Jean-Francois Gariepy of JFG Tonight joins the gang for the whole show this week to talk everything from the origins of DNA to fatherhood to women to transhumanism and the fate of Western civilization! Stick around for our new segment in the second half, "Cool Stories." No spoilers here. Bumper: "Walk Away" by Bricklin Break: "Degeneration" a Quebecois folk song Close: "In Time" by Robbie Robb Follow JF on Telegram and his nightly show on Odysee. And buy his book "The Revolutionary Phenotype." Please consider supporting Full Haus here or at givesendgo.com/FullHaus Censorship-free Telegram commentary: https://t.me/prowhitefam2 Telegram channel with ALL shows available for easy download: https://t.me/fullhausshows Gab.com/Fullhaus DLive and Odysee for special occasion livestreams. Navigating the Collapse segments on Archive RSS: https://fullhaus.libsyn.com/rss All shows since deplatforming: https://fullhaus.libsyn.com/ And of course, feel free to drop us a line with anything on your mind at fullhausshow@protonmail.com. We love ya fam, and we'll talk to you next week!
Now that your provisions are topped off, your raised beds constructed, potatoes in the ground, and chicks sleeping contently under the warm, ruddy glow of heat lamps, we are going to drag you kicking and screaming this week, dear listener, back into the maelstrom of the zeitgeist, because there is no true escape from this hellscape unless we set it straight.
In that spirit, we are honored to welcome Jean-Francois Gadiepi to talk fatherhood, happiness, transhumanism, and everything else we can pack into one show with our usual Ilan.
so monsieur producer allons-y welcome everyone to full house episode 125 the world's most heralded show for white fathers aspiring ones and the whole biofam
I am your napped, caffeinated, and almost back in the gazebo host, Coach Finstock.
It was cold and rainy out there.
I was hoping to get out there with the peepers tonight, but it didn't work out.
And we are raring to go another two hours with the finest programming fit for man or beast and with a great guest, presumably.
Also, big bonus points to any listeners who recognize our special opening bumper track there at the top without looking it up.
Hint it featured briefly in one of the world's greatest films of all time.
Before we meet the birth panel, big thanks to Tom, Jay Hawk, and fellow person for their kind support of the show this week.
And if you'd like to be like those fine fellows, visit givesendgo.com slash fullhouse or full-house.com and the support us tab.
And with that, let us get on to this week's birth panel.
First up, if you listen close enough, you can hear an unmistakable French-Canadian twang lurking just beneath the surface of that sweet, sweet cheese head accent.
Sam, welcome back.
Well, thanks for that intro.
Yeah, that's funny.
I do have a Canadian relation in my family.
My father was Canadian.
And so, but no, I don't have any.
He was an Anglo-Canadian, not a French one.
Yeah, exactly.
And but yeah, I don't get to speak any French, but I do speak a little Spanish at the plant, you know, working, working with the Mexicans.
But, you know, and while they try to get me to speak Spanish, let me put it that way, which, which I don't, I don't mind it.
I, in fact, like languages, but it's, you know, you really got to think on your feet and all that.
And so I tell them I don't have to speak Spanish.
I speak the language of the conqueror.
There you go.
Yeah.
You should have seen my kids laughing as I was practicing alonzi before the show tonight.
You know, I get excited.
We might get excited for our international guests more than others.
JF is rolling his eyes like, geez, these guys are goofy.
Anyway, I think Doctor Who would say that was Doctor Who saying for a while, Alan Z.
Oh, really?
Oh, I just went to Google Translate for Let's Go.
So we cracked the code.
Not next up.
He is on the lamb this week after his shocking confession of domestic fisticuffs last week.
Now, actually, Smasher is down with a migraine tonight, the big softy, but he said he might jump in if his poor little cabesa can tolerate it.
So we'll see if Smasher parachutes in.
And our trusty producer, who was titillated this week by a photo of my recording shed.
And he now wants to see the recording gazebo.
Rolo, you got to give me at least 50 more episodes.
We'll have you out here.
I can do it all.
I'll do it all.
All right.
100, 200, 300.
I'm here to the end.
We'll see.
We'll put that to the test.
Welcome back, buddy.
I know Rolo's got a lag again.
So despite my wife's entreaty for more Rolo content on the show, we'll see.
He'll just have to jump in and interrupt JF all the time.
Anyway, finally, our very patient and distinguished guest.
He is the host of JFG Tonight.
I don't know what that stands for.
I would guess Jolly French giant, but that's speculation.
He is the former host of The Public Space.
He is the author of The Revolutionary Phenotype.
And he is perhaps the second highest IQ Western dissident after Chris Langan.
Sorry, JF.
I had to bust your chops there a little bit.
We are honored to have you on Full House.
How are you, sir?
Not Chris Langen.
You're comparing him to me.
I don't know.
You got to put up your scores, big guy.
This guy is a joke.
But Chris Langan, it's impressive because he brags about his IQ, but he's never produced anything useful for this world.
His theory is complete crap on the human mind.
So it doesn't lead to insight.
So it's one thing to be able to respond to a mathematical test rapidly.
It's another thing to be able to make an advance.
Oh, good.
It got under your skin.
I'm glad.
No, it's funny.
I'm glad that you because, you know, somebody suggested try to get Chris on the show.
And I actually did DM him on Gab to see it.
And his lovely wife was gatekeeping a little bit to see if we were going to be bad for his reputation.
And then like a week later, he went on Keith Woods and I heard mixed reviews of that interview.
But we won't, we still want to have Chris on.
We'll see how he compares to you, JF.
But anyway.
Well, what's the point of having IQ points if your wife controls your Gab account?
Oh, no, no, no.
She's managing it.
Oops.
Hey, I'm so glad that our mutual pal made this connection to have you on the show.
So thank you.
Thank you, humongous.
And JF, let's get out of the way.
Your ethnicity, religion, and fatherhood status, please, buddy.
I'm an atheist.
I'm white, and I'm a father of multiple children.
Very good.
Now, when you say white, are you actually of French ethnicity?
I assume so.
Yes, I'm tested on 23andMe, and the ensemble of my ancestors are known because they have been subject to a study.
So they've been traced back to France for the last about 300 years.
I know exactly who led to my birth.
And 23andMe confirms that I'm 100% white European.
There it is.
Very good, sir.
We wouldn't cut the recording if you weren't, but we do that to all of our guests.
And here at the top, I don't want to get derailed by atheism or religion.
We've had many conversations about religion, but I do have to note, you know, of all of the religions out there, Judaism and atheism seem to be the only two now that our guys really hate.
You know, like agnostics, we're like, okay, we'll give you a little bit of respect.
But I personally respect a little principled atheism as someone who leaned that way very strongly just recently.
So have you always been that way?
Were you raised Catholic, I presume, and came to it?
Yeah.
I was raised Catholic.
I think that what you describe is correct.
People hate atheism, but I think that Richard Dawkins made a terrible disservice to atheism by making it basically synonymous with a form of anti-reproductive leftist liberal mindset, something that was against civilization.
And I would invite people to take my form of atheism, which is not militant atheism.
I just don't believe in God.
I just don't conceive that the universe is surrounded by a being that thinks and that created the universe as such.
Now, the problem with Richard Dawkins is that he's combined the militant atheist project with basically a human software, a cultural software that is hurtful for Western civilization.
And that's the big problem.
Even if atheism was true, there would be limits to how you want to communicate to a bunch of people who you know are reproductively, they can be victimized basically by your knowledge.
They can be discouraged.
They can be disconnected from religion, which has a necessary role in our evolutionary history.
And basically, you can have a negative effect on the demographics of our civilization if you push it too hard.
Fair enough.
Yeah.
So you think when we die, the lights go out and just real quick origins of the universe.
I mean, I know you've done a lot of scientific research and you are an extremely bright guy.
What's your basic belief then, other than disbelief?
Well, I believe that something like the Big Bang must have happened because of the background radiation.
The universe was dense and hot at some point.
But I'm very open on the before the Big Bang question and what happens between Big Bangs, because we could see the universe as a reproductive entity.
There are cyclical cosmological models where the Big Bang just happens again and again.
I'm open to this.
I'm open to the idea that the Big Bang happens inside a black hole.
But there's no strong proof of either of these theories, but they are totally viable.
I would love the universe to be a reproductive entity.
I love reproduction.
And one of the great things about disbelief is that it really does force you to appreciate what we have here in terms of sort of the only go at it rather than Valhalla or something to look forward to in the future.
So you think when we die, the lights go out, so far as you know?
Yeah, because I don't think that the human mind exists in the human brain.
So when the brain is destroyed, you don't think anymore and there's nothing of you to survive other than what you've done in your life, which in our case, as a living entity, we have the chance of preserving everything that matters in our children, basically.
And we even have a second chance at it other than our genes.
We can even communicate cultural stuff.
So we're very lucky.
Out of all the crap in the universe, we have two saving systems.
We have two resets possible.
There you go.
Now, Sam is tempted to start the car up and go up and challenge you to a fight in whatever the parking lot equivalent of Applebee's is.
No, I'm kidding.
No, I mean, you know, I give you credit, Jayf, for sticking to your principles.
And yes, that is a far healthier version and appreciation of atheism than most of the typical fedora tipping obnoxious leftists.
So points were due.
Tell us, if you would, my friend, what you've been up to lately, because I'll speak for myself, but I suspect it goes for a lot of the audience.
I remember seeing you all the time when we were all on Twitter and other platforms, right?
And then we all sort of got scattered to the winds over 2019, 2020 through censorship, etc.
I see you're still on YouTube and it looks like you're still doing a show every week.
So let us know a little bit about that, please.
Yeah, I'm not doing my show on YouTube anymore, but I'm doing it on Odyssey.
So basically my story since 2015, I left academia.
I published my book, My Scientific Theory of the Emergence of Life.
And then I became a e-celeb of sort, being on shows, Warski Live, etc., and started my YouTube career.
I've been. living full time from YouTube since 2017.
And this year, Twitter banned me and they banned me for no good reason at all.
They said that my account was spamming and it was absolutely false.
I was just publishing the links to my shows and I've been always respecting the rules.
So it kind of gave me a kick to be able to dissociate from YouTube.
I took the risk of, okay, let's develop a new platform on Odyssey because they started having super chats.
And so after living from YouTube for five years total, I've been getting my house on YouTube.
I've been making all my money on YouTube, building my farm.
And so now I find myself, okay, kicked out of Twitter.
Let's take the big risk.
Let's jump with the parachute and let's go to Odyssey.
And the fact is most of my audience has transferred and my numbers were already relatively low on YouTube because of the shadow banning and all the attacks.
So in the end, it was a small audience to move.
And at least on Odyssey, I have some freedom of speech and I don't have to control everything that my guests say.
So it's much better from a mental perspective to be able to speak freely every night.
So I continue still as of today, a show every night, seven days a week.
There you go.
Good for you.
And you're coming.
Go ahead, Tim.
What is the name of the show?
JFG Tonight.
I changed because the public space was so attacked and so misrepresented in the media that basically having the name stick to you was giving me problems with monetization and that kind of stuff.
Yeah, because we were chatting before the show and I can remember listening to you through the years and just this last, I don't know, year or so or two.
You know, we just didn't pick up on wherever you were.
So that's good to know.
And I'm sure other people will be like me, which we know who you are, but we just maybe lost track of you a little bit.
So thanks for that.
Yep.
This is one of the terrible things with censorship.
It's the breaking of friendships that could exist.
You know, most of my friends of the time, I lost them because they're not on Gab or something like this, or they just didn't follow me.
And so there's no DM.
It's really heartbreaking how inhuman the censorship thing is, because it's ultimately an attack on social networks.
Yeah.
Yep.
And really, like you can, you can develop, this may sound gay, but you can develop true friendships with people online and get a sense of a man and know that he is a good person and believe what he's saying.
Not all the time.
And yeah, God knows where all those good guys are from Twitter from back in the day.
Some have moved on to Telegram or Gab, but you're right.
It's really tough.
And yet we persevere.
The more they censor us, the harder we'll work.
And I know Odyssey has been kind of glitchy for people lately.
I've seen a lot of complaints about the uploading, but good for you for contributing to the platform.
And I got to ask, were you defenestrated from academia for dissident thoughts or did you leave voluntarily?
Was this your plan all along to go be an e-celeb?
I left voluntarily because I've always been alternating between two aspects of my life.
I was a scientist, but as a hobby, I was also an artist and I was very interested in TV.
But of course, you can't make a career in TV coming out of science in academia as a biologist.
But then there was the whole rise of YouTube as the media, the main media that people consume.
And so this opened up a door.
And I just decided, yeah, it's the best thing for me to do.
For about three years, I did YouTube part-time while I was also getting small work, like grocery store, placing milk, cheese, that kind of stuff.
And eventually my YouTube grew so fast and so well that I could leave my job and I could have financial freedom.
Good for you.
And JF, what do you consider yourself?
I know it's unfair to like say put a label on yourself, but white nationalist, racialist, pro-white, what would you, what box would you put yourself in if you had to?
Well, yeah, I still, after more than seven years talking about these subjects, I don't care about these labels.
I'm just a guy who was interested in fairness and truth.
And just being interested in fairness and truth in 2022 is basically a white nationalist.
There you go.
The question of truth is the question of the existence of race.
And it's unquestionable.
White Europeans exist.
They're a nuclear.
We see it on any graph we plot this on.
And then the question of fairness is if you're going to allow every other race to have political claims about what they want and what they benefit from from a collective perspective, then why wouldn't you have the fairness to leave it to whites?
And amazingly, we see an acceptance of this discourse today in the form of the defense of Ukraine.
Now, it's a separate subject.
We can get on this subject later.
But amazingly, the neo-Nazis have been rehabilitated in this Russia-Ukraine country.
It's the damnedest thing, right?
Yeah.
See no Nazis, hear no Nazis when it comes to Ukraine.
It's really amazing, makes you think.
We'll see how we got a lot of stuff.
JF's a pro.
I was like, well, what do you want to talk about?
And he gave me three topics here.
So we'll do those in deference and respect to him.
And then I've got a bunch too.
So we'll start with number one.
He oddly put reproduction on the list.
Now, JF, this is the dad show.
We all figured it out a long time ago.
But what did you mean by that?
I suspect there was a more deep, and are you talking about fatherhood or the declining birth rates?
What's on your mind when it comes to that?
I mean, I wasn't insisting on anything in particular, but of course, everything should be about reproduction because ultimately that's the sense of life.
But yeah, I was talking to a lot of guys of my audience recently, and I found out so many of them have the same problem.
They can't just decide to have the baby.
And some of them are in perfect situations.
They have the girlfriend.
The girlfriend wants to have a baby, but they find a last reason.
Either, oh, she's not tick enough.
I've heard this one.
Or, oh, she's Asian.
She's Asian and I want to save the white race.
Okay, that's a good one.
Yeah.
Well, I mean, the thing is, I wouldn't recommend running after Asians.
But if you have a good girlfriend that's loyal, wants to reproduce, you have to understand that for most guys, you'll have one shot like this in your life.
You may never have it again.
And so my recommendation is always reproduce and think after, solve the problems after.
You can have white babies later, maybe.
So it's interesting that this comes up.
I mean, we would, you know, on this show, we would certainly disavow or discourage guys.
Dump the Asian girlfriend.
There's plenty of beautiful, fertile white women out there.
Absolutely.
And you, and definitely, JF, I totally agree with you in spirit.
I mean, that's one of the things we almost don't talk about it on the show anymore because we don't want to beat it to death.
But there is no immortality, but the memory that is left in the minds of men is a quote by none other than Napoleon.
Can't believe that one came to me right now with you on the show.
But you achieve immortality, guaranteed immortality by having kids who remember you as a kind and loving and guiding father for as long as humanly possible.
It's one way to do it, of course.
Great deeds that the masses remember are another.
But in terms of guys not yet going for it, like just yeah, just do it.
We did a whole show called Just Do It on all the reasons why you should do it, even if you're not in the perfect situation, right?
There's never a perfect time, even if you're making six figures and you're young and you've got a wife who can stay at home with the kids.
There's always excuses to not miss them.
There's never a perfect time, you know, or there's nothing but perfect times.
Whichever way you want to look at it, just going for it is what counts.
You know, you might say, yeah, but I'm going leaping forward and having the family and all that.
And then the financial strictures may become apparent and all that.
And I say, yeah, that happened to me too.
I can remember and I mean, I carry some bitterness to this day of thinking how hard it was early in life for me having children and having a family and the financial strictures of it.
And I look at it that society owes it to the youth to provide the conditions that you can follow nature's good impulse to have a family.
Instead, we're putting it on the individual that somehow we're going to constantly controvert nature's impulse, nature's call, and that's why society is so unhealthy.
Absolutely.
And I thought you were going to go in the direction, JF, of declining birth rates as a result of infertility or difficulty to conceive.
Just by pure coincidence today in the full house chat, the guys were arguing pretty vigorously about the ultimate source of that.
Is it Jews poisoning our culture to make everyone selfish, materialist, addicted to their phones, et cetera?
Is it the industrial revolution that has made us less healthy?
Is it chemicals in the water and all that?
I tend to think that it's the spiritual and cultural poisoning of our people more than the physical pipes and tubes and pheromones and hormones, etc.
But what do you think about declining Western fertility rates?
And I mean, I guess it's not just whites, but we have it the worst.
Well, there's a couple of reasons.
There is obesity, which results in the paralysis of sperm, and it's harder to get a baby.
You have to try more times.
That's definitely there, but the factors you mentioned are also true.
First, there is a culture of professionalism and of, you know, in the school, they will tell women you can be an astronaut and crap like this.
And that suggests to our young women, this is what success is.
Very rarely you'll see the boom, the generation of boomers and those that are slightly younger than them raise young people to say, do you want to be a mother later?
You just don't hear that one unless you go in extremely niche podcasting things like here.
So that's a problem.
And there's also the timing because there's such a thing as the evolutionary momentum.
If your entire population gets their first children at 18 years old versus if they get their first child at 30 years old, that's a massive difference.
In a couple of generations, you'll have massive drops of the size of the population that this group represents simply because the person who's having the same amount of children, but they're making it earlier in life, they will outcompete through generation cycles being shorter.
So by the time the 30-year-old gives birth, the 20-year-old not only has had the time to give birth, but to raise their children up to teenage years.
And in turn, they will in turn produce their own children.
So twice as fast.
If you go twice as fast in generations, you multiply by two, you're breeding success.
And America has headed toward encouraging women basically to wait up to 30 years old and then be against the biological clock.
And so not only do they have children that are less likely to be healthy, more likely to have genetic disorders, but it's also harder.
The delivery is harder.
Everything is harder because the machine hasn't been used for the whole time that nature had planned to use it, which is between 18 years old and 25.
Yeah, absolutely.
Because like Hitler wrote about in Mein Kampf, the scourge of that day was syphilis.
And at that time, the sentiment was that, well, people should control themselves and people shouldn't go seeking prostitutes or living an immoral life and things like that.
But he said, well, but at the age of teenage years, that's when a man and a woman are, nature is telling them to go and reproduce.
And so the desire to reproduce goes right along with the ability to reproduce.
And that's true.
People should use morality and they should restrain themselves, but also society has to operate in a way that is in harmony with the individual.
So for instance, when I was 18 years old, could I go get a job where I could buy a house and take a wife and start having children?
My grandfather, he worked at the U.S. Post Office and he retired from the U.S. post office.
My grandmother never worked a day in her adult life and they got married when they were, I don't know what age they were, but let's say 20 or 22 at the latest.
And my grandfather lived in a brick house, which he bought.
And when I say bought, not 30-year mortgage bought, but he bought it cash.
And then every couple of years, he would buy a new car, cash, and he raised his family in that house.
So society should be more like that.
There should be the opportunity when a man is 18 or 20 years old or in his young 20s where he can have a type of a job that you can support a family and have children.
Instead, many generations now have been conditioned to, like you say, oh, wait, wait till you're 30.
Then you will have the child.
And that's just, it's very harmful in a lot of ways.
But as far as the antidote, you know, all those factors, coach, especially your listing there, the different, you know, poison in the water and unhealthy conditions and educational things.
But also, as I understand, the way the human person works is that you have these like the synapses, right, will grow and strengthen as you use them.
So let's say somebody is a fearful, cowardly person.
Well, the thing is you start acting brave and the more brave you act, the more brave you will get.
So it's the same thing in our predicament here.
If people will awaken, as many people are awakening to this day, that men have to act like men and we have to, women need to do the things that women should do.
It comes back, you know, because all we're talking about is what is consonant within the human person to be a certain way.
So the more we make ourselves to be a certain way, the more manly we act, the more brave we act, the more we will become that way too.
Yeah.
And if you want to be a revolutionary phenotype, if you recognize this sick, soul-destroying, materialistic, Jew-run society for what it is, one of the greatest ways to revolt is have a big, healthy white family as young, I'd say as young as possible, but yeah, 20s.
Start in your 20s.
I have fun haggling with my kids because I always tell them the story.
I won't go on too long here, JF, but my grandfather was 30 when he had my father.
He was his first.
My father was 30 when he had me and I was his first.
And my dad used to tell me that story occasionally, not exactly dictating that that's the way it should be, but sort of in a proud way.
So what did I do?
I literally waited until I was 30, even though we got married at 25 to have our first.
I was like, oh, I'm keeping up with the family tradition.
And I tell the kids, don't make the mistake I did.
Start earlier.
And so my dear, lovely daughter is like, well, how about 20, I get married at 22 and then have kids at 25.
I was like, that's okay.
You could go, you know, but yeah, talk to your kids about that stuff too.
Set the expectations.
You know, do it as you're able to.
Some people don't meet the right person until later in life.
What you're describing is like the ideal.
That's what we should go for.
That's what the healthy organism will go to do is when the body is able to reproduce, why is that happening at that time?
Except that's the right time, right?
Amen.
JF, you mentioned happiness in your list of topics, and I found that interesting because I am a notoriously moody bastard.
I have blissful moments.
You know, I got a wonderful, healthy family.
And when I look at them and blank out the world, I'm quite happy and content.
And then when I look at the world, I get the blues and I get angry at myself for not doing more.
But what did you mean by what's happiness to you?
Total Aryan victory, big families.
What were you thinking about?
I've never been a guy of collective victories.
I don't care because I think that some things are due to die.
And if white Europeans are not self-preserving enough, then they should disappear.
I'm an evolutionist.
Now, I want to save myself and I want to survive.
And I'm sure there will be a form in which our civilization survives.
But I don't necessarily think it's going to be in the form of majority of our current territory.
I think this is long last.
Well, I was talking about that.
You're an individualist racist then?
You don't care about the collective, but you're like pro-white.
But yeah, I mean, let's put it in the middle of the day.
We know a lot of white people can't be saved.
But yeah, go on that.
The audience is like, what's he talking about here?
I don't care.
You should never self-sacrifice for the collective because eventually the collective will be something else and they will drain your sacrifice.
And if you raise your children to sacrifice to the good forces around them, which is exactly what the boomer generation has done, basically.
The reason we're in the current predicament is that the boomers have sent us signals about happiness, about pleasure, which was important and which worked for them.
But in the modern world, there is so much baiting, there is so much poison in the culture that if you just pursue your edonistic happiness that way, you fall into all sorts of traps that basically didn't exist a hundred years ago.
You fall for contraception, you fall for unreproductive lifestyle, unreproductive sexual preferences, drugs, unproductive stuff.
And none of this was readily accessible to the boomers.
And none of this was certainly not accessible for our great-great-grandfathers.
So it's a poor thing to be pursuing edonism in a society that has already evolved to trick you into the wrong directions.
And I think we're well into this.
Now, I was talking about happiness.
I was thinking exactly what you guys described.
You know, the life of your father or grandfather who bought his own house and car.
This is exactly what I've done.
And I used to be in the system and working at the university and being dependent on that salary and being with loans and everything.
But eventually I changed to, you know what, whatever amount of money I can have in my bank account, I'll buy a house with this.
And it won't be a perfect house, but it will be a house that I don't pay interest on.
Same thing with the car.
I bought it cash.
And since I'm in that lifestyle, there's much less stress.
You know that you're set for the rest of your life and you accept to live with whatever is available to you.
Sure.
Now, I got to drill in here, though, because you mentioned anti-collectivism, which is all well and good, but it sounded like you were even anti-collective on a racial or maybe even national or ethnic basis.
Maybe some libertarian priors there or ones that persist.
I mean, are you not pro- or pro-French or pro-Québécois?
Aren't those collectives worth fighting for, even if they're degraded and arguably dying?
Well, you have to know what's not salvageable first.
So you talk about the Quebecois, for example.
I've abandoned the Quebec people.
And I was a nationalist.
I was for the referendums.
I was for the sovereignty of Quebec.
I was heartbroken when we lost the referendum in 1995 as an 11-year-old child.
I was crying.
I remember that, buddy.
I was excited.
Sorry to interrupt.
I was excited about it, but not from a nationalist perspective because there was speculation if Quebec won independence, that then Newfoundland and maybe a couple other provinces would join the United States so they weren't cut off by Quebec.
But yeah, I remember that 1%.
They almost won freedom that day.
But I digress.
Sorry.
Go ahead about your evolution.
So I was very much a nationalist.
But one thing I realized first is that Quebec can't save itself.
It's way too leftist.
It's stunning to see how a nationalist movement can be basically socialist and communistic, but it's what's happening in Quebec and leftist in a modern sense, not leftist in the sense of statism merely, but in the sense of absolute communism.
So Quebec has mistreated also its families through the child protective services, family courts, a total attack on families in Quebec.
So I had to leave this place and I had to detach myself from this emotion, which I think is noble.
Nationalism is noble to begin with, but you don't want to be nationalism to the point of self-destruction.
And unfortunately, that's what you have to do when you support a nation that will inevitably fail.
So as far as you felt burned by your own people or your own system that you were under.
Yeah.
Or you were burned.
And you know, if you think cancel culture is big in California, everything, cancel culture, vaccine abuse, social pressure, mobs, everything is worse in Quebec.
It's like in a state of advancement, 20 years ahead of what you get in California.
So there's nothing to save there.
So as far as ethnic conceptions, I think they can be good, but you should never forget your self-interest within that Venn diagram, if you will.
Never self-abolish for the race.
However, very often, the interest of the race will align with your self-interest.
It is in my interest to be surrounded by people who are like me, because the kind of people I am, a European with a sense of property, respect, contract, honor, this doesn't succeed very well in the middle of Africa.
So, but it can succeed in a winter nation with other white people who believe the same things.
So you want to care for the race, but only to the extent that it's in line with your interest.
If the race has turned against you, then you must leave and you must care about your own survival first.
Yeah, I think this is what so many of us are doing.
Sorry, real quick, Sam, is just recognizing, yeah, that no argument there.
A lot of our people are beyond saving and are now outright vicious and hostile to our existence as wrong thinking whites.
So we have written them off and what we're trying to do is salvage the ones who are on the fence or open-minded enough to see our way of thinking.
And to get tribal is to be in a self-defense sense and to be for your posterity, recognizing that, you know, solo white nationalism or individualistic white nationalism is doomed.
But if we if we tribe up enough, we get a chance to at least eke out some sort of existence, ideally sovereign and on our own accord.
Well, go ahead, Sam.
I'm sorry I stepped on you there.
Yeah, well, you're touching on a dynamic that Hitler spoke about.
And this is about he bombed out.
All right, Sam will be back and we'll pick up where we left off.
Sam loves to drop the MeinConf references in here and they are always welcome.
But while we're on Quebec and separatism, what's the latest up there?
I mean, just, you know, I supported Scottish independence, even if it was leftist and they were banged for that, just because at this point, more people agitating for independence or autonomy from the quote-unquote system, even if it's for the wrong reasons and with the wrong agenda to me, is a positive development.
But does it still have legs up there?
And if so, it sounds like you're completely checked out or even hostile to it at this point.
Oh, yeah.
Well, I left Quebec.
I actually had to flee Quebec because the state of individual rights and family rights were too harsh.
And so I found freedom in the rest of Canada in a very distant place, a rural place where I can be left alone.
The state of Quebec sovereignty, there's not much seriousness to it today.
It could rearise easily.
However, with the amount of demographic change that Quebec has had, a sovereignist movement that would be reborn today would have a significant Muslim component to it and a far-left component to it.
Basically, it would be a project that would basically the Quebecois people would choose to dissociate from Canada because Canada is not communistic enough and it wouldn't be centered around the Quebecois nation as an ethnic.
Whether this happens or not doesn't matter to me because this far-left project of communism is bound to fail.
And I don't expect that in 100 years from now, people will have my accent when they speak English.
I think that they will have totally abnegated the Quebecois culture.
It was a great people and it created great cinema.
I mean, things that were innovative for the time, even ahead of France and ahead of the U.S.
But unfortunately, no one will be there to remember this.
Man, you know, go figure.
I really didn't plan to be the Quebecois simp on this show.
But just for curiosity's sake, I have a good friend who did a solo driving tour up there just within the past two, maybe three years ago.
And we lived in the same area of the States, which was nothing to compliment.
And his report was glowing.
He said, very few minorities, even in Quebec City.
I counted like 20 over the span of a week.
Beautiful women everywhere, mostly blue-collar whites.
Awesome food.
People seem healthier even though they drink a lot.
It was rustic and I loved it there.
So I don't know, contrasting.
I mean, it's very easy to have this kind of local flash.
I mean, yes, you go to Quebec City, this is what you'll see.
But you can't ignore the question of demographics because ultimately, even if you keep all immigrants centered into Montreal, eventually it dilutes.
Eventually, the culture that's present in Montreal spreads around.
So yes, you can still go in a rural area in Quebec and you'll see only white people and they'll be very Quebecois and they'll have the full accent and the full language.
But this is bound to fail because of the game of numbers.
Eventually, Montreal will be overpopulated and the immigrants of Montreal and the Anglophones of Montreal will start expanding and spreading across the nation.
And eventually you chip away at the culture through self-flagellating the way they do.
And you can't even have racial or ethnic considerations in immigration because people are so obsessed about the French language.
They think it's the defining element of the Quebecois people.
The problem is you can have hordes of Africans, hordes of Muslims from the Middle East that can speak French or North Africa that can speak French, but they won't carry the Quebecois culture forward.
Of course not.
Welcome back, Sam.
I don't know if you wanted to pick that one back up or should we?
Oh, well, if you want me to, I'll just jump on what I was trying to say there.
You know, Hitler talked about that people do not join small obscure parties for all parties for what they can get out of it.
And the very altruistic person might bemoan that or may even criticize or condemn such a person, but that's just kind of how human nature is.
And I think that goes along to what JF was saying there about, you know, like the personal interests.
I think that is kind of just in people, you know, to be that way.
And so if we want our party to succeed, so to speak, the more that we can offer people to join with us, so to speak, then they will.
You know what I mean?
all we say is fight for your race and prepare to die.
Well, that's not very attractive to people.
And so the more we do what we're doing, which is we're kind of creating like a community, right?
Whether it's our little full house club or meetups or other things, you know, people are longing for in the most desperate way, a sense of belonging.
Many of us hardly belong to our own families anymore.
And those relationships we form with people, whether it's, you know, in chat rooms and I hope in real life, not just things over the internet, but real life, you know, to the extent we form those things that, you know, there's, there's just these very basic feelings in a human person about being alone, about being desperate, about trying to grasp the meaning of life or the meaning of my own life, especially.
Having any purpose in this in the system, you know, if it's just pro-white and getting involved in the movement is better than the alternative.
So many of our guys are completely atomized.
And a different or another facet of that that I wanted to mention, though, too, is I think that if you can be a little bit spiritual about it, that, you know, I agree.
We say on this show, and JF was saying about reproduction being such an important part and the most important part of life.
Life is life, right?
That all makes sense.
That's good.
But also you got to think about another way.
What if I have a bunch of kids like I do?
And what if they die?
Or what if they run away from me?
Or what if I never have children?
What if I fall in love, get married, and we just cannot have children?
Or, you know, there's all kinds of things that could happen to say that, what if I don't have family?
What if I don't have a wife?
Yes, those things are very important.
But if you could try to be spiritual about it in a way, like it's also just our blood, the loyalty to our blood.
The three of us talking right now, we're related in a way.
We have a stake in each other's lives and each other's future in a sense.
And we should care about each other.
And people, I think, did feel more like that at one time in history.
So there's just that the four of us.
Sorry.
Sorry, Rolo.
Yeah.
You know, Rolo's like three-fifths of a guy or something.
A very good friend, Sam, recently said, man, I would probably be in this cause, but it sure helps knowing that I have Jesus on my side.
I said, yep, hey, I totally get it.
I wish I had that.
Let's move on here.
JF dropped a spicy one here in which he mentions the costs of mental health costs imposed by women.
I'm sure he was asking for a friend.
None of us have ever been burned by a woman ever.
But go ahead, JF.
Where were you going with that one?
I mean, obviously, women drive us.
We're crazy for women and they drive us crazy.
Can't live with them.
Can't live with them, as Sledgehammer once said.
That was an age.
Can't kill them.
Go ahead.
Where were you going with that one, big guy?
Yeah, I wasn't going anywhere specific, but I was thinking of just the amount of shit, the amount of pain that can be induced by the kind of the different games that men and women are playing.
It's like we're playing on the same board, but we're playing a totally different game.
And it's like you were playing Monopoly and someone is moving across in diagonal across the board.
And you're like, stop it.
And they keep doing it.
Well, you just don't pay attention.
That's been my strategy.
Like you just, you're just oblivious to it.
You never read any game.
You just be yourself.
That's worked for me.
I kind of stumbled into luck in that sense.
But no, I know how many, how many of our guys are absolutely up a wall and looking at you, Rolo, at the state of women out there.
And then they're trapped in whatever sort of difficult marriages or the divorces and the system being stacked against you in terms of the kids and all that.
I am kind of useless on that sense.
Just try to be good.
Don't cheat.
Don't be abusive.
The three A's, abuse, addiction, and adultery.
Don't do those and cross your fingers.
Yeah.
Well, I think sometimes we're like using your game analogy.
Yeah, that's that's as long as we keep looking at it exactly that way.
We're both playing a game that you either follow the rules or you don't.
But I think maybe some of the problem arises because we treat women like men.
And maybe whether it's the three of us or four of us sitting here talking, we observe certain certain decorum with each other.
Or if I have a friend, yeah, my male friend, I've developed trust in that person.
And I do not expect to be double crossed by that person.
And, you know, maybe I extend a lot of consideration to that person.
And I have to make careful choice of friends.
But maybe with women, we try to give them the place of another man in our life.
Whereas a woman should have a different type of place.
I guess we err by interacting with them too much as equals.
And I'm not trying to say, oh, we're so much better and we treat them like children or something like that.
Different species.
Yeah, we have to, I think maybe our previous generations understood that better and men acted in a certain way, women acted in a certain way.
And even though you're married, let's say to a woman and you have an intimate relationship with her, but at the same time, there is this space in between two.
There is a difference and a different stature, different status that you grant a wife or other women that you know in your life.
Well, JF, what does science and evolution and all that inform you about male-female dynamics?
They don't inform you that much in the detail.
They tell you that the drives, that there's no particular reason by nature that men and women would be even similar.
I mean, there are species where the male is like a millimeter long and the female is like 10 centimeter long.
So there are some species of fish where the male has been reduced to a microscopic organism basically living inside the uterus of the female.
Yeah, that's Smasher.
Smasher has that existence.
Now, I had to name somebody, but yeah, that's not true.
Go ahead.
But yeah, it's a danger, especially with the technological developments, because you could have a woman gone their own way if technology allows.
I mean, technology already allows in the form of in vitro fertilization.
So the male has become already theoretically disposable.
And especially as states grow and the amount of kind of UBI, social welfare and that kind of stuff grows, the position of the provider of the male becomes less and less necessary for the woman.
And so there's a unfortunately tempting direction that certain women are taking.
And I think it's what the left is currently taking, which is to just get rid of males because why would you have to negotiate 50-50 on everything in terms of control of the children's brain when all you really need is a bit of sperm?
Yeah, the one takeaway I had from a brief reading, I read F. Roger Devlin's book, Sexual Utopia and Power, which was good.
But, you know, boiled down without civilization and the norms that we impose on ourselves on men and on women, you know, men will revert to caveman status, trying to score as much as possible and spread their seed as far as possible.
And then women have the hypergamy or hypergamy, as I used to say, where they're trying.
They're trying to achieve the highest status, wealthiest, you know, alpha chad that they can lock down to get the best genes in their uterus, as we say.
But does that fair enough to boil down the male-female dynamic to its crudest form, do you think, JF?
Yeah, I think this could be an evolutionary direction.
What we have to retain is that the whole idea of a nuclear family with healthy children receiving good contributions from their father and their mother, each playing important roles, that is a state of equilibrium that is just rare.
And unfortunately, all of the other directions, evolution is pushing toward.
And if we do end up in this kind of polygamy lifestyle, unfortunately, there's kind of an evolutionary interest for men to stop caring.
And this would lead to less good parental behavior.
And it may be the case that the kind of history of Europe for the last 500 years will be just an exception in the history of mankind.
Sure.
So even though the nuclear family is somewhat of a civilizational construct, you still support it as the best way to raise large numbers of healthy, cared for children.
Oh, absolutely.
Because I think it integrates kind of the mix between capitalism and eugenics in a perfect way.
The fact that the father was the provider, it guaranteed that no matter the amount of babies that were coming from him, they were carrying his genes and therefore his quality.
And if you want an advanced civilization, you need a system of meritocracy, both at the level of property and wealth and at the level of genes.
And the nuclear family was the perfect combo.
It was making it sure that the quality of life of the child will be influenced by the wealth of the father and therefore by the capacity of the mother to charm a quality male.
If the male becomes disposable and polygamous and just cares about spreading as much seed as he can, all of this crumbles and along it, the whole of society.
But don't you think that healthier, superior model that you described, that even if we have come to a low ebb in society now, that all of the competing strategies are just inferior to it.
And ultimately good wins out, the way I see it, because it's better.
would be beautiful to believe this.
My problem is I believe that eventually nature attains a ceiling in which excellence is not needed anymore.
And then the kind of dirty forces of the sewers of nature rise and there's nothing you can do against it.
And I believe that we are in one of these era where we have made too much discovery.
There's not much yet to discover to further have incremental gains in our productivity.
And so from here on out, it's all parasitism.
And it's going to be until the parasitism is so intense that our whole societies are destroyed.
And then liberty and meritocracy can be born again.
But I see that in millennia from here.
Yeah.
Well, possibly.
JF, we have a woefully underutilized segment on this show called Full House Love Connection or Feds Meeting Feds.
So I got to ask, not to probe, are you eligible at the moment?
You settled down?
What's your name?
I'm settled down in a productive family.
I don't need any partners.
All right, very good.
Strike him off the list, Rolo.
All right.
Are you okay going a little bit long in this first hour because we still got a couple more?
Or do you have to run?
Sure.
No, I don't have to run.
All right.
Awesome.
Thank you.
You mentioned transhumanism and the dangers of genetically editing your children.
I assume that you were referencing the COVID vaccines there, but also your book was about the dangers of messing around with the human genome, made me think of CRISPR Tech, etc.
So go ahead and what are your biggest concerns there currently and then also over the horizon for humanity, really?
Yeah, I wasn't thinking about the COVID vaccine.
Although the COVID vaccine is kind of a first step to kind of get people habituated to the idea of almost genetic modification, because it's just one layer before the genes.
We got to RNA and the next step will be DNA.
And when we touch DNA, we start in the domain of what I described in my book.
So my book, The Revolutionary Phenotype, offers a theory of how life emerged on Earth.
And it's really not how I've been taught it was.
And it's extremely scary, which is that life forms create other life forms.
This is the certain, absolutely 100% certain statement about life on Earth.
It was created by some other life form.
DNA didn't exist.
There was a life form present on Earth.
It was RNA-based, RNA being the very same molecule that they're modifying with the COVID vaccine.
But that's just a side point.
There used to be an RNA life on Earth, and eventually it created DNA accidentally.
And the circumstances in which it created it was that DNA was used as a tool to make genetic modifications on themselves.
Basically, DNA was not meant to be its own life form.
DNA was a good media to store genes temporarily for the RNA life form.
And eventually, they stored their genes so much that this thing, DNA, took over and started controlling what the ancient life form would do.
Now, my book presents a scenario in which we're basically headed there as humanity.
We are about to create machines, just like they created DNA 4 billion years ago.
We're about to trust these machines with our genetic code.
We've already done it with 23andMe.
We've already exported our genome to these machines.
Eventually, these machines will be recommending how should we modify our children genetically.
And the moment the machine does this, it takes control over your evolution.
It's extremely important to understand that.
The discovery of my book is that if you give up control of your genetic evolution to something else, that thing will start evolving, that thing will start being the unit on which evolution applies and when you're no more the, the unit over which evolution applies.
Uh, one example that we know in nature where this happens is colonies of ants and bees.
When you think about the individual sterile worker, bee or ant, who's totally self-sacrificial, who's basically a robot at the service of the queen, that is what happens when you stop evolving and when you start evolving for something else.
So the sterile workers have started evolving to save the queen because the queen was the only thing in the whole system that kept the one important thing for evolution, which is reproduction.
Now, if we do engage with technology in a way that we start trusting computers to produce our babies rather than ourselves, if we start just letting them control a couple of genes in our children, what will happen is that we'll occupy in this evolutionary system the same place that sterile workers occupy.
We will be at the service of a queen.
The queen will not be a bee or an ant.
It will be a computer.
And eventually these computers will reproduce and will find various creative ways to create lesser humans, humans that will be more sterile, more subordinated, more in service to the queen.
It sounds like Terminator meets Matrix in a sort of pop culture reductionism.
Sorry.
Exactly.
It is as intense as these two movies taken together.
And on top of it, I'm telling you, this is not a science fiction scenario.
It happened 4 billion years ago and we're about to create the conditions for it to happen again.
It's a very serious scientific theory.
It's not speculation.
When you give up your evolution, the other thing starts evolving for you.
And 4 billion years ago, is your hypothesis that an alien being, it reminds me of Prometheus.
Sorry, I hate to be like a Hollywood guy here.
It just immediately comes to mind that a being came down and created DNA as a sort of experiment?
Or what's the idea?
It doesn't have to be from outside planet Earth.
It may have been that the RNA life form was on planet Earth.
And it doesn't have to be a technological advanced civilization.
The RNA life form could have been a very small life form, but for some reason they developed DNA because it was good for them.
It was an advance for them evolutionarily for a moment.
Just like for humans, it was an advance for us to develop some medicine and computers.
But eventually the inventions that you create turn against you.
And the moment they turn against you is when you give up the control of your children's genes to them.
And the book is the revolutionary phenotype, which is still available on Amazon.
Knock on wood.
Doesn't look like it's been censored too hard.
Check it out.
Sounds fascinating.
All right.
Let's go.
We'll skip the French elections.
I mean, I was going to ask you, you're a little bit checked out on the French chauvinism.
Marine Le Pen looks like she's going to at least outperform.
Everybody thought that Eric Zamour, the Jew, was going to steal her thunder, not really take on Macron.
But you paid attention to it in the past.
Marine Le Pen, you know, she's back in the day, I remember maybe it was Murdoch Murdoch with Trump and Putin and Le Pen and Orban as like the four horsemen of the anti-apocalypse, you know, the saviors of Western civilization.
But real quick on Marine Le Pen, is she a true radical who softened to get elected?
Or was that a phony thing?
And do you have any hope for France civilizationally or survivally?
Yeah, all that Marine Le Pen has ever done was cock with respect to the position of her party.
So she cocked to the point now of reaching 48% in a survey.
I find that impressive.
She's definitely, it would be better to have her than Macron if just for the symbolism of it, because she's perceived as a radical, but I'm afraid she's not, because again and again, she's been leaving everything aside that her party initially believed in to turn to a just generic populist discourse.
And I think there's nothing in the shell at this point.
She's emptied it all.
Is that what you need to do to get elected in France?
Perhaps.
But then there's no reason to be elected.
Yeah, no, I know.
My hope is that, yeah, and that was really the depressing part too.
I mean, myself and so many of us have completely checked out of electoral politics as just a shell game, as a fraud, as a farce.
But yeah, my secret hope was that, yeah, she's truly a radical and just softened it to get elected.
But we've seen that in spades with Republicans in the United States.
So anyway, it'll be fascinating to see whether Macron gets a little competition there from somebody who's once radical, supposedly radical, and then moves on to get elected or try to get elected.
I wanted to ask JF without probing, and this is a sincere and fair question.
And a couple guys said, oh, I haven't heard about JF since the thing with the girl.
And you were like, there's no air to clear.
But, you know, what the audience will remember you, of course, this happens to so many guys where like one bad story comes out, our enemies spin it to the worst possible angle.
But it could be boiled down to a young woman was supposed to come up and marry you, I guess, and then things went haywire and she may have been autistic.
Do you want to say anything about that or just leave it be?
Yeah, that was just a hit piece in the Daily Beast that they probably read.
And the hit piece writes everything in a way as to make it look like I abused this girl or that somehow our relationship was not genuine.
This girl came to live with me.
I was living in North Carolina back in the days and there was lots of interest to smear me in the media because I was rising as a YouTube personality, pro-Trump, relatively right-wing.
Although, yeah, I mean, at this point, I had spoken against George Soros, for example.
I think this is what led to having a contract on my head.
So there was lots of interest to just ruin my life.
And in that case, this girl was 19-year-old.
She was able to consent.
She was an adult and who chose to come live with me and lived with me for three weeks.
And she was a brilliant woman who was a student at the university who had a driver's license.
But the problem is her father disagreed with our relationship.
He was a possive Mexican who basically, I think he had a problem with me being fully Western European white.
I think I wasn't enough Hispanic for this guy.
And he's a doctor.
So it's a family with high intelligence and high wealth.
But he was disagreeing that his 19-year-old daughter was in love with me.
And, you know, given that I'm relatively well off, I was able to guarantee this girl, you know, you don't have to work if you want to live here.
And we can, I basically, every woman I've ever been with, I promise eternity of love and care.
And so that's what was happening.
So you wanted to race mix and her father's racism is really what prevented that from happening.
I'm sorry.
Importantly, she was only 25% Mexican because her father was half Mexican and her mother was fully white.
I'm joking.
Anyways, yeah, yeah.
Anyways, this is not important, but I think I've been the victim of racism.
That was my point.
So her father, her father was so pissed off and he didn't respect her liberty, really.
So what he did is he went in a Texas court and had her found mentally insane in her absence.
So imagine you're an adult woman, you make free choices, you decide to live with a guy and your father finds you mentally insane in your absence with zero evidence other than the word of her father.
So how is it that a girl who's been given a driver's license who's studying at the university, suddenly she's not capable of consenting because there's a French guy with a dick inside of her?
That's basically what happened.
Sure.
All right.
Well, hey, while I got you back, go ahead, go ahead.
Yeah, I don't, you know, I didn't say that.
You didn't have to explain all that.
Unfortunately, because of, well, because of the, because of her father had to generate accusations against me to convince the court.
So he made up all sorts of smear, even hired a fake psychiatrist who wasn't a doctor at all.
He was a friend of his to pose as a psychiatrist to claim that she was mentally insane, which she wasn't.
But with all this, they got the court to intervene.
And her father came with a bodyguard to physically take her against her will while she was screaming.
And the last time I saw that girl, she was kidnapped by her father in the car.
And she took the dust that was on the window of the car to dry heart on the window of the car.
To dry heart to say, I love you, JF.
That's the last time I ever saw her.
But that's the state of female liberty in the U.S.
They basically don't have it.
If they make the wrong decision, if they go with too much of a right-wing guy, eventually the system will come for them.
And they will not just fight for getting your kids and controlling your families.
They will fight before you even get to make the kids.
Oh, yeah.
They want to cut you off.
It reminds me of the old Chinese proverb of the highest wheat gets the scythe first.
Thank you for answering that.
I want to give you a chance just because a lot, you know, oh, the last thing I heard was about some young girl and then I checked out.
You know, that's a true unfortunate phenomenon in this thing.
And while I got you back on your heels to be a fair interviewer and host here too, Epstein, I guess, gave you a little bit of money to help you work on your first book and then cut it off or it didn't work out.
Go ahead, tell the audience the backstory.
I know you were like, I don't give a rat's ass.
I'll take money from the devil to help me finish my work, which I respect.
But go ahead.
The Epstein question, JF.
Oh, yeah.
Well, when I was an academic, I was transitioning slowly toward a e-celeb status, very slowly, because I still wasn't making a living out of it.
But even as an academic, while I was doing research on monkeys, I was interested in developing a YouTube channel using technology to educate people about advanced stuff in science.
So I was making a little show, Neuro TV, and it was just to have high-level PhD discussions in neuroscience.
And it worked pretty well.
We had some great thinkers.
We had Nobel Prizes on the channel.
It was great.
And eventually there's a girl who comes to our lab.
And there's a big problem when you work in labs is that there's not a lot of money.
And there's lots of people who want to learn how to do advanced stuff like brain surgery, but there's not a lot of money.
And so this girl wasn't able to get any awards.
Her grades were not good enough.
And so I said, you know what?
I have a solution.
We're going to do a Kickstarter.
We're going to charm some billionaire at giving us money.
And so you're going to be able to work with me in the lab, learn about monkey research, how it's done.
And on the other side, you will have to have some commitments to the Kickstarter and the show.
So you're going to run the show.
And this is also going to be a learning opportunity.
You're going to meet great scientists around the world.
And we're going to film this.
And it's going to give us some product that we can sell, that we can offer to the people on YouTube in terms of science education.
And it just turns out that the way I designed the campaign was like, okay, let's put this young female upcoming scientist forward.
She's going to be the next star of this show.
And this was totally fit for Jeff Epstein because Jeff Epstein has always loved to give some of his millions of dollars to scientists.
He loves putting his name on non-profit and educational stuff and scientific thinking.
And so the whole campaign charmed him.
Yeah, universities, all these art centers.
On top of it, the young scientist I was promoting so that she could get payment, she was a female.
And Jeff Epstein, probably because of what he was doing to other females, was feeling very much guilty.
So he wanted to show that he was capable of doing something positive for women.
And so the whole thing was a perfect setup for Jeff Epstein to send me.
He just sent me an email back then.
It was in 2014 or 15.
And he said, where to send money?
And I said, I gave him my address and I said, send 25,000 here.
And we're going to do something that's very good for women in science.
And he sent the money.
So people are holding this against my head and saying, Jeff collaborates with the Jew.
Yeah, you know what?
I'll collaborate as much as needed to drain money away from Jeff Epstein.
I think I've done something wonderful with this money and I'll do it again.
I hear Sam's car in the driveway starting up again.
He's going up there to meet you at Appleby's or whatever the friend.
Yeah, I don't like that you're on Jeff terms with Jeffrey Epstein.
Well, I guess we're, but that's all right.
No, thank you for doing that.
I didn't even want, I didn't even want to ask, seriously, but I was like, no, I have to.
It's my duty.
JF, you want to take a quick break?
I'll play that beautiful French-Canadian song and we'll come back and do a couple more.
Or do you want me to keep rolling and let you go?
Whatever you want, brother.
You do whatever you want.
I'm still here.
All right.
Let's take a quick musical break.
I gave you the option to pick the music, but it was my good friend.
I won't say his name, who when he came back from Quebec and other places, was full of ethno-chauvinism for people that, I don't know, he maybe had a little bit of that in his blood.
I don't think so.
I thought he was a total mick.
But regardless, this is a beautiful song called Degeneration.
It is a traditional French-Canadian folk song.
I hope you enjoy it.
We'll be right back with JF.
We'll take a quick break.
Don't go anywhere.
Don't go anywhere.
Il tevien des envid de vir proprietaire.
Et tous rave la nui.
D'avoir ton pencil penta.
Ton arrière rier grandmaire lau cators enfant.
Ton arrière grandmaires quasimont.
Et pit grand, mai ronau etroce de suffisant.
Pita mai ron rou le portois têter un accident.
Et pitoi matit fait tu change de partonaire toutin.
Conseu fait des conr ton sau von avortant.
Maisa des mat toutur emplorant.
Con surv la nui.
Den grand table tour es d'enfant.
Ton arrière avia grandpère.
Ron vais que la grand misaire.
Ton arrière grandpère l ram ense son noir.
Et piton grandpère ni ronglé deuf ni millionaire.
Ton pèron au élité le tout mi dencer.
Et 2 té je nestur ton que au ministères.
Pourmoy la voires bredens unstitution boncares.
Pour qualmais des envido hold apét la quesier.
Su di des libre qui picité valenta.
Des arrières aria compa, i save com enfrédé.
Des arrières compalance a swing et faud enlivé.
Pites grand parvants.
Encro les froquier.
Des palance dé despause lo que son gandre.
Et pitoi mon ami ques que tous fait de ta soieré.
Eton tativi faux pour este en cabanais.
Eu rousant que dans viceren chois refuse de changer.
En filte plus beaux abi.
Back to Full House, episode 125, second half.
I was going to make a joke about frogs and having a frog-free second half, but our special guest, Jean-François Gadiepe, is such a good sport and willing to entertain our humble inquiries and solicitations of his opinions that he is back and we are damn happy about that because we got more to cover in addition with him as well as our standard retinue of stuff.
We were actually going to do a good-natured cooking show this episode as a sort of segue from prepping into cooking for your families and then move back into the serious stuff with JF next week.
But our expert chef friend was too busy this week.
Crazy season for him making whatever he's making in the kitchen these days.
But we got that coming soon.
And oh boy, do I have some expert dad recipes of my own creation that I want to share?
Really going to save your families at dinner time.
Just kidding.
It's a terrible nightmare here culinarily.
Let's do new white life here before we get too far afield.
And it is springtime and I think the bumper crops are coming back evolutionarily.
It makes sense that babies would be born more frequently, whatever sort of data disposition.
I'm totally forgetting my statistics.
But regardless, it makes sense that you'd have babies as the weather is getting warmer.
Regardless, I'll shut up.
So congratulations to Jimmy, who's got his second on the way.
Lovely to see a healthy sonogram.
Is there anything better to post?
Everybody loves posting pictures of their homesteads and their beautiful families.
But the moment that you post that sonogram, that's a proud one because you're confident the baby has made it long enough that you don't mind sharing it with your friends.
So congratulations to Jimmy and his lovely wife, who we know as well.
God bless and good luck with your second on the way.
Couldn't be happier.
And also a former regular of this show, which narrows it down a bit, but I'll give no further details, also shared a healthy sonogram today.
And it will be his first boy.
And I tastelessly joked that that little baby in utero looked a little like me.
Couldn't help myself.
I am a jerk.
I just play a nice guy on the show, but very happy for him.
We'll leave it at that.
And can't wait to meet that little guy someday.
And then finally, Ruck was kind enough to write in and say, good morning, guys.
Just want to let you know that my wife recently brought home some new white life and my first son, exclamation mark, into the world.
Did the whole all natural home birth thing, and she was a total champ about it.
We're doing what we can to secure the existence of our people and a future for white children, no matter what JF Garrieti says.
No, he didn't.
Got to rib JF a little bit.
It's like Wayne's World, you know, you got to make fun of the advertisers.
Hail Victory and F, the corporate medical system.
Shame on you, Rook, for cursing in your correspondence with Full House.
Regardless, buddy, haven't met Ruck.
Can't wait to.
Really nice guy online, to my point earlier about being able to get the measure of a man online.
All right.
I will shut up there and let's get back to our very special guest.
We want to pick his brain more.
And we'll start off with a nice one here and a surprise question.
He'll never see it coming.
JF, what is your favorite childhood memory?
Don't think too hard.
First thing that comes to mind, we do this to all of our first time guests these days.
Catching insects and butterflies and trapping them in aquariums when I was eight years old and observing them have sex.
So you were a scientist even back then.
Is that a sincere answer?
Are you trolling us a little bit?
Yes, that is true.
No, no, I've been observing animals having sex since I'm very young.
I've had aquariums, fish, all sorts of animals.
And I've always defined they're happy enough if they have babies.
And I've always measured that they would attain a level of happiness that's acceptable under my care if they can have children.
Incredible.
So you were, you were red-pilled on the reproduction question at the teeth.
Yeah, you score.
It's kind of scary.
I can imagine my parents looking at me like at least wait until puberty there, son.
Did you have a wholesome, you know, idyllic childhood?
Not that.
Very great childhood with bicycles in the village, small town in Quebec.
two very good parents, so I had everything for me.
We weren't rich, but they were just workers.
My father was a soldier and my mother is a secretary.
And they had enough money for a house and we had a forest behind my house.
I was interacting with nature every day.
Beautiful.
And are they still with us on this earth?
And if they are, are they offended by your political views today?
No, my father has died.
My mother is still alive.
You know, my mother doesn't care about my production on the internet.
She knows me as an individual and appreciates me for the personal relationship.
But she just sees the attacks against me.
And at first, it was very surprising for her and very unnerving.
But I told her, this is just the job.
My job is to be hated.
And that's it.
And she doesn't watch the show.
She doesn't know my views in detail and she doesn't care.
Amen.
Bless her.
Yeah.
In this sick world, to be attacked by our enemies is a total badge of honor that all of us should wear proudly.
Judge a man by his friends and also by his enemies.
So in that regard, JF, you're doing all right.
How does this, let's, this is a meaty question I was going to say for the end of the first half, but how do you see this whole thing shaking out given current trends?
My suspicion is that, you know, the trajectory of the system and the elites to control, be rapacious, break down borders, break down cultures, spread degeneracy, keep ratcheting suppression, censorship, oppression will continue until it breaks with the wildcard of the advanced surveillance systems that they have and the totalitarian measures that they can impose,
which what we saw in Australia with COVID and in so many other countries.
I'll shut up there.
I suspect that it will break before they are able to extinguish us.
But I guess, yeah, just assuming current trends, how do you think the world or Western civilization is going to go?
I think we have to be headed toward the same era that the Roman Empire has been attaining at the end.
So we're entering the decline of the American Empire.
So what will happen in this decline is that quality of life will be reduced.
Totalitarianism will be increasing for the next 70, 100 years.
And it has to come to the point where this totalitarianism and this anti-white attitude is so profound that it shakes the very foundation of our nation and eventually drains us of any form of productivity.
So I think we'll be headed toward totalitarianism, foreign wars and forced conscription.
And until it's so inefficient as a nation that it crumbles, but it's going to get worse before it gets better.
And eventually some other civilization will rise.
I've read Philippe Fabry and I'm a translator.
I'm a professional translator for books.
And I translated his text to English because he's a French author.
And he predicts that China will be the next great civilization, that the Chinese dictatorial regime must crumble to leave place to a kind of Americanization where they will kind of learn liberty from us as we lose it ourselves.
And eventually they will have the ingredients needed for a great civilization, which is liberty and demographics.
we will have lost our liberty and we will have lost much of our demographics.
Huh.
I mean, betting on China is obviously a safe bet, but they seem to be doing well under their current system, which some have attributed to essentially a Han ethno-nationalism or even a national socialism.
But you buy that, that they need to essentially buy into some of our Western ideals to really take it to the next level?
Well, the Roman Empire at first was an open society with you have to free enough space for commerce and discovery.
And you cannot get this in a totalitarian regime.
Then the Western Europe was an open regime with a fragmented society.
Now, you need dark ages before you reach that point.
You need a long amount of time where you're going to be not discovering, not developing commerce.
And there's so much internal conflict in the civilization that you can't really go forward and develop massive technological advances.
But I think that at turn in about a thousand years of dark ages for China, followed by this, with the ingredient of liberty and fragmentation that Western Europe had, I think they're going to get there.
All right.
And your timeframe, you think it's going to take 70 to 100 years for the West to totally crumble?
That seems really optimistic or pessimistic, I guess, depending on your viewpoint.
I mean, it seems like just in the past three or four years, everything from COVID to January 6th, to stolen election, to black riots in the streets, to Septagenarian, you know, basically mind-broken leaders here, that you really think it's going to keep stumbling along that long?
Yeah, because I think that the American society is so productive that draining it from its energy, even if our tax codes are already impeding on our success and our development.
But there's so much wealth to drain and so much taxation to be had before the empire strikes at the art of the survivability of the nation.
I think it's going to take a long time.
I think that Russia must rise as an enemy and there will be eventually a confrontation.
And I'm describing pretty much what's in the Philippe Fabry book here, which is called History of the Coming Century.
Russia has to face America.
America can only win because despite the LGBT propaganda and the army and the crazy stuff that's in there, we still have superiority in technology and number.
And so it has to win.
And eventually confrontation with China must come.
And America will probably win, but probably at the cost of its own survival.
Wow.
I'm glad that we had you on because you are more iconoclastic or contrarian to most of the guests and the things we've talked about on the show.
I don't necessarily agree with you on all this stuff, but it's not like you're just making it up as you go along.
Got to ask where technology and technological tyranny fits in, because my other wildcard or concern is that even if all of us stopped being productive or inventive, that they have enough tech or they have enough CRISPR tech to kill us off if they wanted to, or just to create this big, beautiful, big, ugly pan-opticon gulag for us, which in a sense we're already living in.
But where does the tech tyranny come in in your calculations in terms of the system's ability to keep things running?
Well, definitely the revolutionary phenotype, the possibility of a system that starts controlling human genetic, that's definitely a wildcard in there.
But I don't think it's going to affect this cycle of civilization I've just described.
We will probably be tempted by genetic modification.
And will it happen in China first or US first?
I don't know.
But the evolutionary effect will take time to kick in for this.
So we won't be converted into a stable worker queen system within a thousand years.
I think it's going to take a couple of thousands of years.
And so we have the full time for the decline of the Roman Empire to happen in front of us before technology becomes so overtaken that it's actually threatening the existence of our species.
And yes, so I think that there's enough time in there before this starts to matter.
Now, if you talk of technologies other than genetic modification, this will just pair with the atmosphere of increasing totalitarianism of the American empire.
So basically, as we see right now, YouTube, Google, all of the Facebook, Twitter are basically subordinated entity to departments of state and CIA and all of these people at different levels.
Or vice versa in some cases.
Yeah, I mean, they're totally telling these people who to ban and they're doing it.
So they've already been integrated to the totalitarian empire in advance before it's even fully totalitarian.
Stryker calls not Jeffrey Epstein, Jonathan Greenblatt, the shadow president or the real president.
We haven't talked about Jews too much this show.
So let's dip our toes in that.
You know, when you said the revolutionary phenotype, it reminded me of E. Michael Jones's The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit.
It's pretty safe to assume that you don't think that they are demons or satanic powers, but it's probably also safe to assume that you're not a huge fan of them and their impact on society.
So what's your take on the JQ?
I honestly don't know how hard or soft you go on it.
Yeah, it's been years that I couldn't talk about it because it became so censored on YouTube.
But at this point, there's kind of a relaxation of censorship on this subject.
At least if you're like me and you've went on alternative platforms.
Basically, I think that the Jews that we're talking about, when we talk about the effect of militant leftism onto America, they're just really a fragment of the overall Jewish population.
You can go in a rural place of America or Canada, and you're going to find communities of Hasidic Jews, of other types of Jews that are fully conservative, fully traditionals, and who make excellent neighbors, actually.
What?
Nobody wants HASIDS as neighbors.
Come on.
I mean, if you take a bunch of traditional Jews who are running their farm and they're having families and all they want is to do commerce with you, I don't see the big problem there.
You big problem?
No, but the other Jews we're talking about, those Jonathan Green Black of this world, precisely, they have been doing a self-selection because they have at some point left a conservative Jewish community to join the metropolitan world, basically.
And so I think what's happening is we have a skewed view of what Jews are because we're only seeing their revolted spirits.
We're only seeing their revolutionary spirits because those are the very people who have left their community and basically denied the traditions of the vertical transmission of knowledge from their onfathers.
Interesting.
Yeah, I mean, you're not wrong about the high power Ashkenazis being the movers and shakers or the first movers when it comes to cultural degradation and the enhancement of Jewish power around the world.
Not as interesting.
Go ahead.
I knew Sam was working up a similar there.
Well, no, no, I mean, you're giving some interesting takes and observations.
I would only say that I could make similar statements about blacks.
You know, those of us who have worked with blacks, sometimes you know that particular one who is hardworking and who does have a family and who pays his bills and things like that.
I would only say that taken as a bulk, these particular two groups are cancer to society, that they produce only bad results.
Yes, there are parts of it that you could say, well, what about this?
Yeah, but you don't get the just, you don't get just the one good part.
You get all the bad with the good.
And the net effect is bad.
So we cannot have or amongst us if we want to survive at all in the long run.
Jews, blacks, pit bulls, there's a couple good ones in every batch, but on the whole.
Yeah.
Yeah, you cannot.
I understand like the particular individual that is good or even a whole family or whole community of them that are supposedly good.
You cannot separate them from their bad elements.
Yeah, a lot of guys have expressed a sentiment recently.
I maybe said this on a recent show, just that as they've gotten older and more, older and wiser, I guess, their or just, you know, anger toward the invaders has lessened because, you know, when a society or a country opens its borders and essentially lets them in, who can blame them?
It's not their fault for being themselves.
It's the first mover or the head of the snake, as I call it, that's responsible for creating even the ability or the mentality that somehow open borders or a colorless, de-racinated world would in any way be a good thing, except for, of course, the Jews who hope to control it.
Well, I guess I might say it like in the opposite perspective, which is I would say that even the good ones.
So that is the maximalist.
Yeah.
Yeah.
They are of a hostile tribe, even if they individually might not be particularly hostile.
But at the end of the day, who are they going to tribe up with?
All right, JF, let's do Russia-Ukraine.
We haven't done it in a while, and it's still dragging on.
To my surprise, whether it's Western weapons or quote-unquote Ukrainian resolve, or even if you read the Western press, utter Russian chaos and Putin is stewing and firing everyone and all the generals are dead, etc.
But I particularly have been Russia supportive of this one, just as their reaction to the Western imperial project expanding into one of their heretofore still existent red lines where they just said no, no, no, no.
And then finally the West kept pushing and they pushed back.
And just real quick, curious if you agree, the whole Nazis in Ukraine.
Oh, yeah, go ahead.
My idea of like Nazis in Ukraine is it would be like neo-Nazis in Canada under Trudeau somehow like going and like fighting against Quebecois separatists, you know, whites against whites with a hostile government.
Like it just doesn't make sense.
But I honestly am curious about your analysis of the situation.
So how about it?
I think it's undeniable that there's Nazi movements in the Ukraine and they've been recruited simply because nationalist pride in this particular circumstance ends up being anti-Russian.
And it's not the case.
You don't see the left, you know, applaud at the idea of nationalist pride for Americans because nationalist pride for Americans barely has any impact on the Russian position.
But in this particular instance, basically the neo-Nazis were properly positioned to be a force of hate against Russians living in Ukraine, and they've been used as a tool of oppression against them.
I think Vladimir Putin is right on target here to a point where it's hilarious, actually, because the first reaction is to roll your eyes when you hear the denazification claim.
But it's actually true.
There has been a genocide, anti-Russian genocide happening in Ukraine for the last eight years.
And they've been targeted through unfair chances at employment in the government, unfair treatment in terms of checks from the government, and unfair just bombardment of the Donbass region and killing of up to 14,000 people.
And that's a UN number.
It's the minimal number that one can accept.
So I think that there is a legitimate ground to believe that there was massive violations of rights for Russians.
As far as I'm concerned, from a Western perspective, that doesn't matter that much.
I mean, people are oppressed here and there across the planet, and it's not a reason to intervene or to claim a side, as far as I'm concerned.
But the reason I would be enthusiastic from the side of Russia is that ultimately this is where the American empire splits.
This is where you can differentiate the serious guys from the non-serious guys, which there's been people in right-wing dissident movements talking against the American empire for years now.
But when the question of Ukraine comes, they can't help but side with it.
The thing is, this is the ultimate test.
Richard Spencer, I'm looking at you.
Would you applaud?
I'll name it.
This is the ultimate test.
Would you applaud at the destruction of the American empire?
I would.
And so I side here with Russia because any force that can rise against the people who are oppressing us, and that's our government, any force will be applauded by me.
And Russia is not perfect, but it's one more antagonist.
And I want China to eventually join in.
I want the American Empire to be given something that it can't handle so that I can be free in the process.
And what is it about the American Empire personally that so offends you?
And you want, I mean, obviously, you could probably go on for two hours about that.
But at core, what is it about the empire that infuriates you most?
Its attack on the family, its attack on constitutional rights, its abandonment of the principles that led to its initial success, its attack on its demographics, and basically its expansionist policy around the world to the cost of its own principle.
There you go.
It's interesting that you still believe in, it sounds like you believe in human rights, which to me always seemed like an enlightenment and now leftist construction.
I mean, to me, there's only rules that are enforced or not enforced.
But do you actually believe the claptrap in the Declaration about God-given rights and inalienable rights of man?
No, I don't believe that God gave us these rights because I'm an atheist and I don't believe that right.
Sure.
I don't believe that rights exist outside of what we're willing to force into existence.
So basically, a right is nothing else than the statement that one expects other people around him to eventually combat any violation of such rights.
You don't have people to enforce rights, they don't exist.
That being said, I believe that the American success had a recipe, a recipe for success.
And the ingredients to this success were rights that, yes, are human fictions, but they were useful fictions to organize a social contract that was working for a hundred years or so.
Yep.
With, of course, a 90% white majority and, you know, mostly Christian too.
You've surprised me a couple of times this show.
So yeah, I'm relieved that you don't believe in some sort of magical rights that exist and must be universally applied or else they're somehow in violation of the natural order.
How about National Socialism, the Third Reich, and Hitler?
Are you a fan?
Neutral?
Curious about your assessment of that whole thing.
I love to not take the normal position.
I just love Hitler.
I thought you were going to say, I love Hitler.
Come on, just say, I love Hitler.
Let's get it.
It feels good.
I just love not giving to a journalist asking this question.
I love not answering in a way that they expect you to answer.
And they all want you to denunciate.
And I'm like, I never denunciate because denunciating or disavowing is the first type of kneeling they ask for you and then they ask for more.
But the fact is, if you remove the whole edgy aspect of it and my whole my willingness to tickle journalists at time, I really don't like national socialism.
It's socialism, it's communism, and it's not how the West became successful.
The West didn't become successful by having a large centralized state that was bending the will of corporations to its national needs.
And so to me, it's not a recipe for success.
And even if Hitler had been successful at some of his adventures, I would predict that Germany would have crushed under its own weight, under the inefficiencies of these systems.
I just don't believe in the state as a legitimate entity and as a productive entity.
So to me, the state must be minimalized.
All right.
Yep.
Props for sticking to your guns.
Yeah, I mean, I've seen that argument too, that the miracle 1933 to 1939 was slightly not fictional, but inflated and yet not sustainable, absent conquest or further advancement.
However, I don't agree with that and I don't get hung up on socialism anymore.
That's another interesting dynamic is that aside from looking to Jews as the villain as opposed to the invaders themselves, a lot of our guys, myself included, have become more open to socialist ideas or not communist ideas, but communal ideas as we've made our red pill journey from, we need to respect the constitution toward this whole thing is rotten, needs to be torn down.
And oh, we have this model from 70, 80 years ago that seemed to work pretty well and was the only one to take the head of the snake on directly.
And that's why it was crushed.
Wow.
It all depends what you think is the most important thing.
If people being the most wealthy is the most important thing, then maybe American society is the way you would want it.
On the other hand, if the blood is the most important thing, well, then that will mean people are not as affluent and we will take our joys from more organic things like from our community and our families and things like that than from being able to take a lot of expensive vacations or live in a fancy house or drive a fancy car or things like that.
So I personally would prefer that other thing instead of being wealthy.
I'd rather have a more meaningful organic type of life that is centered on the blood of our people.
Sure.
Amen, Sam.
Yeah, I would take a slightly socialistic or even largely socialistic white country that is safe at this point over a deracinated, productive category.
Or even if we're dirt poor, I've been dirt poor.
So it's really nothing different for me.
But I'd rather be dirt poor and have family and organic community around me.
Sure.
Coach's Comfy Corner inserted here, not that we're dirt poor, but the other day we've had torrential rain downpours here for the past three or four days.
And I got the property in pretty good shape with culverts and gravel on the driveway to the house, et cetera.
But when it really pours, it sort of overwhelms the handmade, hand-owned irrigation ditches that we have.
So a little break in the rain, I sort of grabbed the kids and said, come on, we're going outside, put your boots on.
We're working out there.
I should have them do more stuff.
I'm not the best at getting them involved in every one of dad's projects around the property.
But long story short, the rain was not sticking to the little trench that I had made into the other trench.
So I said, come on, guys, we have to dig this out so that it's irrigation and the flows of water are really fascinating, especially when you live in a rural area.
It can really mean the difference between like a dry property or a flooded basement or crawl space.
So I said, come on, we have to re-dig this trench, get all these old leaves out from the fall so that the water follows the right course.
And I had just given my son a haircut, fashioned him up with a number one on the sides, of course.
So he was upsharing.
But my daughter and potato was too young to really appreciate it.
But my daughter is in the perfect age where she said, Dad, this is so satisfying because you dig out a little bit and the water instantly flows toward that section.
And then when you put what you dug out on the side of it, you're building sort of a barrier to further encourage it.
It was a twofer.
And she just said that a couple of times, Dad, this is so satisfying.
I said, God bless you, dear daughter.
It is for me too, to be out with the kids digging trenches.
So get your kids out there involved in irrigation.
As I joke to the grandparents, we've got free irrigation experts here at rock bottom rates.
JF, what do you like to do with your kids?
Are you encouraging them to be scientists?
Or are they all big brained?
Are they across the spectrum of talents and temperaments, etc.?
No, I don't particularly push for science, although it could happen just out of genetic possession.
But I'm mostly, I'm really a libertarian father.
So I'm leaving space for self-discovery and curiosity to develop in the child, not to be pushed inside by me.
And that's a work that doesn't require much intervention, but it requires intelligence about it to create situations where the child will be self-driven to discover something rather than be told something.
Because all we do throughout the school up to someone being 18 years old and sometimes more is to hammer stuff in their brain.
And the one thing you don't hammer when you do this is curiosity and self-drive.
Very good.
And I don't mean we can talk generally about Canada, I guess.
I don't want to probe about your family situation, but is homeschooling an option up there?
I assume private schools exist, but they're expensive like they are here.
What's the general educational options for kids up in Canada?
Absolutely.
The public school system is crap.
Homeschoolers are being pursued by the governments in places like Quebec and Ontario.
So you have these leftist places that are already on the attack mode on homeschooling.
But if you go in rural Canada and you choose wisely your province or your territory, you'll be able to find places that still respect parental liberty on homeschooling.
So the key is don't be in Quebec or Ontario or British Columbia.
Be in a place that is distant and small and where the government doesn't even have the means to oppress you.
Is Canada going to stick together?
Does it have another 70 to 100 years?
Or could you see?
I mean, you've got strong conservative oil strongholds in Alberta, maybe Saskatchewan.
You've got the Chinese invasion of the West Coast and buying up all the properties, still latent Quebecois separatism.
Wither Canada, in your opinion?
Well, it's a good dream to think of a balkanization, but I don't think it would happen.
As you say, we'll have to wait 70 to 100 years.
Maybe the crash of the American Empire would be strong enough to induce an economic shock and that under this shock, the federal government would be weaker.
But the federal government is so oppressive.
Look at what they've done with just a freaking trucker convoy.
They've basically converted into a servant state and into controlling their bank accounts.
So believe me, they won't let a province just decide its sovereignty through democracy.
Sure.
But they also seem like a totally Petiumpkin tyranny up there, right?
I think it was, it's so hard.
I mean, Canada, Australia, we think we have a bad in America, but you look at the tyranny in Australia over COVID and then you look at some of the ministers in Canada.
I mean, your defense secretary or minister is a female Indian, I believe, some sort of Hindu.
And she's saying, sorry, we gave all of our munitions to Ukraine.
We're running short.
It's gone so far, so fast.
What's the white percentage of Canada's population today?
I gotta say, I mean, America is at 60% as of the 2020 census.
It's gotta be approaching that, I fear.
I haven't looked at these numbers for years.
I have no idea at this moment.
I know that there are strong contingents of Asian immigration and Muslim immigration, but I don't know what's the status of demographics.
But yeah, it is in a way a Potemkin dictatorship, but that's where the fight happens in Canada.
It's like it's such a polite country that even our political oppression happens in politeness.
All right.
We are going to, we went long in the first half and I've been dying to introduce a new segment to full house and we might as well do it with JF here and without Smasher here.
I'm afraid of his contribution, but we're just going to call it for lack of better creativity.
Cool stories.
I'll go first.
Sam had a lead up about this.
Rolo, you're welcome to chime in despite the lag and JF will give you plenty of time to think of a cool story from your life to round us out before we land this puppy.
And Sam, I don't, have I ever told the story about the time I thought I was going to get killed in Moscow?
I don't think so.
I don't believe so.
No.
Okay.
All right.
We'll go for it.
So this is just, I got plenty of cool stories from my life, believe it or not, as much of a fuddy-duddy standard white American dad as I am.
So I studied in Moscow in fall 2001, which was fascinating to be there.
We got there in August.
It's where I met my wife to be studying abroad on that program.
Awesome experience.
God, to go back and be 20 years old in Moscow pre and post 9-11 again would be wild.
But I was full of piss and vinegar back then.
I should have been more serious in my studies of Russian, but instead, what was I most interested in?
Sightseeing, my wife to be, Russian vodka, having fun, and just basically living like a 20-year-old white man in a foreign land.
So I was walking back from the Stilovaya, which we call it, which is basically like a small, kind of crappy cafe behind the university down a narrow alley where we would always or usually go to have lunch before going back to class.
And I was with a group of maybe three or four other American students sort of walking on the side of this narrow alleyway back to class.
And what comes along but a giant black Mercedes at a dangerous rate of speed for such a narrow alleyway, perilously close to all of us.
I'm talking maybe two feet from, you know, hitting me or taking out my knee.
And my knee-jerk reaction was to just say in English, F your mother, without thinking.
It's just what came out of my mouth for better or worse.
And son of a bitch, the driver or the passenger must have heard it.
I could have sworn that the windows were up.
And this giant black Mercedes stops on a dime and then does this, either backed up or did a K-turn.
I can't remember.
And this little bald driver in a black jacket pops out of the driver's seat.
And I'm sort of relieved at the moment because I'm like, oh, all right.
So this, you know, some nouveau rich guy in a Mercedes is angry because he heard me say something.
And then the other three doors of the car opened up.
And who were they, but like Yvonne Drago tear, shaved head, black leather jacket, six foot four, probably mafia Russians to back up the boss driver.
And he says in English, who said F you, who said F you?
And me being the guilty party and not wanting to get my compatriots in trouble, I said, Nikto Skazal Nichivo, which was basically saying, nobody said nothing.
So of course, the driver with his toadies and his muscle behind him sprung out of the car like a little evil leprechaun, evil Russian leprechaun, and quick as anything, was up in my face.
And before I knew it, he had grabbed me by the neck.
And I remember I was smoking a cigarette at the time, grabbed me by the neck, threw me up against the wall.
And in that split moment, I actually thought that he was going to either knife me or shoot me for having the temerity to F with, you know, Russian mafia at the time.
I suspect, I don't know, big expensive car, muscle, black leather jackets, et cetera.
And he said something in Russian to the effect of know your place, to which I responded, hot a show.
I didn't freak out.
I remember I still had the lit cigarette in my hand and he let go on my neck, smiled and got back in the car and drove away.
And that was the day I thought I was going to be murdered in broad daylight on the streets of Moscow.
How was that, Sam Rola?
Was that an okay opener to cool stories?
Yeah.
All right.
I don't want to set the bar too high, but that's what's what, you know, I learned, you know, women in Rome do as the Romans do.
Don't go running your mouth in a foreign country when you don't know the lay of the land perfectly.
Yeah, you got to size up your circumstances.
And regardless of what you think is in the right, the right thing to say or do at that moment, you got to see how it might play out.
Yeah.
Right.
All right, Sam, you're up.
I don't know how many minutes that was, five maybe, but go ahead, have that.
Yeah.
Oh, man.
Wow.
You only had, you know, a few decades to contemplate.
Yeah, I don't know.
There's, you know, there's a lot of, a lot of, you know, as you put this challenge out to us, I was thinking of like, oh, you want us to come up with some kind of, you know, analogous coach's comfy corner.
But that's fine, too.
It doesn't have to be salacious or dangerous.
Well, no, because my reaction was like, no, I, you know, what I, stories I would tell would be the ones that make me angry, you know, so it could be Sam's sadistic sauna or something like that.
I don't know.
Some kind of thing.
But whatever you well, I remember back when I was a teenager and I used to go to the all ages show.
You know, I'd go into the big city to see some shows.
And even though since high school, I've been, you know, reading our, reading the underground newspapers, you know, so to speak, or reading the WN literature.
Yeah, there you go.
Reading the literature and listening to the music and stuff like that.
I had always kept myself kind of like just independent or to myself.
I never began associating with groups until later when I got maybe into my young 20s.
But anyways, so I was going to the show with some friends.
I mean, they were always friends, but as far as like a like a real legitimate group, you know, I'd never really associated with till I was at least like 20.
But anyways, we were going to a show and this is one of those moments that really pushed me to be, you know, a stronger feeling about or a stronger reaction to the realities on the ground.
And it was a winter night and we had come out of the gig and was sitting in the car, really just warming it up.
And across a large parking lot, I could see in the distance, this group of people, you know, a group, a mob of people running in the direction, you know, and it's just, it's just something strange that you, it's hard to really interpret it at the moment.
You see, oh, here's this, this big happening.
Yeah, something got off the airplane, right?
Yeah, right.
Something like, well, what is that?
Like, you know, it's just, you don't even have a real reaction to it.
And, and then they're, now they're coming, coming my way or coming our way towards the car.
And then as they get closer, I could see there's a mob of at least maybe 15 or 20 people chasing this one girl.
And they're chasing her.
And then pretty soon she's running right at our car.
And the crowd, she gets up and she's running to this car, to my car.
And the crowd, they throw her up against the car and she's already, and then I could see she's already been hit.
She's bloody, white girl.
Is she a swarthy mob?
Yes, yeah.
And she was wearing a screwdriver t-shirt.
And she kind of, they threw her against the side of the car.
And then she kind of ran around the other side of the car.
They're punching her, kicking her.
And my reaction was just to get out of the car, which was probably not the right reaction.
And I got out of the car and I started screaming at these people.
You know, and the thing is, in such a moment, if you're thinking, listening to the story, what would I do?
You know, you just react in the moment when something like that happens.
And then so somehow she opens the back.
It was a four-door car.
She opens the back door and she gets in the car, somehow manages to get in there.
So I think, well, okay, I'm going to get in the car too.
And just in the few seconds of this happening, this mob kicks the windows out of my car, kicks the headlights out, you know, just kicking the sides of the doors and everything.
And with that, I get out of the car again because I'm like angry and not even thinking, this is all just going on instant.
And then they run away, you know, and while they're, yeah, they're screaming, shouting, you know, and at me, but they all run away.
And so then I got what it was all about, which was this girl.
She was, you know, and back in the city back in that day.
I mean, you can't really be an outright Nazi now either.
But then there were these gangs of baldies that you might really have to contend with.
Baldies, we called them in the day.
This is so-called anti-racist skinheads.
And maybe now they'd be more like you would call anti-sharps or something like that.
Sharps, yeah, sharps.
We used the term baldies at the time.
And that's when I, that was where it really got, you know, my face pressed in it was in an inadvertent way, I probably saved this girl's life from getting kicked to death, you know, but just because I was there and she got in the back seat and, you know, I had a couple of friends with me and that was enough where the mob did their damage and then they ran off.
But that certainly convinced us of who were the good guys and who were the bad guys.
Now, were they white sharps or were they, was it a black mob?
I wasn't clear.
No, no, no, no.
It was probably primarily white, but it was a mixed mixed group.
Gotcha.
And by virtue of their mission statement.
Yeah.
And I did keep in touch with this young lady for a while, just on a friend basis and all that.
And apparently she was from Indiana.
And so she didn't maybe quite grasp the dynamic herself.
And she had been in this McDonald's, which was the big parking lot was across.
McDonald's was across from where the club was.
She had been in there and whatever had words with people in there about all this already.
And she was wearing and had the shirt on.
So they just were going to, I mean, and these scum, these, they would kick, kick somebody to death.
I'm convinced of it.
They would, you know, these are worse than animals.
Amen.
And you saved a young, you saved a young girl's life that day.
Your car was sacrificed.
It was a cold winter night.
It was a cold winter night.
And I ended up driving back to where I lived and, you know, with no windows in the car.
It was quite a lot.
At the time, where you're like, maybe this will be my wife.
You know, what a knight and shining armor moment.
Yeah.
Well, I was seeing somebody else anyways.
And, you know, but she's a nice girl.
I don't know whatever happened to her.
Eventually lost track of her, but I remember her name.
Yeah.
That's a more noble story than mine.
All right.
Now, I thought you were going to have to one-up me.
I have to one-up you next week.
All right.
Rolo, Rolo, you want to play?
You got something in the hopper?
Just like, any story do you want?
Because I got one in the hopper if I'm not roboting too bad.
No, no, you're not robot.
And I don't want just any story.
I want a really good story here.
Okay.
I mean, obviously, I'm not going to tell you like about the story of it.
I just bought like a pair of shoes.
I went to the mall the other week and I bought some.
You never can tell with Rolo.
All right.
Go ahead, buddy.
And then we'll go to JF and bring this home.
So I have this book in my hand right now.
I will not say the name of it nor the author, but this was back in Hollywood.
And I was at some place and I'm trying not to give any personal information out, but I was at a place and a visual effects artist was there.
And a man comes up to him, starts talking to him.
And I recognized him.
He was a writer who had written for a very famous studio.
And I said, hey, are you this guy?
And then he said, oh, yes, I am.
And then he starts talking to me.
And then we're like five minutes into the conversation.
And he says, you should come over to my house sometime for some drinks.
And this was an open.
It's not a secret.
Everyone knew who he was.
And then I just met this guy and I was like, yeah, maybe whatever.
And then I tried to shift the conversation back to like other things.
And then he starts talking to me about old Hollywood and people that he worked with.
And then he gives me a copy of this book.
And then he says, this is a good thing.
This is what happens, Rolo, when you have, Rolo, this is what happens when you have gay pornography.
Like, you know, you're holding literally a blue boy in your hand.
No.
Sorry, go ahead.
Go ahead.
You don't well, you have to tell us what the book is.
That's not like compromising.
No.
Are you embarrassed?
You embarrassed the game.
No, no, I will not tell you what the book is.
I'll tell you off air.
Okay.
I mean, it's just like the book is just like a generic book about like just random old Hollywood stuff.
And, but then he says, yeah, you should, you should come to my house.
Yeah, we'll just have some drinks and we'll talk.
And then this was back when I was in Hollywood and I was right before I decided I'm done.
I'm out.
I realized this was going to rape me.
Whoa.
Yeah.
He thought you were.
Yep.
Absolutely.
He was like really trying to sweet talk me.
Just come over for some drinks.
Like he wasn't like, hey, you know, like I'm working on a project or something.
Like, hey, you maybe, no, it was just come over for drinks.
It was like a short writer in Hollywood.
And that was the moment I was like, okay, I am done here.
I am going to live in a cabin in the woods.
Thank you.
You could have been somebody, Rolo.
All you had to do was take one for Team Homo there that night.
Absolutely.
No, it's absolutely true.
It would have just cost me like never sleeping.
And if I do, there's never-ending nightmares and maybe some stitches in the butt.
But other than that, that was when I walked away from Hollywood.
It's like, this is just not worth it.
I can't look at any actor.
Like Chris Pratt seems like all-American, you know, family man and stuff.
I'm like, what did he, did he have to do something to get that first breakthrough role?
Yes.
Yep.
He probably did.
Yeah.
Probably.
Brad Pitt and Kiana Reeves are the most famous ones that were passed around Jewish gay producers.
Really?
Is that just gossip?
Or you're pretty sure on that one?
About 99% sure on that one.
I didn't see the pictures, but you know, good.
Good.
Well, thank you, Rolo.
I'm glad you didn't end up a bottom to make it.
Oh, you got me.
I made the right choice.
You could have been a top.
I mean, you know, maybe he was looking for a top.
All right.
Sorry.
Maybe if maybe had I done that, I'd have been a more serious guy.
And then, you know, I could be doing something and be in the movement for the right reasons in these concentric circles.
Oh, I see where you went there.
All right.
JF has fallen asleep and disavowed Full House for all time after those sordid tales.
Just kidding.
He seems to still be there.
Damn fascinated to see where you're going to go with this fork in the road or open invitation, JF.
Tell us a cool story from your life, please, sir.
We're so happy to have you on.
I have great moments in my life, but I don't know.
You guys are telling stories that are so socially constructed.
I don't know that I've had any extensive social interaction the way you guys do, where you explain everything that the other thinks and says this and I say that.
Basically, this is a longer conversation than anything I've had in my life.
I do.
Tell us about the frogs humping in your aquarium.
No, no, no.
I don't want to.
Tell us about Ethan Ralph.
Oh, gossip.
All right.
But here's a story.
I was in a monkey lab.
We had 16 monkeys.
We were studying the brain of monkeys.
And I was a psychopath.
I was like, I wanted to push everything to the maximum and be the most productive scientist ever.
And I was pushing the monkeys to do stuff that they had never done in the lab.
I was giving them joysticks.
They were playing soccer games on the computer.
I had programmed a whole soccer game where there was a goalkeeper, there was a kicker, and the monkeys were playing against each other.
And I was rewarding them with apple juice so that they are motivated to win.
Now, this was something reserved for experts.
I mean, to handle monkeys, you have to be some kind of an expert.
And it's very rare that we had young interns in that lab.
But again, being the psychopath that I was, I was like, we're going to get the youngest interns.
We're going to show that it's possible for a 20-year-old, newly trained biologist to be able to handle a monkey.
So enter the interns.
I was taking all sorts of risks that were never taken before.
And I was like, okay, today, you 20-year-old intern, you're going to be handling the monkey.
And so I give her the pole.
She takes the monkey from the cage.
The monkey escapes.
She drops the pole on the floor.
The monkey is totally free in the lab.
And it's a little monkey.
It was a 15-kilogram.
This one was maybe very young at that moment, maybe 10-kilogram monkey.
But the monkey is flying all around the room and eventually jumps on my intern, bites her leg, and she has a big mark on her leg from attempting to control a monkey.
Outbreak.
Did you get, you must have gotten in trouble for that one?
Yeah, because on top of it, I'm like, all right, it's just a small injury.
Don't worry about it.
And then all of the ethical committees were like, JF, you have to report any such injuries to the Committee of Injuries.
I was like, yeah, okay, okay.
Oh, man.
I really want to see the monkeys playing soccer on joysticks more than more than your poor intern getting bit outbreak style.
Not bad, my friend.
All right, everybody.
I'm going to go around the horm.
Sammy Baby, thank you so much.
Well, thank you.
And thanks to JF for being on the show.
Amen.
Lots of fun.
And JF, a little iconoclastic compared to our usual repertoire of talented special guests.
Rolo, very good job.
A little creepy about the story, but, you know, it's toward the end of the second half.
So hopefully the kids weren't listening.
The kids are long asleep.
Don't worry about it.
There you go.
Long car ride.
And JF, thank you so much for joining us and sticking with us to the end.
Please plug anything that you'd like.
We were damn happy to have you.
Thanks for having me.
You can find all my links at jfg.world, or you can search JFG tonight on Odyssey.
Good stuff.
And please send me the Philip Fabre.
I don't know about the spelling on the last name for that book.
We'll post your links, your book.
And are you working on another book or sticking with the show for now?
Yeah, I'm working on The Moral Signal as a second book.
It will be a evolutionary theory of human morality, politics, and language.
Sounds good.
I might buy it if I like the revolutionary phenotype, if I can make it through.
We'll see.
I'm sure you'll love it.
All right.
Serious question.
Can the layman read your books and more or less comprehend things or these dense academic?
Absolutely.
Okay.
I wrote the revolutionary phenotype with the idea that laymen could know about a new scientific theory before even the experts of my field learn about it.
Sounds good.
Full disclosure, I did ask a trusted friend in the movement before we had you on.
I said, hey, is JF still cool or has he been excommunicated or anything?
And this guy said, no, absolutely not.
He's cool.
He doesn't disavow people and he stays true to his word.
And of course, he lived up to that tonight.
So we wish you the best, brother.
Good luck with your show, with your new book, and all of your work and with your kids and your steady one or wife, whichever it is right now.
We wish you the best.
Wonderful.
Thank you for having me.
You bet.
Our honor.
Full house episode 125 was recorded on a damp but still beautiful April 7th, now April 8th, 2022.
Follow us on Telegram Gab and full-house.com.
And please do consider supporting us at GIFSEMGO or full-house.com and the support us tab.
So to all of our listeners who may be too weary to gaze upon the horrors of the modern world and perhaps quite worse terrors to come, do not avert your gaze.
You have to know your enemy.
To close us out this week, damn, I was going to go out with one from Bill and Ted's excellent.
Yeah, Voivod.
What the hell is Voivod?
Canadian metal band?
Yeah.
All right.
I believe they're from Quebec.
Is it a good?
Well, all right.
Is it a good song?
Like, I don't want to, I don't want yelling and screaming.
It's like Metallica, Meghan.
Sam's like, yeah.
All right.
Well, we're either going to go with In Time by Robbie Robb, one of the greatest songs from the Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventures soundtrack.
I love that song.
Or it's a wonderful song.
We're probably going with that unless Rolo's obscure Canadian death metal band really tickles my fancy once we close this puppy up.
So we love you, fam.
Smasher did not pop on to do the honors this week, but we'll talk to you next week.
Maybe with a cooking show, maybe with another special guest.
Maybe we'll just do all cool stories for our next show.
Check out Jean-Francois Gadippi's work and whatever you do.
Be good, raise strong, healthy, multitudinous white children.
And we'll talk to you next week.
Go ahead, Rolo.
You got the honors this week.
See ya.
See ya.
Oh, geez.
See ya.
I'll dream we'll all come true.
I promise you, cause I can see for my son.
In time, you'll be dancing in the streets of night.
Oh, night, oh night.
In time, yes, everything will be alright.
Oh night, oh now.
It'll take time working for you and me, this I'm loud in time.
We'll be dancing in the streets of night.
Oh yeah, oh yeah, oh yeah, oh, in time we'll be dancing in the streets of night.
One heart, one sword, one night.
Our eyes will be the land.
We will see this rain come down without this sun.
We can all we can go break free in time.
We'll be dancing in the streets of land.
Oh no, oh night.
In time, yes, everything will be alright.
Oh no, oh, it'll take time.
But we'll go where you and me and some real in time.
We'll be dancing in the streets alone.
We'll be dancing in the streets of the land.
Oh no, in time, yes, everything will be alright.
It'll take time, but the goal falls.
You and me, as I know who we are in time, we'll be dancing in the streets of the land.
We'll be dancing.
We'll be dancing.
We'll make dancing in the streets of the world.
Dancing in time, we'll dance in the streets of time.