July 20, 2023 - Slightly Offensive - Elijah Schaffer
01:48:21
REDUCE The Population” Elites Accidentally LEAK Ultimate Plan | Guest: Austin Peterson
The ELITES let the cat out of the bag and revealed their final goal for the climate change agenda: reduce the population. We also found out that white nationalism is now a diverse movement of all ethnicities and races. Biden amin members admit to taking psychedelic mushrooms to learn how to govern, Republicans are banning condoms apparently, Rumble censored NJF, or did they, and so much more.
__
Don't forget that we are fully independent and you can get this episode early & support Indp media directly at https://elijahschaffer.locals.com/supportShow more __
⇩ FOLLOW AUSTIN PETERSON ⇩
rumble.com/user/AP4Liberty
https://ap4libertyshop.com/collections/founding-flavors
https://twitter.com/AP4Liberty
__
⇩ SPONSORS ⇩
MY PATRIOT SUPPLY: Listeners of Slightly Offensive will get 10% their first order of survival food that lasts 25 years right now at https://4patriots.com/ by using code OFFENSIVE
UNDERTAC: Get the best pair of boxers in America that are breathable, don't ride up, and last the test of time. Plus, they are battle forces tested. http://www.undertac.com/ for 20% off with the offer code OFFENSIVE20. Satisfaction guaranteed or your money back.
VNSH: Get the BEST holster that fits 99% of all semi-auto handguns, works without a tactical belt, lets you carry in multiple positions and carries 2 fully-loaded magazines.And best of all is that because you’re a supporter of our podcast you can get it for $50 off. Just go to www.vnsh.com/slightly to see if your gun will work with it and to activate your discount today. Normally $130, you’ll get a steal as a supporter of our show. Go to https://www.vnsh.com/slightly today to claim your $50 discount.
__
⇩ GET MERCH HERE ⇩
WEBSITE: https://slightlyoffensive.com/
__
⇩ DOWNLOAD AUDIO PODCAST & GIVE A 5 STAR RATING! ⇩
APPLE: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/slightly-offens-ve-uncut/id1450057169
SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7jbVobnHs7q8pSRCtPmC41?si=qnIgUqbySSGdJEngV-P5Bg
(also available Google Podcasts & wherever else podcasts are streamed)
__
➤BOOKINGS: [email protected]
➤BUSINESS INQUIRIES: [email protected]
__
⇩ SOCIAL MEDIA ⇩
➤ INSTAGRAM https://www.instagram.com/slightlyoffensive.tv
➤ TWITTER: https://twitter.com/ElijahSchaffer
➤ TELEGRAM https://t.me/SlightlyOffensive
__
The Idea Of A Free Society...For Kids!
Head to https://bit.ly/teach-freedom for a unique book series that introduces the important ideas that schools no longer teach. Show less
Well, it was a crazy day today across the United States.
While everybody was freaking out about Rumble's censorship battle with Nicholas J. Fuentes, which we will get into later in the show, the Deep State leaked their plan to reduce the population.
But don't be so afraid of the Deep State.
This image came out live of what the Deep State looks like.
Apparently, the Deep State is a combined 192 pounds and approximately an average height of 5'6.
You shouldn't be afraid because my guest today is Austin Peterson, the host of the Wake Up America show.
He's going to be on in just a moment.
It is approximately 10:15 p.m. Eastern time in the United States.
And we've got a great show plus our stereotypical dancing intro.
White People Can Dance.
Let's get down.
Amazing stuff.
My name is Elijah Schaefer.
You can follow me on Twitter at Elijah Schaefer.
Our story today is something of an amazing moment.
The elites leaked their plan here, Kamala Harris, live on Daytime Talk Television.
And here's what she had to say: When we invest in clean energy and electric vehicles and reduce population, more of our children can breathe clean air and drink clean water.
I do want to remind people, though, that you can support directly links in the description.
Austin, you can follow him on social media.
You can grab his new coffee.
We'll look at that in a second.
But also, don't forget that you can join the locals chat.
Be in the exclusive club, guys.
It is actually an exclusive club right here.
You can get in, you can drop super chats because we're demonetized everywhere else.
You can get the exclusive live stream.
You can get extra segments.
And most importantly, you can say words that you can't say in the chat everywhere else because we don't censor.
We only have terms of service are please no porn and also no incitement to violence or threats of violence, which we'll find out more about.
But you can join right there at elijahschafer.locals.com.
It's free to join.
And if you don't join, you're a bitch.
So make sure that you get in there and you actually join the community.
We're going to go into the story for today.
It looks like the world has been going crazy.
The plan to depopulate the world has been leaked on this night's top story.
Let's get into this with Austin Peterson tonight.
Well, it shouldn't shock you, Austin.
We know that the plan to depopulate the world has been said by many different people, but it is shocking.
The most popular president in history and his administration were caught live on camera on an official White House live stream telling us all that they planned to depopulate the world.
And what we saw there was an edit, but as we look at this clip, Austin, it's like, do you think it was a Freudian slip?
Like it was just something that she's heard in meetings that she let out, or do you think this was actually a part of the speech that she was supposed to let us know that they've planned to reduce the American population?
No, I think that it was a you know, they this isn't something that they usually talk about in public like that.
And, you know, when they talk about depopulation, whenever you confront them about this, which is it very rarely happens, like I would really be, you know, the only sad thing is usually the type of people who like get access to confront them are the type of people that they can write off as insane.
But I would really love it if like a mainstream media reporter would do their job and ask her that question.
But, you know, nobody has the balls to do that.
So, you know, it's just not going to happen.
But, you know, you have to ask yourself, why do they believe this?
Right.
And there's, you know, this is like a philosophy that's been around for a long time where they actually think that people are like a plague.
They're a cancer.
And if you go on YouTube and you actually watch leftist YouTube videos of what they believe in, I mean, they think that humanity, that having children is evil.
They think having children is wrong and that you shouldn't do it.
It's fascinating, you know, that these people want to spread their philosophy.
They work so hard to get into the institutions of power in government and to take over nonprofit institutions to be able to spread authoritarian philosophy, right?
Because they're going to depopulate the earth either through voluntary means or through involuntary means.
They're going to do whatever it takes to try and reduce population.
And they're going to use our institutions of government to try and force us to have a lower population.
But what's fascinating is that they don't want to reduce the population in some other countries around the world.
They want to reduce the population in Western countries, right?
So we are specifically the biggest problem, right?
They don't want to reduce the population of China, right?
Because the main concern is global warming, climate change, et cetera.
But they never want to say that they want to reduce the population of India because, of course, that would entail racism, right?
If you want to reduce the population of China, well, that would be racist, right?
But, oh, if you want to reduce the population in the United States, you want to reduce the population of Australia, or if you want to reduce the population of New Zealand, oh, that's just all well and good and fine.
No, we are the problem.
And it really is because they want to reduce the population in countries like ours because, like, well, the Klaus Schwab clip, I can't wait for you to play that one where they talk about the middle class.
You know, it's people like you and I and the rest of the middle class type of people who probably watch this show that are standing in between them and their goals of creating an elite at the top and an underclass at the bottom with no middle class.
And that's what the depopulation agenda is about.
They want to take out the middle class in white Western countries so that they can have a permanent underclass that they can rule over, just like back in slavery days.
I don't know what alarms you, Austin, but to me, like I find this to be somewhat alarming when I hear not only the vice president saying, when we reduce the population, this isn't an epithet of saying, oh, you know, this idea of maybe a natural disaster happens, wink, wink, wink, a virus gets released in the population.
Maybe there is going to be a reduction of population.
It is an absolute admission of guilt, like we are going to reduce the population, and then explaining why or what the motive is so that we can reduce our climate footprint.
And that's when you see the euphemism and the rejection of truth in the fact that they see us directly as the problem.
I want to bring this up and get your thoughts on this specifically because there's a meme that is going around that I find to be absolutely, you know, somewhat sadly true, but it reminds me of the agenda that they're bringing upon us.
And it's this one.
You are the carbon they want to reduce, right?
They say carbon is a problem and the carbon footprint should be eradicated.
But I mean, it's, you know, when you consider it sounded like Kamala was saying that on purpose, as if that was part of her speech.
So I'm a little shocked to hear that that was something that she was doing on purpose.
But it's not a coincidence, Elijah, that the economy slows down when Democrats take over.
That's not an accident.
That's deliberate, right?
All of the rules and the regulations that the left wants to place on the economy are in part, a large part, because they want to reduce the ability of people to be able to maintain and take care of themselves so that we will be dependent upon government and that government can determine which communities can grow and which communities can't.
And we've seen this with all sorts of policies.
And that's why it's so important, I think, for, and I know conservatives have really been having a battle over this question of economic growth and GDP and can we really have like constant economic growth in the United States?
Well, you know, one, if we're pro-life, and I know that you are, Elijah, and I certainly am as well.
And I think probably a lot of your listeners are as well.
If you have a pro-life agenda, then you have to have a pro-economic growth agenda, right?
And the left is the opposite, right?
They have a pro-abortion agenda and they have an anti-economic growth agenda because they want to be able to maintain, they want to be able to maintain certain groups in the United States that they want to see grow and they want to see flourish, and then others that they want to wither on the vine.
If they're the ones who can control the largesse, and if all of the largesse of the federal government is where people go in order to get their sustenance, well, then that's just all well and good.
That's why I'm a big believer in like anarchistic free markets, the idea that we can build our own communities and have our own lifestyles and our own make our own living without having to go and ask the government for help, right?
But you know, technological advancements, right?
If for the people, for the leftists who aren't just the Klaus Schwab, sort of evil, you know, puppet masters of the world, for those who are sort of like just the dummy, I guess you might call them the useful idiots of the left, right?
The things that they don't understand about economics is in terms of population control is that technological advancements have always come along for us to be able to support the kind of population growth explosion that we've seen in recent decades.
I mean, nearly a billion lives have been saved in large part from starvation because of the genetic manipulation of crops that have allowed us to create crop yields to sustain higher populations, right?
The left doesn't understand that, or they fear that, right?
They fear the science that has enabled us to sustain that population growth.
And they don't believe in the future that a capitalistic society can bring to actually sustain the population growth that we would see.
And now, you know, with Rover, Roe versus Wade overturned in the United States, I saw some statistic the other day where I can't remember what state it was, but it was like 16,000 babies that would have been aborted before this law had passed, those lives have been saved.
And the left was livid.
They were upset that 16,000 people now live because of Roe versus Wade.
And, you know, God bless the Supreme Court for that.
But I mean, we're talking about people's lives here.
They see them as tools, right?
They look at it very much just like the Chinese did in Mao's Cultural Revolution: that the state owns our lives and can dispense with them as they see fit, right?
You know, they'd love to, that's another reason I think why the left really wants to get Americans involved in Russia and Ukraine, because they know that the type of people that we would be sending over to die in these wars are the type of people that won't vote for them, that they would love to wean out of the population.
But again, that's the evil puppet master side of things.
But there's a lot of useful idiots out there.
And some of those people, I think, are well-meaning, but they just don't, they're just economic ignoramuses, and they really just need to be educated on these issues.
And there is a video that I want to bring up as well, where I believe it was a Klaus Schwab was talking about the only thing that's holding them back from instituting their entire great reset is the holding out of the middle class.
And this should shock you because it is somewhat alarming.
It's pleased to see you back here in Davos because I remember before you assumed your position of Vice President of the United States, you came here as a senator, you came here as the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee of the Senate.
And I have to say, in my memory, you were one of the most engaged and hardest working participants here at the annual meeting.
I watched you in the morning up to midnight, sometimes one engagement after the other one.
And also to our discussion, which we had at dinner two days ago.
The fourth industrial revolution has one big challenge.
Yeah, like we're going to talk about that more because I think when he's talking about the fourth industrial revolution, what's holding out is the middle class, you realize that obviously climate is not why they want to reduce the population.
There's something else at play here.
But before we jump into that and talk about that, I want to give a huge shout out to the sponsor of today's show, which is Undertak.
Guys, many of you don't understand how important the quality of your boxers are and the material that's used, and you also aren't even thinking about what is going on down there.
Now, this is an important part of your body.
It's needed for reproduction.
You use the restroom there, sexual gratification, and also part of your identity.
So why would you trust one of these weird gay brands with rainbow waistbands or all these weird synthetic materials that aren't healthy for you or a company that hates you?
Why not trust Undertak to get the best boxers in America that are battle forces tested and have a special composite material that are used to prevent not only wetness, but also to give you breathability.
The best part about this is when you go to undertack.com and you use promo code offensive20, you get 20% off the entire store.
You can get their infantry boxer briefs, which is what I mostly wear.
Honestly, even Kez wears them sometimes too.
They feel great.
They look great.
And they're hella comfortable.
The other ones, like the Undertaker recon brief or recon opsec are used for exercise.
I have a couple t-shirts from them.
They also have other gear, but most importantly, if you don't have a couple pairs of infantry boxer briefs, realize that they don't lose elasticity.
They don't peel and lose quality.
I've had mine now for like three years.
And my first pair and my recent pair still look and fit absolutely fantastic.
So that's pretty good.
Three years of work.
And everyone knows, you know, I've got a lot to work with down there, obviously.
El Micron grower gang, you know what's going on.
Anyway, check it out at undertack.com, UN D-E-R-T-A-C.com, promo code Offensive20 for 20% off.
OFF, ENSA, VE20, links in the description.
They're great boxers.
Make sure you check them out.
Because if you don't know what to buy someone for a gift, you can get Undertak boxers.
And they donate a portion of their profits to veterans groups, which is absolutely fantastic.
And they've been tested on the battlefield.
Anyway, I want to get back to this topic with my guest, Austin Peterson.
Again, you can follow him in the description below.
You can also check out his coffee company if you're looking for new coffee.
You can grab that coffee.
We'll talk about it later in the show and what he's doing to sort of revolutionize this.
But jumping back into our discussion on why they want to reduce the population, right?
This is the critical moment here.
He says it's because the middle class and the holdout of the middle class is preventing the fourth industrial revolution.
And like, what does that mean to you when you hear that?
Because I know what the fourth industrial revolution is, but not everybody watching does.
Well, you know, it sort of reminds me of a quote from Woodrow Wilson back when they were building the modern education system in the United States.
And what he said was, I'm just kind of paraphrasing here, was that they were trying to create two different, they were trying to educate two different types of people here in the United States.
They had one group of people that they wanted to have who would go on to, you know, higher education and university and to take jobs in academia and to work in the government and to be at the highest echelons of the military and public service.
And then Woodrow Wilson said, and then we want another class of people in the United States.
And those people should be the workers.
They should be the factory workers.
They should work with their hands.
These are the people that we want to be able to push off and to be able to control.
We don't really want them to be educated that well.
We don't want them to know too much because we just want them to be obedient workers.
And when I think of what Klaus Schwab is talking about when he says the FOIA Revolution, he wants to put, he wants to, you know, continue Woodrow Wilson's legacy of segregating our society into two camps because we're so much easier to control that way.
People who live and work and operate in the middle class, maybe they make $50,000 a year up to like maybe $150,000 a year.
These are people who have dreams and goals and plans that may not align with what Klaus Schwab wants them to do, right?
People who live in my community, for example, who are in the middle class, we trade beef, right?
And we eat a lot of beef.
And there's a lot of meat that is traded in this community.
And that is enemy number one of people like Klaus Schwab and others.
They want us to live in the pod, eat the bugs, and own nothing and be happy.
But when you have ownership of something, especially when you have land, and so my life really changed when my wife and I took ownership of five and a half acres here in mid-Missouri.
And because having stewardship over land and having that responsibility for something changes how you view not only yourself and your own family, but also your community, because you have a responsibility to others in your community.
So, you know, I can't dump toxic waste or chemicals in my community.
Ironically, I'm actually, we have to be better economic stewards because we know that what we do impacts people who we've got a creek in our backyard, right?
You know, and if somebody's dumping in our creek or they're dumping trash in our creek, I've got a problem with my neighbors, right?
And that's something that, you know, that the communities all work together to try and try and clean up.
So, and we do, we do.
We've had volunteer cleanups of our communities and these people work together to try.
They're called the stream team, I think, here in Missouri.
And they come out and they do volunteer work.
Nobody gets paid.
They just, we all want to help take care of our communities.
But they don't like that.
They don't want that.
They want it to be government organized, managed, and planned that everybody, nobody owns anything.
You don't own that creek, right?
And then, of course, that leads to the kind of poor management that we see with government-held resources.
But, you know, when you're talking about a depopulation agenda, you know, one of the real thing, the big things, the problems with that, of course, is that when they hollow out the middle class and they depopulate a society, right?
That leads to an aging population, right?
Where you get a smaller working-age population, and then we can't sustain taking care of the larger elderly population.
And we're definitely moving towards that in the United States.
I know Japan is having that problem in the East.
But if we get rid of our middle class, who is it that's going to pay to take care of the aging population in this country?
Who's going to actually pay the entitlement benefits?
Again, a lot of the problem, a lot of what they say are problems.
They rely on the kind of economic ignorance that these people have because all of the, if you stole all of the money from all of the rich people in the United States, you still would not be able to pay off the U.S. national debt.
So it's entirely ignorant and there's no way to sustain it, right?
They create this unsustainable system and they do it because, again, many of them are malevolent, but most of them, again, are useful idiots.
And I think the population control problem is ultimately like it is about not just controlling people, but I think it's satanic, right?
I mean, yeah, you know, you're agnostic or whatever you are.
I'm pray for you.
I hope you don't go to hell.
Plus you married a Jew.
And so, you know, we got to make sure you're going on a bad path, my friend.
This is an intervention.
But I genuinely, you know, on a real note, you know, speak up on this.
And I don't think that it's by coincidence that when people get into power, that the depravity of man turns into a lust for the things of this world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes and the pride of life, that they end up looking for money and power.
And then it becoming, for the most part, a good leader is a rarity, right?
I mean, even when you look in like the, you know, Israeli history, even from Jehiakim, Josiah, et cetera, there's very few people in the books, you know, in Chronicles, first, second kings, of kings that actually led well or governed well because there's this natural tendency towards evil.
And I mean, I was even reading about an Ottoman, an Ottoman king who created a court of midgets.
And I think he ended up losing a war because that would be funny to bring all the midgets on small horses with him to the front lines.
I'll just let you know, it didn't go very well.
And there's this backwards mentality and all of that.
And I do want to talk about that.
And as we jump into this, I want to go into the matrix on this of how backwards our leadership really is.
We're going to find out that the KKK is now diverse.
Let's get into this.
Shocking new story just coming out from NPR, National Public Radio, publicly funded news source.
The Ku Klux Klan groups are diversifying their aims and marketing themselves to people of color.
Initial thoughts on this, Austin, that the KKK is finding out white supremacy apparently is not just for white people.
Tell your wife she can join now too.
Jews, blacks, they're all invited to the cross burning.
I actually think this is a good sign because, you know, the KKK has really been founded for a long time.
The Democrats have really been going down on their recruitment these days.
So they've got to get out.
But, you know, multiracial white supremacy, this is what we're hearing a lot from people on the left these days.
You know, we saw some cartel, the gang member violence that occurred.
They've got to find new ways to label the same old violence that we've had from Democrats and the left.
So whenever you see an instance of violence that occurs, if it's someone who is racially motivated, you know, the Democrats are just praying that it was a white guy.
They're hoping that it was a white guy.
And that's because they have this narrative of violence that they have to run away from their legacy of slavery, their legacy of Jim Crow, that they don't want to own.
So they come up with this narrative of, what do they call it?
Oh, it's the party switched, right?
The party switched.
But I want to give a little bit of ammunition to your listeners whenever they might get approached by someone or hear someone make that argument, right?
Remember, they'll say, oh, well, the party switched in the 1960s, right?
Well, if the party switched, then was FDR a Republican?
Hmm.
Does that mean Woodrow Wilson was a good Republican?
Oh, no, no, no, no.
FDR was a good Democrat.
Okay, well, then I guess the parties didn't really switch there.
But I mean, you know, the whole, the multiracial white supremacy thing is like, you know, it's like throwing spaghetti at the wall, trying to see what sticks.
It's kind of like Latin X.
Now, that's been really hilarious because we haven't heard Latin X in some time, right?
They threw that spaghetti at the wall and it didn't stick because none of the Latinas and Latinos were taking that up, right?
They didn't want their language to be subsumed.
But I mean, this is the, you got to admire the left for at least trying, you know, when it comes to Republicans and libertarians or right-wingers and things like that, they tend to have a script and they tend to stick to it and they tend to say ultra-wars and traditional conservatism, conservative values, right?
Biblical values, conservative values, fighting the satanic, you know, elite pedophiles and things like that.
But they don't really stare stray from the script much.
The Democrats, and again, I honestly, I think that this is a good strategy.
They're always trying something new, right?
They're always like seeing, like, you know, moving forward.
That's why the progressives tend to win, right?
And the long arch of history right now in the last hundred years, since like the early 1900s, the progressives have been winning.
I mean, cultural battles, Bud Light is like a blip on the map compared to the cultural battles the left has won.
It's only been like, you know, a few battles that we've won recently.
Roe versus Wade, right?
What with the Bruin gun decision?
There, you know, there have been a few things like those are not quite as cultural battles, but Roe versus Wade certainly is a cultural battle.
But I see that as like a battle over life and death.
But I mean, you got to hand it to the progressives.
The fact that they keep coming up with new plays and they keep trying to run in these new plays, it's smart and it works.
And honestly, I wish conservatives would sometimes come up with a new script.
Not that I don't think that the satanic evil cabal of pedophiles don't need to be taken down.
They certainly do.
And when I saw Sound of Freedom like everybody else in the last weekend, and that theater was packed.
And I'll tell you, so maybe we do need to kind of like ramp it up in that area because I think people are now starting to pay attention to it.
We might be actually making some hate that way.
Otherwise, I think the Democrats are smart in coming up with these new strategies.
Because again, what happens is that we love to run.
We love to run with the ball.
We love to chase.
They set out a rabbit.
We chase it, right?
We're very good at that.
I mean, whenever there's some new transgender stuff online, I mean, I follow some leftist accounts just to see what they're up to.
But I mean, you know, it's mostly the conservatives who are posting the gay shit, right?
Like, I see more gay shit from conservative feeds than I ever do from left feeds.
More LGBT stuff than I ever do because I know that like that we take the bait, we take the bait, right?
But we need like setting our own bait and trolling the leftists.
Like, I just like saw tonight this Nina Turner character.
I don't know if you know who she is, but she's like a big race baiter online on Twitter.
And she was the one who like attacked the American founding fathers on the 4th of July and was calling them, you know, slaveholders.
Don't forget that the founding fathers had slaves.
Her whole shtick is slavery and racism, right?
And of course, conservatives and libertarians are all kind of chasing the rabbit, chasing the rabbit.
She's sending down the rabbit.
We're chasing the rabbit.
But today, I think the Libertarian Party of New Hampshire account posted something they were talking about.
They trolled this out of her.
Dude, it was awesome.
But they were like, they were comparing forcing people to make insulin or insulin as part of healthcare, like, you know, socialized medicine.
They compared it to slavery, right?
So, and she just went apoplectic.
She went nuts.
Dude, they sent the rabbit and she chased the rabbit.
And I was like, that's how it gets done.
Like, we need to be better at sending out the rabbits.
And I mean, they say here, right, that as America's longest-lived white supremacist organization, the Ku Klux Klan has achieved a rare kind of name recognition.
You know, the way people say Xerox when they mean to photocopy or Kleenex when they mean tissue.
KKK functions something like that, except it's shorthands to racial terrorism and extrajudicial killings.
It's a dilemma that some Klan groups are trying to address by being less, well, Klannish.
Back in April, after 73 years old Klansmen went on a deadly shooting spree in Kansas City, a whole lot of avowed racists condemned the shootings.
CNN.com even ran a story called Can the Klan Rebrand?
This is like a serious Fed posting here.
Imperial wizard Frank Ann Conna was upset too.
What this guy just did set back everything I've been trying to do for years.
And so they come back as these are traditionalists and they're moving in this direction.
But in juxtaposition to this, I find it to be interesting that, you know, they always demonize the Klan and they always talk about the fact, you know, the Klan is racist.
It's white supremacist.
But I have a running theory that white supremacy is becoming more diverse because the way that textbooks describe white supremacy is, you know, you're walking around, you know, calling Jews kikes and, you know, saying, you know, whatever, whatever you're doing out there, you know, and saying how you hate black people and saying the N-word all the time or whatever, which is everybody after enough to drink.
I will bring up the point that it's funny that they go, but it's diversifying.
Now, it's not like white supremacists were like, hey, we want black people to live with us.
But what they changed white supremacy into was polite Western society, right?
So any sort of institutional structure of like being on time, right?
Educational standards, benchmarks, rule and law and order, not being allowed indoors.
You know, these types of things.
They said, now that's all white supremacy.
So, you know, lots of people want to move to white countries, which are not going to be white in 50 years.
Lots of people move to white neighborhoods.
You never have a bunch of white people move into a neighborhood and everyone freaks out that it's going to get worse.
In fact, the angry people are that it gets better.
It's called gentrification.
But the whole point of this is, is that it's like, well, you maybe ask yourself this.
If white supremacy is an ideology that's antithetical towards, you know, towards black people, towards Jews, but a bunch of Jews and black people are becoming white supremacists, then maybe you're confused on white supremacy, what white supremacy is.
And maybe what you're attacking isn't white supremacy.
You're attacking the basic structure and Western idealism.
And that's why my Hispanic friend, Drew Hernandez, I consider him more of a white supremacist than my own sister who's white.
Because, you know what I mean?
I'm just saying.
I mean, he's Hispanic, but we believe the same things.
And we would both get called Nazis and white supremacists today simply because we happen to think that if you murder someone, you shouldn't be let out without bail within 24 hours, like in New York.
I mean, we just believe in basic tenants, and now that is white supremacy.
Like, I don't know if I'm wrong on that, but that's what, to me, what white supremacy is.
You know, there are two tests that I have for someone, whether or not I trust them as an activist on the right.
If they have not been banned by social media, right, and have like, you know, suspended accounts and all that kind of stuff, then you should be really suspect of them.
And if they're not getting called a racist or a white supremacist or a Nazi at some point, or like a white supremacist enabler, like Larry Elder was called the black face and white supremacy, if that, if they're not being, if they're not attacking you in that way, then I don't trust you as an activist.
But there's a story that I think you would love and I think your listeners would really love, and they should definitely look it up after the show is over about this black woman who went to Dubai.
I talked about this on my morning talk show this morning.
It's hilarious.
She went to Dubai.
She's a truck driver and she's an e-girl and internet thought.
So she posts pictures of her ass and spanks and all that kind of stuff.
And she looks terrible, but there's plenty of Siphs out there, I'm sure, who love it.
So she goes to Dubai and she's, you know, she takes all those pictures of herself where she's wearing a bikini and she's showing her Tatas and she's just acting like she would act in the West over in Dubai.
And apparently she got into some kind of car accident.
And then in order for her to get back some of her personal belongings that were in the rental car after the accident, she went to the rental car company and they were telling her that in order to get it back, she had to pay some undisclosed sum.
Well, then she got into an argument with the person who was there at the rental car company.
It was a man.
She started screaming at the man.
She's now sitting in jail in Dubai.
They've taken her passport and she cannot come back to the West.
This is another Brittany Griner situation that's happening right now.
And her lawyer, her lawyer and her mother are like, you should, you know, it shouldn't be a crime for you to scream in public at a man for you to act a certain way.
And it's like, you know, in those countries, in those Eastern countries, they don't tolerate what we tolerate here in Western society.
And what they said, what the left says about how horrible and awful and evil it is and what a patriarchy is, the left doesn't know what a patriarchy is.
And so like, I know this is probably small of me and mean to say, but like part of me just wants to say, you know what, just leave her there.
You know, don't bring her back.
Like, I remember during the Britney Griner thing, I'm a hypocrite now where I was kind of like, I was like, you know, yeah, you know, if it was me, please bring me back.
You know, if I was auto-warm beer in North Korea, like, please send this SEAL Team 6, whatever you can, try and rescue me.
I would want to be rescued.
But at this point, you know, like, I think we ought to, like, I would, I think, you know, taxpayer-funded, as a libertarian, I'm going to say, we should all send the left, these, these leftist terrorists, Antifa types, Black Lives Matter activists, everybody who hates us, everybody who hates Americans, send them on a nice tour of Dubai.
And here's the thing: you don't have to worry that they're going to read the travel brochures because they're not going to do it.
You know, they're not going to do it.
They're going to go out.
They're going to drink in public.
They're going to scream.
They're going to act a fool.
They're going to act like they do in Chicago's South Side.
And you know what?
In one, that one fell swoop, that one trip, either they won't, either they'll come back and they'll realize how good we've got it here in the West and how good they have it here with all of our freedoms, or they're not going to come back and they're going to be rotting in a Dubai prison.
I have a really important thing to bring about why people don't buy this white supremacist narrative.
Like a couple stories that recently came out, including this one.
People are mad at Jason Aldean for putting out a song called Try That in My Small Town, right?
I don't know if you heard about that, but essentially the lyrics, the lyrics are talking about, you know, the chaos in large cities and how in small towns they take care of each other.
Now, everyone's mad because we should, you know, riots are a part of society and in fiery but mostly peaceful protests.
It's fucking nuts that they're mad at this guy.
But then this happens, right?
You know, a black man killed four whites in a small town that hasn't had a homicide in over four years.
One of these, it was a Michael Jackson impersonator, actually, killed four white people in this small town.
And talk about a moonwalk, right?
I mean, he didn't send them to the moon.
He sent them past Mars.
These people were KO'd.
And I'm not mocking it.
I'm just saying this doesn't make it into the news because these are white people and nobody cares.
But make a song with lyrics that says sucker punch somebody on a sidewalk, carjack an old lady at a red light, pull a gun on the owner of a liquor store.
Yeah, you think it's cool.
Well, act a fool if you like.
Cuss at a cop, spit in his face, stomp on the flag and light it up.
Yeah, you think you're tough.
We'll try that in a small town.
See how you make it down the road.
Around here, we take care of our own.
You cross that line.
It won't take long for you to find out.
I recommend you don't try that in a small town.
So just asking black people and BLM activists, which by the way, were mostly white people as well, like Antifa to behave civilly is considered a newsworthy event.
But this motherfucker, I fucking hate this guy, kills four people, which should be a concern, but four white people in a town where there's no violence, nobody cares because we're supposed to accept that because white lives don't matter.
And before we jump into that, I need to give a huge shout out to one of our sponsors for today, which is For Patriots, a company that does care about your safety, your health, and your protection.
Now, many of you guys know that the supply chain has been screwed up for months, if not years now.
The price of food fluctuates.
Bread is up 11.5%.
Basically, you don't know what's going to go on.
Remember, we're eating food that basically was probably grown a couple years ago.
I'm not joking.
If you understand how the grain industry works and you know how food is processed, things might get really bad over the next two years, which is why you need emergency food, especially if you ever in a natural disaster, if you live in a tornado-prone area, a hurricane plot area, a hurricane or flood area, as well as earthquakes, et cetera.
You need to be.
So this is like California all the way into the Midwest to the South and Florida.
Make sure you have a supply of this food.
It lasts over 25 years.
High-level ingredients.
It's an American company.
And the most important part is that it lasts, like I said, for over the 25 years when stored correctly.
So it's older than some of you.
If you're on a budget, remember, they have two-week survival food kits now for $129.
So you can get four-week survival food kits.
I recommend the three months personally, the one year if you have the budget.
But look at these reviews.
Don't believe me.
Look at the people who bought this, who have tried it, who have used it, and many people who it's actually saved their lives.
And when you go to 4patriots.com, promo code Offensive, OFF, E-N-S-I-V-E, you get 10% off the entire order.
So go to 4Patriots at number 4, P-A-T-R-I-O-T-S.com, promo code O-F-F-E-N-S-I-V-E for 4patriots.com, promo code offensive, 10% off.
Check it out.
They also have power and solar, water, RV, and camping gear, and everything else that you could desire.
Don't wait until there's a fire and you don't have the right supplies.
Go to 4patriots.com.
Use my promo code link in description for 10% off.
I want to jump back into this, like we were talking about with the diversity of the Ku Klux Klan and this misguided representation of what white supremacy is.
I would argue that this type of content is what's diversifying the Ku Klux Klan because you don't have to be white to be angry that four white lives don't matter.
And you don't have to be white to see the media being misguided.
I would be pissed.
If I was black and the media let a black guy off the hook for murder because he was black, that hurts my reputation.
And if the media gets mad at a country singer for making a song against inner city crime, that hurts my reputation because you've just said that we can't, you've unironically said that black people are just violent in two different ways.
I played that this morning on my show by Jason Aldean.
I think that, you know, he's absolutely right.
These people would never try the things that they do in these big cities if they were to come to the Republican part of our states.
It would just, it would never go down.
As a matter of fact, a couple of years ago, there was that situation that happened here in St. Louis, Missouri.
And it was like, you know, even though St. Louis is a pretty dangerous part of town, Black Lives Matter made a really big mistake.
And they went to like the one wealthy white part of St. Louis.
And he's actually a buddy of mine.
His name is Mark McCluskey.
Some of you guys remember him as the AR-15 gun guy.
He and his wife came out of their mansion, this giant mansion.
He had his AR-15 and she had a pistol and they were pointing it at Black Lives Matter protesters.
And then all of a sudden, their attitudes just completely changed.
So, I mean, if you want to see Jason Aldean's song in accent, a song in action, they've looked no further than the McCluskeys of Missouri because even in Missouri, the way that our gun laws are set up are that we don't even allow cities to set their own gun rules and restrictions and regulations.
It's not like the state of New York where, you know, if you're in upstate New York, maybe you can have like a concealed carry permit or what have you, but in New York City, there's no way that you can't.
We don't tolerate that in Missouri.
So if you're in Kansas City or if you're in St. Louis, Jefferson City or what have you downtown, like actually, you can carry a gun into our capital.
My wife and I went and visited our representative the other day and we saw the sign that was sent outside.
It's like, you do have to go through security, but you can conceal carry a gun in our state capitol here in the state of Missouri.
That's how free the state of Missouri is.
That's what Jason Aldean was talking about.
Like that song is about Missouri.
Like you can't do the things in Missouri that you can do in other states, in Minnesota or in Wisconsin or in New York or California and places like that.
Like this is this, these small towns, like you won't get away with it.
And it's not because they're racist.
It's because we actually look after one another and defend one another.
Like whenever anything weird happens on my property, like I get a phone call from my neighbors, right?
It's like we're so heavily armed with the teeth.
I was actually, this was hilarious on the Memorial Day.
I was sitting on my back porch, and there's like kind of like over down the ways from my property.
There's like a little bad neighborhood over there.
And I'm sitting on my back porch.
I'm literally wearing an American flag tank top.
And I just got done shooting.
So I was cleaning my firearms.
Shit you not, Elijah.
I had my M1 Garand, my World War II, like Nazi killing battle rifle, like right there in my hand.
And these three thugs rolled up onto my property out in my field on an ATV.
And I'm just sitting there.
And it's, you know, it's three black kids.
And so I'm saying to myself, you know, sometimes kids come on our property and they're just, you know, they're not trying to do anything wrong.
You know, they're just like going for a walk down by the creek.
You know, I don't freak out or anything like that.
You know, I was just kind of keep an eye on them.
But, you know, like kids, kids just want to be kids.
But they pull out a gun, right?
And I, you know, I'm just sitting there thinking to myself, I was like, oh, shit, here we go again.
You know, so, so, and this is all on my ring camera.
It's all documented.
So it's no bullshit.
So I like, I'm literally with in my American flag tank top with my M1 Grand.
I walk over to the edge of my fence and I was like, hey guys, what are you doing?
You know, and they're like, oh, nothing.
You know, I was like, is that a gun?
Did you bring a gun onto my property?
And then they're like, no, I don't know.
I was like, I think you guys should leave.
And then, of course, they started cursing my name and saying, calling me absolutely every name in the book.
But I'm just thinking, you know, that's the perfect example.
Shit just doesn't get started here in Mid-Missouri.
It doesn't even happen.
The violence is kept low because the threat of violence always hangs over everybody's heads here.
So speaking of this, of the white supremacy diversifying, there's a great story that's coming out that you're going to love where black people are getting paid for being stupid.
And this is another offensive moment as well.
But you got to laugh at this story.
let's get into this.
I literally cannot, I literally cannot handle this story specifically from the New York Post.
Black and Hispanic New Yorkers who failed a teacher's test strike.
They struck a $1.8 billion deal in a New York City settlement.
This comes again from the New York Post.
We'll watch the video in a second.
Failing the New York State teachers exam really paid off, especially for Queensman, who learned this month that he's getting $2 million windfall over it.
Remember, if you're a VA patient, Austin, and you're trying to get a hip replacement, you got to wait two years because, God forbid, we spend $50,000 on a surgery for our veterans.
But if you failed an exam in New York, you get $2 million.
Roughly 5,200 black and Hispanic ex-Big Apple teachers and once-aspiring educators are expected to collect more than $1.8 billion in judgments after the city stopped fighting a nearly three decades federal discrimination lawsuit and found a certification exam was biased.
It's the largest legal payout in the city's history.
And while you might not be laughing, this is funny.
If you have a dark humor and you understand, this is hilarious.
Like, I mean, this is the funniest thing possible.
We are giving $2 billion to black people because they were stupid.
And it's now racist to expect black people to reach the standards of white people.
Again, this is what I'm saying.
If I was an intelligent black guy, I would not be okay with this, right?
And I would join the white supremacist movement.
I haven't just joined the Ku Klux Klan as a brother now.
I'm joining every group, right?
I'm in Patriot Front.
I'm about a mask.
I'm going.
I'm about to have a march.
I'm going to go to the March for Life and pledge allegiance to the Nazis.
That's what I'm doing if I see this kind of story.
Because if you're telling me the Nazis are the one fighting this stuff, then I'm becoming a Nazi.
And I just, I don't understand why or what the equip what's the point of this, paying black people $2 billion for being retards.
California is like on the cusp of approving these like trillions of dollars in reparations.
I mean, this is the state that is the deepest in debt of any of the states in the entire country.
And so the states do, whenever they need a bailout, they go to the federal, which means that all of us, we the taxpayers, have to pay for, are you still paying taxes in the United States?
So then you're paying for these reparations whenever we have to bail one of these states out.
You know, as we talk about racism and slavery, the KKK, you know, my wife and I, we were watching some of the some Civil War documentaries the other day about the Cornerstone speech.
And I really would like to highly recommend for those of your listeners and followers who are literate that they go and they read the Cornerstone speech from the vice president of the Confederacy, Alexander H. Stevens.
And in it, you know, he talks about why he thinks that the black race should be subjugated to the white race, yada, yada, yada, a bunch of racism.
But there's an economic portion of this speech that I think is really important and that never, of course, nobody ever talks about the economics of the Civil War.
But he talks about the subject of internal improvements under the power of Congress to regulate commerce.
Because he's talking here about why when you have a situation where a state is either making an internal improvement or if it were doing something like reparation, that should be the responsibility of the citizens of the taxpayers of that state, right?
We need to have a divorce between the states and the federal government so that these people aren't incentivized to do it.
Because listen, I mean, listen, the dumbest person advocating for reparations knows that the state of California itself can't pay trillions of dollars of reparations, right?
They know that they're going to go to the rich people in the heartland and the South and the Midwest who work jobs in the middle class who are going to have to pay these taxes.
But if you read the cornerstone speech, barring all the racism, I don't endorse any of that.
But I do endorse the idea that we should have states having to foot the bill for their own mistakes.
The problem is, is that people aren't forced to pay the price for their own mistakes.
It's like that chick that I was talking about in Dubai.
The reason why that woman is going to learn her lesson, or Brittany Griner is going to learn their lesson, is because they're forced to pay for their mistakes.
And that's probably the failure of the West.
The fall of the West is when we divorce people from the responsibility of their actions, right?
You know, like sex without consequences, right?
Sex without having to worry about the possibility of actually having a child.
And so if more people had to pay the price, the consequences of it, instead of spreading that cost out, socializing that amongst the masses, then I think you would see fewer problems like that.
But these teachers, they know that those billions of dollars that are going to get paid from them from the state of New York, somehow, some way, the state of New York is going to get that from the federal government.
Okay, but I want you to pay attention to details in the video, in the sound.
I won't give it away, but I just want to let, you know, this is a real interview from the news, and I want you to listen to what's actually going on in the background.
Listen to this.
unidentified
And they know I wasn't taking them seriously because I just wasn't taking them serious.
You know, what you send me letters and tell me about lawsuits, because I know lawsuits either go through or they won't go through.
reading, hearing news, and all that stuff.
And I know a couple of people that had education, but they went through lawsuits and they didn't win or anything like that.
So to me, this like fabric, you know, either, you know, but it's when I finally got in my head, they kept pushing and kept explaining things piece by piece until I sort of got it in my head and just listened to them and it went from there.
Okay.
But still today, I don't really believe it.
But, you know, and yes, they've been seen for a long time trying to convince me that it's real.
I was credentialed as a teacher in California, right?
And I was educated as a high school credentialed biology teacher.
And I went through the credential testing.
And that's a weird thing.
You don't want me teaching your kid in public school, but be a pretty cool teacher.
The thing is, the test was not hard.
In fact, I took the multiple sciences test as well.
And I have know nothing about geology.
I know nothing about earthquake science or anything.
And I nearly got perfection on my test because I just guessed on a lot of shit.
This is in California too.
So maybe this is probably similar to New York.
How you fail an exam, considering you'd have to have a degree, right?
You'd have to have a four-year degree and you'd have gone through four years of schooling in a subject, how you fail a licensing exam, you have to be a straight-up fucking retard.
But I mean, like, you know, back on our original subject, how do you think they're going to eliminate the middle class in this country, right?
They're going to create a system where people are educate, people are being educated by people like that, right?
They think they, there are people who actually think that he should have passed those tests, that the test should be set up in a way that someone like that should actually stand in front of a bunch of students and teach them, you know, science or literature or language or read.
The guy doesn't even know how to change the battery and a smoke detector, but he should definitely stand up in front of kids and lecture them.
But again, this goes back to what Klaus Schwab was talking about, right?
There's the middle class, the people like yourself and myself who can see, you know, in front of us, like when they piss on our leg and then tell us it's raining, we know that they're really pissing on our leg, right?
And things like this are a perfect example of that, right?
Multiracial white supremacy is a way for them to say, um, you know, that they're daring us, right?
They're daring us to challenge them.
Things like this, they're daring us to have a lawsuit.
Joe Biden and the student loan forgiveness, right?
He gets slapped down by the Supreme Court.
What do they do?
Now he does it again.
They're daring us to stop them, right?
They just, it's all just them seeing what they can get away with.
And again, it's back to what I was saying earlier: they're sending out the rabbits, we're chasing the rabbits, and we're playing defense instead of playing offense.
But I mean, I guess, you know, this is something that I struggle with, Elijah.
And I actually, if you don't mind me interviewing you for just a second, I would just love to hear your thoughts.
I mean, in terms of a strategy for fighting back, you know, obviously we do podcasts, you know, you got a big audience, you know, and you're trying to change hearts and minds, and you want to be, you know, you want to influence people and things like that.
But like, what do you really think are like, what, what's effective for people who believe what we believe, like, who's out there actually being effective, would you say, as a leader in terms of like moving the football down the field in the opposite direction, in your opinion?
That is such a complicated question because, like, effectively, I think if you're honest, you could end up very black pilled with that answer.
Because, like, while I think certain people are effectively, you know, making concessions or in a positive way or positively challenging the system, right?
Like, a good example, which we'll get to in the next segment.
I know you might have to hop off soon.
Is like, obviously, Nick Fuentes is effectively doing one thing.
He's opening up conversations about foreign influence in the government and having that conversation.
But his critics would say, on the other hand, that some of his tactics or his speech, as we'll talk about, is actually hurting more than helping.
So there's that argument, right?
So that's somebody who's making an impact, but people can't, the problem is, people can't agree whether that impact is good or not.
And that's not my personal view.
I'm saying, go put his put his picture up.
I put his picture up on the on Twitter, and it was really interesting to see the juxtaposition of opinions.
Like, on one hand, you have comments that are like, follow him to the cross.
And on the other hand, there's comments that are like so, so convinced that he's the worst person in the world that they probably would be okay with him being publicly stoned.
Meaning, it wasn't like a clear, you know, decisive, like, we like what this guy is doing.
But on the other hand, there's other people like that I know that are trying to influence, like Carl Benjamin, who has been un but he's been unsuccessfully or unsuccessful politically.
So, like, on one hand, like, he, he had a pretty interesting take on Nick Fuentes and Andrew Tate.
It wasn't sensational, nor was it highly agreeable, but he was, he, you know, he's didactic, he's agnostic, I believe, or maybe he's flirting with Christianity, but he's pretty well grounded.
And, you know, he's had this UKIP movement or trying to bring a political approach, but he fucking failed.
And I like, and I'm not talking shit.
I really like him, right?
So on that end, too, it's like you go Fuentes opening up a genuine conversation, but it's very polarizing.
Then you have someone more middle ground, like Carl Benjamin, genuinely creating original ideas, but it's not enough to Get any traction in a polarized world.
And then, on the other hand, you have, I mean, if I were to actually think about people that are like, you know, maybe making an impact, let's go with the real political world.
Let's talk about people that aren't afraid to oppose their own leadership, like Thomas Massey, or, you know, we could talk about other individuals in Congress who are willing to sort of go against their own party.
You know, they don't have enough internal power to whip votes or to really like affect the change of what they actually believe in.
And so, when I actually look at people, whether they're polarizing like Fuentes, but maybe correct about some things, or you look at like Carl, who tends to be pretty middle ground, he can't get the attention, or you look at the politicians trying to go against the grain, they can't whip the votes.
Like, no matter where I look on the spectrum of people, like I would say this, whether you like Massey, Carl, or Fuentes, I don't fucking care if you like him or don't like him.
My point is, these are people trying to like make change in the real world.
He's definitely, he definitely is not the president in terms of legally speaking from the confirmation.
My point is, is that even that a last election is a good example.
Look at Trump.
Like, I don't even know what the hell happened in the last election.
The black pill is, is I'm not trying to be doomer mentality to my audience right now and to the SOBs, and I'm not trying to fuck around.
I'm just saying, like, wherever you lie on the political spectrum and whatever you think about those three guys as irrelevant to me, the point is they're all trying to do something that they believe is right and they're trying to make an impact where they believe they need to make an impact.
And I would say that there's strong opposition and that the support is polarizing with all of them and it's not there in the terms of like enough to really change things at the moment.
Well, can I interject and say, like, I think if you're looking without, right, if you're looking outside of yourself for, you know, for hope or for leadership or what have you, then you're definitely going to end up on the black pill, right?
So whether it's, you know, I mean, I don't want to burst anybody's bubble here, but like a guy who says I like Hitler and we should kill the Jews is probably not going to be a leader in the future, right?
But Carl Benjamin, you know, a good voice for our cause, but whether or not he's politically successful now, you know, maybe he has an opportunity in the future.
Well, we'll see.
But to me, I think that really, and something that Andrew Tate talks about that he's right about, and again, I'm not a huge Andrew Tate fan, but like there's a lot of things that he says that people need to hear is that like to me, the revolution has to come from within.
And like a lot of young men nowadays are really frustrated.
I see like your commenters, for example, talking about women and their frustrations with women and things like that.
I think that a lot of young men, like they have been so focused externally and outwardly and trying to not only please, you know, their governments, trying to please their communities, trying to please their teachers, they're trying to please the women in their lives and things like that.
And they really haven't focused because I think that the revolution first will be within and that these young men are going to need to focus on, if you focus on yourself and if you actually build yourself up and if you engage in Western literature, there's a lot of people who talk about trying to save the West and trying to protect the West who don't know Plato from Euripides.
They don't know Uranus from Jupiter, right?
They don't know anything about Western civilization and they haven't read the classics.
And, you know, if you shot, if you cite Shakespeare to them, they'll think that you're, you know, that you're a cuckoo, right?
So I think, you know, one, like educating yourself in the Western classics, looking within, like, I really like, I love this.
This is something that I know is a sign of success.
When MSNBC the other day wrote that article that said that working out at home could be a sign that you're far right, like that to me, shows that like there is a trend of more people who are starting to look more seriously at their health and the pushback against the body, body positivity movement from like MARS Corporation and Nestle BARS and, you know, KFC and McDonald's and stuff that want us, that are all behind this whole.
You know, blow up to 600 pounds and you know, get fat and don't, you know, be complacent and watch Netflix and pornography all weekend.
Those people, they're scared, right.
It's like that scene in Starship Troopers when they put their hand on the brain bug and he's like well, you know, it's scared, right.
That is an example of the mainstream media showing that people, more people, are starting to worry about their physical health and take steps to care about their physical health because they know that that's going to mean longevity and that they're going to be better able to take care of their families and better able to take care of themselves.
But the the real, if you look within and if you're focused internally as a man and you and I tell my, my guy friends, some of them who are single are like, oh, the dating market sucks, I can't get a woman.
These women are terrible, they're crap, they're feminist blah blah, blah.
I'm like, don't chase women, right?
And a lot of women in my life who are, who are friends of mine, some of them who are single and stuff like that, are out there.
They would love to date a man.
I tell them I'm like listen, you need to, you need to find yourself a good man.
You need to chase men.
And I tell my guy friends, you don't need to chase a woman like my wife.
She's very, she very proudly says you know that like I was sitting down the other day to the lunch with a buddy of ours and he's like, so how did he get a girl like you?
How did he get you as a wife?
Blah blah, blah.
And she's like, actually I I came on to him, I chased him, I wanted to be him because I was so focused on making myself the best version of me that, like you know maybe this is, you know, I'm out of.
I really feel like I'm out of step a lot of times with like, the modern right, the modern conservative movement, because I am so white-pilled.
But I think I'm white-pilled because I focused on my physical health, I focused on my intellectual journey, I focused on on making myself the absolute best version of myself that I can be, and for that I get labeled a white supremacist, a Nazi, a bigot, you know, an extremist, a right winger, etc etc.
But the white pill lies within, because if we create a generation of men and I think it is most it's going to have to be men who are going to have to lead the way out of this and the women are going to have to follow eventually.
Right is that when we create this generation of men who are literate, who are, who are strong, who are physically strong, these are going to be the men who are going to be able to take us through the next turning right.
And it's it's about every 30, I think, years or so that there's something like a great big turning that happens in in countries and we're definitely, Definitely, we're getting to the next turning.
And what, you know, my thing is, my problem is, is that I think we have a lot of, I don't want to say, I know people use this as this word as an attack, but like there's like an involuntary kind of celibate feel, like not that I'm saying that you need to go out and need to screw around and get lots of chicks or anything like that.
But there's like, there's an internal, like an inwardness that some men turn to that is not engaged with the world, that is not sort of like cognizant and aware of the threats that are going on around you.
And there's a sort of like, you know, there's this intense sort of nihilism, I feel like, that some men on the right experience, especially when they, when they follow some of these podcasters who I think, you know, they say they advocate for Western values or they advocate for this or that, but they, what they really advance is a form of nihilism, right?
And it's like, also, like, look at the person who is leading you, right?
So like, ask yourself this.
Like, again, like, I know that you're, you and probably a lot of your fans really like Nick Fuentes, but I mean, like, Nick Fuentes needs to hit the gym, okay?
Like, Nick Fuentes, like, he needs, if, if he's advocating for these ideals and stuff, and Western strength and courage and things like that, like, he needs to go work out.
Like, you know, you got to hand it to Andrew Tate.
Like, the guy is a kickboxer and he actually takes care of his physical health.
But, like, you know, I do actually, you know, now that the left has made body positivity and being fat is beautiful and lizzo is beautiful and all those kinds of things.
Now, like, I look at someone's physical health as a sign or an example of their character because how they take care of themselves or how they think about themselves is how they're going to see the world.
So if you want a white pill, if you want, and this is this, I got to wrap this up in my rant.
I got to run because I got an early morning show here in a few hours.
But I just, I really believe that the white pill is within.
And if I think people doom scroll and they get addicted to negativity, right?
My wife and I talk about this a lot.
People in our lives who are constantly negative, dude, you can get addicted to it.
It is addicting.
You see the hatred.
You see the Twitter battles and you get online and rage.
Rage is something, especially we as men that we shouldn't get mad except on purpose.
Never get mad except on purpose.
Because if you're getting angry at something that's going on, you're reacting to it.
That person has power over you, right?
Never let another person have power over you or have control over you in that way.
You should have the strength to be able to say, when I'm going to get mad, I'm going to get mad deliberately and I'm going to do it with a purpose and I have a goal in mind and I'm going to go out there and I'm going to get done what needs to get done.
But the first thing that people ought to do, that men ought to do who are listening to this podcast right now is get fit and they ought to get mentally healthy.
And I promise you that you will be popping white pills in no time.
Austin, just to bring this up as you as you head out and as we look at what was going on with you, I want to bring up something on the screen because next we're going to be talking on particularly on Rumble about what happened with Fuentes.
Although I will tell you guys, if you want to hear more of Austin's ideas, make sure that you check out his Rumble, which is directly in our link in our description.
But he also has this new coffee company as well, which is really cool that is here.
It is particularly, let me bring this up right here.
We use the money, the profits that we have, we use to spread the message of liberty here in the United States.
Next week, where I'm going to be in Athens, Tennessee, I'm shooting a documentary called Bleed American, The Battle of Athens, which is a story about World War II veterans who saw voter fraud happening in their small town, and they actually went and got their guns and they staged an insurrection in their small town and they fired on the jail where the deputies have been counting ballots in secret and they won the day.
And they found out that their election had been stolen, that they had actually legitimately won it.
And so I'm going to be in Tennessee for the anniversary of that event next week filming that.
So all of the profits that we make from AP for Liberty Shop go right back into spreading the message of freedom.
Guys, before we jump into that, I want to give a huge shout out to one of our sponsors for today, which is Vanish Holsters.
You know the drill.
Many of you don't carry your firearm with you because it is just uncomfortable.
And you need a holster that is not only comfortable, but is also able to fit onto you, your lady, or if you're a lady, also onto your man, or whether you're fat or you're skinny.
You need a holster that changes with you as life does.
That's adjustable, made of high-quality composite material, fits 99.9% of sidearms, which means that you don't need to buy multiple ones for your different guns.
And it holds two extra magazines because bullets do run out, believe it or not, unlike in videos.
Sometimes people think that you don't have or don't need extra magazines, but you do because straight up, sometimes it takes a lot of shots to neutralize a target, whether you're hunting, whether you're a target practice, whether you're just walking around in one of a constitutional carry states.
Go to vnsh.com/slash slightly.
That's vnsh.com slash sli gh-t-l-y and get the holster that so many trust, one of the most popular holsters in America that also attaches very easily to body armor and other external kits.
You can check this out.
You can get $55 off right now at vnsh.com slash slightly.
That's vnsh.com slash sli gh t-l-y.
That's vanish the company.
10% off at vnsh.com slash slightly.
I want to jump into the story a little bit about this to close up on this segment and what we were talking about.
It's just like the backwardness of it, right?
Where that black guy is getting awarded in New York $2 million in a $1.8 billion settlement.
But of course, like, you know, this story that was brought up recently, Scott Anno was a CBS security guard.
Two weeks ago, he tried shoplifting a shoplift, or he tried stopping a shoplifter with 14 arrests in 2023 alone.
He was forced to kill the shoplifter after he was attacked and thrown to the ground.
The district attorney Bragg is charging him with murder.
Now, he is a POC, a person of color, as the progressives call them, but he's not safe.
And this is why, you know, the white supremacist movement, quote unquote, is diversifying because ultimately they only care about the color of your skin when you're an asset to these people, when they could take advantage of you.
But when you're not one of these people, then they don't care about you anymore and they don't care to follow the law.
They don't care to apply the law to you equally and they don't care about your freedom.
So they'll give you $2 million if you're a retarded person.
But if you're a black guy and you're trying to follow the law and enforce the law in a CVS, then they will literally make sure that you go to jail, that you go to prison, that you lose the job that you have.
So I don't know about that.
But we're going to have this discussion, as I mentioned, that Rumble is accused right now of censoring Nick Fuentes' live stream.
Free speech is very important on the show.
It's always very important to me.
And I encourage you guys, if you're watching on YouTube, I'm getting a new content strategy up where we may not even eventually be streaming on YouTube very soon.
I'm going to think about it.
I might not stream on YouTube anymore.
I just stream on Rumble.
But I encourage you to check it out.
So right now, head to rumble.com/slash slightly offensive.
I'm drinking mineral water out of a glass because God knows that this is the elixir of life.
I need to get my energy up on the show.
You have no idea what's going on.
I'm in a giant room now.
I got to get used to this room.
It's not that my energy has been low.
It's that I'm in a giant freaking studio.
This is the producer seat of my new show, which now is coming out next week.
I know we deleted another week.
It's because I can't explain it, but it's coming out next week now.
But it's a giant studio.
And I don't know what to do in here because I'm by myself.
And it's really weird.
I got Brian now directing the show electronically and I'm by myself in Australia.
But here's the deal on WTF.
This story is weird.
And I'm not going to win any allies on this because my opinion is irrelevant.
I'm just trying to follow the facts.
It's crazy.
Like I mentioned, I work with the Gateway Pundit.
Now I don't work for them, but I work with them.
I got my credential back as a journalist and I'm doing original research.
And this is one of the stories I've been working on the last 24 hours.
So let's see what actually happened on one of the weirdest encounters.
Is Rumble censoring, or are we misguided on this episode's What the Fuck?
All right, our story today is this feud that was going off between the America First movement, whose followers are known as Groypers, and...
and what happened with the Nicholas Fuentes situation.
So let's go ahead and break this down.
I saw this tweet pop up from Viva Frey.
Viva Fry, I don't know, who was putting up a clip from in question from the Nicholas Fuentes Rally 2, I think it was called, took place in Florida.
And apparently, this clip is what got his live stream or his restream taken down.
I'll kind of break down the story to you.
So this was a clip from the, I imagine from the original stream because the audio was kind of bunked, but there was an event.
It was live streamed on to Rumble.
And I'm going to try to get this as accurate as possible.
And if I mess up on a few things, crucify me.
I'm trying my best.
But there was a rally that was live streamed.
The audio was messed up because apparently from talking to sources, the venue made them use their own mixer and then the mixer like blew.
And so then they, but they had a backup recording of the audio.
So they were already planning to take this down, apparently.
They were planning to take down this video.
And I believe they put it on private because they were putting back up a remastered version because the audio is so important, even though the visuals were good.
Now, in the middle of the speech, a lot was said.
I'm not saying that this is in context.
This is very much could be taken out of context.
So I'll give the benefit of the doubt here.
But this quote was said during the speech on a live stream on Rumble.
And while I'm going to get taken down for playing this on Rumble, I don't know.
That's a good question.
Hmm.
That's actually kind of funny.
Am I going to get taken down on Rumble for playing this?
All right, fuck it.
Let's go.
unidentified
We're in a holy war, and I will tell you this.
Because we're willing to die in the holy war, we will make them die in the holy war.
All right, so I don't know who he's talking about.
I don't know if he's about the Jews or the pagans or the Satanists or the globalists.
I'm not entirely sure, right?
I don't know.
I was originally told based on some connections to National File that his video, this was taken down because of their policy, which they have implemented in 2022, which was to censor or to take down hate speech, which includes anti-Semitism.
Now, what's interesting is I end up reaching out both to Nick and to Rumble directly.
And so here's basically what I have an understanding of what happened based on my original research, right?
So here's, I wrote a thread on this and I'm going to read it to you guys because I did a poll the other day that asked you guys if you thought anti-Semitism was protected free speech under the First Amendment.
And there was 20,000 votes casted.
113,000 people saw it.
So about a 17.5% interaction rate.
About three quarters of people overwhelmingly said yes.
Only a minority said no.
And a few people disagreed or said it was annoying, but it was legal.
So I don't think the argument here is whether or not you should be allowed to talk about a holy war or to, you know, or even, I'm not even claiming Nick was doing this, right?
I'm not even claiming Nick was talking about the Jews.
But I'm not, I don't think anti-Semitism should be illegal.
And I don't think, I think the phrase anti-Semitism is already kind of like a ploy to catch people, right?
Because it's supposed to like separate Jews as being criticism of Jews is more harmful than criticism of any other group.
I know that, right?
I know, I'm very aware of the sensitivities of these people.
I grew up in LA.
I grew up around a lot of Jewish people.
And I'm aware that if you even just question the flavorfulness of matzo ball soup, you're just as bad as Heinleich, you know, as Himmler or whatever his name was.
I don't know.
I don't know how to pronounce it.
I got the Heimlich maneuver and Himmler mixed up, maybe.
But essentially, what ended up happening is I talked to Rumble.
So I called Rumble directly.
I do have contacts there.
I talked to Nick directly.
I'm supposed to have a call with him after the show as well to kind of find out what happened because this stuff's important to me, right?
There's our friend there.
No, I'm just kidding.
So he's frozen.
He's off.
So here's what happened.
So the claim was out that Rumble censored Nick Fuentes.
And I don't think that censored is going to be the correct term here, but they did take action and they did restrict him.
And I use the phrase restricted because you'll see what happens.
So what my timeline says is that Rumble had always had clear terms of service, which was no porn and no incitement to violence.
Okay.
And whether or not Nick was inciting violence by saying that they're going to die in a holy war, that's kind of subjective.
Because do I personally think he was calling for violence?
No, I don't.
I don't think so.
Like, I know Nick.
He's not calling for violence.
He's just not, right?
Is there a time for violence?
Yeah, I mean, there are just wars, right?
There are times where violence can be called.
For instance, self-defense is violence, right?
So if you're calling for self-defense, you're technically calling for violence in terms of if someone shoots you, you should shoot them back if you have the chance to protect yourself.
That could be considered incitement to violence, but I think there are legally protected versions of that.
So I think this is probably focusing on illegal versions and people that just want me to like take a side.
I'm trying to understand the truth here, which is fucking crazy.
I know.
I know it's wild to like try to have an accurate understanding of what's going on rather than just like be sensational, but I do want to know what's going on because I'm on Rumble.
It affects my income, my well-being.
It directly affects the success of my own life.
So maybe I'm a little bit selfish, but I want to know what's going on here because I say things that could get me in trouble on YouTube and I want to know what their policies are.
Also, I like Nick.
He's a friend of mine.
I think he does great work.
I think we disagree on a few things here and there.
And we have different methods and whatnot.
But I have lots of friends who have lots of different viewpoints.
And I don't want him getting censored for saying things that are true or if we came to a different conclusion.
I don't want him being censored.
I'm going to fight for his right to speak the truth or to speak what he believes is the truth.
I'll die on that hill.
I'll die on that hill to fight for the Groipers and those people to be able to say what they think, right?
I mean, that's just the truth.
And I also, like I said, with Rumble, I mean, I don't want to be promoting a platform that is hypocritical.
So I want to know what's going on.
So that's why I did this research.
And people are mad at me for doing my own research.
Fuck you.
I don't care if you're mad at me.
I don't give a shit.
I'm just trying to say what I know is to be true from the situation.
You can kill the messenger if you want, or you can just listen to what I, my, my, these are from phone calls, right?
These are direct scripts from phone calls and text messages with people.
So I, free speech is, is, is their priority, right?
It's in their terms.
It's what they want.
They even removed France as a market.
It's a huge financial loss to preserve their company's commitment to this principle.
Somebody was a smart ass and was like, that was only 1% of their market.
Yeah, at the time, but growing.
But 1% revenue loss is millions of dollars.
So, I mean, yeah, they gave up millions of dollars, at least at this point, in order to maintain free speech.
If you don't know about this, they were trying to attack a creator of Macron's government, and Rumble essentially removed Rumble from their market because they wouldn't capitulate.
So that was a positive, right?
That was definitely a positive.
But apparently, this is what we didn't know.
And I think Nick said he didn't know this either.
So, like, I don't, I don't think anyone was aware of this at the time, is that Nick's restream of his rally was removed for violating terms of service, calling for people to die in, like, or saying that they could or would die, which is what separated his speech from Steve Bannon, who made similar comments.
Because Steve Bannon did say he did call for a holy war.
And it's important to know, right?
Is Rumble biased towards Nick?
That's, because if they're allowing the same rhetoric from Steve Bannon and from Turning Point, then that would be considered total hypocrisy.
So I did watch the clip from Bannon and I did listen to even some interviews.
I would say that Bannon was, you know, saying pretty fiery rhetoric.
I don't think there's anything wrong with calling for a holy war because you could be calling for a spiritual holy war.
Like, I don't know, right?
I don't fucking know what that means.
So I don't, like, my personal opinion is irrelevant here.
Do I think Nick Fuentes was calling for violence?
No, that's retarded as fuck.
I don't think he was.
I know Nick.
He's not violent.
He's not a violent guy.
And if he had had reasons to call for violence, I mean, when he got robbed, right, and got his money taken out of his account, he could have called for violence.
Most men would.
When he was, you know, you know, unduly restricted from flying or, you know, treated as a terrorist, when he's been smeared.
Those are all logical reasons any aggressive man would call for violence.
And he didn't.
So I don't think he's randomly just going to like wake up one day at a speech and be like, let's go kill Jewish people.
Like I don't, that's not even what his MO is.
So I don't, I don't think that's what was happening here.
And I think that some people that hate him mischaracterized him.
But let's find out if that phrase is legally, is legal, right?
That's what I want to know.
Is that phrase legal?
And is that an incitement to violence legally?
Well, we'll find out, right?
So what separated his speech from Bannon was the holy war statement?
No, it was the die.
If you missed what that was, if you missed the statement earlier on and you didn't hear what was said, I'll just replay it for you so you can hear it and you can judge for yourself.
Was this an incitement to violence?
Did this violate the terms of service?
Could it have been misinterpreted?
What do you think?
unidentified
We're in the holy war.
And I will tell you this.
Because we're willing to die in the holy war, we will make them die in the holy war.
I mean, I don't know if you, if you, uh, if you think that.
I mean, I don't, I don't, I don't really know what my opinion is on that.
I mean, I do think it's really fiery rhetoric.
I think that's really writing close to the sun.
But I think even Nick knows that, and I think he's clarified a bit on his on his Telegram.
But to clarify the timeline even more, this is where I think a lot of the confusion was initially.
This was the second time that the stream was removed as the first video with bad sound was deleted by Rumble for the same violation.
But Nick claims he was unaware that the first stream was deleted by Rumble before uploading his restream.
So one of the main issues here was that the original stream was deleted for the same reason.
But I think Nick's team is claiming that because they already had the video on private, they didn't know it got deleted by Rumble.
Okay, so that is, so when they re-uploaded this and got a hard strike, just remember, Rumble deleted the first video from my understanding, because they were live streaming.
So the first time Rumble deleted this stream, they didn't restrict his live streaming capabilities at all, from my understanding.
And I might have gotten that wrong.
Now, people are mad saying Rumble didn't clarify that.
Rumble didn't alert them.
Rumble, from my understanding from talking to them, they did give an alert.
Nick says he didn't get it.
Look, if I have that part wrong, then again, crucify me.
But from my understanding, Rumble did alert them, and they're claiming they didn't get the alert.
This is a he said, she said.
I don't know.
Okay?
I don't know.
But apparently they were alerted.
And then they restreamed the same speech.
And that's when they got a hard strike.
Okay.
They got a hard strike.
Now, the initial reports, five, were that the video was taken down for anti-Semitism, which would be really gay.
Because what is anti-Semitism?
I don't even know.
I mean, there is real hatred of Jews.
And there's a lot of people who hate Jews, right?
There's a lot of people who hate a lot of people.
There's a lot of people who hate the color pink.
Anti-pinketism.
It's very dangerous.
The Barbie movie.
People are very threatened, right?
Everyone was really mad at Matt Gates for wearing a pink suit.
But six, Nick wrote on Telegram that his phrase was not calling for violence, but indirectly suggested it could be seen that way on a stream with Leafy.
I'm not trying to misquote Nick here.
I just think he was like explaining that it got taken out of context.
I watched like a 20-minute clip.
You can watch that.
It's on the internet.
He was humble about it and understanding the complex nature of the situation.
He seemed to be understanding.
Now, if I'm wrong on that, then maybe I am.
But I think he was understanding where the issue came up.
And it seemed to be an issue of miscommunication.
Now, people are mad at me for some reason for tweeting on this and have been really forgiving like the internet is, which I don't fucking care, but it does make me laugh.
You get these kind of tweets, like Elijah got the call.
I mean, it got a good amount of likes, right?
Like 100 likes, right?
In this thread.
And I clarified I did, actually.
I did get the call.
I just want to clarify that I said, yes, Netanyahu called me and said, quick, talk to both parties directly to get a clear picture of what happened and publish the facts on Twitter.
Since the left wants to destroy Rumble and Nick Jay Fuentes try to preserve the peace and seek truth, that is your number one Tel Aviv directive.
So it is true.
Tele Aviv made me write this.
But no, I don't make any money from Rumble, man.
I honestly don't.
I make like a couple hundred bucks a month on monetization.
I have no deals with them at this time.
I would love a deal with Rumble.
That's not why I'm doing this.
And I make no money from Nick, and I'm not a part of the America First movement, that side of I'm America First, but I'm not a Groyper.
So I have no, you know, I have no reason.
Why would I be against either of these parties?
I think Rumble's a great platform.
I think Nick's doing great work.
So I'm not going to like, you know, try to try to do anything, but try to, you know, clarify here what's going on.
And people who just don't understand that these things are complex, that haven't dealt in business, that don't know, it's easy to judge, but this stuff is crazy, right?
And I want to figure out the truth.
Now, I did also want to clarify here that Nick is not banned from Rumbles.
People are saying he's banned.
No, he's restricted from live streaming for two weeks because he re-uploaded content that was taken down.
He was actually not restricted from live streaming, from my understanding, for his incitement to violence.
He was restricted for a hard strike for re-uploading the same content that was taken down.
So he was given like a warning and then he re-uploaded it.
And I guess the issue is he didn't know that he was given a warning.
But so yeah, so he got, but he's allowed to upload.
So he's not banned.
So with YouTube, when you get banned or when you get banned for a strike, you can't upload or live stream, right?
You can't upload content or onto any of your channels.
If you have multiple channels, you can't upload content.
So he's not banned.
And all of his videos are still up.
And I did look at some of his videos.
And there is stuff in there that YouTube would be considered anti-Semitic or racist or whatever.
I mean, this show has stuff that would be considered that, right?
On YouTube for some people at times because they're very sensitive.
And like any criticism of any group is racist now.
It's like fucking bullshit.
But the whole clarification here is that he's not banned.
He can upload videos, but he's restricted from streaming for two weeks for not obeying the warning.
Whether or not he really got the warning, I don't know if there's any way I can prove that.
I could ask for a copy of that.
I think that would be disclosing personal information, but I think I could ask Rumble.
If that would help people, let me know in the comments.
I can ask for a clarification if he did get warned.
This isn't the end of the world, this whole situation, but I do like to hyper-autistically focus on these topics because they do matter.
And I consider these like ruling Supreme Court cases, like they're very important to know what's going on.
Rumble also told me they are not censoring people that they say things they disagree with or even find abhorrent, but they'll continue to enforce their terms of service, especially in line with local and federal laws preventing threats of violence or comments that can be perceived as such in the court of law.
So I guess that was what was determined here is that this comment, if they left it up, would cause them to be accused of facilitating violence and become a target for federal probe or something to that extent.
I'm not even going to get into nine because nine, I don't even feel like talking about it anymore, but I think people like, I think, I thought this was really weird, right?
Because I know like Ian Miles Chong put this up, right?
Presented without comment.
So I called Rumble to ask them about this and get into their SEO and their financial markings.
Was saying here that like, oh, Rumble's a video platform that builds itself in neutral and immune to cancel culture back in 2022.
And then a recent financial stockholder share thing where it shows that the Vanguard group and BlackRock own a portion of Rumble.
So I did want to know about this because I was like, huh, I wonder if they're influencing decision making.
It's this little thing called Curiosity.
And what happened was, is I actually spoke to some of the investors and people.
Like I actually got a real inside look onto how I got to look into the inside structure of what the company looks like and how decision making takes place.
You don't have to believe me, but 85% of the voting power and the structural power comes from a few people who it doesn't matter, but they're not Jewish, right?
So I guess some people say that some of the board is Jewish, but they don't have the decision-making process on the actual website.
They're not Jewish people.
So there's not that.
But also 85% of the power and voting power comes from these like, you know, like Dan Bongino and the CEO and a couple investors.
So, and then it's a public company.
So like some of these hedge funds just buy floating stock, which you can't really avoid legally.
So like, like I could go buy Rumble stock, right?
Like my friend Aldo owns Rumble stock.
My buddy Sal owns Rumble stock.
Like anyone can buy Rumble stock, but they don't have decision making.
They've never, they don't have power over the company and they're not they're not a part of any decision making.
Like I'm not a part of decision making.
I can go buy Rumble stock tomorrow, but I don't get to vote somebody off.
And that's what that is.
It's just like the 10% of the floating stock, different companies own that because it's a public IPO and that was listed and people were able to buy it on a traded market.
Whether you believe that, again, that's up to you.
I'm not here to control your worldview.
If that was red flags, then maybe it should be.
But I also know that like I looked at who owns what stock and like, like, yeah, it's not, they don't have decision making, you know, power.
But I also got accused for, I'm getting accused now of trying to lower the pressure on Rumble or trying to, you know, I don't know, get their back in some way.
I have no financial incentive to do so at the moment.
And I have no ideological incentive beyond the fact that I like Rumble.
I want to work with Rumble.
And if it fucking blows, then I don't want to waste my time building a platform there.
And I also fight for people.
I fight for people to speak and to have the ability to speak.
And I hate censorship.
And so if I thought that what they were doing was hypocritical, then I would want to call that shit out.
I don't think that's what happened here.
If you disagree with me, feel free to disagree with me.
And like I said, people say he got restricted for two weeks.
That was after a warning and they did show me the process.
I didn't see an email.
So I guess I could ask for that as well.
But if Nick didn't get it, then I don't blame him either for re-uploading it, right?
I'm not saying Nick did anything like intentionally wrong or immoral or that even what he said was bad.
But, you know, sometimes we say dumb shit or we say things that are taken out of context.
And like Milo Yiannopoulos got canceled, right?
For making an interim like a joke about pedophilia or something.
I forget what it was.
And he got taken out of context and he got lost a lot.
So shit does happen.
And I hope that it does clarify some things for you guys.
Yeah, I just hope that that does bring some clarification.
Like Roseanne on Theo Von.
Yeah, you guys were saying that.
Exactly.
Roseanne on Theo Vaughn.
I think we're going to go ahead and we'll wrap up the show there for today.
I did have a lot of other stuff I could cover, but I do want to end by reading some of your chats here inside of locals because I do want to remind you is if you want to support, the easiest way to support the show is at elijahshaver.locals.com.
You can join the community.
You can be a part of the movement.
You can be a part of the chat.
And of course, one of the best parts about it is that it's free to join.
And it helps me so much because we are demonetized everywhere.
And you can also send super chats.
So some of your chats that you guys wrote for today, just to read them through, The George says says, reach out to Don Quan Suelo for $8.
Icona Turner said my opinion.
He's saying the Holy War exists and his kind are being attacked for their views, which he's willing to fight for.
And he's saying he's willing to win if it comes to it.
Self-defense.
And someone said a dollar just for speaking out.
And you guys can, you know, get in here.
And can Pierre saying Elijahism?
Also, someone said Elijah Schaefer determines my worldview.
That's so funny.
And so someone's saying they're going to do him like Project Veritas eventually.
I mean, remember, everyone who's effective, they try to oust and everything that's useful, they try to shut down.
So people, you can give your idea.
In my opinion, Rumble is Pepsi to YouTube is Coca-Cola.
So some people are the same thing.
And someone called me a Zionist Elijah.
Also, you guys are saying, I think so, too.
I think he was talking about the spiritual battle.
Yeah.
And there we go.
We'll just end there.
And some of you guys like to share really incredible memes.
Fantastic.
That was a real thumbnail from somebody, by the way.
So that's pretty fantastic.
You guys love doing that.
You love pink things, Elijah.
Anyway, you can leave your chats there as well and to all the Rumble people.
I really do appreciate you.
Shout out as well.
I brought up my issue that I wanted to bring up with Rumble of how we never make it to the front page, but we're often one of the top live streamers that are on at night.
Like we genuinely are.
To put into perspective, like just to be like up front, let me bring this up and show you what I'm talking about here.
When you go to like actual live streams, right?
You go to actual the top live streams, check this out.
We're one, two, three, four, five, six, seven.
We're the seventh largest live stream right now going on on Rumble.
We have no deals, right?
And you look at some of these people that are bigger than us, Real America's Voice, Newsmax, InfoWars.
Those are organizations.
So I don't even count those.
And then you have Leafy's online right now, right?
Leafy's a lot bigger than us in terms of just like social impact.
And he's, you know, more dedicated streamer.
He goes longer, bet better.
He's, you know, more talented and whatnot.
So that's pretty cool.
Shout out to Leafy.
Leafy's a really, really cool guy.
I really like what the stuff he does.
And then you have, you know, Jay Deon.
He's a huge guy and whatever this is, that's cool.
I don't know.
They have a ton of live viewers.
Congrats.
But you also go back here and you go to like podcasts, which is what we're categorized as, not even under the lives, but you go to podcasts and we're the number one streaming podcast, right?
But you go here and we're not even on the front page of podcasts.
Like, why are we never on the front page?
We're the number one largest live stream of any of the podcasts that are going on right now on the website, but we're not on the front page.
And we are in the top 10, which is really helpful on like the front of the page, right?
Like, I mean, you come down here, we'd be like at the front, and you go here and we're not even listed.
So I talked, I talked to Rumble about that, and apparently they're open to changing that so that our show can get on the front page because I think it would help with discoverability.
I don't know about you.
I think we run the best worst show on the internet.
I think it's like almost good, but it's shit.
And it's like one of the few live streams that runs like it's a studio show, right?
Like I come from networks.
I've worked in Con Inc. for a long time.
And I still work in the establishment a little bit.
I know people don't like that.
I mean, I'm working with the outsiders, but I work with Gateway.
I have a new network that I'm going to be putting a new show on.
I still like, I'm not like some retard out that like, you know, pulls my fucking dick out and then, you know, claims censorship.
We're really trying here to get good stories, good structure, and produce a good show for you guys.
But we're fucking smashed on YouTube.
And then Rumble, we can't be discovered.
So I have high hopes for it, but Rumble seems like they're going to work with us to fix that issue because I think that's also sucks for people like Leafy, right?
Because Leafy's up there and then he's not even on the front page.
And fucking shout out to Leafy.
Leafy should get more exposure as well.
He's fucking honest.
But yeah.
I mean, look, oh, Drew Hernandez.
Drew Hernandez is an incredible live streamer as well.
And he's there live streaming right now, right?
unidentified
I mean, I'm just saying, theoretically, how about I just punch you in the face over and over and over again?
