All Episodes
April 12, 2024 - Slightly Offensive - Elijah Schaffer
32:16
BOMBSHELL Investigation Exposes FBI/CIA Entrapment of PATRIOTS. Are You Next? | Guest: Eric Cochran | CENSORED PREVIEW

➤ SUPPORT THE SHOW: https://censored.tv/ promo code “OFFENSIVE” for 20% Streams on Rumble, X, Locals, & YouTube MWF 10PM EST + Censored EXCLUSIVE content every Thursday 10PM EST __Show more DESCRIPTION: When we talk about J6, Ukraine, or even the JFK assassination — mentioning the FBI or CIA usually isn’t too far off. To the uninitiated, this may seem like conspiratorial, tin-foil hat talk: but as a result of fearless journalists like James O’Keefe, Laura Loomer, and now Eric Cochran and Sound Investigations, we have CONFIRMATION from the people in these organizations that not everything is at it may seem. So, how many of these events had some degree of infiltration? Eric Cochran from Sound Investigations joins us TONIGHT on CENSORED.TV to explain more! __ ➤ NOTICER T-SHIRTS: https://slightlyoffensive.com/ __ ⇩ELIJAH’S SOCIAL MEDIA ⇩ ➤ RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/c/SlightlyOffensive ➤ INSTA: https://www.instagram.com/slightlyoffensive.tv ➤ X: https://X.com/ElijahSchaffer ➤ TELEGRAM https://t.me/SlightlyOffensive __ ⇩FOLLOW ERIC COCHRAN ⇩ ➤ X: https://twitter.com/Eric_Cochran ➤ X: https://twitter.com/SoundInvestig ➤ Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/SoundInvestigations ____________ Show less

Participants
Main voices
e
elijah schaffer
12:55
e
eric cochran
10:46
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
elijah schaffer
A bombshell investigation was just dropped exposing how the CIA entraps American patriots.
We've seen it so many times before with the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot.
We've seen it in January 6th, which we'll look at some of those evidences.
But the smoking gun has just been found as a possibly gay, not that there's anything wrong with that, but a possibly gay CIA agent ends up explaining how they actually entrap Americans, how they entrap foreigners, and even details on how they entrapped Alex Jones.
Now, you might have seen the clip going around.
We'll watch it.
It's literally insane what we're witnessing.
But the founder of Sound Investigations, the organization behind this and what's going on exposing these types of things, is here with me today.
I'd like to welcome to Nightly Offensive, Eric Cochrane or Cochrane.
I don't know how to pronounce it.
How are you doing, man?
Cochrane.
I'm doing well.
eric cochran
Thank you for having me.
elijah schaffer
Yeah, dude.
So before we get into the intro, tell us a little bit about yourself and who you are, because this video has not only broken the internet, this investigation has not only changed minds, but it's gotten Congress members' attention.
It's exposing the deep state.
It's so delicate, yet so bombastic, man.
So who are you?
What do you do?
And yeah, tell us a little bit about your organization, how you guys come to creating things like this.
eric cochran
Yeah, well, I'm Eric.
I actually, you know, years ago worked at Project Veritas, kind of like got my news hat there.
Worked on the source, worked in the sources department.
What I always wanted to do, though, was investigate the pornography industry, actually, because nobody's really touched it.
Nobody had gone after them.
And then, you know, flash forward to a year ago, I actually start Sound Investigations, my own undercover journalism organization.
We exposed Pornhub, the leading pornography website and like the owner of like these massive other conglomerates.
And now there's like lawsuits and there's laws getting changed off of those videos.
And that's kind of like our bread and butter.
And then now you come to this story and kind of the inside story of this is my very small team, Sound Investigations, you know, we do undercover journalism, but like we're not necessarily like, we weren't necessarily going in to find CIA agents or FBI agents or anything like that.
But my team is in DC.
Happens, one of my journalists happens to bump into a guy and then he meets him again and the guy reveals, hey, I work for the CIA.
Well, when you're an undercover journalist and a guy says, like, I work for the CIA and your camera is rolling, you don't say no to that meeting.
And then the guy keeps on giving up more and more information.
Like he says, oh yeah, like we can bring a nudge to not entrap people, but get all the way up to the line without going over it.
And then like he just kept on talking.
And we ended up with a two-part release from all these revelations from this guy.
And again, it wasn't even like something we were necessarily, we were like investigating, but we said like the public has to know this.
We have to at least put this out for people to see it.
And then to our surprise, like people really cared.
And then like you said, like it blew up.
Like Elon Musk responded to it three times.
I know like Mike Lee was responding to it.
Marjorie Taylor Greene was responding to it.
Alex Jones says he might launch a lawsuit because this guy even brings up all on his own brings up Alex Jones and starts saying how, yeah, we were going after him hardcore.
elijah schaffer
Yeah, so I want to watch the video in its entirety.
It's about seven and a half minutes or the clip that I have here, but I do think it's worth watching.
I'm sure you've seen it a million times, but I'm assuming people haven't.
So basically, it comes out from sound investigations that CIA officer, former FBI, boasts, can put anyone in jail and set them up.
We call it a nodge, and we did what we wanted to Alex Jones.
And I want you to listen to this because we are being gaslit every single day, being told that what you're seeing is not true.
Diversity is our strength.
Black people do not commit crime.
That's racist.
You know, Israel is not bombing children and we are not funding the war.
But, you know, you can see what's going on.
You can watch the videos on Twitter every day of the crime around American cities and who's committing it.
You can see that we're sending intelligence officers and aid packages to fund this war in Israel.
And yet when you bring up the evidence, they go, yeah, you're actually, that's okay, whatever.
And they don't care.
But it's important that we have the evidence so that we wake up.
The best thing we can do is wake people up to what's really going on.
And so when we say the CIA, the FBI, they're entrapping Americans.
They're literally just politically picking us apart like they're Gestapo.
When someone says it themselves, they'll still write it off and say, oh, he's not really this.
We'll talk about some of the snapback here.
Check this out.
This is absolutely crazy.
unidentified
Went in jail if you know what to do.
How?
elijah schaffer
Does the Bureau practice entrapment a lot?
unidentified
We get really close.
We call it a nudge.
A nudge.
A nudge.
Sometimes you just gotta get a quick whip just to see what happens.
Sometimes you like the fuse and just wait for it to follow.
Nothing with putting up a fake social media thing to like really get people mad.
Alex Jones.
Yeah, so we were after him.
You are.
We did what we wanted.
elijah schaffer
Which was what?
unidentified
Took his money away.
eric cochran
Gavin O'Blenis is a contracting officer at the CIA.
O'Blenis worked for the FBI in 2021 and 2022 in the San Diego office, moved on to Homeland Security where he conducted asylum interviews at the southern border, and now works for the CIA managing multi-million dollar contracts across government agencies and private sector vendors.
unidentified
I work for how I'm not supposed to tell people kind of job.
If I say intelligence, what do you think?
CIA?
Yep.
You work for the CIA?
I do.
That's incredible.
Contracting officer.
Amazing.
So I deal a lot with like different agencies.
We're contracting with like Director of National Intelligence to do stuff.
We do Navy, Army video, really.
I just FBI.
I used to work for the FBI.
So I threw the FBI at me.
They're like, Peter, you used to work there.
Oh, I'm permitted.
So good.
eric cochran
Why do they call a contract?
unidentified
Because I do the contract.
I do all the legal contracts.
Lay out the vendors and evaluate them.
I love the agency.
Good for you.
I like the Bureau, too.
The Bureau is a lot of fun.
I got to do a lot of cool stuff with the Bureau.
I was the guy in the back of the truck in the van.
eric cochran
O'Blennis spoke to an undercover sound investigations reporter about this.
elijah schaffer
Before we get into what he said, you know, this sort of like contact and meetup may reveal it, but like, how do you go about making contact with a CIA agent or like building this rapport with people?
Because these organizations know that groups like you exist.
They know that, you know, James O'Keefe is around.
They know you guys are exposing them.
And they even give PowerPoints, like you mentioned earlier, warning people how to avoid people like you.
So how does a journalist create contact or build this relationship with such a high-profile subject?
eric cochran
Yeah, well, you know, I don't want to reveal all of our methods in the field, but it's rare.
Like, you know, there's a reason that this doesn't happen a lot.
You know, you're not, it's not easy to go just meet up with a CIA agent.
A lot of people had said, like, oh, was this on a dating app or anything?
I'll say, like, this was not on a dating app.
CIA agents don't put, I work for the CIA.
I mean, maybe some do.
You know, maybe there's a chance that happens.
But no, like, you know, the thing is, there's a lot of bureaucrats in DC.
So I'll say that much.
You know, you, there's, you know, there's a reason, like, I think James O'Keefe probably is in DC maybe right now as we speak, finding new subjects.
You know, DC is full of a lot of corruption.
elijah schaffer
It is, yeah.
And so this is crazy, right?
Leave it.
I mean, this is not you saying this, but leave it to the gay guy to have the loose lips.
I keep seeing this.
There's a lot of these homosexual men who are real flirtatious and let things drop, but it's also the straight men too.
You know, I think you guys use pretty girls to go on dates.
These guys will guys will basically do anything for sex, it seems like, including give up national intelligence secrets.
That's my perspective.
Is that what you guys think is happening, or do you have a different conclusion?
eric cochran
I think that, you know, people like to, you know, show what they know about, you know, want to say that.
But I think it might go even beyond like the romantic or anything like that.
People like talking about themselves.
Like I am talking about what I just have been working on for the last few weeks right here.
And I love it.
People like explaining their day-to-day talking about what they like to do.
There's a great book, maybe ironically, by a former FBI agent called It's Not All About Me.
And it's about listening to other people and letting them talk about themselves and building rapport with people.
It's very short.
I recommend people read it because even if you're not an undercover agent, it's just good for conversations with people.
So I think it goes beyond just like the romantic.
It's about listening to people.
unidentified
Right.
elijah schaffer
So let me go to this back to the video here.
This is so crazy what he says.
By the way, if you're just joining, this is Eric Cochran.
Yeah, I guess that's how he's really bad at saying that name.
But he runs sound investigations and they did this expose, expose the CIA and their entrapment scheme.
He's on the show with me today to discuss it.
Everyone wanted to talk to Alex Jones about this, but we prefer to talk to people at the source.
As you know, I'm a journalist myself still outside of this show.
So it is really nice to speak to someone who's doing real work here.
Check this out.
eric cochran
About his work experience involving near entrapment and his employers' involvement with political commentator Alex Jones' legal battles.
unidentified
As long as the bureau is able to progress far enough to be able to put co-lifers in jail whenever they want.
Yeah.
You think that's on the agenda?
You can kind of put anyone in jail if you know what to do.
How?
He's like.
You create the situation to where they have no choice but to act on their impulse.
At least they act on that impulse.
Then we call that new trapman.
It's a fine line.
Yeah.
elijah schaffer
Does the bureau practice entrapment a lot?
unidentified
We get really close.
elijah schaffer
Not officially.
unidentified
No.
We get as close as we can.
We get as close as we can to it without doing it.
So they can entrap some of these pro-lifers into doing things that they don't.
Yeah.
We call it a nudge.
A nudge.
A nudge.
Sometimes you just gotta get in a quick look just to see what happens, right?
How did that happen?
You put a post out there or you have some fake profile say something that triggers that.
We know it's gonna trigger, right?
Like we already know your history.
If we're to that point, we already know everything about it.
So we're like, oh, that's a pistol.
Sometimes you like the fuse and just wait for it to follow, right?
eric cochran
Like a railing.
unidentified
Like a, oh.
So when a rally happens, sometimes the bureau behind it?
Yeah, sometimes.
Nothing like putting on a fake social media thing to like really get people mad.
Mm-hmm.
Post fake news.
Sometimes it's not fake.
It's embellished a little bit.
Who would be like a big influencer that you're after?
You.
elijah schaffer
Like a.
I don't know, like.
unidentified
I don't even know these names.
Like a Fox News person or like a Tucker Carlson.
Oh, I'm sure he's influenced.
Right.
You always want the biggest and loudest.
Like that, what was his name?
The one that said Sandy Hook didn't have.
Alex Jones.
Yeah.
So we were after him.
elijah schaffer
You are?
unidentified
Are you still after him?
Why?
Because he's broke.
He got found guilty and had to pay like $100 million.
So why are you after him?
We're not anymore.
Just to get the money from him?
Yeah.
Was that court case used?
Was that in CIA?
elijah schaffer
That was the agency thing?
unidentified
Well, actually, it was a defamation case.
So it's a civil, not government.
But we were looking at all of his followers coming following, like, who's that the latest, right?
So, even though it's technically not our, well, not the agency, definitely, but the Bureau, for instance.
Yeah, it's not our purview.
It's a civil, it's a civil matter.
Since they got all this access to this stuff and it's there, what can we go find?
And did you find anything?
I can't determine anything.
Oh, we did.
But so, you know, it's just kind of like, you know, realize the opportunity that you have.
So with Alex Jones, you were watching him long before anything ended up happening.
Probably.
It wasn't my office, but I mean, we would have been well aware of what he was doing.
elijah schaffer
And the goal with him was what?
unidentified
Just to bankrupt him?
Oh, pretty much.
And we let the families do it.
What?
We let the families do it.
elijah schaffer
Were they encouraged to do that by the Bureau?
Like, nudged?
unidentified
We don't encourage people.
But, like, we just say there's no federal statute being broken.
But you do have the option for a civil.
For a civil case.
And it's a pretty good case.
Nice.
In our opinion.
So, like, oh, that makes so much sense.
elijah schaffer
I have a cousin who's a lawyer.
So that's a lot of these cases.
They're kind of encouraged by the FBI.
unidentified
Yeah, like, there's nothing federally, federal law we can do, but civilly, we slow at him that way.
Chop his legs on them.
And they did.
elijah schaffer
So the FBI was happy.
unidentified
We didn't care.
We were like, oh.
elijah schaffer
Basically, the citizens did your job.
Wow, so you can encourage a civil lawsuit.
unidentified
I encourage.
Educate.
elijah schaffer
So let's talk about that for a second.
Before we, there's more that is released, which is crazy.
I think you guys had a part two as well.
There's so much to talk about.
But he literally says, look, we don't entrap.
This is the gaslighting.
We're not entrapping.
We are nudging.
So we're basically entrapping.
Basically, we're backing a dog into a corner and then we are putting it to sleep when it bites back.
Like we are putting people in positions where they really don't have another choice, but we don't make them do it.
So it's technically as close to the line of illegality, which is completely opposite to what you would think the intelligence agencies should be doing in terms of they should be trying to help the American public or get us as far away from self-harm and self-inflicted injury.
It would look like, and I might say from this, that he's admitting that the intelligence agencies are what we call the deep state and that they are causing a lot of the problems in our own country.
And then they're blaming the people for it.
Am I wrong on that?
Is that what he was saying?
eric cochran
Yeah.
I mean, the fact that they have a euphemism for entrapment so that they on paper, they don't have to say entrapment.
They can just say, oh, it's a nudge.
We light the fuse and see where it goes.
And yeah, it's like you said, shouldn't the FBI, so he's speaking from his experience in the San Diego office at the FBI, where he worked a couple of years ago.
And he like, you know, shouldn't their job be to protect us from criminals, not see if criminals are going to go do crimes and then entrap them?
elijah schaffer
Well, yeah, but I also feel like I think we have to realize this makes sense then that like what they're doing, we know with January 6th, right, that there were over, he talks about this, that there were over like 20 informants just in the crowd.
Now this guy, you know, covers contracting.
If you read his profile on the website, I do have this, I want to show this slide here.
As of today, though, it seems like the CIA contracting office, Gavin Oblenis, which is unironic that the owner of the network we're on right now, his name's Gavin McGinnis, his evil twin.
I guess Gavin O'Blenis is Gavin's gay alter ego.
But Gavin Oblenis's LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram pages are gone, and you can see the verifiable social media.
So do you know anything?
Was this guy fired or has he just done an OPSEC and disappeared off the face of the earth because he intelligence leaked in agency that shouldn't have intelligence leaks, right?
eric cochran
We don't know his employment status right now.
If I were to perhaps guess, I would say they probably can't afford to fire this guy.
I mean, one, because it might look really bad right now and who knows what he might do.
But then two, I mean, you know, he handles these multi-million dollar sentiments hundred to up to $300 million that he has to handle across government agencies.
That's not necessarily an easy thing to replace immediately.
elijah schaffer
Yeah, so let's so let's continue watching because it is really interesting and it's fascinating to me on exactly what he's saying here.
If you are in the chat and if you've seen this video already, drop ones.
If you haven't seen it, drop twos.
I'd just like to know how much you guys keep up with the news and these stories.
It also is good to know if you've listened to this and I appreciate it.
When we have somebody on who's actually behind this stuff, someone in the chat even said they were like, it's almost uncomfortable when you actually come across real journalism today.
It really is because we're so not accustomed to it.
Check this out.
What do you do with people like Alex Jones now?
He's still chirping.
unidentified
They can chirp.
Are you still watching him?
eric cochran
Why?
unidentified
He did what we wanted.
elijah schaffer
Which was what?
unidentified
Took his money away.
We shut him up for a while.
You're never going to shut him up right now.
elijah schaffer
Unless you put him in prison.
unidentified
He didn't do anything about this.
Being ignorant is not a crime, though it should.
It is.
I mean, you could bring a nudge if he did inside a riot.
Cheetos.
He didn't encourage people to go shoot me.
He didn't.
eric cochran
So he didn't.
Additionally, O'Blenis states that he knows and works with FBI agents who were undercover in the January 6th Capitol riot, estimating about 20 field agents were there undercover.
elijah schaffer
Okay, before we jump into that part, I noticed he called Donald Trump Cheeto.
Like, I mean, this is a government employee from an intelligence agency calling the previous president, which I'm assuming he worked under, Cheeto.
Was that normally?
Like, do you feel like that was the understanding here?
Like, this guy did not like Donald Trump, that he clearly was not a supporter of him.
Like, is that what I'm hearing there?
eric cochran
Well, I don't think he was a supporter of Donald Trump.
No.
I mean, you know, like people, people make funny things.
You know, I'm not going to, I guess I'm not going to fault the guy for calling Trump Cheeto.
You know, if it was a Republican talking casually, he might say something derogatory about Biden.
But, you know, that's, you know, his personal politics, I suppose.
I'm willing to let that go, especially in the face of all of the other things that he's talking about.
elijah schaffer
Okay, so we're about to get into this section here where he talks about January 6th.
And I think this is really important.
We'll jump off of this.
I got a lot of clips and things to discuss here.
But this is, I think, the first time we have an active CIA employee directly admitting that there was FBI informants right on camera.
Am I wrong on that?
eric cochran
I believe that is correct.
You know, the funny thing is, this next clip you're about to show, I almost didn't put this.
I almost didn't release this tape.
And then Arden Young, actually, one of our journalists saw it and said, hey, like, actually, they've continued to deny that they're undercover agents in January 6th.
And so apparently she's like, this is news.
Like, nobody has released this yet.
And I was like, all right, I guess we're breaking news with this.
elijah schaffer
Yeah, good job on that, man.
Listen to what he had to say if you haven't watched this video before.
eric cochran
Oblenis notes that they were not involved in violence.
This appears to be the first admission of undercover FBI agents in attendance.
unidentified
I thought you said that there were FBI agents in the crowd at J6.
There are.
There always are when there's a big protest in DC.
Just in case it gets out of hand.
There wasn't enough to turn that tie.
I mean, I'm talking maybe having 20.
You needed 1,000 to get rid of that crap.
So they had like 20.
elijah schaffer
Oh, that was just 20?
unidentified
Yeah, just to go through there and see what I could hear or, you know, that kind of thing.
Wow.
Yeah, definitely.
They needed 1,000 at least.
That's also capital police jurisdiction.
They're in charge.
So that they didn't have more on hand?
I don't know.
The Bureau didn't really want people knowing that they were in the crowd.
That would be overstepping their boundaries.
A little bit.
Do people know that?
Do people know that Pierre was in the crowd?
Nope, we probably never will.
You know agents that were there?
Really?
What's the agency doing?
elijah schaffer
Okay, so coming back from this directly here, you see this and it's going, he's saying nobody knows this.
So you actually did break the story here because he's saying these, they're FBI agents.
Was he alluding that they were entrapping people or is he just saying like, you know, they just were there in case it got out of hand?
Because I didn't understand that part where he's explaining that they might have been overstepping their boundaries.
What do you know about that?
eric cochran
Yeah, so I don't believe he, you know, if there was entrapment, I don't think he knows about it.
And I don't, he's not alleging any of that.
What's interesting is that FBI director Christopher Wr has continued to decline to comment if there were undercover.
He won't even say that there were peaceful undercover agents there.
But Gavin O'Blenis here is saying like, oh, yeah, there are like, you know, about 20.
And like, yeah, I know some of them.
So it is the first, as far as we know, this is the first, you know, admission that there were FBI agents in the crowd.
And then, yeah, as far as he's talking about overstepping bounds, he's talking about it gets tricky, I suppose, with who has jurisdiction because the Capitol Police, you know, they have their undercover people.
They need to control crowds in there.
And so, you know, then like the FBI has to communicate where they are.
So I think there might have been some, you know, maybe there is some internal scuffle or something over the jurisdiction of the FBI there.
elijah schaffer
Well, and I think people are not so happy.
Check this out.
You guys had posted this, that a lot of people online are unhappy about this expose.
And there's something really quite common about them.
You know, the profiles here, I think I can, can I zoom in?
I don't think I can zoom in on that right now, but some of the profiles of the people commenting on your video that are mad.
This guy is a realist, a veteran, a constitutional conservative.
Definitely not MAGA.
Retired Department of Defense.
This guy's a recovering FBI agent, constitutional extremist.
This is 22 years as a Fed.
This one is retired FBI.
So is this like a cult or a club?
Like they're mad because you're blowing the mask off and exposing them.
And so like, these are all ex-employees.
Is this sort of like a president?
Once they're not a president, they still have secret service.
These people are still like beholden to the cult.
What's up with that and the pushback from this?
eric cochran
I mean, maybe there's still loyalty.
You know, if you leave an organization, maybe you're not super happy when there's an undercover expose of the organization that you are part of.
Maybe you still know people there.
I don't know what's going on there.
elijah schaffer
Yeah, so there's another clip that I want to play here about the Russian oligarchs.
This is pretty interesting.
So about the foreign expose on what happened, let me go ahead and bring this up.
This is about what we do to other countries.
Now, you may wonder why a lot of nations don't seem to like the United States.
And Americans themselves are very kind people, very friendly.
Go to another country like Australia.
People are not like, they'll be nice to you, but they don't want to be friendly.
Americans are deep.
They like to talk about things.
Why does everyone hate us?
Well, there's several reasons.
And one of them is exactly this.
It's bullying other nations because things are backed by the U.S. dollar.
So we have the authority to do so.
Listen.
unidentified
We did seize the billionaire's shop from Russia.
That must have been cool.
It was.
I've never seen a fellow go to that, so I fat on it.
He went in?
Yeah.
Amazing.
It was worth $970 million.
And who is this?
One of Putin's oligarchs.
We seize him.
Why?
Because we could.
elijah schaffer
There was no need.
unidentified
There was no need for it.
We just did it.
Just because he was there.
elijah schaffer
How many times does Zero do that?
unidentified
A lot.
Really?
He sees all kinds of people from other countries, people.
He don't live.
He sees all kinds of shit.
Because all their money comes through here, right?
Because everything's based on the U.S. dollar.
So at some point, it's going to judge him.
So you can.
That's good.
I paid that $35 billion in Putin's money first in New York.
That's amazing.
Good.
He's like, that's not yours.
Yeah, it is.
elijah schaffer
It's in our accounts.
eric cochran
It's on our shoulders.
unidentified
How do we use that?
I'm sure there's some legal things.
That's interesting.
You know, then international money laws come into play.
It gets a little murky.
elijah schaffer
So let me ask you this, Eric.
Do you find particularly that do you think he's BSing to show off to a young boy?
Like he's like grooming him or something like that and just trying to sound like he knows more than what he's talking about?
Or do you find that he's a credible witness and that this is a true account of what he knows?
eric cochran
I think he's a very credible witness.
He's specifically describing a raid that he went on with details off the top of his head about this raid.
I don't see any signs of making this up.
And this is something publicly that has happened, by the way.
Yeah, you know, I really, this is actually one of my favorite clips.
I know maybe not a lot of people are super interested in this, but I really like this because he's talking about, you know, the U.S. has not declared war on Russia.
We are not at war with Russia.
But then the FBI has gone in and seized a lot of foreign assets.
And then technically in international courts, in international finance courts, they have to go to these courts and say, oh, we suspected money laundering.
They have to give these like facade reasons.
Oh, we suspected some corruption.
But here, Gavin Oblenis is just admitting, nah, we did it because we could, because it was there, because it was free for the taking.
And so, you know, that just like rips the, you know, rips the veil off of that.
And the other thing is like this, this hurts the U.S. dollar.
It hurts the U.S. financial markets because what happens is then the, you know, Russia and China and other countries do not want to be on the U.S. dollar anymore when the U.S. is just seizing assets because they can.
And foreign investors, private foreign investors do not want to put money into American businesses, invest their money here if it's going to touch New York, if it's going to touch the U.S. dollar.
Because what happens when all of a sudden the U.S. doesn't even declare war, but is just unfriendly with your country?
Well, they're going to take your money.
So this actually hurts Americans too, in that it hurts American companies.
It hurts investors.
So I find this very interesting.
And it's kind of something that not a lot of people like talk about that the FBI is involved in.
elijah schaffer
No, and I think what's really interesting and I'm keen to know is also the stuff that he talked about with Ukraine.
He let a lot of things out of the bag.
And I think that there was a bombshell report that just came out the other day on the Gateway pundit.
It wasn't exclusive, but it was Senator Rand Paul's testimony talking about how 15 agencies, federal agencies, knew about the creation of COVID-19.
They knew that there was gain of function research and they knew it came from the lab.
And not a single whistleblower or person decided to tell anybody anything.
In fact, one of the key scientists behind it ended up having, you know, he realized that the virus came from the lab, emailed Dr. Fauci about it.
Four days later, he came out and said that he didn't think so anymore and suddenly got $15 million richer.
So like these people are seizing assets to pay people off and they're just doing all this.
And that's what I think I want to reiterate.
That's what makes me angry.
That's the deep state.
That is where just agencies that are not elected are doing things against our interest because the elites want things done.
It's not some grand conspiracy.
It's just what's happening.
And you can still talk to Americans today, show them this, and they won't believe you.
Now, we're going to go into all the Ukraine stuff, but the preview here on Rumble is we're going to be cutting off the stream here on Rumble and we're going over to censored.tv.
Guys, I want to remind you that this show has no advertisers on Thursday nights right now because it's completely supported by you guys.
So we can get right into these things directly at censored.tv.
Use my promo code Offensive, get 20% off a membership.
You get this show.
You get Gavin McGinnis, you get wrong opinion.
And also you can join right here.
You can join the chat.
We're in the chat right here too.
And you can watch live.
Nice, nice screenshot.
But I want you to check it out.
Go over directly to censored.tv.
Join the chat.
We're going to get into his expose, the part two that dropped today on the bombshell stuff about Ukraine and what the federal agencies are admitting we've been doing, which is way more than just sending aid.
In fact, it's a lot deeper.
We're going to take about a minute break here for a second.
We're going to end the stream at Rumble.
Shout out to all you guys.
I'll see you tomorrow night on Rumble at 10 p.m. with Nick Holt and Ben for a birthday stream.
And we're going to be getting into some really deep stuff.
Everyone's going to be in studio.
It's going to be a ton of fun.
So I'll see you there.
But to everyone on Rumble, have a great rest of the week.
I'll see you over at censored.tv.
Export Selection