Breanna Morello and Ken Silva expose the Office of Special Counsel’s probe into Jack Smith for Hatch Act violations tied to Trump’s dismissed cases, while Kimberly Chetley’s security clearance revocation reveals Secret Service failures in the Iranian threat linked to the assassination attempt. A Washington judge’s refusal to recognize "honor killing" led to acquittals despite near-strangulation, while a Somali rapist’s defense by a Minnesota Islamic Center underscores legal and cultural conflicts. Judge Cannon’s CIPA ruling hides DOJ evidence, criticized as misuse in cases like Pulse and Garland shootings, mirroring past Trump assassination trials with suppressed undercover agent details. Missing toxicology specimens in Thomas Crooks’ report hint at potential foul play, while Trump-backed Bolsonaro faces EU sanctions amid Brazil’s lawfare crisis, drawing parallels to global attacks on political opponents. The episode reveals systemic corruption in justice and security institutions. [Automatically generated summary]
The Office of Special Counsel is investigating Jack Smith for possible violations to the Hatch Act.
unidentified
Now, if you recall, the Hatch Act is the law that limits political activities by government employees.
Now, if you also recall, Jack Smith is the hack who went after President Donald Trump by leading two criminal investigations into Joe Biden's political opposition.
He was the lead prosecutor in the classified documents case, as well as the January 6th case against President Trump.
Now, both cases were dismissed, but it's refreshing to see that we're at least starting off by going after Smith.
unidentified
Now, let's turn to Secret Service because that's where a former Secret Service director, Kimberly Chetley, has just had her security clearance revoked and she will not have it renewed.
That's according again to another report.
The General Account Office report requested that Senator Chuck Grassley and others release the Butler assassination anniversary, which revealed a lot of the key details in all of this and how top Secret Service officials really missed out on letting federal and local officials know about the Iranian threat.
Now, as many of you guys know, there was an Iranian threat on President Trump's life that was issued 10 days prior to that Butler rally, and they never told local and federal law enforcement agents about that.
And obviously, that is the reason why the director is no longer in her position.
We'll be talking about the assassination attempt on President Trump's life, both of them later in the show with Ken Silva in just a few moments.
Now, let's turn to AG Pam Bonnie because she's now instructing investigators to look into a potential election fraud going on all around the country, but specifically non-U.S.
The probe aligns with President Donald Trump's look at enforcing federal election laws.
The DOJ's civil rights division is primarily leading these investigations, and they just want to make sure that everyone on the voter rolls is an American citizen.
The viral videos showed the daughter collapsing on the pavement with prosecutors stating that her father continued to strangle her unconscious body for nearly 20 seconds.
It is Kay Lean Lee and D. Ree, I can't even pronounce this, but the suspect in all of this case has been sentenced to 12 years in prison for the heinous crime.
unidentified
The worst part about it, though, a Minnesota Islamic Center actually wrote a gushing letter in support of the Somalian man, saying that it wasn't really his fault.
When we talk about uncensored truth, we mean it on this show because the corporate media is not going to tell you about those two assassination attempts against President Donald Trump, but we will on this show.
Thank you for joining me.
Now, folks, we have to talk about what happened, obviously, because the mainstream media, like I said, is trying to avoid it.
But Judge Eileen Cannon just said something in court that's very shocking.
She's allowing the DOJ to keep evidence in the alleged would-be assassination attempt on President Trump's life regarding the Ryan Roth case.
She's allowing to keep it secretive on grounds that it discloses so-called secret and damaging information that could actually be a national security threat.
Now, what exactly is going on here?
Well, Ken Silva is the man who is following all of this over at Headline USA, and he's going to break down this latest shocking report that he just dropped.
Ken, thanks for joining the program.
You know, I find it very, very shocking that Judge Cannon is allowing the DOJ to keep certain elements to this case secretive.
Well, yeah, indeed, it's a very troubling development.
And first of all, thank you for having me on because this is really an important issue.
So, Judge Cannon made her ruling pursuant to a law called the Classified Information Procedures Act, which was passed in the 1980s.
And it was initially designed to kind of protect like FISA intercepts.
So, if the NSA is spying on a terrorist overseas and they eventually arrest that guy, they can keep the intelligence information separate from the actual criminal case that they built against the terrorists.
However, in the advent of social media, instant text messages, apps like Signal and WhatsApp, the FBI has frankly bastardized this law to protect all text messages between undercover informants and their targets, which we know they make dozens of these cases every month.
Whether that was the case in the Ruth case, was he talking to an undercover informant or agent?
We don't know, but we know a long list of cases where this has been the case.
The most notorious one was the Pulse nightclub shooting in 2017.
It later broke that the shooter's father was an FBI informant.
Well, that was something that was initially hidden under this Classified Information Procedures Act.
Perhaps an even more egregious case was the 2015 shooting in Garland, Texas, where it was later revealed that one of the shooters was in touch with an undercover FBI agent who, quote, told him to go tear up Garland.
This was like a huge scandal where the FBI was directly provoking terrorism.
And this was all hidden under the same law, the Classified Information Procedures Act.
The last example is another Trump assassination case where a supposed Iranian assassination plot was taking place last year.
Two of the so-called hitmen that were targeting Trump were, again, undercover FBI agents.
And we don't know all these recordings or what they told their target, again, because of this same law.
So it's really, it seems totally unconstitutional, outdated.
unidentified
It needs to be updated for transparency.
And we need to know, you know, why was there classified information in Ruth's case?
And was he talking to feds?
Yeah, and I think it's really important.
And, you know, the President Trump's administration continues to say that they are the most transparent of them all, but this is his own DOJ doing this and pushing for this.
And so I would like to see that change because these are the things that the American people need to know.
And I think it's very important that we do.
I also want to turn to something else before we go, because I think this one's really important.
He did an incredible report just a few days ago in regards to Thomas Crooks.
They took some urine, some eye fluids, some bile, and an envelope of his hair.
Now, when you look at the findings underneath the specimens, it lists one, two, four, five, and six.
So they're not listing three of the specimens.
They're not listing one of the vials of blood.
They're not listing the bile.
And I believe it might be the eye fluid is the other missing specimen.
And if you do a little bit of Googling and research, bile and hair specifically would indicate whether the shooter was on some kind of psychotropic drugs or other mind-altering substances.
So whether the medical examiner tested for these substances and didn't include them in his report or he didn't test them at all, either way, to me, this is a huge scandal.
I mean, it was revealed last year that they didn't test for psychotropics.
So make sure you give him a follow on X. Now, I wanted to turn to Brazil because, folks, President Trump is really going aggressively hard right now over at the dictators in Brazil.
I say dictators plural because they have a president who's currently sitting and pretending to be president, but they also have a corrupt Supreme Court.
Now, as many of you guys know, there's been a war on censorship, and it's been outrageous to watch over the last few years.
The former president Bolsonaro is being targeted because they don't like what he's done.
They want to throw him in prison and his entire family.
unidentified
They've all been the victims of lawfare.
Well, the White House is pushing back, and they just recently announced 50% tariffs and sanctions overseeing what investigation against Bolsonaro, for those who are participating in the investigation against Bolsonaro, will be sanctioned.
And then it's very important because it's not just President Trump who's looking to push back on all of this.
Thankfully, we have brave members over at the European Parliament who are looking to push back, 16 of them sending a letter saying that they also want the EU to look into possibly sanctioning the Brazilian Supreme Court justice, Alexandro D. Mayoris, and his close allies for what they've done to the Bolsonaro family.
Now, this is, again, very important that we even talk about this because this is the war that's going on right now in Brazil.
I wanted to thank you guys for putting together this list because this list is very, very important.
unidentified
This letter specifically in regards to how we should be able to push back.
We've got about one minute.
I'm going to hold you on after the commercial break, but give us a brief summary of what you guys are looking to do at the EU to hold Brazil accountable.
Because thank you, InfoWars, because this is actually a war.
When someone is trying to jail you, if they are trying to get rid of the free speech, when they paid a visit to President Bolsonaro while he was in the hospital after very serious time in a hospital, that was unhuman.
The great folks over at the Oversight Project are doing just that.
They just recently tried to refer Christopher Wray, the former FBI director, to the DOJ over claims that he misled lawmakers regarding that Catholic memo.
unidentified
Now, you guys know, Kyle Sarah from the FBI whistleblower brought this to our attention when he exposed the corruption, of course.
And Christopher Wright may have lied under oath.
That's still up for debate, but that's the reason why we need an investigation.
Mike, I want to thank you for joining us because we are sitting here.
unidentified
We're wondering, when the heck is the DOJ going to react?
When are they going to start moving?
I mean, I haven't heard any whispers about any grand juries in DC, so I'm getting a little nervous.
Maybe there's grand juries going on outside the DC area, but normally you'd hear something.
But it looks like your group is moving forward in trying to make sure that Christopher Wray is held accountable and expose the fact that he lied under oath.
So tell us a little bit about this latest news.
Yeah, so we referred Christopher Wray for investigation and potential prosecution because he deserves it.
And he broke the law when he misled Congress about two major things.
One of them being the existence of a massive Chinese plot with 20,000 fake IDs in advance of the 2020 election to help Joe Biden.
He knew about it.
It's very clear in the record.
And when asked by Congress, he said there are no major threats.
I know we see our officials, individuals like FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino and Cash Patel telling us just to wait, that there's things going on behind the scenes.
But I mean, when the previous administration was in power, you know, Merrick Garland had over 400 J6 arrests under his belt.
And so we saw the results of that, but we're not really seeing anything here.
What do you think is leading to all of that?
Like, do you really think that there's something happening behind the scenes?
No, no, I don't.
And if there were, we'd know about it.
And I don't think it would be through intimations and like goofy tweets from, you know, the FBI about knowing something, but not being able to tell us, like, seems to be the pattern.
It would be from the left leaking it.
If a grand jury was convened or any movement was taken, there'd be a full-on onslaught press about President Trump weaponizing the Department of Justice and so forth.
And so rest assured, if something was happening, we'd know because it would be weaponized back against the Trump administration.
I think ultimately what's happening is they are hoping that just disclosure and shiny object transparency along the way will satiate people's need for accountability.
U.S. air marshals who are being flown on those deportation flights are being told by their supervisor, their director, to go on those flights unarmed.
unidentified
Now, they're also being forced to do hair lice checks and to hand out juice box to the deportees.
Now, I asked DHS about these accusations, specifically about the email that I've received that specifically had the director of the air marshals telling these individuals to go on these flights unarmed.
And DHS did not respond to my request for comment.
But someone who will respond to my request for comment is Sonia Labasco.
She is the director of Air Marshal National Council.
She's also a retired supervisor over at the Federal Air Marshal, and she joins us now to discuss.
Sonia, I can't believe it, but they're asking your air marshals to fly on these dangerous deportation flights unarmed.
And they're also telling them to check for headlights.
What the heck's going on here?
I mean, Brianna, is this the dumbest thing you've ever heard in your life?
You're going to remove your elite workforce, number one, from carrying guns on a commercial aircraft to protect American citizens.
Number two, you're going to disarm them and have them on the tarmac doing lies checks, lies checks, for God's sake.
unidentified
Don't they have a contractor that they're paying like a billion dollars to to be doing these things?
Why, once again, are we revisiting the situation where the air marshals are not being used to stop another 9-11?
Yeah.
And it's frustrating because I reached out to DHS for comment on this and they didn't really want to say much.
But, you know, other individuals have assured me that they do take security seriously and they went and disclosed information like that to me as a journalist.
But the email itself that the director of the air marshal sent out in regards to all of this, telling these air marshals that they have to fly on these planes without their firearms.
I mean, they're going to third world countries that are ran by the cartels.
What kind of dangers await them when those doors open?
And another thing that the agency won't tell you is they cut all their communications off.
unidentified
So when they're flying into another country, they disabled their cell phones.
So they don't even have a way to communicate with anyone if anything goes wrong while they're in some of these violent third world countries.
The other big problem that I'm having with this entire thing, number one, you're unarming the air marshals.
But number two, you're using them as a contract security guard where you're already paying a billion dollars to GEO group to provide these functions while they've decided to supplement the air marshals again.
You know, we went through this in the last administration, removing the air marshals from the border.
Anybody that thinks taking the air marshals out of the air, not protecting the American people, their decision is stupid.
It's stupid and it's wrong.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And Sonia, you know, you've been on the ball with all of this.
And I wanted to, before we wrap, I wanted to thank you for your hard work because for a lot of our audience members, you probably don't realize, but Sonia's been the voice, the main person trying to end the TSA terror watch list known as the Quiet Skies program.
If you at home had a four, like the little four S's in the corner of your boarding pass, Sonia was actively looking to get that shut down.
She's done incredible work.
And just recently, the Trump administration shut that down.
So Sonia, as we wrap up, we've got about 15 seconds, but I want to thank you for all of your hard work on making sure that got shut down because you and I worked together on exposing the fact that Tulsi Gabbert was on that list.
And now we have you to thank.
So thank you so much for your hard work.
Hey, we couldn't have done it without you, Brianna.
I'm not even trying to fluff her up because she's a friend of mine.
She is the person who was behind all of that.
I know many of you guys who were on the J6 terror watch lists that they had created were probably victims of the Biden regime adding you to that watch list.
He is one of the great hosts over at The Blaze TV.
unidentified
And he's with us now because Steve, I mean, I'm sitting here watching everyone as they're reacting to what's coming out.
And they're all acting like it's breaking news, but we've known about this for years now.
We've known exactly what was happening behind the scenes during the Obama years and what Hillary Clinton was doing.
But we're now seeing some documents in regards to all of this.
So do you think this is overhype or do you think the attention it's getting now is warranted?
I think the attention it is getting now is warranted, but we're about to find out whether it's overhyped.
You know, there was a saying, Brianna, when we were kids, picture it didn't happen, right?
Okay.
I'm at the stage now, arrests or it didn't happen.
Arrests or it doesn't matter.
And, you know, behind any human enterprise is what's called a social compact, whether that's a marriage, whether that's a business, whether that's a country.
You know, there's a reason why our Constitution begins with the words, we the people, because the people existed before the Constitution.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, endowed by their creator, certain alien labor rights, right?
unidentified
Well, after that battle was won over that mission statement, the Constitution comes along and says, in light of this social compact, here's now how we will live together and cover ourselves.
What has happened in our political duopoly is one side has shredded that social compact.
It's a little bit like a marriage where one of the spouses has just decided to openly cheat on the other, even in broad daylight, even in their own master bedroom.
unidentified
And the other spouse is just still continuing on, following to the upteenth codicle of the spirit of every stipulation of the marriage covenant while it's been completely defecated on by the other party.
And so we cannot have a situation where one side gets to shoot our candidates, gets to try to put our candidates in prison over undisclosed campaign or hush money bribes from 20 years ago of meager amounts in the grand scheme of things, but prison for 93 years for such things, where we can just take your people, if they pray the things we don't like, say the things that we don't like, just essentially arrest them and put them in prison.
We cannot have one side do that, orchestrate an entire treasonous plot in order to stillborn a presidency with a fake impeachment that was completely colluded upon.
You know, a lot of times you don't see the signs of the times until they that are happening underneath you until they erupt in broad daylight.
unidentified
And this idea that the side of the country that owns 300 million guns, Brianna, is just going to sit here for an indefinite period of time because the NFL is that much fun and Marvel movies are just that cool.
And so I'm thinking a lot about the future just beyond the next election cycle.
And this idea, you know, I know this audience is aware, but I don't know how many people in the Normie community truly understand how angry the young men of the right really are.
The anger of when my son comes to me and says, wait a minute, I got to make $35,000 a year not to live in an apartment in a slum in Des Moines, Iowa, where I live.
Of course, it's always a pleasure to speak with you.
Folks, the whole Russia gate situation, it just really infuriates me because we're watching President Trump as he continues to push out there all of these truth social posts calling for the arrest of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and yet we don't hear anything from our DOJ, our Pam Bondi.
It's time to really consider possibly replacing her.
Biometric data, our federal government loves to grab on to your privacy information regarding that.
And it's deeply concerning.
I've been covering it for years now on how our federal government is taking your biometrics and potentially using it and just distributing it to private companies and other nations.
So I was extremely alarmed to receive an email from DHS this week in which they detailed how the United States and Chile have signed a new letter of intent to share biometric identification, transnational migration alert program information.
Well, biometrics, we all know what that is, with your face, your fingerprints, that is now being shared between both countries.
unidentified
Now, it doesn't specifically say whether that means Americans' information is going to be sent to Chile and their government so that they have our biometrics.
Again, folks, biometric data is something that should not be shared with other countries, but they do cite security reasons and they say that's the reason why they're doing this, that this is going to help them catch very violent criminals who are looking to make their way to the United States and that this is a security issue.
And we should be able to know where your biometric data is going.
And I tell you all the time, guys, when you go through TSA, when they sit there and they tell you to take a quick photo, so you can just go through the TSA line very quickly.
I tell you all to reject it.
And it's because of my exclusive report I broke to you also last year in regards to TSA.
TSA tells you that they delete the image after they capture your biometrics.
And I recently posted, of course, the news regarding the U.S.-Chile deal.
And I was alarmed to learn that this wasn't just exclusively regarding the migration program they've set up.
Sarah Adams commented on my tweets.
And as many of you guys know, she's the former counterterrorism analyst.
And she alerted me that this actually happened in Afghanistan as well.
And she joins the show now to discuss.
Sarah, I'm excited to have you on the program today because you commented on my posts, and it was extremely alarming to hear that the biometric information of people who are helping us in Afghanistan was left behind, if I've got that correct.
And it really exposed a lot of these individuals to the Taliban.
Yeah, it is awful because a lot of these people did help us.
And I know for our audience, you know, we talked about it also: how a lot of these individuals were looking to flee Afghanistan before the Taliban officially took over under the Biden administration.
And we also took in individuals that we didn't vet properly into the United States and into other countries.
And now we're seeing countries like Saudi Arabia who are potentially working out agreements to bring back these individuals to Afghanistan.
President Trump saying that he's going to push back on that and try his very best to save those individuals.
Your reaction to the potential dangers that are at risk of individuals who helped us out during our war in Afghanistan now being handed back over to the Taliban.
I've reported on the story extensively in regards to the U.S. service member who was sexually assaulted allegedly on a U.S. military base in New Mexico after we brought in a bunch of these Afghans, again, unvetted by the Biden administration.
They just brought them in.
unidentified
And I continuously, and it's not even just the Biden administration, right?
Because we have a new administration now in power.
And I continuously ask for an update on the investigation into all of this.
I mean, I think what we watched as the Biden administration allowed hundreds of individuals into our country who had ties to ISIS, and that was coming from their own DHS.
So it's probably even significantly larger the amount that they released into this country.
unidentified
And it's unfortunate because, again, no one's holding these people accountable.
And it's just, I feel like we're a ticking time mom just sitting around waiting to see if something does happen.
And I really hope that's not the case.
Sarah Adams, you're doing a great job.
So I'd highly recommend our audience give you a follow on X as well because you are calling all of this out.
You're doing the digging that we need.
So, Sarah, thank you for joining us today.
We greatly appreciate it.
Thanks for having me.
All right, in case you guys missed it, Jeff Clark, a friend of mine, well, he's been battling the law fair, and it's been absolutely gut-wrenching to sit here and watch over the last few years.
If people are giving you tips regarding election fraud, why wouldn't you want to look into it?
Well, Jeff Clark joined me and he detailed three specific instances where AG at the time built bar shut down election fraud investigation tips and any type of looking into any of the tips that were coming, I should say, more specifically.
But on the receiving end of all of this, Jeff Clark has been tortured legally.
He just recently was recommended by the DC Bar Board to be disbarred, not because of anything that he did of substance, not because he actually lied, but they're cooking up lies and they're pretending like that's the reason why Jeff Clark should not be able to practice law in DC.
It's extremely unfortunate, but it just goes to show the many layers of the lawfare machine.
And of course, they want to go after that great patriot.
Jeff Clark was one of the co-defendants in the Fulton County criminal case against President Donald Trump.
He also had his home rate and they tried their very best to embarrass Jeff, but Jeff's a patriot and he will never give in.
So I wanted to bring your attention to this because so many people think because we have a new administration that everything's okay, but there are still people fighting back on the law fair.
Now, as you recall, Jeff Clark, like I said, ran two divisions over at the DOJ.
He wanted to make sure that President Trump knew that there were these tips coming in.
And it wasn't just him being targeted as well as his attorneys, President Trump's attorneys, Rudy Giuliani and John Eastman, who've also felt the law fair attacks on their rights to practice law.