Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 2, 2024 - Fresh & Fit

05:40:56

Ivan Raiklin EXPOSES Deep State, J6, & Stolen Election Conspirators By NAME!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Welcome to Freshier Podcast.
	We're here with Ivan Rinkler.
	We're going to be exposing the deep state.
	Let's get into it!
	Let's go!
	Yeah!
	Let's go!
	Let's go!
	We are back.
	What's up, guys?
	Welcome to the Fresh Fit Podcast, regular edition.
	We're here with a special guest in the house, Ivan Raikland.
	Quick announcement as we get into the show, guys.
	It's rumble.com slash Fresh Fit.
	As you guys know, that is the home base.
	We might have to do some toggles to rumble during the course of this conversation.
	We might have to.
	We're going to be talking about some things that you may or may not have heard about before.
	Also check us out on couchclub.tv, guys.
	You guys know that is how we're able to keep the show running and be able to do what we do because, you know, we're demonetized on YouTube because they don't like the truth.
	So it is what it is.
	We're live on the platforms right now.
	We're live on YouTube, Rumble, and Twitch.
	And we're also live on Ivan's ex, actually, too.
	I'll upload this episode to my ex after the fact because I can't live stream, so we're up on Ivan's ex right now as well.
	Yeah, we got over 2,000 right now on ex.
	Yeah, nice.
	Anything else for us before you introduce the guests?
	Pretty much, that's it, I think, for now.
	Oh, and then guys, just so you know, we're probably going to stop live streaming on YouTube here pretty soon.
	Yeah.
	So guys, what's going to end up happening is this.
	We're going to be streaming only on Rumble and on Twitch, and we're going to be putting only clips on YouTube, probably starting after this week.
	So just get ready.
	We're going to have to move the main platform to Twitch and to Rumble, so you guys will be watching the streams over there.
	We're not going to be streaming on YouTube very much longer.
	It's going to be clips and shorts only on YouTube, and we're going to be streaming on Rumble and on Twitch, and you guys can get the best parts here on YouTube.
	But other than that, man, we've got special guests now.
	Welcome to the show, Ivan.
	We met at the RNC. I'm happy to have you here at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee.
	What happened to your shirt?
	My shirt?
	Yeah, where's your shirt?
	I have it.
	But it's cold as hell in here.
	Yeah, fresh out one.
	I will tell you this, though.
	I didn't know what it meant, F-A-F-O, but now I know what it means.
	I like it.
	I think so.
	But yeah, we met at the...
	As you guys know, I went to the RNC Republican National Convention, and I think it was in July.
	Early August?
	No, it was July.
	It was July.
	It was a good time.
	I met Ivan there.
	We had some talks about the deep state stuff like that, and I was like, shit, man, we've got to have this guy on the podcast.
	And he's here today, so I'll have you introduce yourself for those that might not be aware of who you are and what your background is.
	Yeah, thanks for having me on.
	I'm kind of similar background from the government, unfortunately, at this point.
	At this point, we had a trust issue.
	Yeah.
	With our government.
	And I'll explain exactly why that is.
	You may know it gut-feeling-wise.
	I'm going to go into a lot of detail.
	So my background, 25 years in the national security ecosystem as a Green Beret intel officer, also a constitutional lawyer.
	But I used to teach intelligence analysis as my last, I guess, gig as a contractor within the Defense Intelligence Agency.
	So I taught...
	DIA? Yeah, DIA. National Intel course.
	We talked about Intel support to multinational operations and how to become a professional intelligence analyst.
	While I was doing that in the reserves, as I finished off my career in the military, I was a technology scout in Silicon Valley focused on artificial intelligence, mixed reality, and gaming companies that wanted to basically sell into the Army.
	So bi-coastal in terms of my ecosystem professional background, right?
	Both the Intel community, the whole national security, foreign policy-making community.
	And then on the left coast out in the San Francisco Greater Bay Area.
	So when I talk about the deep state, and when I talk about the censorship industrial complex, and when I talk about the individuals by name, date, place, and transgression, I'm probably not the dumbest guy in the room.
	So this is your background, military and tech as well, and intel.
	Yeah, and when you piss me off...
	F-A-F-O. Now we go on offense, and I'm going to expose every...
	Depending on how many hours and weeks you want to go on this show, you want this to be the longest fresh and fit?
	That's the longest you've ever done.
	We've done eight hours?
	Eight hours.
	You guys, right?
	Easy.
	Nine hours.
	Let's roll, 10 hours.
	Actually, you're also a big supporter of BLM. Yeah, I totally support BLM. It's pronounced Biden Laptops Matter, and we can go into the details on why that is.
	I pronounce it the Biden Criminal Syndicate Laptop.
	Oh, God.
	And guess what?
	Your boy Mark Suckabuck over at Fakebook and InstaGarbage and WhatsApp.
	Yeah, guess what he did?
	We talked about this before the show started.
	Was it last week?
	He just admitted.
	To genocide, one.
	Ooh, you might get deplatformed for saying that.
	Because guess what?
	I think Commitube did the same thing as Mark Suckabuck did.
	So anyway, he admitted to genocide because he censored out COVID information.
	Number two, he admitted to covering up for the Biden criminal syndicate laptop, which meant he stole the election in that aspect.
	And number three, he was involved in bribing to the tune of $400 million through an organization, CTCL, Center for Tech and Civic Life, which was the organization cutout that he funneled his money to then be able to bribe officials in different states at the county level, whether it's Wisconsin, Georgia, other places, in order to steal the election in those states in 2020.
	I can go into details on that.
	Okay.
	He just admitted to it.
	I mean, not in those words.
	With that letter.
	But with that letter, when you look into the details of it and you've been following election integrity and what's been going on with all the lawsuits, the legislative actions, I've had a first row seat to the entire operation from identifying the illegal election in 2020, identifying Mike Pence's inaction in December under the Electoral Count Act of 2020, and then in 2021 on January 6th.
	I presented the two legal theories in order to be able to remedy that illegal election.
	And then since then, I've basically been exposing all these folks by, again, name, date, place, transgression, category, linking them, utilizing the skills that I tried to impart on others through my teaching program.
	But in my private capacity, laying out the case to America, this is who are...
	Enemies of the constitutional order are domestically and why that is and I'm now like on a basically a roadshow going on all as many podcasts as possible On the free speech platforms to go into as much detail as you allow me the time for yeah Wow, okay, so I'm coming for him So real quick for the audience because we see this term get thrown around a lot deep state this deep state that deep state this can you enter like Define what the term is for the audience Yeah, so some of you guys, I don't know what type of audience you have, but you may have heard of Tucker Carlson, right?
	He uses the term permanent Washington, permanent bureaucracy.
	So you have, obviously you vote for some folks like the president, the vice president, and then members of Congress, members of the House, members of the Senate.
	But you have this entire apparatus known as the executive branch, meaning all the departments, right?
	Department of Homeland Security, Department of Defense, right?
	Department of Health and Human Services, right?
	And so you have all these different departments, and you have...
	People that are working there as employees that are not voted in, but they're in there for decades, and then their families are in there for decades.
	So you start to build what I call this incestuous generational rot and corruption that is then also amplified by None other than some of the policies that our government implemented in order to make it, you know, the outcomes, what do they use the term for?
	Equitable, right?
	Yeah, equitable.
	Instead of giving it equal opportunity, it's forced and mandated, hey, you're going to do this, this, and this, and no matter how well you perform, you're still going to keep your job, okay?
	You can tell who's there based on merit, and you can tell who's there based on no merit whatsoever.
	You've been in the system.
	Yeah, so basically it's the people that are non-elected officials that have a great amount of power.
	That then use that power well beyond their authorized power that we grant them through our constitutional order.
	Another example of that would be, you know, it's...
	I get it.
	You need a staff, you need people in the government in order to be able to function, to provide services to the people.
	But at the point where they go beyond that authority to then start to violate your First Amendment, where you can't speak, as they coordinate and collude with Commitube and CommieSearch and Fakebook and InstaGarbage, right?
	To basically say, hey, fresh and fit, you need to move them off of the platform because they're exposing us, right?
	Like, this show is probably going to get, in some way, shape, or form, somehow dampened because I'm going to go into details, right?
	Because they don't want you to have somebody that has intellectual capacity with critical thought bringing in another line of discussion that's totally anathema or the antithesis or the, sorry, lawyerly noise is coming out here.
	No, no, you're good, you're good.
	I like this.
	I haven't heard the antithesis.
	So, the anti to what the prevailing narrative is of those that are in power, right?
	And they got there in power a lot of times based on corruption.
	So, permanent Washington, permanent bureaucracy, those corrupt actors that are there for decades in order to essentially...
	Violate your First Amendment.
	Violate my Fourth Amendment.
	I was on the Quiet Skies program for 21 months because of my First Amendment activity.
	For those that don't know what the Quiet Skies program is, you can look it up.
	It's essentially Ivan Raiklin, even though he has TSA pre-check.
	He's got global entry.
	He's got a TS clearance at the time he was traveling.
	He's a lieutenant colonel in the reserves.
	He has TSA pre-check and clear.
	We're gonna go ahead and, is this a rated R show?
	Yeah, yeah, go ahead.
	Okay.
	We're gonna go ahead and fourth amendment gang rape him.
	What does that mean?
	I try to check in remotely.
	No, you can't.
	I go to the counter.
	No, you can't check in.
	We gotta call TSA, let them know you're physically present in the airport, and when you go through clear, the manager's gonna have to call, or the clear person is gonna have to call our manager.
	The manager's gonna have to tell the TSA, okay, he went through clear, but you're gonna now go through secondary screening, We're going to literally touch and feel you from top to bottom, earlobes inside the ears, down inside your waist and beltline.
	We're going to take out your wallet and we're going to go ahead and swab absolutely everything.
	Three Federal Air Marshals are also going to surveil Ivan from the time he leaves his home to his flight at the airport.
	When he's at the airport between that TSA checkpoint, in the airport, three Federal Air Marshals are surveilling me.
	And then on the airplane, they're sitting next to me.
	You know, when they're packing, and they're basically surveilling me until I get to my destination, which was what?
	I was going to meet with state Senate presidents and state speakers of the House to let them know all the evidence that I've compiled in the collective.
	With my background, this is how your state's election was illegal, immoral, and ethical, and you now have an obligation to convene your state legislative body under Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 to nullify your electors that were transmitted in 2020.
	And I was doing it based on using my First Amendment.
	But the belligerent, illegitimate executive branch is trying to find dirt on me so that I don't convince them to do that because that is a lawful, peaceful method and mechanism to decertify the illegitimate one that's squatting in the White House right now.
	And he's not even squatting in there.
	He's squatting at the beach.
	Yeah, he's chilling.
	He's literally squatting on the beach.
	Yeah, he is.
	He's been chilling for like two weeks.
	Waves cracking.
	He's so busy, man.
	He made one phone call.
	Yeah.
	Sweating it.
	You saw that?
	Anyhow, to kind of wrap up that question, the deep state references the collective body of corrupt, illegitimate, belligerent government officials that know each other through decades of working in the system to literally fuck all of you.
	First Amendment.
	Second Amendment.
	They're trying to ban assault weapons.
	No due process.
	Why?
	Because you're a threat to exposing their corruption.
	And when you piss off...
	I always say this.
	What part of Green Beret and lawyer did you miss?
	Because I'm coming for you.
	I don't care what you do to me.
	And if you want to call my bluff, please.
	Please, by all means, I welcome it.
	Because then I can instruct you on specifically what the Second Amendment looks like.
	Did they try to put you on a no-fly list?
	That's basically what it was.
	Yeah, because, what is it called?
	You said Quiet Skies?
	No Fly by the Skies means you can't travel.
	Yeah.
	The Quiet Skies program, It authorizes them to put you on the list for enhanced security screening.
	Gotcha.
	Okay.
	So what inspires you?
	Because they're trying to find something on me, right?
	Yeah, of course.
	They're trying to entrap me, intimidate me, right?
	It doesn't work like that, right?
	Homie, don't play that.
	I'm curious.
	What inspired you to want to expose these people after what you've been through and working for them basically behind the scenes?
	I think the main reason why for me...
	I was in the Ukraine in 2014.
	A lot of this goes back to 2014.
	You watch what Mike Benz puts out.
	All roads lead to 2014.
	At that time, I was on what's called the Ukraine Crisis Team in the Pentagon at the National Military Command Center.
	And I was one of the senior analysts basically providing information on what was going on in Crimea, Lugansk.
	I was going to ask next, were you there?
	Was this like right when Russia came into Crimea?
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	So you got put on that team for that.
	I got called in.
	I was like, hey, Ivan, are you in D.C.? What's going on?
	What do you know what's going on in Russia and Crimea?
	I'm like, how many weeks you got, bro?
	Yeah.
	So they pulled me in.
	And at that time, so this would have been, what, March, April, May into June of 2014.
	And I'm observing what's going on.
	But in addition to that, you know, I'm interested in what's going on outside of, you know, I was doing 12-hour shifts a day.
	And then off-duty, I'd be looking at it and studying it.
	I speak Russian.
	I can read Ukrainian.
	I was going to say, is that why they brought you in?
	Because of your background.
	Right, right.
	So, I'm looking at the problem set.
	Because before then, in 2007, I was a reserve attaché in the Republic of Georgia.
	Not Fulton, Fanny, Georgia, right?
	Not Atlanta.
	But I wasn't actually the former Soviet Republic.
	So, yeah, didn't see Fannie out there, but I did talk to the ambassador a couple times.
	By the way, the ambassador at the time, side note, was John Teft.
	If you look him up, all of a sudden...
	You got Russia invading Georgia in the 2008 timeframe.
	The U.S. ambassador there was John Tepp.
	And then when 2014 rolls around, I'm in the Pentagon and John Tepp's the U.S. ambassador in Ukraine.
	Huh, what a coincidence.
	And then later he becomes the ambassador to Moscow and Russia.
	Anyway, I'm not saying anything.
	I'm just saying take a look for a coincidence.
	So he's ambassador and then Russia ends up coming in every single time.
	So he was ambassador in 2007, 2008 in Georgia, country of Georgia.
	And then in 2014, Ambassador in Ukraine.
	I call that a failure in diplomacy when you go to war, right?
	Yeah.
	Interesting.
	What a coincidence.
	Anyhow, 2014 rolls around.
	As I'm observing and reading it on my own, you can pull this up, the producer or whatever, bring up a couple of Washington Compost articles as you look up Hunter Biden, John Brennan, and the failed Vice President Biden.
	Here's how it happened.
	Yes, he was vice president back then.
	This is Obama administration.
	Right, so April of 2014, you have John Brennan flying out to Kyiv.
	Okay.
	Basically what happened, based on my publicly-facing research and information gathering, got to caveat it that way, right?
	Of course.
	To play safe.
	Yeah.
	None of this is classified.
	All publicly available information that I've gathered and compiled.
	So, you have John Brennan basically going to Kyiv, working with Victoria Nuland to essentially respond to Petro Poroshenko and say, hey, good job.
	Good job in having us have a successful coup.
	If I'm not mistaken, Nuland was Secretary of State back then?
	No, no.
	She was at...
	What was her position?
	I believe she might have been head of Ukraine or European division.
	I'd have to take a look.
	I know she hates Russia.
	But I think she was in Kiev at the time.
	Yeah, a huge antagonist of Putin hates them.
	And then you mentioned...
	I'm no fan of Putin either, but...
	Yeah, what was the other one you said?
	Johnny Boy Brennan, the former C.L.A. director.
	C.L.A. director.
	Okay.
	C.L.A. And then obviously Poroshenko, who was the former...
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	Petro Poroshenko.
	I know these names.
	Before Zelensky.
	Yeah, let me slow it down.
	Yeah, yeah, for the audience so they know.
	This is the guy that was there before Zelensky, right?
	Yeah.
	No, no.
	Yes.
	Before Zelensky and after Viktor Yanukovych.
	Viktor Yanukovych was the guy that John Brennan and company and the Biden-Barry Hussein cabal wanted to go ahead and take out and oust.
	Because they wanted to push for NATO, Ukraine to join NATO. Why?
	Because you get a lot of money from getting another country into NATO, because then you've got to sell them military equipment in order for them to get up to speed with NATO spec, right?
	It's all about it, right?
	It's all about the green, the military-industrial complex.
	Yeah, so right now there's 32 members of the NATO, but that's a side note.
	Exactly, military-industrial complex.
	So 2014, you've got Brennan Cohen going in, and the next person that he tees up is like, Obama's guy for Ukraine, which is Biden, right?
	So Biden goes over there, and he has a meeting with Petro Poroshenko.
	And he says, hey, I got the best We need to focus on developing your economy in Ukraine.
	And you need to focus on developing your natural gas and oil capabilities, right?
	She was the spokesperson for the Department of State, Victoria Nuland.
	Back then in 2014?
	It says former spokesperson for the United States.
	I knew she was the Department of State, I just didn't know what her position was.
	Yeah, so she was at the Department of State.
	She's heavily involved.
	She's an American diplomat.
	If you go back, look at her background in 2014 as I kind of talk this through.
	So 2014, then you have failed Vice President Biden coming in, into Ukraine.
	As he's talking to Poroshenko, the newly installed leader of Ukraine, courtesy of RC LIA, right?
	John Brennan.
	Side note, John Brennan is the same dude that decided to vigilante style, no due process, say, hey, this guy Anwar...
	Even though he's an American citizen, we're gonna waste him.
	Drone strike, murder, done.
	That's Barry Hussein, C. L.A. Director.
	Now, whether this guy is evil or not, there's a little bit of due process that's required in order to murder an American citizen, wouldn't you think?
	Oh, yeah, of course.
	If the government's going to do it.
	With a drone strike?
	And I got it right here.
	Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs.
	There you go.
	That was her official title.
	So, Secretary of State, but she had a very particular position in the Department of State.
	So, she was that state that covered Europe and Eurasia, which is like...
	West of the Urals from the Russian Federation over to basically Portugal, Spain.
	And she was U.S. Ambassador to NATO from 2005 to 2008.
	There you go.
	Victoria Newland.
	Before that.
	So Biden's in there, presenting to, imagine you're Petro, and I'm like, hey, hey, bro.
	I got an idea for you.
	Really?
	Let's hear it.
	Check this out.
	My son, man, his sense of smell is so good.
	His left nostrils, it can sniff out oil fields for you.
	For Burisma.
	Right?
	Yeah.
	And his right nostril can sniff out, did I say oil?
	Gas fields.
	Really?
	Yeah.
	So you take him on.
	$1 million a year so that he can use that for his hookers and blow.
	Okay?
	And I'll provide you top cover.
	How do I provide you top cover?
	As long as I get 10% for the big guy, you get a billion dollars.
	But what I need you to do is stop your prosecutor general from investigating the company that you're going to help me put my son on.
	Because he's looking for a job since he just pissed hot on his urinalysis while trying to be in the naval reserves.
	And I'm acting like I'm Biden, right?
	Joe Biden?
	And guess what?
	I had to get him a waiver because of his age, my son.
	Again, he's the smartest guy I know, right?
	And number two, I had to give him a waiver because, man, he loves that crack, that pipe, and he loves that cocaine.
	So we're looking for a job for him.
	You want to take him in as a board member of Burisma?
	You know what?
	I'm going to throw in that package as I talk to my boy John Kerry, his nephew, Devin Archer.
	Let's throw both of them in.
	What do you say?
	Deal?
	Sounds good, man, but...
	That dude smokes crack like the best of them.
	You sure he can smell oil?
	Yeah.
	You sure?
	I think so.
	I mean, think about it.
	Probably both nostrils he can pull out.
	Some oil fields.
	And it'll help develop Burisma.
	Man, you make some money.
	I'm going to give you $1 billion in four and eight as long as you get 10% for the big guy in the joint bank account with my son, Hunter.
	$1 billion?
	Yeah.
	Count me in, brother.
	Woo!
	Count me in.
	That's basically what happened, folks.
	Don't believe me?
	Look it up yourself.
	Well, there was him at a press conference threatening to get that prosecutor fired.
	That's exactly what I'm referring to, yeah.
	So yeah, it's 100% true.
	There's a video of it.
	It is.
	He said it right there.
	He admitted to it at the Council of Foreign Relations with Mr.
	Haas, executive director of the Council on Foreign Relations.
	That's crazy, bro.
	We're just getting started, man.
	We're just getting started on the Biden Criminal Syndicate.
	And they said Biden was dumb.
	Back in the day, he was on point.
	Too sharp.
	You want to go back in the day?
	When were you born?
	92.
	92.
	Check this out.
	What was going on in 1973?
	Let's say about January 3rd.
	January 3rd, 73?
	Yeah, January 3rd.
	So every January 3rd...
	I think Ted Bundy had just escaped from prison.
	So check this out.
	Every January...
	I'm not kidding around.
	They were like, hey, I didn't escape prison right around that time.
	It was 72, but yeah, we'll continue on.
	No, I'm kind of sticking to the Biden criminal safety here, right?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah, my bad.
	Exactly.
	You're probably right.
	So January 3rd every other year in the odd years is when the new House of Representatives comes into play, like the new Congress.
	That's why right now we're in the 118th Congress, right?
	Every time it's like, in January 3rd of 2025, it's going to be 119th.
	So back in 1973, January 3rd, guess who won their election as senator?
	As the junior senator from Delaware.
	Your boy failed Vice President Biden, right?
	So anyway, this guy's been in power for what, 51 years now?
	Yeah.
	Wow.
	So begs the question.
	He came on as a senator at 29, right?
	Senator at 29?
	Yeah.
	30, because you've got to be 30 as a senator.
	Okay, okay.
	Minimum 30.
	Now, he may have been 29 when he was elected, but you have to be 30 by the time that you take office.
	Yeah, I think he got elected at 29.
	So check this out.
	Remember when we started out with, what's deep state?
	Generational incestuous corruption.
	Yeah.
	What's 51 years?
	Is that pretty generational?
	You were born in 91?
	92.
	Would you say that generational?
	So then it begs the question, like, then you start to do the link analysis, something that I used to teach.
	You were in 1811, like the 301 or the 0132s?
	Yeah, 0132 is intelligence, but yeah, 1811, yeah.
	So think about this, just to kind of...
	0132s, they don't carry, but Intel...
	But that's a long time, though.
	It is.
	It's a very long time.
	It's longer than I've been alive.
	And I'm old, you know, but I still got...
	I'm still pretty fresh and fit, you know?
	I'm just saying.
	I heard some ping over there.
	So just to kind of frame it in the DHS and what your background is, imagine the 132.
	They got to go through training, right?
	Yeah, for sure.
	They got to become a basic level intel analyst, right?
	Well, where do they go?
	Some of them actually go through the program that I ran.
	Yeah.
	So like I said, I know the system pretty well.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Going back to the Biden thing, as I'm doing the link analysis of these people, to answer your question, because we got sidetracked, what's my why, right?
	Why am I doing this?
	Yeah.
	So when I was on the Ukraine crisis team, I saw this.
	I was at the Defense Intelligence Agency.
	The director of the Defense Intelligence Agency was General Flynn.
	Oh, shit.
	In 2014, when Barry Hussein decided to resign General Flynn because he was speaking truth to power during testimony about Ukraine, about ISIS not being a JV team, and the whole Iran deal.
	If you look at his background, you guys probably don't know that much about the military, but let me kind of contextualize it.
	Imagine, of all the 193 countries in the world, and you look at the one country that has the most capable military, and then within that military, you look at what is the most capable, like, badass unit that exists in that military.
	And who's the intelligence officer for that badass unit?
	Probably a pretty capable individual, right?
	Of course.
	And then from there, that individual then is picked to be the number one intel officer to go ahead and work the Afghan problem.
	And then from there, he gets to go and be appointed as what's called the Assistant Director for National Intelligence for Partner Engagements.
	In that position, he's in the role to coordinate and synchronize with every single interagency actor at the highest levels.
	Right?
	Globally, within our U.S., national, all the cabinet levels, state, local, tribal, domestically.
	So it's the one person in the entire intel community that has insight and visibility on literally every federated aspect of the American constitutional order in order to provide both domestic, foreign, and protection to the country.
	Of course.
	That's before he became the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency.
	I'm talking about General Flynn.
	Yeah, this is General Flynn that had all this authority.
	Yeah, so he was literally right in everywhere.
	Everything.
	He had, shit.
	I don't even know what, would that be considered what, a Yankee white clearance or some shit like that?
	He's damn near getting the same briefings the president's getting.
	As the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, you're, you know, basically, you are running the most, the largest intel organization on the planet.
	And if by extension, because in some capabilities, when you look at the military intelligence program, the national intelligence program, you have influence over and insight and visibility on what's going on at the NSA, the NGA, National Reconnaissance Office.
	So when you...
	CIA and everybody.
	No.
	Not CIA. Not DIA. So when you're looking at all the defense-related programs and the Defense Intelligence Enterprise, which is way bigger than CIA, etc., in terms of money, budget, and personnel, absolutely.
	I'm glad you mentioned CLIA. So with the CLIA, not to be confused with the FBI, again, he didn't have insight and visibility, but if you've been in the system long enough and you had to synchronize with those agencies, you know enough people and you know enough to find out the details, right?
	Just think about it.
	If I know you and you're at DHS and I trust you, I know you're going to know stuff.
	I just won't know the details and I'm gonna have to ping you, right?
	Yeah, of course, yeah.
	So imagine you spent 33 years in the system, you're gonna know people, right?
	So by the time he rolls around to become, I'm getting ahead of myself, the National Security Advisor, and as he's going into the transition period, he's kind of like, well, I want to look at an audit, because when he was the director, he was looking at auditing what was going on, contractors, etc.
	Well, people start to squirm, right?
	If you are conducting generational corruption, And some dude that's completely clean comes in and says, hey, I want to look at the books.
	Uh-oh.
	Whoa.
	No, no, you're not looking at the books.
	Right.
	Yeah, I am.
	I'm the director.
	There's pushback.
	Of course.
	The deep state starts to push back.
	Okay?
	I observed it internally.
	I'm like, oh, yeah.
	Clean.
	My background is pretty good.
	Pretty clean.
	Fresh, fit, and clean.
	Mr.
	Clean.
	What do you got?
	You pinging it over there?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Every time I say it, you got to even ping it?
	Boom!
	No, I want explosions, man.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	You got a little ping shit in it.
	That ain't enough.
	No worries.
	You got your own side effect out, man.
	You got to bring the heat, man.
	Energy.
	You got a little coffee in here?
	I'll be pinging off the walls before you know it.
	So check this out.
	So they're squirming, right?
	Got to look at the books, right?
	Audit.
	Ooh.
	So they're pushing back.
	And so Obama resigned him.
	Probably that was one of the reasons.
	FBI opened up an investigation.
	But by the time he becomes the National Security Advisor, and he's like, hmm, I want to audit the whole thing.
	So for those that aren't really understanding how our system works, remember, I used to teach this.
	This is how it works in the simplest terms.
	You got the president up here.
	You get the National Security Advisor and the National Security Advisor It has responsibility over the entire national security, domestic, and foreign policy portfolio.
	It is the one position that has the biggest portfolio.
	33 plus agencies that you oversee.
	Intel community?
	Except CIA and FBI. No, no.
	Including CIA. Including FBI's intel component.
	The FISA process.
	Right?
	Yeah.
	Because that's the guy briefing the president.
	Directly.
	So the direct reports to the president are all the cabinet level, the secretaries, And then the National Security Advisor, as well as the Vice President, are statutory members of what's known as the National Security Council.
	So like the highest level, you're talking Yankee, White, all that, right?
	The highest level, most classified briefings are literally those three individuals at a minimum are going to participate.
	You got other advisors that are normally part of those meetings, but that's it, right?
	One more time for the people.
	President, National Security Advisor, who's the third guy?
	Vice President.
	Vice President, okay.
	Yeah, that makes sense.
	Yep.
	So...
	If you're the National Security Advisor and you're like, you know what, I'm going to audit the CIA's black budget.
	Not to be confused with BLM. Actually, to be confused with my BLM. Because if you're scratching the surface into the CIA's black budget, you might stumble across some of the Biden criminal syndicate laptop stuff, right?
	You might start, because here's how it works.
	The most sensitive things that the CLIA does is what's known as presidential...
	I say covert action, right?
	Yeah.
	So what is that?
	When you look at...
	Again, everything I'm saying is based on publicly available information when you compile it.
	There's a thing called a presidential finding.
	If you want to pull it up back there, the wiki article on it, what that means.
	Real quick, Bill, if we can, presidential finding.
	I'll summarize it for you.
	So the president...
	Basically says, you know what?
	I am going to task you, the CIA, John Brennan.
	Imagine this.
	In the United States, a presidential finding, more formally known as a memorandum of notification, MON, is a presidential directive required by statute to be delivered to certain congressional committees to justify the commencement of covert operations by the Central Intelligence Agency.
	What does that mean specifically?
	So I'm going to name names on how that would look.
	Sure.
	Right?
	Because when you look at this, remember, I'm a lawyer.
	When you look at the statute and how it's supposed to roll, this is how it's supposed to roll.
	Imagine I'm, hmm, George Bush, the president, right?
	Or I am Barry Hussein, the president.
	I then look over to my CLI director, John Brennan, right?
	Et cetera, et cetera.
	And say, hmm, I'm going to authorize you to...
	Do covert action...
	Name one that you've heard of as you've read through life that you think is a covert action.
	Kill Soleimani.
	Kill Soleimani.
	That's going to be done at the highest level.
	Trump did that back in, what, 2020 or whatever.
	Now, what about stuff that is actually domestically oriented?
	As far as, like, making that hit happen?
	As far as anything beyond that.
	Well, you'd probably want to get...
	Is it possible JFK? What about JFK? Oh, is that possibly a presidential finding?
	Oh, yeah.
	Possibly?
	Yeah, yeah, for sure.
	I'm not saying it is.
	I'm just saying, hypothetically, right?
	Well, Trump did try to declassify it.
	So here's how it works, right?
	What if the National Security Advisor is walking in and saying, you know what?
	I want to look at every single presidential finding on the books that exists.
	And I want to audit, and I want to see who was involved, and I want to see who funded it, and where the money's going, and if it's still on the books.
	Every program.
	Because every presidential finding leads to a CIA covert action.
	Correct.
	I see what you mean.
	Okay.
	So you're able to backtrack it that way.
	So then, if the National Security Advisor does that, and hasn't been involved in any of them, and is clean, and his fingerprints is not going to be anywhere near it, who starts to squirm?
	Ah, I see what you mean now.
	Who was the Vice President for Ronald Reagan, who later became the President, and before being the Vice President for Ronald Reagan was the CLIA Director.
	George Bush Sr.
	George H.W. Bush.
	Is he and his family starting to squirm if this National Security Advisor is going to start looking?
	Not to be confused with Junior, guys.
	Bush Sr.
	Who was Bush Sr.'s Secretary of Defense?
	Colin Powell?
	Liz Cheney's dad.
	Oh, yeah.
	Liz Cheney's dad.
	You start to see how this is playing out?
	What about Barry Hussein's C.L.I. Director?
	Johnny Boy Brennan?
	So, if I'm auditing all these folks that have their names on it, and if they committed a transgression, you think they're going to lock arms to...
	Whoa, whoa, whoa, we can't have that.
	Yeah.
	And that's what you saw develop in 2016, right after Mike Pence was foisted on Donald Trump to be the Uniparty's handler, the deep state handler of Trump for his first term.
	Ah, okay.
	As soon as that happened in July 2016...
	So, Flynn comes in and says, I want to start looking at some of this stuff.
	Okay.
	July 2016, as soon as Trump was basically told you're gonna take Pence, otherwise we're gonna support Hillary.
	Trump had no option because he only had one-third of the vote at that time.
	Two-thirds of the Republicans were anti-Trump.
	So they had the leverage through like Reince Priebus, the chair of the Republican Party, Speaker Paul Reince.
	People forget that he was highly unfavorable in the Republican Party.
	Yeah, two-thirds didn't support him.
	But he still like obliterated everybody else because there were so many people.
	They had to basically get behind him.
	Right, and so that was kind of the deal, and then two weeks later, just based on documentary evidence that I've compiled, it's out there publicly, they launched Crossfire Hurricane, which was the illegal spying operation through Carter Page into the Trump campaign, as well as the illegal spying operation on General Flynn.
	And so if you are afraid, you already know that if Trump wins, Flynn is going to be in and is going to be doing basically what I'm saying.
	Yeah.
	You got to take steps to make sure he's out, right?
	How did they know that when Flynn gets in, he was going to want to look at the presidential findings?
	He already said it.
	Oh!
	He didn't say it specifically like that.
	I'm extrapolating based on...
	If you want to watch the movie General Flynn, deliver the truth, whatever the cost.
	I actually was going to watch that.
	Long story story, I was in Vegas.
	I did an interview with Jake Shields and we talked about General Flynn for a little bit.
	And I was like, I need to watch this documentary because he had him on.
	He can imagine that if you went into those documents, you might get fired, right?
	Did he know that if you went looking for those things, you might get fired or no?
	I don't think so.
	No, I mean, you're just trying to make sure that taxpayer dollars are used appropriately, right?
	It's like, ah, this ain't good, this ain't good.
	So he basically alluded that he was going to look into presidential findings.
	No, if you guys go back and even look up the New Woke Slimes, is the newspaper outlet.
	If you type New Woke Slimes and put Flynn audit, you'll probably come up with an article.
	Where's he now?
	Flynn.
	Where's he at?
	Yeah.
	Well, let's see.
	Is he still being, like, spied on?
	I think he's somewhere in Florida.
	You got cameras on my phone?
	No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
	You can't see it.
	You can't see it.
	No, no, so he's here in Florida, probably.
	No, I mean, bottom line, let me kind of go on this tangent, and we can go into detail.
	Do you think Flynn was in jail?
	No.
	No, they had him under investigation.
	I know that.
	FBI tried to get him for false statements and shit.
	He was never charged with a crime.
	The evidence that they were using as called criminal information that they used to coerce him into a guilty plea was based on false testimony of Peter Strzok in coordination with Lisa Page, two FBI officials.
	Again, we can go into details on all these people.
	I got 600 people.
	I can give you their background dossier by name, date, place, and transgression of what they committed from the illegal spying operation on Trump and how all of them have been involved in the coverup since then.
	To include the illegal election and the illegal certification on January 6th, the fedsurrection, the fedsurrection cover-up.
	I've led that investigative effort and I've been working with members of Congress.
	We could definitely talk about January 6th as well.
	But sorry, continue.
	So General Flynn was never charged.
	He was coerced into a guilty plea in order to protect his son from being criminalized because the Mueller team basically told him, you're going to go ahead and take guilty plea.
	If you don't, we're going to go after your son until we find a crime.
	And we've got an unlimited budget, so you want to try us, you can go ahead and fight us, and guess what?
	It's going to be a D.C. jury, so 96-97% of them, they're just going to believe us because they hate you.
	Because we own the media, and we already told them that they need to hate you.
	The commie tubes and the commie searches were leveraged as well.
	The New Oak Slimes was told what to write, right?
	The Washington Compost, fake book, Insta garbage, right?
	All these scum.
	Raw sewage, some people pronounce raw story.
	Even Paul Ryan, who's on the board of Faux News, right, was leveraging that position.
	You heard of him?
	Fox News, people pronounce it?
	Yeah.
	Faux News?
	No, but let's say they come after you.
	Can you ever really fight back against the deep state or not really?
	I'll give you an example.
	The deep state went after General Flynn.
	They tried to discredit him.
	You do a search on CommieSearch and it says, worst person in the history of humanity.
	Biggest traitor ever known.
	No mammal has been such a traitor, right?
	The auto-populator.
	Can we pull up his wiki page real quick, bills for the audience, so they know who this is?
	General Flynn.
	After Sidney Powell came on, his new attorney came on after the Mueller team basically said there's no Russian collusion even though the media said that there was.
	He basically pulled his guilty plea and started fighting back.
	And what happened?
	They dismissed the case against him.
	But when they dismissed the case against him, the judge, Judge Sullivan, who's like this with Eric Holder, who was the former attorney general for Barry Hussein—I'm talking about Obama, right?
	Yeah.
	They basically said, no, you've got to keep him in this status to force a pardon by Trump.
	Meanwhile, dude— So they tried to get him for lying, yeah.
	False statements.
	Never charged with the crime.
	Coerced into a guilty plea.
	When the evidence was disclosed that it was a lie that they used in order to coerce him into a guilty plea, he pulls the guilty plea, and then the DOJ dismisses the case.
	And then the judge refuses to dismiss the case.
	And then the judge, the first time ever in American history that a judge refused to dismiss a case that the prosecution wanted to dismiss.
	It's the first time ever in American jurisprudence history.
	And it's the first time in American history that somebody got what's called a pardon of innocence because there was no charge.
	I was going to say he got pardoned.
	There was no crime.
	By Trump, right?
	There was nothing.
	I think Trump pardoned him, yeah.
	By Trump.
	But there was no crime.
	If you watch the movie, he didn't even want the pardon.
	There's no reason for it.
	Because if you're innocent, there's no reason for a pardon.
	But by doing the pardon, it allowed them to back off and say, hey, look, he's a convicted felon.
	That's why Trump had to pardon him.
	And it puts Trump in a bad spot because Trump is supporting him.
	So it puts Trump in a bad spot, too, by default.
	Yeah, they had to take out the—they could handle Trump because Trump didn't know the system.
	They could just run circles around him, which they did a lot, right, in the first term.
	And the one person that could have advised him and could have basically protected his flanks from the blind spots of the deep state was Flynn.
	They had to keep him out.
	Wow.
	That's why.
	So that's my...
	That's a long answer to your question of why am I in this?
	When I observed firsthand, secondhand, that they were doing this to somebody that I massively respect for speaking truth to power, you crossed my red line.
	Okay?
	So now I felt compelled...
	To identify which individuals in that deep state did what with maximum evidence.
	See, and now I'm coming after them, and a lot of people are on board with this.
	You know what's crazy?
	You were in those positions to actually understand what's happening behind the scenes, so you can have a really good background on what's happening.
	Because most people, we didn't even know this.
	I didn't know this.
	You can't know because, like, you're not in the position to know.
	I get it.
	So I find it my obligation to explain this.
	So would it be fair to say, so it started...
	It started, because Fresh asked you, hey, what prompted you to start this?
	So it started, I would say, in 2014 when you saw what was going on with Russia and Ukraine.
	Yeah, just something that didn't feel right.
	Something that didn't seem right with the whole Biden stuff.
	Yeah.
	John Brennan.
	Yeah.
	I didn't know the details.
	So you had questions at that point, and then when you saw what happened to Flynn, you said, okay, that's it.
	2016, 2017, it's like you crossed a red line, and I'm like, I'm all in.
	I started attending all the hearings.
	Were you still working for the government at this point?
	Yeah, I was...
	What were you working as?
	So you were the liaison over there in Ukraine, like you were there because of your background and your language came in?
	Not in Ukraine, in the Pentagon in 2014.
	It was a short assignment.
	Okay.
	And so I was, back then I was active duty.
	2016, most of, like half of 2016 I was deployed in the Middle East.
	Okay, where were you at?
	As a company commander in Jordan.
	Okay.
	So we're doing the joint mission for ISIS. It was foreign internal defense helping them out to counter the ISIS threat and some other stuff.
	Okay.
	So, that was 2016 during the whole campaign cycle, right?
	Yep.
	Going into 2017, as General Flynn becomes the National Security Advisor, I was talking to the transition team to get on to the National Security Council with General Flynn, and there's another individual that kind of led that effort.
	But instead, on January 24th, FBI Director Jim Comey Deputy Director Andy McCabe sends two agents, Peter Strzok and Joseph Pientka III, to interview General Flynn with the purpose of getting him to lie or to get him fired.
	January 24th.
	This is 2017 now.
	2017.
	Four days into the new administration, the first, right?
	First Trump term.
	Yeah, because Trump got sworn in, what, December 20th or something like that?
	January 20th.
	Oh, January 20th.
	Four days earlier.
	Okay.
	Oh, yeah.
	Check this out.
	Peter Strzok was a senior guy at the FBI, right?
	One of his subordinates that was on the Crossfire Hurricane team, which was the illegal spying op on Trump, He's also one of the two guys that's sent to interview General Flynn.
	The notes of the assistant director of counterintelligence at the FBI, Bill Priestap, he even said it.
	During the process of disclosing what information that they had in order for him to pull his guilty plea later, they found out that it was Bill Priestap that said, are we going after Flynn to get him to lie or to get him fired?
	So they sent him to interview him about his communications with Russian ambassador.
	The reason why he was talking to the Russian ambassador and probably a hundred other countries National Security Advisor equivalents, right, or something like that, is because he's about to be the National Security Advisor, right?
	Yeah.
	Makes sense.
	Yeah.
	But they had to take him out because, remember, he was twice appointed by Obama as Assistant Director for National Intelligence, Director of Defense Intelligence Agency.
	Yeah.
	So, to them, they had to get him out.
	Because he knew the system too well to then expose their illegal spying op on the Trump campaign.
	And he's a threat because he's going to audit the system like we talked about.
	And he's going to expose left and right.
	The Bush syndicate, the Cheney syndicate, the Obama-Biden syndicate.
	Both political parties.
	So, Another key thing.
	I'm going after both political parties when it comes to this.
	You'll kind of see why.
	So the lead Russia analyst for Peter Strzok, one of the two guys that was sent to take out Flynn, a girl by the name of Catherine Seaman.
	When you look at her, you can't make this shit up.
	Catherine Seaman.
	Sorry.
	Relax over there.
	Producers are getting excited over there.
	Hold your breath, because you've got to take a deep breath as you laugh at the next one.
	So Catherine Seaman...
	George for the FBI. For the FBI, for Peter Strzok, one of the two guys that went to take out General Flynn.
	She's married to Joshua Pitcock.
	What?
	You hear that in the background?
	Ain't no way!
	Drum roll.
	Drum roll this.
	Catherine Seaman married Josh Pitcock.
	Guess who Josh Pitcock works for?
	Mike motherfucking Pence.
	Oh.
	Shit starting to make sense now?
	What was his position?
	Chief of Staff.
	For the Vice President.
	His lead employee.
	Yeah.
	So imagine this.
	Fresh.
	You're Mike Pence.
	Nah, bruh.
	I'm your guy.
	I'm your chief of staff.
	I want to be Mike.
	You think we talk?
	Of course.
	How much?
	Every day.
	And because you're a statutory member of the National Security Council as vice president, you think I got the same access as you do in order to be able to advise and help you out with everything?
	Of course.
	All right.
	I would agree.
	And then, you think I talk to my wife?
	Yeah, every night.
	Okay.
	You think I talk to her about work?
	Semen.
	I don't work.
	Yeah.
	You think I talk to my wife?
	Yeah.
	About work stuff?
	Pillow talk.
	Especially since she is on the FBLI team that's going after General Friend.
	Was she an 1811 or was she an analyst?
	132.
	Okay, she was an analyst.
	Okay.
	Intel analyst.
	Yeah.
	So you see how this plays out?
	Yeah.
	What happens if I take...
	What happens is Ivan Raiklin...
	Uses the same technical capability that the FBI has when they do a FISA on us, but I use that same technology to dig into your communications with your chief of staff, and then your chief of staff's communications with his wife, and my wife's communications with her boss, Peter Strzok, and beyond.
	What do you think I find in that?
	Everything.
	Can we Google this guy real quick, Peter Strzok FBI? I want to pull his thing up real quick.
	Type in Peter Strzok FBI. I want to see what his position was with the Bureau.
	I'm sure the FBI isn't all bad, but at the same time, why would he be so sloppy to leave everything on the table?
	Why would he be so sloppy to just put it out there where it can be found?
	They didn't do it where it was found.
	So how did you get the info?
	I didn't say I did.
	Is it Sam, bro?
	I didn't say I didn't.
	Is that him?
	Yeah.
	This is him, right?
	Yeah.
	P.D. Pablo Strzok.
	Okay.
	He's a deputy assistant director of the FBI's counterintelligence division.
	And led the investigation into the Russian interference in 2016.
	So, okay.
	So, he ran the Clinton stuff, too.
	Hillary Clinton, remember, back in the day?
	So yeah, he was the...
	Okay, deputy assistant.
	Okay, so he's high up.
	Yeah.
	Hey, hey, hey.
	By the way, man, I don't want to be on the deep state radar, so let me know now what gets us on our radar.
	Well, I mean, I'm on the radar.
	I've been investigated 20 times across DHS, DOD, DOJ, and the Congress.
	Really?
	For what?
	Over 20 times.
	Why?
	For what?
	What's their...
	Because I'm trying to...
	I was going to say, what charge?
	Like, are they trying to come at you?
	What's the bullshit charge they're trying to come at you?
	No, there is no charge.
	It's just an investigation.
	You're just...
	Okay.
	Just them waiting around.
	Okay.
	So, sorry.
	So, Peter Strzok...
	They're trying to find something on me.
	We got him.
	Yeah, of course.
	They're trying to.
	So, okay.
	So, his wife, an analyst...
	Or, no.
	Excuse me.
	No, no.
	Peter Strzok's employee.
	Employee.
	Yeah.
	Catherine Seaman.
	Yeah.
	Catherine Seaman.
	His analyst is married to the Chief of Staff for Pence.
	Okay.
	Bro.
	Gotcha.
	Gotcha.
	You know what we're gonna do?
	Yeah.
	If we can.
	If you go to...
	Let me send you something.
	Can we play this clip?
	Yeah.
	It'll quickly explain...
	Sure.
	I think the next few questions.
	Alright.
	It's a little video.
	Yeah, give it to me and I'll give it to Bill.
	Hey, man.
	We're trying to stay on YouTube, right?
	Or what we doing right now?
	No, no.
	What about YouTube?
	This will be alright for YouTube.
	Okay, good.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Let me know what it's not.
	So...
	Let me know what it's not.
	Well, actually, you know what?
	Before we play, you want to take a little...
	Do you guys do commercials?
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	I think it might be a good time for you to commercial break for the suspense because what I'm about to drop is pretty sweet.
	And I think since we're going to go for a minute, I'm going to give you some stuff that I've never released publicly, okay?
	Okay.
	Since I got to, man.
	Let's do it, man.
	Let's get this rolling.
	Okay.
	Listen, bro.
	Niggas may call me scared.
	I'm careful, okay?
	Very careful because nowadays you never know what's going to happen.
	You never know, man.
	Where from our sponsor?
	Yeah, Mo got this.
	Mo got this one?
	Yeah.
	I'll tell you this though, man.
	Deep State Man ain't no joke.
	Holy.
	This episode is sponsored by Rumble Premium.
	him.
	This sponsorship is from Rumble Premium, one that is incredibly important to the survival of the company.
	When Rumble first started in 2013, they built a platform for small creators.
	They didn't censor or have biases.
	They were fair and treated all creators equally.
	No one thought that platforms would censor political conversations or censor opinions on the bear bug.
	But they did.
	Facebook admitted that they felt the pressure from Biden and Harris administration.
	Rumble did not.
	They held a line.
	They are attacked daily for giving us a voice to talk to you.
	They are attacked in the corporate media.
	They are attacked in governments like France.
	They are attacked from brand advertisers who refuse to work with them.
	Corporate America is fighting to remove free speech.
	Rumble is fighting to keep it.
	Rumble will not survive without brand advertisers.
	But they don't get much of it.
	Watching our show on Rumble is the most they can ask from you.
	But if you really believe in this fight, if you have the means, one major way you can do is help Rumble survive is by joining Rumble Premium.
	Join the community that believes in the First Amendment and believes in our human rights to free speech.
	Rumble is offering $10 off with the promo code STUDIO when you purchase an annual subscription.
	So go to rumble.com slash premium and use the promo code STUDIO.
	And like I said, if you have the means and believe in the cause, now is the time to join Rumble Premium.
	If you don't have the means, we're just happy that you're watching us on Rumble.
	And thank you so much to Rumble Studio and Rumble Premium for sponsoring this episode.
	And just so you guys know, we might as well tell you guys this again, just a quick little reminder.
	Guys, we are going to, probably starting next week, we are going to start streaming on Rumble and Twitch only exclusively.
	We're no longer going to stream on YouTube, so we're only going to be putting clips on YouTube in short.
	So don't worry, you guys are still going to get a bunch of content on the Clips channel and on the main channel, but we're not going to stream on YouTube no more.
	We're just going to go ahead and put clips on there, and we're going to be streaming on Rumble and on Twitch, guys.
	So sup to Rumble?
	We're going to bring our Twitch back up.
	We're actually going to start doing Twitch subathons as well.
	So get ready, guys.
	We're going to be taking over Twitch as well.
	Some double dates.
	Back to the old days.
	You're like, hold on.
	Maybe, I don't know.
	We'll see, we'll see, we'll see.
	But yeah, other than that, so let's go back into it.
	So just a quick little summary for everybody.
	We've went into a lot of different things, right?
	Your background, what you do.
	We talk about how people have been, obviously the information that you have is, you know, people following you and everything else like that.
	It's very tough for you to even just get a flight, a peaceful flight to get to where you need to go to.
	Lawyer, Green Beret, soldier, worked in the intel world, significantly trained people up.
	And then you started exposing the deep state After two things occurred mostly, which is pretty much 2014, you saw the corruption that was going on in Ukraine.
	And then when you were there, still working for the military in the intel world.
	And then in 2016, seeing how they treated General Flynn and how basically he wanted to come in and get a little bit of, I guess, clarity on things going on.
	And they immediately worked to silence him, to stop him from being able to do that.
	These presidential...
	What's it called?
	Presidential...
	Findings.
	Findings.
	There you go.
	But I didn't know a lot of that.
	My gut told me something was wrong in 2017 when he was basically told to resign.
	Okay.
	And that's when I started the journey of digging and digging and digging.
	And that's what I found out that happened earlier through a lot of the disclosure that Sidney Powell was able to do as his attorney, the new attorney in Jesse Banal.
	And then I attended every hearing that he was a part of.
	Things just didn't make sense.
	So, like, when you know a person based on, you know, he was obviously my boss's boss's boss, but, I mean, when you know a lot of people in the organization and the people that worked for him, you kind of know a person based on the people around him.
	And everything the media that was saying about him as being like bad, bad, bad, it just made no sense.
	So I'm like, you know what?
	I'm a critical thinker.
	I mean, I'm going to take a look at this because I'm interested in what's going on.
	And that's when I developed every single person that was involved in taking him down.
	And I think I would say the next.
	So there's three strikes, right?
	The first one you talked about 2014 kind of got my radar going up.
	Yeah.
	2017, I was like a little bit more skeptical.
	But then later on when the illegal election took place with the whole COVID con.
	Oh you Rumble.
	You're going to be booted.
	Rumble, rumble, rumble.
	Rumble, rumble.
	Listen to Rumble.
	Listen to Rumble.
	No, not yet, because I'm not going to go into the details on that yet.
	Cool.
	Thanks.
	Thank you, sir.
	Well, I don't limit my speech.
	I just give it a little taste.
	Yeah.
	And then when they came after me, we can go into that.
	I think the story is similar to what your reasons also, maybe, for rolling out.
	Uh, yeah.
	I mean, you crossed my red line.
	It's...
	I mean, let's face it.
	When somebody punks you in the street, you're just gonna let them continue to do that?
	Of course not.
	Yeah, I'm not.
	I don't care how big you are.
	I don't care if you're a trillionaire.
	You confront me.
	F-A-F-O, okay?
	You want to test that?
	I don't care if you're the government.
	And guess what General Flynn and his family did?
	He asked, how do we confront them?
	You can't do anything.
	Well, guess what?
	General Flynn and his family crushed them.
	Freeman is exposing them.
	Now it's time for offense and accountability on their side.
	And I think that tees up this little clip pretty well.
	Many of you have probably seen it.
	I don't know.
	Have you guys seen it?
	It's where a national poison radio reporter comes up to me, right after the Weaponization Committee hearing.
	And I'm up in Congress almost every day when they're in session.
	That's your term for NPR? Yeah, National Poison Radio?
	Yeah.
	So anyway, this girl, I mean, she may be nice, right?
	I give everybody the benefit of the doubt.
	You know, doesn't really know anything about the system.
	Was probably tasked to come up to me and try to find dirt on me.
	I get it.
	And she asks me a few questions.
	And that thing went viral to the tunes of tens of millions of views.
	But what somebody did was there's a gentleman that took that clip Took out some stuff, and every name that I drop, he puts up the picture and a little bit of information about every name that I drop so that everybody knows who these people are, right?
	As we teach America who the deep state is by name and what they did, okay?
	And it covers a couple of categories on my deep state target list.
	And those categories include, there's 39 government officials to include Biden and Jamie Raskin's wife, Sarah, that illegally unmasked and spied on General Flynn.
	There's 51 you probably heard about, right?
	The spies who lied?
	Yeah, 51 people that signed off on the laptop being disinformation.
	And when you look at the detail and background of all those, almost all of them are former senior officials at the CLIA. Interesting.
	When you do the deep dive on them.
	When you look further, one of those names is David Buckley.
	Guess who he was after he said that the Biden criminal sent.
	He was one of those providing cover for the Biden criminal syndicate laptop, just like Mark Suckabuck.
	Right.
	Yeah.
	Just admit it to the buck ends here.
	Guess what?
	He right after January 6th.
	Guess what?
	He was appointed as in July of 2021.
	The staff director of the January 6th cover up committee.
	Oh.
	I follow all of these people.
	So as you start to learn, the whole thing gets unraveled.
	I think this video really hits it home in detail of who these people are.
	Let's roll the clip real fast for the people.
	Give me a break.
	This is a conversation with NPR reporters Zoe Chase and Ivan Raiklin on May 15, 2024.
	So my Raiklin account is still being censored by the FBI's Brian Otten, Laura Demlow, Joe Pienka, and Elvis Chan.
	So you started a new account?
	No, that still exists because it was reinstated.
	Those are the individuals that are at the FBI that run the censorship industrial complex on behalf of this illegitimate regime.
	Do you know those names?
	No.
	I can provide you much detail on them.
	They were the ones also involved in the original illegal crossfire hurricane spying operation on General Flynn, Carter Page, George Papadopoulos, and Paul Ranafort.
	I have receipts on every single individual.
	That's why they haven't really come after me yet, because if they bring me in, the entire regime comes crumbling down.
	So they are scared of me, not the other way around.
	That makes more sense.
	On your Twitter bio, I noticed today it said Secretary of Retribution.
	Yep.
	I just wondered what that meant.
	Yeah, that means that I will guarantee consequences for a list of at least 350 individuals that are on my deep state target list.
	Okay.
	And when you read that deep state target list, remember, I'm an attorney and a retired Green Beret, okay?
	Then I know.
	That I might be interested in talking with you more about, is your deep state target list, if you have time.
	Elon Musk has it.
	Michael Schellenberger has it.
	Matt Taibbi has it.
	The Judiciary Committee has it.
	The Weaponization Committee has it.
	The Oversight Subcommittee that is part of the House Administration Committee has it.
	The House Freedom Caucus has it.
	The Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, likely has it.
	And it's just a matter of time for a joint A press conference to take place between Speaker Johnson and Elon Musk to go ahead and disclose And release the Twitter direct messages of those individuals on my Deep State target list, proving the seditious conspiracy going back to 2016, the illegal spying operation on the Trump campaign.
	You're also going to find the involvement of Mike Pence and his chief of staff, Joshua Pitcock, in that conspiracy, along with Josh Pitcock's wife, Katherine Seaman.
	Who was the senior Russian analyst for Peter Strzok, who was one of the two individuals that was deployed by Jim Comey and Andrew McCabe to get General Flynn to lie or to get him fired, as per Bill Priestap's notes, which was the deputy assistant director of counterintelligence at the FBI. That's a long list.
	I can go in much more detail, but that's generally the crux of it.
	Do you get to meet with Jim Jordan and talk about this stuff?
	I meet with everybody.
	All these guys?
	Every single member that you think I talk to or may talk to, I talk to them.
	And what do you guys talk about?
	What's the reason that you talk to them?
	Everything that I put out publicly, I also provide that to them.
	And I guess what I mean is...
	I don't do anything behind machines, like, behind closed doors.
	I guess what I mean is, like, what are you hoping to get out of talking to them?
	Like, why do you do it?
	I want to guarantee Elon Musk discloses the direct messages for the mother of all Twitter files, so that...
	The entire country can see what just occurred to them, starting from the illegal spying operation, the corrupt DOJ and FBI. The raid on Mar-a-Lago was to seize the evidence that was declassified by Donald Trump in the last few hours of his first term,
	which involved the crossfire hurricane details, which would list all the names that I've mentioned so far, whether it was Lisa Page, who was Andy McCabe's chief counsel at the time, Along with Peter Strzok, a guy by the name of Joseph Pientka III, who is currently the number three individual at the San Francisco field office.
	You have the special agent in charge, you have ASAC, assistant special agents in charge, and then you have the ASAC for counterintelligence.
	That guy is a guy by the name of Joseph Pientka III, Who was the second agent that was deployed to interview General Flynn on January 24, 2017 in order to get General Flynn fired or to get him to lie.
	That was an entrapment.
	And that's the same agent that was deployed in August of 2016 to the Trump campaign to do what they call a counterintelligence briefing, a defensive one, but with the secondary purpose in order to, and this was him, Pientka, along with Trump, Chris Christie. along with Trump, Chris Christie.
	You know that Chris Christie's attorney during his Bridgegate scandal was Christopher Wray?
	I didn't know that.
	Well, now you know.
	And then the third person in that meeting was a guy by the name of General Flynn.
	Joe Pientka was deployed by the Crossfire Hurricane leadership, authorized by the general counsel at the time, Jim Baker, who then later became the Twitter 1.0 number two lawyer, to coordinate the censorship industrial complex to cover up and censor and suspend those individuals that exposed their corruption.
	Okay?
	And it just keeps mounting and mounting and mounting the cover-ups.
	This is just yet a...
	They're trying to take out Trump now because they were able to take out their first existential threat, which was General Flynn.
	Because he would have been the first one to go ahead and expose this level of corruption because he knows the system.
	Now that Trump knows the system after being four years in it, he is now an existential threat to that very DOJ, the national security apparatus.
	Remember, 39 individuals unmasked General Flynn.
	One of them was Jamie Raskin's wife, Sarah Raskin.
	Totally unlawful, unmasking.
	Look that up.
	The 51 individuals that said the Biden laptop had all the earmarks of a Russian information campaign, where your colleagues over at Folitico published that on their website, one of those 51 individuals is John Brennan.
	Another one is a guy by the name of David Buckley.
	David Buckley ended up becoming the staff director for Liz Cheney's and Benny Thompson and Nancy Pelosi's January 6 cover-up committee.
	So it's a pretty small world it sounds like.
	So David Buckley was tasked to create a list and do his deep state target list of political targets.
	So now it's my turn.
	I have a deep state target list and I'm coming for all of them.
	And what does that mean when I say coming for all of them?
	It means the most legal, moral, and ethical consequences to the maximum to include the maximum punishment for treason.
	We're going to, I personally guarantee, that they're going to face those consequences.
	And you can take a look at that list.
	Like, are you going to sue them?
	Is that what you would do?
	Just wait for it.
	You will see it.
	It will be so visible for the entire world to see and hear.
	I'll give you some examples.
	I'm going to incorporate the precedence that's already been set.
	So, we're going to incorporate what was done to General Flynn.
	We're going to incorporate what was done to Steve Bannon.
	What was done to Peter Navarro.
	What was done to Mike Lindell.
	What was done to Scott Perry.
	Translation.
	Expect to see live stream swatting raids of every single individual on that deep state target list because the precedence has already been set.
	Remember when Mike Lindell in the Hardee's parking lot?
	The FBI went and conducted armed robbery of him in Minnesota?
	Remember when Peter Navarro was swatted in an airport?
	Remember when Steve Bannon on multiple occasions within the U.S. Capitol Police Jurisdictional Zone conducted swattings and allowed for swattings to take place of Steve Bannon and his residents.
	Remember the armed robbery and burglary of Roger Stone that was live-screened by your colleagues over at Criminal News Network?
	That we're going to take in the collective and do that.
	It does not matter what It happens in the election.
	It does not matter who wins the election.
	This is going to take place at the hands of the American people with or without an election and with or without whoever wins the election.
	I guarantee you that that will take place at the county and state level because right now the federal government is not in a position because of its capture and its corruption.
	So imagine this.
	When you take a look at the direct messages and the geotagged location data of the 350 plus members on that deep state target list, and then you curate that Elon Musk, and then do geotagging of the communications, and then you present those communications to name the county of the 3,143 county and county equivalents in our nation.
	The 50 states and the six federal districts, right?
	Okay.
	And then you identify where a treasonous communication took place.
	And then you present that to the local DA, similar to good old Alvin Bragg.
	That then will create the nexus to showcase this criminal, seditious conspiracy and treason charge.
	And that local DA... The local sheriff will then be deputizing folks like Ivan Raiklin and those of us that were thrown out of the military because we did not comply with the illegal DNA mutilation injection, the forced DNA mutilation injection.
	Do you mean the COVID vaccine?
	I'm talking about the CCP 19 lab incident money-making scheme by Pfizer.
	The Pfizer fail, the murder and the mutilation, or whether it was just the myocarditis making, heart exploding, J&J jab.
	So those of us that were either thrown out or left because we would not participate in the DNA mutilation of our own physiological beings.
	There's 80,000 of us that are ready, willing, and able in order to be deputized by appropriate sheriffs throughout the country to be participants as lawful deputies to conduct the livestream swatting raids of every single person that we can identify that conducted the necessary unlawful activity by county on my deep state target list.
	Two questions.
	Where did you get the 80,000 number?
	My first question.
	Yeah.
	So...
	8600, about 8500 approximately were thrown out of the military.
	Okay.
	Because they wouldn't do the vaccine?
	Because it wasn't a vaccine.
	The name of vaccine, the definition changed before the rollout and it was never approved by the FDA. There was never a product that was approved by the FDA to then be able to coerce and manipulate into other people's bodies.
	Don't believe me.
	Look at the footnote on FDA's own quote-unquote approval of Pfizer's Comirnaty.
	Legally distinct, and the product was never created.
	The Pfizer BioNTech was created, but that one was never approved.
	That was only under emergency use authorization.
	So I need to correct you on that one.
	You need to do some more studying, man, okay?
	Next, 80,000.
	As far as the 80,000 goes, that's the minimum that I see of folks that left the military early through retirement, ended their careers early because of the illegal mandate that was promulgated by and enforced by the entire chain of command.
	Those are also going to be, many of the members on the deep state target list are those military leaders.
	I call them failures within the Department of Defense and at the Pentagon that will face similar consequences for forcing and coercing unlawfully the mutilation of another person's body and thus minimizing and destroying our personal readiness within the DOD. So this is all post-2020 people you're talking about?
	No.
	Come on.
	Are you going to ask that question, that level of ignorance?
	2016?
	Crossfire hurricane?
	No, no, no, no, no.
	I'm not saying the 80,000 that you referenced.
	At this point, you're wasting my time if you don't even have that level of context.
	Take a couple hundred hours to research the subject, follow my work on Rumble.
	Once you see that, I want you to identify one thing that I have incorrect, and then you can start coming after me with questions to scrutinize it.
	Because you have not done the necessary, requisite research for me to even give you my time.
	So I think that's about it.
	Can I ask one last question?
	You don't have to answer.
	It better be intelligent.
	Well, I guess that'll be the eye of the beholder.
	You don't think...
	You were saying it doesn't matter what happens in the election.
	So you don't think you need sort of the protection of Trump's Justice Department to do some of what you're talking about?
	No, because we're going after the Justice Department.
	They are the enemy.
	That's what you fail to understand.
	The individuals that I mentioned are the enemy of our constitutional order.
	We're coming for them, maximally.
	And how we're coming for them is because we are engaging with counties and states in order to crush them.
	Via the sheriffs, basically.
	What do you think Alvin Bragg's doing right now?
	Is that a federal officer?
	Exactly my point.
	Look at the counties in this country that are red versus blue.
	It is overwhelmingly red.
	So Alvin Bragg and the Dems are setting our precedent as we go on offense.
	Well, thanks, Ivan.
	It's going to be a doozy.
	And I love it when it gets spicy.
	And there are, again, out of the 80,000 of us, we are clamoring to be deputized by sheriffs nationwide in order to conduct the necessary live stream raids, if they want to push us to that.
	So, if I did want to follow up with you, and you wanted to answer.
	And I'll say lastly.
	Yeah.
	There are over one million service members.
	I'm going to say this.
	You said Secretary of Retribution.
	The Secretary of Retribution consists of three divisions.
	Number one, The research arm.
	And should there be a mechanism where we create it, it's going to be the first division.
	Again, everything I'm telling you, I've already said it publicly.
	And I have many podcasts where I've said this.
	So, number one, we're going to have a research arm to continue to develop our targets.
	Okay?
	Okay.
	Number two, and that's going to be staffed by January 6th defendants, family members, as well as their lawyers, since they have already kind of conducted some of that research.
	So they're already kind of interned, if you will, over the last three and a half years.
	Number two will be the second division, which will include the action arm.
	The 80,000 of us that have decades of conducting action.
	This type of activity of action and targets overseas, right?
	And the third arm is going to consist of those that will live stream, right?
	Independent media, obviously not your organization, won't be included in that.
	But they will ride along.
	They will ride along and livestream the swaddings and raids of the 2nd Division that I just mentioned that are properly and appropriately deputized to conduct those raids.
	And then the first arm is obviously going to be the one that crates those lists.
	We're just using the playbook and the precedence.
	It has already been developed to target those that conducted lawful First Amendment activity on January 6th and everything downstream from that.
	So if you say you don't need, you know, you're not waiting for Trump's election, like, when are you planning to do it?
	Stand by.
	Just keep an eye on things.
	Okay.
	So how could I follow up with you?
	So you can follow everything I do online.
	Everything's public.
	But, like, if I wanted to ask you a question.
	I advocate for the most.
	These people are going to experience the most peaceful and patriotic, lawful, moral, and ethical It's legal, moral, ethical.
	I said it was peaceful and patriotic.
	It may not be peaceful for them, but for me it'll be peaceful.
	Don't forget to subscribe and click the notification bell for more must-see videos.
	All right.
	So definitely a lot there.
	Totally.
	Yeah.
	That covered a lot there.
	So then it's funny because you mentioned like Alvin Bragg is already doing it.
	So we need to go after it.
	It was just funny.
	The Democrats are doing something right for once.
	So it would basically be state level done deputization, which makes sense.
	Well, not yet.
	There's phases, right?
	Yeah, of course.
	Phase one is you have to create the political courage to do what the Dems are already doing.
	And I say that the fastest way to do that is for Elon Musk to go ahead and dig into every single thing that Twitter owns related to the Deputy General Counsel.
	At the time, Twitter 1.0's lawyer was there, which was Jim Baker.
	Jim Baker, this is why this guy is so important.
	From 2014 to 2018, Jim Baker was the general counsel of the FBI. 2014, right?
	Remember when we started this conversation in 2014?
	Well, over at the FBI, he was the senior lawyer of the FBI. What does that mean?
	Well, he was the one that authorized...
	The spying operation Crossfire Hurricane in 2016.
	So he knows all the details of it.
	He continued it, and he was probably also keeping an eye on the illegal FISA that was approved to spy on Carter Page.
	A little background on Carter Page.
	Here's what happened.
	In order to spy on an American citizen, you first have to present to a FISA court, meaning the FBI agent, the FBI, the organization, presents to a FISA court a document, like a binder, if you will, known as a Woods file.
	And that Woods file creates the necessary justification for the judge to say, hey, go ahead and give us the authorization to spy, meaning we're going to send over this authorization to the NSA, So we can wiretap everything, right?
	And observe and monitor this guy.
	In that Woods file, when you look at it in detail, here are two things that were in it.
	Number one, lawyer Kevin Clinesmith from the FBI included an email.
	That was the following.
	He sends an email over to his CIA counterpart asking, hey, is Carter Page, after he does his private business deals in Russia, because he's on the Trump campaign and as an advisor, is he reporting back to the CIA? The CIA guy says, yes, he is.
	Everything's above board by the book.
	The FBI lawyer...
	He's disclosing his foreign relations, which you typically have to do.
	He does everything by the book.
	Yeah.
	But what does Kevin Kleinsmith, the FBI lawyer, do?
	He manipulates that email and says, no, he is not, to include that in the Woods file.
	Interesting.
	Okay.
	Fraud.
	The senior intel analyst for Crossfire Hurricane, Brian Auten, Who later becomes the guy that is the Senior Intel Analyst for the Censorship Industrial Complex, who is also the guy that receives the Biden Criminal Syndicate laptop, but that's for later.
	You said he was the Chief Intel Analyst on this?
	Brian Auten.
	Yeah.
	SIA. For Operation Crossfire.
	Yep.
	A-U-T-E-N. Okay.
	So Brian Auten gives an assessment, right, as an analyst.
	On basically everything.
	To include whether or not, you know, he thinks that there's the Russia, Russia, Russia thing.
	Keep an eye on the background you got on this team, Crossfire Hurricane team, you still got the Peter Strucks, you still got the Catherine Siemens, all that relationship.
	So you're telling me that Mike Pence doesn't know anything about this?
	Or is he driving it?
	That's a question we got to find out.
	So Brian Aughton gives the assessment because these guys have TDS, like massive, massive TDS, and it's blinding them from reality.
	When you say TDS, what does that mean?
	Trump derangement syndrome.
	Ah, okay.
	You heard of that?
	No.
	Yeah, they just didn't like Trump that, okay, I get what you're saying.
	It's when you hate something so bad you can't see anything clearly.
	Got it.
	Like you're completely blinded while you're passionate hate, and the reason why you have that passionate hate is because the same individuals that I'm talking about that are involved in this, I'll give you an example.
	John Brennan, you look him up, he's a senior spokesman on Criminal News Network, CNN, to tell you what to think and believe about Flynn, Trump, etc.
	He's one of the guys, the senior guy, former CIA director, John Brennan.
	Jim Comey, the former FBI director, well, during this time, and the deputy director, Andrew McCabe, they're over on MSLSD, right, MSNBC? And they're telling you, like, Trump is the worst person in the history of humanity.
	Why?
	They're protecting themselves.
	They're manipulating the entire country, the public.
	Okay?
	And so that's why people have TDS, because the very people that ran this op are the same ones that are explaining.
	And then they send the general counsel over to Twitter 1.0.
	Yeah, Twitter 1.0.
	In 2018, when the Democrats won the House and Nancy Pelosi became the Speaker of the House, In San Francisco, providing top cover to start the censorship regime from out there.
	So, when Phase 1 starts with Elon Musk, since he moved Twitter to Texas, he is now safe as a company.
	Because he's no longer under the thumb of Gavin Newsom, the governor out there.
	Nancy Piglosi, right?
	The congresswoman from California.
	Or Mad Maxine Waters.
	Isn't it scary that at one point when she was Speaker of the House, you're like third strongest person in the United States?
	Yeah.
	Because if the Vice President, let's say the Vice President and the President die...
	She assumes power, becomes President of the United States.
	Speaker of the House.
	She's next.
	Speaker of the House.
	A lot of people don't know that.
	Speaker of the House is the third most important position in the United States.
	Her third most powerful.
	Wow.
	I think Secretary of State is next.
	I argue that the Speaker of the House is the most powerful person on the planet.
	You think so?
	Really?
	I'll explain why.
	Okay, go ahead.
	So when you look at our constitutional order, the U.S. House of Representatives is the organization that starts the budget process for our entire federal government.
	So our national budget, let's just say, is about $6 trillion a year.
	So if you're Speaker of the House, you get to decide how that budget into the global economy looks like.
	The whole thing.
	$6 trillion a year.
	You're the speaker for two years for one Congress.
	So you get to control $12 trillion over the course of 24 months.
	Name one other person that has that influence.
	Elon Musk is worth, what, $200 billion?
	Vladimir Putin is probably worth $250, $300 billion, even though it's not on the books.
	We'll just say it's $500 billion.
	That's not $6 trillion.
	The President of China, let's just say he's a trillionaire.
	That's only one trillion.
	The Speaker of the House, because if you look at the Chinese budget, their national budget, it's still not even close to America's.
	So that's why I argued the Speaker of the House gets to drive that entire thing.
	Number two.
	The Speaker of the House and the Senate Majority Leader.
	Who's Mike Johnson now, if I'm not mistaken.
	Mike Johnson and then Chuck Schumer on the Senate side.
	They have a law enforcement entity that's subordinate to them.
	Do they?
	Known as the Sergeant at Arms on each side.
	And those two individuals form two of the three Capitol Police Board members to control what the Capitol Police do.
	Okay, okay.
	So, wow, I didn't know that.
	So the Speaker of the House is basically, think of it as the Chief of Police for the Capitol Police.
	The Speaker of the House is above the Capitol Police.
	No, of course.
	That's what I'm saying.
	And the Senate Majority Leader is above.
	They're the equivalent to a commissioner.
	Like NYPD has a chief of police, then they got a commissioner above that who's a political head.
	That's the Speaker of the House to the Capitol Police.
	It gets even more interesting.
	I'm getting to the January 6th here.
	Okay.
	All right.
	Here we go.
	Here we go.
	So imagine...
	Okay, here.
	You're the Senate Majority Leader.
	Before we get into January 6th, did you have anything else that you wanted to do on Flynn?
	Or any of this other stuff?
	I mean, that video explained a lot of it.
	By the way, she wanted your phone number, bro.
	What's that?
	She wanted your phone number.
	You know that, right?
	Oh, her?
	Yeah.
	You noticed?
	She wanted it, bro.
	She was hot ready.
	I believe it.
	Fresh and fit.
	She wanted it, bro.
	I believe it.
	She kept asking for it.
	Did he give her?
	Oh, we even got the ding.
	Did he give her?
	No, I told her you can publicly comment on me on X. Okay.
	Get in line.
	Rejected.
	Get in line.
	Oh, shit.
	Get in line.
	No, no, no.
	That's the funny part.
	How can I reach you?
	I bet you will.
	Okay.
	To summarize that part, then we'll get into January 6th.
	We covered a lot.
	We covered what led you to here.
	We covered Flynn.
	If you think I know, I'm name dropping.
	I know the system.
	If you think I know a lot about the system, I introduced General Flynn's background.
	He knows the system a hundred times better than I do.
	But he knows the people.
	Because he was at the highest levels.
	Of course.
	I was at the mid...
	He dealt with all of them personally to a degree.
	He, yeah, personally communicated and worked with all of them.
	And matter of fact, when you watch the movie, Flynn's movie, Flynn Delivered the Truth Whatever the Cost, which...
	I'm going to watch it after this.
	You've got to watch it because you're going to, in two hours, literally understand what has happened.
	We need to bring him on.
	I'll try to help.
	Yeah, that'd be great.
	What has happened to basically all of it, all of us, over the last six years?
	Because he was the first guy they went after.
	Because he was the biggest threat.
	Now they got to take out Trump because he knows who he is.
	Oh, because you want to look into these presidential...
	That's one component.
	And number two, he would have identified who was doing the FISA to illegally spy on Trump.
	And it would have been like, whoa, whoa, whoa.
	It gets everybody.
	Who's next?
	What's the name of that term?
	One more time.
	Presidential findings.
	To me, that seems like...
	I don't want to say the linchpin, but it's like the presidential findings will tell you...
	Every single CIA covert up.
	Yes.
	And they didn't want him to see that.
	Wow.
	Because that exposes the black budget.
	Because theoretically, you can go all the way back to the fucking 60s and look at what they did to Kennedy.
	JFK. RFK. Malcolm X. Martin Luther King Jr.
	Who killed him?
	That's what he was trying to look into.
	There you go.
	And you know, that's interesting that you say that because we know.
	I mean, Tucker Carlson talked about this, I remember, years ago.
	When they first declassified JFK docs.
	Yeah, but when you have total...
	When you have all the documents, like, bro.
	Yeah, it's crazy.
	And Tucker...
	If Elon releases all the communications of Jim Baker, he then communicates with everybody at the FBI that were part of the crossfire hurricane and what to censor and who to censor.
	The FBI lawyer, yeah.
	Jim Baker, man.
	That's the key to the kingdom.
	This is interesting because, Tucker, I remember this vividly.
	When they first declassified the JFK documents like two years ago.
	No, they didn't declassify it.
	Not all of them.
	They declassified a part of it.
	This is back when Tucker was still on Fox.
	He mentioned, hey, I had someone who actually looked at the files and they said unequivocally that the CIA was involved.
	And I was like, holy shit.
	So could you imagine if Flynn actually was able to go back and look at exactly what was in there?
	I mean, Trump apparently said he saw it and he didn't want to declassify it.
	Which I should tell you what you need to know right there.
	So, damn.
	I think the Trump back in 2016 can't be the Trump of today.
	For example, he can't be the same because what he's been through with the deep state changed him.
	Had to.
	That's what I think.
	Yeah, but if you're the deep state, what are you going to do to keep him in the box if you let him in?
	Control him?
	That's it.
	You know who's going to do it?
	Should I start calling out names?
	Sure.
	What do you think of Kevin McCarthy?
	Interesting.
	I wouldn't think he would be...
	So Kevin McCarthy still has a lot of influence over the Congressional Leadership Fund, which is the biggest pack that supports U.S. House members, Republicans.
	He was the biggest fundraiser in the House.
	So you think he's just out in the shadows?
	If you look it up, he's trying to be the chief of staff for Trump 2.0.
	Damn.
	And here's how he's going to try to leverage it.
	And for all you members of Congress and staff that are watching and listening to this, here's how I think he's going to play it out.
	Everything's a game of leverage in politics, right?
	For sure.
	Or blackmail.
	But before we go there, because this is the other point that I want to hit on before we go on to this point, and we'll come back to it.
	As the Speaker of the House and the Senate Majority Leader, we'll go back.
	You control your sergeant at arms that you appoint and guess what they manage?
	They manage all the IT and the video and all security related matters in the house.
	So if any member in your house body and in the Senate has a transgression that you can pull up in their emails, And their staff.
	Blackmail.
	Well, hold on, yeah.
	Or their CCTV footage that you control through your sergeant at arms.
	And you're like, hey bro, you're gonna vote this way otherwise.
	I got this.
	Remember this?
	On this date from this camera angle?
	Oh.
	Remember this email?
	Oh, by the way, you don't know about this one.
	This is your staffer.
	This is what they were doing.
	You voting that way?
	You're going to vote that way.
	Yeah, you are.
	You're going to be like, okay.
	Is that huge?
	No, yeah, because you control the entire infrastructure.
	Isn't that what Epstein did to his people?
	Epstein?
	Yeah, but you as a Senate Majority Leader can look at your sergeant and say, hey, this guy in my party, he's not wanting to vote the way I want him to vote.
	Can you pull up everything?
	Oh, you got something?
	Thanks.
	Yeah, because imagine having politicians in your house every single day, them working from there.
	They send emails through there.
	They get horny in there.
	You know what I'm saying?
	They want some corn, some child stuff.
	You got them.
	That's not...
	That makes sense.
	Well, government computers...
	See how that leverage game works?
	I see what you mean.
	So if you're clean...
	You can kind of guess who's clean based on their voting record.
	Right?
	Thomas Massey.
	Oh.
	Exactly.
	Nobody likes him.
	Yeah.
	They hate him.
	I love that dude.
	He's the only one that got it right from the very beginning.
	Remember he asked for a vote in person?
	Yeah.
	Related to the thing that you can't mention on Commitube?
	Yeah.
	Which is the CCP lab incident stuff?
	Yeah.
	Which we can talk about that too.
	Yeah.
	Anyhow, I want to address that because that's critical.
	Most people don't understand.
	So when you know the insider baseball game of how this...
	And the speaker of the house and the top guy at the center have this access to this stuff.
	Yeah, if you're a lawyer and you're the one, I'm going to be like, well, this guy's just talking out of his ass, right?
	Why don't you look up Title II, U.S. Code, Chapter 29, read the whole thing, specifically two sections, 1967 and 1979.
	Title II. Title II, U.S. Code, 1967.
	And you take a look at that.
	It lays out...
	The jurisdictional authority of the United States Capitol Police, like the geographical space that they control concurrently and individually.
	And then 1979 talks about who has control over the security information, security footage, which would be CCTV, IT. And then you can go through all of that and look through kind of the House runs and all the rules and regulations.
	I've looked at all this, right?
	I'm not going to bore you with all the regulations behind it.
	But if you want to fact-check law, check me.
	Title II, U.S. Code, Chapter 29.
	From there, you're going to be like, oh my God, that explains Ray Epps.
	That explains why the mayor did this.
	That's why Nancy Pelosi did this with Yogananda Pittman and the chief of intel.
	Pulling strings.
	So, the next point you were going to make, Mr.
	Fit, we're going to come back to, because I want to address the U.S. Capitol Police thing.
	January 6th.
	No, before that.
	The CCP stuff?
	No.
	What was he talking about?
	Wait.
	Is the Speaker of the House having power?
	No, we're good.
	We addressed it.
	Speaker of the House, right?
	Yeah, we addressed it.
	We talked about Title II. Yeah, we talked about their authority.
	So, January 6th, I mean, you want to go there?
	We can.
	Oh, you were supposed to summarize everything that we had discussed with Flynn and everything else.
	Yeah, in two hours, you'll get everything, pretty much.
	If you want to go deep dive, then you got to go, obviously, I think I did a five hour deep dive.
	I can do a 40 hour.
	Okay, okay.
	But it'll have to go by like each different component.
	I think I'm going to start that 40 hour journey tomorrow night on my mother of all Twitter files space.
	Gotcha.
	It's actually going to be, it's going to come out to be the biggest, I think, subscriber based Twitter space so far.
	Let's go.
	So let's go.
	No, I'm, I'm just kind of confused because if I'm in deep state, you know so much.
	I'll take you out, nigga.
	How are you still here chilling?
	I like that question.
	I'm going to answer it this way.
	Are you a fed?
	This is how I'm going to answer that question.
	No, I'm not a fed.
	I'm out.
	I love that question because here's how it works.
	Imagine you're part of these people that I'm going after, right?
	I got 25 years in the system, right?
	The people that are doing the work that these guys want to happen to come after people like me, they gotta task somebody, right?
	You think I know all of them?
	A lot of them?
	Yeah.
	So if you're like a boss man, you're like, hey bro, agent so and so, I need you to look into Ivan Raiklin.
	Guess what?
	Guess what happens when that happens?
	You think I get an alert from somebody on the inside that I know that says, hey, you're being looked into?
	I do.
	And what happens next?
	They now get investigated by me.
	So imagine you're investigating me on behalf of these scum.
	I get alerted.
	I'm investigating you and I start to look at you.
	Your family, your friends, your neighbor, your entire lifestyle.
	And oh wait, I find something.
	And I post it online saying, hey, let's take a look at this dude.
	I write a Substack article about you.
	Or I write a Twitter post saying, hey, let's find everything out about, that you can find publicly available on Fresh.
	His family, his neighbors, his colleagues, everything.
	Oh, you found that he's done this?
	Interesting.
	And so now I get to increase the public understanding of who you are, where you work, what position you hold.
	And then I go into deeper.
	Oh, okay, you live here.
	Sweet.
	This is what vehicle you drive.
	And we start going through the ropes.
	Because we got access to a lot, right?
	Yeah.
	So imagine you're in that position.
	I got a platform that's pretty big.
	You don't.
	You're investigating me.
	You haven't found a single thing.
	You get to listen to me all day, every day, right?
	As I red pill you.
	Because you're listening to the Fresh and Fit podcast.
	Let's go!
	As I talk about it.
	And you're like, ooh, is it worth going after Ivan Raiklund?
	Because we found nothing on him.
	But I'm being told to keep my job.
	I've got to go after him.
	So what are you going to do?
	You tell me.
	What are you going to do in that situation?
	Keep watching?
	You keep watching me, but you can't really do anything, right?
	Yeah.
	Because then when you do something to me, what happens?
	I get called up.
	What happens if they come after me?
	Seriously.
	Everybody's gonna wanna listen to what I have to say.
	Right?
	And it only exposes them more.
	So then that's a risk.
	It's more risky for them to come after me than to just censor and silence me.
	It's safer to censor and silence me.
	That's what they've been doing.
	So they squeeze you rather than just kill you one time?
	They're like squeezing you.
	They try.
	It only motivates me to go after them harder.
	Got it.
	Okay.
	There you go.
	So that's my explanation.
	Fair enough.
	Because if you're a line analyst or an agent, you don't know what's going on at the high levels, right?
	Yeah, you don't know.
	You're just being told and tasked, Ivan's a bad dude.
	You've got to look into him and let's try to create a crime on him.
	But as you're listening to my calls...
	If you have anything, you just have a case open, but you don't do nothing with it.
	Right.
	You work on other shit that matters.
	Right, you got the case open, and okay, you're looking into me, but imagine you're looking into me.
	Do I come off as like totally unhinged, like completely?
	It's like, whoa, this guy kind of knows what's going on.
	Maybe there's some truth there.
	So as you, as a, if you're operating in good faith, you got nothing to hide because you've lived a clean life, then you're like, man, everything he says checks out.
	And yeah, his rhetoric goes up to the line, but he never crosses it.
	Every single time.
	So then what happens?
	I'm literally red-pilling the entire federal bureaucracy that's coming after me.
	Because I'm very transparent.
	I'm very open.
	Fair enough.
	That's my explanation of that.
	And plus I leverage my friends in the Congress.
	Makes sense.
	Fair enough.
	Networking, baby.
	Networking.
	Okay, so I'm going to...
	A quick little message from our sponsor, guys.
	This is from Be Naked.
	It goes, Let's cut the crap.
	Masculinity is under attack, but you don't have to be.
	Naked organs is pure power in a capsule packed with nutrient-rich bison organs.
	We're talking vitamin...
	Wait, wait.
	B12 to keep you lit.
	Vitamin D to keep you strong.
	Iron to keep you solid.
	And COQ10 to keep you sharp.
	No BS, just raw primal power to keep you dominating.
	And these bison, they're not lounging around like your lazy cousin.
	They're on the wild, battling nature like it's a 24-7 gym session.
	That's the kind of strength and resilience you're getting.
	Pure, untamed nutrients that keep your testosterone levels where they should be, not where some soy ladle says they should.
	Yeah, fuck that.
	Latte.
	Soy latte.
	For fresh drinks to soy latte.
	Latte.
	No, I don't!
	Sink up overpriced, underperforming products.
	This is for men who actually want to get shit done, not just talk about it.
	Hit up BeNaked.com, use code FRESH for 15% off, and start channeling that bison strength.
	If it doesn't work, you can send it back, no questions asked.
	So guys, stop being a pussy and drinking soy drinks against some goddamn BeNaked bison strength.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Yeah!
	Better save than a lot of you motherfuckers.
	He's older than you guys.
	Let's go!
	Let's go!
	Bison Energy.
	Bison Energy, motherfuckers.
	Be naked.
	Let's go.
	Wait, no, no, no.
	Let's go.
	No, I'm about to lose right now, bro.
	Ready, set, go!
	Ready?
	Oh, shit.
	That was it.
	Do it, do it, do it, do it!
	Let's go, let's go, let's go!
	Let's go, man!
	Let's just continue on!
	Don't get it!
	Come on, man!
	Don't get it!
	Continue on.
	I was like, what's going on here?
	Okay!
	That was random.
	I was just like, holy shit, what's going on?
	That was funny, man.
	That was random, though.
	No, I mean, it was helping amplify your message.
	No, I appreciate that, man.
	I didn't expect that.
	We should have coordinated it beforehand.
	It was good, though.
	The producer saw me take it out while you were reading it.
	I'm like, reading it.
	I'm like, oh shit, I had no idea.
	I like that zoom in, too.
	This is crazy.
	Oh, man.
	Dynamite comes in a small package.
	Awesome.
	Different, bro.
	Okay, so January 6th.
	Let's do it.
	January 6th.
	We covered the Flynn.
	I didn't know the coffee, bro.
	Victoria Newland, everything else like that.
	Let me see if we have some...
	I got you right now.
	Go ahead.
	January 6th.
	Yeah.
	Where do we begin this journey?
	Okay.
	I need a fit to listen in.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	I'm trying to get your water and stuff.
	No, no, no.
	I'm fine.
	He's like, talk about January 6th.
	I mean, come on.
	We gotta...
	Alright, January 6th.
	Before we talk about January 6th, I want to introduce my role in the entire thing.
	Okay?
	So...
	In November 3rd of 2020, when the election took place, okay?
	I watched it, observed it like everybody else.
	It wasn't called because there were still shenanigans going on.
	I'm observing it closely.
	So then come time.
	Thank you, sir.
	All right.
	Ah, I had my little Marco Rubio gulp moment when he was...
	Literally, bro.
	No, so November 3rd happens.
	A couple days later, I think it was Thursday, Friday, I'm watching it and really no one in the campaign or in, from my perspective, because I was kind of following closely, from the campaign or the White House had any sort of messaging out there on like how a presidential election takes place under the Constitution.
	So I'm like, alright, I'm going to take to Twitter and give my personal assessment based on my background and from the constitutional component, create a daily update on what the forecast is of who's going to secure the election.
	So I take to Twitter and I put out my Electoral College map.
	You know how they forecast the map with the Electoral College?
	But I was using the legal framework, not what the media was using as only one component, which is they called the popular vote in a state.
	Because that's not how it works.
	The way that states allocate their electors is confined based on Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2.
	And that means that the state legislatures, so like State House, State Senate, we're in Florida here.
	In Tallahassee, you have a State House and a State Senate.
	Both are Republican.
	So the state of Florida can literally today, the legislature, convene, or even on November 5th, later this year, And say, you know what?
	We're going to run our election how the U.S. Constitution allows us to.
	And we're going to reclaim the power and just say, directly allocate the 20, was it 9, plus 2, 31 electors that Florida has for president.
	And every state can do that, but their legislature.
	It's just that after the first few elections in our country, the legislature has decided to create what's known as election laws to then give that authority to the popular vote in the state.
	But they don't have to keep that.
	They can just decide on their own to take that power back without governor's involvement.
	Okay?
	Most people don't know that.
	I mean, it's clearly written in the Constitution.
	So, knowing that, and knowing that that's how our electoral college system works, I get it's complicated, but that's how it works.
	That's our rule book.
	I took to Twitter to explain that when there's a contested election or when a state hasn't certified, when a state conducted its election according to COVID measures and not according to the legislature's rules, which is the election law, then that state ran their election illegitimately.
	And the only way they can fix that is to run a new election according to this legislature or the legislator to vote on how they're going to allocate those electors.
	Well, when you understand that, 39 states ran their elections according to COVID measures in 2020.
	A lot of the mail-in ballots.
	Right.
	So 39 states just ran their election illegally, illegitimate.
	Now, I get it six were contested, but whatever.
	So as I'm observing and explaining some of this stuff...
	I take a look again at the Electoral Count Act, which gives you the details on how that works at the federal level.
	It gives the guide to the states on the process.
	And when you look at Title III, U.S. Code, Section 12, it says that if a state does not transmit its electors to the vice president or president of the Senate, Then the vice president has to send a demand letter on the states saying, hey, you didn't send me a slate of electors, please do so.
	This is why Pence was so critical.
	Absolutely.
	So I wrote a tweet, and in that, there was a memorandum attached to it.
	And that tweet was called Operation Pence Card.
	And it was to Mike Pence, CC real Donald Trump, subject Operation Pence Card.
	That's my tweet.
	It was retweeted by Trump.
	It went everywhere.
	By the way...
	When did you tweet this out?
	December 22nd of 2020.
	Because in the electoral count act it says, if by the 4th Wednesday, which would have been December 23rd...
	Yeah.
	So I tweeted it out the day before.
	Basically saying, hey, this is what you got to do, Pence.
	You got to send it back to the states because the states ran their elections illegitimately.
	39.
	And you need to...
	But I basically just said the 6th contested, right?
	Yeah.
	So if he does that, he's not basically dictating how those electors are going to go.
	He's telling them just to fix your shit.
	Yeah.
	Because you ran it illegitimately.
	It's illegal.
	So then he's telling them how to do it through that memo that I attached.
	One, hold a new election.
	Option two, just have a joint session over your legislature and vote.
	Or three, just abstain and don't send electors while you try to figure it out.
	He didn't do that.
	But Trump retweeted it.
	He didn't do that.
	And that's where all his problems started.
	Because I was calling it out.
	I was doing live streams.
	I had hundreds of thousands of people watching my stuff.
	I had a quarter of a billion impressions on Twitter at the time before they started censoring me.
	Fast forward.
	So that was under what I had advised through Twitter in my First Amendment capacity, Ivan Raiklin, what Pence should do under the framework.
	He refused.
	So then that takes us into January 6th.
	Did you ever get a correspondence from him or anybody from the Office of Vice President or no?
	I communicated to Mark Short, which is, at the time, Chief of Staff of Mike Pence.
	Okay.
	So it wasn't the other guy that we talked about before, the guy that was married to Seaman?
	No, because he left.
	After there was a little too much pressure and scrutiny on him, Mike Pence...
	Because of his obvious connections with FBI because of his wife.
	Joshua Pitcock replaced him I think at the time with Nick Ayers okay who's a very connected Georgia political operative for Brian Kemp you'll start to see why Brian Kemp operates the way he does in Georgia and why he stole the election in 2020 for Georgia yeah this dude I can go on each one one of two hours sure for sure like I understand so then after him it was Long story short, he got that guy out, had a new chief of staff.
	Right.
	This is a Mark Shore guy.
	And he spoke with you about this letter that you wrote.
	Not letter, but this memorandum.
	I didn't speak with him directly.
	I had other people convey to him what he should do.
	Okay.
	Through others.
	Gotcha.
	Okay.
	Never responded to you, though.
	Him.
	To me, no.
	Him.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	So then...
	You were talking about what he needs to do, the memorandum.
	I'm going to disclose some stuff that I've never disclosed, okay?
	Since we're on this subject.
	Listen up, motherfuckers.
	So if you look at...
	If you pull up J6 Transcripts, let's do that.
	Okay.
	J6 Transcripts.
	We'll Google that real quick.
	Go ahead and do a search and pull up J6 Transcripts.
	Type in J6 Transcripts Families, I think will come up, and then pull up that website.
	We'll pull up the Google page for you right now so you can guide us.
	Let's look at that because this is crucial.
	Bills, if you can, please.
	Just pull up the Google search bar.
	Is it j6families.org?
	I think that might be what it is.
	Alright, let's see what it is.
	I think Families or something is in there.
	Yeah, that one.
	Type in my last name.
	R-A-I-K-L-I-N. So what you're looking at here is a...
	K-L-I-L-I-N. R-A-I-K-L-I-N. This is an entire database of everybody that was interviewed by the Nancy Pelosi and Mike Pence January 6th cover-up committee, is what I call it, right?
	You know, the January 6th committee?
	Yeah.
	Type in my name, now do a...
	Click on name in that column.
	Yeah, just above the photos, that first photo, just click on that.
	That's the people that they interviewed.
	And take a look on the left.
	They asked all of those individuals about me.
	Interesting.
	Rudy Giuliani.
	Ivanka Trump.
	Scroll down.
	Keep scrolling.
	Keep going.
	Mark Short.
	Jared.
	General Flynn.
	Keep going.
	Patrick Byrne.
	Can you explain to the audience real quick what the J6 committee was?
	Yeah, so the January 6th committee was the committee that was constituted on July 22nd of 2021 in order to promote the insurrection narrative and to cover up the fedsurrection narrative.
	To basically make the American public think that it was not a parliamentary coup, but instead it was an insurrection, right?
	To promote that in the court of public opinion.
	Gotcha, gotcha.
	So, when you see that, like, I want to ask you a question.
	They're investigating.
	They question about a thousand people.
	15, 20 of the most prominent people that many people know.
	Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, Patrick Byrne.
	You heard of these names?
	Yeah.
	They ask them about me.
	Yeah.
	What does that tell you?
	They want to know what they know about you.
	I'm a person of interest, right?
	Yeah, for sure.
	Why?
	Because you're exposing people.
	You think I'm a fed when you see that?
	Hey man, just ask questions.
	No, seriously.
	Is that street cred or is that, am I a fed question?
	Seriously.
	Well, no.
	I mean, yeah, the answer is a no.
	If they're asking you, if they're asking them about you, then yeah.
	So while you're on that website, go ahead and click on, this is where it's going to get interesting.
	Why don't you click on the Rudy Giuliani transcript when they ask about me?
	So while you're pulling up, I'm going to give a little more context.
	He's actually right there next to us when I met you.
	Yeah, that's right, that's right.
	I spoke to him shortly after.
	So you click on there, they're asking him, you do it, control F, whatever, find in there, look for my name.
	They're asking all these people about the tweet that I wrote.
	Do you know who a person named Ivan Raikland is?
	No, maybe I do.
	Maybe if I had pictures it would help.
	I do not have a picture of Mr.
	Raikland, but if we get one, I'd be more than happy to show you.
	Okay.
	And the person, the question, the questioner says, Mr.
	Raikland is somebody who I believe worked with General Flynn, possibly, and others, and to submit a memo on what he thought the Vice President's authority should be on January 6th to a number of people, including folks at the White House.
	And I don't know if you want me to keep reading.
	That's enough, I think.
	So here's the deal.
	Who was the person that was asking these questions?
	That's the January 6th Council.
	Okay.
	And remember who's running the committee.
	I was going to ask you.
	David Buckley.
	Okay.
	The David Buckley, former Inspector General of the CIA for John Brennan, who was also one of the 51 spies who lied to cover for the Biden criminal syndicate laptop.
	He was OIG for CIA, this guy.
	Yes.
	No, the guy that ran the committee on behalf of the members of Congress.
	Yeah, but I'm saying he was former CIA OIG. He was a former CIA Inspector General that ran OIG. That later was one of the co-signers saying that the Biden laptop was Russian disinfo.
	Gotcha.
	So one of the guys that provided cover with Mark Zuckerberg to cover for the Biden criminal laptop.
	He was the one that ran this committee.
	He ran that committee.
	And so he's trying to find dirt.
	So one of his cronies asked these questions probably.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Now it makes sense.
	Okay.
	So he's asking.
	And they're asking about the tweet.
	What did I say before we read that?
	The tweet was based on Title III U.S. Code Section 12 for December 23rd of 2020.
	Yep.
	Did I say January 6th?
	No.
	No, because you wrote that before January 6th.
	I said December 23rd of 2020.
	These complete retards, right, that are running and trying to find dirt on something and me are trying to kind of label what that memo that was attached to the tweet that I sent out that Trump retweeted, they wanted to somehow relate that to January 6th.
	I see what you mean.
	Had nothing to do with January 6th.
	I mean, you had no foreknowledge of it before.
	Zero.
	Yeah.
	No, no.
	I did have stuff related to January 6th, but I want to separate this.
	That's the next theory.
	But you knew about January 6th on December 20th when he wrote that?
	Probably not.
	No, hold up.
	There's two theories.
	I don't want you to confuse this.
	I presented two separate legal theories on what should take place as it relates to the 2020 election.
	The first one was this one.
	The memo that they're talking about.
	And guess what?
	They mentioned my name about that memo that I tweeted in the third hearing of the January 6th committee hearings of the 10th.
	That's when I was like, alright, you wanna call me out?
	You gonna punk me publicly?
	Now it's my turn, okay?
	So these punk idiots are trying to say that that tweet had something to do with January 6th.
	It didn't.
	And this is what the retard Jack Smith also does.
	So retard Jack Smith...
	Is relying on retard Jack Smith, complete moron buffoon, is relying on the evidence provided to him from Mike Pence's and Liz Cheney's and Nancy Pelosi's committee.
	That said that this tweet had something to do with January 6th, and it didn't, because they're fucking retards, right?
	Yeah, Jack Smith, you're a fucking retard, along with the Congress members that are fucking retards that sent this shit over to you.
	Guess what Jack's scumbag Smith does?
	He incorporates in the indictment on Donald Trump in the Jack Smith trial.
	Yeah, out of Washington, D.C., right?
	Yeah.
	Pull up the indictment.
	On page 43.
	They actually just superseded and indicted him on that recently.
	Pull up page 43 of the original indictment from August of last year.
	Okay, type in...
	And then type in, once you pull it up, Pence card.
	Okay, Bill, this is what you're gonna type in to find it easier.
	Type in Jack Smith, District of Columbia.
	Trump indictment and that should bring up the first one because he literally just got a superseded indict on this like last week.
	But yes, I'm familiar with this indictment because that one was the insurrection indictment, not the document one.
	Guess what the original fact and the fact pattern is as they used to deploy against President Trump is?
	Let's see right now.
	My tweet.
	My tweet.
	You scared yet?
	Well, I'm black so I'll be okay.
	Hey, I get it.
	Black privilege.
	I know.
	Just saying, man.
	Bro.
	And back then, was Jack Smith still...
	No, he was a lawyer, obviously.
	I'm trying to think what his role was back then.
	He was over at The Hague.
	Doing coercion and corruption.
	Yeah.
	Basically coercing people into guilty pleas.
	Yeah.
	Or not guilty pleas.
	Coercing people to pay him so that he wouldn't prosecute them.
	Wow.
	If you want details on that, there's a couple whistleblowers.
	Okay, so this is the original.
	Yep, here we go.
	August 1st, 2023.
	Go to line 88.
	Line 88.
	Paragraph 88.
	Just type in 88.
	Oh, yeah, you gotta go way down.
	Read that.
	Paragraph 88.
	I think it is.
	Alright, here we go.
	Okay.
	On December 23rd, a defendant retweeted a memo titled Operation Pence Card, which falsely asserted that the Vice President could, among other things, unilaterally disqualify legitimate electors from six targeted states.
	Alright, here's the reality.
	They actually used him retweeting as a piece of...
	Oh my god.
	Okay.
	So here's the deal.
	For the Jack Smith retards and those that work for him, I want you to listen closely to me.
	Alright.
	Damn.
	This is for you, Jackie Boy Smith, your staff, your colleagues, and everybody in that scheme, as well as everybody that participated in the J6 cover-up committee, whether it's Jamie Ratskin or Benny Thompson or Lizzie Chaney or Adam Crybaby Kinzinger and all the rest of you scum.
	Listen very carefully.
	That memo, when you read it, details out the obligations of the President of the Senate, at the time Mike Pence, on his role to defend Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution that says, it is the state legislatures that allocate the state's electors.
	So I argued that, so the first time that a federal officer participates in the electoral college process, because you remember, this is how it works.
	The people vote.
	The counties certify it.
	The county then goes to the state secretary of state in most states, like in Wisconsin, it's the Wisconsin Election Commission.
	They go through a process.
	The campaigns can contest it.
	Goes through a legal process potentially in the courts, right?
	And then it goes and then is certified by usually November, December timeframe in that state.
	December 8th is when the state decides which electoral slate gets to vote, Republican slate of electors or the Democrat, based on the underlying election, so December 8th.
	December 14th is when they actually conduct the vote.
	So they first decide who is gonna vote, and then December 14th in the state capitol, they then vote.
	And then based on that- Based on how their state voted prior.
	Correct.
	They represent us, guys, is the process.
	December 14th is when that's done, and December 23rd is the next kind of phase.
	But before that, you have a December 18th, which is under Executive Order 13848.
	It basically says if there's any foreign interference, The intel community has to, within 45 days of the election, which would have been December 18th, put out an intel community assessment published to the president, vice president, secretary of treasurer, a couple different people in that EO, to mention whether or not there was foreign interference.
	That basically is done in order to inform one of the statutory members, vice president of the National Security Council, Pence, on whether or not and what to do as it relates to the election.
	It's very, like, the process is very good.
	And then Article, was it Title III, U.S. Code, Section 12?
	If there's something illegal in the process that violates federal law or the U.S. Constitution, that's the first opportunity for the Vice President to correct it.
	He refused.
	So that tweet and the memo that attached to it that's in the indictment has nothing to do with January 6th.
	Okay?
	But they're trying to make it sound like it has something to do with January 6th.
	And it says...
	Pence doesn't have the authorities, like, wrongfully or incorrectly.
	Yeah, pull it up.
	Let's use that.
	Yeah, let's look at what they...
	They said it, like, falsely asserts that he has certain...
	Let's see here.
	It says, falsely asserted that the vice president could, among other things, unilaterally disqualify legitimate electives from six...
	So let me correct that.
	It wasn't false because, guess what?
	I never argued that Mike Pence had unilateral authority to decertify anything.
	I said that he had the authority under Title 3 U.S. Code Section 12 to send it back to the states requesting that they not send it back, but tell them that they have to transmit an electoral slate based on a legitimate election that follows Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2 of the federal constitution.
	And as a federal officer, he is bound by under his oath as a federal officer.
	See how that works?
	I see what you mean.
	Basically...
	The way that you guys voted isn't appropriate, so I'm going to go ahead and delegate it back to you guys so you get your shit together before you go ahead and tell- To do it right.
	Before January 6th.
	Yeah.
	So that you just- I see what you mean.
	I didn't recommend that he tell, hey, state Wisconsin or whatever, you have to vote for the Republican slate of electors.
	No.
	Yeah.
	You have to run your election legally under the federal constitution.
	Once you do that, if you want to do it legally and then ultimately you decide to allocate your state's electors to Biden, Not, like, you're good.
	Yeah.
	You legally conducted it.
	So you're saying it started off faulty, so you guys need to go back and do it again, and the vice president had that power to do that.
	I argued that he had the legal, moral, and ethical obligation to do so because I laid it out how they violated their own...
	The Constitution in that instance.
	Because the electors that were transmitted were run under procedures under COVID that warrant the procedures as was prescribed by the state legislature, thus triggering the violation of Article 2, Section 1-2.
	Gotcha.
	So you're telling me they can take your tweet, twist it, and use against you?
	They tried.
	In court of law?
	They're trying.
	No, but they don't need me.
	They use it as a basis to show that Trump was...
	Because they're trying to frame Trump as an insurrectionist.
	So they used that tweet to say, yo, this tweet says that Pence can unilaterally be like, you guys are not going to blah, blah, blah.
	So they tried to use that.
	The fact that Trump retweeted that...
	That he's an insurrectionist, he tried to promote the insurrection by using a tweet that would promote insurrection.
	Which begs the question, when you say they, who do you think they is?
	Who's in the best position to try to attack me?
	Your friends over there at the...
	No, no, who did I call out?
	An Operation Pence card.
	You mean from that tweet?
	Yeah.
	Oh, the people that were voting.
	No, no, Mike Pence.
	Yeah, yeah, the office of the vice president.
	But didn't they vote incorrectly based off of those people that were holding the...
	No, the people below them, the states, voted incorrectly.
	And then it was Pence's duty to tell the states, hey, you guys did this incorrectly.
	Go back and get your shit together and then submit it to me.
	He didn't do it.
	Exactly.
	He sat there as a toxic, feckless, stone-cold coward, gutless simp.
	Basically, he could have, I don't want to say stopped this situation.
	And you know, he testified before the Jack Smith Committee, too.
	He's their star witness.
	Yeah.
	He's their star witness, yeah.
	Why?
	Because I exposed him.
	He's their star witness.
	So, now that we covered that, is December the same thing as January?
	No.
	Is 23 the same thing as 6?
	No.
	Is 2020 the same year as 2021?
	No.
	Okay, Jack Smith, you're a fucking retard.
	Because anybody can tell you that January 6th, 2021 is a different day, month, year than December 23rd, 2020.
	So everybody that works for Jack Smith, you're a fucking idiot.
	It's also interesting how they try to use that tweet to insinuate that you're stimulating an insurrection, but it's not like you knew, yeah, this is totally going to lead to an insurrection on January 6th.
	You wrote it way before.
	Now let's go into January 6th.
	Yeah.
	Because that first part I wanted to hit clearly.
	And you see how, like, my First Amendment activity online is literally driving this entire national conversation.
	Out of curiosity, you said the COVID mandates and the way that they voted basically was unconstitutional, which prompted Pence to, obviously, had a duty and moral obligation to tell the states these votes weren't collected correctly, go back.
	What were some of the things you would say, the top three things that made the voting unconstitutional?
	Just for the audience to know.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	Great question.
	Fantastic.
	So imagine the Constitution is set up this way.
	You've got three branches of government.
	You've got Article I, you're the Federal Congress.
	Two, I'm the executive branch.
	And you're the courts, right?
	So if I'm the...
	If you're the legislative branch and the Constitution says that it's up to the legislature of the states...
	You have the authority to allocate the electors, and you have the authority to create your own mechanism on how you allocate your electors through creating an election law for your state.
	Of course.
	I write the laws.
	You write the laws, and that's how I am supposed to execute them, right?
	Imagine this at the state level.
	Okay?
	So here's what happened.
	Remember a governor said, we're going to run our elections based on COVID rules?
	Yeah.
	A governor is not- A lot of mail-in ballots.
	Is a governor a legislative actor?
	No, no, no.
	He's executive, yeah.
	Is the secretary of state that works for a governor part of the legislature?
	So if I'm a secretary of state or if I'm a governor, I say, hey, we got to run COVID measures, mail-in drop boxes, you name it.
	I just took away your power that you have without your authority to run an election for people to vote based on how I wanted to do it.
	Which defeats the whole purpose.
	And I'm taking in Mark Zuckerberg's $400 million bribe money in order to make sure that we create the electoral outcome of the executive branch's choosing, not based on the law of what you passed, that you have the authority to do.
	I see.
	I see.
	And that's the whole reason why Checks and Balances was created, to avoid this very problem.
	39 states ran their elections illegitimately in 2020.
	Based off of executive branch directives, not legislative.
	Based on non-legislative actors, two or three, right, the other branches, dictating on how the election would be run.
	Interesting.
	Violating Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2.
	So while everybody was looking at, oh, there's software fraud, oh, there's foreign interference, oh, there's fraud, retail, wholesale, you name it.
	I simplified it and said, hey, while all that may be true, let's just put all of that aside.
	If you can agree with me, state legislator or federal congressman, that the state conducted their election on COVID measures, and the COVID measures that they implemented were done by a non-legislative actor of the state, If you can agree with me on that, and they're like, yeah, of course, then you are now obligated to object on January 6th to that state's electors.
	The only way we could defeat this is if, like, the governors have some kind of special power where they can take that, like, you know, supreme, but they don't, right?
	They would have to amend the Constitution to do that.
	And that was not done during the plandemic.
	Gotcha.
	So, just in summary here, from what I'm here for, you're saying, we're fucked.
	Because...
	The government itself is corrupt.
	And no matter what you do, it's corrupt.
	At the highest levels.
	I would say that the government's fucked.
	So what's the point of avoiding?
	No, no.
	We're not fucked.
	The government's about to...
	What does FAFO stand for?
	They fucked around, now they're gonna fucking find out.
	That's what's gonna happen.
	Okay.
	And I'm going to explain how that works once we finish with January 6th.
	So very, very interesting how...
	Because I actually did a whole thread on this on Twitter.
	Jackie Boy Smith's going to find out.
	All the things that went wrong in the 2020 election that led to the election being stolen.
	But if you're going to boil it down, simply put, though all those things might have occurred, it doesn't matter because you had...
	Governors acting in a capacity they didn't necessarily have the authority to do.
	That's it.
	It's simple.
	And they violated constitutional law by doing so.
	So basically the states, the conclusion they came to wasn't valid.
	Correct.
	And also, the process in which they came to the conclusion was a legitimate process.
	Gotcha.
	And manly ballots are easy to treat because you can pretty much put whatever you want under.
	Yeah, but he's saying that that's irrelevant.
	Which I understand now because- The way you address all the illegalities that took place, mail-in, signature verification, all of that, the way you clean it up and address it so that it becomes lawful in the cleanest way possible is for the joint session of that state's legislature to convene and say, you know what?
	Got it.
	It was illegitimate, but we're going to still vote for the Biden electors.
	If they did that, it would have been a completely legitimate election.
	I would have been the first one to say, you know what?
	I do not want Biden in office, but that state ran their election totally lawfully, legitimately.
	They cleared the air with all the underlying issues of whatever was alleged.
	And I would have been like, oh man, this is going to be a bad four years.
	But I would have said, Biden is legitimately elected.
	Right now, Biden is still not legitimately...
	No one has received the necessary 270 legitimate electoral votes from 2020 to be considered a legitimate president.
	Gotcha, yeah.
	To this day.
	So, this is a very complex situation here.
	And Trump has not either, because no one got the necessary vote, because those states never ran their election to then allocate those electors legitimately.
	Okay.
	So I'm gonna go through this just so the audience understands one more time.
	So the process in which each state collected their votes was unconstitutional because they followed COVID-19 mandates to gather those votes.
	- Illegal COVID-19 mandates.
	- Illegal COVID-19 mandates to gather those votes so they weren't legitimate, and then they passed them up and Pence refused.
	- Pence allowed them that to come through.
	So that was his first violation of the Constitution.
	So...
	December 23rd.
	Yeah.
	And I basically warned him and said, hey, this is what...
	This is what you can do, yeah.
	To rectify this problem.
	Because these votes were illegally collected.
	And I'm not telling him unilaterally to direct what votes would take place.
	He's just basically saying, hey, you gotta do it legally.
	Yeah.
	If you want to send Biden votes again...
	That you sent illegitimately the first time, great.
	It's good.
	They never did that.
	They never did it.
	They just went with the COVID mandate.
	And the states never did it.
	Interesting.
	So, outside, because everyone tends to focus...
	And the reason why I'm buckling down on this real quick for the audience to understand is because everyone boils down to like...
	Not boils down.
	Everyone comes back to...
	The mail-in ballots.
	Show me the evidence.
	The laptop.
	I just showed you the evidence.
	The people coming in with the late-night bags full of votes, etc.
	Everyone looks at that.
	But all of that is technically irrelevant because the way the votes were gathered in the first place is unconstitutional.
	Well, those are components of the overall picture of...
	The reason why that even was allowed to take place is because someone that doesn't even have the authority to allow that to take place made that decision.
	Which is the governor's.
	So the chief, just to say the chief thing, That made all of this unconstitutional was the COVID mandates and then the governors allowing these votes to be...
	Or secretaries of state.
	Or secretaries of state allowing these votes to be collected in this way and pushing them up towards Pence.
	Or in the case of Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania said, you know what?
	Eh, you can go beyond three days of getting, you know, after somebody mails on a ballot.
	You can go a week.
	You can go two weeks, I think it was.
	Okay.
	Again, so Article 1, you have the authority to do the election.
	Article 2, basically execute us on what you wrote as a law, but I decided to do it my way.
	Gotcha.
	Or the court, in the case of Pennsylvania, says, you know what?
	Eh, we want to...
	And again...
	The judicial branch.
	The judicial branch.
	Yeah.
	Again...
	Without the authority to do so, without the authority to do so, U.S. Article I branch of government is the only one under the U.S. Constitution that has the authority to do so.
	And I was completely left out as the legislative branch of the state.
	Correct.
	Okay.
	Chad, give me once, if this all makes sense to you guys, on Rumble and on YouTube, because obviously this is very complex.
	And that's why I really wanted to make sure that we rehash this.
	Because now that I'm thinking about it, when we talk about, oh yeah, voter fraud with the mail-in ballots, all this other stuff, we're stepping over dollars to pick up pennies.
	The real issue, overall, is that this was done unconstitutionally.
	That's the biggest problem.
	Give me ones if this all makes sense to y'all.
	Alright.
	If you're gonna put twos, tell me what doesn't make sense to so that we can rehash it.
	But mostly I see ones.
	Great.
	Great.
	Because I didn't know this.
	I thought, again, like most Americans, I was looking at all the other bullshit, like bringing in votes late at night, mail-in ballots, dead people voting, illegal aliens voting.
	I was like, yeah, this is a problem.
	But it's the overall situation where the governors took power versus...
	Let me back this up a little even more globally.
	The way our federal rules are set up, meaning the U.S. Constitution, is because three-fourths of our states...
	Three-fourths of our state legislatures?
	We've got 50 states right now, right?
	So the way our current rules were created with the U.S. Constitution was when we had 13 colonies turned into 13 states, and then when nine of the 13 state legislatures, meaning their Congress at the state level...
	Ratified the federal national government.
	They created the seven articles of the U.S. Constitution in 1789.
	One of those, Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2, is where the states agreed.
	To give and retain the power to allocate their presidential electors with themselves, with the state legislatures.
	So when three-quarters of those legislatures ratified the Constitution, that's when the Constitution came to being.
	So what I'm saying here is that the supreme power in our constitutional framework above anything and everything is state legislatures collectively because they created the federal government.
	Okay?
	And so it's the same body that allocates what I call the units of sovereignty in allocating a president and vice president, collectively, those state legislatures.
	In some states...
	They delegated, well, initially it was voted that way, where the state house and the state senate would vote.
	We're going to vote our state's electors for George Washington, right?
	Or Thomas Jefferson versus somebody else.
	But after a few elections, those legislatures passed laws to say, you know what, we're going to have a popular vote.
	Once they did that, that's when fraud started.
	Which would have been the third and fourth presidential election and then beyond.
	Because guess what?
	When you leave it to that, that's when you get coercion, poll taxes, right?
	You have machines being implemented after the 2000 election.
	So you're starting to add more and more layers of...
	Potential and risk of fraud in the electoral process that can easily be then circumvented or cleaned up by the state legislature just holding a vote.
	Because when you do it that way, with today's technology, you can literally observe live-streamed on Rumble, right?
	On Telegram, on Truth, on C-SPAN, how a state legislature votes.
	Because you already know how many Republicans and Democrats are in that body, right?
	And then it's free, fair, transparent.
	And then you don't have to deal with illegals voting.
	You don't have to deal with drop boxes that are fraudulent.
	You don't have to deal with signature verification mail-in fraud, right?
	You don't have to deal with dirty voter rolls of registered, non-registered, if somebody's dead or not.
	Because you get to see how people vote.
	People don't realize that that's the power that state legislatures have.
	And so, if Jack Smith, maybe that's why they investigated me, and when I started to shit on them for being retards, they're like, oh wait, Ivan's right.
	But yet, I guess I'm going to get him for, it was contempt of court.
	Jack Smith's filing.
	Maybe I'll file a lawsuit for literally lying to the court with Line 88 because it has no basis in reality on that particular tweet that they're referencing that falsely said that Mike Pence...
	Well, guess what?
	One, it wasn't false.
	And two, I never said that Mike Pence had the unilateral authority.
	So I know I'm beating this dead horse, but...
	You got a massive platform, and I want to make sure that Jack Smith knows that he's a fucking retarded punk.
	Okay?
	And everybody that works for him.
	Because he's basing his Line 88 on other dumbass, retarded punks from the January 6th Select Committee.
	Because the reason why every single January Sixer is a defendant, to include Trump, because the court and the DOJ is using the evidence, the fake, manipulated, bullshit, bogus evidence that was created by that January 6th committee and sent over to the DOJ to prosecute folks.
	And I can get into the details of that.
	Because I'm probably the guy with the most instrumental role in why January 6th occurred the way it did and its subsequent cover-up.
	And we haven't even addressed that yet.
	Yeah, yeah.
	You know what?
	Let's go ahead and we'll go into the January 6th part now.
	Now that we know how we even got there in the first place, which I'm really glad that we hashed it out.
	About 78% of the people understand.
	How the election was done unconstitutionally at the state level, and then that eventually got up to the federal level, and Pence didn't stop it.
	We explained that.
	But no, that's very interesting.
	So a majority understands.
	Cool, which I'm glad.
	So now the second component.
	That's the first...
	Legal explanation that I said how we can clean it up.
	Pence failed to do anything.
	So now it goes from Pence under Title III U.S. Code Section 12.
	Now we go into from December 23rd into January 6th.
	So here was my role.
	As soon as I saw Pence do nothing, I'm like, okay.
	Now it goes into the hands under the Electoral College process in the Constitution, 12th Amendment specifically, of the Congress is going to decide which electors to accept and which electors to not accept.
	You know, through the objection process on January 6th.
	But a couple things you need to know about before that happens.
	January 3rd, remember we talking about?
	Good old 1973?
	Yeah.
	When Joe Biden takes office, right?
	Every odd year is when the new Congress convenes, they vote for a Speaker of the House, and everybody becomes a member of Congress.
	So on January 3rd of 2021, that's when the new Congress, the 117th Congress at that time in 2021...
	Yeah, 2021.
	Becomes seated.
	The first thing that they do, as we saw last year, is that they vote on the Speaker of the House.
	At that time, there were 434 members because one of the Louisiana members of Congress died from, they claimed, COVID, right?
	So instead of 435, it was 434.
	And the construct, if I'm not mistaken, was 222 Democrats and 212 Republicans, okay?
	So the Democrats had the majority.
	And on January 3rd, everybody convened to vote for Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
	Okay?
	Why is this important?
	Was this during COVID measures, right?
	January 3rd?
	But everybody was on the House floor to vote for Nancy Pelosi.
	Interesting.
	Three days later...
	Oh, by the way, going from December 23rd to January 3rd, and actually January 6th, Ivan Raiklin is doing the following.
	Hey, Congressman Mike Waltz.
	Hey, Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, Congresswoman-elect.
	Hey, Congressman-elect Bob Good.
	Hey, Congressman Ben Kline.
	And so on and so forth.
	And what am I telling all of them?
	What did I just explain?
	Yeah, about, yeah.
	Pence didn't do anything.
	It is now within your authority and legal obligation, now that you know...
	So Pence basically passed it off to them, the Congress, yeah.
	You are now legally obligated in your constitutional role to object to the states that ran their election, not according to Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2.
	Which were 39 of them, right?
	Yeah, but those weren't contested, and so we left it to like just six, right?
	Gotcha, okay.
	And so...
	What are those six states, just out of curiosity?
	Georgia, Wisconsin, Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada.
	Oh, the most important fucking states, of course.
	The most important states.
	And there's others, like New Mexico, Minnesota.
	Those are all battleground important states.
	So...
	Yeah, go ahead.
	Again, yes, I was texting.
	Yes, I was calling.
	And I was publicly on Twitter explaining this.
	I was doing massive podcast outreach.
	You know, I was on whoever was going to have me on as I explain this, right?
	Yeah.
	Again.
	Because it's a nuanced subject.
	Have you heard anything that I've said to this point advocating anything unlawful?
	No.
	Anything other than peaceful.
	You're literally citing the statue and the code.
	And guess who was censoring me first as I was doing that?
	Probably Twitter.
	LinkedIn.
	As I was citing Title 3 U.S. Code Section 12 and Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2, LinkedIn started to censor me.
	What the fuck?
	I didn't even know they...
	Seriously.
	Wait, you make posts on there?
	Yeah.
	That's gay.
	I had like 30,000 followers.
	I didn't even know you could do that on LinkedIn.
	What the hell?
	Yeah.
	I was one of the biggest influencers on LinkedIn before they started censoring me.
	That's crazy.
	Okay.
	I didn't know you could post on LinkedIn?
	That's just crazy.
	Yeah.
	Let me back up.
	Back in 2017, I ran 22 miles a day for 81 days straight to run 1776 miles throughout every county and city in Virginia.
	And I vlogged it on LinkedIn.
	Did they pay?
	They flew me out to do a...
	They flew like 12 people out, the biggest influencers on LinkedIn, to do a shoot.
	And I was going to be like on Times Square and all this other stuff.
	And then when they found out I was running for U.S. Senate, they're like, oh no, you're out.
	We can't do that.
	Why not?
	Because I was running as a Republican.
	Oh.
	There you go.
	Of course.
	There you go.
	Anyhow.
	Were you monetized on LinkedIn?
	Back then, no.
	I mean...
	You could stream on LinkedIn.
	I didn't know that you could stream on it, surprisingly.
	No, when you say monetize, I mean, you can drive traffic and then attention, right?
	And then monetize from there.
	Not directly, like on X. Okay.
	Or Rumble.
	Yeah, that was before that stuff.
	Alright, so back to...
	Because this is crucial, man.
	I'm the guy that literally set the whole stage on everything.
	To bring it back, yeah.
	So basically, Pence dropped the ball.
	He didn't do what he was supposed to do.
	So now you're calling every congressperson saying, yo, it's your moral obligation.
	Private citizen Ivan Raiklin.
	I know some of these people, right?
	It's like me calling you like, hey man, you have the authority.
	I'm giving you a heads up.
	Because I don't want you to look like a fool.
	And so guess what?
	One turns into two.
	Two turns into four.
	Ten.
	I'm like, hey Ben, tell Jim Jordan.
	Okay, great.
	Hey, so and so, why don't you tell this other congressman?
	And hey, why don't you have me in front of the entire Freedom Caucus as I lay this out?
	Because a lot of these guys don't know.
	I get it.
	I'm the expert right now in the country on this particular topic because I've been...
	There's other people that are out there talking about different aspects in the fraud, but I don't have the platform that they do and they're not addressing the holistic constitutional issue.
	Yeah.
	Okay?
	So we lay out the case.
	Every member of Congress was like, oh yeah, that's simple.
	I don't have to prove the software algorithm fraud.
	That's complicated, right?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	I don't have to like...
	The more nuanced shit, the mail-in fraud.
	Yeah, yeah, you're right.
	Illegal aliens voting, yeah.
	And then while everybody's like, well, the evidence was presented, 60 cases that the Trump campaign did, this and that.
	I'm like, hey, morons.
	A president and vice president in America is not...
	Decided by the courts.
	It's not decided by the executive branch of the states or the federal government.
	It's a conversation and agreement between state legislatures and the federal congress.
	Those are the entities that decide on who the legitimate executive leader of the federal government is.
	State legislatures through their allocation of the electors and the acceptance by the federal Congress.
	So knowing that, I'm like, all right, members of Congress, here's the play that Ivan presented for January 6th.
	Very important.
	I need people to listen closely.
	This is another complicated component.
	You want to pull up 12th Amendment?
	Sure.
	Again, you might be canceled by Commitube if you put up the 12th Amendment since it's the U.S. Constitution.
	Let's go to Rumble.
	No, no, no.
	It's just the 12th Amendment.
	Come on.
	I think we're fucked anyway.
	Amendment 12 to the Constitution was ratified on June 13, 1804.
	No, don't worry about it.
	It revised and outlines the procedure of how presidents and vice presidents are elected specifically so they are elected together.
	Okay, that's enough.
	That's kind of the summary.
	If you want the details, you read it.
	Here's the gist of it.
	If no one gets the majority, in this case, in this 2020 cycle, 270 electoral votes, it goes into what's called a contingent election.
	Meaning, the House then decides who the president is going to be, and the Senate votes on who the vice president is going to be.
	See that?
	Interesting.
	It is.
	And please read it.
	House decides who the president's going to be.
	The Senate decides who the vice president's going to be.
	But in that contingent election, the way that the House votes is not one person, one vote.
	Meaning, there's not 435 votes.
	It's done by state delegation.
	Meaning, there's 50 votes to be allocated.
	Okay.
	One representative of each state.
	So imagine this.
	Florida right now has 29 members in the House.
	Yep.
	Because of the size of the state, guys.
	It's based on the size of the state, Chad.
	So each state has different representatives.
	Different electors.
	Electors are done by how many House members and senators are represented in the state.
	So each state has two senators, but different number of House members.
	So in the case of Florida, it's 31 electoral votes.
	But when you run the vote under the 12th Amendment framework, it's 29 Florida delegation members.
	So like...
	Whether it's Val Demings, which is a Democrat, is part of that 29, whether it's Mike Waltz or Kat Kamek or Matt Gaetz, you guys have probably heard of, right, etc.
	They basically convene and say, hey, out of the 29 of us, how are we going to vote for our one Florida vote?
	It's a majority Republican.
	So if everyone votes by political party, then the Florida state will vote for the Republican or, in this case, right, because there's two candidates left, for the Republican presidential pick, right?
	Now, if you take that and multiply that by all 50 states for going into January 6th, because that's when the vote takes place, What does it look like?
	At that time, it was 27 states were Republican, 20 Democrat, and three tied up because it was a split with the delegation.
	So if you've got 27 Republican states, right, who wins the nomination if it goes to that contingent election?
	It's the Republican nominee.
	Donald Trump.
	That's the context for what I'm about to say.
	In the House, so when they went into January 6th, the way they run the election, to certify the election, it starts in alphabetical order, and this is laid out in the Electoral Count Act, Title III of the United States Code.
	So you start with the letter A, right?
	And you work your way through.
	Well, which state was the first one that that was potentially going to be objected to?
	Arizona.
	Yeah.
	Right?
	And so if you go to Arizona...
	Arizona or Alabama?
	No, no.
	Alabama starts, right?
	Yeah.
	And then Alaska, but I'm talking about of the six contested states.
	Yeah, Arizona.
	Then we go to Arizona.
	So when you look at the Electoral Count Act, there's nothing that says in there, if there's an objection, if you vote one person, one vote in the House, or you vote one state, one vote in the House.
	It doesn't say it.
	So then which way do you vote?
	Who decides?
	This is what I came up with and presented to Mark Short and Kevin McCarthy.
	Because think about it, if 27 states are Republican under the contingent election framework, who's considered the leader of that Republican majority state delegation framework?
	The leader of the Republican Party.
	At that time it was Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy.
	So, Ivan Raiklin conveys to members of the House, this is how you should vote on January 6th on the objections.
	Because there is no framework or law that says you have to vote one person, one vote on objections.
	Whether it's one person, one vote, or state delegation, use your political power on how you move forward.
	So since you have the majority under the state delegation framework, vote that way on Arizona, Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada.
	And if he does that, then guess what?
	They have the votes to object to Arizona and all of them, right?
	What does that mean?
	That means Biden doesn't get those Democrat electors times the six states, or even if they did it to Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
	If they run that vote, then that means no one gets the necessary 270 votes, right?
	And then it triggers that 12th Amendment contingent election overall for the House to decide who the president is and the Senate to decide who the vice president is.
	And on January 6th- Has that ever happened?
	No.
	It's never happened, right?
	Yeah.
	Triggering the 12th Amendment like that.
	No, no.
	Not like the way I explained it on the objections.
	It's happened three times before where the 12th Amendment was triggered because no one got the sufficient 270 electoral votes and then they decided based on the top two who it would be.
	It went to like several votes and the reason why the 12th Amendment happened is because there was a tie between Jefferson and I can't remember the other guy and then they couldn't break the tie so then it went to a kind of separate process.
	Sorry, continue on.
	What did you say?
	My bad.
	So there is precedent to go somewhat slightly different with the traditional voting system because when you hit a point where the Constitution isn't specific, then it's up to the House body and they decide.
	So I argue that, hey, we've never been in this situation.
	These states ran their elections illegitimately.
	You know that.
	You've got to object to it.
	But...
	If you do it one person, one vote, then the Democrats are going to allow those electors to come through.
	But if you vote by state delegation, then they won't let it through.
	So now there's a conflict of the U.S. House, right?
	Of the entire U.S. House.
	So here's how it works.
	Imagine you're the House and the Senate.
	So when an objection takes place in the joint session in the House chambers, you go into your respective chambers.
	The Senate is the one that deliberates based on the guidance of that 12th Amendment.
	You can then presume that you then object and determine the vice presidential electors, 5248 Republican, and then you decide on the presidential electors, either 222 to 212 or 27 to 20 to 3.
	So in my Twitter profile, way in November, right after the election, I said, I said that Trump is a guaranteed victor.
	Why?
	Because I already knew and forecasted this out, seeing how this would play out.
	Meaning that if everybody ran to the maximum political authority that they had in leverage, the re-election would have been a 27-20-3 vote.
	Okay?
	So I advise this to Mark Short, Mike Pence's chief of staff.
	I advise Kevin McCarthy, like directly, text message, because one of his major donors reached out to me on Twitter DM and said, hey, here's his number.
	I already talked to him.
	Go ahead and text him your play.
	Oh, shit.
	Okay.
	So I'm like, sure.
	Here's the play.
	Okay.
	Because Pence dropped the ball.
	Here's what happened.
	And this is where he drops the ball again.
	So on January 6th, I articulated that on January 6th, you object on Arizona, you vote by state delegation, and then when you convene back after the two-hour objection period as a joint session, the presiding officer in a joint session is the vice president.
	Mike Pence has three constitutional roles.
	The vice president, when he's not on the Capitol grounds, when he's in the U.S. Senate, he's the president of the Senate.
	When he's in the House during the joint session, he is the presiding officer of the joint session.
	Three separate constitutional roles.
	Boom.
	Okay.
	Okay?
	So when he's presiding officer of the Senate, imagine you're Nancy Pelosi.
	Yep.
	And you're Kevin McCarthy.
	And I'm the presiding officer.
	And I come back into session, and I'm Pence.
	And I'm like, alright, two hours objection period is up.
	What is the ruling on Arizona?
	House?
	What do you tell me?
	I'm going to tell you we're going to go with Trump.
	No, you're Pelosi.
	You're going to tell me that you voted 222 to 212 and you're going to allow the Biden electors.
	You're not going to object to the objection.
	I'm like, okay.
	And then Kevin, I basically said, Kevin McCarthy, at that point in time, you stand up and say, point of order, Mr.
	presiding officer.
	Well, I would have said Trump, but Pelosi's- Order!
	Yeah, you're right.
	You would have said, Kevin McCarthy, point of order, Mr.
	presiding officer.
	Yeah.
	We're actually objecting to Arizona's electors, 27 to 23.
	And even if the Democrats did not participate, because they're like, no, we're not going to do it that way, because they would have been like, no, we're not voting with you guys.
	Of course, yeah.
	If all Republicans voted, it would have been 43 to 0.
	Because that framework requires at least one member of the House from a state to vote, and you need a minimum of two-thirds of the states represented to be considered a quorum.
	So 34 members of the House from at least a different state would be considered a quorum under that style of voting.
	This is under the 12th Amendment.
	It's in there.
	You track it so far?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	But the thing is, in the 50 states, when you look at the delegation, if you have at least one member of the Republican Party in the state, they can vote for that state even if the Democrats don't participate.
	Make sense?
	Okay.
	All right.
	So 43 of the 50 states on January 6th had at least one Republican in the delegation.
	Gotcha.
	So that's why I said it would have been a 43 to 0.
	Because even if the Democrats were like, we're not going to participate in your shit.
	Yeah.
	Doesn't matter.
	Doesn't matter.
	We hit quorum with the 43 that we have.
	So then he presents to me 43 to 0.
	Now I'm the presiding officer.
	Mike Pence, on January 6th, and I'm stuck with the dilemma.
	I got one framework telling me it's 43 to 0 to object to Arizona, and then another framework telling me to allow those electors to come through.
	Now I have to decide which one to go with, because the electoral contact doesn't give me any guidance on how to do this.
	Okay.
	The 12th Amendment only talks about a contingent election.
	This isn't a contingent election.
	This is objection on the electors.
	Yeah.
	So now I have to make the decision, right?
	Oh, shit.
	Now, does the vice president have this authority to make the decision in a situation like this?
	Absolutely, because there's a conflict within the chambers.
	The last final arbiter of a tiebreaker's authority has to be the presiding officer.
	You're right.
	The one running the show.
	Yeah.
	So here's what I... Here's what I said.
	I then recommended Mike Pence in order to make this transparent and for good precedent moving forward, right?
	I'm not here to just like totally circumvent the constitutional order in my recommendations.
	I would say like, hey, why don't you go ahead and ask the House parliamentarian how to proceed?
	Well, the House parliamentarian works for the Speaker of the House.
	So the Nancy Pelosi...
	Is that their, like, number two?
	It's Nancy Pelosi's underhand?
	No, no.
	The parliamentarian gives you the rules and procedures so that everybody follows the methods and rules that everybody agreed to in the House chambers, right?
	Yeah.
	But is that, like, Nancy Pelosi's, like, I'm asking, like, her chain of command under Pelosi, second and third in command?
	No, it's not like chain of command.
	It's, like, literally somebody that says how you're supposed to run under the rules of the House.
	Okay.
	All right.
	It's a direct report, right?
	Yeah.
	Somebody that directly...
	Just like the Sergeant at Arms, it's, like, a direct report.
	Gotcha.
	Okay.
	So the...
	I recommended, hey, Mark Short, you then tell Mike Pence, hey, parliamentarian from the House, what do you recommend?
	And they would have said so-and-so.
	And then Mike Pence would have said, thank you for the advice.
	However, the parliamentarian is binding on the Speaker of the House when the House is by itself not in a joint session.
	You're not binding on me because we're in a joint session.
	Gotcha.
	Gotcha.
	You're just an advisor.
	Yeah.
	You can't bind me under this because he's the...
	The presiding officer is the final arbiter of authority.
	Same thing goes for the Senate.
	The Senate parliamentarian would basically say whatever, and then Mike Pence would say, thank you for that, but you're only binding on me when we're in the Senate chambers.
	So let me get this straight.
	When I'm the president of the Senate.
	Senate, House, comes to their conclusions, right?
	And then their parliamentarians can advise you, as Pence, you're Vice Pence, you're Mike Pence.
	They advise you.
	So the America learns.
	The process in here is like why he has the authority.
	And then you, at the end of the day, they can give you their advice, what they think.
	And then I would say, hey, thank you.
	Noted.
	But you're only binding on Pelosi when you guys are only in the House.
	We're in a joint session here, House and Senate.
	Gotcha.
	And then the Senate parliamentarian is binding on the president of the Senate when they're in the Senate chambers.
	But the joint session is taking place in the House.
	Not in the Senate chambers.
	Those are two sovereign nations with their own sets of rules.
	Yep.
	Which is why when they went to go do the vote, they split into their own separate places to do their votes.
	During the ejection.
	Then they come back.
	The Constitution is beautiful, man, when people understand it.
	Yeah.
	Well, it's to avoid, obviously, tyranny.
	This is specifically why.
	It's complex, but this is why they do it this way.
	So then, exactly.
	Exactly.
	So I recommended this, right?
	And as I recommended that path...
	We're giving these guys a civics class right now.
	When you hear this out, bro, it's...
	Who do you think when...
	Like, if everyone votes by political party and does what I explain, how does this play out?
	It's a guaranteed re-election for Trump.
	I see how you can't get that conclusion.
	Guaranteed!
	Yeah.
	If everyone votes by political party affiliation.
	And is it unilateral on Pence to do that?
	Yeah.
	How?
	Oh, you mean, no, no, no.
	Because he's getting information from them.
	The House has to first vote before it even gets to him.
	So institutionally, it's the entire Congress and the presiding officer in the collective that decides who the...
	Because they had to be stalemated for him to even have the authority.
	They had to go through the objections for it to get to him.
	To even get to him.
	Yeah, I see what you mean.
	For him to make that decision.
	At the end, you can make the argument he does, but he only got that power because they couldn't come to a fucking conclusion on their own.
	That's why Jackie Boy Smith, you fucking retard again?
	I see what you mean now.
	Is that unilateral?
	No.
	Now, for the second component of this, at what point in time did I talk about violence?
	I didn't hear any at all.
	At what point in time did I talk about anything unlawful?
	All ethical and within the Constitution.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	I hear anything balanced.
	So why are they coming after me?
	Because you're exposing the truth.
	So here's...
	Do you think Mike Pence willingly knew and just didn't act on it because he wanted Trump to lose?
	I can answer the first part.
	I'm just assuming off of what I learned today.
	I didn't say he did it.
	So this is essentially what happened on January 6th.
	We're getting there.
	I know this is like...
	We're getting along, but...
	No worries, no worries.
	That's why I asked you how much time we have, because I can...
	No, it's cool, it's cool.
	We're going in as maximum depth as I can.
	Yeah.
	To answer the first part of your question, did Mike Pence know?
	Absolutely.
	How do I know this?
	I briefed Mark Short.
	He got the information.
	He got the message from me and he got the message from another, let's say, journalist.
	Mike Shore was a right-hand guy.
	And he got the message from somebody in the White House.
	You said Mike Shore was his chief of staff, right?
	Yep.
	At the time.
	Yeah.
	Literally, yeah, that's his right-hand man.
	Okay.
	Yeah.
	So what happens next?
	As I explain this, remember, this is...
	They're literally talking every day.
	This is me going from...
	This is what I'm saying, what I just told you, to members of Congress and Mark Short from December 23rd going into January 6th.
	Gotcha.
	So you gave out this thing.
	I'm literally going into Congress telling people...
	But see, this is why...
	Like in Congress, like in person, to members of Congress.
	Explaining this concept.
	And on the phone, and text messaging, and DMing on Twitter.
	But see, this is why I believe elections are not even fair.
	Because I guarantee you, someone told Mike, or someone maybe said, you know what, don't do anything.
	Just stay how you are.
	Let things play out.
	Mike Pence, before I put out that information, had planned on going to Israel to kiss the ring.
	Aw, man.
	See?
	On January 6th.
	I'm not joking.
	This was in there.
	Hold on.
	I'm not saying who or what caused things to happen.
	I'm just saying, as a result, it's rigged, bro.
	It's all rigged.
	Hold on, hold on.
	I got you.
	But check this out.
	I'm going to say that again before the cha-ching.
	Mike Pence, and you can look at...
	Please, you know what?
	Can you pull up an article or something?
	Sure, sure, sure.
	That basically said, Mike Pence planned...
	Plan Israel January 6th.
	Just put in that.
	Okay.
	He had planned to be...
	I like how you had to kiss the ring.
	He had planned to go to Israel when he's supposed to be the presiding officer on January 6th.
	Oh, man.
	But once my information's out there...
	Here we go.
	Pence said planning to visit Israel on international tours starting on January 6th, 2021.
	Oh, man.
	I'm telling you, man, fucking Jack Smith, fucking fact check me, motherfucker.
	Holy shit, bro.
	So, you know what's scary, though?
	This means Trump's going to lose again.
	I got a plan for everything, bro.
	Oh, you do?
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	We're not there yet.
	Should we take a commercial break?
	Yeah, we can, actually.
	This is crazy.
	Yeah, actually, we should read chats, yeah.
	Let's read some chats.
	Let me use the restroom while you read some chats.
	Cool.
	I hope you guys are enjoying this.
	This is probably one of our most informative episodes.
	This is like a civics class, by the way.
	You know what I mean?
	I'm learning a lot, man.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	But I have theories, but he makes it into detail why the theories make sense.
	So that's really good on him.
	All right, let's go ahead.
	Okay, WGuess, can we have an opposite show with Mo Bills and Chris on the panel and Myron Refresh in the back?
	No!
	All right.
	Finally, you bring on the Marauder on.
	Ivan, I've been sharing with everyone I know who cares even a little bit about what's going on.
	Keep up the amazing work.
	I hope everything goes according to your plan.
	I want to see the deep state completely out of our government.
	I didn't fight and bleed for my great country for these snakes to run it into the ground.
	WMRWMO, WBillsW, Deep State Marauder, LPugFresh, just because.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	WFNF, fresh updates.
	Thank you very much.
	Chicagoland Castle Club, Telegram, met yesterday.
	Great FNF fun and fellowship.
	Yeah, actually I got a bunch of pictures.
	A bunch of you guys met up already and did like some cool events.
	CastleCup.tv, guys, join the network, man.
	WCEO Network, WCAS Club, WFNF, WBenjiLofit, AB as a bum.
	Oh, we got Ben in the studio, actually.
	Well, he had to go.
	One of our supporters.
	Oh, he just dipped?
	Yeah.
	But we did our meetup this weekend.
	CEO Network, it was crazy.
	ATVs, everything, it was dope.
	Thanks for helping get the message out, newfollow.
	Shout out to you, KFD. Janne Maga says, I'm sick of Ivan.
	Shout out to you.
	My eyes have been assaulted, Ivan, and I like it.
	My raw media?
	Okay.
	Probably a girl, I'm assuming.
	Insulted?
	No, assaulted.
	Assaulted.
	Yeah, but it's a heart emoji.
	And then we got Melville.
	Fresh and fit, brand new fan.
	I love the content.
	Thanks for the help I've already received.
	Keep up the much-needed go-work guys.
	We got y'all, man.
	I see some people in here complaining that there's no girls, but guys, that'll be on Wednesday.
	You guys got to stop thirsting for a little bit, man.
	I'd rather have these high IQ conversations.
	Fresh and fit, new fit.
	Okay, we got that from before.
	Anything else?
	That's it.
	All right, we'll turn it back to Ivan here.
	So we talked about...
	Wednesday women.
	Yeah, Wednesday womanizers.
	No, women.
	I like that better.
	Woman Wednesday.
	I like that.
	That's better.
	More clean.
	Go ahead, Ivan.
	So we were talking about Pence having this planned trip to Israel and that kind of, this whole thing, how he was supposed to be.
	Yeah, and then I started making some constitutional sound that put him in line.
	He's like, oh wait, I actually have to be there?
	I'm like, yeah.
	Read the Constitution, punk.
	Because you already saw this coming.
	Yeah.
	That they were going to be stalemated.
	Or were they already stalemated at this point?
	No, because the discussion was there because I was maximally on every single podcast basically saying this is what needs to happen.
	Talking about this.
	And because I got retweets by Trump several times, General Flynn, Sidney Powell, like big accounts.
	Of course, yeah.
	So now everybody's kind of paying attention.
	Yeah, I notice now.
	Yeah, so until they suspended me.
	But that's later, January 8th.
	This is before Elon bought it, right?
	Yeah, hold on.
	We're getting there.
	Okay, okay, okay.
	So January 6th.
	So now that you know what I had advised to happen, you know, text, phone calls, in-person meetings with the people that have the authority to do this, right?
	And I argue they have the obligation because now you know, right, the illegal election was conducted the way it was.
	So now I'm taken to the public domain, right?
	Through Twitter 1.0 at the time, and then through podcasts.
	And one of my last podcasts that I explained was like...
	Remember, if I'm doing this publicly...
	Then that means Nancy Pelosi and her staff probably sees it, especially if some of the stuff's being retweeted by Trump.
	You're putting a lot of onus on them, too.
	And they're like, well, let's follow Ivan Raiklund, because then I had like 187,000 followers at the time.
	So, I mean, it's making reach, right?
	People are seeing it.
	Whether it's Nancy Pelosi or Chief of Staff Terry McCullough or her staff special advisor, Jamie Fleet.
	Yeah, I know.
	Dude, I got them.
	I love that you name them by name, by the way.
	This is awesome.
	A lot of people say, Dave State!
	But they never name who the fuck is who.
	And I love the fact that you named them.
	We'll bring up the list later.
	We will bring it up.
	That's for tomorrow.
	I'm going to do a Twitter space on that.
	Each name and why they're on it by category.
	And their Twitter handle and what we're going to likely see from within their Twitter DMs.
	Fair enough.
	Elon Musk.
	Ken Paxton.
	Alright, this is going to be glorious, bro.
	You're too much fun, bro.
	It's so good.
	What the heck?
	I'm going to let it marinate until tomorrow.
	No worries, man.
	No worries.
	So keep me alive until tomorrow.
	They're probably going to want them gone.
	Well, after he does the space, they're going to want them gone.
	Hey, man.
	More power to you, bro, but I got some vacations to go on, some bitches to fuck.
	Hey, man.
	Fuck that shit, bro.
	All right, so...
	So I'm putting it out there.
	My last little praying medic asks me, hey, Trump just tweeted out something where he said, January 6th, come to January 6th, it's going to be wild.
	He's like, what do you think he means by that?
	I'm like, well, I'll tell you what I think he means.
	Ready?
	This is what he means.
	Remember when Trump tweeted out, come January 6th, it's going to be wild?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	And I was asked, what do you think he means by it's going to be wild?
	I'm like, well, here's what it is from my perspective.
	Now that you know how much involvement I was in the whole conversation.
	I think that if Kevin McCarthy pulls through and Mike Pence is going to do what he does, this is what Nancy Pelosi is going to do in response.
	She's going to call on her sergeant-at-arms, because remember, she's the host of the joint session.
	Yep.
	Capitol Police directs her.
	Yeah, Pence is the presiding officer.
	She controls the House that's hosting this.
	She's going to look at her house sergeant-at-at-arms and say, hey, throw the Senate out and throw the Vice President out so that they don't even do it.
	Oh, shit!
	She could do that?
	She could literally tell Capitol Police, get them the fuck out of here?
	Why wouldn't she?
	If she's trying to make sure that Biden wins and the vote happens the way I'm explaining it, what are her options?
	I see what you mean.
	The House Sergeant-at-Arms is ordered to throw the Senate out...
	Because you were calling this out for a while, so she knows what's coming.
	So she's like, how do I get ahead of this?
	I even said, like, this is...
	How do I keep Mike Pence from being the final arbiter?
	Right.
	I see.
	Okay.
	And I even said this on, like, one of the last podcasts going into January 6th.
	I was like...
	Because they asked me, what do you think Trump means by that?
	I'm like, I don't know, but this is what I think he means.
	Nancy Pelosi could run this play, stop the joint session from taking place, and then there'd be a stalemate, a face-off.
	What's Trump's response as the leader of the executive branch?
	I would say, hey, the executive branch leader is observing the legislative body violating and stopping the 12th Amendment from taking place timely in its due course by her ordering her sergeant-at-arms to stop the electoral contact process from taking place.
	And so then it becomes Pelosi's sergeant-at-arms in U.S. Capitol Police.
	What is Trump going to do?
	He's got more executive branch assets to do what?
	To make sure that the joint session takes place, meaning it votes.
	How are they going to vote?
	I prefer they vote the way that I just explained.
	So then you have potentially a kinetic confrontation with the sole purpose from the executive branch to make sure that it takes place constitutionally and from the legislative branch, the speaker, so that it doesn't take place.
	Hmm.
	And I was like, it could get wild.
	And guess what?
	The executive branch has a little bit more assets than the sergeant-at-arms and the U.S. Capitol Police.
	Of course.
	If the commander-in-chief wants to flex that to make sure that the 12th Amendment is followed.
	That's how it could get wild.
	And what ended up happening?
	That's where we're going to get into January 6th.
	So, because I had to explain it that way, If you're Nancy Pelosi, the only way to stop the guaranteed re-election that I just explained is to run a Fed's direction.
	I think I'm the direct root cause of why the Fed's direction took place on January 6th.
	Because of what I just explained.
	She had to stop it from taking place.
	She had to derail it.
	Because on January 5th, one of the interviews that I did, I haven't even published this one yet.
	I still have it somewhere.
	I'm going to have to ask the guy that recorded it.
	It's dated January 6th in the morning, I think.
	Or January 5th.
	Because that would have been Tuesday morning.
	January 6th was a Wednesday.
	They asked me, hey man, what do you think of the chances of Trump's re-election?
	I was like, if you asked me a month ago, one in a trillion.
	Three weeks ago, one in a billion.
	Two weeks ago, one in a million.
	Last week, one in a thousand.
	And I'm like, right now, as I'm sitting here today, we've got 147 members of the House, and growing by the minute, that already publicly said they're going to object to at least two states.
	Coming into tomorrow.
	Gotcha.
	And 12 U.S. Senators had already publicly objected and that number was growing by the minute.
	Let me guess, were some of these guys, people that you spoke to and said, yo, this is fucking unconstitutional, etc.?
	Of course.
	Yeah, great.
	Awesome.
	I see.
	Okay.
	So Pelosi knew this was coming.
	I basically said...
	Sitting here right now as you're interviewing me in whatever morning of January 5th, I think it's a 50-50.
	It's a 50-50 chance depending on what Kevin McCarthy and Mike Pence does.
	And depending on whether or not I'm able to actually physically sit down and meet with them before tomorrow.
	Because I was trying to do that too.
	Like I had all my feelers out to try to make sure that not only am I sending it digitally, but I want to know for myself personally that they are equipped with the maximum information to then make their decision.
	Okay?
	And they're like, under what authority?
	Under Private Citizen Ivan Ricklin Authority.
	I need no one's permission.
	Okay?
	Nothing's illegal.
	And so with Nancy Pelosi, I think knowing that, they had to run the play.
	They had to run the Fed's direction.
	All right, take us through the Fed's direction then.
	All right.
	There we go.
	Actually, before we do, I'm going to read this ad real quick and then we'll get into it.
	I'll keep my shirt on.
	Yeah, yeah.
	This was for coffee, so no worries.
	Hey, give me another one.
	Yeah, man.
	Actually, yeah, we're going to get...
	Alright, have you guys heard of the recent advertising scandal?
	Let me break it down.
	The CEO of Rumble, Chris Pavlosky, recently released an email from Inspire Brands and Dunkin' Donuts.
	The email explicitly states, the right-wing culture of Rumble is too polarizing.
	As you guys can see from this explosive interview that we're doing right now with Ivan.
	In other words, Dunkin' Donuts has a problem with right-wing culture and wants nothing to do with it or Rumble.
	So here's the solution.
	Stop buying products that don't support you and start supporting brands that support you.
	The competing coffee brands that we all need to get behind is Rumble's 1775 Coffee.
	For a limited time, Rumble is offering to buy two bags of coffee and get one for free.
	Go to 1775coffee.com and enter the promo code Duncan to get this limited time deal because fuck Dunkin' Donuts, guys.
	It's all about 1775 coffee.
	If you guys stand for free speech and have any tough discussions like we're having right fucking now, exposing the deep state, talking about January 6th, going into the real deep legal matter that was involved with how this was unconstitutional, you ain't gonna get it nowhere else besides places like Rumble.
	Hell, we'll probably have to take this video off YouTube or get off YouTube here very soon.
	So, guys, because yeah, January 6th is an issue for them.
	Yes.
	And for a very long time, if you talked about January 6th on YouTube, they would ban you.
	Now I think it's better, but yeah, for a very long time.
	Knowing us, yeah, we're not.
	So yeah, guys, support 1775 Coffee Man, support Rumble.
	Well, we got it for a while, but I don't know now, though.
	I guess not, because the Hodge twins, man, they got censored.
	We haven't talked about the thing yet that got them a strike.
	We haven't talked about it yet.
	AB&S, they'll definitely do something to us.
	Yeah.
	I'm telling you.
	Sorry about that, guys.
	So let's get back.
	So January 6th, the Fed's direction.
	How did we get there?
	This is where I need some of your insight.
	Because where were you at during January 6th?
	I was here.
	I was just chilling.
	I wasn't working for the government at that point.
	You were out?
	I was out.
	I left the government December 4th of 2020.
	Okay, here's where I need to give a little context going into January 6th.
	Remember, Mike Pence...
	Ran the COVID task force, right?
	Yes.
	So Fauci's boss was Mike Pence.
	Deborah Burke's boss was Mike Pence.
	Let's go back to 2001.
	2001 to 2013, Mike Pence was a congressman.
	10 of those 12 years, he was on the Judiciary Committee, okay?
	Which has oversight over the DOJ, okay?
	FBI. FBI? And at that period of time, right after 9-11, that's when the Patriot Act was passed and the Homeland Security Act was passed, right?
	When was it passed?
	Do you remember?
	2003.
	March of 2003.
	March 3rd, I think, if I'm not mistaken.
	Which committee in the House had jurisdiction to create that law?
	The Judiciary Committee, of which Mike Pence was the co-author for both.
	Okay?
	So then it begs the question, who staffed By the way, Patriot Act expanded the FISA Court from 7 to 11 judges, thus allowing greater throughput to spy on, like we talked about earlier, American citizens, to achieve a political end.
	I won't go in that direction since we're on January 6th.
	But Homeland Security Act was created.
	So then it begs the question, who is staffing those senior level positions at Homeland Security?
	Would you agree with this assumption that Mike Pence and other members of the Judiciary Committee that created the Homeland Security Department of Homeland Security probably would want to usher in people that they know, their staffers?
	Of course.
	Right?
	Of course, yeah.
	So just keep that in mind going into January 6th.
	Okay.
	And remember, when we talked about Liz Cheney's dad, way before, like early on when we were talking about Deep State.
	Dick Cheney?
	Yeah, former Secretary of Defense.
	Halle Burton CEO that made money hand over fist during the Afghan and Iraq war efforts.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	So anyway, January 6th, what does Mike Pence do?
	This is what happens.
	Remember, I said January 3rd of 2021, the whole House, all 434 House members, convene to vote for Speaker Pelosi.
	Three days later on January 6th at 1 p.m., she gavels in to introduce the presiding officer in the joint session.
	And as she does, she says, with the agreement of leadership, meaning McCarthy, McConnell, Schumer, so the Democrat majority, the majority leader, minority leader, House minority leader,
	Pelosi, and Mike Pence agreed that only 11 members of the House Democrats, 11 of the House Republicans, 11 Senate Republicans, and 11 Senate Democrats could participate on the House floor during the joint session.
	Oh, shit.
	So 44 people, roughly?
	What did I say about quorum?
	Two-thirds of the Senators must be present under the 12th Amendment?
	Is 2267?
	No.
	Two-thirds would be 67.
	Yeah, 67.
	She only allows 22.
	Interesting.
	And the House, she only allows 22.
	Remember I said 34?
	One representing each state?
	Yep.
	For a two-thirds quorum of the states?
	You know what a quorum is?
	A quorum is what is minimally required for a legal legislative body to have in terms of number of officers inside of the chambers to perform its function, its legal function.
	The minimum requirement to conduct their constitutional duty.
	And in this instance, it's a two-thirds requirement.
	So they were underrepresented.
	They agreed to not have the necessary quorum on January 6th.
	Is that even legal?
	Thus making January 6th certification completely illegitimate.
	Bam.
	Okay.
	So I addressed the whole states, how they ran it illegitimately.
	Mike Pence illegitimate.
	The joint session was completely illegitimate.
	Wow.
	January 6th.
	So we got a couple of fuck-ups.
	State level fuck-up.
	Vice president fuck-up.
	Every layer.
	Now, here, with the joint session, not even enough representation.
	And I'm like the only guy calling it out.
	Why has it got to be me?
	I can see why, because most people probably don't know the legal parameters here.
	I mean, you're going back to look at the Constitution and articles here and everything in subsections.
	I'm just trying to follow the rules here.
	Yeah, so you're looking at it.
	Well, what the fuck?
	Two thirds weren't present, so this isn't even legit.
	And after Nancy Pelosi does that, gavels in, she hands it over to Mike Pence, because now he's the presiding officer, right?
	She starts it, hands it over, now he's the presiding officer.
	This is all on C-SPAN. You can look it all up.
	I put out Telegram X. I put this out video, clipping it out and giving my gameplay.
	It's on my Rumble long-form interviews I've done where I laid it all out with video, right?
	This is what Mike Pence does.
	January 6th.
	By the way, this is the stuff that's going on inside.
	Everyone focused on what was going on inside.
	I'm explaining to you what's going on inside in the deliberative decision-making process of those that have the authority to do so.
	At 1.02 p.m., Mike Pence, on his Twitter account, tweets out an almost three-page memo saying that I don't have the authority to unilaterally Send back or do anything with the electors, right?
	Can we Google this real quick?
	Type in Mike Pence, January 6th, Twitter.
	I want to see if we can pull this tweet up.
	Sorry, keep going.
	So far I've been 100%, right?
	In my references.
	Yeah, yeah, no.
	I just want the audience to see it.
	But it's better because people are convinced better that way when you see the source document.
	So January 6th, he tweets it out and literally within the same minute or two, He basically agrees with Nancy Pelosi.
	And here's what happens.
	So Mike Pence gallows and says, we're going to go ahead and proceed with the certification process.
	Congressman Morgan Griffith from Virginia's 9th Congressional District stands up and says, point of order, Mr.
	Vice President.
	He should have said Mr.
	Presiding Officer, but whatever.
	He says, point of order.
	How are we supposed to Make a point of order or a parliamentary inquiry if we're not allowed, if over 90% of us are not even allowed on the House floor to participate in the joint session.
	Oh.
	He calls it.
	Yeah.
	Nice.
	What does Mike Pence say?
	Objections are not allowed under Title III U.S. Code Section 18.
	Morgan Griffiths says, I'm not attempting to make an objection.
	I'm attempting to make a parliamentary inquiry.
	Okay.
	And make a point of order.
	How do we even participate in this process if you're not even letting us be, like, here?
	Because Pelosi just said 11-11-11-11.
	Yeah.
	Mike Pence responds with, and as before he responds, in his ears whispering, Nancy Pelosi's parliamentarian.
	Oh.
	So he doesn't let the other parliamentarian talk.
	Pence is just like, that's an objection.
	Objections are not allowed.
	Which means Mike Pence did exactly what he said he couldn't do.
	He unilaterally denied Congress to have a quorum to go through the proper methodology on determining whether or not to object to electors or not.
	Because he's the final arbiter.
	He unilaterally took that authority away from Congress on that day.
	So he did what he said he couldn't do.
	So Jack Smith, fucking answer that motherfucker.
	He's defending the cabal.
	Jack Smith is there to protect the failures.
	Like, best case scenario, Mike Pence is just a cowardly retard.
	Yeah.
	That's like best case scenario.
	Best case scenario.
	Just incompetent.
	Buffoon.
	Coward.
	Idiot.
	Doesn't want to ruffle feathers, whatever the fuck.
	But when you look at the track record...
	Of him and his chief of staff working with wife Catherine Seaman to take out General Flynn and being part of that 25th Amendment attempted process against President Trump in the initial phases of the first Trump presidency with Rod Rosenstein, who was the deputy attorney general of the DOJ back in the day.
	And then when you see that he's then me, me, me, Mr.
	President, I'm going to run the COVID op as I provide cover for it.
	And then I'm going to go ahead and not have a quorum.
	There's a pattern here.
	Yeah.
	It shows intent.
	And him running the whole COVID thing led to the unconstitutional voting done by the states.
	Bingo.
	Holy shit, man.
	This shit is deep.
	This is fucking deep.
	I have a question.
	That's why they call me?
	The Deep State Marauder.
	Holy shit.
	This is great, by the way.
	Mind fucking blown.
	I have a question though.
	Yeah.
	This is all well indeed, ethical, amazing info, constitutional, right?
	Yeah.
	How do we affect change to make a change and move forward with this information?
	I got the answer to that.
	You want to jump ahead though.
	I'm already saying where this is going.
	I'm going to explain to you all the key players in the scum so that you know what they did so that people demand a fix.
	Because without knowing what the problem is, you don't know what to fix.
	That's kind of what I'm stepping through.
	You guys are giving me an opportunity for it and I appreciate it, seriously.
	America needs to know this.
	I didn't know I had such an instrumental role until I started to dig into it.
	When you line everything up, it makes sense.
	What ended up happening with that person from Virginia?
	Congressman Morgan Griffith.
	Yeah.
	When he called Pence out for not allowing them to be represented, he said...
	Meanwhile, he has Pelosi fucking talking in his ear.
	What ended up happening after that?
	He's like, no.
	Sit down.
	That's an objection.
	It can't have objections.
	And so they just proceeded as they...
	Even though this guy said, no, I'm talking to you as a parliamentarian, which he has the authority to do, still didn't matter.
	But here's what happens next.
	They go through Alabama, right?
	Alaska, Arizona.
	This was just on the first date we're in Arizona.
	Now we go to Arizona.
	Yeah, okay.
	Here's what happens.
	Because this is the first date in question.
	By the way, I'm over at the Ellipse in the VIP section over at the White House.
	Oh, you're at the White House when this is all happening?
	Yeah.
	Oh, shit.
	Just outside the White House.
	Okay.
	So I'm just in the crowd at the White House.
	And the VIP, you know, inside of the bubble, inside the Secret Service bubble, right?
	And you guys are watching this on C-SPAN. I'm seeing this.
	I'm looking at Mike Pence's tweets, right?
	I'm like...
	Do we pull up that tweet, by the way?
	As I'm looking at Mike Pence's tweet, I'm thinking to myself, like...
	Can someone find it for us in the chat, please?
	This tweet, January 6th, 102 p.m.
	from Mike Pence.
	This little bitch punked out.
	It's game over.
	Because he basically said, like, I give up.
	I'm like, alright.
	It's over.
	Because, like, my play relies on Pence and McCarthy, right?
	For it to be legitimate.
	If he's publicly saying, like, I'm in a cave, and I'm not even going to allow this thing to take place, it's like, it's over.
	So in my mind, it's like, it's over.
	Like, whatever, it's done.
	I'm headed to the house.
	So, what happens when Arizona comes up?
	Yeah.
	Oh, shit.
	Okay.
	You want to go line by line?
	Here it is.
	This is key.
	Yeah, if we want, yeah.
	That's up to you.
	Yeah, we can go.
	I'm the subject matter expert on every single component of this.
	I know you're getting tired because you're exhibiting micro-weaknesses, man.
	We need coffee.
	It's brewing.
	It's going to be epic.
	We're brewing it up.
	Nine hours, bro.
	We're going to like four in the morning.
	We're brewing this right now.
	Four in the morning!
	Until I got to catch my flight at like six or seven.
	So we got time.
	In the morning.
	Alright, you read it.
	Oh, you want me to read it?
	Okay, alright.
	And I'll ad-lib as you read it.
	Okay, let me get my glasses.
	Give me a break.
	I've been talking the whole time, bro.
	Yeah, what did I say?
	102?
	Man, my memory's not too bad, huh?
	Not bad at all.
	Dear colleague, today for the 59th time in our nation's history, Congress will convene in joint session to count electoral votes for President of the United States.
	Under our Constitution, it will be my duty as Vice President and as President of the Senate to serve as a presiding officer.
	After an election with significant allegations of voting irregularities and numerous instances of officials setting aside state election law, I share concern of millions of Americans about the integrity of this election, which we said earlier.
	Pause.
	Many states, say that part again, setting aside?
	Yeah, setting aside state election law.
	What did I say?
	Many states setting aside their state election law.
	You called it.
	That means, hey, punk ass, Mike Pence, you just admitted that you were complicit on December 23rd in violating the U.S. Constitution because you didn't defend it.
	Just like I explained.
	he knowingly did it so you can't say like oh i didn't know uh that they violated because i just didn't know i wasn't advised he specifically his signature block is on this memo he knowingly just like mark zuckerberg just did the knowing the admission of guilt
	this is an admission of guilt by mike pence on january 6th that he knew the states ran their elections outside of that state's election law and thus triggering the violation of article 2 section 1 clause 2 and And as a federal officer, Mike Pence had the obligation to refuse electors from the states that did that.
	You don't even need to read.
	Like, we can go if you want to.
	Oh, okay.
	I mean, if you think that sufficiently explains what you were trying to get at, then...
	Unless you want us to keep going.
	But he keeps going, and I... How about this?
	We could have just finished this part.
	Yeah.
	American president and have every right under the law to demand free and fair elections and a full investigation of electoral misconduct.
	As presiding officer, I was on my duty to ensure that these concerns receive a fair and open hearing in the Congress of the United States.
	Pause.
	I will ensure that they'll have a free and fair hearing, except I'm only going to allow 22 members of the House and 22 members of the Senate.
	Quorum, 12th Amendment?
	Shit, man, I got my trip to Israel to go to.
	Let's get this thing going.
	That's what's going on in this punk's mind.
	As he kneels down and smiles like a donut as he goes to travel to Israel.
	You said donut.
	And it says here, objections will be heard, evidence will be presented, and the elected representatives of the American people will make their choice or decision.
	Elected representatives, but only 11 Democrats, 11 Republicans in the House, and only 11 Democrats and 11 Republican Democrats in the Senate that were chosen by the leadership to be on the floor, and Kevin McCarthy decided so that half of them were Would not object and half of them would argue the objection.
	Let me say that again.
	Kevin McCarthy was complicit in allowing the lack of quorum because if Pelosi was true, they had to agree to not have a quorum because she said with leadership consent.
	And then it was Kevin McCarthy that had...
	So it would have been Kevin McCarthy, five and five, right?
	That's eleven.
	So he chose five members of the Republican Conference that would argue for five minutes each on objecting to that Arizona, whatever, but then the other half would argue why they shouldn't object.
	So he was already stacking the deck.
	Yeah.
	Where 75...
	He wanted to create plausible deniability that it was fair, but it really wasn't from the beginning.
	Does this guy have a fucking issue with Trump?
	McCarthy?
	Oh, dude.
	That's another five-hour episode.
	But short answer?
	Yes.
	I'm going to answer it this way.
	Of the ten impeachment voters that voted with...
	Here we go.
	Yeah.
	Remember later in February 2021?
	Yeah.
	The ten Republicans that voted to impeach Trump because they wanted to side with Jamie Raskin and Nancy Pelosi to cover up the fedsurrection and promote the insurrection narrative?
	Kevin McCarthy and his PAC donated to five of those ten at a minimum.
	Aww.
	Is that a good answer?
	There you go.
	Yeah, that answers it right there.
	Even though he's a Republican, yeah.
	That's a short answer, bro.
	And you said this fucking asshole is posturing right now to be the chief of staff for Trump?
	Yeah.
	See, this is why the Trump campaign has been losing steam, because he's bringing in all these fucking snakes that didn't support him in 2020.
	Let me drop some names here.
	I have a question.
	Wait, let him drop names.
	On his point, can Trump actually win doing it his way, or he has to play the game smarter to win this time?
	There's only one way that I see he can win.
	But we'll get to it at the end.
	Okay.
	You said you wanted to name names?
	That's the solution.
	You said you wanted to name names or something?
	Yeah, so...
	Kevin McCarthy.
	He has to have leverage within the Trump campaign also, right?
	In order to be able to wiggle his way in as Chief of Staff.
	Of course, yeah.
	Especially after being a snake like that.
	You heard of the name Chris Lasavita?
	Of course, that's his campaign manager.
	That's the fucking idiot that said the election was real.
	And he was also the idiot that said that Trump should get his Twitter taken away.
	And he's also the guy that said Kevin Paxton should be in jail.
	Damn.
	And he's also the guy that run Mr.
	P. Bush's A.G. race against Ken Paxton.
	Wait, Bush?
	Is that a relative?
	Yeah, it is.
	Yeah.
	And how close is Chris Lasavita with Kevin McCarthy?
	Probably very.
	My sources tell me extremely.
	Well, yeah.
	If he's able to weasel his way in and become fucking chief of staff after fucking Trump over like that and allowing only a minority to come in.
	So what options does Trump have?
	Well, he should.
	Imagine you're Donald and I'm going to come up with this.
	Hey, bro.
	Hey, Donald.
	I'm President Trump.
	Yeah.
	Have I got a deal for you.
	I can make sure you're the president.
	And you remain so for four years.
	If you take me as Chief of Staff, I'll make sure that the Republican House is fully funded with all the money that I control so that you can have a Republican House and are not impeached.
	If you don't take me...
	He's the biggest fundraiser.
	I wrote that down in my notes.
	Or if you pull me from being your Chief of Staff, remember, almost all the Republican conferences in Congress, because of my support and help over the years that I've been in leadership in the Republican House, they are loyal to me, not to you.
	And so here's the deal.
	All I have to do is have whatever the difference in majority is, even if the Republicans win it.
	But I'm going to say it this way.
	If you refuse to announce publicly that I'm going to be your Chief of Staff, I'm going to go ahead and fund the Democrats so that Jamie Raskin can propose a bill when Hakeem Jeffries is the Speaker so that you don't even take office on January 20th.
	Because on January 3rd when we convene with the new House, we're going to call you an insurrectionist under the 14th Amendment Section 3.
	And so you're not even going to take office even if you win the election because Congress is going to tell you you're gone.
	Now, here's the other thing.
	If you want to have me as Chief of Staff and then Basically pull me out and punk me during your presidency as a Chief of Staff, then I'm going to go ahead and work with some of the Republicans to work with the Democrats so that they can then also label you an insurrectionist.
	I got the leverage in this.
	Which is an automatically disqualifier for me, President of the United States.
	It's one of the few disqualifiers as being an insurrectionist.
	I told you.
	You can be a felon, but you can't be an insurrectionist.
	I knew this.
	Hey, I knew this, bro.
	Because Trump's position, bro, he can't really win without help from those people.
	He can't.
	He's fucked, bro.
	Literally fucked.
	Yeah, but bro, you think I'm just going to sit idly by and...
	Know what I think their play is and let it happen?
	I want to hear your plan, though.
	Come on.
	I want to hear your plan.
	Shit.
	Because we had a debate recently, me, you, Andrew, and Haas, and I believe that the population itself, if it's going to be a fair election, which is not really fair, are going to vote for Kamala because they're being pretty much brainwashed.
	You think they're going to allow Trump in?
	No.
	With what I just explained that they did?
	No, they won't.
	They won't.
	But I want to hear your plan because...
	They're going to go to the max.
	Yeah, 100%.
	And Kamala's campaign is pretty good because they're putting celebrities that people can relate to to vote for Kamala, given the...
	Come on, relatable, bro.
	And I'm just saying, the gender population is not smart enough to say, you know what?
	Okay, here's A and B. Okay, this is a lesser evil.
	I'll choose this.
	They're going to be like, you know what?
	This feels good.
	I'm going to go over here.
	But with your plan, I'm down here, bro.
	All right.
	January 6th, Fed's direction.
	Here's how it took place.
	Nancy Pelosi knew what the play was.
	Mayor of D.C., Muriel Bowser, knew what the play was, right?
	McCarthy agreed on this limited representation.
	So, when...
	And oh, by the way, when I sent the play to McCarthy, he was kind of like...
	He's somewhat of a coward, too, kind of like Pence.
	So, best case scenario, he's just like a weakling and doesn't know where to go.
	He just goes where the wind blows, right?
	What's the plan?
	I just thought about it.
	If you say the plan now, this will be part two.
	Can I ask you or whoever will hear it and then fuck it up.
	So don't say the plan.
	No, the plan has to...
	The plan involves the people knowing the plan so that it can be...
	So that people can help execute it.
	Hey, don't ruin it, nigga.
	Let them say the plan.
	No, because when you hear it, you're going to be like, damn.
	Okay.
	All right, so Fed Surrection and the plan.
	Go ahead.
	All right.
	So the Fed Surrection, on January 5th, Muriel Bowser, who's the mayor of D.C. So here's where it comes down to jurisdiction.
	Man!
	January...
	What was it?
	Title II U.S. Code, 1979, 1967 lays out the jurisdiction of the U.S. Capitol Police.
	Yes.
	The jurisdiction goes up to Union Station up north, north of the Capitol, down to Nat Stadium, south of the Capitol.
	Goes west, just up to the...
	National Mall, and then East, that includes the Supreme Court.
	Okay.
	Okay?
	In that area.
	That's the concurrent jurisdictions, though, between U.S. Capitol Police and Metropolitan Police Department.
	Let me get one, too.
	Okay?
	Metropolitan Police Department and U.S. Capitol Police have concurrent jurisdiction over that.
	Inside of the Capitol buildings, meaning the Senate, the Capitol, the House, and the Library of Congress, that's unilateral jurisdiction for...
	U.S. Capitol Police.
	Only.
	Okay.
	Only.
	Metroponic Police, no.
	No.
	On the inside.
	On the outside, in that jurisdiction zone, it's concurrent.
	Meaning?
	Both can.
	And you get this, right?
	As an agent, jurisdiction, right?
	So the only way a DHS, HSI agent can step foot in that zone is under what authority?
	They have to be invited by the law enforcement agency that has primary or concurrent jurisdiction, meaning MPD, Mayor Bowser can make parameters around it, and the Capitol Police Board through the Sergeants at Arms that work for the Speaker and the Senate Majority Leader.
	See how this plays?
	Yeah.
	So when you look at the DNC and the RNC pipe bombs, do they fall into the jurisdiction of the MPD and U.S. Capitol Police?
	Yes, they do.
	Yeah.
	Start to make you think.
	Yeah, yeah.
	But guess what?
	Retards in Congress, whether it's Thomas Mass, on this point, he's a retard.
	Marjorie Taylor Greene, as it applies to the pipe bomb stuff and the jurisdictional hook of the U.S. Capitol Police, retard.
	Every single reporter that's out there that's a J6 expert, complete fucking retard.
	Because they don't understand, nor do they even bother to make it a point to understand, that once you understand the legal framework upon which they ran the diversion known as the pipe bombs, and who had the authority and roles and responsibility behind it, you can't answer the holistic picture of January 6th.
	January 6th.
	Okay, let me start with my top line assessment and I'm going to go into the details.
	I should have started with this.
	January 6th was a deliberate, facilitated, instigated, and incited breach of the Capitol led by the Capitol Police leadership, Capitol Police Board, Sergeants at Arms, and the political leadership of the bicameral legislative branch.
	So when we're talking about covert action and findings, there's one place in America where the federal legislative branch has unilateral supremacy over everything.
	Judge, jury, executioner, and discretionary law enforcement decision-making.
	So if I want to prosecute anybody inside of the Capitol, The Speaker of the House has full authority to do so.
	On the Senate side, the Senate Majority Leader has full authority to do so.
	Got him.
	Okay?
	And if you want to conduct a covert action, well, I wouldn't call it, like, let's call it a covert action kind of like what we described, but it's different because a covert action is what the President appoints to the CIA. In this instance, the jurisdictional zone inside of the Capitol office building is a separate sovereign entity.
	That the executive branch has no authority over, the judicial...
	Like, for example, the marshals.
	They have jurisdiction over the courts.
	Yep.
	HSI supports that, or like the Federal Protective Service, right?
	Yeah, Homeland Security supports that, yeah.
	But that's under the invite of the judiciary.
	Same thing here, Article 1, branch of government, the invite.
	So, for Donald Trump to send executive branch assets, like they said that he should have done, he's not able to legally, unless Nancy Pelosi...
	And Senator McConnell request it, depending on which side of the House or Senate.
	They have to request it, because they're the ones that have primacy over that space, that time space right there.
	Knowing that, if you want to run a Fed's direction for it to be successful, you don't want anybody that's loyal to President Trump stopping that.
	So you bring in those that are friendly to you.
	Who do you work through to be able to facilitate that in the U.S. Capitol Police?
	Well, to answer that question, you probably want to know the task organization of the U.S. Capitol Police, right?
	Sure, yeah.
	And the sergeants at arms.
	Yeah.
	Which means you probably want to look at the policies and procedures manual of the U.S. Capitol Police.
	Do they have investigators, PD, patrol guys, canine unit?
	And you want to look at the authorities and roles and responsibilities of each different officer.
	Yeah.
	Oh, let's stumble across...
	How about you were...
	How about you take a look at the head of the Intel and Interagency Coordination Division of the U.S. Capitol Police?
	Okay.
	That's a thing.
	I'm sure it is, yeah.
	Who's the girl that leads it?
	Bring up her photo.
	Yogananda Pittman.
	Okay.
	Yogananda Pittman.
	You want to do one of the sounds?
	Let me see the sound effects, man.
	Let me play around with that.
	Yeah, I got so many here.
	Which one do you want?
	I'm going to play around with that as a girl.
	Okay.
	I don't know if you'll figure it out, though.
	I have, like, literally a million.
	Okay.
	Yogananda Pittman.
	Y-O. That's right.
	Yogananda Pittman.
	Gotcha, bitch!
	Yeah!
	Let's go!
	Okay, let's go!
	I got the right one.
	Okay, this is her right here.
	Yeah.
	Alright, a little bit about Yogan...
	Her nickname's Yogi.
	Hey, she's one of us!
	Alright, Yogananda Pittman.
	Check this out.
	You can read the first line.
	She's the acting chief of the United States Capitol Police.
	Former.
	Former.
	But now it looks like she's the head of the University of California Berkeley chief of police.
	And guess which congressional district that is?
	Berkeley.
	Where she's at.
	Zoe Lofgren.
	Guess who Zoe Lofgren was?
	She was the chair of the House Administration Committee, the committee in the House that has oversight over the Capitol Police and the Capitol Police Board.
	Democrat during this time.
	Gotcha.
	I don't know how deep you want to go into this.
	So she got hooked up.
	Oh, yeah, of course.
	So she was the head of the interagency cooperation team for Capitol Police at the time?
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	She's the one that withheld the evidence that there might be a breach of the Capitol.
	She withheld it from the chief of Capitol Police and the head of ops, deliberately.
	Oh, so she had $4 that there was going to be a breach?
	Yeah.
	And instead, she kept it.
	And she only provided it to...
	Sean Gallagher, I think is what it was.
	And Sean Gallagher, dude, that's a separate, I'm going to have to do a separate discussion.
	That's fine, that's fine.
	Bottom line is, I've looked at every single individual in this, and the basis for what...
	How did she know that they were going to storm the Capitol, allegedly?
	Because her deputy, Julie Farnham, pulled up.
	Sip that coffee, man.
	1775 coffee, guys.
	Julie Farnham blocks me on Twitter.
	I wonder why.
	And so does the disinformation diva, Wixipedia.
	Remember the disinformation governance board chick?
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Oh, man.
	Dude, I got dirt on everybody.
	You ask me how I survive?
	I got dirt on everybody.
	God, I love it.
	I need to do like a 40-hour version of this on each one of these scumbags.
	I get it.
	She's the interagency person.
	I'm getting too much in the weeds.
	So if you're head of Intel and Interagency Coordination Division, just by the title alone, right, you're supposed to provide intelligence on threats and provide it, which she didn't.
	And the way I know that is because Chief Sun testified to it, and Tarek Johnson, the whistleblower, heard of him?
	Tarek Johnson?
	Yeah.
	Testified to it.
	And let's just say I talked to those guys.
	Who did he work for?
	He was a lieutenant at the U.S. Capitol Police.
	Gotcha.
	With the MAGA hat that basically, remember?
	Yeah.
	He was on Tucker, and he was like...
	Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.
	But I talked to all these people, so I don't...
	Actually, you know what?
	What's the name again?
	Tariq...
	Tariq Johnson.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Yeah, and he got fired for that shit, if I'm not mistaken.
	Right?
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Former Capitol Police.
	Let me look him up.
	No, he got fired because he was exposing the corruption.
	Yeah.
	What happened to Tariq Johnson is the same thing that they did to General Flynn.
	Yes, I've seen this guy on X before.
	But for the Capitol Police component of it.
	I see him.
	Yes, I've seen this guy on X before.
	Yeah, put him up.
	Tarek Johnson, hero.
	Yeah.
	Where does he work now?
	Former lieutenant with the U.S. Capitol Police.
	My goals are J6 justice and to create national unity.
	I walked away from the Democratic Party in Trump 2024.
	Wait.
	Yeah, I remember seeing this guy's profile before.
	He's doing what?
	Pull him up.
	Tarek Johnson.
	He's doing furniture?
	Yeah.
	It's an embarrassment.
	What's going on with him?
	Just like what they did to General Flynn.
	Alright, we're getting a little bit to the weeds, so let me say this.
	We'll go back to this woman that was the head of interagency cooperation at Intel.
	Thank you.
	So when you're in that role, the role is to provide Intel, which she deliberately didn't release, and then as per whistleblower testimony and others that are going to be disclosed, and then interagency coordination.
	So what does that mean, interagency?
	Remember, I used to teach this stuff for four years.
	Interagency coordination, interagency is a term of art.
	It means the entire intel community, the entire law enforcement community that needs to be coordinated with as you are kind of representing and protecting U.S. Capitol and its members, right?
	Members of the House, Senate, staff.
	So who would you want to coordinate with?
	How about you coordinate with the elements, to begin with, that are in your jurisdiction zone?
	NPD, right?
	What about the DNC security?
	Head of security?
	What about the RNC head of security, right?
	Yep.
	Make sense?
	Yep.
	What about the FBI? What about DHS? CBP-HSI, right?
	Of course.
	Of course.
	So if you're, according to Tarek Johnson, Tariq Johnson spent 22 and a half, 23 years in the Capitol Police.
	He knows it pretty well.
	Yep.
	Okay.
	He knows Yogananda Pittman.
	Okay.
	So, man, I've done three-hour episodes just on January 6th, so I'm going to back off because I can go forever.
	According to Tariq Johnson, Yogananda Pittman is like this with the Democrats and the leadership.
	The Congressional Black Caucus.
	Again, I'm quoting Tariq Johnson.
	If you look at her records of promotions and the timeline on it, it's very quick based on what Tariq told me.
	And when you look at the entire policies, procedures manual, and everything related to the U.S. Capitol Police, which I may or may not have, Right?
	It's pretty evident based on what you see, kind of what goes on.
	So anyway, I suspect that she was the one tasked with Running the Fed, not tasked with, but to participate in the Fed's direction play.
	So I had a best case scenario for her, epic abysmal failure going on January 6th.
	Same thing with Julie Farnham.
	And they're trying to protect their name.
	I think there's more to it, though.
	Because when you look at it, and all the video evidence is out there, and all their deliberate intent to block the CCTV footage from ever getting out.
	Remember when they controlled the house?
	Yep.
	The reason why they did that is according to the whistleblower...
	They said they were going to release it.
	They never did.
	No, they've been releasing it because the committee that now has control over it is headed up by Chairman Barry Loudermilk, the House subcommittee.
	So they're finally releasing it now.
	Dude.
	It took years.
	I have been...
	Remember, I identify the problem and then I try to figure out who's going to solve it.
	So as it applies to January 6th and exposing the Fed's direction and exposing the whole op and exposing the whole cover-up.
	Remember, David Buckley led the cover-up with that committee.
	I already kind of laid that out.
	Before it was announced that he was going to chair that committee, Loudermont, Georgia Congressman, I was at an event at the Capitol Hill Club.
	And the guy said, hey, what are you doing?
	It was just like an event.
	I'm like, hey, my name's Ivan Raikland, and I'm basically investigating the Fed's direction.
	And he's like, well, a buddy of mine works for Loudermilk.
	You know what?
	Fuck it.
	I'm just going to say everything.
	Go ahead.
	Might as well.
	You guys heard it here first.
	Time's short.
	Yep.
	The chief of staff for Barry Loudermilk.
	Was this guy's friend.
	So we set up a meeting the following day.
	And in that meeting I brought in Ashley Babbitt's mother.
	You know who Ashley Babbitt is?
	It's the girl that was shot point blank in the chest by U.S. Capitol Police Officer Michael Byrd inside of the Capitol.
	The first and only time in our nation's history that a person was murdered inside of the Capitol.
	Did you ever hear about that?
	No.
	Why do you think that?
	Covered up.
	You heard about George Floyd?
	Yeah.
	What do you think about that?
	I think it was planned.
	Why do you think you've heard about George Floyd if you didn't hear about Ashley Babbitt?
	Didn't have enough pull for their agenda.
	What do you think?
	Well, they're always going to put out the BLM bullshit and the propaganda over someone getting killed at the fucking Capitol every single time.
	They went and prosecuted everyone for J6, but they didn't prosecute anyone for BLM, the riots.
	Whether it was legitimate or illegitimate, whether he was murdered by the officer or whether he was...
	Fentanyl overdose.
	Fentanyl overdose, right?
	Let's agree that all of that happened, right?
	How many times that either one of those has occurred in this country?
	A lot.
	How many times has a person been murdered inside of the United States Capitol?
	That's never, but the time someone dying from the police all the time.
	One time and only one time.
	There was no media coverage on it, is the point.
	Which is, by design.
	That's my point.
	Yeah, by design.
	And so how many people even...
	They focus on insurrectionists instead of the insurrectionists that, allegedly insurrectionists, that got killed.
	So check this out.
	And then when you start to dig into Ashley Babbitt...
	And you start digging into...
	You heard of Roseanne Boylan?
	Hmm.
	Do you know that there was two people murdered on January 6th?
	No.
	Roseanne Boylan's the other one.
	Guess who killed her?
	So the first one, Ashley Babbitt, was shot and killed by...
	Michael Byrd.
	By the way, please bring this up.
	I need people, if you're not familiar with this, I'm guessing a lot of your audience has never heard of this.
	Yeah, unless you research January 6th stuff, you're not going to know this stuff.
	Who was holding a flag?
	The mainstream media wasn't pushing this stuff.
	If you can pull up Michael Byrd.
	Sure.
	Michael Byrd, Capitol Police.
	Wasn't somebody holding a flag?
	When they died?
	Or no?
	Lieutenant Michael Byrd.
	It's out there.
	Actually, you know what?
	StopHate.com.
	Pull up StopHate.com and just go through there.
	I've got to give them a shout out.
	It's an entire encyclopedia website that goes into all the transgressions by U.S. Capitol Police, Metropolitan Police Department that will happen on January 6th, right?
	Now I'm going to say this.
	J6, the true timeline, but bottom line, as you scroll through that, let's just kind of talk through this.
	Type in Ashley Babbitt in the URL up top.
	StopHate.com, I think Ashley.
	Ashley Babbitt.
	Or maybe just Ashley.
	I can't remember.
	So anyway, it goes into like four angles of video of what happened to her as you look for it.
	You'll find it as we talk this through.
	So bottom line, the U.S. Capitol Police officer killed her.
	You never heard about it.
	She was unarmed.
	Peaceful.
	Alright?
	There you go.
	You wanna play it?
	Uh, we're on YouTube.
	Can we play it?
	Let's play it.
	Yeah.
	Maybe...
	This is what we'll do.
	Toggle over to...
	Guys, come on over to Umbra real quick.
	We'll play it.
	Um, and then we'll toggle back to YouTube after.
	So just toggle YouTube off and then let's show it.
	Have you seen this?
	I haven't seen this, no.
	I knew about her being killed, but I didn't know.
	I didn't see the video.
	Oh, wow.
	I... Because they said that they were gonna release this shit for so long and they didn't.
	So...
	I was ignorant.
	I thought a lot more people knew about this.
	No.
	I was ignorant.
	I was thinking that a lot more people knew about this.
	Dude, unless you're a January 6th researcher, 99% of Americans don't know this shit, bro.
	Like, they're not.
	They're just not.
	Because they don't know George Floyd because that was in the fucking media and the BLM riots around this time.
	But they went after the J6ers, but they didn't go after the BLM writers.
	So she's an Air Force vet, right?
	Yeah.
	You may think whatever you think about her, but like, is it cool for an unarmed...
	5'2", 110, 20-pound girl with a backpack on that's basically asking a U.S. Capitol Police officer and say, hey, this guy right here is being belligerent next to me.
	He's trying to break the doors and everything.
	Can you stop what he's doing?
	And when the U.S. Capitol Police isn't doing anything, she's like, she used to be a security officer in the Air Force.
	She's a lefty.
	Punches that dude.
	Name's Zach Alam.
	For him to stop destroying property inside the Capitol.
	And then tries to exit the vestibule area.
	And as she's exiting, going through the door window, you'll see it.
	Alright, let's play.
	You shot before as an 1811?
	Yeah, yeah, no, of course.
	I want you to look at it from...
	Which one do you want to watch?
	The Bishu?
	We can watch the Rumble version.
	Where his finger on the trigger is.
	Watch it on Rumble.
	For anyone struggling with high blood sugar, do not drink cold water.
	Did you know type 2 diabetes is a complete...
	This $35 water bottle is making waves worldwide.
	Don't drink another drop until you see what this cell...
	We are walking to the Capitol in a mob.
	There's an estimated over 3 million people here today.
	So despite what the media tells you, boots on ground definitely say something different.
	There is a sea of...
	Nothing but red, white, and blue patriots and Trump.
	And it was amazing.
	You could see the president talk.
	We are now walking down the inaugural path to the Capitol building.
	Three million plus people.
	God bless America, patriots.
	How are you doing, man?
	Stay safe, alright?
	Man, you are covered.
	I thought I was that.
	You got it way worse.
	Okay.
	That guy that said, man, you are whatever.
	That guy's name is John Sullivan.
	Here, into the mic just so they can hear you.
	Go ahead.
	The guy that's in the background taking this video, his name is John Sullivan.
	John Sullivan is a known Antifa BLM guy.
	Pull up his name.
	Pull it up.
	So when Christopher Wray...
	The director of the FBI is testifying before Congress later on saying, we have no evidence of Antifa BLM being at the Capitol.
	So he was right behind her the whole time.
	He's right there.
	Yeah, recording.
	Looks like it's his camera.
	I call him the inner breach leader.
	Okay.
	Interesting.
	Dude, I got so much evidence on all these people.
	Alright, so pull up John Sullivan, January 6th, Antifa.
	Or no, BLM, whatever.
	This guy runs the organization known as Insurgents USA. Insurgents, like, he's promoting Insurgents.
	He's been seeing that different, like, in the Summer of Love, he was at all of them, right?
	Mm-hmm.
	Where is he?
	John Sullivan?
	Rioter or journalist?
	You can play Washington Compost, because that's the lefty's favorite thing, but you've got to pay for it, so I wouldn't recommend it, because that thing's a garbage source.
	Is that him right there?
	John Earl Sullivan?
	Yeah, 1994.
	He's a young motherfucker.
	That's him right here.
	Okay.
	Okay?
	He's an American political activist and self-identified photojournalist who participated in the January 6th United States Capitol attack.
	In November 2023, he was convicted by a jury, a felony obstruction of official proceeding civil disorder, and five misdemeanors.
	Before the January 6th attacks, Sullivan organized and participated in protests related to Black Lives Matter.
	Faggot.
	Movement through, though, a few other BLM, or we're on Rumbles, I can say, organized explicitly.
	Yeah, but it's on X, so Elon's going to be mad.
	No, we're not even on X, right?
	On X, it's just so is Rumble right now.
	Even expelling Sullivan from rallies and warning fellow activists to avoid associating with Sullivan.
	On January 6th, Sullivan entered the Capitol wearing a Trump MAGA hat and attire and broke a window using a bullhorn.
	He repeatedly shouted encouragement to fellow writer Sullivan captured footage that attacked his own interaction law enforcement and the shooting of Ashley Babbitt.
	Okay, so let's play the video real quick.
	Oh, he got it on film.
	Yeah, he was the one behind her with the video that we're gonna see right now.
	Oh, she was white?
	You tell me.
	I thought she was black.
	Bro, you didn't see her the whole time?
	Oh, shit!
	I thought she was black.
	Alright, let's play.
	Hey, do you need water or something?
	Chill out!
	Chill the fuck out, bro!
	Hey, chill out!
	You see that guy punch the door?
	Keep an eye on him and keep an eye on Ashley Babbitt, alright?
	Ashley Babbitt's the girl.
	This guy's clearly a fucking antagonizer.
	instigator go
	And there's so many people.
	It's just, they're going to push their way up here.
	Bro, I see people out there get hurt.
	I don't want to see you.
	We will make a pop dead ass.
	That's what I'm saying.
	We won't make a pop, bro.
	You see what he's doing?
	Yeah.
	That guy just breaks the window.
	Yeah.
	Zachary Allum looks directly at Ashley Babbitt.
	Ashley begins throwing a punch at Allum.
	Oh, shit!
	Ashley Punch makes contact with Ellen's face knocking his glasses off.
	And...
	Here's the guy!
	Here's the guy!
	Here's a gun!
	- Back it in. - Back it in. - Back it in. - Back it in. - Yep, I see it. - Back it in. - Back it in. - Back it in. - Back it in. - Oh, that was the fuck.
	- Oh, shit.
	- Oh, shit. - So bring it back 10 seconds. - All right, rewind in a second.
	- Oh, shit. - Let me explain something. - Yeah, bring it back before the shoot.
	Yeah, so you can see the cop on the left here with the gun.
	And she's on the right-hand side on the video.
	And she's right behind this dude that's punching the window.
	Talk me through your training.
	Talk everyone through your training as you see it from this situation.
	That's a bad shoot, bro.
	Very bad shoot.
	There was no imminent danger on his life.
	I don't know why the fuck he shot.
	Step us through, like, methodically what you were trained as an 1811 special agent as it applies to...
	That guy shooting in relationship, you saw where the U.S. Capitol Police officers were, that were standing right there, and also the stack of the other U.S. Capitol Police officers just on the other side of that wall.
	Isn't that murder?
	That is such maximal potential for fratricide, bro.
	Yeah, I mean, there's a couple of different things here, right?
	Because you're the expert.
	Yeah, so there's a couple of different things, right?
	Use of force typically is you got to make sure that, well, number one, there needs to be like a life or death or, you know, serious bodily injury, right?
	That's going to be apparent, right?
	Very apparent to you, right?
	So when you pull that trigger, you need to basically be in fear of your life or someone else, a serious bodily injury, right?
	To protect somebody else.
	Second is you need to know where your bullet is going and target at there and beyond the target so Obviously in a very concentrated area like that to shoot is fucking crazy And then also you can see that he wasn't no eminent danger because he was behind the door and then I don't see how he could unless he saw something I didn't Anyone else is an eminent danger and then the fact that like you got your colleagues right there I would never pull the trigger in a situation like that with all those people there so That's a fucking wild shoe unless he has some kind of facts to him that
	weren't apparent to me, but to me that's like no reason to pull a shoe at all.
	Remember, the other aspect is as you watch it, she's got a backpack on, Her hand's up there, and she's going, like, think of the balance component.
	How much of a threat does she have on the guy that is right there?
	Yeah.
	And another thing I want people to understand, when you do a search for Michael Byrd and then left service weapon in bathroom.
	This guy's got a history of...
	Being a dumbass?
	Yeah.
	Probably if he's doing dumb shoots like that.
	God damn.
	Alright, let's um...
	Knowing that, I didn't hear about it.
	She's white.
	Look at the lady with the pot.
	She's black.
	Remember the lady with the pot?
	Yeah.
	Don't give a shit if you kill a white person.
	Yeah, that's why I didn't hear about it.
	Yeah, baby.
	Biden laptops matter.
	Shit.
	Okay.
	All right.
	Let's play that clip back one more time.
	We'll go back to the clip.
	Yeah.
	Oh, hold up.
	Before the clip.
	He already had it up.
	Oh, okay.
	Bring that.
	Capitol Police weapon left unattended in Capitol Bathroom again.
	Scroll down and read through who left it.
	Zoom it in.
	Lieutenant Mike Byrd left his Glock 22.
	So that's Glock 22.
	That's going to be a 40 cal.
	Yo, I'm sorry, bro.
	I'm not about to be in the Capitol rioting and banging on doors or even standing by the door.
	Because to be fair, bro, I'm not saying what happened there was right.
	But I'm not about to be there chilling.
	Like, what the fuck?
	Like, why was she even there?
	To riot?
	First Amendment inside of the Capitol.
	You can get her for trespass, but what did she do that was threatening?
	Nothing.
	But she's there, though.
	What did they do to those protesting in the Cannon building in October of 2023?
	Let them go?
	The Palestinian stuff?
	And what about at the DNC? When they're basically firebombing the DNC, what happened to them?
	Not much?
	You know why?
	Why?
	Because it all depends on who the Capitol Police Chief is.
	And when Pelosi and Schumer are appointed, and they're achieving the political objectives of those two leaders in the House and Senate, they get to decide who to arrest and who not to arrest.
	And they get to decide who to murder and who not to murder, and whether or not that's considered objectively reasonable or not.
	That's what's going on.
	All right, let's play this clip real quick.
	I'm not going to lie, bro.
	You know where she should have been?
	Making a sandwich, bitch.
	I agree.
	Who?
	Hey, hey, hey.
	Listen, man.
	That was a joke.
	A bad joke.
	I agree.
	Just saying.
	To be real, though, she should have been in the kitchen at least home.
	To be fair.
	Let the men do it.
	You don't do it.
	What do you think about this shoot?
	Shooting?
	Oh, terrible, bro.
	Let's roll it forward.
	Alright, play it.
	Goddamn fresh.
	What?
	Is this a raw take on the scenario?
	This is a raw take, bro.
	Again, let me back up.
	The first and only time in American history that someone has gotten shot and killed like this in the United States Capitol.
	You ever heard about an investigation?
	Like, even if you disagree, even if you're like, you shouldn't have been there, Like, she was wrong across every aspect you can think of.
	You think that there should be an investigation?
	100%.
	Where is it?
	Well, the powers that be don't want to investigate.
	That's my point.
	So when you don't investigate, then there's something more to it.
	Yeah, I know for sure.
	When you asked me earlier why I'm involved, when I smell something fishy, no one else is covering it, that's where I'm going.
	Because everybody is afraid to touch it.
	What happened to the cop?
	Did he get arrested?
	He got promoted to captain.
	Oh, that's crazy, bro.
	Alright, so let's play this clip and I'm going to explain how use of force situations go.
	Let's play this and then I'll talk about what should have happened and clearly didn't here.
	Play.
	Look at where his finger is.
	His finger is on the trigger the entire time of shoot.
	What's going through the window?
	She was about to climb through, it looked like.
	Was she the only one climbing through?
	Looked like it.
	No balance.
	Hands are out there.
	Right?
	Yeah.
	Tell me what threat she's posing.
	Zero, dude.
	Zero.
	I don't know why the fuck he shot her.
	Even if she had come through, like, you can restrain her physically, but there's no...
	Can't he just physically?
	Yeah.
	Like, there's no reason to shoot.
	And when you look at the size and stature of that officer, dude's like twice her size.
	Yeah.
	Here, keep playing it, Bills.
	Here, keep playing keep playing it.
	Here, keep shooting it.
	Get her down.
	You said she was shot in the chest?
	I thought I would go by the neck, I think.
	Okay, that makes more sense.
	She's bleeding to a hole.
	All right, so you got a full staff right there.
	You got two other US Catholic priests over Irving Howard.
	They have the women officer on the other side and has less understanding of the situation.
	If it was an imminent threat, you might have everybody in the West right to the top.
	Oh, there you can see these doors.
	I don't like that, you can see them.
	I don't like that.
	Go ahead.
	Yeah.
	See what?
	So one of the guys that's in that crowd is a guy by the name of Taylor Hansen.
	Okay.
	I've talked to him.
	I've interviewed him.
	Okay.
	So this is it.
	He describes it all as well.
	Now I'll say this, that it should force people to ask this question.
	Okay, we get it.
	The Democrats don't want this to come out because it looks bad, right?
	It looks terrible.
	What about the Republicans?
	Why is Fox News not covering this?
	You're saying there's no audio?
	Hmm.
	Why is Fox News not covering this?
	That's a question that I like to ask myself and investigate.
	You want to know what I think?
	What do you think?
	So the sergeant at arms for Pelosi, Paul Irving, was also the sergeant at arms for Paul Ryan when he was the Speaker of the House before Pelosi.
	So as I looked into when they mentioned the third hearing, when they mentioned my name, some of the other testimony included where Paul Ryan calls Mike Pence's Chief of Staff, Mark Short, and Mike Pence, telling them that, hey, you got no authority to do anything on January 6th.
	Basically, don't listen to what Ivan Raiklund's saying.
	He probably called his sergeant-at-arms and said, hey, man, run the Fed's direction play, and I'll provide you top cover because I'm on the board of Fox News.
	We won't cover it.
	We'll protect you.
	That's why none of the media covered it left to right.
	They're all in on it, I think.
	Is this on X? This video?
	I mean, we've...
	It's on Rumble.
	Stop hate has put it out.
	Go back to X since we're done with this.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, so we're done with it.
	You're good with the video?
	Yeah.
	Okay, so we can go ahead and go back to YouTube now and open it back up.
	I think the thing that's important for people to realize, so after a shooting like that, typically what's going to happen is the Internal Affairs is going to open an investigation and then the local jurisdiction that's involved is going to open an investigation.
	So in this case, it's probably going to be...
	Yes, their internal affairs.
	They have an internal affairs board.
	Or in this case, it might even be an OIG, Office of Inspector General.
	But either way, their internal affairs is going to investigate, and then what they're going to typically do is they're going to make sure that he was, like, using the proper weapon when he shot, was it the rounds were, you know, duty issue, all this other crap.
	Then the criminal investigation or potential criminal investigation is going to be conducted by the state.
	It's going to be the Metropolitan Police Department more than likely that investigates it.
	Or, yeah, it's going to be the Metropolitan Police Department.
	So, Metropolitan Police Department comes in.
	They're going to investigate as a potential homicide.
	Capitol Police is going to do an independent investigation internally to make sure that he acted within, you know, that he shot the correct round.
	He was using a service weapon when the shooting happened, etc.
	So, if Metropolitan Police Department homicide clears him, what's going to happen is they're going to...
	Is there something playing?
	Yeah, I hear it.
	Might be your phone Yeah, I think it's the other yeah Okay, so then after, don't worry about it.
	18,000, baby.
	Yeah, after Metropod, a police department clears the police officer, Capitol Police, then Internal Affairs 9 out of 10 times is going to clear him as well.
	Because Internal Affairs isn't going to do the criminal investigation.
	They're going to typically do administrative.
	They typically don't do the criminal case.
	It's going to be the state that does the criminal case because murder 9 out of 10 times falls under the state to prosecute.
	And guess who has to sign off on basically every criminal referral?
	In the U.S. Capitol Police.
	Yogi?
	The General Counsel.
	Thomas Aquinas Tobias is his name.
	And the Chief of Capitol Police.
	Acting at the time was?
	Yogi Beer.
	Yogi Pittman.
	So this guy didn't get any days off on...
	He didn't get anything.
	He didn't get nothing on this.
	They sanctioned a clean shoot, I guess.
	No, they sent him over to Bowling Air Force Base, to the officer quarters in Maryland, in hiding and protection.
	While he was being investigated.
	And then when it blew over, because they were able to promote the insurrection narrative enough and cover up the fedsurrection, then he was sent back to the U.S. Capitol Police.
	Because they painted her as insurrectionist is what they painted her as.
	That's why she got shot.
	Yeah, I mean, for me, looking at the footage, there's no way that I can justify shooting an unarmed individual running into the Capitol thing.
	His finger's on the trigger while he's, like, fumbling around.
	Yeah, that's crazy.
	You only put your finger on the trigger when you're ready to take the shot.
	Yeah, finger should always be on the trigger.
	Not like...
	And if you see him inside of the house chambers, there's a picture of him with his finger on the trigger while he's running through the chambers before he gets to that door.
	Yeah, that's very bad.
	I've talked to Mark Wayne Mullen, congressman that was in the chambers at the time, next to him.
	I've talked to Troy Nels.
	If you take Troy Nels' quote, Troy Nels was the closest member of Congress to Michael Byrd.
	He calls it a murder.
	But here's the problem.
	If your own Capitol Police officers are the ones protecting you, Are you going to feel comfortable saying that they conducted a murder?
	Of course not.
	No.
	No, because then they're going to mutiny you.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	And that's crazy to me.
	That's why it requires somebody from the outside to investigate what happened.
	So two issues here.
	One, she shouldn't have tried to jump through the glass.
	But two, on the other hand, there was no need for that level of force.
	Correct.
	You didn't need that.
	My question is, why are you even there?
	Well, they had to be there.
	Because the 2020 election was completely illegitimate and stolen.
	The people that were there in D.C. that day knew everything that I'm laying out right now.
	No, I get it, but like, I just think personally, women should be out of that, you know, scenario because it could be dangerous.
	Why are you even there?
	It's all men there, but you're the only woman there.
	They're just First Amendment activity.
	No, there's a bunch of women out there.
	But they're not in, where she's at, right?
	I mean, she's like inside.
	He's saying she shouldn't have went into the Capitol building.
	That's what he's saying, which I see her perspective on that.
	But for him to shoot her, that's wild.
	It's fucked up.
	But I'm saying her even being there, like, why are you even here?
	There's a bunch of dudes around you.
	I answered that.
	I know, I know, but...
	It's an illegal election.
	I mean, from a woman's standpoint, you should not be there, man.
	But from a criminality standpoint, it's trespassing is what it boils down to.
	I know where you're trying to go.
	I'm not budging.
	Understandable.
	Not on this one.
	Because it's too serious of a topic.
	Yeah.
	Fair?
	Yeah, the crime that was committed here was trespassing.
	At the end of the day.
	What is that, like, 40 bucks?
	100 bucks?
	It's like 50 bucks, usually.
	It's a misdemeanor.
	Yeah.
	It's a misdemeanor.
	Nothing, right?
	It's a misdemeanor.
	All we want is equal justice under the law, right?
	We want it all.
	Yeah.
	Alright, now that the somber tone has started...
	You're like...
	I've spent the last three and a half years basically going after these scum.
	The cover-up.
	It's literally...
	This is only another component of the cover-up after escalatory cover-up.
	The reason why they're going to this level of covering everything up...
	Because the first illegal thing they did was the illegal spying on Trump.
	Right.
	They could not let him back in because he's going...
	Like, we already know.
	They already fucked around, and they know they're going to find out if he comes back in.
	So they're willing to conduct a plandemic.
	They're willing to conduct point-blank murder inside of the Capitol.
	I mean, best case scenario, that's negligent homicide, right?
	Very bad shoot, man.
	Very bad shoot.
	Okay.
	Deep State, right?
	I still want to know.
	Beat her with a baton, tase her.
	Oh, you want to talk about beat her with a baton?
	Like, shoot her though?
	That's wild.
	Bring up Roseanne Boylan on that same website.
	Yeah.
	Beaten to death by Lila Morris, Metropolitan Police Department officer outside of the Capitol.
	Really?
	That was the second murder.
	Alright, we could pull that one up next.
	You never heard of this.
	So, hold on, hold on.
	Another woman.
	Hold on.
	To your point.
	What?
	Why women shouldn't be in infantry.
	It's going to cause, like, issues.
	And then, listen, I get it.
	This part here...
	I'm going to answer it this way.
	I got to rudely interrupt.
	I'm going to answer it this way.
	You guys are all about men being men, right?
	Mm-hmm.
	When men are not being men...
	I'm going to go hard on this one.
	Okay, okay, okay.
	I'm going to go hard on this one.
	I know where you're going with it.
	Go ahead.
	When retards are lopping their penises off and slapping on a vagina, because these scumbags are trying to manipulate the country into believing it through bots, AI algorithms, so that men are no longer men, women are stepping up to stop that bullshit from happening.
	People like Ashley and Roseanne, whatever you want to think of them, it's because men are no longer men.
	I'm here to basically teach people how to fucking grow a dick back, okay?
	I think you guys are part of that.
	Oh, helping guys grow their dicks back?
	Helping guys grow their fucking dicks back.
	Well, yeah, I mean, we definitely have some issues here with masculinity in the United States.
	I think what he's saying is that, well, you're trying to say women shouldn't be in law enforcement?
	I don't know, bro.
	I get your point, but the issue is more so like our society itself.
	He's saying it's a societal issue, outside of this situation with the January Sixers, but...
	This is dangerous.
	I think we're somewhat agreeing here.
	You're not seeing that I'm somewhat agreeing with you.
	If men are men and provide the necessary protection...
	We wouldn't be in a situation where we're in with them.
	We wouldn't be in a situation where really anybody needs to show up.
	Because we are stopping the bullshit lawlessness from happening before it even is contemplated.
	He's saying the issues occurred way before this shit, and then the female stepped up to revolt, but it shouldn't have gotten to that point is what he's saying.
	But to make this concrete and disagree with you as well, who created the issues in the first place?
	Deep State.
	I agree.
	I'm at fault too, because I didn't see it early enough.
	None of us did.
	Because at the end of the day, we have a lot of power, man.
	As individuals.
	The people, yeah.
	The people do.
	To crack skulls on these scumbags.
	Is this video on this same website that you wanted to show?
	Yeah.
	Okay, so let's go ahead and...
	You can't find it at all?
	It should be on that same website.
	This is Stop Hate.
	What do you want us to type in in the search bar?
	Yeah, I think my boy Tommy probably sent it to me already.
	Yeah, he's watching.
	Okay.
	No, never mind.
	That's another one.
	Hey, Tommy, if you're listening in, send me the link.
	Okay, so it's on this website, Stop Hate.
	Roseanne.
	Yeah, I don't see Roseanne.
	I see Ashley.
	Murder.
	But there's no Roseanne.
	Link.
	ASAP. Okay.
	Is it a different site?
	It might be a different site or like something different.
	I don't know.
	Go on X. X? Okay.
	Actually, I'm going to wait for him to send me a link.
	Okay.
	That's the number two.
	We'll go back to it once we get the link.
	Sure, sure, when we get it, yeah.
	But yeah, to finish up, yeah, normally that's how the shooting investigation would go.
	The fact that he was promoted after that is fucking crazy to me.
	What I just witnessed there was a murder.
	Yeah.
	That was, yeah, what I just witnessed there.
	We could all agree with that.
	She can go ahead and jump over the thing, right?
	But to shoot, that's wild.
	Like, taser...
	Tackler to the floor.
	Dude.
	But the shooter is like deadly force for that.
	It's like...
	That's crazy.
	Handcover.
	I mean, it's like...
	Yeah.
	That's crazy.
	You had seven...
	Seven other U.S. Capitol Police officers in that crowd.
	That's the other thing to me.
	It's like, bro, okay, you want to execute, you do deadly force, bro.
	Like, literally, there was a bunch of people right there.
	But if they can cover up this, what else can they cover up?
	And if you're against the agenda, and they know you're against the agenda, well, guess what?
	I don't give a fuck.
	I'm going to take you out because you're against my agenda.
	So that's kind of crazy that they can do that.
	Well, guess what?
	The more people that see this, and the more men that step up, the better.
	They have nowhere to run and the reason why like you you think like gloom and doom like what are we gonna do?
	Well guess what when the jet when the former director of the FBI Jim Comey is on MSLSD a few weeks ago saying if Trump wins Former and current FBI agents are gonna flee the country Yeah You think he's got he's confident?
	No Scared you know why cuz I'm coming for him.
	I'm coming for the FBI agents that he's talking about they're on my list They're on my deep state target list Just like in that long-form video.
	We're coming for him, and I don't care if they travel to another country.
	We're gonna find him.
	Okay Remember you see the movie taken yeah, I'll find you I Have a certain set of skills, and I'm not the only one with a certain set of skills They crossed my red line and I think they've crossed a lot of people's red line We will find them and we will dispense with them in the maximum legal moral and ethical Capability that we can effectuate on them some examples of precedent that we're going to use that they've already
	set so Remember what I talked about in that video we played yeah Precedent.
	We talked about Fulton Fannie.
	We talked about Alvin Bragg.
	Yep.
	So imagine Elon Musk releases the direct messages of everybody on my deep state target list, some we've talked about today, that proves the seditious conspiracy and the crimes.
	And they committed them in a red county, in a red state.
	All they have to do, the DA, is go and say, hey, here's the arrest warrant, Sheriff.
	And now that sheriff can basically look back and say, oh, I'm going to do what Michael Byrd just did to my target.
	Or I'm going to do what Lila Morris did as a Metropolitan Police Department officer on Roseanne Boylan.
	That's my precedent.
	And I'm going to call it objectively reasonable.
	Right?
	You think they're going to fall through it at all?
	What do you think?
	Okay, hold on.
	So, I just came back from the bathroom.
	So, let me get this straight.
	So you're saying...
	They called that objectively reasonable.
	Yeah, it's not.
	Not murder.
	It's not at all.
	And when you play the video for Roseanne Boylan, which I'm sending it right now to you...
	Oh, you got it?
	Okay.
	Yeah, that was not objectively reasonable whatsoever.
	Let me make sure it's the right one.
	From me looking at that, unless he had to...
	I'd be interested to see what he told the police, which what led him to pull the trigger.
	Did he see a weapon?
	What did he see that made him pull that trigger?
	Yo, bro, with all this info...
	He had to have lied.
	I'm gonna worry for his safety.
	For Ivan?
	You should be worried for their safety.
	Who?
	The deep state that I'm going through right now.
	Alright, we got the video here.
	Oh, you sent it to me?
	Yeah.
	Okay, let me...
	Man, I can't say what I want to say, bro.
	But all I'm going to say is that, like, you're fighting a very brief fight.
	What do you want to say?
	We're going to have to switch to Rumble anyway so we can say it.
	We might as well just say it.
	I said to Rumble.
	Yeah.
	No, man, because we're losing all the ex-audience.
	Yeah, well, tell them to come over to Rumble, man.
	Because when we do the switchover, it has to go to, you know what I mean?
	It goes to Rumble.
	Like I mentioned, I'm in rooms, right?
	Switch to Rumble real quick.
	They're kind of in deep state.
	Well, I'm not sitting on camera, but I'm just...
	Hey, bro.
	They fear me.
	No, no, I believe you, but I just know what they do.
	It's people.
	I know what I do.
	Okay, my friend.
	You are a brave man, bro.
	Alright, so this is the video.
	I mean, come call my bluff.
	No, no, I'm not saying it.
	I'm not saying it to you.
	I'm telling them.
	Come call my bluff.
	Because when they call my bluff, it's going to trigger a sequence of events that their family members will regret that they did.
	Alright, so this is the Roseanne Boylan, right?
	So, let's hit play real quick.
	Tommy Tatum.
	Holy shit.
	This is outside the camera.
	Yeah, if you could lower it just a tad, Bills.
	Roseanne Boyland.
	Okay, there she is right there.
	Oh, now he beat him.
	There's some body cam from Manchester City Police Department.
	Oh!
	Justin Winchell.
	Roseanne lay unconscious, bleeding from the mouth and nose, and it's repeatedly beaten with a stick.
	MPD Officer Leela Morris I need a question.
	Christopher Maurer.
	How much do you think she weighs?
	Fresh, man.
	Okay, play it.
	Bruh.
	Play it.
	What a loud figure.
	Thank you.
	Hey, I'll say this though.
	I don't know how you do it.
	Keep saying bro.
	I don't know how to do it.
	That's crazy.
	It doesn't have a button.
	Okay, so where's the shark thing?
	Where does it go?
	I don't know.
	They're trying to give her a...
	Is that her belly?
	They're trying to resuscitate her.
	I don't know how you do it.
	How much you weigh?
	I don't know how to do it.
	I didn't weigh her.
	So here's how the media reported it.
	She died of a drug overdose.
	Bro, I literally just witnessed them hit her on the head with a baton as she was on the floor.
	That's fucking crazy.
	And here's the thing, when you hit someone on the head with a baton, that's deadly force.
	That's absolutely deadly force.
	That constitutes deadly force.
	So, that's inexcusable as well.
	She was already down.
	She's not a threat to you anymore.
	Why are you hitting on her in the head with a fucking baton?
	She's unconscious.
	Alright, now I'll do a search and pull up Lila Morris, Super Bowl 2021.
	That's crazy, bro.
	That was murder right there.
	You know what happened to that officer?
	What happened?
	Promoted to?
	She was invited to the Super Bowl and lauded as a hero.
	Wow.
	Pull it up.
	Lila Morris.
	That's fucking crazy, bro.
	She hit her upside the head while she was down.
	I saw like two or three strikes.
	Dude, people like me have more training and knowledge of the system than they do.
	And they pissed us off.
	Now we're coming for them.
	And they know it.
	Three D.C. police officers who defend in the U.S. Capitol.
	I'm only one dude.
	I represent tens of thousands of people in my network.
	Scroll down a bit, Bill.
	Okay, I'm assuming that's her in the middle that I killed her?
	That's right there in the middle, bro.
	Fish is black?
	And guess who's on the left?
	Michael Fanone.
	Witness before the January 6th cover-up committee.
	When you read his book that he wrote, because he got the deal for testifying to support Nancy Pelosi and her January 6th cover-up committee, he talks about how he has, if you listen to the book, total Tourette's.
	And he's an emotionally unstable drug addict.
	Okay.
	He's a Metropolitan Police Department officer.
	Really?
	People from the MPD talk horribly about him.
	And he would talk about how, like, two and three in the morning, Nancy Pelosi would call him.
	And he would have drinks with her and other members of Congress.
	Wow.
	Wow.
	Pretty grim, huh?
	We can switch back to YouTube if you want, Bills.
	We can switch back.
	That's fucking terrible.
	So those are the two people that were...
	Killed that day.
	But everyone was told it was an insurrection.
	They had to stop the election from happening.
	Like, how I explained it.
	Yeah.
	And unfortunately, we had some collateral damage.
	Because all they wanted to do was basically a little bit of damage to the Capitol, have a breach, and then that was it.
	You know that Nancy Pelosi's daughter was with her filming a documentary that day?
	Her daughter's name is Alexandra Pelosi.
	You know who she's married to?
	Michael Voss, Dutch journalist, was filming from the outside.
	And why was Michael Voss on the previous day on January 5th meeting with John Sullivan at the JW Marriott Hotel lobby?
	The John Sullivan that took the picture of her video of Ashley's death?
	They were meeting the day prior at noon.
	How do I know this?
	The BLM writer.
	After his trial, the jury was deliberating.
	After Sullivan's trial.
	Okay.
	He was in the cafeteria at the D.C. District Court.
	Okay.
	And I accidentally bump into him.
	Okay.
	He was found guilty?
	I'm like, yeah.
	Well, before he was found guilty, I knew he was going to be there because he's waiting for his verdict.
	Oh, they were deliberating.
	Okay.
	So I'm like, hey, bro.
	Show me where you were on January 5th at noon.
	He's like, oh, I was at this and this.
	I was at the airport because I had to get my luggage.
	I'm like, show me.
	He's like, actually, I can show you because as part of my defense and testimony, I was basically showing my geotag location based on my Google evidence.
	I'm like, all right.
	Pull it up.
	Noon, January 5th.
	Guess where he was?
	J.W. Marriott.
	Meeting with Nancy Pelosi's son-in-law, basically.
	Why were they meeting?
	Interesting.
	And then why was John Sullivan later that day standing from me to you to Ray Epps?
	Heard of Ray Epps?
	Yeah.
	The Outer Breach team leader?
	Okay.
	I'm going to say Outer Breach Team Leader for Capitol Police?
	Outer Breach Team for the Fed Surrection Op.
	Okay.
	So remember, the jurisdiction...
	The entity that was the one that owned the situation to run this op was not the FBI, was not DHS, it was the leadership of the legislative branch.
	And subordinate to them was FBI. Like they had to get their permission.
	A guy by the name of Clay Higgins, Congressman, exposed that there was a bus underneath over by Union Station that was supposedly FBI. They don't go into that territory without MPD, without U.S. Capitol Police approval.
	People forget this, don't understand it.
	Look at Section 1967.
	And the reason why they withheld the video and all the CCTV footage is because they can, under Section 1979, which lays out the authority.
	Pull up Section 2, U.S. City, 1979, Paragraph B. Title II, U.S. Code section.
	Just put 2 U.S.C.1979 All right, and then also section two.
	So, okay, so all this footage you're saying was withheld, whatever, even though a lot of private citizens took this photo, this video.
	Well, that's private citizen photo, and the body cam photo, that's MPD. There were two law enforcement entities in the vicinity of the Capitol.
	MPD, you got body cam.
	U.S. Capitol does not have body cam.
	They only have CCTV footage, and it does not have audio.
	Paragraph B. Read it, baby.
	Authority of board to determine conditions of release.
	Okay.
	The Capitol Police Board it's referring to.
	Yeah.
	Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any security information in the possession of the Capitol Police may be released by the Capitol Police to another entity, including an individual, only if the Capitol Police Board determines in consultation with other appropriate law enforcement officials, experts in security preparedness and appropriate committee of Congress that the release of security information will not compromise the security experts in security preparedness and appropriate committee of Congress that the release of security information will not compromise the security and safety of the Capitol buildings and grounds or any individual whose Well, that's pretty broadly ran.
	For obvious reasons.
	So basically, watch this.
	They reserve the right to release it.
	We got 1,500 people that are currently defendants for their role in January 6th.
	To include Trump.
	To include the electors from Georgia and Arizona and Michigan that voted for Trump.
	This is how the weaponization against them started.
	David Buckley.
	January 6th committee.
	The General Counsel of the U.S. Capitol Police, Tad Tobias, his Twitter account is the nobody guy.
	He's on my deep state.
	These guys are on my deep state target list, right?
	They then decide with Pelosi and Schumer, and they're appointed now Capitol Police Chief, Thomas Manger.
	And guess where Thomas Manger's from?
	He's from Montgomery County, Maryland.
	Yep, right next door.
	Guess who the member of Congress is from there?
	Jamie Raskin.
	Guess who Jamie Raskin endorsed for her when she ran for...
	I think it was like a county board seat.
	The chief of the Capitol Police's wife.
	Guess who Jamie Raskin's wife is?
	Sarah Raskin, one of the 39 that illegally spied on Flynn.
	Interesting.
	Dude, I got it all.
	I did the whole link analysis.
	It's like, I kind of know what I'm doing here.
	I used to teach this shit.
	So, back to January 6th.
	They ran the op.
	They did it pretty brilliantly, okay?
	But here's where the autocorrect happens.
	I think I've laid it out sufficiently.
	Who was involved, the cover-up, the escalatory, they're not going to let Trump in.
	Because we're coming for him.
	But what they fail to understand is that it doesn't matter.
	I know that they won't let them back in.
	So then we have to create a method to stop them with other means, as I laid out, county and state.
	But we have to create the political courage for those office holders at the county and state level to feel comfortable and confident to say, you know what?
	I will take on this federal belligerent executive branch to the max.
	And when you have literally, you guys have a big platform.
	As we're educating millions, tens of millions, and as Elon leverages X to then educate hundreds of millions of people in the U.S. to be like, whoa, whoa, enough's enough.
	We gotta fix this shit show.
	And that's where I think where we fix it.
	The U.S. House Now this is a plan to get Trump in, right?
	That we discussed earlier.
	Okay, now we're gonna get into the plan.
	Alright, cool.
	For the timestamp person.
	So you know.
	Go ahead.
	Alright.
	This is where you need to take notes.
	I've been writing a bunch the whole time.
	So over the last two years, some of you have seen me behind the scenes, sitting behind Anthony Fraudchi, Christopher Ray, Ali Mayorkas, as these scumbags testify in the House or the Senate, right?
	Lloyd Austin.
	I mean, if you want to see me confronting these scum, as I call deep state marauding, I actually post it on my X on my subscribers.
	So I get up close and personal with them and I drop the video.
	I tell them that I know that they know that I know.
	Okay.
	And then we post it.
	So I've been basically self-interning to identify who are the ones with courage in the house, staff, etc., assessing the landscape.
	Remember, I'm retired.
	I do with my time what I want within the limits of the law.
	And I also travel the country to figure out who, which AGs, and I observe, And entities throughout the country, the 254 sheriffs in Texas, right?
	I went to their convention to let them know this is what's about to take place.
	I'm coordinating this national effort.
	That's why I call myself the Secretary of Retribution.
	It's the...
	Yeah, I'm the deep state marauder, but at this point we need to get to the point of accountability.
	Knowing that our executive branch is completely captured, right?
	We have to create the necessary mechanism and...
	No one's stepping up, right?
	So we got to take a position of leadership or title.
	What is it?
	I'm secretary of retribution by action, not by really title of a position.
	And the action is educating the nation of who their authorities are that can body check these scum.
	Working with the members of the House and Senate that are also willing to somehow participate in their discretionary role and authority.
	So the one entity in the United States Congress That is in the position to provide and expose the January 6th component of this, that will help then secure a free and fair election going into November, is an organization known as the House Admin Committee Subcommittee on Oversight, chaired by Barry Loudermilk, Georgia Congressman, who happens to be the Congressman that represents Roseanne Boylan had she been alive to this day.
	Okay?
	This is the level of research that I do.
	And he was also the Congressman that Nancy Piglosi identified as, oh, he was given insurrection tours before January 6th.
	Remember that?
	If you didn't know, she was the one...
	They were trying to discredit anybody, him, Troy Nels, anybody that was exposing the U.S. Capitol Police leadership.
	That's what they do.
	Yeah.
	Because that's how they protect themselves.
	Yeah.
	By labeling them as insurrectionists.
	Yeah.
	Yep.
	So...
	That committee has been...
	We weren't able to really get anywhere with Kevin McCarthy because he was complicit, remember?
	The reason why he's somewhat complicit half in, half out is because...
	He didn't want Trump in.
	Exactly.
	The New Woke Slimes came out with the audio recording of Kevin McCarthy saying that Trump needs to resign.
	Did you guys remember?
	If you didn't...
	The audio came out where he was saying that.
	Well, that audio, where'd it come from?
	Liz Cheney recorded it, which begs the question, what other dirt does Liz Cheney have on Kevin McCarthy to make sure...
	What would her incentive be, though?
	Was she a Trump supporter?
	Liz Cheney?
	Oh yeah, she is.
	No.
	No?
	Then why would she...
	Liz Cheney is Dick Cheney's daughter.
	Yeah, so what's her incentive to record McCarthy's daughter?
	She was one of the members of the J6 cover-up committee.
	But what was her incentive?
	A Republican.
	Yeah, but what was her incentive to secretly record McCarthy like that?
	To create leverage.
	Ah, okay.
	Alright.
	She was one of the ten impeachment voters.
	She was one of the two Republicans that were on the January 6 cover-up committee in order to promote the insurrection narrative.
	As a Republican.
	To try to get Trump out.
	Why?
	So McCarthy funded it and she was on the board to get him impeached.
	On the J6 bullshit.
	Because you said McCarthy funded a bunch of people that were on the board for the impeachment.
	No, no, I wouldn't say that.
	To be more precise on that one, Kevin McCarthy allowed Nancy Pelosi to decide who would be on that committee and he really didn't fight or do anything to kind of leverage his way in and the reason why is because I'm sure my guess is Liz Cheney had a lot of dirt on him So he had to like play it like he was a Republican leader But it was really soft because of all the levers just like he did with letting them fucking Letting Pelosi kind of get in no quorum.
	Yeah, exactly So he's compromised.
	So that's why...
	He's fucking compromised, this guy.
	I wrote 13...
	Remember when you get your TSSEI? Yeah.
	You got to do the SSBI? Yes.
	SF-86?
	Yes, of course.
	And they run a counterintelligence investigation on everybody that gets a top-secret clearance.
	Yep.
	So there's 13 adjudicative guidelines that they go by in order to grant you a top-secret security clearance.
	What stops me as private citizen Ivan Raiklin of using those same adjudicative guidelines to run a counterintelligence investigation on Kevin McCarthy before he becomes speaker?
	Nothing, right?
	Nothing, yeah.
	So I did it.
	Yeah.
	I did research and analysis in the public domain of Kevin McCarthy, and he did not pass six of the 13 adjudicative guidelines.
	Oh, shit.
	I wrote a Substack article on each one of the 13 elements.
	You go to my Substack, and you can see it.
	And on the last one, I close out with saying, here's the summary.
	Some of them that I can think of off the top of my head, drug use, foreign relations, financial, personal background, criminal history.
	Debt?
	No.
	Well, that's where your financial thing comes in.
	Okay.
	the financial history of debt.
	Relationships with other individuals, foreign and domestic.
	Which ones did he fail?
	I just said yes, yes, no to the ones that you said.
	When you said yes and no, I thought you meant like, no, that's not an adjudicating thing.
	Okay, let me go through it again then.
	My bad.
	I thought you were saying like, that's not an adjudicating thing.
	Okay, finances.
	Yes.
	Okay, so we failed that.
	Foreign relations?
	Probably failed that one too.
	Drug use?
	No.
	I just didn't have evidence to support it.
	Okay, so you can't confirm or deny a fee of drug use.
	Probably alcohol use, substance abuse, it's all one.
	Yeah, I didn't have sufficient evidence to really get them on that.
	The foreign and the money already is going to be a disqualifier.
	Because then you'll basically sell secrets at that point.
	Work on you.
	Criminal history, background.
	And I have, like, it's detailed.
	Yeah.
	They're detailed subsecs.
	So when you did your background check on them.
	So as I run that, and I wrote my subsec, ivanrakeland.subsec.com.
	Check them out, guys.
	I was, I got every member of Congress's phone number.
	And their personal email.
	So as I wrote those subsec articles, before they were voting in on Speaker of the House, Because this was from November 22 and in 2023.
	You did all this information, you sent it in.
	Here, here.
	This is Kevin McCarthy's background.
	Yeah, so we won the first 15 votes because we blocked them from becoming...
	Remember that?
	I was up there.
	I was in the House.
	I was on the floor and I was the only guy up there that wasn't a member of Congress.
	Yeah, and you were there.
	Okay.
	Don't ask me how.
	That's fine.
	Some power plays there.
	Let's just say each member of Congress gets one pass to the gallery that they can give to whoever they want to give.
	Okay.
	Well, after his wife was there for the first vote, was like, nah, I got to go home.
	I'm like, I'm getting her pass.
	Please, sir.
	Yeah, sure.
	So I did.
	So I was working it.
	So we saw that happen, right?
	I know I went on a tangent, but I wanted to hit on that.
	What were we talking about before this?
	Because I want to, like, kind of re-engage on that.
	We're talking about January 6th.
	We're talking about...
	Your plan to...
	Yeah, we're talking about Trump to get Trump back in.
	The reason why I went to the Kevin McCarthy path is, like, we couldn't fix things with the Kevin McCarthy Speaker of the House, meaning exposing the January 6th Fed's direction, because he was blocking it.
	One example.
	Ashley Babbitt's mother, that was just...
	You saw a murder.
	That was killed, yeah.
	Her name's Mickey Widthoff.
	I was literally sitting with her like this.
	Zoom out.
	Okay.
	Like this.
	Yep.
	This close.
	As we're planning on what we're going to convey because Kevin McCarthy accepted to have a meeting with him.
	A meeting with her.
	Ashley Babbitt's mother.
	Okay.
	And she asked for me to be with her as we went into that meeting.
	Gotcha.
	So he accepted a meeting with the mom.
	The day prior, she gets a phone call, and they say, yeah, only you.
	We don't want Ivan, and we don't want Dave Summerall, who's the author of that Stop Hate website.
	Dave Summerall is hands down...
	He understands what happened on many aspects.
	I've got to give a shout out to Dave Summerall, Gary McBride.
	Gary McBride is a subject matter expert on all the video footage of the CCTV and MPD on everything related to January 6th, hands down.
	Dave Summerall has put together the whole repository of everything J6 related to all the researchers.
	Trinus Evans has a really good understanding of the DHS's involvement.
	I got some questions on J6 after, but I didn't want to interrupt your Trump thing here, because you're saying, like, how do we get him back in?
	I'm getting there, because I'm setting, like, the context, though.
	Yeah.
	And then last person is Tommy Tatum, as it relates to Roseanne Boylan.
	He was right next to her when she was beat to death.
	Okay.
	And there's a couple other folks that...
	So, anyhow...
	The, uh...
	The way that we fixed this is we had to create and place people in positions...
	Did she end up having that meeting with Kevin McCarthy?
	The mom?
	Right, so...
	She did?
	She ended up having the meeting.
	You couldn't...
	I was blocked out and she was called by the General Counsel office.
	It was from the phone number of the General Counsel of the U.S. Capitol Police.
	And as we were kind of wargaming, what we're going to prepare to say to Kevin McCarthy when he was the speaker was...
	I'm talking to both of you, sorry.
	She basically, they blocked me out, but I basically said, you know, I expect, the reason why I wanted to be there is because I expected the General Counsel of the U.S. Capitol Police to be there, obviously, and then also the Speaker's General Counsel, two separate positions.
	All I wanted to say was, here's my substack specifically on where you need to investigate to get to the truth of January 6th.
	And it's still up there on my sub stack.
	And then number two, here's the spreadsheet of the evidence compiled by the names of people that I mentioned in the collective where we see a transgression that took place by a governmental actor against an election integrity rally attendee on January 6th.
	They call them insurrectionists.
	I call them unarmed, peaceful election justice rally attendees.
	Because they were there on January 6th, because they already knew at that point that the 2020 election was completely illegally conducted.
	And they wanted to protest that.
	Okay.
	Okay?
	Now, mind you...
	Transgressions being murder.
	Yeah.
	Battery, and many layers.
	I got an Excel spreadsheet.
	This occurred in the earlier stages after they were murdered, probably where you were thinking we can get some accountability on these people.
	Now it's clear that they're corrupt.
	Right, and so they blocked me from going, so I ended up asking Ashley Babbitt.
	Because you were going to tell the Capitol Police how they should respond to these situations.
	Yeah, to clean house.
	Gotcha, gotcha.
	Because I get it.
	Because you thought they were still going to be clean at this point.
	I'm exhausting all mechanisms just to good faith due diligence, right?
	To see if they're going to be honest, yeah.
	Operate beyond reproach, right?
	Well, they blocked you.
	So they blocked me, so I'm like, okay, I got you.
	So I gave it to her to give to Kevin McCarthy and his staff.
	Okay.
	She did what I was going to give him anyway.
	And then while she was having the meeting, I was meeting with the House Admin Committee staff to give them the same thing and put them on notice.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	But I like to be transparent.
	I publicly say what I do.
	So then they can hide behind, like, yeah, I got it and ignore you.
	But as you guys allow me to have a bigger platform, right, a lot more people see that, yep, everything I say is backed up by facts and it becomes trustworthy and amplifies.
	And so it creates that public pressure against these people to actually act.
	But when Kevin McCarthy did nothing, That's when we're like, alright, it's time to remove the guy.
	Motion to vacate the chair.
	And I had been communicating for months with Matt Gaetz and his staff.
	And others.
	Like, I had been wanting to do it earlier, but like, you know, he's a political genius, by the way.
	Who's Matt Gaetz?
	Matt Gaetz is a congressman from Florida.
	Okay.
	That actually filed what's called the motion to vacate the chair to remove Kevin McCarthy as a Speaker of the House.
	Gotcha.
	Okay.
	Ah.
	That was a guy.
	Yeah.
	So me and a few others, we kind of like brainstormed the play.
	Obviously Matt Gase was the point man, because you have to be a member of Congress to do that.
	He ran it, and we were able to remove Kevin McCarthy.
	One of the biggest reasons, from my perspective, we had to remove him is because he did not do anything as it relates to exposure of January 6th.
	Yeah, with the police especially, the Capitol Police.
	Once we removed McCarthy and then placed Mike Johnson, I get it.
	Mike Johnson continued down the Ukraine first, Israel first, China first policy in terms of funding.
	Yeah, bitch.
	What a fucking bitch.
	But the reason why I give him a C- or a D- as a speaker...
	Oh, for Mike Johnson?
	He's got a D-, okay?
	The reason why I haven't called on maximal full-court press removal of him is because he's tripled the staff of the subcommittee that has the ability to provide oversight and look into January 6th.
	Ah, okay.
	And that's who I've been working with over the last two years.
	Mike Johnson?
	Oh.
	Barry Loudermilk's team.
	Okay, from Georgia.
	Mm-hmm.
	Okay.
	And so now they're going through the process, and this gets to finally your question, how do we fix this shit show?
	I had to lay that out that way.
	No problem.
	I laid out what they need to do, and all the evidence that we've put together, me and the other people that I mentioned, They are now at a point, in my professional more than opinion, expect in mid-September that committee is going to pass a resolution to go ahead and nullify the entire January 6th committee report.
	Okay.
	That's dope.
	Are we talking about people being exonerated then?
	And pardoned?
	Finally?
	Out of jail?
	These are toxic, feckless, stone-cold, coward, gutless simps, mind you.
	Right?
	And many of them have TDS. The Republicans.
	Trump syndrome.
	Yeah, Trump derangement syndrome.
	So they could care less about the law.
	They're just so duped into believing orange man bad.
	It's literally so toxic, right?
	To me, it's like Trump's a sideshow to this whole lawlessness, right?
	You're focused on January 6th.
	They're focused on Trump and January 6th.
	So, when you get to the full truth, because no one ever investigated the Capitol Police in any missteps that they did.
	In the absence of that, like, okay, I'm going to do it.
	Why me?
	Because no one else is doing it.
	That's my answer.
	And so, and then I look into what institutions can help me out with it.
	Well, Loudermilk's team is playing ball, right?
	So when that happens, here's the sequence of events that I think are going to take place.
	When that happens, the court of public opinion amplified by now we have a platform known as X. You guys on Rumble, etc.
	We have the ability to reach America to essentially say, you know what?
	That January 6th committee report, they shredded and destroyed evidence.
	This is the evidence that we found that they destroyed.
	Every single thing that they said here is nullified by this.
	So a good...
	There needs to be a rebuttal to the original one in order to nullify it.
	And doing the interviews and explaining to America what happened on free speech platforms, it's going to wake people up.
	Were you woken up by like, you didn't even know about Ashley Babbitt, right?
	Definitely, yeah.
	It's like, you're probably pissed right now, right?
	That the entire media complex literally manipulated you.
	Well, I already knew from the beginning how the media works.
	But it's more disgusting when it's like that egregious.
	It's in your face, yeah.
	It's so in your face.
	But then you're like, you gotta question me.
	And then you do your own research.
	And then when you do your own research, it's like, shit.
	Yeah, I still need to do that as well.
	Because you can't agree with me yet.
	You gotta like, I present it to you, and then you're gonna look at it like, oh shit.
	Ivan did his research.
	But like, don't...
	Be critical of everything I say.
	Just like be critical of anybody else says.
	I am.
	So when they...
	Nullify it.
	People get angry.
	Right?
	People are going to want accountability.
	And then once that happens, the whole frame of like, oh, I've been lied to my entire whatever about the insurrection.
	Then it creates a question like, yeah, it totally looks like a fedsurrection.
	And then from there we move into, like, this is our time right now.
	Today, really going into mid-September.
	Because if we run the election how it's currently set, Which I pray we don't because I have a better solution than that Early voting in Pennsylvania starts in two weeks.
	Yeah in two weeks is when early voting starts going into November 5th So how do we shape that to educate the early voter?
	Yeah number one September 9th is when Congress is back into session.
	September 10th is when the first debate happens between Kamala and Trump.
	What did Biden do before his debate with Trump?
	Took a bunch of drugs.
	Get ready.
	No, no, no.
	Rest for two weeks.
	2020.
	Oh, and 2020?
	I don't know.
	I'll tell you.
	Remember the 51 Intel officers?
	Oh, yes.
	They suppressed the laptop story.
	They published that it was Russian disinformation.
	Russian disinfo.
	Yes.
	In time for him to use it during his debate.
	Yes.
	Yes.
	So now Elon Musk just endorsed Trump, right?
	Yep.
	Why can't Elon Musk disclose the mother of all Twitter files?
	Meaning everything I've literally done the work for Elon Musk and Donald Trump Pro bono and for America because I want to I want to autocorrect the shit show I want to expose these come and create accountability So the way we do that so you know that there was DMS between these people on on Twitter that will make them look like shit basically Here's how I'm gonna answer that question My assessment is with almost certainty.
	Absolutely yes.
	Okay.
	And here's why.
	The first few Twitter files, you heard of them, right?
	That came out?
	That disclosed the censorship industrial complex between the government colluding with...
	Elon went on an interview and talked about how conservative creators were being stifled like three to four times as much as...
	So they used...
	Facebook.
	Left-wing creators.
	Yeah.
	So here's what they did.
	Last week, Mark Zuckerberg...
	Fucking pussy.
	We could pull that up, actually, that letter.
	Which one?
	The letter, it's on Telegram, that he wrote to everybody, kind of apologizing.
	We pulled it up before.
	It's in Telegram.
	It's an admission of guilt of genocide.
	It's an admission of guilt of covering for the Biden criminal syndicate.
	And it's an admission of guilt of bribing different states to steal the election.
	Okay?
	Those are the three paragraphs, basically, that are in that admission of guilt letter.
	Okay.
	And in there it says, elements of the White House.
	Go to that third paragraph down.
	Just read like the first line.
	In 2021.
	Okay.
	In 2021, senior officials from the Biden administration, including the White House, repeatedly pressured our teams for months to censor certain COVID-19 content, including humor and satire, and expressed a lot of frustration with our teams when we didn't agree.
	Censored, right?
	Senior officials from the Biden administration.
	I want to know their names.
	Hey, Attorney General Ken Paxton in Texas.
	Hey, Attorney General in Kansas, Chris Kobach.
	Hey, Attorney General in Missouri, Mr.
	Bailey.
	You find out every single resident of your state that died from the jab...
	Their family member has a class action, cause of action of wrongful death against Mark Zuckerberg and every single person that he's referring to when he says Biden admin.
	Wrongful death because of his censorship regime that convinced them to take the unsafe and ineffective product.
	And all the main social media platforms were on the hook for this.
	Like I talked about this, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, all the main platforms censored COVID dissenting information.
	Mark Zuckerberg just admitted to it.
	Yep.
	So then who in the FBI, who in the White House did that?
	I want to know their names, because we're coming for them.
	They're on my deep state target list.
	Oh, you already know who they are, probably.
	Some of them.
	What about the Epstein list?
	I'm not focusing on that one.
	That's a whole other.
	We're still waiting for that shit.
	That's not treason.
	Yeah, that's a whole other.
	That's a different level.
	That's lower or lesser crimes.
	Okay.
	Number two, paragraph two.
	What does he admit to?
	In a separate situation, the FBI warned us about a potential Russian disinformation operation about the Biden family.
	And by the way, we did a whole thing with Epstein, by the way, guys, with Ryan Dawson.
	Guys, go check it out.
	It's on our Rumble.
	We did a whole thing with Ryan Dawson on the Epstein list.
	You forgot?
	No, no, I'm saying all the names.
	We don't know all the names.
	He named a bunch of them.
	He already knew the names.
	But there's more names that they didn't call out.
	Bro, he went over all the names.
	All of them?
	He went over all the names, pretty much.
	Every single one?
	Pretty much.
	Yeah.
	Because there's some that we don't know.
	Well, he already knew who they were.
	All of them?
	I don't know, man.
	But guys, yeah, go check it out.
	We literally have it.
	Watch Ryan Dawson Epstein.
	We covered it.
	He did a whole map on it, remember?
	He's selling maps on it.
	I know, but there was some that he...
	He knew every single last one, the one that weren't...
	He knew everybody.
	Him and Whitney Webb both know all of them.
	Okay.
	In a separate situation.
	It's just that the government didn't put it out.
	But they've been on it.
	They put it out.
	But we haven't gotten all the names from the government yet.
	That's why they want the government to confirm what these guys have been talking about.
	That's why.
	But they won't.
	Probably not.
	No.
	They probably won't.
	Until we take it back over.
	Okay.
	In a separate situation, the FBI warned us about a potential Russian disinformation operation about the Biden family and the Burisma in the lead up to the 2020 election.
	Period.
	Burisma?
	Yep.
	Ukraine crisis team?
	You see how I literally had a front or second row seat to this everything?
	Yep.
	He says, in a separate situation, right?
	Yep.
	Does it say FBI? Yep.
	I want to know the names.
	Guess what?
	I know those names.
	I've told you about them.
	Peter Strzok and all them?
	What isn't Brian Otten?
	Laura Demlow?
	Elvis Chan?
	Joe Bianca?
	And others.
	They're on my deep state target list as a separate category.
	Some of them have Twitter accounts, like Jim Comey.
	Like Pete Strzok.
	Look them up right now.
	Pete Strzok.
	And then Comey's is at Comey.
	So my list...
	That I've provided to, like I said, everybody that needs to know about it, the list of names, category, and their Twitter handles.
	So in the first few Twitter files, they used emails from Twitter employees with the government, and then internal Slack channels where they coordinated the censorship and decided who to censor and when to censor them, right?
	Let me call out this name.
	I got a new one.
	Looks like he retired from the FBI. Yeah, yeah, he did.
	Says FBI veteran.
	So...
	Here we go.
	Oh, I love it.
	I just wonder...
	Let's take a look here.
	I can tell you who censored me on Twitter.
	You know how I know?
	How you know?
	Because I had a five-hour meeting with Matt Taibbi, one of the co-authors of the Twitter files.
	Oh, okay.
	He's got way more stuff than he's released.
	Okay.
	So in that meeting, I'm like, hey, bro, please, can you send me the name of the who censored me?
	Hmm.
	Let's take a look.
	Ah!
	Friday, January 8th, 2021.
	12.04.47.
	Sounds like noon.
	12.04pm.
	47 seconds.
	Mary Strong.
	Hey Mary.
	You're on my list now!
	Raiklyn as well.
	This is the screenshot.
	Okay.
	Of who censored whom.
	Okay, gotcha, gotcha.
	And you know what they used as the reason why?
	Not sure he's outwardly Q enough to action here.
	What does that mean?
	Thank you.
	You want to know the last tweet that I used?
	Which one?
	Before they censor me?
	It sounded something like this.
	We the people do not accept the results of the 2020 election until the state legislatures in the following states, Georgia, Wisconsin, Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Nevada, hold a joint session vote allocating their electors for president and vice president.
	They censored me.
	They suspended my account for that.
	Really?
	On Twitter?
	This is 2021, obviously.
	Before January 8th, 2021.
	Yep, when you called out Pence.
	Is that QAnon-sounding content?
	Not at all.
	They said it was.
	Of course.
	It's not QAnon at all.
	And you said that was Mary Strong?
	Yeah.
	She obviously worked at Twitter?
	You want to pull up her LinkedIn?
	Let's see.
	Wait, she's still there?
	No.
	Thank God.
	She probably got liquidated when Elon came out.
	Elon said, get out of here!
	Half the fucking staff he got rid of them.
	Wait, let me see.
	Hey Jess.
	Hey Jess, if you're watching, send me a...
	Yeah, Mary Strong.
	Maybe type in LinkedIn or some shit.
	There's a bunch of them, Ivan.
	Can you give us something more?
	I'm gonna wait.
	She used to work for Twitter, yeah.
	Can you send a link?
	Don't bring it to the wrong one now.
	Yo, yo, that would be crazy.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Yeah, I'm going to see it.
	I don't know.
	A lot of people are asleep because they're weaklings.
	No, this one's a medical.
	So as soon as I get it, if she's up, I get it.
	I'm not going to lie, though.
	That's a long list.
	I got a whole team.
	We said 600.
	That's a long list, bro.
	That's a lot of people.
	Which, by the way, guys, we'll probably give you guys Fresh If It news later this week.
	Let's do it on Friday.
	A new call-in show with the news.
	We'll get some more topics and add it to the call-in show.
	We could do that because we're going to do the campus stuff.
	Yeah.
	We're going to do the campus stuff on Wednesday.
	Go ahead.
	Let me back up and kind of like reset.
	Sure.
	Step one, we have to educate the country so that you know exactly what happened to y'all.
	Just bring the mic up a little bit so they can hear you better.
	There you go.
	Once you see the truth, you're going to be furious.
	And you're going to start deleting your fake book accounts, your commie tube accounts.
	You're going to stop using commie search, right?
	And Insta garbage.
	Because you're going to realize like what you're seeing in those platforms...
	It's complete bullshit.
	Well, yeah.
	Complete bullshit.
	100%.
	Okay?
	Do we find this Mary Strong, girl?
	Hell no.
	So, don't worry about it.
	Once I get a note, if it happens, it happens.
	But, yeah, I got...
	I'll be looking into her.
	She'll be scrutinized a little bit.
	Okay.
	So she was responsible for censoring you on Twitter.
	Yeah, and I want to know, she was a Twitter employee, so once we find out who she was communicating with at the FBI to do so, I can assess with somewhat confidence that it was Brian Auten.
	Joe Pienka, maybe.
	Elvis Chan.
	Laura Demlow.
	All these names, right?
	I know where they're at right now, right?
	So, I know where they live, I know what vehicle, make and model, I got their phone number, I got it all, right?
	It's not illegal to have that.
	It's not illegal to accidentally bump into them where they can do grocery shopping.
	Right?
	You're crazy, bro.
	You know what I'm saying?
	Just saying.
	They gotta do grocery shopping?
	Go to the park, whatever.
	Make sure to let them know organic.
	Pattern of life works both ways, right?
	Let them know organic is a scam.
	What's up, buddy, boys?
	Organic is a scam.
	Yeah, tell them organic is a scam.
	So when Elon Musk is...
	So tomorrow...
	So as I laid it out, right, September 10th, we want to set the frame...
	Framework.
	To make sure that we have...
	Elon Musk, we want Elon Musk to survive, right?
	He probably wants to survive himself.
	Yeah, I hope he does.
	You think he's gonna sit on the criminal evidence that he's sitting on?
	See this idiot Richard Reek or whatever trying to say that he needs to get arrested?
	I saw that.
	You know why?
	Why?
	Because they're following my logic here.
	Yeah.
	When Elon Musk realizes that he's sitting on...
	Remember, he said in December 2022 that Twitter is a crime scene and a social media company.
	Well, now that he's moving Twitter from California to Texas in safe haven space like Ken Paxton, right?
	Yeah.
	The Attorney General, yep.
	I don't see how Elon Musk doesn't disclose this.
	Because if he doesn't, he's fucked.
	Elon Musk's fucked if Trump doesn't win.
	Yeah, I think we're all fucked if Trump doesn't win.
	And so because we have the most influential figure on the planet on our side, I think the odds are somewhat in our favor.
	Because once he releases the evidence, and now that Twitter is the number one downloaded news app in America, And it's now number three as of a couple weeks ago as the most sticky website after KamiTube and KamiSearch, right?
	Oh, is it the third most visited website now?
	Yeah, as of like user minutes, whatever.
	Okay.
	Over YouTube and...
	That's good.
	We're now getting into that...
	Space of being able to influence the information landscape of their dominance.
	It's overwhelmingly right-wing, I would say.
	For sure.
	It's overwhelmingly right-wing, thank God.
	As we explain that with the evidence, the people are going to start leaning on the institutions that can hold these people to account, which is county, state.
	And so, before we go into early voting, they're going to continue to do illegal voting, right?
	But going back to the constitutional framework that I articulated going into January 6th and before that with the Electoral Count Act, the only way that I see we can have a free, fair, and transparent election right now is to have Elon, Tucker, Joe Rogan explain to America The only way we can do that is to have our state legislatures in the states allocate the presidential and vice presidential electors themselves.
	So we don't run into what we ran into.
	Because if we don't, you're going to have massive illegal voting.
	You're going to have massive questions about software manipulation and fraud, right?
	Et cetera, et cetera.
	Because here's why.
	Remember we talked about Paul Ryan?
	Yeah.
	And he's still on the board of Faux News, Fox News?
	He's at Faux News.
	Yeah.
	What did Fox News do last year?
	They just bribed deviant voting systems $850 million.
	I call it a bribe.
	Some people call it a settlement.
	So if you're the CEO of Deviant Voting Systems, and I'm over at Fox, and I'm like, hey, bro, here's $850 million in our settlement, you're going to create the electoral outcome of my choosing and your choosing that we agree to in the 28 states that you have a touchpoint in that electoral infrastructure.
	Deal?
	For the 850 million billies.
	Yeah.
	So if we fail to assassinate Trump, if we fail to get him off of being nominated at the RNC convention, our last course of action is to do that.
	You with me?
	Now let me ask you this.
	That's what I think they're doing, and the way we can circumvent that is to have this public release exposing all of them to include Paul Ryan and everybody else who's on my list to have the state legislatures vote.
	And guess how many votes are controlled?
	If everyone votes by political party under that framework, guess what the result's going to be?
	It's going to be Trump.
	274 electoral votes are controlled by Republican majority legislatures in this country.
	Yep.
	It's guaranteed.
	Let me ask you this, though.
	And then the congressional nullification of potentially calling him an insurrectionist is covered because I've been working with the committee to debunk it.
	Yeah.
	So let me ask you this, because you mentioned Fox News being involved in this situation.
	But Fox, I would say, for the most part, is fairly right-wing.
	Why would they conspire to not get Trump in?
	Through working with this deviant voting company.
	All right, where do I start?
	I know, it's...
	Paul.
	Yeah.
	Paul Ryan...
	Alright.
	In 2016, Paul Ryan was the Speaker of the House.
	Okay.
	Reince Priebus was the Chair of the Republican National Committee.
	And the longest standing Republican Speaker of the House in any state, a guy by the name of Robin Voss.
	Okay.
	All three of those are from a place in Wisconsin known as Racine, 1st Congressional District.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	So, Reince Priebus, before he was the Chief of Staff for Trump, he was the Chair of the RNC. Before that, he was the Chair of the Republican Party in Wisconsin.
	Before that, he was the 1st Congressional District Chairman.
	Before that, he was college roommates with that guy Robin Voss and he was college roommates with Paul Ryan's chief of staff.
	They go back decades.
	They were part of the crew that foisted Mike Pence onto Donald Trump to be the handler on behalf of them.
	To protect themselves from exposure.
	If Trump comes back in, they're fucked.
	So he has to do everything to keep him out?
	So that makes sense.
	Okay.
	So even though he's...
	And he's on the board of Fox.
	Okay.
	So even though he is a right-leaning Republican, and he's on Fox, which is, I would say, generally fairly pro-Trump.
	Have you ever heard Fox News say anything negative about Mike Pence?
	No, never.
	No.
	My point.
	Never.
	And I would say some of them are pro-Trump, some of them are not, but now that makes sense.
	They still need to make money though.
	Of course.
	They need to still bring in that brought to you by Pfizer, brought to you by Moderna, brought to you by J&J money.
	It's a business.
	Johnson& Johnson.
	So, okay.
	Now I see.
	So Paul Ryan has a vested interest in not allowing Trump to come in because it's pretty much going to be cleaning house if he does.
	Unless he can get his boy Kevin McCarthy to be the Chief of Staff.
	To protect him.
	To protect him.
	There we go.
	Okay.
	And guess what?
	And this is how they do it.
	The other component, and we just introduced it now, is that Kevin McCarthy has the financial leverage that I laid out, but Paul Ryan has the ability to platform or not platform the people of his choosing.
	So if you're a Republican member of Congress...
	Yeah.
	And you're not going to play ball with Paul Ryan.
	You just don't go on Fox News.
	And with Kevin McCarthy, you're not going to get funded for re-election.
	Gotcha.
	And you're not going to be able to get platformed on Fox News to promote your campaign and your membership in the House.
	That makes sense.
	See the control mechanism?
	Yeah, I see.
	That's why it's so important for us to create.
	Like, you guys need to be like, in all the independents, I'm only going on independent long-form shows.
	Because it's the process, like this process of educating a mass number of people that are not in the matrix.
	Yeah.
	It creates an off-ramp of people.
	They've got to come from somewhere.
	Your viewers are coming up and up.
	They're coming from somewhere, and it's coming from those scum platforms that I'm calling out.
	Yeah, they're tired of the lies.
	That's crazy.
	Okay, so now that makes sense.
	McCarthy is going to basically run cover for him to protect him.
	To protect the entire left and right Democrat-Republican cabal from being...
	From being held to account.
	Gotcha.
	So that's why he wants to be Chief of Staff.
	And this is why...
	Okay, it makes sense.
	And if you look, Trump has been bringing in a bunch of people that like Chris LaCivita, J.D. Vance.
	Now, I didn't even know McCarthy was posturing to be Chief of Staff.
	All these people are fucking scumbags that have betrayed him in the past.
	I always say...
	Trump, that we know from back then, was fresh, clean to the scene, didn't know how things worked.
	He had no clue.
	Now he knows how things work.
	He has to play the game.
	There's a game being played here.
	There is a game being played, and there's friction.
	There's internal friction.
	Don't get me wrong.
	It's not like a lost cause.
	RFK's on board.
	Who better in the national conversation than RFK to expose the COVID con?
	No one comes close.
	No one else, yeah.
	You heard of the...
	Pull up this website.
	Militaryaccountability.com.
	You heard of it?
	I have heard of this website, yeah.
	So militaryaccountability.com.
	Rob Green, who wrote the book Defending the Constitution Behind Enemy Lines, he lays out over the last...
	It came out July 4th of 2023.
	It lays out in sequence the illegal DoD Jab Man 8 by the numbers.
	Another Substack article written by...
	80,000, right?
	Were pricked illegally?
	No, no, no.
	I'd say 80,000 of us refused to comply with the legal order.
	And you refused to comply as well, right?
	Homie, don't play that.
	My situation is unique where you first had to Tell them your vaccine status.
	I responded this way.
	I said, hey, leadership both as a contractor and as a reservist, I said, if you can have the JAG or the general counsel show me in writing that I have to answer the form what my vaccine status is, once you provide that to me, I will determine what my next steps will be.
	They couldn't provide it.
	Okay.
	And at this point, you said you were a contractor and you were a reservist at this point in 2020.
	Okay.
	Yeah.
	And in 2020.
	What'd they tell you?
	They couldn't do it.
	And they got all butthurt.
	It's like, well, everybody else has to.
	I'm like, look at the form.
	Small print.
	It says it's optional.
	I opt to not respond.
	Have a nice day.
	And that's it?
	They couldn't do anything to you?
	They couldn't fuck with your pension, your reserve status?
	And then they put me on the Quiet Skies program.
	Oh, okay.
	And that's when their problem started.
	And this was in 2020?
	This happened to you?
	2021?
	2021.
	DHS Maine.
	June of 2021.
	Started an investigation on me.
	I got receipts, bro.
	So, okay, so...
	Because I investigate them.
	As soon as I find out.
	Okay, so...
	So after you get censored on Twitter for calling out Pence, for pussying out, and Pelosi, then next thing you know, a couple months later...
	A couple things happen simultaneously.
	I'll have to fool you, and once we get...
	We're getting there.
	One thing is that part.
	The other part is Benny Thompson used to be the chair of the...
	He later chaired in July when they stood it up, the January 6th committee.
	But then also he was the chair of the Homeland Security Committee.
	He sent a memo to Ali Mayorkas basically saying, hey, go after the political targets, here's the list.
	And then he...
	Point of job.
	Okay.
	Interesting.
	Okay.
	Because I'm an insider, right?
	Yeah.
	Because I'm a threat.
	Yeah.
	Now, if I wanted to use it for nefarious purposes, yeah, I'm a threat.
	But they've investigated me.
	Nothing.
	I've got four middle fingers up my sleeve.
	That's about it.
	Okay, so going back to the Paul Ryan thing, because you were talking about how we were going to defeat this and get Trump in.
	So go back to the strategy that you had.
	He just said it.
	No, he didn't finish.
	Yeah, I'm kind of reiterating, because it's key.
	So now that you know who the threats are, like the biggest influence or threats to fixing this, you got Paul Ryan on one hand that's literally just bribed the company that has massive influence over the machinery in our electoral process across 28 states last I checked.
	How do we address that, okay?
	From the other aspect you have, they're going to continue to try to assassinate him, right?
	Okay.
	You have the Democrats and Jamie Raskin that want to call him an insurrectionist to block him from even taking office if they fail to assassinate him and if they fail to rig it through the machines.
	Right?
	So phase one, like, from now until November 5th, And maybe beyond, assassination is what they're going to continue to do.
	Number two, they're going to try to destroy Elon Musk from releasing this information.
	That's why it's crucial, literally starting tomorrow.
	Tomorrow's the best day to start this process because everyone's back from vacation.
	Today's Labor Day.
	Well, we're done with Labor Day a couple hours ago.
	Today starts the election season and we have to educate the entire country on this.
	So Elon, from now on to basically early voting beyond, you got to protect Trump, which means every single person listening in that knows someone that is law enforcement that wants to make sure that this thing happens legally, morally and ethically.
	I need you to volunteer anytime that there's a rally or an event where Trump is at.
	You need to volunteer and make sure you're protecting President Trump, not only from external threats, but also you're observing the Secret Service and the FBI to make sure that they don't assassinate him from within.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Right?
	That's one mechanism of addressing it.
	Because the threats are coming from within.
	That's reality.
	So we need to have the local, like when he's doing rallies in these different places, you got cops that are called to volunteer to provide security.
	So you need to be vigilant internally and externally.
	Of our own federal law enforcement, right?
	Because we still don't know what happened in Butler, and our entire machinery is literally covering it up.
	Because they don't want to talk about it.
	I was at the hearing last week with, a couple weeks ago, Bongino, with the Congress members, Eric Prince, etc.
	So, we've got to address the security posture.
	The cyber component, Elon is kind of covering it.
	He's got...
	Starlink, right?
	He's creating mechanisms at play.
	Now there's direct communications with T-Mobile.
	He just launched a couple days ago between Starlink and etc.
	But we need to be able to communicate and spread the message.
	That's why it's so important for Elon.
	Because in Brazil, they're trying to stop him from communicating.
	You saw that, right?
	Yeah, yeah.
	And the reason why is because they think that it's influential to their election.
	It's literally the same.
	Like, they saw how it affected the 2016 election and they don't want it.
	That was their basis for banning X there.
	Exactly.
	Which is crazy.
	They don't want the truth.
	They want to control the narrative to stay in power and protect themselves from exposure.
	Of course.
	Because they already corrupted it, right?
	So...
	Stop assassination.
	Stop the cyber attacks.
	They're going to continue to do it.
	And then number three...
	The sensing information from Fox, right?
	Right.
	And then...
	What else?
	If those two things fail going into November, then we have to stop the machines from being used.
	And then the last component, the fourth, is that we have to stop the House from 14th Amendment Section 3.
	So I already talked about what we're going to do in order to stop the political justification for 14th Amendment Section 3, because Loudermilk's team is addressing that component, right?
	The assassination, I kind of explained one of the mechanisms, and he just has to have protection at all times, right?
	And number three, the way we address the machinery...
	We talked about the cyber.
	That's the mother of all Twitter files.
	I'm going to talk about it tomorrow in my space at 8 p.m.
	And really the last component is how do we stop illegals from voting?
	How do we stop the machines from being used?
	Foreign interference, right?
	All the different layers of fraud, mail-in ballots, the signature verification fraud, all of it, right?
	I only see one method for that to fix it in the time that we have.
	And I know people are saying like one day in person, paper ballot, hand count and all that.
	Great.
	But we're at like 50, 60 days.
	I say let's do it the easiest way with very limited money behind it.
	Prove to America, Elon Musk, based on the holdings of direct messages and communications that you have, that the 2020 election, with the evidence that you're sitting on, was completely raw dog stolen and illegal.
	Tucker, amplify that.
	Joe Rogan, showcase it.
	Who else?
	AG Paxton subpoena anything else that Elon Musk won't can't disclose through a proper process and then Essentially going into the next two weeks you think we have enough time to do that though.
	I mean the elections literally two months away You can just start releasing it tomorrow Hopefully they do and then what and then basically demand that Americans Demand that their state legislatures allocate the electors accordingly.
	Yeah when that happens I think we go back to a free, fair, transparent...
	Imagine you watch them voting.
	You think a Republican, even if they're complicit, even if they're in on it, or they're just cowards, you think they're...
	It's like this.
	On one side, if you're a complicit one of these Republicans that have TDS, on one side you're like, ooh, I have to vote for the Republican or the Democrat nominee in my chambers in my state capitol.
	If they vote for a Democrat...
	Kamala Harris and they're a Republican.
	What do you think the people do to him or her?
	Oh, there's gonna be a problem.
	Be creative.
	What are some things that come to mind?
	Get them out of office.
	You think that's all they're gonna do?
	Well...
	I think they're gonna do way more than what we did to Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger when they voted to impeach and be on the committee to do the fedsurrection cover-up and insurrection promotion narrative.
	They were obliterated politically.
	Yeah.
	I think in today's climate, Their constituents are going to go above and beyond.
	And what I mean by that is the sky's the limit.
	What do you think business owners are going to do to that representative?
	Oh, not donate, not support.
	What do you think family members and neighbors, friends, relatives...
	We've seen that happen.
	I mean, look at RFK. They denounced them for supporting Trump.
	I think you're being very diplomatic.
	Well...
	There's other things they could do too, but generally speaking, that's what's going to happen.
	Yeah.
	I suspect it's going to be much more aggressive.
	That's my analysis.
	Potentially.
	So the transparency of it is a forcing function for people to vote by their political party affiliation, thus creating the 274 electoral vote allocation.
	Yeah.
	And then by the time it gets to the House, with all the evidence out there...
	Republican House, and then the more exposure of Kevin McCarthy, which I'm doing through members of Congress that are influential, that talk to the people that need to be talked to, I think we're going to get to a solution.
	Now, are they just gonna roll over?
	No.
	They're gonna try to shut us down.
	If you expose Kevin McCarthy, you think he's just gonna kind of be like, you know what, I don't even want to be Chief of Staff anymore.
	I'm good.
	Is that the goal here?
	Keep him from becoming Chief of Staff?
	Absolutely.
	Without Trump having to necessarily do it himself, let the public embarrass him so much?
	Yeah.
	I see what you mean.
	I see what you mean.
	That's the solution.
	If somebody has a better solution, please.
	You feel as though he's strong-arming him, essentially?
	A bit?
	Maybe he's not conveying it that way, but that's essentially what's going on, I think.
	Because at the end of the day, think about it, between him and Kevin McCarthy and Paul Ryan, they got juice.
	They got a lot of juice, yeah.
	One controls the media side, the other one controls the funding.
	And unfortunately, Trump continues to do interviews on Hannity and Mark Levin.
	He does.
	He does.
	He gives Hannity all the interviews.
	He's only empowering them further.
	I will say this.
	He has been doing more independent interviews.
	He did The Comedian.
	Fuck.
	Oh.
	He did Theovan.
	Theovan.
	He did Aidan Ross.
	Dr.
	Phil.
	Aidan Ross.
	He just did...
	Apparently, I just saw Lex Friedman just interviewed him.
	Yeah.
	Oh, shit.
	So, that's good.
	He's going on more independent podcasters, right, versus doing the whole Fox run.
	So, I'm going to say this.
	I'm going to do a call to action.
	Yep.
	Everybody that has RFK's number...
	After you guys watch the movie, Flynn delivered the truth, whatever the cost, you need to demand that RFK watches it.
	Does he not watch that?
	And when he watches that, he's going to realize that...
	I would think him of all people would be familiar with this shit.
	He's going to realize...
	He knows the deep state to a whole other degree.
	They killed his fucking uncle and his father.
	Can you imagine RFK and Flynn up against these guys?
	Well, I tell you this, all the tinfoil hats will vote for them.
	They love them.
	No, but think about it.
	I was happy with RFK's endorsement for Trump.
	I actually like RFK a lot.
	Even though I would consider myself pretty far right, I like RFK because he's willing to challenge the status quo.
	And I think that's why the Democrat Party was so scared of him and didn't want to legitimize him and why he had to go independent.
	And I'm glad that he supported Trump.
	You know that General Flynn was a Democrat?
	No, that makes sense.
	He worked under Obama.
	That makes sense.
	You know that he was a Democrat going into the Trump administration?
	I didn't know that.
	He was a Kennedy Democrat.
	He's seen it for what it is, though.
	I would say you're very optimistic, and I like the plan.
	What's your plan?
	See, my plan is very based.
	I'm based.
	I want to hear it.
	Because...
	I believe in reality.
	I believe in things that we can't control.
	And ultimately, there's the facet of the population that believes that things are hunky-dory.
	They're okay.
	Things are going fine.
	And they don't want to be bothered by this type of talk.
	This is kind of like too much for them to handle, or they just don't care.
	TikTok brain, you feel me?
	All these things.
	And as a result of these current mindsets, Some people will change when they hear this.
	Some people might say, you know what?
	It's cool and all, but I'll go out to play some video games and watch movies.
	It's cool and all.
	As a result, this revelation to myself and what I've seen so far is almost like if, like, change is necessary and it can't happen.
	But are people really going to wake up and make a change?
	That, I don't know.
	That's my worry.
	I think what you're saying is 100% correct, but are people actually going to make a change?
	That's what I worry about.
	You're talking to the guy that basically created the Fed's direction that Nancy Pelosi had to run.
	You're talking to the guy that in the first time, I think, in our nation's history going back 150 years, where we removed the Speaker of the House.
	If anyone could do it, you could do it.
	But again, I just think some people, bro, don't give two shits about none of this.
	And not because they don't want to, it's because they've been brainwashed by society and social media to believe, you know what?
	Fuck the foreign policy.
	Fuck what's going on in politics.
	I just want to go to work, party with my friends, enter alcohol, and play games.
	That's it.
	While you guys do that, go ahead and lop off your penis and slap on a vagina, because that's what shit talk is telling you to do.
	Because the Chinese Communist Party is manipulating your brain into doing that.
	On purpose.
	On purpose, because they understand, okay, you know what?
	I can't beat it from the outside, but get it from the inside, which is social media.
	So while they do that, I'm going to keep grinding with or without anybody.
	If you want to help, I got open arms.
	Seriously.
	That's why we did an interview.
	I need help.
	And you guys allowed the platform.
	I mean, massive.
	Seriously, how many people have the courage?
	This is where I got to give you guys a shout out.
	There's very few people that have the courage to have somebody like me on, knowing that the risk to your business is great, right?
	Well, lots of people are pussies.
	Luckily, we got more and more people that have the courage.
	Think about it.
	Look at my background.
	If somebody like me doesn't step forward, then who's going to step forward?
	Yeah.
	So which begs the question, as you're listening in, look at the mirror.
	What can you do to increase the pressure on these scum?
	They're your neighbors.
	Some of them you know.
	Most people know a sheriff or a DA or a state rep.
	They're right there in their community.
	Be like, hey bro, why don't you run a press conference and say, you know what, the only way we're going to secure our election is to have a, on November 5th, we'll just have our state legislatures vote.
	And the way we justify it for people to say, oh, but you're taking away the vote from the people.
	Well, no, because we don't have a system right now that's free, fair, and safe and secure.
	But what I like is, you brought up the problem, and they made a solution.
	Most people just talk about it, but no solution.
	So that's bravery, bro.
	Thank you, thank you.
	But the first thing you gotta do is specifically know what the problem is, so that you can then craft a solution.
	And my solutions are always, they're limited.
	Because there's other solutions out there, but I'm trying to keep it with...
	Well, not trying.
	I always keep it within the legal, moral, and ethical construct.
	Peaceful and patriotic.
	Let's just hope Elon Musk is willing to go to this extent.
	I need everybody to tag Elon Musk and show up tomorrow 8 p.m.
	Eastern Standard Time, right?
	I might have.
	I'm still waiting on Ken Paxton to respond.
	He might be showing up.
	Cool.
	Nice.
	I gotta look at my phone.
	Fair enough.
	We'll close this thing out here in a second.
	Quick word from our sponsors here in a second, then we'll read some chats.
	Cool.
	Should we do first chats?
	No, you're good.
	Okay.
	Quick word from the sponsors, guys.
	This comes from 1775 Trophy.
	This episode is sponsored by 1775 Coffee because you guys know that we've been going long and hard.
	Pause five and a half hours so far.
	Big pause.
	Do you enjoy the free speech that Rumble is protecting and fighting for?
	Our show on Rumble is only possible thanks to our viewers supporting Rumble's platform by purchasing Rumble products.
	Most of you drink coffee every day.
	That's why you have Rumble 1775 Coffee.
	It's actually some of the best coffee and it's the best price as a coffee you buy now, but it's way better.
	Rumble 1775 Coffee is free from chemicals yet rich in flavor.
	This is because their beans are sourced from high-altitude farms in Bolivia, handpicked, roasted weekly at their facility in Miami, and delivered fresh to your doorstep.
	And as believers in freedom, buying from Rumble helps fight back against woke corporations like Starbucks and Dunkin' Donuts.
	Yeah, fuck both of those guys.
	Join the Coffee Revolution and brew Rebellion with Rumble 1775 Coffee.
	Go to 1775coffee.com, use code STUDIO, and get a free month's supply.
	Of their cognitive boosting supplement Limitless when you buy two bags of their coffee.
	Think about that.
	It's a crazy deal and the supplement is worth more than two bags of coffee.
	Go to 1775coffee.com.
	Try their amazing coffee.
	Guys, remember the code is STUDIO. Alright man, so go support us over there.
	Go support Rumble and go support the coffee because at the end of the day, you know, you got Dunkin' Donuts and...
	Starbucks, these fucking guys don't support free speech, man.
	Hell no, man.
	They want to suppress speech because actually they're a part of that big conglomerate of people that...
	Advertisers, they're a part of that where they want to censor free speech.
	I believe it was Gram, right?
	Garm or some bullshit like that.
	Fuck those assholes.
	And it's crazy because they want to keep you fat too as well.
	Of course they do.
	They want to keep you fat, stupid, and unaware of what's going on.
	They don't want you guys hearing conversations like this.
	At all.
	Alright, I'll read these chats, and we'll close out here in a little bit.
	I just tuned in, so this may be irrelevant to the topic at hand, but this message is for Fresh.
	I've noticed Myron only laughs at your stutters and not your jokes, so brother, if you want to make a funny joke, put a stutter in your mutter.
	Okay, I love you.
	Known Billy, four bucks, I appreciate that.
	Well, that's because Fresh is funny.
	We all know this.
	Fresh is dumb as fuck.
	I've been...
	Ivan, I commend you for keeping your cool with this idiot next to you running a stupid mouth.
	Please continue.
	People can do research on this topic later.
	Lay out your plan.
	Hold on.
	To Tony, real quick.
	And he dropped 20 bucks?
	I gotta say this, man.
	You do know I'm playing a character, right?
	This is not my actual IQ level.
	I have to play a character sometimes.
	So, just so you understand.
	Fresh to 60 IQ asylum seeker who fell out of a coconut tree.
	He flinches every time a discussion like this happens.
	The downfall of most men is always women.
	I got your back.
	Yours will be fresh.
	It's all good, bro.
	Listen, listen, listen.
	Who is that punk?
	It's all good, brother.
	I know they don't understand what's happening, but it's okay.
	It's fine.
	Anybody else?
	Fresh, you're a punk-ass bitch.
	Get informed and get rid of that trash across from you.
	Ivan, thank you for everything you do.
	It's Tony again, same guy.
	Same guy, Tony.
	It's all good, it's all good.
	Anything else?
	Elosi is in the Deep State new member.
	So, Pelosi is a deep state?
	Really?
	Of course.
	Anything else?
	That is all.
	Caught up?
	Cool.
	So, Ivan, thank you for breaking down all this, man.
	This is great.
	We covered what the deep state is.
	We covered how you came to your awakening.
	We covered the corruption of the deep state.
	We covered how to get Trump back in.
	We covered January 6th in excruciating detail.
	We covered the Capitol Police, how they kind of went ahead and concealed a lot of their missteps, killing innocent people.
	Thank you so much for coming on.
	You know what we need?
	What?
	Zoom call with him on Castle Club.
	Go into some details that we can't go on alone on YouTube and Rumble.
	Sure.
	Sure we can.
	And then they can also support him as well after.
	Yeah, yeah.
	All his stuff.
	For sure.
	For sure.
	It's like a private membership group basically behind the scenes.
	Yeah.
	I'm game.
	So yeah, guys.
	I'm glad we were able to do this.
	It's hard to get here.
	Ivan, do you have anything you want to tell people before we close out?
	Where can they find you as well?
	Where can they find you as well?
	Yeah, so I'm on X while they allow me to speak.
	Ivan Raikland, I'm on Rumble.
	I got a sub-stack, like I mentioned.
	I follow him, guys.
	You can find him easily on my following list.
	Ivan Raikland is on Twitter.
	I follow him on there.
	I guess I'll close with this.
	You gotta look yourself in the mirror and come after these scum.
	You gotta educate the people next to you.
	The easiest thing you can do is to shut down.
	I know it's hard.
	You're gonna come up with every excuse in the book.
	Mark Zuckerberg just admitted to genocide, stealing the election, and providing cover for the Biden criminal laptop.
	That syndicate.
	You gotta remove yourself off those platforms.
	Because what you're doing is continuing to support them by allowing them to do what they're doing.
	Yeah.
	Or if you are going to be on there, at least support Rumble more.
	Watch these streams on Rumble.
	Yeah, subvert them.
	Tell them to go over to Rumble.
	Yeah, exactly.
	X. Like, use those platforms to move people over to the real platforms like X and Rumble.
	Put a link to each video.
	Yeah, that's how you really fight back because...
	I mean, there wasn't a lot of you guys.
	Like, I mean, like, literally, like, and here's other, like, YouTube suppressed anything on COVID that wasn't, that was, like, anti-vaccine.
	So the same people that Mark Zuckerberg admits to are the same people that did the same kind of coercion to Commitube and...
	Of course.
	100%.
	There was a cabal of them.
	And over to Twitter.
	I talked about this on Twitter, on a Twitter space, about, like, how it was all a fucking...
	You coming on tomorrow?
	What's that?
	You coming on the Twitter space tomorrow?
	Yeah, if you send me an invite.
	8pm.
	Yeah, if you send me an invite.
	Eastern Standard Time.
	Mother of all Twitter files.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah, I could come in there.
	He'll be there.
	I'm gonna put up stuff that people are gonna be like, God dang.
	How did he get that?
	I'll go in there.
	I'll go in there.
	WBills W Myron.
	Yeah, I appreciate that.
	That was great, guys.
	Guys, go make sure to support Ivan.
	And, you know, obviously, follow us on...
	Follow me on Twitter, Unplugged FedEx.
	Follow...
	Ivan on there.
	Ivan Raiklin.
	All at one word.
	And we'll be back on Wednesday.
	I think we're going to do a college campus episode, by the way, guys.
	For you guys on there.
	On Wednesday with me debating girls.
	And then we'll have a after hours.
	And then we'll probably do Fresh If It News for you guys as well sometime.
	And this is Ivan's page right here, guys.
	So go check him out.
	So what does FAFO stand for?
	Fuck around and find out, man.
	Fuck around and find out.
	Fuck around and find out.
	It's the find out phase.
	Yeah, man.
	All right.
	So, Ivan, thank you for coming on, bro.
	And we'll catch you guys on Wednesday afternoon, guys.
	And just like I said before, we're going to probably stop streaming on YouTube after this week, guys.
	So, start following us on Twitch and on Rumble.
	We'll do the news on Friday with a call-in show as well.
	Yeah, we can do that.
	Play together.
	Yeah, because obviously this is a longer show for you guys, but this is a very important topic, man.
	So, now you guys should have a very good working knowledge of January 6th, the collusion, everything else that went down.
	We'll catch you guys on Wednesday.

▲