Feb. 27, 2026 - Gray Area - Rex Jones & Tim Tompkins
01:45:40
Trump 2nd VICTIM? Hillary Clinton Subpoenaed | Gray Area LIVE #52
Rex Jones and Tim Tompkins dissect Trump’s State of the Union as a hollow spectacle—$40M PACs funding politicians like Byron Donald while ignoring systemic failures, like Epstein-related DOJ cover-ups (50 redacted pages) and WEF CEO Brenda’s resignation after Epstein ties. They contrast U.S. inaction with European accountability, then pivot to U.S.-Iran talks collapsing Thursday amid nuclear threats, questioning why governments escalate conflicts while ordinary citizens oppose them. The episode warns against oversimplified blame and media propaganda, framing wars as broken promises, before teasing FBI whistleblower Kyle Serafin’s claims about Trump’s potential involvement. [Automatically generated summary]
You got the morbidly obese English bulldog in the cart.
No, that's your congressperson.
And, you know, they're supposed to be looking out for you, taking care of you, stopping the war situation that's going on right now.
But they're not going to do that because you see, they make hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars in the stock market or lobbying or, you know, just watching it.
Nah, X finally got to the point where it's kind of working to where the streams now are posting themselves, but now there's more glitches on top of things.
I believe it relates to the FBI's illegal spying on people that were going to school board meetings.
I think it has something to do with the persecution of Catholics that was happening under Joe Biden.
I'm not exactly sure, but he's tapped into a lot of different things.
He's got a lot of really good sources.
He's a very frequent Alex Jones guest.
He goes on the Alex Jones show all the time.
It's going to be really fun to have him on.
And, you know, I think it's kind of a thing as to where I want to ask him more questions about the bureaucracy and how it works because you think about a giant three-letter agency or system.
And like, we, we, I don't know.
I've seen criminal minds, right?
I've seen like law and order, SVU, Miami Vice, something like that.
But I haven't necessarily, you know, actually begun to figure out how those organizations actually operate.
You should be ashamed of yourself not standing up.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
That is why I'm also asking you to end deadly sanctuary cities that protect the criminals and enact serious penalties for public officials who block the removal of criminal aliens, in many cases, drug lords, murderers all over our country.
Maybe I should do a deep dive on the progression of the wildness from what it used to be like, from what it used to be like, and then kind of the transition to what it's like now.
But all of these people, all these entrenched powers, and even people like the squad, like Elon O'More, they're all there to be a part of the political system, right?
And it's like I was on the Nimrod pod yesterday.
I was talking to the guys and they were asking me questions about RFK.
And they're like, you think RFK is blackmailed?
Do you think he's controlled?
And I was like, no, I think when they tell you it's time to get off the bench and play in the big game, that you kind of cooperate in whatever the big game is, right?
I think with, I think in within reason, well, within reason is like, you can still, you know, play the Kim Kardashian, keeping up with the Kardashian stuff and yell at each other.
But if you start rocking the boat on like things that control real power, I think somebody agree.
We are honored to be joined tonight by a woman who's been through hell, Anya Zuretska.
In 2022, she and her beautiful daughter, so beautiful.
What a beautiful young woman.
Irina fled war-turn, war-torn Ukraine to live with relatives near Charlotte, North Carolina.
And by the way, what's going on with Charlotte?
Last summer, 23-year-old Irina was riding home on the train when a deranged monster who had been arrested over a dozen times and was released through no cash bail stood up and viciously slashed a knife through her neck and body.
Mrs. Zaretska, tonight, I promise you, we will ensure justice for your magnificent daughter, Irina.
So you flee Ukraine, you come to America, you think you're going to be safe, you get ganked on a train, and then your mom, a year later, however long, it hasn't even been that long.
Damn, time flies is crazy.
Yeah, a short while after, your mom is going to be used as a political prop at the State of the Union.
All of it, you know, the celebration of the bread and circuses, literally the Olympics, the celebration of the athlete, of the military man over any real substance policy, anything actually going on in the country.
The president's job during this speech is he's supposed to inform people on the state of the country and what is going on.
And instead of any of the substantive things, like, you know, the tariffs being struck down, the wars that are about to be started, the taxes that are being cut for the ultra-wealthy, instead of that conversation, it's all a conversation on the periphery.
It's all a conversation on the sizzle and not the steak.
Every morning when you wake up and every morning or every night before you go to bed, you have to pray to the stock market and you have to pray to Pam Bonnie.
You have to pray the Dow remains over 5,000.
That's what we all need to do.
And he should just, the president during the State of the Union, he should just bring all the sports teams out there.
He should have the NBA, the NFL, the NHL, whatever he wants to have.
And they should all in a chorus sing to the God of America money.
So if it's possible for, you know, we always talk about the 20-something year olds making a bunch of mistakes and things.
Look, you don't just suddenly overnight become a new person and learn better morals and all these types of things.
No, you take those with you as you get older and they just become more and more solidified.
So whatever deep-rooted flaws that these people had at a young age, you know, some maybe have done personal development, some probably definitely didn't.
They carry that with them and they basically feel like the same person they were all those years ago.
I think you go to Washington, D.C. to avoid personal development.
I think you go there to develop contracts and connections.
I think that's what these people are interested in.
And it's the little kids' table, right?
Because the cheapest thing in the world is a position, right?
Because the position just belongs to someone else and you're an empty suit.
You just get put into that role.
These people are just proud of their identity as politicos, as lawyers, really ultimately as politicians, whatever you want to say.
And they're happy and they know they don't make any real policy.
And it's kind of a cop-out on their end.
Go, well, you know, I'm a part of this evil broken system that's starving the rest of the country and the constituents of the people I'm supposed to work for, but I'm an idiot and I don't know anything about it.
Therefore, I can get away with being in the system.
So kind of like how you got your dorm room in college.
And then you join clubs.
That's how you know who your friends are.
And then on the house floor, there's no assigned seating, but like there is.
And if you sit in the wrong spot, like literally today I had to tell one of our new members, you can't sit with us because he sat in a seat that was taken by somebody else.
Well, that's what you vote for, guys, whenever you vote for one of these people.
And that's why, you know, I'm glad we've kind of, you know, we've accidentally migrated into the realm of local and state elections.
That's why I care more about that than I care about something like this, because you can brainwash the lowest common denominator with ads to vote for these people.
I don't know how you entrench someone that's like vote, like a district that had like millions of voters for a congressional seat or something like that.
I met some guy that basically is working for one of the House of Reps in Texas at the national level.
And he's got like, like you said, like four guys that manage parts of Texas and they've got people underneath them that basically do what you're talking about.
Well, I mean, I'm just talking about the amount of money that's been spent, right?
You think about this amount of money and you're like, well, like, there are really rich, powerful people who, to them, that's just a rounding error, right?
If it means you get the weapons contract or it means you get the shipping contract or whatever.
But for the average person, that's a lot, especially if you're thinking of the average salary of a congressional person is like $175, I think, around there.
Sure, but you look at it as like there's like tiers to the economy, right?
There's the lower economy where you exist and hey, maybe if you do really well and you're really smart, you own a lot of like dental practices or like you make it real big as a lawyer, maybe you can have $20, $30 million.
When you get up into, you know, like the centennial like millionaire or whatever it's called, like once you're over like a, once you're over like eight to eight figures, right, or something like that, once you reach that stratosphere, you kind of don't have to deal with anything anymore.
And then you're, you're living in kind of like zero gravity world.
But the thing is, is like if you have a bunch of assets, whether that's stock or real estate or whatever that you own, you can get loans and leverage debt against and often often it is also, you can also get debt.
And I know we want to play the clip and we want to get to it.
So you're Trump, right?
And because you'd be in jail, I'm going to throw Hillary in prison.
Hillary and Bill Clinton are evil, blah, blah, blah.
Of course, you're friends with them all throughout the 90s and the 2000s, but it's when you decide to run that y'all decide to fight, which I've always found to be very odd.
But you're against them.
You hate them, whatever.
You run on in 2024, you run on releasing the Epstein files.
You basically, you say you're going to do it.
All the people that you appoint signal they're going to do it.
Do not let this go.
The words of Dan Bongino.
Do not let this go.
And then you redact everything.
You hide everything.
You refuse to release names.
You cover up more than half of the files.
And now the people that you've beaten in an election, really two elections, you've beaten Hillary and Bill.
They get an opportunity to come into Congress and say that you're the worst person ever in history.
And then you can't say anything about it because you won't release the files.
I think when you start admitting things like that, there are other assets that you're talking about that you're trying to protect for your kids, businesses, those types of things that you have a trickle-down effect across the board.
Like they have family and friends that they want to make sure don't get affected by this.
Also, I guess, yeah, I guess it's all a big club argument, and that makes sense, but it's still a thing as to where they're going to play the political game with it.
They're going to get the sound bites out of it, they're going to threaten.
And then Trump has to sit there like a cuck and not do anything about it.
What's he going to do?
He goes, Hillary just lied to the deposition.
She lied about me.
She lied about the files.
He's like, okay, Donald, why don't you release the files?
I am the ranking member for the Oversight Democrats.
We're here today, of course, for two days of depositions of both Secretary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton.
So I'm going to have some general comments.
We will actually be back out here to answer any questions once we've actually started the depositions, but we wanted to make some brief comments right now, and then we'll go ahead and go in and start.
Let me just begin by saying that Oversight Democrats, from day one, we have said that we want to talk to anyone, any person that has information about Jeffrey Epstein, about his crimes, about how he was able to get so much wealth.
We will talk to any single person, whether that is a Democrat, a Republican, how much wealth they have, how powerful their position is.
We want to talk to anyone.
So we're happy to be here, and we're glad that both Secretary Clinton and former President Clinton are willing to talk to this committee.
I also think it's important to note, I'm glad to see that we have our Republican colleagues here.
There's a big group of them.
I wish they would have joined us at the Les Wexner deposition, but I'm glad that they're here now to get questions answered that is an important part of our investigation.
Let me just add that as it relates to Secretary Clinton, who's here today, she has been very clear.
She's never met Jeffrey Epstein.
We have no evidence of her having any interactions with Mr. Epstein.
And so I think that's important to note as we walk into this deposition.
But I also want to say, which I think is very important, that at this very moment, the Department of Justice continues to lead a White House cover-up.
And we're going to be demanding, even over these next few days, that the remaining files that have not been released.
And that includes new files that were just discovered in the last couple days of a survivor that has made serious accusations and allegations against not just Jeffrey Epstein, but also against President Trump and about abuse that she suffered when she was a minor.
We have seen the DOJ files and the archive manifest that clearly shows that the interviews and information around this survivor have been removed and are missing from the DOJ files.
Where are these files?
Who removed them?
Those questions have to be answered.
What we have is a survivor that we have verified, that others have verified, and those files are missing.
It is abundantly clear that this is the most egregious cover-up in American history.
The recent reporting by the New York Times, NPR, and other media outlets that have verified this, demonstrating that the Department of Justice, in addition to violating the law over and over again, as they refuse to release the full and unredacted files, have withheld 50 pages of allegations against President Trump.
This cover-up needs to end immediately.
I am glad that we are here today as part of this ongoing investigation because we will accept any information that anybody can give us about Jeffrey Epstein's vast child sex trafficking operation.
I just want to say that young people in this country are watching right now.
If the most powerful people in the United States of America, the elite and rich and powerful men and women are able to get away with these heinous crimes, then we are sending a horrible message to young people in this country that powerful people will always protect themselves and the rule of law does not apply to everyone.
You've got the fact that there's another victim that basically probably has even worse crimes committed against her from Trump and she's an Epstein, of course.
That's been significantly redacted.
And then the 50% number is something I can't wrap my head around.
How are they allowed to not release another 50% when it's literally right there?
Do they not understand they're digging themselves a hole each roadblock that they throw up for Congress?
It becomes like they know it's a cat and mouse game.
What could be in there that would be worth destroying the credibility of the entire Republican Party and Trump administration writ large?
Like, why would they do this?
Why would they hold back over half the files?
Why would they redact all these names?
If it's just a crazy accusation, you should be able to address it, right?
And you should be able to make sense of it somehow.
Ultimately, the PR argument from people like my dad and other people, which is like Trump knows he's going to destroy a lot of people's lives.
He doesn't want the information out there.
He's trying to make deals and more or less cover it up.
That's the excuse that's given.
It's like he wouldn't be doing that if he wasn't implicated.
And the thing that the thing that I've heard that I latch onto more than the victims accusing right now or whatever, I need to see more information on that.
There's a lot of evidence that he was introduced to Melania through Epstein.
I think the thing about this that bothers me the most is, you know, you were talking about the fact that there are things in there that he could be implicated, not implicated on, whatever the fact is or how they can.
But not Trump, which again, I have to give credit where credit's due.
He's got people in such a good chokehold in terms of how good he is in terms of his oration, how good he is at galvanizing as like lovable guy, those types of things to the point where they're like, he couldn't do it.
That's the same reason why OJ Simpson wrote a whole book, if I did it.
He had enough people and loyal fans, yet he was clearly.
There were so many facts and evidence that it just didn't make any sense.
But because OJ is OJ and he's got that personality, there's a nice thin layer of like plausible deniability that people latch on to because our brains want to feel comfortable.
Because most of the time, human beings, they will prefer to seek out the negative over the positive, right?
Like you'll look for bad news.
You'll look for negative information.
It reaches a point, though, when you've done so much good stuff in the public eye that people look at you as inspiring, heroic, brave, that even if you've done the worst things possible, they still look at you and they go, well, I mean, OJ won the Heisman.
They have such a good personality and charisma that it entraps you to believe that, like, there's no possible way that this person could do these things.
You know, if you, if you anybody in the comments know who the other two guys are in this photo, the guy in the white, zoom in on his face a little bit.
You guys are going to miss these moments when it's like full-blown production and we got like a bunch of fancy stuff going on.
You're going to be like, dang, I missed those days when Rupert just tore down the backdrop or, you know, messed up the camera and Tim's got to get out of his seat and adjust the camera, you know?
Steps in as the interim CEO while a success research begins amid broader Epstein document fallout prompting probes and arrests elsewhere in Europe.
Thomas Massey says, CEO of World Economic Forum resigns.
You're welcome.
Got photos of them together.
AI slop relating to this.
But yeah, this is a big deal.
Sadly, of course, we're not seeing governmental action.
We're not seeing this person be arrested or anything like that.
Not saying there's dirt on him specifically to warrant that, but with a lot of these people, with the people that are redacted here in America, I think that evidence is readily apparent.
It's just there's a black box over it, so you can't see it.
If you can get everybody into one room at one place, oh, that's where business deals and decisions are being made, right?
So what it does is it basically hosts those, publishes reports on economics, climate, tech, AI, global risk, and then it promotes public and private partnerships between governments and corporations.
And the reason why it matters is it doesn't pass the laws, but it shapes the narrative and long-term strategies.
So pretty much the ideas are basically launched there.
It's like stakeholder capitalism.
Often they show up later in government and corporate policy.
So it's kind of like the the, the origin point, at which things kind of trickle.
Yeah, I mean, this is it's one of those big events where the people that are rich, famous or powerful they all go and they drink wine, they talk about how smart they are, like that.
That that's what it is and that that's the real rooms where things get done.
Uh, heavy corporate involvement, major global companies that are there um, and they're basically this is, this is where it all happens.
I mean, i'm sure there's deals that happen other places, but if you can get the world's powerful, most powerful leaders together and corporations, best believe you just got to go to society.
It turns me into like a radical, like I hate it so much.
I I hate it so much that these, these fat cats, these carpetbaggers, these pigs that have gotten rich off really the destruction of the West and the corporate capture of it all, they just get to go meet and like, fan each other and tell each other how great they are.
Meanwhile we're all struggling.
So it just grinds my gears a little bit don't really have a point there.
Let's go ahead and get into the Iran stuff, because we got a clear timeline here of stuff that I want to go through.
Okay, let's start with the peace talks ending without deal, the Geneva uh link there, and we'll just go down straight and first one on second page there.
Uh, first thing on the second page and we'll just go down the list here and then uh, we'll wrap, probably okay um yeah, so I mean pretty much.
I'm going to go ahead and read yeah, and this is this is.
The thing is like, this is exactly what happened last time.
By the way, U.s Iran nuclear talks end without deal in Geneva.
And this is my little mini version of a deep dive, but news Blitz, deep dive.
We're going to cover it indirect.
U.s Iran negotiations in Geneva concluded thursday without an agreement.
The Omani mediators reported significant progress and planned technical talks in Vienna next week.
Trump officials, including vice president Jd Vance and secretary of state Marco Rubio, accused Iran of secretly restarting nuclear weapons work at sites like the knots hit in the 2025 U.s Israeli strikes, while demanding full disarmament and zero enrichment.
So we got a clip here at the end where they talk about how they destroyed it, But they didn't destroy It.
Because they're rebuilding it and you can see them rebuilding it.
But it doesn't mean you can't rebuild.
I mean, people have car accidents and obliterate their bones and their legs, and yet they can still put, you know, they can still put metal back in them and walk again.
But if you say it's obliterated and you say it's done, you get to kind of force an end to the conflict because you come with that overwhelming military power.
You drop the big bombs and you just kind of pull out.
It's kind of like a shot.
It's like you break into someone's house, you just punch them and you run out the door.
I don't know what you're talking about.
I don't know what you're talking about.
And then it got him red in the face.
And then it could be both chalked up to an isolated incident and could also be like looming over you.
Like we might do it again.
But there are three main nuclear sites.
There was enriched uranium in centrifuges, I think, in Fordow.
And it's like on record they got that out of there before they dropped the bomb basically.
So like they have enriched uranium.
They do have visile material.
However, they have a religious fatwell, a religious decree.
They're not allowed to make a nuclear weapon.
If you think about it, we don't want them to have one.
I don't want them to have one for their own interests in the region.
So I want to, there's a part of me that wants to believe it, but there's also a big part of me that knows that, you know, we have a ton of intelligence and inside information, and we've got agents on the ground.
I really feel like Iran hates us so much that they would still think that they can get away with it and be sneaky.
Clips I've seen of Ben Shapiro and Levin and the stuff coming out is now not just about the nuclear, but it's Iran can't have ballistic missiles that can reach Israel.
Yeah, I'm saying like the United States is making it as well as Israel an Israel issue.
But at the end of the day, I don't even know if we never got involved in the first place there and we just let Iran and Iraq kind of like fight it out and duke it out and those types of things, would we be still having the same issues today?
You go back to the 90s and even before we funded Saddam Hussein's invasion of Iran.
We were a big part of that.
So like we've wanted them gone forever.
So like having the same amount or more of military assets in the region that we did during the Iraq invasion, it's very terrifying to me to think about because here's the thing, right?
Like we're talking about these things and then we're having a discussion, a mild debate on it.
We're like, hey, like maybe this is good.
Maybe this is bad.
Maybe it's a mix, whatever.
There are people that genuinely just cheer for war.
And they're just like, we got to go in there and drop the bombs.
I don't like the hypocrisy of it and the schizophrenia of it because I view Israel as a theocracy.
I view Iran as a theocracy.
If these places are going to have a religious system of government, then it's our job as a place that has separation of church and state to not get involved with any of it.
So what I'm saying here is when it comes to like Judaism and all those things and the Jews, in the religion, it's not an aggressive religion in and of itself.
If you're just reading the Torah and you're just practicing it as a normal person, we have gone extensively through the Quran and Islam and the things that are in there to where even though not all the Islamists are, you know, all the people who practice Islam are doing the things, there's enough of a population that is radical enough to where like Islam as a whole left alone can be more of a problem than just Christianity or I would say I would say Old Testament's plenty radical.
Yeah, but I would say that there's a lot of murder and blood and death and On the new Kings James Version and all these other versions that are pretty much.
My argument is that without the fulfillment of the New Testament, if you look at the Old Testament in a vacuum, without Jesus, you kind of have a system where you do have an ethno-state.
You have a religious nation.
Over time, that nation either gets punished by God or is used by God to punish another nation that's not being congruent to God's values.
So when they say Palestine is Amalek, well, they kill in the Bible, they kill the men, the women, the children, the animals.
Everything that happened in 1948 when the UN decided to withdraw from that region and you had the conflicts between Israel and Palestine and the Nakba and all those different things set a negative chain reaction of events, right?
To where that region has never stopped being conquered and going to war.
I think in and itself, if you just look at the Jewish people and you look at the Iranian people as a whole, most of them just want to live peaceful lives.
I think, again, it comes down to the government systems in themselves, right?
But there's less people in a Jewish culture that want to go out there and practice jihad and do terrorist attacks.
Like if you just look at a majority of terrorist attacks, it does come from Islam.
We spent two days here now, and almost everyone we've met with across the spectrum within the Jewish community.
That's where we've been meeting.
None of them have expressed any fear about going into bomb shelters or ballistic missiles in Iran.
Every one of them universally has said to us, you must be excited to be here.
You're going to have a front row seat to the miracles that are about to happen.
When you speak about the resilience of the Israeli people and what they've been through for two years, they're not in fear.
At least those we've met with across the spectrum have all expressed this faith and almost, I don't want to describe excitement, but they've had a front row seat to miracles for two years and they feel like they're about to see the next chapter of it.
And they ask you, aren't you excited to be here for it?
Okay, so my take on like not even going specifically on the words itself, but like the actual, if I just look at the situation, whoever was in charge of Israel in that region during that time period and decided to push all the Palestinians out of the region made a mistake and also taking more regions and uh territories than they should have.
When the UN decided to, to to carve it up, which technically the um, the Arab countries, said we don't even agree to the UN charter that they put together.
The problem was is, once you pushed them out, then you had enough Arab people that were so pissed off that they would never let Israel live in peace.
And that's not necessarily on the Israeli people.
It's the government at the time that made the choice to basically like, okay, we're going to get up in arms and we're going to take all of this.
So when I look at the situation now, because we're all we're like 60 plus years into the future, it's an ongoing fight in which i'm not sitting here trying to defend the Israelis because they technically kicked off this negative feedback loop, but I think they're getting to the point where, like you and I don't know what it feels like to have, like neighboring countries always wanting to bomb you because you did take the land that wasn't your land and so, rather than just being like well, we're going to give it up.
Enough generations have passed to where they're like well, we don't want to give it up because that was a decision that was made when I wasn't in control or whatever.
It's very difficult in that situation where, like you actually have somebody who's making a claim like I actually used to live in this region, and then you also have the country that said well, we already took it.
And then they're also having other countries that are like, trying to basically throw bombs constantly.
I mean, that's the most conflict-ridden region.
For a very long time.
They've had war after war and conflict after conflict, and at a certain point, the Israeli who's like well, I just want to live in peace, is like we'll just go like, hit the terrorist first, so I don't have to be worried about a bomb dropping on my head, and I think that's what it really comes down to, and it's just that negative feedback loop and it just makes the Arabs even more angry.
Um, and that that's kind of like one of the most dangerous things in life.
What's happened in that region's kind of a microcosm of it.
Uh, we can agree to disagree.
Yeah, that's, that's totally fine.
My point with all this is is, isn't it a, isn't it a bit weird that like the religious leader meets with the ambassador and he's like we're ready for it, just please, just please.
Let's let it begin, let the strikes begin yeah, and all i'm saying is that attitude comes from the fact that, like we don't know what it feels like to always, constantly be on edge, that like a missile can like drop on your, your home, or that you have sirens constantly going on, because Hamas was still launching missiles for like the last 10 years, right going back and forth, and they have a I think they have a doctrine can be said of them.
I just I just no 100 it's, it is it, isn't it.
But i'm just saying it goes down to that negative Feedback loop, to where now both sides are like, Well, we're just not going to concede on anything because of the fact that no one wants to actually completely let go of the situation.
We'll cover the Tucker Carlson reaction to the buildup of forces.
We'll probably wrap.
It's been pretty good.
Thank you all for being here tonight.
Really appreciate everyone who's here.
Here's the thing: if you're not following Truism Tim on X or Gray Area Talks on X, after the stream, please go do that.
Really helps us out.
Helps us get better guests.
Helps us grow the show.
Helps us grow our platform.
We really appreciate it.
If you're watching live on My X and you're not following Tim or you're not subscribed to the Gray Area YouTube or Rumble, highly recommend you go ahead and do that.
That way you can watch us on whatever streaming platform you choose, the stream platform of your choice.
And it's easier to watch us when you're doing other things on your phone on YouTube or Rumble.
I will concede on the fact that, like, how are you going on for like almost 20 years saying the exact same message?
And it just is like, are you guys just gaslighting at this point?
Or have you guys just been making them restart?
Have you guys been destroying the region so that they couldn't do it?
But I think there's more to the story that is even that hasn't been reported, right?
Like, I think there's more things that Israel is not talking about, the United States isn't talking about, and Iran is not talking about.
And the fact is, is that we're not part of these conversations and these higher-level decisions.
So it really is a battle of the governments, like I'm talking about.
It's not a battle of the people.
And that's the biggest thing that I want people to take away from this.
I just, I don't like when we lump groups and just say, well, they're all complicit because their government has done it.
Well, no, I'm just saying, like, right now, you know, there's nothing to be said about the fact that I'm sorry, there is something to be said about like a lot of stuff that's happening on social media.
There's a frenzy against the Jewish people, right?
Like, I don't have any personal gripe with Jewish peoples, but I'm not also like sitting here being like, well, I'm going to go kiss the wall.
I'm not, I'm pretty neutral on the situation.
I'm just saying that I attack the group without understanding the nuance.
With the whole Gaza, Palestine, those types of things.
Like that was what led the trickle-down effect of people talking about Israel more and more and more and more again.
But it comes down to my same argument.
It's really the government and the government controls the soldiers and they decide what happens and where they go.
The average person that's just watching TV like you and I, or just, you know, chilling or relaxing, the average Jew doesn't have any say over those things.
And honestly, a lot of them didn't even agree with certain things that Netanyahu was doing.
Everybody knows the only reason we're having this war is because Israel wants it.
This is their last chance, they believe this presidency is the last presidency where they're going to have unequivocal bipartisan support.
Period.
You can't primary every Thomas Massey, and there's a whole army of them coming at some point because everyone can see what's going on.
And you can shut down X and you can shut down the internet.
You can be like Great Britain and arrest people who protest Israel, but attitudes are not going to revert to what they were five years ago.
Sorry.
And they know this.
So this is their last chance.
What's so amazing is that Israel, which at least is acting in what it perceives to be its own national interest, is joined by its shills in the United States, of course.
But really, its only other ally in this is the American news media, whose job it is to tell you the truth and inform you as to what's happening, to tell you, hey, wake up.
The world could be changing and it's going to affect you and your family.
That's their job.
And instead, they've been lulling you to sleep with the same variety of transparent lies and propaganda.
I used to not like him, but maybe that was because he was part of the system and now he's kind of out doing his own thing and he's a lot more free with his speech than he was when he was on Fox.
I think a lot of that energy comes from being able to make choices for yourself and being independent.
And like that, that's how I think the American people feel about this is like, we are going to pay for it, regardless of the situation or the setup of situation or what led to it.
We're going to foot the bill.
We're going to spend the billions and we have endless billions.
We can print more and more money, whatever we want to say.
It's just, it's another thing on America's tap.
And that's not what we voted for.
Okay.
We voted for no more wars.
That was a campaign promise.
So sitting here today, not even just looking at what's happening with the Iran situation with Israel, looking at what's happening in Ukraine, looking at the Venezuela situation, looking at brewing future conflicts with Russia and China together.
It's just, we're in an angrier world, and it's not what I voted for.
Like, why would you give up like the best job ever where you have tons of political pull and influence to like being a politician is actually a very weak position.
Next week is going to be very fun, very interesting.
We've got a lot of things we've been working on and behind the scenes.
Like I said, for everybody who's been here from the beginning, we appreciate every single one of you guys that's in here.
Yes, you guys are at the grassroots.
You guys get to look back at these times when we've been struggling with the streams and figuring things out.
But, like, every single person that is on our team believes in us and we believe in them.
And honestly, every single comment that you guys give when you guys repost, when you guys comment, when you guys give a like, those things actually impact us, okay?