right? | ||
| We want to keep the people here who are our allies, but get rid of those who we did bring terrorists in here. | ||
| That huge number of people they're talking about is actually in the Emirates. | ||
| Well, a thousand of those people had no pathways to the United States. | ||
| The biometrics were never taken correctly in the Emirates. | ||
| So I do believe all the vetting needs to be done before we move any of those people either to the United States or back to Afghanistan, right? | ||
| I mean, this is a complicated situation. | ||
| Because we're dealing with terrorists going both ways. | ||
| And I don't know if you're aware, but Suraj Adeen Akhani, a terrorist, runs the passport office. | ||
| And as of now, he has issued forty thousand Afghan passports to non Afghan nationals. | ||
| So that many foreigners have Afghan passports who are not Afghans, and the US government is not handling the passport as compromised when, I'm sorry, forty thousand people have it who don't belong, it doesn't belong to them. | ||
| That's a problem. | ||
| Yeah, Sarah, it's a massive problem. | ||
| And there's been a lot of these issues. | ||
| I mean, we brought in so many people that we had no idea where they came from. | ||
| I've reported on the story extensively in regard to the US service member who was sexually assaulted allegedly on a US military base in New Mexico after we brought in a bunch of these Afghans. | ||
| Again, unvetted by the Biden administration. | ||
| They just brought them in. | ||
| And I continually, and it's not even just the Biden administration, right? | ||
| Because we have a new administration now in power, and I continually ask for an update on the investigation into all this. | ||
| Were these individuals released into our country after these accusations of sexual assault took place? | ||
| And unfortunately, even under this new FBI, they're not giving me much information at all. | ||
| I mean, that's just putting it nicely. | ||
| They're not giving me anything. | ||
| I had a FOIA request denied when I asked for an update. | ||
| We should know if criminal charges ever amounted in this case. | ||
| We should know if the service member is still serving, but no one wants to talk about this. | ||
| Sarah, I mean, I know you are just as fair as it gets when it comes to being critical of whatever administration is in power. | ||
| How would you rate the Trump administration's overall performance thus far? | ||
| Well, I think they've done a really good job of like deporting illegals who should be here. | ||
| I think they've done a weak job of deporting terrorists. | ||
| There's actually a terrorist, a person here, they gave a green card to. | ||
| He provided location information on me to the Haqqanis that went to Al Qaeda, right? | ||
| I reported it. | ||
| Nothing is done about this individual. | ||
| So it's very frustrating. | ||
| So they've been pretty weak on going after the terrorists because obviously they're the harder ones to find. | ||
| It takes more work. | ||
| You have to put in the legwork and we're not seeing that being done. | ||
| And I really do think there needs to be some sort of task force that leads that because I don't see the FBI doing it effectively at this point. | ||
| Yeah, I don't see it either and it's really unfortunate that this even has to be argued at this point. | ||
| I mean, I think we watched as the Biden administration allowed hundreds of individuals into our country who had ties to ISIS and that was coming from their own DHS. | ||
| So it's probably even significantly larger the amount that they release into this country. | ||
| And it's unfortunate because again, no one's holding these people accountable and it's just un I feel like we're taking time bomb just sitting around waiting to see if something does happen. | ||
| And I really hope that's not the case. | ||
| Sarah Adams, you're doing a great job. | ||
| So I'd strongly recommend our audience give you a follow on X as well, because you're calling all this out. | ||
| You're doing the digging that we need. | ||
| So Sarah, thank you for joining us today. | ||
| We greatly appreciate it. | ||
| Thanks for having me. | ||
| All right, in case you guys missed it, Jeff Clark, a friend of mine, well, he's been fighting the law fair and it's been absolutely gut-running to sit here and watch over the last few years. | ||
| Jeff Clark ran two departments over at the DOJ. | ||
| He is, like I said, a friend of mine. | ||
| He is a patriot. | ||
| He is a fighter. | ||
| And when they tried their very best to go after Jeff because Jeff wanted to report on election fraud. | ||
| Jeff refused to come up with their lies. | ||
| He actually refused to comply and just simply wanted to investigate the tips that were coming in in 2020. | ||
| Now, I have no problem with investigations. | ||
| If people are giving you tips regarding election fraud, why wouldn't you want to look into it? | ||
| Well, Jeff Clark joined me and he detailed three specific instances where AG at the time, Bill Barr, shut down election fraud investigation tips and any type of looking into any of the tips that were coming in. | ||
| I should say more specifically. | ||
| But on the receiving end of all this, Jeff Clark has been tortured legally. | ||
| He just recently was recommended by the DC Bar Board to be barred not because of anything that he did of substance, not because he actually lied, but they're cooking up lies and they're pretending like that's the reason why Jeff Clark should not be able to practice law in DC. | ||
| It's extremely unfortunate, but it just goes to show the many layers of the lawfare machine it's still going on today. | ||
| You think new administration, this would end. | ||
| It's not going to end. | ||
| Of course, the bar is a kilometer of liberal hacks. | ||
| And of course, they want to go after that great patriot. | ||
| Jeff Clark was one of the codefendants in the Fulton County criminal case against President Donald Trump. | ||
| He also had his home raid and they tried their very best to embarrass Jeff, but Jeff's a patriot and he will never give in. | ||
| So I wanted to bring your attention to this because so many people think because we have a new administration that everything's okay, but there are still people fighting back on the law fair. | ||
| Now, as you recall, Jeff Clark, as I said, ran two divisions over the DOJ, he wanted to make sure that President Trump knew that there were these tips coming in. | ||
| And it wasn't just him being targeted as well as his attorneys, President Trump's attorneys, Rudy Giuliani and John Eastman, who have also felt the law fair attacks on their rights to practice law. | ||
| And it's just really unfortunate thatate that it's still going on, but keep Jeff Clark in your prayers. | ||
| This is a patriot. | ||
| He's going to continue to fight and we need him in this fight. | ||
| All right, folks, that's it for this edition of Good Morning Info Wars. | ||
| If you missed any of the show, it will be replayed on Alex Jones page, so make sure to give it a look at real Alex Jones. | ||
| That's at real Alex Jones. | ||
| You can find me over on independentnewsroom dot com and on X at Brianna Morello. | ||
| I'll catch you here again next Saturday. |
Export Selection