Wikipedia Co-Founder Reveals He’s Working on Letter of Protest Against Site
|
Time
Text
I'm going to set up a letter of protest.
I don't think I'll call it a petition.
Probably a letter of protest.
And I'm going to try to circulate this around to a lot of prominent people who have been wronged in various ways by Wikipedia.
I think that will help, but at this point it seems to be increasingly necessary, making some noise at Congress, which has now got the Oversight Committee is investigating foreign influence on Wikipedia.
And this bears on the more general problems of Wikipedia being, as I say, an engine of defamation.
I am not trying to get Wikipedia to be generally regulated.
That would just be a disaster.
Of course not.
That's not what I'm trying to do.
I simply want it to be possible to sue somebody if there has not been any satisfaction from the Wikipedia fold.
Where there is a tort, there must be a defendant.
That's my idea.
So I think, and for that matter, speaking directly to the Wikimedia Foundation, making your feelings known, especially if you're a prominent person, you know, if you're a congressman or senator, obviously your voice counts for more.
You will be listened to more by the adults in the room at the Wikimedia Foundation.
I'm sure there are a lot of people who have been bad-mouthed by Wikipedia who would sign such a letter.
We can send it to the Wikimedia Foundation and to Congress and the White House and other governments around the world, perhaps.
I don't know.
I'm not saying that I want to use the power of government to impose anything on Wikipedia.
I don't want to do that at all.
I still have many libertarian bones in my body.
That actually makes me uncomfortable.
But some of the worst problems with Wikipedia today that would cause somebody like you to sign such a letter of protest are actually creations of the law,